Pending: 32002D0106

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever(1), and in particular Article 17(3) and Article 29(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) It is necessary to lay down at Community level diagnostic procedures, sampling methods and criteria for the evaluation of the results of laboratory tests for the confirmation of classical swine fever.(2) Annex IV to Directive 2001/89/EC lays down the functions and duties of the Community Reference Laboratory for classical swine fever in order to coordinate, in consultation with the Commission, the methods employed in the Member States for diagnosing the disease; these functions and duties include the organisation of periodic comparative tests and the supplying of standard reagents at Community level.(3) Classical swine fever virus is not considered to be a hazard for human health.(4) Laboratory tests have been recently developed to ensure a quick diagnosis of classical swine fever.(5) The experience gained in the control of classical swine fever in recent years has resulted in the identification of the most suitable sampling procedures and criteria for evaluation of the results of the laboratory tests for a proper diagnosis of this disease in different situations.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

Article 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the confirmation of classical swine fever is based on:
(a) the detection of clinical signs and post-mortem lesions of disease;
(b) the detection of virus, antigen or genome in samples of pig tissues, organs, blood or excreta;
(c) the demonstration of a specific antibody response in blood samples,
in accordance with the procedures, sampling methods and criteria for evaluation of the results of laboratory tests laid down in the Manual annexed to this Decision.
2. However, the national diagnostic laboratories referred to in Annex III(1) to Directive 2001/89/EC may apply modifications to the laboratory tests referred to in the Manual annexed to this Decision, or use different tests, provided that an equal sensitivity and specificity can be demonstrated.
The sensitivity and specificity of these modified or different tests must be evaluated in the framework of the periodic comparative tests organised by the Community Reference Laboratory for classical swine fever.

Article 3
This Decision shall apply from 1 November 2002.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 February 2002.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5.
(2) OJ L 47, 21.2.1980, p. 11.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever(1), and in particular Article 17(3) and Article 29(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) It is necessary to lay down at Community level diagnostic procedures, sampling methods and criteria for the evaluation of the results of laboratory tests for the confirmation of classical swine fever.(2) Annex IV to Directive 2001/89/EC lays down the functions and duties of the Community Reference Laboratory for classical swine fever in order to coordinate, in consultation with the Commission, the methods employed in the Member States for diagnosing the disease; these functions and duties include the organisation of periodic comparative tests and the supplying of standard reagents at Community level.(3) Classical swine fever virus is not considered to be a hazard for human health.(4) Laboratory tests have been recently developed to ensure a quick diagnosis of classical swine fever.(5) The experience gained in the control of classical swine fever in recent years has resulted in the identification of the most suitable sampling procedures and criteria for evaluation of the results of the laboratory tests for a proper diagnosis of this disease in different situations.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,
1. Member States shall ensure that the confirmation of classical swine fever is based on:
(a) the detection of clinical signs and post-mortem lesions of disease;
(b) the detection of virus, antigen or genome in samples of pig tissues, organs, blood or excreta;
(c) the demonstration of a specific antibody response in blood samples,
in accordance with the procedures, sampling methods and criteria for evaluation of the results of laboratory tests laid down in the Manual annexed to this Decision.
2. However, the national diagnostic laboratories referred to in Annex III(1) to Directive 2001/89/EC may apply modifications to the laboratory tests referred to in the Manual annexed to this Decision, or use different tests, provided that an equal sensitivity and specificity can be demonstrated.
The sensitivity and specificity of these modified or different tests must be evaluated in the framework of the periodic comparative tests organised by the Community Reference Laboratory for classical swine fever.
This Decision shall apply from 1 November 2002.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 February 2002.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5.
(2) OJ L 47, 21.2.1980, p. 11.
CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL

Pending: 32002D0060

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,Having regard to the proposals made by the governments of the Member States,Whereas:The Committee should consist of representatives of regional and local bodies,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006:- as members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex I hereto,- as alternate members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex II hereto.Article 2This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.Done at Brussels, 22 January 2002.For the CouncilThe PresidentR. de Rato y FigaredoANEXO I/BILAG I/ANHANG I/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Ι/ANNEX I/ANNEXE I/ALLEGATO I/BIJLAGE I/ANEXO I/LIITE I/BILAGA IMiembros/Medlemmer/Mitglieder/Μέλη/Members/Membres/Membri/Leden/Membros/Jäsenet/LedamöterBELGIË/BELGIQUE/BELGIENVAN CAUWENBERG Jean-ClaudeMinistre-président du gouvernement wallonHASQUIN HervéMinistre-président de la communauté française, chargé des relations internationalesDESGAIN XavierDéputé wallonLAMBERTZ Karl-HeinzMinistre-président du gouvernement de la communauté germanophone et ministre de l’emploi, de la politique des handicapés, des médias et des sportsDE DONNEA François-XavierMinistre-président du gouvernement de la région de Bruxelles-Capitale et ministre des pouvoirs locaux, de l’aménagement du territoire, des monuments et sites, de la rénovation urbaine et de la recherche scientifiqueCHABERT JosMinistre des travaux publics, du transport, de la lutte contre l’incendie et de l’aide médicale urgente du gouvernement de la région de Bruxelles-CapitaleStefaan PLATTEAUVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerPatrick DEWAELMinister-President van de Vlaamse RegeringGilbert BOSSUYTVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerFrans RAMONVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerPaul VAN GREMBERGENVlaams minister van Binnenlandse Aangelegenheden, Ambtenarenzaken en Buitenlands BeleidLuc VAN DEN BRANDEVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerDANMARKAmtsborgmester Knud ANDERSENBornholms AmtAmtsborgmester Vibeke STORM RASMUSSENKøbenhavns AmtAmtsborgmester Johannes FLENSTED-JENSENÅrhus AmtAmtsrådsmedlem Lars ABELKøbenhavns AmtBorgmester Henning JENSENNæstved KommuneBorgmester Ejgil W. RASMUSSENGedved KommuneBorgmester Søren ANDERSENSkive KommuneBorgmester Anker BOYEOdense KommuneOverborgmester Jens KRAMER MIKKELSENKøbenhavns KommuneDEUTSCHLANDMinisterpräsident Erwin TEUFELStaatsministerium Baden-WürttembergMinister Reinhold BOCKLETMinister für Bundes- und EuropaangelegenheitenBayerische StaatskanzleiAndré SCHMITZStaatssekretär, Chef der Senatskanzlei, Land BerlinProf. Dr. Kurt SCHELTER,Ministerium der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes BrandenburgManfred LENZMitglied des Landtages BrandenburgDr. Kerstin KIEßLERBevollmächtigte beim Bund und für Europa und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, Bremen.Reinhard STUTHBevollmächtigter beim Bund und Europabeauftragter des Senats, HamburgBerndt RÖDERErster Vizepräsident der Bürgerschaft, HamburgJochen RIEBELMinister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten und Chef der Staatskanzlei, Hessische StaatskanzleiHelmut HOLTERMinister für Arbeit und Bau und Stellvertretender Ministerpräsident, Mecklenburg-VorpommernTill BACKHAUSMinister für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft, Forsten und Fischerei, Mecklenburg-VorpommernWolfgang SENFFMinister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten, Niedersächsische StaatskanzleiProf. Dr. Manfred DAMMEYERMitglied des Landtages, Nordrhein-WestfalenDr. Karl-Heinz KLÄRStaatssekretär, Bevollmächtigter beim Bund und für Europa, Rheinland-Pfalz.Peter MÜLLERMinisterpräsident des SaarlandesHelma KUHN-THEISMitglied des Landtages des SaarlandesStanislaw TILLICHStaatsminister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten, Sächsische StaatskanzleiTilman TÖGELMitglied des Landtages von Sachsen-AnhaltHeide SIMONISMinisterpräsidentin, Staatskanzlei Schleswig-HolsteinJürgen GNAUCKMinister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten und Chef der Staatskanzlei, ThüringenFritz SCHRÖTERMitglied des Thüringer LandtagesPetra ROTHDeutscher Städtetag, Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Frankfurt am MainAxel ENDLEINPräsident des Deutschen Landkreistages, Landrat, MdL, NortheimHans EVESLAGEVizepräsident des Deutschen Städte- und Gemeindebundes, Landrat, BarßelΕΛΛΑΣΚΟΥΛΟΥΜΠΗΣ ΕυάγγελοςΝομαρχιακός Σύμβουλος ΑθηνώνΠΑΠΑΤΣΑΚΩΝΑΣ ΙωάννηςΝομάρχης ΛασιθίουΑΠΟΣΤΟΛΑΚΟΣ ΓρηγόριοςΝομάρχης ΛακωνίαςΕΥΣΤΑΘΙΑΔΗΣ ΔημήτριοςΝομαρχιακός Σύμβουλος ΑθηνώνΖΑΡΜΠΑΛΑΣ ΝικόλαοςΝομάρχης ΙωαννίνωνΣΚΟΤΕΙΝΙΩΤΗΣ ΠαναγιώτηςΝομάρχης ΜαγνησίαςΑΒΡΑΜΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΔημήτριοςΔήμαρχος ΑθηνώνΚΑΡΑΒΟΛΑΣ ΑνδρέαςΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΠατρώνΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΠάριςΔήμαρχος ΚοζάνηςΛΑΖΑΡΙΔΗΣ ΘρασύβουλοςΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΘεσσαλονίκηςΝΙΚΟΛΑΪΔΟΥ ΒέραΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΝίκαιαςΠΑΛΑΙΟΛΟΓΟΥ ΧρήστοςΔήμαρχος ΛειβαδιάςESPAÑAExcmo. Sr. D. Juan José IBARRETXE MARKUARTUPresidente del Gobierno VascoMolt Honorable Sr. Jordi PUJOL I SOLEYPresidente de la Generalidad de CataluñaExcmo. Sr. D. Manuel FRAGA IRIBARNEPresidente de la Xunta de GaliciaExcmo. Sr. D. Manuel CHAVES GONZÁLEZPresidente de la Junta de AndalucíaExcmo. Sr. D. Vicente A. ÁLVAREZ ARECESPresidente del Gobierno del Principado de AsturiasExcmo. Sr. D. José Joaquín MARTÍNEZ SIESOPresidente del Gobierno de CantabriaExcmo. Sr. D. Pedro SANZ ALONSOPresidente del Gobierno de La RiojaExcmo. Sr. D. Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISOPresidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de MurciaMolt Honorable Sr. D. Eduardo ZAPLANA HERNÁNDEZ-SOROPresidente de la Generalidad ValencianaExcmo. Sr. D. Marcelino IGLESIAS RICOUPresidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de AragónExcmo. Sr. D. José BONO MARTÍNEZPresidente de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La ManchaExcmo. Sr. D. Román RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZPresidente del Gobierno de CanariasExcmo. Sr. D. Miguel SANZ SESMAPresidente del Gobierno de NavarraExcmo. Sr. D. Juan Carlos RODRÍGUEZ IBARRAPresidente de la Junta de ExtremaduraHonorable Sr. Francesc ANTICH OLIVERPresidente del Gobierno BalearExcmo. Sr. D. Alberto RUIZ-GALLARDÓN JIMÉNEZPresidente de la Comunidad de MadridExcmo. Sr. D. Juan VICENTE HERRERA CAMPOPresidente de la Junta de Castilla y LeónIlma. Sra. D.a Rita BARBERÁ NOLLAAlcaldesa de ValenciaExcmo. Sr. D. José María ÁLVAREZ DEL MANZANO Y LÓPEZ DEL HIERROAlcalde de MadridExcmo. Sr. D. Joan CLOS I MATHEUAlcalde de BarcelonaIlma Sra. D.a Paz Fernández FELGUEROSOAlcaldesa de Gijón (Asturias)FRANCEJean-Pierre BAZINVice-président du Conseil régional des Pays de la LoireMarc BELLETConseiller régional de Basse-NormandieJacques BLANCPrésident du Conseil régional de Languedoc-RoussillonYannick BODINVice-président du Conseil régional d’Île-de-FranceAnne-Marie COMPARINIPrésidente du Conseil régional de Rhône-AlpesMichèle EYBALINConseillère régionale de Rhône-AlpesValéry GISCARD D’ESTAINGPrésident du Conseil régional d’AuvergneClaude du GRANRUTConseillère régionale de PicardieMireille KERBAOLConseillère régionale d’AquitaineAlain LE VERNPrésident du Conseil régional de Haute-NormandieJean-Pierre RAFFARINPrésident du Conseil régional de Poitou-CharentesRobert SAVYPrésident du Conseil régional du LimousinAugustin BONREPEAUXPrésident du Conseil général de l’AriègeClaude-Henri GIRARDPrésident du Conseil général du DoubsRoland HUGUETPrésident du Conseil général du Pas-de-CalaisGilberte MARIN-MOSKOVITZVice-présidente du Conseil général du Territoire de BelfortJean PUECHPrésident du Conseil général de l’AveyronPhilippe RICHERTPrésident du Conseil général du Bas-RhinAlfred ALMONTMaire de SchoelcherOlivier BERTRANDMaire de Saint-Sylvain de BellegardeMichel DELEBARREMaire de DunkerqueJean-Paul DELEVOYEMaire de BapaumeJean-Louis JOSEPHMaire de la BastidonneJuliette SOULABAILLEMaire de Corps-NudsIRELANDCouncillor Royston BRADYDublin City CouncilCouncillor Séamus MURRAYMeath Co CoCouncillor Anthony P. VESEYCavan Co CoAlderman Maurice CUMMINSWaterford City CouncilCouncillor Constance HANNIFFYOffaly Co CoCouncillor Joe LEDDINLimerick City CouncilCouncillor Seán Ó NEACHTAINGalway Co CoCouncillor Annette McNAMARACork Co CoCouncillor Mae SEXTONLongford Co CoITALIAAGOSTINACCHIO PaoloSindaco di FoggiaANDRIA AlfonsoPresidente della Provincia di SalernoBASSOLINO AntonioPresidente della Regione CampaniaENRICO BorghiSindaco di VogognaBRESSO MercedesPresidente della Provincia di TorinoCUFFARO SalvatorePresidente della Regione SiciliaD’AMBROSIO VitoPresidente della Regione MarcheDURNWALDER LuisPresidente della Provincia Autonoma di BolzanoERRANI VascoPresidente della Regione Emilia RomagnaFITTO RaffaelePresidente della Regione PugliaFORMIGONI RobertoPresidente della Regione LombardiaGALAN GiancarloPresidente della Regione VenetoGOTTARDO IsidoroConsigliere della Regione Friuli Venezia GiuliaLAMBERTI GianfrancoSindaco di LivornoLORENZETTI Maria RitaPresidente della Regione UmbriaMARMO RobertoPresidente della Provincia di AstiMARTINI ClaudioPresidente della Regione ToscanaMARZIANO BrunoPresidente della Provincia di SiracusaMOFFA SilvanoPresidente della Provincia di RomaPERICU GiuseppeSindaco di GenovaPILI MauroPresidente della Regione SardegnaSTORACE FrancescoPresidente della Regione LazioVENTRE RiccardoPresidente del Consiglio Comunale di FormicolaVIERIN DinoPresidente della Regione Valle d’AostaLUXEMBOURGASSELBORN JeanBourgmestre de la commune de SteinfortBEISSEL SimoneÉchevin de la ville de LuxembourgDURDU AgnèsBourgmestre de la commune de WincrangeLENTZ AlbertConseiller de la commune de MerschMEYERS Paul-Henri1er échevin de la ville de LuxembourgMUTSCH, LydiaBourgmestre de la ville d’Esch-sur-AlzetteNEDERLANDdrs. H. DIJKSMAGedeputeerde van Flevolanddrs. W.T. VAN GELDERCommissaris van de Koningin in Zeelandmr. A.Ph. HERTOGBurgemeester van Velsendhr. H.J.M. KEMPERMANGedeputeerde van Overijsselmr. dr. A.A.L.G.M. KESSENBurgemeester van Hulstdhr. G. van KLAVERENGedeputeerde van Frieslandmr. I.W. OPSTELTENBurgemeester van Rotterdammr. Dr. A.G.J.M. ROMBOUTSBurgemeester van ‘s-Hertogenboschdrs. J.J.M. TINDEMANSGedeputeerde van Limburgdrs. J.H.J. VERBURGGedeputeerde van Noord-Hollandmw. P.C. KRIKKEBurgemeester van Arnhemdrs. J.W. VAN DER SLUIJSBurgemeester van NoordwijkÖSTERREICHLandeshauptmann Hans NIESSL, EisenstadtLandeshauptmann von BurgenlandLandeshauptmann Dr. Jörg HAIDER, KlagenfurtLandeshauptmann von KärntenLandeshauptmann Dr. Erwin PRÖLL, St. PöltenLandeshauptmann von NiederösterreichLandeshauptmann Dr. Josef PÜHRINGER, LinzLandeshauptmann von OberösterreichLandeshauptmann Dr. Franz SCHAUSBERGER, SalzburgLandeshauptmann von SalzburgLandeshauptmann Waltraud KLASNIC, GrazLandeshauptmann von SteiermarkLandeshauptmann Dr. Wendelin WEINGARTNER, InnsbruckLandeshauptmann von TirolLandeshauptmann Dr. Herbert SAUSGRUBER, BregenzLandeshauptmann von VorarlbergLandeshauptmann Dr. Michael HÄUPL, WienLandeshauptmann von WienBürgermeisterin Helga MACHNE, LienzBürgermeister Alfred STINGL, GrazBürgermeister Walter ZIMPER, Markt PiestingPORTUGALCÉSAR Carlos Manuel Martins do ValePresidente do Governo da Região Autónoma dos AçoresCORREIA José MacárioPresidente da Câmara Municipal de TaviraJARDIM Alberto JoãoPresidente do Governo Regional da MadeiraMESQUITA MACHADO Francisco SoaresPresidente da Câmara Municipal de BragaMIRANDA José Narciso RodriguesPresidente da Câmara Municipal de MatosinhosMORAIS IsaltinoPresidente da Câmara Municipal de OeirasOLIVEIRA José Ernesto Ildefonso LeãoPresidente da Câmara Municipal de ÉvoraPINTO DE SÁ Carlos RodriguesPresidente da Câmara de Montemor-o-NovoRUAS FernandoPresidente da Câmara Municipal de ViseuSANTANA LOPES PedroPresidente da Câmara Municipal de LisboaTUTA Carlos Alberto SantosPresidente da Câmara Municipal de MonchiqueVIEIRA DE CARVALHO JoséPresidente da Câmara Municipal da MaiaSUOMIEva-Riitta SIITONEN,ylipormestari, HelsinkiSusanna RAHKONEN,kansanedustaja, Espoon kaupunginvaltuuston- ja hallituksen jäsen Uudenmaan liiton hallituksen jäsen, EspooRisto KOIVISTOkunnanjohtaja, Pirkanmaan liiton maakuntahallituksen puheenjohtaja, PirkkalaRisto ERVELÄtoiminnanjohtaja, Varsinais-Suomen liiton maakuntavaltuuston puheenjohtaja, Sauvon kunnan valtuuston puheenjohtaja, SauvoJaana RAUTIO-TEIJONMAAtoimittaja, Etelä-Savon maakuntaliiton valtuuston ja hallituksen jäsen, SavonlinnaJyrki MYLLYVIRTAkaupunginjohtaja, MikkeliMarkku KAUPPINENkaupunginjohtaja, KuhmoIrma PELLINEN,rehtori, Haukiputaan kunnanvaltuuston puheenjohtaja, Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liiton valtuuston jäsen, HaukipudasAhvenanmaa, Åland:Hasse SVENSSON, journalist, lagtingsledamot, Mariehamn, ÅlandSVERIGERoger KALIFFKalmar kommunAnn BESKOWOrsa kommunCatarina TARRAS-WAHLBERGStockholms kommunAnneli STARKVästra Götalands läns landstingUno ALDEGRENSkåne läns landstingRune HJÄLMGöteborgs kommunAnders GUSTÂVSolna kommunAnders KNAPEKarlstads kommunHenrik HAMMARSkåne läns landstingKent JOHANSSONVästra Götalands läns landstingLars NORDSTRÖMVästra Götalands läns landstingAldo ISKRAMalmö kommunUNITED KINGDOMMuriel BARKERNorth East Lincolnshire (Unitary) DistrictDerek BODENLeader of the North West Regional AssemblyKen BODFISH OBELeader of Brighton & Hove City CouncilAlbert BORELeader of Birmingham City CouncilKeith BROWNLeader of Clackmannanshire CouncilRosemary BUTLER AMNational Assembly for Wales, Newport WestRuth COLEMANExecutive Member of North Wiltshire County CouncilMichael DAVEYLeader of Northumberland County CouncilSir Simon DAYChairman of Devon County CouncilMargaret EATONLeader of Bradford Metropolitan Borough CouncilBaroness (Joan) HANHAMLondon Borough of Kensington and ChelseaLord HANNINGFIELDEssex County CouncilGordon KEYMERLeader of Tanbridge District CouncilChristine MAYLeader of Fife CouncilPeter MOORELiberal Democrat Leader of Sheffield Metropolitan Borough CouncilDermot NESBITT MLAJunior Minister in the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First MinisterAlban MAGINNESS MLANorthern Ireland AssemblyIrene OLDFATHER MSPScottish Parliament, Cunninghame SouthDame Sally POWELLLondon Borough of Hammersmith and FulhamBrian SMITHTorfaen County Borough CouncilNicol STEPHEN MSPScottish Deputy Minister for Education and Young PeopleThe Hon Joan TAYLORNottinghamshire County CouncilLord TOPE CBELiberal Democrat Leader of the Greater London AssemblyMilner WHITEMANBridgnorth District CouncilANEXO II/BILAG II/ANHANG II/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ II/ANNEX II/ANNEXE II/ALLEGATO II/BIJLAGE II/ANEXO II/LIITE II/BILAGA IISuplentes/Suppleanter/Stellvertreter/Αναπληρωτές/Alternates/Suppléants/Supplenti/Plaatsvervangers/Suplentes/Varaedustajat/SuppleanterBELGIË/BELGIQUE/BELGIENKUBLA SergeVice-président et ministre de l’économie, des PME, de la recherche et des technologies nouvelles du gouvernement wallonDEMOTTE RudyMinistre de la culture, du budget, de la fonction publique, de la jeunesse et des sports du gouvernement de la Communauté françaiseNOLLET Jean-MarcMinistre de l’enfance, chargé de l’enseignement fondamental, de l’accueil et des missions confiées à l’ONE du gouvernement de la Communauté françaiseGENTGENS BerndMinistre de l’enseignement et de la formation, de la culture et du tourisme du gouvernement de la Communauté germanophoneTOMAS EricMinistre de l’emploi, de l’économie, de l’énergie et du logement du gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-CapitaleVANHENGEL GuyMinistre des finances, du budget, de la fonction publique et des relations extérieures du gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-CapitaleAndré DENYSVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerPatrick LACHAERTVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerJacques TIMMERMANSVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerEloi GLORIEUXVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerBert ANCIAUXVlaams minister van Cultuur, Jeugd, Sport, Brusselse Aangelegenheden en OntwikkelingssamenwerkingGuy SWENNENVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerDANMARKAmtsrådsmedlem Kresten PHILIPSEN,Sønderjyllands AmtAmtsborgmester Søren ERIKSEN,Vestsjællands AmtAmtsrådsmedlem Bente NIELSEN,Århus AmtAmtsrådsmedlem Christian OVERDAL AAGAARD,Århus AmtBorgmester Tove LARSEN,Rødekro KommuneByrådsmedlem Else KØBSTRUP,Hjørring KommuneBorgmester Kurt HOCKERUP,Vallensbæk KommuneViceborgmester Helene LUND,Farum KommuneForhenværende borgmester John WINTHER,Frederiksberg KommuneDEUTSCHLANDPeter STRAUBPräsident des Landtages von Baden-WürttembergDr. Edmund STOIBERMinisterpräsident, Bayerische StaatskanzleiMaria KRAUTZBERGERStaatssekretärin, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung, Land BerlinGustav-Adolf STANGEStaatssekretär im Ministerium der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes BrandenburgWolfgang KLEINMitglied des Landtages von BrandenburgKarola JAMNIG-STELLMACHMitglied der Bremischen BürgerschaftOle VON BEUSTErster Bürgermeister der Freien und Hansestadt HamburgDr. Barbara BRÜNINGMitglied der Hamburger BürgerschaftKlaus Peter MÖLLERPräsident des Hessischen LandtagesKarsten NEUMANNMitglied des Landtages von Mecklenburg-VorpommernErwin SELLERINGJustizminister des Landes Mecklenburg-VorpommernUdo MIENTUSMitglied des Niedersächsischen LandtagesGabriele SIKORAMitglied des Nordrhein-westfälischen LandtagesNicole MORSBLECHMitglied des Rheinland-pfälzischen LandtagesKarl RAUBERStaatssekretär, Europabeauftragter der Landesregierung und Chef der Staatskanzlei des SaarlandesCornelia HOFFMANN-BETHSCHEIDERMitglied des Landtages des SaarlandesVolker SCHIMPFFMitglied des Sächsischen LandtagesWerner BALLHAUSENStaatssekretär, Bevollmächtigter für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten des Landes Sachsen-AnhaltUlrike RODUSTMitglied des Landtages von Schleswig-HolsteinHans KAISERStaatssekretär, Bevollmächtigter beim Bund des Landes ThüringenGustav BERGEMANNMitglied des Thüringischen LandtagesDr. Rolf BÖHMEOberbürgermeister der Stadt Freiburg im BreisgauDr. Peter WINTERLandrat, SaarlouisFriedrich Willhelm HEINRICHSHauptgeschäftsführer des Städte- und Gemeindebundes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Mitglied des Kreistages des Oberbergischen KreisesΕΛΛΑΣΣΤΑΥΡΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΣτέργιοςΝομάρχης ΡοδόπηςΒΑΣΙΛΑΚΗΣ ΒασίλειοςΝομάρχης ΧαλκιδικήςΜΑΡΚΟΓΙΑΝΝΑΚΗ ΑλεξάνδραΝομικός Σύμβουλος ΧανίωνΠΑΠΑΔΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ Κων/νοςΝομάρχης ΘεσσαλονίκηςΡΗΓΑΣ ΠαναγιώτηςΝομάρχης ΚυκλάδωνΤΟΥΡΙΚΗΣ ΙωάννηςΝομικός Σύμβουλος ΖακύνθουΣΤΥΛΙΑΝΙΔΗΣ ΜιχάληςΔήμαρχος ΞάνθηςΒΛΑΧΟΣ ΙωάννηςΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΣερρώνΓΑΖΗ ΓιώταΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΆμφισσαςΓΕΩΡΓΑΚΗΣ ΘεόδωροςΔήμαρχος ΗλιούποληςΣΩΚΟΣ ΕυθύμιοςΔήμαρχος ΑγρινίουΤΑΜΠΑΚΙΔΗΣ ΝίκοςΔήμαρχος Αγ. ΑναργύρωνESPAÑAIlmo. Sr. D. José María MUÑOA GANUZAComisionado para las Relaciones ExterioresIlmo. Sr. Joaquim LLIMONA I BALCELLSDirector General de Relaciones ExterioresIlmo. Sr. D. Jesús GAMALLO ALLERSecretario General de Relaciones con la Unión Europea y Acción ExteriorIlmo. Sr. D. Joaquín RIVAS RUBIALESDirector General de Asuntos Europeos y Cooperación ExteriorIlma. Sra. D.a Adela BARRERO FLÓREZDirectora General de Asuntos EuropeosExcmo. Sr. Juan José FERNÁNDEZ GÓMEZConsejero de Economía y HaciendaIlmo. Sr. D. Emilio DEL RÍO SANZSecretario General para la Unión Europea y Acción ExteriorExcmo. Sr. D. José Ramón BUSTILLO NAVIA-OSORIOConsejero de PresidenciaHonorable Sr. D. José Luis OLIVAS MARTÍNEZVicepresidente Primero del Gobierno ValencianoExcmo. Sr. D. Eduardo BANDRÉS MOLINÉConsejero de Economía, Hacienda y Función PúblicaExcma. Sra. D.a María Luisa ARAUJO CHAMORROConsejera de Economía y HaciendaIlmo. Sr. Francisco AZNAR VALLEJOViceconsejero de Acción Exterior y Relaciones InstitucionalesExcmo. Sr. D. Francisco IRIBARREN FENTANESConsejero de Economía y HaciendaIlmo. Sr. D. Ignacio SÁNCHEZ AMORDirector del Gabinete del Presidente de la JuntaExcmo. Sr. D. Antoni GARCÍAS I COLLConsejero de Presidencia del Gobierno de las Illes BalearsExcmo. Sr. D. Manuel COBO VEGAConsejero de PresidenciaExcmo. Sr. D. José Luis GONZÁLEZ VALLVÉConsejero de Industria, Comercio y TurismoIlmo. Sr. D. Francisco Javier LEÓN DE LA RIVAAlcalde de ValladolidIlmo. Sr. D. Joan Maria ROIG I GRAUAlcalde de Amposta (Tarragona)Ilma. Sra. D.a Rosa AGUILAR RIVEROAlcaldesa de CórdobaIlmo. Sr. D. Francisco Javier VÁZQUEZ VÁZQUEZAlcalde de A CoruñaFRANCEMartine CALDEROLI-LOTZConseillère régionale d’AlsaceNicole GUILHAUDINConseillère régionale de Rhône-AlpesLucette MICHAUX-CHEVRYPrésidente du Conseil régional de la GuadeloupeNicole MORICHAUDConseillère régionale d’Île-de-FranceNicole AMELINEVice-présidente du Conseil régional de Basse-NormandieNicette AUBERTConseillère régionale de Provence-Alpes-Côte d’AzurNathalie OEGGERLI-BERTINConseillère régionale de Franche-ComtéAlain PERELLEVice-président du Conseil régional de LorraineMichel NEUGNOTConseiller régional de BourgogneAntoine KARAMPrésident du Conseil régional de GuyaneAmbroise GUELLECVice-président du Conseil régional de BretagneBernard SOULAGEConseiller régional de Rhône-AlpesChristian FAVIERPrésident du Conseil général du Val-de-MarneLouis de BROISSIAPrésident du Conseil général de la Côte-d’OrClaudy LEBRETONPrésident du Conseil général des Côtes-d’ArmorMireille LACOMBEConseillère générale du Puy-de-DômePierre HUGONVice-président du Conseil général de la LozèreMarie-Françoise JACQVice-présidente du Conseil général d’Ille-et-VilaineDenis MERVILLEMaire de SainnevilleJean-Pierre ALDUYMaire de PerpignanJean-Paul BACHYMaire de SedanJean-Pierre TESSEIREMaire de CassisPhilippe BODARDMaire de Nurs-ÉrignéRené ROUQUETMaire d’AlfortvilleIRELANDCouncillor Margaret RICHARDSONFingal Co CoCouncillor Catherine MURPHYKildare Co CoCouncillor Terry BRENNANLouth Co CoCouncillor John PENDERCarlow Co CoCouncillor P. J. COGHILLWestmeath Co CoCatherine CONNOLLYGalway City CouncilCouncillor Angela LUPTONGalway City CouncilCouncillor Vivian CALLAGHANCork Co CoCouncillor Noreen RYANLimerick Co CoITALIAALVARO AncisiConsigliere Comunale di RavennaBAGNASCO GabrieleSindaco di VercelliBARCI GiandomenicoConsigliere della Regione LiguriaBISOGNO FrancescoConsigliere della Provincia di CosenzaBUBBICO FilippoPresidente della Regione BasilicataCHIARAVALLOTI GiuseppePresidente della Regione CalabriaCOGO MargheritaPresidente della Regione Trentino Alto AdigeCONDORELLI RosarioConsigliere Comunale di CataniaDEL FRE’ LucianoSindaco di San Vito al TagliamentoDELLAI LorenzoPresidente della Provincia Autonoma di TrentoFLORIO Luigi AndreaSindaco di AstiFONTANA VincenzoPresidente della Provincia di AgrigentoGUARISCHI Massimo GianlucaConsigliere della Regione LombardiaIORIO Angelo MichelePresidente della Regione MoliseMASTROCINQUE GiovanniPresidente del Consiglio Provinciale di BeneventoMEROI MarcelloConsigliere Comunale di ViterboPACE GiovanniPresidente della Regione AbruzzoPASTORELLI OresteConsigliere della Provincia di RietiPELLA RobertoSindaco di ValdengoPRIGNACHI ValerioSindaco di Treviso BrescianoRHODIO GuidoPresidente del Consiglio Comunale di SquillaceRICCA Luigi SergioSindaco di BollengoSERRI LinettaConsigliere Comunale di ArmungiaTATARELLA SalvatoreConsigliere Comunale di BariLUXEMBOURGETGEN FernandBourgmestre de la commune de FeulenHALSDORF Jean-MarieBourgmestre de la commune de PétangeLIBER JohnConseiller de la ville de LuxembourgLUX LucienBourgmestre de la commune de BettembourgMAY AlyConseiller de la ville de KopstalSCHNEIDER RomainBourgmestre de la ville de WiltzNEDERLANDdrs. J. BOERTJENSGedeputeerde van Groningenmw.mr. M.J. HAVERMANBurgemeester van Franekeradeeldhr. A.M.C.A. HOOIJMAIJERSWethouder van Amsterdammw.ir. C.W. JACOBSLid van Provinciale Staten van Gelderlandmw.mr. M.N. KALLEN-MORRENGedeputeerde van Utrechtdrs. L.J.J. van NISTELROOIJGedeputeerde van Noord-Brabantdhr. L.E. VAN DER SARGedeputeerde van Zuid-Hollanddrs. S.B. SWIERSTRAGedeputeerde van Drenthedhr. M. VERBEEKWethouder van Harenmr. drs. G.A.A. VERKERKWethouder van Den Haagmw. J.G. VLIETSTRABurgemeester van Winschotendhr. W. ZWAANWethouder van MeppelÖSTERREICHLandtagspräsident Walter PRIOREisenstadtLandtagsabgeordneter Adam UNTERRIEDERKlagenfurtLandtagspräsident Mag. Edmund FREIBAUERSt. PöltenLandesrat Josef FILLLinzLandeshauptmann-Stellv. Mag. Gabriele BURGSTALLERSalzburgLandeshauptmann-Stellv. DDr. Peter SCHACHNER-BLAZIZEKGrazLandeshauptmann-Stellv. Ferdinand EBERLEInnsbruckLandtagspräsident Manfred DÖRLERBregenzLandeshauptmann-Stellv. Dr. Sepp RIEDERWienBürgermeister Anton KOCZURGroß-SieghartsBürgermeister Helmut MÖDLHAMMERHallwangGemeinderat Ernst WOLLERWienPORTUGALAIRES FERREIRA Fernando AntónioPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Torre de MoncorvoAMARAL Roberto de Sousa RochaSecretário Regional da Presidência para as Finanças e Planeamento do Governo Regional dos AçoresCUNHA E SILVA João CarlosVice-Presidente do Governo Regional da MadeiraMARTINS ManuelPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Vila RealPAIVA AntónioPresidente da Câmara Municipal de TomarPINTO CarlosPresidente da Câmara Municipal da CovilhãPROENÇA Vitor Manuel Chaves de CaroPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Santiago do CacémRAPOSO Joaquim MoreiraPresidente da Câmara Municipal da AmadoraDOS SANTOS José Raúl MendesPresidente da Câmara Municipal de OuriqueSOLHEIRO António Rui EstevesPresidente da Câmara Municipal de MelgaçoTEIXEIRA PauloPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Castelo de PaivaXAVIER Emídio BrancoPresidente da Câmara Municipal do BarreiroSUOMIPirjo HÄMÄLÄINEN-FORSLUND, kriitikko, Hyvinkään kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen, Uudenmaan liiton hallituksen jäsen,HyvinkääEeva HONKANUMMI, tutkija, Espoon kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen,EspooPauliina HAIJANEN, asianajaja, Varsinais-Suomen liiton hallituksen jäsen, Laitilan kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen,LaitilaOssi MARTIKAINEN, maanviljelijä, yhteiskuntatieteiden maisteri, Lapinlahden kunnanvaltuuston puheenjohtaja,LapinlahtiIrma PEIPONEN, lehtori, Varkauden kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen, Pohjois-Savon liiton maakuntavaltuuston jäsen,VarkausMarkus AALTONEN, taloustieteiden maisteri, Seinäjoen kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen,SeinäjokiAntti NIEMI-ARO, talouspäällikkö, Etelä-Pohjanmaan liiton hallituksen puheenjohtaja,KauhajokiGustav SKUTHÄLLA, kaupunginjohtaja,NärpiöAhvenanmaa, Åland:Britt LUNDBERG, personalsekreterare, lagtingsledamot, Mariehamn, ÅlandSVERIGEBernth JOHNSONBlekinge läns landstingChristina TALLBERGStockholms läns landstingIngibjörg SIGURDSDÓTTIRGotlands kommunEndrick SCHUBERGVästra Götalands läns landstingJens NILSSONÖstersunds kommunMona-Lisa NORRMANKrokoms kommunAgneta GRANBERGGöteborgs kommunCatarina SEGERSTEN-LARSSONVärmlands läns landstingBengt-Anders JOHANSSONGislaveds kommunLena CELIONGotlands kommunHans KLINTBOMGotlands kommunLisbeth RYDEFJÄRDJönköpings läns landstingUNITED KINGDOMJennette ARNOLDMember of the Greater London AssemblyJean ASHTONIndependent Group Leader and Deputy Leader of Boston District CouncilRuth BAGNALLabour Group Leader of Cambridge City CouncilOlive BROWNLeader of Wear Valley District CouncilDiane BUNYANDeputy Leader of Bristol City CouncilFlo CLUCLASLiverpool City CouncilHugh HALCRO-JOHNSTONConvenor, Orkney Islands Council and Vice-President of CoSLADr Ruth HENIG CBEChair of Lancashire Police AuthorityJonathan HUISHRhondda Cynon Taff County Borough CouncilElin JONES AMNational Assembly for Wales, CeredigionSusie KEMPOpposition Leader of West Berkshire County CouncilLord Tarsem KINGLeader of Sandwell Metropolitan Borough CouncilSue Sida LOCKETTConservative Group Leader of Suffolk County CouncilCorrie McCHORDLeader of Stirling CouncilJack McCONNELL MSPFirst MinisterIrene McGUGAN MSPShadow Spokesperson for Children and EducationBob NEILLMember of the Greater London Assembly, Bexley and BromleyMargaret RITCHIEDistrict Councillor, Down District CouncilGeorge SAVAGE MLANorthern Ireland Assembly, Upper BannDavid SHAKESPEARELeader of Buckinghamshire County CouncilShirley SMARTLeader of the Isle of Wight Unitary CouncilJim SPEECHLEY CBELeader of the Lincolnshire County CouncilLiz TUCKERLiberal Democrat Leader of Worcestershire County CouncilSir Ron WATSON (CBE)Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council

Article 1
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006:
– as members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex I hereto,
– as alternate members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex II hereto.

Article 2
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 22 January 2002.
For the Council
The President
R. de Rato y Figaredo
ANEXO I/BILAG I/ANHANG I/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Ι/ANNEX I/ANNEXE I/ALLEGATO I/BIJLAGE I/ANEXO I/LIITE I/BILAGA I
Miembros/Medlemmer/Mitglieder/Μέλη/Members/Membres/Membri/Leden/Membros/Jäsenet/Ledamöter
BELGIË/BELGIQUE/BELGIEN
VAN CAUWENBERG Jean-Claude
Ministre-président du gouvernement wallon
HASQUIN Hervé
Ministre-président de la communauté française, chargé des relations internationales
DESGAIN Xavier
Député wallon
LAMBERTZ Karl-Heinz
Ministre-président du gouvernement de la communauté germanophone et ministre de l’emploi, de la politique des handicapés, des médias et des sports
DE DONNEA François-Xavier
Ministre-président du gouvernement de la région de Bruxelles-Capitale et ministre des pouvoirs locaux, de l’aménagement du territoire, des monuments et sites, de la rénovation urbaine et de la recherche scientifique
CHABERT Jos

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,Having regard to the proposals made by the governments of the Member States,Whereas:The Committee should consist of representatives of regional and local bodies,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006:- as members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex I hereto,- as alternate members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex II hereto.Article 2This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.Done at Brussels, 22 January 2002.For the CouncilThe PresidentR. de Rato y FigaredoANEXO I/BILAG I/ANHANG I/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Ι/ANNEX I/ANNEXE I/ALLEGATO I/BIJLAGE I/ANEXO I/LIITE I/BILAGA IMiembros/Medlemmer/Mitglieder/Μέλη/Members/Membres/Membri/Leden/Membros/Jäsenet/LedamöterBELGIË/BELGIQUE/BELGIENVAN CAUWENBERG Jean-ClaudeMinistre-président du gouvernement wallonHASQUIN HervéMinistre-président de la communauté française, chargé des relations internationalesDESGAIN XavierDéputé wallonLAMBERTZ Karl-HeinzMinistre-président du gouvernement de la communauté germanophone et ministre de l’emploi, de la politique des handicapés, des médias et des sportsDE DONNEA François-XavierMinistre-président du gouvernement de la région de Bruxelles-Capitale et ministre des pouvoirs locaux, de l’aménagement du territoire, des monuments et sites, de la rénovation urbaine et de la recherche scientifiqueCHABERT JosMinistre des travaux publics, du transport, de la lutte contre l’incendie et de l’aide médicale urgente du gouvernement de la région de Bruxelles-CapitaleStefaan PLATTEAUVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerPatrick DEWAELMinister-President van de Vlaamse RegeringGilbert BOSSUYTVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerFrans RAMONVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerPaul VAN GREMBERGENVlaams minister van Binnenlandse Aangelegenheden, Ambtenarenzaken en Buitenlands BeleidLuc VAN DEN BRANDEVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerDANMARKAmtsborgmester Knud ANDERSENBornholms AmtAmtsborgmester Vibeke STORM RASMUSSENKøbenhavns AmtAmtsborgmester Johannes FLENSTED-JENSENÅrhus AmtAmtsrådsmedlem Lars ABELKøbenhavns AmtBorgmester Henning JENSENNæstved KommuneBorgmester Ejgil W. RASMUSSENGedved KommuneBorgmester Søren ANDERSENSkive KommuneBorgmester Anker BOYEOdense KommuneOverborgmester Jens KRAMER MIKKELSENKøbenhavns KommuneDEUTSCHLANDMinisterpräsident Erwin TEUFELStaatsministerium Baden-WürttembergMinister Reinhold BOCKLETMinister für Bundes- und EuropaangelegenheitenBayerische StaatskanzleiAndré SCHMITZStaatssekretär, Chef der Senatskanzlei, Land BerlinProf. Dr. Kurt SCHELTER,Ministerium der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes BrandenburgManfred LENZMitglied des Landtages BrandenburgDr. Kerstin KIEßLERBevollmächtigte beim Bund und für Europa und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, Bremen.Reinhard STUTHBevollmächtigter beim Bund und Europabeauftragter des Senats, HamburgBerndt RÖDERErster Vizepräsident der Bürgerschaft, HamburgJochen RIEBELMinister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten und Chef der Staatskanzlei, Hessische StaatskanzleiHelmut HOLTERMinister für Arbeit und Bau und Stellvertretender Ministerpräsident, Mecklenburg-VorpommernTill BACKHAUSMinister für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft, Forsten und Fischerei, Mecklenburg-VorpommernWolfgang SENFFMinister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten, Niedersächsische StaatskanzleiProf. Dr. Manfred DAMMEYERMitglied des Landtages, Nordrhein-WestfalenDr. Karl-Heinz KLÄRStaatssekretär, Bevollmächtigter beim Bund und für Europa, Rheinland-Pfalz.Peter MÜLLERMinisterpräsident des SaarlandesHelma KUHN-THEISMitglied des Landtages des SaarlandesStanislaw TILLICHStaatsminister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten, Sächsische StaatskanzleiTilman TÖGELMitglied des Landtages von Sachsen-AnhaltHeide SIMONISMinisterpräsidentin, Staatskanzlei Schleswig-HolsteinJürgen GNAUCKMinister für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten und Chef der Staatskanzlei, ThüringenFritz SCHRÖTERMitglied des Thüringer LandtagesPetra ROTHDeutscher Städtetag, Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Frankfurt am MainAxel ENDLEINPräsident des Deutschen Landkreistages, Landrat, MdL, NortheimHans EVESLAGEVizepräsident des Deutschen Städte- und Gemeindebundes, Landrat, BarßelΕΛΛΑΣΚΟΥΛΟΥΜΠΗΣ ΕυάγγελοςΝομαρχιακός Σύμβουλος ΑθηνώνΠΑΠΑΤΣΑΚΩΝΑΣ ΙωάννηςΝομάρχης ΛασιθίουΑΠΟΣΤΟΛΑΚΟΣ ΓρηγόριοςΝομάρχης ΛακωνίαςΕΥΣΤΑΘΙΑΔΗΣ ΔημήτριοςΝομαρχιακός Σύμβουλος ΑθηνώνΖΑΡΜΠΑΛΑΣ ΝικόλαοςΝομάρχης ΙωαννίνωνΣΚΟΤΕΙΝΙΩΤΗΣ ΠαναγιώτηςΝομάρχης ΜαγνησίαςΑΒΡΑΜΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΔημήτριοςΔήμαρχος ΑθηνώνΚΑΡΑΒΟΛΑΣ ΑνδρέαςΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΠατρώνΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΠάριςΔήμαρχος ΚοζάνηςΛΑΖΑΡΙΔΗΣ ΘρασύβουλοςΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΘεσσαλονίκηςΝΙΚΟΛΑΪΔΟΥ ΒέραΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΝίκαιαςΠΑΛΑΙΟΛΟΓΟΥ ΧρήστοςΔήμαρχος ΛειβαδιάςESPAÑAExcmo. Sr. D. Juan José IBARRETXE MARKUARTUPresidente del Gobierno VascoMolt Honorable Sr. Jordi PUJOL I SOLEYPresidente de la Generalidad de CataluñaExcmo. Sr. D. Manuel FRAGA IRIBARNEPresidente de la Xunta de GaliciaExcmo. Sr. D. Manuel CHAVES GONZÁLEZPresidente de la Junta de AndalucíaExcmo. Sr. D. Vicente A. ÁLVAREZ ARECESPresidente del Gobierno del Principado de AsturiasExcmo. Sr. D. José Joaquín MARTÍNEZ SIESOPresidente del Gobierno de CantabriaExcmo. Sr. D. Pedro SANZ ALONSOPresidente del Gobierno de La RiojaExcmo. Sr. D. Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISOPresidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de MurciaMolt Honorable Sr. D. Eduardo ZAPLANA HERNÁNDEZ-SOROPresidente de la Generalidad ValencianaExcmo. Sr. D. Marcelino IGLESIAS RICOUPresidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de AragónExcmo. Sr. D. José BONO MARTÍNEZPresidente de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La ManchaExcmo. Sr. D. Román RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZPresidente del Gobierno de CanariasExcmo. Sr. D. Miguel SANZ SESMAPresidente del Gobierno de NavarraExcmo. Sr. D. Juan Carlos RODRÍGUEZ IBARRAPresidente de la Junta de ExtremaduraHonorable Sr. Francesc ANTICH OLIVERPresidente del Gobierno BalearExcmo. Sr. D. Alberto RUIZ-GALLARDÓN JIMÉNEZPresidente de la Comunidad de MadridExcmo. Sr. D. Juan VICENTE HERRERA CAMPOPresidente de la Junta de Castilla y LeónIlma. Sra. D.a Rita BARBERÁ NOLLAAlcaldesa de ValenciaExcmo. Sr. D. José María ÁLVAREZ DEL MANZANO Y LÓPEZ DEL HIERROAlcalde de MadridExcmo. Sr. D. Joan CLOS I MATHEUAlcalde de BarcelonaIlma Sra. D.a Paz Fernández FELGUEROSOAlcaldesa de Gijón (Asturias)FRANCEJean-Pierre BAZINVice-président du Conseil régional des Pays de la LoireMarc BELLETConseiller régional de Basse-NormandieJacques BLANCPrésident du Conseil régional de Languedoc-RoussillonYannick BODINVice-président du Conseil régional d’Île-de-FranceAnne-Marie COMPARINIPrésidente du Conseil régional de Rhône-AlpesMichèle EYBALINConseillère régionale de Rhône-AlpesValéry GISCARD D’ESTAINGPrésident du Conseil régional d’AuvergneClaude du GRANRUTConseillère régionale de PicardieMireille KERBAOLConseillère régionale d’AquitaineAlain LE VERNPrésident du Conseil régional de Haute-NormandieJean-Pierre RAFFARINPrésident du Conseil régional de Poitou-CharentesRobert SAVYPrésident du Conseil régional du LimousinAugustin BONREPEAUXPrésident du Conseil général de l’AriègeClaude-Henri GIRARDPrésident du Conseil général du DoubsRoland HUGUETPrésident du Conseil général du Pas-de-CalaisGilberte MARIN-MOSKOVITZVice-présidente du Conseil général du Territoire de BelfortJean PUECHPrésident du Conseil général de l’AveyronPhilippe RICHERTPrésident du Conseil général du Bas-RhinAlfred ALMONTMaire de SchoelcherOlivier BERTRANDMaire de Saint-Sylvain de BellegardeMichel DELEBARREMaire de DunkerqueJean-Paul DELEVOYEMaire de BapaumeJean-Louis JOSEPHMaire de la BastidonneJuliette SOULABAILLEMaire de Corps-NudsIRELANDCouncillor Royston BRADYDublin City CouncilCouncillor Séamus MURRAYMeath Co CoCouncillor Anthony P. VESEYCavan Co CoAlderman Maurice CUMMINSWaterford City CouncilCouncillor Constance HANNIFFYOffaly Co CoCouncillor Joe LEDDINLimerick City CouncilCouncillor Seán Ó NEACHTAINGalway Co CoCouncillor Annette McNAMARACork Co CoCouncillor Mae SEXTONLongford Co CoITALIAAGOSTINACCHIO PaoloSindaco di FoggiaANDRIA AlfonsoPresidente della Provincia di SalernoBASSOLINO AntonioPresidente della Regione CampaniaENRICO BorghiSindaco di VogognaBRESSO MercedesPresidente della Provincia di TorinoCUFFARO SalvatorePresidente della Regione SiciliaD’AMBROSIO VitoPresidente della Regione MarcheDURNWALDER LuisPresidente della Provincia Autonoma di BolzanoERRANI VascoPresidente della Regione Emilia RomagnaFITTO RaffaelePresidente della Regione PugliaFORMIGONI RobertoPresidente della Regione LombardiaGALAN GiancarloPresidente della Regione VenetoGOTTARDO IsidoroConsigliere della Regione Friuli Venezia GiuliaLAMBERTI GianfrancoSindaco di LivornoLORENZETTI Maria RitaPresidente della Regione UmbriaMARMO RobertoPresidente della Provincia di AstiMARTINI ClaudioPresidente della Regione ToscanaMARZIANO BrunoPresidente della Provincia di SiracusaMOFFA SilvanoPresidente della Provincia di RomaPERICU GiuseppeSindaco di GenovaPILI MauroPresidente della Regione SardegnaSTORACE FrancescoPresidente della Regione LazioVENTRE RiccardoPresidente del Consiglio Comunale di FormicolaVIERIN DinoPresidente della Regione Valle d’AostaLUXEMBOURGASSELBORN JeanBourgmestre de la commune de SteinfortBEISSEL SimoneÉchevin de la ville de LuxembourgDURDU AgnèsBourgmestre de la commune de WincrangeLENTZ AlbertConseiller de la commune de MerschMEYERS Paul-Henri1er échevin de la ville de LuxembourgMUTSCH, LydiaBourgmestre de la ville d’Esch-sur-AlzetteNEDERLANDdrs. H. DIJKSMAGedeputeerde van Flevolanddrs. W.T. VAN GELDERCommissaris van de Koningin in Zeelandmr. A.Ph. HERTOGBurgemeester van Velsendhr. H.J.M. KEMPERMANGedeputeerde van Overijsselmr. dr. A.A.L.G.M. KESSENBurgemeester van Hulstdhr. G. van KLAVERENGedeputeerde van Frieslandmr. I.W. OPSTELTENBurgemeester van Rotterdammr. Dr. A.G.J.M. ROMBOUTSBurgemeester van ‘s-Hertogenboschdrs. J.J.M. TINDEMANSGedeputeerde van Limburgdrs. J.H.J. VERBURGGedeputeerde van Noord-Hollandmw. P.C. KRIKKEBurgemeester van Arnhemdrs. J.W. VAN DER SLUIJSBurgemeester van NoordwijkÖSTERREICHLandeshauptmann Hans NIESSL, EisenstadtLandeshauptmann von BurgenlandLandeshauptmann Dr. Jörg HAIDER, KlagenfurtLandeshauptmann von KärntenLandeshauptmann Dr. Erwin PRÖLL, St. PöltenLandeshauptmann von NiederösterreichLandeshauptmann Dr. Josef PÜHRINGER, LinzLandeshauptmann von OberösterreichLandeshauptmann Dr. Franz SCHAUSBERGER, SalzburgLandeshauptmann von SalzburgLandeshauptmann Waltraud KLASNIC, GrazLandeshauptmann von SteiermarkLandeshauptmann Dr. Wendelin WEINGARTNER, InnsbruckLandeshauptmann von TirolLandeshauptmann Dr. Herbert SAUSGRUBER, BregenzLandeshauptmann von VorarlbergLandeshauptmann Dr. Michael HÄUPL, WienLandeshauptmann von WienBürgermeisterin Helga MACHNE, LienzBürgermeister Alfred STINGL, GrazBürgermeister Walter ZIMPER, Markt PiestingPORTUGALCÉSAR Carlos Manuel Martins do ValePresidente do Governo da Região Autónoma dos AçoresCORREIA José MacárioPresidente da Câmara Municipal de TaviraJARDIM Alberto JoãoPresidente do Governo Regional da MadeiraMESQUITA MACHADO Francisco SoaresPresidente da Câmara Municipal de BragaMIRANDA José Narciso RodriguesPresidente da Câmara Municipal de MatosinhosMORAIS IsaltinoPresidente da Câmara Municipal de OeirasOLIVEIRA José Ernesto Ildefonso LeãoPresidente da Câmara Municipal de ÉvoraPINTO DE SÁ Carlos RodriguesPresidente da Câmara de Montemor-o-NovoRUAS FernandoPresidente da Câmara Municipal de ViseuSANTANA LOPES PedroPresidente da Câmara Municipal de LisboaTUTA Carlos Alberto SantosPresidente da Câmara Municipal de MonchiqueVIEIRA DE CARVALHO JoséPresidente da Câmara Municipal da MaiaSUOMIEva-Riitta SIITONEN,ylipormestari, HelsinkiSusanna RAHKONEN,kansanedustaja, Espoon kaupunginvaltuuston- ja hallituksen jäsen Uudenmaan liiton hallituksen jäsen, EspooRisto KOIVISTOkunnanjohtaja, Pirkanmaan liiton maakuntahallituksen puheenjohtaja, PirkkalaRisto ERVELÄtoiminnanjohtaja, Varsinais-Suomen liiton maakuntavaltuuston puheenjohtaja, Sauvon kunnan valtuuston puheenjohtaja, SauvoJaana RAUTIO-TEIJONMAAtoimittaja, Etelä-Savon maakuntaliiton valtuuston ja hallituksen jäsen, SavonlinnaJyrki MYLLYVIRTAkaupunginjohtaja, MikkeliMarkku KAUPPINENkaupunginjohtaja, KuhmoIrma PELLINEN,rehtori, Haukiputaan kunnanvaltuuston puheenjohtaja, Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liiton valtuuston jäsen, HaukipudasAhvenanmaa, Åland:Hasse SVENSSON, journalist, lagtingsledamot, Mariehamn, ÅlandSVERIGERoger KALIFFKalmar kommunAnn BESKOWOrsa kommunCatarina TARRAS-WAHLBERGStockholms kommunAnneli STARKVästra Götalands läns landstingUno ALDEGRENSkåne läns landstingRune HJÄLMGöteborgs kommunAnders GUSTÂVSolna kommunAnders KNAPEKarlstads kommunHenrik HAMMARSkåne läns landstingKent JOHANSSONVästra Götalands läns landstingLars NORDSTRÖMVästra Götalands läns landstingAldo ISKRAMalmö kommunUNITED KINGDOMMuriel BARKERNorth East Lincolnshire (Unitary) DistrictDerek BODENLeader of the North West Regional AssemblyKen BODFISH OBELeader of Brighton & Hove City CouncilAlbert BORELeader of Birmingham City CouncilKeith BROWNLeader of Clackmannanshire CouncilRosemary BUTLER AMNational Assembly for Wales, Newport WestRuth COLEMANExecutive Member of North Wiltshire County CouncilMichael DAVEYLeader of Northumberland County CouncilSir Simon DAYChairman of Devon County CouncilMargaret EATONLeader of Bradford Metropolitan Borough CouncilBaroness (Joan) HANHAMLondon Borough of Kensington and ChelseaLord HANNINGFIELDEssex County CouncilGordon KEYMERLeader of Tanbridge District CouncilChristine MAYLeader of Fife CouncilPeter MOORELiberal Democrat Leader of Sheffield Metropolitan Borough CouncilDermot NESBITT MLAJunior Minister in the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First MinisterAlban MAGINNESS MLANorthern Ireland AssemblyIrene OLDFATHER MSPScottish Parliament, Cunninghame SouthDame Sally POWELLLondon Borough of Hammersmith and FulhamBrian SMITHTorfaen County Borough CouncilNicol STEPHEN MSPScottish Deputy Minister for Education and Young PeopleThe Hon Joan TAYLORNottinghamshire County CouncilLord TOPE CBELiberal Democrat Leader of the Greater London AssemblyMilner WHITEMANBridgnorth District CouncilANEXO II/BILAG II/ANHANG II/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ II/ANNEX II/ANNEXE II/ALLEGATO II/BIJLAGE II/ANEXO II/LIITE II/BILAGA IISuplentes/Suppleanter/Stellvertreter/Αναπληρωτές/Alternates/Suppléants/Supplenti/Plaatsvervangers/Suplentes/Varaedustajat/SuppleanterBELGIË/BELGIQUE/BELGIENKUBLA SergeVice-président et ministre de l’économie, des PME, de la recherche et des technologies nouvelles du gouvernement wallonDEMOTTE RudyMinistre de la culture, du budget, de la fonction publique, de la jeunesse et des sports du gouvernement de la Communauté françaiseNOLLET Jean-MarcMinistre de l’enfance, chargé de l’enseignement fondamental, de l’accueil et des missions confiées à l’ONE du gouvernement de la Communauté françaiseGENTGENS BerndMinistre de l’enseignement et de la formation, de la culture et du tourisme du gouvernement de la Communauté germanophoneTOMAS EricMinistre de l’emploi, de l’économie, de l’énergie et du logement du gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-CapitaleVANHENGEL GuyMinistre des finances, du budget, de la fonction publique et des relations extérieures du gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-CapitaleAndré DENYSVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerPatrick LACHAERTVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerJacques TIMMERMANSVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerEloi GLORIEUXVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerBert ANCIAUXVlaams minister van Cultuur, Jeugd, Sport, Brusselse Aangelegenheden en OntwikkelingssamenwerkingGuy SWENNENVlaams volksvertegenwoordigerDANMARKAmtsrådsmedlem Kresten PHILIPSEN,Sønderjyllands AmtAmtsborgmester Søren ERIKSEN,Vestsjællands AmtAmtsrådsmedlem Bente NIELSEN,Århus AmtAmtsrådsmedlem Christian OVERDAL AAGAARD,Århus AmtBorgmester Tove LARSEN,Rødekro KommuneByrådsmedlem Else KØBSTRUP,Hjørring KommuneBorgmester Kurt HOCKERUP,Vallensbæk KommuneViceborgmester Helene LUND,Farum KommuneForhenværende borgmester John WINTHER,Frederiksberg KommuneDEUTSCHLANDPeter STRAUBPräsident des Landtages von Baden-WürttembergDr. Edmund STOIBERMinisterpräsident, Bayerische StaatskanzleiMaria KRAUTZBERGERStaatssekretärin, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung, Land BerlinGustav-Adolf STANGEStaatssekretär im Ministerium der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes BrandenburgWolfgang KLEINMitglied des Landtages von BrandenburgKarola JAMNIG-STELLMACHMitglied der Bremischen BürgerschaftOle VON BEUSTErster Bürgermeister der Freien und Hansestadt HamburgDr. Barbara BRÜNINGMitglied der Hamburger BürgerschaftKlaus Peter MÖLLERPräsident des Hessischen LandtagesKarsten NEUMANNMitglied des Landtages von Mecklenburg-VorpommernErwin SELLERINGJustizminister des Landes Mecklenburg-VorpommernUdo MIENTUSMitglied des Niedersächsischen LandtagesGabriele SIKORAMitglied des Nordrhein-westfälischen LandtagesNicole MORSBLECHMitglied des Rheinland-pfälzischen LandtagesKarl RAUBERStaatssekretär, Europabeauftragter der Landesregierung und Chef der Staatskanzlei des SaarlandesCornelia HOFFMANN-BETHSCHEIDERMitglied des Landtages des SaarlandesVolker SCHIMPFFMitglied des Sächsischen LandtagesWerner BALLHAUSENStaatssekretär, Bevollmächtigter für Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten des Landes Sachsen-AnhaltUlrike RODUSTMitglied des Landtages von Schleswig-HolsteinHans KAISERStaatssekretär, Bevollmächtigter beim Bund des Landes ThüringenGustav BERGEMANNMitglied des Thüringischen LandtagesDr. Rolf BÖHMEOberbürgermeister der Stadt Freiburg im BreisgauDr. Peter WINTERLandrat, SaarlouisFriedrich Willhelm HEINRICHSHauptgeschäftsführer des Städte- und Gemeindebundes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Mitglied des Kreistages des Oberbergischen KreisesΕΛΛΑΣΣΤΑΥΡΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΣτέργιοςΝομάρχης ΡοδόπηςΒΑΣΙΛΑΚΗΣ ΒασίλειοςΝομάρχης ΧαλκιδικήςΜΑΡΚΟΓΙΑΝΝΑΚΗ ΑλεξάνδραΝομικός Σύμβουλος ΧανίωνΠΑΠΑΔΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ Κων/νοςΝομάρχης ΘεσσαλονίκηςΡΗΓΑΣ ΠαναγιώτηςΝομάρχης ΚυκλάδωνΤΟΥΡΙΚΗΣ ΙωάννηςΝομικός Σύμβουλος ΖακύνθουΣΤΥΛΙΑΝΙΔΗΣ ΜιχάληςΔήμαρχος ΞάνθηςΒΛΑΧΟΣ ΙωάννηςΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΣερρώνΓΑΖΗ ΓιώταΔημοτικός Σύμβουλος ΆμφισσαςΓΕΩΡΓΑΚΗΣ ΘεόδωροςΔήμαρχος ΗλιούποληςΣΩΚΟΣ ΕυθύμιοςΔήμαρχος ΑγρινίουΤΑΜΠΑΚΙΔΗΣ ΝίκοςΔήμαρχος Αγ. ΑναργύρωνESPAÑAIlmo. Sr. D. José María MUÑOA GANUZAComisionado para las Relaciones ExterioresIlmo. Sr. Joaquim LLIMONA I BALCELLSDirector General de Relaciones ExterioresIlmo. Sr. D. Jesús GAMALLO ALLERSecretario General de Relaciones con la Unión Europea y Acción ExteriorIlmo. Sr. D. Joaquín RIVAS RUBIALESDirector General de Asuntos Europeos y Cooperación ExteriorIlma. Sra. D.a Adela BARRERO FLÓREZDirectora General de Asuntos EuropeosExcmo. Sr. Juan José FERNÁNDEZ GÓMEZConsejero de Economía y HaciendaIlmo. Sr. D. Emilio DEL RÍO SANZSecretario General para la Unión Europea y Acción ExteriorExcmo. Sr. D. José Ramón BUSTILLO NAVIA-OSORIOConsejero de PresidenciaHonorable Sr. D. José Luis OLIVAS MARTÍNEZVicepresidente Primero del Gobierno ValencianoExcmo. Sr. D. Eduardo BANDRÉS MOLINÉConsejero de Economía, Hacienda y Función PúblicaExcma. Sra. D.a María Luisa ARAUJO CHAMORROConsejera de Economía y HaciendaIlmo. Sr. Francisco AZNAR VALLEJOViceconsejero de Acción Exterior y Relaciones InstitucionalesExcmo. Sr. D. Francisco IRIBARREN FENTANESConsejero de Economía y HaciendaIlmo. Sr. D. Ignacio SÁNCHEZ AMORDirector del Gabinete del Presidente de la JuntaExcmo. Sr. D. Antoni GARCÍAS I COLLConsejero de Presidencia del Gobierno de las Illes BalearsExcmo. Sr. D. Manuel COBO VEGAConsejero de PresidenciaExcmo. Sr. D. José Luis GONZÁLEZ VALLVÉConsejero de Industria, Comercio y TurismoIlmo. Sr. D. Francisco Javier LEÓN DE LA RIVAAlcalde de ValladolidIlmo. Sr. D. Joan Maria ROIG I GRAUAlcalde de Amposta (Tarragona)Ilma. Sra. D.a Rosa AGUILAR RIVEROAlcaldesa de CórdobaIlmo. Sr. D. Francisco Javier VÁZQUEZ VÁZQUEZAlcalde de A CoruñaFRANCEMartine CALDEROLI-LOTZConseillère régionale d’AlsaceNicole GUILHAUDINConseillère régionale de Rhône-AlpesLucette MICHAUX-CHEVRYPrésidente du Conseil régional de la GuadeloupeNicole MORICHAUDConseillère régionale d’Île-de-FranceNicole AMELINEVice-présidente du Conseil régional de Basse-NormandieNicette AUBERTConseillère régionale de Provence-Alpes-Côte d’AzurNathalie OEGGERLI-BERTINConseillère régionale de Franche-ComtéAlain PERELLEVice-président du Conseil régional de LorraineMichel NEUGNOTConseiller régional de BourgogneAntoine KARAMPrésident du Conseil régional de GuyaneAmbroise GUELLECVice-président du Conseil régional de BretagneBernard SOULAGEConseiller régional de Rhône-AlpesChristian FAVIERPrésident du Conseil général du Val-de-MarneLouis de BROISSIAPrésident du Conseil général de la Côte-d’OrClaudy LEBRETONPrésident du Conseil général des Côtes-d’ArmorMireille LACOMBEConseillère générale du Puy-de-DômePierre HUGONVice-président du Conseil général de la LozèreMarie-Françoise JACQVice-présidente du Conseil général d’Ille-et-VilaineDenis MERVILLEMaire de SainnevilleJean-Pierre ALDUYMaire de PerpignanJean-Paul BACHYMaire de SedanJean-Pierre TESSEIREMaire de CassisPhilippe BODARDMaire de Nurs-ÉrignéRené ROUQUETMaire d’AlfortvilleIRELANDCouncillor Margaret RICHARDSONFingal Co CoCouncillor Catherine MURPHYKildare Co CoCouncillor Terry BRENNANLouth Co CoCouncillor John PENDERCarlow Co CoCouncillor P. J. COGHILLWestmeath Co CoCatherine CONNOLLYGalway City CouncilCouncillor Angela LUPTONGalway City CouncilCouncillor Vivian CALLAGHANCork Co CoCouncillor Noreen RYANLimerick Co CoITALIAALVARO AncisiConsigliere Comunale di RavennaBAGNASCO GabrieleSindaco di VercelliBARCI GiandomenicoConsigliere della Regione LiguriaBISOGNO FrancescoConsigliere della Provincia di CosenzaBUBBICO FilippoPresidente della Regione BasilicataCHIARAVALLOTI GiuseppePresidente della Regione CalabriaCOGO MargheritaPresidente della Regione Trentino Alto AdigeCONDORELLI RosarioConsigliere Comunale di CataniaDEL FRE’ LucianoSindaco di San Vito al TagliamentoDELLAI LorenzoPresidente della Provincia Autonoma di TrentoFLORIO Luigi AndreaSindaco di AstiFONTANA VincenzoPresidente della Provincia di AgrigentoGUARISCHI Massimo GianlucaConsigliere della Regione LombardiaIORIO Angelo MichelePresidente della Regione MoliseMASTROCINQUE GiovanniPresidente del Consiglio Provinciale di BeneventoMEROI MarcelloConsigliere Comunale di ViterboPACE GiovanniPresidente della Regione AbruzzoPASTORELLI OresteConsigliere della Provincia di RietiPELLA RobertoSindaco di ValdengoPRIGNACHI ValerioSindaco di Treviso BrescianoRHODIO GuidoPresidente del Consiglio Comunale di SquillaceRICCA Luigi SergioSindaco di BollengoSERRI LinettaConsigliere Comunale di ArmungiaTATARELLA SalvatoreConsigliere Comunale di BariLUXEMBOURGETGEN FernandBourgmestre de la commune de FeulenHALSDORF Jean-MarieBourgmestre de la commune de PétangeLIBER JohnConseiller de la ville de LuxembourgLUX LucienBourgmestre de la commune de BettembourgMAY AlyConseiller de la ville de KopstalSCHNEIDER RomainBourgmestre de la ville de WiltzNEDERLANDdrs. J. BOERTJENSGedeputeerde van Groningenmw.mr. M.J. HAVERMANBurgemeester van Franekeradeeldhr. A.M.C.A. HOOIJMAIJERSWethouder van Amsterdammw.ir. C.W. JACOBSLid van Provinciale Staten van Gelderlandmw.mr. M.N. KALLEN-MORRENGedeputeerde van Utrechtdrs. L.J.J. van NISTELROOIJGedeputeerde van Noord-Brabantdhr. L.E. VAN DER SARGedeputeerde van Zuid-Hollanddrs. S.B. SWIERSTRAGedeputeerde van Drenthedhr. M. VERBEEKWethouder van Harenmr. drs. G.A.A. VERKERKWethouder van Den Haagmw. J.G. VLIETSTRABurgemeester van Winschotendhr. W. ZWAANWethouder van MeppelÖSTERREICHLandtagspräsident Walter PRIOREisenstadtLandtagsabgeordneter Adam UNTERRIEDERKlagenfurtLandtagspräsident Mag. Edmund FREIBAUERSt. PöltenLandesrat Josef FILLLinzLandeshauptmann-Stellv. Mag. Gabriele BURGSTALLERSalzburgLandeshauptmann-Stellv. DDr. Peter SCHACHNER-BLAZIZEKGrazLandeshauptmann-Stellv. Ferdinand EBERLEInnsbruckLandtagspräsident Manfred DÖRLERBregenzLandeshauptmann-Stellv. Dr. Sepp RIEDERWienBürgermeister Anton KOCZURGroß-SieghartsBürgermeister Helmut MÖDLHAMMERHallwangGemeinderat Ernst WOLLERWienPORTUGALAIRES FERREIRA Fernando AntónioPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Torre de MoncorvoAMARAL Roberto de Sousa RochaSecretário Regional da Presidência para as Finanças e Planeamento do Governo Regional dos AçoresCUNHA E SILVA João CarlosVice-Presidente do Governo Regional da MadeiraMARTINS ManuelPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Vila RealPAIVA AntónioPresidente da Câmara Municipal de TomarPINTO CarlosPresidente da Câmara Municipal da CovilhãPROENÇA Vitor Manuel Chaves de CaroPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Santiago do CacémRAPOSO Joaquim MoreiraPresidente da Câmara Municipal da AmadoraDOS SANTOS José Raúl MendesPresidente da Câmara Municipal de OuriqueSOLHEIRO António Rui EstevesPresidente da Câmara Municipal de MelgaçoTEIXEIRA PauloPresidente da Câmara Municipal de Castelo de PaivaXAVIER Emídio BrancoPresidente da Câmara Municipal do BarreiroSUOMIPirjo HÄMÄLÄINEN-FORSLUND, kriitikko, Hyvinkään kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen, Uudenmaan liiton hallituksen jäsen,HyvinkääEeva HONKANUMMI, tutkija, Espoon kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen,EspooPauliina HAIJANEN, asianajaja, Varsinais-Suomen liiton hallituksen jäsen, Laitilan kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen,LaitilaOssi MARTIKAINEN, maanviljelijä, yhteiskuntatieteiden maisteri, Lapinlahden kunnanvaltuuston puheenjohtaja,LapinlahtiIrma PEIPONEN, lehtori, Varkauden kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen, Pohjois-Savon liiton maakuntavaltuuston jäsen,VarkausMarkus AALTONEN, taloustieteiden maisteri, Seinäjoen kaupunginvaltuuston jäsen,SeinäjokiAntti NIEMI-ARO, talouspäällikkö, Etelä-Pohjanmaan liiton hallituksen puheenjohtaja,KauhajokiGustav SKUTHÄLLA, kaupunginjohtaja,NärpiöAhvenanmaa, Åland:Britt LUNDBERG, personalsekreterare, lagtingsledamot, Mariehamn, ÅlandSVERIGEBernth JOHNSONBlekinge läns landstingChristina TALLBERGStockholms läns landstingIngibjörg SIGURDSDÓTTIRGotlands kommunEndrick SCHUBERGVästra Götalands läns landstingJens NILSSONÖstersunds kommunMona-Lisa NORRMANKrokoms kommunAgneta GRANBERGGöteborgs kommunCatarina SEGERSTEN-LARSSONVärmlands läns landstingBengt-Anders JOHANSSONGislaveds kommunLena CELIONGotlands kommunHans KLINTBOMGotlands kommunLisbeth RYDEFJÄRDJönköpings läns landstingUNITED KINGDOMJennette ARNOLDMember of the Greater London AssemblyJean ASHTONIndependent Group Leader and Deputy Leader of Boston District CouncilRuth BAGNALLabour Group Leader of Cambridge City CouncilOlive BROWNLeader of Wear Valley District CouncilDiane BUNYANDeputy Leader of Bristol City CouncilFlo CLUCLASLiverpool City CouncilHugh HALCRO-JOHNSTONConvenor, Orkney Islands Council and Vice-President of CoSLADr Ruth HENIG CBEChair of Lancashire Police AuthorityJonathan HUISHRhondda Cynon Taff County Borough CouncilElin JONES AMNational Assembly for Wales, CeredigionSusie KEMPOpposition Leader of West Berkshire County CouncilLord Tarsem KINGLeader of Sandwell Metropolitan Borough CouncilSue Sida LOCKETTConservative Group Leader of Suffolk County CouncilCorrie McCHORDLeader of Stirling CouncilJack McCONNELL MSPFirst MinisterIrene McGUGAN MSPShadow Spokesperson for Children and EducationBob NEILLMember of the Greater London Assembly, Bexley and BromleyMargaret RITCHIEDistrict Councillor, Down District CouncilGeorge SAVAGE MLANorthern Ireland Assembly, Upper BannDavid SHAKESPEARELeader of Buckinghamshire County CouncilShirley SMARTLeader of the Isle of Wight Unitary CouncilJim SPEECHLEY CBELeader of the Lincolnshire County CouncilLiz TUCKERLiberal Democrat Leader of Worcestershire County CouncilSir Ron WATSON (CBE)Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006:
– as members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex I hereto,
– as alternate members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex II hereto.
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 22 January 2002.
For the Council
The President
R. de Rato y Figaredo
ANEXO I/BILAG I/ANHANG I/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Ι/ANNEX I/ANNEXE I/ALLEGATO I/BIJLAGE I/ANEXO I/LIITE I/BILAGA I
Miembros/Medlemmer/Mitglieder/Μέλη/Members/Membres/Membri/Leden/Membros/Jäsenet/Ledamöter
BELGIË/BELGIQUE/BELGIEN
VAN CAUWENBERG Jean-Claude
Ministre-président du gouvernement wallon
HASQUIN Hervé
Ministre-président de la communauté française, chargé des relations internationales
DESGAIN Xavier
Député wallon
LAMBERTZ Karl-Heinz
Ministre-président du gouvernement de la communauté germanophone et ministre de l’emploi, de la politique des handicapés, des médias et des sports
DE DONNEA François-Xavier
Ministre-président du gouvernement de la région de Bruxelles-Capitale et ministre des pouvoirs locaux, de l’aménagement du territoire, des monuments et sites, de la rénovation urbaine et de la recherche scientifique
CHABERT Jos

Pending: 32002D0050

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second and third subparagraphs of Article 137(2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 18 September 2001,Whereas:(1) Pursuant to Article 2 of the Treaty, the Community shall have as part of its tasks that of promoting a high level of employment and of social protection and the raising of the standard of living and quality of life throughout the Community and economic and social cohesion.(2) Pursuant to Article 136 of the Treaty, the Community and the Member States, taking note of fundamental political principles, such as those set out in the European Social Charter signed at Turin on 18 October 1961, the revised Social Charter of the Council of Europe (1996), in particular in Article 30 thereof on the right to protection against poverty and social exclusion, and in the 1989 Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers, and bearing in mind also the rights and principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union(5) proclaimed jointly by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 7 December 2000, shall have as an objective the combating of exclusion.(3) In its Recommendation 92/441/EEC(6), the Council recommends that Member States should recognise the basic right of a person to sufficient resources and social assistance to live in a manner compatible with human dignity. In Recommendation 92/442/EEC(7), the Council recommends that Member States should guarantee a level of resources in keeping with human dignity. In its Conclusions of 17 December 1999(8), the Council commits itself to promoting social inclusion as one of the objectives of the modernisation and improvement of social protection systems.(4) The European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions have all urged the Community to strengthen its contribution to efforts in Member States to prevent and to combat social exclusion.(5) The Commission communication of 1 March 2000, “Building an inclusive Europe”, described the challenge of social exclusion and poverty and the existing policy responses in Member States and at Community level, and proposed on this basis to give a new impetus to cooperation of the European Union in this field.(6) The Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000 incorporated as intrinsic to the overall strategy of the Union the promotion of social inclusion to achieve its strategic goal for the next decade of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth, with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.(7) The said Lisbon European Council, finding the number of people living below the poverty line and in social exclusion in the Union unacceptable, deemed it necessary to take steps to make a decisive impact on the eradication of poverty by setting adequate objectives. Such objectives were agreed by the Nice European Council of 7, 8 and 9 December 2000.(8) The said Lisbon Council further acknowledged that the new knowledge-based society offers the potential for reducing social exclusion, both by creating the economic conditions for greater prosperity through higher levels of growth and employment, and by opening up new ways of participating in society. At the same time, it brings a risk of an ever-widening gap between those who have access to the new knowledge, and those who are excluded. It recognised that policies should be directed towards avoiding this risk and maximising this new potential and that the best safeguard against social exclusion is a job.(9) The said European Council further agreed that policies for combating social exclusion should be based on an open method of coordination combining national action plans and a Commission initiative for cooperation.(10) This Commission initiative which consists of a proposal for a multiannual action programme designed to encourage cooperation between Member States should aim at improving knowledge, developing exchanges of information and best practices, and evaluating experiences in order to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of policies to combat exclusion.(11) The drawing-up of harmonised surveys and analyses, and the study of commonly agreed qualitative and quantitative indicators, will provide a basis for the development of the open method of coordination.(12) The fight against social exclusion and poverty requires participation in quality employment and access for all to resources, rights, goods and services, to be facilitated.(13) Measures to combat social exclusion should aim at enabling everyone to support himself or herself, by gainful employment or otherwise, and to integrate into society.(14) The Social Protection Committee, set up by Council Decision 2000/436/EC(9) to enhance cooperation between the Member States on social protection policies, contributes to the development of and systematic follow-up to action to modernise social protection and promote social integration in accordance with the Presidency conclusions of the European Council meeting in Lisbon on 23 and 24 March 2000 and in Feira on 19 and 20 June 2000.(15) Many non-governmental organisations at various levels (local, regional, national and European) have experience of and expertise in fighting social exclusion, as well as acting at European level as the advocates of people who are exposed to social exclusion. Local and regional authorities also have experience and knowledge in this field. Non-governmental organisations, social partners and local and regional authorities can therefore make an important contribution at European level to understanding the diverse forms and effects of social exclusion and to ensuring that the design and implementation of and follow-up to the programme take account of the experience of people exposed to social exclusion.(16) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(10).(17) It is necessary, in order to reinforce the added value of Community action, that the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, should ensure, at all levels, the coherence and complementarity of actions implemented in the framework of this Decision and all other relevant Community instruments, policies and actions, in particular those under the Structural Funds.(18) Special attention should be paid to social exclusion in view of the future enlargement of the Union.(19) The Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement) provides for greater cooperation in the social field between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the countries of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) participating in the European Economic Area (EFTA/EEA countries), on the other. Provision should be made for opening up this programme to participation by the applicant countries of Central and Eastern Europe, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils, and by Cyprus, Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the procedures to be agreed with those countries.(20) In implementing this programme, the work carried out by other international organisations, in particular the United Nations, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the International Labour Organisation and the Council of Europe, will be of particular interest.(21) This Decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the prime reference for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(11). The amount of the financial framework proposed in the programme is compatible with the current financial perspective.(22) Gender is a crucial cross-cutting issue which has a large impact on the effects and causes of exclusion. Moreover, by virtue of Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty, the elimination of inequalities and the promotion of equality, between men and women, are part of the task conferred on the Community, which should feature as an aim in all its activities.(23) It is essential to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the programme to ensure that it achieves its objectives.(24) Since the objectives of the proposed action concerning the contribution of the Community to combating social exclusion cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States for reasons including the need for multilateral partnerships, the transnational exchange of information and the Community-wide dissemination of good practice and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives,HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Establishment of the programmeA programme of Community action to encourage cooperation between Member States in order to combat social exclusion, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, shall be adopted for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006.Article 2Principles1. The programme shall be part of an open method of coordination between Member States to give a decisive impetus to the elimination of social exclusion and poverty by setting appropriate objectives at Community level and by the implementation of national action plans.2. The programme and the national action plans shall contribute to a better understanding of social exclusion, the mainstreaming of the combating of exclusion in Member States’ and Community policies and measures, and the development of priority actions chosen by Member States in accordance with their particular situation.3. In designing, implementing and following up the activities under the programme, account shall be taken of the experience of Member States at all levels involved and of people exposed to social exclusion and poverty, as well as social partners, non-governmental and voluntary organisations, bodies providing social services and other actors involved in the fight against social exclusion and poverty.Article 3ObjectivesIn the context of the open method of coordination referred to in Article 2(1), the programme shall support cooperation which enables the Community and the Member States to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of policies to combat social exclusion by:(a) improving the understanding of social exclusion and poverty with the help in particular of comparable indicators;(b) organising exchanges on policies which are implemented and promoting mutual learning inter alia in the context of national action plans, with the help in particular of comparable indicators;(c) developing the capacity of actors to address social exclusion and poverty effectively, and to promote innovative approaches, in particular through networking at European level, and by promoting dialogue with all those involved including at national and regional level.Article 4Community actions1. With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3, the following Community actions may be implemented within a transnational framework:(a) analysis of characteristics, causes, processes and trends in social exclusion, including the collection of statistics on the various forms of social exclusion in order to compare these data, the study of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the development of common methodologies and thematic studies;(b) exchange of information and best practices encouraging the development of quantitative and qualitative indicators, based on these objectives as agreed by the European Parliament and the Council, assessment criteria and benchmarks and monitoring, evaluation and peer review;(c) promotion of dialogue involving the various actors and support for relevant networking at European level between organisations active in the fight against poverty and social exclusion, in particular non-governmental organisations.2. Arrangements for the implementation of the Community actions described in paragraph 1 are set out in the Annex.Article 5Implementation and cooperation with the Member States1. The Commission shall:(a) ensure the implementation of the Community actions covered by the programme;(b) have a regular exchange of views with representatives of non-governmental organisations and the social partners at European level on the design and implementation of and follow-up to the programme and on related policy orientations. To this end, the Commission shall make useful information available to non-governmental organisations and social partners. The Commission shall inform the Committee established under Article 8 of these views;(c) promote active partnership and dialogue between all the partners involved in the programme to encourage an integrated and coordinated approach to the fight against social exclusion and poverty.2. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, take the necessary steps to:(a) promote the involvement in the programme of all the parties concerned;(b) ensure the dissemination of the results of the Community actions undertaken within the framework of the programme;(c) provide appropriate information, publicity and follow-up with regard to Community actions supported by the programme.Article 6Financing1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period referred to in

Article 1
Establishment of the programme
A programme of Community action to encourage cooperation between Member States in order to combat social exclusion, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, shall be adopted for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006.

Article 2
1. The programme shall be part of an open method of coordination between Member States to give a decisive impetus to the elimination of social exclusion and poverty by setting appropriate objectives at Community level and by the implementation of national action plans.
2. The programme and the national action plans shall contribute to a better understanding of social exclusion, the mainstreaming of the combating of exclusion in Member States’ and Community policies and measures, and the development of priority actions chosen by Member States in accordance with their particular situation.
3. In designing, implementing and following up the activities under the programme, account shall be taken of the experience of Member States at all levels involved and of people exposed to social exclusion and poverty, as well as social partners, non-governmental and voluntary organisations, bodies providing social services and other actors involved in the fight against social exclusion and poverty.

Article 3
In the context of the open method of coordination referred to in Article 2(1), the programme shall support cooperation which enables the Community and the Member States to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of policies to combat social exclusion by:
(a) improving the understanding of social exclusion and poverty with the help in particular of comparable indicators;
(b) organising exchanges on policies which are implemented and promoting mutual learning inter alia in the context of national action plans, with the help in particular of comparable indicators;
(c) developing the capacity of actors to address social exclusion and poverty effectively, and to promote innovative approaches, in particular through networking at European level, and by promoting dialogue with all those involved including at national and regional level.

Article 4
Community actions
1. With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3, the following Community actions may be implemented within a transnational framework:
(a) analysis of characteristics, causes, processes and trends in social exclusion, including the collection of statistics on the various forms of social exclusion in order to compare these data, the study of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the development of common methodologies and thematic studies;
(b) exchange of information and best practices encouraging the development of quantitative and qualitative indicators, based on these objectives as agreed by the European Parliament and the Council, assessment criteria and benchmarks and monitoring, evaluation and peer review;
(c) promotion of dialogue involving the various actors and support for relevant networking at European level between organisations active in the fight against poverty and social exclusion, in particular non-governmental organisations.
2. Arrangements for the implementation of the Community actions described in paragraph 1 are set out in the Annex.

Article 5
Implementation and cooperation with the Member States
1. The Commission shall:
(a) ensure the implementation of the Community actions covered by the programme;
(b) have a regular exchange of views with representatives of non-governmental organisations and the social partners at European level on the design and implementation of and follow-up to the programme and on related policy orientations. To this end, the Commission shall make useful information available to non-governmental organisations and social partners. The Commission shall inform the Committee established under Article 8 of these views;
(c) promote active partnership and dialogue between all the partners involved in the programme to encourage an integrated and coordinated approach to the fight against social exclusion and poverty.
2. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, take the necessary steps to:
(a) promote the involvement in the programme of all the parties concerned;
(b) ensure the dissemination of the results of the Community actions undertaken within the framework of the programme;
(c) provide appropriate information, publicity and follow-up with regard to Community actions supported by the programme.

Article 6
1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period referred to in Article 1 is hereby set at EUR 75 million, including technical and administrative expenditure.
2. The annual appropriations, including those relating to human resources, shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.

Article 7
Implementing measures
1. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to the matters referred to below shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 8(2):
(a) the annual implementation of the programme’s Community actions and the annual plan of work;
(b) the breakdown of the funds between the different strands of the programme;
(c) the arrangements for selecting activities and organisations for Community support;
(d) the criteria for evaluating the programme, including those relating to cost-effectiveness, and the arrangements for disseminating and transferring the results.
2. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to all other matters shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 8(3).

Article 8
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two months.
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
4. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.

Article 9
Cooperation with other committees and links with the Social Protection Committee
1. To ensure the consistency and complementarity of this programme with other measures referred to in Article 10, the Commission shall keep the Committee regularly informed about other Community action contributing to combating social exclusion. Where appropriate, the Commission shall establish regular and structured cooperation between this Committee and the monitoring committees established for other relevant policies, instruments and actions.
2. The Commission shall establish the necessary links with the Social Protection Committee within the framework of the Community actions referred to in this Decision.

Article 10
Consistency and complementarity
1. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency with other relevant Community policies, instruments and actions, in particular by establishing appropriate mechanisms to coordinate the activities of this programme with relevant activities relating to research, employment, economic, industrial and enterprise policies, non-discrimination, immigration, equality between women and men, social protection, education, training and youth policy, health and in the field of enlargement and the Community’s external relations.
2. The Member States shall make every possible effort to ensure consistency and complementarity between activities under this programme and those carried out at national, regional and local levels.
3. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure consistency and complementarity between action undertaken under this programme and action undertaken in the field of employment and also with Community action under the structural funds, in particular the Community initiative EQUAL.

Article 11
Participation of the EFTA/EEA countries, the associated countries of Central and Eastern Europe, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey
This programme shall be open to the participation of:
– the EFTA/EEA countries in accordance with the conditions established in the EEA Agreement;
– the associated central and eastern European countries in accordance with the conditions established in the Europe Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils;
– Cyprus, Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with procedures to be agreed with each country.

Article 12
Monitoring and evaluation
1. The Commission shall regularly monitor this programme in cooperation with the Member States in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 8(2).
2. The Commission shall report on the overall consistency of policies with social cohesion including progress achieved under this programme in its annual summary report to the Spring European Council, on which the European Parliament shall express its views in due course.
3. The programme shall be evaluated by the Commission by the end of the third year and at the end of the programme with the assistance of independent experts. This evaluation will assess the relevance, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of activities implemented with regard to the objectives referred to in Article 3. It will also examine the impact of the programme as a whole. The evaluation will also examine the complementarity between action under the programme and that pursued under other relevant Community policies, instruments and actions.
4. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a final report on the implementation of the programme by 31 December 2006.

Article 13
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Done at Brussels, 7 December 2001.
For the European Parliament
The President
N. Fontaine
For the Council
(1) OJ C 337 E, 28.11.2000, p. 130 and
OJ C 96 E, 27.3.2001, p. 229.
(2) OJ C 14, 16.1.2001, p. 69.
(3) OJ C 144, 16.5.2001, p. 52.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 16 November 2000 (OJ C 223, 8.8.2001, p. 284), Council Common Position of 12 February 2001 (OJ C 93, 23.3.2001, p. 11) and Decision of the European Parliament of 17 May 2001. Decision of the European Parliament of 15 November 2001 and Council Decision of 21 November 2001.
(5) OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 245, 26.8.1992, p. 46.
(7) OJ L 245, 26.8.1992, p. 49.
(8) OJ C 8, 12.1.2000, p. 7.
(9) OJ L 172, 12.7.2000, p. 26.
(10) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(11) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second and third subparagraphs of Article 137(2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 18 September 2001,Whereas:(1) Pursuant to Article 2 of the Treaty, the Community shall have as part of its tasks that of promoting a high level of employment and of social protection and the raising of the standard of living and quality of life throughout the Community and economic and social cohesion.(2) Pursuant to Article 136 of the Treaty, the Community and the Member States, taking note of fundamental political principles, such as those set out in the European Social Charter signed at Turin on 18 October 1961, the revised Social Charter of the Council of Europe (1996), in particular in Article 30 thereof on the right to protection against poverty and social exclusion, and in the 1989 Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers, and bearing in mind also the rights and principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union(5) proclaimed jointly by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 7 December 2000, shall have as an objective the combating of exclusion.(3) In its Recommendation 92/441/EEC(6), the Council recommends that Member States should recognise the basic right of a person to sufficient resources and social assistance to live in a manner compatible with human dignity. In Recommendation 92/442/EEC(7), the Council recommends that Member States should guarantee a level of resources in keeping with human dignity. In its Conclusions of 17 December 1999(8), the Council commits itself to promoting social inclusion as one of the objectives of the modernisation and improvement of social protection systems.(4) The European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions have all urged the Community to strengthen its contribution to efforts in Member States to prevent and to combat social exclusion.(5) The Commission communication of 1 March 2000, “Building an inclusive Europe”, described the challenge of social exclusion and poverty and the existing policy responses in Member States and at Community level, and proposed on this basis to give a new impetus to cooperation of the European Union in this field.(6) The Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000 incorporated as intrinsic to the overall strategy of the Union the promotion of social inclusion to achieve its strategic goal for the next decade of becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth, with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.(7) The said Lisbon European Council, finding the number of people living below the poverty line and in social exclusion in the Union unacceptable, deemed it necessary to take steps to make a decisive impact on the eradication of poverty by setting adequate objectives. Such objectives were agreed by the Nice European Council of 7, 8 and 9 December 2000.(8) The said Lisbon Council further acknowledged that the new knowledge-based society offers the potential for reducing social exclusion, both by creating the economic conditions for greater prosperity through higher levels of growth and employment, and by opening up new ways of participating in society. At the same time, it brings a risk of an ever-widening gap between those who have access to the new knowledge, and those who are excluded. It recognised that policies should be directed towards avoiding this risk and maximising this new potential and that the best safeguard against social exclusion is a job.(9) The said European Council further agreed that policies for combating social exclusion should be based on an open method of coordination combining national action plans and a Commission initiative for cooperation.(10) This Commission initiative which consists of a proposal for a multiannual action programme designed to encourage cooperation between Member States should aim at improving knowledge, developing exchanges of information and best practices, and evaluating experiences in order to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of policies to combat exclusion.(11) The drawing-up of harmonised surveys and analyses, and the study of commonly agreed qualitative and quantitative indicators, will provide a basis for the development of the open method of coordination.(12) The fight against social exclusion and poverty requires participation in quality employment and access for all to resources, rights, goods and services, to be facilitated.(13) Measures to combat social exclusion should aim at enabling everyone to support himself or herself, by gainful employment or otherwise, and to integrate into society.(14) The Social Protection Committee, set up by Council Decision 2000/436/EC(9) to enhance cooperation between the Member States on social protection policies, contributes to the development of and systematic follow-up to action to modernise social protection and promote social integration in accordance with the Presidency conclusions of the European Council meeting in Lisbon on 23 and 24 March 2000 and in Feira on 19 and 20 June 2000.(15) Many non-governmental organisations at various levels (local, regional, national and European) have experience of and expertise in fighting social exclusion, as well as acting at European level as the advocates of people who are exposed to social exclusion. Local and regional authorities also have experience and knowledge in this field. Non-governmental organisations, social partners and local and regional authorities can therefore make an important contribution at European level to understanding the diverse forms and effects of social exclusion and to ensuring that the design and implementation of and follow-up to the programme take account of the experience of people exposed to social exclusion.(16) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(10).(17) It is necessary, in order to reinforce the added value of Community action, that the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, should ensure, at all levels, the coherence and complementarity of actions implemented in the framework of this Decision and all other relevant Community instruments, policies and actions, in particular those under the Structural Funds.(18) Special attention should be paid to social exclusion in view of the future enlargement of the Union.(19) The Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement) provides for greater cooperation in the social field between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the countries of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) participating in the European Economic Area (EFTA/EEA countries), on the other. Provision should be made for opening up this programme to participation by the applicant countries of Central and Eastern Europe, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Europe Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils, and by Cyprus, Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with the procedures to be agreed with those countries.(20) In implementing this programme, the work carried out by other international organisations, in particular the United Nations, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the International Labour Organisation and the Council of Europe, will be of particular interest.(21) This Decision lays down, for the entire duration of the programme, a financial framework constituting the prime reference for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure, within the meaning of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(11). The amount of the financial framework proposed in the programme is compatible with the current financial perspective.(22) Gender is a crucial cross-cutting issue which has a large impact on the effects and causes of exclusion. Moreover, by virtue of Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty, the elimination of inequalities and the promotion of equality, between men and women, are part of the task conferred on the Community, which should feature as an aim in all its activities.(23) It is essential to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the programme to ensure that it achieves its objectives.(24) Since the objectives of the proposed action concerning the contribution of the Community to combating social exclusion cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States for reasons including the need for multilateral partnerships, the transnational exchange of information and the Community-wide dissemination of good practice and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives,HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Establishment of the programmeA programme of Community action to encourage cooperation between Member States in order to combat social exclusion, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, shall be adopted for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006.Article 2Principles1. The programme shall be part of an open method of coordination between Member States to give a decisive impetus to the elimination of social exclusion and poverty by setting appropriate objectives at Community level and by the implementation of national action plans.2. The programme and the national action plans shall contribute to a better understanding of social exclusion, the mainstreaming of the combating of exclusion in Member States’ and Community policies and measures, and the development of priority actions chosen by Member States in accordance with their particular situation.3. In designing, implementing and following up the activities under the programme, account shall be taken of the experience of Member States at all levels involved and of people exposed to social exclusion and poverty, as well as social partners, non-governmental and voluntary organisations, bodies providing social services and other actors involved in the fight against social exclusion and poverty.Article 3ObjectivesIn the context of the open method of coordination referred to in Article 2(1), the programme shall support cooperation which enables the Community and the Member States to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of policies to combat social exclusion by:(a) improving the understanding of social exclusion and poverty with the help in particular of comparable indicators;(b) organising exchanges on policies which are implemented and promoting mutual learning inter alia in the context of national action plans, with the help in particular of comparable indicators;(c) developing the capacity of actors to address social exclusion and poverty effectively, and to promote innovative approaches, in particular through networking at European level, and by promoting dialogue with all those involved including at national and regional level.Article 4Community actions1. With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3, the following Community actions may be implemented within a transnational framework:(a) analysis of characteristics, causes, processes and trends in social exclusion, including the collection of statistics on the various forms of social exclusion in order to compare these data, the study of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the development of common methodologies and thematic studies;(b) exchange of information and best practices encouraging the development of quantitative and qualitative indicators, based on these objectives as agreed by the European Parliament and the Council, assessment criteria and benchmarks and monitoring, evaluation and peer review;(c) promotion of dialogue involving the various actors and support for relevant networking at European level between organisations active in the fight against poverty and social exclusion, in particular non-governmental organisations.2. Arrangements for the implementation of the Community actions described in paragraph 1 are set out in the Annex.Article 5Implementation and cooperation with the Member States1. The Commission shall:(a) ensure the implementation of the Community actions covered by the programme;(b) have a regular exchange of views with representatives of non-governmental organisations and the social partners at European level on the design and implementation of and follow-up to the programme and on related policy orientations. To this end, the Commission shall make useful information available to non-governmental organisations and social partners. The Commission shall inform the Committee established under Article 8 of these views;(c) promote active partnership and dialogue between all the partners involved in the programme to encourage an integrated and coordinated approach to the fight against social exclusion and poverty.2. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, take the necessary steps to:(a) promote the involvement in the programme of all the parties concerned;(b) ensure the dissemination of the results of the Community actions undertaken within the framework of the programme;(c) provide appropriate information, publicity and follow-up with regard to Community actions supported by the programme.Article 6Financing1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period referred to in
Establishment of the programme
A programme of Community action to encourage cooperation between Member States in order to combat social exclusion, hereinafter referred to as “the programme”, shall be adopted for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006.
1. The programme shall be part of an open method of coordination between Member States to give a decisive impetus to the elimination of social exclusion and poverty by setting appropriate objectives at Community level and by the implementation of national action plans.
2. The programme and the national action plans shall contribute to a better understanding of social exclusion, the mainstreaming of the combating of exclusion in Member States’ and Community policies and measures, and the development of priority actions chosen by Member States in accordance with their particular situation.
3. In designing, implementing and following up the activities under the programme, account shall be taken of the experience of Member States at all levels involved and of people exposed to social exclusion and poverty, as well as social partners, non-governmental and voluntary organisations, bodies providing social services and other actors involved in the fight against social exclusion and poverty.
In the context of the open method of coordination referred to in Article 2(1), the programme shall support cooperation which enables the Community and the Member States to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of policies to combat social exclusion by:
(a) improving the understanding of social exclusion and poverty with the help in particular of comparable indicators;
(b) organising exchanges on policies which are implemented and promoting mutual learning inter alia in the context of national action plans, with the help in particular of comparable indicators;
(c) developing the capacity of actors to address social exclusion and poverty effectively, and to promote innovative approaches, in particular through networking at European level, and by promoting dialogue with all those involved including at national and regional level.
Community actions
1. With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3, the following Community actions may be implemented within a transnational framework:
(a) analysis of characteristics, causes, processes and trends in social exclusion, including the collection of statistics on the various forms of social exclusion in order to compare these data, the study of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the development of common methodologies and thematic studies;
(b) exchange of information and best practices encouraging the development of quantitative and qualitative indicators, based on these objectives as agreed by the European Parliament and the Council, assessment criteria and benchmarks and monitoring, evaluation and peer review;
(c) promotion of dialogue involving the various actors and support for relevant networking at European level between organisations active in the fight against poverty and social exclusion, in particular non-governmental organisations.
2. Arrangements for the implementation of the Community actions described in paragraph 1 are set out in the Annex.
Implementation and cooperation with the Member States
1. The Commission shall:
(a) ensure the implementation of the Community actions covered by the programme;
(b) have a regular exchange of views with representatives of non-governmental organisations and the social partners at European level on the design and implementation of and follow-up to the programme and on related policy orientations. To this end, the Commission shall make useful information available to non-governmental organisations and social partners. The Commission shall inform the Committee established under Article 8 of these views;
(c) promote active partnership and dialogue between all the partners involved in the programme to encourage an integrated and coordinated approach to the fight against social exclusion and poverty.
2. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, take the necessary steps to:
(a) promote the involvement in the programme of all the parties concerned;
(b) ensure the dissemination of the results of the Community actions undertaken within the framework of the programme;
(c) provide appropriate information, publicity and follow-up with regard to Community actions supported by the programme.
1. The financial framework for the implementation of the programme for the period referred to in Article 1 is hereby set at EUR 75 million, including technical and administrative expenditure.
2. The annual appropriations, including those relating to human resources, shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.
Implementing measures
1. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to the matters referred to below shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 8(2):
(a) the annual implementation of the programme’s Community actions and the annual plan of work;
(b) the breakdown of the funds between the different strands of the programme;
(c) the arrangements for selecting activities and organisations for Community support;
(d) the criteria for evaluating the programme, including those relating to cost-effectiveness, and the arrangements for disseminating and transferring the results.
2. The measures necessary for the implementation of this Decision relating to all other matters shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 8(3).
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two months.
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
4. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.
Cooperation with other committees and links with the Social Protection Committee
1. To ensure the consistency and complementarity of this programme with other measures referred to in Article 10, the Commission shall keep the Committee regularly informed about other Community action contributing to combating social exclusion. Where appropriate, the Commission shall establish regular and structured cooperation between this Committee and the monitoring committees established for other relevant policies, instruments and actions.
2. The Commission shall establish the necessary links with the Social Protection Committee within the framework of the Community actions referred to in this Decision.
Consistency and complementarity
1. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, ensure overall consistency with other relevant Community policies, instruments and actions, in particular by establishing appropriate mechanisms to coordinate the activities of this programme with relevant activities relating to research, employment, economic, industrial and enterprise policies, non-discrimination, immigration, equality between women and men, social protection, education, training and youth policy, health and in the field of enlargement and the Community’s external relations.
2. The Member States shall make every possible effort to ensure consistency and complementarity between activities under this programme and those carried out at national, regional and local levels.
3. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure consistency and complementarity between action undertaken under this programme and action undertaken in the field of employment and also with Community action under the structural funds, in particular the Community initiative EQUAL.
Participation of the EFTA/EEA countries, the associated countries of Central and Eastern Europe, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey
This programme shall be open to the participation of:
– the EFTA/EEA countries in accordance with the conditions established in the EEA Agreement;
– the associated central and eastern European countries in accordance with the conditions established in the Europe Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective Association Councils;
– Cyprus, Malta and Turkey, funded by additional appropriations in accordance with procedures to be agreed with each country.
Monitoring and evaluation
1. The Commission shall regularly monitor this programme in cooperation with the Member States in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 8(2).
2. The Commission shall report on the overall consistency of policies with social cohesion including progress achieved under this programme in its annual summary report to the Spring European Council, on which the European Parliament shall express its views in due course.
3. The programme shall be evaluated by the Commission by the end of the third year and at the end of the programme with the assistance of independent experts. This evaluation will assess the relevance, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of activities implemented with regard to the objectives referred to in Article 3. It will also examine the impact of the programme as a whole. The evaluation will also examine the complementarity between action under the programme and that pursued under other relevant Community policies, instruments and actions.
4. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a final report on the implementation of the programme by 31 December 2006.
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Done at Brussels, 7 December 2001.
For the European Parliament
The President
N. Fontaine
For the Council
(1) OJ C 337 E, 28.11.2000, p. 130 and
OJ C 96 E, 27.3.2001, p. 229.
(2) OJ C 14, 16.1.2001, p. 69.
(3) OJ C 144, 16.5.2001, p. 52.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 16 November 2000 (OJ C 223, 8.8.2001, p. 284), Council Common Position of 12 February 2001 (OJ C 93, 23.3.2001, p. 11) and Decision of the European Parliament of 17 May 2001. Decision of the European Parliament of 15 November 2001 and Council Decision of 21 November 2001.
(5) OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 245, 26.8.1992, p. 46.
(7) OJ L 245, 26.8.1992, p. 49.
(8) OJ C 8, 12.1.2000, p. 7.
(9) OJ L 172, 12.7.2000, p. 26.
(10) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(11) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
INDICATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME
1. Action strands
With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3 and implementing the Community actions set out in Article 4, the following measures may be implemented within a transnational framework:
Analysis of characteristics, processes, causes and trends in social exclusion
To improve understanding of the phenomenon of social exclusion, the following measures may be supported:
1.1. studies and meetings on the development of common methodologies to measure and understand social exclusion and poverty, their extent, characteristics, processes, causes and trends, and on technical work on indicators;
1.2. the collection, in Member States and at Community level, and dissemination of statistics on the various types of social exclusion for the purposes of comparing such data effectively. This measure should support cooperation between national statistical offices and the Commission and improve the statistical reference sources at Community level and their contribution to the analysis of social exclusion and poverty;
1.3. the promotion of innovative approaches, the development of thematic studies to contribute to the understanding of social exclusion, in order to address common issues in connection with policy developments in Member States, including emerging issues in relation to the knowledge-based society.
It is important to reflect the experience on the ground of persons confronted with social exclusion and poverty and to make use of all relevant sources of information on social exclusion and poverty, including that coming from non-governmental organisations.
In analysing social exclusion and poverty, special attention will be paid to their multiple dimensions and to the diverse situations of the social groups concerned, including child poverty, and of the geographical areas which are exposed to the risks of social exclusion.
Policy cooperation and exchange of information and best practices
In order to promote policy cooperation and mutual learning in the context of national action plans, the following transnational activities may be supported:
2.1. transnational exchanges aimed at transferring information and good practices and encouraging peer review by means of meetings/workshops/seminars on benchmarks or on policies and practices, or other forms of exchange such as joint development of strategies and common dissemination of information, field visits and exchanges of personnel etc., organised at the initiative of either Member States and/or other key actors with the active involvement of Member States, or European organisations. Transnational exchanges between national observatories or similar recognised bodies may also be supported under this strand;
2.2. expert work and technical studies in connection with the development of indicators and benchmarks, including in relation to the knowledge-based society;
2.3. annual report on social exclusion, which would present the state of play on the action conducted, especially national action plans, in the main policies and fields where the fight against poverty and social exclusion is at stake.
Bearing in mind that social exclusion is a multidimensional phenomenon, particular attention should be paid to relevant policy developments on social protection, employment, education and training, health and housing policies.
Participation of the various actors and support for networking at European level
To promote dialogue with all the operators concerned, the following measures may be supported:
3.1. core funding for key European networks involved in the fight against poverty and social exclusion; the core funding is subject to an upper limit of 90 % of the expenditure eligible for support. This ceiling may only be reached under exceptional circumstances;
3.2. an annual European Union Round Table Conference on social exclusion. The conference would be organised in close collaboration with the Presidency of the Council of the European Union and prepared for in consultation with all the actors concerned, among others social partners, representatives of non-governmental organisations with experience in the field, and representatives of the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions.
2. Access to the programme
Under the conditions and arrangements for implementation specified in this Annex, access to this programme shall be open to all public and/or private bodies, actors and institutions involved in the fight against social exclusion, in particular:
(a) Member States;
(b) local and regional authorities;
(c) bodies responsible for combating social exclusion;
(d) social partners;
(e) bodies providing social services;
(f) non-governmental organisations;
(g) universities and research institutes;
(h) national statistical offices;
3. General considerations
The programme shall take into account the results of preparatory actions and activities under other relevant Community policies, instruments and actions.
In designing, implementing, following up and evaluating activities under the programme, account will be taken of the experience of people exposed to poverty and social exclusion, as well as social partners, non-governmental organisations and other bodies involved in the fight against social exclusion and poverty. In all its activities, the programme will respect the principle of gender mainstreaming.
4. Method of presenting applications for support
5. Carrying out the activities
The activities to be taken may be funded by service contracts following calls for tender or by subsidies for joint financing with other sources. In the latter case, the level of financial assistance by the Commission may not, as a general rule, exceed 80 % of the expenditure actually incurred by the recipient.
In carrying out the programme, the Commission may require additional resources, including recourse to experts. These requirements will be decided in the context of the Commission’s ongoing assessment of resource allocation.
In implementing the programme, the Commission may make use of technical and/or administrative assistance (definition, preparation, management, monitoring, audit and control), in the mutual interests of the Commission and of the recipients.
The Commission may also undertake information, publication and dissemination activities. It may also undertake evaluation studies and organise seminars, workshops or other meetings of experts.
Activities undertaken will fully respect the principles of data protection.

Pending: 32002D0040

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 300(2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas:(1) In accordance with the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on fishing off the coast of Guinea Bissau(1), the Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau have conducted negotiations to determine any amendments or additions to be made to the Agreement at the end of the period of application of the Protocol annexed thereto.(2) As a result of those negotiations, a new Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the compensation provided for in the Agreement was initialled on 30 May 2001.(3) Under this Protocol, Community fishermen enjoy fishing opportunities in the waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period from 16 June 2001 to 15 June 2006.(4) In order to ensure uninterrupted fishing activities by Community vessels, it is essential that the new Protocol be applied as quickly as possible. For this reason, the two parties have initialled an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters providing for the provisional application of the initialled Protocol from 16 June 2001.(5) The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters should be approved, pending a definitive decision under Article 37 of the Treaty.(6) The method of allocating the fishing opportunities among the Member States should be defined on the basis of the traditional allocation of fishing opportunities under the Fisheries Agreement,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on fishing off the coast of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2001 to 15 June 2006 is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.The texts of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters and of the Protocol are attached to this Decision.Article 2The fishing opportunities provided for in the Protocol shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:(a) shrimps:>TABLE>(b) fin-fish/cephalopods:>TABLE>(c) tuna seiners:>TABLE>(d) surface longliners and pole-and-line vessels:>TABLE>If licence applications from these Member States do not cover all the fishing opportunities fixed by the Protocol, the Commission may consider licence applications from any other Member State.Article 3The Member States whose vessels are fishing under this Protocol are obliged to notify the Commission of the quantities of each stock taken in Guinea-Bissau’s fishing zone in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 500/2001 of 14 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 on the monitoring of catches taken by Community fishing vessels in third country waters and on the high seas(2).Article 4The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.Done at Brussels, 6 December 2001.For the CouncilThe PresidentI. Durant(1) OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, p. 34.(2) OJ L 73, 15.3.2001, p. 8.

Article 1
The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on fishing off the coast of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2001 to 15 June 2006 is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
The texts of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters and of the Protocol are attached to this Decision.

Article 2
The fishing opportunities provided for in the Protocol shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:
(a) shrimps:
(b) fin-fish/cephalopods:
(c) tuna seiners:
(d) surface longliners and pole-and-line vessels:
If licence applications from these Member States do not cover all the fishing opportunities fixed by the Protocol, the Commission may consider licence applications from any other Member State.

Article 3
The Member States whose vessels are fishing under this Protocol are obliged to notify the Commission of the quantities of each stock taken in Guinea-Bissau’s fishing zone in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 500/2001 of 14 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 on the monitoring of catches taken by Community fishing vessels in third country waters and on the high seas(2).

Article 4
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.
Done at Brussels, 6 December 2001.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, p. 34.
(2) OJ L 73, 15.3.2001, p. 8.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 300(2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas:(1) In accordance with the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on fishing off the coast of Guinea Bissau(1), the Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau have conducted negotiations to determine any amendments or additions to be made to the Agreement at the end of the period of application of the Protocol annexed thereto.(2) As a result of those negotiations, a new Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the compensation provided for in the Agreement was initialled on 30 May 2001.(3) Under this Protocol, Community fishermen enjoy fishing opportunities in the waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period from 16 June 2001 to 15 June 2006.(4) In order to ensure uninterrupted fishing activities by Community vessels, it is essential that the new Protocol be applied as quickly as possible. For this reason, the two parties have initialled an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters providing for the provisional application of the initialled Protocol from 16 June 2001.(5) The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters should be approved, pending a definitive decision under Article 37 of the Treaty.(6) The method of allocating the fishing opportunities among the Member States should be defined on the basis of the traditional allocation of fishing opportunities under the Fisheries Agreement,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on fishing off the coast of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2001 to 15 June 2006 is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.The texts of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters and of the Protocol are attached to this Decision.Article 2The fishing opportunities provided for in the Protocol shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:(a) shrimps:>TABLE>(b) fin-fish/cephalopods:>TABLE>(c) tuna seiners:>TABLE>(d) surface longliners and pole-and-line vessels:>TABLE>If licence applications from these Member States do not cover all the fishing opportunities fixed by the Protocol, the Commission may consider licence applications from any other Member State.Article 3The Member States whose vessels are fishing under this Protocol are obliged to notify the Commission of the quantities of each stock taken in Guinea-Bissau’s fishing zone in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 500/2001 of 14 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 on the monitoring of catches taken by Community fishing vessels in third country waters and on the high seas(2).Article 4The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.Done at Brussels, 6 December 2001.For the CouncilThe PresidentI. Durant(1) OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, p. 34.(2) OJ L 73, 15.3.2001, p. 8.
The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on fishing off the coast of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2001 to 15 June 2006 is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
The texts of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters and of the Protocol are attached to this Decision.
The fishing opportunities provided for in the Protocol shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:
(a) shrimps:
(b) fin-fish/cephalopods:
(c) tuna seiners:
(d) surface longliners and pole-and-line vessels:
If licence applications from these Member States do not cover all the fishing opportunities fixed by the Protocol, the Commission may consider licence applications from any other Member State.
The Member States whose vessels are fishing under this Protocol are obliged to notify the Commission of the quantities of each stock taken in Guinea-Bissau’s fishing zone in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 500/2001 of 14 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 on the monitoring of catches taken by Community fishing vessels in third country waters and on the high seas(2).
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.
Done at Brussels, 6 December 2001.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, p. 34.
(2) OJ L 73, 15.3.2001, p. 8.

Pending: 32002D0018

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,Whereas:(1) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that the Commission is to establish a Community eco-label working plan.(2) The working plan should include a strategy for the development of the scheme, setting out objectives for environmental improvement and market penetration, a non-exhaustive list of product groups which should be considered as priorities for Community action, and plans for coordination and cooperation between the Community scheme and other eco-label award schemes in Member States.(3) Furthermore the working plan should provide measures for the implementation of the strategy and include the planned financing of the scheme.(4) Finally the working plan should outline the services to which the scheme is not applicable, taking into account Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)(2).(5) The working plan should be reviewed periodically.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,

Article 1
The Community eco-label working plan for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004, set out in the Annex, is adopted.

Article 2
A review of the working plan shall be initiated before 31 December 2004.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 December 2001.
For the Commission
Margot Wallström
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 114, 24.4.2001, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,Whereas:(1) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that the Commission is to establish a Community eco-label working plan.(2) The working plan should include a strategy for the development of the scheme, setting out objectives for environmental improvement and market penetration, a non-exhaustive list of product groups which should be considered as priorities for Community action, and plans for coordination and cooperation between the Community scheme and other eco-label award schemes in Member States.(3) Furthermore the working plan should provide measures for the implementation of the strategy and include the planned financing of the scheme.(4) Finally the working plan should outline the services to which the scheme is not applicable, taking into account Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)(2).(5) The working plan should be reviewed periodically.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
The Community eco-label working plan for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004, set out in the Annex, is adopted.
A review of the working plan shall be initiated before 31 December 2004.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 December 2001.
For the Commission
Margot Wallström
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 114, 24.4.2001, p. 1.
COMMUNITY ECO-LABEL WORKING PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The Community eco-label was introduced in 1992 to encourage businesses to develop products with a reduced environmental impact throughout their whole life cycle, and to provide consumers with better information about these impacts.
Since then, new policy approaches on sustainable goods and services have been developed. These endeavours undertaken at all political levels have culminated in the Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy(1) (IPP). This document proposes a new strategy to strengthen and refocus product-related environmental policies and develop the market for greener products, which will also be one of the key innovative elements of the sixth environmental action programme – Environment 2010: “Our future, our choice”(2).
The strategy, as proposed by the Commission in the Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy, is currently being discussed by other European institutions and stakeholders. The outcome of this wide debate will provide an insight into how the integrated product policy strategy can be successfully integrated into environmental policy. The debate will also be the basis for a forthcoming White Paper setting out the conclusions of the Commission for the implementation of such an IPP approach. The strategy, as proposed in the Green Paper, includes three main elements, namely price mechanisms, green consumer demand and measures in favour of a more environmentally friendly design and use of products. Inter alia, consumers should be given easier access to understandable, relevant and credible information through a strengthened and refocused strategy on environmental labelling.
This opens new opportunities for the European eco-label, which has so far had to operate with little or no support from other policy measures, and has not yet achieved a satisfactory level of visibility on the market. Within the European eco-label scheme there is considerable information and expertise on product policy based on life-cycle thinking which should be made available to stakeholders involved in further developing the integrated product policy approach.
This working plan therefore should be seen in the context of the ongoing discussions on an EU integrated product policy and the development of the sixth environmental action programme and the Community’s sustainable development strategy. The European Union’s sustainable development strategy forms part of its preparations for the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg. At this summit, following the 1992 Rio process, the European Union will seek to achieve a “global deal” on sustainable development. The June 2001 European Council of Göteborg(3) agreed on a strategy for sustainable development and added an environmental dimension to the Lisbon process for employment, economic reform and social cohesion. By explicitly mentioning the integrated product policy as a task of joint responsibility and by inviting industry to take part in the development and wider use of environmentally friendly technologies, the European Council itself stressed the importance of de-coupling economic growth from resource use.
Environmental labelling will constitute an important element within all these new approaches, with ISO type-I labels (life-cycle based, third party certified eco-labels following ISO 14024), such as the Community eco-label, making a significant contribution. It should be recognised that the eco-label, as both a voluntary and a selective scheme, does not have the force and universality that measures such as regulations can provide. But good environmental labelling schemes will remain attractive to consumers because of their immediacy and simplicity. They are also business friendly because they act as product enhancers and offer marketing advantages at the point of sale. In addition the eco-label offers a reference point for environmental excellence at European level, for example in greening public procurement and for identifying green products on which taxation could be reduced. Moreover, in the draft directive on the environmental impact of electrical and electronic equipment, the eco-label is proposed as giving a presumption of conformity with the requirements of the directive.
Finally, while it is clear that the Community eco-label has not yet achieved satisfactory market penetration, it is now in a better situation than ever before, with a continuously widening range of product groups, with eco-labelled products in nearly all of the Member States and new applications coming in all the time. Moreover, new perspectives, such as IPP in general and the greening of public procurement in particular, are opening up fresh market opportunities. Nevertheless, much still needs to be done to make the eco-label more attractive to manufacturers, distributors, consumers and other stakeholders.
In particular, it needs to be more widely recognised that the eco-label is a label of environmental excellence that has several unique strengths. It is the only truly European eco-label, being valid throughout the 15 Member States of the EU and the three Member States of the EEA. It is a public label, not a private label, developed under the authority of the European institutions. The criteria are developed following very extensive consultation between all interested parties, including public authorities, representatives of consumer and environmental non-governmental organisations (NGOs), industry, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), distributors and others. It is an environmental label, not a health or quality label, although these aspects are also considered. It takes into account all stages of the life cycle of the product, that is to say it is not a single issue label or limited to the characteristics of the product itself. It uses the same logo for a wide range of product groups, and so is easily recognisable by the consumer, who can be confident that the product bearing the label is one of the best with respect to its environmental performance. This is not a self-claim of the manufacturer, as compliance with the criteria is certified, verified and monitored by an independent third party (one of the eco-label competent bodies).
The fundamental aim of this working plan is, therefore, to build on these solid foundations and lay down the programme of work for the next three years that will:
– make the eco-label a more successful and effective instrument for improving the environmental quality of products and services,
– contribute to making consumption more sustainable, and to the policy objectives set out in the Community’s sustainable development strategy, the sixth environmental action programme and the forthcoming White Paper on Integrated Product Policy Strategy,
– make the most effective use of the resources allocated to the scheme by the Commission, the Member States and the members of the European Union Eco-labelling Board (EUEB)(4).
STRATEGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCHEME 2002 TO 2004
1. Policy and strategy
The Community eco-label is continually developing and adapting its long-term policy and strategy, which needs to be closely integrated, among others, with the ongoing discussions on an EU integrated product policy, with the development of the sixth environmental action programme and with the Community’s sustainable development strategy. The eco-label also needs to follow closely the wider developments in product labelling, including ISO type-II and III labels as well as ethical, quality and health labels.
In order to manage more effectively the various related discussions and information flow, both within the scheme and with respect to external forums, and to prepare and lead the debate on the future of the scheme, an active and permanent policy management group should be set up.
Continue to develop and adapt the long-term policy and strategy of the scheme, as well as the integration of the eco-label in the various policies being developed in relation to sustainable consumption (such as IPP, greening public procurement, wider labelling, reduced taxation for green products, etc.).
Implementing measures
The EUEB should set up a permanent policy management group, to develop and adapt its long-term policy and strategy, and to coordinate with and provide input to the abovementioned policy developments. These policy issues should also be discussed during the Presidential meetings(5).
2. Objectives for environmental improvement and market penetration
The objectives for environmental improvement and market penetration are essentially:
(a) to widen the number of markets potentially open to eco-labelled products by progressively expanding the range of eco-label product groups,
(b) within each of these markets/product groups, to increase significantly the visibility of the eco-label (i.e. the number of eco-labelled products on the market),
(c) and thereby to continually reinforce the overall environmental benefits of the scheme and its contribution to making consumption more sustainable
(a) Product group development
Currently criteria have been adopted for 17 product groups (tissue paper, dishwashers, soil improvers, bed mattresses, indoor paints and varnishes, footwear, textile products, personal computers, laundry detergents, detergents for dishwashers, copying paper, light bulbs, portable computers, refrigerators, washing machines, all purpose and sanitary cleaners, hand-dishwashing detergents).
Work is ongoing on at least five new product groups (hard floor coverings, televisions, furniture, vacuum cleaners, and tourist accommodation), and should be finalised in 2002.
The long-term objective is to establish a set of product groups which forms a sufficiently complete range of products to attract retailers, manufacturers and consumers, and which is also manageable in terms of the work necessary to establish and regularly revise their criteria. In the short term this should be between 25 and 35 product groups (see section 4a, and sections 3a and Appendix II for a non-exhaustive list of priority product groups). The scope of each product group should, where appropriate, be progressively widened, for example to include also certain products for professional use.
The scheme, its procedures and its resources are currently such that between four and eight Commission decisions on product group criteria can be made every year. The revision of existing product groups should, in general, be made every four to five years (although this period should be adapted on a case-by-case basis), implying on average some four to six revisions every year, and thereby allowing perhaps two new product groups to be established every year.
Establish a set of product groups which forms a sufficiently complete and manageable range of products to attract retailers, manufacturers and consumers.
Within five years, the number of established product groups should increase to between 25 and 35.
Implementing measures
Taking into account the priority list of product groups, the Commission, the EUEB and the Member States should, in addition to carrying out the necessary revisions, establish one or two new product groups every year of the working plan.
The duration of validity of product group criteria should in general be four to five years (although this guideline period should be adapted on a case-by-case basis).
In order to facilitate criteria setting, the EUEB should set up a working group to address horizontal issues common to many product groups (e.g. flame retardants, packaging, etc.).
(b) Market penetration, visibility and consumer awareness
There are four parameters for measuring the visibility of the eco-label:
– companies: the number of companies awarded the eco-label,
– products: the number of products for which these companies have the eco-label,
– articles: the number of articles of these products marketed bearing the eco-label,
– values: the ex-factory sales value of these articles.
Currently (August 2001) 83 companies use the eco-label (compared to 37 in March 2000), on several hundreds of their products. Textiles and paints and varnishes are by far the most successful product groups in terms of the number of applicants. Tissue paper accounts for a significant proportion of the overall sales value of eco-labelled items. The distribution of eco-label holders and their products over the European Union and the European Economic Area is still fairly uneven, but compared to the situation one year ago, shows a much better and more balanced coverage of products in 12 of the 17 product groups with licence holders in 13 out of the 18 participating countries. For 2000, provisional data gives sales of approximately 17 million eco-labelled articles with an ex-factory value of approximately EUR 38 million.
In terms of actual market penetration, Community eco-labelled products are however still relatively insignificant, currently representing less than 1 % of the total market for the different product groups. For example, the ex-factory sales value of eco-labelled indoor paints and varnishes in the EU was approximately EUR 8 million in 1999, compared to the total sales value of all decorative paints of approximately EUR 7200 million.
The short-term objective is therefore to increase considerably the number of labelled products, so as to make the eco-label visible on the market and to increase its environmental impact. The longer term objective is to continuously reinforce this visibility so as to move towards the full theoretical potential for market penetration of the eco-label, which generally lies between 1 % and 30 % of the overall market (depending on the product group in question and the selectivity of its related eco-label criteria).
It should be stressed that the global experience of type I eco-labels is that it is infrequent to achieve anything close to such levels of market penetration, and generally this has only been achieved for one or two product groups in geographically restricted markets. The eco-label should therefore embrace realistic but at the same time ambitious targets. In the short term, in order to achieve a minimum level of visibility, an annual increase of at least 25 % of the value and/or number of eco-labelled articles would be necessary.
Visibility is far from being a precise concept, but in so far as the eco-label is concerned, one could consider minimum visibility to be achieved if consumers all over the EU and the EEA have the possibility of choosing eco-labelled products of different sorts during their shopping, without having to search too actively. A rough guideline definition could, for example, be that eco-labelled products of at least three or four different product groups should be marketed in each Member State, in quantities representing at least 1 % of the overall market of those product groups.
In this respect, the eco-label competent bodies in each Member State have identified certain existing product groups for targeting their marketing and promotion, including in particular textiles, footwear, paints and varnishes, soil improvers and tissue paper.
While, in the final analysis, the decision to use the eco-label or not lies entirely with the individual companies (and is taken essentially on the basis of economic and marketing factors), the EUEB, the Member States and the Commission can nevertheless considerably influence the market penetration of the eco-label. As well as actively promoting the eco-label to all stakeholders (see also section on joint promotional actions), the extensive consultation and dialogue during the establishment of the criteria aim to achieve the best possible balance between environmental ambition and technical feasibility, so as to be attractive to manufacturers, distributors and consumers.

Pending: 32001D1346

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 156 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 13 March 2001,Whereas:(1) Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network(5) constitutes a general reference framework covering the objectives, priorities and broad thrust of the measures contemplated as well as the projects of common interest in the area of the trans-European transport network.(2) Interconnection points including seaports, inland ports and intermodal terminals are a pre-condition for the integration of the different transport modes in a multimodal network.(3) Seaports in the trans-European transport network are classified into categories. These are defined on the basis of quantitative criteria or their location in island, peripheral or outermost regions. Only those ports in the highest category by volume of traffic should be shown, by way of indication, on maps. The specifications which a seaport project is to meet to be deemed of common interest should be set out.(4) The criteria relating to inland ports should be supplemented by criteria concerning either the nature of their equipment or the volume of traffic and those ports should be shown, by way of indication, on maps.(5) The European Council held in Dublin in 1996 decided that project No 8 in the list from the Essen European Council of 1994 should become the Portugal/Spain multimodal link with the rest of Europe.(6) Decision No 1692/96/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1Decision No 1692/96/EC is hereby amended as follows:1. Article 11 shall be amended as follows:(a) paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following: “3. Inland ports shall form part of the network, in particular as points of interconnection between the waterways referred to in paragraph 2 and Article 14 and other modes of transport.”(b) The following paragraph shall be inserted: “3a. The network shall include inland ports(a) open to commercial traffic,(b) located on the network of inland waterways as shown in the outline in Annex I, Section 4,(c) interconnected with other trans-European transport routes as shown in Annex I, and(d) equipped with transhipment facilities for intermodal transport or with an annual freight traffic volume of at least 500000 tonnes.”2. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 12Characteristics1. Seaports shall permit the development of sea transport and shall constitute shipping links for islands and the points of interconnection between sea transport and other modes of transport. They shall provide equipment and services to transport operators. Their infrastructure shall provide a range of services for passenger and goods transport, including ferry services and short- and long-distance shipping services, including coastal shipping, within the Community and between the latter and non-member countries.2. The seaports included in the network shall correspond to one of the categories, A, B or C, defined below:A. international seaports: ports with a total annual traffic volume of not less than 1,5 million tonnes of freight or 200000 passengers which, unless it is an impossibility, are connected with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and therefore play a major role in international maritime transport;B. Community seaports, not included in category A: these ports have a total annual traffic volume of not less than 0,5 million tonnes of freight or between 100000 and 199999 passengers, are connected, unless it is an impossibility, with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and are equipped with the necessary transhipment facilities for short-distance sea shipping;C. regional ports: these ports do not meet the criteria of categories A and B but are situated in island, peripheral or outermost regions, interconnecting such regions by sea and/or connecting them with the central regions of the Community.The seaports in category A shall be shown on the indicative maps in the outline plans in Section 5 of Annex I, on the basis of the most recent port data.3. In addition to the criteria set out in Article 7, seaport projects of common interest related to seaports included in the trans-European seaport network shall comply with the criteria and specifications in Annex II.”3. Article 14 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 14CharacteristicsThe trans-European combined transport network shall comprise:- railways and inland waterways which are suitable for combined transport and shipping which, combined where appropriate with the shortest possible initial and/or terminal road haulage, permit the long-distance transport of goods,- intermodal terminals equipped with installations permitting transhipment between railways, inland waterways, shipping routes and roads,- suitable rolling stock, on a provisional basis, where the characteristics of the infrastructure, as yet unadapted, so require.”4. Article 19 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 19Specific projectsAnnex III contains, by way of indication, the projects identified in Annexes I and II and in the other provisions of this Decision, to which the European Councils held in Essen in 1994 and in Dublin in 1996 attributed particular importance.”5. Annex I shall be amended as follows:(a) in the contents- the title of Section 4 “Inland waterway network” shall be replaced by: “Inland waterway network and inland ports”,- Section 5 shall be replaced by the following: “Section 5: Seaports – Category A5.0. Europe5.1. Baltic Sea5.2. North Sea5.3. Atlantic Ocean5.4. Mediterranean Sea – western part5.5. Mediterranean Sea – eastern part”,- in Section 7 “Combined transport network”, point 7.2 shall be deleted;(b) as regards the maps corresponding to Sections 4 and 5:- the map showing Section 4 shall be replaced by those annexed to this Decision. These maps identify also inland ports which are equipped with transhipment facilities for combined transport and shall replace the map showing point 7.2,- the maps showing Section 5 as they appear in the Annex to this Decision shall be inserted.6. Annex II shall be amended as follows:(a) the part of Section 4 concerning inland ports shall be replaced by the following: “Inland portsProjects of common interest must relate solely to infrastructure open to any user on a non-discriminatory basis.In addition to projects relating to the connections and inland ports mentioned in Annex I, projects of common interest will be deemed to include any infrastructure project corresponding to one or more of the following categories:1. access to the port from waterways;2. port infrastructure inside the port area;3. other transport infrastructures inside the port area;4. other transport infrastructures linking the port to other elements of the trans-European network.Any project which concerns the following work will be deemed to be of common interest: construction and maintenance of all elements of the transport system generally open to all transport users within the port and of links with the national or international transport network; in particular, this includes the development and maintenance of land for commercial and other port-related purposes, the construction and maintenance of road and rail connections, the construction and maintenance, including dredging, of access routes and of other areas of water in the port, and the construction and maintenance of navigation aids and traffic management, communication and information systems in the port and on the access routes.”(b) Section 5 shall be replaced by the following: “Section 5Seaports1. Common conditions for projects of common interest relating to seaports in the networkProjects of common interest must relate solely to infrastructure open to any user on a non-discriminatory basis.Any project which concerns the following work will be deemed to be of common interest: construction and maintenance of all elements of the transport system generally open to all transport users within the port and of links with the national or international transport network; in particular, this includes the development and maintenance of land for commercial and other port-related purposes, the construction and maintenance of road and rail connections, the construction and maintenance, including dredging, of access routes and of other areas of water in the port, and the construction and maintenance of navigation aids and traffic management, communication and information systems in the port and on the access routes.2. Specifications for projects of common interest relating to the seaport network>TABLE>”.(c) The second and third indents of Section 7 shall be replaced by the following: “- construction or development of centres for transfers between inland types of transport, including the setting up within the terminal of transhipment equipment with the corresponding infrastructure,- adaptation of port areas, making it possible to develop or improve combined transport between sea transport and rail, inland waterway or road transport”.7. Annex III shall be amended as follows:(a) the title shall be replaced by the following: “List of the 14 projects adopted by the European Councils held in Essen in 1994 and in Dublin in 1996″(b) Item 8 (“Motorway Lisbon – Valladolid”) shall be replaced by the following: “8. Portugal/Spain multimodal link with the rest of Europe through developing rail, road, sea and air connections in the following three Iberian corridors:- Galicia (A Coruña)/Portugal (Lisbon)- Irún/Portugal (Valladolid-Lisbon)- Southwest corridor (Lisbon-Seville).”Article 2This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.Article 3This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 22 May 2001.For the European ParliamentThe PresidentN. FontaineFor the CouncilThe PresidentM. Winberg(1) OJ C 120, 18. 4.1998, p. 14.(2) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 40.(3) OJ C 373, 2.12.1998, p. 20.(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 10 March 1999 (OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 110), Council Common Position of 5 June 2000 (OJ C 228, 9.8.2000, p. 1) and Decision of the European Parliament of 3 October 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Decision of the European Parliament of 5 April 2001 and Council Decision of 24 April 2001.(5) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1.ANNEX”ANNEX ISECTION 4Inland waterway network and inland ports>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.000901.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001101.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001301.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001501.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001701.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001901.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002101.TIF”>SECTION 5Seaports – Category A>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002501.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002701.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002901.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.003101.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.003301.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.003501.TIF”>”Commission statementThe Commission intends at the next revision of Decision 1692/96/EC to include in its proposal the Elbe-Lübeck Kanal and the Twente-Mittellandkanal as part of the inland waterway network.

Article 1
Decision No 1692/96/EC is hereby amended as follows:
1. Article 11 shall be amended as follows:
(a) paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following: “3. Inland ports shall form part of the network, in particular as points of interconnection between the waterways referred to in paragraph 2 and Article 14 and other modes of transport.”
(b) The following paragraph shall be inserted: “3a. The network shall include inland ports
(a) open to commercial traffic,
(b) located on the network of inland waterways as shown in the outline in Annex I, Section 4,
(c) interconnected with other trans-European transport routes as shown in Annex I, and
(d) equipped with transhipment facilities for intermodal transport or with an annual freight traffic volume of at least 500000 tonnes.”
2. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 12
Characteristics
1. Seaports shall permit the development of sea transport and shall constitute shipping links for islands and the points of interconnection between sea transport and other modes of transport. They shall provide equipment and services to transport operators. Their infrastructure shall provide a range of services for passenger and goods transport, including ferry services and short- and long-distance shipping services, including coastal shipping, within the Community and between the latter and non-member countries.
2. The seaports included in the network shall correspond to one of the categories, A, B or C, defined below:
A. international seaports: ports with a total annual traffic volume of not less than 1,5 million tonnes of freight or 200000 passengers which, unless it is an impossibility, are connected with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and therefore play a major role in international maritime transport;
B. Community seaports, not included in category A: these ports have a total annual traffic volume of not less than 0,5 million tonnes of freight or between 100000 and 199999 passengers, are connected, unless it is an impossibility, with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and are equipped with the necessary transhipment facilities for short-distance sea shipping;
C. regional ports: these ports do not meet the criteria of categories A and B but are situated in island, peripheral or outermost regions, interconnecting such regions by sea and/or connecting them with the central regions of the Community.
The seaports in category A shall be shown on the indicative maps in the outline plans in Section 5 of Annex I, on the basis of the most recent port data.
3. In addition to the criteria set out in Article 7, seaport projects of common interest related to seaports included in the trans-European seaport network shall comply with the criteria and specifications in Annex II.”
3. Article 14 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 14
The trans-European combined transport network shall comprise:

Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 May 2001.
For the European Parliament
The President
N. Fontaine
For the Council
(1) OJ C 120, 18. 4.1998, p. 14.
(2) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 40.
(3) OJ C 373, 2.12.1998, p. 20.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 10 March 1999 (OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 110), Council Common Position of 5 June 2000 (OJ C 228, 9.8.2000, p. 1) and Decision of the European Parliament of 3 October 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Decision of the European Parliament of 5 April 2001 and Council Decision of 24 April 2001.
(5) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 156 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(4), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 13 March 2001,Whereas:(1) Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network(5) constitutes a general reference framework covering the objectives, priorities and broad thrust of the measures contemplated as well as the projects of common interest in the area of the trans-European transport network.(2) Interconnection points including seaports, inland ports and intermodal terminals are a pre-condition for the integration of the different transport modes in a multimodal network.(3) Seaports in the trans-European transport network are classified into categories. These are defined on the basis of quantitative criteria or their location in island, peripheral or outermost regions. Only those ports in the highest category by volume of traffic should be shown, by way of indication, on maps. The specifications which a seaport project is to meet to be deemed of common interest should be set out.(4) The criteria relating to inland ports should be supplemented by criteria concerning either the nature of their equipment or the volume of traffic and those ports should be shown, by way of indication, on maps.(5) The European Council held in Dublin in 1996 decided that project No 8 in the list from the Essen European Council of 1994 should become the Portugal/Spain multimodal link with the rest of Europe.(6) Decision No 1692/96/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1Decision No 1692/96/EC is hereby amended as follows:1. Article 11 shall be amended as follows:(a) paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following: “3. Inland ports shall form part of the network, in particular as points of interconnection between the waterways referred to in paragraph 2 and Article 14 and other modes of transport.”(b) The following paragraph shall be inserted: “3a. The network shall include inland ports(a) open to commercial traffic,(b) located on the network of inland waterways as shown in the outline in Annex I, Section 4,(c) interconnected with other trans-European transport routes as shown in Annex I, and(d) equipped with transhipment facilities for intermodal transport or with an annual freight traffic volume of at least 500000 tonnes.”2. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 12Characteristics1. Seaports shall permit the development of sea transport and shall constitute shipping links for islands and the points of interconnection between sea transport and other modes of transport. They shall provide equipment and services to transport operators. Their infrastructure shall provide a range of services for passenger and goods transport, including ferry services and short- and long-distance shipping services, including coastal shipping, within the Community and between the latter and non-member countries.2. The seaports included in the network shall correspond to one of the categories, A, B or C, defined below:A. international seaports: ports with a total annual traffic volume of not less than 1,5 million tonnes of freight or 200000 passengers which, unless it is an impossibility, are connected with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and therefore play a major role in international maritime transport;B. Community seaports, not included in category A: these ports have a total annual traffic volume of not less than 0,5 million tonnes of freight or between 100000 and 199999 passengers, are connected, unless it is an impossibility, with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and are equipped with the necessary transhipment facilities for short-distance sea shipping;C. regional ports: these ports do not meet the criteria of categories A and B but are situated in island, peripheral or outermost regions, interconnecting such regions by sea and/or connecting them with the central regions of the Community.The seaports in category A shall be shown on the indicative maps in the outline plans in Section 5 of Annex I, on the basis of the most recent port data.3. In addition to the criteria set out in Article 7, seaport projects of common interest related to seaports included in the trans-European seaport network shall comply with the criteria and specifications in Annex II.”3. Article 14 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 14CharacteristicsThe trans-European combined transport network shall comprise:- railways and inland waterways which are suitable for combined transport and shipping which, combined where appropriate with the shortest possible initial and/or terminal road haulage, permit the long-distance transport of goods,- intermodal terminals equipped with installations permitting transhipment between railways, inland waterways, shipping routes and roads,- suitable rolling stock, on a provisional basis, where the characteristics of the infrastructure, as yet unadapted, so require.”4. Article 19 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 19Specific projectsAnnex III contains, by way of indication, the projects identified in Annexes I and II and in the other provisions of this Decision, to which the European Councils held in Essen in 1994 and in Dublin in 1996 attributed particular importance.”5. Annex I shall be amended as follows:(a) in the contents- the title of Section 4 “Inland waterway network” shall be replaced by: “Inland waterway network and inland ports”,- Section 5 shall be replaced by the following: “Section 5: Seaports – Category A5.0. Europe5.1. Baltic Sea5.2. North Sea5.3. Atlantic Ocean5.4. Mediterranean Sea – western part5.5. Mediterranean Sea – eastern part”,- in Section 7 “Combined transport network”, point 7.2 shall be deleted;(b) as regards the maps corresponding to Sections 4 and 5:- the map showing Section 4 shall be replaced by those annexed to this Decision. These maps identify also inland ports which are equipped with transhipment facilities for combined transport and shall replace the map showing point 7.2,- the maps showing Section 5 as they appear in the Annex to this Decision shall be inserted.6. Annex II shall be amended as follows:(a) the part of Section 4 concerning inland ports shall be replaced by the following: “Inland portsProjects of common interest must relate solely to infrastructure open to any user on a non-discriminatory basis.In addition to projects relating to the connections and inland ports mentioned in Annex I, projects of common interest will be deemed to include any infrastructure project corresponding to one or more of the following categories:1. access to the port from waterways;2. port infrastructure inside the port area;3. other transport infrastructures inside the port area;4. other transport infrastructures linking the port to other elements of the trans-European network.Any project which concerns the following work will be deemed to be of common interest: construction and maintenance of all elements of the transport system generally open to all transport users within the port and of links with the national or international transport network; in particular, this includes the development and maintenance of land for commercial and other port-related purposes, the construction and maintenance of road and rail connections, the construction and maintenance, including dredging, of access routes and of other areas of water in the port, and the construction and maintenance of navigation aids and traffic management, communication and information systems in the port and on the access routes.”(b) Section 5 shall be replaced by the following: “Section 5Seaports1. Common conditions for projects of common interest relating to seaports in the networkProjects of common interest must relate solely to infrastructure open to any user on a non-discriminatory basis.Any project which concerns the following work will be deemed to be of common interest: construction and maintenance of all elements of the transport system generally open to all transport users within the port and of links with the national or international transport network; in particular, this includes the development and maintenance of land for commercial and other port-related purposes, the construction and maintenance of road and rail connections, the construction and maintenance, including dredging, of access routes and of other areas of water in the port, and the construction and maintenance of navigation aids and traffic management, communication and information systems in the port and on the access routes.2. Specifications for projects of common interest relating to the seaport network>TABLE>”.(c) The second and third indents of Section 7 shall be replaced by the following: “- construction or development of centres for transfers between inland types of transport, including the setting up within the terminal of transhipment equipment with the corresponding infrastructure,- adaptation of port areas, making it possible to develop or improve combined transport between sea transport and rail, inland waterway or road transport”.7. Annex III shall be amended as follows:(a) the title shall be replaced by the following: “List of the 14 projects adopted by the European Councils held in Essen in 1994 and in Dublin in 1996″(b) Item 8 (“Motorway Lisbon – Valladolid”) shall be replaced by the following: “8. Portugal/Spain multimodal link with the rest of Europe through developing rail, road, sea and air connections in the following three Iberian corridors:- Galicia (A Coruña)/Portugal (Lisbon)- Irún/Portugal (Valladolid-Lisbon)- Southwest corridor (Lisbon-Seville).”Article 2This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.Article 3This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 22 May 2001.For the European ParliamentThe PresidentN. FontaineFor the CouncilThe PresidentM. Winberg(1) OJ C 120, 18. 4.1998, p. 14.(2) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 40.(3) OJ C 373, 2.12.1998, p. 20.(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 10 March 1999 (OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 110), Council Common Position of 5 June 2000 (OJ C 228, 9.8.2000, p. 1) and Decision of the European Parliament of 3 October 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Decision of the European Parliament of 5 April 2001 and Council Decision of 24 April 2001.(5) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1.ANNEX”ANNEX ISECTION 4Inland waterway network and inland ports>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.000901.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001101.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001301.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001501.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001701.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.001901.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002101.TIF”>SECTION 5Seaports – Category A>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002501.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002701.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.002901.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.003101.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.003301.TIF”>>PIC FILE= “L_2001185EN.003501.TIF”>”Commission statementThe Commission intends at the next revision of Decision 1692/96/EC to include in its proposal the Elbe-Lübeck Kanal and the Twente-Mittellandkanal as part of the inland waterway network.
Decision No 1692/96/EC is hereby amended as follows:
1. Article 11 shall be amended as follows:
(a) paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following: “3. Inland ports shall form part of the network, in particular as points of interconnection between the waterways referred to in paragraph 2 and Article 14 and other modes of transport.”
(b) The following paragraph shall be inserted: “3a. The network shall include inland ports
(a) open to commercial traffic,
(b) located on the network of inland waterways as shown in the outline in Annex I, Section 4,
(c) interconnected with other trans-European transport routes as shown in Annex I, and
(d) equipped with transhipment facilities for intermodal transport or with an annual freight traffic volume of at least 500000 tonnes.”
2. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 12
Characteristics
1. Seaports shall permit the development of sea transport and shall constitute shipping links for islands and the points of interconnection between sea transport and other modes of transport. They shall provide equipment and services to transport operators. Their infrastructure shall provide a range of services for passenger and goods transport, including ferry services and short- and long-distance shipping services, including coastal shipping, within the Community and between the latter and non-member countries.
2. The seaports included in the network shall correspond to one of the categories, A, B or C, defined below:
A. international seaports: ports with a total annual traffic volume of not less than 1,5 million tonnes of freight or 200000 passengers which, unless it is an impossibility, are connected with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and therefore play a major role in international maritime transport;
B. Community seaports, not included in category A: these ports have a total annual traffic volume of not less than 0,5 million tonnes of freight or between 100000 and 199999 passengers, are connected, unless it is an impossibility, with the overland elements of the trans-European transport network and are equipped with the necessary transhipment facilities for short-distance sea shipping;
C. regional ports: these ports do not meet the criteria of categories A and B but are situated in island, peripheral or outermost regions, interconnecting such regions by sea and/or connecting them with the central regions of the Community.
The seaports in category A shall be shown on the indicative maps in the outline plans in Section 5 of Annex I, on the basis of the most recent port data.
3. In addition to the criteria set out in Article 7, seaport projects of common interest related to seaports included in the trans-European seaport network shall comply with the criteria and specifications in Annex II.”
3. Article 14 shall be replaced by the following: “Article 14
The trans-European combined transport network shall comprise:
This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 May 2001.
For the European Parliament
The President
N. Fontaine
For the Council
(1) OJ C 120, 18. 4.1998, p. 14.
(2) OJ C 214, 10.7.1998, p. 40.
(3) OJ C 373, 2.12.1998, p. 20.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 10 March 1999 (OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 110), Council Common Position of 5 June 2000 (OJ C 228, 9.8.2000, p. 1) and Decision of the European Parliament of 3 October 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Decision of the European Parliament of 5 April 2001 and Council Decision of 24 April 2001.
(5) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1.
5. Annex I shall be amended as follows:
(a) in the contents
– the title of Section 4 “Inland waterway network” shall be replaced by: “Inland waterway network and inland ports”,
– Section 5 shall be replaced by the following: “Section 5: Seaports – Category A
5.0. Europe
5.1. Baltic Sea
5.2. North Sea
5.3. Atlantic Ocean
5.4. Mediterranean Sea – western part
5.5. Mediterranean Sea – eastern part”,
– in Section 7 “Combined transport network”, point 7.2 shall be deleted;
(b) as regards the maps corresponding to Sections 4 and 5:
– the map showing Section 4 shall be replaced by those annexed to this Decision. These maps identify also inland ports which are equipped with transhipment facilities for combined transport and shall replace the map showing point 7.2,
– the maps showing Section 5 as they appear in the Annex to this Decision shall be inserted.
6. Annex II shall be amended as follows:
(a) the part of Section 4 concerning inland ports shall be replaced by the following: “Inland ports
Projects of common interest must relate solely to infrastructure open to any user on a non-discriminatory basis.
In addition to projects relating to the connections and inland ports mentioned in Annex I, projects of common interest will be deemed to include any infrastructure project corresponding to one or more of the following categories:
1. access to the port from waterways;
2. port infrastructure inside the port area;
3. other transport infrastructures inside the port area;
4. other transport infrastructures linking the port to other elements of the trans-European network.
Any project which concerns the following work will be deemed to be of common interest: construction and maintenance of all elements of the transport system generally open to all transport users within the port and of links with the national or international transport network; in particular, this includes the development and maintenance of land for commercial and other port-related purposes, the construction and maintenance of road and rail connections, the construction and maintenance, including dredging, of access routes and of other areas of water in the port, and the construction and maintenance of navigation aids and traffic management, communication and information systems in the port and on the access routes.”
(b) Section 5 shall be replaced by the following: “Section 5
1. Common conditions for projects of common interest relating to seaports in the network
Projects of common interest must relate solely to infrastructure open to any user on a non-discriminatory basis.
Any project which concerns the following work will be deemed to be of common interest: construction and maintenance of all elements of the transport system generally open to all transport users within the port and of links with the national or international transport network; in particular, this includes the development and maintenance of land for commercial and other port-related purposes, the construction and maintenance of road and rail connections, the construction and maintenance, including dredging, of access routes and of other areas of water in the port, and the construction and maintenance of navigation aids and traffic management, communication and information systems in the port and on the access routes.
2. Specifications for projects of common interest relating to the seaport network
(c) The second and third indents of Section 7 shall be replaced by the following: “- construction or development of centres for transfers between inland types of transport, including the setting up within the terminal of transhipment equipment with the corresponding infrastructure,
– adaptation of port areas, making it possible to develop or improve combined transport between sea transport and rail, inland waterway or road transport”.
7. Annex III shall be amended as follows:
(a) the title shall be replaced by the following: “List of the 14 projects adopted by the European Councils held in Essen in 1994 and in Dublin in 1996”
(b) Item 8 (“Motorway Lisbon – Valladolid”) shall be replaced by the following: “8. Portugal/Spain multimodal link with the rest of Europe through developing rail, road, sea and air connections in the following three Iberian corridors:
– Galicia (A Coruña)/Portugal (Lisbon)
– Irún/Portugal (Valladolid-Lisbon)
– Southwest corridor (Lisbon-Seville).”

Pending: 32001D0934

Pending: 32001D0932

Pending: 32001D0923

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third sentence of Article 123(4) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank(3),Whereas:(1) The Treaty calls on the Community to take the measures necessary for the rapid introduction of the euro as the single currency.(2) In its Recommendation of 7 July 1998 regarding the adoption of certain measures to enhance the legal protection of euro banknotes and coins(4), the European Central Bank (ECB) called on the Commission to establish cooperation to combat the counterfeiting of euro banknotes and coins. It also suggested that the Council, the Commission and the Member States consider implementing any possible measures to improve the combating of counterfeiting.(3) In its communication of 22 July 1998 to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Central Bank on the protection of the euro, the Commission said it would examine the possibility of launching a scheme for all those involved in the system for preventing, detecting and suppressing currency counterfeiting, which should allow guidelines to be determined for future planning.(4) On 28 June 2001 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting(5) which deals with exchanges of information, cooperation and mutual assistance, including external aspects of protection of the euro, and the withdrawal obligations incumbent on financial establishments. Its object is also to set up a comprehensive cooperation framework applicable before euro banknotes and coins are introduced in 2002. On the same day the Council also adopted Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 extending the effects of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting to those Member States which have not adopted the euro as their single currency(6).(5) Consultations and experience show that a specific, multidisciplinary supplementary programme organised at Community level and carried out over the long term is likely to be more effective than measures conducted at national level. The two abovementioned Regulations should accordingly be supplemented by the adoption of an action programme, the aim of which is to raise the awareness of all the persons concerned with the protection of the euro against counterfeiting through the implementation of measures involving in particular the exchange of information and staff and technical and scientific back-up and training measures. This programme will support and complement the work done by Member States in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity provided for in Article 5 of the Treaty.(6) It should be ensured that this Community action programme, which is geared to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, is consistent with, and complementary to, other existing or future programmes and activities.(7) Without prejudice to the ECB’s role in the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, the Commission will carry out all consultations concerning the evaluation of needs for the protection of the euro with the principal parties involved (in particular the competent national authorities designated by the Member States, the ECB and Europol) within the appropriate advisory committee provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001, particularly as regards exchanges, assistance and training, for the purpose of implementing this programme.(8) The Community should promote cooperation with non-member countries in the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.(9) A financial reference amount, within the meaning of point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(7), will be included in this Decision for the entire duration of the programme without thereby affecting the powers of the budgetary authority as defined by the Treaty.(10) This Decision is without prejudice to initiatives which may be taken pursuant to the Treaty on European Union with a view to the establishment of programmes concerning aspects of criminal law,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Establishment of the programme1. This Decision establishes a Community action programme to support and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and programmes established or to be established in order to protect the euro against counterfeiting.2. This action programme shall be known as the Pericles programme. It shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005.3. Programme implementation and evaluation shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 5 to 13.Article 2Objectives of the programme1. The Community action programme shall, through the various measures provided for in Article 3, seek to protect the euro against counterfeiting. It shall take account of transnational and multidisciplinary aspects. It shall concentrate on promoting convergence of the substance of measures so as to guarantee equivalent levels of protection on the basis of consideration of best practice while also respecting the distinct traditions of each Member State.2. In particular, its remit shall encompass:(a) raising awareness of the staff concerned of the Community dimension of the new currency (also as a reserve currency and a currency for international transactions);(b) acting as a catalyst to encourage closer cooperation between the structures and staff concerned, the development of a climate of mutual trust and satisfactory knowledge, inter alia of methods of action and difficulties, by promoting various appropriate measures such as placements, specialist workshops or the involvement of guest speakers in national training and staff exchanges;(c) promoting convergence of high-level training activities for trainers in ways which are compatible with national operational strategies;(d) expanding general knowledge, in particular of relevant Community and international law and instruments.Article 3Measures1. The content of training and of operational support, based on a multidisciplinary and transnational approach, shall embrace not only security aspects but also the exchange of information, in particular technical and strategic information, and technical and scientific back-up.2. The setting-up of exchanges of information at Community level particularly shall involve methodologies of control and analysis for evaluating:(a) the economic and financial impact of counterfeiting;(b) the operation of databases;(c) the use of detection tools with computer back-up;(d) enquiry and investigation methods;(e) scientific assistance (in particular scientific databases and technology watch/monitoring of new developments);(f) operation of early warning systems;(g) related matters, such as the scope of the obligation to provide information;(h) the protection of personal data;(i) the different aspects of cooperation;(j) the protection of the euro outside the European Union;(k) research activities, and(l) the provision of specific operational expertise.Such exchanges of information may be reflected in a variety of measures such as the organisation of workshops, meetings and seminars, and a targeted policy of placements and exchanges of staff.3. Technical, scientific and operational back-up shall concern in particular:(a) any measure which establishes teaching resources at Community level (handbook of EU legislation, information bulletins, practical manuals, glossaries and lexicons, databases, especially in the area of scientific assistance or technology watch) or computer support applications (such as software);(b) studies with a multidisciplinary and transnational dimension; and(c) the development of technical support instruments and methods to facilitate detection activities at Community level.Article 4Target group for actions and contributions1. The measures shall target the following groups:(a) staff of agencies engaged in detecting and combating counterfeiting (in particular police forces and financial administrations depending on their specific functions at national level);(b) intelligence personnel;(c) representatives of the national central banks, the mints and other financial intermediaries (particularly as regards the obligations of financial institutions);(d) representatives of the commercial banks (in particular as regards the obligations of financial institutions);(e) judicial officers and specialist lawyers in this field;(f) any other group of specialists concerned (such as chambers of commerce and industry or comparable structures capable of providing access to small and medium-sized enterprises, traders and hauliers).2. In addition to the Commission’s contribution, the following parties shall be invited to contribute to the attainment of the objectives of the Community action programme using their respective areas of expertise:(a) the national central banks and the ECB, inter alia as regards the Counterfeit Monitoring System (CMS);(b) the National Analysis Centres (NAC) and the Coin National Analysis Centres (CNAC);(c) the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) and the national mints;(d) Europol and Interpol;(e) the national central anti-counterfeiting offices provided for in Article 12 of the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency signed at Geneva on 20 April 1929(8) and other agencies specialising in the prevention, detection and law-enforcement in connection with counterfeiting;(f) specialist bodies concerned, for instance, by duplication and certification technologies, printers and engravers;(g) any other body offering specific expertise, including, where appropriate, third countries and in particular accession candidate countries.Article 5Consistency and complementarity1. The programme shall be implemented and coordinated by the Commission and the Member States, working closely together.This coordination shall take account of measures undertaken elsewhere, in particular by the ECB and Europol.2. The Commission shall, in particular with an eye to sound financial management, seek to ensure consistency and complementarity between this Community action programme, geared to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, and other existing and future programmes and activities.Article 6Reference amountThe financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period referred to in

Article 1
Establishment of the programme
1. This Decision establishes a Community action programme to support and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and programmes established or to be established in order to protect the euro against counterfeiting.
2. This action programme shall be known as the Pericles programme. It shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005.
3. Programme implementation and evaluation shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 5 to 13.

Article 2
Objectives of the programme
1. The Community action programme shall, through the various measures provided for in Article 3, seek to protect the euro against counterfeiting. It shall take account of transnational and multidisciplinary aspects. It shall concentrate on promoting convergence of the substance of measures so as to guarantee equivalent levels of protection on the basis of consideration of best practice while also respecting the distinct traditions of each Member State.
2. In particular, its remit shall encompass:
(a) raising awareness of the staff concerned of the Community dimension of the new currency (also as a reserve currency and a currency for international transactions);
(b) acting as a catalyst to encourage closer cooperation between the structures and staff concerned, the development of a climate of mutual trust and satisfactory knowledge, inter alia of methods of action and difficulties, by promoting various appropriate measures such as placements, specialist workshops or the involvement of guest speakers in national training and staff exchanges;
(c) promoting convergence of high-level training activities for trainers in ways which are compatible with national operational strategies;
(d) expanding general knowledge, in particular of relevant Community and international law and instruments.

Article 3
1. The content of training and of operational support, based on a multidisciplinary and transnational approach, shall embrace not only security aspects but also the exchange of information, in particular technical and strategic information, and technical and scientific back-up.
2. The setting-up of exchanges of information at Community level particularly shall involve methodologies of control and analysis for evaluating:
(a) the economic and financial impact of counterfeiting;
(b) the operation of databases;
(c) the use of detection tools with computer back-up;
(d) enquiry and investigation methods;
(e) scientific assistance (in particular scientific databases and technology watch/monitoring of new developments);
(f) operation of early warning systems;
(g) related matters, such as the scope of the obligation to provide information;
(h) the protection of personal data;
(i) the different aspects of cooperation;
(j) the protection of the euro outside the European Union;
(k) research activities, and
(l) the provision of specific operational expertise.
Such exchanges of information may be reflected in a variety of measures such as the organisation of workshops, meetings and seminars, and a targeted policy of placements and exchanges of staff.
3. Technical, scientific and operational back-up shall concern in particular:
(a) any measure which establishes teaching resources at Community level (handbook of EU legislation, information bulletins, practical manuals, glossaries and lexicons, databases, especially in the area of scientific assistance or technology watch) or computer support applications (such as software);
(b) studies with a multidisciplinary and transnational dimension; and
(c) the development of technical support instruments and methods to facilitate detection activities at Community level.

Article 4
Target group for actions and contributions
1. The measures shall target the following groups:
(a) staff of agencies engaged in detecting and combating counterfeiting (in particular police forces and financial administrations depending on their specific functions at national level);
(b) intelligence personnel;
(c) representatives of the national central banks, the mints and other financial intermediaries (particularly as regards the obligations of financial institutions);
(d) representatives of the commercial banks (in particular as regards the obligations of financial institutions);
(e) judicial officers and specialist lawyers in this field;
(f) any other group of specialists concerned (such as chambers of commerce and industry or comparable structures capable of providing access to small and medium-sized enterprises, traders and hauliers).
2. In addition to the Commission’s contribution, the following parties shall be invited to contribute to the attainment of the objectives of the Community action programme using their respective areas of expertise:
(a) the national central banks and the ECB, inter alia as regards the Counterfeit Monitoring System (CMS);
(b) the National Analysis Centres (NAC) and the Coin National Analysis Centres (CNAC);
(c) the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) and the national mints;
(d) Europol and Interpol;
(e) the national central anti-counterfeiting offices provided for in Article 12 of the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency signed at Geneva on 20 April 1929(8) and other agencies specialising in the prevention, detection and law-enforcement in connection with counterfeiting;
(f) specialist bodies concerned, for instance, by duplication and certification technologies, printers and engravers;
(g) any other body offering specific expertise, including, where appropriate, third countries and in particular accession candidate countries.

Article 5
Consistency and complementarity
1. The programme shall be implemented and coordinated by the Commission and the Member States, working closely together.
This coordination shall take account of measures undertaken elsewhere, in particular by the ECB and Europol.
2. The Commission shall, in particular with an eye to sound financial management, seek to ensure consistency and complementarity between this Community action programme, geared to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, and other existing and future programmes and activities.

Article 6
Reference amount
The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period referred to in Article 1(2) is hereby set at EUR 4 million.
The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.

Article 7
International cooperation
In the light of the arrangements for distributing euro banknotes and coins, operational requirements, evaluation of the threat and risk analysis, the programme shall be open to the associated accession candidate countries, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the association agreements and the additional protocols thereto concerning participation in Community programmes concluded or to be concluded with those countries.
In addition, the programme shall, if necessary, be open to non-member countries in so far as appropriations are available in the Community budget, under conditions and in accordance with arrangements to be agreed with those countries.

Article 8
Financial provisions for workshops, meetings and seminars
1. As regards the workshops, meetings and seminars provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) and organised by the Commission:
(a) the following costs shall be borne by the Community:
(i) the travel and accommodation expenses in another Member State of staff taking part and the general overheads associated with organising these events;
(ii) publication and translation costs for the teaching materials used;
(b) the following costs shall be borne by the Member States:
(i) the costs associated with initial and continuing training of their staff, particularly as regards technical training;
(ii) certain logistical costs in connection with the workshops, meetings and seminars organised on their territory with Community funding (such as internal transfers, rental of premises, provision of interpreting facilities).
2. Where the workshops, meetings and seminars provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) are organised jointly with other partners such as the ECB, Europol or Interpol, the ensuing expenses shall be divided between them. The contribution of those partners may be a contribution in kind provided it is substantial. In any event, each partner shall bear the travel and accommodation costs of its own guest speakers.

Article 9
Financial provisions for staff exchanges
1. The costs of participation by staff from Member States in the placements or exchanges provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) shall be borne by the Community, in so far as those activities are in keeping with attainment of the objectives referred to in Article 2.
2. However, the costs of participation by staff from Member States in placements or exchanges which are not covered by the programme shall be borne by the Member States.

Article 10
Financial provisions for assistance
1. The Community shall bear up to 70 % of the cost of the operational support referred to in Article 3(2) by way of co-financing, in particular:
(a) the design and production costs of teaching resources and computer applications or technical instruments with a European dimension;
(b) the costs of studies, e.g. comparative law studies, on the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.
Exceptionally, where Commission initiatives are concerned, such operational support measures may, however, be financed up to 100 %.
2. However, all expenses relating to the non-Community components of teaching resources and of communications and information-exchange systems, namely the national databases that form part of those systems, the network connections between the Community and the non-Community components, and such software and hardware as each Member State shall deem appropriate for the full operation of those systems throughout its administration, shall be borne by the Member States.

Article 11
Financial provisions for external measures
In accordance with the conditions set out in Article 7, apart from bearing the cost of participation of officials from third countries in the workshops, meetings and seminars provided for in Article 8, the Community may co-finance up to 70 % of the cost of training measures on the territory of non-member countries and operational support measures in those countries.

Article 12
Presentation and selection of projects
1. Projects under the programme may emanate from the Member States’ competent authorities or from the Commission.
Member States may present no more than one project a year (concerning the workshops, meetings and seminars referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2)). Projects in connection with placements, exchanges or assistance may also be presented.
2. The Commission shall select projects presented by the Member States, and projects devised on its own initiative, on the basis of the following criteria:
(a) compliance with the programme’s objectives as defined in Article 2;
(b) the European dimension, including in particular aspects concerning cooperation with the ECB and Europol;
(c) complementarity with other previous, current or future projects;
(d) the organiser’s capacity to implement the project;
(e) the intrinsic quality of the project and its cost-effectiveness ratio;
(f) the amount of aid requested and whether it is commensurate with the anticipated results;
(g) the impact of the anticipated results on the attainment of the programme’s objectives.
The projects which best meet the objectives set out above shall be selected.
3. The Commission shall be responsible for managing and implementing the programme in cooperation with the Member States.

Article 13
Follow-up and evaluation
1. The beneficiaries of each project selected shall submit an annual report to the Commission.
2. On completion of the projects, the Commission shall evaluate the way in which they have been implemented and the impact they have had in order to gauge whether the objectives set at the outset have been achieved.
3. The Commission shall send to the European Parliament and the Council:
(a) by 30 June 2005 a report, which shall be independent of the programme manager, evaluating the relevance, the efficiency and the effectiveness of the programme and a communication on whether this programme should be continued and adapted, accompanied by an appropriate proposal;
(b) on completion of the programme and no later than 30 June 2006, a detailed report on the implementation and the results of the programme setting out in particular the added value of the Community’s financial assistance.

Article 14
Applicability
This Decision shall be effective in those Member States which have adopted the euro as the single currency.

Article 15
Operational date
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply from 1 January 2002.
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2001.
For the Council
The President
A. Neyts-Uyttebroeck
(1) OJ C 240 E, 28.8.2001, p. 120.
(2) Opinion delivered on 13 November 2001 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) OJ C 293, 19.10.2001, p. 3.
(4) OJ C 11, 15.1.1999, p. 13.
(5) OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 6.
(6) OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 11.
(7) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
(8) League of Nations Treaty Series No 2623 (1931), p. 372.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third sentence of Article 123(4) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank(3),Whereas:(1) The Treaty calls on the Community to take the measures necessary for the rapid introduction of the euro as the single currency.(2) In its Recommendation of 7 July 1998 regarding the adoption of certain measures to enhance the legal protection of euro banknotes and coins(4), the European Central Bank (ECB) called on the Commission to establish cooperation to combat the counterfeiting of euro banknotes and coins. It also suggested that the Council, the Commission and the Member States consider implementing any possible measures to improve the combating of counterfeiting.(3) In its communication of 22 July 1998 to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Central Bank on the protection of the euro, the Commission said it would examine the possibility of launching a scheme for all those involved in the system for preventing, detecting and suppressing currency counterfeiting, which should allow guidelines to be determined for future planning.(4) On 28 June 2001 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting(5) which deals with exchanges of information, cooperation and mutual assistance, including external aspects of protection of the euro, and the withdrawal obligations incumbent on financial establishments. Its object is also to set up a comprehensive cooperation framework applicable before euro banknotes and coins are introduced in 2002. On the same day the Council also adopted Regulation (EC) No 1339/2001 extending the effects of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting to those Member States which have not adopted the euro as their single currency(6).(5) Consultations and experience show that a specific, multidisciplinary supplementary programme organised at Community level and carried out over the long term is likely to be more effective than measures conducted at national level. The two abovementioned Regulations should accordingly be supplemented by the adoption of an action programme, the aim of which is to raise the awareness of all the persons concerned with the protection of the euro against counterfeiting through the implementation of measures involving in particular the exchange of information and staff and technical and scientific back-up and training measures. This programme will support and complement the work done by Member States in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity provided for in Article 5 of the Treaty.(6) It should be ensured that this Community action programme, which is geared to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, is consistent with, and complementary to, other existing or future programmes and activities.(7) Without prejudice to the ECB’s role in the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, the Commission will carry out all consultations concerning the evaluation of needs for the protection of the euro with the principal parties involved (in particular the competent national authorities designated by the Member States, the ECB and Europol) within the appropriate advisory committee provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001, particularly as regards exchanges, assistance and training, for the purpose of implementing this programme.(8) The Community should promote cooperation with non-member countries in the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.(9) A financial reference amount, within the meaning of point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure(7), will be included in this Decision for the entire duration of the programme without thereby affecting the powers of the budgetary authority as defined by the Treaty.(10) This Decision is without prejudice to initiatives which may be taken pursuant to the Treaty on European Union with a view to the establishment of programmes concerning aspects of criminal law,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Establishment of the programme1. This Decision establishes a Community action programme to support and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and programmes established or to be established in order to protect the euro against counterfeiting.2. This action programme shall be known as the Pericles programme. It shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005.3. Programme implementation and evaluation shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 5 to 13.Article 2Objectives of the programme1. The Community action programme shall, through the various measures provided for in Article 3, seek to protect the euro against counterfeiting. It shall take account of transnational and multidisciplinary aspects. It shall concentrate on promoting convergence of the substance of measures so as to guarantee equivalent levels of protection on the basis of consideration of best practice while also respecting the distinct traditions of each Member State.2. In particular, its remit shall encompass:(a) raising awareness of the staff concerned of the Community dimension of the new currency (also as a reserve currency and a currency for international transactions);(b) acting as a catalyst to encourage closer cooperation between the structures and staff concerned, the development of a climate of mutual trust and satisfactory knowledge, inter alia of methods of action and difficulties, by promoting various appropriate measures such as placements, specialist workshops or the involvement of guest speakers in national training and staff exchanges;(c) promoting convergence of high-level training activities for trainers in ways which are compatible with national operational strategies;(d) expanding general knowledge, in particular of relevant Community and international law and instruments.Article 3Measures1. The content of training and of operational support, based on a multidisciplinary and transnational approach, shall embrace not only security aspects but also the exchange of information, in particular technical and strategic information, and technical and scientific back-up.2. The setting-up of exchanges of information at Community level particularly shall involve methodologies of control and analysis for evaluating:(a) the economic and financial impact of counterfeiting;(b) the operation of databases;(c) the use of detection tools with computer back-up;(d) enquiry and investigation methods;(e) scientific assistance (in particular scientific databases and technology watch/monitoring of new developments);(f) operation of early warning systems;(g) related matters, such as the scope of the obligation to provide information;(h) the protection of personal data;(i) the different aspects of cooperation;(j) the protection of the euro outside the European Union;(k) research activities, and(l) the provision of specific operational expertise.Such exchanges of information may be reflected in a variety of measures such as the organisation of workshops, meetings and seminars, and a targeted policy of placements and exchanges of staff.3. Technical, scientific and operational back-up shall concern in particular:(a) any measure which establishes teaching resources at Community level (handbook of EU legislation, information bulletins, practical manuals, glossaries and lexicons, databases, especially in the area of scientific assistance or technology watch) or computer support applications (such as software);(b) studies with a multidisciplinary and transnational dimension; and(c) the development of technical support instruments and methods to facilitate detection activities at Community level.Article 4Target group for actions and contributions1. The measures shall target the following groups:(a) staff of agencies engaged in detecting and combating counterfeiting (in particular police forces and financial administrations depending on their specific functions at national level);(b) intelligence personnel;(c) representatives of the national central banks, the mints and other financial intermediaries (particularly as regards the obligations of financial institutions);(d) representatives of the commercial banks (in particular as regards the obligations of financial institutions);(e) judicial officers and specialist lawyers in this field;(f) any other group of specialists concerned (such as chambers of commerce and industry or comparable structures capable of providing access to small and medium-sized enterprises, traders and hauliers).2. In addition to the Commission’s contribution, the following parties shall be invited to contribute to the attainment of the objectives of the Community action programme using their respective areas of expertise:(a) the national central banks and the ECB, inter alia as regards the Counterfeit Monitoring System (CMS);(b) the National Analysis Centres (NAC) and the Coin National Analysis Centres (CNAC);(c) the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) and the national mints;(d) Europol and Interpol;(e) the national central anti-counterfeiting offices provided for in Article 12 of the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency signed at Geneva on 20 April 1929(8) and other agencies specialising in the prevention, detection and law-enforcement in connection with counterfeiting;(f) specialist bodies concerned, for instance, by duplication and certification technologies, printers and engravers;(g) any other body offering specific expertise, including, where appropriate, third countries and in particular accession candidate countries.Article 5Consistency and complementarity1. The programme shall be implemented and coordinated by the Commission and the Member States, working closely together.This coordination shall take account of measures undertaken elsewhere, in particular by the ECB and Europol.2. The Commission shall, in particular with an eye to sound financial management, seek to ensure consistency and complementarity between this Community action programme, geared to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, and other existing and future programmes and activities.Article 6Reference amountThe financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period referred to in
Establishment of the programme
1. This Decision establishes a Community action programme to support and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and programmes established or to be established in order to protect the euro against counterfeiting.
2. This action programme shall be known as the Pericles programme. It shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005.
3. Programme implementation and evaluation shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 5 to 13.
Objectives of the programme
1. The Community action programme shall, through the various measures provided for in Article 3, seek to protect the euro against counterfeiting. It shall take account of transnational and multidisciplinary aspects. It shall concentrate on promoting convergence of the substance of measures so as to guarantee equivalent levels of protection on the basis of consideration of best practice while also respecting the distinct traditions of each Member State.
2. In particular, its remit shall encompass:
(a) raising awareness of the staff concerned of the Community dimension of the new currency (also as a reserve currency and a currency for international transactions);
(b) acting as a catalyst to encourage closer cooperation between the structures and staff concerned, the development of a climate of mutual trust and satisfactory knowledge, inter alia of methods of action and difficulties, by promoting various appropriate measures such as placements, specialist workshops or the involvement of guest speakers in national training and staff exchanges;
(c) promoting convergence of high-level training activities for trainers in ways which are compatible with national operational strategies;
(d) expanding general knowledge, in particular of relevant Community and international law and instruments.
1. The content of training and of operational support, based on a multidisciplinary and transnational approach, shall embrace not only security aspects but also the exchange of information, in particular technical and strategic information, and technical and scientific back-up.
2. The setting-up of exchanges of information at Community level particularly shall involve methodologies of control and analysis for evaluating:
(a) the economic and financial impact of counterfeiting;
(b) the operation of databases;
(c) the use of detection tools with computer back-up;
(d) enquiry and investigation methods;
(e) scientific assistance (in particular scientific databases and technology watch/monitoring of new developments);
(f) operation of early warning systems;
(g) related matters, such as the scope of the obligation to provide information;
(h) the protection of personal data;
(i) the different aspects of cooperation;
(j) the protection of the euro outside the European Union;
(k) research activities, and
(l) the provision of specific operational expertise.
Such exchanges of information may be reflected in a variety of measures such as the organisation of workshops, meetings and seminars, and a targeted policy of placements and exchanges of staff.
3. Technical, scientific and operational back-up shall concern in particular:
(a) any measure which establishes teaching resources at Community level (handbook of EU legislation, information bulletins, practical manuals, glossaries and lexicons, databases, especially in the area of scientific assistance or technology watch) or computer support applications (such as software);
(b) studies with a multidisciplinary and transnational dimension; and
(c) the development of technical support instruments and methods to facilitate detection activities at Community level.
Target group for actions and contributions
1. The measures shall target the following groups:
(a) staff of agencies engaged in detecting and combating counterfeiting (in particular police forces and financial administrations depending on their specific functions at national level);
(b) intelligence personnel;
(c) representatives of the national central banks, the mints and other financial intermediaries (particularly as regards the obligations of financial institutions);
(d) representatives of the commercial banks (in particular as regards the obligations of financial institutions);
(e) judicial officers and specialist lawyers in this field;
(f) any other group of specialists concerned (such as chambers of commerce and industry or comparable structures capable of providing access to small and medium-sized enterprises, traders and hauliers).
2. In addition to the Commission’s contribution, the following parties shall be invited to contribute to the attainment of the objectives of the Community action programme using their respective areas of expertise:
(a) the national central banks and the ECB, inter alia as regards the Counterfeit Monitoring System (CMS);
(b) the National Analysis Centres (NAC) and the Coin National Analysis Centres (CNAC);
(c) the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) and the national mints;
(d) Europol and Interpol;
(e) the national central anti-counterfeiting offices provided for in Article 12 of the International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency signed at Geneva on 20 April 1929(8) and other agencies specialising in the prevention, detection and law-enforcement in connection with counterfeiting;
(f) specialist bodies concerned, for instance, by duplication and certification technologies, printers and engravers;
(g) any other body offering specific expertise, including, where appropriate, third countries and in particular accession candidate countries.
Consistency and complementarity
1. The programme shall be implemented and coordinated by the Commission and the Member States, working closely together.
This coordination shall take account of measures undertaken elsewhere, in particular by the ECB and Europol.
2. The Commission shall, in particular with an eye to sound financial management, seek to ensure consistency and complementarity between this Community action programme, geared to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, and other existing and future programmes and activities.
Reference amount
The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period referred to in Article 1(2) is hereby set at EUR 4 million.
The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.
International cooperation
In the light of the arrangements for distributing euro banknotes and coins, operational requirements, evaluation of the threat and risk analysis, the programme shall be open to the associated accession candidate countries, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the association agreements and the additional protocols thereto concerning participation in Community programmes concluded or to be concluded with those countries.
In addition, the programme shall, if necessary, be open to non-member countries in so far as appropriations are available in the Community budget, under conditions and in accordance with arrangements to be agreed with those countries.
Financial provisions for workshops, meetings and seminars
1. As regards the workshops, meetings and seminars provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) and organised by the Commission:
(a) the following costs shall be borne by the Community:
(i) the travel and accommodation expenses in another Member State of staff taking part and the general overheads associated with organising these events;
(ii) publication and translation costs for the teaching materials used;
(b) the following costs shall be borne by the Member States:
(i) the costs associated with initial and continuing training of their staff, particularly as regards technical training;
(ii) certain logistical costs in connection with the workshops, meetings and seminars organised on their territory with Community funding (such as internal transfers, rental of premises, provision of interpreting facilities).
2. Where the workshops, meetings and seminars provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) are organised jointly with other partners such as the ECB, Europol or Interpol, the ensuing expenses shall be divided between them. The contribution of those partners may be a contribution in kind provided it is substantial. In any event, each partner shall bear the travel and accommodation costs of its own guest speakers.
Financial provisions for staff exchanges
1. The costs of participation by staff from Member States in the placements or exchanges provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) shall be borne by the Community, in so far as those activities are in keeping with attainment of the objectives referred to in Article 2.
2. However, the costs of participation by staff from Member States in placements or exchanges which are not covered by the programme shall be borne by the Member States.
Financial provisions for assistance
1. The Community shall bear up to 70 % of the cost of the operational support referred to in Article 3(2) by way of co-financing, in particular:
(a) the design and production costs of teaching resources and computer applications or technical instruments with a European dimension;
(b) the costs of studies, e.g. comparative law studies, on the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.
Exceptionally, where Commission initiatives are concerned, such operational support measures may, however, be financed up to 100 %.
2. However, all expenses relating to the non-Community components of teaching resources and of communications and information-exchange systems, namely the national databases that form part of those systems, the network connections between the Community and the non-Community components, and such software and hardware as each Member State shall deem appropriate for the full operation of those systems throughout its administration, shall be borne by the Member States.
Financial provisions for external measures
In accordance with the conditions set out in Article 7, apart from bearing the cost of participation of officials from third countries in the workshops, meetings and seminars provided for in Article 8, the Community may co-finance up to 70 % of the cost of training measures on the territory of non-member countries and operational support measures in those countries.
Presentation and selection of projects
1. Projects under the programme may emanate from the Member States’ competent authorities or from the Commission.
Member States may present no more than one project a year (concerning the workshops, meetings and seminars referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2)). Projects in connection with placements, exchanges or assistance may also be presented.
2. The Commission shall select projects presented by the Member States, and projects devised on its own initiative, on the basis of the following criteria:
(a) compliance with the programme’s objectives as defined in Article 2;
(b) the European dimension, including in particular aspects concerning cooperation with the ECB and Europol;
(c) complementarity with other previous, current or future projects;
(d) the organiser’s capacity to implement the project;
(e) the intrinsic quality of the project and its cost-effectiveness ratio;
(f) the amount of aid requested and whether it is commensurate with the anticipated results;
(g) the impact of the anticipated results on the attainment of the programme’s objectives.
The projects which best meet the objectives set out above shall be selected.
3. The Commission shall be responsible for managing and implementing the programme in cooperation with the Member States.
Follow-up and evaluation
1. The beneficiaries of each project selected shall submit an annual report to the Commission.
2. On completion of the projects, the Commission shall evaluate the way in which they have been implemented and the impact they have had in order to gauge whether the objectives set at the outset have been achieved.
3. The Commission shall send to the European Parliament and the Council:
(a) by 30 June 2005 a report, which shall be independent of the programme manager, evaluating the relevance, the efficiency and the effectiveness of the programme and a communication on whether this programme should be continued and adapted, accompanied by an appropriate proposal;
(b) on completion of the programme and no later than 30 June 2006, a detailed report on the implementation and the results of the programme setting out in particular the added value of the Community’s financial assistance.
Applicability
This Decision shall be effective in those Member States which have adopted the euro as the single currency.
Operational date
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
It shall apply from 1 January 2002.
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2001.
For the Council
The President
A. Neyts-Uyttebroeck
(1) OJ C 240 E, 28.8.2001, p. 120.
(2) Opinion delivered on 13 November 2001 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) OJ C 293, 19.10.2001, p. 3.
(4) OJ C 11, 15.1.1999, p. 13.
(5) OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 6.
(6) OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 11.
(7) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
(8) League of Nations Treaty Series No 2623 (1931), p. 372.

Pending: 32001D0886

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 30(1)(a) and (b), Article 31(a) and (b) and Article 34(2)(c) thereof,Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of Sweden(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Whereas:(1) The Schengen Information System, set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the Convention of 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at common borders, hereinafter referred to as “the 1990 Schengen Convention”, constitutes an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union.(2) The Schengen Information System in its current form has the capacity to service no more than 18 participating States. It is at present operational for 13 Member States and 2 other States (Iceland and Norway) and is intended to become operational for the United Kingdom and Ireland in the foreseeable future. It has, however, not been constructed so as to service the increased number of Member States of the European Union after its enlargement.(3) For this reason, and in order to benefit from the latest developments in the field of information technology and to allow for the introduction of new functions, it is necessary to develop a new, second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), as already acknowledged in Decision SCH/Com-ex (97) 24 of the Executive Committee of 7 October 1997(3).(4) The expenditure involved in the development of SIS II is to be charged to the budget of the European Union in accordance with the Council conclusions to that effect of 29 May 2001. This Decision constitutes, together with Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 of 6 December 2001 on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)(4), the required legislative basis to allow for the inclusion in the budget of the Union of the necessary appropriations for the development of SIS II and the execution of that part of the budget.(5) The legislative basis consists of two parts: this Decision based on Article 30(1)(a) and (b), Article 31(a) and (b) and Article 34(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union and a Council Regulation based on Article 66 (…) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. The reason for this is that, as set out in Article 92 of the 1990 Schengen Convention, the Schengen Information System is to enable the authorities designated by the Member States, by means of an automated search procedure, to have access to alerts on persons and property for the purposes of border checks and other police and customs checks carried out within the country in accordance with national law, as well as for the purposes of issuing visas, residence permits and the administration of legislation on aliens in the context of the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the movement of persons.(6) The fact that the legislative basis required for allowing the development of SIS II to be financed by the Union budget consists of two separate instruments does not affect the principle that the Schengen Information System constitutes, and should continue to constitute, one single, integrated, information system and that SIS II must be developed as such.(7) This Decision is without prejudice to the adoption in future of the necessary legislation describing in detail the operation and use of SIS II, such as, but not limited to, rules defining the categories of data to be entered into the system, the purposes for which they are to be entered and the criteria for their entry, rules concerning the content of SIS records, including responsibility for their correctness, rules on the duration of alerts, interlinking of alerts and compatibility between alerts, rules on access to SIS data and rules on the protection of personal data and their control.(8) This Decision sets out procedures for the taking of measures necessary for its implementation which mirror the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001, so as to ensure that there will be one single implementing process for the development of SIS II as a whole.(9) This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in

Article 1
The Schengen Information System set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the 1990 Schengen Convention, shall be replaced by a new system, the Schengen Information System II (SIS II), which shall allow for new Member States to be integrated into the system.

Article 2
The SIS II, which shall be a single integrated system, shall be developed by the Commission, in accordance with the procedures set out in this Decision.

Article 3
The measures necessary for the development of SIS II shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 5 where they concern matters other than those listed in Article 4.

Article 4
The measures necessary for the development of SIS II concerning the following matters shall be taken in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 6:
(a) the design of the physical architecture of the system, including its communication network;
(b) technical aspects which have a bearing on the protection of personal data;
(c) technical aspects which have serious financial implications for the budgets of the Member States or which have serious technical implications for the national systems of the Member States;
(d) the development of security requirements.

Article 5
1. Where reference is made to this Article, the Commission shall be assisted by a management committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The committee shall adopt its rules of procedure on a proposal by the chair on the basis of standard rules of procedure which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
3. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft, within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
4. The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event, the Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided on for a period of two months from the date of such communication.
5. The Council, acting by qualified majority, may take a different decision within the period provided for by paragraph 4.

Article 6
1. Where reference is made to this Article, the Commission shall be assisted by a regulatory committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The committee shall adopt its rules of procedure on a proposal by the chair on the basis of standard rules of procedure which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
3. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
4. The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee.
5. If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken and shall inform the European Parliament.
6. The Council may act by qualified majority on the proposal, within two months from the date of referral to the Council.
If within that period the Council has indicated by qualified majority that it opposes the proposal, the Commission shall re-examine it. It may submit an amended proposal to the Council, re-submit its proposal or present a legislative proposal.
If on the expiry of that period the Council has neither adopted the proposed implementing act nor indicated its opposition to the proposal for implementing measures, the proposed implementing act shall be adopted by the Commission.

Article 7
This Decision shall take effect on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal.
It shall expire on 31 December 2006.
Done at Brussels, 6 December 2001.
For the Council
The President
M. Verwilghen
(1) OJ C 183, 29.6.2001, p. 14.
(2) Opinion delivered on 23 October 2001 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, p. 442.
(4) See page 4 of this Official Journal.
(5) OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31.
(6) OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 30(1)(a) and (b), Article 31(a) and (b) and Article 34(2)(c) thereof,Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of Sweden(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Whereas:(1) The Schengen Information System, set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the Convention of 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at common borders, hereinafter referred to as “the 1990 Schengen Convention”, constitutes an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union.(2) The Schengen Information System in its current form has the capacity to service no more than 18 participating States. It is at present operational for 13 Member States and 2 other States (Iceland and Norway) and is intended to become operational for the United Kingdom and Ireland in the foreseeable future. It has, however, not been constructed so as to service the increased number of Member States of the European Union after its enlargement.(3) For this reason, and in order to benefit from the latest developments in the field of information technology and to allow for the introduction of new functions, it is necessary to develop a new, second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), as already acknowledged in Decision SCH/Com-ex (97) 24 of the Executive Committee of 7 October 1997(3).(4) The expenditure involved in the development of SIS II is to be charged to the budget of the European Union in accordance with the Council conclusions to that effect of 29 May 2001. This Decision constitutes, together with Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 of 6 December 2001 on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)(4), the required legislative basis to allow for the inclusion in the budget of the Union of the necessary appropriations for the development of SIS II and the execution of that part of the budget.(5) The legislative basis consists of two parts: this Decision based on Article 30(1)(a) and (b), Article 31(a) and (b) and Article 34(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union and a Council Regulation based on Article 66 (…) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. The reason for this is that, as set out in Article 92 of the 1990 Schengen Convention, the Schengen Information System is to enable the authorities designated by the Member States, by means of an automated search procedure, to have access to alerts on persons and property for the purposes of border checks and other police and customs checks carried out within the country in accordance with national law, as well as for the purposes of issuing visas, residence permits and the administration of legislation on aliens in the context of the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the movement of persons.(6) The fact that the legislative basis required for allowing the development of SIS II to be financed by the Union budget consists of two separate instruments does not affect the principle that the Schengen Information System constitutes, and should continue to constitute, one single, integrated, information system and that SIS II must be developed as such.(7) This Decision is without prejudice to the adoption in future of the necessary legislation describing in detail the operation and use of SIS II, such as, but not limited to, rules defining the categories of data to be entered into the system, the purposes for which they are to be entered and the criteria for their entry, rules concerning the content of SIS records, including responsibility for their correctness, rules on the duration of alerts, interlinking of alerts and compatibility between alerts, rules on access to SIS data and rules on the protection of personal data and their control.(8) This Decision sets out procedures for the taking of measures necessary for its implementation which mirror the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001, so as to ensure that there will be one single implementing process for the development of SIS II as a whole.(9) This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in
The Schengen Information System set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the 1990 Schengen Convention, shall be replaced by a new system, the Schengen Information System II (SIS II), which shall allow for new Member States to be integrated into the system.
The SIS II, which shall be a single integrated system, shall be developed by the Commission, in accordance with the procedures set out in this Decision.
The measures necessary for the development of SIS II shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 5 where they concern matters other than those listed in Article 4.
The measures necessary for the development of SIS II concerning the following matters shall be taken in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 6:
(a) the design of the physical architecture of the system, including its communication network;
(b) technical aspects which have a bearing on the protection of personal data;
(c) technical aspects which have serious financial implications for the budgets of the Member States or which have serious technical implications for the national systems of the Member States;
(d) the development of security requirements.
1. Where reference is made to this Article, the Commission shall be assisted by a management committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The committee shall adopt its rules of procedure on a proposal by the chair on the basis of standard rules of procedure which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
3. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft, within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
4. The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event, the Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided on for a period of two months from the date of such communication.
5. The Council, acting by qualified majority, may take a different decision within the period provided for by paragraph 4.
1. Where reference is made to this Article, the Commission shall be assisted by a regulatory committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
2. The committee shall adopt its rules of procedure on a proposal by the chair on the basis of standard rules of procedure which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
3. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
4. The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee.
5. If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken and shall inform the European Parliament.
6. The Council may act by qualified majority on the proposal, within two months from the date of referral to the Council.
If within that period the Council has indicated by qualified majority that it opposes the proposal, the Commission shall re-examine it. It may submit an amended proposal to the Council, re-submit its proposal or present a legislative proposal.
If on the expiry of that period the Council has neither adopted the proposed implementing act nor indicated its opposition to the proposal for implementing measures, the proposed implementing act shall be adopted by the Commission.
This Decision shall take effect on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal.
It shall expire on 31 December 2006.
Done at Brussels, 6 December 2001.
For the Council
The President
M. Verwilghen
(1) OJ C 183, 29.6.2001, p. 14.
(2) Opinion delivered on 23 October 2001 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, p. 442.
(4) See page 4 of this Official Journal.
(5) OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31.
(6) OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43.