Pending: 31999D0178

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) thereof,Whereas the first subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 provides that the conditions for the award of the Community eco-label shall be defined by product group;Whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 states that the environmental performance of a product shall be assessed by reference to the specific criteria for product groups;Whereas, in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92, the Commission has consulted the principal interest groups within a consultation forum;Whereas the measures set out in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee set up under Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘textile products` (hereinafter referred to as ‘the product group`) shall mean:
textile clothing: clothing consisting at least 90 % by weight of textile fibres,
interior textiles: textile products for indoor use, consisting at least 90 % by weight of textile fibres, and excluding floor coverings,
yarn and fabric, for use in textile clothing or interior textiles.

Article 2
The environmental performance and the fitness for use of the product group as defined in Article 1 shall be assessed by reference to the specific ecological and fitness-for-use criteria set out in the Annex.

Article 3
The product group definition and the criteria for the product group shall be valid for a period of three years from the first day of the month following the adoption of the criteria.

Article 4
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group shall be ‘016`.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 February 1999.
For the Commission
Ritt BJERREGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 99, 11. 4. 1992, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) thereof,Whereas the first subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 provides that the conditions for the award of the Community eco-label shall be defined by product group;Whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92 states that the environmental performance of a product shall be assessed by reference to the specific criteria for product groups;Whereas, in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92, the Commission has consulted the principal interest groups within a consultation forum;Whereas the measures set out in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee set up under Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 880/92,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘textile products` (hereinafter referred to as ‘the product group`) shall mean:
textile clothing: clothing consisting at least 90 % by weight of textile fibres,
interior textiles: textile products for indoor use, consisting at least 90 % by weight of textile fibres, and excluding floor coverings,
yarn and fabric, for use in textile clothing or interior textiles.
The environmental performance and the fitness for use of the product group as defined in Article 1 shall be assessed by reference to the specific ecological and fitness-for-use criteria set out in the Annex.
The product group definition and the criteria for the product group shall be valid for a period of three years from the first day of the month following the adoption of the criteria.
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group shall be ‘016`.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 February 1999.
For the Commission
Ritt BJERREGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 99, 11. 4. 1992, p. 1.
In order to qualify for an eco-label, the product as defined in Article 1 must comply with the criteria of this Annex, with tests carried out on application as indicated in the criteria. Where appropriate, other test methods may be used if their equivalence is accepted by the competent body assessing the application. Where no tests are mentioned, or are mentioned as being for use in verification or monitoring, competent bodies should rely as appropriate on declarations and documentation provided by the applicant and/or independent verifications.
The competent bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental management schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria in this Annex.
These criteria aim in particular at promoting the reduction of water pollution related to the key processes throughout the textile manufacturing chain, including fibre production, spinning, weaving, knitting, bleaching, dyeing and finishing.
Functional unit
The functional unit, to which inputs and outputs should be related, is:
1 kg of textile product at normal conditions (65 % RH ± 2 % and 20 °C ± 2 °C – these norm conditions are specified in ISO 139 Textiles – standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing).
A. ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA
The ecological criteria are divided into two main categories, concerning textile fibres (A1) and processes and chemicals (A2).
A1. TEXTILE FIBRES
Fibre-specific criteria are set in this section A1 for acrylic, cotton, elastane, flax and other bast fibres, greasy wool and other keratin fibres, man-made cellulose fibres, polyamide, polyester and polypropylene. Other fibres for which no fibre specific criteria are set are also allowed, with the exception of mineral fibres, glass fibres, metal fibres, carbon fibres and other inorganic fibres.
The applicant shall supply detailed information as to the composition of the textile product. The criteria set in this section A1 for a given fibre-type need not be met if that fibre contributes to less than 5 % of the total weight of the textile fibres in the product. Similarly they need not be met if the fibres are of recycled origin. In this context, recycled fibres are defined as fibres originating only from cuttings from textile and clothing manufacturers or from post-consumer waste (textile or otherwise). Neverthelss, at least 85 % by weight of all fibres in the product must be either in compliance with the corresponding fibre-specific criteria, if any, or of recycled origin.
(a) The residual acrylonitrile content in raw white fibres leaving the fibre production plant shall be less than 1,5 mg/kg.
Test-method: extraction with boiling water and quantification by capillary gas-liquid chromatography. Test report required on application.
(b) The emissions to air of acrylonitrile (during polymerisation and up to the solution ready for spinning), expressed as an annual average, shall be less than 1 g/kg of fibre produced.
Cotton fibres shall not contain more than 0,05 ppm (sensibility of the test method permitting) of each of the following substances: aldrin, captafol, chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorocyclohexane (total isomers), 2,4,5-T, chlordimeform, chlorobenzilate, dinoseb and its salts, and monocrotophos.
Test methods: as appropriate, US EPA 8081 A (organo-chlorine pesticides, with ultrasonic or Soxhlet extraction and apolar solvents (iso-octane or hexane)), 8151 A (chlorinated herbicides, using methanol), 8141 A (organophosphorus compounds), or 8270 C (semi-volatile organic compounds). Test report required on application.
This requirement does not apply where more than 50 % of the cotton content is organic, that is to say certified by an independent organisation to have been produced in conformity with the production and inspection requirements laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 (1).
This requirement does not apply if documentary evidence can be presented that establishes the identity of the farmers producing at least 75 % of the cotton used in the final product, together with a declaration from these farmers that the substances listed above have not been applied to the fields or cotton plants producing the cotton in question, or to the cotton itself.
Where more than 95 % of the cotton is organic, that is to say certified by an independent organisation to have been produced in conformity with the production and inspection requirements laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, the applicant may place the mention ‘organic cotton` next to the eco-label.
3. Elastane
(a) The content of zinc shall not exceed 1 000 ppm.
Test method: direct determination by atomic absorbtion spectrometry. Test report required on application
(b) The emissions to air of aromatic diisocyanates during polymerisation and spinning, expressed as an annual average, shall be less than 5 mg/kg of fibre produced.
4. Flax and other bast fibres (including hemp, jute, and ramie)
Flax and other bast fibres shall not be obtained by water retting, unless the wastewater from the water retting is treated so as to reduce the COD or TOC by at least 75 % for hemp fibres and by at least 95 % for linen and the other bast fibres.
Test method: ISO 6060 (COD). Test report required on application if water retting used.
5. Greasy wool and other keratin fibres (including wool from sheep, camel, alpaca, goat)
(a) The sum total content of the following substances shall not exceed 0,5 ppm: á-hexachlorocyclohexane, ß-hexachlorocyclohexane, lindane (ã-hexachlorocyclohexane), ä-hexachlorocyclohexane, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, p,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDD.
(b) The sum total content of the following substances shall not exceed 2 ppm: propetamphos, diazinon, dichlofenthion, fenchlorphos, chlorfenvinphos.
(c) The sum total content of the following substances shall not exceed 3 ppm: cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate.
These requirements (as detailed in (a), (b) and (c) and taken separately) do not apply if documentary evidence can be presented that establishes the identity of the farmers producing at least 75 % of the wool or keratin fibres in question, together with a declaration from these farmers that the substances listed above have not been applied to the fields or animals concerned.
Test method for (a), (b) and (c): serial non-polar/polar solvent extraction, clean up with gel permeation chromatography and determination with capillary gas-liquid chromatography with electron capture detection. Test report required on application.
(d) For scouring effluent discharged to sewer, the COD discharged to sewer shall not exceed 60 g/kg greasy wool, and the effluent shall be treated off-site so as to achieve at least a further 75 % reduction of COD content.
For scouring effluent treated on site and discharged to surface waters, the COD discharged to surface waters shall not exceed 5 g COD/kg greasy wool. The pH of the effluent discharged to surface waters shall be between 6 and 9 (unless the pH of the receiving waters is outside this range), and the temperature shall be below 40 °C (unless the temperature of the receiving water is above this value).
Test method for (d): ISO 6060. Test report and appropriate data required on application.
6. Man-made cellulose fibres (including viscose, lyocell, acetate, cupro, triacetate)
(a) The level of AOX in the fibres shall not exceed 250 ppm
Test method: ISO 11480.97 (controlled combustion and microcoulometry). Test report required on application.
(b) For viscose fibres, the sulphur content of the emissions of sulphur compounds to air from the processing during fibre production, expressed as an annual average, shall not exceed 160 g/kg filament fibre produced and 30 g/kg staple fibre produced. Where both types of fibre are produced on a given site, the overall emissions must not exceed the corresponding weighted average.
(c) For viscose fibres, the emission to water of zinc from the production site, expressed as an annual average, shall not exceed 1 g/kg.
(d) For cupro fibres, the copper content of the effluent water leaving the site, expressed as an annual average, shall not exceed 0,1 ppm.
7. Polyamide
The emissions to air of N2O during monomer production, expressed as an annual average, shall not exceed 1 g/kg fibre produced.
8. Polyester
(a) The amount of antimony in the polyester fibres shall not exceed 300 ppm.
Test method: direct determination by atomic absorbtion spectrometry. Test report required on application
(b) The emissions of VOCs during polymerisation of polyester, expressed as an annual average, shall not exceed 1,2 g/kg of produced polyester resin. (VOCs are any organic compound having at 293,15 K a vapour pressure of 0,01 kPa or more, or having a corresponding volatility under the particular conditions of use.)
9. Polypropylene
Lead based pigments shall not be used.
A2. PROCESSES AND CHEMICALS

Pending: 31999D0081

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – common system of value-added tax: uniform basis for assessment (1) and in particular Article 27 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion and avoidance;Whereas, by letter registered with the Commission on 23 January 1998, the Kingdom of Spain requested authorisation to introduce a measure derogating from Articles 2 and 28a(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas, in accordance with Article 27(3) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the other Member States were informed on 18 February 1998 of the request submitted by the Kingdom of Spain;Whereas the first purpose of the special measure is to exempt the supply and intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials consisting of paper, board or glass, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 50 million;Whereas the second purpose of the measure is to exempt the supply and intra-Community acquisition of used and waste material consisting of ferrous metals, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 200 million;Whereas the third purpose of the measure is to exempt the supply and intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals, irrespective of the turnover for sales of such goods;Whereas traders are not entitled to deduct VAT in respect of transactions exempted under these special measures;Whereas the taxable persons whose transactions are covered by the above exemptions may, subject to the conditions laid down by the Kingdom of Spain, be authorised not to apply that measure to their transactions;Whereas this measure both simplifies matters and helps to combat fraud since a category of taxable persons where checks and efforts at collection would be disproportionate to the revenue generated can be excluded from the VAT system;Whereas, consequently, the special measure satisfies the conditions laid down in Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme, together with a timetable, for the phased introduction of a common system of VAT for the single market;Whereas authorisation should be granted until 31 December 2000 so that an assessment can then be made of the compatibility of the measure with the overall approach adopted for the new common system of VAT;Whereas this derogation will have no impact on the European Communities’ own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Kingdom of Spain is hereby authorised from 1 January 1999 until 31 December 2000 to apply a special measure for the taxation of used and waste materials that contains provisions derogating from Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977.
The provisions in question are laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4 below.

Article 2
By way of derogation from Article 2(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the supply of used and waste materials consisting of paper, board or glass, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 50 million,
– the supply of used and waste materials consisting of ferrous metals, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 200 million,
– the supply of non-ferrous metals.

Article 3
By way of derogation from Article 28a(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials consisting of paper, board or glass, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 50 million,
– the intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials consisting of ferrous metals, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 200 million,
– the intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals.

Article 4
Taxable persons whose transactions come within the scope of the exemptions laid down in Articles 2 and 3 may be authorised not to subject such supplies and intra-Community acquisitions to the particular arrangements laid down in this Decision.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Done at Brussels, 18 January 1999.
For the Council
The President
O. LAFONTAINE
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – common system of value-added tax: uniform basis for assessment (1) and in particular Article 27 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion and avoidance;Whereas, by letter registered with the Commission on 23 January 1998, the Kingdom of Spain requested authorisation to introduce a measure derogating from Articles 2 and 28a(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas, in accordance with Article 27(3) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the other Member States were informed on 18 February 1998 of the request submitted by the Kingdom of Spain;Whereas the first purpose of the special measure is to exempt the supply and intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials consisting of paper, board or glass, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 50 million;Whereas the second purpose of the measure is to exempt the supply and intra-Community acquisition of used and waste material consisting of ferrous metals, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 200 million;Whereas the third purpose of the measure is to exempt the supply and intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals, irrespective of the turnover for sales of such goods;Whereas traders are not entitled to deduct VAT in respect of transactions exempted under these special measures;Whereas the taxable persons whose transactions are covered by the above exemptions may, subject to the conditions laid down by the Kingdom of Spain, be authorised not to apply that measure to their transactions;Whereas this measure both simplifies matters and helps to combat fraud since a category of taxable persons where checks and efforts at collection would be disproportionate to the revenue generated can be excluded from the VAT system;Whereas, consequently, the special measure satisfies the conditions laid down in Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme, together with a timetable, for the phased introduction of a common system of VAT for the single market;Whereas authorisation should be granted until 31 December 2000 so that an assessment can then be made of the compatibility of the measure with the overall approach adopted for the new common system of VAT;Whereas this derogation will have no impact on the European Communities’ own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Kingdom of Spain is hereby authorised from 1 January 1999 until 31 December 2000 to apply a special measure for the taxation of used and waste materials that contains provisions derogating from Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977.
The provisions in question are laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4 below.
By way of derogation from Article 2(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the supply of used and waste materials consisting of paper, board or glass, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 50 million,
– the supply of used and waste materials consisting of ferrous metals, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 200 million,
– the supply of non-ferrous metals.
By way of derogation from Article 28a(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials consisting of paper, board or glass, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 50 million,
– the intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials consisting of ferrous metals, in the case of taxable persons whose sales of such products in the previous year were worth not more than PTA 200 million,
– the intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals.
Taxable persons whose transactions come within the scope of the exemptions laid down in Articles 2 and 3 may be authorised not to subject such supplies and intra-Community acquisitions to the particular arrangements laid down in this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Done at Brussels, 18 January 1999.
For the Council
The President
O. LAFONTAINE
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).

Pending: 31999D0080

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – common system of value-added tax: uniform basis for assessment (1), and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion and avoidance;Whereas, by letter to the Commission registered on 19 March 1998, the Italian Republic requested authorisation to introduce a measure derogating from Articles 2 and 10 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas, in accordance with Article 27(3) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the other Member States were informed on 17 April 1998 of the request submitted by the Italian Republic;Whereas the first purpose of the special measure is to exempt, without granting the right to deduct input tax, supplies of scrap metal and other recyclable materials made either by firms which have a fixed establishment and generated a turnover excluding tax of not more than ITL 2 billion during the previous year or by firms which do not have a fixed establishment;Whereas the second purpose of the measure is to grant firms which have a fixed establishment and generated a turnover excluding tax of between ITL 150 million and ITL 2 billion during the previous year the right to opt for the normal taxation arrangements;Whereas the third purpose of the measure is to apply VAT suspension arrangements, with the right to deduct input tax, to supplies of non-ferrous scrap, irrespective of the turnover excluding tax of the firm making them;Whereas this measure is likely to prove an effective means of combating fraud which is becoming increasingly prevalent in this area;Whereas, consequently, the special measure satisfies the conditions laid down in Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme and a timetable of proposals providing for gradual, step-by-step progress towards a common VAT system for the single market;Whereas authorisation should be granted until 31 December 2000 so that an assessment can then be made of the compatibility of the measure with the overall approach adopted for the new common system of VAT;Whereas this derogation will have no impact on the European Communities’ own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Italian Republic is hereby authorised from 1 January 1999 until 31 December 2000 to apply a special measure for the taxation of used and waste materials that contains provisions derogating from Directive 77/388/EEC.
The provisions in question are laid down in Articles 2 and 3 below.

Article 2
By way of derogation from Article 2(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, and without prejudice to Article 3 of this Decision, supplies of used and waste materials consisting inter alia of paper, board, rags or glass shall be exempt from VAT where they are made by firms which either:
– have a fixed establishment and generated a turnover excluding tax of less than ITL 2 billion during the previous year, or
– do not have a fixed establishment.
The firms referred to in the first indent which generated a turnover excluding tax of more than ITL 150 million during the previous year may be allowed not to apply the special measure provided for in the preceding paragraph in respect of the supplies concerned.

Article 3
By way of derogation from Article 10(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, supplies of non-ferrous scrap, including scrap which has undergone rudimentary initial processing reducing it to the primary state with the aid of minimal, elementary technical facilities, shall be subject to VAT suspension arrangements.
These suspension arrangements shall also apply to supplies of used and waste materials other than non-ferrous metals made by taxable persons who deal in both non-ferrous scrap and other recyclable materials, provided that the transactions involving non-ferrous metals are not of an incidental nature.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Done at Brussels, 18 January 1999.
For the Council
The President
O. LAFONTAINE
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – common system of value-added tax: uniform basis for assessment (1), and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion and avoidance;Whereas, by letter to the Commission registered on 19 March 1998, the Italian Republic requested authorisation to introduce a measure derogating from Articles 2 and 10 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas, in accordance with Article 27(3) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the other Member States were informed on 17 April 1998 of the request submitted by the Italian Republic;Whereas the first purpose of the special measure is to exempt, without granting the right to deduct input tax, supplies of scrap metal and other recyclable materials made either by firms which have a fixed establishment and generated a turnover excluding tax of not more than ITL 2 billion during the previous year or by firms which do not have a fixed establishment;Whereas the second purpose of the measure is to grant firms which have a fixed establishment and generated a turnover excluding tax of between ITL 150 million and ITL 2 billion during the previous year the right to opt for the normal taxation arrangements;Whereas the third purpose of the measure is to apply VAT suspension arrangements, with the right to deduct input tax, to supplies of non-ferrous scrap, irrespective of the turnover excluding tax of the firm making them;Whereas this measure is likely to prove an effective means of combating fraud which is becoming increasingly prevalent in this area;Whereas, consequently, the special measure satisfies the conditions laid down in Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme and a timetable of proposals providing for gradual, step-by-step progress towards a common VAT system for the single market;Whereas authorisation should be granted until 31 December 2000 so that an assessment can then be made of the compatibility of the measure with the overall approach adopted for the new common system of VAT;Whereas this derogation will have no impact on the European Communities’ own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Italian Republic is hereby authorised from 1 January 1999 until 31 December 2000 to apply a special measure for the taxation of used and waste materials that contains provisions derogating from Directive 77/388/EEC.
The provisions in question are laid down in Articles 2 and 3 below.
By way of derogation from Article 2(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, and without prejudice to Article 3 of this Decision, supplies of used and waste materials consisting inter alia of paper, board, rags or glass shall be exempt from VAT where they are made by firms which either:
– have a fixed establishment and generated a turnover excluding tax of less than ITL 2 billion during the previous year, or
– do not have a fixed establishment.
The firms referred to in the first indent which generated a turnover excluding tax of more than ITL 150 million during the previous year may be allowed not to apply the special measure provided for in the preceding paragraph in respect of the supplies concerned.
By way of derogation from Article 10(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, supplies of non-ferrous scrap, including scrap which has undergone rudimentary initial processing reducing it to the primary state with the aid of minimal, elementary technical facilities, shall be subject to VAT suspension arrangements.
These suspension arrangements shall also apply to supplies of used and waste materials other than non-ferrous metals made by taxable persons who deal in both non-ferrous scrap and other recyclable materials, provided that the transactions involving non-ferrous metals are not of an incidental nature.
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Done at Brussels, 18 January 1999.
For the Council
The President
O. LAFONTAINE
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).

Pending: 31999D0071

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2), and in particular Articles 8(1) and 9(2) thereof,After consulting the Advisory Committee,Whereas:(1) By Regulation (EC) No 1742/98 (3) the Commission imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports in the Community of hardboard originating in Brazil, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Russia and provisionally accepted price undertakings offered by certain exporting producers in the countries concerned by the proceeding, with the exception of Russia.(2) Following the adoption of the provisional anti-dumping measures, in accordance with Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Basic Regulation`), the Commission continued the investigation of dumping, injury and Community interest. The definitive findings and conclusions of the investigation are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 194/1999 imposing definitive duties (4).(3) Based on the definitive findings of the investigation, it was concluded that the injury suffered by the Community industry was not caused by imports of hardboard originating in Brazil, that the proceeding should be terminated without the adoption of protective measures with regard to this country and that the undertakings provisionally accepted from the exporting producers in Brazil should lapse according to Article 8(6) of the Basic Regulation.(4) The investigation confirmed the provisional findings of injurious dumping relating to imports originating in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Russia.(5) The Commission considers that the price undertakings offered by the exporting producers and provisionally accepted in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1742/98 are an effective measure to remove the injury caused by the dumped imports, since their prices are such as to eliminate the injurious effect of the dumping, they only cover imports of a reduced number of product types and only up to a certain quantity threshold. Indeed, without these three conditions effective monitoring would not be practicable and companies would be encouraged to circumvent the undertaking by declaring as covered by the undertaking product types outside its scope.(6) In accordance with the provisions of the undertakings, the minimum prices contained therein have been amended in line with the definitive findings of the investigation.(7) Having been informed of the main facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to accept the undertakings, the Community industry did not raise any objections to the acceptance of the proposed undertakings.(8) In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking a definitive anti-dumping duty may be imposed, pursuant to Article 8(9) and (10) of the Basic Regulation,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. The undertakings offered by the producers mentioned below, in the framework of the anti-dumping proceedings concerning imports into the Community of hardboard originating in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are hereby accepted.
2. The investigations in connection with the anti-dumping proceedings referred to in paragraph 1 are hereby terminated with regard to the parties named in that paragraph.

Article 2
The proceeding in respect of imports of hardboard originating in Brazil is hereby terminated without adoption of protective measures.

Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Done at Brussels, 6 January 1999.
For the Commission
Leon BRITTAN
Vice-President
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 128, 30. 4. 1998, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 218, 6. 8. 1998, p. 16.
(4) See page 16 of this Official Journal.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2), and in particular Articles 8(1) and 9(2) thereof,After consulting the Advisory Committee,Whereas:(1) By Regulation (EC) No 1742/98 (3) the Commission imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports in the Community of hardboard originating in Brazil, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Russia and provisionally accepted price undertakings offered by certain exporting producers in the countries concerned by the proceeding, with the exception of Russia.(2) Following the adoption of the provisional anti-dumping measures, in accordance with Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Basic Regulation`), the Commission continued the investigation of dumping, injury and Community interest. The definitive findings and conclusions of the investigation are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 194/1999 imposing definitive duties (4).(3) Based on the definitive findings of the investigation, it was concluded that the injury suffered by the Community industry was not caused by imports of hardboard originating in Brazil, that the proceeding should be terminated without the adoption of protective measures with regard to this country and that the undertakings provisionally accepted from the exporting producers in Brazil should lapse according to Article 8(6) of the Basic Regulation.(4) The investigation confirmed the provisional findings of injurious dumping relating to imports originating in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Russia.(5) The Commission considers that the price undertakings offered by the exporting producers and provisionally accepted in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1742/98 are an effective measure to remove the injury caused by the dumped imports, since their prices are such as to eliminate the injurious effect of the dumping, they only cover imports of a reduced number of product types and only up to a certain quantity threshold. Indeed, without these three conditions effective monitoring would not be practicable and companies would be encouraged to circumvent the undertaking by declaring as covered by the undertaking product types outside its scope.(6) In accordance with the provisions of the undertakings, the minimum prices contained therein have been amended in line with the definitive findings of the investigation.(7) Having been informed of the main facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to accept the undertakings, the Community industry did not raise any objections to the acceptance of the proposed undertakings.(8) In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking a definitive anti-dumping duty may be imposed, pursuant to Article 8(9) and (10) of the Basic Regulation,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The undertakings offered by the producers mentioned below, in the framework of the anti-dumping proceedings concerning imports into the Community of hardboard originating in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are hereby accepted.
2. The investigations in connection with the anti-dumping proceedings referred to in paragraph 1 are hereby terminated with regard to the parties named in that paragraph.
The proceeding in respect of imports of hardboard originating in Brazil is hereby terminated without adoption of protective measures.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Done at Brussels, 6 January 1999.
For the Commission
Leon BRITTAN
Vice-President
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 128, 30. 4. 1998, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 218, 6. 8. 1998, p. 16.
(4) See page 16 of this Official Journal.

Pending: 31999D0066

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 7 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),(1) Whereas the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for research and training activities (1998-2002) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the fifth framework programme`) was adopted by Council Decision 1999/64/Euratom (4); whereas the detailed rules for financial participation by the Community, as set out in Annex III to that Decision, must be supplemented by other provisions relating to the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in research and technological activities, including demonstration activities, and training activities, hereinafter referred to as ‘indirect RTDT actions`;(2) Whereas the new provisions should be part of a complete, coherent and transparent framework;(3) Whereas the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities must be adapted to the nature of the indirect RTDT actions; whereas moreover, they may vary depending on whether the participant is based in a Member State, an Associated State or a third State and on its legal structure;(4) Whereas the participation of legal entities of third States should be envisaged, including on the basis of international agreements; whereas, however, the agreements concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 101 of the Treaty, must be implemented in accordance with the principle of reciprocity and the protection of intellectual and industrial property rights; whereas the Community’s legal entities must accordingly enjoy genuine access to the research programmes of the third State concerned;(5) Whereas the Joint Research Centre (JRC) takes part in indirect RTDT actions on the same basis as legal entities established in a Member State or in an Associated State;(6) Whereas the rules should be applied in a simple and efficient manner so as to minimise the administrative and financial burden on participants and the Commission, particularly with respect to the time taken to prepare proposals, conclude contract negotiations and make reimbursements;(7) Whereas the Community financial participation should be paid to the participants against justification of the eligible costs of the indirect RTDT action, although other more appropriate methods may be used;(8) Whereas research and technological activities, including demonstration activities, and training activities should be carried out in accordance with the principles of sound financial management;(9) Whereas, to the extent necessary for achieving its objectives, the research and training programme may set out in greater detail or supplement the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities;(10) Whereas the provisions relating to dissemination of knowledge are laid down in Articles 12 to 29 of the Treaty;(11) Whereas, in order to ensure coherence between the activities carried out under the fifth framework programme and those undertaken pursuant to Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 December 1998 concerning the fifth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002) (5), this Decision and Council Decision 1999/65/EC of 22 December 1998 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results for the implementation of the fifth framework programme (6), should be adopted simultaneously and for the same period,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1
Definitions
For the purposes of this Decision:
(a) ‘RTDT activities` means the research activities, including demonstration activities, and training activities described in Annex II to the fifth framework programme;
(b) ‘indirect RTDT actions` means one of the two ways of implementing RTDT activities, as described in Annex III to the fifth framework programme. Such actions are carried out by third parties under contracts concluded with the Community; the JRC may take part in such actions under the conditions laid down in Article 6;
(c) ‘Associated State` means a State which is party to an international agreement concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 101 of the Treaty, under which the State concerned makes a financial contribution to the fifth framework programme. The said agreement relates to cooperation in research and training;
(d) ‘third State` means a State which is neither a Member State nor an Associated State;
(e) ‘legal entity` means:
– any natural person, or
– any legal person, provided that it has been established under Community law or the applicable national law and has been given legal personality or has the capacity, in its own name, to hold rights and obligations of all kinds, to conclude contracts and to be a party to legal proceedings;
(f) ‘international organisation` means any association of States, other than the Community, established on the basis of a Treaty or similar act, having common institutions and an international legal personality distinct from that of its Member States;
(g) ‘potential user of RTD results` means any legal entity, any international organisation or the JRC which, by virtue of its needs and capabilities – whether scientific, technological, economic or social – has a specific contribution to make to the use or the ensuring of the use of the results of indirect RTDT actions.

Article 2
The rules laid down in this chapter shall apply, in conformity with Article 10 of the Treaty, to the participation of legal entities and international organisations and of the JRC in indirect RTDT actions.

Article 3
Number of participants in indirect RTDT actions
1. Indirect RTDT actions shall be carried out by:
(a) at least two mutually independent legal entities established in two different Member States or in a Member State and an Associated State; or
(b) at least one legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State and the JRC; or
(c) one or several legal entities established in a third State or international organisations, acting in cooperation with the minimum number of legal entities established in a Member State or Associated State and the JRC, as required in (a) or (b).
2. Exceptionally, where the nature of the indirect RTDT action or activity to be undertaken requires it to be carried out by a single participant, it must be carried out by:
(a) a legal entity established in a Member State, in an Associated State or in a third State; or
(b) an international organisation; or
(c) the JRC.

Article 4
Conditions for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States
1. Any legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State may take part in indirect RTD actions and receive funding from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
– it is carrying out or is about to carry out an RTDT activity, or
– it contributes to the dissemination and use of results of RTDT activities, or
– it is a potential user of RTDT results, or
– in the case of thematic networks and concerted actions, it is in a position to contribute substantial added value to the quality of work to be undertaken by virtue of its knowledge of the relevant area of research.
2. The conditions set out in paragraph 1 do not apply in case of accompanying measures, where the legal entity has the necessary technical know-how to carry out the indirect RTDT action in question.
3. Where the purpose of the indirect RTDT action concerned so permits, any legal entity referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 must carry out the major part of the work within the Member States or Associated States.

Article 5
Conditions for legal entities from third States and for international organisations
1. Without prejudice to the conditions set out in paragraph 2, any legal entity established in a third State and any international organisation may take part in indirect RTDT actions in conformity with the interests of the Community and without financing from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
(a) the number of participations in the proposal for an indirect RTDT action is in accordance with Article 3; and
(b) it meets the conditions laid down in Article 4(1) and (2) for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States.
This shall not apply to training fellowships as defined in Annex III to the fifth framework programme.
2. Where necessary to provide access to high-quality programmes in a third State and/or to ensure suitable intellectual property rights (IPR) arrangements, participation of legal entities established in that third State is subject to the conclusion of an international agreement between the Community and the third State concerned. Where such an agreement exists, participation is additionally subject to the principles, conditions and limits laid down therein.
3. Any legal entity established in the central and eastern European States or the new independent States which meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 may participate with financing from the fifth framework programme in the area of nuclear fission, provided that the financing is duly justified on the grounds that the participation makes an essential contribution to the objectives of the programme which cannot be provided by other means.
Community financing will be provided only for the activities specified in the research and training programme and under the conditions laid down therein.
4. Any international organisation may, exceptionally, receive financing from the fifth framework programme provided that:
(a) in the case of indirect RTDT actions other than accompanying measures,
– the financing is duly justified as being essential for achieving the objectives of the indirect RTD action in question, and
– where any basic facility is to be used which is located in a third State, it is essential for carrying out the proposed work;
(b) in the case of accompanying measures, it has the necessary technical skills and know-how, which are not readily accessible or are unavailable in the Member States or the Associated States.

Article 6
Conditions for the JRC
Subject to the internal budgetary and administrative measures necessary to enable the JRC to take part in indirect RTDT actions, the JRC shall be bound by the same conditions and have the same rights and obligations as the legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated State taking part in indirect RTDT actions.

Article 7
Conditions relating to resources
1. Any legal entity, international organisation and the JRC must:
– when filing its proposal for an indirect RTDT action, have at least the potential resources needed for carrying it out,
– when the contract is signed, demonstrate that it will have all the necessary resources as and when needed for carrying it out.
2. The resources needed for carrying out the indirect RTDT action shall comprise human resources, infrastructure, financial resources and, where appropriate, intangible property.

Article 8
Procedures to be applied
1. Indirect RTDT actions other than accompanying measures shall be the subject of calls for proposals. These may be preceded by a call for expressions of interest of an informative nature. All such calls shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities and should also be disseminated through other appropriate channels.
Indirect RTDT actions relating to controlled thermonuclear fusion and carried out under the contracts of the Association, the Net Agreement, the quadripartite cooperation agreement between the Community, Japan, the Russian Federation and the United States of America concerning the engineering design activities of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), The Joint European Torus (JET) Joint Undertaking and any other agreement concluded by the Community shall comply with the procedures laid down in those agreements.
2. Accompanying measures shall, as appropriate, be the subject of:
– calls for proposals, in accordance with procedures identical to those described in paragraph 1,
– public procurement procedures, where the indirect RTDT action consists of a purchase or a service, in accordance with the applicable provisions,
– invitations to apply for appointment as an independent expert where the measure concerned requires the Commission to take account in a balanced fashion of the various research players, without prejudice to other procedures designed to achieve the same result in the case of the independent highly qualified experts appointed for the five-year evaluation referred to in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme.
3. Indirect RTDT actions carried out as pilot schemes shall be governed by procedures appropriate to those actions as set out in the research and training programme decision.
4. Subject to legal constraints and the need to respect requirements of transparency and equal treatment, the Commission shall keep the procedures for the submission, selection and adoption of proposals as short as reasonably achievable and keep the administrative costs of the applicants and of the Commission to the minimum level necessary.

Article 9
Selection criteria and conditions applicable in accordance with the type of procedure
1. Proposals for indirect RTDT actions resulting from calls for proposals and pilot schemes shall be selected in conformity with Annex I to the fifth framework programme on the basis of the conditions for participation set out in Articles 3 to 7 and the following criteria:
(a) scientific excellence;
(b) Community added value;
(c) the potential contribution to furthering the economic and social objectives of the Community;
(d) the innovative nature of the proposal for an indirect RTDT action;
(e) the prospects for disseminating/exploiting the results, as described in the plan for dissemination and use attached to the proposal for an indirect RTDT action;
(f) effective transnational cooperation;
(g) effective and efficient management;
(h) any additional criteria set out in the research and training programme.
These criteria shall be applied in accordance with the category of indirect RTDT action and with the nature of the RTDT activity.
Any project which contravenes the principles laid down in relevant international conventions and regulations shall not be selected.
Proposals for accompanying measures which are subject to a public procurement procedure shall be evaluated on the basis of selection and award criteria defined in accordance with the relevant provisions.
2. Applicants responding to an invitation to apply shall be selected on the basis of the criteria set out in the relevant Commission Decision and of the relevant conditions for participation set out in Articles 3, 4 and 5.

Article 10
Community financial participation and eligible costs
1. In compliance with the provisions of Annex III to the fifth framework programme, the Community financial participation shall consist of the reimbursement, in part or in whole, of the eligible costs of the indirect RTDT action.
2. A cost relating to an indirect RTDT action shall be eligible where it is necessary for the action in question and is provided for in the contract. It shall be reimbursable by payment within a reasonable period provided that the amount has actually been spent and has been recorded in the accounts or the tax documents.
In the appropriate circumstances, provisions should be made for advance payments.
3. In the case of the research projects, demonstration projects and combined research/demonstration projects, recourse shall be had to additional eligible costs where, in the view of the Commission, the system of accounting used by the participant in an indirect RTDT action does not enable the full costs of carrying out the indirect RTDT action to be established with sufficient precision.
4. Total eligible costs will be reimbursed by payments against justification of the actual costs of the indirect RTDT action concerned. The documents substantiating these costs must be satisfactory. However, at the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTDT action, general expenses may instead be calculated on a flat-rate basis by agreement with the Commission.
At the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTDT action and by agreement with the Commission, the contract can establish other conditions:
(a) in the case of small-scale projects, fixed amounts determined on the basis of an assessment of the estimated costs of the work;
(b) in other cases, fixed amounts linked to the demonstration of best efforts to complete contractually agreed objectives;
(c) other arrangements involving flat- and composite-rate payments appropriate to specific projects.
5. Additional eligible costs, as referred to in Annex III to the fifth framework programme, shall comprise the following:
– the additional eligible costs generated simply by taking part in the indirect RTDT action,
– a flat-rate contribution to the general expenses.

Article 11
1. Proposals for indirect RTDT actions selected following any of the procedures set out in Article 8 shall be subject of a contract.
2. Contracts will be based on the relevant model contract drawn up by the Commission in consultation with Member States, taking account, where appropriate, of the different RTDT activities involved.

Article 12
Provisions which may be laid down in the research and training programme
1. The rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities may be set out in greater detail or supplemented in the Council Decision adopting the research and training programme implementing the fifth framework programme.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply in the case of the definitions set out in Article 1 or the training fellowships referred to in Article 5(1), second subparagraph, and Article 5(3), third subparagraph.

Article 13
Detailed rules of application
The Commission shall lay down the detailed rules for applying Articles 3, 7 and 10.

Article 14
1. The annual report which the Commission sends to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 5(4) of the fifth framework programme shall contain information on the implementation of this Decision.
2. Before the end of the fifth framework programme the Commission shall present a report to the Council on the application of this Decision.

Article 15
This Decision shall apply to indirect RTDT actions implementing the fifth framework programme.
Done at Brussels, 22 December 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ C 40, 7.2.1998, p. 14.
(2) OJ C 195, 22.6.1998, p. 27.
(3) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 51.
(4) See page 34 of this Official Journal.
(5) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
(6) See page 46 of this Official Journal.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 7 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),(1) Whereas the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for research and training activities (1998-2002) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the fifth framework programme`) was adopted by Council Decision 1999/64/Euratom (4); whereas the detailed rules for financial participation by the Community, as set out in Annex III to that Decision, must be supplemented by other provisions relating to the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in research and technological activities, including demonstration activities, and training activities, hereinafter referred to as ‘indirect RTDT actions`;(2) Whereas the new provisions should be part of a complete, coherent and transparent framework;(3) Whereas the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities must be adapted to the nature of the indirect RTDT actions; whereas moreover, they may vary depending on whether the participant is based in a Member State, an Associated State or a third State and on its legal structure;(4) Whereas the participation of legal entities of third States should be envisaged, including on the basis of international agreements; whereas, however, the agreements concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 101 of the Treaty, must be implemented in accordance with the principle of reciprocity and the protection of intellectual and industrial property rights; whereas the Community’s legal entities must accordingly enjoy genuine access to the research programmes of the third State concerned;(5) Whereas the Joint Research Centre (JRC) takes part in indirect RTDT actions on the same basis as legal entities established in a Member State or in an Associated State;(6) Whereas the rules should be applied in a simple and efficient manner so as to minimise the administrative and financial burden on participants and the Commission, particularly with respect to the time taken to prepare proposals, conclude contract negotiations and make reimbursements;(7) Whereas the Community financial participation should be paid to the participants against justification of the eligible costs of the indirect RTDT action, although other more appropriate methods may be used;(8) Whereas research and technological activities, including demonstration activities, and training activities should be carried out in accordance with the principles of sound financial management;(9) Whereas, to the extent necessary for achieving its objectives, the research and training programme may set out in greater detail or supplement the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities;(10) Whereas the provisions relating to dissemination of knowledge are laid down in Articles 12 to 29 of the Treaty;(11) Whereas, in order to ensure coherence between the activities carried out under the fifth framework programme and those undertaken pursuant to Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 December 1998 concerning the fifth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002) (5), this Decision and Council Decision 1999/65/EC of 22 December 1998 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results for the implementation of the fifth framework programme (6), should be adopted simultaneously and for the same period,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS
Definitions
For the purposes of this Decision:
(a) ‘RTDT activities` means the research activities, including demonstration activities, and training activities described in Annex II to the fifth framework programme;
(b) ‘indirect RTDT actions` means one of the two ways of implementing RTDT activities, as described in Annex III to the fifth framework programme. Such actions are carried out by third parties under contracts concluded with the Community; the JRC may take part in such actions under the conditions laid down in Article 6;
(c) ‘Associated State` means a State which is party to an international agreement concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 101 of the Treaty, under which the State concerned makes a financial contribution to the fifth framework programme. The said agreement relates to cooperation in research and training;
(d) ‘third State` means a State which is neither a Member State nor an Associated State;
(e) ‘legal entity` means:
– any natural person, or
– any legal person, provided that it has been established under Community law or the applicable national law and has been given legal personality or has the capacity, in its own name, to hold rights and obligations of all kinds, to conclude contracts and to be a party to legal proceedings;
(f) ‘international organisation` means any association of States, other than the Community, established on the basis of a Treaty or similar act, having common institutions and an international legal personality distinct from that of its Member States;
(g) ‘potential user of RTD results` means any legal entity, any international organisation or the JRC which, by virtue of its needs and capabilities – whether scientific, technological, economic or social – has a specific contribution to make to the use or the ensuring of the use of the results of indirect RTDT actions.
The rules laid down in this chapter shall apply, in conformity with Article 10 of the Treaty, to the participation of legal entities and international organisations and of the JRC in indirect RTDT actions.
Number of participants in indirect RTDT actions
1. Indirect RTDT actions shall be carried out by:
(a) at least two mutually independent legal entities established in two different Member States or in a Member State and an Associated State; or
(b) at least one legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State and the JRC; or
(c) one or several legal entities established in a third State or international organisations, acting in cooperation with the minimum number of legal entities established in a Member State or Associated State and the JRC, as required in (a) or (b).
2. Exceptionally, where the nature of the indirect RTDT action or activity to be undertaken requires it to be carried out by a single participant, it must be carried out by:
(a) a legal entity established in a Member State, in an Associated State or in a third State; or
(b) an international organisation; or
(c) the JRC.
Conditions for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States
1. Any legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State may take part in indirect RTD actions and receive funding from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
– it is carrying out or is about to carry out an RTDT activity, or
– it contributes to the dissemination and use of results of RTDT activities, or
– it is a potential user of RTDT results, or
– in the case of thematic networks and concerted actions, it is in a position to contribute substantial added value to the quality of work to be undertaken by virtue of its knowledge of the relevant area of research.
2. The conditions set out in paragraph 1 do not apply in case of accompanying measures, where the legal entity has the necessary technical know-how to carry out the indirect RTDT action in question.
3. Where the purpose of the indirect RTDT action concerned so permits, any legal entity referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 must carry out the major part of the work within the Member States or Associated States.
Conditions for legal entities from third States and for international organisations
1. Without prejudice to the conditions set out in paragraph 2, any legal entity established in a third State and any international organisation may take part in indirect RTDT actions in conformity with the interests of the Community and without financing from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
(a) the number of participations in the proposal for an indirect RTDT action is in accordance with Article 3; and
(b) it meets the conditions laid down in Article 4(1) and (2) for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States.
This shall not apply to training fellowships as defined in Annex III to the fifth framework programme.
2. Where necessary to provide access to high-quality programmes in a third State and/or to ensure suitable intellectual property rights (IPR) arrangements, participation of legal entities established in that third State is subject to the conclusion of an international agreement between the Community and the third State concerned. Where such an agreement exists, participation is additionally subject to the principles, conditions and limits laid down therein.
3. Any legal entity established in the central and eastern European States or the new independent States which meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 may participate with financing from the fifth framework programme in the area of nuclear fission, provided that the financing is duly justified on the grounds that the participation makes an essential contribution to the objectives of the programme which cannot be provided by other means.
Community financing will be provided only for the activities specified in the research and training programme and under the conditions laid down therein.
4. Any international organisation may, exceptionally, receive financing from the fifth framework programme provided that:
(a) in the case of indirect RTDT actions other than accompanying measures,
– the financing is duly justified as being essential for achieving the objectives of the indirect RTD action in question, and
– where any basic facility is to be used which is located in a third State, it is essential for carrying out the proposed work;
(b) in the case of accompanying measures, it has the necessary technical skills and know-how, which are not readily accessible or are unavailable in the Member States or the Associated States.
Conditions for the JRC
Subject to the internal budgetary and administrative measures necessary to enable the JRC to take part in indirect RTDT actions, the JRC shall be bound by the same conditions and have the same rights and obligations as the legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated State taking part in indirect RTDT actions.
Conditions relating to resources
1. Any legal entity, international organisation and the JRC must:
– when filing its proposal for an indirect RTDT action, have at least the potential resources needed for carrying it out,
– when the contract is signed, demonstrate that it will have all the necessary resources as and when needed for carrying it out.
2. The resources needed for carrying out the indirect RTDT action shall comprise human resources, infrastructure, financial resources and, where appropriate, intangible property.
Procedures to be applied
1. Indirect RTDT actions other than accompanying measures shall be the subject of calls for proposals. These may be preceded by a call for expressions of interest of an informative nature. All such calls shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities and should also be disseminated through other appropriate channels.
Indirect RTDT actions relating to controlled thermonuclear fusion and carried out under the contracts of the Association, the Net Agreement, the quadripartite cooperation agreement between the Community, Japan, the Russian Federation and the United States of America concerning the engineering design activities of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), The Joint European Torus (JET) Joint Undertaking and any other agreement concluded by the Community shall comply with the procedures laid down in those agreements.
2. Accompanying measures shall, as appropriate, be the subject of:
– calls for proposals, in accordance with procedures identical to those described in paragraph 1,
– public procurement procedures, where the indirect RTDT action consists of a purchase or a service, in accordance with the applicable provisions,
– invitations to apply for appointment as an independent expert where the measure concerned requires the Commission to take account in a balanced fashion of the various research players, without prejudice to other procedures designed to achieve the same result in the case of the independent highly qualified experts appointed for the five-year evaluation referred to in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme.
3. Indirect RTDT actions carried out as pilot schemes shall be governed by procedures appropriate to those actions as set out in the research and training programme decision.
4. Subject to legal constraints and the need to respect requirements of transparency and equal treatment, the Commission shall keep the procedures for the submission, selection and adoption of proposals as short as reasonably achievable and keep the administrative costs of the applicants and of the Commission to the minimum level necessary.
Selection criteria and conditions applicable in accordance with the type of procedure
1. Proposals for indirect RTDT actions resulting from calls for proposals and pilot schemes shall be selected in conformity with Annex I to the fifth framework programme on the basis of the conditions for participation set out in Articles 3 to 7 and the following criteria:
(a) scientific excellence;
(b) Community added value;
(c) the potential contribution to furthering the economic and social objectives of the Community;
(d) the innovative nature of the proposal for an indirect RTDT action;
(e) the prospects for disseminating/exploiting the results, as described in the plan for dissemination and use attached to the proposal for an indirect RTDT action;
(f) effective transnational cooperation;
(g) effective and efficient management;
(h) any additional criteria set out in the research and training programme.
These criteria shall be applied in accordance with the category of indirect RTDT action and with the nature of the RTDT activity.
Any project which contravenes the principles laid down in relevant international conventions and regulations shall not be selected.
Proposals for accompanying measures which are subject to a public procurement procedure shall be evaluated on the basis of selection and award criteria defined in accordance with the relevant provisions.
2. Applicants responding to an invitation to apply shall be selected on the basis of the criteria set out in the relevant Commission Decision and of the relevant conditions for participation set out in Articles 3, 4 and 5.
Community financial participation and eligible costs
1. In compliance with the provisions of Annex III to the fifth framework programme, the Community financial participation shall consist of the reimbursement, in part or in whole, of the eligible costs of the indirect RTDT action.
2. A cost relating to an indirect RTDT action shall be eligible where it is necessary for the action in question and is provided for in the contract. It shall be reimbursable by payment within a reasonable period provided that the amount has actually been spent and has been recorded in the accounts or the tax documents.
In the appropriate circumstances, provisions should be made for advance payments.
3. In the case of the research projects, demonstration projects and combined research/demonstration projects, recourse shall be had to additional eligible costs where, in the view of the Commission, the system of accounting used by the participant in an indirect RTDT action does not enable the full costs of carrying out the indirect RTDT action to be established with sufficient precision.
4. Total eligible costs will be reimbursed by payments against justification of the actual costs of the indirect RTDT action concerned. The documents substantiating these costs must be satisfactory. However, at the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTDT action, general expenses may instead be calculated on a flat-rate basis by agreement with the Commission.
At the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTDT action and by agreement with the Commission, the contract can establish other conditions:
(a) in the case of small-scale projects, fixed amounts determined on the basis of an assessment of the estimated costs of the work;
(b) in other cases, fixed amounts linked to the demonstration of best efforts to complete contractually agreed objectives;
(c) other arrangements involving flat- and composite-rate payments appropriate to specific projects.
5. Additional eligible costs, as referred to in Annex III to the fifth framework programme, shall comprise the following:
– the additional eligible costs generated simply by taking part in the indirect RTDT action,
– a flat-rate contribution to the general expenses.
1. Proposals for indirect RTDT actions selected following any of the procedures set out in Article 8 shall be subject of a contract.
2. Contracts will be based on the relevant model contract drawn up by the Commission in consultation with Member States, taking account, where appropriate, of the different RTDT activities involved.
Provisions which may be laid down in the research and training programme
1. The rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities may be set out in greater detail or supplemented in the Council Decision adopting the research and training programme implementing the fifth framework programme.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply in the case of the definitions set out in Article 1 or the training fellowships referred to in Article 5(1), second subparagraph, and Article 5(3), third subparagraph.
Detailed rules of application
The Commission shall lay down the detailed rules for applying Articles 3, 7 and 10.
1. The annual report which the Commission sends to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 5(4) of the fifth framework programme shall contain information on the implementation of this Decision.
2. Before the end of the fifth framework programme the Commission shall present a report to the Council on the application of this Decision.
This Decision shall apply to indirect RTDT actions implementing the fifth framework programme.
Done at Brussels, 22 December 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ C 40, 7.2.1998, p. 14.
(2) OJ C 195, 22.6.1998, p. 27.
(3) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 51.
(4) See page 34 of this Official Journal.
(5) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
(6) See page 46 of this Official Journal.

Pending: 31999D0065

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130j and the second paragraph of Article 130o thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 189c of the Treaty (3),(1) Whereas the fifth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998 to 2002) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the fifth framework programme`) was adopted by Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European Parliament and Council (4); whereas the detailed rules for financial participation by the Community, as set out in Annex IV to that Decision, must be supplemented by other provisions to be laid down in accordance with Article 130j and the second paragraph of Article 130o of the Treaty;(2) Whereas the new provisions should be part of a complete, coherent and transparent framework so that the specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme may be carried out in a harmonised manner;(3) Whereas the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities must be adapted to the nature of the research and technological development activities, including demonstration activities (hereinafter referred to as ‘indirect RTD actions`); whereas, moreover, they may vary depending on whether the participant is based in a Member State, an Associated State or a third country and on its legal structure;(4) Whereas, under the fifth framework programme, the participation of legal entities of third countries should be envisaged, including on the basis of international agreements; whereas, however, the agreements concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 130m of the Treaty, must be implemented in accordance with the principle of reciprocity and the protection of intellectual and industrial property rights; whereas the Community’s legal entities must accordingly enjoy genuine access to the research programmes of the third country concerned;(5) Whereas, in the specific case of small and medium-sized enterprises, particular stress should be laid on indirect RTD actions designed to encourage their participation, since they can contribute to the creation and maintenance of jobs and to innovation;(6) Whereas the Joint Research Centre (JRC) takes part in indirect RTD actions on the same basis as legal entities established in a Member State or in an Associated State;(7) Whereas the rules should be applied in a simple and efficient manner so as to minimise the administrative and financial burden on participants and the Commission, particularly with respect to the time taken to prepare proposals, conclude contract negotiations and make reimbursements;(8) Whereas the Community financial participation must be paid to the participants against justification of the eligible costs of the indirect RTD action, although other more appropriate methods may be used;(9) Whereas the RTD activities should be carried out in compliance with ethical principles;(10) Whereas the rules for the dissemination of research results must guarantee the protection of rights linked to obtaining and using knowledge;(11) Whereas the rules must take account of the interests of the Community and the legitimate interests of the parties to any contract concluded as a result of the selection of the proposal for an indirect RTD action;(12) Whereas, in the case of indirect RTD actions, the rules must, generally speaking, be adapted to the level of the Community financial participation or the proximity to the market of the RTD activity in question, including demonstration;(13) Whereas ownership of the knowledge resulting from indirect RTD actions is normally determined in accordance with the level of Community financial participation;(14) Whereas, in the case of indirect RTD actions, the knowledge must be used or, failing that, disseminated;(15) Whereas the primary responsibility for dissemination or use of research results rests with the contractors; whereas for projects closer to the market the rules must promote the use of results suitable for exploitation by the contractors; whereas the rules must otherwise promote the dissemination of suitable results, including those suitable for use which have not been exploited, to third parties, including Member States’ and Associated States’ governments, so as to facilitate the use of those results and avoid duplication of research efforts;(16) Whereas agreements concerning exclusive rights may be necessary to facilitate exploitation of the knowledge; whereas such agreements must comply with the applicable rules on competition;(17) Whereas, in the case of certain indirect RTD actions, a technological implementation plan must be produced by the contractors to enable the Commission to monitor the use and dissemination of the knowledge;(18) Whereas RTD activities should be carried out in accordance with the principles of sound financial management;(19) Whereas, to the extent necessary for achieving their objectives, the specific programmes may set out in greater detail or supplement the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results;(20) Whereas, in order to ensure coherence between the activities carried out under the fifth framework programme and those undertaken pursuant to Council Decision 1999/64/Euratom of 22 December 1998 concerning the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for research and training activities (1998-2002) (5), this Decision and Council Decision 1999/66/Euratom of 22 December 1998 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the implementation of the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) (1998 to 2002) (6) should be adopted simultaneously and for the same period,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1
Definitions
For the purposes of this Decision:
(a) RTD activities means the research and technological development activities, including demonstration activities, described in Annex II to the fifth framework programme;
(b) indirect RTD actions means one of the two ways of implementing RTD activities, as described in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme. Such actions are carried out by third parties under contracts concluded with the Community; the JRC may take part in such actions under the conditions laid down in Article 7;
(c) direct RTD actions means one of the two ways of implementing RTD activities, as described in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme. Such actions are carried out by the JRC;
(d) Associated State means a State which is party to an international agreement concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 130m of the Treaty, under which the State concerned makes a financial contribution to the fifth framework programme. The said agreement relates to cooperation in research, technological development and demonstration;
(e) third country means a country which is neither a Member State nor an Associated State;
(f) legal entity means:
– any natural person, or
– any legal person, provided that it has been established under Community law or the applicable national law and has been given legal personality or has the capacity, in its own name, to hold rights and obligations of all kinds, to conclude contracts and to be a party to legal proceedings;
(g) international organisation means any association of States, other than the Community, established on the basis of a Treaty or similar act, having common institutions and an international legal personality distinct from that of its Member States;
(h) potential user of RTD results means any legal entity, any international organisation or the JRC which, by virtue of its needs and capabilities – whether scientific, technological, economic or social – has a specific contribution to make to the use or the ensuring of the use of the results of indirect RTD actions;
(i) small and medium-sized enterprises (hereinafter referred to as ‘SMEs`) means enterprises which meet the criteria set out in Commission Recommendation 96/280/EC, (7) namely:
– have fewer than 250 employees (full-time equivalents), and
– have either an annual turnover not exceeding ECU 40 million or an annual balance-sheet total not exceeding ECU 27 million, and
– conform to the criterion of independence as defined in the Recommendation;
(j) knowledge means the results, including information, which result from RTD actions under the fifth framework programme;
(k) dissemination means the disclosure of knowledge by any appropriate means other than the publication resulting from the formalities for protecting the knowledge, for the purposes of promoting scientific and technical progress;
(l) use means the direct or indirect use of knowledge in research activities or for the purposes of exploitation;
(m) exploitation means the use of knowledge for creating and marketing a product or process or for creating and providing a service;

Article 2
Interests of the Community
The interests of the Community, as referred to in Articles 6, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 20, shall be assessed with particular regard to:
(a) the objective of strengthening the international competitiveness of Community industry;
(b) the objective of providing appropriate incentives for maintaining and creating jobs in the Community;
(c) the objective of promoting sustainable development and improving the quality of life in the Community;
(d) the needs of other Community policies in support of which the RTD actions are carried out;
(e) the existence of scientific and technical cooperation agreements between the Community and third countries or international organisations.

Article 3
The rules laid down in this Chapter shall apply to the participation of legal entities and international organisations and of the JRC in indirect RTD actions.

Article 4
Number of participants in indirect RTD actions
1. Indirect RTD actions shall be carried out by:
(a) at least two mutually independent legal entities established in two different Member States or in a Member State and an Associated State; or
(b) at least one legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State and the JRC; or
(c) one or several legal entities established in a third country or international organisations, acting in cooperation with the minimum number of legal entities established in a Member State or Associated State and the JRC, as required in points (a) or (b).
2. Exceptionally, where the nature of the indirect RTD action or activity to be undertaken requires it to be carried out by a single participant, it must be carried out by:
(a) a legal entity established in a Member State, in an Associated State or in a third country; or
(b) an international organisation; or
(c) the JRC.

Article 5
Conditions for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States
1. Any legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State may take part in indirect RTD actions and receive funding from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
– it is carrying out or is about to carry out a research, technological development or demonstration activity, or
– it contributes to the dissemination and use of results in accordance with the specific programme on ‘Promotion of innovation and encouragement of SME participation`, or
– it is a potential user of RTD results,
or, additionally for thematic networks and concerted actions,
– it is instead in a position to contribute substantial added value to the quality of work to be undertaken by virtue of its knowledge of the relevant area of research.
2. The conditions set out in paragraph 1 do not apply in the following cases:
(a) for exploratory awards, where the legal entity must be an SME or, exceptionally, a potential user of RTD results. In the latter case, the entity will not normally receive funding from the fifth framework programme;
(b) for cooperative research projects, where the legal entity must be an SME which is a potential user of RTD results but with little or no RTD capability of its own;
(c) for accompanying measures, where the legal entity has the necessary technical know-how to carry out the indirect RTD action in question.
3. Where an Associated State is only partially associated with the fifth framework programme, a legal entity in that country may only take part and receive financing under this Article in those specific programmes covered by the association agreement. Participation in specific programmes to which that country is not associated is subject to Article 6.
4. Where the purpose of the indirect RTD action concerned so permits, any legal entity referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall carry out the major part of the work within the Member States or Associated States.

Article 6
Conditions for legal entities from third countries and for international organisations
1. Any legal entity established in a third European country or Mediterranean partner country and any international organisation may take part in indirect RTD actions on a project-by-project basis in conformity with the interests of the Community and without financing from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
(a) the number of participations in the proposal for an indirect RTD action is in accordance with Article 4; and
(b) it meets the conditions laid down in Article 5(1) and (2) for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States.
This shall not apply to training fellowships as defined an Annex IV to the fifth framework programme.
2. Legal entities established in other third countries may participate on the same terms provided that their participation is also of substantial added value or implementing all or part of the specific programmes in accordance with the objectives of that programme.
3. Where an international agreement between the Community and a third country is necessary to provide access to high-quality programmes in the third country concerned and/or to ensure suitable IPR arrangements, participation of legal entities established in that third country shall be subject to the conclusion of such an agreement. Where such an agreement exists, participation shall additionally be subject to the principles, conditions and limits laid down therein.
4. Any legal entity referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 may, exceptionally, participate with financing from the fifth framework programme provided that the financing is duly justified as being essential for achieving the objectives of the indirect RTD action in question.
This shall not apply to training fellowships as defined in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme.
5. In the case of RTD activities under the specific programme on ‘Confirming the international role of Community research`, any legal entity which meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 1(a) and (b) may take part provided that it contributes to one of the objectives of the specific programme and its participation is in conformity with the interests of the Community.
Community financing will be provided only for the activities specified in this specific programme and under the conditions laid down therein.
6. Any international organisation may, exceptionally, receive financing from the fifth framework programme provided that:
(a) in the case of indirect RTD actions other than accompanying measures,
– the financing is duly justified as being essential for achieving the objectives of the indirect RTD action in question, and,
– where any basic facility is to be used which is located in a third country, it is essential for carrying out the proposed work;
(b) in the case of accompanying measures, it has the necessary technical skills and know-how, which are not readily accessible or are unavailable in the Member States or the Associated States.

Article 7
Conditions for the JRC
Subject to the internal budgetary and administrative measures necessary to enable the JRC to take part in indirect RTD actions, the JRC shall be bound by the same conditions and have the same rights and obligations as the legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated State taking part in indirect RTD actions.

Article 8
Conditions relating to resources
1. Any legal entity, international organisation and the JRC must:
– when filing its proposal for an indirect RTD action, have at least the potential resources needed for carrying it out,
– when the contract is signed, demonstrate that it will have all the necessary resources as and when needed for carrying it out.
2. The resources needed for carrying out the indirect RTD action shall comprise human resources, infrastructure, financial resources and, where appropriate, intangible property.

Article 9
Procedures to be applied
1. Indirect RTD actions other than accompanying measures shall be the subject of calls for proposals. These may be preceded by a call of expressions of interest of an informative nature. All such calls shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities and should also be disseminated through other appropriate channels.
2. Accompanying measures shall, as appropriate, be the subject of:
– calls for proposals, in accordance with procedures identical to those described in paragraph 1,
– public procurement procedures, where the indirect RTD action consists of a purchase or a service, in accordance with the applicable provisions,
– invitations to apply for appointment as an independent expert where the measure concerned requires the Commission to take account in a balanced fashion of the various research players, without prejudice to other procedures designed to achieve the same result in the case of the independent highly qualified experts appointed for the five-year evaluation referred to in Article 5(2) of the fIfth framework programme.
In specific cases, for example for a contribution to the costs of conferences, workshops and seminars, spontaneous applications for a subsidy, addressed to the Commission by a legal entity or international organisation, may be supported by the Community.
3. Indirect RTD actions carried out as pilot schemes shall be governed by procedures appropriate to those actions as set out in the relevant specific programme decisions.
4. Subject to legal constraints and the need to respect requirements of transparency and equal treatment, the Commission shall keep the procedures for the submission, selection and adoption of proposals as short as reasonably achievable and keep the administrative costs of the applicants and of the Commission to the minimum level necessary.

Article 10
Selection criteria and conditions applicable in accordance with the type of procedure
1. Proposals for indirect RTD actions resulting from calls for proposals and pilot schemes shall be selected in conformity with Annex I to the fifth framework programme on the basis of the conditions for participation set out in Articles 4 to 8 and the following criteria:
(a) scientific excellence;
(b) Community added value;
(c) the potential contribution to furthering the economic and social objectives of the Community;
(d) the innovative nature of the proposal for an indirect RTD action;
(e) the prospects for disseminating/exploiting the results, as described in the plan for dissemination and use attached to the proposal for an indirect RTD action;
(f) effective transnational cooperation;
(g) effective and efficient management;
(h) any additional criteria set out in the specific programme concerned.
These criteria shall be applied in accordance with the category of indirect RTD action and with the nature of the RTD activity.
Any project which contravenes the ethical principles laid down in the relevant international conventions and regulations shall not be selected.
Proposals for accompanying measures which are subject to a public procurement procedure shall be evaluated on the basis of selection and award criteria defined in accordance with the relevant provisions.
2. Applications for subsidies shall be selected on the basis of:
– the relevant conditions for participation set out in Articles 4, 5, 6 and 8, and
– their appropriateness and usefulness in contributing to the objectives and to the scientific and technological content of the fifth framework programme and/or of the specific programme concerned.
3. Applicants responding to an invitation to apply shall be selected on the basis of the criteria set out in the relevant Commission Decision and of the relevant conditions for participation set out in Articles 4, 5 and 6.

Article 11
Community financial participation and eligible costs
1. In compliance with the provisions of Annex IV to the fifth framework programme, the Community financial participation shall consist of the reimbursement, in part or in whole, of the eligible costs of the indirect RTD action.
2. A cost relating to an indirect RTD action shall be eligible where it is necessary for the action in question and is provided for in the contract. It shall be reimbursable by payment within a reasonable period provided that the amount has actually been spent and has been recorded in the accounts or the tax documents.
In the appropriate circumstances, provisions should be made for advance payments.
3. In the case of the research and technological development projects, demonstration projects and combined RTD/demonstration projects, recourse shall be had to additional eligible costs where, in the view of the Commission, the system of accounting used by the participant in an indirect RTD action does not enable the full costs of carrying out the indirect RTD action to be established with sufficient precision.
4. Total eligible costs will be reimbursed by payments against justification of the actual costs of the indirect RTD action concerned. The documents substantiating these costs must be satisfactory. However, at the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTD action, general expenses may instead be calculated on a flat-rate basis by agreement with the Commission.
At the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTD action and by agreement with the Commission, the contract can establish other conditions:
(a) in the case of small-scale projects, fixed amounts determined on the basis of an assessment of the estimated costs of the work;
(b) in other cases, fixed amounts linked to the demonstration of best efforts to complete contractually agreed objectives;
(c) other arrangements involving flat- and composite-rate payments appropriate to specific projects.
5. Additional eligible costs, as referred to in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme, shall comprise the following:
– the additional eligible costs generated simply by taking part in the indirect RTD action,
– a flat-rate contribution to the general expenses.

Article 12
1. Proposals for indirect RTD actions selected following any of the procedures set out in Article 9 shall be the subject of a contract.
2. Contracts will be based on the relevant model contract drawn up by the Commission in consultation with Member States, taking account, where appropriate, of the different RTD activities involved.

Article 13
For the purpose of carrying out the specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme, the rules for the dissemination and use of research results shall:
– apply in compliance with international agreements concluded with the Community in particular under Article 130m of the Treaty,
– take full account of pre-existing know-how including the relevant existing property rights without prejudice to the contents of the detailed rules of application provided for in Article 22 and of the contracts referred to in Article 12.

Article 14
Adaptation of the rules for the dissemination and use of research results
The rules for the dissemination and use of research results relating to knowledge resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions shall, as a general rule, be determined by the level of Community financing reflecting, where appropriate, the different RTD activities involved and the proximity to the market.
The Community shall disseminate or promote the use of research results where it has financed indirect actions entirely.

Article 15
Ownership of knowledge
1. Knowledge resulting from work carried out under direct RTD actions shall be the property of the Community.
2. Knowledge resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions the full cost of which is borne by the Community shall, as a general rule, be the property of the Community.
Knowledge resulting from work carried out under cooperative research projects shall be the property of the SMEs who have entrusted the resolution of their research problem to a third legal entity.
Knowledge resulting from work carried out under other indirect RTD actions the full cost of which is not borne by the Community shall, as a general rule, be the property of the contractors who have carried out the work, including, where applicable, the Community, pursuant to Article 7.
Any subsequent transfer of such intellectual property rights to a third party is for the contractors to decide subject to imposing a contractual responsibility to respect those obligations on them concerning their dissemination and use and, in particular, the interests of the Community.

Article 16
Protection of knowledge
Knowledge capable of industrial or commercial application shall be protected in an appropriate manner and for an appropriate period of time, with particular regard to the interests of the Community and of the contractors, and in accordance with the contractual provisions and any applicable legislation or convention.

Article 17
Use of knowledge
1. The Community and the contractors shall use, or ensure that effective use is made of, any knowledge suitable for use in their possession, in conformity with the interests of the Community.
2. The Commission shall ensure that all knowledge belonging to the contractors which is suitable for use is used effectively by them. Failing that, after a specified period of time, it must be disseminated by the contractors or, where appropriate, by the Commission.

Article 18
Making knowledge available with a view to its use
1. As a general rule, knowledge resulting from work carried out under direct RTD actions, together with any information necessary for its use, should be made available to any interested legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State, provided that the entity undertakes to use the knowledge, or to ensure that it is used, in accordance with the interests of the Community. The making available of knowledge and information shall be subject to appropriate conditions, in particular concerning the payment of fees.
2. Knowledge belonging to any of the contractors and resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions, together with any information necessary for its use, shall be made available to the other contractors in the same project, provided the legitimate interests, including commercial interests, of all the contractors are safeguarded.
The detailed arrangements for making knowledge available to third parties with a view to its use shall take account of the interests of the Community and, in principle, the level of Community financial participation reflecting, where appropriate, the different RTD activities involved and the proximity to the market.
3. The making available of such knowledge and information may be subject to appropriate conditions. It may give rise to specific agreements, notably concerning exclusive rights, in compliance with the applicable rules on competition. The grantor of rights shall in that context take into consideration the constraints and risks resulting for the recipient of rights from the investment needed for exploiting the knowledge.

Article 19
Dissemination of knowledge
1. The Commission shall disseminate knowledge resulting from work carried out under direct RTD actions and which is suitable for dissemination.
Particular account shall be taken of:
(a) the need to safeguard intellectual and industrial property rights;
(b) confidentiality;
(c) the benefits of swift dissemination, for example in order to avoid duplication of research efforts.
2. The Commission shall ensure that knowledge resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions and which is suitable for dissemination is disseminated through appropriate forums (e.g. scientific publications) by the contractors or, where appropriate, by the Commission itself.
For indirect actions, in addition to (a), (b) and (c) above, particular account shall also be taken of:
– the legitimate interests of the contractors, including commercial interests,
– in principle, the level of Community financial participation.
3. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States and Associated States shall, on request, for reasons of public and in specific cases, have access, without undue delay, to useful knowledge which is relevant to policy-making. General requirements in this respect shall be set out in the relevant calls for proposals and arrangements, or any exceptions to this principle, for individual projects shall be agreed in the contract.

Article 20
Technological implementation plan
1. Depending on the nature of the RTD activity concerned, contractors taking part in work under indirect RTD actions shall produce a technological implementation plan. It shall reflect the broad outlines of the dissemination and use plan evaluated as part of the original proposal presented to the Commission for participation in indirect RTD actions.
2. The technological implementation plan shall set out the conditions, including a timetable, under which the knowledge is to be disseminated and used. It shall be approved by the Commission, which shall assess its content with regard to the interests of the Community and of the contractors.
3. The contractors shall inform the Commission of the steps taken to carry out this technological implementation plan. They shall justify any material subsequent change in the plan.

Article 21
Provisions which may be laid down in the specific programmes
1. The rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination and use of research results may be set out in greater detail or supplemented in the Council Decision adopting the specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme.
2. The first paragraph shall not apply in the case of the definitions set out in Article 1 or the training fellowships referred to in the second subparagraphs of Article 6(1) and (4).

Article 22
Detailed rules of application
The detailed rules for applying Articles 4, 8, 11 and 14 to 20 shall be drawn up and amended as necessary in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 23.

Article 23
Procedure for drawing up the rules of application
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote.
The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee.
If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by qualified majority.
If, within three months from the date of referral to the Council, the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission.

Article 24
1. The annual report which the Commission sends to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 130p of the Treaty shall contain information on the implementation of this Decision.
2. Before the end of the fifth framework programme the Commission shall present a report to the Council on the application of this Decision.

Article 25
This Decision shall apply to direct RTD actions and indirect RTD actions implementing the fifth framework programme.
Done at Brussels, 22 December 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ C 40, 7.2.1998, p. 14.
(2) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 51.
(3) Opinion on the European Parliament of 28 May 1998 (OJ C 195, 22.6.1998), Council common position of 10 July 1998 (OJ C 262, 19.8.1998, p. 50) and Decision of the European Parliament of 8 October 1998 (OJ C 328, 26.10.1998).
(4) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
(5) See page 34 of this Official Journal.
(6) See page 56 of this Official Journal.
(7) OJ L 107, 30.4.1996, p. 4.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130j and the second paragraph of Article 130o thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 189c of the Treaty (3),(1) Whereas the fifth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998 to 2002) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the fifth framework programme`) was adopted by Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European Parliament and Council (4); whereas the detailed rules for financial participation by the Community, as set out in Annex IV to that Decision, must be supplemented by other provisions to be laid down in accordance with Article 130j and the second paragraph of Article 130o of the Treaty;(2) Whereas the new provisions should be part of a complete, coherent and transparent framework so that the specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme may be carried out in a harmonised manner;(3) Whereas the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities must be adapted to the nature of the research and technological development activities, including demonstration activities (hereinafter referred to as ‘indirect RTD actions`); whereas, moreover, they may vary depending on whether the participant is based in a Member State, an Associated State or a third country and on its legal structure;(4) Whereas, under the fifth framework programme, the participation of legal entities of third countries should be envisaged, including on the basis of international agreements; whereas, however, the agreements concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 130m of the Treaty, must be implemented in accordance with the principle of reciprocity and the protection of intellectual and industrial property rights; whereas the Community’s legal entities must accordingly enjoy genuine access to the research programmes of the third country concerned;(5) Whereas, in the specific case of small and medium-sized enterprises, particular stress should be laid on indirect RTD actions designed to encourage their participation, since they can contribute to the creation and maintenance of jobs and to innovation;(6) Whereas the Joint Research Centre (JRC) takes part in indirect RTD actions on the same basis as legal entities established in a Member State or in an Associated State;(7) Whereas the rules should be applied in a simple and efficient manner so as to minimise the administrative and financial burden on participants and the Commission, particularly with respect to the time taken to prepare proposals, conclude contract negotiations and make reimbursements;(8) Whereas the Community financial participation must be paid to the participants against justification of the eligible costs of the indirect RTD action, although other more appropriate methods may be used;(9) Whereas the RTD activities should be carried out in compliance with ethical principles;(10) Whereas the rules for the dissemination of research results must guarantee the protection of rights linked to obtaining and using knowledge;(11) Whereas the rules must take account of the interests of the Community and the legitimate interests of the parties to any contract concluded as a result of the selection of the proposal for an indirect RTD action;(12) Whereas, in the case of indirect RTD actions, the rules must, generally speaking, be adapted to the level of the Community financial participation or the proximity to the market of the RTD activity in question, including demonstration;(13) Whereas ownership of the knowledge resulting from indirect RTD actions is normally determined in accordance with the level of Community financial participation;(14) Whereas, in the case of indirect RTD actions, the knowledge must be used or, failing that, disseminated;(15) Whereas the primary responsibility for dissemination or use of research results rests with the contractors; whereas for projects closer to the market the rules must promote the use of results suitable for exploitation by the contractors; whereas the rules must otherwise promote the dissemination of suitable results, including those suitable for use which have not been exploited, to third parties, including Member States’ and Associated States’ governments, so as to facilitate the use of those results and avoid duplication of research efforts;(16) Whereas agreements concerning exclusive rights may be necessary to facilitate exploitation of the knowledge; whereas such agreements must comply with the applicable rules on competition;(17) Whereas, in the case of certain indirect RTD actions, a technological implementation plan must be produced by the contractors to enable the Commission to monitor the use and dissemination of the knowledge;(18) Whereas RTD activities should be carried out in accordance with the principles of sound financial management;(19) Whereas, to the extent necessary for achieving their objectives, the specific programmes may set out in greater detail or supplement the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results;(20) Whereas, in order to ensure coherence between the activities carried out under the fifth framework programme and those undertaken pursuant to Council Decision 1999/64/Euratom of 22 December 1998 concerning the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for research and training activities (1998-2002) (5), this Decision and Council Decision 1999/66/Euratom of 22 December 1998 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the implementation of the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) (1998 to 2002) (6) should be adopted simultaneously and for the same period,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS
Definitions
For the purposes of this Decision:
(a) RTD activities means the research and technological development activities, including demonstration activities, described in Annex II to the fifth framework programme;
(b) indirect RTD actions means one of the two ways of implementing RTD activities, as described in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme. Such actions are carried out by third parties under contracts concluded with the Community; the JRC may take part in such actions under the conditions laid down in Article 7;
(c) direct RTD actions means one of the two ways of implementing RTD activities, as described in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme. Such actions are carried out by the JRC;
(d) Associated State means a State which is party to an international agreement concluded with the Community, in particular on the basis of Article 130m of the Treaty, under which the State concerned makes a financial contribution to the fifth framework programme. The said agreement relates to cooperation in research, technological development and demonstration;
(e) third country means a country which is neither a Member State nor an Associated State;
(f) legal entity means:
– any natural person, or
– any legal person, provided that it has been established under Community law or the applicable national law and has been given legal personality or has the capacity, in its own name, to hold rights and obligations of all kinds, to conclude contracts and to be a party to legal proceedings;
(g) international organisation means any association of States, other than the Community, established on the basis of a Treaty or similar act, having common institutions and an international legal personality distinct from that of its Member States;
(h) potential user of RTD results means any legal entity, any international organisation or the JRC which, by virtue of its needs and capabilities – whether scientific, technological, economic or social – has a specific contribution to make to the use or the ensuring of the use of the results of indirect RTD actions;
(i) small and medium-sized enterprises (hereinafter referred to as ‘SMEs`) means enterprises which meet the criteria set out in Commission Recommendation 96/280/EC, (7) namely:
– have fewer than 250 employees (full-time equivalents), and
– have either an annual turnover not exceeding ECU 40 million or an annual balance-sheet total not exceeding ECU 27 million, and
– conform to the criterion of independence as defined in the Recommendation;
(j) knowledge means the results, including information, which result from RTD actions under the fifth framework programme;
(k) dissemination means the disclosure of knowledge by any appropriate means other than the publication resulting from the formalities for protecting the knowledge, for the purposes of promoting scientific and technical progress;
(l) use means the direct or indirect use of knowledge in research activities or for the purposes of exploitation;
(m) exploitation means the use of knowledge for creating and marketing a product or process or for creating and providing a service;
Interests of the Community
The interests of the Community, as referred to in Articles 6, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 20, shall be assessed with particular regard to:
(a) the objective of strengthening the international competitiveness of Community industry;
(b) the objective of providing appropriate incentives for maintaining and creating jobs in the Community;
(c) the objective of promoting sustainable development and improving the quality of life in the Community;
(d) the needs of other Community policies in support of which the RTD actions are carried out;
(e) the existence of scientific and technical cooperation agreements between the Community and third countries or international organisations.
The rules laid down in this Chapter shall apply to the participation of legal entities and international organisations and of the JRC in indirect RTD actions.
Number of participants in indirect RTD actions
1. Indirect RTD actions shall be carried out by:
(a) at least two mutually independent legal entities established in two different Member States or in a Member State and an Associated State; or
(b) at least one legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State and the JRC; or
(c) one or several legal entities established in a third country or international organisations, acting in cooperation with the minimum number of legal entities established in a Member State or Associated State and the JRC, as required in points (a) or (b).
2. Exceptionally, where the nature of the indirect RTD action or activity to be undertaken requires it to be carried out by a single participant, it must be carried out by:
(a) a legal entity established in a Member State, in an Associated State or in a third country; or
(b) an international organisation; or
(c) the JRC.
Conditions for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States
1. Any legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State may take part in indirect RTD actions and receive funding from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
– it is carrying out or is about to carry out a research, technological development or demonstration activity, or
– it contributes to the dissemination and use of results in accordance with the specific programme on ‘Promotion of innovation and encouragement of SME participation`, or
– it is a potential user of RTD results,
or, additionally for thematic networks and concerted actions,
– it is instead in a position to contribute substantial added value to the quality of work to be undertaken by virtue of its knowledge of the relevant area of research.
2. The conditions set out in paragraph 1 do not apply in the following cases:
(a) for exploratory awards, where the legal entity must be an SME or, exceptionally, a potential user of RTD results. In the latter case, the entity will not normally receive funding from the fifth framework programme;
(b) for cooperative research projects, where the legal entity must be an SME which is a potential user of RTD results but with little or no RTD capability of its own;
(c) for accompanying measures, where the legal entity has the necessary technical know-how to carry out the indirect RTD action in question.
3. Where an Associated State is only partially associated with the fifth framework programme, a legal entity in that country may only take part and receive financing under this Article in those specific programmes covered by the association agreement. Participation in specific programmes to which that country is not associated is subject to Article 6.
4. Where the purpose of the indirect RTD action concerned so permits, any legal entity referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall carry out the major part of the work within the Member States or Associated States.
Conditions for legal entities from third countries and for international organisations
1. Any legal entity established in a third European country or Mediterranean partner country and any international organisation may take part in indirect RTD actions on a project-by-project basis in conformity with the interests of the Community and without financing from the fifth framework programme, provided that:
(a) the number of participations in the proposal for an indirect RTD action is in accordance with Article 4; and
(b) it meets the conditions laid down in Article 5(1) and (2) for legal entities from the Member States and Associated States.
This shall not apply to training fellowships as defined an Annex IV to the fifth framework programme.
2. Legal entities established in other third countries may participate on the same terms provided that their participation is also of substantial added value or implementing all or part of the specific programmes in accordance with the objectives of that programme.
3. Where an international agreement between the Community and a third country is necessary to provide access to high-quality programmes in the third country concerned and/or to ensure suitable IPR arrangements, participation of legal entities established in that third country shall be subject to the conclusion of such an agreement. Where such an agreement exists, participation shall additionally be subject to the principles, conditions and limits laid down therein.
4. Any legal entity referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 may, exceptionally, participate with financing from the fifth framework programme provided that the financing is duly justified as being essential for achieving the objectives of the indirect RTD action in question.
This shall not apply to training fellowships as defined in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme.
5. In the case of RTD activities under the specific programme on ‘Confirming the international role of Community research`, any legal entity which meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 1(a) and (b) may take part provided that it contributes to one of the objectives of the specific programme and its participation is in conformity with the interests of the Community.
Community financing will be provided only for the activities specified in this specific programme and under the conditions laid down therein.
6. Any international organisation may, exceptionally, receive financing from the fifth framework programme provided that:
(a) in the case of indirect RTD actions other than accompanying measures,
– the financing is duly justified as being essential for achieving the objectives of the indirect RTD action in question, and,
– where any basic facility is to be used which is located in a third country, it is essential for carrying out the proposed work;
(b) in the case of accompanying measures, it has the necessary technical skills and know-how, which are not readily accessible or are unavailable in the Member States or the Associated States.
Conditions for the JRC
Subject to the internal budgetary and administrative measures necessary to enable the JRC to take part in indirect RTD actions, the JRC shall be bound by the same conditions and have the same rights and obligations as the legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated State taking part in indirect RTD actions.
Conditions relating to resources
1. Any legal entity, international organisation and the JRC must:
– when filing its proposal for an indirect RTD action, have at least the potential resources needed for carrying it out,
– when the contract is signed, demonstrate that it will have all the necessary resources as and when needed for carrying it out.
2. The resources needed for carrying out the indirect RTD action shall comprise human resources, infrastructure, financial resources and, where appropriate, intangible property.
Procedures to be applied
1. Indirect RTD actions other than accompanying measures shall be the subject of calls for proposals. These may be preceded by a call of expressions of interest of an informative nature. All such calls shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities and should also be disseminated through other appropriate channels.
2. Accompanying measures shall, as appropriate, be the subject of:
– calls for proposals, in accordance with procedures identical to those described in paragraph 1,
– public procurement procedures, where the indirect RTD action consists of a purchase or a service, in accordance with the applicable provisions,
– invitations to apply for appointment as an independent expert where the measure concerned requires the Commission to take account in a balanced fashion of the various research players, without prejudice to other procedures designed to achieve the same result in the case of the independent highly qualified experts appointed for the five-year evaluation referred to in Article 5(2) of the fIfth framework programme.
In specific cases, for example for a contribution to the costs of conferences, workshops and seminars, spontaneous applications for a subsidy, addressed to the Commission by a legal entity or international organisation, may be supported by the Community.
3. Indirect RTD actions carried out as pilot schemes shall be governed by procedures appropriate to those actions as set out in the relevant specific programme decisions.
4. Subject to legal constraints and the need to respect requirements of transparency and equal treatment, the Commission shall keep the procedures for the submission, selection and adoption of proposals as short as reasonably achievable and keep the administrative costs of the applicants and of the Commission to the minimum level necessary.
Selection criteria and conditions applicable in accordance with the type of procedure
1. Proposals for indirect RTD actions resulting from calls for proposals and pilot schemes shall be selected in conformity with Annex I to the fifth framework programme on the basis of the conditions for participation set out in Articles 4 to 8 and the following criteria:
(a) scientific excellence;
(b) Community added value;
(c) the potential contribution to furthering the economic and social objectives of the Community;
(d) the innovative nature of the proposal for an indirect RTD action;
(e) the prospects for disseminating/exploiting the results, as described in the plan for dissemination and use attached to the proposal for an indirect RTD action;
(f) effective transnational cooperation;
(g) effective and efficient management;
(h) any additional criteria set out in the specific programme concerned.
These criteria shall be applied in accordance with the category of indirect RTD action and with the nature of the RTD activity.
Any project which contravenes the ethical principles laid down in the relevant international conventions and regulations shall not be selected.
Proposals for accompanying measures which are subject to a public procurement procedure shall be evaluated on the basis of selection and award criteria defined in accordance with the relevant provisions.
2. Applications for subsidies shall be selected on the basis of:
– the relevant conditions for participation set out in Articles 4, 5, 6 and 8, and
– their appropriateness and usefulness in contributing to the objectives and to the scientific and technological content of the fifth framework programme and/or of the specific programme concerned.
3. Applicants responding to an invitation to apply shall be selected on the basis of the criteria set out in the relevant Commission Decision and of the relevant conditions for participation set out in Articles 4, 5 and 6.
Community financial participation and eligible costs
1. In compliance with the provisions of Annex IV to the fifth framework programme, the Community financial participation shall consist of the reimbursement, in part or in whole, of the eligible costs of the indirect RTD action.
2. A cost relating to an indirect RTD action shall be eligible where it is necessary for the action in question and is provided for in the contract. It shall be reimbursable by payment within a reasonable period provided that the amount has actually been spent and has been recorded in the accounts or the tax documents.
In the appropriate circumstances, provisions should be made for advance payments.
3. In the case of the research and technological development projects, demonstration projects and combined RTD/demonstration projects, recourse shall be had to additional eligible costs where, in the view of the Commission, the system of accounting used by the participant in an indirect RTD action does not enable the full costs of carrying out the indirect RTD action to be established with sufficient precision.
4. Total eligible costs will be reimbursed by payments against justification of the actual costs of the indirect RTD action concerned. The documents substantiating these costs must be satisfactory. However, at the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTD action, general expenses may instead be calculated on a flat-rate basis by agreement with the Commission.
At the request of those taking part in the proposal for an indirect RTD action and by agreement with the Commission, the contract can establish other conditions:
(a) in the case of small-scale projects, fixed amounts determined on the basis of an assessment of the estimated costs of the work;
(b) in other cases, fixed amounts linked to the demonstration of best efforts to complete contractually agreed objectives;
(c) other arrangements involving flat- and composite-rate payments appropriate to specific projects.
5. Additional eligible costs, as referred to in Annex IV to the fifth framework programme, shall comprise the following:
– the additional eligible costs generated simply by taking part in the indirect RTD action,
– a flat-rate contribution to the general expenses.
1. Proposals for indirect RTD actions selected following any of the procedures set out in Article 9 shall be the subject of a contract.
2. Contracts will be based on the relevant model contract drawn up by the Commission in consultation with Member States, taking account, where appropriate, of the different RTD activities involved.
For the purpose of carrying out the specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme, the rules for the dissemination and use of research results shall:
– apply in compliance with international agreements concluded with the Community in particular under Article 130m of the Treaty,
– take full account of pre-existing know-how including the relevant existing property rights without prejudice to the contents of the detailed rules of application provided for in Article 22 and of the contracts referred to in Article 12.
Adaptation of the rules for the dissemination and use of research results
The rules for the dissemination and use of research results relating to knowledge resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions shall, as a general rule, be determined by the level of Community financing reflecting, where appropriate, the different RTD activities involved and the proximity to the market.
The Community shall disseminate or promote the use of research results where it has financed indirect actions entirely.
Ownership of knowledge
1. Knowledge resulting from work carried out under direct RTD actions shall be the property of the Community.
2. Knowledge resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions the full cost of which is borne by the Community shall, as a general rule, be the property of the Community.
Knowledge resulting from work carried out under cooperative research projects shall be the property of the SMEs who have entrusted the resolution of their research problem to a third legal entity.
Knowledge resulting from work carried out under other indirect RTD actions the full cost of which is not borne by the Community shall, as a general rule, be the property of the contractors who have carried out the work, including, where applicable, the Community, pursuant to Article 7.
Any subsequent transfer of such intellectual property rights to a third party is for the contractors to decide subject to imposing a contractual responsibility to respect those obligations on them concerning their dissemination and use and, in particular, the interests of the Community.
Protection of knowledge
Knowledge capable of industrial or commercial application shall be protected in an appropriate manner and for an appropriate period of time, with particular regard to the interests of the Community and of the contractors, and in accordance with the contractual provisions and any applicable legislation or convention.
Use of knowledge
1. The Community and the contractors shall use, or ensure that effective use is made of, any knowledge suitable for use in their possession, in conformity with the interests of the Community.
2. The Commission shall ensure that all knowledge belonging to the contractors which is suitable for use is used effectively by them. Failing that, after a specified period of time, it must be disseminated by the contractors or, where appropriate, by the Commission.
Making knowledge available with a view to its use
1. As a general rule, knowledge resulting from work carried out under direct RTD actions, together with any information necessary for its use, should be made available to any interested legal entity established in a Member State or in an Associated State, provided that the entity undertakes to use the knowledge, or to ensure that it is used, in accordance with the interests of the Community. The making available of knowledge and information shall be subject to appropriate conditions, in particular concerning the payment of fees.
2. Knowledge belonging to any of the contractors and resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions, together with any information necessary for its use, shall be made available to the other contractors in the same project, provided the legitimate interests, including commercial interests, of all the contractors are safeguarded.
The detailed arrangements for making knowledge available to third parties with a view to its use shall take account of the interests of the Community and, in principle, the level of Community financial participation reflecting, where appropriate, the different RTD activities involved and the proximity to the market.
3. The making available of such knowledge and information may be subject to appropriate conditions. It may give rise to specific agreements, notably concerning exclusive rights, in compliance with the applicable rules on competition. The grantor of rights shall in that context take into consideration the constraints and risks resulting for the recipient of rights from the investment needed for exploiting the knowledge.
Dissemination of knowledge
1. The Commission shall disseminate knowledge resulting from work carried out under direct RTD actions and which is suitable for dissemination.
Particular account shall be taken of:
(a) the need to safeguard intellectual and industrial property rights;
(b) confidentiality;
(c) the benefits of swift dissemination, for example in order to avoid duplication of research efforts.
2. The Commission shall ensure that knowledge resulting from work carried out under indirect RTD actions and which is suitable for dissemination is disseminated through appropriate forums (e.g. scientific publications) by the contractors or, where appropriate, by the Commission itself.
For indirect actions, in addition to (a), (b) and (c) above, particular account shall also be taken of:
– the legitimate interests of the contractors, including commercial interests,
– in principle, the level of Community financial participation.
3. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States and Associated States shall, on request, for reasons of public and in specific cases, have access, without undue delay, to useful knowledge which is relevant to policy-making. General requirements in this respect shall be set out in the relevant calls for proposals and arrangements, or any exceptions to this principle, for individual projects shall be agreed in the contract.
Technological implementation plan
1. Depending on the nature of the RTD activity concerned, contractors taking part in work under indirect RTD actions shall produce a technological implementation plan. It shall reflect the broad outlines of the dissemination and use plan evaluated as part of the original proposal presented to the Commission for participation in indirect RTD actions.
2. The technological implementation plan shall set out the conditions, including a timetable, under which the knowledge is to be disseminated and used. It shall be approved by the Commission, which shall assess its content with regard to the interests of the Community and of the contractors.
3. The contractors shall inform the Commission of the steps taken to carry out this technological implementation plan. They shall justify any material subsequent change in the plan.
Provisions which may be laid down in the specific programmes
1. The rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination and use of research results may be set out in greater detail or supplemented in the Council Decision adopting the specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme.
2. The first paragraph shall not apply in the case of the definitions set out in Article 1 or the training fellowships referred to in the second subparagraphs of Article 6(1) and (4).
Detailed rules of application
The detailed rules for applying Articles 4, 8, 11 and 14 to 20 shall be drawn up and amended as necessary in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 23.
Procedure for drawing up the rules of application
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote.
The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee.
If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by qualified majority.
If, within three months from the date of referral to the Council, the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission.
1. The annual report which the Commission sends to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 130p of the Treaty shall contain information on the implementation of this Decision.
2. Before the end of the fifth framework programme the Commission shall present a report to the Council on the application of this Decision.
This Decision shall apply to direct RTD actions and indirect RTD actions implementing the fifth framework programme.
Done at Brussels, 22 December 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ C 40, 7.2.1998, p. 14.
(2) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 51.
(3) Opinion on the European Parliament of 28 May 1998 (OJ C 195, 22.6.1998), Council common position of 10 July 1998 (OJ C 262, 19.8.1998, p. 50) and Decision of the European Parliament of 8 October 1998 (OJ C 328, 26.10.1998).
(4) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
(5) See page 34 of this Official Journal.
(6) See page 56 of this Official Journal.
(7) OJ L 107, 30.4.1996, p. 4.

Pending: 31998D2119

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 129 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 27 May 1998,(1) Whereas the prevention of disease, in particular of the major health scourges, is a priority for Community action, requiring a global approach coordinated between Member States;(2) Whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution on public health policy after Maastricht (5), invited the Commission to set up a transfrontier network to devise working definitions of notifiable diseases, to collect, update, analyse and disseminate Member States data on such diseases and to work with national and international agencies on these matters;(3) Whereas in its resolution of 2 June 1994 (6) on the framework for Community action in the field of public health the Council agreed that priority should be given at present to communicable diseases in particular;(4) Whereas in its conclusions of 13 December 1993 (7) the Council considered that there was a need to develop at Community level a network for the surveillance and control of communicable diseases, the main purpose of which would be to collect and coordinate information from monitoring networks in the Member States;(5) Whereas in those same conclusions the Council requested the Commission to devote special attention, in its proposals relating to the framework for action in the field of public health, to setting up an epidemiological network in the Community, taking account of the current proceedings and mechanisms existing at Community and at Member State level, and ensuring the comparability and compatibility of data;(6) Whereas in their resolution of 13 November 1992 on the monitoring and surveillance of communicable diseases (8) the Council and the Ministers for Health, meeting within the Council, underlined the desirability of improving, within the Community, the coverage and effectiveness of existing networks between Member States for the surveillance of communicable diseases (including data-processing networks), and also the desirability of maintaining, establishing or strengthening coordination between them for monitoring outbreaks of communicable diseases, where such action could add to the value of existing measures;(7) Whereas in that same resolution, the Council and the Ministers for Health, meeting within the Council, underlined the value of collecting data from the Member States on a limited number of rare and serious diseases which require large samples for epidemiological study;(8) Whereas in that same resolution the Council and the Ministers for Health, meeting within the Council, invited the Commission to examine the desirability of giving priority to certain suitable proposals relating to the control and surveillance of communicable diseases, in the light, inter alia, of their estimated cost-effectiveness;(9) Whereas, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, any new measure taken in an area which does not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community, such as the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases, may be taken by the Community only if, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, the objectives of the proposed action can be better achieved by the Community than by the Member States;(10) Whereas the varying levels and needs of epidemiological surveillance of communicable diseases in the Member States make it necessary to establish a permanent network at Community level;(11) Whereas measures to be taken in the health field must take into account other actions undertaken by the Community in the field of public health or which have an impact on public health;(12) Whereas the measures to be taken under this Decision are adopted excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States;(13) Whereas Decision 647/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on the prevention of AIDS and certain other communicable diseases within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000) (9) envisages a number of Community actions for the creation and development of networks for the control and surveillance of certain communicable diseases, the early detection of such diseases, and promotion of the training of field epidemiologists;(14) Whereas cooperation with the competent international organisations, particularly the World Health Organisation, notably with regard to disease classification, must be fostered, as well as the use of appropriate language and technology;(15) Whereas cooperation with non-member countries, in particular in the case of the appearance or resurgence of serious communicable diseases, must be supported;(16) Whereas the recent appearance or resurgence of serious communicable diseases has demonstrated that when an emergency situation occurs all necessary information and data gathered in accordance with an agreed methodology must be communicated swiftly to the Commission;(17) Whereas, in order to ensure protection of the population in an emergency, Member States must exchange relevant data and information immediately via the Community network; whereas priority must be given at all times to the protection of public health;(18) Whereas Council Directive 92/117/EEC of 17 December 1992 concerning measures for protection against specified zoonoses and specified zoonotic agents in animals and products of animal origin in order to prevent outbreaks of food-borne infections and intoxications (10) applies equally to information concerning zoonoses which affect human beings; whereas that same Directive provides for a system for collecting and transmitting information on specified zoonoses and zoonotic agents;(19) Whereas the setting-up of a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases at Community level necessarily presupposes compliance with the legal provisions concerning the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the introduction of arrangements to guarantee the confidentiality and security of such data; whereas in this connection the European Parliament and the Council adopted Directive 95/46/EC (11);(20) Whereas the Community projects in the field of the telematic interchange of data between administrations (IDA) (12) and the G7 projects should be closely coordinated with the implementation of the Community actions relating to the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases;(21) Whereas consideration must be given to the efforts deployed with a view to encouraging international cooperation in this field, particularly as part of a joint plan of action with the United States;(22) Whereas it is important, in an emergency situation, that the competent national structures and/or authorities should strengthen their cooperation, in particular with regard to the identification of biological samples;(23) Whereas any Community procedures which may be set up for the rapid exchange of information do not affect the Member States’ rights and obligations under bilateral or multilateral agreements and conventions;(24) Whereas a procedure needs to be established to promote coordination between the Member States concerning the measures they may decide to take to control the spread of communicable diseases; whereas the adoption and implementation of these measures fall within the exclusive competence of the Member States;(25) Whereas it is important that the Commission should implement the Community network in close cooperation with the Member States; whereas a procedure therefore needs to be established to ensure the Member States’ full participation in this implementation;(26) Whereas the costs which may result from the operation of the network at Community level should be met from Community resources and/or from relevant Community programmes;(27) Whereas the costs which may result from the operation of the network at national level will have to be financed by the Member States themselves, unless Community provisions provide otherwise;(28) Whereas a modus vivendi between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concerning the implementing measures for acts adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (13) was concluded on 20 December 1994,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The objective of this Decision is to set up a network at Community level to promote cooperation and coordination between the Member States, with the assistance of the Commission, with a view to improving the prevention and control, in the Community, of the categories of communicable diseases specified in the Annex. This network shall be used for:
– the epidemiological surveillance of these diseases, and
– an early warning and response system for the prevention and control of these diseases.
As regards epidemiological surveillance, the network shall be established by bringing into permanent communication with one another, through all appropriate technical means, the Commission and those structures and/or authorities which, at the level of each Member State and under the responsibility of that Member State, are competent at national level and are charged with collecting information relating to the epidemiological surveillance of communicable diseases, and by establishing procedures for the dissemination of the relevant surveillance data at Community level.
As regards the early warning and response system, this network shall be formed by bringing into permanent communication with one another, through appropriate means, the Commission and the competent public health authorities in each Member State responsible for determining the measures which may be required to protect public health.
The Commission shall provide for the coordination of the network in collaboration with the Member States.

Article 2
For the purpose of this Decision, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1. ‘epidemiological surveillance`: the ongoing systematic collection, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of health data, including epidemiological studies, concerning the categories of communicable diseases set out in the Annex, in particular relating to the pattern of spread of such diseases over time and space and analysis of the risk factors for contracting such diseases, for the purpose of enabling appropriate preventive measures and counter-measures to be taken;
2. ‘prevention and control of communicable diseases`: the range of measures, including epidemiological investigations, taken by the competent public health authorities in the Member States to prevent and stop the spread of communicable diseases;
3. ‘Community network`: network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases, namely the system by which the necessary information for carrying out the activities referred to in points 1 and 2 is exchanged.

Article 3
With a view to the effective operation of the Community network with regard to epidemiological surveillance and to achieving uniform information within this framework, the following shall be determined in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7:
(a) the communicable diseases to be progressively covered by the Community network;
(b) the criteria for selection of these diseases, having regard to the categories set out in the Annex and the existing collaborative networks for disease surveillance that can be built on;
(c) case definitions, in particular clinical and microbiological characteristics;
(d) the nature and type of data and information to be collected and transmitted by the structures and/or authorities referred to in the second paragraph of Article 1 in the field of epidemiological surveillance and the ways in which such data are to be made comparable and compatible;
(e) epidemiological and microbiological surveillance methods;
(f) guidelines on the protective measures to be taken, in particular at external frontiers of the Member States, notably in emergency situations;
(g) guidelines on information and guides to good practice for the public;
(h) the appropriate technical means and the procedures by which the data will be disseminated and analysed at Community level.

Article 4
Each structure and/or authority referred to in the second paragraph or in the third paragraph, whichever is appropriate of Article 1 shall communicate to the Community network:
(a) information regarding the appearance or resurgence of cases of communicable diseases as referred to in Article 3(a) in the Member State to which the structure and/or authority belongs, together with information on control measures applied;
(b) any relevant information concerning the progression of epidemic situations for which it has responsibility for information collection;
(c) information on unusual epidemic phenomena or new communicable diseases of unknown origin;
(d) any relevant information in its possession:
– on cases of communicable diseases covered by the categories set out in the Annex,
– on new communicable diseases of unknown origin in non-member countries;
(e) information concerning existing and proposed mechanisms and procedures for the prevention and control of communicable diseases, in particular in emergency situations;
(f) any relevant considerations which could help Member States to coordinate their efforts for the prevention and control of communicable diseases, including any counter-measures implemented.

Article 5
The Commission shall make available the information referred to in Article 3 to all the structures and authorities referred to in Article 1. Each structure/authority shall ensure that the information which they communicate to the network, pursuant to Article 4, is promptly forwarded to all other participating structures/authorities and the Commission.

Article 6
1. Member States shall, on the basis of the information available through the Community network, consult each other in liaison with the Commission with a view to coordinating their efforts for the prevention and control of communicable diseases.
2. Where a Member State intends to adopt measures for the control of communicable diseases, it shall, before adopting those measures, inform the other Member States and the Commission on the nature and scope of those measures, through the Community network. The Member State in question shall also consult other Member States and the Commission through the Community network on the nature and scope of intended measures unless the need to protect public health is so urgent that consultation proves impossible.
3. Where a Member State has to adopt, as a matter of urgency, control measures in response to the appearance or resurgence of communicable diseases, it shall, as soon as possible, inform through the Community network the other Member States and the Commission.
In duly justified specific cases, appropriate prevention and protection measures, adopted by mutual agreement among Member States in conjunction with the Commission, may be taken by the Member States which so desire.
4. Member States shall, on the basis of their consultations and the information provided, coordinate among themselves in liaison with the Commission with regard to the measures which they have adopted, or intend to adopt at national level.
5. Procedures concerning the information and consultation referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 and procedures concerning the coordination referred to in paragraphs 1 and 4 shall be established in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7.

Article 7
1. For the purposes of implementing this Decision, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of each of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
3. (a) The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee.
(b) If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall without delay submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by a qualified majority.
If within three months of the matter being referred to it the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission.

Article 8
The Annex may be amended or supplemented in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7.

Article 9
Each Member State shall designate, within six months of the entry into force of this Decision, the structures and/or authorities referred to in the second and third paragraphs of Article 1 and shall notify the Commission and the other Member States thereof. The structures and/or authorities which have been so designated shall be described in public by the Member States as forming part of the Community network established by this Decision.

Article 10
For the purposes of this Decision, the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission shall foster cooperation with non-member countries and international organisations competent in the field of public health, in particular the World Health Organisation.

Article 11
This Decision shall apply without prejudice to Directives 92/117/EEC and 95/46/EC.

Article 12
1. This Decision shall not affect the right of the Member States to maintain or introduce other arrangements, procedures and measures for their national systems for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases.
2. This Decision shall not affect Member States’ rights and obligations deriving from existing or future bilateral or multilateral agreements or conventions in the field covered by this Decision.

Article 13
The Commission, with the help of the Member States, shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between this Decision and the relevant Community programmes and initiatives, including those in the context of public health action as well as, in particular, the framework programme for statistical information, projects in the field of telematic interchange of data between administrations and the framework programme for research and technological development, especially the telematics applications of the latter programme.

Article 14
1. The Commission shall submit regular reports evaluating the operation of the Community network to the European Parliament and the Council.
2. The first report, which shall be submitted within three years after the entry into force of this Decision shall, in particular, identify those elements of the Community network which should be improved or adapted. It shall also include any proposal that the Commission considers necessary for the amendment or adaptation of this Decision.
3. The Commission shall conduct an evaluation of the Community network every five years thereafter, paying particular attention to its structural capacity and effective use of resources, and shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council.

Article 15
This Decision shall enter into force on 3 January 1999.

Article 16
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 September 1998.
For the European Parliament
The President
J. M. GIL-ROBLES
For the Council
J. FARNLEITNER
(1) OJ C 123, 26. 4. 1996, p. 10 and
OJ C 103, 2. 4. 1997, p. 11.
(2) OJ C 30, 30. 1. 1997, p. 1.
(3) OJ C 337, 11. 11. 1996, p. 67.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 November 1996 (OJ C 362, 2. 12. 1996, p. 111), Council Common Position of 22 July 1997 (OJ C 284, 19. 9. 1997, p. 10) and Decision of the European Parliament of 14 January 1998 (OJ C 34, 2. 2. 98, p. 70). Decision of the European Parliament of 15 July 1998 (OJ C 292, 21. 9. 1998). Council Decision of 20 July 1998.
(5) OJ C 329, 6. 12. 1993, p. 375.
(6) OJ C 165, 17. 6. 1994, p. 1.
(7) OJ C 15, 18. 1. 1994, p. 6.
(8) OJ C 326, 11. 12. 1992, p. 1.
(9) OJ L 95, 16. 4. 1996, p. 16.
(10) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 38.
(11) OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995, p. 31.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 129 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 27 May 1998,(1) Whereas the prevention of disease, in particular of the major health scourges, is a priority for Community action, requiring a global approach coordinated between Member States;(2) Whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution on public health policy after Maastricht (5), invited the Commission to set up a transfrontier network to devise working definitions of notifiable diseases, to collect, update, analyse and disseminate Member States data on such diseases and to work with national and international agencies on these matters;(3) Whereas in its resolution of 2 June 1994 (6) on the framework for Community action in the field of public health the Council agreed that priority should be given at present to communicable diseases in particular;(4) Whereas in its conclusions of 13 December 1993 (7) the Council considered that there was a need to develop at Community level a network for the surveillance and control of communicable diseases, the main purpose of which would be to collect and coordinate information from monitoring networks in the Member States;(5) Whereas in those same conclusions the Council requested the Commission to devote special attention, in its proposals relating to the framework for action in the field of public health, to setting up an epidemiological network in the Community, taking account of the current proceedings and mechanisms existing at Community and at Member State level, and ensuring the comparability and compatibility of data;(6) Whereas in their resolution of 13 November 1992 on the monitoring and surveillance of communicable diseases (8) the Council and the Ministers for Health, meeting within the Council, underlined the desirability of improving, within the Community, the coverage and effectiveness of existing networks between Member States for the surveillance of communicable diseases (including data-processing networks), and also the desirability of maintaining, establishing or strengthening coordination between them for monitoring outbreaks of communicable diseases, where such action could add to the value of existing measures;(7) Whereas in that same resolution, the Council and the Ministers for Health, meeting within the Council, underlined the value of collecting data from the Member States on a limited number of rare and serious diseases which require large samples for epidemiological study;(8) Whereas in that same resolution the Council and the Ministers for Health, meeting within the Council, invited the Commission to examine the desirability of giving priority to certain suitable proposals relating to the control and surveillance of communicable diseases, in the light, inter alia, of their estimated cost-effectiveness;(9) Whereas, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, any new measure taken in an area which does not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community, such as the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases, may be taken by the Community only if, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, the objectives of the proposed action can be better achieved by the Community than by the Member States;(10) Whereas the varying levels and needs of epidemiological surveillance of communicable diseases in the Member States make it necessary to establish a permanent network at Community level;(11) Whereas measures to be taken in the health field must take into account other actions undertaken by the Community in the field of public health or which have an impact on public health;(12) Whereas the measures to be taken under this Decision are adopted excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States;(13) Whereas Decision 647/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on the prevention of AIDS and certain other communicable diseases within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996 to 2000) (9) envisages a number of Community actions for the creation and development of networks for the control and surveillance of certain communicable diseases, the early detection of such diseases, and promotion of the training of field epidemiologists;(14) Whereas cooperation with the competent international organisations, particularly the World Health Organisation, notably with regard to disease classification, must be fostered, as well as the use of appropriate language and technology;(15) Whereas cooperation with non-member countries, in particular in the case of the appearance or resurgence of serious communicable diseases, must be supported;(16) Whereas the recent appearance or resurgence of serious communicable diseases has demonstrated that when an emergency situation occurs all necessary information and data gathered in accordance with an agreed methodology must be communicated swiftly to the Commission;(17) Whereas, in order to ensure protection of the population in an emergency, Member States must exchange relevant data and information immediately via the Community network; whereas priority must be given at all times to the protection of public health;(18) Whereas Council Directive 92/117/EEC of 17 December 1992 concerning measures for protection against specified zoonoses and specified zoonotic agents in animals and products of animal origin in order to prevent outbreaks of food-borne infections and intoxications (10) applies equally to information concerning zoonoses which affect human beings; whereas that same Directive provides for a system for collecting and transmitting information on specified zoonoses and zoonotic agents;(19) Whereas the setting-up of a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases at Community level necessarily presupposes compliance with the legal provisions concerning the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the introduction of arrangements to guarantee the confidentiality and security of such data; whereas in this connection the European Parliament and the Council adopted Directive 95/46/EC (11);(20) Whereas the Community projects in the field of the telematic interchange of data between administrations (IDA) (12) and the G7 projects should be closely coordinated with the implementation of the Community actions relating to the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases;(21) Whereas consideration must be given to the efforts deployed with a view to encouraging international cooperation in this field, particularly as part of a joint plan of action with the United States;(22) Whereas it is important, in an emergency situation, that the competent national structures and/or authorities should strengthen their cooperation, in particular with regard to the identification of biological samples;(23) Whereas any Community procedures which may be set up for the rapid exchange of information do not affect the Member States’ rights and obligations under bilateral or multilateral agreements and conventions;(24) Whereas a procedure needs to be established to promote coordination between the Member States concerning the measures they may decide to take to control the spread of communicable diseases; whereas the adoption and implementation of these measures fall within the exclusive competence of the Member States;(25) Whereas it is important that the Commission should implement the Community network in close cooperation with the Member States; whereas a procedure therefore needs to be established to ensure the Member States’ full participation in this implementation;(26) Whereas the costs which may result from the operation of the network at Community level should be met from Community resources and/or from relevant Community programmes;(27) Whereas the costs which may result from the operation of the network at national level will have to be financed by the Member States themselves, unless Community provisions provide otherwise;(28) Whereas a modus vivendi between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concerning the implementing measures for acts adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (13) was concluded on 20 December 1994,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The objective of this Decision is to set up a network at Community level to promote cooperation and coordination between the Member States, with the assistance of the Commission, with a view to improving the prevention and control, in the Community, of the categories of communicable diseases specified in the Annex. This network shall be used for:
– the epidemiological surveillance of these diseases, and
– an early warning and response system for the prevention and control of these diseases.
As regards epidemiological surveillance, the network shall be established by bringing into permanent communication with one another, through all appropriate technical means, the Commission and those structures and/or authorities which, at the level of each Member State and under the responsibility of that Member State, are competent at national level and are charged with collecting information relating to the epidemiological surveillance of communicable diseases, and by establishing procedures for the dissemination of the relevant surveillance data at Community level.
As regards the early warning and response system, this network shall be formed by bringing into permanent communication with one another, through appropriate means, the Commission and the competent public health authorities in each Member State responsible for determining the measures which may be required to protect public health.
The Commission shall provide for the coordination of the network in collaboration with the Member States.
For the purpose of this Decision, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1. ‘epidemiological surveillance`: the ongoing systematic collection, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of health data, including epidemiological studies, concerning the categories of communicable diseases set out in the Annex, in particular relating to the pattern of spread of such diseases over time and space and analysis of the risk factors for contracting such diseases, for the purpose of enabling appropriate preventive measures and counter-measures to be taken;
2. ‘prevention and control of communicable diseases`: the range of measures, including epidemiological investigations, taken by the competent public health authorities in the Member States to prevent and stop the spread of communicable diseases;
3. ‘Community network`: network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases, namely the system by which the necessary information for carrying out the activities referred to in points 1 and 2 is exchanged.
With a view to the effective operation of the Community network with regard to epidemiological surveillance and to achieving uniform information within this framework, the following shall be determined in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7:
(a) the communicable diseases to be progressively covered by the Community network;
(b) the criteria for selection of these diseases, having regard to the categories set out in the Annex and the existing collaborative networks for disease surveillance that can be built on;
(c) case definitions, in particular clinical and microbiological characteristics;
(d) the nature and type of data and information to be collected and transmitted by the structures and/or authorities referred to in the second paragraph of Article 1 in the field of epidemiological surveillance and the ways in which such data are to be made comparable and compatible;
(e) epidemiological and microbiological surveillance methods;
(f) guidelines on the protective measures to be taken, in particular at external frontiers of the Member States, notably in emergency situations;
(g) guidelines on information and guides to good practice for the public;
(h) the appropriate technical means and the procedures by which the data will be disseminated and analysed at Community level.
Each structure and/or authority referred to in the second paragraph or in the third paragraph, whichever is appropriate of Article 1 shall communicate to the Community network:
(a) information regarding the appearance or resurgence of cases of communicable diseases as referred to in Article 3(a) in the Member State to which the structure and/or authority belongs, together with information on control measures applied;
(b) any relevant information concerning the progression of epidemic situations for which it has responsibility for information collection;
(c) information on unusual epidemic phenomena or new communicable diseases of unknown origin;
(d) any relevant information in its possession:
– on cases of communicable diseases covered by the categories set out in the Annex,
– on new communicable diseases of unknown origin in non-member countries;
(e) information concerning existing and proposed mechanisms and procedures for the prevention and control of communicable diseases, in particular in emergency situations;
(f) any relevant considerations which could help Member States to coordinate their efforts for the prevention and control of communicable diseases, including any counter-measures implemented.
The Commission shall make available the information referred to in Article 3 to all the structures and authorities referred to in Article 1. Each structure/authority shall ensure that the information which they communicate to the network, pursuant to Article 4, is promptly forwarded to all other participating structures/authorities and the Commission.
1. Member States shall, on the basis of the information available through the Community network, consult each other in liaison with the Commission with a view to coordinating their efforts for the prevention and control of communicable diseases.
2. Where a Member State intends to adopt measures for the control of communicable diseases, it shall, before adopting those measures, inform the other Member States and the Commission on the nature and scope of those measures, through the Community network. The Member State in question shall also consult other Member States and the Commission through the Community network on the nature and scope of intended measures unless the need to protect public health is so urgent that consultation proves impossible.
3. Where a Member State has to adopt, as a matter of urgency, control measures in response to the appearance or resurgence of communicable diseases, it shall, as soon as possible, inform through the Community network the other Member States and the Commission.
In duly justified specific cases, appropriate prevention and protection measures, adopted by mutual agreement among Member States in conjunction with the Commission, may be taken by the Member States which so desire.
4. Member States shall, on the basis of their consultations and the information provided, coordinate among themselves in liaison with the Commission with regard to the measures which they have adopted, or intend to adopt at national level.
5. Procedures concerning the information and consultation referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 and procedures concerning the coordination referred to in paragraphs 1 and 4 shall be established in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7.
1. For the purposes of implementing this Decision, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of each of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
3. (a) The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee.
(b) If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall without delay submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by a qualified majority.
If within three months of the matter being referred to it the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission.
The Annex may be amended or supplemented in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7.
Each Member State shall designate, within six months of the entry into force of this Decision, the structures and/or authorities referred to in the second and third paragraphs of Article 1 and shall notify the Commission and the other Member States thereof. The structures and/or authorities which have been so designated shall be described in public by the Member States as forming part of the Community network established by this Decision.
For the purposes of this Decision, the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission shall foster cooperation with non-member countries and international organisations competent in the field of public health, in particular the World Health Organisation.
This Decision shall apply without prejudice to Directives 92/117/EEC and 95/46/EC.
1. This Decision shall not affect the right of the Member States to maintain or introduce other arrangements, procedures and measures for their national systems for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases.
2. This Decision shall not affect Member States’ rights and obligations deriving from existing or future bilateral or multilateral agreements or conventions in the field covered by this Decision.
The Commission, with the help of the Member States, shall ensure that there is consistency and complementarity between this Decision and the relevant Community programmes and initiatives, including those in the context of public health action as well as, in particular, the framework programme for statistical information, projects in the field of telematic interchange of data between administrations and the framework programme for research and technological development, especially the telematics applications of the latter programme.
1. The Commission shall submit regular reports evaluating the operation of the Community network to the European Parliament and the Council.
2. The first report, which shall be submitted within three years after the entry into force of this Decision shall, in particular, identify those elements of the Community network which should be improved or adapted. It shall also include any proposal that the Commission considers necessary for the amendment or adaptation of this Decision.
3. The Commission shall conduct an evaluation of the Community network every five years thereafter, paying particular attention to its structural capacity and effective use of resources, and shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council.
This Decision shall enter into force on 3 January 1999.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 September 1998.
For the European Parliament
The President
J. M. GIL-ROBLES
For the Council
J. FARNLEITNER
(1) OJ C 123, 26. 4. 1996, p. 10 and
OJ C 103, 2. 4. 1997, p. 11.
(2) OJ C 30, 30. 1. 1997, p. 1.
(3) OJ C 337, 11. 11. 1996, p. 67.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 November 1996 (OJ C 362, 2. 12. 1996, p. 111), Council Common Position of 22 July 1997 (OJ C 284, 19. 9. 1997, p. 10) and Decision of the European Parliament of 14 January 1998 (OJ C 34, 2. 2. 98, p. 70). Decision of the European Parliament of 15 July 1998 (OJ C 292, 21. 9. 1998). Council Decision of 20 July 1998.
(5) OJ C 329, 6. 12. 1993, p. 375.
(6) OJ C 165, 17. 6. 1994, p. 1.
(7) OJ C 15, 18. 1. 1994, p. 6.
(8) OJ C 326, 11. 12. 1992, p. 1.
(9) OJ L 95, 16. 4. 1996, p. 16.
(10) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 38.
(11) OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995, p. 31.
LIST INDICATING CATEGORIES OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES
– Diseases preventable by vaccination
– Sexually-transmitted diseases
– Viral hepatitis
– Food-borne diseases
– Water-borne diseases and diseases of environmental origin
– Nosocomial infections
– Other diseases transmissible by non-conventional agents (including Creutzfeldt-Jakob’s disease)
– Diseases covered by the international health regulations (yellow fever, cholera and plague)
– Other diseases (rabies, typhus, viral haemorrhagic fevers, malaria and any other as yet unclassified serious epidemic disease, etc.).
Commission statement
The Commission will take particular care to set up, in the light of the resources available, a clearly identified structure with sufficient staff to ensure application of the Decision.

Pending: 31998D0684

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2),Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of 10 January 1997 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China, and levying the extended duty on such imports registered pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 703/96 (3),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 of 20 January 1997 on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 (4), and in particular Article 7 thereof,After consulting the Advisory Committee,Whereas:A. REQUESTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION (EC) No 88/97 (1) After the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 a number of bicycle assemblers submitted requests pursuant to Article 3 of that Regulation for exemption from the extension to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the extended anti-dumping duty`) of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93. The Commission published in the Official Journal of the European Communities a list of applicants (5) for which payment of the extended anti-dumping duty in respect of their imports of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation was suspended pursuant to Article 5(1) of that Regulation.(2) The Commission requested and received the necessary information from the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision and found their requests admissible pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 88/97. The information provided was examined and verified where necessary at the premises of the parties concerned.(3) The facts as finally ascertained by the Commission show that the assembly operations of the applicants concerned do not fall within the scope of Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96. It was found that for all the applicants’ bicycle assembly operations, the value of the parts originating in the People’s Republic of China which were used in their assembly operations was lower than 60 % of the total value of the parts used in these assembly operations. In addition, for some of them, the value added to the parts brought in exceeded 25 % of the manufacturing costs of the finished bicycles.(4) For the above reasons, and in accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 88/97, the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty. The parties concerned were informed accordingly and given an opportunity to comment.(5) In accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty as from the date of receipt of their request and their customs debt in respect of the extended anti-dumping duty is to be considered void as from that date.B. INFORMATION TO INTERESTED PARTIES (6) Following the adoption of this Decision, an updated list of parties exempted pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 and of parties whose requests pursuant to Article 3 of that Regulation are under examination will be published in the ‘C` series of the Official Journal of the European Communities in accordance with Article 16(2) of that Regulation,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The parties listed in the Annex to this Decision are hereby exempted from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97, of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China, to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China.
The exemptions shall take effect in relation to each party as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect`.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 1998.
For the Commission
Leon BRITTAN
Vice-President
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 128, 30. 4. 1998, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 16, 18. 1. 1997, p. 55.
(4) OJ L 17, 21. 1. 1997, p. 17.
(5) OJ C 45, 13. 2. 1997, p. 3;
OJ C 112, 10. 4. 1997, p. 9;
OJ C 378, 13. 12. 1997, p. 2 and
OJ C 217, 11. 7. 1998, p. 9.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2),Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of 10 January 1997 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China, and levying the extended duty on such imports registered pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 703/96 (3),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 of 20 January 1997 on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 (4), and in particular Article 7 thereof,After consulting the Advisory Committee,Whereas:A. REQUESTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION (EC) No 88/97 (1) After the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 a number of bicycle assemblers submitted requests pursuant to Article 3 of that Regulation for exemption from the extension to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the extended anti-dumping duty`) of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93. The Commission published in the Official Journal of the European Communities a list of applicants (5) for which payment of the extended anti-dumping duty in respect of their imports of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation was suspended pursuant to Article 5(1) of that Regulation.(2) The Commission requested and received the necessary information from the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision and found their requests admissible pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 88/97. The information provided was examined and verified where necessary at the premises of the parties concerned.(3) The facts as finally ascertained by the Commission show that the assembly operations of the applicants concerned do not fall within the scope of Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96. It was found that for all the applicants’ bicycle assembly operations, the value of the parts originating in the People’s Republic of China which were used in their assembly operations was lower than 60 % of the total value of the parts used in these assembly operations. In addition, for some of them, the value added to the parts brought in exceeded 25 % of the manufacturing costs of the finished bicycles.(4) For the above reasons, and in accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 88/97, the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty. The parties concerned were informed accordingly and given an opportunity to comment.(5) In accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty as from the date of receipt of their request and their customs debt in respect of the extended anti-dumping duty is to be considered void as from that date.B. INFORMATION TO INTERESTED PARTIES (6) Following the adoption of this Decision, an updated list of parties exempted pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 and of parties whose requests pursuant to Article 3 of that Regulation are under examination will be published in the ‘C` series of the Official Journal of the European Communities in accordance with Article 16(2) of that Regulation,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The parties listed in the Annex to this Decision are hereby exempted from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97, of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China, to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China.
The exemptions shall take effect in relation to each party as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect`.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in the Annex to this Decision.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 1998.
For the Commission
Leon BRITTAN
Vice-President
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 128, 30. 4. 1998, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 16, 18. 1. 1997, p. 55.
(4) OJ L 17, 21. 1. 1997, p. 17.
(5) OJ C 45, 13. 2. 1997, p. 3;
OJ C 112, 10. 4. 1997, p. 9;
OJ C 378, 13. 12. 1997, p. 2 and
OJ C 217, 11. 7. 1998, p. 9.

Pending: 31998D0589

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,Having regard to the request submitted by Spain,Whereas the Kingdom of Spain has requested an extension to six months of the maximum period laid down for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals, due to practical difficulties;Whereas the holdings where those bovine animals are born are situated in certain geographical zones and the animals in question belong to certain races;Whereas those bovine animals are kept in extensive farming conditions and in free range where calves stay always close to their mother until they are separated at the age of six months at the latest;Whereas it is justified to take account of Spain’s request, provided that the extension of the maximum period does not affect the quality of information provided by the Spanish database and that there is no movement of such animals to which eartags have not been applied;Whereas the Spanish authorities undertake not to extend this derogation to other elements of the identification and registration system of bovine animals;Whereas this Decision should be without prejudice to the decisions to be adopted regarding the fully operational character of the national databases;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Spain may extend to six months the maximum period laid down by Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 820/97 for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals which fulfil all the conditions set out in Article 2.
This extension shall not affect the quality of information provided by the Spanish database.

Article 2
1. The extension provided for in Article 1 shall be granted subject to all the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 5.
2. The holdings on which the animals are born shall be situated in one of the geographical areas listed in the Annex.
3. The animals shall belong to one of the breeds listed in the Annex.
4. The animals are reared at liberty in a totally extensive system, with the calves staying with their mother until weaned.
5. The eartags shall be applied when the calves are separated from their mothers and, in any case, before they are six months old. If an animal leaves the holding on which it was born before that age, it shall be identified before leaving the holding.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 October 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 117, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.
ANEXO – BILAG – ANHANG – ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ – ANNEX – ANNEXE – ALLEGATO – BIJLAGE – ANEXO – LIITE – BILAGA

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,Having regard to the request submitted by Spain,Whereas the Kingdom of Spain has requested an extension to six months of the maximum period laid down for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals, due to practical difficulties;Whereas the holdings where those bovine animals are born are situated in certain geographical zones and the animals in question belong to certain races;Whereas those bovine animals are kept in extensive farming conditions and in free range where calves stay always close to their mother until they are separated at the age of six months at the latest;Whereas it is justified to take account of Spain’s request, provided that the extension of the maximum period does not affect the quality of information provided by the Spanish database and that there is no movement of such animals to which eartags have not been applied;Whereas the Spanish authorities undertake not to extend this derogation to other elements of the identification and registration system of bovine animals;Whereas this Decision should be without prejudice to the decisions to be adopted regarding the fully operational character of the national databases;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Spain may extend to six months the maximum period laid down by Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 820/97 for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals which fulfil all the conditions set out in Article 2.
This extension shall not affect the quality of information provided by the Spanish database.
1. The extension provided for in Article 1 shall be granted subject to all the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 to 5.
2. The holdings on which the animals are born shall be situated in one of the geographical areas listed in the Annex.
3. The animals shall belong to one of the breeds listed in the Annex.
4. The animals are reared at liberty in a totally extensive system, with the calves staying with their mother until weaned.
5. The eartags shall be applied when the calves are separated from their mothers and, in any case, before they are six months old. If an animal leaves the holding on which it was born before that age, it shall be identified before leaving the holding.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 October 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 117, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.
ANEXO – BILAG – ANHANG – ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ – ANNEX – ANNEXE – ALLEGATO – BIJLAGE – ANEXO – LIITE – BILAGA

Pending: 31998D0510

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC (2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (3), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC, and in particular Article 6(4) thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 97/778/EC (4), as last amended by Decision 98/166/EC (5), draws up a list of border inspection posts agreed for veterinary checks on products and animals from third countries;Whereas the way the list of border inspection posts is presented should be revised for reasons connected with the computerisation of the databases;Whereas the lists should be updated in respect of Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and Austria, in particular by adding the border inspection post Heiligenkreuz in the case of the latter Member State;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Annex to Decision 97/778/EC is replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 July 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 162, 1. 7. 1996, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56.
(4) OJ L 315, 19. 11. 1997, p. 15.
(5) OJ L 62, 3. 3. 1998, p. 29.
ANEXO – BILAG – ANHANG – ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ – ANNEX – ANNEXE – ALLEGATO – BIJLAGE – ANEXO – LIITE – BILAGA
LISTA DE PUESTOS DE INSPECCIÓN FRONTERIZOS AUTORIZADOS LISTE OVER GODKENDTE GRÆNSEKONTROLSTEDER VERZEICHNIS DER ZUGELASSENEN GRENZKONTROLLSTELLEN ÊÁÔÁËÏÃÏÓ ÔÙÍ ÅÃÊÅÊÑÉÌÅÍÙÍ ÌÅÈÏÑÉÁÊÙÍ ÓÔÁÈÌÙÍ ÅÐÉÈÅÙÑÇÓÇÓ LIST OF AGREED BORDER INSPECTION POSTS LISTES DES POSTES D’INSPECTION FRONTALIERS AGRÉÉS ELENCO DEI POSTI DI ISPEZIONE FRONTALIERI RICONOSCIUTI LIJST VAN DE ERKENDE INSPECTIEPOSTEN AAN DE GRENS LISTA DOS POSTOS DE INSPECÇÃO APROVADOS LUETTELO HYVÄKSYTYISTÄ RAJATARKASTUSASEMISTA FÖRTECKNING ÖVER GODKÄNDA GRÄNSKONTROLLSTATIONER
2 = Código Animo
Êùäéêüò Animo
Codice Animo
Código Animo
Animo-koodi
A = Aeropuerto
Lentokenttä
F = Ferrocarril

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC (2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (3), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC, and in particular Article 6(4) thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 97/778/EC (4), as last amended by Decision 98/166/EC (5), draws up a list of border inspection posts agreed for veterinary checks on products and animals from third countries;Whereas the way the list of border inspection posts is presented should be revised for reasons connected with the computerisation of the databases;Whereas the lists should be updated in respect of Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and Austria, in particular by adding the border inspection post Heiligenkreuz in the case of the latter Member State;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Annex to Decision 97/778/EC is replaced by the Annex hereto.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 July 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 162, 1. 7. 1996, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56.
(4) OJ L 315, 19. 11. 1997, p. 15.
(5) OJ L 62, 3. 3. 1998, p. 29.
ANEXO – BILAG – ANHANG – ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ – ANNEX – ANNEXE – ALLEGATO – BIJLAGE – ANEXO – LIITE – BILAGA
LISTA DE PUESTOS DE INSPECCIÓN FRONTERIZOS AUTORIZADOS LISTE OVER GODKENDTE GRÆNSEKONTROLSTEDER VERZEICHNIS DER ZUGELASSENEN GRENZKONTROLLSTELLEN ÊÁÔÁËÏÃÏÓ ÔÙÍ ÅÃÊÅÊÑÉÌÅÍÙÍ ÌÅÈÏÑÉÁÊÙÍ ÓÔÁÈÌÙÍ ÅÐÉÈÅÙÑÇÓÇÓ LIST OF AGREED BORDER INSPECTION POSTS LISTES DES POSTES D’INSPECTION FRONTALIERS AGRÉÉS ELENCO DEI POSTI DI ISPEZIONE FRONTALIERI RICONOSCIUTI LIJST VAN DE ERKENDE INSPECTIEPOSTEN AAN DE GRENS LISTA DOS POSTOS DE INSPECÇÃO APROVADOS LUETTELO HYVÄKSYTYISTÄ RAJATARKASTUSASEMISTA FÖRTECKNING ÖVER GODKÄNDA GRÄNSKONTROLLSTATIONER
2 = Código Animo
Êùäéêüò Animo
Codice Animo
Código Animo
Animo-koodi
A = Aeropuerto
Lentokenttä
F = Ferrocarril