Pending: 32003D0248

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community(1), as last amended by Commission Directive 2003/22/EC(2), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,Having regard to the request made by France,Whereas:(1) Under Directive 2000/29/EC, plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in non-European countries, other than Mediterranean countries, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the continental states of the United States of America, may not in principle be introduced into the Community. However, that Directive permits derogations from that rule, provided that it is established that there is no risk of spreading harmful organisms.(2) In Argentina, the multiplication of plants of Fragaria L., intended for planting, other than seeds, from plants supplied by a Member State, has become an established practice. The plants produced are afterwards exported to the Community to be planted for fruit production.(3) Since 1993, by a succession of decisions, the most recent being Commission Decision 2001/441/EC(3), derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2000/29/EC in respect of plants of Fragaria L., intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina, have been authorised for limited periods and subject to specific conditions.(4) The circumstances justifying those derogations are still valid and there is no new information giving cause for revision of the specific conditions.(5) The Member States should therefore be authorised to provide for derogations, for certain limited periods and subject to specific conditions.(6) That authorisation to provide for derogations should be terminated if it is established that the specific conditions laid down in this Decision are not sufficient to prevent the introduction of harmful organisms into the Community or have not been complied with.(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1Member States are authorised to provide for derogations from Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibitions referred to in point 18 of Part A of Annex III, to that Directive for plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina (hereinafter referred to as the plants).The authorisation to provide for derogations, as provided for in paragraph 1 (hereinafter referred to as the authorisation), shall be subject, in addition to the conditions laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC, to the conditions provided for in the Annex, and shall only apply to the plants that are introduced into the Community, in the periods from:(a) 1 June 2003 to 30 September 2003;(b) 1 June 2004 to 30 September 2004;(c) 1 June 2005 to 30 September 2005; and(d) 1 June 2006 to 30 September 2006.Article 2Member States shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 30 November of the year of importation, with:(a) the information on quantities of plants imported pursuant to this Decision; and(b) a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 5 of the Annex.Any Member State in which the plants are subsequently planted after their import, shall also provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 31 March of the year following the importation, with a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 8 of the Annex.Article 3Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of all consignments introduced into their territory pursuant to this Decision which were subsequently found not to comply with this Decision.Article 4This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 9 April 2003.For the CommissionDavid ByrneMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.(2) OJ L 78, 25.3.2003, p. 10.(3) OJ L 155, 12.6.2001, p. 15.ANNEXSpecific conditions applying to plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina benefiting from derogations provided for in

Article 1
Member States are authorised to provide for derogations from Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibitions referred to in point 18 of Part A of Annex III, to that Directive for plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina (hereinafter referred to as the plants).
The authorisation to provide for derogations, as provided for in paragraph 1 (hereinafter referred to as the authorisation), shall be subject, in addition to the conditions laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC, to the conditions provided for in the Annex, and shall only apply to the plants that are introduced into the Community, in the periods from:
(a) 1 June 2003 to 30 September 2003;
(b) 1 June 2004 to 30 September 2004;
(c) 1 June 2005 to 30 September 2005; and
(d) 1 June 2006 to 30 September 2006.

Article 2
Member States shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 30 November of the year of importation, with:
(a) the information on quantities of plants imported pursuant to this Decision; and
(b) a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 5 of the Annex.
Any Member State in which the plants are subsequently planted after their import, shall also provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 31 March of the year following the importation, with a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 8 of the Annex.

Article 3
Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of all consignments introduced into their territory pursuant to this Decision which were subsequently found not to comply with this Decision.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 9 April 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 78, 25.3.2003, p. 10.
(3) OJ L 155, 12.6.2001, p. 15.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community(1), as last amended by Commission Directive 2003/22/EC(2), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,Having regard to the request made by France,Whereas:(1) Under Directive 2000/29/EC, plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in non-European countries, other than Mediterranean countries, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the continental states of the United States of America, may not in principle be introduced into the Community. However, that Directive permits derogations from that rule, provided that it is established that there is no risk of spreading harmful organisms.(2) In Argentina, the multiplication of plants of Fragaria L., intended for planting, other than seeds, from plants supplied by a Member State, has become an established practice. The plants produced are afterwards exported to the Community to be planted for fruit production.(3) Since 1993, by a succession of decisions, the most recent being Commission Decision 2001/441/EC(3), derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2000/29/EC in respect of plants of Fragaria L., intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina, have been authorised for limited periods and subject to specific conditions.(4) The circumstances justifying those derogations are still valid and there is no new information giving cause for revision of the specific conditions.(5) The Member States should therefore be authorised to provide for derogations, for certain limited periods and subject to specific conditions.(6) That authorisation to provide for derogations should be terminated if it is established that the specific conditions laid down in this Decision are not sufficient to prevent the introduction of harmful organisms into the Community or have not been complied with.(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1Member States are authorised to provide for derogations from Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibitions referred to in point 18 of Part A of Annex III, to that Directive for plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina (hereinafter referred to as the plants).The authorisation to provide for derogations, as provided for in paragraph 1 (hereinafter referred to as the authorisation), shall be subject, in addition to the conditions laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC, to the conditions provided for in the Annex, and shall only apply to the plants that are introduced into the Community, in the periods from:(a) 1 June 2003 to 30 September 2003;(b) 1 June 2004 to 30 September 2004;(c) 1 June 2005 to 30 September 2005; and(d) 1 June 2006 to 30 September 2006.Article 2Member States shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 30 November of the year of importation, with:(a) the information on quantities of plants imported pursuant to this Decision; and(b) a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 5 of the Annex.Any Member State in which the plants are subsequently planted after their import, shall also provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 31 March of the year following the importation, with a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 8 of the Annex.Article 3Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of all consignments introduced into their territory pursuant to this Decision which were subsequently found not to comply with this Decision.Article 4This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 9 April 2003.For the CommissionDavid ByrneMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.(2) OJ L 78, 25.3.2003, p. 10.(3) OJ L 155, 12.6.2001, p. 15.ANNEXSpecific conditions applying to plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina benefiting from derogations provided for in
Member States are authorised to provide for derogations from Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibitions referred to in point 18 of Part A of Annex III, to that Directive for plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina (hereinafter referred to as the plants).
The authorisation to provide for derogations, as provided for in paragraph 1 (hereinafter referred to as the authorisation), shall be subject, in addition to the conditions laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC, to the conditions provided for in the Annex, and shall only apply to the plants that are introduced into the Community, in the periods from:
(a) 1 June 2003 to 30 September 2003;
(b) 1 June 2004 to 30 September 2004;
(c) 1 June 2005 to 30 September 2005; and
(d) 1 June 2006 to 30 September 2006.
Member States shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 30 November of the year of importation, with:
(a) the information on quantities of plants imported pursuant to this Decision; and
(b) a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 5 of the Annex.
Any Member State in which the plants are subsequently planted after their import, shall also provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 31 March of the year following the importation, with a detailed technical report of the official inspections and testing referred to in point 8 of the Annex.
Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of all consignments introduced into their territory pursuant to this Decision which were subsequently found not to comply with this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 9 April 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 78, 25.3.2003, p. 10.
(3) OJ L 155, 12.6.2001, p. 15.
Specific conditions applying to plants of strawberry (Fragaria L.), intended for planting, other than seeds, originating in Argentina benefiting from derogations provided for in Article 1 of this Decision
1. The plants shall be intended for fruit production within the Community and shall have been:
(a) produced exclusively from mother plants, which were imported from a Member State and certified under an approved certification scheme of a Member State;
(b) grown on land which:
– is situated in an area isolated from commercial strawberry production;
– is situated at least one kilometre from the nearest crop of strawberry plants grown for fruit or runner production which do not satisfy the conditions of this Decision;
– is situated at least 200 metres from any other plants of the genus Fragaria which do not satisfy the conditions of this Decision; and
– was, subsequent to the removal of the previous crops and before the planting of the plants, either officially tested by appropriate methods and shown to be free from harmful soil infesting organisms including Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens and Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber) Behrens, or treated to ensure it was free from those organisms;
(c) officially inspected by the Plant Protection Service of Argentina, at least three times during the growing season and again prior to export for the presence of the harmful organisms listed in Part A of Annexes I and II to Directive 2000/29/EC, in particular:
– Aphelenchoides besseyi Christie,
– Colletotrichum acutatum Simmonds,
– Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens,
– Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber) Behrens,
– Naupactus leucoloma (Boheman),
– Phytophthora fragariae Hickmann var. fragariae,
– Strawberry crinkle virus,
– Strawberry mild yellow edge virus,
– Strawberry vein banding virus,
– Xanthomonas fragariae Kennedy and King,
– Xiphinema americanum Cobb sensu lato (non European populations);
and of any other harmful organism which is not known to occur in the Community such as:
– Dendrophoma obscurans,
– Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. fragariae,
– Loxostege similalis,
– Pratylenchus zeae,
– Rhizoctonia fragariae;
and on each occasion found to be free from all such organisms;
(d) prior to export:
– shaken free from soil or other growing medium,
– cleaned (i.e. free from plant debris) and free from flowers and fruits.
2. The plants shall be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued in Argentina which complies with Article 7(1) and Article 13(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, on the basis of the examination laid down therein.
The certificate shall state:
– under the rubric “Disinfestation and/or disinfection treatment”, the specification of the last treatment(s) applied prior to export,
– under “Additional Declaration”, the indication “This consignment meets the conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2003/248/EC”, as well as the name of the variety and the Member State certification scheme under which the mother plants have been certified.
3. The plants shall be introduced through points of entry designated for the purpose of the authorisation by the Member State in which they are situated.
Those points of entry and the name and address of the responsible official body referred to in Directive 2000/29/EC in charge of each point of entry shall be notified sufficiently in advance by the Member States to the Commission and shall be made available on request to other Member States.
Where the introduction of the plants into the Community takes place in a Member State other than the Member State making use of the authorisation, the responsible official bodies of the Member State of introduction shall inform and cooperate with the responsible official bodies of the Member States making use of the authorisation to ensure that this Decision is complied with.
4. Prior to introduction of the plants into the Community, the importer shall be officially informed of the conditions laid down in points 1 to 6.
The said importer shall notify details of each introduction sufficiently in advance to the responsible official bodies of the Member State of introduction indicating the following:
– the type of material,
– the quantity of plants,
– the intended date of introduction into the Community,
– the intended point of entry into the Community,
– the name, addresses and the locations where the plants are to be stored under official control pending the results of the inspections referred to in point 5 or of the premises referred to in point 6 where the plants are to be planted after having successfully undergone the inspections and testing referred to in point 5.
The importer shall inform the responsible official bodies concerned of any changes to the details referred to in this point as soon as they are known.
The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission of the details referred to in this point, and of any changes to them without delay.
At least two weeks before the date the plants are moved from the premises where they are stored, the importer shall notify the responsible official body of the premises referred to in point 6 where the plants are to be planted.
5. The inspections, including testing as appropriate, required under Article 13 of Directive 2000/29/EC and under point 8 of this Decision shall be made by the responsible official bodies in the Member State making use of the authorisation, and where appropriate, in cooperation with the responsible official bodies of the Member State where the plants are to be planted.
During those inspections, Member State(s) shall also inspect, and where appropriate, test for harmful organisms mentioned in point 1(c). Any finding of such harmful organisms shall immediately be notified to the Commission. Appropriate action shall be taken to destroy the harmful organisms and where appropriate the plants concerned.
Without prejudice to the monitoring referred to in the second indent of Article 21(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC, the Commission shall determine to what extent the inspections referred to in that indent shall be integrated into the inspection programme in accordance with the fifth subparagraph of Article 21(5) of that Directive.

Pending: 32003D0218

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000(1) laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue and in particular Article 8(2)(d) and (3), Article 9(1)(c) and Article 12, first paragraph, thereof,Whereas:(1) In the light of the evolution of the bluetongue situation in four Member States in 2001, Commission Decision 2001/783/EC of 9 November 2001 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue and on rules applicable to movements of animals in and from those zones(2), as last amended by Decision 2003/14/EC(3), was adopted, establishing three geographical zones corresponding to specific epidemiological situations. This Decision also provides for the conditions under which exemptions to the restrictions applicable to animal movements laid down by the Directive can be implemented.(2) As regards Greece, the surveillance programme carried on by Greek authorities has demonstrated no seroconversion on sentinel animals during the year 2002.(3) Therefore provisions can be made to relax, under certain conditions, the restrictions on movements of live animals of susceptible species from the Greek territory, with the exception of areas which are under threat of direct reinfestation from third countries.(4) As regards Italy and France, the surveillance programmes carried out in Italy and France have demonstrated that in areas where the vaccination has been correctly implemented, virus circulation has been reduced to a negligible level before the winter season.(5) Therefore provisions can be made to relax, under certain conditions, restrictions on movements of vaccinated live animals from those areas.(6) However, the main condition for implementing these relaxation measures should be that the surveillance programme in place does not show that bluetongue virus activity has recommenced in that area, and it is further appropriate to distinguish areas of higher and lower epidemiological risks respectively.(7) Technical amendments should also be introduced to facilitate movements of live animals inside the territory of the same Member State, in particular for immediate slaughter.(8) For the sake of clarity it is appropriate to repeal Decision 2001/783/EC and to replace it by the present Decision.(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

Article 1
The purpose of this Decision is to establish restricted zones to prevent the extension of bluetongue (BT), comprising protection and surveillance zones in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/75/EC, and to lay down rules on movements in and from those zones of animals of species susceptible to bluetongue.

Article 2
Movement restrictions
The dispatch and transit of live animals of species susceptible to bluetongue and their sperm, ova and embryos, are prohibited:
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IA,
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IB,
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IC section 1,
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IC section 2.

Article 3
Exemptions for trade
1. By way of derogation from Article 2:
(a) dispatches of animals susceptible to bluetongue, their sperm, ova and embryos shall be authorised from the restricted zones set out in Annex I, provided that they comply with the conditions laid down in Annex II;
(b) dispatches of animals susceptible to bluetongue may be authorised from the lower risk areas set out in section 1 of Annex IA, IB, and IC respectively, subject to the approval of the Member State of destination in case of Intra-Community trade, provided that the surveillance programme in place does not show that bluetongue virus activity has recommenced in an epidemiological relevant area of origin and,
(i) as regards Italy and France, provided that the animals have been vaccinated for more than 30 days and less than six months;
(ii) as regards Greece, provided that the animals have been serologically tested (BT ELISA or AGID) with negative result within 72 hours prior to departure and sprayed at the time the sampling for the test is done with insect repellent with a remanent effect of more than four days.
2. In intra-Community trade, the Member State of origin availing itself of the derogations provided for in paragraph 1 shall ensure that the following additional wording is added to the corresponding certificates laid down in Council Directives 64/432/EEC(4), 88/407/EEC(5), 89/556/EEC(6), 91/68/EEC(7) and 92/65/EEC(8):
“animals/semen/ova/embryos in compliance with Decision 2003/218/EC(9)”

Article 4
Exemptions for domestic movements
By way of derogation from Article 2, movements within the territory of the same Member State of live animals susceptible to bluetongue may be authorised by the national competent authorities from the higher risk areas set out in section 2 of Annex IA, IB, and IC respectively:
(a) as regards Italy and France, provided that:
– the surveillance and monitoring programme in an epidemiological relevant area of origin has proved the cessation of bluetongue virus (BTV) transmission for more than 100 days and/or,
– the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiological relevant area of destination has proved the cessation of adult Culicoïdes activity;
(b) as regards Greece, provided that:
– the animals have been serologically tested (BT ELISA or AGID) with negative result within 72 hours before departure and sprayed at the time the sampling for the test is done with insect repellent with a remanant effect of more than four days, provided that the surveillance programme in place does not show that bluetongue virus activity has recommenced in an epidemiological relevant area of origin.
When they use this derogation, Member States shall set up a channelling procedure, under the control of competent authorities of origin and destination, in order to prevent any further movement to another Member State of animals moved under the conditions provided in this Article.

Article 5
Exemptions for slaughtering
By way of derogation from Article 2, movements of animals susceptible to bluetongue for immediate slaughter within the territory of the same Member State may be authorised by the national competent authorities from the lower risk areas set out in section 1 of Annexes IA and IB respectively, provided that:
(a) a case-by-case risk assessment on the possible contact between animals and the vectors during transport to the slaughterhouse is made, taking into consideration:
(i) the data available through the surveillance programme on the vector’s activity;
(ii) the distance from the point of entry in the non-restricted zone to the slaughterhouse, and the entomological data on this route;
(iii) the period of the day during which the transport takes place in relation with the hours of activity of the vectors;
(iv) the possible use of insecticides in compliance with Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and which repeal Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC(10).
(b) the animals to be moved do not show any sign of bluetongue on the day of transport;
(c) the animals are transported in vehicles sealed by the competent authority without delay and directly to the slaughterhouse, under official supervision;
(d) the competent authority responsible for the slaughterhouse is informed of the intention to send animals to it and notifies the dispatching competent authority of their arrival.

Article 6
The transit of animals dispatched from an area of the Community outside the restricted zones set out in Annex I through a restricted zone set out in Annex I, shall be authorised provided that:
(a) an insecticide treatment of the animals and the means of transport shall be carried out at the place of loading or in any case prior to entering the restricted zone. When during transit through a restricted zone, a rest period is foreseen in a staging post, insecticide treatment shall be carried out in order to protect animals from any attack by vectors;
(b) in case of intra Community trade, the transit shall be subject to the authorisation of the competent authorities of the Member States of transit and destination, and the following additional wording shall be added to the corresponding certificates laid down in Directives 64/432/EEC, 91/68/EEC and 92/65/EEC:”Insecticide treatment with (name of the product) on (date) at (time) in conformity with Decision 2003/218/EC.”

Article 7
The Member States shall ensure that the measures they apply to trade are in compliance with this Decision and shall inform the Commission thereof.

Article 8
Decision 2001/783/EC is repealed. References made to the repealed Decision shall be construed to be made to the present Decision.

Article 9
This Decision shall apply from 18 April 2003.

Article 10
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 March 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74.
(2) OJ L 293, 10.11.2001, p. 42.
(3) OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 87.
(4) OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64.
(5) OJ L 194, 22.7.1988, p. 10.
(6) OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 46, 19.2.1991, p. 19.
(8) OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54.
(9) Delete as necessary.
(10) OJ L 125, 23.5.1996, p. 10.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000(1) laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue and in particular Article 8(2)(d) and (3), Article 9(1)(c) and Article 12, first paragraph, thereof,Whereas:(1) In the light of the evolution of the bluetongue situation in four Member States in 2001, Commission Decision 2001/783/EC of 9 November 2001 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue and on rules applicable to movements of animals in and from those zones(2), as last amended by Decision 2003/14/EC(3), was adopted, establishing three geographical zones corresponding to specific epidemiological situations. This Decision also provides for the conditions under which exemptions to the restrictions applicable to animal movements laid down by the Directive can be implemented.(2) As regards Greece, the surveillance programme carried on by Greek authorities has demonstrated no seroconversion on sentinel animals during the year 2002.(3) Therefore provisions can be made to relax, under certain conditions, the restrictions on movements of live animals of susceptible species from the Greek territory, with the exception of areas which are under threat of direct reinfestation from third countries.(4) As regards Italy and France, the surveillance programmes carried out in Italy and France have demonstrated that in areas where the vaccination has been correctly implemented, virus circulation has been reduced to a negligible level before the winter season.(5) Therefore provisions can be made to relax, under certain conditions, restrictions on movements of vaccinated live animals from those areas.(6) However, the main condition for implementing these relaxation measures should be that the surveillance programme in place does not show that bluetongue virus activity has recommenced in that area, and it is further appropriate to distinguish areas of higher and lower epidemiological risks respectively.(7) Technical amendments should also be introduced to facilitate movements of live animals inside the territory of the same Member State, in particular for immediate slaughter.(8) For the sake of clarity it is appropriate to repeal Decision 2001/783/EC and to replace it by the present Decision.(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
The purpose of this Decision is to establish restricted zones to prevent the extension of bluetongue (BT), comprising protection and surveillance zones in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/75/EC, and to lay down rules on movements in and from those zones of animals of species susceptible to bluetongue.
Movement restrictions
The dispatch and transit of live animals of species susceptible to bluetongue and their sperm, ova and embryos, are prohibited:
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IA,
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IB,
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IC section 1,
– from or through the territory corresponding to the administrative units listed in Annex IC section 2.
Exemptions for trade
1. By way of derogation from Article 2:
(a) dispatches of animals susceptible to bluetongue, their sperm, ova and embryos shall be authorised from the restricted zones set out in Annex I, provided that they comply with the conditions laid down in Annex II;
(b) dispatches of animals susceptible to bluetongue may be authorised from the lower risk areas set out in section 1 of Annex IA, IB, and IC respectively, subject to the approval of the Member State of destination in case of Intra-Community trade, provided that the surveillance programme in place does not show that bluetongue virus activity has recommenced in an epidemiological relevant area of origin and,
(i) as regards Italy and France, provided that the animals have been vaccinated for more than 30 days and less than six months;
(ii) as regards Greece, provided that the animals have been serologically tested (BT ELISA or AGID) with negative result within 72 hours prior to departure and sprayed at the time the sampling for the test is done with insect repellent with a remanent effect of more than four days.
2. In intra-Community trade, the Member State of origin availing itself of the derogations provided for in paragraph 1 shall ensure that the following additional wording is added to the corresponding certificates laid down in Council Directives 64/432/EEC(4), 88/407/EEC(5), 89/556/EEC(6), 91/68/EEC(7) and 92/65/EEC(8):
“animals/semen/ova/embryos in compliance with Decision 2003/218/EC(9)”
Exemptions for domestic movements
By way of derogation from Article 2, movements within the territory of the same Member State of live animals susceptible to bluetongue may be authorised by the national competent authorities from the higher risk areas set out in section 2 of Annex IA, IB, and IC respectively:
(a) as regards Italy and France, provided that:
– the surveillance and monitoring programme in an epidemiological relevant area of origin has proved the cessation of bluetongue virus (BTV) transmission for more than 100 days and/or,
– the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiological relevant area of destination has proved the cessation of adult Culicoïdes activity;
(b) as regards Greece, provided that:
– the animals have been serologically tested (BT ELISA or AGID) with negative result within 72 hours before departure and sprayed at the time the sampling for the test is done with insect repellent with a remanant effect of more than four days, provided that the surveillance programme in place does not show that bluetongue virus activity has recommenced in an epidemiological relevant area of origin.
When they use this derogation, Member States shall set up a channelling procedure, under the control of competent authorities of origin and destination, in order to prevent any further movement to another Member State of animals moved under the conditions provided in this Article.
Exemptions for slaughtering
By way of derogation from Article 2, movements of animals susceptible to bluetongue for immediate slaughter within the territory of the same Member State may be authorised by the national competent authorities from the lower risk areas set out in section 1 of Annexes IA and IB respectively, provided that:
(a) a case-by-case risk assessment on the possible contact between animals and the vectors during transport to the slaughterhouse is made, taking into consideration:
(i) the data available through the surveillance programme on the vector’s activity;
(ii) the distance from the point of entry in the non-restricted zone to the slaughterhouse, and the entomological data on this route;
(iii) the period of the day during which the transport takes place in relation with the hours of activity of the vectors;
(iv) the possible use of insecticides in compliance with Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and which repeal Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC(10).
(b) the animals to be moved do not show any sign of bluetongue on the day of transport;
(c) the animals are transported in vehicles sealed by the competent authority without delay and directly to the slaughterhouse, under official supervision;
(d) the competent authority responsible for the slaughterhouse is informed of the intention to send animals to it and notifies the dispatching competent authority of their arrival.
The transit of animals dispatched from an area of the Community outside the restricted zones set out in Annex I through a restricted zone set out in Annex I, shall be authorised provided that:
(a) an insecticide treatment of the animals and the means of transport shall be carried out at the place of loading or in any case prior to entering the restricted zone. When during transit through a restricted zone, a rest period is foreseen in a staging post, insecticide treatment shall be carried out in order to protect animals from any attack by vectors;
(b) in case of intra Community trade, the transit shall be subject to the authorisation of the competent authorities of the Member States of transit and destination, and the following additional wording shall be added to the corresponding certificates laid down in Directives 64/432/EEC, 91/68/EEC and 92/65/EEC:”Insecticide treatment with (name of the product) on (date) at (time) in conformity with Decision 2003/218/EC.”
The Member States shall ensure that the measures they apply to trade are in compliance with this Decision and shall inform the Commission thereof.
Decision 2001/783/EC is repealed. References made to the repealed Decision shall be construed to be made to the present Decision.
This Decision shall apply from 18 April 2003.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 March 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74.
(2) OJ L 293, 10.11.2001, p. 42.
(3) OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 87.
(4) OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64.
(5) OJ L 194, 22.7.1988, p. 10.
(6) OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 46, 19.2.1991, p. 19.
(8) OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54.
(9) Delete as necessary.
(10) OJ L 125, 23.5.1996, p. 10.
(protection zones and surveillance zones)
A. Live animals must have been:
1. protected from culicoïdes attack for at least 100 days prior to shipment; or
2. protected from culicoïdes attack for at least 28 days prior to shipment, and subjected during that period to a serological test to detect antibody to the BTV group, such as the BT competition ELISA or the BT AGID test, with negative results on two occasions, with an interval of not less than seven days between each test, the first test being carried out at least 21 days after introduction into the quarantine station; or
3. protected from culicoïdes attack for at least 14 days prior to shipment, and subjected during that period to a BTV isolation test or polymerase chain reaction test, with negative results, on blood samples taken on two occasions, with an interval of not less than seven days between each test, the first test being carried out at least seven days after introduction into the quarantine station; and
4. protected from culicoïdes attack during transportation to the place of shipment.
B. Semen must have been obtained from donors which have been:
1. protected from culicoïdes attack for at least 100 days before commencement of, and during, collection of the semen; or
2. subjected to a serological test to detect antibody to the BTV group such as the BT competition ELISA or the BT AGID test, with negative results, at least every 60 days throughout the collection period and between 28 and 60 days after the final collection for this consignment; or
3. subjected to a virus isolation test or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test on blood samples collected at commencement and conclusion of, and at least every seven days (virus isolation test) or at least every 28 days (PCR test) during, semen collection for this consignment, with negative results.
C. Ovas and embryos must have been obtained from donors which have been:
1. protected from culicoïdes attack for at least 100 days before commencement of and during, collection of the embryos/ovas; or
2. subjected to a serological test to detect antibody to the BTV group such as the BT competition ELISA or the BT AGID test, between 28 and 60 days after collection with negative results; or
3. subjected to a BTV isolation test or polymerase chain reaction test on a blood sample taken on the day of collection, with negative results.

Pending: 32003D0200

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria are to be established according to product groups.(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in due time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for each product group.(4) It is appropriate to revise the ecological criteria that were established by Commission Decision 1999/476/EC of 10 June 1999 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents(2) in order to reflect the developments in the market. At the same time, the period of validity of that Decision as extended by Decision 2002/172/EC(3) and the definition of the product group should be modified.(5) A new Decision should be adopted establishing the specific ecological criteria for this product group, which will be valid for a period of five years.(6) It is appropriate that, for a limited period of not more than 18 months, both the new criteria and the criteria established by Decision 1999/476/EC should be valid concurrently, in order to allow sufficient time for companies that have been awarded or that have applied for the award of the eco-label for their products prior to the date of application of this Decision to adapt those products to comply with the new criteria.(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are based on the draft criteria developed by the European Union Eco-labelling Board established under Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000.(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,

Article 1
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a laundry detergent must fall within the product group “laundry detergents” as defined in Article 2, and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
The product group “laundry detergents” shall comprise all laundry detergents, in powder, liquid or any other form, for the washing of textiles, and which are intended to be used principally in household machines, but not excluding the use in launderettes and common laundries.

Article 3
For administrative purposes the product group code number assigned to this product group shall be “6”.

Article 5
This Decision shall apply from 1 March 2003 until 29 February 2008.
Producers of products falling within the product group “laundry detergents” which have already been awarded the eco-label before 1 March 2003 may continue to use that label until 31 August 2004.
Producers of products falling within the product group “laundry detergents” which have already applied for the award of the eco-label before 1 March 2003 may be awarded the eco-label under the terms of Decision 1999/476/EC. In these cases the label may be used until 31 August 2004.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 February 2003.
For the Commission
Margot Wallström
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 52.
(3) OJ L 56, 27.2.2002, p. 32.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria are to be established according to product groups.(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in due time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for each product group.(4) It is appropriate to revise the ecological criteria that were established by Commission Decision 1999/476/EC of 10 June 1999 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents(2) in order to reflect the developments in the market. At the same time, the period of validity of that Decision as extended by Decision 2002/172/EC(3) and the definition of the product group should be modified.(5) A new Decision should be adopted establishing the specific ecological criteria for this product group, which will be valid for a period of five years.(6) It is appropriate that, for a limited period of not more than 18 months, both the new criteria and the criteria established by Decision 1999/476/EC should be valid concurrently, in order to allow sufficient time for companies that have been awarded or that have applied for the award of the eco-label for their products prior to the date of application of this Decision to adapt those products to comply with the new criteria.(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are based on the draft criteria developed by the European Union Eco-labelling Board established under Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000.(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a laundry detergent must fall within the product group “laundry detergents” as defined in Article 2, and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.
The product group “laundry detergents” shall comprise all laundry detergents, in powder, liquid or any other form, for the washing of textiles, and which are intended to be used principally in household machines, but not excluding the use in launderettes and common laundries.
For administrative purposes the product group code number assigned to this product group shall be “6”.
This Decision shall apply from 1 March 2003 until 29 February 2008.
Producers of products falling within the product group “laundry detergents” which have already been awarded the eco-label before 1 March 2003 may continue to use that label until 31 August 2004.
Producers of products falling within the product group “laundry detergents” which have already applied for the award of the eco-label before 1 March 2003 may be awarded the eco-label under the terms of Decision 1999/476/EC. In these cases the label may be used until 31 August 2004.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 February 2003.
For the Commission
Margot Wallström
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 52.
(3) OJ L 56, 27.2.2002, p. 32.
The aims of the criteria
These criteria aim in particular at promoting:
– savings of transport and energy by favouring compact laundry detergents,
– reduction of water pollution by reducing the volume of total chemicals used in the products and by limiting the use of potentially hazardous ingredients,
– the minimisation of waste production by reducing the amount of primary packaging.
Additionally, the criteria enhance the consumers’ environmental awareness. The criteria are set at levels that promote the labelling of laundry detergents that have a low environmental impact.
Assessment and verification requirements
The specific assessment and verification requirements are indicated within each criterion.
Where the applicant is required to provide declarations, documentation, analyses test reports, or other evidence to show compliance with the criteria, it is understood that these may originate from the applicant and/or his supplier(s) and/or their supplier(s), et cetera, as appropriate.
Where possible, the testing should be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements of EN ISO 17025 or equivalent.
Where appropriate, test methods other than those indicated for each criterion may be used if the Competent Body assessing the application accepts their equivalence.
The concentration of ingredients in the product, which implies a requirement for documentation of compliance with the ecological criteria, is generally defined at >= 0,1 % by weight of the preparation. This concentration is defined at >= 0,01 % by weight of the preparation for the criterion on dangerous, hazardous or toxic substances or preparations.
Appendix IA. presents the detergent ingredient database (DID list) which contains the most widely used ingredients used in detergent formulations. It shall be used for deriving the data for the calculations of CDVtox and for the assessment of the biodegradability of surfactants.
Where appropriate, the applicant may use subsequent revisions of the detergent ingredient database as they become available.
For ingredients which are not included in the DID list, the applicant shall, under his own responsibility, find the appropriate values for the relevant parameters by using the approach described in Appendix IB.
For ingredients, which are not listed in the DID list, the applicant may use an approach to provide the necessary documentation of anaerobic degradability described in Appendix IC.
Where appropriate, Competent Bodies may require supporting documentation and may carry out independent verifications.
The Competent Bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental management schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria (note: it is not required to implement such management schemes).
Functional unit and reference dosage
The functional unit is expressed in g/wash (grams per wash). For heavy-duty detergents this is related to the dosage per 4,5 kg load (dry textiles) and for low-duty detergents to the dosage per 2,5 kg load (dry textiles) in the washing machine. The dosage recommended by the manufacturer to consumers for the water hardness of 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l and “normally soiled” textiles is taken as the reference dosage for the calculation of the ecological criteria, and the test of washing performance. If the water hardness of 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l is not relevant in the Member States in which the detergent is marketed, the applicant shall specify the dosage used as the reference.
1. Total chemicals
Total chemicals are the recommended dosage in g/wash minus the water content.
The amount of total chemicals shall not exceed 100 g/wash.
Assessment and verification:
the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.
2. Insoluble inorganic ingredients
The total amount of insoluble inorganic ingredients at the recommended dosage shall be less than 30 g/wash.
Assessment and verification:
the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.
3. Toxicity to aquatic organisms
The critical dilution volume toxicity (CDVtox) is calculated for each ingredient (i) using the following equation:
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
where weight (i) is the weight of the ingredient per recommended dose, LF is the loading factor and LTE is the long-term toxicity effect concentration of the ingredient.
The values of the LF and LTE parameters shall be as given in the detergent ingredient database list (DID list) in Appendix 1A. If the ingredient in question is not included in the DID list, the applicant shall estimate their values following the approach described in Appendix 1B. The CDVtox is summed for each ingredient, making the CDVtox for the product:
CDVtox= Σ CDVtox(ingredient)
The CDVtox of the recommended dosage shall not exceed 4500 l/wash.
Assessment and verification:
the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with the details of the CDVtox calculations showing compliance with this criterion.
4. Phosphates
The total amount of phosphates (as sodium tripolyphosphate-STPP) at the recommended dosage shall not exceed 25 g/wash.
Assessment and verification:
the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.
5. Biodegradability of surfactants
(a) Ready biodegradability (aerobic)
Each surfactant used in the product shall be readily biodegradable.
Assessment and verification:
the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body. The DID list (see Appendix IA) indicates whether a specific surfactant is aerobically biodegradable or not (i.e. those that have an entry of “Y” in the column on aerobic non-biodegradability shall not be used). For surfactants which are not included in the DID list, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are aerobically biodegradable shall be provided. The tests for ready biodegradability shall be as referred to in Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances(1), and its subsequent amendments, in particular the methods detailed in Annex V.C4, or their equivalent OECD 301 A-F test methods, or their equivalent ISO tests. The 10 days window principle shall not apply. The pass levels shall be 70 % for the tests referred to in Annex V.C4(A) and C4(B) of Directive 67/548/EEC (and their equivalent OECD 301 A and E tests and ISO equivalents), and shall be 60 % for tests C4-C, D, E and F (and their equivalent OECD 301 B, C, D and F tests and ISO equivalents).
(b) Anaerobic biodegradability
Each surfactant used in the product shall be anaerobically biodegradable.
Assessment and verification:

Pending: 32003D0136

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever(1), and in particular Article 16(1), Article 20(2), Article 25(3) and Article 29(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) In 2001 classical swine fever was confirmed in the feral pig population in Luxembourg.(2) A plan to eradicate classical swine fever in the feral pig population from Luxembourg was approved by the Commission with Decision 2002/181/EC of 28 February 2002 approving the plan presented by Luxembourg for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in certain areas of Luxembourg(2).(3) In the light of the epidemiological situation, Luxembourg has submitted a plan for the emergency vaccination of feral pigs in Luxembourg.(4) The submitted plan has been examined and found to comply with the provisions of Directive 2001/89/EC.(5) The authorities of Luxembourg have authorised the use of a live attenuated vaccine against classical swine fever (C strain) to be used for the immunisation of feral pigs by means of oral baits.(6) The authorities of Luxembourg have undertaken: (i) to keep under continuous review the measures in place to control classical swine fever in Luxembourg in strict cooperation with the Commission services, in the light of the evolution in the epidemiological situation; and (ii) to improve the collection of demographic data on the feral pigs and the epidemiological information on which the eradication and vaccination plans which are approved by this Decision are based. The authorities of Luxembourg shall amend the plans approved by this Decision and submit them to the Commission for further approval, as necessary.(7) Classical swine fever has been confirmed in the feral pigs in France, at the border with Luxembourg. The eradication plan submitted by France was approved by Commission Decision 2002/626/EC of 25 July 2002 approving the plan submitted by France for the eradication of classical swine fever from feral pigs in Moselle and Meurthe-et-Moselle(3).(8) For the sake of clarity it is appropriate to adopt a single Decision: (i) confirming the approval of the plan submitted by Luxembourg for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs; (ii) approving the newly submitted plan for the emergency vaccination of feral pigs; (iii) establishing conditions to ensure, in the border areas concerned, the consistency of the measures to be implemented by Luxembourg with the measures applied by France; and (iv) repealing Decision 2002/181/EC.(9) For the sake of transparency it is appropriate to indicate in the present Decision the geographical areas where the eradication and emergency vaccination plans shall be implemented.(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

Article 1
The plan submitted by Luxembourg for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in Luxembourg is approved.

Article 2
The plan submitted by Luxembourg for the emergency vaccination of feral pigs against classical swine fever in Luxembourg is approved.

Article 3
Luxembourg shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for implementing the plans referred to in Articles 1 and 2 in the areas referred to in the Annex.

Article 4
Luxembourg shall adopt appropriate measures in a strip of its territory with a width of not less than 20 km from the border with France in order to:
(a) reduce as much as possible disturbance to the feral pig population causing long distance movements of feral pigs out of the area in question, taking into account natural and artificial barriers; and
(b) decrease the density of the feral pig population.
The above measures shall be adopted by Luxembourg in coordination and cooperation with the French authorities. They shall include regulation of hunting procedures, or, if necessary, suspension of hunting.

Article 5
Decision 2002/181/EC is repealed.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the French Republic.
Done at Brussels, 27 February 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5.
(2) OJ L 61, 2.3.2002, p. 54.
(3) OJ L 200, 30.7.2002, p. 37.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever(1), and in particular Article 16(1), Article 20(2), Article 25(3) and Article 29(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) In 2001 classical swine fever was confirmed in the feral pig population in Luxembourg.(2) A plan to eradicate classical swine fever in the feral pig population from Luxembourg was approved by the Commission with Decision 2002/181/EC of 28 February 2002 approving the plan presented by Luxembourg for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in certain areas of Luxembourg(2).(3) In the light of the epidemiological situation, Luxembourg has submitted a plan for the emergency vaccination of feral pigs in Luxembourg.(4) The submitted plan has been examined and found to comply with the provisions of Directive 2001/89/EC.(5) The authorities of Luxembourg have authorised the use of a live attenuated vaccine against classical swine fever (C strain) to be used for the immunisation of feral pigs by means of oral baits.(6) The authorities of Luxembourg have undertaken: (i) to keep under continuous review the measures in place to control classical swine fever in Luxembourg in strict cooperation with the Commission services, in the light of the evolution in the epidemiological situation; and (ii) to improve the collection of demographic data on the feral pigs and the epidemiological information on which the eradication and vaccination plans which are approved by this Decision are based. The authorities of Luxembourg shall amend the plans approved by this Decision and submit them to the Commission for further approval, as necessary.(7) Classical swine fever has been confirmed in the feral pigs in France, at the border with Luxembourg. The eradication plan submitted by France was approved by Commission Decision 2002/626/EC of 25 July 2002 approving the plan submitted by France for the eradication of classical swine fever from feral pigs in Moselle and Meurthe-et-Moselle(3).(8) For the sake of clarity it is appropriate to adopt a single Decision: (i) confirming the approval of the plan submitted by Luxembourg for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs; (ii) approving the newly submitted plan for the emergency vaccination of feral pigs; (iii) establishing conditions to ensure, in the border areas concerned, the consistency of the measures to be implemented by Luxembourg with the measures applied by France; and (iv) repealing Decision 2002/181/EC.(9) For the sake of transparency it is appropriate to indicate in the present Decision the geographical areas where the eradication and emergency vaccination plans shall be implemented.(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
The plan submitted by Luxembourg for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in Luxembourg is approved.
The plan submitted by Luxembourg for the emergency vaccination of feral pigs against classical swine fever in Luxembourg is approved.
Luxembourg shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for implementing the plans referred to in Articles 1 and 2 in the areas referred to in the Annex.
Luxembourg shall adopt appropriate measures in a strip of its territory with a width of not less than 20 km from the border with France in order to:
(a) reduce as much as possible disturbance to the feral pig population causing long distance movements of feral pigs out of the area in question, taking into account natural and artificial barriers; and
(b) decrease the density of the feral pig population.
The above measures shall be adopted by Luxembourg in coordination and cooperation with the French authorities. They shall include regulation of hunting procedures, or, if necessary, suspension of hunting.
Decision 2002/181/EC is repealed.
This Decision is addressed to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the French Republic.
Done at Brussels, 27 February 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5.
(2) OJ L 61, 2.3.2002, p. 54.
(3) OJ L 200, 30.7.2002, p. 37.
The whole territory of Luxembourg.

Pending: 32003D0061

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community(1), as last amended by Directive 2002/89/EC(2), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,Having regard to the requests made by Italy and Portugal,Whereas:(1) Under Directive 2000/29/EC, seed potato tubers originating in the American continent may not, in principle, be introduced into the Community. However, that Directive permits derogations from that rule, provided that it is established that there is no risk of spreading harmful organisms.(2) Since 1981, by a succession of decisions, the most recent being Commission Decision 1999/751/EC(3), derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2000/29/EC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Canada have been authorised, for limited periods and subject to specific conditions. The circumstances justifying those derogations are still valid.(3) Canada is now completely free from potato spindle tuber viroid but it is still not yet completely free from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. (“Clavibacter michiganensis”).(4) Information supplied by Canada has shown that it has further developed its programme to eradicate Clavibacter michiganensis in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island and it can reasonably be assumed that the eradication programme is effective in certain areas of those provinces. It can therefore be established that there is no risk of Clavibacter michiganensis spreading, provided that certain technical conditions are complied with.(5) The risk of establishing and spreading Clavibacter michiganensis is higher in wet and cold regions than in dry and warm regions. Consequently the authorisation to provide for derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2000/29/EC should not apply to Member States which are particularly exposed to such risks. Therefore, the authorisation should only apply to Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain.(6) Such authorisation to provide for derogations should apply for the next three seed-potato-marketing seasons, without prejudice to Council Directive 2002/56/EC(4) and to Council Directive 2002/53/EC(5).(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant health,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 11. Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are hereby authorised to provide for derogations from:(a) Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibition referred to in point 10 of Part A of Annex III to that Directive;(b) Article 5(1) and the third indent of Article 13(1)(a), as regards the special requirements referred to in points 25.2 and 25.3 of part A, section I of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC.2. The authorisation to provide for derogations referred to in paragraph 1 shall only apply:(a) to seed potatoes of the varieties “Atlantic”, “Donna”, “Kennebec”, “Russet Burbank”, “Sebago” and “Shepody”, originating in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island in Canada (“the seed potatoes”);(b) to seed potatoes that satisfy the conditions provided for in Articles 2 to 13 in addition to the requirements laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC;(c) for the potato-marketing-seasons from 1 February 2003 to 31 March 2003, from 1 December 2003 to 31 March 2004 and from 1 December 2004 to 31 March 2005.Article 21. In the provinces of Prince Edward Island or New Brunswick, the seed potatoes shall have been produced in fields located in an area that, irrespective of whether the fields are operated by potato producers inside or outside that area, meets the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 8.2. The area shall have been officially declared by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, to be free from both potato spindle tuber viroid and from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. (“Clavibacter michiganensis”).3. The area shall either,(a) consist of fields owned or rented by at least three distinct potato producers; or(b) cover a surface of at least four square kilometres, surrounded entirely by water or by fields where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 have not been found within the previous three years.4. All potatoes produced in the area shall be the first direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category “Pre-elite”, “Elite I”, “Elite II”, “Elite III” or “Elite IV” which were produced in establishments qualified to produce seed potatoes of the “Pre-elite” or “Elite I” categories and which are either official establishments or establishments officially designated and controlled for that purpose;5. The surface allocated for the production of seed potatoes that are not finally certified as seed potatoes shall not exceed one-fifth of the total area allocated for certification.6. Systematic and representative annual surveys shall have been carried out by the relevant official Canadian authorities over at least the previous five years under appropriate conditions for the detection of the harmful organisms referred to at paragraph 2, on all potato fields located in the area and on potatoes harvested there, including appropriate laboratory testing, and have not shown any positive finding, or any other element which could militate against the declaration of the area as disease-free.7. Legislative, administrative or other arrangements shall have been made to ensure that:(a) no potatoes from areas of Canada other than those declared disease-free, or in countries where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 are known to occur, can be introduced into the area;(b) neither potatoes originating in the area nor any containers, packaging material, vehicles and handling, grading and preparation equipment used in such areas can be brought into contact with potatoes originating, or material or equipment as specified used, in areas other than those areas declared disease-free.8. Prior to the introduction of the seed potatoes within the Community, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency shall have provided the Commission with a complete list of the areas declared as disease-free, supported by a technical report, updated each year, on the phytosanitary status of seed potato production in the previous year.Article 3The seed potatoes shall be certified officially by the relevant Canadian authorities as seed potatoes meeting at least the conditions laid down for the “Foundation” category.Article 41. Samples of at least 200 seed potato tubers per lot of 25 tonnes or less shall be taken officially in respect of each lot intended for export to the Community.2. A lot shall consist only of seed potato tubers of one single variety and class which have been produced on one single establishment and with the same reference number.3. The samples shall be examined by official laboratories in order to detect any presence of Clavibacter michiganensis. The examinations shall be carried out on the entire sample, using the method for the detection and diagnosis of the ring rot bacterium in batches of seed potato tubers as laid down in Council Directive 93/85/EEC(6).Article 5Seed potatoes intended to be exported to the Community shall have been subject to legislative, administrative or other arrangements to ensure:(a) direct supervision and control by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency of:(i) the sampling process, i.e. the collection, tagging and sealing;(ii) the labelling system through appropriate label accountability procedures, so that for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment shipped to the Community a numbered label is used and stitched on the bags separately from the certification labels;(iii) the relevant colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State;(b) that at the time of loading the vessel, two sealed bags of seed potatoes of each lot shipped to the Community are kept aside and stored under the supervision and control of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, at least until the results of the examinations referred to in Article 10 are completed;(c) that the lots are kept separate in all operations including transport, at least until delivery to the premises of the importers referred to in Article 7.Article 61. The phytosanitary certificate required shall be made out separately for each consignment and only if it has been established by the scientists involved that the examinations referred to in Article 4 did not give rise to suspicions or to the detection of the presence of Clavibacter michiganensis in the consignment and that, in particular, the IF-testing was shown to be negative.2. The phytosanitary certificate shall contain the following information under “Additional declaration”:(a) confirmation of compliance with the conditions laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4;(b) the name of the establishment or establishments that have produced the lots of seed potato;(c) the relevant seed potato certification lot numbers;(d) the name of the area referred to in Article 2;(e) the name of the establishment referred to in Article 2(4); and(f) the number of bags.3. The phytosanitary certificate shall mention, under “Distinguishing marks”, the colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State, as well as the details of the numbered label used for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment.4. Documents attached to the phytosanitary certificate, as an integral part of the certificate, shall relate precisely to that certificate in both description and quantity of the seed potatoes.Article 71. Prior to introduction into the Community, the importer shall provide advance notification of each introduction of a consignment sufficiently in advance to the responsible official bodies in the Member State concerned as referred to in Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2000/29/EC, giving details of the following:(a) the variety of the seed potatoes;(b) the quantity;(c) the declared date of import;(d) the names and addresses of the premises of the importers of the seed potatoes, and those listed in accordance with the provisions of

Article 1
1. Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are hereby authorised to provide for derogations from:
(a) Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibition referred to in point 10 of Part A of Annex III to that Directive;
(b) Article 5(1) and the third indent of Article 13(1)(a), as regards the special requirements referred to in points 25.2 and 25.3 of part A, section I of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC.
2. The authorisation to provide for derogations referred to in paragraph 1 shall only apply:
(a) to seed potatoes of the varieties “Atlantic”, “Donna”, “Kennebec”, “Russet Burbank”, “Sebago” and “Shepody”, originating in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island in Canada (“the seed potatoes”);
(b) to seed potatoes that satisfy the conditions provided for in Articles 2 to 13 in addition to the requirements laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC;
(c) for the potato-marketing-seasons from 1 February 2003 to 31 March 2003, from 1 December 2003 to 31 March 2004 and from 1 December 2004 to 31 March 2005.

Article 2
1. In the provinces of Prince Edward Island or New Brunswick, the seed potatoes shall have been produced in fields located in an area that, irrespective of whether the fields are operated by potato producers inside or outside that area, meets the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 8.
2. The area shall have been officially declared by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, to be free from both potato spindle tuber viroid and from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. (“Clavibacter michiganensis”).
3. The area shall either,
(a) consist of fields owned or rented by at least three distinct potato producers; or
(b) cover a surface of at least four square kilometres, surrounded entirely by water or by fields where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 have not been found within the previous three years.
4. All potatoes produced in the area shall be the first direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category “Pre-elite”, “Elite I”, “Elite II”, “Elite III” or “Elite IV” which were produced in establishments qualified to produce seed potatoes of the “Pre-elite” or “Elite I” categories and which are either official establishments or establishments officially designated and controlled for that purpose;
5. The surface allocated for the production of seed potatoes that are not finally certified as seed potatoes shall not exceed one-fifth of the total area allocated for certification.
6. Systematic and representative annual surveys shall have been carried out by the relevant official Canadian authorities over at least the previous five years under appropriate conditions for the detection of the harmful organisms referred to at paragraph 2, on all potato fields located in the area and on potatoes harvested there, including appropriate laboratory testing, and have not shown any positive finding, or any other element which could militate against the declaration of the area as disease-free.
7. Legislative, administrative or other arrangements shall have been made to ensure that:
(a) no potatoes from areas of Canada other than those declared disease-free, or in countries where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 are known to occur, can be introduced into the area;
(b) neither potatoes originating in the area nor any containers, packaging material, vehicles and handling, grading and preparation equipment used in such areas can be brought into contact with potatoes originating, or material or equipment as specified used, in areas other than those areas declared disease-free.
8. Prior to the introduction of the seed potatoes within the Community, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency shall have provided the Commission with a complete list of the areas declared as disease-free, supported by a technical report, updated each year, on the phytosanitary status of seed potato production in the previous year.

Article 3
The seed potatoes shall be certified officially by the relevant Canadian authorities as seed potatoes meeting at least the conditions laid down for the “Foundation” category.

Article 4
1. Samples of at least 200 seed potato tubers per lot of 25 tonnes or less shall be taken officially in respect of each lot intended for export to the Community.
2. A lot shall consist only of seed potato tubers of one single variety and class which have been produced on one single establishment and with the same reference number.
3. The samples shall be examined by official laboratories in order to detect any presence of Clavibacter michiganensis. The examinations shall be carried out on the entire sample, using the method for the detection and diagnosis of the ring rot bacterium in batches of seed potato tubers as laid down in Council Directive 93/85/EEC(6).

Article 5
Seed potatoes intended to be exported to the Community shall have been subject to legislative, administrative or other arrangements to ensure:
(a) direct supervision and control by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency of:
(i) the sampling process, i.e. the collection, tagging and sealing;
(ii) the labelling system through appropriate label accountability procedures, so that for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment shipped to the Community a numbered label is used and stitched on the bags separately from the certification labels;
(iii) the relevant colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State;
(b) that at the time of loading the vessel, two sealed bags of seed potatoes of each lot shipped to the Community are kept aside and stored under the supervision and control of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, at least until the results of the examinations referred to in Article 10 are completed;
(c) that the lots are kept separate in all operations including transport, at least until delivery to the premises of the importers referred to in Article 7.

Article 6
1. The phytosanitary certificate required shall be made out separately for each consignment and only if it has been established by the scientists involved that the examinations referred to in Article 4 did not give rise to suspicions or to the detection of the presence of Clavibacter michiganensis in the consignment and that, in particular, the IF-testing was shown to be negative.
2. The phytosanitary certificate shall contain the following information under “Additional declaration”:
(a) confirmation of compliance with the conditions laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4;
(b) the name of the establishment or establishments that have produced the lots of seed potato;
(c) the relevant seed potato certification lot numbers;
(d) the name of the area referred to in Article 2;
(e) the name of the establishment referred to in Article 2(4); and
(f) the number of bags.
3. The phytosanitary certificate shall mention, under “Distinguishing marks”, the colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State, as well as the details of the numbered label used for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment.
4. Documents attached to the phytosanitary certificate, as an integral part of the certificate, shall relate precisely to that certificate in both description and quantity of the seed potatoes.

Article 7
1. Prior to introduction into the Community, the importer shall provide advance notification of each introduction of a consignment sufficiently in advance to the responsible official bodies in the Member State concerned as referred to in Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2000/29/EC, giving details of the following:
(a) the variety of the seed potatoes;
(b) the quantity;
(c) the declared date of import;
(d) the names and addresses of the premises of the importers of the seed potatoes, and those listed in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 of Commission Directive 93/50/EEC(7).
The Member State concerned shall, without delay, convey those details and any subsequent modifications thereto to the Commission.
2. At the time of introduction, the importer shall provide confirmation of the details contained in the advance notification referred to in paragraph 1 to the responsible official bodies in the Member State concerned.

Article 8
The seed potatoes may only be introduced into the Community via the following ports:
(a) Aveiro;
(b) Lisbon;
(e) La Spezia;
(f) Livorno;
(g) Naples;
(h) Ravenna;
(i) Salerno;
(j) Savona.

Article 9
The inspections required pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 13(8) of Directive 2000/29/EC shall be made by responsible official bodies.
Without prejudice to the monitoring referred to in the second indent of Article 21(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC, the Commission shall determine to which extent the inspections referred to in the second indent of Article 21(3), of that Directive shall be integrated into the inspection programme in accordance with the fifth subparagraph of Article 21(5) of that Directive.
The responsible official bodies and, as appropriate, the experts referred to in Article 21(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC shall check the importers premises to confirm details of the quantities of seed potatoes imported from Canada, the colour coding, the numbered labels and the destinations for planting at premises listed under Article 1 of Directive 93/50/EEC.

Article 10
1. The responsible official bodies of the importing Member States shall take a sample of at least 200 tubers per lot of 25 tonnes or less from each of the non-bulk lots of seed potatoes intended to be imported pursuant to this Decision for official examination in respect of Clavibacter michiganensis in accordance with the method for the detection and diagnosis of Clavibacter michiganensis as laid down in Council Directive 93/85/EEC.
2. The lots of seed potatoes shall remain separate under official control and may not be marketed or used until it has been established that the presence of Clavibacter michiganensis was not suspected or detected in the examinations referred to in paragraph 1. The total lots imported shall not exceed an amount which is adequate for the examinations, taking into account the facilities available for that purpose.
3. The samples referred to in paragraph 1 shall be kept available for subsequent examination by other Member States. The responsible official bodies of the importing Member State shall by 15 April 2003, by 15 April 2004 and by 15 April 2005 inform the Commission, with a view to organising that examination and the recording thereof.

Article 11
The seed potatoes shall be planted only at premises within the Member State of import, for which it is possible to trace the names and addresses thereof. However, this restriction shall not apply in the case of final users planting the imported seed potatoes or for users who sell only onto the local market.
For those premises, the potatoes grown from such seed potatoes shall be packaged and labelled accordingly and shall bear the number of the premises listed in accordance with Directive 93/50/EEC, as well as the Canadian origin of the seed potatoes used. Such potatoes may be moved within the Member States, only after approval by the responsible official bodies taking into account the results of the inspection referred to in Article 12.

Article 12
In the growing period following introduction, a suitable proportion of the plants shall be inspected by the responsible official bodies, at appropriate times, at the premises listed in accordance with the provisions of Directive 93/50/EEC or the premises referred to in Article 11.

Article 13
Potatoes grown from seed potatoes introduced pursuant to this Decision:
(a) shall not be certified as seed potatoes; and
(b) shall only be used as potatoes for consumption.

Article 14
The Member States of importation shall inform the other Member States and the Commission by means of the advance notification as referred to in Article 7 of any use of the authorisation to provide derogations pursuant to this Decision.
The Member States of importation shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 1 June 2003, 1 June 2004 and 1 June 2005, with information on the amounts (lots of seed potatoes/consignments) imported pursuant to this Decision and with a detailed technical report on the official examination referred to in Article 10.
In those cases where Member States have made official examinations on the samples as referred to in Article 10, the detailed technical reports of such examinations shall be submitted to the other Member States and Commission before 1 June 2003, 1 June 2004 and 1 June 2005.
Copies of each phytosanitary certificate shall be transmitted to the Commission.

Article 15
The authorisation to provide for derogations referred to Article 1 shall be revoked prior to 31 March 2005 if:
(a) the provisions laid down in Articles 2 to 13:
(i) are shown to be insufficient to prevent the introduction into the Community of Clavibacter michiganensis, or
(ii) have not been complied with;
(b) there are elements which would militate against the proper functioning of the “disease-free” concept in Canada.

Article 16
This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic and the Portuguese Republic.
Done at Brussels, 27 January 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 45.
(3) OJ L 299, 20.11.1999, p. 36.
(4) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 60.
(5) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 259, 18.10.1993, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 205, 17.8.1993, p. 22.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community(1), as last amended by Directive 2002/89/EC(2), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,Having regard to the requests made by Italy and Portugal,Whereas:(1) Under Directive 2000/29/EC, seed potato tubers originating in the American continent may not, in principle, be introduced into the Community. However, that Directive permits derogations from that rule, provided that it is established that there is no risk of spreading harmful organisms.(2) Since 1981, by a succession of decisions, the most recent being Commission Decision 1999/751/EC(3), derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2000/29/EC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Canada have been authorised, for limited periods and subject to specific conditions. The circumstances justifying those derogations are still valid.(3) Canada is now completely free from potato spindle tuber viroid but it is still not yet completely free from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. (“Clavibacter michiganensis”).(4) Information supplied by Canada has shown that it has further developed its programme to eradicate Clavibacter michiganensis in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island and it can reasonably be assumed that the eradication programme is effective in certain areas of those provinces. It can therefore be established that there is no risk of Clavibacter michiganensis spreading, provided that certain technical conditions are complied with.(5) The risk of establishing and spreading Clavibacter michiganensis is higher in wet and cold regions than in dry and warm regions. Consequently the authorisation to provide for derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2000/29/EC should not apply to Member States which are particularly exposed to such risks. Therefore, the authorisation should only apply to Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain.(6) Such authorisation to provide for derogations should apply for the next three seed-potato-marketing seasons, without prejudice to Council Directive 2002/56/EC(4) and to Council Directive 2002/53/EC(5).(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant health,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 11. Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are hereby authorised to provide for derogations from:(a) Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibition referred to in point 10 of Part A of Annex III to that Directive;(b) Article 5(1) and the third indent of Article 13(1)(a), as regards the special requirements referred to in points 25.2 and 25.3 of part A, section I of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC.2. The authorisation to provide for derogations referred to in paragraph 1 shall only apply:(a) to seed potatoes of the varieties “Atlantic”, “Donna”, “Kennebec”, “Russet Burbank”, “Sebago” and “Shepody”, originating in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island in Canada (“the seed potatoes”);(b) to seed potatoes that satisfy the conditions provided for in Articles 2 to 13 in addition to the requirements laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC;(c) for the potato-marketing-seasons from 1 February 2003 to 31 March 2003, from 1 December 2003 to 31 March 2004 and from 1 December 2004 to 31 March 2005.Article 21. In the provinces of Prince Edward Island or New Brunswick, the seed potatoes shall have been produced in fields located in an area that, irrespective of whether the fields are operated by potato producers inside or outside that area, meets the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 8.2. The area shall have been officially declared by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, to be free from both potato spindle tuber viroid and from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. (“Clavibacter michiganensis”).3. The area shall either,(a) consist of fields owned or rented by at least three distinct potato producers; or(b) cover a surface of at least four square kilometres, surrounded entirely by water or by fields where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 have not been found within the previous three years.4. All potatoes produced in the area shall be the first direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category “Pre-elite”, “Elite I”, “Elite II”, “Elite III” or “Elite IV” which were produced in establishments qualified to produce seed potatoes of the “Pre-elite” or “Elite I” categories and which are either official establishments or establishments officially designated and controlled for that purpose;5. The surface allocated for the production of seed potatoes that are not finally certified as seed potatoes shall not exceed one-fifth of the total area allocated for certification.6. Systematic and representative annual surveys shall have been carried out by the relevant official Canadian authorities over at least the previous five years under appropriate conditions for the detection of the harmful organisms referred to at paragraph 2, on all potato fields located in the area and on potatoes harvested there, including appropriate laboratory testing, and have not shown any positive finding, or any other element which could militate against the declaration of the area as disease-free.7. Legislative, administrative or other arrangements shall have been made to ensure that:(a) no potatoes from areas of Canada other than those declared disease-free, or in countries where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 are known to occur, can be introduced into the area;(b) neither potatoes originating in the area nor any containers, packaging material, vehicles and handling, grading and preparation equipment used in such areas can be brought into contact with potatoes originating, or material or equipment as specified used, in areas other than those areas declared disease-free.8. Prior to the introduction of the seed potatoes within the Community, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency shall have provided the Commission with a complete list of the areas declared as disease-free, supported by a technical report, updated each year, on the phytosanitary status of seed potato production in the previous year.Article 3The seed potatoes shall be certified officially by the relevant Canadian authorities as seed potatoes meeting at least the conditions laid down for the “Foundation” category.Article 41. Samples of at least 200 seed potato tubers per lot of 25 tonnes or less shall be taken officially in respect of each lot intended for export to the Community.2. A lot shall consist only of seed potato tubers of one single variety and class which have been produced on one single establishment and with the same reference number.3. The samples shall be examined by official laboratories in order to detect any presence of Clavibacter michiganensis. The examinations shall be carried out on the entire sample, using the method for the detection and diagnosis of the ring rot bacterium in batches of seed potato tubers as laid down in Council Directive 93/85/EEC(6).Article 5Seed potatoes intended to be exported to the Community shall have been subject to legislative, administrative or other arrangements to ensure:(a) direct supervision and control by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency of:(i) the sampling process, i.e. the collection, tagging and sealing;(ii) the labelling system through appropriate label accountability procedures, so that for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment shipped to the Community a numbered label is used and stitched on the bags separately from the certification labels;(iii) the relevant colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State;(b) that at the time of loading the vessel, two sealed bags of seed potatoes of each lot shipped to the Community are kept aside and stored under the supervision and control of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, at least until the results of the examinations referred to in Article 10 are completed;(c) that the lots are kept separate in all operations including transport, at least until delivery to the premises of the importers referred to in Article 7.Article 61. The phytosanitary certificate required shall be made out separately for each consignment and only if it has been established by the scientists involved that the examinations referred to in Article 4 did not give rise to suspicions or to the detection of the presence of Clavibacter michiganensis in the consignment and that, in particular, the IF-testing was shown to be negative.2. The phytosanitary certificate shall contain the following information under “Additional declaration”:(a) confirmation of compliance with the conditions laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4;(b) the name of the establishment or establishments that have produced the lots of seed potato;(c) the relevant seed potato certification lot numbers;(d) the name of the area referred to in Article 2;(e) the name of the establishment referred to in Article 2(4); and(f) the number of bags.3. The phytosanitary certificate shall mention, under “Distinguishing marks”, the colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State, as well as the details of the numbered label used for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment.4. Documents attached to the phytosanitary certificate, as an integral part of the certificate, shall relate precisely to that certificate in both description and quantity of the seed potatoes.Article 71. Prior to introduction into the Community, the importer shall provide advance notification of each introduction of a consignment sufficiently in advance to the responsible official bodies in the Member State concerned as referred to in Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2000/29/EC, giving details of the following:(a) the variety of the seed potatoes;(b) the quantity;(c) the declared date of import;(d) the names and addresses of the premises of the importers of the seed potatoes, and those listed in accordance with the provisions of
1. Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are hereby authorised to provide for derogations from:
(a) Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, with regard to the prohibition referred to in point 10 of Part A of Annex III to that Directive;
(b) Article 5(1) and the third indent of Article 13(1)(a), as regards the special requirements referred to in points 25.2 and 25.3 of part A, section I of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC.
2. The authorisation to provide for derogations referred to in paragraph 1 shall only apply:
(a) to seed potatoes of the varieties “Atlantic”, “Donna”, “Kennebec”, “Russet Burbank”, “Sebago” and “Shepody”, originating in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island in Canada (“the seed potatoes”);
(b) to seed potatoes that satisfy the conditions provided for in Articles 2 to 13 in addition to the requirements laid down in Annexes I, II and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC;
(c) for the potato-marketing-seasons from 1 February 2003 to 31 March 2003, from 1 December 2003 to 31 March 2004 and from 1 December 2004 to 31 March 2005.
1. In the provinces of Prince Edward Island or New Brunswick, the seed potatoes shall have been produced in fields located in an area that, irrespective of whether the fields are operated by potato producers inside or outside that area, meets the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 8.
2. The area shall have been officially declared by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, to be free from both potato spindle tuber viroid and from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. (“Clavibacter michiganensis”).
3. The area shall either,
(a) consist of fields owned or rented by at least three distinct potato producers; or
(b) cover a surface of at least four square kilometres, surrounded entirely by water or by fields where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 have not been found within the previous three years.
4. All potatoes produced in the area shall be the first direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category “Pre-elite”, “Elite I”, “Elite II”, “Elite III” or “Elite IV” which were produced in establishments qualified to produce seed potatoes of the “Pre-elite” or “Elite I” categories and which are either official establishments or establishments officially designated and controlled for that purpose;
5. The surface allocated for the production of seed potatoes that are not finally certified as seed potatoes shall not exceed one-fifth of the total area allocated for certification.
6. Systematic and representative annual surveys shall have been carried out by the relevant official Canadian authorities over at least the previous five years under appropriate conditions for the detection of the harmful organisms referred to at paragraph 2, on all potato fields located in the area and on potatoes harvested there, including appropriate laboratory testing, and have not shown any positive finding, or any other element which could militate against the declaration of the area as disease-free.
7. Legislative, administrative or other arrangements shall have been made to ensure that:
(a) no potatoes from areas of Canada other than those declared disease-free, or in countries where the harmful organisms referred to in paragraph 2 are known to occur, can be introduced into the area;
(b) neither potatoes originating in the area nor any containers, packaging material, vehicles and handling, grading and preparation equipment used in such areas can be brought into contact with potatoes originating, or material or equipment as specified used, in areas other than those areas declared disease-free.
8. Prior to the introduction of the seed potatoes within the Community, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency shall have provided the Commission with a complete list of the areas declared as disease-free, supported by a technical report, updated each year, on the phytosanitary status of seed potato production in the previous year.
The seed potatoes shall be certified officially by the relevant Canadian authorities as seed potatoes meeting at least the conditions laid down for the “Foundation” category.
1. Samples of at least 200 seed potato tubers per lot of 25 tonnes or less shall be taken officially in respect of each lot intended for export to the Community.
2. A lot shall consist only of seed potato tubers of one single variety and class which have been produced on one single establishment and with the same reference number.
3. The samples shall be examined by official laboratories in order to detect any presence of Clavibacter michiganensis. The examinations shall be carried out on the entire sample, using the method for the detection and diagnosis of the ring rot bacterium in batches of seed potato tubers as laid down in Council Directive 93/85/EEC(6).
Seed potatoes intended to be exported to the Community shall have been subject to legislative, administrative or other arrangements to ensure:
(a) direct supervision and control by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency of:
(i) the sampling process, i.e. the collection, tagging and sealing;
(ii) the labelling system through appropriate label accountability procedures, so that for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment shipped to the Community a numbered label is used and stitched on the bags separately from the certification labels;
(iii) the relevant colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State;
(b) that at the time of loading the vessel, two sealed bags of seed potatoes of each lot shipped to the Community are kept aside and stored under the supervision and control of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, at least until the results of the examinations referred to in Article 10 are completed;
(c) that the lots are kept separate in all operations including transport, at least until delivery to the premises of the importers referred to in Article 7.
1. The phytosanitary certificate required shall be made out separately for each consignment and only if it has been established by the scientists involved that the examinations referred to in Article 4 did not give rise to suspicions or to the detection of the presence of Clavibacter michiganensis in the consignment and that, in particular, the IF-testing was shown to be negative.
2. The phytosanitary certificate shall contain the following information under “Additional declaration”:
(a) confirmation of compliance with the conditions laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4;
(b) the name of the establishment or establishments that have produced the lots of seed potato;
(c) the relevant seed potato certification lot numbers;
(d) the name of the area referred to in Article 2;
(e) the name of the establishment referred to in Article 2(4); and
(f) the number of bags.
3. The phytosanitary certificate shall mention, under “Distinguishing marks”, the colour code corresponding to a specified importer in the importing Member State, as well as the details of the numbered label used for each lot of seed potatoes within each consignment.
4. Documents attached to the phytosanitary certificate, as an integral part of the certificate, shall relate precisely to that certificate in both description and quantity of the seed potatoes.
1. Prior to introduction into the Community, the importer shall provide advance notification of each introduction of a consignment sufficiently in advance to the responsible official bodies in the Member State concerned as referred to in Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2000/29/EC, giving details of the following:
(a) the variety of the seed potatoes;
(b) the quantity;
(c) the declared date of import;
(d) the names and addresses of the premises of the importers of the seed potatoes, and those listed in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 of Commission Directive 93/50/EEC(7).
The Member State concerned shall, without delay, convey those details and any subsequent modifications thereto to the Commission.
2. At the time of introduction, the importer shall provide confirmation of the details contained in the advance notification referred to in paragraph 1 to the responsible official bodies in the Member State concerned.
The seed potatoes may only be introduced into the Community via the following ports:
(a) Aveiro;
(b) Lisbon;
(e) La Spezia;
(f) Livorno;
(g) Naples;
(h) Ravenna;
(i) Salerno;
(j) Savona.
The inspections required pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 13(8) of Directive 2000/29/EC shall be made by responsible official bodies.
Without prejudice to the monitoring referred to in the second indent of Article 21(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC, the Commission shall determine to which extent the inspections referred to in the second indent of Article 21(3), of that Directive shall be integrated into the inspection programme in accordance with the fifth subparagraph of Article 21(5) of that Directive.
The responsible official bodies and, as appropriate, the experts referred to in Article 21(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC shall check the importers premises to confirm details of the quantities of seed potatoes imported from Canada, the colour coding, the numbered labels and the destinations for planting at premises listed under Article 1 of Directive 93/50/EEC.
1. The responsible official bodies of the importing Member States shall take a sample of at least 200 tubers per lot of 25 tonnes or less from each of the non-bulk lots of seed potatoes intended to be imported pursuant to this Decision for official examination in respect of Clavibacter michiganensis in accordance with the method for the detection and diagnosis of Clavibacter michiganensis as laid down in Council Directive 93/85/EEC.
2. The lots of seed potatoes shall remain separate under official control and may not be marketed or used until it has been established that the presence of Clavibacter michiganensis was not suspected or detected in the examinations referred to in paragraph 1. The total lots imported shall not exceed an amount which is adequate for the examinations, taking into account the facilities available for that purpose.
3. The samples referred to in paragraph 1 shall be kept available for subsequent examination by other Member States. The responsible official bodies of the importing Member State shall by 15 April 2003, by 15 April 2004 and by 15 April 2005 inform the Commission, with a view to organising that examination and the recording thereof.
The seed potatoes shall be planted only at premises within the Member State of import, for which it is possible to trace the names and addresses thereof. However, this restriction shall not apply in the case of final users planting the imported seed potatoes or for users who sell only onto the local market.
For those premises, the potatoes grown from such seed potatoes shall be packaged and labelled accordingly and shall bear the number of the premises listed in accordance with Directive 93/50/EEC, as well as the Canadian origin of the seed potatoes used. Such potatoes may be moved within the Member States, only after approval by the responsible official bodies taking into account the results of the inspection referred to in Article 12.
In the growing period following introduction, a suitable proportion of the plants shall be inspected by the responsible official bodies, at appropriate times, at the premises listed in accordance with the provisions of Directive 93/50/EEC or the premises referred to in Article 11.
Potatoes grown from seed potatoes introduced pursuant to this Decision:
(a) shall not be certified as seed potatoes; and
(b) shall only be used as potatoes for consumption.
The Member States of importation shall inform the other Member States and the Commission by means of the advance notification as referred to in Article 7 of any use of the authorisation to provide derogations pursuant to this Decision.
The Member States of importation shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 1 June 2003, 1 June 2004 and 1 June 2005, with information on the amounts (lots of seed potatoes/consignments) imported pursuant to this Decision and with a detailed technical report on the official examination referred to in Article 10.
In those cases where Member States have made official examinations on the samples as referred to in Article 10, the detailed technical reports of such examinations shall be submitted to the other Member States and Commission before 1 June 2003, 1 June 2004 and 1 June 2005.
Copies of each phytosanitary certificate shall be transmitted to the Commission.
The authorisation to provide for derogations referred to Article 1 shall be revoked prior to 31 March 2005 if:
(a) the provisions laid down in Articles 2 to 13:
(i) are shown to be insufficient to prevent the introduction into the Community of Clavibacter michiganensis, or
(ii) have not been complied with;
(b) there are elements which would militate against the proper functioning of the “disease-free” concept in Canada.
This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic and the Portuguese Republic.
Done at Brussels, 27 January 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 45.
(3) OJ L 299, 20.11.1999, p. 36.
(4) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 60.
(5) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 259, 18.10.1993, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 205, 17.8.1993, p. 22.

Pending: 32002D2235

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(3),Whereas:(1) In the internal market, the effective, uniform and efficient application of Community law is essential for the functioning of taxation systems, in particular for the protection of national and Community financial interests through combating tax evasion and tax avoidance, avoiding distortions of competition and reducing burdens on administrations and taxpayers. Achieving this effective, uniform and efficient application is a matter for the Community acting in partnership with the Member States.(2) Decision No 888/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 1998 establishing a programme of Community action to ameliorate the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme)(4) has significantly contributed to the achievement of those overall objectives for the period 1998 to 2002. It is therefore considered desirable to continue the Fiscalis programme for another five-year period.(3) Efficient, effective and extensive cooperation among the present and future Member States and between them and the Commission is important for the functioning of the taxation systems in the internal market.(4) The experience gained by the Community from the Fiscalis programme has shown that exchanges, seminars and multilateral control exercises could achieve the objectives of the programme by bringing officials from different national administrations together in professional activities. Those activities should therefore be continued, but extended to cover taxes on income, on capital and on insurance premiums.(5) The establishment and functioning of a communication and information exchange infrastructure has a vital part to play in reinforcing the taxation systems within the Community. In particular, the VAT information exchange system (VIES), referred to in Council Regulation (EEC) No 218/92 of 27 January 1992 on administrative cooperation in the field of indirect taxation (VAT)(5), has shown the value of information technology in protecting revenue whilst minimising administrative burdens.(6) In order to ensure uniform application of Community law, it is essential that officials responsible for taxation have a high common standard of understanding of Community law and its implementation in the present and future Member States. Such a standard can be achieved only through effective initial and continuing training provided by the present and future Member States. Supplementary Community action is useful to coordinate and foster such training.(7) The experience gained from the Fiscalis programme has indicated that the coordinated development and implementation of a common training programme could attain the objectives of this programme, in particular by achieving a higher common standard of understanding of Community law.(8) A sufficient standard of linguistic competence on the part of taxation officials has proved to be essential to facilitate cooperation. Participating countries should therefore provide the necessary language training for their officials.(9) Although the primary responsibility for achieving these objectives rests with the participating countries, supplementary Community action is needed for the coordination of such activities as well as for the provision of an infrastructure and the necessary stimulus. Since the objectives of the measures laid down in this Decision cannot all be sufficiently achieved by the participating countries and can therefore, by reason of the scale and the effect of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.(10) This Decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the prime reference, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(6), for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure.(11) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(7),HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:CHAPTER ISCOPE AND OBJECTIVESArticle 1Fiscalis programme1. A multiannual Community action programme (Fiscalis 2003-2007), hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, is hereby established for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007 to improve the operation of the taxation systems in the internal market.2. The activities of the programme shall consist of:(a) communication and information-exchange systems;(b) multilateral controls involving Member States and those candidate countries which have bilateral or multilateral agreements either with one another or with Member States permitting such activity;(c) seminars;(d) exchanges;(e) training activities;(f) any other working meetings, visits or similar activities in the context of the programme’s objectives as stated in Article 3 which shall be decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).Article 2DefinitionsFor the purpose of this Decision:(a) “taxation” shall mean the following taxes applied in the participating countries:(i) value added tax;(ii) excise duties on alcohol and tobacco products and mineral oils;(iii) taxes on income and on capital as defined in

Article 1
Fiscalis programme
1. A multiannual Community action programme (Fiscalis 2003-2007), hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, is hereby established for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007 to improve the operation of the taxation systems in the internal market.
2. The activities of the programme shall consist of:
(a) communication and information-exchange systems;
(b) multilateral controls involving Member States and those candidate countries which have bilateral or multilateral agreements either with one another or with Member States permitting such activity;
(c) seminars;
(d) exchanges;
(e) training activities;
(f) any other working meetings, visits or similar activities in the context of the programme’s objectives as stated in Article 3 which shall be decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).

Article 2
Definitions
For the purpose of this Decision:
(a) “taxation” shall mean the following taxes applied in the participating countries:
(i) value added tax;
(ii) excise duties on alcohol and tobacco products and mineral oils;
(iii) taxes on income and on capital as defined in Article 1(2) of Council Directive 77/799/EEC of 19 December 1977 concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation(8);
(iv) taxes on insurance premiums as defined in Article 3 of Council Directive 76/308/EEC of 15 March 1976 on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures(9);
(b) “administration” shall mean the public authorities in the participating countries responsible for administering taxation;
(c) “participating countries” shall mean the Member States and the countries referred to in Article 4, which effectively participate in the programme;
(d) “official” shall mean an official of the administration;
(e) “exchange” shall mean a working visit organised under the programme of an official from an administration in another participating country;
(f) “multilateral control” shall mean a coordinated control of the tax liability of one or more related taxable persons, which is organised by several participating countries and has a common or complementary interest.

Article 3
1. The overall objective of the programme shall be to improve the proper functioning of the taxation systems in the internal market by increasing cooperation between participating countries, their administrations and officials.
2. The specific objectives of the programme shall be:
(a) for value added tax and excise duties:
(i) to enable officials to achieve a high common standard of understanding of Community law and of its implementation in Member States;
(ii) to secure efficient, effective and extensive cooperation among Member States;
(iii) to ensure the continuing improvement of administration procedures to take account of the needs of administrations and taxpayers through the development and dissemination of good administrative practice;
(b) for direct taxation:
to provide support for information exchange in the field of mutual assistance and to raise awareness of Community law applicable in the field of direct taxation;
(c) for taxes on insurance premiums:
to improve cooperation between Member States, ensuring better application of the existing rules;
(d) for the candidate countries:
to meet the special needs of candidate countries so that they take the necessary measures for accession in the field of tax legislation and administrative capacity.
3. The action plan of the programme shall be established annually in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).

Article 4
Participation of candidate countries
The programme shall be open to the participation of:
(a) the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements, in the additional protocols thereto and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils;
(b) Cyprus, Malta and Turkey, on the basis of bilateral agreements on this matter concluded with these countries.

Article 5
Communications and information-exchange systems
1. The Commission and the participating countries shall ensure that the following communications and information-exchange systems are operational in so far as their operation is necessary under Community legislation:
(a) the common communications network/common systems interface (CCN/CSI) to the extent necessary to support the functioning of the other systems referred to in this paragraph;
(b) the VAT information exchange system (VIES) and its messaging systems;
(c) the excise movement verification system;
(d) the early warning system for excise;
(e) the excise duty tables system;
(f) any other new communication and information-exchange systems designated in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2), when Community legislation requires them to be introduced.
2. The Community components of the communication and information-exchange systems shall be the hardware, software and network connections, which shall be common to all participating countries so as to ensure the interconnection and interoperability of the systems, whether they be installed at the premises of the Commission (or a designated subcontractor) or at the premises of participating countries (or a designated subcontractor). The Commission shall conclude the necessary contracts to assure the operational nature of these components on behalf of the Community.
3. The non-Community components of the communication and information-exchange systems shall comprise the national databases forming part of these systems, the network connections between the Community and non-Community components and such software and hardware as each participating country shall deem appropriate for the full operation of those systems throughout its administration. The participating countries shall ensure that the non-Community components are kept operational and shall ensure the interoperability of these components with the Community components.
4. The Commission shall coordinate, in cooperation with the participating countries, those aspects of the establishment and functioning of the Community and non-Community elements of the systems and infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1.

Article 6
Multilateral controls
Participating countries shall choose, from among the multilateral controls organised by them, those whose costs are to be borne by the Community in accordance with Article 11. Such controls shall include at all events control of the tax liability in respect of value added tax and/or excise duties.
The participating countries shall send annual reports and evaluations concerning such controls to the Commission.

Article 7
The Commission and the participating countries shall together organise seminars to be attended by officials from the administrations, Commission representatives and, if appropriate, other experts.

Article 8
Exchanges of officials
1. The Commission and participating countries shall organise exchanges of officials. The length of exchanges may not exceed one month. Each exchange shall be targeted on a particular professional activity and shall be sufficiently prepared and subsequently evaluated by the officials and administrations concerned. Provided that it states its reasons for doing so, the host administration may limit the number of participants in the exchange if the volume of applications received impedes its preparation and proper operation.
2. The participating countries shall take the necessary steps to enable exchange officials to play an effective part in the host administration’s activities. To this end, such officials shall be authorised to carry out the tasks relating to the duties entrusted to them by the host administration in accordance with its legal system.
3. During the exchange, the civil liability of the exchange official in the performance of his duties shall be treated in the same way as that of officials of the host administration. Exchange officials shall be bound by the same rules of professional secrecy as national officials.
4. Participating countries may restrict the scope of these exchanges to officials responsible for value added tax and/or excise duties.

Article 9
Training activities
1. In order to encourage structured cooperation between national training bodies and officials responsible for training in taxation in administrations, participating countries shall, in cooperation with the Commission:
(a) develop existing training programmes and, where necessary, devise new programmes to provide a common core of training for officials so as to enable them to acquire the necessary common professional skills and knowledge;
(b) where appropriate, open the training courses in taxation provided by each participating country for its own officials to officials from all participating countries;
(c) develop the necessary common tools for taxation training.
2. Participating countries shall also ensure that their officials receive the initial and continuing training necessary to acquire the common professional skills and knowledge in accordance with the common training programmes and the linguistic training necessary for those officials to attain a sufficient standard of linguistic competence.

Article 10
Financial framework
The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007 is hereby set at EUR 44 million. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.

Article 11
Expenditure
1. The expenditure necessary for the implementation of the programme shall be shared by the Community and the participating countries in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5.
2. The Community shall bear the following expenditure:
(a) the cost of the development, purchase, installation, maintenance and day-to-day operation of the Community components of the communications and information-exchange systems described in Article 5;
(b) the cost of the travel and subsistence expenses relating to multilateral controls, seminars, exchanges of officials and training activities;
(c) the cost relating to the organisation of seminars and the development of training tools;
(d) the cost of evaluation studies to be carried out by third parties on the impact of the programme, while guaranteeing the confidentiality of the data;
(e) the cost of the other activities referred to in Article 1(2)(f).
3. The Commission shall, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(10), determine the rules relating to the payment of expenses and shall communicate them to the participating countries.
4. The Commission shall adopt any necessary measures for the budget management of the programme in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
5. The participating countries shall bear the following expenditure:
(a) the cost of the development, purchase, installation, maintenance and day-to-day operation of the non-Community components of the communications and information-exchange systems described in Article 5;
(b) the costs relating to the initial and continuing training, including linguistic training, of their officials.

Article 12
Financial control
Community financing decisions and any agreements or contracts resulting from this Decision shall be subject to financial control in accordance with Community law on financial and budgetary control.

Article 13
Implementation
The measures necessary for the implementation of Article 1(2)(f), Article 3(3), Article 5(1)(f) and Article 11(4) shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).

Article 14
Committee procedure
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee to be known as the “Fiscalis Committee”.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
3. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.

Article 15
Follow-up and evaluation
1. Each year the Commission shall submit to the Committee referred to in Article 14(1) a follow-up report setting out the progress of all the programme’s activities in terms of implementation and results in relation to the annual action plan. This report shall also be forwarded to the European Parliament.
The administrations shall send the Commission all the information necessary for follow-up reports to be drawn up as efficiently as possible.
2. Mid-term and final evaluations of the programme shall be carried out under the Commission’s responsibility using the follow-up reports and the reports drawn up by the participating countries. The programme’s effectiveness and efficiency shall be evaluated in terms of the objectives set out in Article 3. Evaluations shall be conducted using the reports referred to in paragraph 3 as follows:
– the mid-term evaluation shall review the initial results and impact of the programme’s activities. It shall also assess the use of funding and the progress of follow-up and implementation,
– the final evaluation shall assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the programme’s activities.
3. The participating countries shall send the Commission:
(a) by 31 March 2005, a mid-term evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency;
(b) by 31 March 2008, a final evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council:
(a) by 30 June 2005, a mid-term evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency and a communication on the desirability of continuing the programme, accompanied, where relevant, by a suitable proposal;
(b) by 30 June 2008, a final evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency.
The reports referred to in (a) and (b) shall also be sent to the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions for their information.
5. The evaluation reports referred to in paragraph 4 shall be based mainly on the reports referred to in paragraph 3, and on the follow-up reports referred to in paragraph 1.

Article 16
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply from 1 January 2003.

Article 17
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 December 2002.
For the European Parliament
The President
For the Council
T. Pedersen
(1) OJ C 103 E, 30.4.2002, p. 361.
(2) OJ C 241, 7.10.2002, p. 81.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 June 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Council Common Position of 26 July 2002 (OJ C 228 E, 25.9.2002, p. 34) and Decision of the European Parliament of 24 October 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(4) OJ L 126, 28.4.1998, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 24, 1.2.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 792/2002 (OJ L 128, 15.5.2002, p. 1).
(6) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(8) OJ L 336, 27.12.1977, p. 15. Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(9) OJ L 73, 19.3.1976, p. 18. Directive as last amended by Directive 2001/44/EC (OJ L 175, 28.6.2001, p. 17).
(10) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(3),Whereas:(1) In the internal market, the effective, uniform and efficient application of Community law is essential for the functioning of taxation systems, in particular for the protection of national and Community financial interests through combating tax evasion and tax avoidance, avoiding distortions of competition and reducing burdens on administrations and taxpayers. Achieving this effective, uniform and efficient application is a matter for the Community acting in partnership with the Member States.(2) Decision No 888/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 1998 establishing a programme of Community action to ameliorate the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme)(4) has significantly contributed to the achievement of those overall objectives for the period 1998 to 2002. It is therefore considered desirable to continue the Fiscalis programme for another five-year period.(3) Efficient, effective and extensive cooperation among the present and future Member States and between them and the Commission is important for the functioning of the taxation systems in the internal market.(4) The experience gained by the Community from the Fiscalis programme has shown that exchanges, seminars and multilateral control exercises could achieve the objectives of the programme by bringing officials from different national administrations together in professional activities. Those activities should therefore be continued, but extended to cover taxes on income, on capital and on insurance premiums.(5) The establishment and functioning of a communication and information exchange infrastructure has a vital part to play in reinforcing the taxation systems within the Community. In particular, the VAT information exchange system (VIES), referred to in Council Regulation (EEC) No 218/92 of 27 January 1992 on administrative cooperation in the field of indirect taxation (VAT)(5), has shown the value of information technology in protecting revenue whilst minimising administrative burdens.(6) In order to ensure uniform application of Community law, it is essential that officials responsible for taxation have a high common standard of understanding of Community law and its implementation in the present and future Member States. Such a standard can be achieved only through effective initial and continuing training provided by the present and future Member States. Supplementary Community action is useful to coordinate and foster such training.(7) The experience gained from the Fiscalis programme has indicated that the coordinated development and implementation of a common training programme could attain the objectives of this programme, in particular by achieving a higher common standard of understanding of Community law.(8) A sufficient standard of linguistic competence on the part of taxation officials has proved to be essential to facilitate cooperation. Participating countries should therefore provide the necessary language training for their officials.(9) Although the primary responsibility for achieving these objectives rests with the participating countries, supplementary Community action is needed for the coordination of such activities as well as for the provision of an infrastructure and the necessary stimulus. Since the objectives of the measures laid down in this Decision cannot all be sufficiently achieved by the participating countries and can therefore, by reason of the scale and the effect of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.(10) This Decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the prime reference, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(6), for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure.(11) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(7),HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:CHAPTER ISCOPE AND OBJECTIVESArticle 1Fiscalis programme1. A multiannual Community action programme (Fiscalis 2003-2007), hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, is hereby established for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007 to improve the operation of the taxation systems in the internal market.2. The activities of the programme shall consist of:(a) communication and information-exchange systems;(b) multilateral controls involving Member States and those candidate countries which have bilateral or multilateral agreements either with one another or with Member States permitting such activity;(c) seminars;(d) exchanges;(e) training activities;(f) any other working meetings, visits or similar activities in the context of the programme’s objectives as stated in Article 3 which shall be decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).Article 2DefinitionsFor the purpose of this Decision:(a) “taxation” shall mean the following taxes applied in the participating countries:(i) value added tax;(ii) excise duties on alcohol and tobacco products and mineral oils;(iii) taxes on income and on capital as defined in
Fiscalis programme
1. A multiannual Community action programme (Fiscalis 2003-2007), hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, is hereby established for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007 to improve the operation of the taxation systems in the internal market.
2. The activities of the programme shall consist of:
(a) communication and information-exchange systems;
(b) multilateral controls involving Member States and those candidate countries which have bilateral or multilateral agreements either with one another or with Member States permitting such activity;
(c) seminars;
(d) exchanges;
(e) training activities;
(f) any other working meetings, visits or similar activities in the context of the programme’s objectives as stated in Article 3 which shall be decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
Definitions
For the purpose of this Decision:
(a) “taxation” shall mean the following taxes applied in the participating countries:
(i) value added tax;
(ii) excise duties on alcohol and tobacco products and mineral oils;
(iii) taxes on income and on capital as defined in Article 1(2) of Council Directive 77/799/EEC of 19 December 1977 concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation(8);
(iv) taxes on insurance premiums as defined in Article 3 of Council Directive 76/308/EEC of 15 March 1976 on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures(9);
(b) “administration” shall mean the public authorities in the participating countries responsible for administering taxation;
(c) “participating countries” shall mean the Member States and the countries referred to in Article 4, which effectively participate in the programme;
(d) “official” shall mean an official of the administration;
(e) “exchange” shall mean a working visit organised under the programme of an official from an administration in another participating country;
(f) “multilateral control” shall mean a coordinated control of the tax liability of one or more related taxable persons, which is organised by several participating countries and has a common or complementary interest.
1. The overall objective of the programme shall be to improve the proper functioning of the taxation systems in the internal market by increasing cooperation between participating countries, their administrations and officials.
2. The specific objectives of the programme shall be:
(a) for value added tax and excise duties:
(i) to enable officials to achieve a high common standard of understanding of Community law and of its implementation in Member States;
(ii) to secure efficient, effective and extensive cooperation among Member States;
(iii) to ensure the continuing improvement of administration procedures to take account of the needs of administrations and taxpayers through the development and dissemination of good administrative practice;
(b) for direct taxation:
to provide support for information exchange in the field of mutual assistance and to raise awareness of Community law applicable in the field of direct taxation;
(c) for taxes on insurance premiums:
to improve cooperation between Member States, ensuring better application of the existing rules;
(d) for the candidate countries:
to meet the special needs of candidate countries so that they take the necessary measures for accession in the field of tax legislation and administrative capacity.
3. The action plan of the programme shall be established annually in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
Participation of candidate countries
The programme shall be open to the participation of:
(a) the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements, in the additional protocols thereto and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils;
(b) Cyprus, Malta and Turkey, on the basis of bilateral agreements on this matter concluded with these countries.
Communications and information-exchange systems
1. The Commission and the participating countries shall ensure that the following communications and information-exchange systems are operational in so far as their operation is necessary under Community legislation:
(a) the common communications network/common systems interface (CCN/CSI) to the extent necessary to support the functioning of the other systems referred to in this paragraph;
(b) the VAT information exchange system (VIES) and its messaging systems;
(c) the excise movement verification system;
(d) the early warning system for excise;
(e) the excise duty tables system;
(f) any other new communication and information-exchange systems designated in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2), when Community legislation requires them to be introduced.
2. The Community components of the communication and information-exchange systems shall be the hardware, software and network connections, which shall be common to all participating countries so as to ensure the interconnection and interoperability of the systems, whether they be installed at the premises of the Commission (or a designated subcontractor) or at the premises of participating countries (or a designated subcontractor). The Commission shall conclude the necessary contracts to assure the operational nature of these components on behalf of the Community.
3. The non-Community components of the communication and information-exchange systems shall comprise the national databases forming part of these systems, the network connections between the Community and non-Community components and such software and hardware as each participating country shall deem appropriate for the full operation of those systems throughout its administration. The participating countries shall ensure that the non-Community components are kept operational and shall ensure the interoperability of these components with the Community components.
4. The Commission shall coordinate, in cooperation with the participating countries, those aspects of the establishment and functioning of the Community and non-Community elements of the systems and infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1.
Multilateral controls
Participating countries shall choose, from among the multilateral controls organised by them, those whose costs are to be borne by the Community in accordance with Article 11. Such controls shall include at all events control of the tax liability in respect of value added tax and/or excise duties.
The participating countries shall send annual reports and evaluations concerning such controls to the Commission.
The Commission and the participating countries shall together organise seminars to be attended by officials from the administrations, Commission representatives and, if appropriate, other experts.
Exchanges of officials
1. The Commission and participating countries shall organise exchanges of officials. The length of exchanges may not exceed one month. Each exchange shall be targeted on a particular professional activity and shall be sufficiently prepared and subsequently evaluated by the officials and administrations concerned. Provided that it states its reasons for doing so, the host administration may limit the number of participants in the exchange if the volume of applications received impedes its preparation and proper operation.
2. The participating countries shall take the necessary steps to enable exchange officials to play an effective part in the host administration’s activities. To this end, such officials shall be authorised to carry out the tasks relating to the duties entrusted to them by the host administration in accordance with its legal system.
3. During the exchange, the civil liability of the exchange official in the performance of his duties shall be treated in the same way as that of officials of the host administration. Exchange officials shall be bound by the same rules of professional secrecy as national officials.
4. Participating countries may restrict the scope of these exchanges to officials responsible for value added tax and/or excise duties.
Training activities
1. In order to encourage structured cooperation between national training bodies and officials responsible for training in taxation in administrations, participating countries shall, in cooperation with the Commission:
(a) develop existing training programmes and, where necessary, devise new programmes to provide a common core of training for officials so as to enable them to acquire the necessary common professional skills and knowledge;
(b) where appropriate, open the training courses in taxation provided by each participating country for its own officials to officials from all participating countries;
(c) develop the necessary common tools for taxation training.
2. Participating countries shall also ensure that their officials receive the initial and continuing training necessary to acquire the common professional skills and knowledge in accordance with the common training programmes and the linguistic training necessary for those officials to attain a sufficient standard of linguistic competence.
Financial framework
The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007 is hereby set at EUR 44 million. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.
Expenditure
1. The expenditure necessary for the implementation of the programme shall be shared by the Community and the participating countries in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5.
2. The Community shall bear the following expenditure:
(a) the cost of the development, purchase, installation, maintenance and day-to-day operation of the Community components of the communications and information-exchange systems described in Article 5;
(b) the cost of the travel and subsistence expenses relating to multilateral controls, seminars, exchanges of officials and training activities;
(c) the cost relating to the organisation of seminars and the development of training tools;
(d) the cost of evaluation studies to be carried out by third parties on the impact of the programme, while guaranteeing the confidentiality of the data;
(e) the cost of the other activities referred to in Article 1(2)(f).
3. The Commission shall, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(10), determine the rules relating to the payment of expenses and shall communicate them to the participating countries.
4. The Commission shall adopt any necessary measures for the budget management of the programme in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
5. The participating countries shall bear the following expenditure:
(a) the cost of the development, purchase, installation, maintenance and day-to-day operation of the non-Community components of the communications and information-exchange systems described in Article 5;
(b) the costs relating to the initial and continuing training, including linguistic training, of their officials.
Financial control
Community financing decisions and any agreements or contracts resulting from this Decision shall be subject to financial control in accordance with Community law on financial and budgetary control.
Implementation
The measures necessary for the implementation of Article 1(2)(f), Article 3(3), Article 5(1)(f) and Article 11(4) shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
Committee procedure
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee to be known as the “Fiscalis Committee”.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
3. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.
Follow-up and evaluation
1. Each year the Commission shall submit to the Committee referred to in Article 14(1) a follow-up report setting out the progress of all the programme’s activities in terms of implementation and results in relation to the annual action plan. This report shall also be forwarded to the European Parliament.
The administrations shall send the Commission all the information necessary for follow-up reports to be drawn up as efficiently as possible.
2. Mid-term and final evaluations of the programme shall be carried out under the Commission’s responsibility using the follow-up reports and the reports drawn up by the participating countries. The programme’s effectiveness and efficiency shall be evaluated in terms of the objectives set out in Article 3. Evaluations shall be conducted using the reports referred to in paragraph 3 as follows:
– the mid-term evaluation shall review the initial results and impact of the programme’s activities. It shall also assess the use of funding and the progress of follow-up and implementation,
– the final evaluation shall assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the programme’s activities.
3. The participating countries shall send the Commission:
(a) by 31 March 2005, a mid-term evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency;
(b) by 31 March 2008, a final evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council:
(a) by 30 June 2005, a mid-term evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency and a communication on the desirability of continuing the programme, accompanied, where relevant, by a suitable proposal;
(b) by 30 June 2008, a final evaluation report on the programme’s effectiveness and efficiency.
The reports referred to in (a) and (b) shall also be sent to the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions for their information.
5. The evaluation reports referred to in paragraph 4 shall be based mainly on the reports referred to in paragraph 3, and on the follow-up reports referred to in paragraph 1.
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply from 1 January 2003.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 December 2002.
For the European Parliament
The President
For the Council
T. Pedersen
(1) OJ C 103 E, 30.4.2002, p. 361.
(2) OJ C 241, 7.10.2002, p. 81.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 June 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Council Common Position of 26 July 2002 (OJ C 228 E, 25.9.2002, p. 34) and Decision of the European Parliament of 24 October 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(4) OJ L 126, 28.4.1998, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 24, 1.2.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 792/2002 (OJ L 128, 15.5.2002, p. 1).
(6) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(8) OJ L 336, 27.12.1977, p. 15. Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(9) OJ L 73, 19.3.1976, p. 18. Directive as last amended by Directive 2001/44/EC (OJ L 175, 28.6.2001, p. 17).
(10) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

Pending: 32002D1786

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 152 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 15 May 2002,Whereas:(1) The Community is committed to promoting and improving health, preventing disease, and countering potential threats to health, with a view to reducing avoidable morbidity and premature mortality and activity-impairing disability. To contribute to the well-being of European citizens, the Community must address in a coordinated and coherent way the concerns of its people about risks to health and their expectations for a high level of health protection. Therefore, all health-related activities of the Community must have a high degree of visibility and transparency and allow consultation and participation of all stakeholders in a balanced way, in order to promote better knowledge and communication flows and thus enable a greater involvement of individuals in decisions that concern their health. In this framework, attention should be given to the right of the Community population to receive simple, clear and scientifically sound information about measures to protect health and prevent diseases, with a view to improving quality of life.(2) Health is a priority and a high level of health protection should be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities. Under Article 152 of the Treaty, the Community is required to play an active role in this sector by taking measures which cannot be taken by individual States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity.(3) In the context of the public health framework set out in the Commission communication of 24 November 1993 on the framework for action in the field of public health, eight action programmes were adopted, namely:- Decision No 645/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on health promotion, information, education and training within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(5),- Decision No 646/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting an action plan to combat cancer within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(6),- Decision No 647/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on the prevention of AIDS and certain other communicable diseases within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(7),- Decision No 102/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on the prevention of drug dependence within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(8),- Decision No 1400/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 adopting a programme of Community action on health monitoring within the framework for action in the field of public health (1997 to 2001)(9),- Decision No 372/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 February 1999 adopting a programme of Community action on injury prevention in the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2003)(10),- Decision No 1295/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 1999 adopting a programme of Community action on rare diseases within the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2003)(11), and- Decision No 1296/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 1999 adopting a programme of Community action on pollution-related diseases in the context of the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2001)(12).Furthermore, Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 on setting up a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community(13) was adopted. Pursuant to that Decision, the Commission adopted on 22 December 1999 Decision No 2000/57/EC on the early warning and response system for the prevention and control of communicable diseases(14).(4) Other activities in the context of the public health framework included Council Recommendation 98/463/EC of 29 June 1998 on the suitability of blood and plasma donors and the screening of donated blood in the European Community(15) and Recommendation 1999/519/EC of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields 0 Hz to 300 GHz(16).(5) The public health framework was reviewed in the Commission communication of 15 April 1998 on the development of public health policy in the European Community, which indicated that a new health strategy and programme were needed in view of the new Treaty provisions, new challenges and experience so far.(6) The Council in its Conclusions of 26 November 1998 on the future framework for Community action in the field of public health(17), and in its Resolution of 8 June 1999(18), the Economic and Social Committee, in its opinion of 9 September 1998(19), the Committee of the Regions, in its Opinion of 19 November 1998(20), and the European Parliament, in its Resolution A4-0082/99 of 12 March 1999(21), welcomed the Commission communication of 15 April 1998 and supported the view that actions at Community level should be set out in one overall programme to run for a period of at least five years and comprising three general objectives, namely improving information for the development of public health, reacting rapidly to health threats and tackling health determinants through health promotion and disease prevention, underpinned by inter-sectoral action and the use of all appropriate Treaty instruments.(7) In its Resolution of 29 June 2000 on the follow-up to the Evora conference on health determinants, the Council considered that the increasing differences in health status and health outcomes between and within Member States called for renewed and coordinated efforts at national and Community level; welcomed the Commission’s commitment to submit a proposal for a new public health programme containing a specific strand of action aimed at addressing health determinants by means of health promotion and disease prevention underpinned by intersectoral policy and agreed that there was a need to develop the appropriate knowledge base for this and, therefore, that an efficacious health monitoring system should be established for this purpose; stressed the importance of the new Community public health strategy building upon the activities on specific determinants taken in the existing programmes, especially with respect to tobacco, nutrition and alcohol and that it was important not only to ensure continuity with existing actions, but also to take forward work on these issues in a fully coherent and systematic way.(8) The Council reaffirms its Conclusions on combating tobacco consumption of 18 November 1999, in which it underlined the necessity of developing an overall strategy, and invited the Commission, inter alia, to strengthen cooperation between health and other policy areas, with the aim of ensuring a high level of health protection in these areas.(9) The Council on 18 November 1999 agreed unanimously a Resolution on the Promotion of Mental Health.(10) According to the WHO World Health Report 2000 the five major burdens of disease (in disability-adjusted life years) are: 1. neuropsychiatric disorders, 2. cardiovascular diseases, 3. malignant neoplasms, 4. unintentional injuries and 5. respiratory diseases. Infectious diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, and anti-microbial resistance are also becoming a threat to the health of all people in Europe. An important task of the programme would be to identify better the main burdens of disease in the Community and, in particular, the main health determinants.(11) The programme should contribute to the exchange of information on quality standards identified in the field of public health.(12) It is essential to collect, process and analyse data at Community level for the purpose of effective public health monitoring at Community level and in order to obtain objective, reliable and compatible and comparable information which could be exchanged and would enable the Commission and the Member States to improve information to the public and formulate appropriate strategies, policies and actions to achieve a high level of human health protection. Data from the private sector should also be taken into account for the completeness of the programme. All relevant statistics should be broken down and analysed by gender.(13) The Community and its Member States have at their disposal certain means and mechanisms in relation to information and monitoring in the field of public health. It is therefore necessary to ensure a high level of coordination between actions and initiatives taken by the Community and the Member States to implement the programme, to promote cooperation between Member States and to enhance the effectiveness of existing and future networks in the field of public health.(14) It is essential that the Commission ensure the effectiveness and the cohesion of measures and actions of the programme at both micro- and macro-level as well as the promotion of cooperation between the Member States. Any structural arrangements which would be established under the auspices of the Commission to this end should collect, monitor and evaluate data, and develop surveillance methods and a basis for rapid and coordinated responses to health threats. Such structural arrangements would consist of a strengthened central resource and closely involve the relevant institutions designated by the Member States.(15) There is in particular a need to ensure, relying on competent and relevant expertise, appropriate sustainable coordination, in the area of health information, of activities in relation to the following: definition of information needs, development of indicators, collection of data and information, comparability issues, exchange of data and information with and between Member States, continuing development of databases, analyses, and wider dissemination of information. Such coordination should also be ensured in the area of rapid reaction to health threats, of activities in relation to epidemiological surveillance, development of surveillance methods, exchange of information on guidelines and on prevention and control actions, mechanisms and procedures.(16) It is essential that the Commission, through appropriate structural arrangements, ensures the effectiveness and cohesion of measures and actions contained in the programme and promotes cooperation between the Member States. To enable such structural arrangements to operate smoothly and effectively, it is essential to establish sustained cooperation with the health authorities of the Member States, while respecting Member States’ responsibilities.(17) The Commission should make, as appropriate, further proposals on the kind of structural arrangements needed for the implementation of the public health strategy, especially regarding health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.(18) The overall aim of the public health programme is to contribute towards the attainment of a high level of physical and mental health and well-being and greater equality in health matters throughout the Community, by directing action towards improving public health, preventing human diseases and disorders, and obviating sources of danger to health with a view to combating morbidity and premature mortality, while taking gender and age into consideration. To fulfil this aim, actions should be guided by the need to increase life expectancy without disability or sickness, promote quality of life and minimise the economic and social consequences of ill health, thus reducing health inequalities, while taking into account the regional approach to health issues. Priority should be given to health-promoting actions that address the major burdens of disease. The programme should support the development of an integrated intersectoral health strategy to ensure that Community policies and actions contribute to protecting and promoting health.(19) In order to achieve this, the programme should take into account the importance of education, training and networking.(20) The Treaty requires that a high level of human health protection is ensured in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities. A strong link is to be established between all Community policies having an impact on health and the Community strategy for public health. Within the public health programme, a priority task will be to develop criteria and methodologies for evaluating policy proposals and their implementation. In developing the measures under the programme, and joint strategies and actions with other relevant Community programmes and actions, it should be ensured that these other Community policies and actions incorporate the health aspect, and that they are underpinned by intersectoral policy.(21) Achieving the overall aim, and the general objectives of the programme requires effective cooperation of the Member States, their full commitment in the implementation of Community actions, and the involvement of institutions, associations, organisations and bodies in the health field as well as the public at large. To ensure sustainability and efficient use of existing Community investment and capacity, established Community and national networks should be used to pull together expertise and experience from Member States on effective methods for implementation of health promotional and preventive interventions and on quality criteria. A dialogue should be ensured with all key partners committed to improving public health and their expertise should be incorporated in an efficient and transparent Community knowledge base. Cooperation should be established with bodies and non-governmental organisations active in the field of health through appropriate mechanisms, such as health fora.(22) In accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, Community action on matters which do not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community, such as public health, should be undertaken only if and in so far as, by reason of its scale or effects, its objective can be better achieved by the Community. The objectives of the programme cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States because of the complexity, transnational character and lack of complete control at Member State level over the factors affecting health, and therefore the programme should support and complement the Member States’ actions and measures. The programme can provide a significant added value to health promotion and to health systems in the Community through the support of structures and programmes which enhance the capabilities of individuals, institutions, associations, organisations and bodies in the health field by facilitating the exchange of experience and best practices and by providing a basis for a common analysis of the factors affecting public health. Also, the programme may have added value in the event of threats to public health of a cross-border nature, such as infectious diseases, environmental pollution or food contamination, to the extent that they prompt joint strategies and actions. The programme will enable the Community to contribute towards fulfilling its Treaty obligations in the field of public health while fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the organisation and delivery of health services and health care. This decision does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.(23) The measures under the programme underpin the health strategy of the Community and will yield Community added value by responding to needs arising out of conditions and structures established through Community action in other fields, by addressing new developments, new threats and new problems for which the Community would be in a better position to act to protect its people, by bringing together activities undertaken in relative isolation and with limited impact at national level and by complementing them in order to achieve positive results for the people of the Community, and by contributing to the strengthening of solidarity and cohesion in the Community. The new health strategy and public health action programme should provide the opportunity to further develop the citizens’ dimension of Community health policy.(24) In order to ensure that actions can address broad health issues and threats effectively in cooperation with other Community policies and activities, while avoiding duplication, the programme should provide for the possibility of undertaking joint actions with related Community programmes and actions. A proactive use of other Community policies, such as structural funds and social policy could influence health determinants in a positive way.(25) Effective implementation of the measures and actions and achievement of the desired impact of the programme require comparability of the data collected. Compatibility and interoperability of the systems and networks for exchanging information and data for the development of public health would also make a valuable contribution and further efforts towards these objectives should be pursued. It is of prime importance that information is exchanged on the basis of comparable and compatible data.(26) In general, the measures and actions under the programme should take account of the development of new technologies and IT applications and, in particular, there should be close coordination with the plans drawn up and implemented in the field of public health under the integrated action programme for an electronic Europe (e-Europe), and other relevant programmes, while avoiding overlapping, and taking particular care to ensure equal accessibility to health information.(27) The Feira European Council in June 2000 endorsed the “e-Europe 2002 Action Plan on an Information Society for All”, which under Health Online urges Member States to develop an infrastructure of user-friendly, validated and interoperable systems for health education, disease prevention and medical care. It is essential that the new information technology is exploited to make health information as accessible as possible to citizens.(28) In the execution of the programme, full use should be made of the relevant results generated from the Community research programmes, which support research in areas covered by the programme.(29) The experience acquired from different charters in the field of public health should be taken into account.(30) In the implementation of the Community programme there must be compliance with all the relevant legal provisions in the field of protection of personal data, and the establishment of mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality and security of those data.(31) The programme should last six years in order to allow sufficient time to implement measures to achieve its objectives.(32) It is essential that the Commission should ensure implementation of the programme in close cooperation with the Member States. In order to obtain scientific information and advice to implement the programme, cooperation with scientists and experts of international standing is desirable.(33) Consistency and complementarity should be ensured between actions to be implemented under the programme and those envisaged or implemented under other policies and activities, in particular in the light of the requirement to ensure a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities.(34) Close cooperation and consultation will be expected with Community bodies responsible for risk assessment, monitoring and research in the fields of food and feed safety, environmental protection and product safety.(35) This decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the prime reference, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(22) for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure. The financial framework should correspond to the needs and objectives of the programme.(36) Funding from other Community policies earmarked for joint actions under the programme is additional to the financial framework laid down for the programme.(37) It is essential that there should be flexibility to allow redeployment of resources and adaptation of activities while respecting the need for transparency as well as the criteria for selecting and ordering priorities according to magnitude of risk or potential of effect, the outcome of evaluation, public concerns, availability of interventions or potential for their development, subsidiarity, added value and impact on other sectors. There is a need, however, to maintain a balance between the three objectives of the programme, allocating budget resources fairly between them.(38) Practical measures are essential in order to attain the objectives of the programme. Consequently, when implementing the programme and earmarking resources under it, the importance of practical measures should be emphasised.(39) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(23).(40) The Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement) provides for greater cooperation in the field of public health between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the countries of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area (EFTA/EEA countries), on the other. Provision should also be made to open the programme to participation of the associated Central and Eastern European countries in accordance with the conditions established in the Europe Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils, of Cyprus, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the procedures to be agreed with that country, as well as of Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty.(41) The applicant countries should be actively involved in the development and implementation of the programme and consideration should be given to a strategic approach to health in those countries, and especially to their specific problems.(42) On the accession of new Member States, the Commission should report on the consequences of these accessions for the programme.(43) Cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the sphere of health, such as the WHO, the Council of Europe and the OECD, should be fostered, not only in the field of collecting and analysing data (including indicators) but also in the field of intersectoral health promotion, in order to ensure cost effectiveness, avoid overlapping of activities and programmes and enforce synergy and interaction, taking particular account of specific arrangements for cooperation such as that between the WHO and the Commission.(44) In order to increase the value and impact of the programme there should be regular monitoring and evaluation, including independent external evaluations, of the measures taken. It should be possible to adjust or modify the programme in the light of these evaluations and of developments that may take place in the general context of Community action in health and health-related fields. The European Parliament should be informed of the annual work plans which will be drawn up by the Commission.(45) The programme of Community action in the field of public health builds on the activities and the eight programmes under the previous framework and on the work of the network for epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community, and pursues all the objectives and measures therein in the form of a global and integrated health strategy. The decisions concerning those eight programmes are covered by the new programme and should therefore be repealed with effect from 31 December 2002,HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Establishment of the programme1. This Decision establishes a programme of Community action in the field of public health, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”.2. The programme shall be implemented in the period starting on 1 January 2003 and ending on 31 December 2008.Article 2Overall aim and general objectives1. The programme, which shall complement national policies, shall aim to protect human health and improve public health.2. The general objectives of the programme shall be:(a) to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health;(b) to enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion to threats to health;(c) to promote health and prevent disease through addressing health determinants across all policies and activities.3. The programme shall thereby contribute to:(a) ensuring a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, through the promotion of an integrated and intersectoral health strategy;(b) tackling inequalities in health;(c) encouraging cooperation between Member States in the areas covered by Article 152 of the Treaty.Article 3Community actions and activities1. The general objectives of the programme as set out in Article 2 shall be pursued by means of the actions listed in the Annex.2. These actions shall be implemented in close cooperation with Member States through support to activities of a transversal nature, which may be used to implement all or part of the actions and which may, where appropriate, be combined. These activities are the following:(a) Activities related to the monitoring and rapid reaction systems(i) network activities operated through structures designated by Member States and other activities of Community interest for the purposes of public health monitoring and providing national information, as well as data at Community level, in furtherance of the objectives of the programme;(ii) activities to counter health threats, including major diseases, and react to unforeseen events, enable investigations and coordinate response;(iii) preparation, establishment and operation of appropriate structural arrangements coordinating and integrating networks for health monitoring and for rapid reaction to health threats;(iv) development of appropriate links between the actions concerning the monitoring and rapid reaction systems.(b) Activities on health determinantsdevelopment and implementation of health promotion and disease prevention activities across all Community policies and involving, as appropriate, non-governmental organisations, innovative or pilot projects and networks between national institutions and activities.(c) Activities related to legislation(i) preparatory work for Community legislative instruments in the field of public health;(ii) health impact assessment of Community legislation;(iii) coordination of the position of the Community and its Member States in fora in which health-related matters are discussed.(d) Activities related to consultation, knowledge and information(i) development and dissemination to competent authorities in Member States, to health and other professionals and, where appropriate, to other stakeholders and the general public of health information, knowledge, including statistics, reports, reviews, analysis, and advice on issues of common interest to the Community and to Member States;(ii) information and consultation on health and health-related matters at the Community level, involving all stakeholders such as patients’ organisations, health professionals, health care providers, trade unions, social partners and NGOs in the field of public health;(iii) sharing of experience and exchange of information on health-related matters between the Community and authorities and competent organisations of Member States;(iv) encouraging education and vocational training in the field of public health relevant to the objectives of the programme;(v) developing and maintaining networks for the exchange of information on best practice in public health and the effectiveness of health policies;(vi) obtaining scientific information and advice from high-level scientists and experts;(vii) supporting and promoting activities by the Community and the Member States with regard to good practice and to sound guidelines for public health based on scientific data.(e) Promotion of coordination at the European level of non-governmental organisations which are developing activities defined as priorities under the programme. They may be operating either singly or in the form of several coordinated associations.Article 4Joint strategies and actionsTo ensure a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, the objectives of the programme may be implemented as joint strategies and joint actions by creating links with relevant Community programmes and actions, notably in the areas of consumer protection, social protection, health and safety at work, employment, research and technological development, internal market, information society and information technology, statistics, agriculture, education, transport, industry and environment, and with actions undertaken by the Joint Research Centre and relevant Community bodies with which cooperation shall be fostered.Article 5Implementation of the programme1. The Commission shall ensure the implementation, in close cooperation with the Member States, of the actions set out in the programme, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 and ensuring its harmonious and balanced development.2. In order to assist implementation, the Commission shall ensure, through appropriate structural arrangements closely associating the Member States, the coordination and integration of networks for health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.3. The Commission and Member States shall take appropriate action, within their respective areas of competence, to ensure the efficient running of the programme and to develop mechanisms at Community and Member State level to achieve the objectives of the programme. They shall ensure that appropriate information is provided about actions supported by the programme and that the widest possible participation is obtained in actions requiring implementation through local and regional authorities and non-governmental organisations.4. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, pursue the comparability of data and information and, where possible, the compatibility and interoperability of the systems and networks for exchange of data and information on health.5. In implementing the programme the Commission, together with the Member States, shall ensure compliance with all relevant legal provisions regarding personal data protection and, where appropriate, the introduction of mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality and safety of such data.6. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall ensure the transition between those actions developed within the public health programmes adopted by the Decisions referred to in Article 13 which contribute to the priorities set out in this programme, and those to be implemented under this programme.Article 6Consistency and complementarityThe Commission shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between the actions to be implemented under the programme and those implemented under other Community policies and activities, including the policies mentioned in Article 4. In particular, the Commission shall identify those proposals of particular relevance to the objectives and actions of the programme, and inform the Committee referred to in Article 9 of how health considerations are taken into account in these proposals and of their expected health impact.Article 7Funding1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period specified in

Article 1
Establishment of the programme
1. This Decision establishes a programme of Community action in the field of public health, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”.
2. The programme shall be implemented in the period starting on 1 January 2003 and ending on 31 December 2008.

Article 2
Overall aim and general objectives
1. The programme, which shall complement national policies, shall aim to protect human health and improve public health.
2. The general objectives of the programme shall be:
(a) to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health;
(b) to enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion to threats to health;
(c) to promote health and prevent disease through addressing health determinants across all policies and activities.
3. The programme shall thereby contribute to:
(a) ensuring a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, through the promotion of an integrated and intersectoral health strategy;
(b) tackling inequalities in health;
(c) encouraging cooperation between Member States in the areas covered by Article 152 of the Treaty.

Article 3
Community actions and activities
1. The general objectives of the programme as set out in Article 2 shall be pursued by means of the actions listed in the Annex.
2. These actions shall be implemented in close cooperation with Member States through support to activities of a transversal nature, which may be used to implement all or part of the actions and which may, where appropriate, be combined. These activities are the following:
(a) Activities related to the monitoring and rapid reaction systems
(i) network activities operated through structures designated by Member States and other activities of Community interest for the purposes of public health monitoring and providing national information, as well as data at Community level, in furtherance of the objectives of the programme;
(ii) activities to counter health threats, including major diseases, and react to unforeseen events, enable investigations and coordinate response;
(iii) preparation, establishment and operation of appropriate structural arrangements coordinating and integrating networks for health monitoring and for rapid reaction to health threats;
(iv) development of appropriate links between the actions concerning the monitoring and rapid reaction systems.
(b) Activities on health determinants
development and implementation of health promotion and disease prevention activities across all Community policies and involving, as appropriate, non-governmental organisations, innovative or pilot projects and networks between national institutions and activities.
(c) Activities related to legislation
(i) preparatory work for Community legislative instruments in the field of public health;
(ii) health impact assessment of Community legislation;
(iii) coordination of the position of the Community and its Member States in fora in which health-related matters are discussed.
(d) Activities related to consultation, knowledge and information
(i) development and dissemination to competent authorities in Member States, to health and other professionals and, where appropriate, to other stakeholders and the general public of health information, knowledge, including statistics, reports, reviews, analysis, and advice on issues of common interest to the Community and to Member States;
(ii) information and consultation on health and health-related matters at the Community level, involving all stakeholders such as patients’ organisations, health professionals, health care providers, trade unions, social partners and NGOs in the field of public health;
(iii) sharing of experience and exchange of information on health-related matters between the Community and authorities and competent organisations of Member States;
(iv) encouraging education and vocational training in the field of public health relevant to the objectives of the programme;
(v) developing and maintaining networks for the exchange of information on best practice in public health and the effectiveness of health policies;

Article 4
Joint strategies and actions
To ensure a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, the objectives of the programme may be implemented as joint strategies and joint actions by creating links with relevant Community programmes and actions, notably in the areas of consumer protection, social protection, health and safety at work, employment, research and technological development, internal market, information society and information technology, statistics, agriculture, education, transport, industry and environment, and with actions undertaken by the Joint Research Centre and relevant Community bodies with which cooperation shall be fostered.

Article 5
Implementation of the programme
1. The Commission shall ensure the implementation, in close cooperation with the Member States, of the actions set out in the programme, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 and ensuring its harmonious and balanced development.
2. In order to assist implementation, the Commission shall ensure, through appropriate structural arrangements closely associating the Member States, the coordination and integration of networks for health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.
3. The Commission and Member States shall take appropriate action, within their respective areas of competence, to ensure the efficient running of the programme and to develop mechanisms at Community and Member State level to achieve the objectives of the programme. They shall ensure that appropriate information is provided about actions supported by the programme and that the widest possible participation is obtained in actions requiring implementation through local and regional authorities and non-governmental organisations.
4. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, pursue the comparability of data and information and, where possible, the compatibility and interoperability of the systems and networks for exchange of data and information on health.
5. In implementing the programme the Commission, together with the Member States, shall ensure compliance with all relevant legal provisions regarding personal data protection and, where appropriate, the introduction of mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality and safety of such data.
6. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall ensure the transition between those actions developed within the public health programmes adopted by the Decisions referred to in Article 13 which contribute to the priorities set out in this programme, and those to be implemented under this programme.

Article 6
Consistency and complementarity
The Commission shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between the actions to be implemented under the programme and those implemented under other Community policies and activities, including the policies mentioned in Article 4. In particular, the Commission shall identify those proposals of particular relevance to the objectives and actions of the programme, and inform the Committee referred to in Article 9 of how health considerations are taken into account in these proposals and of their expected health impact.

Article 7
1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period specified in Article 1 is hereby set at EUR 312 million.
Expenditure on technical and administrative assistance related to the structural arrangements referred to under Article 3(2)(a)(iii), and activities arising therefrom, shall be met from the overall budget of the programme.
2. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.

Article 8
Implementation measures
1. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to the matters referred to below shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 9(2):
(a) the annual plan of work for the implementation of the programme, setting out priorities and actions to be undertaken, including allocation of resources;
(b) the arrangements, criteria and procedures for selecting and financing the actions of the programme;
(c) the arrangements for implementing the joint strategies and actions referred to in Article 4;
(d) the arrangements for evaluating the programme referred to in Article 12;
(e) the arrangements for the preparation of any structural arrangements for the coordination of health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats;
(f) the arrangements for transmitting, exchanging and disseminating information and for rapid reaction on health threats under the programme, without prejudice to the implementation measures carried out under Decision 2119/98/EC.
2. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to all other matters shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 9(3).

Article 9
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two months.
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
4. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.

Article 10
Participation of the EFTA/EEA countries, the associated central and eastern European countries, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey
The programme shall be open to the participation of:
(a) the EFTA/EEA countries in accordance with the conditions established in the EEA Agreement;
(b) the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements, in their Additional Protocols and in the Decisions of the respective Association Councils;
(c) Cyprus, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the procedures to be agreed with that country;
(d) Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty.

Article 11
International cooperation
In the course of implementing the programme, cooperation with third countries and with international organisations competent in the sphere of public health, in particular the World Health Organisation, the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, or able to have an impact on public health such as the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation shall be encouraged in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 9(3). In particular, the health information system and the capacity to respond to health threats should be, where appropriate and possible, coordinated with the activities of the World Health Organisation.

Article 12
Monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of results
1. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall regularly monitor, where appropriate with the help of experts, the implementation of the actions of the programme in the light of the objectives. It shall report annually to the Committee. The Commission shall transmit a copy of its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2. At the request of the Commission, Member States shall submit information on the implementation and the impact of this programme.
3. By the end of the fourth year of the programme, the Commission shall have an external assessment conducted by independent qualified experts of the implementation and achievements during the three first years of the programme. It shall also assess the impact achieved on health and the efficiency of the use of resources, as well as the consistency and complementarity with other relevant programmes, actions and initiatives implemented under other Community policies and activities. The Commission shall communicate the conclusions thereof, accompanied by its comments, to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The Commission shall also submit to those institutions and bodies a final report on the implementation of the programme by the end of the year which follows the end of the programme.
4. The Commission shall make the results of actions undertaken and the evaluation reports publicly available.

Article 13
The following Decisions are hereby repealed on 31 December 2002:
Decision No 645/96/EC, Decision No 646/96/EC, Decision No 647/96/EC, Decision No 102/97/EC, Decision No 1400/97/EC, Decision No 372/1999/EC, Decision No 1295/1999/EC, Decision No 1296/1999/EC.

Article 14
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Done at Brussels, 23 September 2002.
For the European Parliament
The President
For the Council
M. Fischer Boel
(1) OJ C 337 E, 28.11.2000, p. 122 and C 240 E, 28.8.2001, p. 168.
(2) OJ C 116, 20.4.2001, p. 75.
(3) OJ C 144, 16.5.2001, p. 43.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 4 April 2001 (OJ C 21, 24.1.2002, p. 161), Council Common Position of 31 July 2001 (OJ C 307, 31.10.2001, p. 27) and Decision of the European Parliament of 12 December 2001 (not yet published in the Official Journal). Decision of the European Parliament of 3 July 2002 and Decision of the Council of 26 June 2002.
(5) OJ L 95, 16.4.1996, p. 1. Decision as last amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC (OJ L 79, 17.3.2001, p. 1).
(6) OJ L 95, 16.4.1996, p. 9. Decision as last amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(7) OJ L 95, 16.4.1996, p. 16. Decision as last amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1997, p. 25. Decision as amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(9) OJ L 193, 22.7.1997, p. 1. Decision as amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(10) OJ L 46, 20.2.1999, p. 1.
(11) OJ L 155, 22.6.1999, p. 1.
(12) OJ L 155, 22.6.1999, p. 7. Decision as amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 152 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 15 May 2002,Whereas:(1) The Community is committed to promoting and improving health, preventing disease, and countering potential threats to health, with a view to reducing avoidable morbidity and premature mortality and activity-impairing disability. To contribute to the well-being of European citizens, the Community must address in a coordinated and coherent way the concerns of its people about risks to health and their expectations for a high level of health protection. Therefore, all health-related activities of the Community must have a high degree of visibility and transparency and allow consultation and participation of all stakeholders in a balanced way, in order to promote better knowledge and communication flows and thus enable a greater involvement of individuals in decisions that concern their health. In this framework, attention should be given to the right of the Community population to receive simple, clear and scientifically sound information about measures to protect health and prevent diseases, with a view to improving quality of life.(2) Health is a priority and a high level of health protection should be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities. Under Article 152 of the Treaty, the Community is required to play an active role in this sector by taking measures which cannot be taken by individual States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity.(3) In the context of the public health framework set out in the Commission communication of 24 November 1993 on the framework for action in the field of public health, eight action programmes were adopted, namely:- Decision No 645/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on health promotion, information, education and training within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(5),- Decision No 646/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting an action plan to combat cancer within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(6),- Decision No 647/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on the prevention of AIDS and certain other communicable diseases within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(7),- Decision No 102/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on the prevention of drug dependence within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000)(8),- Decision No 1400/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 adopting a programme of Community action on health monitoring within the framework for action in the field of public health (1997 to 2001)(9),- Decision No 372/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 February 1999 adopting a programme of Community action on injury prevention in the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2003)(10),- Decision No 1295/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 1999 adopting a programme of Community action on rare diseases within the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2003)(11), and- Decision No 1296/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 1999 adopting a programme of Community action on pollution-related diseases in the context of the framework for action in the field of public health (1999 to 2001)(12).Furthermore, Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 on setting up a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community(13) was adopted. Pursuant to that Decision, the Commission adopted on 22 December 1999 Decision No 2000/57/EC on the early warning and response system for the prevention and control of communicable diseases(14).(4) Other activities in the context of the public health framework included Council Recommendation 98/463/EC of 29 June 1998 on the suitability of blood and plasma donors and the screening of donated blood in the European Community(15) and Recommendation 1999/519/EC of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields 0 Hz to 300 GHz(16).(5) The public health framework was reviewed in the Commission communication of 15 April 1998 on the development of public health policy in the European Community, which indicated that a new health strategy and programme were needed in view of the new Treaty provisions, new challenges and experience so far.(6) The Council in its Conclusions of 26 November 1998 on the future framework for Community action in the field of public health(17), and in its Resolution of 8 June 1999(18), the Economic and Social Committee, in its opinion of 9 September 1998(19), the Committee of the Regions, in its Opinion of 19 November 1998(20), and the European Parliament, in its Resolution A4-0082/99 of 12 March 1999(21), welcomed the Commission communication of 15 April 1998 and supported the view that actions at Community level should be set out in one overall programme to run for a period of at least five years and comprising three general objectives, namely improving information for the development of public health, reacting rapidly to health threats and tackling health determinants through health promotion and disease prevention, underpinned by inter-sectoral action and the use of all appropriate Treaty instruments.(7) In its Resolution of 29 June 2000 on the follow-up to the Evora conference on health determinants, the Council considered that the increasing differences in health status and health outcomes between and within Member States called for renewed and coordinated efforts at national and Community level; welcomed the Commission’s commitment to submit a proposal for a new public health programme containing a specific strand of action aimed at addressing health determinants by means of health promotion and disease prevention underpinned by intersectoral policy and agreed that there was a need to develop the appropriate knowledge base for this and, therefore, that an efficacious health monitoring system should be established for this purpose; stressed the importance of the new Community public health strategy building upon the activities on specific determinants taken in the existing programmes, especially with respect to tobacco, nutrition and alcohol and that it was important not only to ensure continuity with existing actions, but also to take forward work on these issues in a fully coherent and systematic way.(8) The Council reaffirms its Conclusions on combating tobacco consumption of 18 November 1999, in which it underlined the necessity of developing an overall strategy, and invited the Commission, inter alia, to strengthen cooperation between health and other policy areas, with the aim of ensuring a high level of health protection in these areas.(9) The Council on 18 November 1999 agreed unanimously a Resolution on the Promotion of Mental Health.(10) According to the WHO World Health Report 2000 the five major burdens of disease (in disability-adjusted life years) are: 1. neuropsychiatric disorders, 2. cardiovascular diseases, 3. malignant neoplasms, 4. unintentional injuries and 5. respiratory diseases. Infectious diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, and anti-microbial resistance are also becoming a threat to the health of all people in Europe. An important task of the programme would be to identify better the main burdens of disease in the Community and, in particular, the main health determinants.(11) The programme should contribute to the exchange of information on quality standards identified in the field of public health.(12) It is essential to collect, process and analyse data at Community level for the purpose of effective public health monitoring at Community level and in order to obtain objective, reliable and compatible and comparable information which could be exchanged and would enable the Commission and the Member States to improve information to the public and formulate appropriate strategies, policies and actions to achieve a high level of human health protection. Data from the private sector should also be taken into account for the completeness of the programme. All relevant statistics should be broken down and analysed by gender.(13) The Community and its Member States have at their disposal certain means and mechanisms in relation to information and monitoring in the field of public health. It is therefore necessary to ensure a high level of coordination between actions and initiatives taken by the Community and the Member States to implement the programme, to promote cooperation between Member States and to enhance the effectiveness of existing and future networks in the field of public health.(14) It is essential that the Commission ensure the effectiveness and the cohesion of measures and actions of the programme at both micro- and macro-level as well as the promotion of cooperation between the Member States. Any structural arrangements which would be established under the auspices of the Commission to this end should collect, monitor and evaluate data, and develop surveillance methods and a basis for rapid and coordinated responses to health threats. Such structural arrangements would consist of a strengthened central resource and closely involve the relevant institutions designated by the Member States.(15) There is in particular a need to ensure, relying on competent and relevant expertise, appropriate sustainable coordination, in the area of health information, of activities in relation to the following: definition of information needs, development of indicators, collection of data and information, comparability issues, exchange of data and information with and between Member States, continuing development of databases, analyses, and wider dissemination of information. Such coordination should also be ensured in the area of rapid reaction to health threats, of activities in relation to epidemiological surveillance, development of surveillance methods, exchange of information on guidelines and on prevention and control actions, mechanisms and procedures.(16) It is essential that the Commission, through appropriate structural arrangements, ensures the effectiveness and cohesion of measures and actions contained in the programme and promotes cooperation between the Member States. To enable such structural arrangements to operate smoothly and effectively, it is essential to establish sustained cooperation with the health authorities of the Member States, while respecting Member States’ responsibilities.(17) The Commission should make, as appropriate, further proposals on the kind of structural arrangements needed for the implementation of the public health strategy, especially regarding health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.(18) The overall aim of the public health programme is to contribute towards the attainment of a high level of physical and mental health and well-being and greater equality in health matters throughout the Community, by directing action towards improving public health, preventing human diseases and disorders, and obviating sources of danger to health with a view to combating morbidity and premature mortality, while taking gender and age into consideration. To fulfil this aim, actions should be guided by the need to increase life expectancy without disability or sickness, promote quality of life and minimise the economic and social consequences of ill health, thus reducing health inequalities, while taking into account the regional approach to health issues. Priority should be given to health-promoting actions that address the major burdens of disease. The programme should support the development of an integrated intersectoral health strategy to ensure that Community policies and actions contribute to protecting and promoting health.(19) In order to achieve this, the programme should take into account the importance of education, training and networking.(20) The Treaty requires that a high level of human health protection is ensured in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities. A strong link is to be established between all Community policies having an impact on health and the Community strategy for public health. Within the public health programme, a priority task will be to develop criteria and methodologies for evaluating policy proposals and their implementation. In developing the measures under the programme, and joint strategies and actions with other relevant Community programmes and actions, it should be ensured that these other Community policies and actions incorporate the health aspect, and that they are underpinned by intersectoral policy.(21) Achieving the overall aim, and the general objectives of the programme requires effective cooperation of the Member States, their full commitment in the implementation of Community actions, and the involvement of institutions, associations, organisations and bodies in the health field as well as the public at large. To ensure sustainability and efficient use of existing Community investment and capacity, established Community and national networks should be used to pull together expertise and experience from Member States on effective methods for implementation of health promotional and preventive interventions and on quality criteria. A dialogue should be ensured with all key partners committed to improving public health and their expertise should be incorporated in an efficient and transparent Community knowledge base. Cooperation should be established with bodies and non-governmental organisations active in the field of health through appropriate mechanisms, such as health fora.(22) In accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, Community action on matters which do not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community, such as public health, should be undertaken only if and in so far as, by reason of its scale or effects, its objective can be better achieved by the Community. The objectives of the programme cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States because of the complexity, transnational character and lack of complete control at Member State level over the factors affecting health, and therefore the programme should support and complement the Member States’ actions and measures. The programme can provide a significant added value to health promotion and to health systems in the Community through the support of structures and programmes which enhance the capabilities of individuals, institutions, associations, organisations and bodies in the health field by facilitating the exchange of experience and best practices and by providing a basis for a common analysis of the factors affecting public health. Also, the programme may have added value in the event of threats to public health of a cross-border nature, such as infectious diseases, environmental pollution or food contamination, to the extent that they prompt joint strategies and actions. The programme will enable the Community to contribute towards fulfilling its Treaty obligations in the field of public health while fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the organisation and delivery of health services and health care. This decision does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.(23) The measures under the programme underpin the health strategy of the Community and will yield Community added value by responding to needs arising out of conditions and structures established through Community action in other fields, by addressing new developments, new threats and new problems for which the Community would be in a better position to act to protect its people, by bringing together activities undertaken in relative isolation and with limited impact at national level and by complementing them in order to achieve positive results for the people of the Community, and by contributing to the strengthening of solidarity and cohesion in the Community. The new health strategy and public health action programme should provide the opportunity to further develop the citizens’ dimension of Community health policy.(24) In order to ensure that actions can address broad health issues and threats effectively in cooperation with other Community policies and activities, while avoiding duplication, the programme should provide for the possibility of undertaking joint actions with related Community programmes and actions. A proactive use of other Community policies, such as structural funds and social policy could influence health determinants in a positive way.(25) Effective implementation of the measures and actions and achievement of the desired impact of the programme require comparability of the data collected. Compatibility and interoperability of the systems and networks for exchanging information and data for the development of public health would also make a valuable contribution and further efforts towards these objectives should be pursued. It is of prime importance that information is exchanged on the basis of comparable and compatible data.(26) In general, the measures and actions under the programme should take account of the development of new technologies and IT applications and, in particular, there should be close coordination with the plans drawn up and implemented in the field of public health under the integrated action programme for an electronic Europe (e-Europe), and other relevant programmes, while avoiding overlapping, and taking particular care to ensure equal accessibility to health information.(27) The Feira European Council in June 2000 endorsed the “e-Europe 2002 Action Plan on an Information Society for All”, which under Health Online urges Member States to develop an infrastructure of user-friendly, validated and interoperable systems for health education, disease prevention and medical care. It is essential that the new information technology is exploited to make health information as accessible as possible to citizens.(28) In the execution of the programme, full use should be made of the relevant results generated from the Community research programmes, which support research in areas covered by the programme.(29) The experience acquired from different charters in the field of public health should be taken into account.(30) In the implementation of the Community programme there must be compliance with all the relevant legal provisions in the field of protection of personal data, and the establishment of mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality and security of those data.(31) The programme should last six years in order to allow sufficient time to implement measures to achieve its objectives.(32) It is essential that the Commission should ensure implementation of the programme in close cooperation with the Member States. In order to obtain scientific information and advice to implement the programme, cooperation with scientists and experts of international standing is desirable.(33) Consistency and complementarity should be ensured between actions to be implemented under the programme and those envisaged or implemented under other policies and activities, in particular in the light of the requirement to ensure a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities.(34) Close cooperation and consultation will be expected with Community bodies responsible for risk assessment, monitoring and research in the fields of food and feed safety, environmental protection and product safety.(35) This decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the prime reference, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(22) for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure. The financial framework should correspond to the needs and objectives of the programme.(36) Funding from other Community policies earmarked for joint actions under the programme is additional to the financial framework laid down for the programme.(37) It is essential that there should be flexibility to allow redeployment of resources and adaptation of activities while respecting the need for transparency as well as the criteria for selecting and ordering priorities according to magnitude of risk or potential of effect, the outcome of evaluation, public concerns, availability of interventions or potential for their development, subsidiarity, added value and impact on other sectors. There is a need, however, to maintain a balance between the three objectives of the programme, allocating budget resources fairly between them.(38) Practical measures are essential in order to attain the objectives of the programme. Consequently, when implementing the programme and earmarking resources under it, the importance of practical measures should be emphasised.(39) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(23).(40) The Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement) provides for greater cooperation in the field of public health between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the countries of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area (EFTA/EEA countries), on the other. Provision should also be made to open the programme to participation of the associated Central and Eastern European countries in accordance with the conditions established in the Europe Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils, of Cyprus, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the procedures to be agreed with that country, as well as of Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty.(41) The applicant countries should be actively involved in the development and implementation of the programme and consideration should be given to a strategic approach to health in those countries, and especially to their specific problems.(42) On the accession of new Member States, the Commission should report on the consequences of these accessions for the programme.(43) Cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the sphere of health, such as the WHO, the Council of Europe and the OECD, should be fostered, not only in the field of collecting and analysing data (including indicators) but also in the field of intersectoral health promotion, in order to ensure cost effectiveness, avoid overlapping of activities and programmes and enforce synergy and interaction, taking particular account of specific arrangements for cooperation such as that between the WHO and the Commission.(44) In order to increase the value and impact of the programme there should be regular monitoring and evaluation, including independent external evaluations, of the measures taken. It should be possible to adjust or modify the programme in the light of these evaluations and of developments that may take place in the general context of Community action in health and health-related fields. The European Parliament should be informed of the annual work plans which will be drawn up by the Commission.(45) The programme of Community action in the field of public health builds on the activities and the eight programmes under the previous framework and on the work of the network for epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community, and pursues all the objectives and measures therein in the form of a global and integrated health strategy. The decisions concerning those eight programmes are covered by the new programme and should therefore be repealed with effect from 31 December 2002,HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Establishment of the programme1. This Decision establishes a programme of Community action in the field of public health, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”.2. The programme shall be implemented in the period starting on 1 January 2003 and ending on 31 December 2008.Article 2Overall aim and general objectives1. The programme, which shall complement national policies, shall aim to protect human health and improve public health.2. The general objectives of the programme shall be:(a) to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health;(b) to enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion to threats to health;(c) to promote health and prevent disease through addressing health determinants across all policies and activities.3. The programme shall thereby contribute to:(a) ensuring a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, through the promotion of an integrated and intersectoral health strategy;(b) tackling inequalities in health;(c) encouraging cooperation between Member States in the areas covered by Article 152 of the Treaty.Article 3Community actions and activities1. The general objectives of the programme as set out in Article 2 shall be pursued by means of the actions listed in the Annex.2. These actions shall be implemented in close cooperation with Member States through support to activities of a transversal nature, which may be used to implement all or part of the actions and which may, where appropriate, be combined. These activities are the following:(a) Activities related to the monitoring and rapid reaction systems(i) network activities operated through structures designated by Member States and other activities of Community interest for the purposes of public health monitoring and providing national information, as well as data at Community level, in furtherance of the objectives of the programme;(ii) activities to counter health threats, including major diseases, and react to unforeseen events, enable investigations and coordinate response;(iii) preparation, establishment and operation of appropriate structural arrangements coordinating and integrating networks for health monitoring and for rapid reaction to health threats;(iv) development of appropriate links between the actions concerning the monitoring and rapid reaction systems.(b) Activities on health determinantsdevelopment and implementation of health promotion and disease prevention activities across all Community policies and involving, as appropriate, non-governmental organisations, innovative or pilot projects and networks between national institutions and activities.(c) Activities related to legislation(i) preparatory work for Community legislative instruments in the field of public health;(ii) health impact assessment of Community legislation;(iii) coordination of the position of the Community and its Member States in fora in which health-related matters are discussed.(d) Activities related to consultation, knowledge and information(i) development and dissemination to competent authorities in Member States, to health and other professionals and, where appropriate, to other stakeholders and the general public of health information, knowledge, including statistics, reports, reviews, analysis, and advice on issues of common interest to the Community and to Member States;(ii) information and consultation on health and health-related matters at the Community level, involving all stakeholders such as patients’ organisations, health professionals, health care providers, trade unions, social partners and NGOs in the field of public health;(iii) sharing of experience and exchange of information on health-related matters between the Community and authorities and competent organisations of Member States;(iv) encouraging education and vocational training in the field of public health relevant to the objectives of the programme;(v) developing and maintaining networks for the exchange of information on best practice in public health and the effectiveness of health policies;(vi) obtaining scientific information and advice from high-level scientists and experts;(vii) supporting and promoting activities by the Community and the Member States with regard to good practice and to sound guidelines for public health based on scientific data.(e) Promotion of coordination at the European level of non-governmental organisations which are developing activities defined as priorities under the programme. They may be operating either singly or in the form of several coordinated associations.Article 4Joint strategies and actionsTo ensure a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, the objectives of the programme may be implemented as joint strategies and joint actions by creating links with relevant Community programmes and actions, notably in the areas of consumer protection, social protection, health and safety at work, employment, research and technological development, internal market, information society and information technology, statistics, agriculture, education, transport, industry and environment, and with actions undertaken by the Joint Research Centre and relevant Community bodies with which cooperation shall be fostered.Article 5Implementation of the programme1. The Commission shall ensure the implementation, in close cooperation with the Member States, of the actions set out in the programme, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 and ensuring its harmonious and balanced development.2. In order to assist implementation, the Commission shall ensure, through appropriate structural arrangements closely associating the Member States, the coordination and integration of networks for health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.3. The Commission and Member States shall take appropriate action, within their respective areas of competence, to ensure the efficient running of the programme and to develop mechanisms at Community and Member State level to achieve the objectives of the programme. They shall ensure that appropriate information is provided about actions supported by the programme and that the widest possible participation is obtained in actions requiring implementation through local and regional authorities and non-governmental organisations.4. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, pursue the comparability of data and information and, where possible, the compatibility and interoperability of the systems and networks for exchange of data and information on health.5. In implementing the programme the Commission, together with the Member States, shall ensure compliance with all relevant legal provisions regarding personal data protection and, where appropriate, the introduction of mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality and safety of such data.6. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall ensure the transition between those actions developed within the public health programmes adopted by the Decisions referred to in Article 13 which contribute to the priorities set out in this programme, and those to be implemented under this programme.Article 6Consistency and complementarityThe Commission shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between the actions to be implemented under the programme and those implemented under other Community policies and activities, including the policies mentioned in Article 4. In particular, the Commission shall identify those proposals of particular relevance to the objectives and actions of the programme, and inform the Committee referred to in Article 9 of how health considerations are taken into account in these proposals and of their expected health impact.Article 7Funding1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period specified in
Establishment of the programme
1. This Decision establishes a programme of Community action in the field of public health, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”.
2. The programme shall be implemented in the period starting on 1 January 2003 and ending on 31 December 2008.
Overall aim and general objectives
1. The programme, which shall complement national policies, shall aim to protect human health and improve public health.
2. The general objectives of the programme shall be:
(a) to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health;
(b) to enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion to threats to health;
(c) to promote health and prevent disease through addressing health determinants across all policies and activities.
3. The programme shall thereby contribute to:
(a) ensuring a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, through the promotion of an integrated and intersectoral health strategy;
(b) tackling inequalities in health;
(c) encouraging cooperation between Member States in the areas covered by Article 152 of the Treaty.
Community actions and activities
1. The general objectives of the programme as set out in Article 2 shall be pursued by means of the actions listed in the Annex.
2. These actions shall be implemented in close cooperation with Member States through support to activities of a transversal nature, which may be used to implement all or part of the actions and which may, where appropriate, be combined. These activities are the following:
(a) Activities related to the monitoring and rapid reaction systems
(i) network activities operated through structures designated by Member States and other activities of Community interest for the purposes of public health monitoring and providing national information, as well as data at Community level, in furtherance of the objectives of the programme;
(ii) activities to counter health threats, including major diseases, and react to unforeseen events, enable investigations and coordinate response;
(iii) preparation, establishment and operation of appropriate structural arrangements coordinating and integrating networks for health monitoring and for rapid reaction to health threats;
(iv) development of appropriate links between the actions concerning the monitoring and rapid reaction systems.
(b) Activities on health determinants
development and implementation of health promotion and disease prevention activities across all Community policies and involving, as appropriate, non-governmental organisations, innovative or pilot projects and networks between national institutions and activities.
(c) Activities related to legislation
(i) preparatory work for Community legislative instruments in the field of public health;
(ii) health impact assessment of Community legislation;
(iii) coordination of the position of the Community and its Member States in fora in which health-related matters are discussed.
(d) Activities related to consultation, knowledge and information
(i) development and dissemination to competent authorities in Member States, to health and other professionals and, where appropriate, to other stakeholders and the general public of health information, knowledge, including statistics, reports, reviews, analysis, and advice on issues of common interest to the Community and to Member States;
(ii) information and consultation on health and health-related matters at the Community level, involving all stakeholders such as patients’ organisations, health professionals, health care providers, trade unions, social partners and NGOs in the field of public health;
(iii) sharing of experience and exchange of information on health-related matters between the Community and authorities and competent organisations of Member States;
(iv) encouraging education and vocational training in the field of public health relevant to the objectives of the programme;
(v) developing and maintaining networks for the exchange of information on best practice in public health and the effectiveness of health policies;
Joint strategies and actions
To ensure a high level of human health protection in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, the objectives of the programme may be implemented as joint strategies and joint actions by creating links with relevant Community programmes and actions, notably in the areas of consumer protection, social protection, health and safety at work, employment, research and technological development, internal market, information society and information technology, statistics, agriculture, education, transport, industry and environment, and with actions undertaken by the Joint Research Centre and relevant Community bodies with which cooperation shall be fostered.
Implementation of the programme
1. The Commission shall ensure the implementation, in close cooperation with the Member States, of the actions set out in the programme, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 and ensuring its harmonious and balanced development.
2. In order to assist implementation, the Commission shall ensure, through appropriate structural arrangements closely associating the Member States, the coordination and integration of networks for health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.
3. The Commission and Member States shall take appropriate action, within their respective areas of competence, to ensure the efficient running of the programme and to develop mechanisms at Community and Member State level to achieve the objectives of the programme. They shall ensure that appropriate information is provided about actions supported by the programme and that the widest possible participation is obtained in actions requiring implementation through local and regional authorities and non-governmental organisations.
4. The Commission shall, in close cooperation with the Member States, pursue the comparability of data and information and, where possible, the compatibility and interoperability of the systems and networks for exchange of data and information on health.
5. In implementing the programme the Commission, together with the Member States, shall ensure compliance with all relevant legal provisions regarding personal data protection and, where appropriate, the introduction of mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality and safety of such data.
6. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall ensure the transition between those actions developed within the public health programmes adopted by the Decisions referred to in Article 13 which contribute to the priorities set out in this programme, and those to be implemented under this programme.
Consistency and complementarity
The Commission shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between the actions to be implemented under the programme and those implemented under other Community policies and activities, including the policies mentioned in Article 4. In particular, the Commission shall identify those proposals of particular relevance to the objectives and actions of the programme, and inform the Committee referred to in Article 9 of how health considerations are taken into account in these proposals and of their expected health impact.
1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period specified in Article 1 is hereby set at EUR 312 million.
Expenditure on technical and administrative assistance related to the structural arrangements referred to under Article 3(2)(a)(iii), and activities arising therefrom, shall be met from the overall budget of the programme.
2. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.
Implementation measures
1. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to the matters referred to below shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 9(2):
(a) the annual plan of work for the implementation of the programme, setting out priorities and actions to be undertaken, including allocation of resources;
(b) the arrangements, criteria and procedures for selecting and financing the actions of the programme;
(c) the arrangements for implementing the joint strategies and actions referred to in Article 4;
(d) the arrangements for evaluating the programme referred to in Article 12;
(e) the arrangements for the preparation of any structural arrangements for the coordination of health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats;
(f) the arrangements for transmitting, exchanging and disseminating information and for rapid reaction on health threats under the programme, without prejudice to the implementation measures carried out under Decision 2119/98/EC.
2. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to all other matters shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 9(3).
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two months.
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
4. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.
Participation of the EFTA/EEA countries, the associated central and eastern European countries, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey
The programme shall be open to the participation of:
(a) the EFTA/EEA countries in accordance with the conditions established in the EEA Agreement;
(b) the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements, in their Additional Protocols and in the Decisions of the respective Association Councils;
(c) Cyprus, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the procedures to be agreed with that country;
(d) Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty.
International cooperation
In the course of implementing the programme, cooperation with third countries and with international organisations competent in the sphere of public health, in particular the World Health Organisation, the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, or able to have an impact on public health such as the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation shall be encouraged in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 9(3). In particular, the health information system and the capacity to respond to health threats should be, where appropriate and possible, coordinated with the activities of the World Health Organisation.
Monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of results
1. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall regularly monitor, where appropriate with the help of experts, the implementation of the actions of the programme in the light of the objectives. It shall report annually to the Committee. The Commission shall transmit a copy of its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2. At the request of the Commission, Member States shall submit information on the implementation and the impact of this programme.
3. By the end of the fourth year of the programme, the Commission shall have an external assessment conducted by independent qualified experts of the implementation and achievements during the three first years of the programme. It shall also assess the impact achieved on health and the efficiency of the use of resources, as well as the consistency and complementarity with other relevant programmes, actions and initiatives implemented under other Community policies and activities. The Commission shall communicate the conclusions thereof, accompanied by its comments, to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The Commission shall also submit to those institutions and bodies a final report on the implementation of the programme by the end of the year which follows the end of the programme.
4. The Commission shall make the results of actions undertaken and the evaluation reports publicly available.
The following Decisions are hereby repealed on 31 December 2002:
Decision No 645/96/EC, Decision No 646/96/EC, Decision No 647/96/EC, Decision No 102/97/EC, Decision No 1400/97/EC, Decision No 372/1999/EC, Decision No 1295/1999/EC, Decision No 1296/1999/EC.
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Done at Brussels, 23 September 2002.
For the European Parliament
The President
For the Council
M. Fischer Boel
(1) OJ C 337 E, 28.11.2000, p. 122 and C 240 E, 28.8.2001, p. 168.
(2) OJ C 116, 20.4.2001, p. 75.
(3) OJ C 144, 16.5.2001, p. 43.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 4 April 2001 (OJ C 21, 24.1.2002, p. 161), Council Common Position of 31 July 2001 (OJ C 307, 31.10.2001, p. 27) and Decision of the European Parliament of 12 December 2001 (not yet published in the Official Journal). Decision of the European Parliament of 3 July 2002 and Decision of the Council of 26 June 2002.
(5) OJ L 95, 16.4.1996, p. 1. Decision as last amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC (OJ L 79, 17.3.2001, p. 1).
(6) OJ L 95, 16.4.1996, p. 9. Decision as last amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(7) OJ L 95, 16.4.1996, p. 16. Decision as last amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1997, p. 25. Decision as amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(9) OJ L 193, 22.7.1997, p. 1. Decision as amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
(10) OJ L 46, 20.2.1999, p. 1.
(11) OJ L 155, 22.6.1999, p. 1.
(12) OJ L 155, 22.6.1999, p. 7. Decision as amended by Decision No 521/2001/EC.
ACTIONS AND SUPPORT MEASURES
1. To improve health information and knowledge for the development of public health by:
1.1. developing and operating a sustainable health monitoring system to establish comparable quantitative and qualitative indicators at Community level on the basis of existing work and of accomplished results, and to collect, analyse and disseminate comparable and compatible age- and gender-specific information on human health at Community level concerning health status, health policies and health determinants, including demography, geography and socioeconomic situations, personal and biological factors, health behaviours such as substance abuse, nutrition, physical activity, sexual behaviour, and living, working and environmental conditions, paying special attention to inequalities in health;
1.2. developing an information system for the early warning, detection and surveillance of health threats, both on communicable diseases, including with regard to the danger of cross-border spread of diseases (including resistant pathogens), and on non-communicable diseases;
1.3. improving the system for the transfer and sharing of information and health data including public access;
1.4. developing and using mechanisms for analysis, advice, reporting, information and consultation with Member States and stakeholders on health issues relevant at Community level;
1.5. improving analysis and knowledge of the impact of health policy developments and of other Community policies and activities, such as the internal market as it affects health systems, in contributing to a high level of human health protection, including developing criteria and methodologies for assessing policies for their impact on health and developing other links between public health and other policies;
1.6. reviewing, analysing, and supporting the exchange of experiences on, health technologies, including new information technologies;
1.7. supporting the exchange of information and experiences on good practice;
1.8. developing and operating a joint action with the plans drawn up under e-Europe to improve availability to the general public on the Internet of information on health matters, and considering the possibilities for establishing a system of recognisable Community seals of approval for Internet sites.
The existing data and the information provided by the system is to be easily accessible to the Community, relevant users in Member States and, as appropriate, international organisations.
The statistical element of the system will be developed, in collaboration with Member States, using as necessary the Community Statistical Programme to promote synergy and avoid duplication.
2. To enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion to threats to health by:
2.1. enhancing the capacity to tackle communicable diseases by supporting the further implementation of Decision No 2119/98/EC on the Community network on the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases;
2.2. supporting the network’s operation, in the Member States and the countries participating on the basis of Article 10 of this decision, in particular in relation to common investigations, training, continuous assessment, quality assurance and, where appropriate, in relation to its contribution to the actions described in the Annex, points 1.2 and 1.3;
2.3. developing strategies and mechanisms for preventing, exchanging information on and responding to non-communicable disease threats, including gender-specific health threats and rare diseases;
2.4. exchanging information concerning strategies in order to counter health threats from physical, chemical or biological sources in emergency situations, including those relating to terrorist acts, and developing or using, when appropriate, Community approaches and mechanisms;
2.5. exchanging information on vaccination and immunisation strategies;
2.6. enhancing the safety and quality of organs and substances of human origin, including blood, blood components and blood precursors by developing high standards of quality and safety for the collection, processing, storage and distribution and use of these substances;
2.7. implementing vigilance networks for human products, such as blood, blood components and blood precursors;
2.8. promoting strategies and measures concerning the protection of human health from possible adverse effects from environmental agents such as ionising and non-ionising radiation and noise;
2.9. developing strategies for reducing antibiotic resistance.
3. To promote health and prevent disease through action on health determinants across all Community policies and activities by:
3.1. preparing and implementing strategies and measures, including those related to public awareness, on life-style related health determinants, such as nutrition, physical activity, tobacco, alcohol, drugs and other substances and on mental health, including measures to take in all Community policies and age- and gender-specific strategies;
3.2. analysing the situation and developing strategies on social and economic health determinants, in order to identify and combat inequalities in health and to assess the impact of social and economic factors on health;
3.3. analysing the situation and developing strategies on health determinants related to the environment and contributing to the identification and assessment of the health consequences of environmental factors;
3.4. analysing the situation and exchange information on genetic determinants and the use of genetic screening;
3.5. developing methods to evaluate quality and efficiency of health promotion strategies and measures;
3.6. encouraging relevant training activities related to the above measures.
4. Support measures
4.1. Community assistance may be provided to support the actions and activities referred to in Article 3.
4.2. In carrying out the programme, the Commission may require additional resources, including recourse to experts, for instance for the monitoring system, the evaluation of the programme or the preparation of new legislation. It may also require experts to work for the Community structural arrangements for the coordination and integration of networks for health monitoring and for rapid reaction to health threats. The report referred to in Article 12(1) shall be accompanied, if need be, by any proposal regarding adjustment of the requirements.
4.3. The Commission may also undertake information, publication and dissemination of actions. It may also undertake evaluation studies and organise seminars, colloquia or other meetings of experts.
Commission Statements
Declaration on structural arrangements
in order to ensure the effective implementation of the programme, in conformity with Article 5 of the Decision, the Commission intends to proceed as follows:
1. it will take the necessary steps to ensure the functioning of the Committee established under Articles 8 and 9 of the Decision. This Committee will be composed of representatives designated by the Member States, as laid down in Decision 1999/468/EC;
2. in full respect of the provisions of Article 218(2) of the EC treaty, it will operate its departments in the best way in order to facilitate attaining the three general objectives of the programme set out in Article 2 of the Decision;
3. in accordance with point 4 of the Annex to the Decision, the Commission will make use of scientific and technical experts to reinforce its capacity in the specific areas of action of the programme. Such experts will work with the Commission services in conformity with the relevant administrative rules;
4. the Commission also intends to make full use of the possibilities described in its Communication on externalisation (COM(2000) 788) and proposed regulation (COM(2001) 808). This may include examining the setting up of an executive agency in order to assist the Commission in implementing certain tasks of the programme once the proposed Regulation currently before the Council, is adopted.
The Commission further declares that the actions envisaged in points 1 and 2 will be implemented not later than the beginning of 2003, when the programme comes into effect; point 3 will begin early in the programme as soon as the relevant arrangements can be made, and point 4 will be considered later in the programme once the proposed Regulation is adopted.
Declaration on Article 7
The financial framework of the programme shall be reviewed in the context both of the accession of new Member States and the preparation for the revision of the financial perspective, taking account of the establishment of the structural arrangements, and of developments concerning key priorities; financial proposals will be made, if appropriate.

Pending: 32002D0975

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Directive 2002/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC(4), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 92/40/EEC introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(5), and in particular Article 16 thereof,Whereas:(1) During 1999 and 2000 Italy has experienced outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H7N1 with devastating economic losses for the poultry industry. Prior to the epidemic a virus of low pathogenicity had been circulating in the area.(2) During monitoring for avian influenza the presence of low pathogenic avian influenza virus of subtype H7N3 was detected in the regions of Veneto and Lombardia in October 2002.(3) Currently the control of low pathogenic avian influenza infections is not covered by Community legislation.(4) The Italian competent veterinary authorities have taken control measures to avoid the spread of disease to other areas; however the infection cannot be contained sufficiently.(5) Low pathogenic virus may mutate to highly pathogenic virus and may cause severe disease outbreaks.(6) During the previous avian influenza epidemic in Italy a vaccination programme was approved by the Commission in connection with intensive monitoring and certain provisions for intra-Community trade in live poultry and poultry products.(7) As a follow-up of the vaccination campaign certain measures concerning movement restrictions for intra-Community trade of live poultry and poultry products were maintained by the adoption of Commission Decision 2002/552/EC(6).(8) The experience of the Italian vaccination campaign suggests that this has successfully stopped the spread of the low pathogenic avian influenza virus.(9) Avian influenza virus subtype H7N3 is responsible for the current infections, whereas the previous epidemic was caused by an H7N1 virus subtype.(10) The infection occurs at present in an area of Italy with dense poultry population.(11) In this context vaccination can be an effective tool to supplement disease control measures against avian influenza.(12) Where vaccination against avian influenza is practised movement restrictions for vaccinated poultry have to be implemented.(13) Italy has presented a vaccination programme to supplement the measures to control avian influenza in a limited area of Italy including specific movement restrictions.(14) Italy has authorised the use of two inactivated vaccines against avian influenza for the implementation of the programme. For the initial phase a homologous vaccine is obtained from the master seed strain CK/Pak/1995-H7N3 and for the following period starting from early 2003 a heterologous vaccine with the master seed strain A/CK/Italy/AG-473/1999-H7N1 shall be used.(15) Within a technical working group meeting the vaccination programme presented by Italy was reviewed.(16) Monitoring on vaccinated and unvaccinated poultry flocks shall be continued including the use of the serological test (iIFA-test) which had been approved by Commission Decision 2001/847/EC(7).(17) Italy shall introduce specific movement restrictions related to vaccination of poultry and to intra-Community trade.(18) For reasons of clarity Decision 2002/552/EC should be repealed as its provisions are superseded by this Decision.(19) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The vaccination programme against avian influenza presented by Italy is hereby approved and shall be carried out in the area described in Annex I.Article 2The restrictions on movements of live birds, hatching eggs, table eggs and fresh poultry meat into, out of and within the area described in Annex I shall apply as laid down in the vaccination programme referred to in

Article 1
The vaccination programme against avian influenza presented by Italy is hereby approved and shall be carried out in the area described in Annex I.

Article 2
The restrictions on movements of live birds, hatching eggs, table eggs and fresh poultry meat into, out of and within the area described in Annex I shall apply as laid down in the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1.

Article 3
1. No live birds and hatching eggs coming from and/or originating from the area described in Annex I shall be dispatched from Italy.
2. Live birds and hatching eggs coming from and/or originating from the territory of Italy outside the area described in Annex I can only be dispatched from Italy if:
– no contacts or other epidemiological links in relation to avian influenza have been established between the holding of origin and with a holding or a hatchery situated in the area described in Annex I, and
– the holding of origin is not located in any of the restriction zones established by the competent authority in relation with avian influenza.
3. No table eggs derived from poultry vaccinated against avian influenza and originating from the area described in Annex I, shall be dispatched from Italy.

Article 4
Animal health certificates accompanying consignments of live birds and hatching eggs from Italy shall include the words: “The animal health conditions of this consignment are in accordance with Decision 2002/975/EC”.

Article 5
1. Fresh meat of poultry must be marked in accordance with Article 5 of Council Directive 91/494/EEC(8) and shall not be dispatched from Italy if it is derived from:
(a) poultry vaccinated against avian influenza;
(b) avian influenza seropositive poultry flocks destined for slaughter under official control in accordance with the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1;
(c) poultry originating from holdings located in a restriction zone, which shall be established based on a minimum radius of three kilometres around any poultry farm infected with low pathogenic avian influenza in accordance with the provisions laid down in the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1.
2. By derogation from paragraph 1(a) and (b), fresh meat from turkeys vaccinated against avian influenza with a heterologous vaccine of subtype (H7N1) shall not be marked in accordance with Article 5 of Council Directive 91/494/EEC and can be dispatched to other Member States, provided that the meat comes from slaughter turkey flocks which:
(i) have been regularly inspected and tested with negative results for avian influenza as laid down in the approved vaccination programme, with particular attention to be paid to the sentinel birds.
For the testing of:
– vaccinated birds, the iIFA-test shall be used,
– sentinel birds, either the Haemagglutination-Inhibition Test (HI), the AGID-test or the ELISA-test shall be used. However, the iIFA-test shall also be used if necessary;
(ii) have been clinically inspected by an official veterinarian within 48 hours before loading, with particular attention to be paid to the sentinel birds;
(iii) have been tested serologically with negative results at the National Laboratory for avian influenza, by using the sampling and testing procedure laid down in Annex II to this Decision;
(iv) must be sent directly to a slaughterhouse designated by the competent authority and be slaughtered immediately after arrival. The birds shall be kept separated from other flocks not complying with the present provisions.
3. Fresh turkey meat fulfilling the requirements as set out in paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by the health certificate laid down in Annex VI of Directive 71/118/EEC(9), which shall include under point IV(a) of the certificate the following attestation of the official veterinarian:
“The turkey meat described above is in accordance with Decision 2002/975/EC”.

Article 6
Italy shall ensure that in the area described in Annex I:
1. Only disposable packaging material, or packaging material which can be effectively washed and disinfected, is used for the collection, storage and transport of table eggs.
2. All means of transport used for transporting poultry, hatching eggs, table eggs and poultry feedstuff must be cleaned and disinfected immediately before and after each transport with disinfectants in accordance with the methods of use approved by the competent authority.

Article 7
Movements of live poultry and hatching eggs coming from areas of Italy outside the area described in Annex I to other Member States shall only be allowed following five days advance notification to the central and local veterinary authorities of destination. The notification shall be dispatched by the competent veterinary authority.

Article 8
1. Italy shall notify to the Commission and to other Member States the date of the commencement of the vaccination, at least one day in advance.
2. The provisions of the Articles 2 to 7 shall be enforced from the date of the commencement of the vaccination.

Article 9
1. Italy shall, at six-month intervals, present a report containing information on the effectiveness of the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1.
2. This Decision, and in particular the period of time during which the movement restrictions provided for in Articles 2 to 7 shall continue to apply after the completion of the vaccination programme, shall be reviewed accordingly.

Article 10
Decision 2002/552/EC is repealed.

Article 11
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 December 2002.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.
(2) OJ L 315, 19.11.2002, p. 14.
(3) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13.
(4) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.
(5) OJ L 167, 22.6.1992, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 180, 10.7.2002, p. 24.
(7) OJ L 315, 1.12.2001, p. 61.
(8) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 35.
(9) OJ L 55, 8.3.1971, p. 23.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Directive 2002/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC(4), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 92/40/EEC introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(5), and in particular Article 16 thereof,Whereas:(1) During 1999 and 2000 Italy has experienced outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H7N1 with devastating economic losses for the poultry industry. Prior to the epidemic a virus of low pathogenicity had been circulating in the area.(2) During monitoring for avian influenza the presence of low pathogenic avian influenza virus of subtype H7N3 was detected in the regions of Veneto and Lombardia in October 2002.(3) Currently the control of low pathogenic avian influenza infections is not covered by Community legislation.(4) The Italian competent veterinary authorities have taken control measures to avoid the spread of disease to other areas; however the infection cannot be contained sufficiently.(5) Low pathogenic virus may mutate to highly pathogenic virus and may cause severe disease outbreaks.(6) During the previous avian influenza epidemic in Italy a vaccination programme was approved by the Commission in connection with intensive monitoring and certain provisions for intra-Community trade in live poultry and poultry products.(7) As a follow-up of the vaccination campaign certain measures concerning movement restrictions for intra-Community trade of live poultry and poultry products were maintained by the adoption of Commission Decision 2002/552/EC(6).(8) The experience of the Italian vaccination campaign suggests that this has successfully stopped the spread of the low pathogenic avian influenza virus.(9) Avian influenza virus subtype H7N3 is responsible for the current infections, whereas the previous epidemic was caused by an H7N1 virus subtype.(10) The infection occurs at present in an area of Italy with dense poultry population.(11) In this context vaccination can be an effective tool to supplement disease control measures against avian influenza.(12) Where vaccination against avian influenza is practised movement restrictions for vaccinated poultry have to be implemented.(13) Italy has presented a vaccination programme to supplement the measures to control avian influenza in a limited area of Italy including specific movement restrictions.(14) Italy has authorised the use of two inactivated vaccines against avian influenza for the implementation of the programme. For the initial phase a homologous vaccine is obtained from the master seed strain CK/Pak/1995-H7N3 and for the following period starting from early 2003 a heterologous vaccine with the master seed strain A/CK/Italy/AG-473/1999-H7N1 shall be used.(15) Within a technical working group meeting the vaccination programme presented by Italy was reviewed.(16) Monitoring on vaccinated and unvaccinated poultry flocks shall be continued including the use of the serological test (iIFA-test) which had been approved by Commission Decision 2001/847/EC(7).(17) Italy shall introduce specific movement restrictions related to vaccination of poultry and to intra-Community trade.(18) For reasons of clarity Decision 2002/552/EC should be repealed as its provisions are superseded by this Decision.(19) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The vaccination programme against avian influenza presented by Italy is hereby approved and shall be carried out in the area described in Annex I.Article 2The restrictions on movements of live birds, hatching eggs, table eggs and fresh poultry meat into, out of and within the area described in Annex I shall apply as laid down in the vaccination programme referred to in
The vaccination programme against avian influenza presented by Italy is hereby approved and shall be carried out in the area described in Annex I.
The restrictions on movements of live birds, hatching eggs, table eggs and fresh poultry meat into, out of and within the area described in Annex I shall apply as laid down in the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1.
1. No live birds and hatching eggs coming from and/or originating from the area described in Annex I shall be dispatched from Italy.
2. Live birds and hatching eggs coming from and/or originating from the territory of Italy outside the area described in Annex I can only be dispatched from Italy if:
– no contacts or other epidemiological links in relation to avian influenza have been established between the holding of origin and with a holding or a hatchery situated in the area described in Annex I, and
– the holding of origin is not located in any of the restriction zones established by the competent authority in relation with avian influenza.
3. No table eggs derived from poultry vaccinated against avian influenza and originating from the area described in Annex I, shall be dispatched from Italy.
Animal health certificates accompanying consignments of live birds and hatching eggs from Italy shall include the words: “The animal health conditions of this consignment are in accordance with Decision 2002/975/EC”.
1. Fresh meat of poultry must be marked in accordance with Article 5 of Council Directive 91/494/EEC(8) and shall not be dispatched from Italy if it is derived from:
(a) poultry vaccinated against avian influenza;
(b) avian influenza seropositive poultry flocks destined for slaughter under official control in accordance with the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1;
(c) poultry originating from holdings located in a restriction zone, which shall be established based on a minimum radius of three kilometres around any poultry farm infected with low pathogenic avian influenza in accordance with the provisions laid down in the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1.
2. By derogation from paragraph 1(a) and (b), fresh meat from turkeys vaccinated against avian influenza with a heterologous vaccine of subtype (H7N1) shall not be marked in accordance with Article 5 of Council Directive 91/494/EEC and can be dispatched to other Member States, provided that the meat comes from slaughter turkey flocks which:
(i) have been regularly inspected and tested with negative results for avian influenza as laid down in the approved vaccination programme, with particular attention to be paid to the sentinel birds.
For the testing of:
– vaccinated birds, the iIFA-test shall be used,
– sentinel birds, either the Haemagglutination-Inhibition Test (HI), the AGID-test or the ELISA-test shall be used. However, the iIFA-test shall also be used if necessary;
(ii) have been clinically inspected by an official veterinarian within 48 hours before loading, with particular attention to be paid to the sentinel birds;
(iii) have been tested serologically with negative results at the National Laboratory for avian influenza, by using the sampling and testing procedure laid down in Annex II to this Decision;
(iv) must be sent directly to a slaughterhouse designated by the competent authority and be slaughtered immediately after arrival. The birds shall be kept separated from other flocks not complying with the present provisions.
3. Fresh turkey meat fulfilling the requirements as set out in paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by the health certificate laid down in Annex VI of Directive 71/118/EEC(9), which shall include under point IV(a) of the certificate the following attestation of the official veterinarian:
“The turkey meat described above is in accordance with Decision 2002/975/EC”.
Italy shall ensure that in the area described in Annex I:
1. Only disposable packaging material, or packaging material which can be effectively washed and disinfected, is used for the collection, storage and transport of table eggs.
2. All means of transport used for transporting poultry, hatching eggs, table eggs and poultry feedstuff must be cleaned and disinfected immediately before and after each transport with disinfectants in accordance with the methods of use approved by the competent authority.
Movements of live poultry and hatching eggs coming from areas of Italy outside the area described in Annex I to other Member States shall only be allowed following five days advance notification to the central and local veterinary authorities of destination. The notification shall be dispatched by the competent veterinary authority.
1. Italy shall notify to the Commission and to other Member States the date of the commencement of the vaccination, at least one day in advance.
2. The provisions of the Articles 2 to 7 shall be enforced from the date of the commencement of the vaccination.
1. Italy shall, at six-month intervals, present a report containing information on the effectiveness of the vaccination programme referred to in Article 1.
2. This Decision, and in particular the period of time during which the movement restrictions provided for in Articles 2 to 7 shall continue to apply after the completion of the vaccination programme, shall be reviewed accordingly.
Decision 2002/552/EC is repealed.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 December 2002.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.
(2) OJ L 315, 19.11.2002, p. 14.
(3) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13.
(4) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.
(5) OJ L 167, 22.6.1992, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 180, 10.7.2002, p. 24.
(7) OJ L 315, 1.12.2001, p. 61.
(8) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 35.
(9) OJ L 55, 8.3.1971, p. 23.
VACCINATION AREA
Veneto region
Verona province
The vaccination area comprises the territory of the following municipalities:
Albaredo d’Adige
Boschi Sant’Anna
Buttapietra
Calmiero area to the south of the A4 motorway
Castel d’Azzano
Castelnuovo del Garda area to the south of the A4 motorway
Cologna Veneta
Colognola ai Colli area to the south of the A4 motorway
Concamarise
Gazzo Veronese
Isola della Scala
Isola Rizza
Lavagno area to the south of the A4 motorway
Monteforte d’Alpone area to the south of the A4 motorway
Nogarole Rocca
Peschiera del Garda area to the south of the A4 motorway
Povegliano Veronese
Ronco all’Adige
Roverchiara
Roveredo di Guà
S. Bonifacio area to the south of the A4 motorway
S. Giovanni Lupatoto area to the south of the A4 motorway
S. Martino Buon Albergo area to the south of the A4 motorway
S. Pietro di Morubio
Sanguinetto
Soave area to the south of the A4 motorway
Sommacampagna
Sona area to the south of the A4 motorway
Trevenzuolo
Valeggio sul Mincio
Verona area to the south of the A4 motorway
Villafranca di Verona
Vicenza province
The vaccination area comprises the territory of the following municipalities:
Asigliano Veneto
Barbarano Vicentino
Campiglia dei Berici
Montegaldella
Noventa Vicentina
Poiana Maggiore
S. Germano dei Berici
Padova province
The vaccination area comprises the territory of the following municipalities:
Casale di Scodosia
Lozzo Atestino
Megliadino S. Fidenzio
SAMPLING AND TESTING PROCEDURE
1. Introduction and general use
The developed indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (iIFA-test) is aimed at the differentiation between vaccinated/field exposed and vaccinated/non field exposed turkeys in the framework of a “DIVA” (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) vaccination strategy using a heterologous subtype vaccine from the H7N3 field virus subtype.
2. Use of the test for the purpose of dispatching fresh turkey meat from the vaccination area in Italy to other Member States
Meat originating from turkey flocks vaccinated against avian influenza may be dispatched to other Member States provided that:
Blood samples shall be taken by the official veterinarian:
– from each group of turkeys destined for slaughter, which are kept in the same building of the holding in question,
– within 48 hours before sending the animals to the slaughterhouse,
– from at least 10 vaccinated animals chosen at random from each group.

Pending: 32002D0882

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee(3),Whereas:(1) The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) authorities re-established links with international organisations and in particular made progress towards normalising the country’s financial relations with multilateral creditors, including the European Investment Bank, and with official bilateral creditors.(2) Since October 2000, the FRY has achieved substantial progress in economic stabilisation and reform and has made important steps towards a well-functioning market economy.(3) Within the Stabilisation and Association process, which is the framework for the European Union’s (EU) relations with the region, it is desirable to support efforts to sustain political and economic stabilisation in the FRY, with a view to evolving towards the development of a full cooperation relationship with the Community.(4) Financial assistance from the Community should be instrumental in bringing the FRY closer to the Community.(5) The Community already provided in 2001 macro-financial assistance of EUR 345 million to the FRY(4). The International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved in May 2002 a three-year “Extended Arrangement” for the FRY of about USD 829 million to support the authorities’ economic programme in 2002 to 2005.(6) The World Bank decided in May 2001 to make available to the FRY on a temporary basis a package of concessional loans of USD 540 million over a three year period. So far, two structural adjustment credits of USD 70 million and of USD 85 million have been approved in January and May 2002, respectively, to support reforms in public finance as well as in the energy and social sector and to foster private sector development.(7) The Members of the Paris Club agreed in November 2001 on a substantial debt relief in favour of the FRY, already alleviating the balance of payments situation.(8) The authorities of the FRY have requested financial assistance from the international financial institutions, the Community, and other bilateral donors.(9) Over and above the estimated financing which could be provided by the IMF and the World Bank, an important residual financing gap remains to be covered to support the policy objectives attached to the authorities’ reform efforts.(10) Community macro-financial assistance to the FRY is an appropriate measure to help ease the country’s external financial constraints, supporting the balance of payments and strengthening the reserve position.(11) Financial assistance from the Community in the form of a combination of a long-term loan and a straight grant is an appropriate measure to support the sustainability of the FRY’s external financial position, given its limited borrowing capacity. This Community financial assistance should be effective and properly implemented.(12) The inclusion of a grant component in this assistance is without prejudice to the powers of the Community budgetary authority.(13) A new Constitutional Charter is presently in the process of parliamentary discussion. Upon its entry into force, the FRY would continue to exist under a new name. The pending name change does not affect this Decision.(14) Upon entry into force of the aforementioned Constitutional Charter, the National Bank of Yugoslavia may cease to exist. Therefore, after entry into force of the Constitutional Charter, the macro-financial assistance provided under this Decision will be paid to the institution or institutions designated to take on the responsibilities from the National Bank of Yugoslavia for receiving funds in the context of this Decision.(15) This assistance should be managed by the Commission, in consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee.(16) The Treaty does not provide, for the adoption of this Decision, powers other than those of Article 308,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. The Community shall make available to the FRY further macro-financial assistance in the form of a long-term loan and a straight grant with a view to ensuring a sustainable balance-of-payments situation and strengthening the country’s reserve position.2. The loan component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum principal of EUR 55 million with a maximum maturity of 15 years. To this end, the Commission is empowered to borrow, on behalf of the Community, the necessary resources that will be placed at the disposal of the FRY in the form of a loan.3. The grant component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum of EUR 75 million.4. This Community financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in close consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee and in a manner consistent with the agreements reached between the IMF and the FRY.Article 21. The Commission is empowered to agree with the authorities of the FRY, after consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee, the economic policy conditions attached to further Community macro-financial assistance. These conditions shall be consistent with the agreements referred to in

Article 1
1. The Community shall make available to the FRY further macro-financial assistance in the form of a long-term loan and a straight grant with a view to ensuring a sustainable balance-of-payments situation and strengthening the country’s reserve position.
2. The loan component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum principal of EUR 55 million with a maximum maturity of 15 years. To this end, the Commission is empowered to borrow, on behalf of the Community, the necessary resources that will be placed at the disposal of the FRY in the form of a loan.
3. The grant component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum of EUR 75 million.
4. This Community financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in close consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee and in a manner consistent with the agreements reached between the IMF and the FRY.

Article 2
1. The Commission is empowered to agree with the authorities of the FRY, after consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee, the economic policy conditions attached to further Community macro-financial assistance. These conditions shall be consistent with the agreements referred to in Article 1(4).
2. The Commission shall verify at regular intervals, in collaboration with the Economic and Financial Committee and in coordination with the IMF, that economic policies in the FRY are in accordance with the objectives of this macro-financial assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled.

Article 3
1. The loan and grant components of this assistance shall be made available to the FRY in at least two instalments. Subject to Article 2, the first instalment is to be released on the basis of satisfactory implementation of the adjustment and reform programme of the FRY under the present Extended Arrangement with the IMF.
2. Subject to Article 2, the second and any further instalments shall be released on the basis of a satisfactory track record on the FRY’s adjustment and reform programme, and not before one quarter after the release of the previous instalment.
3. The funds shall be paid to the National Bank of the FRY, and after the entry into force of a new Constitutional Charter, to the institution or institutions designated to take on the responsibilities of the National Bank of Yugoslavia for receiving funds in the context of this Decision.

Article 4
1. The borrowing and lending operations referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out using the same value date and must not involve the Community in the transformation of maturities, in any exchange or interest rate risks, or in any other commercial risk.
2. The Commission shall take the necessary steps, if the FRY so requests, to ensure that an early repayment clause is included in the loan terms and conditions and that it may be exercised.
3. At the request of the FRY, and where circumstances permit an improvement in the loan’s interest rate, the Commission may refinance all or part of its initial borrowings or restructure the corresponding financial conditions. Refinancing or restructuring operations shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions set out in paragraph 1 and shall not have the effect of extending the average maturity of the borrowing concerned or increasing the amount, expressed at the current exchange rate, of capital outstanding at the date of the refinancing or restructuring.
4. All related costs incurred by the Community in concluding and carrying out the operation under this Decision shall be borne by the FRY, if appropriate.
5. The Economic and Financial Committee shall be kept informed of developments in the operations referred to in paragraph 2 and 3 at least once a year.

Article 5
At least once a year, and before September, the Commission shall address to the European Parliament and to the Council a report, which will include an evaluation on the implementation of this Decision in the previous year.

Article 6
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply until two years after that date.
Done at Brussels, 5 November 2002.
For the Council
The President
T. Pedersen
(1) Proposal of 27 August 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(2) Opinion delivered on 10 October 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) Opinion delivered on 17 October 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(4) Decision 2001/549/EC (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 38), Decision as amended by Decision 2001/901/EC (OJ L 334, 18.12.2001, p. 30).

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee(3),Whereas:(1) The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) authorities re-established links with international organisations and in particular made progress towards normalising the country’s financial relations with multilateral creditors, including the European Investment Bank, and with official bilateral creditors.(2) Since October 2000, the FRY has achieved substantial progress in economic stabilisation and reform and has made important steps towards a well-functioning market economy.(3) Within the Stabilisation and Association process, which is the framework for the European Union’s (EU) relations with the region, it is desirable to support efforts to sustain political and economic stabilisation in the FRY, with a view to evolving towards the development of a full cooperation relationship with the Community.(4) Financial assistance from the Community should be instrumental in bringing the FRY closer to the Community.(5) The Community already provided in 2001 macro-financial assistance of EUR 345 million to the FRY(4). The International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved in May 2002 a three-year “Extended Arrangement” for the FRY of about USD 829 million to support the authorities’ economic programme in 2002 to 2005.(6) The World Bank decided in May 2001 to make available to the FRY on a temporary basis a package of concessional loans of USD 540 million over a three year period. So far, two structural adjustment credits of USD 70 million and of USD 85 million have been approved in January and May 2002, respectively, to support reforms in public finance as well as in the energy and social sector and to foster private sector development.(7) The Members of the Paris Club agreed in November 2001 on a substantial debt relief in favour of the FRY, already alleviating the balance of payments situation.(8) The authorities of the FRY have requested financial assistance from the international financial institutions, the Community, and other bilateral donors.(9) Over and above the estimated financing which could be provided by the IMF and the World Bank, an important residual financing gap remains to be covered to support the policy objectives attached to the authorities’ reform efforts.(10) Community macro-financial assistance to the FRY is an appropriate measure to help ease the country’s external financial constraints, supporting the balance of payments and strengthening the reserve position.(11) Financial assistance from the Community in the form of a combination of a long-term loan and a straight grant is an appropriate measure to support the sustainability of the FRY’s external financial position, given its limited borrowing capacity. This Community financial assistance should be effective and properly implemented.(12) The inclusion of a grant component in this assistance is without prejudice to the powers of the Community budgetary authority.(13) A new Constitutional Charter is presently in the process of parliamentary discussion. Upon its entry into force, the FRY would continue to exist under a new name. The pending name change does not affect this Decision.(14) Upon entry into force of the aforementioned Constitutional Charter, the National Bank of Yugoslavia may cease to exist. Therefore, after entry into force of the Constitutional Charter, the macro-financial assistance provided under this Decision will be paid to the institution or institutions designated to take on the responsibilities from the National Bank of Yugoslavia for receiving funds in the context of this Decision.(15) This assistance should be managed by the Commission, in consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee.(16) The Treaty does not provide, for the adoption of this Decision, powers other than those of Article 308,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. The Community shall make available to the FRY further macro-financial assistance in the form of a long-term loan and a straight grant with a view to ensuring a sustainable balance-of-payments situation and strengthening the country’s reserve position.2. The loan component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum principal of EUR 55 million with a maximum maturity of 15 years. To this end, the Commission is empowered to borrow, on behalf of the Community, the necessary resources that will be placed at the disposal of the FRY in the form of a loan.3. The grant component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum of EUR 75 million.4. This Community financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in close consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee and in a manner consistent with the agreements reached between the IMF and the FRY.Article 21. The Commission is empowered to agree with the authorities of the FRY, after consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee, the economic policy conditions attached to further Community macro-financial assistance. These conditions shall be consistent with the agreements referred to in
1. The Community shall make available to the FRY further macro-financial assistance in the form of a long-term loan and a straight grant with a view to ensuring a sustainable balance-of-payments situation and strengthening the country’s reserve position.
2. The loan component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum principal of EUR 55 million with a maximum maturity of 15 years. To this end, the Commission is empowered to borrow, on behalf of the Community, the necessary resources that will be placed at the disposal of the FRY in the form of a loan.
3. The grant component of this assistance shall amount to a maximum of EUR 75 million.
4. This Community financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in close consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee and in a manner consistent with the agreements reached between the IMF and the FRY.
1. The Commission is empowered to agree with the authorities of the FRY, after consultation with the Economic and Financial Committee, the economic policy conditions attached to further Community macro-financial assistance. These conditions shall be consistent with the agreements referred to in Article 1(4).
2. The Commission shall verify at regular intervals, in collaboration with the Economic and Financial Committee and in coordination with the IMF, that economic policies in the FRY are in accordance with the objectives of this macro-financial assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled.
1. The loan and grant components of this assistance shall be made available to the FRY in at least two instalments. Subject to Article 2, the first instalment is to be released on the basis of satisfactory implementation of the adjustment and reform programme of the FRY under the present Extended Arrangement with the IMF.
2. Subject to Article 2, the second and any further instalments shall be released on the basis of a satisfactory track record on the FRY’s adjustment and reform programme, and not before one quarter after the release of the previous instalment.
3. The funds shall be paid to the National Bank of the FRY, and after the entry into force of a new Constitutional Charter, to the institution or institutions designated to take on the responsibilities of the National Bank of Yugoslavia for receiving funds in the context of this Decision.
1. The borrowing and lending operations referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out using the same value date and must not involve the Community in the transformation of maturities, in any exchange or interest rate risks, or in any other commercial risk.
2. The Commission shall take the necessary steps, if the FRY so requests, to ensure that an early repayment clause is included in the loan terms and conditions and that it may be exercised.
3. At the request of the FRY, and where circumstances permit an improvement in the loan’s interest rate, the Commission may refinance all or part of its initial borrowings or restructure the corresponding financial conditions. Refinancing or restructuring operations shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions set out in paragraph 1 and shall not have the effect of extending the average maturity of the borrowing concerned or increasing the amount, expressed at the current exchange rate, of capital outstanding at the date of the refinancing or restructuring.
4. All related costs incurred by the Community in concluding and carrying out the operation under this Decision shall be borne by the FRY, if appropriate.
5. The Economic and Financial Committee shall be kept informed of developments in the operations referred to in paragraph 2 and 3 at least once a year.
At least once a year, and before September, the Commission shall address to the European Parliament and to the Council a report, which will include an evaluation on the implementation of this Decision in the previous year.
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply until two years after that date.
Done at Brussels, 5 November 2002.
For the Council
The President
T. Pedersen
(1) Proposal of 27 August 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(2) Opinion delivered on 10 October 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) Opinion delivered on 17 October 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(4) Decision 2001/549/EC (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 38), Decision as amended by Decision 2001/901/EC (OJ L 334, 18.12.2001, p. 30).