Pending: 32021D0710

30.4.2021 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 147/12
(1) The resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic priority for the Union and the Union must remain actively engaged until that conflict is solved on the basis of the two-State solution.
(2) The Union is committed to a comprehensive and lasting peace for the entire Middle East region and stands ready to work to that end together with regional and international partners.
(3) A European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process should be appointed for a period of 22 months.
(4) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
(a) the overall objective is a just, lasting and comprehensive peace that should be achieved on the basis of a two-State solution, with Israel and a democratic, contiguous, viable, peaceful and sovereign Palestinian State living side by side within secure and recognised borders enjoying normal relations with their neighbours in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and recalling other relevant UNSCRs, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), the Madrid principles, including land for peace, the Roadmap, the agreements previously reached by the parties, the Arab Peace Initiative and the recommendations of the Middle East Quartet ('the Quartet') of 1 July 2016. In light of the different strands of Israeli-Arab relations, the regional dimension constitutes an essential component for a comprehensive peace;
(b) in achieving this objective, policy priorities are the preservation of the two-State solution and relaunching and supporting the peace process. Clear parameters defining the basis for negotiations are key elements for a successful outcome and the Union has set out its position with regard to such parameters in the Council conclusions of December 2009, December 2010 and July 2014, which it will continue to actively promote;
(c) the Union is committed to working with the parties and with partners in the international community, including through participating in the Quartet and actively pursuing appropriate international initiatives to create a new dynamic for the negotiations.
(a) provide an active and efficient Union contribution to actions and initiatives leading to a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-state solution and in line with the Union parameters and relevant UNSCRs, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), and put forward proposals for Union action in this regard;
(b) facilitate and maintain close contacts with all the parties to the peace process, relevant political actors, other countries of the region, members of the Quartet and other relevant countries, as well as the UN and other relevant international organisations, like the League of Arab States, in order to work with them in strengthening the peace process;
(c) take advantage of the evolving regional landscape in the Middle East and in particular the normalisation of relations between Israel and a number of Arab countries, in order to further advance the peace process and thus contribute to regional stability;
(d) pay particular attention to factors affecting the regional dimension of the peace process, to the engagement with Arab partners and to the implementation of the Arab Peace Initiative;
(e) work as appropriate to promote and contribute to a possible new framework of negotiations in consultation with all the key stakeholders and the Member States;
(f) actively support and contribute to peace negotiations between the parties, including by putting forward proposals on behalf of the Union and in line with its consolidated longstanding policy in the context of those negotiations;
(g) ensure the continued presence of the Union in relevant international fora;
(h) contribute to crisis management and prevention, including with regard to Gaza;
(i) contribute, where requested, to the implementation of international agreements reached between the parties and engage with them diplomatically in the event of non-compliance with the terms of those agreements;
(j) contribute to political efforts to bring about a fundamental change leading to a sustainable solution for the Gaza Strip which is an integral part of a future Palestinian State and should be addressed in the negotiations;
(k) engage constructively with signatories to agreements within the framework of the peace process in order to promote compliance with the basic norms of democracy, including respect for international humanitarian law, human rights and the rule of law;
(l) make proposals for Union intervention in the peace process and on the best way of pursuing Union initiatives and ongoing peace-process-related Union efforts, such as the Union's contribution to Palestinian reforms and including the political aspects of relevant Union development projects;
(m) engage the parties in refraining from unilateral actions threatening the viability of the two-State solution, notably in Jerusalem and in Area C of the Occupied West Bank;
(n) report regularly, as Envoy to the Quartet, on progress and evolution in the negotiations, as well as on the Quartet activities, and contribute to the preparation of Quartet Envoys meetings on the basis of Union positions and through coordination with other Quartet members;
(o) contribute to the implementation of the Union's human rights policy in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the Union Guidelines on human rights, in particular the Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and Union policy regarding UNSCR 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments as well as formulating recommendations in that regard;
(p) contribute to a better understanding and visibility of the role of the Union among opinion leaders in the region;
(q) engage, as necessary, with representatives of civil society, including women and young people, as well as with those involved in measures to build confidence between the parties.
(a) establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and a mission contingency and evacuation plan;
(b) ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c) ensuring that all members of the EUSR's team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d) ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the HR, the Council and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress and mandate implementation reports.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) The resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic priority for the Union and the Union must remain actively engaged until that conflict is solved on the basis of the two-State solution.
(2) The Union is committed to a comprehensive and lasting peace for the entire Middle East region and stands ready to work to that end together with regional and international partners.
(3) A European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process should be appointed for a period of 22 months.
(4) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative
Article 1
Mr Sven KOOPMANS is hereby appointed as the EUSR for the Middle East Peace Process from 1 May 2021 until 28 February 2023. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, on the basis of an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).

Policy objectives
Article 2
The mandate of the EUSR shall be based on the following policy regarding the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP):
(a)
the overall objective is a just, lasting and comprehensive peace that should be achieved on the basis of a two-State solution, with Israel and a democratic, contiguous, viable, peaceful and sovereign Palestinian State living side by side within secure and recognised borders enjoying normal relations with their neighbours in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and recalling other relevant UNSCRs, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), the Madrid principles, including land for peace, the Roadmap, the agreements previously reached by the parties, the Arab Peace Initiative and the recommendations of the Middle East Quartet (‘the Quartet’) of 1 July 2016. In light of the different strands of Israeli-Arab relations, the regional dimension constitutes an essential component for a comprehensive peace;
(b)
in achieving this objective, policy priorities are the preservation of the two-State solution and relaunching and supporting the peace process. Clear parameters defining the basis for negotiations are key elements for a successful outcome and the Union has set out its position with regard to such parameters in the Council conclusions of December 2009, December 2010 and July 2014, which it will continue to actively promote;
(c)
the Union is committed to working with the parties and with partners in the international community, including through participating in the Quartet and actively pursuing appropriate international initiatives to create a new dynamic for the negotiations.

Mandate
Article 3
1. In order to achieve the policy objectives, the mandate of the EUSR shall be to:
(a)
provide an active and efficient Union contribution to actions and initiatives leading to a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-state solution and in line with the Union parameters and relevant UNSCRs, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), and put forward proposals for Union action in this regard;
(b)
facilitate and maintain close contacts with all the parties to the peace process, relevant political actors, other countries of the region, members of the Quartet and other relevant countries, as well as the UN and other relevant international organisations, like the League of Arab States, in order to work with them in strengthening the peace process;
(c)
take advantage of the evolving regional landscape in the Middle East and in particular the normalisation of relations between Israel and a number of Arab countries, in order to further advance the peace process and thus contribute to regional stability;
(d)
pay particular attention to factors affecting the regional dimension of the peace process, to the engagement with Arab partners and to the implementation of the Arab Peace Initiative;
(e)
work as appropriate to promote and contribute to a possible new framework of negotiations in consultation with all the key stakeholders and the Member States;
(f)
actively support and contribute to peace negotiations between the parties, including by putting forward proposals on behalf of the Union and in line with its consolidated longstanding policy in the context of those negotiations;
(g)
ensure the continued presence of the Union in relevant international fora;
(h)
contribute to crisis management and prevention, including with regard to Gaza;
(i)
contribute, where requested, to the implementation of international agreements reached between the parties and engage with them diplomatically in the event of non-compliance with the terms of those agreements;
(j)
contribute to political efforts to bring about a fundamental change leading to a sustainable solution for the Gaza Strip which is an integral part of a future Palestinian State and should be addressed in the negotiations;
(k)
engage constructively with signatories to agreements within the framework of the peace process in order to promote compliance with the basic norms of democracy, including respect for international humanitarian law, human rights and the rule of law;
(l)
make proposals for Union intervention in the peace process and on the best way of pursuing Union initiatives and ongoing peace-process-related Union efforts, such as the Union’s contribution to Palestinian reforms and including the political aspects of relevant Union development projects;
(m)
engage the parties in refraining from unilateral actions threatening the viability of the two-State solution, notably in Jerusalem and in Area C of the Occupied West Bank;
(n)
report regularly, as Envoy to the Quartet, on progress and evolution in the negotiations, as well as on the Quartet activities, and contribute to the preparation of Quartet Envoys meetings on the basis of Union positions and through coordination with other Quartet members;
(o)
contribute to the implementation of the Union’s human rights policy in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the Union Guidelines on human rights, in particular the Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and Union policy regarding UNSCR 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments as well as formulating recommendations in that regard;
(p)
contribute to a better understanding and visibility of the role of the Union among opinion leaders in the region;
(q)
engage, as necessary, with representatives of civil society, including women and young people, as well as with those involved in measures to build confidence between the parties.
2. The EUSR shall support the work of the HR, while maintaining an overview of all MEPP-related activities of the Union in the region.

Implementation of the mandate
Article 4
1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall ensure systematic and clear concertation and cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the relevant departments thereof.
4. The EUSR will undertake regular visits to the region and will ensure close coordination with relevant Union Delegations across the region, including the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, the Union Delegation in Tel Aviv and, through them, with Member States’ diplomatic representations.

Financing
Article 5
1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR in the period from 1 May 2021 until 28 February 2023 shall be EUR 2 099 463,58.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team
Article 6
1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States, institutions of the Union and the EEAS may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the Member State, the institution of the Union concerned or the EEAS, respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union or the EEAS may also be posted to work with the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State, institution of the Union or the EEAS and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the mandate of the EUSR.
4. The EUSR staff shall be co-located with the relevant EEAS department, Union Delegation in Tel Aviv and Union Representative Office in Jerusalem in order to ensure the coherence and consistency of their respective activities.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and his staff
Article 7
The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the mission of the EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s staff shall be agreed with the host parties, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information
Article 8
The EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(1).

Access to information and logistical support
Article 9
1. Member States, the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union Delegations in the region and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security
Article 10
In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in conformity with the EUSR’s mandate and the security situation in the area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and a mission contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the HR, the Council and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress and mandate implementation reports.

Reporting
Article 11
The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with reports. The EUSR shall also report to other Council working parties as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. The EUSR may be involved in providing information to the European Parliament.

Coordination
Article 12
1. The EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently, to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission services. The EUSR shall provide regular briefings to the Union’s Delegations and to Member States’ Missions, including the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem and the Union Delegation in Tel Aviv.
2. Close liaison shall be maintained in the field with the relevant Heads of Member States’ Missions, Heads of Union Delegations and Heads of common security and defence policy Missions. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR, in close coordination with the Head of Union Delegation in Tel Aviv and the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, shall provide the Heads of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) and of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) with local political guidance. The EUSR shall also liaise with other international and regional actors in the field.

Assistance in relation to claims
Article 13
The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSRs for the MEPP, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review
Article 14
The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the HR, the Council and the Commission with regular progress reports and a final comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2022.

Entry into force
Article 15
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) The resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic priority for the Union and the Union must remain actively engaged until that conflict is solved on the basis of the two-State solution.
(2) The Union is committed to a comprehensive and lasting peace for the entire Middle East region and stands ready to work to that end together with regional and international partners.
(3) A European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process should be appointed for a period of 22 months.
(4) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative

Mr Sven KOOPMANS is hereby appointed as the EUSR for the Middle East Peace Process from 1 May 2021 until 28 February 2023. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, on the basis of an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).

Policy objectives

The mandate of the EUSR shall be based on the following policy regarding the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP):
(a)
the overall objective is a just, lasting and comprehensive peace that should be achieved on the basis of a two-State solution, with Israel and a democratic, contiguous, viable, peaceful and sovereign Palestinian State living side by side within secure and recognised borders enjoying normal relations with their neighbours in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and recalling other relevant UNSCRs, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), the Madrid principles, including land for peace, the Roadmap, the agreements previously reached by the parties, the Arab Peace Initiative and the recommendations of the Middle East Quartet (‘the Quartet’) of 1 July 2016. In light of the different strands of Israeli-Arab relations, the regional dimension constitutes an essential component for a comprehensive peace;
(b)
in achieving this objective, policy priorities are the preservation of the two-State solution and relaunching and supporting the peace process. Clear parameters defining the basis for negotiations are key elements for a successful outcome and the Union has set out its position with regard to such parameters in the Council conclusions of December 2009, December 2010 and July 2014, which it will continue to actively promote;
(c)
the Union is committed to working with the parties and with partners in the international community, including through participating in the Quartet and actively pursuing appropriate international initiatives to create a new dynamic for the negotiations.

Mandate

1. In order to achieve the policy objectives, the mandate of the EUSR shall be to:
(a)
provide an active and efficient Union contribution to actions and initiatives leading to a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-state solution and in line with the Union parameters and relevant UNSCRs, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), and put forward proposals for Union action in this regard;
(b)
facilitate and maintain close contacts with all the parties to the peace process, relevant political actors, other countries of the region, members of the Quartet and other relevant countries, as well as the UN and other relevant international organisations, like the League of Arab States, in order to work with them in strengthening the peace process;
(c)
take advantage of the evolving regional landscape in the Middle East and in particular the normalisation of relations between Israel and a number of Arab countries, in order to further advance the peace process and thus contribute to regional stability;
(d)
pay particular attention to factors affecting the regional dimension of the peace process, to the engagement with Arab partners and to the implementation of the Arab Peace Initiative;
(e)
work as appropriate to promote and contribute to a possible new framework of negotiations in consultation with all the key stakeholders and the Member States;
(f)
actively support and contribute to peace negotiations between the parties, including by putting forward proposals on behalf of the Union and in line with its consolidated longstanding policy in the context of those negotiations;
(g)
ensure the continued presence of the Union in relevant international fora;
(h)
contribute to crisis management and prevention, including with regard to Gaza;
(i)
contribute, where requested, to the implementation of international agreements reached between the parties and engage with them diplomatically in the event of non-compliance with the terms of those agreements;
(j)
contribute to political efforts to bring about a fundamental change leading to a sustainable solution for the Gaza Strip which is an integral part of a future Palestinian State and should be addressed in the negotiations;
(k)
engage constructively with signatories to agreements within the framework of the peace process in order to promote compliance with the basic norms of democracy, including respect for international humanitarian law, human rights and the rule of law;
(l)
make proposals for Union intervention in the peace process and on the best way of pursuing Union initiatives and ongoing peace-process-related Union efforts, such as the Union’s contribution to Palestinian reforms and including the political aspects of relevant Union development projects;
(m)
engage the parties in refraining from unilateral actions threatening the viability of the two-State solution, notably in Jerusalem and in Area C of the Occupied West Bank;
(n)
report regularly, as Envoy to the Quartet, on progress and evolution in the negotiations, as well as on the Quartet activities, and contribute to the preparation of Quartet Envoys meetings on the basis of Union positions and through coordination with other Quartet members;
(o)
contribute to the implementation of the Union’s human rights policy in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the Union Guidelines on human rights, in particular the Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and Union policy regarding UNSCR 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments as well as formulating recommendations in that regard;
(p)
contribute to a better understanding and visibility of the role of the Union among opinion leaders in the region;
(q)
engage, as necessary, with representatives of civil society, including women and young people, as well as with those involved in measures to build confidence between the parties.
2. The EUSR shall support the work of the HR, while maintaining an overview of all MEPP-related activities of the Union in the region.

Implementation of the mandate

1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall ensure systematic and clear concertation and cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the relevant departments thereof.
4. The EUSR will undertake regular visits to the region and will ensure close coordination with relevant Union Delegations across the region, including the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, the Union Delegation in Tel Aviv and, through them, with Member States’ diplomatic representations.

Financing

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR in the period from 1 May 2021 until 28 February 2023 shall be EUR 2 099 463,58.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team

1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States, institutions of the Union and the EEAS may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the Member State, the institution of the Union concerned or the EEAS, respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union or the EEAS may also be posted to work with the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State, institution of the Union or the EEAS and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the mandate of the EUSR.
4. The EUSR staff shall be co-located with the relevant EEAS department, Union Delegation in Tel Aviv and Union Representative Office in Jerusalem in order to ensure the coherence and consistency of their respective activities.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and his staff

The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the mission of the EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s staff shall be agreed with the host parties, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information

The EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(1).

Access to information and logistical support

1. Member States, the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union Delegations in the region and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security

In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in conformity with the EUSR’s mandate and the security situation in the area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and a mission contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the HR, the Council and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress and mandate implementation reports.

Reporting

The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with reports. The EUSR shall also report to other Council working parties as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. The EUSR may be involved in providing information to the European Parliament.

Coordination

1. The EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently, to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission services. The EUSR shall provide regular briefings to the Union’s Delegations and to Member States’ Missions, including the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem and the Union Delegation in Tel Aviv.
2. Close liaison shall be maintained in the field with the relevant Heads of Member States’ Missions, Heads of Union Delegations and Heads of common security and defence policy Missions. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR, in close coordination with the Head of Union Delegation in Tel Aviv and the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, shall provide the Heads of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) and of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) with local political guidance. The EUSR shall also liaise with other international and regional actors in the field.

Assistance in relation to claims

The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSRs for the MEPP, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review

The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the HR, the Council and the Commission with regular progress reports and a final comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2022.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Pending: 32020D1664

10.11.2020 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 374/11
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds, including poultry. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most poultry species. The disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) Since 2005, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5 subtype have shown to be able to infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations.
(3) The presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(4) In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(5) Council Directive 2005/94/EC(3)sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds. That Directive provides for the establishment of protection and surveillance zones in the event of an outbreak of HPAI. This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
(6) Germany recently confirmed the presence of HPAI of subtype H5N8 virus in migratory and non-migratory wild birds on its territory.
(7) Also, Germany recently notified the Commission of an outbreak of HPAI of subtype H5N8 on its territory, in one holding where poultry or other captive birds are kept in the Nordfriesland district, and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
(8) The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with Germany, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that Member State, are at a sufficient distance to the holding where the outbreak was confirmed.
(9) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to HPAI in Germany at Union level.
(10) Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in Germany where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
(11) This Decision is to be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 29(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC
SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN
Landkreis Nordfriesland—Hallig Oland — Hallig Oland 1.12.2020
— Hallig Oland
— Hallig Oland
Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 31 of Directive 2005/94/EC
SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN
Landkreis Nordfriesland—Gemeinde Galmsbüll—Gemeinde Dagebüll—Gemeinde Ockholm—Hallig Gröde—Hallig Langeneß—Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr—Gemeinde Wrixum—Gemeinde Oevenum — Gemeinde Galmsbüll — Gemeinde Dagebüll — Gemeinde Ockholm — Hallig Gröde — Hallig Langeneß — Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr — Gemeinde Wrixum — Gemeinde Oevenum 10.12.2020
— Gemeinde Galmsbüll
— Gemeinde Dagebüll
— Gemeinde Ockholm
— Hallig Gröde
— Hallig Langeneß
— Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr
— Gemeinde Wrixum
— Gemeinde Oevenum
Landkreis Nordfriesland—Hallig Oland — Hallig Oland From 2.12.2020 until 10.12.2020
— Hallig Oland
— Gemeinde Galmsbüll
— Gemeinde Dagebüll
— Gemeinde Ockholm
— Hallig Gröde
— Hallig Langeneß
— Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr
— Gemeinde Wrixum
— Gemeinde Oevenum
— Hallig Oland
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds, including poultry. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most poultry species. The disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) Since 2005, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5 subtype have shown to be able to infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations.
(3) The presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(4) In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(5) Council Directive 2005/94/EC(3)sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds. That Directive provides for the establishment of protection and surveillance zones in the event of an outbreak of HPAI. This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
(6) Germany recently confirmed the presence of HPAI of subtype H5N8 virus in migratory and non-migratory wild birds on its territory.
(7) Also, Germany recently notified the Commission of an outbreak of HPAI of subtype H5N8 on its territory, in one holding where poultry or other captive birds are kept in the Nordfriesland district, and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
(8) The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with Germany, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that Member State, are at a sufficient distance to the holding where the outbreak was confirmed.
(9) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to HPAI in Germany at Union level.
(10) Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in Germany where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
(11) This Decision is to be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Germany shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
This Decision shall apply until 28 February 2021.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds, including poultry. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most poultry species. The disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) Since 2005, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5 subtype have shown to be able to infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations.
(3) The presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(4) In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(5) Council Directive 2005/94/EC(3)sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds. That Directive provides for the establishment of protection and surveillance zones in the event of an outbreak of HPAI. This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
(6) Germany recently confirmed the presence of HPAI of subtype H5N8 virus in migratory and non-migratory wild birds on its territory.
(7) Also, Germany recently notified the Commission of an outbreak of HPAI of subtype H5N8 on its territory, in one holding where poultry or other captive birds are kept in the Nordfriesland district, and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
(8) The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with Germany, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that Member State, are at a sufficient distance to the holding where the outbreak was confirmed.
(9) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to HPAI in Germany at Union level.
(10) Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in Germany where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
(11) This Decision is to be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Germany shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall apply until 28 February 2021.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

PART A

ANNEXProtection zone as referred to in Article 1:
Member State: Germany

Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 29(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC
SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN
Landkreis Nordfriesland—Hallig Oland | — | Hallig Oland | 1.12.2020
— | Hallig OlandPART BSurveillance zone as referred to in Article 1:
Member State: Germany

Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 31 of Directive 2005/94/EC
SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN
Landkreis Nordfriesland—Gemeinde Galmsbüll—Gemeinde Dagebüll—Gemeinde Ockholm—Hallig Gröde—Hallig Langeneß—Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr—Gemeinde Wrixum—Gemeinde Oevenum | — | Gemeinde Galmsbüll | — | Gemeinde Dagebüll | — | Gemeinde Ockholm | — | Hallig Gröde | — | Hallig Langeneß | — | Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr | — | Gemeinde Wrixum | — | Gemeinde Oevenum | 10.12.2020
— | Gemeinde Galmsbüll
— | Gemeinde Dagebüll
— | Gemeinde Ockholm
— | Hallig Gröde
— | Hallig Langeneß
— | Gemeinde Wyk auf Föhr
— | Gemeinde Wrixum
— | Gemeinde Oevenum
Landkreis Nordfriesland—Hallig Oland | — | Hallig Oland | From 2.12.2020 until 10.12.2020
— | Hallig Oland

Pending: 32020D1654

9.11.2020 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 372/52
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds, including poultry. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most poultry species. The disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) Since 2005, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5 subtype have shown to be able to infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations.
(3) The presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(4) In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(5) Council Directive 2005/94/EC(3)sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds. That Directive provides for the establishment of protection and surveillance zones in the event of an outbreak of HPAI. This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
(6) The United Kingdom recently notified the Commission of an outbreak of HPAI of subtype H5N8 on its territory, in one holding where poultry or other captive birds are kept in Cheshire County, and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
(7) The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with the United Kingdom, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that country, are at a sufficient distance to the holdings where the outbreak was confirmed.
(8) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to HPAI in the United Kingdom at Union level.
(9) Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in the United Kingdom where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
(10) This Decision is to be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 29(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC
Those parts of Cheshire County (ADNS code 00140) contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N53.25 and W2.81 27.11.2020
Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 31 of Directive 2005/94/EC
Those parts of Cheshire County (ADNS code 00140) extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N53.25 and W2.81 6.12.2020
Those parts of Cheshire County (ADNS code 00140) contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N53.25 and W2.81 From 28.11.2020 until 6.12.2020
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof, in conjunction with Article 131 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (‘Withdrawal Agreement’),
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof, in conjunction with Article 131 of the Withdrawal Agreement,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds, including poultry. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most poultry species. The disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) Since 2005, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5 subtype have shown to be able to infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations.
(3) The presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(4) In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(5) Council Directive 2005/94/EC(3)sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds. That Directive provides for the establishment of protection and surveillance zones in the event of an outbreak of HPAI. This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
(6) The United Kingdom recently notified the Commission of an outbreak of HPAI of subtype H5N8 on its territory, in one holding where poultry or other captive birds are kept in Cheshire County, and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
(7) The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with the United Kingdom, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that country, are at a sufficient distance to the holdings where the outbreak was confirmed.
(8) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to HPAI in the United Kingdom at Union level.
(9) Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in the United Kingdom where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
(10) This Decision is to be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The United Kingdom shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2020.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof, in conjunction with Article 131 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (‘Withdrawal Agreement’),
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof, in conjunction with Article 131 of the Withdrawal Agreement,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds, including poultry. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most poultry species. The disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) Since 2005, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5 subtype have shown to be able to infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations.
(3) The presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(4) In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept.
(5) Council Directive 2005/94/EC(3)sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds. That Directive provides for the establishment of protection and surveillance zones in the event of an outbreak of HPAI. This regionalisation is applied in particular to preserve the health status of birds in the remainder of the territory of the Member State by preventing the introduction of the pathogenic agent and ensuring the early detection of the disease.
(6) The United Kingdom recently notified the Commission of an outbreak of HPAI of subtype H5N8 on its territory, in one holding where poultry or other captive birds are kept in Cheshire County, and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
(7) The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with the United Kingdom, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that country, are at a sufficient distance to the holdings where the outbreak was confirmed.
(8) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to HPAI in the United Kingdom at Union level.
(9) Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in the United Kingdom where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
(10) This Decision is to be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The United Kingdom shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2020.
This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

PART A

ANNEXProtection zone as referred to in Article 1:

United Kingdom

Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 29(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC
Those parts of Cheshire County (ADNS code 00140) contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N53.25 and W2.81 | 27.11.2020PART BSurveillance zone as referred to in Article 1:

United Kingdom

Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 31 of Directive 2005/94/EC
Those parts of Cheshire County (ADNS code 00140) extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N53.25 and W2.81 | 6.12.2020
Those parts of Cheshire County (ADNS code 00140) contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N53.25 and W2.81 | From 28.11.2020 until 6.12.2020

Pending: 32020D1135

31.7.2020 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 247/25
(1) On 4 August 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1338(1)extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Kosovo and appointing Ms Nataliya APOSTOLOVA as the EUSR in Kosovo. The Council further extended that mandate by Decisions (CFSP) 2017/348(2), (CFSP) 2018/903(3)and (CFSP) 2020/249(4). That mandate is set to expire on 31 August 2020.
(2) Mr Tomáš SZUNYOG should be appointed as the EUSR in Kosovo for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 August 2021.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
(a) offer the Union’s advice and support in the political process;
(b) promote overall Union political coordination in Kosovo;
(c) strengthen the presence of the Union in Kosovo and ensure its coherence, effectiveness and visibility;
(d) provide local political guidance to the Head of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO), including on the political aspects of issues relating to executive responsibilities;
(e) ensure consistency and coherence of Union action in Kosovo, including in guiding locally the EULEX KOSOVO transition for the eventual transfer of activities to the EUSR or the EU Office in Kosovo and/or the local authorities, as appropriate and if local circumstances permit;
(f) support Kosovo’s European perspective and rapprochement with the Union, in line with the perspective of the region and in accordance with the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Decision (EU) 2015/1988, and in line with the relevant Council conclusions, through targeted public communication and Union outreach activities designed to ensure a broader understanding and support from the Kosovo public on issues related to the Union, including the work of EULEX KOSOVO;
(g) monitor, assist and facilitate, by all the means and instruments at the disposal of the EUSR and with the support of the EU office in Kosovo, progress on political, economic and European priorities, in line with respective institutional competencies and responsibilities, and support the implementation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, including through the European Reform Agenda;
(h) contribute to the development and consolidation of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Kosovo, including with regard to women and children and protection of minorities, in accordance with the Union’s human rights policy and Union Guidelines on Human Rights;
(i) support, as required, the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue facilitated by the Union, including operational support tasks that have to be eventually transferred from EULEX KOSOVO, in coordination with the EUSR for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and other Western Balkans regional issues and with emphasis on promoting a conducive environment for the process;
(j) support the mandate of the Specialist Chambers and the Specialist Prosecutor Office, as appropriate, including through communication and outreach.
(a) establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and providing for a contingency and evacuation plan;
(b) ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high-risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c) ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d) ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 4 August 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1338(1)extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Kosovo and appointing Ms Nataliya APOSTOLOVA as the EUSR in Kosovo. The Council further extended that mandate by Decisions (CFSP) 2017/348(2), (CFSP) 2018/903(3)and (CFSP) 2020/249(4). That mandate is set to expire on 31 August 2020.
(2) Mr Tomáš SZUNYOG should be appointed as the EUSR in Kosovo for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 August 2021.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative
Article 1
Mr Tomáš SZUNYOG is hereby appointed as the EUSR in Kosovo from 1 September 2020 until 31 August 2021. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, on the basis of an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).

Policy objectives
Article 2
The EUSR’s mandate shall be based on the policy objectives of the Union in Kosovo. These include: playing a leading role in promoting a stable, viable, peaceful, democratic and multi-ethnic Kosovo which cooperates with the region; strengthening stability in the region and contributing to regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations in the Western Balkans; promoting a Kosovo that is committed to the rule of law and to the protection of minorities and of cultural and religious heritage; supporting Kosovo’s European perspective and rapprochement with the Union in line with the perspective of the region and in accordance with the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part(5)(hereinafter ‘the Stabilisation and Association Agreement’) and Council Decision (EU) 2015/1988(6), and in line with the relevant Council conclusions.

Mandate
Article 3
In order to achieve the policy objectives, the EUSR’s mandate shall be to:
(a)
offer the Union’s advice and support in the political process;
(b)
promote overall Union political coordination in Kosovo;
(c)
strengthen the presence of the Union in Kosovo and ensure its coherence, effectiveness and visibility;
(d)
provide local political guidance to the Head of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO), including on the political aspects of issues relating to executive responsibilities;
(e)
ensure consistency and coherence of Union action in Kosovo, including in guiding locally the EULEX KOSOVO transition for the eventual transfer of activities to the EUSR or the EU Office in Kosovo and/or the local authorities, as appropriate and if local circumstances permit;
(f)
support Kosovo’s European perspective and rapprochement with the Union, in line with the perspective of the region and in accordance with the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Decision (EU) 2015/1988, and in line with the relevant Council conclusions, through targeted public communication and Union outreach activities designed to ensure a broader understanding and support from the Kosovo public on issues related to the Union, including the work of EULEX KOSOVO;
(g)
monitor, assist and facilitate, by all the means and instruments at the disposal of the EUSR and with the support of the EU office in Kosovo, progress on political, economic and European priorities, in line with respective institutional competencies and responsibilities, and support the implementation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, including through the European Reform Agenda;
(h)
contribute to the development and consolidation of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Kosovo, including with regard to women and children and protection of minorities, in accordance with the Union’s human rights policy and Union Guidelines on Human Rights;
(i)
support, as required, the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue facilitated by the Union, including operational support tasks that have to be eventually transferred from EULEX KOSOVO, in coordination with the EUSR for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and other Western Balkans regional issues and with emphasis on promoting a conducive environment for the process;
(j)
support the mandate of the Specialist Chambers and the Specialist Prosecutor Office, as appropriate, including through communication and outreach.

Implementation of the mandate
Article 4
1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall work in close coordination with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and its relevant departments.

Financing
Article 5
1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 August 2021 shall be EUR 3 300 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team
Article 6
1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States, institutions of the Union and the EEAS may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the Member State, the institution of the Union concerned or the EEAS, respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union or the EEAS may also be posted to work with the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State, the sending institution of the Union or the EEAS and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the EUSR’s mandate.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and the EUSR’s staff
Article 7
The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the EUSR’s mission and the members of the EUSR’s staff shall be agreed with the host parties, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information
Article 8
1. The EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(7).
2. The HR shall be authorised to release to NATO/KFOR EU classified information and documents up to the level ‘CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL’ generated for the purposes of the action, in accordance with the security rules for protecting EU classified information.
3. The HR shall be authorised to release to the United Nations and to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, in accordance with the operational needs of the EUSR, EU classified information and documents up to the level ‘RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED’ which are generated for the purposes of the action, in accordance with the security rules for protecting EU classified information. Local arrangements shall be drawn up for that purpose.
4. The HR shall be authorised to release to third parties associated with this Decision EU non-classified documents related to the deliberations of the Council with regard to the action covered by the obligation of professional secrecy pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure(8).

Access to information and logistical support
Article 9
1. Member States, the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union office and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security
Article 10
In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in accordance with the EUSR’s mandate and the security situation in the area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and providing for a contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high-risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.

Reporting
Article 11
The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with oral and written reports. The EUSR shall also report to Council working parties as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty, the EUSR may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

Coordination
Article 12
1. The EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently, to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region, as appropriate. The EUSR shall provide regular briefings to Member States’ missions and Union delegations.
2. In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with the Heads of Union delegations in the region and Member States’ Heads of Mission. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR shall provide local political guidance to the Head of EULEX KOSOVO, including on the political aspects of issues relating to executive responsibilities. The EUSR and the Civilian Operation Commander shall consult each other as required. The EUSR shall also liaise with relevant local bodies and other international and regional actors in the field.
3. The EUSR, with other Union actors present in the field, shall ensure the dissemination and sharing of information among Union actors in theatre with a view to achieving a high degree of common situation awareness and assessment.

Assistance in relation to claims
Article 13
The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSRs in Kosovo, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review
Article 14
The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with a progress report by 31 October 2020 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report by 31 May 2021.

Entry into force
Article 15
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 4 August 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1338(1)extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Kosovo and appointing Ms Nataliya APOSTOLOVA as the EUSR in Kosovo. The Council further extended that mandate by Decisions (CFSP) 2017/348(2), (CFSP) 2018/903(3)and (CFSP) 2020/249(4). That mandate is set to expire on 31 August 2020.
(2) Mr Tomáš SZUNYOG should be appointed as the EUSR in Kosovo for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 August 2021.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative

Mr Tomáš SZUNYOG is hereby appointed as the EUSR in Kosovo from 1 September 2020 until 31 August 2021. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, on the basis of an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).

Policy objectives

The EUSR’s mandate shall be based on the policy objectives of the Union in Kosovo. These include: playing a leading role in promoting a stable, viable, peaceful, democratic and multi-ethnic Kosovo which cooperates with the region; strengthening stability in the region and contributing to regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations in the Western Balkans; promoting a Kosovo that is committed to the rule of law and to the protection of minorities and of cultural and religious heritage; supporting Kosovo’s European perspective and rapprochement with the Union in line with the perspective of the region and in accordance with the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part(5)(hereinafter ‘the Stabilisation and Association Agreement’) and Council Decision (EU) 2015/1988(6), and in line with the relevant Council conclusions.

Mandate

In order to achieve the policy objectives, the EUSR’s mandate shall be to:
(a)
offer the Union’s advice and support in the political process;
(b)
promote overall Union political coordination in Kosovo;
(c)
strengthen the presence of the Union in Kosovo and ensure its coherence, effectiveness and visibility;
(d)
provide local political guidance to the Head of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO), including on the political aspects of issues relating to executive responsibilities;
(e)
ensure consistency and coherence of Union action in Kosovo, including in guiding locally the EULEX KOSOVO transition for the eventual transfer of activities to the EUSR or the EU Office in Kosovo and/or the local authorities, as appropriate and if local circumstances permit;
(f)
support Kosovo’s European perspective and rapprochement with the Union, in line with the perspective of the region and in accordance with the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Decision (EU) 2015/1988, and in line with the relevant Council conclusions, through targeted public communication and Union outreach activities designed to ensure a broader understanding and support from the Kosovo public on issues related to the Union, including the work of EULEX KOSOVO;
(g)
monitor, assist and facilitate, by all the means and instruments at the disposal of the EUSR and with the support of the EU office in Kosovo, progress on political, economic and European priorities, in line with respective institutional competencies and responsibilities, and support the implementation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, including through the European Reform Agenda;
(h)
contribute to the development and consolidation of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Kosovo, including with regard to women and children and protection of minorities, in accordance with the Union’s human rights policy and Union Guidelines on Human Rights;
(i)
support, as required, the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue facilitated by the Union, including operational support tasks that have to be eventually transferred from EULEX KOSOVO, in coordination with the EUSR for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and other Western Balkans regional issues and with emphasis on promoting a conducive environment for the process;
(j)
support the mandate of the Specialist Chambers and the Specialist Prosecutor Office, as appropriate, including through communication and outreach.

Implementation of the mandate

1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall work in close coordination with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and its relevant departments.

Financing

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 August 2021 shall be EUR 3 300 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team

1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States, institutions of the Union and the EEAS may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the Member State, the institution of the Union concerned or the EEAS, respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union or the EEAS may also be posted to work with the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State, the sending institution of the Union or the EEAS and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the EUSR’s mandate.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and the EUSR’s staff

The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the EUSR’s mission and the members of the EUSR’s staff shall be agreed with the host parties, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information

1. The EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(7).
2. The HR shall be authorised to release to NATO/KFOR EU classified information and documents up to the level ‘CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL’ generated for the purposes of the action, in accordance with the security rules for protecting EU classified information.
3. The HR shall be authorised to release to the United Nations and to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, in accordance with the operational needs of the EUSR, EU classified information and documents up to the level ‘RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED’ which are generated for the purposes of the action, in accordance with the security rules for protecting EU classified information. Local arrangements shall be drawn up for that purpose.
4. The HR shall be authorised to release to third parties associated with this Decision EU non-classified documents related to the deliberations of the Council with regard to the action covered by the obligation of professional secrecy pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure(8).

Access to information and logistical support

1. Member States, the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union office and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security

In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in accordance with the EUSR’s mandate and the security situation in the area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and providing for a contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high-risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.

Reporting

The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with oral and written reports. The EUSR shall also report to Council working parties as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty, the EUSR may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

Coordination

1. The EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently, to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region, as appropriate. The EUSR shall provide regular briefings to Member States’ missions and Union delegations.
2. In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with the Heads of Union delegations in the region and Member States’ Heads of Mission. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR shall provide local political guidance to the Head of EULEX KOSOVO, including on the political aspects of issues relating to executive responsibilities. The EUSR and the Civilian Operation Commander shall consult each other as required. The EUSR shall also liaise with relevant local bodies and other international and regional actors in the field.
3. The EUSR, with other Union actors present in the field, shall ensure the dissemination and sharing of information among Union actors in theatre with a view to achieving a high degree of common situation awareness and assessment.

Assistance in relation to claims

The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSRs in Kosovo, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review

The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with a progress report by 31 October 2020 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report by 31 May 2021.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Pending: 32018D1939

11.12.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 314/41
(1) On 12 December 2003 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (‘the Strategy’), which states that non-proliferation, disarmament and arms control can make an essential contribution in the global fight against terrorism by reducing the risk of non-State actors gaining access to weapons of mass destruction, radioactive materials and means of delivery. Chapter III of the Strategy contains a list of measures that need to be taken both within the Union and in third countries to combat such proliferation.
(2) The Union is actively implementing the Strategy and is giving effect to the measures listed in Chapter III thereof, in particular by working towards the universalisation and, where necessary, strengthening of the main treaties, agreements and verification arrangements on disarmament and non-proliferation and by releasing financial resources to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions such as the United Nations (UN) Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism (UNOCT).
(3) In his Agenda for Disarmament entitled ‘Securing our Common Future’, which was launched on 24 May 2018, the UN Secretary-General noted that the current nuclear risks were unacceptable and that they were growing.
(4) On 13 April 2005 the UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, which was opened for signature on 14 September 2005.
(5) The technical implementation of this Decision should be entrusted to the UNODC and the UN Counter-Terrorism Centre (UNCCT) of the UNOCT.
(6) This Decision should be implemented in accordance with the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement concluded by the European Commission with the UN concerning the management of financial contributions by the Union to programmes or projects administered by the UN,
(a) increase the number of States Parties to ICSANT;
(b) increase ICSANT awareness among beneficiaries, such as national policy- and decision-makers, including members of parliament, and in international fora;
(c) improve national legislation by incorporating all ICSANT requirements;
(d) develop e-learning and other relevant training materials and incorporate them into technical legal assistance delivery, including, inter alia, case studies;
(e) develop and maintain a reference website containing all ICSANT-relevant information, including good practices;
(f) enhance the capacities of criminal justice officials and other relevant national stakeholders with regard to the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases;
(g) develop synergies with other relevant international legal instruments, such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, and UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1540 (2004);
(h) strengthen the capacity of States to detect and respond to the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials.
Project 1 : Promotion of adherence through a high-level event to be held in New York in close cooperation with the UN Office of Legal AffairsProject details: A high-level event will be held either in the margins of the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or in the margins of the annual Treaty Event, organised by the UN Secretary-General and held in parallel with the general debate of the General Assembly. The high-level event could also be held during any special UN forum on specific treaties that are intended to facilitate the participation of States in the multilateral treaty framework.Implementing entity: UNCCT
Project 2 : Promotion of adherence via regional workshops and country visitsProject details: Organising up to six regional, interregional and subregional workshops for policy- and decision-makers of States not party to ICSANT(1)in:—Africa,—Central and South Asia,—Europe,—South-East Asia and the Pacific.Relevant materials developed under the project (e.g. case studies and self-assessment questionnaires) will be used in the workshops. In addition to focusing on ICSANT, the workshops will address synergies with the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, as well as UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004).Implementing entity: UNODC — Africa, — Central and South Asia, — Europe, — South-East Asia and the Pacific.
— Africa,
— Central and South Asia,
— Europe,
— South-East Asia and the Pacific.
Project 3 : Provision of relevant legislative assistanceProject details: Provision of relevant legislative assistance to requesting States via desk reviews or legislative drafting workshops (up to 10 States).Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 4 : Capacity building for relevant stakeholders, including criminal justice officials who could be involved in investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating cases involving nuclear and other radioactive material covered by ICSANTProject details: Three regional workshops will be held for prosecutors of selected States Parties to ICSANT in Africa, Europe and Asia.Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 5 : Promotion of adherence through engagement with the Inter-Parliamentary UnionProject details: Consultations will be held with the Inter-Parliamentary Union with a view to organising events to support speedy adherence to ICSANT and joint appeals to States that are not yet party to ICSANT.Implementing entity: UNCCT
Project 6 : Study on reasons for States not adhering to ICSANT and the challenges faced by those StatesProject details: Study on the reasons for States not adhering to ICSANT and the challenges faced by those States. The UNCCT will conduct an academic study to obtain a deeper understanding of the reasons for States not becoming party to ICSANT and the challenges faced by those States, and will issue recommendations on how to address those reasons and challenges in order to ensure increased adherence and will indicate legislative requirements and measures for effective implementation.Implementing entity: UNCCT
Project 7 : Development and maintenance of a regularly updated, password-protected website on all resources on ICSANT, including examples of national legislationProject details: The website will contain all available resources on ICSANT, including a collection of all existing national legislation implementing ICSANT in all States Parties, a collection of good practices and model legislation, scholarly articles, information and a calendar on outreach activities, a dedicated email address for questions, information on available assistance, a questionnaire with answers on ICSANT and the delivery of 12 one-hour webinars on different aspects of ICSANT (four in English, four in French and four in Spanish).Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 8 : Development and delivery of a training manual on ICSANT-relevant fictional case studiesProject details: A training manual on ICSANT will be developed on the basis of fictional case studies.Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 9 : Development of an e-learning module on ICSANTProject details: The module will be translated into at least four UN official languages and will be hosted on the UNODC Global e-learning website (https://www.unodc.org/elearning).Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 10 : Nuclear-terrorism-related capacity building in the area of border security and managementProject details: The UNCCT will hold capacity-building events on border security and management in six regions:—Sahel,—South Asia and South-East Asia,—Horn of Africa,—Central Asia and the Caucasus,—Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,—Middle East and North Africa.Implementing entity: UNCCT — Sahel, — South Asia and South-East Asia, — Horn of Africa, — Central Asia and the Caucasus, — Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, — Middle East and North Africa.
— Sahel,
— South Asia and South-East Asia,
— Horn of Africa,
— Central Asia and the Caucasus,
— Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,
— Middle East and North Africa.
Project 11 : Development of flyers and learning materialProject details: Development of promotional flyers on ICSANT in all six UN official languages and a self-assessment questionnaire for States considering adherence.Implementing entity: UNODC
— Africa,
— Central and South Asia,
— Europe,
— South-East Asia and the Pacific.
— Sahel,
— South Asia and South-East Asia,
— Horn of Africa,
— Central Asia and the Caucasus,
— Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,
— Middle East and North Africa.
1. increase in the number of States Parties to ICSANT;
2. increased ICSANT awareness among beneficiaries, such as national policy- and decision-makers, including members of parliament, and in international fora;
3. national legislation improved by incorporating all ICSANT requirements;
4. e-learning and other relevant training materials developed and incorporated into technical legal assistance delivery, including, inter alia, case studies;
5. a reference website containing all ICSANT-relevant information developed and maintained, including good practices;
6. enhanced capacities of criminal justice officials and other relevant national stakeholders with regard to the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases;
7. synergies developed with other relevant international legal instruments such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, and UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004);
8. strengthened capacity of States to detect and respond to the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 12 December 2003 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (‘the Strategy’), which states that non-proliferation, disarmament and arms control can make an essential contribution in the global fight against terrorism by reducing the risk of non-State actors gaining access to weapons of mass destruction, radioactive materials and means of delivery. Chapter III of the Strategy contains a list of measures that need to be taken both within the Union and in third countries to combat such proliferation.
(2) The Union is actively implementing the Strategy and is giving effect to the measures listed in Chapter III thereof, in particular by working towards the universalisation and, where necessary, strengthening of the main treaties, agreements and verification arrangements on disarmament and non-proliferation and by releasing financial resources to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions such as the United Nations (UN) Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism (UNOCT).
(3) In his Agenda for Disarmament entitled ‘Securing our Common Future’, which was launched on 24 May 2018, the UN Secretary-General noted that the current nuclear risks were unacceptable and that they were growing.
(4) On 13 April 2005 the UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, which was opened for signature on 14 September 2005.
(5) The technical implementation of this Decision should be entrusted to the UNODC and the UN Counter-Terrorism Centre (UNCCT) of the UNOCT.
(6) This Decision should be implemented in accordance with the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement concluded by the European Commission with the UN concerning the management of financial contributions by the Union to programmes or projects administered by the UN,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. For the purpose of ensuring the continuous and practical implementation of certain elements of the Strategy, the Union shall promote the universalisation and effective implementation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (‘ICSANT’) by providing support for the activities of the UNODC, and in particular its Terrorism Prevention Branch (TPB), which, inter alia, supports the efforts of States to adhere to relevant international legal instruments and to strengthen their national legal and criminal justice frameworks and institutional capacity to counter nuclear terrorism, and the UNCCT programme on preventing and responding to weapons of mass destruction (‘WMD’)/chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (‘CBRN’) terrorism, which, inter alia, seeks to support States and international organisations in preventing terrorist groups from accessing and using WMD/CBRN materials and in ensuring that they are better prepared for, and can effectively respond to, a terrorist attack involving WMD/CBRN materials.
2. The projects to be financed by the Union shall aim to:
(a)
increase the number of States Parties to ICSANT;
(b)
increase ICSANT awareness among beneficiaries, such as national policy- and decision-makers, including members of parliament, and in international fora;
(c)
improve national legislation by incorporating all ICSANT requirements;
(d)
develop e-learning and other relevant training materials and incorporate them into technical legal assistance delivery, including, inter alia, case studies;
(e)
develop and maintain a reference website containing all ICSANT-relevant information, including good practices;
(f)
enhance the capacities of criminal justice officials and other relevant national stakeholders with regard to the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases;
(g)
develop synergies with other relevant international legal instruments, such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, and UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1540 (2004);
(h)
strengthen the capacity of States to detect and respond to the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials.
The projects shall be implemented by the UNODC and the UNCCT in close collaboration with relevant UNODC field offices and other relevant institutions and experts, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, the Group of Experts of the UNSC Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004) and the EU CBRN Risk Mitigation Centres of Excellence.
In the implementation of the projects, both Union visibility and proper programme management shall be ensured.
All project components shall be supported by proactive and innovative public outreach activities, and resources shall be allocated accordingly.
A detailed description of the projects is set out in the Annex.

Article 2
1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) shall be responsible for the implementation of this Decision.
2. The technical implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be carried out by the UNODC and the UNCCT. They shall perform that task under the responsibility of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with the UNODC and the UNCCT.

Article 3
1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be EUR 4 999 986. The total estimated budget of the overall project shall be EUR 5 223 907, which shall be provided through co-financing.
2. The expenditure financed by the financial reference amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the Union budget.
3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the financial reference amount referred to in paragraph 1. For that purpose, it shall conclude financing agreements with the UNODC and the UNCCT. The financing agreements shall stipulate that the UNODC and the UNCCT have to ensure the visibility of the Union contribution, appropriate to its size.
4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreements referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the financing agreements.

Article 4
1. The High Representative shall report to the Council twice a year on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular reports prepared by the UNODC and the UNCCT. Those reports shall form the basis for the evaluation carried out by the Council.
2. The Commission shall provide information twice a year on the financial aspects of the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2).

Article 5
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
This Decision shall expire 36 months after the date of the conclusion of the financing agreements referred to in Article 3(3). However, it shall expire six months after the date of its entry into force if no financing agreement has been concluded within that period.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 12 December 2003 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (‘the Strategy’), which states that non-proliferation, disarmament and arms control can make an essential contribution in the global fight against terrorism by reducing the risk of non-State actors gaining access to weapons of mass destruction, radioactive materials and means of delivery. Chapter III of the Strategy contains a list of measures that need to be taken both within the Union and in third countries to combat such proliferation.
(2) The Union is actively implementing the Strategy and is giving effect to the measures listed in Chapter III thereof, in particular by working towards the universalisation and, where necessary, strengthening of the main treaties, agreements and verification arrangements on disarmament and non-proliferation and by releasing financial resources to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions such as the United Nations (UN) Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism (UNOCT).
(3) In his Agenda for Disarmament entitled ‘Securing our Common Future’, which was launched on 24 May 2018, the UN Secretary-General noted that the current nuclear risks were unacceptable and that they were growing.
(4) On 13 April 2005 the UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, which was opened for signature on 14 September 2005.
(5) The technical implementation of this Decision should be entrusted to the UNODC and the UN Counter-Terrorism Centre (UNCCT) of the UNOCT.
(6) This Decision should be implemented in accordance with the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement concluded by the European Commission with the UN concerning the management of financial contributions by the Union to programmes or projects administered by the UN,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. For the purpose of ensuring the continuous and practical implementation of certain elements of the Strategy, the Union shall promote the universalisation and effective implementation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (‘ICSANT’) by providing support for the activities of the UNODC, and in particular its Terrorism Prevention Branch (TPB), which, inter alia, supports the efforts of States to adhere to relevant international legal instruments and to strengthen their national legal and criminal justice frameworks and institutional capacity to counter nuclear terrorism, and the UNCCT programme on preventing and responding to weapons of mass destruction (‘WMD’)/chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (‘CBRN’) terrorism, which, inter alia, seeks to support States and international organisations in preventing terrorist groups from accessing and using WMD/CBRN materials and in ensuring that they are better prepared for, and can effectively respond to, a terrorist attack involving WMD/CBRN materials.
2. The projects to be financed by the Union shall aim to:
(a)
increase the number of States Parties to ICSANT;
(b)
increase ICSANT awareness among beneficiaries, such as national policy- and decision-makers, including members of parliament, and in international fora;
(c)
improve national legislation by incorporating all ICSANT requirements;
(d)
develop e-learning and other relevant training materials and incorporate them into technical legal assistance delivery, including, inter alia, case studies;
(e)
develop and maintain a reference website containing all ICSANT-relevant information, including good practices;
(f)
enhance the capacities of criminal justice officials and other relevant national stakeholders with regard to the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases;
(g)
develop synergies with other relevant international legal instruments, such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, and UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1540 (2004);
(h)
strengthen the capacity of States to detect and respond to the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials.
The projects shall be implemented by the UNODC and the UNCCT in close collaboration with relevant UNODC field offices and other relevant institutions and experts, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, the Group of Experts of the UNSC Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004) and the EU CBRN Risk Mitigation Centres of Excellence.
In the implementation of the projects, both Union visibility and proper programme management shall be ensured.
All project components shall be supported by proactive and innovative public outreach activities, and resources shall be allocated accordingly.
A detailed description of the projects is set out in the Annex.
1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) shall be responsible for the implementation of this Decision.
2. The technical implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be carried out by the UNODC and the UNCCT. They shall perform that task under the responsibility of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with the UNODC and the UNCCT.
1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be EUR 4 999 986. The total estimated budget of the overall project shall be EUR 5 223 907, which shall be provided through co-financing.
2. The expenditure financed by the financial reference amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the Union budget.
3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the financial reference amount referred to in paragraph 1. For that purpose, it shall conclude financing agreements with the UNODC and the UNCCT. The financing agreements shall stipulate that the UNODC and the UNCCT have to ensure the visibility of the Union contribution, appropriate to its size.
4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreements referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the financing agreements.
1. The High Representative shall report to the Council twice a year on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular reports prepared by the UNODC and the UNCCT. Those reports shall form the basis for the evaluation carried out by the Council.
2. The Commission shall provide information twice a year on the financial aspects of the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2).
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
This Decision shall expire 36 months after the date of the conclusion of the financing agreements referred to in Article 3(3). However, it shall expire six months after the date of its entry into force if no financing agreement has been concluded within that period.
ANNEX
Project 1 | : | Promotion of adherence through a high-level event to be held in New York in close cooperation with the UN Office of Legal AffairsProject details: A high-level event will be held either in the margins of the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or in the margins of the annual Treaty Event, organised by the UN Secretary-General and held in parallel with the general debate of the General Assembly. The high-level event could also be held during any special UN forum on specific treaties that are intended to facilitate the participation of States in the multilateral treaty framework.Implementing entity: UNCCT
Project 2 | : | Promotion of adherence via regional workshops and country visitsProject details: Organising up to six regional, interregional and subregional workshops for policy- and decision-makers of States not party to ICSANT(1)in:—Africa,—Central and South Asia,—Europe,—South-East Asia and the Pacific.Relevant materials developed under the project (e.g. case studies and self-assessment questionnaires) will be used in the workshops. In addition to focusing on ICSANT, the workshops will address synergies with the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, as well as UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004).Implementing entity: UNODC | — | Africa, | — | Central and South Asia, | — | Europe, | — | South-East Asia and the Pacific.
— | Africa,
— | Central and South Asia,
— | Europe,
— | South-East Asia and the Pacific.
Project 3 | : | Provision of relevant legislative assistanceProject details: Provision of relevant legislative assistance to requesting States via desk reviews or legislative drafting workshops (up to 10 States).Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 4 | : | Capacity building for relevant stakeholders, including criminal justice officials who could be involved in investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating cases involving nuclear and other radioactive material covered by ICSANTProject details: Three regional workshops will be held for prosecutors of selected States Parties to ICSANT in Africa, Europe and Asia.Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 5 | : | Promotion of adherence through engagement with the Inter-Parliamentary UnionProject details: Consultations will be held with the Inter-Parliamentary Union with a view to organising events to support speedy adherence to ICSANT and joint appeals to States that are not yet party to ICSANT.Implementing entity: UNCCT
Project 6 | : | Study on reasons for States not adhering to ICSANT and the challenges faced by those StatesProject details: Study on the reasons for States not adhering to ICSANT and the challenges faced by those States. The UNCCT will conduct an academic study to obtain a deeper understanding of the reasons for States not becoming party to ICSANT and the challenges faced by those States, and will issue recommendations on how to address those reasons and challenges in order to ensure increased adherence and will indicate legislative requirements and measures for effective implementation.Implementing entity: UNCCT
Project 7 | : | Development and maintenance of a regularly updated, password-protected website on all resources on ICSANT, including examples of national legislationProject details: The website will contain all available resources on ICSANT, including a collection of all existing national legislation implementing ICSANT in all States Parties, a collection of good practices and model legislation, scholarly articles, information and a calendar on outreach activities, a dedicated email address for questions, information on available assistance, a questionnaire with answers on ICSANT and the delivery of 12 one-hour webinars on different aspects of ICSANT (four in English, four in French and four in Spanish).Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 8 | : | Development and delivery of a training manual on ICSANT-relevant fictional case studiesProject details: A training manual on ICSANT will be developed on the basis of fictional case studies.Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 9 | : | Development of an e-learning module on ICSANTProject details: The module will be translated into at least four UN official languages and will be hosted on the UNODC Global e-learning website (https://www.unodc.org/elearning).Implementing entity: UNODC
Project 10 | : | Nuclear-terrorism-related capacity building in the area of border security and managementProject details: The UNCCT will hold capacity-building events on border security and management in six regions:—Sahel,—South Asia and South-East Asia,—Horn of Africa,—Central Asia and the Caucasus,—Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,—Middle East and North Africa.Implementing entity: UNCCT | — | Sahel, | — | South Asia and South-East Asia, | — | Horn of Africa, | — | Central Asia and the Caucasus, | — | Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, | — | Middle East and North Africa.
— | Sahel,
— | South Asia and South-East Asia,
— | Horn of Africa,
— | Central Asia and the Caucasus,
— | Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,
— | Middle East and North Africa.
Project 11 | : | Development of flyers and learning materialProject details: Development of promotional flyers on ICSANT in all six UN official languages and a self-assessment questionnaire for States considering adherence.Implementing entity: UNODCExpected outcome of the above projects:

1. | increase in the number of States Parties to ICSANT;
2. | increased ICSANT awareness among beneficiaries, such as national policy- and decision-makers, including members of parliament, and in international fora;
3. | national legislation improved by incorporating all ICSANT requirements;
4. | e-learning and other relevant training materials developed and incorporated into technical legal assistance delivery, including, inter alia, case studies;
5. | a reference website containing all ICSANT-relevant information developed and maintained, including good practices;
6. | enhanced capacities of criminal justice officials and other relevant national stakeholders with regard to the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases;
7. | synergies developed with other relevant international legal instruments such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, and UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004);
8. | strengthened capacity of States to detect and respond to the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials.
(1) Invitations could be extended to States Parties to ICSANT on a case-by-case basis if there is an added value in their participation.

Pending: 32018D1788

20.11.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 293/11
(1) On 16 December 2005 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (‘the EU SALW Strategy’), subsequently revised in 2018, which set the guidelines for Union action in the field of small arms and light weapons (‘SALW’). The EU SALW Strategy noted that the Union will, as a priority, support regional initiatives to combat illicit SALW and their ammunition, providing financial and technical support for regional and national organisations responsible for implementing relevant regional instruments. The EU SALW Strategy mentioned the Balkans as a priority region for support.
(2) On 17 May 2018, at the EU-Western Balkans Summit in Sofia, the EU leaders agreed on the Sofia Declaration, to which the Western Balkans partners aligned themselves, and which includes the commitment to enhance significantly operational cooperation in the fight against international organised crime in priority areas such as firearms, drugs, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings.
(3) The Western Balkans region remains one of the sources of illicit arms trafficking into the Union.
(4) On 13 June 2018 the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) presented a Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on elements towards an EU strategy against illicit firearms, SALW and their ammunition entitled ‘Securing Arms, Protecting Citizens’.
(5) On 10 July 2018 the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland hosted the 5th Western Balkans Summit in London, which adopted the ‘Regional Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans by 2024’ (‘the Roadmap’), which was prepared by the SALW commissions of the Western Balkans in the framework of the Franco-German donor coordination initiative on illicit firearms trafficking in the Western Balkans. Those commissions are preparing their action plans for the implementation of the Roadmap.
(6) The United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted on 25 September 2015, affirmed that sustainable development cannot be realised without peace and security and that illicit arms flows are amongst the factors which give rise to violence, insecurity and injustice.
(7) At the third UN conference to review progress made in the implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, held in June 2018, UN Member States undertook to strengthen partnerships and cooperation at all levels in preventing and combating the illicit trade in SALW, and to promote and strengthen border cooperation and regional and subregional coordination.
(8) The goals of the Roadmap agreed by the Western Balkans partners are consistent with the efforts within the Union and the UN to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition. Therefore, the Union should support the Western Balkans in implementing the Roadmap.
(9) SEESAC, established in Belgrade in 2002 and functioning under the joint mandate of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the Regional Cooperation Council (RCC), which is the successor to the Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe, assists national and regional stakeholders in controlling and reducing the spread and misuse of SALW and ammunition, and thus contributes to enhanced stability, security and development in South-Eastern and Eastern Europe. SEESAC places particular emphasis on the development of regional projects to address the reality of cross-border flows of weapons.
(10) The Union previously supported SEESAC by means of Council Decision 2002/842/CFSP(1), extended and amended by Council Decisions 2003/807/CFSP(2)and 2004/791/CFSP(3), as well as by means of Council Decision 2010/179/CFSP(4), Council Decision 2013/730/CFSP(5), extended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2051(6), and Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356(7).The agreement concluded pursuant to Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356 expires on 29 December 2019.
(11) The Union considers SEESAC to be the preferred implementing partner for the implementation of the Roadmap in the Western Balkans, because of its proven experience and established network, the proven quality of its work and its coordinating role in the preparation of the Roadmap.
(12) In addition, this Union action should provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus,
(1) By 2023, ensure that arms control legislation is in place, fully harmonized with the EU regulatory framework and other related international obligations and standardized across the region.
(2) By 2024, ensure that arms control policies and practices in the Western Balkans are evidence based and intelligence led.
(3) By 2024, significantly reduce illicit flows of firearms, ammunition and explosives (FAE) into, within and beyond the Western Balkans.
(4) By 2024, significantly reduce the supply, demand and misuse of firearms through increased awareness, education, outreach and advocacy.
(5) By 2024, substantially decrease the estimated number of firearms in illicit possession in the Western Balkans.
(6) Systematically decrease the surplus and destroy seized small arms and light weapons and ammunition.
(7) Significantly decrease the risk of proliferation and diversion of firearms, ammunition and explosives.
(a) support the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
(b) support authorities in the Western Balkans in fully harmonising their arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations; and
(c) provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.
— coordinate and monitor the implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
— support authorities in the Western Balkans in fully harmonising their arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations; and
— provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.
— in BiH:—the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union's Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH;—the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH;—the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.To date, significant gains were achieved through tight cooperation and coordination with those three projects, which resulted in more efficient results; — the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union's Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH; — the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH; — the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.
— the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union's Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH;
— the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH;
— the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.
— the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union's Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH;
— the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH;
— the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.
— in Serbia, the conventional ammunition stockpile management (CASM) project, funded by the United States Department of State, UNDP and the OSCE, is designed to enhance the security and safety of predefined conventional ammunition storage locations and the disposal of reported surplus ammunition;
— in Montenegro, the Montenegro demilitarization (MONDEM) project, managed by UNDP in partnership with the OSCE, is designed to work on the reduction of counter-proliferation risks through the development of safe and secure conventional ammunition storage infrastructure and management systems, reduction of explosive risk to communities by environmentally benign demilitarisation, the destruction of toxic hazardous waste (liquid rocket propellant) and support for defence reform through the destruction of a limited quantity of heavy weapons systems designated by the MoD of Montenegro;
— in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the project on the reduction of the risk for proliferation of weapons and ammunition, which aims to increase the security of existing stockpiles of small arms and ammunition, and which is managed by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and implemented by the OSCE mission to Skopje;
— in Kosovo, the firearms and explosives risk mitigation (FERM) project (formerly KOSSAC), which was designed initially to reduce armed violence in Kosovo and increase community safety, and which aims to support the Kosovo stakeholders in controlling the widespread illegal possession and circulation of SALW and, through risk-based management and an evidence-based approach, to minimise the risks of such weapons and explosive materials;
— regionally, the Regional Security Sector Reform Platform (RSSRP), a well-established resource that delivers quick, effective and demand-driven responses to rule-of-law needs at the technical level across the globe; with a quick deployment mechanism based on SEESAC's unique network of security experts with experience in the area of security-sector reform, RSSRP provides tailor-made assistance with a particular focus on SALW control and gender mainstreaming in security policy.
— coordinated implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
— support provided for the full harmonisation of the Western Balkans authorities' arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations, and standardisation across the region;
— countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.
— formal regional Roadmap coordination meetings focusing on taking stock of progress and information exchange;
— the provision of expert and technical support to local Roadmap coordination meetings monitoring the implementation of partners' action plans;
— the development of biannual monitoring and evaluation reports documenting progress, challenges and needs in the implementation of the Roadmap based on the commonly agreed KPIs;
— a mid-term evaluation of the implementation of the Roadmap action plans, including capacity assessment for the six beneficiaries on SALW control;
— Roadmap outreach and visibility activities (including the establishment of an online platform, stakeholder engagement and awareness raising).
— Organisation of up to six regional Roadmap coordination meetings;
— Enabling taking stock of progress, information exchange, knowledge transfer and standardisation;
— Organisation of local coordination meetings (up to 36 in total);
— Development of biannual monitoring and evaluation reports (up to six);
— Mid-term evaluation, including capacity assessment prepared for six Roadmap beneficiaries;
— Establishment of an online platform to ensure proper outreach and visibility of the Roadmap.
— development of an assessment and gap analysis of partners' legal frameworks on SALW control and the level of harmonisation with Union and international legislation, as well as the level of standardisation of procedures in the region;
— provision of support for legislative standardisation and harmonisation through continuous and on-demand advisory support and the organisation of thematic workshops on arms laws, regulations and criminal codes at both regional and national level;
— updating of the regional arms-law compendium as an easy-reference guide for SALW/firearms control legislation in the region;
— carrying-out of a gender screening of the legal framework and the continuation of the Gender Coach programme;
— training on media strategy development.
— Assessment and gap analysis (six) of legal framework reports for each beneficiary;
— Up to three regional workshops and six thematic workshops for the beneficiaries;
— Provision of on-demand expertise on legislative and policy updates;
— Updated arms-law compendium translated into all of the relevant languages of the region;
— Gender-screening reports on the arms legal framework (six reports);
— Gender Coach programme with two heads of SALW commissions;
— Media strategy development and training.
— Needs assessment of the border-police and criminal-police services of the Western Balkans in countering illicit arms trafficking;
— Building on the current work on the establishment of the FFPs through practical support for information-exchange capabilities, in particular with regard to ballistic evidence, as well as the procurement of specialised equipment in support of the FFPs;
— Assessment of the capacities of the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus for selected aspects of SALW, ammunition and explosives control as well as combating illicit trafficking of firearms, focusing, inter alia, on legal and policy frameworks, physical security and stockpile management (PSSM) capabilities, border control, the criminal police and the judicial response to trafficking and the misuse of firearms. The detailed assessment will identify opportunities, threats and challenges, with recommendations for possible targeted interventions to address the threat posed by illicit trafficking of SALW.
— Needs assessment of the border-police and criminal-police services of the Western Balkans in countering illicit arms trafficking;
— Strengthened capacity of ballistics experts and investigators for addressing cross-border firearm-related criminality;
— Implemented pilot on operational ballistic information-exchange structure;
— Assessment of capacities of the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus for selected aspects of SALW control with identified targeted interventions.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 16 December 2005 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (‘the EU SALW Strategy’), subsequently revised in 2018, which set the guidelines for Union action in the field of small arms and light weapons (‘SALW’). The EU SALW Strategy noted that the Union will, as a priority, support regional initiatives to combat illicit SALW and their ammunition, providing financial and technical support for regional and national organisations responsible for implementing relevant regional instruments. The EU SALW Strategy mentioned the Balkans as a priority region for support.
(2) On 17 May 2018, at the EU-Western Balkans Summit in Sofia, the EU leaders agreed on the Sofia Declaration, to which the Western Balkans partners aligned themselves, and which includes the commitment to enhance significantly operational cooperation in the fight against international organised crime in priority areas such as firearms, drugs, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings.
(3) The Western Balkans region remains one of the sources of illicit arms trafficking into the Union.
(4) On 13 June 2018 the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) presented a Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on elements towards an EU strategy against illicit firearms, SALW and their ammunition entitled ‘Securing Arms, Protecting Citizens’.
(5) On 10 July 2018 the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland hosted the 5th Western Balkans Summit in London, which adopted the ‘Regional Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans by 2024’ (‘the Roadmap’), which was prepared by the SALW commissions of the Western Balkans in the framework of the Franco-German donor coordination initiative on illicit firearms trafficking in the Western Balkans. Those commissions are preparing their action plans for the implementation of the Roadmap.
(6) The United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted on 25 September 2015, affirmed that sustainable development cannot be realised without peace and security and that illicit arms flows are amongst the factors which give rise to violence, insecurity and injustice.
(7) At the third UN conference to review progress made in the implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, held in June 2018, UN Member States undertook to strengthen partnerships and cooperation at all levels in preventing and combating the illicit trade in SALW, and to promote and strengthen border cooperation and regional and subregional coordination.
(8) The goals of the Roadmap agreed by the Western Balkans partners are consistent with the efforts within the Union and the UN to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition. Therefore, the Union should support the Western Balkans in implementing the Roadmap.
(9) SEESAC, established in Belgrade in 2002 and functioning under the joint mandate of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the Regional Cooperation Council (RCC), which is the successor to the Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe, assists national and regional stakeholders in controlling and reducing the spread and misuse of SALW and ammunition, and thus contributes to enhanced stability, security and development in South-Eastern and Eastern Europe. SEESAC places particular emphasis on the development of regional projects to address the reality of cross-border flows of weapons.
(10) The Union previously supported SEESAC by means of Council Decision 2002/842/CFSP(1), extended and amended by Council Decisions 2003/807/CFSP(2)and 2004/791/CFSP(3), as well as by means of Council Decision 2010/179/CFSP(4), Council Decision 2013/730/CFSP(5), extended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2051(6), and Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356(7).The agreement concluded pursuant to Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356 expires on 29 December 2019.
(11) The Union considers SEESAC to be the preferred implementing partner for the implementation of the Roadmap in the Western Balkans, because of its proven experience and established network, the proven quality of its work and its coordinating role in the preparation of the Roadmap.
(12) In addition, this Union action should provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. With a view to fighting the illicit trade in firearms and SALW in the Western Balkans and reducing the risk of illicit arms entering the Union from the Western Balkans region, the Union shall support Western Balkans partners with the implementation of the ‘Regional Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans by 2024’, pursuing the support of the Western Balkans partners in reaching the goals set out in the Roadmap, namely:(8)
(1)
By 2023, ensure that arms control legislation is in place, fully harmonized with the EU regulatory framework and other related international obligations and standardized across the region.
(2)
By 2024, ensure that arms control policies and practices in the Western Balkans are evidence based and intelligence led.
(3)
By 2024, significantly reduce illicit flows of firearms, ammunition and explosives (FAE) into, within and beyond the Western Balkans.
(4)
By 2024, significantly reduce the supply, demand and misuse of firearms through increased awareness, education, outreach and advocacy.
(5)
By 2024, substantially decrease the estimated number of firearms in illicit possession in the Western Balkans.
(6)
Systematically decrease the surplus and destroy seized small arms and light weapons and ammunition.
(7)
Significantly decrease the risk of proliferation and diversion of firearms, ammunition and explosives.
2. In addition to the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, this Union action shall provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus.
3. In order to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Union shall, by means of this Decision:
(a)
support the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
(b)
support authorities in the Western Balkans in fully harmonising their arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations; and
(c)
provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.
4. The project’s geographic scope is the Western Balkans, with direct project beneficiaries being Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo(*1), Montenegro, Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In addition, the project will seek to continue support to the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus, which are dealing with similar SALW control challenges, through the transfer of knowledge and experiences gained and best practices developed in the Western Balkans since 2001.
5. The action resulting from this Decision will build upon the basis created by the achievements under the previous Council Decisions in support of SEESAC.
6. A detailed description of the project is set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
1. The High Representative shall be responsible for implementing this Decision.
2. The technical implementation of the project referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out by SEESAC, where necessary in coordination with the Driver of the European multidisciplinary platform against criminal threats (EMPACT) Firearms.
3. SEESAC shall perform its tasks under the responsibility of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with UNDP, which shall act on behalf of SEESAC.

Article 3
1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the project financed by the Union referred to in Article 1 shall be EUR 4 002 587,52.
2. The expenditure financed by the reference amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the Union budget.
3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 2. For that purpose, it shall conclude the necessary agreement with UNDP, which shall act on behalf of SEESAC. The agreement shall stipulate that SEESAC has to ensure the visibility of the Union’s contribution, appropriate to its size.
4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the agreement referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the agreement.

Article 4
1. The High Representative shall report to the Council on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular quarterly reports prepared by SEESAC. Those reports shall form the basis of the evaluation carried out by the Council.
2. The Commission shall report on the financial aspects of the project referred to in Article 1.

Article 5
1. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
2. This Decision shall expire 36 months after the date of conclusion of the agreement referred to in Article 3(3). However, it shall expire six months after the date of its entry into force if no agreement has been concluded within that period.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 16 December 2005 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (‘the EU SALW Strategy’), subsequently revised in 2018, which set the guidelines for Union action in the field of small arms and light weapons (‘SALW’). The EU SALW Strategy noted that the Union will, as a priority, support regional initiatives to combat illicit SALW and their ammunition, providing financial and technical support for regional and national organisations responsible for implementing relevant regional instruments. The EU SALW Strategy mentioned the Balkans as a priority region for support.
(2) On 17 May 2018, at the EU-Western Balkans Summit in Sofia, the EU leaders agreed on the Sofia Declaration, to which the Western Balkans partners aligned themselves, and which includes the commitment to enhance significantly operational cooperation in the fight against international organised crime in priority areas such as firearms, drugs, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings.
(3) The Western Balkans region remains one of the sources of illicit arms trafficking into the Union.
(4) On 13 June 2018 the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) presented a Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on elements towards an EU strategy against illicit firearms, SALW and their ammunition entitled ‘Securing Arms, Protecting Citizens’.
(5) On 10 July 2018 the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland hosted the 5th Western Balkans Summit in London, which adopted the ‘Regional Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans by 2024’ (‘the Roadmap’), which was prepared by the SALW commissions of the Western Balkans in the framework of the Franco-German donor coordination initiative on illicit firearms trafficking in the Western Balkans. Those commissions are preparing their action plans for the implementation of the Roadmap.
(6) The United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted on 25 September 2015, affirmed that sustainable development cannot be realised without peace and security and that illicit arms flows are amongst the factors which give rise to violence, insecurity and injustice.
(7) At the third UN conference to review progress made in the implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, held in June 2018, UN Member States undertook to strengthen partnerships and cooperation at all levels in preventing and combating the illicit trade in SALW, and to promote and strengthen border cooperation and regional and subregional coordination.
(8) The goals of the Roadmap agreed by the Western Balkans partners are consistent with the efforts within the Union and the UN to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition. Therefore, the Union should support the Western Balkans in implementing the Roadmap.
(9) SEESAC, established in Belgrade in 2002 and functioning under the joint mandate of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the Regional Cooperation Council (RCC), which is the successor to the Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe, assists national and regional stakeholders in controlling and reducing the spread and misuse of SALW and ammunition, and thus contributes to enhanced stability, security and development in South-Eastern and Eastern Europe. SEESAC places particular emphasis on the development of regional projects to address the reality of cross-border flows of weapons.
(10) The Union previously supported SEESAC by means of Council Decision 2002/842/CFSP(1), extended and amended by Council Decisions 2003/807/CFSP(2)and 2004/791/CFSP(3), as well as by means of Council Decision 2010/179/CFSP(4), Council Decision 2013/730/CFSP(5), extended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2051(6), and Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356(7).The agreement concluded pursuant to Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356 expires on 29 December 2019.
(11) The Union considers SEESAC to be the preferred implementing partner for the implementation of the Roadmap in the Western Balkans, because of its proven experience and established network, the proven quality of its work and its coordinating role in the preparation of the Roadmap.
(12) In addition, this Union action should provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. With a view to fighting the illicit trade in firearms and SALW in the Western Balkans and reducing the risk of illicit arms entering the Union from the Western Balkans region, the Union shall support Western Balkans partners with the implementation of the ‘Regional Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans by 2024’, pursuing the support of the Western Balkans partners in reaching the goals set out in the Roadmap, namely:(8)
(1)
By 2023, ensure that arms control legislation is in place, fully harmonized with the EU regulatory framework and other related international obligations and standardized across the region.
(2)
By 2024, ensure that arms control policies and practices in the Western Balkans are evidence based and intelligence led.
(3)
By 2024, significantly reduce illicit flows of firearms, ammunition and explosives (FAE) into, within and beyond the Western Balkans.
(4)
By 2024, significantly reduce the supply, demand and misuse of firearms through increased awareness, education, outreach and advocacy.
(5)
By 2024, substantially decrease the estimated number of firearms in illicit possession in the Western Balkans.
(6)
Systematically decrease the surplus and destroy seized small arms and light weapons and ammunition.
(7)
Significantly decrease the risk of proliferation and diversion of firearms, ammunition and explosives.
2. In addition to the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, this Union action shall provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus.
3. In order to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Union shall, by means of this Decision:
(a)
support the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
(b)
support authorities in the Western Balkans in fully harmonising their arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations; and
(c)
provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.
4. The project’s geographic scope is the Western Balkans, with direct project beneficiaries being Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo(*1), Montenegro, Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In addition, the project will seek to continue support to the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus, which are dealing with similar SALW control challenges, through the transfer of knowledge and experiences gained and best practices developed in the Western Balkans since 2001.
5. The action resulting from this Decision will build upon the basis created by the achievements under the previous Council Decisions in support of SEESAC.
6. A detailed description of the project is set out in the Annex to this Decision.
1. The High Representative shall be responsible for implementing this Decision.
2. The technical implementation of the project referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out by SEESAC, where necessary in coordination with the Driver of the European multidisciplinary platform against criminal threats (EMPACT) Firearms.
3. SEESAC shall perform its tasks under the responsibility of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with UNDP, which shall act on behalf of SEESAC.
1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the project financed by the Union referred to in Article 1 shall be EUR 4 002 587,52.
2. The expenditure financed by the reference amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the Union budget.
3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 2. For that purpose, it shall conclude the necessary agreement with UNDP, which shall act on behalf of SEESAC. The agreement shall stipulate that SEESAC has to ensure the visibility of the Union’s contribution, appropriate to its size.
4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the agreement referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the agreement.
1. The High Representative shall report to the Council on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular quarterly reports prepared by SEESAC. Those reports shall form the basis of the evaluation carried out by the Council.
2. The Commission shall report on the financial aspects of the project referred to in Article 1.
1. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
2. This Decision shall expire 36 months after the date of conclusion of the agreement referred to in Article 3(3). However, it shall expire six months after the date of its entry into force if no agreement has been concluded within that period.

UNION CONTRIBUTION TO THE SEESAC PROJECT ON SALW CONTROL ACTIVITIES IN THE WESTERN BALKANS IN IMPLEMENTING THE ROADMAP FOR A SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION TO THE ILLEGAL POSSESSION, MISUSE AND TRAFFICKING OF SALW/FIREARMS AND THEIR AMMUNITION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

ANNEX1. Introduction and objectives
South-East Europe remains an area of concern and an important challenge in the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (‘the EU SALW Strategy’). While significant progress has been made in recent years, the accumulation of small arms and light weapons (‘SALW’) and ammunition, inadequate storage conditions, illicit possession, and policy-making and implementation capacity gaps coupled with fragile political systems continue to limit the effectiveness of SALW control efforts. Therefore, in order to ensure continuous progress, secure the gains made and pave the way for a long-term sustainable solution that includes full harmonisation with the Union legislative and regulatory framework and compliance with international standards, the continuation of support to combat the threat posed by the spread and illicit trafficking of SALW in and from South-East Europe forms an essential part of the Union’s efforts to achieve the goals of the EU SALW Strategy.
To address the remaining challenges in SALW control and reinforce the commitment of the Western Balkans in combating illicit trafficking and misuse of firearms, a Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans by 2024 (‘the Roadmap’) was developed by the SALW commissions of the Western Balkans on 29 May 2018 in Tirana, following a consultation process with relevant institutions and international organisations. It was endorsed in the framework of the Western Balkans Summit in London on 9 July 2018. The Roadmap envisions the Western Balkans as a safer region and an exporter of security, where comprehensive and sustainable oversight and control mechanisms, fully harmonised with Union and other international standards, are in place to identify, prevent, prosecute and control the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives. The Roadmap has been developed as a guiding document and, as such, envisages agreed levels of performance and outlines the commitment required at strategic, policy and operational level amongst the beneficiaries, building on the political commitment of the Western Balkans authorities to the UN and Union arms-control commitments and strategic documents.
The South-Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC), as the executive arm of the Regional Implementation Plan on Combating the Proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons, supported the development of the Roadmap and will coordinate and support its implementation. This action will thus increase the assistance for SALW control provided by means of Council Decisions 2010/179/CFSP, 2013/730/CFSP and (CFSP) 2016/2356. It will advance further the processes and measures necessary for achieving sustainable SALW control in the Western Balkans.
This action will: (a) support the coordination of the Roadmap implementation; (b) provide support for the harmonisation of legislative and regulatory frameworks on SALW/firearms with those of the Union; and (c) enable a clear understanding of the current gaps and needs in order to improve further cross-border detection capacities with regard to illicit firearms trafficking by building on the establishment of the firearms focal points (‘FFPs’) in South-East Europe. It will also ensure a better overview of the current situation and identify areas for capacity support in preventing the illicit proliferation and trafficking of SALW/firearms in Ukraine and Belarus, building on the assistance provided under Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356 in support of reducing the threat of the illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW in South-East Europe (SEESAC IV). As such, the implementation of this action will complement the activities under Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356, allowing for the scaling-up of the impact on combating illicit trafficking of firearms. It will ensure the coordination of other actions and initiatives in the region concerning the fight against firearms trafficking, in order to exploit synergies, enhance interoperability and prevent duplication of effort.(1)
The overall objective of the project is to contribute to European and global peace and security by combating the threat posed by the accumulation of and illicit trafficking in SALW and their ammunition in and from South-East Europe. At the same time, it will enhance regional stability by working within the framework of the Regional Cooperation Council (RCC) and in partnership with other relevant international partners and initiatives.
The project will directly contribute to the implementation of the EU Security Strategy, the EU SALW Strategy, the EU Firearms Strategy, the Action Plan on illicit trafficking in firearms between the EU and the South East Europe region for the period 2015–2019 (‘the 2015–2019 Action Plan’), the EU Policy Cycle for organised and serious international crime, including the European multidisciplinary platform against criminal threats (EMPACT) Firearms, the Arms Trade Treaty, the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects, the International Tracing Instrument, the UN Firearms Protocol and UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000), and will specifically enhance regional cooperation in combating the threat posed by the spread of SALW and their ammunition. The project results will also directly contribute the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16 on peaceful and just societies, in particular targets 16.1 (significantly reduce all forms of violence and death rate everywhere) and 16.4 (significantly reduce illicit arms flows). In addition, the project will complement the implementation of the Commission Action Plan to target the illicit trafficking of firearms and explosives in the Union.
Specifically, the project will:

— | coordinate and monitor the implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
— | support authorities in the Western Balkans in fully harmonising their arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations; and
— | provide support for countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.Building upon the successful implementation of Decision 2013/730/CFSP as well as Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356, and in line with the EU SALW Strategy, this follow-up project thus aims to further strengthen partners’ control systems and to continue to foster multilateralism by reinforcing well-established regional mechanisms for countering the supply and destabilising spread of SALW and their ammunition. Furthermore, in order to ensure that the capacities developed within South-East Europe institutions are shared with other geographic areas of concern, the project will provide for a more comprehensive regional dimension through targeted knowledge-transfer efforts.
2. Selection of implementing agency and coordination with other relevant funding initiatives
SEESAC is a joint initiative of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the RCC, and as such is the focal point for SALW-related activities in South-East Europe. As the executive arm of the Regional Implementation Plan on Combating the Proliferation of SALW, SEESAC has been working since 2002 with national and international stakeholders in South-East Europe on implementing a holistic approach to SALW control through the execution of a wide spectrum of activities including: the facilitation of strategic and operational regional cooperation, supporting policy development and capacity enhancement for institutions, awareness-raising and SALW collection campaigns, stockpile management, surplus reduction, and improved marking and tracing capabilities, as well as improved arms-exports control. In this way, SEESAC has acquired a unique capacity and experience implementing multi-stakeholder regional interventions against the shared political and economic background of the partners in the region, ensuring national and regional ownership and the long-term sustainability of its actions and establishing itself as the primary regional authority in the SALW control field.
SEESAC continues to maintain bilateral and multilateral channels of communication with all relevant actors and organisations. In that regard, SEESAC continues to serve as the Secretariat of the Regional Steering Group for SALW (RSG). In addition, SEESAC is the Secretariat of the Regional Approach to Stockpile Reduction (RASR) initiative. SEESAC is also part of the SALW and mine action (‘MA’) coordination meetings, an informal coordination mechanism on SALW control activities involving NATO, the Union and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and SEESAC. SEESAC regularly contributes to relevant regional fora. SEESAC continues to maintain a wide network of formal and informal partnerships with organisations such as the Centre for Security Cooperation of the Regional Arms Control Verification and Implementation Assistance Centre (RACVIAC) and the OSCE Forum for Security Cooperation (FSC). Regular coordination meetings as well as information and data exchange with other UN agencies such as UNODC and UNODA take place through, inter alia, the UN Coordinating Action on Small Arms (CASA). SEESAC thus serves as a regional hub and focal point for a wide spectrum of issues related to security-sector reform, with a particular focus on SALW control and stockpile management. SEESAC maintains close contact and provides support to relevant Union institutions for a more effective outreach to South-East Europe counterparts, primarily to DG Migration and Home Affairs of the Commission, and Europol, as well as Union-led initiatives such as EMPACT Firearms and the European Firearm Experts (EFE) group.
Based in Belgrade, SEESAC currently operates throughout South-East Europe, with activities in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the Republic of Moldova, as well as limited support to Ukraine and Belarus. In the past, SEESAC also operated in Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania. Regional ownership is ensured through the RCC as well as through the RSG, where representatives of all partners in South-East Europe provide the strategic guidance, initiatives and requests for SEESAC activities.
SEESAC has pioneered an approach based on tackling shared problems through regional initiatives, which has yielded impressive results in South-East Europe not only because of the crucial information-sharing and promotion of healthy regional competition which it sparks, but also because it helps achieve consistent and easily measurable results at national and regional level through a holistic implementation modality. The organisation of the annual RSG meetings and participation by SEESAC in all relevant processes and initiatives provides timely and candid information exchange, strong situational awareness and the foresight necessary to ensure that implementation is not prone to overlap and is in line with the current needs of the governments and the regions as well as with developing trends.
SEESAC grounds all of its activities in counterparts’ expressed needs and the collected baseline data, and secures endorsement and political support from national stakeholders as a precondition for action. In addition, all efforts are framed in support of Union-led processes and achievement of Union standards and criteria. SEESAC implemented its previous Union-funded projects with a very high delivery rate of the envisaged activities, delivering sustainable project results by developing and fostering partners’ ownership of its projects and activities, and promoting regional coordination, experience and the sharing of best practices, as well as regional research. Its SALW expertise and in-depth knowledge of regional affairs and relevant stakeholders make SEESAC the most suitable implementing partner for this particular action.
The project also complements existing national and regional efforts, seeking maximum synergies. SEESAC will work in combination with the following international assistance efforts:

— | in BiH:—the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union’s Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH;—the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH;—the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.To date, significant gains were achieved through tight cooperation and coordination with those three projects, which resulted in more efficient results; | — | the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union’s Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH; | — | the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH; | — | the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.
— | the Union project on stockpile management, technical support and ammunition surplus reduction (EU STAR), funded by the short-term component of the Union’s Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and implemented by the UNDP office in Sarajevo; the EU STAR project builds upon the results and lessons learned from the EXPLODE project, which was funded by the Union and implemented by UNDP from April 2013 to November 2016, to continue supporting the establishment of a sustainable stockpile management system in BiH;
— | the project funded by the German Federal Foreign Office focusing on countering illicit arms trafficking (CIAT), assisting the BiH border police as well as the BiH Ministry of Security in building their capacity to identify, prevent, and counter the trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through BiH;
— | the coordination mechanism set up by the BiH Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) and international actors under the coordination of EUFOR Althea in an effort to ensure continuous complementarity of action with the ongoing efforts of the international community to address the issue of surplus stocks of conventional ammunition held by the BiH MoD and in view of any possible future plans for a campaign to collect illegal conventional weapons in BiH.
— | in Serbia, the conventional ammunition stockpile management (CASM) project, funded by the United States Department of State, UNDP and the OSCE, is designed to enhance the security and safety of predefined conventional ammunition storage locations and the disposal of reported surplus ammunition;
— | in Montenegro, the Montenegro demilitarization (MONDEM) project, managed by UNDP in partnership with the OSCE, is designed to work on the reduction of counter-proliferation risks through the development of safe and secure conventional ammunition storage infrastructure and management systems, reduction of explosive risk to communities by environmentally benign demilitarisation, the destruction of toxic hazardous waste (liquid rocket propellant) and support for defence reform through the destruction of a limited quantity of heavy weapons systems designated by the MoD of Montenegro;
— | in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the project on the reduction of the risk for proliferation of weapons and ammunition, which aims to increase the security of existing stockpiles of small arms and ammunition, and which is managed by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and implemented by the OSCE mission to Skopje;
— | in Kosovo, the firearms and explosives risk mitigation (FERM) project (formerly KOSSAC), which was designed initially to reduce armed violence in Kosovo and increase community safety, and which aims to support the Kosovo stakeholders in controlling the widespread illegal possession and circulation of SALW and, through risk-based management and an evidence-based approach, to minimise the risks of such weapons and explosive materials;
— | regionally, the Regional Security Sector Reform Platform (RSSRP), a well-established resource that delivers quick, effective and demand-driven responses to rule-of-law needs at the technical level across the globe; with a quick deployment mechanism based on SEESAC’s unique network of security experts with experience in the area of security-sector reform, RSSRP provides tailor-made assistance with a particular focus on SALW control and gender mainstreaming in security policy.SEESAC regularly liaises with the OSCE, NATO, Europol, EMPACT and Interpol, as well as with other relevant actors, in order to secure complementarities of action, timeliness of intervention and cost-effectiveness in the use of resources.
3. Project description
The new phase of the SEESAC project will build upon the basis of the achievements under Decision 2013/730/CFSP and in complementarity with Decision (CFSP) 2016/2356.
It will focus on three main areas, maintaining the holistic approach to tackling the threat posed by SALW in the region. Those three areas address the strategic/policy level as well as the operational aspects, thus directly assisting at all levels of SALW control, with a focus on: closely coordinating the regional approach for the implementation of the Roadmap; strengthening capacities for the harmonisation of arms-control legislation; and contributing to a better understanding of the capacities to counter illicit trafficking for Ukraine and Belarus.
In particular, the project will result in:

— | coordinated implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans;
— | support provided for the full harmonisation of the Western Balkans authorities’ arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations, and standardisation across the region;
— | countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities.The project’s strategy is grounded in SEESAC’s unique approach of fostering confidence and cooperation in the region as a prerequisite for achieving concrete and measurable transformational change. In particular, at the regional level, different cooperation processes facilitated by SEESAC, involving both policy-makers and operational-level practitioners, have proven to be an essential ingredient in ensuring an enabling and competitive environment for knowledge transfer, expertise exchange and information-sharing. This has served not only to increase the capacities in the region, but more importantly to build confidence and establish direct cooperation among institutions and individual experts, which, among other things, enabled the development of the Roadmap. In turn, the atmosphere of professional trust enables national-level progress on issues tackled by the Roadmap. In addition, the regional cooperation approach has made the region more transparent and efficient in its efforts to control the arms trade, with the result that the South-East Europe partners are among the most transparent globally in their reporting on arms transfers. Therefore, the project will continue to foster regional cooperation as the essential enabling element for measurable results.
The project’s geographic scope is the Western Balkans, with direct project beneficiaries being Albania, BiH, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In addition, the project will seek to further the support to Eastern European countries dealing with the similar SALW control challenges, such as the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus, through the transfer of knowledge and experiences gained and best practices developed in the Western Balkans since 2001.
3.1. Coordination of the implementation of the Roadmap for a sustainable solution to the illegal possession, misuse and trafficking of SALW/firearms and their ammunition in the Western Balkans
Objective
To ensure the effective coordination of the implementation of the Roadmap by six beneficiaries and the accompanying six action plans developed with specific objectives and measured through key performance indicators (‘KPIs’). Progress will be measured through a mechanism for monitoring, evaluating and reporting the results achieved in the implementation of the Roadmap and the partners’ action plans for its implementation.

Description
The Western Balkans partners reconfirmed at the Western Balkans Summit in London on 9 July 2018 the common determination and reinforced commitment to put an end to illicit possession, misuse and trafficking of firearms through the endorsement of the Roadmap. The regional Roadmap, developed through a thorough consultative process and with SEESAC’s support, complements existing Union activity to counter that threat, specifically the 2015–2019 Action Plan, the Joint Communication of the Commission and the High Representative on elements towards an EU strategy against illicit firearms, SALW and their ammunition, and Europol’s EMPACT work in the region. The Roadmap is a testimony to the consensus reached among all stakeholders in the region about the current challenges, the overall targets to be reached and the timeline of actions to be taken. It provides an overall platform for the achievement of commonly agreed KPIs at strategic, policy and operational level. As such, the work under this component will result in: an effective coordination of the implementation of the Roadmap at regional level; tailor-made support for SALW commissions and relevant authorities in the implementation of their Roadmap action plans; periodic monitoring and evaluation of progress against the jointly agreed KPIs; as well as a better understanding of the capacities of the beneficiaries to implement the actions under the functional areas of the Roadmap.
Specifically, the project envisages the coordination of the implementation of the Roadmap through:

— | formal regional Roadmap coordination meetings focusing on taking stock of progress and information exchange;
— | the provision of expert and technical support to local Roadmap coordination meetings monitoring the implementation of partners’ action plans;
— | the development of biannual monitoring and evaluation reports documenting progress, challenges and needs in the implementation of the Roadmap based on the commonly agreed KPIs;
— | a mid-term evaluation of the implementation of the Roadmap action plans, including capacity assessment for the six beneficiaries on SALW control;
— | Roadmap outreach and visibility activities (including the establishment of an online platform, stakeholder engagement and awareness raising).Project results/implementation indicators:

— | Organisation of up to six regional Roadmap coordination meetings;
— | Enabling taking stock of progress, information exchange, knowledge transfer and standardisation;
— | Organisation of local coordination meetings (up to 36 in total);
— | Development of biannual monitoring and evaluation reports (up to six);
— | Mid-term evaluation, including capacity assessment prepared for six Roadmap beneficiaries;
— | Establishment of an online platform to ensure proper outreach and visibility of the Roadmap.3.2. Support to the authorities of the Western Balkans in fully harmonising their arms-control legislation with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations and standards across the region
Objective
This component will provide comprehensive technical support for the development and implementation of a strong legal framework for SALW control that is fully harmonised and in compliance with Union regulatory framework and other international agreements and standards.

Description
Goal 1 of the Roadmap aims to ensure that arms-control legislation in the Western Balkans is in place and fully harmonised with the Union regulatory framework and other related international obligations by 2023. There is an evident and urgent need for such a legislative and regulatory framework on SALW/firearms control in the Western Balkans to effectively regulate arms control and facilitate the response to relevant threats. This will consequently enable the compatibility of arms-control laws and procedures in the Western Balkans and the standardisation of SALW/firearms control procedures and practices. Such standardisation would allow for the removal of obstacles preventing law enforcement and the judiciary from cooperating directly, exchanging information and conducting joint or parallel investigations. It would also allow for a better and more efficient response to the firearm-related threats at national, regional and European level. Additionally, as the gender perspective is often neither recognised nor adequately addressed by legislative and policy frameworks regulating SALW control in South-East Europe, thereby making the arms-control efforts less efficient in providing security for all citizens, whether women, men, girls or boys, the project will contribute to the integration of the gender perspective in arms-control legislation.
Building upon the expert support provided to the authorities in the region through the implementation of Decision 2013/730/CFSP, this component will support the authorities in the region with a view to: providing a better understanding of the current baseline and gaps of the legal framework in the six beneficiaries; ensuring technical support for full harmonisation with the Union regulatory framework and other international agreements/standards; developing tailor-made national and regional thematic workshops; updating the regional arms-law compendium; carrying out a gender screening of the legal framework of the project beneficiaries in order to ensure that policies regulating arms control are not silent about the linkages between SALW and gender; and continuing the Gender Coach programme. The action will also provide support for strengthening the capacities of SALW commissions for outreach and advocacy through training on media strategy development.
It will do so through the:

— | development of an assessment and gap analysis of partners’ legal frameworks on SALW control and the level of harmonisation with Union and international legislation, as well as the level of standardisation of procedures in the region;
— | provision of support for legislative standardisation and harmonisation through continuous and on-demand advisory support and the organisation of thematic workshops on arms laws, regulations and criminal codes at both regional and national level;
— | updating of the regional arms-law compendium as an easy-reference guide for SALW/firearms control legislation in the region;
— | carrying-out of a gender screening of the legal framework and the continuation of the Gender Coach programme;
— | training on media strategy development.Project results/implementation indicators:

— | Assessment and gap analysis (six) of legal framework reports for each beneficiary;
— | Up to three regional workshops and six thematic workshops for the beneficiaries;
— | Provision of on-demand expertise on legislative and policy updates;
— | Updated arms-law compendium translated into all of the relevant languages of the region;
— | Gender-screening reports on the arms legal framework (six reports);
— | Gender Coach programme with two heads of SALW commissions;
— | Media strategy development and training.3.3. Countering illicit arms trafficking in the Western Balkans, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus through capacity assessments and technical assistance to the law-enforcement and border-police authorities
Objective
To reduce the threat of illicit trafficking of firearms by enhancing the capacities of law-enforcement and border police for further gathering, analysis and sharing of information.

Description
This component will assess the capabilities of the regional authorities to perform both preventive and repressive activities necessary to successfully identify, thwart and counter trafficking of firearms, ammunition and explosives from and through their jurisdiction. The assistance will focus on an in-depth assessment of the needs of the border authorities and criminal police human resources and equipment necessary for the appropriate functioning and performance. A pilot project will be implemented with a view to establishing the South-East Europe Ballistic Information Network, a cost-effective operational ballistic information-exchange structure linked directly to Europol and designed to automate collection and exchange of actionable ballistic information about existing cross-border firearm-related criminality, the prevention of further crime and the improvement of the strategic picture about the nature and patterns of gun crime.
The proposed activities will complement and be closely coordinated with the ongoing Union-supported actions in South-East Europe, primarily the EU Policy Cycle for organised and serious international crime and specifically the operational action plans of EMPACT Firearms, as well as the activities of Europol, Frontex and Interpol. Finally, the activities under this component will contribute to the implementation of the 2015–2019 Action Plan.
In addition, building upon the successful approach of including the authorities of the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus in the regional cooperation processes ongoing in South-East Europe, a number of SALW control needs have been already identified. In the interest of increasing the capacity for SALW control authorities in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus to combat crime in general and SALW/firearms proliferation and trafficking in particular, this component will assess critical SALW control areas in those jurisdictions, thus paving the way for targeted interventions to address the threat posed by illicit trafficking of SALW.
Main activities envisaged:

— | Needs assessment of the border-police and criminal-police services of the Western Balkans in countering illicit arms trafficking;
— | Building on the current work on the establishment of the FFPs through practical support for information-exchange capabilities, in particular with regard to ballistic evidence, as well as the procurement of specialised equipment in support of the FFPs;
— | Assessment of the capacities of the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus for selected aspects of SALW, ammunition and explosives control as well as combating illicit trafficking of firearms, focusing, inter alia, on legal and policy frameworks, physical security and stockpile management (PSSM) capabilities, border control, the criminal police and the judicial response to trafficking and the misuse of firearms. The detailed assessment will identify opportunities, threats and challenges, with recommendations for possible targeted interventions to address the threat posed by illicit trafficking of SALW.Project results/implementation indicators:

— | Needs assessment of the border-police and criminal-police services of the Western Balkans in countering illicit arms trafficking;
— | Strengthened capacity of ballistics experts and investigators for addressing cross-border firearm-related criminality;
— | Implemented pilot on operational ballistic information-exchange structure;
— | Assessment of capacities of the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus for selected aspects of SALW control with identified targeted interventions.4. Beneficiaries
The direct beneficiaries of the project will be the institutions responsible for SALW control in the Western Balkans. The authorities for home affairs, police services, border guards and customs authorities of the Republic of Albania, BiH, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the Republic of Moldova will benefit from capacity development, knowledge advancement, improved procedures and cost-effective specialised equipment necessary for policy, operational and technical advancements in SALW control. Finally, SALW commissions and other institutions responsible for the control of SALW in South-East Europe will benefit from training and information-sharing as well as regional cooperation. In addition, key institutions tasked with SALW control in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus will benefit from a better understanding of the illicit firearms trafficking threat and targeted knowledge transfer.
The proposed activities are fully in line with the Roadmap, as well as partners’ priorities on SALW control and have been endorsed by the relevant partners’ SALW control authorities, demonstrating their buy-in and commitment for the achievement of project results.
The general population of the countries in Western Balkans, Eastern Europe and the Union, at risk from the widespread proliferation of SALW, will benefit from this project as the risk decreases.
5. Union visibility
SEESAC shall take all appropriate measures to publicise the fact that the action has been funded by the Union. Such measures will be carried out in accordance with the Commission’s Communication and Visibility Manual for European Union External Actions. SEESAC will thus ensure the visibility of the Union’s contribution with appropriate branding and publicity, highlighting the role of the Union, ensuring the transparency of its actions and raising awareness of the reasons for the Decision as well as Union support for the Decision and the results of this support. Material produced by the project will prominently display the European Union flag in accordance with Union guidelines for the accurate use and reproduction of the flag.
Given that planned activities vary greatly in scope and character, a range of promotional tools will be used, including: traditional media; websites; social media; and informational and promotional materials including infographics, leaflets, newsletters, press releases and others, as appropriate. Publications, public events, campaigns, equipment and construction works procured under the project will be branded accordingly. To further amplify the impact by raising awareness among various national governments and the public, the international community and local and international media, each of the project target groups will be addressed using the appropriate language. Particular focus will be placed on new media and online presence.
6. Duration
Based on the experience of implementing Decisions 2010/179/CFSP and 2013/730/CFSP, and taking into consideration the regional scope of the project, the number of beneficiaries and the number and the complexity of planned activities, the timeframe for implementation is 36 months.
7. General set-up
The technical implementation of this action has been entrusted to UNDP, acting on behalf of SEESAC, the regional initiative working under the mandate of UNDP and the RCC. As the executive arm of the Regional Implementation Plan on Combating the Proliferation of SALW, SEESAC acts as focal point for all SALW-related issues in the South-East Europe region, including facilitating coordination of the implementation of the regional Roadmap.
UNDP, acting on behalf of SEESAC, will have the overall responsibility for the implementation of project activities and accountability for project implementation. The project duration is three years (36 months).
8. Partners
SEESAC will directly implement the action in close cooperation with SALW commissions as well as with the authorities for home affairs of Albania, BiH, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the Republic of Moldova, and relevant institutions in Ukraine and Belarus. Other institutions will be closely involved in line with the established multi-stakeholder holistic approach to SALW control.
9. Reporting
Reporting, narrative as well as financial, shall cover the whole of the action described in the relevant contribution-specific agreement and its attached budget, regardless of whether this action is wholly financed or co-financed by the Commission.
On a quarterly basis, narrative progress reports shall be submitted to record and monitor progress towards the completion of key results.
10. Estimated budget
The total estimated cost of the Union-financed project is EUR 4 002 587,52.

(1) The Action Plan on illicit trafficking in firearms between the EU and the South East Europe region for the period 2015–2019; Council conclusions on the implementation of an EU Policy cycle 2018–2021 for organised and serious international crime – EMPACT Firearms.

Pending: 32018D1490

8.10.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 252/38
(1) Pursuant to point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Hungary may exempt from value added tax (VAT) taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 35 000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.
(2) By letter registered with the Commission on 13 November 2017, Hungary requested an authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to increase the exemption threshold to EUR 48 000. Through that special measure, those taxable persons would be exempt from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
(3) A higher threshold for the special scheme for small enterprises set out in Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC is a simplification measure, as it may significantly reduce the VAT obligations of small enterprises.
(4) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, by letters dated 6 February 2018, the Commission transmitted the request made by Hungary to other Member States. By letter dated 7 February 2018, the Commission notified Hungary that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
(5) The requested special measure is in line with the policy objectives of the Commission Communication of 25 June 2008 entitled ‘Think Small First’ — A ‘Small Business Act’ for Europe.
(6) Given that the increased threshold would result in reduced VAT obligations and thus a reduction in the administrative burden and compliance costs for small enterprises, Hungary should be authorised to apply the special measure for a limited period. The special scheme for small enterprises is optional, so taxable persons would still be able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
(7) As Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review, it is possible that a directive amending those Articles enters into force setting a date from which Member States are to apply national provisions before the period of validity of the derogation expires on 31 December 2021. If that happens, this Decision should cease to apply.
(8) Based on information provided by Hungary, the special measure will only have a negligible impact on the overall amount of the tax revenue that Hungary collects at the stage of final consumption.
(9) The special measure has no impact on the Union's own resources accruing from VAT because Hungary will carry out a compensation calculation in accordance with Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89(2),
(a) 31 December 2021;
(b) the date from which Member States are to apply any national provisions that they are required to adopt in the event that a directive is adopted amending Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax(1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 395(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
(1) Pursuant to point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Hungary may exempt from value added tax (VAT) taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 35 000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.
(2) By letter registered with the Commission on 13 November 2017, Hungary requested an authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to increase the exemption threshold to EUR 48 000. Through that special measure, those taxable persons would be exempt from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
(3) A higher threshold for the special scheme for small enterprises set out in Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC is a simplification measure, as it may significantly reduce the VAT obligations of small enterprises.
(4) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, by letters dated 6 February 2018, the Commission transmitted the request made by Hungary to other Member States. By letter dated 7 February 2018, the Commission notified Hungary that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
(5) The requested special measure is in line with the policy objectives of the Commission Communication of 25 June 2008 entitled ‘Think Small First’ — A ‘Small Business Act’ for Europe.
(6) Given that the increased threshold would result in reduced VAT obligations and thus a reduction in the administrative burden and compliance costs for small enterprises, Hungary should be authorised to apply the special measure for a limited period. The special scheme for small enterprises is optional, so taxable persons would still be able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
(7) As Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review, it is possible that a directive amending those Articles enters into force setting a date from which Member States are to apply national provisions before the period of validity of the derogation expires on 31 December 2021. If that happens, this Decision should cease to apply.
(8) Based on information provided by Hungary, the special measure will only have a negligible impact on the overall amount of the tax revenue that Hungary collects at the stage of final consumption.
(9) The special measure has no impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT because Hungary will carry out a compensation calculation in accordance with Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89(2),
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
By way of derogation from point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Hungary is authorised to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 48 000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.

Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its notification.
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2019 until the earlier of the following two dates:
(a)
31 December 2021;
(b)
the date from which Member States are to apply any national provisions that they are required to adopt in the event that a directive is adopted amending Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to Hungary.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax(1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 395(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
(1) Pursuant to point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Hungary may exempt from value added tax (VAT) taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 35 000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.
(2) By letter registered with the Commission on 13 November 2017, Hungary requested an authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to increase the exemption threshold to EUR 48 000. Through that special measure, those taxable persons would be exempt from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
(3) A higher threshold for the special scheme for small enterprises set out in Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC is a simplification measure, as it may significantly reduce the VAT obligations of small enterprises.
(4) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, by letters dated 6 February 2018, the Commission transmitted the request made by Hungary to other Member States. By letter dated 7 February 2018, the Commission notified Hungary that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
(5) The requested special measure is in line with the policy objectives of the Commission Communication of 25 June 2008 entitled ‘Think Small First’ — A ‘Small Business Act’ for Europe.
(6) Given that the increased threshold would result in reduced VAT obligations and thus a reduction in the administrative burden and compliance costs for small enterprises, Hungary should be authorised to apply the special measure for a limited period. The special scheme for small enterprises is optional, so taxable persons would still be able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
(7) As Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review, it is possible that a directive amending those Articles enters into force setting a date from which Member States are to apply national provisions before the period of validity of the derogation expires on 31 December 2021. If that happens, this Decision should cease to apply.
(8) Based on information provided by Hungary, the special measure will only have a negligible impact on the overall amount of the tax revenue that Hungary collects at the stage of final consumption.
(9) The special measure has no impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT because Hungary will carry out a compensation calculation in accordance with Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89(2),
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
By way of derogation from point (12) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Hungary is authorised to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 48 000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its notification.
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2019 until the earlier of the following two dates:
(a)
31 December 2021;
(b)
the date from which Member States are to apply any national provisions that they are required to adopt in the event that a directive is adopted amending Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the special scheme for small enterprises.
This Decision is addressed to Hungary.

Pending: 32018D1248

19.9.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 235/9
(1) The resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic priority for the Union and the Union must remain actively engaged until it is solved on the basis of the two-State solution.
(2) A European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) should be appointed until 29 February 2020.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
(a) provide an active and efficient Union contribution to actions and initiatives leading to a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-State solution and in line with the Union parameters and relevant UNSCRs including UNSCR 2334 (2016) and put forward proposals for Union action in this regard;
(b) facilitate and maintain close contacts with all the parties to the peace process, relevant political actors, other countries of the region, members of the Quartet and other relevant countries, as well as the UN and other relevant international organisations, like the League of Arab States, in order to work with them in strengthening the peace process;
(c) work as appropriate to promote and contribute to a possible new framework of negotiations in consultation with all the key stakeholders and the Union Member States, in particular through advancing the objectives of the Joint Declaration adopted by the participants of the conference held in Paris on 15 January 2017(1);
(d) actively support and contribute to peace negotiations between the parties, including by putting forward proposals on behalf of the Union and in line with its consolidated longstanding policy in the context of those negotiations;
(e) ensure the continued presence of the Union in relevant international fora;
(f) contribute to crisis management and prevention, including with regard to Gaza;
(g) contribute, where requested, to the implementation of international agreements reached between the parties and engage with them diplomatically in the event of non-compliance with the terms of those agreements;
(h) contribute to political efforts to bring about a fundamental change leading to a sustainable solution for the Gaza Strip which is an integral part of a future Palestinian State and should be addressed in the negotiations;
(i) pay particular attention to factors affecting the regional dimension of the peace process, to the engagement with Arab partners and to the implementation of the Arab Peace Initiative;
(j) engage constructively with signatories to agreements within the framework of the peace process in order to promote compliance with the basic norms of democracy, including respect for international humanitarian law, human rights and the rule of law;
(k) make proposals for Union intervention in the peace process and on the best way of pursuing Union initiatives and ongoing peace process related Union efforts, such as the Union's contribution to Palestinian reforms and including the political aspects of relevant Union development projects;
(l) engage the parties in refraining from unilateral actions threatening the viability of the two-State solution, notably in Jerusalem and in Area C of the Occupied West Bank;
(m) report regularly, as Envoy to the Quartet, on progress and evolution in the negotiations, as well as on the Quartet activities, and contribute to the preparation of Quartet Envoys meetings on the basis of Union positions and through coordination with other Quartet members;
(n) contribute to the implementation of the Union's human rights policy in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the Union Guidelines on human rights, in particular the Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and Union policy regarding UNSCR 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments as well as formulating recommendations in this regard;
(o) contribute to a better understanding of the role of the Union among opinion leaders in the region.
(a) establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to and within the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents, and including a contingency plan and evacuation plan;
(b) ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c) ensuring that all members of the EUSR team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d) ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) The resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic priority for the Union and the Union must remain actively engaged until it is solved on the basis of the two-State solution.
(2) A European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) should be appointed until 29 February 2020.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative
Article 1
Ms Susanna TERSTAL is hereby appointed as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) until 29 February 2020. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, on the basis of an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).

Policy objectives
Article 2
1. The mandate of the EUSR shall be based on the Union’s policy objectives regarding the MEPP.
2. The overall objective is a comprehensive peace that should be achieved on the basis of a two-State solution, with Israel and a democratic, contiguous, viable, peaceful and sovereign Palestinian State living side by side within secure and recognised borders enjoying normal relations with their neighbours in accordance with the relevant United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and recalling other relevant Resolutions, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), the Madrid principles, including land for peace, the Roadmap, the agreements previously reached by the parties, the Arab Peace Initiative and the recommendations of the Middle East Quartet (‘the Quartet’) of 1 July 2016. In light of the different strands of the Israeli-Arab relations, the regional dimension constitutes an essential element for a comprehensive peace.
3. In achieving this objective, policy priorities are the preservation of the two-State solution and relaunching and supporting the peace process. Clear parameters defining the basis for negotiations are key elements for a successful outcome and the Union has set out its position with regard to such parameters in the Council conclusions of December 2009, December 2010 and July 2014, which it will continue to actively promote.
4. The Union is committed to working with the parties and with partners in the international community, including through participating in the Quartet and actively pursuing appropriate international initiatives to create a new dynamic for the negotiations.

Mandate
Article 3
1. In order to achieve the policy objectives, the EUSR’s mandate shall be to:
(a)
provide an active and efficient Union contribution to actions and initiatives leading to a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-State solution and in line with the Union parameters and relevant UNSCRs including UNSCR 2334 (2016) and put forward proposals for Union action in this regard;
(b)
facilitate and maintain close contacts with all the parties to the peace process, relevant political actors, other countries of the region, members of the Quartet and other relevant countries, as well as the UN and other relevant international organisations, like the League of Arab States, in order to work with them in strengthening the peace process;
(c)
work as appropriate to promote and contribute to a possible new framework of negotiations in consultation with all the key stakeholders and the Union Member States, in particular through advancing the objectives of the Joint Declaration adopted by the participants of the conference held in Paris on 15 January 2017(1);
(d)
actively support and contribute to peace negotiations between the parties, including by putting forward proposals on behalf of the Union and in line with its consolidated longstanding policy in the context of those negotiations;
(e)
ensure the continued presence of the Union in relevant international fora;
(f)
contribute to crisis management and prevention, including with regard to Gaza;
(g)
contribute, where requested, to the implementation of international agreements reached between the parties and engage with them diplomatically in the event of non-compliance with the terms of those agreements;
(h)
contribute to political efforts to bring about a fundamental change leading to a sustainable solution for the Gaza Strip which is an integral part of a future Palestinian State and should be addressed in the negotiations;
(i)
pay particular attention to factors affecting the regional dimension of the peace process, to the engagement with Arab partners and to the implementation of the Arab Peace Initiative;
(j)
engage constructively with signatories to agreements within the framework of the peace process in order to promote compliance with the basic norms of democracy, including respect for international humanitarian law, human rights and the rule of law;
(k)
make proposals for Union intervention in the peace process and on the best way of pursuing Union initiatives and ongoing peace process related Union efforts, such as the Union’s contribution to Palestinian reforms and including the political aspects of relevant Union development projects;
(l)
engage the parties in refraining from unilateral actions threatening the viability of the two-State solution, notably in Jerusalem and in Area C of the Occupied West Bank;
(m)
report regularly, as Envoy to the Quartet, on progress and evolution in the negotiations, as well as on the Quartet activities, and contribute to the preparation of Quartet Envoys meetings on the basis of Union positions and through coordination with other Quartet members;
(n)
contribute to the implementation of the Union’s human rights policy in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the Union Guidelines on human rights, in particular the Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and Union policy regarding UNSCR 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments as well as formulating recommendations in this regard;
(o)
contribute to a better understanding of the role of the Union among opinion leaders in the region.
2. The EUSR shall support the work of the HR, while maintaining an overview of all MEPP related activities of the Union in the region.

Implementation of the mandate
Article 4
1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall work in close coordination with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and its relevant departments.
4. The EUSR will undertake regular visits to the region and will ensure close coordination with the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, the Union delegation in Tel Aviv, as well as with other relevant Union delegations in the region.

Financing
Article 5
1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period until 29 February 2020 shall be EUR 1 730 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract signed between the EUSR and the Commission.
4. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure until the approval by the Commission of the final report formalising the financial closure of the mandate.

Constitution and composition of the team
Article 6
1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States and the institutions of the Union may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the sending authority. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union may also be posted to work with the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending authority and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the EUSR’s mandate.
4. The EUSR staff shall be co-located with the relevant EEAS department, Union delegation in Tel Aviv and Union Representative Office in Jerusalem in order to ensure the coherence and consistency of their respective activities.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and the EUSR’s staff
Article 7
The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the EUSR’s mission and EUSR staff members shall be agreed with the host countries, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information
Article 8
The EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(2).

Access to information and logistical support
Article 9
1. Member States, the Commission, the EEAS and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union delegations in the region and/or the Member States shall, as appropriate, provide logistical support in the region.

Security
Article 10
In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in accordance with the EUSR’s mandate and on the basis of the security situation in the area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to and within the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents, and including a contingency plan and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.

Reporting
Article 11
The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with oral and written reports. The EUSR shall also report to Council working parties, as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty, the EUSR may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

Coordination
Article 12
1. The EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission services. The EUSR shall provide regular briefings to the Union’s delegations and to Member States’ missions, particularly the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem and the Union delegation in Tel Aviv.
2. Close liaison shall be maintained in the field with the relevant Heads of Member States’ Missions, Heads of Union delegations and heads of CSDP Missions. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR, in close coordination with the Head of Union delegation in Tel Aviv and the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, shall provide the Heads of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) and of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) with local political guidance. The EUSR shall also liaise with other international and regional actors in the field.

Assistance in relation to claims
Article 13
The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSRs for the MEPP, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review
Article 14
The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with a progress report by 31 January 2019 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2019.

Entry into force
Article 15
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) The resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic priority for the Union and the Union must remain actively engaged until it is solved on the basis of the two-State solution.
(2) A European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) should be appointed until 29 February 2020.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative

Ms Susanna TERSTAL is hereby appointed as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) until 29 February 2020. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, on the basis of an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).

Policy objectives

1. The mandate of the EUSR shall be based on the Union’s policy objectives regarding the MEPP.
2. The overall objective is a comprehensive peace that should be achieved on the basis of a two-State solution, with Israel and a democratic, contiguous, viable, peaceful and sovereign Palestinian State living side by side within secure and recognised borders enjoying normal relations with their neighbours in accordance with the relevant United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and recalling other relevant Resolutions, including UNSCR 2334 (2016), the Madrid principles, including land for peace, the Roadmap, the agreements previously reached by the parties, the Arab Peace Initiative and the recommendations of the Middle East Quartet (‘the Quartet’) of 1 July 2016. In light of the different strands of the Israeli-Arab relations, the regional dimension constitutes an essential element for a comprehensive peace.
3. In achieving this objective, policy priorities are the preservation of the two-State solution and relaunching and supporting the peace process. Clear parameters defining the basis for negotiations are key elements for a successful outcome and the Union has set out its position with regard to such parameters in the Council conclusions of December 2009, December 2010 and July 2014, which it will continue to actively promote.
4. The Union is committed to working with the parties and with partners in the international community, including through participating in the Quartet and actively pursuing appropriate international initiatives to create a new dynamic for the negotiations.

Mandate

1. In order to achieve the policy objectives, the EUSR’s mandate shall be to:
(a)
provide an active and efficient Union contribution to actions and initiatives leading to a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the two-State solution and in line with the Union parameters and relevant UNSCRs including UNSCR 2334 (2016) and put forward proposals for Union action in this regard;
(b)
facilitate and maintain close contacts with all the parties to the peace process, relevant political actors, other countries of the region, members of the Quartet and other relevant countries, as well as the UN and other relevant international organisations, like the League of Arab States, in order to work with them in strengthening the peace process;
(c)
work as appropriate to promote and contribute to a possible new framework of negotiations in consultation with all the key stakeholders and the Union Member States, in particular through advancing the objectives of the Joint Declaration adopted by the participants of the conference held in Paris on 15 January 2017(1);
(d)
actively support and contribute to peace negotiations between the parties, including by putting forward proposals on behalf of the Union and in line with its consolidated longstanding policy in the context of those negotiations;
(e)
ensure the continued presence of the Union in relevant international fora;
(f)
contribute to crisis management and prevention, including with regard to Gaza;
(g)
contribute, where requested, to the implementation of international agreements reached between the parties and engage with them diplomatically in the event of non-compliance with the terms of those agreements;
(h)
contribute to political efforts to bring about a fundamental change leading to a sustainable solution for the Gaza Strip which is an integral part of a future Palestinian State and should be addressed in the negotiations;
(i)
pay particular attention to factors affecting the regional dimension of the peace process, to the engagement with Arab partners and to the implementation of the Arab Peace Initiative;
(j)
engage constructively with signatories to agreements within the framework of the peace process in order to promote compliance with the basic norms of democracy, including respect for international humanitarian law, human rights and the rule of law;
(k)
make proposals for Union intervention in the peace process and on the best way of pursuing Union initiatives and ongoing peace process related Union efforts, such as the Union’s contribution to Palestinian reforms and including the political aspects of relevant Union development projects;
(l)
engage the parties in refraining from unilateral actions threatening the viability of the two-State solution, notably in Jerusalem and in Area C of the Occupied West Bank;
(m)
report regularly, as Envoy to the Quartet, on progress and evolution in the negotiations, as well as on the Quartet activities, and contribute to the preparation of Quartet Envoys meetings on the basis of Union positions and through coordination with other Quartet members;
(n)
contribute to the implementation of the Union’s human rights policy in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the Union Guidelines on human rights, in particular the Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and Union policy regarding UNSCR 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments as well as formulating recommendations in this regard;
(o)
contribute to a better understanding of the role of the Union among opinion leaders in the region.
2. The EUSR shall support the work of the HR, while maintaining an overview of all MEPP related activities of the Union in the region.

Implementation of the mandate

1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall work in close coordination with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and its relevant departments.
4. The EUSR will undertake regular visits to the region and will ensure close coordination with the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, the Union delegation in Tel Aviv, as well as with other relevant Union delegations in the region.

Financing

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period until 29 February 2020 shall be EUR 1 730 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract signed between the EUSR and the Commission.
4. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure until the approval by the Commission of the final report formalising the financial closure of the mandate.

Constitution and composition of the team

1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States and the institutions of the Union may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the sending authority. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union may also be posted to work with the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending authority and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the EUSR’s mandate.
4. The EUSR staff shall be co-located with the relevant EEAS department, Union delegation in Tel Aviv and Union Representative Office in Jerusalem in order to ensure the coherence and consistency of their respective activities.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and the EUSR's staff

The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the EUSR’s mission and EUSR staff members shall be agreed with the host countries, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information

The EUSR and the members of the EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(2).

Access to information and logistical support

1. Member States, the Commission, the EEAS and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union delegations in the region and/or the Member States shall, as appropriate, provide logistical support in the region.

Security

In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in accordance with the EUSR’s mandate and on the basis of the security situation in the area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to and within the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents, and including a contingency plan and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.

Reporting

The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with oral and written reports. The EUSR shall also report to Council working parties, as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty, the EUSR may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

Coordination

1. The EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission services. The EUSR shall provide regular briefings to the Union’s delegations and to Member States’ missions, particularly the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem and the Union delegation in Tel Aviv.
2. Close liaison shall be maintained in the field with the relevant Heads of Member States’ Missions, Heads of Union delegations and heads of CSDP Missions. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR, in close coordination with the Head of Union delegation in Tel Aviv and the Union Representative Office in Jerusalem, shall provide the Heads of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) and of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) with local political guidance. The EUSR shall also liaise with other international and regional actors in the field.

Assistance in relation to claims

The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSRs for the MEPP, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review

The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with a progress report by 31 January 2019 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2019.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Pending: 32018D1111

10.8.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 203/20
(1) On 13 September 2013, Monsanto Europe SA/NV submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 maize (‘the application’) to the national competent authority of Belgium in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The application also covered the placing on the market of products consisting of or containing genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 for uses other than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation.
(2) The application covered, for those uses, all three sub-combinations of the single genetic modification events constituting maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603. One of those sub-combinations, MON 89034 × NK603, was already authorised under Commission Decision 2010/420/EU(2). Monsanto Europe SA/NV asked the Commission to repeal that Decision when authorising maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and all its sub-combinations.
(3) In accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, the application included information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3)and the information required by Annexes III and IV to that Directive. It also included a monitoring plan for environmental effects set out in Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(4) On 1 August 2017, the European Food Safety Authority (‘EFSA’) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003(4). EFSA concluded that genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, as described in the application, is as safe and as nutritious as the non-genetically modified comparator and the tested non-genetically modified reference varieties in the context of the scope of the application. No new safety concerns were identified for the previously assessed sub-combination MON 89034 × NK603 and previous conclusions on this sub-combination remain valid.
(5) For the remaining two sub-combinations, the EFSA concluded that they are expected to be as safe and as nutritious as the single events MON 87427, MON 89034 and NK603, as the previously assessed sub-combination MON 89034 × NK603 and as the three-event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603.
(6) In its opinion, the EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(7) The EFSA also concluded that the monitoring plan for environmental effects submitted by the applicant, consisting of a general surveillance plan, is in line with the intended uses of the products. However, the proposed monitoring plan was revised, as recommended by the EFSA, to cover explicitly the sub-combinations.
(8) Taking into account those considerations, the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and its three possible sub-combinations for the uses listed in the application should be authorised.
(9) Decision 2010/420/EU authorising maize MON 89034 × NK603 should be repealed.
(10) A unique identifier should be assigned to each genetically modified organism (‘GMO’) covered by this Decision in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004(5). The unique identifier assigned to maize MON 89034 × NK603 by Decision 2010/420/EU should continue to be used.
(11) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements, other than those laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), appear to be necessary for the products covered by this Decision. However, in order to ensure the use of those products within the limits of the authorisation granted by this Decision, the labelling of the products containing or consisting of maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, MON 87427 × NK603, MON 89034 × NK603 and MON 87427 × MON 89034, with the exception of food products, should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question are not intended for cultivation.
(12) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects and on the results. Those results should be presented in accordance with the standard reporting format requirements laid down in Commission Decision 2009/770/EC(7).
(13) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(14) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(15) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing-House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(8).
(16) The Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman. This implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted it to the appeal committee for further deliberation. The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the appeal committee,
(a) the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603;
(b) the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × NK603;
(c) the unique identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 89034 × NK603;
(d) the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × MON 89034.
(a) foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1;
(b) feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1;
(c) genetically modified maize, referred to in Article 1, in products containing them or consisting of them, for uses other than those provided for in points (a) and (b) of this Article, with the exception of cultivation.
(a) Applicant and authorisation holder:Name:Monsanto Europe SA/NVAddress:Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, BelgiumOn behalf of:Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63167, USA. Name : Monsanto Europe SA/NV Address : Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium
Name : Monsanto Europe SA/NV
Address : Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium
Name : Monsanto Europe SA/NV
Address : Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium
(b) Designation and specification of the products:(1)foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);(2)feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);(3)genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.MON-87427-7 maize expresses CP4 EPSPS protein, which confers tolerance to glyphosate-based herbicides.MON-89Ø34-3 maize expresses the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins, which confer protection against certain lepidopteran pests.MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize expresses CP4 EPSPS protein and the variant CP4 EPSPS L214P, which confer tolerance to glyphosate-based herbicides. (1) foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e); (2) feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e); (3) genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.
(1) foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);
(2) feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);
(3) genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.
(1) foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);
(2) feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);
(3) genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.
(c) Labelling:(1)For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;(2)The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients. (1) For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’; (2) The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients.
(1) For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
(2) The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients.
(1) For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
(2) The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients.
(d) Method for detection:(1)The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6.(2)Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx(3)Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm (1) The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6. (2) Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx (3) Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm
(1) The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6.
(2) Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx
(3) Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm
(1) The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6.
(2) Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx
(3) Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm
(e) Unique identifiers:MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3. MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6; MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6; MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6; MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3.
MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3.
MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3.
(f) Information required under Annex II to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity:[Biosafety Clearing-House, Record ID number:published in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed when notified].
(g) Conditions or restrictions on the placing on the market, use or handling of the products:Not required.
(h) Monitoring plan for environmental effects:Monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.[Link:plan published in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed]
(i) Post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food for human consumptionNot required.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed(1), and in particular Article 7(3) and Article 19(3) thereof,
(1) On 13 September 2013, Monsanto Europe SA/NV submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 maize (‘the application’) to the national competent authority of Belgium in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The application also covered the placing on the market of products consisting of or containing genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 for uses other than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation.
(2) The application covered, for those uses, all three sub-combinations of the single genetic modification events constituting maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603. One of those sub-combinations, MON 89034 × NK603, was already authorised under Commission Decision 2010/420/EU(2). Monsanto Europe SA/NV asked the Commission to repeal that Decision when authorising maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and all its sub-combinations.
(3) In accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, the application included information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3)and the information required by Annexes III and IV to that Directive. It also included a monitoring plan for environmental effects set out in Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(4) On 1 August 2017, the European Food Safety Authority (‘EFSA’) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003(4). EFSA concluded that genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, as described in the application, is as safe and as nutritious as the non-genetically modified comparator and the tested non-genetically modified reference varieties in the context of the scope of the application. No new safety concerns were identified for the previously assessed sub-combination MON 89034 × NK603 and previous conclusions on this sub-combination remain valid.
(5) For the remaining two sub-combinations, the EFSA concluded that they are expected to be as safe and as nutritious as the single events MON 87427, MON 89034 and NK603, as the previously assessed sub-combination MON 89034 × NK603 and as the three-event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603.
(6) In its opinion, the EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(7) The EFSA also concluded that the monitoring plan for environmental effects submitted by the applicant, consisting of a general surveillance plan, is in line with the intended uses of the products. However, the proposed monitoring plan was revised, as recommended by the EFSA, to cover explicitly the sub-combinations.
(8) Taking into account those considerations, the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and its three possible sub-combinations for the uses listed in the application should be authorised.
(9) Decision 2010/420/EU authorising maize MON 89034 × NK603 should be repealed.
(10) A unique identifier should be assigned to each genetically modified organism (‘GMO’) covered by this Decision in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004(5). The unique identifier assigned to maize MON 89034 × NK603 by Decision 2010/420/EU should continue to be used.
(11) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements, other than those laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), appear to be necessary for the products covered by this Decision. However, in order to ensure the use of those products within the limits of the authorisation granted by this Decision, the labelling of the products containing or consisting of maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, MON 87427 × NK603, MON 89034 × NK603 and MON 87427 × MON 89034, with the exception of food products, should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question are not intended for cultivation.
(12) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects and on the results. Those results should be presented in accordance with the standard reporting format requirements laid down in Commission Decision 2009/770/EC(7).
(13) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(14) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(15) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing-House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(8).
(16) The Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman. This implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted it to the appeal committee for further deliberation. The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the appeal committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Genetically modified organism and unique identifier
Article 1
The following unique identifiers are assigned to genetically modified maize as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 65/2004:
(a)
the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603;
(b)
the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × NK603;
(c)
the unique identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 89034 × NK603;
(d)
the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × MON 89034.

Authorisation
Article 2
The following products are authorised for the purposes of Article 4(2) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
(a)
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1;
(b)
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1;
(c)
genetically modified maize, referred to in Article 1, in products containing them or consisting of them, for uses other than those provided for in points (a) and (b) of this Article, with the exception of cultivation.

Labelling
Article 3
1. For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’.
2. The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the documents accompanying products containing or consisting of genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1, with the exception of foods and food ingredients.

Monitoring for environmental effects
Article 4
1. The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
2. The authorisation holder shall submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan to the Commission in accordance with Decision 2009/770/EC.

Method for detection
Article 5
The method set out in point (d) of the Annex shall apply for the detection of maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, MON 87427 × NK603, MON 89034 × NK603 and MON 87427 × MON 89034.

Community register
Article 6
The information set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Authorisation holder
Article 7
The authorisation holder shall be Monsanto Europe SA/NV, Belgium, representing Monsanto Company, United States.

Repeal
Article 8
Decision 2010/420/EU is hereby repealed.

Validity
Article 9
This Decision shall apply for a period of 10 years from the date of its notification.

Addressee
Article 10
This Decision is addressed to Monsanto Europe SA/NV, Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed(1), and in particular Article 7(3) and Article 19(3) thereof,
(1) On 13 September 2013, Monsanto Europe SA/NV submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 maize (‘the application’) to the national competent authority of Belgium in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. The application also covered the placing on the market of products consisting of or containing genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 for uses other than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation.
(2) The application covered, for those uses, all three sub-combinations of the single genetic modification events constituting maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603. One of those sub-combinations, MON 89034 × NK603, was already authorised under Commission Decision 2010/420/EU(2). Monsanto Europe SA/NV asked the Commission to repeal that Decision when authorising maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and all its sub-combinations.
(3) In accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, the application included information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3)and the information required by Annexes III and IV to that Directive. It also included a monitoring plan for environmental effects set out in Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(4) On 1 August 2017, the European Food Safety Authority (‘EFSA’) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003(4). EFSA concluded that genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, as described in the application, is as safe and as nutritious as the non-genetically modified comparator and the tested non-genetically modified reference varieties in the context of the scope of the application. No new safety concerns were identified for the previously assessed sub-combination MON 89034 × NK603 and previous conclusions on this sub-combination remain valid.
(5) For the remaining two sub-combinations, the EFSA concluded that they are expected to be as safe and as nutritious as the single events MON 87427, MON 89034 and NK603, as the previously assessed sub-combination MON 89034 × NK603 and as the three-event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603.
(6) In its opinion, the EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(7) The EFSA also concluded that the monitoring plan for environmental effects submitted by the applicant, consisting of a general surveillance plan, is in line with the intended uses of the products. However, the proposed monitoring plan was revised, as recommended by the EFSA, to cover explicitly the sub-combinations.
(8) Taking into account those considerations, the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and its three possible sub-combinations for the uses listed in the application should be authorised.
(9) Decision 2010/420/EU authorising maize MON 89034 × NK603 should be repealed.
(10) A unique identifier should be assigned to each genetically modified organism (‘GMO’) covered by this Decision in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004(5). The unique identifier assigned to maize MON 89034 × NK603 by Decision 2010/420/EU should continue to be used.
(11) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements, other than those laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), appear to be necessary for the products covered by this Decision. However, in order to ensure the use of those products within the limits of the authorisation granted by this Decision, the labelling of the products containing or consisting of maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, MON 87427 × NK603, MON 89034 × NK603 and MON 87427 × MON 89034, with the exception of food products, should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question are not intended for cultivation.
(12) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects and on the results. Those results should be presented in accordance with the standard reporting format requirements laid down in Commission Decision 2009/770/EC(7).
(13) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(14) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(15) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing-House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(8).
(16) The Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman. This implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted it to the appeal committee for further deliberation. The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the appeal committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Genetically modified organism and unique identifier

The following unique identifiers are assigned to genetically modified maize as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 65/2004:
(a)
the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603;
(b)
the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × NK603;
(c)
the unique identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 89034 × NK603;
(d)
the unique identifier MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 for genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) MON 87427 × MON 89034.

Authorisation

The following products are authorised for the purposes of Article 4(2) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
(a)
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1;
(b)
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1;
(c)
genetically modified maize, referred to in Article 1, in products containing them or consisting of them, for uses other than those provided for in points (a) and (b) of this Article, with the exception of cultivation.

Labelling

1. For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’.
2. The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the documents accompanying products containing or consisting of genetically modified maize referred to in Article 1, with the exception of foods and food ingredients.

Monitoring for environmental effects

1. The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
2. The authorisation holder shall submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan to the Commission in accordance with Decision 2009/770/EC.

Method for detection

The method set out in point (d) of the Annex shall apply for the detection of maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603, MON 87427 × NK603, MON 89034 × NK603 and MON 87427 × MON 89034.

Community register

The information set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Authorisation holder

The authorisation holder shall be Monsanto Europe SA/NV, Belgium, representing Monsanto Company, United States.

Repeal

Decision 2010/420/EU is hereby repealed.

Validity

This Decision shall apply for a period of 10 years from the date of its notification.

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to Monsanto Europe SA/NV, Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium.
ANNEX
(a) | Applicant and authorisation holder:Name:Monsanto Europe SA/NVAddress:Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, BelgiumOn behalf of:Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63167, USA. | Name | : | Monsanto Europe SA/NV | Address | : | Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium
Name | : | Monsanto Europe SA/NV
Address | : | Scheldelaan 460, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium
(b) | Designation and specification of the products:(1)foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);(2)feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);(3)genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.MON-87427-7 maize expresses CP4 EPSPS protein, which confers tolerance to glyphosate-based herbicides.MON-89Ø34-3 maize expresses the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins, which confer protection against certain lepidopteran pests.MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize expresses CP4 EPSPS protein and the variant CP4 EPSPS L214P, which confer tolerance to glyphosate-based herbicides. | (1) | foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e); | (2) | feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e); | (3) | genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.
(1) | foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);
(2) | feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e);
(3) | genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) referred to in point (e) in products containing them or consisting of them for uses other than those provided for in points (1) and (2), with the exception of cultivation.
(c) | Labelling:(1)For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;(2)The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients. | (1) | For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’; | (2) | The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients.
(1) | For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
(2) | The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in the accompanying documents of the products containing or consisting of the maize specified in (e), with the exception of foods and food ingredients.
(d) | Method for detection:(1)The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6.(2)Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx(3)Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm | (1) | The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6. | (2) | Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx | (3) | Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm
(1) | The quantitative event-specific PCR detection methods for maize MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 are those validated for genetically modified maize events MON-87427-7, MON-89Ø34-3 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6.
(2) | Validated by the EU Reference Laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdossiers.aspx
(3) | Reference Material: ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) is accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission at https://crm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ as well as AOCS 0512-A (for MON-87427-7), AOCS 0906-E (for MON-89Ø34-3) are accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at https://www.aocs.org/crm
(e) | Unique identifiers:MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3. | | MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6; | | MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6; | | MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6; | | MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3.
| MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
| MON-87427-7 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
| MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6;
| MON-87427-7 × MON-89Ø34-3.
(f) | Information required under Annex II to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity:[Biosafety Clearing-House, Record ID number:published in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed when notified].
(g) | Conditions or restrictions on the placing on the market, use or handling of the products:Not required.
(h) | Monitoring plan for environmental effects:Monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.[Link:plan published in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed]
(i) | Post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food for human consumptionNot required.Note:links to relevant documents may need to be modified over the time. Those modifications will be made available to the public via the updating of the Community register of genetically modified food and feed.

Pending: 32018D0906

26.6.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 161/22
(1) On 7 December 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/2274(1)appointing Mr Ángel LOSADA FERNÁNDEZ as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Sahel. The EUSR's mandate is to expire on 30 June 2018.
(2) The EUSR's mandate should be extended for a further period of 20 months.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
(a) actively contribute to the implementation of the Strategy and its RAP and to coordinate and further develop the Union's integrated approach to the regional crises, with a view to enhancing the overall coherence and effectiveness of Union activities in the Sahel;
(b) engage with all relevant stakeholders of the region, governments, regional organisations, in particular the G5 Sahel and its Joint Force in regard to which attention should,inter alia, be paid to promoting respect for human rights and non-military elements of the force such as the police component, international organisations, civil society and diasporas, including with all the countries of the Maghreb and Lake Chad Basin, with a view to furthering the Union's objectives and contribute to a better understanding of the role of the Union in the Sahel;
(c) represent and promote the interests and visibility of the Union in relevant regional and international fora, including the participation in the Comité de Suivi of the Mali Peace Agreement, and facilitate fully coordinated and comprehensive Union action in the region drawing on all relevant instruments, including development cooperation such as the Sahel Alliance, Member States' activities and Union support to crisis management and conflict prevention through the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed Forces (EUTM Mali), the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali), the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger), and stabilisation action under Article 28 of the Treaty;
(d) maintain close cooperation with the UN, in particular the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for West Africa and the Sahel, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Head of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission, the African Union (AU), in particular the AU High Representative for Mali and the Sahel, the G5 Sahel, in particular the G5 Presidency and its Permanent Secretary, the Economic Community of West African States, the lake Chad Basin Commission and other leading national, regional and international stakeholders including other special envoys for the Sahel, as well as with the relevant authorities in the Maghreb and Middle East area;
(e) closely follow the regional and trans-boundary dimensions of the challenges facing the region, including terrorism, organised crime, arms smuggling, human trafficking and smuggling, drug trafficking, refugee and migration flows and related financial flows; in close cooperation with the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, contribute to the further implementation of the EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy;
(f) closely follow the humanitarian, political, security and development consequences of large scale refugee and migration flows and related illicit financial flows across the region; upon request, engage in dialogues on migration with relevant stakeholders and contribute more generally to the Union's policy on migration and refugees with respect to the region, in line with the Union's political priorities, in order to increase cooperation including on return and readmission; work with countries of the Sahel to follow up action agreed at the Valetta Summit in November 2015, including the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Stability and Addressing Root Causes of Irregular Migration and Displaced Persons in Africa and in connection with the Partnership Frameworks;
(g) maintain regular high level political contacts with the countries in the region affected by terrorism and international crime and ensure the Union's key role in the international efforts to fight terrorism and international crime. This includes the Union's efforts to enhance its support to the security sector through the regionalisation of the CSDP missions and active support to regional capacity-building in particular the Joint Force G5 Sahel, its coordination with international players such as MINUSMA, and its relation with the local population, in line with UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2359 (2017) and UNSCR 2391 (2017), and ensuring that the root causes of terrorism and international crime in the Sahel are adequately addressed;
(h) closely follow the political, security and development consequences of humanitarian crises in the region;
(i) with regard to Mali, contribute to the stabilisation of the country, in particular a full return to constitutional normalcy and governance throughout the territory and a credible national inclusive dialogue in the overall framework of the Mali Peace Agreement. This also includes promoting institution building, security sector reform, in line with UNSCR 2364 (2017), and long-term peace building and reconciliation and fighting against corruption and impunity in Mali, as well as facilitating active and fully coordinated Union efforts to promote a swift implementation of the Mali Peace Agreement;
(j) contribute to the implementation of the Union's human rights policy in the region in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the EU Guidelines on human rights, in particular the EU Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict, as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and the Union's policy on Women, Peace and Security, and promote inclusiveness and gender equality in the state building process, in line with UNSCR 1325 (2000) and subsequent resolutions on Women, Peace and Security, including UNSCR 2242 (2015). The contribution will include monitoring and reporting on developments, as well as formulating recommendations in this regard and maintain regular contacts with the relevant authorities in Mali and in the region, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the human rights defenders and observers in the region;
(k) follow up and report on compliance with relevant UNSCRs, in particular UNSCRs 2056 (2012), 2071 (2012), 2085 (2012), 2100 (2013), 2295 (2016), 2364 (2017) and 2374 (2017), 2359 (2017), 2391 (2017).
(a) advise and report on the formulation of Union positions in regional and international fora, as appropriate, in order to proactively promote and strengthen the Union's comprehensive approach towards the crisis in the Sahel;
(b) maintain an overview of all activities of the Union and cooperate closely with relevant Union delegations.
(a) establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to and within the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and providing for a contingency and evacuation plan;
(b) ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high-risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c) ensuring that all members of the EUSR's team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d) ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 7 December 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/2274(1)appointing Mr Ángel LOSADA FERNÁNDEZ as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Sahel. The EUSR’s mandate is to expire on 30 June 2018.
(2) The EUSR’s mandate should be extended for a further period of 20 months.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative
Article 1
1. The mandate of Mr Ángel LOSADA FERNÁNDEZ as the EUSR for the Sahel is extended until 29 February 2020. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, based on an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).
2. For the purposes of the EUSR’s mandate, the Sahel is defined as comprising the primary focus of the EU Strategy for Security and Development in the Sahel (the ‘Strategy’) and its Regional Action Plan (the ‘RAP’), namely Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania and Niger. For issues with broader regional implications, the EUSR shall engage with the countries of the Lake Chad Basin and other countries and regional or international entities beyond the Sahel, including the Maghreb, West Africa and the Gulf of Guinea, as appropriate.

Policy objectives
Article 2
1. The EUSR’s mandate shall be based on the policy objective of the Union in relation to the Sahel to contribute actively to regional and international efforts to achieve lasting peace, security and development in the region. The EUSR shall furthermore aim to enhance the quality, intensity and impact of the Union’s multi-faceted engagement in the Sahel.
2. The EUSR shall contribute to developing and implementing all the Union’s efforts in the region, in particular in the political, security and development areas, and to coordinating all relevant instruments for Union actions.
3. Priority shall be given to Mali’s long-term stabilisation and to the partnership with the G5 Sahel, in coordination with the Union delegations and other relevant stakeholders, including Member States, the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS).
4. The Union’s policy objectives shall aim, through the coordinated and effective use of all its instruments, to promote a return for Mali and its people to a path of peace, reconciliation, security and development.
5. The Union’s policy objectives shall also aim to strengthen the link between security and development issues in the countries of the G5 Sahel.

Mandate
Article 3
1. In order to achieve the Union’s policy objectives in relation to the Sahel, the mandate of the EUSR shall be to:
(a)
actively contribute to the implementation of the Strategy and its RAP and to coordinate and further develop the Union’s integrated approach to the regional crises, with a view to enhancing the overall coherence and effectiveness of Union activities in the Sahel;
(b)
engage with all relevant stakeholders of the region, governments, regional organisations, in particular the G5 Sahel and its Joint Force in regard to which attention should,inter alia, be paid to promoting respect for human rights and non-military elements of the force such as the police component, international organisations, civil society and diasporas, including with all the countries of the Maghreb and Lake Chad Basin, with a view to furthering the Union’s objectives and contribute to a better understanding of the role of the Union in the Sahel;
(c)
represent and promote the interests and visibility of the Union in relevant regional and international fora, including the participation in the Comité de Suivi of the Mali Peace Agreement, and facilitate fully coordinated and comprehensive Union action in the region drawing on all relevant instruments, including development cooperation such as the Sahel Alliance, Member States’ activities and Union support to crisis management and conflict prevention through the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed Forces (EUTM Mali), the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali), the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger), and stabilisation action under Article 28 of the Treaty;
(d)
maintain close cooperation with the UN, in particular the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for West Africa and the Sahel, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Head of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission, the African Union (AU), in particular the AU High Representative for Mali and the Sahel, the G5 Sahel, in particular the G5 Presidency and its Permanent Secretary, the Economic Community of West African States, the lake Chad Basin Commission and other leading national, regional and international stakeholders including other special envoys for the Sahel, as well as with the relevant authorities in the Maghreb and Middle East area;
(e)
closely follow the regional and trans-boundary dimensions of the challenges facing the region, including terrorism, organised crime, arms smuggling, human trafficking and smuggling, drug trafficking, refugee and migration flows and related financial flows; in close cooperation with the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, contribute to the further implementation of the EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy;
(f)
closely follow the humanitarian, political, security and development consequences of large scale refugee and migration flows and related illicit financial flows across the region; upon request, engage in dialogues on migration with relevant stakeholders and contribute more generally to the Union’s policy on migration and refugees with respect to the region, in line with the Union’s political priorities, in order to increase cooperation including on return and readmission; work with countries of the Sahel to follow up action agreed at the Valetta Summit in November 2015, including the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Stability and Addressing Root Causes of Irregular Migration and Displaced Persons in Africa and in connection with the Partnership Frameworks;
(g)
maintain regular high level political contacts with the countries in the region affected by terrorism and international crime and ensure the Union’s key role in the international efforts to fight terrorism and international crime. This includes the Union’s efforts to enhance its support to the security sector through the regionalisation of the CSDP missions and active support to regional capacity-building in particular the Joint Force G5 Sahel, its coordination with international players such as MINUSMA, and its relation with the local population, in line with UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2359 (2017) and UNSCR 2391 (2017), and ensuring that the root causes of terrorism and international crime in the Sahel are adequately addressed;
(h)
closely follow the political, security and development consequences of humanitarian crises in the region;
(i)
with regard to Mali, contribute to the stabilisation of the country, in particular a full return to constitutional normalcy and governance throughout the territory and a credible national inclusive dialogue in the overall framework of the Mali Peace Agreement. This also includes promoting institution building, security sector reform, in line with UNSCR 2364 (2017), and long-term peace building and reconciliation and fighting against corruption and impunity in Mali, as well as facilitating active and fully coordinated Union efforts to promote a swift implementation of the Mali Peace Agreement;
(j)
contribute to the implementation of the Union’s human rights policy in the region in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the EU Guidelines on human rights, in particular the EU Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict, as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and the Union’s policy on Women, Peace and Security, and promote inclusiveness and gender equality in the state building process, in line with UNSCR 1325 (2000) and subsequent resolutions on Women, Peace and Security, including UNSCR 2242 (2015). The contribution will include monitoring and reporting on developments, as well as formulating recommendations in this regard and maintain regular contacts with the relevant authorities in Mali and in the region, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the human rights defenders and observers in the region;
(k)
follow up and report on compliance with relevant UNSCRs, in particular UNSCRs 2056 (2012), 2071 (2012), 2085 (2012), 2100 (2013), 2295 (2016), 2364 (2017) and 2374 (2017), 2359 (2017), 2391 (2017).
2. For the purpose of the fulfilment of the EUSR’s mandate, the EUSR shall,inter alia:
(a)
advise and report on the formulation of Union positions in regional and international fora, as appropriate, in order to proactively promote and strengthen the Union’s comprehensive approach towards the crisis in the Sahel;
(b)
maintain an overview of all activities of the Union and cooperate closely with relevant Union delegations.

Implementation of the mandate
Article 4
1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the responsibilities of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall work in close coordination with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and its relevant departments.

Financing
Article 5
1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period from 1 July 2018 to 29 February 2020 shall be EUR 2 400 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team
Article 6
1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy and security issues as required by the mandate, including gender. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States, institutions of the Union, and the EEAS may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the Member State, the sending institution of the Union or the EEAS, respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union or the EEAS may also be posted to the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State, the sending institution of the Union or the EEAS and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the EUSR’s mandate.
4. The EUSR staff shall be co-located with the relevant EEAS departments or Union delegations in order to ensure coherence and consistency of their respective activities.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and the EUSR’s staff
Article 7
The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the EUSR’s mission and the members of the EUSR’s staff shall be agreed with the host countries, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information
Article 8
The EUSR and the members of EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(2).

Access to information and logistical support
Article 9
1. Member States, the Commission, the EEAS and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union delegations in the region and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security
Article 10
In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in accordance with the EUSR’s mandate and the security situation in the geographical area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to and within the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and providing for a contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high-risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.

Reporting
Article 11
The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with reports, including an interim mandate report in spring 2019. The EUSR shall also report to Council working parties, as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty, the EUSR may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

Coordination with other Union actors
Article 12
1. In the framework of the Strategy and the RAP, the EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s political and diplomatic action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently, to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate.
2. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of Union delegations and of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region. The EUSR shall provide Member States’ missions and Union delegations in the region with regular briefings.
3. In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with the relevant Heads of Member States’ Missions and of the Union delegations. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR, in close coordination with the relevant Union delegations, shall provide the Heads of Missions of EUCAP Sahel Niger and of EUCAP Sahel Mali and the Mission Commander of EUTM Mali with local political guidance. The EUSR, the Mission Commander of EUTM Mali and the Civilian Operation Commander of EUCAP Sahel Niger and EUCAP Sahel Mali shall consult each other as required.

Assistance in relation to claims
Article 13
The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSR for Sahel, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review
Article 14
The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with a progress report by 31 October 2018 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2019.

Entry into force
Article 15
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 7 December 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/2274(1)appointing Mr Ángel LOSADA FERNÁNDEZ as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Sahel. The EUSR’s mandate is to expire on 30 June 2018.
(2) The EUSR’s mandate should be extended for a further period of 20 months.
(3) The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

European Union Special Representative

1. The mandate of Mr Ángel LOSADA FERNÁNDEZ as the EUSR for the Sahel is extended until 29 February 2020. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, based on an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).
2. For the purposes of the EUSR’s mandate, the Sahel is defined as comprising the primary focus of the EU Strategy for Security and Development in the Sahel (the ‘Strategy’) and its Regional Action Plan (the ‘RAP’), namely Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania and Niger. For issues with broader regional implications, the EUSR shall engage with the countries of the Lake Chad Basin and other countries and regional or international entities beyond the Sahel, including the Maghreb, West Africa and the Gulf of Guinea, as appropriate.

Policy objectives

1. The EUSR’s mandate shall be based on the policy objective of the Union in relation to the Sahel to contribute actively to regional and international efforts to achieve lasting peace, security and development in the region. The EUSR shall furthermore aim to enhance the quality, intensity and impact of the Union’s multi-faceted engagement in the Sahel.
2. The EUSR shall contribute to developing and implementing all the Union’s efforts in the region, in particular in the political, security and development areas, and to coordinating all relevant instruments for Union actions.
3. Priority shall be given to Mali’s long-term stabilisation and to the partnership with the G5 Sahel, in coordination with the Union delegations and other relevant stakeholders, including Member States, the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS).
4. The Union’s policy objectives shall aim, through the coordinated and effective use of all its instruments, to promote a return for Mali and its people to a path of peace, reconciliation, security and development.
5. The Union’s policy objectives shall also aim to strengthen the link between security and development issues in the countries of the G5 Sahel.

Mandate

1. In order to achieve the Union’s policy objectives in relation to the Sahel, the mandate of the EUSR shall be to:
(a)
actively contribute to the implementation of the Strategy and its RAP and to coordinate and further develop the Union’s integrated approach to the regional crises, with a view to enhancing the overall coherence and effectiveness of Union activities in the Sahel;
(b)
engage with all relevant stakeholders of the region, governments, regional organisations, in particular the G5 Sahel and its Joint Force in regard to which attention should,inter alia, be paid to promoting respect for human rights and non-military elements of the force such as the police component, international organisations, civil society and diasporas, including with all the countries of the Maghreb and Lake Chad Basin, with a view to furthering the Union’s objectives and contribute to a better understanding of the role of the Union in the Sahel;
(c)
represent and promote the interests and visibility of the Union in relevant regional and international fora, including the participation in the Comité de Suivi of the Mali Peace Agreement, and facilitate fully coordinated and comprehensive Union action in the region drawing on all relevant instruments, including development cooperation such as the Sahel Alliance, Member States’ activities and Union support to crisis management and conflict prevention through the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed Forces (EUTM Mali), the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali), the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger), and stabilisation action under Article 28 of the Treaty;
(d)
maintain close cooperation with the UN, in particular the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for West Africa and the Sahel, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Head of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission, the African Union (AU), in particular the AU High Representative for Mali and the Sahel, the G5 Sahel, in particular the G5 Presidency and its Permanent Secretary, the Economic Community of West African States, the lake Chad Basin Commission and other leading national, regional and international stakeholders including other special envoys for the Sahel, as well as with the relevant authorities in the Maghreb and Middle East area;
(e)
closely follow the regional and trans-boundary dimensions of the challenges facing the region, including terrorism, organised crime, arms smuggling, human trafficking and smuggling, drug trafficking, refugee and migration flows and related financial flows; in close cooperation with the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, contribute to the further implementation of the EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy;
(f)
closely follow the humanitarian, political, security and development consequences of large scale refugee and migration flows and related illicit financial flows across the region; upon request, engage in dialogues on migration with relevant stakeholders and contribute more generally to the Union’s policy on migration and refugees with respect to the region, in line with the Union’s political priorities, in order to increase cooperation including on return and readmission; work with countries of the Sahel to follow up action agreed at the Valetta Summit in November 2015, including the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Stability and Addressing Root Causes of Irregular Migration and Displaced Persons in Africa and in connection with the Partnership Frameworks;
(g)
maintain regular high level political contacts with the countries in the region affected by terrorism and international crime and ensure the Union’s key role in the international efforts to fight terrorism and international crime. This includes the Union’s efforts to enhance its support to the security sector through the regionalisation of the CSDP missions and active support to regional capacity-building in particular the Joint Force G5 Sahel, its coordination with international players such as MINUSMA, and its relation with the local population, in line with UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2359 (2017) and UNSCR 2391 (2017), and ensuring that the root causes of terrorism and international crime in the Sahel are adequately addressed;
(h)
closely follow the political, security and development consequences of humanitarian crises in the region;
(i)
with regard to Mali, contribute to the stabilisation of the country, in particular a full return to constitutional normalcy and governance throughout the territory and a credible national inclusive dialogue in the overall framework of the Mali Peace Agreement. This also includes promoting institution building, security sector reform, in line with UNSCR 2364 (2017), and long-term peace building and reconciliation and fighting against corruption and impunity in Mali, as well as facilitating active and fully coordinated Union efforts to promote a swift implementation of the Mali Peace Agreement;
(j)
contribute to the implementation of the Union’s human rights policy in the region in cooperation with the EUSR for Human Rights, including the EU Guidelines on human rights, in particular the EU Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict, as well as on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them, and the Union’s policy on Women, Peace and Security, and promote inclusiveness and gender equality in the state building process, in line with UNSCR 1325 (2000) and subsequent resolutions on Women, Peace and Security, including UNSCR 2242 (2015). The contribution will include monitoring and reporting on developments, as well as formulating recommendations in this regard and maintain regular contacts with the relevant authorities in Mali and in the region, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the human rights defenders and observers in the region;
(k)
follow up and report on compliance with relevant UNSCRs, in particular UNSCRs 2056 (2012), 2071 (2012), 2085 (2012), 2100 (2013), 2295 (2016), 2364 (2017) and 2374 (2017), 2359 (2017), 2391 (2017).
2. For the purpose of the fulfilment of the EUSR’s mandate, the EUSR shall,inter alia:
(a)
advise and report on the formulation of Union positions in regional and international fora, as appropriate, in order to proactively promote and strengthen the Union’s comprehensive approach towards the crisis in the Sahel;
(b)
maintain an overview of all activities of the Union and cooperate closely with relevant Union delegations.

Implementation of the mandate

1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate, acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The PSC shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the responsibilities of the HR.
3. The EUSR shall work in close coordination with the European External Action Service (EEAS) and its relevant departments.

Financing

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period from 1 July 2018 to 29 February 2020 shall be EUR 2 400 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team

1. Within the limits of the EUSR’s mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting a team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy and security issues as required by the mandate, including gender. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of the team.
2. Member States, institutions of the Union, and the EEAS may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of such seconded personnel shall be covered by the Member State, the sending institution of the Union or the EEAS, respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the institutions of the Union or the EEAS may also be posted to the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State, the sending institution of the Union or the EEAS and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the EUSR’s mandate.
4. The EUSR staff shall be co-located with the relevant EEAS departments or Union delegations in order to ensure coherence and consistency of their respective activities.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and the EUSR's staff

The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the EUSR’s mission and the members of the EUSR’s staff shall be agreed with the host countries, as appropriate. Member States and the EEAS shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information

The EUSR and the members of EUSR’s team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2013/488/EU(2).

Access to information and logistical support

1. Member States, the Commission, the EEAS and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union delegations in the region and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security

In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in accordance with the EUSR’s mandate and the security situation in the geographical area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under the EUSR’s direct authority, in particular by:
(a)
establishing a specific security plan based on guidance from the EEAS, including specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing the management of the secure movement of personnel to and within the area of responsibility, as well as management of security incidents and providing for a contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high-risk insurance, as required by the conditions in the area of responsibility;
(c)
ensuring that all members of the EUSR’s team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the area of responsibility, based on the risk ratings assigned to that area by the EEAS;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the Council, the HR and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the progress report and the report on the implementation of the mandate.

Reporting

The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with reports, including an interim mandate report in spring 2019. The EUSR shall also report to Council working parties, as necessary. Regular reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. The EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports. In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty, the EUSR may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

Coordination with other Union actors

1. In the framework of the Strategy and the RAP, the EUSR shall contribute to the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s political and diplomatic action and shall help ensure that all Union instruments and Member States’ actions are engaged consistently, to attain the Union’s policy objectives. Liaison with Member States shall be sought where appropriate.
2. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of Union delegations and of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region. The EUSR shall provide Member States’ missions and Union delegations in the region with regular briefings.
3. In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with the relevant Heads of Member States’ Missions and of the Union delegations. They shall make every effort to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR, in close coordination with the relevant Union delegations, shall provide the Heads of Missions of EUCAP Sahel Niger and of EUCAP Sahel Mali and the Mission Commander of EUTM Mali with local political guidance. The EUSR, the Mission Commander of EUTM Mali and the Civilian Operation Commander of EUCAP Sahel Niger and EUCAP Sahel Mali shall consult each other as required.

Assistance in relation to claims

The EUSR and the EUSR’s staff shall assist in providing elements to respond to any claims and obligations arising from the mandates of the previous EUSR for Sahel, and shall provide administrative assistance and access to relevant files for such purposes.

Review

The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with a progress report by 31 October 2018 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2019.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.