Pending: 31998D0488

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,Whereas Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 provides that the conditions for the award of the Community eco-label shall be defined by product group;Whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 states that the environmental performance of a product shall be assessed by reference to the specific criteria for product groups;Whereas, by Decision 94/923/EC (2), the Commission established ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers, which, according to Article 3 thereof, were valid until 14 November 1997;Whereas it is appropriate to adopt a new Decision establishing criteria for this product group, which will be valid for a further period of three years after the expiry of the period of validity of the previous criteria;Whereas it is appropriate to revise the criteria which were established by Decision 94/923/EC in order to reflect the developments in the market;Whereas products must be in compliance with national legislation which is in conformity with Community health, safety and environmental requirements without prejudice to regulatory requirements of Community or national law applicable to the various life stages of the product;Whereas in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 the Commission has consulted the principal interest groups within a consultation forum;Whereas the measures set out in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee set up pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘soil improvers` shall mean:
‘Materials sold as end user products for gardening to be added to the soil to improve at least its physical condition or its physical and biological condition without causing harmful effects.`

Article 2
The environment performance of the product group as defined in Article 1 shall be assessed by reference to the specific ecological criteria set out in the Annex.

Article 3
The product group definition and the specific ecological criteria for the product group shall be valid from 1 April 1998 until 31 March 2001.

Article 4
For administrative purposes, the product group code number assigned by the Commission to this product group shall be ‘003`.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 April 1998.
For the Commission
Ritt BJERREGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 99, 11. 4. 1992, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 364, 31. 12. 1994, p. 21.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,Whereas Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 provides that the conditions for the award of the Community eco-label shall be defined by product group;Whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 states that the environmental performance of a product shall be assessed by reference to the specific criteria for product groups;Whereas, by Decision 94/923/EC (2), the Commission established ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers, which, according to Article 3 thereof, were valid until 14 November 1997;Whereas it is appropriate to adopt a new Decision establishing criteria for this product group, which will be valid for a further period of three years after the expiry of the period of validity of the previous criteria;Whereas it is appropriate to revise the criteria which were established by Decision 94/923/EC in order to reflect the developments in the market;Whereas products must be in compliance with national legislation which is in conformity with Community health, safety and environmental requirements without prejudice to regulatory requirements of Community or national law applicable to the various life stages of the product;Whereas in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 the Commission has consulted the principal interest groups within a consultation forum;Whereas the measures set out in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee set up pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘soil improvers` shall mean:
‘Materials sold as end user products for gardening to be added to the soil to improve at least its physical condition or its physical and biological condition without causing harmful effects.`
The environment performance of the product group as defined in Article 1 shall be assessed by reference to the specific ecological criteria set out in the Annex.
The product group definition and the specific ecological criteria for the product group shall be valid from 1 April 1998 until 31 March 2001.
For administrative purposes, the product group code number assigned by the Commission to this product group shall be ‘003`.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 April 1998.
For the Commission
Ritt BJERREGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 99, 11. 4. 1992, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 364, 31. 12. 1994, p. 21.
In order to qualify for an eco-label the soil improver as defined below shall comply with the criteria and requirements of this document, which are aimed at promoting:
– the use and/or re-use of organic matter derived from the collection and/or processing of waste materials and therefore contributing to a minimisation of solid waste,
– the reduction of environmental damage or risks from heavy metals and nutrients in products to be marketed and applied as soil improvers.
1. Product source
A soil improver will only be considered for the award of an eco-label if its organic matter content is provided by constituents derived from the processing and/or re-use of waste materials (as defined in Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and in Annex I to the said Directive).
Note: the term ‘organic` refers in the general sense to materials of, or formed from/by, living organisms.
Products must not contain sewage sludge.
Products which include materials of animal origin shall comply with the provisions set out by existing Community legislation.
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA
2. Soil degradation and water pollution
In the final product, the content of the following elements must be lower than the values shown below, measured in terms of dry weight:
Products must not contain bark which has been treated with lindane, cypermethrin or promecarb. If the product contains bark, traces of lindane (ã – HCH) in the bark must not exceed 0,1 mg/kg.
3. Nutrient loadings
The concentration of nitrogen in the product must not exceed 2 % total N (of dry matter).
When used at the recommended rates of application, products must not exceed maximum nutrient loadings of:
– 17 g/m2 total nitrogen,
– 6 g/m2 P2O5,
– 12 g/m2 K2O.
Note: Products will be exempt from this requirement if less than 10 % (w/w) of the nutrient content is available for plant growth during the first season of application. Such products (for example many mulches) are defined as those having a C:N ratio greater than 30:1.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
4. General labelling
The following information must be provided either on the packaging or by other means (e.g. leaflet) with the product:
– the name and address of the body responsible for marketing,
– a descriptor identifying the product by type, including the phrase ‘soil improver`,
– recommended conditions of storage and the recommended ‘use by` date, together with a manufacturing batch code,
– a description of the purpose for which the product is intended and any limitations to use. The suitability of the product for particular plant groups (e.g. calcifuges or calcicoles) should be stated,
– the major feedstocks (those over 10 % by volume) from which the product has been manufactured, distinguishing between municipal solid waste, wastes from agriculture or forestry, industrial and commercial wastes specifying the sector (e.g. food processing, paper, etc.),
– a statement on recommended methods of use and rate of application expressed as kilograms or litres of product per m2 of ground per annum; the application rate shall take into account the content and availability of nutrients in order not to exceed the maximum nutrient loadings per m2,
– a statement on the concentrations of N, P2O5 and K2O,
– a statement on the concentrations of organic matter,
– a table or list with the concentration limits for the heavy metals mentioned in this Annex,
– guidelines for safe handling and use.
5. Product performance
All products must be supplied in a solid form and contain not less than 25 % dry matter by weight and not less than 20 % organic matter (measured by loss of ignition). Products must not adversely affect plant emergence or subsequent growth.
6. Health and safety
Products must not exceed the maximum levels of primary pathogens set out in the table below:
7. Nuisance
No product shall give rise to persistent offensive odours after being applied to the soil.
No product shall contain any fragments of glass, wire, other metal or hard plastic which may constitute a hazard to human health.
No product shall introduce unacceptable numbers of weed seeds or the vegetative reproductive parts of aggressive weeds into the soil.
8. Test methods and analysis
Test methods and analysis for heavy metals are to be in accordance with the requirements of Directive 86/278/EEC. In the absence of internationally agreed test methods for physical and microbiological analysis as well as for other requirements in relation to soil improvers the test method is the responsibility of Member States.
CONSUMER INFORMATION
The product must bear the following information on the packaging:
This product qualifies for the EU eco-label, because:
it contributes to the reduction of soil and water pollution and minimises waste by promoting its use or re-use.

Pending: 31998D0483

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) thereof,Whereas the first subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 provides that the conditions for the award of the Community eco-label shall be defined by product groups;Whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 states that the environmental performance of a product shall be assessed by reference to the specific criteria for product groups;Whereas, by Decision 93/431/EEC (2), the Commission established ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to dishwashers, which, according to Article 3 thereof, expired on 30 June 1996;Whereas it is appropriate to adopt a new decision establishing ecological criteria for this product group, which will be valid for a further period of three years after the expiry of the period of validity of the previous criteria, in order to allow for the participation in the Community eco-label award scheme of manufacturers and importers of dishwashers;Whereas it is appropriate to revise the criteria which were established by Decision 93/431/EEC in order for the test methods and classification for energy consumption and cleaning and drying performance to be expressed in a manner consistent with Commission Directive 97/17/EC (3) implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC (4) with regard to energy labelling of household dishwashers and in order to adapt the energy and water consumption requirements to technological innovation and market developments;Whereas in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 the Commission has consulted the principal interest groups within a consultation forum;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘dishwashers` (hereinafter referred to as ‘the product group`) shall mean:
– electric mains-operated household dishwashers sold to the general public. Appliances that may also use other energy sources, such as batteries, or have no internal heat source are excluded.

Article 2
The environmental performance and the fitness for use of the product group shall be assessed by reference to the specific ecological criteria set out in the Annex.

Article 3
The definition of the product group and the specific ecological criteria for the product group shall be valid for a period of three years from the first day of the month following the adoption of the criteria.

Article 4
The code number assigned for administrative purposes to the product group shall be ‘002`.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 July 1998.
For the Commission
Ritt BJERREGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 99, 11. 4. 1992, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 198, 7. 8. 1993, p. 38.
(3) OJ L 118, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 297, 13. 10. 1992, p. 16.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) thereof,Whereas the first subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 provides that the conditions for the award of the Community eco-label shall be defined by product groups;Whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 states that the environmental performance of a product shall be assessed by reference to the specific criteria for product groups;Whereas, by Decision 93/431/EEC (2), the Commission established ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to dishwashers, which, according to Article 3 thereof, expired on 30 June 1996;Whereas it is appropriate to adopt a new decision establishing ecological criteria for this product group, which will be valid for a further period of three years after the expiry of the period of validity of the previous criteria, in order to allow for the participation in the Community eco-label award scheme of manufacturers and importers of dishwashers;Whereas it is appropriate to revise the criteria which were established by Decision 93/431/EEC in order for the test methods and classification for energy consumption and cleaning and drying performance to be expressed in a manner consistent with Commission Directive 97/17/EC (3) implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC (4) with regard to energy labelling of household dishwashers and in order to adapt the energy and water consumption requirements to technological innovation and market developments;Whereas in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 the Commission has consulted the principal interest groups within a consultation forum;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘dishwashers` (hereinafter referred to as ‘the product group`) shall mean:
– electric mains-operated household dishwashers sold to the general public. Appliances that may also use other energy sources, such as batteries, or have no internal heat source are excluded.
The environmental performance and the fitness for use of the product group shall be assessed by reference to the specific ecological criteria set out in the Annex.
The definition of the product group and the specific ecological criteria for the product group shall be valid for a period of three years from the first day of the month following the adoption of the criteria.
The code number assigned for administrative purposes to the product group shall be ‘002`.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 July 1998.
For the Commission
Ritt BJERREGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 99, 11. 4. 1992, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 198, 7. 8. 1993, p. 38.
(3) OJ L 118, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 297, 13. 10. 1992, p. 16.
In order to be awarded an eco-label the dishwasher shall comply with the criteria of this Annex, which are aimed at promoting:
– reduction of environmental damage or risks related to the use of energy (global warming, acidification, depletion of non-renewable resources) by reducing energy consumption,
– reduction of environmental damage related to the use of natural resources by reducing water consumption,
– reduction of water pollution by contributing to reduced detergent consumption.
Additionally, the criteria encourage the implementation of best practice and enhance the environmental awareness of consumers.
Furthermore, marking of plastic components encourages their recycling.
KEY CRITERIA
1. Energy saving
Dishwashers with 10 or more place settings must have an energy efficiency index lower than 0,76 as defined in Commission Directive 97/17/EC, Annex IV, using the same test method EN 50242 and programme cycle as chosen for Directive 97/17/EC.
The appliance will thus qualify for either energy efficiency class A or B as defined in Directive 97/17/EC, Annex IV.
Dishwashers with less than 10 place settings must have an energy efficiency index lower than 0,88 as defined in Directive 97/17/EC, Annex IV, using the same test method EN 50242 and programme cycle as chosen for Directive 97/17/EC.
The appliance will thus qualify for either energy efficiency class A, B or C as defined in Directive 97/17/EC, Annex IV.
2. Water saving
The water consumption of the dishwasher (expressed as W(measured)) shall be lower or equal to the threshold as defined by the equation below:
W(measured) ≤ 0,6 s + 11,2
W(measured) = the measured water consumption of the dishwasher in litres per cycle, expressed to the first decimal,
s = the applicable number of standard place settings of the dishwasher.
The water consumption shall be measured using the same test method EN 50242 and programme cycle as chosen for Directive 97/17/EC.
3. Prevention of excessive use of detergent
The appliance shall have clear volumetric markings on the detergent dispenser allowing the user to adjust the detergent quantity used according to the type and amount of load and its degree of soiling (see also criterion 5.1.g).
BEST PRACTICE CRITERIA
4. Appliance design
1. The appliance shall allow the user to select a programme for washing a standard load using detergents that work best at temperatures lower than 65 °C, i.e. 55 ° or 50 °C.
2. The appliance shall have clear markings identifying the appropriate settings for the programmes available (e.g. standard, low-temperature, half-load, lightly or heavily soiled load, etc.).
3. Where applicable, the appliance shall allow the salt dosing to be adjusted to the local water hardness, and shall have a salt refill indicator.
5. User instructions
The appliance shall be sold with an instruction manual which provides advice on the correct environmental use and, in particular:
1. Recommendations for optimal use of energy, water and additives (detergent, salt, etc.) in the operation of the appliance, including:
(a) Guidelines on the proper installation of the dishwasher and, if hot-fill is available on the machine, advice on the fuel best used for home water heating.
(b) Advice to adjust the salt dosing to the local water hardness, if applicable.
(c) Advice to use a full load whenever possible.
(d) Advice to avoid rinsing items before placing them in the dishwasher.
(e) Advice on the best use of the rinse and hold option, if available.
(f) Advice on the availability of detergents that work best at temperatures lower than 65 °C and have the potential to save energy.
(g) Advice on varying the detergent dose according to the type and amount of the load and its degree of soil (for example: a half load requires less detergent). Reference shall be made to the markings in the detergent dispenser.
(h) Information about the energy and water consumption of the dishwasher for the different programmes, allowing the consumer to identify an appropriate programme to make the least use of energy and water.
(i) Advice that the dishwasher should not be left in the ‘on`-position when it has completed its cycle, because of possible standby energy losses. The instruction manual shall state the time needed to complete the programmes available.
(j) Information about the cleaning and drying performance of the dishwasher, with reference to the energy-label classes.
(k) Advice on appropriate maintenance of the dishwasher, including the regular cleaning of filters and removal of deposits.
(l) Information that ignoring the issues mentioned above can lead to higher consumption of energy, water and/or detergent and thus can increase the running costs and lead to poor results.
2. Information about those parts and materials of the dishwasher which are reusable and/or recyclable.
3. Advice that when disposing of the dishwasher the consumer should enquire about and follow the applicable waste management route.
6. Recycling
Plastic parts weighing more than 50 g must have a permanent marking identifying the material, in conformity with ISO 1043.
Excluded from this criterion are extruded plastic materials.
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
7. Cleaning performance
The dishwasher must have a cleaning performance index of more than 0,88 as defined in Directive 97/17/EC, Annex IV, using the same test method EN 50242 and programme cycle as chosen for Directive 97/17/EC.
The dishwasher will thus qualify for either cleaning performance class A, B or C as defined in Directive 97/17/EC, Annex IV.
8. Drying performance

Pending: 31998D0467

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Decision No 888/98/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 30 March 1998 establishing a programme of Community action to improve the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme) (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,Whereas certain procedures should be established for the implementation of the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls referred to in Article 5 of the above decision;Whereas as many officials as possible should benefit from the programme;Whereas the planning and execution of these exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls must be organised so as to maximise the benefit and value-for-money for the Community;Whereas certain financial provisions should be adopted to ensure the sound financial management and control of the expenditure incurred by the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls, as provided for in Article 8 of the above decision;Whereas certain procedures should be established to guarantee the continuous evaluation provided for in Article 12 of the above decision;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 11 of Decision No 888/98/EC,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
This decision lays down certain implementing provisions in respect of European Parliament and Council Decision No 888/98/EC establishing a programme of Community action to improve the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme); these provisions relate to:
– the organisation of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls,
– the financial procedures for the payment and reimbursement of expenses in connection with exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls,
– the procedures for continuous evaluation of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls.

Article 2
Each Member State shall ensure that their representative to the Committee referred to in Article 11 of Decision No 888/98/EC (‘the Committee`) shall be responsible for the coordination of their Member State’s fulfilment of the provisions of this decision. Where a Member State is represented by two representatives they shall jointly be so responsible.
GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 3
1. The Member States shall ensure that their officials are regularly informed of the opportunities available under the Fiscalis programme.
2. The Member States shall ensure that all their officials chosen to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are able to communicate well in the languages used during these activities.
3. As a general rule, the Member States shall ensure that the Community does not bear the expenses related to more than:
– one exchange per official during the programme,
– one multilateral control per official in a given year,
– two seminars per official in a given year.
Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission in advance. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned.
4. The Member States shall choose officials from all appropriate parts of their administrations to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls.
5. The Member States shall ensure that their officials chosen to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are suitably qualified; fully prepared in advance; and attend and participate fully in the activities involved.
6. The Member States shall communicate each year to the Commission the number of officials in their administration they consider eligible to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls. Eligible officials shall be those defined by Article 2(c) of Decision No 888/98/EC.

Article 4
1. Each Member State shall communicate to the Commission any duties or tasks carried out by their own officials which their legal system does not permit to be entrusted to an official from another Member State in the course of an exchange or a multilateral control. The nature of the specific exclusion shall also be communicated to the Commission. The Commission shall collate this information and make it available to all Member States.
2. Each Member State shall ensure that officials from other Member States shall be entrusted with all appropriate duties and tasks to be carried out during the exchange or multilateral control that permit the fulfilment of the objectives of the exchange or multilateral control. Each Member State shall consider all duties and tasks carried out by their own officials holding a similar position as potentially appropriate for an official from another Member State to carry out, except those specifically excluded and communicated to the Commission in accordance with Article 4(1).

Article 5
1. The Community may only bear travel and subsistence expenses incurred by officials in the course of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls that take place other than in the Member State of the official. Travel and subsistence expenses incurred by officials in the course of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls that take place in their own Member State shall be borne by the Member State concerned.
2. As a general rule, exchanges and seminars shall be completed within the same calendar year as that in which the Community bears the related expenses. Journeys by officials to or from other Member States related to multilateral controls shall be completed within five months of the decision that the Community will bear part of the expenses of the particular control. Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission in advance. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned.

Article 6
Member States shall ensure that their choice of Member States to be visited by their officials (‘host Member States`) is geographically balanced. As a general rule, each Member State shall send at least three officials to each other Member State within the duration of the programme and shall ensure that the average of the duration of all the exchanges on which they send their officials in a given year shall not be less than two weeks. Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission before the end of August each year. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned.

Article 7
1. Each year, the Member States shall choose: the officials to participate in exchanges (‘exchange officials`); the objective and particular work activity of each proposed exchange; and potential host Member States. The number of exchanges so selected shall be determined in the light of total amount of travel and subsistence expenses established in accordance with Article 10(1) and (2). The exchanges chosen shall be those where the combination of exchange official, objective and work activity, and host Member State, are most likely to meet the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC.
2. The Member State of origin shall ensure that each exchange official completes an exchange proposal form, in accordance with the model established by the Commission, indicating the objectives of the exchange and the professional experience of the candidate. The Member State of origin shall ensure that the objectives and particular work activity of the exchange have been discussed and agreed with the superior manager of the exchange official.
3. For each selected candidate, the Member State of origin shall send the completed exchange proposal form to any appropriate host Member States that have been identified.
4. Within two weeks of receipt of the exchange proposal form, the host Member State shall, as a general rule, confirm to the origin Member State that the exchange will take place on the basis of the exchange proposal form. The name and contact details of an official who will organise the exchange (‘host official`) shall also be communicated to the Member State of origin. If the host Member State is unable to confirm the exchange within the two weeks, the Commission shall be notified by the host Member State.
5. Both Member States shall ensure that the exchange official and the host official reach agreement in advance of the exchange on the objectives and particular work activity of the exchange; the duties to be entrusted to the exchange official by the host administration; any linguistic or specific professional requirements; the date of the exchange and any other relevant details.
6. The host Member State shall take any other necessary steps to ensure that in its planning and execution of the exchange, the exchange official plays an effective part in the activities of the host administration.
7. The host Member State shall take any necessary steps to ensure that during the exchange, the civil liability of the exchange official in the performance of his duties shall be treated in the same way as that of officials of the host Member State. The Member State of origin and the host Member State shall take any steps they consider necessary to ensure that the exchange official is bound by the same rules of professional secrecy as officials of the host Member State during the exchange.

Article 8
1. No more than 15 seminars may be organised in any given year. Proposals for seminars may be made by the Member States or the Commission. The seminars chosen shall be those which are most likely to meet the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC.
2. Seminars may last between two and three working days, as appropriate.
3. The travel and subsistence expenses of two representatives from each Member State (but not including the host Member State) and no more than five outside experts may be borne by the Community for each seminar. The Commission and the host Member State may agree to permit more representatives from any or all of the Member States to attend the seminar, without their expenses being borne by the Community. In addition the travel and subsistence expenses for one day for one official from no more than five Member States other than the host Member State may also be borne by the Community for a preparatory meeting for each seminar. The Commission and the host Member State shall agree jointly on the need for such a meeting.
4. The Community shall bear other expenses relating to the organisation of seminars not covered by the travel and subsistence expenses of officials and agreed between the Commission and the host Member State in accordance with the following paragraph. The Commission shall reimburse directly these expenses. The financial control procedures set out in Annex I to this decision shall be respected.
5. The venue for each seminar and the supply of any equipment or facilities required shall be agreed between the Commission and the host Member State, taking into account: accessibility from other Member States; availability of appropriate facilities and value-for-money; and the rates in force for reimbursement of subsistence expenses for the host Member State.
6. Each seminar shall be jointly planned and executed by the Commission and the host Member State to ensure the greatest possible active participation and involvement of the participants.
MULTILATERAL CONTROLS

Article 9
1. As a general rule, the Community may only bear the travel and subsistence expenses entailed by a maximum of two return journeys to another Member State, per official, per multilateral control and a total of 10 days subsistence per official per multilateral control. Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission in advance. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned. The Community may only bear the travel and subsistence expenses in this way of two officials per Member State, per multilateral control.
2. The number of multilateral controls chosen, for which the travel and subsistence expenses shall be borne by the Community, shall be determined in the light of total amount of travel and subsistence expenses established in accordance with Article 10(1) and (2). The multilateral controls chosen shall be those which are most likely to meet the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC.
Each proposal for a multilateral control shall be evaluated on the basis of the following information supplied by the proposing Member State to the Commission and all other Member States:
– the industrial sector and approximate size of the taxable person or persons to be controlled,
– the justification for a multilateral control,
– the justification for the Community to bear some of the expenses, in relation to the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC,
– and any other relevant information.
In addition, the proposing Member State shall simultaneously inform all other Member States where the taxable person or persons involved have or may possibly have fiscal obligations, of the identity of the taxable person or persons to be controlled.
3. For each multilateral control for which it has been agreed that the Community will bear some of the expenses, the Member State which proposed the control shall be responsible for the planning and execution of the multilateral control, in consultation with the other participating Member States. In accordance with paragraph one, the multilateral controls may not, as a general rule, entail more than two journeys to another Member State for the officials involved.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL

Article 10
1. The total amount of travel and subsistence expenses incurred by the officials of each Member State in a given year that may be borne by the Community shall be determined by the Commission, taking into account:
– the annual budgetary appropriations authorised for the Fiscalis programme,
– the appropriations required for Fiscalis activities other than exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls,
– the appropriations required to reimburse the cost of participation of officials and outside experts at seminars,
– the number of officials in each Member State eligible to participate in the activities of the programme (in accordance with Article 3(6)),
– the number of Member States,
– any adjustments made in accordance with paragraph 2; and in the light of the reports referred to in paragraph 10,
– and the number of taxable persons in each Member State making intra-Community supplies.
2. The total amount of travel and subsistence expenses for exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls that may be borne by the Community for each Member State may be adjusted throughout the year. Such adjustments shall be justified in the light of the reports of actual and forecast expenditure referred to in paragraph 9.
3. If the total amount of expenses incurred in a given year by the officials of a Member State in the course of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls exceeds the total amount for that Member State determined according to paragraphs 1 and 2, the additional amount of expenses shall be borne by the Member State concerned, in accordance with Article 8(3)a of Decision No 888/98/EC.
4. The Member States shall ensure that their officials participating in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are appropriately insured against any moral, material or bodily harm they may incur in the course of the journey to or from, or stay in, the place where the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are carried out. In particular, an official using his own car shall remain liable for any accidents to his car or to third parties in accordance with the laws in force where any such accident occurs. No moral, material or bodily harm incurred by an official in the course of the journey to or from or stay in the place where the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are carried out may be the subject of a claim against the Community.
5. The Member States shall reimburse on behalf of the Community the travel and subsistence expenses incurred by officials in the course of exchanges, seminars or multilateral controls up to the total amount of travel and subsistence expense established in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2. The Member States shall ensure that only expenses incurred in accordance with the rules set down in Annex I to this Decision are reimbursed.
6. The Commission shall in turn reimburse the Member States the expenses they have reimbursed on behalf of the Community in accordance with paragraph 5. A maximum of 60 % of the total amount that the Community will bear for each Member State will be paid to each Member State at the beginning of the year. Further payments to the Member States may be made subsequently, as necessary. These subsequent payments may be withheld until the Commission considers that all the provisions of this decision, in particular paragraphs 9 and 10 and Title VI, have been fulfilled.
7. All funds paid to the Member States by the Commission shall be made in the currency of the Community budget for the given year. The Member States may reimburse the expenses in any appropriate Community currency, provided that only the official conversion rates established by the Commission are applied. The Member States shall bear any costs incurred in converting currency.
8. The Member States shall preserve for five years all necessary supporting documentation.
9. Each Member State shall send to the Commission before the end of August each year, a report of actual and forecast expenditure on travel and subsistence, in accordance with a Commission model.
10. Each Member State shall send to the Commission before 20 February each year, a report of actual expenditure on travel and subsistence in the preceding year, in accordance with a Commission model.
11. If, in exceptional circumstances, any of the funds paid to a Member State remain unspent they shall, with the prior agreement of the Commission, be considered as part of the payment of the amount of the following year. The first payment of the following year shall be reduced by the corresponding amount. The Commission may, alternatively, recover any unspent funds from the Member States.
REPORTS AND EVALUATION

Article 11
1. The Member States shall ensure that the evaluation forms set out in Annex II to this Decision are completed and countersigned and communicated to the Commission within the deadlines indicated:
– evaluation of the exchange by the exchange official (within two weeks of the completion of the exchange). This shall also be sent to the host Member State,
– evaluation of the exchange by the host official (within two weeks of the completion of the exchange). This shall also be sent to the origin Member State,
– evaluation of the exchange by the superior manager of the exchange official (within six months of the completion of the exchange),
– evaluation of the seminar by each participant (before departure from the seminar),
– evaluation of the seminar by each Member State (within six months of the completion of the seminar),
– evaluation of each multilateral control by the Member States involved (within two months of the completion of the control).
2. The Commission and the Member States, as appropriate, shall ensure that the following reports are completed. The Member States shall ensure that these reports are circulated throughout their administration, as appropriate.
– report of the exchange by the exchange official,
– report of the seminar by one participant per Member State,
– report of the seminar drawn up by the Commission and the host Member State. This report shall be sent to all Member States within three months of the completion of the seminar and shall be subsequently discussed by the Committee,
– report of each multilateral control by the host Member State. This report shall be sent to the Commission within eight months of the decision that the Community will bear some of the costs of the multilateral control. The Commission shall forward the report to all Member States and it shall subsequently be discussed by the Committee.

Article 12
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply from 1 January 1998.

Article 13
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 2 July 1998.
For the Commission
Mario MONTI
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 126, 28. 4. 1998, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Decision No 888/98/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 30 March 1998 establishing a programme of Community action to improve the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme) (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,Whereas certain procedures should be established for the implementation of the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls referred to in Article 5 of the above decision;Whereas as many officials as possible should benefit from the programme;Whereas the planning and execution of these exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls must be organised so as to maximise the benefit and value-for-money for the Community;Whereas certain financial provisions should be adopted to ensure the sound financial management and control of the expenditure incurred by the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls, as provided for in Article 8 of the above decision;Whereas certain procedures should be established to guarantee the continuous evaluation provided for in Article 12 of the above decision;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 11 of Decision No 888/98/EC,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
This decision lays down certain implementing provisions in respect of European Parliament and Council Decision No 888/98/EC establishing a programme of Community action to improve the functioning of the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme); these provisions relate to:
– the organisation of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls,
– the financial procedures for the payment and reimbursement of expenses in connection with exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls,
– the procedures for continuous evaluation of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls.
Each Member State shall ensure that their representative to the Committee referred to in Article 11 of Decision No 888/98/EC (‘the Committee`) shall be responsible for the coordination of their Member State’s fulfilment of the provisions of this decision. Where a Member State is represented by two representatives they shall jointly be so responsible.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The Member States shall ensure that their officials are regularly informed of the opportunities available under the Fiscalis programme.
2. The Member States shall ensure that all their officials chosen to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are able to communicate well in the languages used during these activities.
3. As a general rule, the Member States shall ensure that the Community does not bear the expenses related to more than:
– one exchange per official during the programme,
– one multilateral control per official in a given year,
– two seminars per official in a given year.
Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission in advance. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned.
4. The Member States shall choose officials from all appropriate parts of their administrations to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls.
5. The Member States shall ensure that their officials chosen to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are suitably qualified; fully prepared in advance; and attend and participate fully in the activities involved.
6. The Member States shall communicate each year to the Commission the number of officials in their administration they consider eligible to participate in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls. Eligible officials shall be those defined by Article 2(c) of Decision No 888/98/EC.
1. Each Member State shall communicate to the Commission any duties or tasks carried out by their own officials which their legal system does not permit to be entrusted to an official from another Member State in the course of an exchange or a multilateral control. The nature of the specific exclusion shall also be communicated to the Commission. The Commission shall collate this information and make it available to all Member States.
2. Each Member State shall ensure that officials from other Member States shall be entrusted with all appropriate duties and tasks to be carried out during the exchange or multilateral control that permit the fulfilment of the objectives of the exchange or multilateral control. Each Member State shall consider all duties and tasks carried out by their own officials holding a similar position as potentially appropriate for an official from another Member State to carry out, except those specifically excluded and communicated to the Commission in accordance with Article 4(1).
1. The Community may only bear travel and subsistence expenses incurred by officials in the course of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls that take place other than in the Member State of the official. Travel and subsistence expenses incurred by officials in the course of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls that take place in their own Member State shall be borne by the Member State concerned.
2. As a general rule, exchanges and seminars shall be completed within the same calendar year as that in which the Community bears the related expenses. Journeys by officials to or from other Member States related to multilateral controls shall be completed within five months of the decision that the Community will bear part of the expenses of the particular control. Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission in advance. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned.
Member States shall ensure that their choice of Member States to be visited by their officials (‘host Member States`) is geographically balanced. As a general rule, each Member State shall send at least three officials to each other Member State within the duration of the programme and shall ensure that the average of the duration of all the exchanges on which they send their officials in a given year shall not be less than two weeks. Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission before the end of August each year. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned.
1. Each year, the Member States shall choose: the officials to participate in exchanges (‘exchange officials`); the objective and particular work activity of each proposed exchange; and potential host Member States. The number of exchanges so selected shall be determined in the light of total amount of travel and subsistence expenses established in accordance with Article 10(1) and (2). The exchanges chosen shall be those where the combination of exchange official, objective and work activity, and host Member State, are most likely to meet the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC.
2. The Member State of origin shall ensure that each exchange official completes an exchange proposal form, in accordance with the model established by the Commission, indicating the objectives of the exchange and the professional experience of the candidate. The Member State of origin shall ensure that the objectives and particular work activity of the exchange have been discussed and agreed with the superior manager of the exchange official.
3. For each selected candidate, the Member State of origin shall send the completed exchange proposal form to any appropriate host Member States that have been identified.
4. Within two weeks of receipt of the exchange proposal form, the host Member State shall, as a general rule, confirm to the origin Member State that the exchange will take place on the basis of the exchange proposal form. The name and contact details of an official who will organise the exchange (‘host official`) shall also be communicated to the Member State of origin. If the host Member State is unable to confirm the exchange within the two weeks, the Commission shall be notified by the host Member State.
5. Both Member States shall ensure that the exchange official and the host official reach agreement in advance of the exchange on the objectives and particular work activity of the exchange; the duties to be entrusted to the exchange official by the host administration; any linguistic or specific professional requirements; the date of the exchange and any other relevant details.
6. The host Member State shall take any other necessary steps to ensure that in its planning and execution of the exchange, the exchange official plays an effective part in the activities of the host administration.
7. The host Member State shall take any necessary steps to ensure that during the exchange, the civil liability of the exchange official in the performance of his duties shall be treated in the same way as that of officials of the host Member State. The Member State of origin and the host Member State shall take any steps they consider necessary to ensure that the exchange official is bound by the same rules of professional secrecy as officials of the host Member State during the exchange.
1. No more than 15 seminars may be organised in any given year. Proposals for seminars may be made by the Member States or the Commission. The seminars chosen shall be those which are most likely to meet the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC.
2. Seminars may last between two and three working days, as appropriate.
3. The travel and subsistence expenses of two representatives from each Member State (but not including the host Member State) and no more than five outside experts may be borne by the Community for each seminar. The Commission and the host Member State may agree to permit more representatives from any or all of the Member States to attend the seminar, without their expenses being borne by the Community. In addition the travel and subsistence expenses for one day for one official from no more than five Member States other than the host Member State may also be borne by the Community for a preparatory meeting for each seminar. The Commission and the host Member State shall agree jointly on the need for such a meeting.
4. The Community shall bear other expenses relating to the organisation of seminars not covered by the travel and subsistence expenses of officials and agreed between the Commission and the host Member State in accordance with the following paragraph. The Commission shall reimburse directly these expenses. The financial control procedures set out in Annex I to this decision shall be respected.
5. The venue for each seminar and the supply of any equipment or facilities required shall be agreed between the Commission and the host Member State, taking into account: accessibility from other Member States; availability of appropriate facilities and value-for-money; and the rates in force for reimbursement of subsistence expenses for the host Member State.
6. Each seminar shall be jointly planned and executed by the Commission and the host Member State to ensure the greatest possible active participation and involvement of the participants.
MULTILATERAL CONTROLS
1. As a general rule, the Community may only bear the travel and subsistence expenses entailed by a maximum of two return journeys to another Member State, per official, per multilateral control and a total of 10 days subsistence per official per multilateral control. Exceptions to this general rule should be notified to the Commission in advance. In the absence of an opinion to the contrary from the Commission within 10 working days of the receipt of the notification, the Community shall bear the expenses related to the activity concerned. The Community may only bear the travel and subsistence expenses in this way of two officials per Member State, per multilateral control.
2. The number of multilateral controls chosen, for which the travel and subsistence expenses shall be borne by the Community, shall be determined in the light of total amount of travel and subsistence expenses established in accordance with Article 10(1) and (2). The multilateral controls chosen shall be those which are most likely to meet the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC.
Each proposal for a multilateral control shall be evaluated on the basis of the following information supplied by the proposing Member State to the Commission and all other Member States:
– the industrial sector and approximate size of the taxable person or persons to be controlled,
– the justification for a multilateral control,
– the justification for the Community to bear some of the expenses, in relation to the general objectives of the programme, as set down in Article 3 of Decision No 888/98/EC,
– and any other relevant information.
In addition, the proposing Member State shall simultaneously inform all other Member States where the taxable person or persons involved have or may possibly have fiscal obligations, of the identity of the taxable person or persons to be controlled.
3. For each multilateral control for which it has been agreed that the Community will bear some of the expenses, the Member State which proposed the control shall be responsible for the planning and execution of the multilateral control, in consultation with the other participating Member States. In accordance with paragraph one, the multilateral controls may not, as a general rule, entail more than two journeys to another Member State for the officials involved.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL
1. The total amount of travel and subsistence expenses incurred by the officials of each Member State in a given year that may be borne by the Community shall be determined by the Commission, taking into account:
– the annual budgetary appropriations authorised for the Fiscalis programme,
– the appropriations required for Fiscalis activities other than exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls,
– the appropriations required to reimburse the cost of participation of officials and outside experts at seminars,
– the number of officials in each Member State eligible to participate in the activities of the programme (in accordance with Article 3(6)),
– the number of Member States,
– any adjustments made in accordance with paragraph 2; and in the light of the reports referred to in paragraph 10,
– and the number of taxable persons in each Member State making intra-Community supplies.
2. The total amount of travel and subsistence expenses for exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls that may be borne by the Community for each Member State may be adjusted throughout the year. Such adjustments shall be justified in the light of the reports of actual and forecast expenditure referred to in paragraph 9.
3. If the total amount of expenses incurred in a given year by the officials of a Member State in the course of exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls exceeds the total amount for that Member State determined according to paragraphs 1 and 2, the additional amount of expenses shall be borne by the Member State concerned, in accordance with Article 8(3)a of Decision No 888/98/EC.
4. The Member States shall ensure that their officials participating in exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are appropriately insured against any moral, material or bodily harm they may incur in the course of the journey to or from, or stay in, the place where the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are carried out. In particular, an official using his own car shall remain liable for any accidents to his car or to third parties in accordance with the laws in force where any such accident occurs. No moral, material or bodily harm incurred by an official in the course of the journey to or from or stay in the place where the exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls are carried out may be the subject of a claim against the Community.
5. The Member States shall reimburse on behalf of the Community the travel and subsistence expenses incurred by officials in the course of exchanges, seminars or multilateral controls up to the total amount of travel and subsistence expense established in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2. The Member States shall ensure that only expenses incurred in accordance with the rules set down in Annex I to this Decision are reimbursed.
6. The Commission shall in turn reimburse the Member States the expenses they have reimbursed on behalf of the Community in accordance with paragraph 5. A maximum of 60 % of the total amount that the Community will bear for each Member State will be paid to each Member State at the beginning of the year. Further payments to the Member States may be made subsequently, as necessary. These subsequent payments may be withheld until the Commission considers that all the provisions of this decision, in particular paragraphs 9 and 10 and Title VI, have been fulfilled.
7. All funds paid to the Member States by the Commission shall be made in the currency of the Community budget for the given year. The Member States may reimburse the expenses in any appropriate Community currency, provided that only the official conversion rates established by the Commission are applied. The Member States shall bear any costs incurred in converting currency.
8. The Member States shall preserve for five years all necessary supporting documentation.
9. Each Member State shall send to the Commission before the end of August each year, a report of actual and forecast expenditure on travel and subsistence, in accordance with a Commission model.
10. Each Member State shall send to the Commission before 20 February each year, a report of actual expenditure on travel and subsistence in the preceding year, in accordance with a Commission model.
11. If, in exceptional circumstances, any of the funds paid to a Member State remain unspent they shall, with the prior agreement of the Commission, be considered as part of the payment of the amount of the following year. The first payment of the following year shall be reduced by the corresponding amount. The Commission may, alternatively, recover any unspent funds from the Member States.
REPORTS AND EVALUATION
1. The Member States shall ensure that the evaluation forms set out in Annex II to this Decision are completed and countersigned and communicated to the Commission within the deadlines indicated:
– evaluation of the exchange by the exchange official (within two weeks of the completion of the exchange). This shall also be sent to the host Member State,
– evaluation of the exchange by the host official (within two weeks of the completion of the exchange). This shall also be sent to the origin Member State,
– evaluation of the exchange by the superior manager of the exchange official (within six months of the completion of the exchange),
– evaluation of the seminar by each participant (before departure from the seminar),
– evaluation of the seminar by each Member State (within six months of the completion of the seminar),
– evaluation of each multilateral control by the Member States involved (within two months of the completion of the control).
2. The Commission and the Member States, as appropriate, shall ensure that the following reports are completed. The Member States shall ensure that these reports are circulated throughout their administration, as appropriate.
– report of the exchange by the exchange official,
– report of the seminar by one participant per Member State,
– report of the seminar drawn up by the Commission and the host Member State. This report shall be sent to all Member States within three months of the completion of the seminar and shall be subsequently discussed by the Committee,
– report of each multilateral control by the host Member State. This report shall be sent to the Commission within eight months of the decision that the Community will bear some of the costs of the multilateral control. The Commission shall forward the report to all Member States and it shall subsequently be discussed by the Committee.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply from 1 January 1998.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 2 July 1998.
For the Commission
Mario MONTI
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 126, 28. 4. 1998, p. 1.
RULES CONCERNING THE REIMBURSEMENT OF TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES (Article 10(5))
1. Arrangements common to exchanges, seminars and multilateral controls
(a) Travelling expenses to and from the host Member State
– Travel by train
Where the length of the outward and return journeys total less than 800 km, the trip shall be made by train and will be reimbursed on the basis of the price of a first-class railway ticket. Reservation expenses and the supplements for high-speed trains can also be reimbursed.
– Travel by air
Where the length of the outward and return journeys total more than 800 km the trip may be made by air. Air travel is in economy class and special rates must be used where they are available. Where the travel conditions allow, reduced tariffs must be used (PEX or others). In the latter case, an additional daily subsistence allowance may be granted for the minimum period necessary in order to satisfy the conditions for the application of this type of tariff. Where the stay is extended in this way, the total cost (air travel expenses and additional daily subsistence allowances) must be lower than the normal ticket prices. Additional daily subsistence allowances for an extended stay will not be granted when normal tariffs are used.
Journeys of under 800 km are permitted by air if the total cost (i.e. travel and daily allowance for time spent travelling) is cheaper than that of a journey by rail.
Travel by air is authorised for outward and return journeys of less than 800 km in the following cases:
– when the journey includes a sea-crossing,
– in cases of emergency or force majeure.
– Travel by private vehicle
Officials travelling by private vehicle can be reimbursed on the basis of the price of the first class rail fare or the most economic air fare whichever is the lowest. The first class rail fare of the normal train service (and not high speed services) shall be used; e.g. TGV, Thalys fares shall not be used for this calculation.
If two or more officials who are entitled to a reimbursement of their travelling expenses use the same vehicle, reimbursement is carried out only to the person having charge of the vehicle, at the rate of 150 %.
– Travel by boat
Additional expenses for a journey by boat are not reimbursable since they are included in the price of the first class rail fare.
The journey to and from the railway station or airport may be reimbursed on the basis of the cost of public transport. Where there is no public transport link, the reimbursement will be on the basis of the first-class rail-fare for an equivalent distance. Taxi fares are not reimbursed unless the flight or train leaves before 08.00 and/or arrives after 21.00 or in cases of emergency or force majeure.
Exchanges/seminars/multilateral controls combined with holidays
In general, participants will refrain from combining an exchange/seminar/multilateral control with holidays taken at the place of the exchange/seminar/multilateral control. However in certain circumstances, duly approved by the representative of the Member State to the Committee, an exception may be made and the following rules will be observed:
– if more than three working days are taken, the equivalent of half the cost of a return journey between the place of origin and the place of exchange/seminar, excluding any supplement, will be reimbursed,
– the travelling time normally needed to reach or return from the place of exchange/seminar is considered as a holiday (and counts towards the three working days) when the travelling takes place on a working day.
Where the conditions and dates of travel allow, the cheapest fare available will be taken into account for the purpose of determining the part of the expenses to be paid by the official on exchange or participating in a seminar.
(b) Living expenses
The official is entitled to a flat-rate daily subsistence allowance to cover in particular accommodation, breakfast, meals, local travelling and other expenditure. Taxi expenses at the place of destination are included in the daily subsistence allowance and cannot be reimbursed by the Commission.
The rates of the daily subsistence allowance are those applicable to missions of Commission officials (grades A 4-B) and shall be communicated by the Commission to the Member States annually.
The flat-rate daily subsistence allowance shall be broken down as follows:
– for each period of 24 hours: one day’s allowance,
– for a residual period of six hours or less: a quarter of the allowance for a whole day,
– for a residual period of 12 hours or less, but longer than six hours: half of the allowance for a whole day,
– for a residual period longer than 12 hours: a whole day’s subsistence allowance.
For the calculation of the daily subsistence allowance, the following rules apply:
– in the event of travel by rail, the duration of the stay is determined by the times of departure and of arrival of the train, plus 30 minutes before departure and after arrival,
– a journey by air is regarded as having begun two hours before take-off and finishing two hours after the landing of the aircraft,
– where the use of a personal vehicle means extending the duration of the mission, travelling time for an equivalent rail/air journey, whichever is the most economical, will be taken into account when calculating the daily subsistence allowance.
Exchanges/seminars/multilateral controls combined with holidays
If more than three working days are taken, the official stay for the purpose of calculating the daily subsistence allowance is reckoned as starting at the beginning of the exchange/seminar if the days are taken before the exchange/seminar, and as finishing at the close of the exchange/seminar if the days taken follow the official stay. Where a reduced-rate fare has been obtained, allowances will be calculated to take account of the minimum period necessary to satisfy the conditions for the application of this type of tariff.
Daily subsistence allowances are not paid in respect of travelling time normally needed to reach or return from the place of exchange/seminar/multilateral control.
2. Arrangements specific to exchanges
(a) Payment of the expenses for travelling to different places in the host Member state shall be agreed between the Member States concerned. The Commission will reimburse these expenses to the appropriate Member state.
(b) In cases where the duration of the exchange exceeds 28 days at the same place, the rate of the subsistence allowance is reduced by 25 %.
Reimbursement of seminar expenses other than travel and subsistence (Article 8(4))
1. Type of expenditure
Certain expenses directly connected with the organisation of seminars can be met by the Commission, these are in particular the hiring of the rooms, interpretation, the installation and hiring of the interpreters’ cubicles, certain ancillary expenses such as the hiring of equipment (overhead projector, etc.). This expenditure will be paid by the Commission after prior authorisation.
2. VAT exemption
The Commission is exempted from all duties and taxes, in particular from value-added tax, pursuant to the provisions of Articles 3 and 4 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities. The Commission will issue a certificate to support the exemption from VAT under Article 15(10) of Council Directive 77/388/EEC with the order for the hire of accommodation and equipment.
3. Testing the market
The Commission may decide, as appropriate, to carry out the necessary market test, purchase order and payment procedures for these expenses. In other cases, where the Commission and the host Member State agree that they shall jointly carry out these procedures, the following procedure shall be respected.
Transactions involving equipment hire and the supply of services shall be concluded only after an invitation to tender. Thus it is necessary, as far as possible and by all suitable means, to ensure that the traders eligible to make the supply have been subjected to competitive market conditions.
The host Member State is to carry out this market test as follows:
– the Member State shall make a rapid overview of the market (for the expenditure mentioned in paragraph 1) and is to send a form, in accordance with a model to be drawn up by the Commission together with a copy of the offers received (two offers per supply), by fax or by mail to the Commission,
FISCALIS EXCHANGE EVALUATION FORM 1
>START OF GRAPHIC>
This form should be completed by each official who went on an exchange. It should be completed immediately on return. It should be sent immediately to your national Fiscalis coordinator.
Part A: About you
1.What is your name?
2.What is your gender?
3.What is your age?
4.Which is your country?
5.What is your work area? (you may tick more than one)
6.What is your position in your administration?
Operational manager
Operational official
7.What is your work in your administration? (tick one only)
Audit/control
Fraud investigation
Policy/legislation
Recovery/collection
Central management
Administrative cooperation
Legal advice/litigation
Public/taxpayer relations
Other (please indicate)
8.Have you participated in an exchange, seminar or multilateral control supported by the European Community before?
Multilateral control
9.How do you rate your language skills? (indicate your mother tongue)
10.Describe the language training your administration has provided you in your career:
Insufficient
11.Do you initiate or answer requests for administrative cooperation to/from other Member States?
Occasionally
12.How do you rate the usefulness of the Community systems of communication and information exchange (VIES, SEED, Fiscal SCENT, etc.)?
Part B: About the exchange
13.What Member State did you visit?
14.When did your exchange take place?
//15.How many working (non-holiday) days did it cover?
16.What was the objective of your exchange? (tick as many as appropriate)
Gain general understanding of administration
Improve particular professional skills
Study particular administrative practice
Improve particular cooperation relationship
Improve particular working methods
Develop new forms of cooperation
Other (please describe)
17.What activities did you carry out? (tick as many as appropriate)
Attended internal training course/seminar
Assisted in desk-audit/investigation/recovery
Attended internal meetings
Carried out desk-audit/investigation/recovery
Meetings/visits with officials
Assisted in field-audit/investigation/recovery
Read internal documents

Pending: 31998D0404

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), as last amended by Decision 96/43/EC (2), and in particular Article 18 thereof,Whereas, in the course of a Commission inspection visit to Turkey, serious flaws have come to light in the procedures for exporting horses from Turkey to the Community;Whereas, given the usual movements to which equidae are subject, this situation presents a serious threat to equidae in the Member States;Whereas, therefore, it is necessary to prohibit both the readmission of registered horses after temporary export and the temporary admission of registered horses from Turkey;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Member States shall prohibit the temporary admission of registered horses from Turkey, their transit and the readmission of registered horses from Turkey after temporary export.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 June 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ L 162, 1. 7. 1996, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), as last amended by Decision 96/43/EC (2), and in particular Article 18 thereof,Whereas, in the course of a Commission inspection visit to Turkey, serious flaws have come to light in the procedures for exporting horses from Turkey to the Community;Whereas, given the usual movements to which equidae are subject, this situation presents a serious threat to equidae in the Member States;Whereas, therefore, it is necessary to prohibit both the readmission of registered horses after temporary export and the temporary admission of registered horses from Turkey;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Member States shall prohibit the temporary admission of registered horses from Turkey, their transit and the readmission of registered horses from Turkey after temporary export.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 June 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ L 162, 1. 7. 1996, p. 1.

Pending: 31998D0320

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 66/400/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of beet seed (1), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC (2), and in particular Article 13a thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (3), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC, and in particular Article 13a thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (4), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC, and in particular Article 13a thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 69/208/EEC of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (5), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC, and in particular Article 12a thereof,Whereas, pursuant to Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC, seed can be officially certified only where the conditions to be satisfied by the seed have been established in official seed testing on samples of seed drawn officially for the purpose of seed testing;Whereas it has been claimed that seed sampling and seed testing under official supervision may constitute improved alternatives to the procedures for official seed certification, without a significant decline in the quality of the seed;Whereas that claim cannot yet be confirmed at Community level on the basis of the information available;Whereas it is therefore appropriate to organise a temporary experiment under specified conditions with the aim of assessing whether that claim can be sustained at Community level and in particular whether there will be any significant decline in the quality of the seed compared with that achieved under the system of official seed sampling and seed testing;Whereas the conditions applying to that experiment should be specified in such a manner as to enable the maximum amount of information to be collected at Community level with a view to drawing appropriate conclusions for possible future adaptations of the Community provisions;Whereas, for the purpose of that experiment, Member States should be released from certain obligations laid down in the Directives concerned;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. A temporary experiment is hereby organised at Community level with the aim of assessing whether seed sampling for the purpose of seed testing and seed testing under official supervision may constitute improved alternatives to the procedures for official seed certification required within the meaning of Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC, without a significant decline in the quality of the seed.
Any Member State may participate in the experiment.
2. Member States which participate in the experiment are hereby released from the obligations laid down in the Directives referred to in paragraph 1 in respect of official seed sampling and official seed testing, subject to the conditions set out in Articles 2 and 3 respectively.

Article 2
1. Seed sampling shall be carried out by seed samplers who have been authorised for that purpose by the competent seed certification authority of the Member State concerned under the conditions set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.
2. Seed samplers shall have the necessary technical qualifications obtained in training courses organised under conditions applicable to official seed samplers and confirmed by official examinations.
They shall carry out seed sampling in accordance with current international methods.
3. Seed samplers shall be:
(a) independent natural persons,
(b) persons employed by natural or legal persons whose activities do not involve seed production, seed growing, seed processing or seed trade,
(c) persons employed by natural or legal persons whose activities involve seed production, seed growing, seed processing or seed trade.
In the case referred to in point (c), a seed sampler may carry out seed sampling only on seed lots produced on behalf of his employer, unless it has been otherwise agreed between his employer, the applicant for certification and the competent seed certification authority.
4. In respect of their responsibilities vis-à-vis the competent seed certification authority, seed samplers shall be assimilated to official seed samplers. Their performance of seed sampling shall be subject to proper supervision by the competent seed certification authority.
5. For the purposes of the supervision referred to in paragraph 4 a proportion of the seed lots entered for the official certification under the experiment shall be check-sampled by official seed samplers. That proportion shall in principle be as evenly spread as possibly over natural and legal persons entering seed for certification, but may also be orientated to eliminate specific doubt. That proportion shall be at least 5 %.
The Member States which participate in the experiment shall compare the seed samples drawn officially with those of the same seed lot drawn under official supervision.
6. The certification number required for the official labels prescribed under the Directives referred to in Article 1(1), or other appropriate alternatives, shall enable the Member States and the Commission to identify seed lots which have been sampled under official supervision.
7. Where a Member State participates in the experiment, an appropriate proportion of the samples supplied by that Member State for Community comparative trials shall represent samples drawn under the experiment. The details shall be determined in the respective technical protocols for the Community comparative trials.

Article 3
1. Seed testing shall be carried out by seed testing laboratories which have been authorised for that purpose by the competent seed certification authority of the Member State concerned under the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 5.
2. The laboratory shall have a seed analyst-in-charge who has direct responsibility for the technical operations of the laboratory and has the necessary qualifications for technical management of a seed testing laboratory.
Its seed analysts shall have the necessary technical qualifications obtained in training courses organised under conditions applicable to official seed analysts and confirmed by official examinations.
The laboratory shall be maintained in premises and with equipment officially considered by the competent seed certification authority to be satisfactory for the purpose of seed testing, within the scope of the authorisation.
It shall carry out seed testing in accordance with current international methods.
3. The laboratory shall be:
(a) an independent laboratory,
(b) a laboratory belonging to a seed company.
In the case referred to in point (b), the laboratory may carry out seed testing only on seed lots produced on behalf of the seed company to which it belongs, unless it has been otherwise agreed between the seed company to which it belongs, the applicant for certification and the competent seed certification authority.
4. In respect of their responsibilities vis-à-vis the competent seed certification authority, the seed analysts referred to in the first and second subparagraphs of paragraph 2 shall be assimilated to corresponding official analysts.
5. The laboratory’s performance of seed testing shall be subject to proper supervision by the competent seed certification authority.
6. For the purposes of the supervision referred to in paragraph 5 a proportion of the seed lots entered for the official certification under the experiment shall be checktested by official seed testing. That proportion shall in principle be as evenly spread as possible over natural and legal persons entering seed for certification but may also be oriented to eliminate specific doubts. That proportion shall be at least 7 % in the case of seeds of cereals and 10 % in the case of seeds of other species.
The Member States which participate in the experiment shall compare the seed samples tested officially with those of the same seed lot tested under official supervision.
7. The reference number of the lot required for the official labels prescribed under the Directives referred to in Article 1(1), or other appropriate alternatives, shall enable the Member States and the Commission to identify seed lots which have been tested under official supervision.
8. Where a Member State participates in the experiment, an appropriate proportion of the samples supplied by that Member State for Community comparative trials shall represent samples tested under the experiment. The details shall be determined in the respective technical protocols for the Community comparative trials.

Article 4
The experiment and the release referred to in Article 1 shall expire on 30 June 2002.

Article 5
1. Member States shall inform the Commission and the other Member States within three months of the date of notification of this Decision:
(a) whether they have decided to participate in the experiment,
(b) in the case of participation solely in respect of seed sampling or solely in respect of seed testing, the scope thereof,
(c) in the case of participation subject to restrictions to certain species, categories, regions or to other restrictions, the scope thereof.
If Member States decide to cease participating in the experiment, they shall inform the Commission and the other Member States within three months.
2. Member States shall report to the Commission before the end of each year the results of the checks carried out in accordance with Article 2(5) and Article 3(6).
3. In the light of the results referred to in paragraph 2 as well as the results from the comparative trials referred to in Article 2(7) and Article 3(8), the proportion of seed lots to be check-sampled by official seed samplers within the meaning of Article 2(5) or the proportion of seed lots to be check-tested by official seed testing within the meaning of Article 3(6) may be revised in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21 of Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC and 66/402/EEC and Article 20 of Directive 69/208/EEC.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 April 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2290/66.
(2) OJ L 304, 27. 11. 1996, p. 10.
(3) OJ 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2298/66.
(4) OJ 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2309/66.
(5) OJ L 169, 10. 7. 1969, p. 3.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 66/400/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of beet seed (1), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC (2), and in particular Article 13a thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (3), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC, and in particular Article 13a thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (4), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC, and in particular Article 13a thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 69/208/EEC of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (5), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC, and in particular Article 12a thereof,Whereas, pursuant to Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC, seed can be officially certified only where the conditions to be satisfied by the seed have been established in official seed testing on samples of seed drawn officially for the purpose of seed testing;Whereas it has been claimed that seed sampling and seed testing under official supervision may constitute improved alternatives to the procedures for official seed certification, without a significant decline in the quality of the seed;Whereas that claim cannot yet be confirmed at Community level on the basis of the information available;Whereas it is therefore appropriate to organise a temporary experiment under specified conditions with the aim of assessing whether that claim can be sustained at Community level and in particular whether there will be any significant decline in the quality of the seed compared with that achieved under the system of official seed sampling and seed testing;Whereas the conditions applying to that experiment should be specified in such a manner as to enable the maximum amount of information to be collected at Community level with a view to drawing appropriate conclusions for possible future adaptations of the Community provisions;Whereas, for the purpose of that experiment, Member States should be released from certain obligations laid down in the Directives concerned;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. A temporary experiment is hereby organised at Community level with the aim of assessing whether seed sampling for the purpose of seed testing and seed testing under official supervision may constitute improved alternatives to the procedures for official seed certification required within the meaning of Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC, without a significant decline in the quality of the seed.
Any Member State may participate in the experiment.
2. Member States which participate in the experiment are hereby released from the obligations laid down in the Directives referred to in paragraph 1 in respect of official seed sampling and official seed testing, subject to the conditions set out in Articles 2 and 3 respectively.
1. Seed sampling shall be carried out by seed samplers who have been authorised for that purpose by the competent seed certification authority of the Member State concerned under the conditions set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.
2. Seed samplers shall have the necessary technical qualifications obtained in training courses organised under conditions applicable to official seed samplers and confirmed by official examinations.
They shall carry out seed sampling in accordance with current international methods.
3. Seed samplers shall be:
(a) independent natural persons,
(b) persons employed by natural or legal persons whose activities do not involve seed production, seed growing, seed processing or seed trade,
(c) persons employed by natural or legal persons whose activities involve seed production, seed growing, seed processing or seed trade.
In the case referred to in point (c), a seed sampler may carry out seed sampling only on seed lots produced on behalf of his employer, unless it has been otherwise agreed between his employer, the applicant for certification and the competent seed certification authority.
4. In respect of their responsibilities vis-à-vis the competent seed certification authority, seed samplers shall be assimilated to official seed samplers. Their performance of seed sampling shall be subject to proper supervision by the competent seed certification authority.
5. For the purposes of the supervision referred to in paragraph 4 a proportion of the seed lots entered for the official certification under the experiment shall be check-sampled by official seed samplers. That proportion shall in principle be as evenly spread as possibly over natural and legal persons entering seed for certification, but may also be orientated to eliminate specific doubt. That proportion shall be at least 5 %.
The Member States which participate in the experiment shall compare the seed samples drawn officially with those of the same seed lot drawn under official supervision.
6. The certification number required for the official labels prescribed under the Directives referred to in Article 1(1), or other appropriate alternatives, shall enable the Member States and the Commission to identify seed lots which have been sampled under official supervision.
7. Where a Member State participates in the experiment, an appropriate proportion of the samples supplied by that Member State for Community comparative trials shall represent samples drawn under the experiment. The details shall be determined in the respective technical protocols for the Community comparative trials.
1. Seed testing shall be carried out by seed testing laboratories which have been authorised for that purpose by the competent seed certification authority of the Member State concerned under the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 5.
2. The laboratory shall have a seed analyst-in-charge who has direct responsibility for the technical operations of the laboratory and has the necessary qualifications for technical management of a seed testing laboratory.
Its seed analysts shall have the necessary technical qualifications obtained in training courses organised under conditions applicable to official seed analysts and confirmed by official examinations.
The laboratory shall be maintained in premises and with equipment officially considered by the competent seed certification authority to be satisfactory for the purpose of seed testing, within the scope of the authorisation.
It shall carry out seed testing in accordance with current international methods.
3. The laboratory shall be:
(a) an independent laboratory,
(b) a laboratory belonging to a seed company.
In the case referred to in point (b), the laboratory may carry out seed testing only on seed lots produced on behalf of the seed company to which it belongs, unless it has been otherwise agreed between the seed company to which it belongs, the applicant for certification and the competent seed certification authority.
4. In respect of their responsibilities vis-à-vis the competent seed certification authority, the seed analysts referred to in the first and second subparagraphs of paragraph 2 shall be assimilated to corresponding official analysts.
5. The laboratory’s performance of seed testing shall be subject to proper supervision by the competent seed certification authority.
6. For the purposes of the supervision referred to in paragraph 5 a proportion of the seed lots entered for the official certification under the experiment shall be checktested by official seed testing. That proportion shall in principle be as evenly spread as possible over natural and legal persons entering seed for certification but may also be oriented to eliminate specific doubts. That proportion shall be at least 7 % in the case of seeds of cereals and 10 % in the case of seeds of other species.
The Member States which participate in the experiment shall compare the seed samples tested officially with those of the same seed lot tested under official supervision.
7. The reference number of the lot required for the official labels prescribed under the Directives referred to in Article 1(1), or other appropriate alternatives, shall enable the Member States and the Commission to identify seed lots which have been tested under official supervision.
8. Where a Member State participates in the experiment, an appropriate proportion of the samples supplied by that Member State for Community comparative trials shall represent samples tested under the experiment. The details shall be determined in the respective technical protocols for the Community comparative trials.
The experiment and the release referred to in Article 1 shall expire on 30 June 2002.
1. Member States shall inform the Commission and the other Member States within three months of the date of notification of this Decision:
(a) whether they have decided to participate in the experiment,
(b) in the case of participation solely in respect of seed sampling or solely in respect of seed testing, the scope thereof,
(c) in the case of participation subject to restrictions to certain species, categories, regions or to other restrictions, the scope thereof.
If Member States decide to cease participating in the experiment, they shall inform the Commission and the other Member States within three months.
2. Member States shall report to the Commission before the end of each year the results of the checks carried out in accordance with Article 2(5) and Article 3(6).
3. In the light of the results referred to in paragraph 2 as well as the results from the comparative trials referred to in Article 2(7) and Article 3(8), the proportion of seed lots to be check-sampled by official seed samplers within the meaning of Article 2(5) or the proportion of seed lots to be check-tested by official seed testing within the meaning of Article 3(6) may be revised in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21 of Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC and 66/402/EEC and Article 20 of Directive 69/208/EEC.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 April 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2290/66.
(2) OJ L 304, 27. 11. 1996, p. 10.
(3) OJ 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2298/66.
(4) OJ 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2309/66.
(5) OJ L 169, 10. 7. 1969, p. 3.

Pending: 31998D0272

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC, and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,(1) Whereas new information has been published in the United Kingdom further supporting the hypothesis that exposure to the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agent is linked to the new variant of Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease (CJD) in humans; whereas on 16 September 1997 the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) of the United Kingdom concluded that recent research provided compelling new evidence that the agent which causes BSE is identical to the agent which causes the new variant of CJD in humans; whereas on 18 September 1997 the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) concluded that the BSE agent should now be classified as a human pathogen under Directive 90/425/EEC, the Member State of origin or dispatch is required to implement on its territory the appropriate measures to prevent all situations likely to constitute a serious hazard to animals or to human health;(2) Whereas, pursuant to Council Directive 82/894/EEC (4), as last amended by Commission Decision 98/12/EC (5), Member States have since 1990 been obliged to notify all cases of BSE to the Commission and to the other Member States;(3) Whereas pursuant to Council Directive 91/68/EEC (6), as last amended by Commission Decision 94/953/EC (7), since 1993 scrapie must be an officially notifiable disease in all Member States;(4) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee has stated on the basis of its risk assessment that several Member States including the United Kingdom have reported scrapie in native-born sheep, that the presence of scrapie cannot be excluded in any Member State where sheep are present and that only a thorough epidemiological investigation conducted to common standards will give the necessary information about the scrapie status of each country;(5) Whereas inspections were carried out in Member States in 1996 and 1997 to check the implementation of Community measures on BSE; whereas the results of those inspections have revealed certain deficiencies, in particular in surveillance and implementation of the prohibition on use of mammalian protein in ruminant feed;(6) Whereas in view of previous trade in certain products, in particular meat and bone meal and live animals, the possible presence of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) agents cannot be ruled out in any of the Member States, subject to further scientific evaluation;(7) Whereas the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties (OIE)) in its international animal health code on bovine spongiform encephalopathy of May 1997 has recommended minimum requirements for effective surveillance; whereas the OIE has adopted guidelines for continuous surveillance and monitoring of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in its Code of January 1997;(8) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee in its report on surveillance of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies of 11 June 1997 has laid down guidelines taking account of the recommendations of the OIE;(9) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with that opinion and represent a harmonised approach towards effective TSE surveillance in the Member States; whereas more detailed rules will be laid down in Council legislation based on Article 100a of the Treaty;(10) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision will be applied in conjunction with Commission Decision 97/534/EC of 30 July 1997 on the prohibition of the use of material presenting risks as regards transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (8), as last amended by Council Decision 98/248/EC (9);(11) Whereas investigation requirements for ante-mortem inspection in slaughterhouses of bovine animals were laid down in Commission Decision 94/474/EC (10), as last amended by Council Decision 98/256/EC (11); whereas those requirements are now set out in this Decision; whereas, therefore, the corresponding provisions of Decision 94/474/EEC should be deleted;(12) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Member States shall ensure that staff of the competent authority, of diagnostic laboratories and colleges of agriculture and veterinary medicine, official veterinarians, veterinary practitioners, slaughterhouse personnel and animal breeders, keepers and handler have the knowledge of the clinical signs, epidemiology and, as appropriate, laboratory findings relating to TSEs.

Article 2
1. Member States shall ensure that it is compulsory for the suspected presence of any TSE in any animal to be notified immediately to the competent veterinary authority.
2. BSE shall be suspected in bovine animals aged over 20 months displaying behavioural or neurological signs where the disease cannot be ruled out either on the basis of response treatment or following laboratory examination.
3. Scrapie shall be suspected in ovine and caprine animals aged over 12 months displaying behavioural or neurological signs where the disease cannot be ruled out either on the basis of response to treatment or following laboratory examination.

Article 3
1. Any animal which shows clinical signs giving rise to the suspicion of a TSE shall be placed under official movement restrictions pending the outcome of a clinical and epidemiological investigation by the competent authority.
2. Where the competent authority decides that the possibility of infection with a TSE cannot be ruled out, the animal shall be killed and its brain and such other tissues as the competent authority may determine shall be removed and sent to an approved laboratory for testing for the presence of TSE using the methods set out in Article 5. The carcase and remaining internal organs of the animal shall be retained under official supervision until a diagnosis has been made or until it has been destroyed in accordance with Article 4 of Decision 97/534/EC.

Article 4
1. In order to give early warning of the emergence or occurrence of BSE or scrapie, each Member State shall carry out an annual programme of monitoring in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex.
2. Member States shall inform the Commission and the Member States, within the Standing Veterinary Committee, of the results obtained from the monitoring programme and of the emergence of TSEs other than BSE or scrapie. The information shall be presented by way of an annual report, submitted to the Commission within three months after the end of each year. It shall at least cover the information referred to in the Annex.

Article 5
1. Sampling and laboratory testing for the presence of a TSE shall be carried out using the methods and protocols laid down in the Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines of the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties), May 1997 edition. The tests performed shall at least comprise histopathology examination of brain tissue. The competent authority may also require the use of other laboratory tests such as immunocytochemic and immunodiagnostic tests for the detection of scrapie associated fibrils (SAFs), where their use is considered appropriate.
2. The competent authority shall ensure coordination of diagnostic methods and protocols between the laboratories approved for testing for the presence of TSEs and verify the use of those diagnostic methods and protocols.

Article 6
Community inspections may be carried out, in particular where the annual report is not submitted in accordance with Article 4(2).

Article 8
This Decision shall apply from 1 May 1998.

Article 9
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 April 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13.
(2) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(3) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29.
(4) OJ L 378, 31. 12. 1982, p. 58.
(5) OJ L 4, 8. 1. 1998, p. 63.
(6) OJ L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 19.
(7) OJ L 371, 31. 12. 1994, p. 14.
(8) OJ L 216, 8. 8. 1997, p. 95.
(9) OJ L 102, 2. 4. 1998, p. 26.
(10) OJ L 194, 29. 7. 1994, p. 96.
(11) OJ L 113, 15. 4. 1998, p. 32.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC, and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,(1) Whereas new information has been published in the United Kingdom further supporting the hypothesis that exposure to the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agent is linked to the new variant of Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease (CJD) in humans; whereas on 16 September 1997 the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) of the United Kingdom concluded that recent research provided compelling new evidence that the agent which causes BSE is identical to the agent which causes the new variant of CJD in humans; whereas on 18 September 1997 the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) concluded that the BSE agent should now be classified as a human pathogen under Directive 90/425/EEC, the Member State of origin or dispatch is required to implement on its territory the appropriate measures to prevent all situations likely to constitute a serious hazard to animals or to human health;(2) Whereas, pursuant to Council Directive 82/894/EEC (4), as last amended by Commission Decision 98/12/EC (5), Member States have since 1990 been obliged to notify all cases of BSE to the Commission and to the other Member States;(3) Whereas pursuant to Council Directive 91/68/EEC (6), as last amended by Commission Decision 94/953/EC (7), since 1993 scrapie must be an officially notifiable disease in all Member States;(4) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee has stated on the basis of its risk assessment that several Member States including the United Kingdom have reported scrapie in native-born sheep, that the presence of scrapie cannot be excluded in any Member State where sheep are present and that only a thorough epidemiological investigation conducted to common standards will give the necessary information about the scrapie status of each country;(5) Whereas inspections were carried out in Member States in 1996 and 1997 to check the implementation of Community measures on BSE; whereas the results of those inspections have revealed certain deficiencies, in particular in surveillance and implementation of the prohibition on use of mammalian protein in ruminant feed;(6) Whereas in view of previous trade in certain products, in particular meat and bone meal and live animals, the possible presence of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) agents cannot be ruled out in any of the Member States, subject to further scientific evaluation;(7) Whereas the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties (OIE)) in its international animal health code on bovine spongiform encephalopathy of May 1997 has recommended minimum requirements for effective surveillance; whereas the OIE has adopted guidelines for continuous surveillance and monitoring of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in its Code of January 1997;(8) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee in its report on surveillance of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies of 11 June 1997 has laid down guidelines taking account of the recommendations of the OIE;(9) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with that opinion and represent a harmonised approach towards effective TSE surveillance in the Member States; whereas more detailed rules will be laid down in Council legislation based on Article 100a of the Treaty;(10) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision will be applied in conjunction with Commission Decision 97/534/EC of 30 July 1997 on the prohibition of the use of material presenting risks as regards transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (8), as last amended by Council Decision 98/248/EC (9);(11) Whereas investigation requirements for ante-mortem inspection in slaughterhouses of bovine animals were laid down in Commission Decision 94/474/EC (10), as last amended by Council Decision 98/256/EC (11); whereas those requirements are now set out in this Decision; whereas, therefore, the corresponding provisions of Decision 94/474/EEC should be deleted;(12) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Member States shall ensure that staff of the competent authority, of diagnostic laboratories and colleges of agriculture and veterinary medicine, official veterinarians, veterinary practitioners, slaughterhouse personnel and animal breeders, keepers and handler have the knowledge of the clinical signs, epidemiology and, as appropriate, laboratory findings relating to TSEs.
1. Member States shall ensure that it is compulsory for the suspected presence of any TSE in any animal to be notified immediately to the competent veterinary authority.
2. BSE shall be suspected in bovine animals aged over 20 months displaying behavioural or neurological signs where the disease cannot be ruled out either on the basis of response treatment or following laboratory examination.
3. Scrapie shall be suspected in ovine and caprine animals aged over 12 months displaying behavioural or neurological signs where the disease cannot be ruled out either on the basis of response to treatment or following laboratory examination.
1. Any animal which shows clinical signs giving rise to the suspicion of a TSE shall be placed under official movement restrictions pending the outcome of a clinical and epidemiological investigation by the competent authority.
2. Where the competent authority decides that the possibility of infection with a TSE cannot be ruled out, the animal shall be killed and its brain and such other tissues as the competent authority may determine shall be removed and sent to an approved laboratory for testing for the presence of TSE using the methods set out in Article 5. The carcase and remaining internal organs of the animal shall be retained under official supervision until a diagnosis has been made or until it has been destroyed in accordance with Article 4 of Decision 97/534/EC.
1. In order to give early warning of the emergence or occurrence of BSE or scrapie, each Member State shall carry out an annual programme of monitoring in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex.
2. Member States shall inform the Commission and the Member States, within the Standing Veterinary Committee, of the results obtained from the monitoring programme and of the emergence of TSEs other than BSE or scrapie. The information shall be presented by way of an annual report, submitted to the Commission within three months after the end of each year. It shall at least cover the information referred to in the Annex.
1. Sampling and laboratory testing for the presence of a TSE shall be carried out using the methods and protocols laid down in the Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines of the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties), May 1997 edition. The tests performed shall at least comprise histopathology examination of brain tissue. The competent authority may also require the use of other laboratory tests such as immunocytochemic and immunodiagnostic tests for the detection of scrapie associated fibrils (SAFs), where their use is considered appropriate.
2. The competent authority shall ensure coordination of diagnostic methods and protocols between the laboratories approved for testing for the presence of TSEs and verify the use of those diagnostic methods and protocols.
Community inspections may be carried out, in particular where the annual report is not submitted in accordance with Article 4(2).
This Decision shall apply from 1 May 1998.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 April 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13.
(2) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(3) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29.
(4) OJ L 378, 31. 12. 1982, p. 58.
(5) OJ L 4, 8. 1. 1998, p. 63.
(6) OJ L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 19.
(7) OJ L 371, 31. 12. 1994, p. 14.
(8) OJ L 216, 8. 8. 1997, p. 95.
(9) OJ L 102, 2. 4. 1998, p. 26.
(10) OJ L 194, 29. 7. 1994, p. 96.
(11) OJ L 113, 15. 4. 1998, p. 32.
A. MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A PROGRAMME FOR MONITORING BSE AND SCRAPIE
Selection of subpopulations
Selection must be by means of a risk assessment of subpopulations of native-born animals displaying clinical signs compatible with TSEs and, in a decreasing order of relevance, of higher-risk animals. Within each subpopulation and age group, selection must be random.
1. The following shall be the criteria for the selection of native-born animals displaying clinical signs compatible with TSEs:
– animals displaying behavioural or neurological signs lasting for at least 15 days and resistant to treatment,
– moribund animals without signs of infectious or traumatic illness,
– animals displaying other progressive disease conditions.
2. The following risks must be taken into account for the selection of higher risk animals:
– animals originating from countries with indigenous TSE,
– animals which have consumed potentially contaminated feedstuffs,
– animals born or derived from TSE infected dams, and/or sires.
Animal species and type of TSE
1. Bovine animals must be examined for the presence of BSE.
2. Ovine and caprine animals must be examined for the presence of scrapie.
Age of the targeted animals
The sample must target the oldest animals in the subpopulation. However, all targeted bovine animals must be over 20 months of age and all targeted ovine and caprine animals must be over 12 months of age. Targeted bovine animals displaying progressive disease conditions without showing neurological signs must be over 4 years of age.
Sample size
The minimum number of animals to be examined on an annual basis must comply with the sample sizes referred to in the table for animals in subpopulations of native-born animals displaying clinical signs compatible with TSEs. Animals in which infection with a TSE cannot be ruled out and as such have to be examined in accordance with Article 3 may be included within the minimum sample size. Samples from the subpopulations of higher-risk animals must be collected at the time when the animals are slaughtered or killed.
B. ANNUAL REPORT
The annual report must contain data on:
1. the total number of animals and age structure examined within the different groups of the respective populations of bovine, ovine and caprine animals categorised according to epidemiological criteria;
2. the overall mortality and mortality due to neurological diseases per animal species;
3. records of the competent authority on the number and types of animals or carcases placed under movement restrictions in accordance with Article 3;
4. the number and outcome of the clinical and epidemiological investigations carried out in accordance with Article 3; these records must be kept for seven years;
5. TSEs in animals other than bovine, ovine and caprine animals;
6. training with respect to knowledge referred to in Article 1.

Pending: 31998D0179

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) thereof,Whereas the procedures set up by the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for sampling and treatment of samples until they reach the laboratory responsible for analysis have a direct and immediate bearing on the presence of illegal substances in samples and the possibilities for detecting the residues of certain substances; whereas such procedures are therefore an important stage in the residue monitoring plan;Whereas in order to improve the effectiveness of the monitoring plans implemented each year by the Member States for the detection of certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products, and in order to ensure the comparability of the results obtained, detailed rules for sampling should be laid down and harmonised;Whereas samples must be taken in accordance with Annexes III and IV to the abovementioned Directive; whereas, in this respect, the targeting criteria for sampling must also be specified;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The detailed rules for official sampling, including the targeting criteria, are set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 February 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 125, 23. 5. 1996, p. 10.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) thereof,Whereas the procedures set up by the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for sampling and treatment of samples until they reach the laboratory responsible for analysis have a direct and immediate bearing on the presence of illegal substances in samples and the possibilities for detecting the residues of certain substances; whereas such procedures are therefore an important stage in the residue monitoring plan;Whereas in order to improve the effectiveness of the monitoring plans implemented each year by the Member States for the detection of certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products, and in order to ensure the comparability of the results obtained, detailed rules for sampling should be laid down and harmonised;Whereas samples must be taken in accordance with Annexes III and IV to the abovementioned Directive; whereas, in this respect, the targeting criteria for sampling must also be specified;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The detailed rules for official sampling, including the targeting criteria, are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 February 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 125, 23. 5. 1996, p. 10.
Rules for official sampling procedures and official sample treatment
1. Responsibilities
1.1. Inspector
Official inspectors shall be designated by the competent authority for taking, registering, preparing and organising the transport of the official control samples under appropriate condition.
1.2. Approved laboratories
The analysis of the samples shall be carried out exclusively by the laboratories approved for official residue control by the competent authority.
Participation in an internationally recognised external quality control assessment and accreditation scheme is required for authorised laboratories. The accreditations must be obtained before 1 January 2002.
These laboratories must prove their competence by regularly and successfully participating in adequate proficiency testing schemes recognised or organised by the national or community reference laboratories.
2. Sampling
2.1. Fundamental aspects
Whenever official samples are taken, sampling must be unforeseen, unexpected and effected at no fixed time and on no particular day of the week – the Member States must take all the precautions necessary to ensure that the element of surprise in the checks is constantly maintained.
Sampling shall be carried out in variable intervals spread over the whole year at the establishments mentioned in paragraph 1 of Annex III of Council Directive 96/23/EC (1). In this context it has to be considered that a number of substances is administered only in particular seasons.
Without prejudice of the regulations of the residue control plan, other available information shall be taken into consideration when choosing the samples, e.g. the use of presently unknown substances, diseases suddenly appearing in particular regions, indications of fraudulent activities etc.
2.2. Sampling strategy
The residue control plan is aimed at:
(a) detecting all illegal treatment, as defined in Article 2(b) of Directive 96/23/EC;
(b) controlling the compliance with the MRLs for residues of veterinary drugs fixed in Annex I and III of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 (2) and the maximum levels of pesticides fixed in in Annex II of Council Directive 86/363/EEC (3) or national regulations on environmental contaminants;
(c) surveying and revealing the reasons for residue in food of animal origin;
2.3. Collection of the samples
2.3.1. Definitions
2.3.1.1. Targeted sample
Targeted sample is a sample which is taken in accordance with the sampling strategy as defined in 2.2 above.
2.3.1.2. Suspect sample
Suspect sample is a sample which is taken:
– as a consequence of positive results of sample taken in accordance with the requirements of Article 5 of Directive 96/23/EC,
– as a consequence of Article 11,
– as the requirements of Article 24.
2.3.1.3. Random sample
A random sample is a sample which is taken under statistical consideration to provide representative data.
2.3.2. On farm targeted sampling
2.3.2.1. Criteria for the selection of targeted sample
Farms for on farm sampling can be chosen using local knowledge or any other relevant information such as type of fattening system, breed and sex of animal. The inspector then makes an assessment of all the stock on the farm to select those animals to be sampled. In making this assessment the following criteria should be applied inter alia:
– indication of use of pharmacological active substances,
– secondary sexual characteristics,
– behavioural changes,
– the same level of development in a group of animals of different breed/categories,
– animals with good conformation and little fat.
2.3.2.2. Type of targeted sample to be collected
For the detection of pharmacological active substances the corresponding suitable samples are taken according to the provisions in the residue control plan.
2.3.3. Targeted sampling at primary processing establishments
2.3.3.1. Criteria for the selection
In making their assessment on the animal carcases and/or the animal products to be sampled the inspector should apply the following criteria inter alia:
– sex, age, species, and farming system,
– information about the producer,
– indication of use of pharmacological active substances,
– common practice with regards to the administration of particular pharmacological active substances in the respective farm production system.
When taking the samples, efforts should be made to avoid multiple sampling from one producer.
2.3.3.2. Type of samples collected
For the detection of pharmacological active substances the corresponding suitable samples are taken according to the provisions in the residue control plan.
2.4. Sample quantity

Pending: 31998D0144

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 of 2 July 1987 on the protection of designations used in marketing of milk and milk products (1) as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 4(2)(b) thereof,Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 establishes the principle that the descriptions ‘milk` and ‘milk products` may not be used for milk products other than those described in Article 2 thereof; whereas, as an exception, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that Regulation, this principle is not applicable to the designation of products the exact nature of which is known because of traditional use and/or when the designations are clearly used to describe a characteristic quality of the product;Whereas Commission Decision 88/566/EEC of 28 October 1988 (2) lists the products which benefit from this exception;Whereas, following the accession to the European Union of Austria, Finland and Sweden, the new Member States submitted lists of the products which they deem to meet, within their own territories, the criteria for the abovementioned exception; whereas the Annex to Decision 88/566/EEC should be completed by including the names of the products from the new Member States, in the relevant languages, which can benefit from the exception;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Annex of Decision 88/566/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the products listed in point 1 of the Annex to this Decision are added to section II;
2. the new sections X and XI set out in point 2 of the Annex to this Decision are added.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 February 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 182, 3. 7. 1987, p. 36.
(2) OJ L 310, 16. 11. 1988, p. 32.
ANEXO – BILAG – ANHANG – ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ – ANNEX – ANNEXE – ALLEGATO – BIJLAGE – ANEXO – LIITE – BILAGA
1. ‘Butterhäuptel
Butterschnitzel
Faschiertes Butterschnitzel
Milchmargarine
Magarinestreichkäse`
Jordnötssmör
Maapähkinävoi
Voileipäkeksi
Voileipäkakku`

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 of 2 July 1987 on the protection of designations used in marketing of milk and milk products (1) as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 4(2)(b) thereof,Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 establishes the principle that the descriptions ‘milk` and ‘milk products` may not be used for milk products other than those described in Article 2 thereof; whereas, as an exception, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that Regulation, this principle is not applicable to the designation of products the exact nature of which is known because of traditional use and/or when the designations are clearly used to describe a characteristic quality of the product;Whereas Commission Decision 88/566/EEC of 28 October 1988 (2) lists the products which benefit from this exception;Whereas, following the accession to the European Union of Austria, Finland and Sweden, the new Member States submitted lists of the products which they deem to meet, within their own territories, the criteria for the abovementioned exception; whereas the Annex to Decision 88/566/EEC should be completed by including the names of the products from the new Member States, in the relevant languages, which can benefit from the exception;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Annex of Decision 88/566/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the products listed in point 1 of the Annex to this Decision are added to section II;
2. the new sections X and XI set out in point 2 of the Annex to this Decision are added.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 February 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 182, 3. 7. 1987, p. 36.
(2) OJ L 310, 16. 11. 1988, p. 32.
ANEXO – BILAG – ANHANG – ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ – ANNEX – ANNEXE – ALLEGATO – BIJLAGE – ANEXO – LIITE – BILAGA
1. ‘Butterhäuptel
Butterschnitzel
Faschiertes Butterschnitzel
Milchmargarine
Magarinestreichkäse`
Jordnötssmör
Maapähkinävoi
Voileipäkeksi
Voileipäkakku`

Pending: 31998D0131

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 of 21 December 1993 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 25/97 (2), and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof,Having regard to Council Decision 97/413/EC of 26 June 1997 concerning the objectives and detailed rules for restructuring the Community fisheries sector for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001 with a view to achieving a balance on a sustainable basis between resources and their exploitation (3) and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,Whereas Decision 97/413/EC was adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 of 20 December 1992 establishing a Community system for fisheries and aquaculture (4), as amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden;Whereas Sweden, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Member State`, on 27 June 1997, in accordance with Article 6(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, submitted to the Commission a fishing effort limitation programme for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, and has supplemented this programme by further information at later dates; whereas Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the Commission shall adopt the multiannual guidance programmes (MAGP) for the fishing fleets of individual Member States no later than 30 November 1997;Whereas Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that capacity reductions shall be ensured by the establishment in each Member State of a permanent regime to control the renewal of the fleet, which will determine, segment by segment, the ratio of entries/exits of vessels; whereas the programmes submitted by Member States either contain no information on this issue whatsoever or are unsatisfactory; whereas Member States should therefore communicate the necessary information to the Commission at a later stage;Whereas Article 7(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the starting point for the objectives fixed for the fishing fleets for 31 December 2001 shall be the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programme for 31 December 1996;Whereas the objectives fixed by the previous programme should be adjusted in cases where this is justified by new information supplied by the Member State concerned;Whereas, pursuant to Article 7(2) of Decision 97/413/EC, the particular situation of the fleet of each Member State concerned must be taken into account in fixing the objectives applicable to that fleet;Whereas Decision 97/413/EC, and in particular Article 9(1) thereof, requires the fixing of annual intermediate targets; whereas since a large part of the first year of the period covered by the programmes will have elapsed at the time of the adoption of the present Decision it is not appropriate to set an intermediate objective for 1997;Whereas, pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, the Commission shall adopt the detailed rules for the implementation of that Decision; whereas it is useful to clarify certain concepts;Whereas the starting point for calculating the intermediate and final fleet objectives under MAGP IV are the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programmes for 31 December 1996 (MAGP III); whereas the tonnage objectives set by MAGP III were expressed in gross registered tonnes (GRT), but the MAGP IV objectives must be expressed in units of gross tonnes (GT); whereas not all Member States have submitted GT values for all fishing vessels of the fleet concerned notwithstanding their obligation to measure or estimate the GT of all vessels in their fleet, and to transmit this information to the Commission;Whereas, in those circumstances, the Commission must, using a practical approach, estimate the missing GT values in order to provisionally determine that Member State’s MAGP IV intermediate and final objectives on the basis of those estimates;Whereas however the Commission cannot accept any claims by Member States that fishing effort and/or capacity has been reduced in as far as they relate to vessels for which the Member State concerned has not fulfilled its obligation to transmit at GT value or estimate to the Commission, since the exact amount of that reduction is not verifiable;Whereas, in the absence of the required GT tonnage values measured or estimated in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2930/86 of 22 September 1986 defining the characteristics of fishing vessels (5), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (6) and implemented by Commission Decision 95/84/EC (7), the Commission will be unable to verify the percentage changes in the fleet capacity or fishing effort represented by changes in the capacity or activity of individual vessels, or by vessel entries or exits to and from the fleet; whereas the Commission will therefore have to assess whether the fishing effort reductions applied to vessels for which the required GT values are available have been sufficient to be almost certain that a Member State has reached its MAGP IV objectives;Whereas, since the starting point for the MAGP IV objectives are the final MAGP III objectives, a Member State cannot be deemed to have reached either intermediate or final MAGP IV objectives until it has fulfilled its obligations under MAGP III, and in particular the obligation to reach at least 55 % of the MAGP III obligations by reductions in capacity,Whereas the segmentation of the fleet must take into account the segmentation adopted by the previous programme;Whereas in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/94 of 19 January 1994 concerning the Community register of fishing vessels (8), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/96 (9), each Member State must communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery;Whereas the calculation of the objectives of the programme is based on information supplied by the Member State; whereas it may be necessary to revise the objectives if this information is later found to have been inaccurate;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Sweden for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.Article 2The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.Article 31. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.Article 41. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.Article 5As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.Article 6In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.Article 7The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.Article 8This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.For the CommissionEmma BONINOMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.ANNEX MULTIANNUAL GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE FISHING FLEET OF SWEDEN FOR THE PERIOD 1997 TO 2001 I. TABLES OF OBJECTIVES The tables specifying the applicable reduction objectives can be found at the end of this Annex.II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 1. Identification of segments and fisheries Segments of the fleet are defined in accordance with

Article 1
The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Sweden for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.

Article 2
The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.
In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.

Article 3
1. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:
(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;
(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;
(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.
2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.
3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.

Article 4
1. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.
2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.
3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.

Article 5
As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.

Article 6
In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.

Article 7
The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.

Article 8
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.
It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.
Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.
For the Commission
Emma BONINO
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.
(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.
(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.
(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.
(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.
(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 of 21 December 1993 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 25/97 (2), and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof,Having regard to Council Decision 97/413/EC of 26 June 1997 concerning the objectives and detailed rules for restructuring the Community fisheries sector for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001 with a view to achieving a balance on a sustainable basis between resources and their exploitation (3) and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,Whereas Decision 97/413/EC was adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 of 20 December 1992 establishing a Community system for fisheries and aquaculture (4), as amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden;Whereas Sweden, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Member State`, on 27 June 1997, in accordance with Article 6(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, submitted to the Commission a fishing effort limitation programme for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, and has supplemented this programme by further information at later dates; whereas Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the Commission shall adopt the multiannual guidance programmes (MAGP) for the fishing fleets of individual Member States no later than 30 November 1997;Whereas Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that capacity reductions shall be ensured by the establishment in each Member State of a permanent regime to control the renewal of the fleet, which will determine, segment by segment, the ratio of entries/exits of vessels; whereas the programmes submitted by Member States either contain no information on this issue whatsoever or are unsatisfactory; whereas Member States should therefore communicate the necessary information to the Commission at a later stage;Whereas Article 7(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the starting point for the objectives fixed for the fishing fleets for 31 December 2001 shall be the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programme for 31 December 1996;Whereas the objectives fixed by the previous programme should be adjusted in cases where this is justified by new information supplied by the Member State concerned;Whereas, pursuant to Article 7(2) of Decision 97/413/EC, the particular situation of the fleet of each Member State concerned must be taken into account in fixing the objectives applicable to that fleet;Whereas Decision 97/413/EC, and in particular Article 9(1) thereof, requires the fixing of annual intermediate targets; whereas since a large part of the first year of the period covered by the programmes will have elapsed at the time of the adoption of the present Decision it is not appropriate to set an intermediate objective for 1997;Whereas, pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, the Commission shall adopt the detailed rules for the implementation of that Decision; whereas it is useful to clarify certain concepts;Whereas the starting point for calculating the intermediate and final fleet objectives under MAGP IV are the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programmes for 31 December 1996 (MAGP III); whereas the tonnage objectives set by MAGP III were expressed in gross registered tonnes (GRT), but the MAGP IV objectives must be expressed in units of gross tonnes (GT); whereas not all Member States have submitted GT values for all fishing vessels of the fleet concerned notwithstanding their obligation to measure or estimate the GT of all vessels in their fleet, and to transmit this information to the Commission;Whereas, in those circumstances, the Commission must, using a practical approach, estimate the missing GT values in order to provisionally determine that Member State’s MAGP IV intermediate and final objectives on the basis of those estimates;Whereas however the Commission cannot accept any claims by Member States that fishing effort and/or capacity has been reduced in as far as they relate to vessels for which the Member State concerned has not fulfilled its obligation to transmit at GT value or estimate to the Commission, since the exact amount of that reduction is not verifiable;Whereas, in the absence of the required GT tonnage values measured or estimated in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2930/86 of 22 September 1986 defining the characteristics of fishing vessels (5), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (6) and implemented by Commission Decision 95/84/EC (7), the Commission will be unable to verify the percentage changes in the fleet capacity or fishing effort represented by changes in the capacity or activity of individual vessels, or by vessel entries or exits to and from the fleet; whereas the Commission will therefore have to assess whether the fishing effort reductions applied to vessels for which the required GT values are available have been sufficient to be almost certain that a Member State has reached its MAGP IV objectives;Whereas, since the starting point for the MAGP IV objectives are the final MAGP III objectives, a Member State cannot be deemed to have reached either intermediate or final MAGP IV objectives until it has fulfilled its obligations under MAGP III, and in particular the obligation to reach at least 55 % of the MAGP III obligations by reductions in capacity,Whereas the segmentation of the fleet must take into account the segmentation adopted by the previous programme;Whereas in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/94 of 19 January 1994 concerning the Community register of fishing vessels (8), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/96 (9), each Member State must communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery;Whereas the calculation of the objectives of the programme is based on information supplied by the Member State; whereas it may be necessary to revise the objectives if this information is later found to have been inaccurate;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Sweden for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.Article 2The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.Article 31. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.Article 41. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.Article 5As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.Article 6In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.Article 7The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.Article 8This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.For the CommissionEmma BONINOMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.ANNEX MULTIANNUAL GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE FISHING FLEET OF SWEDEN FOR THE PERIOD 1997 TO 2001 I. TABLES OF OBJECTIVES The tables specifying the applicable reduction objectives can be found at the end of this Annex.II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 1. Identification of segments and fisheries Segments of the fleet are defined in accordance with
The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Sweden for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.
The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.
In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.
1. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:
(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;
(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;
(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.
2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.
3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.
1. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.
2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.
3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.
As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.
In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.
The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.
It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.
Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.
For the Commission
Emma BONINO
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.
(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.
(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.
(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.
(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.
(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.
MULTIANNUAL GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE FISHING FLEET OF SWEDEN FOR THE PERIOD 1997 TO 2001
I. TABLES OF OBJECTIVES
The tables specifying the applicable reduction objectives can be found at the end of this Annex.
II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
1. Identification of segments and fisheries
Segments of the fleet are defined in accordance with Article 1(4) and 4 of Decision 97/413/EC. One or more fisheries may be identified within segments using active gears.
Objectives fixed in terms of fishing effort by fishery are valid provided that the measures to limit fishing effort described in the programme submitted pursuant to Article 6 of Decision 97/413/EC, as approved by the Commission, are respected.
The objectives fixed must be attained for each of the segments and where applicable for each of the fisheries by the end of the programme.
Each segment of the fleet is allocated a code number by which the segment to which any vessel belongs is recorded in the fishing vessel register of the Community. All changes to the allocation of vessels to segments must be communicated according to the procedures of Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
2. Conversion of tonnage objectives from units of GRT to units of GT
The objectives of the MAGP III fixed for 31 December 1996 serve as the starting point for the calculation of the objectives of MAGP IV. The tonnage objectives for the MAGP III are converted from units of gross registered tonnes (GRT) to units of GT by the application of the following formula to each of the fleet segments or applicable subdivisions of the fleet segments of MAGP III:
Objective for 31 December 1996 (GT) = objective for 31 December 1996 (GRT) × >NUM>Situation at 31 December 1996 (GT)
>DEN>Situation at 31 December 1996 (GRT)
where the situation at 31 December 1996 in GRT incorporates, where necessary, calculations made in accordance with Commission Decision 97/259/EC (1).
3. Calculation of the objectives
The objectives are expressed in terms of tonnage in GT and power as defined in Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 in kW.
3.1. Objectives by segment
Where a segment comprising small coastal vessels has been identified in accordance with Article 3 of Decision 97/413/EC, the objectives fixed by the MAGP IV are to stabilise capacity at its level at 1 January 1997 or, at the choice of the Member State, to limit capacity to a level corresponding to the objectives of the MAGP III for this segment.
The capacity objectives for 31 December 2001 for all other segments are calculated by applying the appropriate reduction rate to the capacity objectives by segment for 31 December 1996 fixed by the MAGP III. If the vessels in one or more segments of the MAGP III are redistributed into one or more segments of the MAGP IV, the sum of the objectives for 31 December 1996 of the MAGP III segments concerned gives the sum of the objectives for 31 December 1996 of the new MAGP IV segments so created. The objectives of the MAGP IV segments for 31 December 1996 are calculated by partitioning this sum among the MAGP IV segments according to the size of those segments at 31 December 1996.
The reduction rate applied to each segment is calculated according to the method described in Annex II to Decision 97/413/EC, in which the pilot reduction rate for the segment is multiplied by the proportion of the catch in weight of the segment that is made up of critical stocks.
3.2. Objectives by fishery
Where distinct fisheries have been identified in one or more segments, and where the programme for the limitation of fishing effort in each of these fisheries submitted in accordance with Article 6 of Decision 97/413/EC has been approved by the Commission, distinct effort reduction rates are calculated for each of the fisheries. The method of calculation of the reduction rate in each fishery is identical to that for capacity reductions by segment.
The effort objectives by fishery are calculated by applying the appropriate reduction rate to the baseline level of effort for that fishery. The baseline levels of effort for the fisheries in a segment are calculated by partitioning the effort objective for the segment for 31 December 1996 among the fisheries. The effort objective for the segment is given by the product of the capacity objective of the segment for 31 December 1996 and mean activity of vessels in the segment over the reference period agreed with the Commission. The proportion of the effort objective for the segment allocated to each fishery is decided by the Member State subject to approval by the Commission, and is fixed for the duration of the programme.
Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of the present Decision, the intermediate objectives expressed in terms of fishing effort will be deemed to have been met if the cumulative fishing effort from the start of the programme to the date of the intermediate objective is equal to or less than the cumulative fishing effort that would have been exerted if all the annual intermediate objectives had been met exactly.
Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of the present Decision, the final objectives expressed in terms of fishing effort will be deemed to have been met if the cumulative fishing effort over the period of the programme is equal to or less than the cumulative fishing effort that would have been exerted if all the annual objectives had been met exactly.
3.3. Authorised adjustments to the objectives
Member States may at any time submit to the Commission a programme of safety improvements. In accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of Decision 97/413/EC the Commission will decide whether any capacity increase foreseen by such a programme justifies a corresponding increase in the objectives of the MAGP IV.
Where a Member State implements technical measures that result in a reduction in the by-catch of critical stocks, the Commission will, at the request of that Member State, determine whether these measures justify a revision of the weighted reduction rates applicable to the segments or fisheries concerned.
The Decisions of the Commission concerning the provisions of this paragraph will be taken according to the procedures of Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92.
3.4. Backlog from the previous programme
Where the objectives for 31 December 1996 have not been achieved, the backlog in a given segment can be made up by a mixture of capacity and activity reductions, provided that a programme for the reduction of effort is submitted to the Commission for approval in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 109/94 and provided that at least 55 % of the backlog for all segments combined is made up by capacity reductions. The reductions in activity resulting from such a programme have been taken into account in order to establish the baseline activity levels for MAGP IV.
4. Implementation and monitoring
The implementation of the measures to reduce fishing effort for certain segments of fleet require that evidence is given to the Commission by the Member State that the following are available for each of the segments concerned:
– data concerning activity levels before the entry into force of the measures,
– effective tools to manage time at sea, and an ability to manage fishing licence schemes,
– data making it possible to follow the effect of the measures implemented. These effects have to be controllable by the Commission, in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 (2) relating to control.
(1) OJ L 104, 22.4.1997, p. 28.
(2) OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1.

Pending: 31998D0130

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 of 21 December 1993 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 25/97 (2), and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof,Having regard to Council Decision 97/413/EC of 26 June 1997 concerning the objectives and detailed rules for restructuring the Community fisheries sector for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001 with a view to achieving a balance on a sustainable basis between resources and their exploitation (3) and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,Whereas Decision 97/413/EC was adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 of 20 December 1992 establishing a Community system for fisheries and aquaculture (4), as amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden;Whereas Finland, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Member State`, on 27 June 1997, in accordance with Article 6(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, submitted to the Commission a fishing effort limitation programme for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, and has supplemented this programme by further information at later dates; whereas Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the Commission shall adopt the multiannual guidance programmes (MAGP) for the fishing fleets of individual Member States no later than 30 November 1997;Whereas Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that capacity reductions shall be ensured by the establishment in each Member State of a permanent regime to control the renewal of the fleet, which will determine, segment by segment, the ratio of entries/exits of vessels; whereas the programmes submitted by Member States either contain no information on this issue whatsoever or are unsatisfactory; whereas Member States should therefore communicate the necessary information to the Commission at a later stage;Whereas Article 7(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the starting point for the objectives fixed for the fishing fleets for 31 December 2001 shall be the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programme for 31 December 1996;Whereas the objectives fixed by the previous programme should be adjusted in cases where this is justified by new information supplied by the Member State concerned;Whereas, pursuant to Article 7(2) of Decision 97/413/EC, the particular situation of the fleet of each Member State concerned must be taken into account in fixing the objectives applicable to that fleet;Whereas Decision 97/413/EC, and in particular Article 9(1) thereof, requires the fixing of annual intermediate targets; whereas since a large part of the first year of the period covered by the programmes will have elapsed at the time of the adoption of the present Decision it is not appropriate to set an intermediate objective for 1997;Whereas, pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, the Commission shall adopt the detailed rules for the implementation of that Decision; whereas it is useful to clarify certain concepts;Whereas the starting point for calculating the intermediate and final fleet objectives under MAGP IV are the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programmes for 31 December 1996 (MAGP III); whereas the tonnage objectives set by MAGP III were expressed in gross registered tonnes (GRT), but the MAGP IV objectives must be expressed in units of gross tonnes (GT); whereas not all Member States have submitted GT values for all fishing vessels of the fleet concerned notwithstanding their obligation to measure or estimate the GT of all vessels in their fleet, and to transmit this information to the Commission;Whereas, in those circumstances, the Commission must, using a practical approach, estimate the missing GT values in order to provisionally determine that Member State’s MAGP IV intermediate and final objectives on the basis of those estimates;Whereas however the Commission cannot accept any claims by Member States that fishing effort and/or capacity has been reduced in as far as they relate to vessels for which the Member State concerned has not fulfilled its obligation to transmit at GT value or estimate to the Commission, since the exact amount of that reduction is not verifiable;Whereas, in the absence of the required GT tonnage values measured or estimated in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2930/86 of 22 September 1986 defining the characteristics of fishing vessels (5), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (6) and implemented by Commission Decision 95/84/EC (7), the Commission will be unable to verify the percentage changes in the fleet capacity or fishing effort represented by changes in the capacity or activity of individual vessels, or by vessel entries or exits to and from the fleet; whereas the Commission will therefore have to assess whether the fishing effort reductions applied to vessels for which the required GT values are available have been sufficient to be almost certain that a Member State has reached its MAGP IV objectives;Whereas, since the starting point for the MAGP IV objectives are the final MAGP III objectives, a Member State cannot be deemed to have reached either intermediate or final MAGP IV objectives until it has fulfilled its obligations under MAGP III, and in particular the obligation to reach at least 55 % of the MAGP III obligations by reductions in capacity,Whereas the segmentation of the fleet must take into account the segmentation adopted by the previous programme;Whereas in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/94 of 19 January 1994 concerning the Community register of fishing vessels (8), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/96 (9), each Member State must communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery;Whereas the calculation of the objectives of the programme is based on information supplied by the Member State; whereas it may be necessary to revise the objectives if this information is later found to have been inaccurate;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Finland for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.Article 2The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.Article 31. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.Article 41. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.Article 5As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.Article 6In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.Article 7The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.Article 8This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.For the CommissionEmma BONINOMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.ANNEX MULTIANNUAL GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE FISHING FLEET OF FINLAND FOR THE PERIOD 1997 TO 2001 I. TABLES OF OBJECTIVES The tables specifying the applicable reduction objectives can be found at the end of this Annex.II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 1. Identification of segments and fisheries Segments of the fleet are defined in accordance with

Article 1
The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Finland for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.

Article 2
The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.
In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.

Article 3
1. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:
(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;
(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;
(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.
2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.
3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.

Article 4
1. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.
2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.
3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.

Article 5
As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.

Article 6
In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.

Article 7
The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.

Article 8
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.
It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.
Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.
For the Commission
Emma BONINO
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.
(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.
(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.
(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.
(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.
(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 of 21 December 1993 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 25/97 (2), and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof,Having regard to Council Decision 97/413/EC of 26 June 1997 concerning the objectives and detailed rules for restructuring the Community fisheries sector for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001 with a view to achieving a balance on a sustainable basis between resources and their exploitation (3) and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,Whereas Decision 97/413/EC was adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92 of 20 December 1992 establishing a Community system for fisheries and aquaculture (4), as amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden;Whereas Finland, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Member State`, on 27 June 1997, in accordance with Article 6(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, submitted to the Commission a fishing effort limitation programme for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, and has supplemented this programme by further information at later dates; whereas Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the Commission shall adopt the multiannual guidance programmes (MAGP) for the fishing fleets of individual Member States no later than 30 November 1997;Whereas Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that capacity reductions shall be ensured by the establishment in each Member State of a permanent regime to control the renewal of the fleet, which will determine, segment by segment, the ratio of entries/exits of vessels; whereas the programmes submitted by Member States either contain no information on this issue whatsoever or are unsatisfactory; whereas Member States should therefore communicate the necessary information to the Commission at a later stage;Whereas Article 7(1) of Decision 97/413/EC provides that the starting point for the objectives fixed for the fishing fleets for 31 December 2001 shall be the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programme for 31 December 1996;Whereas the objectives fixed by the previous programme should be adjusted in cases where this is justified by new information supplied by the Member State concerned;Whereas, pursuant to Article 7(2) of Decision 97/413/EC, the particular situation of the fleet of each Member State concerned must be taken into account in fixing the objectives applicable to that fleet;Whereas Decision 97/413/EC, and in particular Article 9(1) thereof, requires the fixing of annual intermediate targets; whereas since a large part of the first year of the period covered by the programmes will have elapsed at the time of the adoption of the present Decision it is not appropriate to set an intermediate objective for 1997;Whereas, pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 97/413/EC, the Commission shall adopt the detailed rules for the implementation of that Decision; whereas it is useful to clarify certain concepts;Whereas the starting point for calculating the intermediate and final fleet objectives under MAGP IV are the fleet objectives fixed by the previous programmes for 31 December 1996 (MAGP III); whereas the tonnage objectives set by MAGP III were expressed in gross registered tonnes (GRT), but the MAGP IV objectives must be expressed in units of gross tonnes (GT); whereas not all Member States have submitted GT values for all fishing vessels of the fleet concerned notwithstanding their obligation to measure or estimate the GT of all vessels in their fleet, and to transmit this information to the Commission;Whereas, in those circumstances, the Commission must, using a practical approach, estimate the missing GT values in order to provisionally determine that Member State’s MAGP IV intermediate and final objectives on the basis of those estimates;Whereas however the Commission cannot accept any claims by Member States that fishing effort and/or capacity has been reduced in as far as they relate to vessels for which the Member State concerned has not fulfilled its obligation to transmit at GT value or estimate to the Commission, since the exact amount of that reduction is not verifiable;Whereas, in the absence of the required GT tonnage values measured or estimated in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2930/86 of 22 September 1986 defining the characteristics of fishing vessels (5), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (6) and implemented by Commission Decision 95/84/EC (7), the Commission will be unable to verify the percentage changes in the fleet capacity or fishing effort represented by changes in the capacity or activity of individual vessels, or by vessel entries or exits to and from the fleet; whereas the Commission will therefore have to assess whether the fishing effort reductions applied to vessels for which the required GT values are available have been sufficient to be almost certain that a Member State has reached its MAGP IV objectives;Whereas, since the starting point for the MAGP IV objectives are the final MAGP III objectives, a Member State cannot be deemed to have reached either intermediate or final MAGP IV objectives until it has fulfilled its obligations under MAGP III, and in particular the obligation to reach at least 55 % of the MAGP III obligations by reductions in capacity,Whereas the segmentation of the fleet must take into account the segmentation adopted by the previous programme;Whereas in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/94 of 19 January 1994 concerning the Community register of fishing vessels (8), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/96 (9), each Member State must communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery;Whereas the calculation of the objectives of the programme is based on information supplied by the Member State; whereas it may be necessary to revise the objectives if this information is later found to have been inaccurate;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Finland for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.Article 2The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.Article 31. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.Article 41. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.Article 5As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.Article 6In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.Article 7The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.Article 8This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.For the CommissionEmma BONINOMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.ANNEX MULTIANNUAL GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE FISHING FLEET OF FINLAND FOR THE PERIOD 1997 TO 2001 I. TABLES OF OBJECTIVES The tables specifying the applicable reduction objectives can be found at the end of this Annex.II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 1. Identification of segments and fisheries Segments of the fleet are defined in accordance with
The multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of Finland for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2001, as forwarded on 27 June 1997 and subsequently supplemented, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision and the Annex thereto.
The Member State shall ensure that any reductions in capacity or fishing effort that are required to meet the final objectives of the programme are achieved progressively. To this end intermediate objectives are set such that at least one quarter of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1998, half of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 1999 and three-quarters of the reductions are achieved by 31 December 2000.
In order to ensure that the final and intermediate objectives of the programme will be met, the Member State shall communicate to the Commission for approval the regime of entries/exits of vessels referred to in Article 6(2) of Decision 97/413/EC.
1. The following units shall be used to measure whether the final and intermediate MAGP IV objectives have been met:
(i) the capacity of a vessel is measured both in terms of its tonnage expressed in gross tonnes (GT) and in terms of its power measured in kW according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2930/86;
(ii) the fishing activity of a vessel is measured in days at sea in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94;
(iii) in accordance with Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 109/94 the fishing effort of a vessel is measured both as tonnage effort, defined as the product of its activity and its tonnage expressed in GT, and as power effort, defined as the product of its activity and its power expressed in kW.
2. Active and passive gears correspond to the lists of towed and static gears respectively in Annex I, Table 2 to Regulation (EC) No 109/94, with the exception of purse seines which are considered to be active gears for the purposes of the present Decision.
3. Fleet segments and, if applicable, fisheries are defined as shown in the Annex and in accordance with point 1 of the additional provisions thereof.
1. Until such time as a Member State has fulfilled its obligations pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to submit a measured or duly estimated GT value of a vessel, for the purposes of MAGP IV, the GT of that vessel shall be estimated by the Commission as being equivalent to the tonnage of that vessel expressed in GRT.
2. Any fishing effort reduction, including capacity reductions, claimed by a Member State shall not be taken into account by the Commission unless the Member State has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 to furnish the Commission with the GT value or estimate of the vessel concerned.
3. If a Member State has not transmitted all the values or estimates of GT required pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 necessary in order to determine whether that Member State has reached an intermediate or final objective, the Commission will assess whether the information on tonnage that has been supplied to it is nevertheless sufficient to assume that the Member State concerned has reached that objective. If the Commission concludes that this is the case, it shall consider that the conditions for granting modernisation and construction aid laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 have been fulfilled.
As long as a Member State has not fulfilled its global final obligations under MAGP III, and notably the obligation to achieve at least 55 % of the reduction objectives under MAGP III by capacity reductions, it shall be deemed not to have fulfilled its global intermediate and/or final obligations under MAGP IV.
In order to monitor and control the implementation of the programme, the Member States shall communicate all changes to the situation of the fishing fleet and the evolution of fishing effort by fishery according to the procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
The annual communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the progress of the MAGP IV provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, shall be based on the information contained in the fishing vessel register of the Community and may incorporate additional information contained in the reports communicated by the Member States in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93.
The objectives of the programme are indicated in the Annex. These objectives may be revised by the Commission, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92, whenever information gathered in order to calculate the objectives, notably concerning the composition of the catches by segment or by fishery, the starting levels of effort and the GT values or estimates, is found to have been inaccurate.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.
It shall enter into force from 1 January 1997.
Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.
For the Commission
Emma BONINO
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7.
(3) OJ L 175, 3.7.1997, p. 27.
(4) OJ L 389, 31.12.1992, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 274, 25.9.1986, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 339, 29.12.1994, p. 11.
(7) OJ L 67, 25.3.1995, p. 33.
(8) OJ L 19, 22.1.1994, p. 5.
(9) OJ L 72, 21.3.1996, p. 12.
MULTIANNUAL GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE FISHING FLEET OF FINLAND FOR THE PERIOD 1997 TO 2001
I. TABLES OF OBJECTIVES
The tables specifying the applicable reduction objectives can be found at the end of this Annex.
II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
1. Identification of segments and fisheries
Segments of the fleet are defined in accordance with Article 1(4) and 4 of Decision 97/413/EC. One or more fisheries may be identified within segments using active gears.
Objectives fixed in terms of fishing effort by fishery are valid provided that the measures to limit fishing effort described in the programme submitted pursuant to Article 6 of Decision 97/413/EC, as approved by the Commission, are respected.
The objectives fixed must be attained for each of the segments and where applicable for each of the fisheries by the end of the programme.
Each segment of the fleet is allocated a code number by which the segment to which any vessel belongs is recorded in the fishing vessel register of the Community. All changes to the allocation of vessels to segments must be communicated according to the procedures of Regulation (EC) No 109/94.
2. Conversion of tonnage objectives from units of GRT to units of GT
The objectives of the MAGP III fixed for 31 December 1996 serve as the starting point for the calculation of the objectives of MAGP IV. The tonnage objectives for the MAGP III are converted from units of gross registered tonnes (GRT) to units of GT by the application of the following formula to each of the fleet segments or applicable subdivisions of the fleet segments of MAGP III:
Objective for 31 December 1996 (GT) = objective for 31 December 1996 (GRT) × >NUM>Situation at 31 December 1996 (GT)
>DEN>Situation at 31 December 1996 (GRT)
where the situation at 31 December 1996 in GRT incorporates, where necessary, calculations made in accordance with Commission Decision 97/259/EC (1).
3. Calculation of the objectives
The objectives are expressed in terms of tonnage in GT and power as defined in Regulation (EEC) No 2930/86 in kW.
3.1. Objectives by segment
Where a segment comprising small coastal vessels has been identified in accordance with Article 3 of Decision 97/413/EC, the objectives fixed by the MAGP IV are to stabilise capacity at its level at 1 January 1997 or, at the choice of the Member State, to limit capacity to a level corresponding to the objectives of the MAGP III for this segment.
The capacity objectives for 31 December 2001 for all other segments are calculated by applying the appropriate reduction rate to the capacity objectives by segment for 31 December 1996 fixed by the MAGP III. If the vessels in one or more segments of the MAGP III are redistributed into one or more segments of the MAGP IV, the sum of the objectives for 31 December 1996 of the MAGP III segments concerned gives the sum of the objectives for 31 December 1996 of the new MAGP IV segments so created. The objectives of the MAGP IV segments for 31 December 1996 are calculated by partitioning this sum among the MAGP IV segments according to the size of those segments at 31 December 1996.
The reduction rate applied to each segment is calculated according to the method described in Annex II to Decision 97/413/EC, in which the pilot reduction rate for the segment is multiplied by the proportion of the catch in weight of the segment that is made up of critical stocks.
3.2. Objectives by fishery
Where distinct fisheries have been identified in one or more segments, and where the programme for the limitation of fishing effort in each of these fisheries submitted in accordance with Article 6 of Decision 97/413/EC has been approved by the Commission, distinct effort reduction rates are calculated for each of the fisheries. The method of calculation of the reduction rate in each fishery is identical to that for capacity reductions by segment.
The effort objectives by fishery are calculated by applying the appropriate reduction rate to the baseline level of effort for that fishery. The baseline levels of effort for the fisheries in a segment are calculated by partitioning the effort objective for the segment for 31 December 1996 among the fisheries. The effort objective for the segment is given by the product of the capacity objective of the segment for 31 December 1996 and mean activity of vessels in the segment over the reference period agreed with the Commission. The proportion of the effort objective for the segment allocated to each fishery is decided by the Member State subject to approval by the Commission, and is fixed for the duration of the programme.
Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of the present Decision, the intermediate objectives expressed in terms of fishing effort will be deemed to have been met if the cumulative fishing effort from the start of the programme to the date of the intermediate objective is equal to or less than the cumulative fishing effort that would have been exerted if all the annual intermediate objectives had been met exactly.
Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of the present Decision, the final objectives expressed in terms of fishing effort will be deemed to have been met if the cumulative fishing effort over the period of the programme is equal to or less than the cumulative fishing effort that would have been exerted if all the annual objectives had been met exactly.
3.3. Authorised adjustments to the objectives
Member States may at any time submit to the Commission a programme of safety improvements. In accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of Decision 97/413/EC the Commission will decide whether any capacity increase foreseen by such a programme justifies a corresponding increase in the objectives of the MAGP IV.
Where a Member State implements technical measures that result in a reduction in the by-catch of critical stocks, the Commission will, at the request of that Member State, determine whether these measures justify a revision of the weighted reduction rates applicable to the segments or fisheries concerned.
The Decisions of the Commission concerning the provisions of this paragraph will be taken according to the procedures of Article 18 of Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92.
3.4. Backlog from the previous programme
Where the objectives for 31 December 1996 have not been achieved, the backlog in a given segment can be made up by a mixture of capacity and activity reductions, provided that a programme for the reduction of effort is submitted to the Commission for approval in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 109/94 and provided that at least 55 % of the backlog for all segments combined is made up by capacity reductions. The reductions in activity resulting from such a programme have been taken into account in order to establish the baseline activity levels for MAGP IV.
4. Implementation and monitoring
The implementation of the measures to reduce fishing effort for certain segments of fleet require that evidence is given to the Commission by the Member State that the following are available for each of the segments concerned:
– data concerning activity levels before the entry into force of the measures,
– effective tools to manage time at sea, and an ability to manage fishing licence schemes,
– data making it possible to follow the effect of the measures implemented. These effects have to be controllable by the Commission, in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 (2) relating to control.
(1) OJ L 104, 22.4.1997, p. 28.
(2) OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1.