Official Journal |
EN L series |
REGULATION (EU) 2025/13 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 19 December 2024
on the collection and transfer of advance passenger information for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/818
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 14(1)(a) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) For dimethomorph, fluopicolide, mandipropamid, metrafenone, nicotine and spirotetramat maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(2) In the context of a procedure, in accordance with Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (2), for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance mandipropamid on hops an application was made under Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRL.
(3) As regards dimethomorph, such an application was made for use on strawberries and lamb's lettuce. As regards fluopicolide, such an application was made for use on onions, tomatoes, cucurbits (edible peel), flowering brassica, head brassica, kohlrabi, lettuce and leek.
(4) In accordance with Article 6(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 an application was made for metrafenone for use on wine grapes and table grapes. The authorised use of metrafenone on wine grapes and table grapes in the United States leads to higher residues than the MRL in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. To avoid trade barriers for the importation of wine and table grapes, a higher MRL is necessary. Avoiding trade barriers is also in conformity with the objectives of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine (3), as stated in Article 1 of that Agreement.
(5) In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, these applications were evaluated by the Member States concerned and the evaluation reports were forwarded to the Commission.
(6) As regards nicotine, the Commission received information from food business operators showing the presence of nicotine in tea, herbal infusions, spices, rose hips and fresh herbs leading to higher residues than the default MRL of 0,01 mg/kg laid down in that Regulation.
(7) The European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter "the Authority", assessed for dimethomorph, fluopicolide, mandipropamid and metrafenone the applications and the evaluation reports, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and where relevant to animals and gave reasoned opinions on the proposed MRLs (4). For nicotine the Authority assessed the available monitoring data and gave a reasoned opinion on the setting of temporary MRLs for nicotine in the products concerned (5). It forwarded these opinions to the Commission and the Member States and made them available to the public.
(8) The Authority concluded in its reasoned opinions that, all requirements with respect to data were met and that the modifications to the MRLs requested by the applicants were acceptable with regard to consumer safety on the basis of a consumer exposure assessment for 27 specific European consumer groups. It took into account the most recent information on the toxicological properties of the substances. Neither the lifetime exposure to these substances via consumption of all food products that may contain these substances, nor the short term exposure due to extreme consumption of the relevant crops showed that there is a risk that the acceptable daily intake (ADI) or the acute reference dose (ARfD) is exceeded.
(9) As regards fluopicolide on onions, tomatoes, cucurbits (edible peel), flowering brassica, head cabbage and Brussels sprouts the Authority concluded that the MRLs were already fixed at the levels covering the current authorised uses.
(10) Based on the reasoned opinions of the Authority and taking into account the factors relevant to the matter under consideration, the proposed modifications to the MRLs fulfil the requirements of Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(11) As regards spirotetramat, the Codex Alimentarius Commission has adopted CXLs. (6) These CXLs should be included in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as MRLs, with the exception of those CXLs which are not safe for a European consumer group and for which the Union presented a reservation to the CAC.
(12) Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(13) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council has opposed them,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
(1) OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 87, 24.3.2006, p. 2.
(4) EFSA scientific reports available on http://www.efsa.europa.eu: Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of existing MRL for dimethomorph, EFSA Journal 2011;9(1):1978 [29 pp.]. Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of existing MRL for fluopicolide, EFSA Journal 2011;9(1):1977 [39 pp.]. Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of the current MRL for mandipropamid, EFSA Journal 2011;9(2):2013 [22 pp.]. Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of existing MRL for metrafenone, EFSA Journal 2011;9(1):1979 [23 pp.].
(5) Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the setting of temporary MRLs for nicotine in tea, herbal infusions, spices, rose hips and fresh herbs. EFSA Journal 2011;9(3):2098 [50 pp.].
(6) Appendix III, of ALINORM 09/32/24 from Codex Alimentarius Commission. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp
(1) OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 87, 24.3.2006, p. 2.
(4) EFSA scientific reports available on http://www.efsa.europa.eu: Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of existing MRL for dimethomorph, EFSA Journal 2011;9(1):1978 [29 pp.]. Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of existing MRL for fluopicolide, EFSA Journal 2011;9(1):1977 [39 pp.]. Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of the current MRL for mandipropamid, EFSA Journal 2011;9(2):2013 [22 pp.]. Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of existing MRL for metrafenone, EFSA Journal 2011;9(1):1979 [23 pp.].
(5) Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the setting of temporary MRLs for nicotine in tea, herbal infusions, spices, rose hips and fresh herbs. EFSA Journal 2011;9(3):2098 [50 pp.].
(6) Appendix III, of ALINORM 09/32/24 from Codex Alimentarius Commission. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/812/oj