Pending: 31995D0341

                                January 15, 2026                            

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and  public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not  subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I)  to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), as last amended by  Commission Decision 95/339/EC (2) and in particular Article 10 (2) (c) and (3) (a), Whereas Annex I, Chapter I, of the abovementioned Directive lays down specific animal health  requirements for imports of milk and milk-based products not intended for human consumption; Whereas Commission Decision 95/340/EC (3) draws up lists of third countries from which Member  States authorize imports of raw milk, heat-treated milk and milk-based products and acidified  milk-based products, which are applicable to imports not intended for human consumption; Whereas the categories of milk and milk-based products that may be imported from third countries  will vary with the animal health situation in the third country or parts thereof concerned; Whereas it is necessary to lay down the animal health conditions, treatments and certificates  required for imports of milk and milk-based products not intended for human consumption from those  third countries listed in the abovementioned Decision; Whereas specific requirements must be established in order to avoid the introduction of exotic  diseases through the importation of milk or milk-based products; Whereas these requirements should take account in particular of the opinion of the Scientific  Veterinary Committee; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING DECISION:
Article 1

1. Member States shall authorize imports of:

(a) milk and milk-based products from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column  B of the Annex to Decision 95/340/EC if they have undergone a pasteurization treatment sufficient  to produce a negative phosphatase test and are accompanied by a copy of the health certificate at  Annex I;

(b) milk-based products with a pH reduced to less than 6 from third countries or parts of third  countries listed in column C of the Annex to Decision 95/340/EC if they have first undergone a  pasteurization treatment sufficient to produce a negative phosphatase test and are accompanied by a  copy of the health certificate at Annex II;

(c) milk and milk-based products from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column  C of the Annex to Decision 95/340/EC if they have first undergone a sterilization process or a  double heat treatment where each treatment was sufficient to produce a negative phosphatase test on  its own and are accompanied by a copy of the health certificate at Annex III.
Article 2

Milk and milk-based products imported from third countries or parts of third countries  where there has been an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in the last 12 months or where  vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease has been practised in the last 12 months must, before  introduction onto Community territory, have undergone:

(a) a sterilization process whereby an F° value equal to or greater than 3 is achieved; or

(b) an  initial heat treatment with a heating effect at least equal to that achieved by a pasteurization  process of at least 72 °C for at least 15 seconds and sufficient to produce a negative reaction to  a phoshapatase test, followed by:

– a second heat treatment with a heating effect at least equal to that achieved by the initial heat  treatment, and which would be sufficient to produce a negative reaction to a phosphatase test,  followed, in the case of dried milk, or a dried milk-based product, by a drying process, or

– an  acidification process such that the pH has been maintained at less than 6 for at least one hour.
Article 3

This Decision shall apply from 2 February 1996.
Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 62, 15.  3. 1993, p. 49.

(2) See page 36 of this Official Journal.

(3) See page 38 of this Official Journal.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and  public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not  subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I)  to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), as last amended by  Commission Decision 95/339/EC (2) and in particular Article 10 (2) (c) and (3) (a), Whereas Annex I, Chapter I, of the abovementioned Directive lays down specific animal health  requirements for imports of milk and milk-based products not intended for human consumption; Whereas Commission Decision 95/340/EC (3) draws up lists of third countries from which Member  States authorize imports of raw milk, heat-treated milk and milk-based products and acidified  milk-based products, which are applicable to imports not intended for human consumption; Whereas the categories of milk and milk-based products that may be imported from third countries  will vary with the animal health situation in the third country or parts thereof concerned; Whereas it is necessary to lay down the animal health conditions, treatments and certificates  required for imports of milk and milk-based products not intended for human consumption from those  third countries listed in the abovementioned Decision; Whereas specific requirements must be established in order to avoid the introduction of exotic  diseases through the importation of milk or milk-based products; Whereas these requirements should take account in particular of the opinion of the Scientific  Veterinary Committee; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING DECISION:
1. Member States shall authorize imports of:

(a) milk and milk-based products from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column  B of the Annex to Decision 95/340/EC if they have undergone a pasteurization treatment sufficient  to produce a negative phosphatase test and are accompanied by a copy of the health certificate at  Annex I;

(b) milk-based products with a pH reduced to less than 6 from third countries or parts of third  countries listed in column C of the Annex to Decision 95/340/EC if they have first undergone a  pasteurization treatment sufficient to produce a negative phosphatase test and are accompanied by a  copy of the health certificate at Annex II;

(c) milk and milk-based products from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column  C of the Annex to Decision 95/340/EC if they have first undergone a sterilization process or a  double heat treatment where each treatment was sufficient to produce a negative phosphatase test on  its own and are accompanied by a copy of the health certificate at Annex III.
Milk and milk-based products imported from third countries or parts of third countries  where there has been an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in the last 12 months or where  vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease has been practised in the last 12 months must, before  introduction onto Community territory, have undergone:

(a) a sterilization process whereby an F° value equal to or greater than 3 is achieved; or

(b) an  initial heat treatment with a heating effect at least equal to that achieved by a pasteurization  process of at least 72 °C for at least 15 seconds and sufficient to produce a negative reaction to  a phoshapatase test, followed by:

– a second heat treatment with a heating effect at least equal to that achieved by the initial heat  treatment, and which would be sufficient to produce a negative reaction to a phosphatase test,  followed, in the case of dried milk, or a dried milk-based product, by a drying process, or

– an  acidification process such that the pH has been maintained at less than 6 for at least one hour.
This Decision shall apply from 2 February 1996.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 62, 15.  3. 1993, p. 49.

(2) See page 36 of this Official Journal.

(3) See page 38 of this Official Journal.
ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE for milk and milk-based products, which have undergone  a single heat treatment and are not intended for human consumption for dispatch to the European  Community

>START OF GRAPHIC>

Note for the importer: This certificate is only for veterinary  purposes and has to accompany the consignment until it reaches the border inspection post.

Reference number of the health certificate: .

Country of destination: .

(Name of EC Member State)

Exporting country: .

Responsible ministry: .

Certifying department: .

I. Identification of milk/milk-based products

Description of milk/milk-based products .

Nature of packaging: .

Number of packages: .

Net weight: .

Lot/batch production reference numbers: .

Address and registration number of treatment or processing establishment (1): .

III. Destination of milk/milk-based products

The milk/milk-based products will be sent

(Place of loading)

(Country and place of destination)

by the following means of transport (2): .

Number of the seal (2): .

Name and address of consignor: .

Name and address of consignee: .

(1) Delete as appropriate.

(2) For goods vehicles the registration number should be given. For bulk containers, the container  number and the seal number should be included.

IV. Health attestation

I, the undersigned official veterinarian, certify that:

1. …………………. (exporting country), …………………… (region) (3), has been free  from foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest for 12 months immediately prior to export and has not  practised vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease or rinderpest in the 12 months immediately  prior to export.

2. The milk/milk-based product referred to in this certificate:

(a) has been prepared from raw milk which comes from animals:

– not showing clinical signs of a disease that can be transmitted through the milk

– belonging to  holdings which are not under official restrictions due to foot-and-mouth disease or rinderpest;  and

(b) has undergone a process involving heating to ……….. (temperature) for ………….  (time), which ensured a negative reaction to the phosphatase test, followed by, in the case of  dried milk or dried milk-based product, a drying process.

(3) Every precaution was taken to avoid contamination of the milk/milk-based product after  processing.

(4) The milk/milk-based product was packed in new containers (1) or

– where bulk containers were  used, these were disinfected prior to loading using a product approved by the competent authorities  (1), and

– the containers are marked so as to indicate the nature of the milk/milk-based product.

Done at . ,on .

(Place)(Date)

(Signature of official veterinarian) (4)

(Name in capital letters, qualification and title)

XTB:STAMPEN400

(3) To be completed if the  authorization to import into the Community is restricted to certain regions of the third country  concerned.

(4) The signature and the stamp must be in a different colour to that of the printing.

>END OF GRAPHIC>
ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE for heat treated milk-based products with a pH  reduced to less than 6 not intended for human consumption for dispatch to the European Community

> START OF GRAPHIC>

Note for the importer: This certificate is only for veterinary purposes and has  to accompany the consignment until it reaches the border inspection post.

Reference number of the health certificate: .

Country of destination: .

(Name of EC Member State)

Exporting country: .

Responsible ministry: .

Certifying department: .

I. Identification of milk-based products

Description of milk-based products: .

Nature of packaging: .

Number of packages: .

Net weight: .

Lot/batch production reference numbers: .

Address and registration number of treatment or processing establishment (1): .

III. Destination of milk-based products

The milk-based products will be sent

(Place of loading)

(Country and place of destination)

by the following means of transport (2): .

Number of the seal (2): .

Name and address of consignor: .

Name and address of consignee: .

(1) Delete as appropriate.

(2) For goods vehicles the registration number should be given. For bulk containers, the container  number and the seal number should be included.

IV. Health attestation

I, the undersigned official veterinarian, certify that:

1. The milk-based product referred to in this certificate:

(a) has been prepared from raw milk which comes from animals:

– not showing clinical signs of a disease that can be transmitted through the milk

– belonging to  holdings which are not under official restrictions due to foot-and-mouth disease or rinderpest;  and

(b) has undergone a process involving heating to ……….. (temperature) for ………….  (time), which ensured a negative reaction to the phosphatase test and

(c) has undergone an  acidification process whereby its pH has been maintained at less than 6 for at least one hour.

2. Every precaution was taken to avoid contamination of the milk-based product after processing.

3. The milk-based product was packed in new containers (1) or

– where bulk containers were used,  these were disinfected prior to loading using a product approved by the competent authorities (1),  and

– the containers are marked so as to indicate the nature of the milk-based product.

Done at . ,on .

(Place)(Date)

(Signature of official veterinarian) (3)

(Name in captial letters, qualification and title)

XTB:STAMPEN300

(1) Delete as appropriate.

(3) The signature and the stamp must be in a different colour to that of the printing.

>END OF GRAPHIC>
ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE for milk and milk-based products, which have  undergone a sterilization or a double heat treatment and are not intended for human consumption for  dispatch to the European Community

>START OF GRAPHIC>

Note for the importer: This certificate is  only for veterinary purposes and has to accompany the consignment until it reaches the border  inspection post.

Reference number of the health certificate: .

Country of destination: .

(Name of EC Member State)

Exporting country: .

Responsible ministry: .

Certifying department: .

I. Identification of milk/milk-based products

Nature of milk/milk-based products: . Nature of packaging: .

Number of packages: .

Net weight: .

Lot/batch production reference numbers: .

Address and registration number of treatment or processing establishment (1): .

III. Destination of milk/milk-based products

The milk/milk-based products will be sent

(Place of loading)

(Country and place of destination)

by the following means of transport (2): .

Number of the seal. (2): .

Name and address of consignor: .

Name and address of consignee: .

(1) Delete as appropriate.

(2) For goods vehicles the registration number should be given. For bulk containers, the container  number and the seal number should be included.

IV. Health attestation

I, the undersigned official veterinarian, certify that:

1. The milk/milk-based product referred to in the certificate:

(a) has been prepared from raw milk which comes from animals:

– not showing clinical signs of a disease that can be transmitted through the milk and

– belonging  to holdings which are not under official restrictions due to foot-and-mouth disease or rinderpest  and

2. has undergone:

(a) a sterilization process whereby an Fo value equal to or greater than 3 was achieved; or

(b) an  initial process involving heating to …………. (temperature) for …………. (time), which  ensured a negative reaction to the phosphatase test, followed by,

a further process involving heating to …………. (temperature) for ………… (time), which  would have ensured a negative reaction to the phosphatase test, followed by, in the case of dried  milk or dried milk-based product, a drying process.

3. Every precaution was taken to avoid contamination of the milk/milk-based product after  processing.

4. The milk/milk-based product was packed in new containers (1) or

– where bulk containers were  used, these were disinfected prior to loading using a product approved by the competent authorities  (1), and

– the containers are marked so as to indicate the nature of the milk/milk-based product.

Done at . ,on .

(Place)(Date)

(Signature of official veterinaria (3)

(Name in capital letters, qualification and title)

XTB:STAMPEN300

(3) The signature and the stamp  must be in a different colour to that of the printing.

>END OF GRAPHIC>

Pending: 31995D0190

                                January 15, 2026                            

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for  the production and the placing on the market of fishery products  (1), as last amended by the the  Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to the Philippines to  verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the  Community; Whereas the provisions of the Philippines legislation on health inspection and monitoring of  fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the ‘Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR)`, the competent authority in the  Philippines is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of  Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum  requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person  empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to  packages of fishery products, giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the  establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments  must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the BFAR  to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the BFAR to ensure compliance with the provisions  laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the BFAR has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in  Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements equivalent  to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) is recognized as  the competent authority in the Philippines for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery  products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Article 2

Fishery and aquaculture products originating in the Philippines must meet the following  conditions:

1.  each consignment must be acompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed,  signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model set out in Annex A  hereto;

2.  the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;

3.  except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of  preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Philippines` and the approval number of the  establishment of origin in indelible letters.
Article 3

1.  The certificate referred to in point 1 of Article 2 must be drawn up in at least  one official language of the Member States where the checks are carried out.

2.  The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the BFAR  and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the other indications on the  certificate.
Article 4

This Decision shall apply from 1 August 1995.
Article 5

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 May 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for  the production and the placing on the market of fishery products  (1), as last amended by the the  Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to the Philippines to  verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the  Community; Whereas the provisions of the Philippines legislation on health inspection and monitoring of  fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the ‘Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR)`, the competent authority in the  Philippines is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of  Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum  requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person  empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to  packages of fishery products, giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the  establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments  must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the BFAR  to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the BFAR to ensure compliance with the provisions  laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the BFAR has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in  Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements equivalent  to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) is recognized as  the competent authority in the Philippines for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery  products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in the Philippines must meet the following  conditions:

1.  each consignment must be acompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed,  signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model set out in Annex A  hereto;

2.  the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;

3.  except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of  preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Philippines` and the approval number of the  establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1.  The certificate referred to in point 1 of Article 2 must be drawn up in at least  one official language of the Member States where the checks are carried out.

2.  The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the BFAR  and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the other indications on the  certificate.
This Decision shall apply from 1 August 1995.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 May 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
HEALTH CERTIFICATE

for fishery or aquaculture products originating in the  Philippines and intended for export to the European Community with the exception of bivalve  molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in any form Reference No:

Country of dispatch: PHILIPPINES Competent authority: Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources I. Details identifying the products Description of fishery or aquaculture products  (1):

–  species (scientific name):

–  presentation of products  (2) and type of treatment:

Code number (where available):

Type of packaging:

Number of packages:

Net weight:

Requisite storage and transport temperature:

II. Origin of products Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s) approved by the BFAR for exports to the  European Community:

III. Destination of products The fishery or aquaculture products  (1) are dispatched from:    (place of dispatch) to:    (country and place of destination) by the following means of transport:

Name and address of dispatcher:

Name of consignee and address at place of destination:

IV. Health attestation The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery and aquaculture products specified above:

1.  were caught and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by  Directive 92/48/EEC;

2.  were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and  stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the  Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;

3.  have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive  91/493/EEC;

4.  are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of  the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;

5.  do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;

6.  have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological  checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the  implementing decisions thereto.

The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directive  91/493/EEC, Directive 92/48/EEC.

Done  at   ,

(place) on    (date) Official seal  (1)   Signature of official inspector  (1)  (name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

Pending: 31995D0173

                                January 15, 2026                            

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Peru to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of Peruvian legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Peru the Ministerio de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Ambiental (‘Digesa`) is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the Digesa to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the Digesa to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the Digesa has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

The Ministerio de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Ambiental (Digesa) shall be the competent authority in Peru for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Article 2

Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Peru, must meet the following conditions:

1. Each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto.

2. The products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto.

3. Except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘PERU` and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
Article 3

1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.

2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Digesa and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
Article 4

This Decision shall apply from 1 February 1995.
Article 5

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Peru to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of Peruvian legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Peru the Ministerio de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Ambiental (‘Digesa`) is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the Digesa to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the Digesa to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the Digesa has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Ministerio de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Ambiental (Digesa) shall be the competent authority in Peru for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Peru, must meet the following conditions:

1. Each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto.

2. The products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto.

3. Except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘PERU` and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.

2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Digesa and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision shall apply from 1 February 1995.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
>START OF GRAPHIC>

>END OF GRAPHIC>
LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS AND FACTORY VESSELS

I. Establishments

II. Factory vessels
			

Pending: 31995D0168

                                January 15, 2026                            

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and  public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not  subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (1)  to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC  (1), as last amended by  the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Annex II, Chapter 2, first  indent, Whereas by Decisions 94/968/EC  (2) and 95/50/EC  (3), the Commission approved the operational  programmes for the control of salmonella presented by Finland and Sweden; whereas these programmes  contain specific measures for eggs of laying hens intended for direct human consumption; Whereas Finland has given an undertaking that packing centres will accept only those eggs which  originate from flocks of laying hens subjected to regular salmonella checks; whereas Sweden has  provided for salmonella checks on all the flocks of laying hens whose eggs are placed on the  market; Whereas additional guarantees equivalent to those which Finland and Sweden implement under their  operational programmes should be established; Whereas packing centres should therefore provide a guarantee that eggs intended for Finland and  Sweden originate from flocks of laying hens which have been subjected to a microbiological test by  sampling; Whereas the rules relating to such microbiological tests by sampling should be drawn up laying down  the sampling method, the number of samples to be taken and the microbiological method to be used  for examining the samples; Whereas account should be taken of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain  marketing standards for eggs  (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3117/94  (5), Commission  Regulation (EEC) No 1274/91 of 15 May 1991 introducing detailed rules for implementing Regulation  (EEC) No 1907/90 on certain marketing standards for eggs  (6), as last amended by Regulation (EC)  No 3239/94  (7), and Council Decision 94/371/EC of 20 June 1994 laying down specific public health  conditions for the putting on the market of certain types of eggs  (8); Whereas Finland and Sweden must apply import requirements for consignments originating from third  countries at least as stringent as those laid down in this Decision; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

1.  For the purposes of this Decision, the definitions given in  Regulations (EEC) No 1907/90 and (EEC) No 1274/91 shall apply.

2.  However, for the purposes of this Decision, ‘eggs` means hen eggs intended for human  consumption and falling within the following categories:

–  Grade ‘A` eggs,

–  Grade ‘B` eggs.

3.  This Decision shall not apply to eggs intended for the production of egg products or delivered  to food industry undertakings approved in accordance with Council Directive 89/437/EEC  (1),  provided that packs containing them are clearly marked to show such destination.
Article 2

1.  Packing centres shall provide a guarantee that eggs intended for Finland and Sweden  originate from flocks of laying hens which have been subjected to a microbiological test by  sampling carried out in accordance with the provisions set out in Annex I.

2.  For the purposes of the guarantee referred to in paragraph 1, the eggs must be accompanied by a  certificate as set out in Annex II.
Article 3

The additional guarantees provided for in this Decision shall not apply to eggs  originating in an establishment subject to a programme recognized, in accordance with the procedure  laid down in Article 18 of Directive 92/118/EEC, as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and  Sweden.
Article 4

This Decision will be reviewed before 31 December 1996. The review will be based on a  report, prepared by Finland and Sweden, on the experience gained, to be presented before 30  September 1996.
Article 5

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and  public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not  subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (1)  to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC  (1), as last amended by  the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Annex II, Chapter 2, first  indent, Whereas by Decisions 94/968/EC  (2) and 95/50/EC  (3), the Commission approved the operational  programmes for the control of salmonella presented by Finland and Sweden; whereas these programmes  contain specific measures for eggs of laying hens intended for direct human consumption; Whereas Finland has given an undertaking that packing centres will accept only those eggs which  originate from flocks of laying hens subjected to regular salmonella checks; whereas Sweden has  provided for salmonella checks on all the flocks of laying hens whose eggs are placed on the  market; Whereas additional guarantees equivalent to those which Finland and Sweden implement under their  operational programmes should be established; Whereas packing centres should therefore provide a guarantee that eggs intended for Finland and  Sweden originate from flocks of laying hens which have been subjected to a microbiological test by  sampling; Whereas the rules relating to such microbiological tests by sampling should be drawn up laying down  the sampling method, the number of samples to be taken and the microbiological method to be used  for examining the samples; Whereas account should be taken of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain  marketing standards for eggs  (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3117/94  (5), Commission  Regulation (EEC) No 1274/91 of 15 May 1991 introducing detailed rules for implementing Regulation  (EEC) No 1907/90 on certain marketing standards for eggs  (6), as last amended by Regulation (EC)  No 3239/94  (7), and Council Decision 94/371/EC of 20 June 1994 laying down specific public health  conditions for the putting on the market of certain types of eggs  (8); Whereas Finland and Sweden must apply import requirements for consignments originating from third  countries at least as stringent as those laid down in this Decision; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1.  For the purposes of this Decision, the definitions given in  Regulations (EEC) No 1907/90 and (EEC) No 1274/91 shall apply.

2.  However, for the purposes of this Decision, ‘eggs` means hen eggs intended for human  consumption and falling within the following categories:

–  Grade ‘A` eggs,

–  Grade ‘B` eggs.

3.  This Decision shall not apply to eggs intended for the production of egg products or delivered  to food industry undertakings approved in accordance with Council Directive 89/437/EEC  (1),  provided that packs containing them are clearly marked to show such destination.
1.  Packing centres shall provide a guarantee that eggs intended for Finland and Sweden  originate from flocks of laying hens which have been subjected to a microbiological test by  sampling carried out in accordance with the provisions set out in Annex I.

2.  For the purposes of the guarantee referred to in paragraph 1, the eggs must be accompanied by a  certificate as set out in Annex II.
The additional guarantees provided for in this Decision shall not apply to eggs  originating in an establishment subject to a programme recognized, in accordance with the procedure  laid down in Article 18 of Directive 92/118/EEC, as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and  Sweden.
This Decision will be reviewed before 31 December 1996. The review will be based on a  report, prepared by Finland and Sweden, on the experience gained, to be presented before 30  September 1996.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
1.  Sampling method In the case of hens raised on perches or free-range, composite samples of faeces, each sample  consisting of separate samples of fresh faeces, each weighing at least 1 gram, are to be taken at  random at a number of points in the building in which the hens are kept or, where such hens have  free access to more than one building on a given farm, such samples shall be taken in each group of  farm buildings in which the hens are kept.

In the case of laying hens in cages, such samples are to be taken from scrapers or from surface  droppings in the pit.

2.  Number of samples to be taken The number of samples must make it possible to detect with 95  % reliability a 5  % presence of  salmonella.

3.  Microbiological test for the examination of samples Salmonella must be isolated in accordance with the standard method of the International  Organization for Standardization (ISO 6579:  1993).

4.  Sampling frequency The flock must be sampled within a period of two weeks before the beginning of laying and  thereafter at least once every 25 weeks.
CERTIFICATE

for the consignment to Finland and Sweden of certain types of eggs   (1) Reference No  I.  Identification of egg consignment Quality grading:

Weight category:

Number of units or packs:

Date of minimum durability:

Net weight:

Means of transport:

II.  Origin of the eggs Member State of origin:

Consignor (name and full address):

Address(es) and approval No(s) of packing centre(s):

Competent authority:

III.  Destination of the eggs Consignee (name and full address):

IV.  Attestation I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the eggs described above originate from a flock of laying  hens which has been subjected, with negative results, to the provisions laid down in Commission  Decision 95/168/EC of 8 May 1995 establishing, as regards salmonella, additional guarantees for  consignments to Finland and Sweden of certain types of eggs intended for human consumption.

Done  at   ,

(place)   (date) Stamp  (2)    (signature of the competent authority  (2))     (name in capital letters)

Pending: 31995D0160

                                January 15, 2026                            

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions  governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs   (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular  Article 9 (a) (2) thereof, Whereas the Commission has approved the operational programmes submitted by Finland and Sweden  regarding salmonella controls; whereas those programmes include specific measures for breeding  poultry and for day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of  productive poultry; Whereas guarantees should be established equivalent to those implemented by Finland and Sweden  under their operational programmes; Whereas the detailed guarantees are to be based in particular on a microbiological examination of  the poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden; Whereas in this context different rules should be laid down for breeding poultry and day-old  chicks; Whereas rules should be established for this microbiological examination of samples by laying down  the sampling method, the number of samples to be taken and the microbiological method for examining  the samples; Whereas those guarantees should not be applicable to any flock that is subject to a programme  recognized as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and Sweden; Whereas with regard to consignments originating from third countries, Finland and Sweden should  apply import requirements at least as stringent as those laid down in this Decision; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

Breeding poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden shall be subject to  a microbiological test, effected by sampling in the flock of origin.
Article 2

The microbiological test referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out as laid down in  Annex I.
Article 3

1.  Breeding poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden shall be accompanied by the  certificate shown in Annex II.

2.  The certificate provided for in paragraph 1 may:

–  either be accompanied by model 3 certificate of Annex IV to Directive 90/539/EEC,

–  or be incorporated in the certificate referred to in the first indent.
Article 4

Day-old chicks to be sent to Finland or Sweden for introduction into flocks of breeding  poultry or of productive poultry must come from hatching eggs from breeding poultry that have been  subjected to the test provided for in Article 2.
Article 5

1.  Day-old chicks to be sent to Finland or Sweden for introduction into flocks of  breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry must be accompanied by a certificate as shown in  Annex III.

2.  The certificate provided for in paragraph 1 may:

–  either be accompanied by the model 2 certificate shown in Annex IV to Directive 90/539/EEC,

–  or be incorporated in the certificate referred to in the first subparagraph.
Article 6

The additional guarantees provided for in this Decision shall not be applicable to  flocks subject to a programme recognized, according to the procedure laid down in Article 32 of  Directive 90/539/EEC, as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and Sweden.
Article 7

This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 December 1996 at the latest. The review shall be  based on a report prepared by Finland and Sweden in the light of the experience gained, to be  presented not later than 30 September 1996.
Article 8

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions  governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs   (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular  Article 9 (a) (2) thereof, Whereas the Commission has approved the operational programmes submitted by Finland and Sweden  regarding salmonella controls; whereas those programmes include specific measures for breeding  poultry and for day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of  productive poultry; Whereas guarantees should be established equivalent to those implemented by Finland and Sweden  under their operational programmes; Whereas the detailed guarantees are to be based in particular on a microbiological examination of  the poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden; Whereas in this context different rules should be laid down for breeding poultry and day-old  chicks; Whereas rules should be established for this microbiological examination of samples by laying down  the sampling method, the number of samples to be taken and the microbiological method for examining  the samples; Whereas those guarantees should not be applicable to any flock that is subject to a programme  recognized as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and Sweden; Whereas with regard to consignments originating from third countries, Finland and Sweden should  apply import requirements at least as stringent as those laid down in this Decision; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Breeding poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden shall be subject to  a microbiological test, effected by sampling in the flock of origin.
The microbiological test referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out as laid down in  Annex I.
1.  Breeding poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden shall be accompanied by the  certificate shown in Annex II.

2.  The certificate provided for in paragraph 1 may:

–  either be accompanied by model 3 certificate of Annex IV to Directive 90/539/EEC,

–  or be incorporated in the certificate referred to in the first indent.
Day-old chicks to be sent to Finland or Sweden for introduction into flocks of breeding  poultry or of productive poultry must come from hatching eggs from breeding poultry that have been  subjected to the test provided for in Article 2.
1.  Day-old chicks to be sent to Finland or Sweden for introduction into flocks of  breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry must be accompanied by a certificate as shown in  Annex III.

2.  The certificate provided for in paragraph 1 may:

–  either be accompanied by the model 2 certificate shown in Annex IV to Directive 90/539/EEC,

–  or be incorporated in the certificate referred to in the first subparagraph.
The additional guarantees provided for in this Decision shall not be applicable to  flocks subject to a programme recognized, according to the procedure laid down in Article 32 of  Directive 90/539/EEC, as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and Sweden.
This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 December 1996 at the latest. The review shall be  based on a report prepared by Finland and Sweden in the light of the experience gained, to be  presented not later than 30 September 1996.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
1.  General rules The flock of origin must be isolated for 15 days The microbiological test must cover all the salmonella serotypes.

2.  Sampling method The sampling method and the number of samples to be taken must be as laid down in Annex III,  Section I point A (2), (b) and (c) and point B of Council Directive 92/117/EEC of 17 November 1992  concerning measures for protection against specified zoonoses and specified zoonotic agents in  animals and in products of animal origin in order to prevent outbreaks of food-borne infections and  intoxications  (1).

3.  Microbiological test for examination of the samples The isolation of the salmonella should be carried out using the standardized ISO 6579:  1993 method  of the International Organization for a Standardization.
CERTIFICATION

I, the undersigned, official veterinarian, certify that the  breeding poultry has been tested with negative results according to the rules laid down in  Commission Decision 95/160/EC of 21 April 1995 establishing additional guarantees regarding  salmonella for consignments to Finland and Sweden of breeding poultry and day-old chicks for  introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry.

Done at    Date          Signature Stamp      Name (in capitals)       Qualification
CERTIFICATION

I, the undersigned, official veterinarian, certify that the  one-day chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry  have been tested with negative results according to the rules laid down in Commission Decision  95/160/EC of 21 April 1995 establishing additional guarantees regarding salmonella for consignments  to Finland and Sweden of breeding poultry and day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of  breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry.

Done at    Date          Signature Stamp      Name (in capitals)       Qualification
			

Pending: 31995D0119

                                January 15, 2026                            

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the principles  governing the organization of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third  countries  (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in  particular Article 19 thereof, Whereas a mission of experts of the Commission went to Japan to check the conditions of production  and processing of fishery products exported to the Community; whereas according to the observations  of these experts, the official guaranties given by the Japanese authorities are not adhered to and  the conditions of production and storage of fishery products show serious defects as regards  hygiene and control which can constitute risks to public health; Whereas Commission Decision 94/206/EC  (2) prohibits the import of consignments of bivalve molluscs  and marine gastropods originating in Japan other than scallops and other Pectinidae, frozen or  processed; Whereas it is necessary to suspend the import of all fishery products originating in Japan pending  improvement of the conditions of hygiene and control of production; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

Member States shall prohibit the import of consignments of fishery  products in whatever form originating in Japan.
Article 2

Decision 94/206/EC is repealed.
Article 3

Member States shall amend the measures that they apply to imports to comply with this  Decision. They shall inform the Commission thereof.
Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the principles  governing the organization of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third  countries  (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in  particular Article 19 thereof, Whereas a mission of experts of the Commission went to Japan to check the conditions of production  and processing of fishery products exported to the Community; whereas according to the observations  of these experts, the official guaranties given by the Japanese authorities are not adhered to and  the conditions of production and storage of fishery products show serious defects as regards  hygiene and control which can constitute risks to public health; Whereas Commission Decision 94/206/EC  (2) prohibits the import of consignments of bivalve molluscs  and marine gastropods originating in Japan other than scallops and other Pectinidae, frozen or  processed; Whereas it is necessary to suspend the import of all fishery products originating in Japan pending  improvement of the conditions of hygiene and control of production; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the  Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Member States shall prohibit the import of consignments of fishery  products in whatever form originating in Japan.
Decision 94/206/EC is repealed.
Member States shall amend the measures that they apply to imports to comply with this  Decision. They shall inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
			

Pending: 31995D0090

                                January 15, 2026                            

03/ 16
BG
Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
169



L 070/27
ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ




1.
всяка пратка трябва да бъде придружена от номериран здравен сертификат в оригинал, надлежно попълнен, с дата и подпис, състоящ се само от един лист, съгласно образеца от приложение А.



2.
продуктите трябва да произхождат от одобрени предприятия, изброени в приложение Б.



3.
с изключение на замразените рибни продукти в насипно състояние, предназначени за производството на консерви, думата „Албания“ и номера на разрешителното на предприятието, от което произхождат продуктите, трябва да са обозначени с неизличими букви на всяка опаковка.



Номер на одобрението
Предприятие
Адрес
Валидно до

1
Konservimi Adriatik
Durres
31. 12. 1995

2
Vival Novosel
Vlore
31. 12. 1995

3
Kap
Kavaje
31. 12. 1995

4
Albamar
Durres
31. 12. 1995

5
Aulona-Peshk
Vlore
31. 12. 1995

6
Pesca Adriatik
Vlore
31. 12. 1995

7
Sangiovani
Lezhe
31. 12. 1995

8
Italpeshk
Durres
31. 12. 1995

9
Peshk Karavasta
Lushnje
31. 12. 1995

10
Toma
Lezhe
31. 12. 1995

11
Ihtisara
Sarande
31. 12. 1995

12
Limjon Peska
Sarande
31. 12. 1995

13
Velipoje Peshk
Shkoder
31. 12. 1995

14
N. Peshkimi
Shkoder
31. 12. 1995

15
Orik Peshk
Vlore
31. 12. 1995

16
Goga-Shengjin
Lezhe
31. 12. 1995

03/ 16BGОфициален вестник на Европейския съюз16931995D0090L 070/27ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗРЕШЕНИЕ НА КОМИСИЯТАот 17 март 1995 годинаотносно определяне на специални условия на внос на рибн
			

Pending: 31994D0434

                                January 15, 2026                            

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Directive 93/25/EEC of 1 June 1993 on the statistical surveys to be carried out on sheep and goat production (1), and in particular Articles 1 (4), 2 (2), 3 (2) and (3), 7 (1), 10 (1) and (2) and 13 (3) thereof,  Whereas precise definitions are required in order to carry out the surveys provided for in Directive 93/25/EEC; whereas this first requires the definition of the agricultural holdings covered by the survey; whereas the individual categories into which  the survey results are to be broken down must also be precisely defined, and the herd size classes and regions according to which the Member States draw up the survey results at regular intervals must be determined; whereas a single definition of  carcass weight is necessary for the drawing-up of slaughtering statistics;  Whereas, according to Directive 93/25/EEC, the Member States may, at their request, be authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys and the prescribed breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered  years;  Whereas applications have be made by the Member States for the abovementioned types of authorization;  Whereas Commission Decision 82/958/EEC (2) should be replaced;  Whereas, since Directive 93/25/EEC is applicable as from 1 January 1994, it is appropriate to apply the provisions of this Decision with effect from the same date;  Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics,  HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1

1. For the purposes of Article 2 (2) of Directive 93/25/EEC, ‘agricultural holding’ means any technical and economic unit under single management which produces agricultural products.

2. The survey referred to in Article 1 (1) of Directive 93/25/EEC shall cover:

(a) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of 1 ha or more;

(b) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of less than 1 ha, if their production is to a certain extent intended for sale or if their production unit exceeds certain natural thresholds.

3. Member States wishing to apply a different survey threshold shall, however, undertake to determine that threshold in such a way that only the smallest holdings are excluded, and that together the holdings excluded account for 1 % or less of the total  standard gross margin, within the meaning of Commission Decision 85/377/EEC (3), of the Member State concerned.
Article 2

The definitions of the categories of sheep and goat referred to in Article 3 (1) and Article 13 (2) of Directive 93/25/EEC are set out in Annex I.
Article 3

The territorial subdivisions referred to in Article 7 (1) of Directive 93/25/EEC are set out in Annex II.
Article 4

The breakdown provided for in Article 10 of Directive 93/25/EEC is set out in Annex III.
Article 5

The carcass weight referred to in Article 13 (1) of Directive 93/25/EEC is defined in Annex IV.
Article 6

1. Pursuant to Article 1 (3) of Directive 93/25/EEC, the Member States listed in point (a) of Annex V are authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys.

2. Pursuant to Article 10 (2) of Directive 93/25/EEC, the Member States listed in point (b) of Annex V are authorized to use the breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years.
Article 7

Decision 82/958/EEC is repealed.
Article 8

This Decision shall apply with effect from 1 January 1994.
Article 9

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 May 1994.

For the Commission

Henning CHRISTOPHERSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 10.

(2) OJ No L 386, 31. 12. 1982, p. 43.

(3) OJ No L 220, 17. 8. 1985, p. 1.
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Directive 93/25/EEC of 1 June 1993 on the statistical surveys to be carried out on sheep and goat production (1), and in particular Articles 1 (4), 2 (2), 3 (2) and (3), 7 (1), 10 (1) and (2) and 13 (3) thereof,  Whereas precise definitions are required in order to carry out the surveys provided for in Directive 93/25/EEC; whereas this first requires the definition of the agricultural holdings covered by the survey; whereas the individual categories into which  the survey results are to be broken down must also be precisely defined, and the herd size classes and regions according to which the Member States draw up the survey results at regular intervals must be determined; whereas a single definition of  carcass weight is necessary for the drawing-up of slaughtering statistics;  Whereas, according to Directive 93/25/EEC, the Member States may, at their request, be authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys and the prescribed breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered  years;  Whereas applications have be made by the Member States for the abovementioned types of authorization;  Whereas Commission Decision 82/958/EEC (2) should be replaced;  Whereas, since Directive 93/25/EEC is applicable as from 1 January 1994, it is appropriate to apply the provisions of this Decision with effect from the same date;  Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics,  HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
1. For the purposes of Article 2 (2) of Directive 93/25/EEC, ‘agricultural holding’ means any technical and economic unit under single management which produces agricultural products.

2. The survey referred to in Article 1 (1) of Directive 93/25/EEC shall cover:

(a) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of 1 ha or more;

(b) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of less than 1 ha, if their production is to a certain extent intended for sale or if their production unit exceeds certain natural thresholds.

3. Member States wishing to apply a different survey threshold shall, however, undertake to determine that threshold in such a way that only the smallest holdings are excluded, and that together the holdings excluded account for 1 % or less of the total  standard gross margin, within the meaning of Commission Decision 85/377/EEC (3), of the Member State concerned.
The definitions of the categories of sheep and goat referred to in Article 3 (1) and Article 13 (2) of Directive 93/25/EEC are set out in Annex I.
The territorial subdivisions referred to in Article 7 (1) of Directive 93/25/EEC are set out in Annex II.
The breakdown provided for in Article 10 of Directive 93/25/EEC is set out in Annex III.
The carcass weight referred to in Article 13 (1) of Directive 93/25/EEC is defined in Annex IV.
1. Pursuant to Article 1 (3) of Directive 93/25/EEC, the Member States listed in point (a) of Annex V are authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys.

2. Pursuant to Article 10 (2) of Directive 93/25/EEC, the Member States listed in point (b) of Annex V are authorized to use the breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years.
Decision 82/958/EEC is repealed.
This Decision shall apply with effect from 1 January 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 May 1994.

For the Commission

Henning CHRISTOPHERSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 10.

(2) OJ No L 386, 31. 12. 1982, p. 43.

(3) OJ No L 220, 17. 8. 1985, p. 1.
Definition of categories  Ewes and ewe lambs put to the ram

Females of the ovine species which have already lambed at least once as well as those which have been put to the ram for the first time.

Ewes which are kept exclusively or principally to produce milk for human consumption and/or for processing into dairy products.

This includes cast milk sheep (whether fattened or not between their last lactation and slaughtering).

Ewes other than milk sheep.

male or female sheep under 12 months old.
Territorial subdivisions  Belgium: Provinces/Provincies

Germany: Bundeslaender

Greece: The regions of the Regional Development Service

Spain: País Vasco

Castilla y Léon

Castilla-La Mancha

Comunidad Valenciana

Región de Murcia

Extremadura

other Comunidades Autónomas

France: – for sheep, the following regions:

Midi-Pyrénées

Poitou-Charentes

Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur

other regions

– for goats, the following regions:

Rhône-Alpes

Poitou-Charentes

Centre-Pays-de-la-Loire

Midi-Pyrénées

other regions

Italy: – for sheep: Regioni

– for goats: Regioni:

other regions

Luxembourg: –

Netherlands: Provincies

Portugal: Regiões

United Kingdom: Standard Regions
TABLE 1   Size classes of sheep stocks held

>(2)(b)(3)(c)(3)(c)”> ID=”1″>I> ID=”2″>1-9> ID=”5″>1-9> ID=”8″>1-9> ID=”11″>1-9″> ID=”1″>II> ID=”2″>10-19> ID=”5″>10-19> ID=”8″>10-19> ID=”11″>10-19″> ID=”1″>III> ID=”2″>20-49> ID=”5″>20-49> ID=”8″>20-49> ID=”11″>20-49″> ID=”1″>IV>  ID=”2″>50-99> ID=”5″>50-99> ID=”8″>50-99> ID=”11″>50-99″> ID=”1″>V> ID=”2″>100-199> ID=”5″>100-199> ID=”8″>100-199> ID=”11″>100-199″> ID=”1″>VI> ID=”2″>200-499 & ge; 100 (1)()> ID=”5″>200-499 & ge; 100 (1)()> ID=”8″>200-499 & ge; 100 (1)()>  ID=”11″>200-499 & ge; 100 (1)()”> ID=”1″>VII> ID=”2″>500-999> ID=”5″>500-999> ID=”8″>500-999> ID=”11″>500-999″> ID=”1″>VIII> ID=”2″>& ge; 1 000> ID=”5″>& ge; 1 000> ID=”8″>& ge; 1 000> ID=”11″>& ge; 1 000″> ID=”2″>Total > ID=”5″>Total > ID=”8″>Total  > ID=”11″>Total “”

TABLE 2   Size classes of goat stocks held

>(6)(c)”> ID=”1″>I> ID=”2″>1-9> ID=”5″>1-9″> ID=”1″>II> ID=”2″>10-19> ID=”5″>10-19″> ID=”1″>III> ID=”2″>20-49> ID=”5″>20-49″> ID=”1″>IV> ID=”2″>50-99> ID=”5″>50-99″> ID=”1″>V> ID=”2″>100-499> ID=”5″>100-499″> ID=”1″>VI> ID=”2″>500-999 (5)(b)  & ge; 100 (4)()> ID=”5″>500-999 (5)(b) & ge; 100 (4)()”> ID=”1″>VII> ID=”2″>& ge; 1 000> ID=”5″>& ge; 1 000″> ID=”2″>Total > ID=”5″>Total “”

(1)() Breakdown optional for L, B, DK

(2)(b) Optional for D, NL

(3)(c) Optional for D, NL, UK, IRL (4)() Breakdown optional for D, L, B, UK, IRL

(5)(b) Breakdown optional for F

(6)(c) Optional for D, NL
Definition of carcass weight  Carcass weight is the weight of the slaughtered animal’s cold body after having been bled, skinned and eviscerated, and after removal of the head (severed at the atlanto-occipital joint), of the feet (severed at the  carpo-metacarpal or tarso-metatarsal joints), of the tail (severed between the sixth and seventh caudal vertebrae) and of the genital organs (including udder).

Kidneys and kidneys fats are included in the carcass.
(a) Member States authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys.

(b) Member States authorized to use the breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years.

Pending: 31994D0273

                                January 15, 2026                            

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 concerning laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in  specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) thereof,  Whereas it is necessary to establish a veterinary certificate for dogs and cats that are placed on the market in the United Kingdom and Ireland and not originating in those countries;  Whereas the animals concerned must fulfil the relevant necessary health conditions, as reflected in the certificate and duly attested to by an authorized veterinarian;  Whereas conforming to Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) dogs and cats must be accompanied by an individual vaccination record;  Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,  HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

The model of the certificate provided for in Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) of Directive 92/65/EEC is established in the Annex.
Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 54.
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 concerning laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in  specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) thereof,  Whereas it is necessary to establish a veterinary certificate for dogs and cats that are placed on the market in the United Kingdom and Ireland and not originating in those countries;  Whereas the animals concerned must fulfil the relevant necessary health conditions, as reflected in the certificate and duly attested to by an authorized veterinarian;  Whereas conforming to Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) dogs and cats must be accompanied by an individual vaccination record;  Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,  HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The model of the certificate provided for in Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) of Directive 92/65/EEC is established in the Annex.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 54.
(1) Health certificates may be drawn up only for animals which are to be transported in the same mode of transport and which come from the same holding and which are being sent to the same consignee.

(2) Delete where not applicable.

(3) The certificate is valid for only one species at a time.

(4) Give the registration number in the case of lorries, trucks, vans or cars, the flight number in the case of aircraft, the name in the case of boat/ship, and in the case of rail travel, the estimated date and time of arrival.

(5) Delete where not applicable.

Pending: 31994D0205

                                January 15, 2026                            

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,  Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and placing on the market of fishery products (1) and in particular Article 11 thereof,  Whereas Article 3 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC lays down that bivalve molluscs for processing must comply with the provisions of Council Directive 91/492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and placing on the market  of live bivalve molluscs (2); whereas, moreover, bivalve molluscs for processing must meet certain conditions laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;  Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Japan to verify the conditions under which scallops are produced and placed on the market;  Whereas Japanese legislation makes the veterinary health department of the Ministry of Health and Welfare responsible for health legislation concerning scallops, and the Public Health Centres in the local Prefectures responsible for health inspections  and for monitoring the conditions of hygiene and cleanliness pertaining to production;  Whereas Japanese legislation requires each package of frozen or packaged scallops to be identified by an official stamp indicating the date and place of harvest, the approval number of the establishment, the production date and the name of the body  responsible for dispatch;  Whereas the competent Japanese authorities have provided official assurances regarding compliance with the requirements specified in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/492/EEC and with requirements equivalent to those prescribed in that Directive  for the classification of production and public health control and production monitoring;  Whereas, with a view to complying with Article 3 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC as regards frozen or processed scallops, the production areas from which live scallops may be harvested must be established;  Whereas the procedure for obtaining a health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must include the definition of a model certificate, the language(s) in which it must be drawn up and the qualifications of the signatory;   Whereas, in accordance with Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of frozen or processed scallops, giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin;  Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas this list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication to the Commission from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare;  whereas it is therefore for the said Ministry to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to this end by Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;  Whereas the Ministry of Health and Welfare has given official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of the conditions equivalent to those laid down by the said  Directive for the approval of establishments; whereas, in particular, the said Ministry has undertaken to sample and test for toxins in each consignment of scallops bound for the Community;  Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,  HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1

The Veterinary Hygiene Department of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Public Health Centre of the Prefectures which answer to it shall be the competent authority in Japan for verifying and certifying that scallops meet the  requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC, and in particular Article 3 (4) thereof.
Article 2

Frozen or processed scallops and other Pectinidae originating in Japan and intended for human consumption must meet the following conditions.

1. Each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;

2. The scallops and other Pectinidae must have been harvested after the adoption of this Decision in the authorized production areas listed in Annex B hereto;

3. They must be prepared, frozen or processed and packed by an approved establishment included in the list in Annex C hereto;

4. Each package must bear the word Japan and the following information:

– the date and place of harvesting,

– the approval number of the establishment,

– the production date,

– the name of the body responsible for the consignment.
Article 3

1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State in which the check is carried out.

2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Public Health Centre of the competent Prefecture and its official seal, in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
Article 4

Each consignment must be subjected to an analysis for toxins on arrival in the Community. Customs clearance may not take place until the results of the analysis have demonstrated that the criteria set out in the Annex, Chapter V point 6 and 7  of Directive 91/492/EEC, have been respected.
Article 5

This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 May 1994 at the latest.
Article 6

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 1.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,  Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and placing on the market of fishery products (1) and in particular Article 11 thereof,  Whereas Article 3 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC lays down that bivalve molluscs for processing must comply with the provisions of Council Directive 91/492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and placing on the market  of live bivalve molluscs (2); whereas, moreover, bivalve molluscs for processing must meet certain conditions laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;  Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Japan to verify the conditions under which scallops are produced and placed on the market;  Whereas Japanese legislation makes the veterinary health department of the Ministry of Health and Welfare responsible for health legislation concerning scallops, and the Public Health Centres in the local Prefectures responsible for health inspections  and for monitoring the conditions of hygiene and cleanliness pertaining to production;  Whereas Japanese legislation requires each package of frozen or packaged scallops to be identified by an official stamp indicating the date and place of harvest, the approval number of the establishment, the production date and the name of the body  responsible for dispatch;  Whereas the competent Japanese authorities have provided official assurances regarding compliance with the requirements specified in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/492/EEC and with requirements equivalent to those prescribed in that Directive  for the classification of production and public health control and production monitoring;  Whereas, with a view to complying with Article 3 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC as regards frozen or processed scallops, the production areas from which live scallops may be harvested must be established;  Whereas the procedure for obtaining a health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must include the definition of a model certificate, the language(s) in which it must be drawn up and the qualifications of the signatory;   Whereas, in accordance with Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of frozen or processed scallops, giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin;  Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas this list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication to the Commission from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare;  whereas it is therefore for the said Ministry to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to this end by Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;  Whereas the Ministry of Health and Welfare has given official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of the conditions equivalent to those laid down by the said  Directive for the approval of establishments; whereas, in particular, the said Ministry has undertaken to sample and test for toxins in each consignment of scallops bound for the Community;  Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,  HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Veterinary Hygiene Department of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Public Health Centre of the Prefectures which answer to it shall be the competent authority in Japan for verifying and certifying that scallops meet the  requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC, and in particular Article 3 (4) thereof.
Frozen or processed scallops and other Pectinidae originating in Japan and intended for human consumption must meet the following conditions.

1. Each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;

2. The scallops and other Pectinidae must have been harvested after the adoption of this Decision in the authorized production areas listed in Annex B hereto;

3. They must be prepared, frozen or processed and packed by an approved establishment included in the list in Annex C hereto;

4. Each package must bear the word Japan and the following information:

– the date and place of harvesting,

– the approval number of the establishment,

– the production date,

– the name of the body responsible for the consignment.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State in which the check is carried out.

2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Public Health Centre of the competent Prefecture and its official seal, in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
Each consignment must be subjected to an analysis for toxins on arrival in the Community. Customs clearance may not take place until the results of the analysis have demonstrated that the criteria set out in the Annex, Chapter V point 6 and 7  of Directive 91/492/EEC, have been respected.
This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 May 1994 at the latest.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 1.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE  relating to frozen or processed scallops and other Pectinidae originating in Japan and intended for human consumption in the European Economic Community

Reference No:

Country of dispatch: Japan

Competent authority: Ministry of Health and Welfare,

Veterinary Health Department

I. Details identifying the products

– Species (scientific name):

– Presentation (1):

– Code No (where available):

– Type of packaging:

– Number of packages:

– Net weight:

– Analysis report number (where available):

II. Origin of products

– Authorized production area:

– Name and official approval number of the establishment(s) approved by the Ministry of Health and Welfare for exports to the European Community:

III. Destination of products

The scallops and other Pectinidae are dispatched

(place of dispatch)

(country and place of destination)

by the following means of transport:

Name and address of consignor:

Name of consignee and address at place of destination:

IV. Health attestation

The official inspector hereby certifies that the scallops specified above:

1. were harvested in an approved production area which, on the date of harvest, was not subject to any restrictions becaue of the presence of toxins, and was checked in accordance with Chapter VI of the Annex to Directive 91/492/EEC;

2. comply with points 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/492/EEC;

3. were transported in accordance with rules at least equivalent to those laid down in Chapter II of the Annex to Directive 91/492/EEC;

4. were prepared, frozen or processed and packaged in accordance with health rules at least equivalent to those laid down in Chapters III, IV and VI of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;

5. have undergone controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;

6. were handled and transported in accordance with health rules at least equivalent to those laid down in Chapter VIII of Directive 91/493/EEC;

7. were sampled and tested for the presence of toxins in the ovary, before dispatch.

Signature of official inspector

(Name in capitals, capacity and qualifications of person signing)

(1) Frozen or processed.
Production areas authorized for the harvesting of scallops and other pectinidae meeting the conditions laid down in Chapter I (1) (a) of the Annex to Council Directive 91/492/EEC  1. Mutsu Bay, Aomori

2. The mouth of Funka Bay, Hokkaido

3. The western part of Funka Bay, Hokkaido

4. The eastern part of Funka Bay, Hokkaido

5. The nothern part of the Sea of Okhotsk, Hokkaido

6. The southern part of the Sea of Okhotsk, Hokkaido

7. Lake Saroma, Hokkaido
List of establishments approved for the export of frozen or processed scallops and other pectinidae to the European Community

“” ID=”1″>0188001> ID=”2″>MARUSIN TERAMOTO SYOTEN> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>39, Akebonocho, Yuubetu-cho,”> ID=”2″>Monbetsu-gun, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0188002> ID=”2″>HOKUYUU SHOKUHIN KOGYO CO., LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>100-1  Kitaheison-Iku, Kamiyuubetsu-cho, Monbetsu-gun, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0188003> ID=”2″>HOKUSHO FISHERY CO., LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>51, Naniwa, Saroma-cho, Tokoro-Gun. Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0191001> ID=”2″>MARUKICHI CO., Inc.>  ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>5-2, Higashi 2-chome, Kita 3-jyo, Abashiri-shi, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0191002> ID=”2″>TOKORO FISHERIES CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION   Refrigeration plant> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>23-4, Higashihama, Tokoro-cho,  Tokoro-gun, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0191003> ID=”2″>KITAMI-SYOKUHINKOUGYO CO., Inc.> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>8, Kaigancho 1-chome, Abasirishi, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0192001> ID=”2″>HOKKO-REIZO CO., LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>25-29,  Sin-Minatocho 2-chome, Monbetsu-shi, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0192002> ID=”2″>MONBETSU FISHERIES CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>5-2, Minatocho 6-chome, Monbetsu-shi, Hokkaido, Japan”> ID=”1″>0251001> ID=”2″>SEIHO SHOJI CO.,  LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>268-1, Ashiya, Yatsuyaku, Aomori-shi, Aomori, Japan”> ID=”1″>0251002> ID=”2″>MATSUBARA SUISAN CO., LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>208-9, Yamada, Shinjo, Aomori-shi, Aomori, Japan”> ID=”1″>0251003> ID=”2″>AOMORI  FEDERATION OF FISHERIES COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS SECOND HIRANAI REFRIGERATION PROCESS FACTORY> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>91-53, Asadokoro, Hiranai-machi, Higashitsugaru-gun, Aomori, Japan”> ID=”1″>0251004> ID=”2″>KITAFUKU LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12.  1994″> ID=”2″>1-5, Yunosawa, Negishi, Taira-date-mura, Higashitsugaru-gun, Aomori, Japan”> ID=”1″>0257001> ID=”2″>MARUICHI YOKOHMAM CO., LTD> ID=”3″>31. 12. 1994″> ID=”2″>34-92, Toriitaira, Noheji-machi, Kamikita-gun, Aomori, Japan”>

Номер на одобрението	Предприятие	Адрес	Валидно до
1	Konservimi Adriatik	Durres	31. 12. 1995
2	Vival Novosel	Vlore	31. 12. 1995
3	Kap	Kavaje	31. 12. 1995
4	Albamar	Durres	31. 12. 1995
5	Aulona-Peshk	Vlore	31. 12. 1995
6	Pesca Adriatik	Vlore	31. 12. 1995
7	Sangiovani	Lezhe	31. 12. 1995
8	Italpeshk	Durres	31. 12. 1995
9	Peshk Karavasta	Lushnje	31. 12. 1995
10	Toma	Lezhe	31. 12. 1995
11	Ihtisara	Sarande	31. 12. 1995
12	Limjon Peska	Sarande	31. 12. 1995
13	Velipoje Peshk	Shkoder	31. 12. 1995
14	N. Peshkimi	Shkoder	31. 12. 1995
15	Orik Peshk	Vlore	31. 12. 1995
16	Goga-Shengjin	Lezhe	31. 12. 1995