Pending: 31997D0710

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Articles 57, 66 and 100a thereof,Having regard to the proposal of the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3),(1) Whereas on 7 December 1993 the Council adopted a resolution on the introduction of satellite personal-communications services in the Community (4); whereas in that resolution the Council recognized the desirability of coordinated action to allow the introduction of satellite personal-communications services in the Community, taking full account of the global nature of such services; whereas the Council stressed the importance of developing an effective policy and asked the Commission to study the matter, monitor international developments and propose appropriate measures and/or actions;(2) Whereas on 19 May 1995, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on mobile and personal communications in the European Union (5) in which it considered it a priority objective to establish a harmonized licensing approach for satellite-based mobile and personal communications and, on that basis, to initiate procedures for licensing such systems at an early stage; whereas, according to that resolution, that approach should have been implemented by 1 January 1996 in order to take account of the rapid development of such services at global level and of their potential in both social and commercial terms;(3) Whereas on 29 June 1995 the Council adopted a resolution on the further development of mobile and personal communications in the European Union (6) in which it considered it a priority objective to ensure, before 1 June 1996, the specification of a harmonized licensing approach for satellite-based mobile and personal communications, after investigation by the European Committee for Telecommunications Regulatory Affairs (Ectra);(4) Whereas on 18 June 1996 the Council adopted common position No 34/96 with a view to adopting the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of open network provision (ONP) (7), hereinafter referred to as ‘the interconnection Directive`; whereas principles to govern the interconnection of mobile services which include satellite personal-communications services with separate telecommunications networks are set out in this Directive;(5) Whereas on 6 December 1995 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to telecommunications terminal equipment and satellite earth-station equipment, including the mutual recognition of their conformity (consolidated version);(6) Whereas the European Parliament and the Council are examining a common position with a view to the adoption of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common framework for general authorizations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications services (8), hereinafter referred to as ‘the licensing Directive`; whereas, given the urgency of these matters and the fact that no such authorization measures have been adopted or implemented, the area of satellite personal-communications services therefore requires action at Community level in accordance with this Decision; whereas that action should be of limited duration;(7) Whereas, having considered the telecommunications, trade and industry aspects as well as the frequency and standardization aspects of satellite personal communications and having consulted the industry concerned, the Commission has submitted a proposal for a decision and the related timetable with the aim of harmonizing the authorization of satellite personal-communications services on the basis of a common approach;(8) Whereas, in accordance with Commission Directive 94/46/EC of 13 October 1994 amending Directive 88/301/EEC and Directive 90/388/EEC in particular with regard to satellite communications (9), market entry for satellite personal communications space-segment operators can be restricted only on the basis of objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory selection criteria relating to the availability of scarce resources; whereas if spectrum is not available for the accommodation of all candidate systems, decisions on such restrictions should be coordinated;(9) Whereas there is an urgent need for harmonization of the use of frequency bands for satellite personal-communications services, which for the purposes of this Decision are defined as those operating in the 1.6/2.4 GHz and 1.9/2.1 GHz frequency bands; whereas the Member States’ final assignment of frequencies to individual systems should comply with established International Telecommunication Union procedures;(10) Whereas each country has the sovereign right to decide whether and how to participate in satellite personal-communications systems and to determine the terms and conditions of access to such systems from its territory, known as uplinks, and satellite personal-communications services operators are required to operate at the point of delivery under the legal, financial and regulatory requirements of the Member State within the territory of which those services are authorized; as a consequence, satellite personal-communications services operators are concurrently subject to the jurisdictions of the notifying administrations for the satellite personal-communications systems and to those of the countries in which services are authorized;(11) Whereas, despite the priority at present given to services operating in the aforementioned 1.6/2.4 GHz and 1.9/2.1 GHz frequency bands, Member States recognize the possible need to harmonize the use of other satellite frequency bands, in particular those corresponding to ‘small LEOs` (non-vocal, non-geostationary satellite mobile-telecommunications systems);(12) Whereas, since satellite personal communications by their nature primarily address the needs of mobile users travelling between Member States and especially outwith the Community, diverging national laws, regulations and administrative provisions would hinder or even prevent the provision of Community-wide satellite personal-communications services, the free movement of related equipment and, as a consequence, the successful introduction of satellite personal-communications services on the internal market;(13) Whereas the freedom to provide satellite personal-communications services and the free movement of related equipment on the internal market requires the approximation of national regulations and administrative provisions;(14) Whereas, owing to the need for the widest possible territorial coverage by satellite personal-communications systems, Member States should aim at the rapid and simultaneous introduction of compatible satellite personal-communications services in the Community on the basis of internal market principles by means of a coordinated approach;(15) Whereas, given the timetable laid down for the implementation of satellite personal-communications systems, this Decision is intended to ensure that, within its limited duration, appropriate regulatory measures are taken in the Community to achieve the harmonized provision of satellite personal communications, taking due account of the international dimension and its consequent requirements;(16) Whereas it is necessary to determine whether the scarcity of frequencies in the 1.6/2.4 GHz and 1.9/2.1 GHz frequency bands represents a constraint on the number of satellite personal-communications services which can be provided in the Community in these bands shared among candidate systems; whereas, to prevent the emergence of ‘paper satellite systems` due account must be taken of the advanced stage of development of those systems;(17) Whereas the principle of transparency should apply at all stages of the procedure to any measure adopted pursuant to this Decision without prejudice to the legitimate right to confidentiality;(18) Whereas authorizations are granted pursuant to the national regimes applicable in accordance with Directive 94/46/EC;(19) Whereas measures adopted by the European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) and Ectra are, if consistent with Community law, a basis for the use of the relevant frequencies by and for the preparation of the criteria for the authorization of satellite personal-communications services;(20) Whereas European standardization bodies such as the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (Cenelec) may be called upon in due course to prepare the necessary standards in this area;(21) Whereas the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), Ectra and ERC in particular will also be given mandates to harmonize authorization conditions and procedures;(22) Whereas to facilitate the granting of satellite personal-communications services authorizations to undertakings in more than one Member State, a ‘one-stop-shopping procedure` should be established; whereas that one-stop-shopping procedure should be implemented without prejudice to national provisions relating to the language used in the relevant procedures;(23) Whereas the global dimension of satellite personal-communications systems and services and the related global regulatory structure under which they are provided play an important role in the Community’s deliberations; whereas the Commission should monitor developments, particularly in respect of the regulatory process, outwith the Community and, if appropriate, consult with third countries on the coordinated introduction of satellite personal communications at global level; whereas this action at Community level should permit the Community and its Member States to exert greater influence on the worldwide development of mobile and personal communications;(24) Whereas the inherent global nature of satellite personal-communications services may require the conclusion of a substantial number of agreements with third countries on, inter alia, interconnection, the free movement and use of equipment, satellite-system and satellite-control operations, access to gateway stations and access to third countries’ markets; whereas those agreements are closely related to market access arrangements;(25) Whereas Community undertakings should have effective and comparable access to third countries’ markets and enjoy treatment in third countries similar to that offered in the Community to undertakings owned wholly, controlled through majority ownership or effectively controlled by nationals of the third countries concerned;(26) Whereas, therefore, the Commission may start multilateral and bilateral negotiations on those aspects of satellite personal communications on the basis of specific mandates from the Council, which should make it possible to conclude balanced agreements ensuring in particular effective and comparable access for Community operators in third countries;(27) Whereas the results of international consultations and other changes in the situation may require that decisions taken pursuant to this Decision be amended or other appropriate measures be undertaken;(28) Whereas Member States should take all appropriate measures to implement this Decision and decisions arising therefrom in due course and communicate all national implementation measures to the Commission;(29) Whereas the industry concerned should be requested to cooperate closely with the Commission and national regulatory authorities in the implementation of this Decision;(30) Whereas the nature of the information provided by applicants and by other representatives of the industry concerned may be of a commercially confidential nature; whereas the utmost discretion should be exercised in connection with that information,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The aim of this Decision shall be to facilitate the rapid introduction of compatible satellite personal-communications services in the Community on the basis of internal-market principles within a comparable time-frame by means of a coordinated approach.

Article 2
Coordinated authorization approach
1. When preparing and applying their authorization systems Member States shall ensure that the provision of satellite personal-communications services is organized in frequency bands which are harmonized by CEPT in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 3.
2. If it is established, in accordance with Article 3 and in conjunction with CEPT, that it is necessary to limit the number of satellite personal-communications services authorizations owing to the scarcity of the frequency spectrum available, Member States shall coordinate their authorization procedures with a view to authorizing the same satellite personal-communications services throughout the Community.
3. Member States may attach the conditions listed in Annex I to authorizations.
Those conditions may be imposed even if no part of the satellite personal-communications systems concerned is located within the territory of a Member State.
4. Member States shall take all technical and other appropriate measures to ensure the free movement of technical equipment within their territories in accordance with European harmonized standards and common technical regulations (CTRs).

Article 3
Cooperation with CEPT
1. The Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7, give CEPT/Ectra and CEPT/ERC mandates to harmonize frequency use and the conditions attached to general authorizations for satellite personal-communications services, without prejudice to the scope established in the licensing Directive for individual licences. Those mandates shall define the tasks to be performed and lay down a timetable.
2. The timetable for the first mandates shall be as set out in Annex II.
3. On the completion of the mandates it shall be decided in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6 whether the result of the work done pursuant to the mandates shall be made applicable in the Community.
4. Notwithstanding Article 2 (1), if the Commission or any Member State considers that work done pursuant to the mandate given to CEPT/Ectra or CEPT/ERC is not progressing satisfactorily having regard to the timetable laid down, it may refer the matter to the committee provided for in Article 5, which shall act in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6.

Article 4
One-stop-shopping procedure
1. Where appropriate and in conjunction with CEPT/Ectra and CEPT/ERC, the Commission shall take the steps necessary for the operation of a one-stop-shopping procedure for the grant of individual licences and, in the case of general authorizations, for notification procedures, including suitable arrangements for its administration, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6. Information on that one-stop-shopping procedure shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
2. The one-stop-shopping procedure shall comply with the following conditions:
(a) it shall be open to all undertakings wishing to operate telecommunications services in the Community;
(b) the submission of applications and notifications shall be possible and one or more bodies to which applications and notifications may be submitted shall be designated;
(c) in the case of individual licences, applications shall be passed to the national regulatory authorities concerned, within seven working days of formal receipt, by the bodies to which they were submitted.
In the case of general authorizations, notifications shall be passed to the national regulatory authorities concerned, within two working days of formal receipt, by the bodies to which they were submitted;
(d) in the case of individual licenses, the national regulatory authorities concerned shall decide within a reasonable time whether to grant them; inter alia, they shall inform the applicants of their decisions as soon as possible but not more than six weeks after receiving the applications. Member States may extend that time limit to up to four months in objectively justified cases which are defined specifically in the provisions adopted to implement the licensing Directive. In the case of comparative bidding procedures in particular, Member States may further extend that time limit by up to four months. Those time limits shall be without prejudice to any applicable international agreements relating to international frequency and satellite coordination.
Within one week of taking their decisions, national regulatory authorities shall inform both the applicants and the bodies to which the relevant applications were submitted accordingly.
In the case of general authorizations, the national regulatory authorities concerned may require the applicants to wait for up to four weeks after the authorities’ formal receipt of all the information required, before starting to provide the services covered by the general authorizations;
(e) the bodies to which applications and notifications may be sumbitted shall report annually to the Commission on the operation of the one-stop-shopping procedure, including information on refusals of applications and objections raised to notifications;
(f) the bodies involved in the one-stop-shopping procedure shall undertake to observe the level of confidentiality prescribed in Article 11.

Article 5
The committee
1. In the implementation of this Decision the Commission shall be assisted by the Licensing Committee set up by the licensing Directive. The Licensing Committee shall proceed in accordance with Articles 6 and 7.
2. In view of the urgency of these matters and until the committee referred to in paragraph 1 is set up, the Commission shall be assisted by an interim ad hoc committee which it shall convene when necessary and which shall proceed in accordance with Articles 6 and 7.

Article 6
Committee procedure II b (10)
1. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148 (2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
2. The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event:
– the Commission shall defer application of the measures which it has decided for a period of three months from the date of communication;
– the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit laid down in the first indent.

Article 7
Committee procedure I (11)
The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote.
The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes.
The Commission shall take the utmost possible account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account.

Article 8
Exchange of information
1. The Commission shall regularly inform the committee of the outcome of consultations with the representatives of telecommunications organizations, users, consumers, manufacturers, service providers and trade unions.
2. The committee shall, taking into account the Community’s telecommunications policy, encourage the exchange of information between the Member States and the Commission on the situation and the development of regulatory activities regarding the authorization of satellite personal-communications services.

Article 9
International aspects
1. Member States may inform the Commission of any general difficulties encountered, de jure or de facto, by Community organizations on the introduction of satellite personal-communications services in third countries which have been brought to their attention.
2. Whenever the Commission is informed of such difficulties it may, if necessary, submit a proposal to the Council for an appropriate mandate for negotiation with the aim of ensuring effective and comparable access for Community organizations in those third countries. The Council shall decide by qualified majority.
3. Measures taken pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be without prejudice to the Community’s and Member States’ obligations pursuant to relevant international agreements.

Article 10
Notification
Member States shall give the Commission such information as it may require for the purpose of verifying the implementation of this Decision.

Article 11
Confidentiality
1. Neither the Commission nor the national regulatory authorities shall disclose any information covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components.
2. Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the right of national regulatory authorities to undertake disclosure where it is essential for the purposes of fulfilling their duties, in which case such disclosure shall be proportionate and shall have regard to the legitimate interests of the undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.
3. Paragraph 1 shall not preclude the publication of information on licensing conditions which does not include information of a confidential nature.

Article 12
This Decision shall enter into force on the 20th day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities and shall remain in force for three years after that date.

Article 13
The Commission shall keep developments in the field of satellite personal communications under review and report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the effectiveness of action taken pursuant to this Decision after two years.

Article 14
Implementation
Member States shall take all measures necessary, by law or administrative action, for the measures provided for in, or agreed on pursuant to this Decision to be implemented.

Article 15
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 March 1997.
For the European Parliament
The President
J. M. GIL-ROBLES
For the Council
H. VAN MIERLO
(1) OJ No C 15, 20. 1. 1996, p. 6, and OJ No C 350, 21. 11. 1996, p. 14.
(2) OJ No C 204, 15. 7. 1996, p. 8.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 19 June 1996 (OJ No C 198, 8. 7. 1996, p. 93), Council common position of 9 December 1996 (OJ No C 41, 10. 2. 1997, p. 37) and Decision of the European Parliament of 20 February 1997 (OJ No C 85, 17. 3. 1997). Council Decision of 6 March 1997.
(4) OJ No C 339, 16. 12. 1993, p. 1.
(5) OJ No C 151, 19. 6. 1995, p. 473.
(6) OJ No C 188, 22. 7. 1995, p. 3.
(7) OJ No C 220, 29. 7. 1996, p. 13.
(8) OJ No C 41, 10. 2. 1997, p. 48.
(9) OJ No L 268, 19. 10. 1994, p. 15.
(10) Procedures set out in Council Decision 87/373/EEC of 13 July 1987 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ No L 197, 18. 7. 1987, p. 33).

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Articles 57, 66 and 100a thereof,Having regard to the proposal of the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3),(1) Whereas on 7 December 1993 the Council adopted a resolution on the introduction of satellite personal-communications services in the Community (4); whereas in that resolution the Council recognized the desirability of coordinated action to allow the introduction of satellite personal-communications services in the Community, taking full account of the global nature of such services; whereas the Council stressed the importance of developing an effective policy and asked the Commission to study the matter, monitor international developments and propose appropriate measures and/or actions;(2) Whereas on 19 May 1995, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on mobile and personal communications in the European Union (5) in which it considered it a priority objective to establish a harmonized licensing approach for satellite-based mobile and personal communications and, on that basis, to initiate procedures for licensing such systems at an early stage; whereas, according to that resolution, that approach should have been implemented by 1 January 1996 in order to take account of the rapid development of such services at global level and of their potential in both social and commercial terms;(3) Whereas on 29 June 1995 the Council adopted a resolution on the further development of mobile and personal communications in the European Union (6) in which it considered it a priority objective to ensure, before 1 June 1996, the specification of a harmonized licensing approach for satellite-based mobile and personal communications, after investigation by the European Committee for Telecommunications Regulatory Affairs (Ectra);(4) Whereas on 18 June 1996 the Council adopted common position No 34/96 with a view to adopting the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of open network provision (ONP) (7), hereinafter referred to as ‘the interconnection Directive`; whereas principles to govern the interconnection of mobile services which include satellite personal-communications services with separate telecommunications networks are set out in this Directive;(5) Whereas on 6 December 1995 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to telecommunications terminal equipment and satellite earth-station equipment, including the mutual recognition of their conformity (consolidated version);(6) Whereas the European Parliament and the Council are examining a common position with a view to the adoption of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common framework for general authorizations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications services (8), hereinafter referred to as ‘the licensing Directive`; whereas, given the urgency of these matters and the fact that no such authorization measures have been adopted or implemented, the area of satellite personal-communications services therefore requires action at Community level in accordance with this Decision; whereas that action should be of limited duration;(7) Whereas, having considered the telecommunications, trade and industry aspects as well as the frequency and standardization aspects of satellite personal communications and having consulted the industry concerned, the Commission has submitted a proposal for a decision and the related timetable with the aim of harmonizing the authorization of satellite personal-communications services on the basis of a common approach;(8) Whereas, in accordance with Commission Directive 94/46/EC of 13 October 1994 amending Directive 88/301/EEC and Directive 90/388/EEC in particular with regard to satellite communications (9), market entry for satellite personal communications space-segment operators can be restricted only on the basis of objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory selection criteria relating to the availability of scarce resources; whereas if spectrum is not available for the accommodation of all candidate systems, decisions on such restrictions should be coordinated;(9) Whereas there is an urgent need for harmonization of the use of frequency bands for satellite personal-communications services, which for the purposes of this Decision are defined as those operating in the 1.6/2.4 GHz and 1.9/2.1 GHz frequency bands; whereas the Member States’ final assignment of frequencies to individual systems should comply with established International Telecommunication Union procedures;(10) Whereas each country has the sovereign right to decide whether and how to participate in satellite personal-communications systems and to determine the terms and conditions of access to such systems from its territory, known as uplinks, and satellite personal-communications services operators are required to operate at the point of delivery under the legal, financial and regulatory requirements of the Member State within the territory of which those services are authorized; as a consequence, satellite personal-communications services operators are concurrently subject to the jurisdictions of the notifying administrations for the satellite personal-communications systems and to those of the countries in which services are authorized;(11) Whereas, despite the priority at present given to services operating in the aforementioned 1.6/2.4 GHz and 1.9/2.1 GHz frequency bands, Member States recognize the possible need to harmonize the use of other satellite frequency bands, in particular those corresponding to ‘small LEOs` (non-vocal, non-geostationary satellite mobile-telecommunications systems);(12) Whereas, since satellite personal communications by their nature primarily address the needs of mobile users travelling between Member States and especially outwith the Community, diverging national laws, regulations and administrative provisions would hinder or even prevent the provision of Community-wide satellite personal-communications services, the free movement of related equipment and, as a consequence, the successful introduction of satellite personal-communications services on the internal market;(13) Whereas the freedom to provide satellite personal-communications services and the free movement of related equipment on the internal market requires the approximation of national regulations and administrative provisions;(14) Whereas, owing to the need for the widest possible territorial coverage by satellite personal-communications systems, Member States should aim at the rapid and simultaneous introduction of compatible satellite personal-communications services in the Community on the basis of internal market principles by means of a coordinated approach;(15) Whereas, given the timetable laid down for the implementation of satellite personal-communications systems, this Decision is intended to ensure that, within its limited duration, appropriate regulatory measures are taken in the Community to achieve the harmonized provision of satellite personal communications, taking due account of the international dimension and its consequent requirements;(16) Whereas it is necessary to determine whether the scarcity of frequencies in the 1.6/2.4 GHz and 1.9/2.1 GHz frequency bands represents a constraint on the number of satellite personal-communications services which can be provided in the Community in these bands shared among candidate systems; whereas, to prevent the emergence of ‘paper satellite systems` due account must be taken of the advanced stage of development of those systems;(17) Whereas the principle of transparency should apply at all stages of the procedure to any measure adopted pursuant to this Decision without prejudice to the legitimate right to confidentiality;(18) Whereas authorizations are granted pursuant to the national regimes applicable in accordance with Directive 94/46/EC;(19) Whereas measures adopted by the European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) and Ectra are, if consistent with Community law, a basis for the use of the relevant frequencies by and for the preparation of the criteria for the authorization of satellite personal-communications services;(20) Whereas European standardization bodies such as the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (Cenelec) may be called upon in due course to prepare the necessary standards in this area;(21) Whereas the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), Ectra and ERC in particular will also be given mandates to harmonize authorization conditions and procedures;(22) Whereas to facilitate the granting of satellite personal-communications services authorizations to undertakings in more than one Member State, a ‘one-stop-shopping procedure` should be established; whereas that one-stop-shopping procedure should be implemented without prejudice to national provisions relating to the language used in the relevant procedures;(23) Whereas the global dimension of satellite personal-communications systems and services and the related global regulatory structure under which they are provided play an important role in the Community’s deliberations; whereas the Commission should monitor developments, particularly in respect of the regulatory process, outwith the Community and, if appropriate, consult with third countries on the coordinated introduction of satellite personal communications at global level; whereas this action at Community level should permit the Community and its Member States to exert greater influence on the worldwide development of mobile and personal communications;(24) Whereas the inherent global nature of satellite personal-communications services may require the conclusion of a substantial number of agreements with third countries on, inter alia, interconnection, the free movement and use of equipment, satellite-system and satellite-control operations, access to gateway stations and access to third countries’ markets; whereas those agreements are closely related to market access arrangements;(25) Whereas Community undertakings should have effective and comparable access to third countries’ markets and enjoy treatment in third countries similar to that offered in the Community to undertakings owned wholly, controlled through majority ownership or effectively controlled by nationals of the third countries concerned;(26) Whereas, therefore, the Commission may start multilateral and bilateral negotiations on those aspects of satellite personal communications on the basis of specific mandates from the Council, which should make it possible to conclude balanced agreements ensuring in particular effective and comparable access for Community operators in third countries;(27) Whereas the results of international consultations and other changes in the situation may require that decisions taken pursuant to this Decision be amended or other appropriate measures be undertaken;(28) Whereas Member States should take all appropriate measures to implement this Decision and decisions arising therefrom in due course and communicate all national implementation measures to the Commission;(29) Whereas the industry concerned should be requested to cooperate closely with the Commission and national regulatory authorities in the implementation of this Decision;(30) Whereas the nature of the information provided by applicants and by other representatives of the industry concerned may be of a commercially confidential nature; whereas the utmost discretion should be exercised in connection with that information,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The aim of this Decision shall be to facilitate the rapid introduction of compatible satellite personal-communications services in the Community on the basis of internal-market principles within a comparable time-frame by means of a coordinated approach.
Coordinated authorization approach
1. When preparing and applying their authorization systems Member States shall ensure that the provision of satellite personal-communications services is organized in frequency bands which are harmonized by CEPT in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 3.
2. If it is established, in accordance with Article 3 and in conjunction with CEPT, that it is necessary to limit the number of satellite personal-communications services authorizations owing to the scarcity of the frequency spectrum available, Member States shall coordinate their authorization procedures with a view to authorizing the same satellite personal-communications services throughout the Community.
3. Member States may attach the conditions listed in Annex I to authorizations.
Those conditions may be imposed even if no part of the satellite personal-communications systems concerned is located within the territory of a Member State.
4. Member States shall take all technical and other appropriate measures to ensure the free movement of technical equipment within their territories in accordance with European harmonized standards and common technical regulations (CTRs).
Cooperation with CEPT
1. The Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7, give CEPT/Ectra and CEPT/ERC mandates to harmonize frequency use and the conditions attached to general authorizations for satellite personal-communications services, without prejudice to the scope established in the licensing Directive for individual licences. Those mandates shall define the tasks to be performed and lay down a timetable.
2. The timetable for the first mandates shall be as set out in Annex II.
3. On the completion of the mandates it shall be decided in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6 whether the result of the work done pursuant to the mandates shall be made applicable in the Community.
4. Notwithstanding Article 2 (1), if the Commission or any Member State considers that work done pursuant to the mandate given to CEPT/Ectra or CEPT/ERC is not progressing satisfactorily having regard to the timetable laid down, it may refer the matter to the committee provided for in Article 5, which shall act in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6.
One-stop-shopping procedure
1. Where appropriate and in conjunction with CEPT/Ectra and CEPT/ERC, the Commission shall take the steps necessary for the operation of a one-stop-shopping procedure for the grant of individual licences and, in the case of general authorizations, for notification procedures, including suitable arrangements for its administration, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6. Information on that one-stop-shopping procedure shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
2. The one-stop-shopping procedure shall comply with the following conditions:
(a) it shall be open to all undertakings wishing to operate telecommunications services in the Community;
(b) the submission of applications and notifications shall be possible and one or more bodies to which applications and notifications may be submitted shall be designated;
(c) in the case of individual licences, applications shall be passed to the national regulatory authorities concerned, within seven working days of formal receipt, by the bodies to which they were submitted.
In the case of general authorizations, notifications shall be passed to the national regulatory authorities concerned, within two working days of formal receipt, by the bodies to which they were submitted;
(d) in the case of individual licenses, the national regulatory authorities concerned shall decide within a reasonable time whether to grant them; inter alia, they shall inform the applicants of their decisions as soon as possible but not more than six weeks after receiving the applications. Member States may extend that time limit to up to four months in objectively justified cases which are defined specifically in the provisions adopted to implement the licensing Directive. In the case of comparative bidding procedures in particular, Member States may further extend that time limit by up to four months. Those time limits shall be without prejudice to any applicable international agreements relating to international frequency and satellite coordination.
Within one week of taking their decisions, national regulatory authorities shall inform both the applicants and the bodies to which the relevant applications were submitted accordingly.
In the case of general authorizations, the national regulatory authorities concerned may require the applicants to wait for up to four weeks after the authorities’ formal receipt of all the information required, before starting to provide the services covered by the general authorizations;
(e) the bodies to which applications and notifications may be sumbitted shall report annually to the Commission on the operation of the one-stop-shopping procedure, including information on refusals of applications and objections raised to notifications;
(f) the bodies involved in the one-stop-shopping procedure shall undertake to observe the level of confidentiality prescribed in Article 11.
The committee
1. In the implementation of this Decision the Commission shall be assisted by the Licensing Committee set up by the licensing Directive. The Licensing Committee shall proceed in accordance with Articles 6 and 7.
2. In view of the urgency of these matters and until the committee referred to in paragraph 1 is set up, the Commission shall be assisted by an interim ad hoc committee which it shall convene when necessary and which shall proceed in accordance with Articles 6 and 7.
Committee procedure II b (10)
1. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148 (2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
2. The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event:
– the Commission shall defer application of the measures which it has decided for a period of three months from the date of communication;
– the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit laid down in the first indent.
Committee procedure I (11)
The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote.
The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes.
The Commission shall take the utmost possible account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account.
Exchange of information
1. The Commission shall regularly inform the committee of the outcome of consultations with the representatives of telecommunications organizations, users, consumers, manufacturers, service providers and trade unions.
2. The committee shall, taking into account the Community’s telecommunications policy, encourage the exchange of information between the Member States and the Commission on the situation and the development of regulatory activities regarding the authorization of satellite personal-communications services.
International aspects
1. Member States may inform the Commission of any general difficulties encountered, de jure or de facto, by Community organizations on the introduction of satellite personal-communications services in third countries which have been brought to their attention.
2. Whenever the Commission is informed of such difficulties it may, if necessary, submit a proposal to the Council for an appropriate mandate for negotiation with the aim of ensuring effective and comparable access for Community organizations in those third countries. The Council shall decide by qualified majority.
3. Measures taken pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be without prejudice to the Community’s and Member States’ obligations pursuant to relevant international agreements.
Notification
Member States shall give the Commission such information as it may require for the purpose of verifying the implementation of this Decision.
Confidentiality
1. Neither the Commission nor the national regulatory authorities shall disclose any information covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components.
2. Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the right of national regulatory authorities to undertake disclosure where it is essential for the purposes of fulfilling their duties, in which case such disclosure shall be proportionate and shall have regard to the legitimate interests of the undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.
3. Paragraph 1 shall not preclude the publication of information on licensing conditions which does not include information of a confidential nature.
This Decision shall enter into force on the 20th day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities and shall remain in force for three years after that date.
The Commission shall keep developments in the field of satellite personal communications under review and report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the effectiveness of action taken pursuant to this Decision after two years.
Implementation
Member States shall take all measures necessary, by law or administrative action, for the measures provided for in, or agreed on pursuant to this Decision to be implemented.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 March 1997.
For the European Parliament
The President
J. M. GIL-ROBLES
For the Council
H. VAN MIERLO
(1) OJ No C 15, 20. 1. 1996, p. 6, and OJ No C 350, 21. 11. 1996, p. 14.
(2) OJ No C 204, 15. 7. 1996, p. 8.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 19 June 1996 (OJ No C 198, 8. 7. 1996, p. 93), Council common position of 9 December 1996 (OJ No C 41, 10. 2. 1997, p. 37) and Decision of the European Parliament of 20 February 1997 (OJ No C 85, 17. 3. 1997). Council Decision of 6 March 1997.
(4) OJ No C 339, 16. 12. 1993, p. 1.
(5) OJ No C 151, 19. 6. 1995, p. 473.
(6) OJ No C 188, 22. 7. 1995, p. 3.
(7) OJ No C 220, 29. 7. 1996, p. 13.
(8) OJ No C 41, 10. 2. 1997, p. 48.
(9) OJ No L 268, 19. 10. 1994, p. 15.
(10) Procedures set out in Council Decision 87/373/EEC of 13 July 1987 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ No L 197, 18. 7. 1987, p. 33).
CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE ATTACHED TO AUTHORIZATIONS
1. Any conditions which are attached to authorizations must be consistent with the competition rules of the Treaty.
2. Conditions which may be attached to all authorizations, where justified and subject to the principle of proportionality:
2.1. Conditions intended to ensure compliance with relevant essential requirements.
2.2. Conditions linked to the provision of information reasonably required for the verification of compliance with applicable conditions and for statistical purposes.
2.3. Conditions intended to prevent anti-competitive behaviour in telecommunications markets, including measures to ensure that tariffs are non-discriminatory and do not distort competition.
2.4. Conditions relating to the effective and efficient use of numbering capacity.
3. Specific conditions which may be attached to general authorizations for the provision of publicly available telecommunications services and of public telecommunications networks that are required for the provision of such services, where justified and subject to the principle of proportionality:
3.1. Conditions relating to the protection of users and subscribers, in relation particularly to:
– the prior approval of the national regulatory authority of the standard subscriber contract,
– the provision of detailed and accurate billing,
– the provision of a procedure for the settlement of disputes,
– publication and adequate notice of any change in access conditions, including tariffs, quality and the availability of services.
3.2. Financial contributions to the provision of universal service in accordance with Community law.
3.3. Communication of customer-database information necessary for the provision of universal directory information.
3.4. Provision of emergency services.
3.5. Special arrangements for disabled people.
3.6. Conditions relating to the interconnection of networks and the interoperability of services in accordance with the interconnection Directive and obligations pursuant to Community law.
4. Specific conditions which may be attached to individual licences, where justified and subject to the principle of proportionality:
4.1. Specific conditions linked to the allocation of numbering rights (compliance with national numbering schemes).
4.2. Specific conditions linked to the effective use and efficient management of radio frequencies.
4.3. Specific environmental and specific town and country planning requirements, including conditions linked to the granting of access to public or private land and conditions linked to collocation and facility sharing.
4.4. Maximum duration, which shall not be unreasonably short, in particular in order to ensure the efficient use of radio frequencies or numbers or to grant access to public or private land, without prejudice to other provisions concerning the withdrawal or the suspension of licences.
4.5. Provision of universal service obligations in accordance with the interconnection Directive and Directive 95/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1995 on the application of the principles of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony (1).
4.6. Conditions applied to operators having significant market power, as notified by Member States within the meaning of the interconnection Directive, intended to guarantee interconnection or the control of significant market power.
4.7. Conditions concerning ownership which comply with Community law and the Community’s commitments vis-à-vis third countries.
4.8. Requirements relating to the quality, availability and permanence of a service or network, including the financial, managerial and technical competence of the applicant and conditions setting a minimum period of operation and including, where appropriate and in accordance with Community law, the mandatory provision of publicly available telecommunications services and public telecommunications networks.
4.9. Specific conditions relating to the provision of leased lines in accordance with Council Directive 92/44/EEC of 5 June 1992 on the application of open network provision to leased lines (2).
This list of conditions is without prejudice to:
– any other conditions which are not specific to the telecommunications sector,
– measures taken by Member States in accordance with public interest requirements recognized by the Treaty, in particular Articles 36 and 56, specifically in relation to public morality, public security, including the investigation of criminal activities, and public policy.
(1) OJ No L 321, 30. 12. 1995, p. 6.
(2) OJ No L 165, 19. 6. 1992, p. 27. Directive as amended by Commission Decision 94/439/EC (OJ No L 181, 15. 7. 1994, p. 40).

Pending: 31997D0594

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community,Having regard to Commission Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EC) No 3418/93 of 9 December 1993 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 (1), and in particular Article 145 thereof,Whereas the consumer price index (EUR 15) was 136,77 in December 1992, 141,40 in December 1993, 145,70 in December 1994 and 150,00 in December 1995;Whereas, pursuant to Article 145 of Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EC) No 3418/93, the fixed amounts specified in that Regulation should be adapted with effect from 1 January 1997,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1
The fixed amounts specified in Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EC) No 3418/93 shall be updated as follows with effect from 1 January 1997:

Article 2
This Decision shall be communicated to the other Community institutions and bodies by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Done at Brussels, 30 July 1997.
For the Commission
Erkki LIIKANEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 315, 16. 12. 1993, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community,Having regard to Commission Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EC) No 3418/93 of 9 December 1993 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 (1), and in particular Article 145 thereof,Whereas the consumer price index (EUR 15) was 136,77 in December 1992, 141,40 in December 1993, 145,70 in December 1994 and 150,00 in December 1995;Whereas, pursuant to Article 145 of Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EC) No 3418/93, the fixed amounts specified in that Regulation should be adapted with effect from 1 January 1997,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
The fixed amounts specified in Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EC) No 3418/93 shall be updated as follows with effect from 1 January 1997:
This Decision shall be communicated to the other Community institutions and bodies by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Done at Brussels, 30 July 1997.
For the Commission
Erkki LIIKANEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 315, 16. 12. 1993, p. 1.

Pending: 31997D0480

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States are authorized to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as last amended by Council Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Articles 2 (1) and 7 thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 95/340/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 96/584/EC (4), draws up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of milk and milk-based products;Whereas the health and veterinary certification requirements for imports of milk and milk-based products from the countries appearing on that list have been laid down in Commission Decision 95/343/EEC (5), as last amended by Decision 97/115/EC (6);Whereas Commission Decision 97/252/EC (7) draws up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorize imports of milk and milk-based products for human consumption;Whereas the Commission has received from Canada and Israel lists of establishments with guarantees that they fully meet the appropriate Community health requirements and that should an establishment fail to do so its export activities to the European Community will be suspended;Whereas Commission Decision 97/299/EC (8) draws up a list of establishments in the Czech Republic;Whereas Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and Switzerland have amended the lists of establishments in Decision 97/252/EC; whereas these amendments should therefore be published;Whereas the Commission has been unable to ascertain in the third countries other than those whose establishments are listed in Decision 97/252/EC the compliance of their establishments with Community requirements and the validity of the guarantees provided by the competent authorities, particularly by means of on-the-spot inspections; whereas it is therefore necessary to extend the period they have been granted;Whereas it is necessary to ensure the consistency of decisions drawing up lists of establishments; whereas Decision 97/252/EC should therefore be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 11. In

Article 1
1. In Article 1 (1) of Decision 97/252/EC, the words ‘third country` are inserted before ‘establishments`.
2. Article 1 (2) of Decision 97/252/EC is replaced by the following:
‘Up to 1 January 1998 Member States may authorize imports of milk and milk-based products from establishments in third countries other than those listed in the Annex hereto.`

Article 2
1. The Annex to Decision 97/252/EC is supplemented by Annex I to this Decision for Canada and Israel.
2. The Annex to Decision 97/252/EC is replaced by Annex II to this Decision for Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and Switzerland.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 July 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.
(2) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.
(3) OJ No L 200, 24. 8. 1995, p. 38.
(4) OJ No L 255, 9. 10. 1996, p. 20.
(5) OJ No L 200, 24. 8. 1995, p. 52.
(6) OJ No L 42, 13. 2. 1997, p. 16.
(7) OJ No L 101, 18. 4. 1997, p. 46.
(8) OJ No L 124, 16. 5. 1997, p. 50.
ANEXO I / BILAG I / ANHANG I / ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ I / ANNEX I / ANNEXE I / ALLEGATO I / BIJLAGE I / ANEXO I / LIITE I / BILAGA I
ANEXO II / BILAG II / ANHANG II / ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ II / ANNEX II / ANNEXE II / ALLEGATO II / BIJLAGE II /ANEXO II / LIITE II / BILAGA II

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States are authorized to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as last amended by Council Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Articles 2 (1) and 7 thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 95/340/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 96/584/EC (4), draws up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of milk and milk-based products;Whereas the health and veterinary certification requirements for imports of milk and milk-based products from the countries appearing on that list have been laid down in Commission Decision 95/343/EEC (5), as last amended by Decision 97/115/EC (6);Whereas Commission Decision 97/252/EC (7) draws up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorize imports of milk and milk-based products for human consumption;Whereas the Commission has received from Canada and Israel lists of establishments with guarantees that they fully meet the appropriate Community health requirements and that should an establishment fail to do so its export activities to the European Community will be suspended;Whereas Commission Decision 97/299/EC (8) draws up a list of establishments in the Czech Republic;Whereas Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and Switzerland have amended the lists of establishments in Decision 97/252/EC; whereas these amendments should therefore be published;Whereas the Commission has been unable to ascertain in the third countries other than those whose establishments are listed in Decision 97/252/EC the compliance of their establishments with Community requirements and the validity of the guarantees provided by the competent authorities, particularly by means of on-the-spot inspections; whereas it is therefore necessary to extend the period they have been granted;Whereas it is necessary to ensure the consistency of decisions drawing up lists of establishments; whereas Decision 97/252/EC should therefore be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 11. In
1. In Article 1 (1) of Decision 97/252/EC, the words ‘third country` are inserted before ‘establishments`.
2. Article 1 (2) of Decision 97/252/EC is replaced by the following:
‘Up to 1 January 1998 Member States may authorize imports of milk and milk-based products from establishments in third countries other than those listed in the Annex hereto.`
1. The Annex to Decision 97/252/EC is supplemented by Annex I to this Decision for Canada and Israel.
2. The Annex to Decision 97/252/EC is replaced by Annex II to this Decision for Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and Switzerland.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 July 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.
(2) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.
(3) OJ No L 200, 24. 8. 1995, p. 38.
(4) OJ No L 255, 9. 10. 1996, p. 20.
(5) OJ No L 200, 24. 8. 1995, p. 52.
(6) OJ No L 42, 13. 2. 1997, p. 16.
(7) OJ No L 101, 18. 4. 1997, p. 46.
(8) OJ No L 124, 16. 5. 1997, p. 50.
ANEXO I / BILAG I / ANHANG I / ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ I / ANNEX I / ANNEXE I / ALLEGATO I / BIJLAGE I / ANEXO I / LIITE I / BILAGA I
ANEXO II / BILAG II / ANHANG II / ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ II / ANNEX II / ANNEXE II / ALLEGATO II / BIJLAGE II /ANEXO II / LIITE II / BILAGA II

Pending: 31997D0464

25.7.1997 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 198/33
Product Intended use Level or class Attestation of conformity system
Back-flow devices: air admittance valve ventilating pipework For use inside buildings 4(1)
Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s)
Kits for waste water pumping station and effluent lifting plants For use inside building 3(2)
Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s)
Kits and elements for waste water treatment plants and on-site treatment equipment—Septic tanks — Septic tanks To be used outside buildings, for rain water, faecal and organic effluents 3(3)
— Septic tanks
— Septic tanks
Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s)
Prefabricated drainage channel To be used outside buildings, for waste water from buildings and civil engineering works including roads 3(4)
Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s)
Manholes and inspection chambersCovers, step irons, ladders and handrail for manholes and inspection chambers, gully tops To be used on carriageways, parking areas, hard shoulders and outside buildings 4(5)
Separators For waste water/sewage from buildings and civil engineering works including roads 4(5)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1), as amended by Directive 93/68/EEC (2), and in particular Article 13 (4) thereof,
Whereas the Commission is required to select, as between the two procedures in accordance with Article 13 (3) of Directive 89/106/EEC for attesting the conformity of a product, the ‘least onerous possible procedure consistent with safety’; whereas this means that it is necessary to decide whether, for a given product or family of products, the existence of a factory production control system under the responsibility of the manufacturer is a necessary and sufficient condition for an attestation of conformity, or whether, for reasons related to compliance with the criteria mentioned in Article 13 (4), the intervention of an approved certification body is required for that purpose;
Whereas Article 13 (4) requires that the procedure thus determined must be indicated in the mandates and in the technical specifications; whereas, therefore, it is desirable to define the concept of products or family of products as used in the mandates and in the technical specifications;
Whereas the two procedures provided for in Article 13 (3) are described in detail in Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC; whereas it is necessary therefore to specify clearly the methods by which the two procedures must be implemented, by reference to Annex III, for each product or family of products, since Annex III gives preference to certain systems;
Whereas the procedure referred to in point (a) of Article 13 (3) corresponds to the systems set out in the first possibility, without continuous surveillance, and the second and third possibilities of point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III, and the procedure referred to in point (b) of Article 13 (3) corresponds to the systems set out in point (i) of Section 2 of Annex III, and in the first possibility, with continuous surveillance, of point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III;
Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Construction,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The products set out in Annex I shall have their conformity attested by a procedure whereby, in addition to a factory production control system operated by the manufacturer, an approved certification body is involved in assessment and surveillance of the production control or of the product itself.

Article 2
The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex II shall be indicated in mandates for harmonized standards.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 June 1997.
For the Commission
Martin BANGEMANN
Member of the Commission
(1)  OJ No L 40, 11. 2. 1989, p. 12.
(2)  OJ No L 220, 30. 8. 1993, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1), as amended by Directive 93/68/EEC (2), and in particular Article 13 (4) thereof,
Whereas the Commission is required to select, as between the two procedures in accordance with Article 13 (3) of Directive 89/106/EEC for attesting the conformity of a product, the ‘least onerous possible procedure consistent with safety’; whereas this means that it is necessary to decide whether, for a given product or family of products, the existence of a factory production control system under the responsibility of the manufacturer is a necessary and sufficient condition for an attestation of conformity, or whether, for reasons related to compliance with the criteria mentioned in Article 13 (4), the intervention of an approved certification body is required for that purpose;
Whereas Article 13 (4) requires that the procedure thus determined must be indicated in the mandates and in the technical specifications; whereas, therefore, it is desirable to define the concept of products or family of products as used in the mandates and in the technical specifications;
Whereas the two procedures provided for in Article 13 (3) are described in detail in Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC; whereas it is necessary therefore to specify clearly the methods by which the two procedures must be implemented, by reference to Annex III, for each product or family of products, since Annex III gives preference to certain systems;
Whereas the procedure referred to in point (a) of Article 13 (3) corresponds to the systems set out in the first possibility, without continuous surveillance, and the second and third possibilities of point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III, and the procedure referred to in point (b) of Article 13 (3) corresponds to the systems set out in point (i) of Section 2 of Annex III, and in the first possibility, with continuous surveillance, of point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III;
Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Construction,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The products set out in Annex I shall have their conformity attested by a procedure whereby, in addition to a factory production control system operated by the manufacturer, an approved certification body is involved in assessment and surveillance of the production control or of the product itself.
The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex II shall be indicated in mandates for harmonized standards.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 June 1997.
For the Commission
Martin BANGEMANN
Member of the Commission
(1)  OJ No L 40, 11. 2. 1989, p. 12.
(2)  OJ No L 220, 30. 8. 1993, p. 1.
Waste water engineering products inside buildings
Back-flow devices: air admittance valve ventilating pipework.
Kits for waste water pumping station and effluent lifting plants.
Waste water engineering products outside buildings
Kits and elements for waste water treatment plants and on-site treatment equipment.
Septic tanks.
Prefabricated drainage channel.
Manholes and inspection chambers.
Covers, step irons, ladders and handrail for manholes and inspection chambers, gully tops.
Separators.
$(document).ready(function(){generateTOC(true,”, ‘Top’,’false’);scrollToCurrentUrlAnchor();});
PRODUCT FAMILY
WASTE WATER ENGINEERING PRODUCTS INSIDE BUILDINGS (1/2)
Systems of attestation of conformity
For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/Cenelec is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonized standard(s):
Product

Intended use

Level or class

Attestation of conformity system

Back-flow devices: air admittance valve ventilating pipework

For use inside buildings

 

4 (1)
The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic (see Article 2.1 of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.
PRODUCT FAMILY
WASTE WATER ENGINEERING PRODUCTS INSIDE BUILDINGS (2/2)
Systems of attestation of conformity
For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/Cenelec is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonized standard(s):
Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Kits for waste water pumping station and effluent lifting plants

For use inside building

 

3 (2)
The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic (see Article 2.1 of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.
PRODUCT FAMILY
WASTE WATER ENGINEERING PRODUCTS OUTSIDE BUILDINGS (1/3)
Systems of attestation of conformity
For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/Cenelec is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonized standard(s):
Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Kits and elements for waste water treatment plants and on-site treatment equipment

—

Septic tanks

To be used outside buildings, for rain water, faecal and organic effluents

 

3 (3)
The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic (see Article 2.1 of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.
PRODUCT FAMILY
WASTE WATER ENGINEERING PRODUCTS OUTSIDE BUILDINGS (2/3)
Systems of attestation of conformity
For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/Cenelec is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonized standard(s):
Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Prefabricated drainage channel

To be used outside buildings, for waste water from buildings and civil engineering works including roads

 

3 (4)
The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic (see Article 2.1 of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.
PRODUCT FAMILY
WASTE WATER ENGINEERING PRODUCTS OUTSIDE BUILDINGS (3/3)
Systems of attestation of conformity
For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/Cenelec is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonized standard(s):
Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Manholes and inspection chambers
Covers, step irons, ladders and handrail for manholes and inspection chambers, gully tops

To be used on carriageways, parking areas, hard shoulders and outside buildings

 

4 (5)

Separators

For waste water/sewage from buildings and civil engineering works including roads

 

4 (5)
The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic (see Article 2.1 of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.
(1)  System 4: See Annex III point 2 (ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility.
(2)  System 3: See Annex III point 2 (ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.
(3)  System 3: See Annex III point 2 (ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.
(4)  System 3: See Annex III point 2 (ii) of Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.
(5)  System 4: See Annex III point 2 (ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility.

Pending: 31997D0413

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 of 20 December 1992 establishing a Community system for fisheries and aquaculture (1), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (2),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3),Whereas the Community fishing fleet should be restructured with the aim of providing the sector with clear perspectives for sustainable fishing activities, taking into account the characteristics of each fishery and the possible economic and social consequences;Whereas the objectives and detailed rules should be fixed by fleet segment or fishery in relation to the state of the stocks taking account of the third Multiannual Guidance Programme (MAGP III), the differing situations in Member States and of the fact that Member States should be able to deploy the necessary fishing effort to take the quota actually available;Whereas the employment generated by the sector in areas dependent on fishing should be taken into account in order to safeguard the particular needs of those regions;Whereas it is necessary to safeguard existing balances and the acquis communautaire, having due regard to the principle of relative stability;Whereas in light of the most recent scientific advice available regarding the state of resources accessible to Community vessels, there is an urgent need to reduce the fishing mortality of certain stocks;Whereas to that end it is necessary to adopt specific guidelines for reducing the fishing effort on the stocks in question, over an appropriate period of time;Whereas the fishing effort reduction rates should target depletion risk and overfished stocks;Whereas the precautionary approach requires that fishing effort on other stocks should not increase unless such an increase is duly justified;Whereas in the case of fisheries composed of several species it is appropriate that the reductions in fishing effort be weighted to reflect the relative quantities of critical stocks in the overall catch;Whereas the common fisheries policy provides for a wide range of measures which, individually and collectively, contribute to the reduction of fishing mortality;Whereas it is agreed that small scale coastal non-trawling fishing activities merit special treatment since such activities maintain a high number of direct jobs while having a modest impact on depletion risk and overfished stocks;Whereas, given the need to ensure the highest safety standards in the Community fishing fleet, safety improvements should not, in certain cases, be counted against the objectives for Member States’ fleet segments;Whereas the characteristics of power and tonnage are the most pertinent parameters for expressing fishing capacity of the fleets using active gear; whereas the main parameters for expressing effort in respect of passive gear are different; whereas it is nonetheless necessary to ensure a non-discriminatory approach and fully equivalent result as between the two gear types;Whereas Member States should be able to choose to reduce fishing mortality by the different means available to them, either by reducing capacity for each fleet segment, or by reducing fishing effort for each fishery; whereas to this effect a certain period must be allowed for Member States to develop management programmes setting out the implementation of these means in order to achieve the objectives fixed;Whereas the required reductions in fishing effort can be achieved through fishing effort limitation programmes or reductions in capacity; whereas specific fishing effort limitation programmes on depletion risk and overfished stocks are to be encouraged where a Member State demonstrates its ability to set up and administer such programmes; whereas in the absence of fishing effort limitation programmes, or if these programmes do not offer the necessary guarantees or do not have sufficient effect, the only alternative is capacity reduction;Whereas the fleet objectives for Member States set by this Decision should be based on the previous objectives;Whereas the fleet segments of Member States involved in bilateral fisheries agreements, or in fishing activities covered by international fishing conventions to which the Community is a Contracting Party, need to be adjusted in accordance with the resources available and accessible under those agreements or conventions;Whereas this Decision is based on a five-year period in order to ensure real progress over a sufficient length of time; whereas the measures proposed must aim to eliminate the factors that made this restructuring necessary, in particular by putting into place a permanent regime of fleet renewal;Whereas a review of the fishing effort reduction objectives should be carried out by the Council by the end of 1999 on the basis of the latest scientific advice available and an assessment made at the same time of the effects of all available measures on the state of resources and the sector to be provided by the Commission to the Council;Whereas it is necessary to verify that the programmes of Member States are progressively achieved by reference to intermediate objectives;Whereas full transparency is required among Member States; whereas this transparency should be ensured in the decision process leading to the adoption of the individual programmes for Member States, and their subsequent implementation, through the procedures provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (ECC) 3760/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
For the purposes of this Decision the following definitions are used:
1. the capacities of fleet segments are expressed at least in GT tonnage and kW power as defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 of 22 September 1986 defining characteristics for fishing vessels (4);
2. the effort of fleet segments comprised of vessels using active gear is defined in accordance with Annex VI of Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/94 of 19 January 1994 concerning the fishing vessel register of the Community (5);
3. the effort of fleet segments comprised of vessels using passive gear is expressed in terms of the capacity of the vessels defined in subparagraph 1;
4. without prejudice to Article 4 (1), a fleet segment is defined as a group of vessels having homogeneous physical characteristics using the same fishing gear or the same type of fishing gear;
5. a fishery is defined as a fishing activity on a stock or a group of stocks harvested by the same fishing gear or the same type of fishing gear.

Article 2
1. By 31 December 2001 at the latest, the fishing effort of each Member State shall be reduced, taking the levels defined in Article 7 (1) as a starting point, on the basis of the reduction rates in fishing effort which are required to be achieved in relation to the critical stocks set out in Annex I.
2. The pilot reduction rates shall be as follows:
– 30 % for the stocks defined as depletion risk in Annex I;
– 20 % for the stocks defined as overfished in Annex I.
3. In the case of stocks defined as fully exploited in Annex I, there shall be no increase in fishing effort for the period 1997 to 2001.
4. In respect of stocks other than those referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, including stocks for which the situation is insufficiently known, there shall be no increase in fishing effort for the period 1997 to 2001. In specific cases where Member States can identify additional fishing opportunities on these stocks, a level of additional fishing effort for the fleet segments fishing these stocks may be decided.
5. The weighted fishing effort reduction rates are calculated by fleet segment or by fishery as a function of the composition of the catches of stocks in these fleet segments or fisheries in accordance with Annex II.

Article 3
A Member State may exempt fishing vessels of its fleet of less than 12 metres overall, other than trawlers, from the provisions of Article 2. In this case, the aggregate capacity of this fleet segment, expressed in GT tonnage and in kW power, shall not increase beyond the level at 1 January 1997, or beyond the level corresponding to the objectives of MAGP III, for the period to 31 December 2001, except in the framework of programmes for improving safety of navigation at sea.

Article 4
1. The segmentation of the fleet of each Member State shall be determined in relation to the stocks defined in Annex I and to the fishing techniques, taking account of the segmentation adopted as part of MAGP III as well as the differing situations in Member States.
2. In the Multiannual Guidance Programmes for Member States, increases in capacity resulting exclusively from safety improvements shall justify, on a cases by case basis, an increase by the same amount of the objectives for fleet segments where they do not increase the fishing effort of the vessels concerned.

Article 5
Reduction in fishing mortality of critical stocks shall be achieved for each fleet segment by a reduction in capacity or for each fishery by means of a reduction in fishing effort.

Article 6
1. Each Member State shall submit to the Commission by 30 June 1997 a fishing effort limitation programme. This programme shall establish, by fleet segment, the starting levels for capacity and fishing effort on the basis of the objectives fixed in the MAGP III, whilst taking account of the fishing effort data submitted in accordance with the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
In cases where the objectives are achieved by capacity reduction only, the Member State shall apply to the fleet segment the weighted reduction rates calculated in accordance with Annex II.
In cases where the objectives are achieved by fishing effort reductions, the Member State shall identify the fisheries related to each fleet segment and shall allocate to these fisheries starting levels for a fishing effort within the limits of the starting levels laid down for each fleet segment, with a view to ensuring that Member States can take up the quotas actually available to them. The Member State shall apply to the fishing effort levels defined above by fishery the reduction rates defined in Article 2.
The Member State shall identify and quantify the means (capacity, activity) by which to respect the aforementioned objectives.
2. Among the means to reduce fishing effort, each Member State shall determine in its programme the reduction in the capacity of each fleet segment which will permit the objectives to be achieved. This reduction in capacity shall be ensured by the establishment in each Member State of a permanent regime to control the renewal of the fleet. This regime shall determine, segment by segment, the ratio of entries/exits of vessels that will ensure over the period that the fishing capacity by type of vessel will be brought down to the determined levels.
3. Where a Member State does not submit such programmes or these are not approved, fishing effort reduction targets shall be achieved through reductions in capacity.
4. Where a Member State does not achieve the annual intermediate objectives referred to in Article 9 (1), the objectives of the following year shall be adjusted accordingly, including through reductions in capacity.

Article 7
1. The starting point for Member States’ fleet objectives for 31 December 2001 shall be the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programmes for 31 December 1996.
2. In fixing the objectives for the fishing fleets of each Member State under this Decision, account shall be taken of the specific characteristics of individual fishing fleets.

Article 8
The fleet segment fishing in the waters of third countries or on the high seas shall be identified and the fishing effort adjusted by the Commission and the Member State taking account of the global fishing opportunities of this fleet segment in line with the objectives fixed in fisheries management recommendations issued by international organizations, approved by the Community or the Member States, and, where appropriate, the fishing opportunities in third country waters defined by agreements concluded between the Community and those third countries.

Article 9
1. The implementation of the objectives and detailed rules of this Decision shall be carried out by the Commission for the period 1997 to 2001 in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 (6). The Commission shall adopt the Multiannual Guidance Programmes for the fishing fleets of individual Member States no later than 30 November 1997. The programmes shall apply with effect from 1 January 1997 and shall be progressively achieved, by reference to annual intermediate objectives, by 31 December 2001.
2. The Commission shall present to the Council, by 30 March 1999 at the latest, a report on the state and evolution of fish stocks and of fisheries based on the most recent scientific advice available and an assessment of the effects of structural, conservation, control and other policy measures as well as the effects of the Multiannual Guidance Programmes, on the state of the resources and on the sector.
3. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 by 31 December 1999 at the latest on the basis of the scientific advice and other information in the report from the Commission, on any necessary adjustments to the targets for fishing effort for the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2001.

Article 10
For the purposes of implementing the provisions of this Decision the procedures under Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 shall apply.

Article 11
This Decision shall apply as of 1 January 1997.

Article 12
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Luxembourg, 26 June 1997.
For the Council
The President
H. VAN MIERLO
(1) OJ No L 389, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1. Regulation as amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(2) OJ No C 259, 6. 9. 1996, p. 6.
(3) OJ No C 20, 20. 1. 1997, p. 372.
(4) OJ No L 274, 25. 9. 1986, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (OJ No L 339, 29. 12. 1994, p. 11).
(5) OJ No L 19, 22. 1. 1994, p. 5. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/96 (OJ No L 72, 21. 3. 1996, p. 12).
(6) Council Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 of 21 December 1993 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (OJ No L 346, 31. 12. 1993, p. 1). Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 965/96 (OJ No L 131, 1. 6. 1996, p. 1).

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 of 20 December 1992 establishing a Community system for fisheries and aquaculture (1), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (2),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3),Whereas the Community fishing fleet should be restructured with the aim of providing the sector with clear perspectives for sustainable fishing activities, taking into account the characteristics of each fishery and the possible economic and social consequences;Whereas the objectives and detailed rules should be fixed by fleet segment or fishery in relation to the state of the stocks taking account of the third Multiannual Guidance Programme (MAGP III), the differing situations in Member States and of the fact that Member States should be able to deploy the necessary fishing effort to take the quota actually available;Whereas the employment generated by the sector in areas dependent on fishing should be taken into account in order to safeguard the particular needs of those regions;Whereas it is necessary to safeguard existing balances and the acquis communautaire, having due regard to the principle of relative stability;Whereas in light of the most recent scientific advice available regarding the state of resources accessible to Community vessels, there is an urgent need to reduce the fishing mortality of certain stocks;Whereas to that end it is necessary to adopt specific guidelines for reducing the fishing effort on the stocks in question, over an appropriate period of time;Whereas the fishing effort reduction rates should target depletion risk and overfished stocks;Whereas the precautionary approach requires that fishing effort on other stocks should not increase unless such an increase is duly justified;Whereas in the case of fisheries composed of several species it is appropriate that the reductions in fishing effort be weighted to reflect the relative quantities of critical stocks in the overall catch;Whereas the common fisheries policy provides for a wide range of measures which, individually and collectively, contribute to the reduction of fishing mortality;Whereas it is agreed that small scale coastal non-trawling fishing activities merit special treatment since such activities maintain a high number of direct jobs while having a modest impact on depletion risk and overfished stocks;Whereas, given the need to ensure the highest safety standards in the Community fishing fleet, safety improvements should not, in certain cases, be counted against the objectives for Member States’ fleet segments;Whereas the characteristics of power and tonnage are the most pertinent parameters for expressing fishing capacity of the fleets using active gear; whereas the main parameters for expressing effort in respect of passive gear are different; whereas it is nonetheless necessary to ensure a non-discriminatory approach and fully equivalent result as between the two gear types;Whereas Member States should be able to choose to reduce fishing mortality by the different means available to them, either by reducing capacity for each fleet segment, or by reducing fishing effort for each fishery; whereas to this effect a certain period must be allowed for Member States to develop management programmes setting out the implementation of these means in order to achieve the objectives fixed;Whereas the required reductions in fishing effort can be achieved through fishing effort limitation programmes or reductions in capacity; whereas specific fishing effort limitation programmes on depletion risk and overfished stocks are to be encouraged where a Member State demonstrates its ability to set up and administer such programmes; whereas in the absence of fishing effort limitation programmes, or if these programmes do not offer the necessary guarantees or do not have sufficient effect, the only alternative is capacity reduction;Whereas the fleet objectives for Member States set by this Decision should be based on the previous objectives;Whereas the fleet segments of Member States involved in bilateral fisheries agreements, or in fishing activities covered by international fishing conventions to which the Community is a Contracting Party, need to be adjusted in accordance with the resources available and accessible under those agreements or conventions;Whereas this Decision is based on a five-year period in order to ensure real progress over a sufficient length of time; whereas the measures proposed must aim to eliminate the factors that made this restructuring necessary, in particular by putting into place a permanent regime of fleet renewal;Whereas a review of the fishing effort reduction objectives should be carried out by the Council by the end of 1999 on the basis of the latest scientific advice available and an assessment made at the same time of the effects of all available measures on the state of resources and the sector to be provided by the Commission to the Council;Whereas it is necessary to verify that the programmes of Member States are progressively achieved by reference to intermediate objectives;Whereas full transparency is required among Member States; whereas this transparency should be ensured in the decision process leading to the adoption of the individual programmes for Member States, and their subsequent implementation, through the procedures provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (ECC) 3760/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
For the purposes of this Decision the following definitions are used:
1. the capacities of fleet segments are expressed at least in GT tonnage and kW power as defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 of 22 September 1986 defining characteristics for fishing vessels (4);
2. the effort of fleet segments comprised of vessels using active gear is defined in accordance with Annex VI of Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/94 of 19 January 1994 concerning the fishing vessel register of the Community (5);
3. the effort of fleet segments comprised of vessels using passive gear is expressed in terms of the capacity of the vessels defined in subparagraph 1;
4. without prejudice to Article 4 (1), a fleet segment is defined as a group of vessels having homogeneous physical characteristics using the same fishing gear or the same type of fishing gear;
5. a fishery is defined as a fishing activity on a stock or a group of stocks harvested by the same fishing gear or the same type of fishing gear.
1. By 31 December 2001 at the latest, the fishing effort of each Member State shall be reduced, taking the levels defined in Article 7 (1) as a starting point, on the basis of the reduction rates in fishing effort which are required to be achieved in relation to the critical stocks set out in Annex I.
2. The pilot reduction rates shall be as follows:
– 30 % for the stocks defined as depletion risk in Annex I;
– 20 % for the stocks defined as overfished in Annex I.
3. In the case of stocks defined as fully exploited in Annex I, there shall be no increase in fishing effort for the period 1997 to 2001.
4. In respect of stocks other than those referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, including stocks for which the situation is insufficiently known, there shall be no increase in fishing effort for the period 1997 to 2001. In specific cases where Member States can identify additional fishing opportunities on these stocks, a level of additional fishing effort for the fleet segments fishing these stocks may be decided.
5. The weighted fishing effort reduction rates are calculated by fleet segment or by fishery as a function of the composition of the catches of stocks in these fleet segments or fisheries in accordance with Annex II.
A Member State may exempt fishing vessels of its fleet of less than 12 metres overall, other than trawlers, from the provisions of Article 2. In this case, the aggregate capacity of this fleet segment, expressed in GT tonnage and in kW power, shall not increase beyond the level at 1 January 1997, or beyond the level corresponding to the objectives of MAGP III, for the period to 31 December 2001, except in the framework of programmes for improving safety of navigation at sea.
1. The segmentation of the fleet of each Member State shall be determined in relation to the stocks defined in Annex I and to the fishing techniques, taking account of the segmentation adopted as part of MAGP III as well as the differing situations in Member States.
2. In the Multiannual Guidance Programmes for Member States, increases in capacity resulting exclusively from safety improvements shall justify, on a cases by case basis, an increase by the same amount of the objectives for fleet segments where they do not increase the fishing effort of the vessels concerned.
Reduction in fishing mortality of critical stocks shall be achieved for each fleet segment by a reduction in capacity or for each fishery by means of a reduction in fishing effort.
1. Each Member State shall submit to the Commission by 30 June 1997 a fishing effort limitation programme. This programme shall establish, by fleet segment, the starting levels for capacity and fishing effort on the basis of the objectives fixed in the MAGP III, whilst taking account of the fishing effort data submitted in accordance with the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
In cases where the objectives are achieved by capacity reduction only, the Member State shall apply to the fleet segment the weighted reduction rates calculated in accordance with Annex II.
In cases where the objectives are achieved by fishing effort reductions, the Member State shall identify the fisheries related to each fleet segment and shall allocate to these fisheries starting levels for a fishing effort within the limits of the starting levels laid down for each fleet segment, with a view to ensuring that Member States can take up the quotas actually available to them. The Member State shall apply to the fishing effort levels defined above by fishery the reduction rates defined in Article 2.
The Member State shall identify and quantify the means (capacity, activity) by which to respect the aforementioned objectives.
2. Among the means to reduce fishing effort, each Member State shall determine in its programme the reduction in the capacity of each fleet segment which will permit the objectives to be achieved. This reduction in capacity shall be ensured by the establishment in each Member State of a permanent regime to control the renewal of the fleet. This regime shall determine, segment by segment, the ratio of entries/exits of vessels that will ensure over the period that the fishing capacity by type of vessel will be brought down to the determined levels.
3. Where a Member State does not submit such programmes or these are not approved, fishing effort reduction targets shall be achieved through reductions in capacity.
4. Where a Member State does not achieve the annual intermediate objectives referred to in Article 9 (1), the objectives of the following year shall be adjusted accordingly, including through reductions in capacity.
1. The starting point for Member States’ fleet objectives for 31 December 2001 shall be the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programmes for 31 December 1996.
2. In fixing the objectives for the fishing fleets of each Member State under this Decision, account shall be taken of the specific characteristics of individual fishing fleets.
The fleet segment fishing in the waters of third countries or on the high seas shall be identified and the fishing effort adjusted by the Commission and the Member State taking account of the global fishing opportunities of this fleet segment in line with the objectives fixed in fisheries management recommendations issued by international organizations, approved by the Community or the Member States, and, where appropriate, the fishing opportunities in third country waters defined by agreements concluded between the Community and those third countries.
1. The implementation of the objectives and detailed rules of this Decision shall be carried out by the Commission for the period 1997 to 2001 in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 (6). The Commission shall adopt the Multiannual Guidance Programmes for the fishing fleets of individual Member States no later than 30 November 1997. The programmes shall apply with effect from 1 January 1997 and shall be progressively achieved, by reference to annual intermediate objectives, by 31 December 2001.
2. The Commission shall present to the Council, by 30 March 1999 at the latest, a report on the state and evolution of fish stocks and of fisheries based on the most recent scientific advice available and an assessment of the effects of structural, conservation, control and other policy measures as well as the effects of the Multiannual Guidance Programmes, on the state of the resources and on the sector.
3. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 by 31 December 1999 at the latest on the basis of the scientific advice and other information in the report from the Commission, on any necessary adjustments to the targets for fishing effort for the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2001.
For the purposes of implementing the provisions of this Decision the procedures under Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 shall apply.
This Decision shall apply as of 1 January 1997.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Luxembourg, 26 June 1997.
For the Council
The President
H. VAN MIERLO
(1) OJ No L 389, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1. Regulation as amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(2) OJ No C 259, 6. 9. 1996, p. 6.
(3) OJ No C 20, 20. 1. 1997, p. 372.
(4) OJ No L 274, 25. 9. 1986, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (OJ No L 339, 29. 12. 1994, p. 11).
(5) OJ No L 19, 22. 1. 1994, p. 5. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/96 (OJ No L 72, 21. 3. 1996, p. 12).
(6) Council Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 of 21 December 1993 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (OJ No L 346, 31. 12. 1993, p. 1). Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 965/96 (OJ No L 131, 1. 6. 1996, p. 1).
Fishing effort reduction targets
1. The effort reduction target (ERT) for a Member State’s fleet segment or fishery shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
ERT = RR × W
ERT = Effort reduction target,
RR = Reduction rates as in Article 2,
W = the percentage of the catch of a fleet segment or fishery which comprises depletion risk and overfished stocks.
2. The reduction rate for a fleet segment or fishery shall be determined in accordance with the following table by reference to the composition of its catch as between depletion risk, overfished, fully exploited or other stocks.

Pending: 31997D0404

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Whereas sound scientific advice is an essential basis for Community rules on consumer health, including matters on consumer health in its strictest sense, but also on animal health and welfare, plant health and environmental health;Whereas scientific advice on consumer health matters is currently provided by six scientific committees set up by the Commission and addressing the topics of food, animal nutrition, cosmetology, pesticides, toxicity and ecotoxicity, and veterinary matters;Whereas several issues relating to consumer health are of a multidisciplinary nature and require input from various scientific committees which would benefit from an effective coordination;Whereas the Commission must be able to obtain sound and timely scientific advice;Whereas scientific advice on matters relating to consumer health must, in the interests of consumers and industry, be based on the principles of excellence, independence and transparency,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
A Scientific Steering Committee (hereinafter called ‘SSC`) in the field of consumer health and food safety is hereby established.

Article 2
1. The SSC shall assist the Commission to obtain the best scientific advice available on matters relating to consumer health.
2. The SSC shall coordinate the work of the scientific committees set up by the Commission to address matters of consumer health, in particular:
(a) the SSC shall evaluate and monitor the working procedures used by the scientific committees and will harmonize them when necessary;
(b) for matters which require consultation of two or more scientific committees, the SSC shall identify those scientific committees which should be involved, taking account of compulsory consultation requirements, shall consider opinions issued by the different committees and may, in case of substantial differences of opinions, provide an overall view;
(c) when Community measures are based on the evaluation carried out by scientists from organizations in the Member States, the SSC shall assist the Commission, on the latter’s request, in assessing if scientific advice at Community level is needed, and if so, in determining which scientific committee is to provide it.
3. The SSC shall, in the area of consumer health:
(a) deliver scientific advice only on matters which are not covered by the mandates of the other scientific committees. It shall prepare this advice following a request from the Commission and relying on the most appropriate scientific expertise;
(b) specifically deliver scientific advice on multidisciplinary aspects of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, including bovine spongiform encephalopathy. To this end it shall create an ad hoc group which shall be chaired by a member of the SSC and may include external experts;
(c) assist the Commission with the identification of those areas where compulsory consultation of the scientific committees could be appropriate;
(d) arrange for the review of existing and newly developed risk assessment procedures and, where appropriate, propose the development of new risk assessment procedures relating to areas such as, for example, food-borne diseases and the transmissibility of animal diseases to man;
(e) draw the attention of the Commission to any specific or emerging consumer health problem.
4. Those members of the SSC who are not chairpersons of scientific committees shall contribute to the selection of the members of the scientific committees by advising the Commission as to the excellence and independence of the candidates.
5. The Commission may, when requesting an output from the SSC, ask for a deadline for its delivery to be adhered to.

Article 3
1. The SSC shall be composed of eight scientific experts not being members of any other scientific committee, and the chairpersons of the scientific committees. The latter may, should they not be able to participate in a meeting of the SSC, be replaced by one of the vice-chairpersons of their scientific committee.
2. The full SSC will elect by simple majority one chairperson and two vice-chairpersons from amongst its members who are not chairpersons of scientific committees.
3. The members of the SSC shall be scientific experts in one or more fields of consumer health, collectively covering the widest possible range of scientific disciplines relating to this subject.
4. The members of the SSC who are not chairpersons of scientific committees, shall be nominated by the Commission following publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities of a call for expressions of interest, together with the selection criteria and a description of the selection procedure. The selection procedure shall identify in a transparent manner the most suitable candidates for working in the SSC. From these the Commission shall nominate the members of the SSC not being chairpersons of scientific committees. The names of the members of the SSC shall be published in the Official Journal.
5. The term of office of members of the SSC not being chairpersons of scientific committees shall be three years. Those members of the SSC may not serve more than two consecutive terms of office. After the period of three years they shall remain office until their replacement or the renewal of their mandate.
6. In the event that a member of the SSC not being a chairperson of a scientific committee is no longer able to contribute effectively to the work of the SSC, or in the case of his/her voluntary resignation, the Commission shall nominate an appropriate replacement for the remaining term of office, drawn from the most suitable candidates identified in accordance with paragraph 4.
7. Members of the SSC, and external experts invited to contribute to its work, shall receive an indemnity for the service they provide to the Commission in addition to the reimbursement of travel and subsistence expenses, in accordance with the rules laid down by the Commission.

Article 4
1. Members of the SSC shall act independently of external influences in their capacity as members of the SSC.
2. Members of the SSC shall inform the Commission annually of any interests which might be perceived as prejudicial to their independence.
3. Members of the SSC and external experts shall declare specific interests which might be perceived as prejudicial to their independence with regard to the work of the SSC, its working groups or its ad hoc group.

Article 5
The SSC may create specific working groups with clearly defined mandates. Each working group shall be chaired by a member of the committee and may include external experts. The working groups shall report to the SSC.

Article 6
1. The SSC shall adopt its rules of procedure which shall be made publicly available.
2. The rules shall ensure that:
(a) the tasks of the SSC are completed in a manner which satisfies the principles of excellence, independence and transparency, while respecting legitimate requests for commercial confidentiality;
(b) the coordination of the work of the scientific committees is carried out in an efficient and flexible manner, in particular by a timely reporting of the chairpersons on the workplans of the scientific committees;
(c) the SSC provides opinions and other scientific advice in good time;
(d) the SSC may appoint rapporteurs for the preparation of background information and documentation and the drafting of its opinions;
(e) the SSC verifies that appointed rapporteurs can carry out their specific tasks as independently as possible from all external influences.

Article 7
The agenda, minutes and opinions of the SSC shall be made publicly available without undue delay and with regard being had to the need to respect commercial confidentiality. Minority views shall always be included and shall be attributed to Members only at their request.

Article 8
Without prejudice to Article 214 of the Treaty, members shall be obliged not to divulge information which they acquire as a result of the work of the SSC or one of its working groups when they are informed that this information is subject to a request for confidentiality.

Article 9
The Commission shall provide the secretariat for the SSC, its working groups and its ad hoc group.
Done at Brussels, 10 June 1997.
For the Commission
Emma BONINO
Member of the Commission

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Whereas sound scientific advice is an essential basis for Community rules on consumer health, including matters on consumer health in its strictest sense, but also on animal health and welfare, plant health and environmental health;Whereas scientific advice on consumer health matters is currently provided by six scientific committees set up by the Commission and addressing the topics of food, animal nutrition, cosmetology, pesticides, toxicity and ecotoxicity, and veterinary matters;Whereas several issues relating to consumer health are of a multidisciplinary nature and require input from various scientific committees which would benefit from an effective coordination;Whereas the Commission must be able to obtain sound and timely scientific advice;Whereas scientific advice on matters relating to consumer health must, in the interests of consumers and industry, be based on the principles of excellence, independence and transparency,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
A Scientific Steering Committee (hereinafter called ‘SSC`) in the field of consumer health and food safety is hereby established.
1. The SSC shall assist the Commission to obtain the best scientific advice available on matters relating to consumer health.
2. The SSC shall coordinate the work of the scientific committees set up by the Commission to address matters of consumer health, in particular:
(a) the SSC shall evaluate and monitor the working procedures used by the scientific committees and will harmonize them when necessary;
(b) for matters which require consultation of two or more scientific committees, the SSC shall identify those scientific committees which should be involved, taking account of compulsory consultation requirements, shall consider opinions issued by the different committees and may, in case of substantial differences of opinions, provide an overall view;
(c) when Community measures are based on the evaluation carried out by scientists from organizations in the Member States, the SSC shall assist the Commission, on the latter’s request, in assessing if scientific advice at Community level is needed, and if so, in determining which scientific committee is to provide it.
3. The SSC shall, in the area of consumer health:
(a) deliver scientific advice only on matters which are not covered by the mandates of the other scientific committees. It shall prepare this advice following a request from the Commission and relying on the most appropriate scientific expertise;
(b) specifically deliver scientific advice on multidisciplinary aspects of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, including bovine spongiform encephalopathy. To this end it shall create an ad hoc group which shall be chaired by a member of the SSC and may include external experts;
(c) assist the Commission with the identification of those areas where compulsory consultation of the scientific committees could be appropriate;
(d) arrange for the review of existing and newly developed risk assessment procedures and, where appropriate, propose the development of new risk assessment procedures relating to areas such as, for example, food-borne diseases and the transmissibility of animal diseases to man;
(e) draw the attention of the Commission to any specific or emerging consumer health problem.
4. Those members of the SSC who are not chairpersons of scientific committees shall contribute to the selection of the members of the scientific committees by advising the Commission as to the excellence and independence of the candidates.
5. The Commission may, when requesting an output from the SSC, ask for a deadline for its delivery to be adhered to.
1. The SSC shall be composed of eight scientific experts not being members of any other scientific committee, and the chairpersons of the scientific committees. The latter may, should they not be able to participate in a meeting of the SSC, be replaced by one of the vice-chairpersons of their scientific committee.
2. The full SSC will elect by simple majority one chairperson and two vice-chairpersons from amongst its members who are not chairpersons of scientific committees.
3. The members of the SSC shall be scientific experts in one or more fields of consumer health, collectively covering the widest possible range of scientific disciplines relating to this subject.
4. The members of the SSC who are not chairpersons of scientific committees, shall be nominated by the Commission following publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities of a call for expressions of interest, together with the selection criteria and a description of the selection procedure. The selection procedure shall identify in a transparent manner the most suitable candidates for working in the SSC. From these the Commission shall nominate the members of the SSC not being chairpersons of scientific committees. The names of the members of the SSC shall be published in the Official Journal.
5. The term of office of members of the SSC not being chairpersons of scientific committees shall be three years. Those members of the SSC may not serve more than two consecutive terms of office. After the period of three years they shall remain office until their replacement or the renewal of their mandate.
6. In the event that a member of the SSC not being a chairperson of a scientific committee is no longer able to contribute effectively to the work of the SSC, or in the case of his/her voluntary resignation, the Commission shall nominate an appropriate replacement for the remaining term of office, drawn from the most suitable candidates identified in accordance with paragraph 4.
7. Members of the SSC, and external experts invited to contribute to its work, shall receive an indemnity for the service they provide to the Commission in addition to the reimbursement of travel and subsistence expenses, in accordance with the rules laid down by the Commission.
1. Members of the SSC shall act independently of external influences in their capacity as members of the SSC.
2. Members of the SSC shall inform the Commission annually of any interests which might be perceived as prejudicial to their independence.
3. Members of the SSC and external experts shall declare specific interests which might be perceived as prejudicial to their independence with regard to the work of the SSC, its working groups or its ad hoc group.
The SSC may create specific working groups with clearly defined mandates. Each working group shall be chaired by a member of the committee and may include external experts. The working groups shall report to the SSC.
1. The SSC shall adopt its rules of procedure which shall be made publicly available.
2. The rules shall ensure that:
(a) the tasks of the SSC are completed in a manner which satisfies the principles of excellence, independence and transparency, while respecting legitimate requests for commercial confidentiality;
(b) the coordination of the work of the scientific committees is carried out in an efficient and flexible manner, in particular by a timely reporting of the chairpersons on the workplans of the scientific committees;
(c) the SSC provides opinions and other scientific advice in good time;
(d) the SSC may appoint rapporteurs for the preparation of background information and documentation and the drafting of its opinions;
(e) the SSC verifies that appointed rapporteurs can carry out their specific tasks as independently as possible from all external influences.
The agenda, minutes and opinions of the SSC shall be made publicly available without undue delay and with regard being had to the need to respect commercial confidentiality. Minority views shall always be included and shall be attributed to Members only at their request.
Without prejudice to Article 214 of the Treaty, members shall be obliged not to divulge information which they acquire as a result of the work of the SSC or one of its working groups when they are informed that this information is subject to a request for confidentiality.
The Commission shall provide the secretariat for the SSC, its working groups and its ad hoc group.
Done at Brussels, 10 June 1997.
For the Commission
Emma BONINO
Member of the Commission

Pending: 31997D0401

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive No 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by Directive No 95/71/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,Whereas the list of establishments approved by Indonesia for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the Community has been drawn up in Commission Decision No 94/324/EC (3), as last amended by Decision No 96/31/EC (4); whereas this list may be amended following the communication of a new list by the competent authority in Indonesia;Whereas the competent authority in Indonesia has communicated a new list adding 35 establishments, deleting 119 establishments, and amending the data of 11 establishments;Whereas it is necessary to amend the list of approved establishments;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision have been drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down by Commission Decision No 90/13/EEC (5),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 June 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ No L 332, 30. 12. 1995, p. 40.
(3) OJ No L 145, 10. 6. 1994, p. 23.
(4) OJ No L 9, 12. 1. 1996, p. 6.
(5) OJ No L 8, 11. 1. 1990, p. 70.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive No 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by Directive No 95/71/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,Whereas the list of establishments approved by Indonesia for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the Community has been drawn up in Commission Decision No 94/324/EC (3), as last amended by Decision No 96/31/EC (4); whereas this list may be amended following the communication of a new list by the competent authority in Indonesia;Whereas the competent authority in Indonesia has communicated a new list adding 35 establishments, deleting 119 establishments, and amending the data of 11 establishments;Whereas it is necessary to amend the list of approved establishments;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision have been drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down by Commission Decision No 90/13/EEC (5),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 June 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ No L 332, 30. 12. 1995, p. 40.
(3) OJ No L 145, 10. 6. 1994, p. 23.
(4) OJ No L 9, 12. 1. 1996, p. 6.
(5) OJ No L 8, 11. 1. 1990, p. 70.
LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS

Pending: 31997D0370

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pic carcases (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3513/93 (2), and in particular Article 5 (2) thereof,Whereas Article 2 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 provides that the grading of pig carcases must be determined by estimating the content of lean meat in accordance with statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase; whereas the authorization of grading methods is subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment; whereas this tolerance has been defined in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases (3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3127/94 (4);Whereas the Government of Sweden has requested the Commission to authorize the use of two methods for grading pig carcases on its territory and has submitted the information required in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85; whereas an examination of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorizing the said grading methods are fulfilled;Whereas no modification of the grading methods may be authorized except by means of a new Commission Decision adopted in the light of experience gained;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The use of the following methods is hereby authorized for grading pig carcases pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 in Sweden:
– the apparatus termed ‘Intrascope (Optical Probe)` and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex,
– the apparatus termed ‘Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP II)` and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex.

Article 2
Modifications of the apparatus or of the assessment methods shall not be authorized.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.
Done at Brussels, 30 May 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 301, 20. 11. 1984, p. 1.
(2) OJ No L 320, 22. 12. 1993, p. 5.
(3) OJ No L 285, 25. 10. 1985, p. 39.
(4) OJ No L 330, 21. 12. 1994, p. 43.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pic carcases (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3513/93 (2), and in particular Article 5 (2) thereof,Whereas Article 2 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 provides that the grading of pig carcases must be determined by estimating the content of lean meat in accordance with statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase; whereas the authorization of grading methods is subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment; whereas this tolerance has been defined in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases (3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3127/94 (4);Whereas the Government of Sweden has requested the Commission to authorize the use of two methods for grading pig carcases on its territory and has submitted the information required in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85; whereas an examination of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorizing the said grading methods are fulfilled;Whereas no modification of the grading methods may be authorized except by means of a new Commission Decision adopted in the light of experience gained;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The use of the following methods is hereby authorized for grading pig carcases pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 in Sweden:
– the apparatus termed ‘Intrascope (Optical Probe)` and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex,
– the apparatus termed ‘Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP II)` and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex.
Modifications of the apparatus or of the assessment methods shall not be authorized.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.
Done at Brussels, 30 May 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 301, 20. 11. 1984, p. 1.
(2) OJ No L 320, 22. 12. 1993, p. 5.
(3) OJ No L 285, 25. 10. 1985, p. 39.
(4) OJ No L 330, 21. 12. 1994, p. 43.
Intrascope (Optical Probe)
1. Grading of pig carcases shall be carried out by means of the apparatus termed ‘Intrascope (Optical Probe)`.
2. The apparatus shall be equipped with a hexagonal-shaped probe of a maximum width of 12 mm (and of 19 mm at the blade at the top of the probe) containing a viewing window and a light source, a sliding barrel calibrated in millimetres, and having an operating distance of between 3 and 45 mm.
3. The lean meat content of the carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:
^y = 70,200-0,733 x1
^y = the estimated lean meat of the carcase,
x1 = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres measured at 8 cm off the midline of the carcase immediately behind the last rib.
The formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 50 and 120 kilograms.
Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP II)
1. Grading of pig carcases shall be carried out by means of the apparatus termed ‘Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP II)`.
2. The apparatus shall be equipped with a probe of 5,95 mm (and of 6,3 mm at the blade at the top of the probe) containing a photodiode (Siemens LED of the type LYU 260-EO and photodetector of the type 58 MR) and having an operating distance of between 0 and 120 mm. The results of the measurements shall be converted into estimated lean meat content by means of the HGP II itself or a computer linked to it.
3. The lean meat content of the carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:
^y = 59,090-0,500 x1-0,353 x2+0,193 x3
^y = the estimated percentage of lean meat of the carcase,
x1 = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres measured at 8 cm off the midline of the carcase immediately behind the last rib,
x2 = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 6 cm off the midline of the carcase between the third and fourth last ribs,
x3 = the thickness of muscle (M. longissimus dorsi) in millimetres measured at the same time and in the same place as x2.
This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 50 and 120 kilograms.

Pending: 31997D0365

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorized to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as amended by Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Article 2 (1) thereof,Whereas Council Decision 79/542/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Decision 97/160/EC (4), draws up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of meat products;Whereas, for many of the countries on that list the animal health and veterinary certification requirements for importation of meat products have been laid down in Commission Decision 91/449/EEC (5), as last amended by Decision 96/92/EC (6);Whereas the Commission has received from certain third countries lists of establishments, with guarantees that they fully meet the appropriate Community health requirements and that should an establishment fail to do so its export activities to the European Community will be suspended;Whereas the Commission has been unable to ascertain in all the third countries concerned the compliance of their establishments with the Community requirements and the validity of the guarantees provided by the competent authorities;Whereas, to prevent the interruption of trade in meat products from those countries, it is necessary to grant them a further period during which Member States will be able to continue to import meat products from the establishments they have recognized; whereas during that further period the Commission will collect from those countries the guarantees needed in order to be able to add them to the list in accordance with the procedure laid down in Decision 95/408/EC;Whereas on the expiry of that period third countries which have not transmitted their lists of establishments in accordance with the Community rules will no longer be permitted to export meat products to the Community;Whereas Member States will be responsible therefore for satisfying themselves that the establishments from which they import meat products meet requirements for production and placing on the market which are no less stringent than the Community requirements;Whereas provisional lists of establishments producing meat products can thus be drawn up in respect of certain countries;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. The Member States shall authorize imports of products prepared from meat of bovine animals, swine, equidae and sheep and goats from the establishments listed in the Annex hereto.
2. Up to 31 July 1997 the Member States may authorize imports of products prepared from meat of bovine animals, swine, equidae and sheep and goats from establishments in third countries other than those listed in the Annex hereto.
3. Imports of meat products shall remain subject to the Community veterinary provisions adopted elsewhere.

Article 2
This Decision shall apply with effect from 1 April 1997.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 26 March 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.
(2) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.
(3) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.
(4) OJ No L 62, 4. 3. 1997, p. 39.
(5) OJ No L 240, 29. 8. 1991, p. 28.
(6) OJ No L 21, 27. 1. 1996, p. 71.
ANEXO / BILAG / ANHANG / ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ / ANNEX / ANNEXE / ALLEGATO / BIJLAGE / ANEXO / LIITE / BILAGA
LISTA DE LOS ESTABLECIMIENTOS / LISTE OVER VIRKSOMHEDER / VERZEICHNIS DER BETRIEBE / ÐÉÍÁÊÁÓ ÔÙÍ ÅÃÊÁÔÁÓÔÁÓÅÙÍ / LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS / LISTE DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS / ELENCO DEGLI STABILIMENTI / LIJST VAN BEDRIJVEN / LISTA DOS ESTABELECIMENTOS / LUETTELO LAITOKSISTA / FÖRTECKNING ÖVER ANLÄGGNINGAR
Producto: productos cárnicos / Produkt: kødprodukter / Erzeugnis: Fleischerzeugnisse / Ðñïúüí: íùðü êñÝáò ðïõëåñéêþí / Product: meat products / Produit: Produits à base de viandes / Prodotto: prodotti a base di carne / Product: vleesproducten / Produto: produtos à base de carne / Tuote: lihatuotteet / Varuslag: köttvaror
1 = Referencia nacional / National reference / Nationaler Code / Åèíéêüò áñéèìüò Ýãêñéóçò / National reference / Référence nationale / Riferimento nazionale / Nationale code / Referência nacional / Kansallinen referenssi / Nationell referens
2 = Nombre / Navn / Name / Ôßôëïò åãêáôÜóôáóçò / Name / Nom / Nome / Naam / Nome / Nimi / Namn
3 = Ciudad / By / Stadt / Ðüëç / Town / Ville / Città / Stad / Cidade / Kaupunki / Stad
4 = Región / Region / Region / Ðåñéï÷Þ / Region / Région / Regione / Regio / Região / Alue / Region
5 = Menciones especiales / Særlige bemærkninger / Besondere Bemerkungen / ÅéäéêÝò ðáñáôçñÞóåéò / Special remarks / Mentions spéciales / Note particolari / Bijzondere opmerkingen / Menções especiais / Erikoismainintoja / Anmärkningar
6 = * Países y establecimientos que cumplen todos los requisitos del apartado 1 del artículo 2 de la Decisión 95/408/CE del Consejo.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorized to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as amended by Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Article 2 (1) thereof,Whereas Council Decision 79/542/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Decision 97/160/EC (4), draws up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of meat products;Whereas, for many of the countries on that list the animal health and veterinary certification requirements for importation of meat products have been laid down in Commission Decision 91/449/EEC (5), as last amended by Decision 96/92/EC (6);Whereas the Commission has received from certain third countries lists of establishments, with guarantees that they fully meet the appropriate Community health requirements and that should an establishment fail to do so its export activities to the European Community will be suspended;Whereas the Commission has been unable to ascertain in all the third countries concerned the compliance of their establishments with the Community requirements and the validity of the guarantees provided by the competent authorities;Whereas, to prevent the interruption of trade in meat products from those countries, it is necessary to grant them a further period during which Member States will be able to continue to import meat products from the establishments they have recognized; whereas during that further period the Commission will collect from those countries the guarantees needed in order to be able to add them to the list in accordance with the procedure laid down in Decision 95/408/EC;Whereas on the expiry of that period third countries which have not transmitted their lists of establishments in accordance with the Community rules will no longer be permitted to export meat products to the Community;Whereas Member States will be responsible therefore for satisfying themselves that the establishments from which they import meat products meet requirements for production and placing on the market which are no less stringent than the Community requirements;Whereas provisional lists of establishments producing meat products can thus be drawn up in respect of certain countries;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The Member States shall authorize imports of products prepared from meat of bovine animals, swine, equidae and sheep and goats from the establishments listed in the Annex hereto.
2. Up to 31 July 1997 the Member States may authorize imports of products prepared from meat of bovine animals, swine, equidae and sheep and goats from establishments in third countries other than those listed in the Annex hereto.
3. Imports of meat products shall remain subject to the Community veterinary provisions adopted elsewhere.
This Decision shall apply with effect from 1 April 1997.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 26 March 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.
(2) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.
(3) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.
(4) OJ No L 62, 4. 3. 1997, p. 39.
(5) OJ No L 240, 29. 8. 1991, p. 28.
(6) OJ No L 21, 27. 1. 1996, p. 71.
ANEXO / BILAG / ANHANG / ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ / ANNEX / ANNEXE / ALLEGATO / BIJLAGE / ANEXO / LIITE / BILAGA
LISTA DE LOS ESTABLECIMIENTOS / LISTE OVER VIRKSOMHEDER / VERZEICHNIS DER BETRIEBE / ÐÉÍÁÊÁÓ ÔÙÍ ÅÃÊÁÔÁÓÔÁÓÅÙÍ / LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS / LISTE DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS / ELENCO DEGLI STABILIMENTI / LIJST VAN BEDRIJVEN / LISTA DOS ESTABELECIMENTOS / LUETTELO LAITOKSISTA / FÖRTECKNING ÖVER ANLÄGGNINGAR
Producto: productos cárnicos / Produkt: kødprodukter / Erzeugnis: Fleischerzeugnisse / Ðñïúüí: íùðü êñÝáò ðïõëåñéêþí / Product: meat products / Produit: Produits à base de viandes / Prodotto: prodotti a base di carne / Product: vleesproducten / Produto: produtos à base de carne / Tuote: lihatuotteet / Varuslag: köttvaror
1 = Referencia nacional / National reference / Nationaler Code / Åèíéêüò áñéèìüò Ýãêñéóçò / National reference / Référence nationale / Riferimento nazionale / Nationale code / Referência nacional / Kansallinen referenssi / Nationell referens
2 = Nombre / Navn / Name / Ôßôëïò åãêáôÜóôáóçò / Name / Nom / Nome / Naam / Nome / Nimi / Namn
3 = Ciudad / By / Stadt / Ðüëç / Town / Ville / Città / Stad / Cidade / Kaupunki / Stad
4 = Región / Region / Region / Ðåñéï÷Þ / Region / Région / Regione / Regio / Região / Alue / Region
5 = Menciones especiales / Særlige bemærkninger / Besondere Bemerkungen / ÅéäéêÝò ðáñáôçñÞóåéò / Special remarks / Mentions spéciales / Note particolari / Bijzondere opmerkingen / Menções especiais / Erikoismainintoja / Anmärkningar
6 = * Países y establecimientos que cumplen todos los requisitos del apartado 1 del artículo 2 de la Decisión 95/408/CE del Consejo.

Pending: 31997D0245

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities’ own resources (1), and in particular Article 8 (2) thereof,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89 of 29 May 1989 implementing Decision 88/376/EEC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources (2), as last amended by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1355/96 (3), and in particular Articles 6 and 17 thereof,Having consulted the Advisory Committee on Own Resources,Whereas, in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1355/96, the Council adopted provisions designed to improve certain parts of the arrangements for Member States to report to the Commission about action they have taken to recover own resources, in particular where fraud and irregularities are involved;Whereas these improvements mainly concern the production of monthly and quarterly statements of accounts of own resources, the description of cases of fraud and irregularities already detected involving entitlements in excess of ECU 10 000 and the content of the annual report;Whereas the details of these reporting procedures are to be laid down by the Commission after the Advisory Committee on Own Resources has been consulted;Whereas the Member States must be allowed a suitable length of time to apply the reporting procedures,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. Member States shall use the models contained in Annexes I, II and III to draw up the monthly and quarterly statements of their accounts of own resources referred to in Article 6 (3) (a) and (3) (b) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89.
2. The first such statements to be produced using the models referred to in paragraph 1 shall be those for April 1997 for the monthly statement and for the second quarter of 1997 for the quarterly statement.

Article 2
1. Member States shall use the model fraud form and update form in Annexes IV and V for the descriptions of cases of fraud and irregularities detected involving entitlements of over ECU 10 000 and details of the position concerning cases of fraud and irregularities already reported to the Commission where recovery, cancellation or non-recovery has not been indicated earlier, as referred to in Article 6 (4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89.
2. The first fraud forms and updates to be produced using the models referred to in paragraph 1 shall be sent in April 1997.

Article 3
1. The model in Annex VI shall be used for the annual report on the most important problems arising out of the application of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89, as referred to in Article 17 (3) of that Regulation.
2. The first report to be produced using the model referred to in paragraph 1 shall be sent by 30 April 1997.

Article 4
Member States shall inform the Commission by 31 March 1997 of the departments or agencies responsible for producing the statements, forms and reports covered by this decision.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 March 1997.
For the Commission
Erkki LIIKANEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 293, 12. 11. 1994, p. 9.
(2) OJ No L 155, 7. 6. 1989, p. 1.
(3) OJ No L 175, 13. 7. 1996, p. 3.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities’ own resources (1), and in particular Article 8 (2) thereof,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89 of 29 May 1989 implementing Decision 88/376/EEC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources (2), as last amended by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1355/96 (3), and in particular Articles 6 and 17 thereof,Having consulted the Advisory Committee on Own Resources,Whereas, in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1355/96, the Council adopted provisions designed to improve certain parts of the arrangements for Member States to report to the Commission about action they have taken to recover own resources, in particular where fraud and irregularities are involved;Whereas these improvements mainly concern the production of monthly and quarterly statements of accounts of own resources, the description of cases of fraud and irregularities already detected involving entitlements in excess of ECU 10 000 and the content of the annual report;Whereas the details of these reporting procedures are to be laid down by the Commission after the Advisory Committee on Own Resources has been consulted;Whereas the Member States must be allowed a suitable length of time to apply the reporting procedures,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. Member States shall use the models contained in Annexes I, II and III to draw up the monthly and quarterly statements of their accounts of own resources referred to in Article 6 (3) (a) and (3) (b) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89.
2. The first such statements to be produced using the models referred to in paragraph 1 shall be those for April 1997 for the monthly statement and for the second quarter of 1997 for the quarterly statement.
1. Member States shall use the model fraud form and update form in Annexes IV and V for the descriptions of cases of fraud and irregularities detected involving entitlements of over ECU 10 000 and details of the position concerning cases of fraud and irregularities already reported to the Commission where recovery, cancellation or non-recovery has not been indicated earlier, as referred to in Article 6 (4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89.
2. The first fraud forms and updates to be produced using the models referred to in paragraph 1 shall be sent in April 1997.
1. The model in Annex VI shall be used for the annual report on the most important problems arising out of the application of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89, as referred to in Article 17 (3) of that Regulation.
2. The first report to be produced using the model referred to in paragraph 1 shall be sent by 30 April 1997.
Member States shall inform the Commission by 31 March 1997 of the departments or agencies responsible for producing the statements, forms and reports covered by this decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 March 1997.
For the Commission
Erkki LIIKANEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 293, 12. 11. 1994, p. 9.
(2) OJ No L 155, 7. 6. 1989, p. 1.
(3) OJ No L 175, 13. 7. 1996, p. 3.
>START OF GRAPHIC>
‘A` ACCOUNT OF OWN RESOURCES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Statement of established entitlements (1)
>END OF GRAPHIC>
>START OF GRAPHIC>
OWN RESOURCES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – SEPARATE ACCOUNT (1)
>END OF GRAPHIC>
FRAUD FORM Information form to be sent to the Commission (DG XIX) giving a description of cases of fraud and irregularities already detected, involving entitlements in excess of ECU 10 000
IDENTIFICATION OF BASIC FORM
0 Member State:
0.0 Serial number of the case (1):
0.1 Quarter reference period:
0.2 Date of transmission:
0.3 Department or agency which made the establishment:
DESCRIPTION OF CASE
1 Goods involved:
1.0 Commercial description:
1.1. Tariff heading (2):
1.1.1 declared:
1.1.2 established:
1.1.3 presumed:
1.2 Origin:
1.2.1 declared:
1.2.2 established:
1.2.3 presumed:
1.3 Coming from:
1.3.1 declared:
1.3.2 established:
1.3.3 presumed:
1.4 Quantity:
1.4.1 declared:
1.4.2 established:
1.4.3 presumed:
1.5.1 declared:
1.5.2 established:
1.5.3 presumed:
2 Type of fraud and/or irregularity:
2.1 Designation:
2.2 Customs procedure or treatment concerned:
3 Concise description of fraud mechanism:
4 Presumed order of magnitude of own resources evaded or exact amount:
4.1 estimated:
4.2 established:
4.3 recovered:
5 Type of check that led to discovery:
5.1 method:
5.2 remarks:
6 Stage reached in procedure and, where appropriate, details of establishment:
– date of establishment:
– administrative code:
– financial code:
7 Case already notified under mutual assistance arrangements (Regulations (EEC) No 1468/81 and (EEC) No 945/87):
MA reference:
8 Measures taken or planned to prevent the recurrence of cases of fraud and irregularities already detected:
9 9.1 Member States involved:
9.2 Operators concerned (optional):
10 Other information:
>START OF GRAPHIC>
FORM UPDATING BASIC FORM (1)
>END OF GRAPHIC>
ANNUAL REPORT
>START OF GRAPHIC>
Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89, Article 17 (3)
Member State: 19 . .1. Inspections by Member states
Inspection operations
Entries accepted (Customs procedure or treatment concerned)
Entries checked after customs clearance, customs procedure or treatment concerned (post clearance controls)
Total number of staff in customs departments at national level (1)
Total number of staff assigned to post clearance checks at national level
(1) The total number of staff (expressed as persons per year) at all levels of the organization.
2. Fraud and irregularities (1)
Customs arrangement
Fraud and irregularites by type of customs arrangement
cases (2) Amount
involved (3) Amount
established Amount
recovered Recovery rate (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
(5) = (4) / (3) × 100
1 Release for free
circulation
Breakdown of types of fraud under release for free circulation (5) (6)
(a) Non-declaration
(b) Wrong description of the goods or error in CCT classification
(e) Weight/Quantity
3 Customs warehouse
4 Inward processing
5 Outward processing
6 Temporary admission
7 Other customs arrangements or treatment (7)
(1) All cases, regardless of threshold values, expressed in national currency, including cases not included in the ‘B’ account.
(2) Number of cases of fraud detected during the year.
(3) ‘Amount involved’ means the amount (in national currency) after any correction that may have been made.
(4) The recovery rate concerns only the amounts recovered during the year in question and is not the definitive rate.
(5)If the fraud or irregularity involves a combination of two or more types of anomaly please record the case under the heading which appears first in the table (e.g. if there are irregularities involving both value and origin the case should be entered under ‘origin’ and not ‘value’).
(6) The total of the subheadings (a) to (f) should correspond to the total under heading 1.
(7) Processing under customs control, export, free zone/bonded warehouse, re-export.
3.Questions of principle
List of the most important points relating to establishment, entry in the accounts and making-available encountered in the application of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89, including those raised in matters in dispute
(Where necessary, continue references to this item in an Annex to the report)
4.Notification of cases of written-off traditional own resources
(Article 17 (2) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1552/89)
4.1.Total number of cases in this report (1):
Information under items 4.2 to 4.11 is to be given for each case of own resources written off where the amount of duty exceeds ECU 10 000
4.2.Reference number of this form (2): //
(1)Please use a separate form for each case. If there are no cases write ‘None’.
(2) Please use this format: Member State/Year/Number (e.g. UK/1997/1).
4.3.Information on the recovery procedure(1):
Stage Date Comments
Debt incurred