Pending: 32006D0563

15.8.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 222/11
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread from wild birds to domestic birds, notably poultry, and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through international trade in live birds or their products.
(2) Cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of the subtype virus H5N1, hereinafter ‘HPAI H5N1’, have been suspected or confirmed in several Member States. Taking into account the epidemiological situation, Commission Decision 2006/115/EC of 17 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decisions 2006/86/EC, 2006/90/EC, 2006/91/EC, 2006/94/EC, 2006/104/EC and 2006/105/EC(4)was adopted.
(3) The measures laid down in Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(5)were reviewed in-depth in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risk of avian influenza for animal and public health, the development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the experience gained during recent outbreaks of that disease in the Community as well as in third countries. Taking account of that review, Directive 92/40/EEC was repealed and replaced by Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC(6), which is to be transposed by Member States by 1 July 2007.
(4) Pending the transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC and given the current disease situation in relation to avian influenza in the Community, it was necessary to lay down transitional measures to be applied on holdings where outbreaks of avian influenza caused by HPAI viruses are suspected or confirmed in poultry or other captive birds.
(5) Those transitional measures, which are laid down in Commission Decision 2006/416/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain transitional measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry or other captive birds in the Community(7), should enable the Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by the different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved, while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific scenario are the most appropriate.
(6) With progress made in transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC by certain Member States, any reference to the transitional measures should be construed as a reference to the corresponding paragraph in Directive 2005/94/EC.
(7) In order to complement the measures pursuant to Directive 92/40/EEC Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the Community(8)was adopted.
(8) Decision 2006/135/EC has now been replaced by Commission Decision 2006/415/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in poultry in the Community and repealing Decision 2006/135/EC(9)in order to harmonise the interaction between the transitional measures to be taken in case of a HPAI outbreak in poultry and the additional restrictions in case of a HPAI H5N1 suspected or confirmed outbreak in poultry or other captive birds.
(9) Experience with the implementation of Decision 2006/115/EC in affected Member States has shown that certain adjustments for the establishment of the restricted zones and for certain restrictions of movements of live poultry or products derived from them should be permitted on the basis of a risk assessment performed by the competent authority taking into account the level of risk influenced by geographical, limnological, ecological and epizootiological factors.
(10) In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, it is appropriate to apply for the purposes of this Decision certain definitions provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC, Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin(10)and Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
(11) A control and a monitoring area should be established around the place where HPAI of H5 subtype was detected in wild birds. Those areas should be limited to what is necessary to prevent virus introduction into commercial and non-commercial poultry flocks.
(12) In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, the biosecurity measures provided for in Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk(11)should be taken into account in control and monitoring areas, independently of the defined risk status of the area where highly pathogenic avian influenza is suspected or confirmed in wild birds.
(13) It is appropriate to restrict the movement of, in particular, live poultry and other captive birds, day-old chicks, hatching eggs and products of avian origin from the established control and monitoring areas. However, the dispatch under official control from these areas may only be authorised under certain conditions to avoid the possible spread of the disease.
(14) Specific derogations should also be provided for hatching eggs or SPF-eggs used in specialised laboratories or institutes for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical purposes, as they pose a negligible risk for the spread of infection.
(15) The transport of hatching eggs from the control area should be permitted under certain conditions. The dispatch of hatching eggs to other Member States may be permitted subject in particular to compliance with the conditions referred to in Directive 2005/94/EC. In such cases, the animal health certificates provided for in accordance with Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(12)should include a reference to this Decision.
(16) The dispatch from the control area of meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products derived from poultry and farmed feathered game produced in compliance with certain requirements of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(13)and subject to official veterinary controls including ante- and post mortem inspection should be permitted.
(17) The same official animal health controls apply for meat derived from poultry and farmed feathered game originating from the control area and produced in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005, which provides for transitional measures allowing the use of a national identification mark for products of animal origin intended for human consumption and which may only be marketed in the territory of the Member State where they are produced.
(18) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption(14)establishes a list of treatments rendering meat from restricted areas safe, and provides for the possibility to establish a specific health mark and the health mark required for meat not authorised for placing on the market for animal health reasons. It is appropriate to permit the dispatch from the control area of meat derived from poultry and farmed feathered game bearing the health mark provided for in that Directive and destined for treatment within the affected Member State to ensure inactivation of the avian influenza virus. Meat products having undergone such treatment may then be dispatched to other Member States and third countries.
(19) It is necessary to limit the dispatch from the control area of animal by-products of avian origin to those complying with specific conditions for the production, use, treatment or disposal as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(15)that prevent the possible spread of avian influenza virus.
(20) It is necessary to specify the minimum duration of the measures provided for in this Decision which should take account of the incubation period of the disease and the requirements of Directive 2005/94/EC. However it is also necessary to introduce conditions for granting specific derogations following the positive outcome of a risk assessment by the competent authorities.
(21) In the interests of clarity of Community legislation, Decision 2006/115/EC should be repealed and replaced by the present Decision.
(22) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
(a) Decision 2006/416/EC; or
(b) Decision 2006/415/EC and other protective measures in relation to an outbreak of HPAI in poultry or other captive birds caused by an avian influenza virus of the subtype H5 where the neuraminidase type N1 is suspected or confirmed HPAI H5N1.
(a) ‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation laid by poultry as defined in Article 2(4) of Directive 2005/94/EC;
(b) ‘wild feathered game’ means, as far as avian species are concerned, game as defined in point 1.5, second indent, and in point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c) ‘other captive birds’ means birds as defined in Article 2(6) of Directive 2005/94/EC, excluding:(i)pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;(ii)birds for zoos, circuses, amusement parks and experimental laboratories and sentinel birds placed by the competent authority in the frame of surveillance and research activities. (i) pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; (ii) birds for zoos, circuses, amusement parks and experimental laboratories and sentinel birds placed by the competent authority in the frame of surveillance and research activities.
(i) pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;
(ii) birds for zoos, circuses, amusement parks and experimental laboratories and sentinel birds placed by the competent authority in the frame of surveillance and research activities.
(i) pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;
(ii) birds for zoos, circuses, amusement parks and experimental laboratories and sentinel birds placed by the competent authority in the frame of surveillance and research activities.
(a) a control area with a radius of at least three kilometres (the control area); and
(b) a monitoring area with a radius of initially at least 10 kilometres, including the control area (the monitoring area).
(a) establish control and monitoring areas; and
(b) undertake a risk assessment to consider whether the radius of the control and monitoring areas needs to be extended to overlap with the protection and surveillance zones.
(a) amended to an area of sufficient size but in any event not less than of 1 km in radius; or
(b) established as a band of 1 km in width from the banks of a river or the shores of a lake or coast for a length of at least 3 km.
(a) the identification of all commercial poultry holdings and non-commercial holdings;
(b) the implementation of the biosecurity measures laid down in Decision 2005/734/EC for poultry and other captive birds, including disinfection at the entrances and exits to premises where poultry or other captive birds are kept;
(c) intensified official surveillance of wild bird populations, in particular water fowl, and further monitoring for dead or sick birds, if necessary with the co-operation of hunters and bird-watchers, and the reporting of dead bird findings to the competent authority and the removal, as far as possible, of carcasses of dead birds by personnel who have been specifically instructed on measures to protect themselves from infection with the virus and to prevent the spread of the virus to susceptible animals;
(d) campaigns to inform the public and to increase disease awareness among owners of poultry or other captive birds, hunters, bird-watchers and those providing the services of water-related recreation;
(e) periodic and documented visits to all commercial poultry holdings and targeted visits to non-commercial poultry holdings, prioritising those considered to be at greater risk, which must include:(i)a clinical inspection of the poultry or other captive birds including, if necessary, the collection of samples for laboratory examination targeting poultry or other captive birds that had not been confined prior to the positive finding in a wild bird and in particular ducks and geese;(ii)an assessment of the implementation of the biosecurity measures referred to in point (b). (i) a clinical inspection of the poultry or other captive birds including, if necessary, the collection of samples for laboratory examination targeting poultry or other captive birds that had not been confined prior to the positive finding in a wild bird and in particular ducks and geese; (ii) an assessment of the implementation of the biosecurity measures referred to in point (b).
(i) a clinical inspection of the poultry or other captive birds including, if necessary, the collection of samples for laboratory examination targeting poultry or other captive birds that had not been confined prior to the positive finding in a wild bird and in particular ducks and geese;
(ii) an assessment of the implementation of the biosecurity measures referred to in point (b).
(i) a clinical inspection of the poultry or other captive birds including, if necessary, the collection of samples for laboratory examination targeting poultry or other captive birds that had not been confined prior to the positive finding in a wild bird and in particular ducks and geese;
(ii) an assessment of the implementation of the biosecurity measures referred to in point (b).
(a) the removal of poultry or other captive birds from the holding on which they are kept;
(b) the assembly of poultry or other captive birds at fairs, markets, shows or other gatherings;
(c) the transport through the control area of poultry or other captive birds, except transit through the control area by road or rail without unloading or stopping;
(d) the dispatch of hatching eggs collected from holdings which on the date of collection were situated in the control area;
(e) the dispatch from the control area of fresh meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products from poultry originating from the control area and wild feathered game taken from the wild in that area;
(f) the transport or spread of unprocessed manure from holdings of poultry or other captive birds within the control area, except the transport for treatment in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002;
(g) the dispatch to other Member States and third countries of animal by-products of avian origin derived from poultry or other captive birds or wild feathered game originating from the control area;
(h) the hunting of wild birds or otherwise taking them from the wild, unless authorised by the competent authority for specific purposes;
(i) the release of game birds from captivity into the wild.
(a) the removal of poultry or other captive birds out of the monitoring area for the first 15 days following the date of establishment of that area;
(b) the assembly of poultry or other captive birds at fairs, markets, shows or other gatherings;
(c) the hunting of wild birds or otherwise taking them from the wild, unless authorised by the competent authority for specific purposes;
(d) the release of game birds from captivity into the wild.
(a) poultry to holdings under official control situated in the control and monitoring areas;
(b) ready-to-lay pullets and turkeys for fattening to holdings under official control in the same Member State on which the poultry must remain for at least 21 days following the date of arrival of those poultry.
(a) poultry for immediate slaughter to a slaughterhouse located in the control or monitoring area or, if that is not possible, to a slaughterhouse designated by the competent authority outside those areas;
(b) poultry from the monitoring area to holdings under official control on its territory;
(c) day-old chicks, hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated in the control area, to a holding or shed of that holding in the same Member State, preferably located outside that area, subject to the following conditions:(i)appropriate biosecurity measures are applied during transport and at the holding of destination;(ii)the holding of destination is placed under official surveillance following the arrival of the day-old-chicks;(iii)the poultry must remain on the holding of destination for at least 21 days from the date of their arrival, if that holding is situated outside the control or monitoring area. (i) appropriate biosecurity measures are applied during transport and at the holding of destination; (ii) the holding of destination is placed under official surveillance following the arrival of the day-old-chicks; (iii) the poultry must remain on the holding of destination for at least 21 days from the date of their arrival, if that holding is situated outside the control or monitoring area.
(i) appropriate biosecurity measures are applied during transport and at the holding of destination;
(ii) the holding of destination is placed under official surveillance following the arrival of the day-old-chicks;
(iii) the poultry must remain on the holding of destination for at least 21 days from the date of their arrival, if that holding is situated outside the control or monitoring area.
(i) appropriate biosecurity measures are applied during transport and at the holding of destination;
(ii) the holding of destination is placed under official surveillance following the arrival of the day-old-chicks;
(iii) the poultry must remain on the holding of destination for at least 21 days from the date of their arrival, if that holding is situated outside the control or monitoring area.
(d) day-old chicks hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated in the monitoring area to holdings under official control on its territory;
(e) day-old chicks hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated outside the control or monitoring area to any holding, provided that the hatchery of dispatch can ensure by its logistics and by its hygienic working conditions that no contact has occurred between those eggs and any other hatching eggs or day-old chicks originating from poultry flocks within the monitoring area and which are therefore of a different health status.
(a) to a hatchery designated by the competent authority within its territory;
(b) to any hatchery provided that:(i)poultry on the holding have tested negative in a serological survey for HPAI H5N1 capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence; and(ii)the conditions provided for in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Decision 2006/416/EC are fulfilled; (i) poultry on the holding have tested negative in a serological survey for HPAI H5N1 capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence; and (ii) the conditions provided for in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Decision 2006/416/EC are fulfilled;
(i) poultry on the holding have tested negative in a serological survey for HPAI H5N1 capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence; and
(ii) the conditions provided for in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Decision 2006/416/EC are fulfilled;
(i) poultry on the holding have tested negative in a serological survey for HPAI H5N1 capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence; and
(ii) the conditions provided for in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Decision 2006/416/EC are fulfilled;
(c) to an establishment for the manufacture of egg products as set out in Chapter II of Section X of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 to be handled and treated in accordance with Chapter XI of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council(16); or
(d) for disposal.
(a) fresh meat from poultry including meat of farmed feathered game, originating in or outside that area and:(i)produced in accordance with Annex II and Sections II and III of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004; and(ii)controlled in accordance with Sections I, II, III, and Chapters V and VII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004; (i) produced in accordance with Annex II and Sections II and III of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004; and (ii) controlled in accordance with Sections I, II, III, and Chapters V and VII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(i) produced in accordance with Annex II and Sections II and III of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004; and
(ii) controlled in accordance with Sections I, II, III, and Chapters V and VII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(i) produced in accordance with Annex II and Sections II and III of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004; and
(ii) controlled in accordance with Sections I, II, III, and Chapters V and VII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(b) minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products containing meat referred to in point (a) and produced in accordance with Sections V and VI of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c) fresh meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat from poultry, including meat of farmed feathered game and meat preparations and meat products containing such meat, obtained from slaughter poultry or farmed feathered game originating in or outside the control area to its national territory, provided such meat:(i)has been identified in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2002/99/EC, either with the mark provided for in Annex II to that Directive or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005;(ii)has been obtained, cut, stored and transported separately from other fresh meat from poultry or farmed feathered game destined for dispatch to other Member States or for exports to third countries; and(iii)is used in such a way as to avoid it being introduced into meat products or meat preparations intended for placing on the market in other Member States or for export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment, as required for avian influenza specified in table 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC. (i) has been identified in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2002/99/EC, either with the mark provided for in Annex II to that Directive or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005; (ii) has been obtained, cut, stored and transported separately from other fresh meat from poultry or farmed feathered game destined for dispatch to other Member States or for exports to third countries; and (iii) is used in such a way as to avoid it being introduced into meat products or meat preparations intended for placing on the market in other Member States or for export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment, as required for avian influenza specified in table 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
(i) has been identified in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2002/99/EC, either with the mark provided for in Annex II to that Directive or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005;
(ii) has been obtained, cut, stored and transported separately from other fresh meat from poultry or farmed feathered game destined for dispatch to other Member States or for exports to third countries; and
(iii) is used in such a way as to avoid it being introduced into meat products or meat preparations intended for placing on the market in other Member States or for export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment, as required for avian influenza specified in table 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
(i) has been identified in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2002/99/EC, either with the mark provided for in Annex II to that Directive or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005;
(ii) has been obtained, cut, stored and transported separately from other fresh meat from poultry or farmed feathered game destined for dispatch to other Member States or for exports to third countries; and
(iii) is used in such a way as to avoid it being introduced into meat products or meat preparations intended for placing on the market in other Member States or for export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment, as required for avian influenza specified in table 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
(d) fresh meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat from poultry, farmed feathered game and wild feathered game taken from the wild in the area before the control area was established or outside the control area, and meat preparations and meat products containing such meat, produced in establishments in the control area.
(a) the dispatch from the control area of animal by-products of avian origin which:(i)comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V;—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or(ii)are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to designated plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of that virus; or(iii)are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; (i) comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V;—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or — Annex V; — Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and — Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or (ii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to designated plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of that virus; or (iii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(i) comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V;—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or — Annex V; — Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and — Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
— Annex V;
— Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and
— Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to designated plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of that virus; or
(iii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(i) comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V;—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or — Annex V; — Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and — Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
— Annex V;
— Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and
— Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
— Annex V;
— Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and
— Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to designated plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of that virus; or
(iii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(b) the dispatch from the control area to other Member States of untreated feathers or parts of feathers in accordance with point 1(a) of Section A of Chapter VIII of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, produced from poultry or farmed feathered game;
(c) the dispatch from the control area of feathers and parts of feathers that have been treated with a steam current, or by some other method that ensures that no pathogens remain, produced from poultry or wild feathered game;
(a) from where poultry has been moved in accordance with paragraph 1 Article 9(1)(a) and (b) or (2)(a); or
(b) where poultry and farmed feathered game have been kept for the production of fresh meat produced in compliance with the provisions of Article 11.
(a) favourable results of a risk assessment, taking into account the criteria in Article 3(2);
(b) the completion of the measures provided for in Article 5(a);
(c) at least one visit to each holding has been made as provided for in Article 5(e);
(d) negative results have been obtained for all laboratory tests carried out as provided for in Article 5(e)(i).
(a) the necessary information on the epidemiology of HPAI H5N1, and where appropriate the additional control and surveillance measures and the awareness campaigns provided for in Article 5; and
(b) in advance notification, where the competent authority intends that the measures provided for in Article 7 and 8 are no longer applicable.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC(3), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread from wild birds to domestic birds, notably poultry, and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through international trade in live birds or their products.
(2) Cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of the subtype virus H5N1, hereinafter ‘HPAI H5N1’, have been suspected or confirmed in several Member States. Taking into account the epidemiological situation, Commission Decision 2006/115/EC of 17 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decisions 2006/86/EC, 2006/90/EC, 2006/91/EC, 2006/94/EC, 2006/104/EC and 2006/105/EC(4)was adopted.
(3) The measures laid down in Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(5)were reviewed in-depth in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risk of avian influenza for animal and public health, the development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the experience gained during recent outbreaks of that disease in the Community as well as in third countries. Taking account of that review, Directive 92/40/EEC was repealed and replaced by Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC(6), which is to be transposed by Member States by 1 July 2007.
(4) Pending the transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC and given the current disease situation in relation to avian influenza in the Community, it was necessary to lay down transitional measures to be applied on holdings where outbreaks of avian influenza caused by HPAI viruses are suspected or confirmed in poultry or other captive birds.
(5) Those transitional measures, which are laid down in Commission Decision 2006/416/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain transitional measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry or other captive birds in the Community(7), should enable the Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by the different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved, while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific scenario are the most appropriate.
(6) With progress made in transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC by certain Member States, any reference to the transitional measures should be construed as a reference to the corresponding paragraph in Directive 2005/94/EC.
(7) In order to complement the measures pursuant to Directive 92/40/EEC Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the Community(8)was adopted.
(8) Decision 2006/135/EC has now been replaced by Commission Decision 2006/415/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in poultry in the Community and repealing Decision 2006/135/EC(9)in order to harmonise the interaction between the transitional measures to be taken in case of a HPAI outbreak in poultry and the additional restrictions in case of a HPAI H5N1 suspected or confirmed outbreak in poultry or other captive birds.
(9) Experience with the implementation of Decision 2006/115/EC in affected Member States has shown that certain adjustments for the establishment of the restricted zones and for certain restrictions of movements of live poultry or products derived from them should be permitted on the basis of a risk assessment performed by the competent authority taking into account the level of risk influenced by geographical, limnological, ecological and epizootiological factors.
(10) In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, it is appropriate to apply for the purposes of this Decision certain definitions provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC, Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin(10)and Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
(11) A control and a monitoring area should be established around the place where HPAI of H5 subtype was detected in wild birds. Those areas should be limited to what is necessary to prevent virus introduction into commercial and non-commercial poultry flocks.
(12) In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, the biosecurity measures provided for in Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk(11)should be taken into account in control and monitoring areas, independently of the defined risk status of the area where highly pathogenic avian influenza is suspected or confirmed in wild birds.
(13) It is appropriate to restrict the movement of, in particular, live poultry and other captive birds, day-old chicks, hatching eggs and products of avian origin from the established control and monitoring areas. However, the dispatch under official control from these areas may only be authorised under certain conditions to avoid the possible spread of the disease.
(14) Specific derogations should also be provided for hatching eggs or SPF-eggs used in specialised laboratories or institutes for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical purposes, as they pose a negligible risk for the spread of infection.
(15) The transport of hatching eggs from the control area should be permitted under certain conditions. The dispatch of hatching eggs to other Member States may be permitted subject in particular to compliance with the conditions referred to in Directive 2005/94/EC. In such cases, the animal health certificates provided for in accordance with Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(12)should include a reference to this Decision.
(16) The dispatch from the control area of meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products derived from poultry and farmed feathered game produced in compliance with certain requirements of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(13)and subject to official veterinary controls including ante- and post mortem inspection should be permitted.
(17) The same official animal health controls apply for meat derived from poultry and farmed feathered game originating from the control area and produced in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005, which provides for transitional measures allowing the use of a national identification mark for products of animal origin intended for human consumption and which may only be marketed in the territory of the Member State where they are produced.
(18) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption(14)establishes a list of treatments rendering meat from restricted areas safe, and provides for the possibility to establish a specific health mark and the health mark required for meat not authorised for placing on the market for animal health reasons. It is appropriate to permit the dispatch from the control area of meat derived from poultry and farmed feathered game bearing the health mark provided for in that Directive and destined for treatment within the affected Member State to ensure inactivation of the avian influenza virus. Meat products having undergone such treatment may then be dispatched to other Member States and third countries.
(19) It is necessary to limit the dispatch from the control area of animal by-products of avian origin to those complying with specific conditions for the production, use, treatment or disposal as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(15)that prevent the possible spread of avian influenza virus.
(20) It is necessary to specify the minimum duration of the measures provided for in this Decision which should take account of the incubation period of the disease and the requirements of Directive 2005/94/EC. However it is also necessary to introduce conditions for granting specific derogations following the positive outcome of a risk assessment by the competent authorities.
(21) In the interests of clarity of Community legislation, Decision 2006/115/EC should be repealed and replaced by the present Decision.
(22) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Subject-matter and scope
Article 1
1. This Decision lays down certain protection measures to be applied in cases where highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) caused by the highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5 is detected and the neuraminidase type N1 (H5N1) is suspected or confirmed in wild birds, in a Member State (the affected Member State), in order to prevent the spread of avian influenza from wild birds to poultry or other captive birds, as well as the contamination of products thereof.
2. This Decision shall apply without prejudice to:
(a)
Decision 2006/416/EC; or
(b)
Decision 2006/415/EC and other protective measures in relation to an outbreak of HPAI in poultry or other captive birds caused by an avian influenza virus of the subtype H5 where the neuraminidase type N1 is suspected or confirmed HPAI H5N1.

Definitions
Article 2
For the purpose of this Decision, the definitions in Directive 2005/94/EC shall apply.
The following definitions shall also apply:
(a)
‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation laid by poultry as defined in Article 2(4) of Directive 2005/94/EC;
(b)
‘wild feathered game’ means, as far as avian species are concerned, game as defined in point 1.5, second indent, and in point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c)
‘other captive birds’ means birds as defined in Article 2(6) of Directive 2005/94/EC, excluding:
(i)
pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;
(ii)
birds for zoos, circuses, amusement parks and experimental laboratories and sentinel birds placed by the competent authority in the frame of surveillance and research activities.

Establishment of control and monitoring areas
Article 3
1. The affected Member State shall establish around the area where the presence of HPAI caused by avian influenza A virus of subtype H5 is confirmed in wild birds and the neuraminidase type N1 is either suspected or confirmed:
(a)
a control area with a radius of at least three kilometres (the control area); and
(b)
a monitoring area with a radius of initially at least 10 kilometres, including the control area (the monitoring area).
2. The establishment of the control and the monitoring areas shall take account of geographical, limnological, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to the species of wild birds, the characteristics of the avian influenza viruses and the monitoring facilities.
3. The affected Member State shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the details of any control and monitoring areas and shall, as appropriate, inform the public of the measures taken.
4. If the control or the monitoring areas cover the territories of more than one Member State, the competent authorities of those Member States shall collaborate in order to establish those areas.
5. If wild birds are suspected or confirmed to be infected with HPAI H5N1 in a protection or surveillance zone established pursuant to Article 11(1) of Decision 2006/416/EC (the protection or surveillance zones) due to such infection in poultry or other captive birds, the competent authority shall:
(a)
establish control and monitoring areas; and
(b)
undertake a risk assessment to consider whether the radius of the control and monitoring areas needs to be extended to overlap with the protection and surveillance zones.
The competent authority may apply the protection measures provided for in Article 5(b), (c) and (d), in any parts of the protection and surveillance zones that do not overlap with the control and monitoring areas when the risk assessment indicates that there is a risk of spread of HPAI H5N1 to poultry or other captive birds in those parts.

Derogations from measures provided for in Article 3(1)
Article 4
1. By way of derogation from Article 3(1), the affected Member State may refrain from the establishment of control and monitoring areas on basis of the favourable results of a risk assessment by the competent authority.
That assessment shall take into account geographical considerations, the ecology of the infected bird species and lead the competent authority to conclude that HPAI H5N1 is not present in the area in poultry or other captive birds or wild birds, or that the infected wild bird did not present a risk of spreading that virus to poultry or other captive birds or wild birds in the locality.
In those circumstances the competent authority shall attempt, where necessary in liaison with the competent authorities of other Member States or third countries, to establish with the help of ornithological experts whether the wild birds are resident or migrating, such that an assessment can be made as to whether HPAI H5N1 exists in wild birds in other areas under their jurisdiction.
2. By way of derogation from Article 3(1) (a) and on the basis of favourable results to a risk assessment which has taken into account at least the criteria referred to in Article 3(2) and confirmed the existence of sufficient protection of the local poultry or other captive birds based on natural barriers or the absence of suitable habitats for wild birds presenting a risk of spreading HPAI H5N1 the control area may be:
(a)
amended to an area of sufficient size but in any event not less than of 1 km in radius; or
(b)
established as a band of 1 km in width from the banks of a river or the shores of a lake or coast for a length of at least 3 km.
In this case and by way of derogation from Article 3(1)(b) the competent authority shall then also adapt the shape and the size of the monitoring area accordingly to separate the control area from the unaffected parts of the territory.

Measures in the control area
Article 5
The affected Member State shall ensure that at least the following measures are applied in the control area:
(a)
the identification of all commercial poultry holdings and non-commercial holdings;
(b)
the implementation of the biosecurity measures laid down in Decision 2005/734/EC for poultry and other captive birds, including disinfection at the entrances and exits to premises where poultry or other captive birds are kept;
(c)
intensified official surveillance of wild bird populations, in particular water fowl, and further monitoring for dead or sick birds, if necessary with the co-operation of hunters and bird-watchers, and the reporting of dead bird findings to the competent authority and the removal, as far as possible, of carcasses of dead birds by personnel who have been specifically instructed on measures to protect themselves from infection with the virus and to prevent the spread of the virus to susceptible animals;
(d)
campaigns to inform the public and to increase disease awareness among owners of poultry or other captive birds, hunters, bird-watchers and those providing the services of water-related recreation;
(e)
periodic and documented visits to all commercial poultry holdings and targeted visits to non-commercial poultry holdings, prioritising those considered to be at greater risk, which must include:
(i)
a clinical inspection of the poultry or other captive birds including, if necessary, the collection of samples for laboratory examination targeting poultry or other captive birds that had not been confined prior to the positive finding in a wild bird and in particular ducks and geese;
(ii)
an assessment of the implementation of the biosecurity measures referred to in point (b).

Prohibitions in the control area
Article 6
The affected Member State shall ensure that the following are prohibited in the control area:
(a)
the removal of poultry or other captive birds from the holding on which they are kept;
(b)
the assembly of poultry or other captive birds at fairs, markets, shows or other gatherings;
(c)
the transport through the control area of poultry or other captive birds, except transit through the control area by road or rail without unloading or stopping;
(d)
the dispatch of hatching eggs collected from holdings which on the date of collection were situated in the control area;
(e)
the dispatch from the control area of fresh meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products from poultry originating from the control area and wild feathered game taken from the wild in that area;
(f)
the transport or spread of unprocessed manure from holdings of poultry or other captive birds within the control area, except the transport for treatment in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002;
(g)
the dispatch to other Member States and third countries of animal by-products of avian origin derived from poultry or other captive birds or wild feathered game originating from the control area;
(h)
the hunting of wild birds or otherwise taking them from the wild, unless authorised by the competent authority for specific purposes;
(i)
the release of game birds from captivity into the wild.

Measures in the monitoring area
Article 7
The affected Member State shall ensure that at least the measures provided for in Article 5(a) to (d) are applied in the monitoring area.

Prohibitions in the monitoring area
Article 8
The affected Member State shall ensure that the following are prohibited in the monitoring area:
(a)
the removal of poultry or other captive birds out of the monitoring area for the first 15 days following the date of establishment of that area;
(b)
the assembly of poultry or other captive birds at fairs, markets, shows or other gatherings;
(c)
the hunting of wild birds or otherwise taking them from the wild, unless authorised by the competent authority for specific purposes;
(d)
the release of game birds from captivity into the wild.

Derogations for live birds and day-old chicks
Article 9
1. By way of derogation from Article 6(a), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of:
(a)
poultry to holdings under official control situated in the control and monitoring areas;
(b)
ready-to-lay pullets and turkeys for fattening to holdings under official control in the same Member State on which the poultry must remain for at least 21 days following the date of arrival of those poultry.
2. By way of derogation from Article 6(a) and Article 8(a), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of:
(a)
poultry for immediate slaughter to a slaughterhouse located in the control or monitoring area or, if that is not possible, to a slaughterhouse designated by the competent authority outside those areas;
(b)
poultry from the monitoring area to holdings under official control on its territory;
(c)
day-old chicks, hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated in the control area, to a holding or shed of that holding in the same Member State, preferably located outside that area, subject to the following conditions:
(i)
appropriate biosecurity measures are applied during transport and at the holding of destination;
(ii)
the holding of destination is placed under official surveillance following the arrival of the day-old-chicks;
(iii)
the poultry must remain on the holding of destination for at least 21 days from the date of their arrival, if that holding is situated outside the control or monitoring area.
(d)
day-old chicks hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated in the monitoring area to holdings under official control on its territory;
(e)
day-old chicks hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated outside the control or monitoring area to any holding, provided that the hatchery of dispatch can ensure by its logistics and by its hygienic working conditions that no contact has occurred between those eggs and any other hatching eggs or day-old chicks originating from poultry flocks within the monitoring area and which are therefore of a different health status.

Derogations for hatching eggs
Article 10
1. By way of derogation from Article 6(d), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of hatching eggs collected from holdings that were situated in the control area on the date of collection:
(a)
to a hatchery designated by the competent authority within its territory;
(b)
to any hatchery provided that:
(i)
poultry on the holding have tested negative in a serological survey for HPAI H5N1 capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence; and
(ii)
the conditions provided for in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Decision 2006/416/EC are fulfilled;
(c)
to an establishment for the manufacture of egg products as set out in Chapter II of Section X of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 to be handled and treated in accordance with Chapter XI of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council(16); or
(d)
for disposal.
2. By way of derogation from Article 6(d), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch of hatching eggs or SPF-eggs collected on holdings in the control area to designated laboratories, institutes or vaccine manufacturers for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical uses.
3. The animal health certificates accompanying consignments of hatching eggs referred to in paragraph 1(b) and paragraph 2 dispatched to other Member States shall include the following:
‘This consignment complies with the animal health conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2006/563/EC’.

Derogations for meat, minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products
Article 11
By way of derogation from Article 6(e), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch from the control area of:
(a)
fresh meat from poultry including meat of farmed feathered game, originating in or outside that area and:
(i)
produced in accordance with Annex II and Sections II and III of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004; and
(ii)
controlled in accordance with Sections I, II, III, and Chapters V and VII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(b)
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products containing meat referred to in point (a) and produced in accordance with Sections V and VI of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c)
fresh meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat from poultry, including meat of farmed feathered game and meat preparations and meat products containing such meat, obtained from slaughter poultry or farmed feathered game originating in or outside the control area to its national territory, provided such meat:
(i)
has been identified in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2002/99/EC, either with the mark provided for in Annex II to that Directive or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005;
(ii)
has been obtained, cut, stored and transported separately from other fresh meat from poultry or farmed feathered game destined for dispatch to other Member States or for exports to third countries; and
(iii)
is used in such a way as to avoid it being introduced into meat products or meat preparations intended for placing on the market in other Member States or for export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment, as required for avian influenza specified in table 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
(d)
fresh meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat from poultry, farmed feathered game and wild feathered game taken from the wild in the area before the control area was established or outside the control area, and meat preparations and meat products containing such meat, produced in establishments in the control area.

Derogations for animal by-products
Article 12
1. By way of derogation from Article 6(g), the affected Member State shall authorise:
(a)
the dispatch from the control area of animal by-products of avian origin which:
(i)
comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:
—
Annex V;
—
Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and
—
Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to designated plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of that virus; or
(iii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(b)
the dispatch from the control area to other Member States of untreated feathers or parts of feathers in accordance with point 1(a) of Section A of Chapter VIII of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, produced from poultry or farmed feathered game;
(c)
the dispatch from the control area of feathers and parts of feathers that have been treated with a steam current, or by some other method that ensures that no pathogens remain, produced from poultry or wild feathered game;
2. The affected Member State shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph (1)(b) and (c) of Article are accompanied by a commercial document in accordance with Chapter X of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 stating, in the case of the products referred to in paragraph 1(c) of this Article, in point 6.1 of that document that those products have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring that no pathogens remain.
However, that commercial document shall not be required for processed decorative feathers, processed feathers carried by travellers for their private use or consignments of processed feathers sent to private individuals for non-industrial purposes.
3. By derogation from Article 6(f) the transport or spread of unprocessed manure from poultry holdings within the control area may be authorised if originating from stables or sheds:
(a)
from where poultry has been moved in accordance with paragraph 1 Article 9(1)(a) and (b) or (2)(a); or
(b)
where poultry and farmed feathered game have been kept for the production of fresh meat produced in compliance with the provisions of Article 11.

Conditions for movements
Article 13
1. Where movements of animals or products thereof covered by this Decision are authorised under Articles 9, 10, 11 or 12, the authorisation shall be based on the favourable results of a risk assessment carried out by the competent authority, and all appropriate biosecurity measures shall be taken to avoid the spread of avian influenza.
2. Where the dispatch, movement or transport of products referred to in paragraph 1 are authorised under Articles 10, 11 or 12, they must be obtained, handled, treated, stored and transported without compromising the animal health status of other products fulfilling all the animal health requirements for trade, placing on the market or export to third countries.

Duration of the measures in the control and monitoring areas
Article 14
1. If the neuraminidase type is confirmed as being different from N1, the measures provided for in Articles 5 to 8 shall no longer apply.
2. If the presence of HPAI H5N1 is confirmed in wild birds, the measures provided for in Articles 5 to 8 shall apply for as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, limnological, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza and for at least 21 days in the case of the control area and 30 days in the case of the monitoring area following the date of collection from wild birds of the samples on which a HPAI H5N1 virus was confirmed.

Derogations concerning the duration of measures in the control and monitoring areas
Article 15
1. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), the competent authority may decide, following the favourable outcome of a risk assessment taking into account the criteria in Article 3(2), to suspend the measures provided for in Article 6(a) to (g) in the control area and those provided for in Article 8 in the monitoring area, even where further infected wild birds have been found, provided that at least 21 days have lapsed since the initial establishment of the control and monitoring areas and there has been no outbreak of HPAI H5N1 and no suspicion of avian influenza in poultry and other captive birds in those areas.
2. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), where, in accordance with Article 3(5), a control or monitoring area overlap with a surveillance zone and that surveillance zone has been lifted, the competent authority may, on the basis of a favourable outcome of a risk assessment, suspend some or all of the measures provided for in Article 5(a) and (e) and of Article 6 in the control area.
3. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), the competent authority may decide to replace the control area by a monitoring area subject to the following conditions:
(a)
favourable results of a risk assessment, taking into account the criteria in Article 3(2);
(b)
the completion of the measures provided for in Article 5(a);
(c)
at least one visit to each holding has been made as provided for in Article 5(e);
(d)
negative results have been obtained for all laboratory tests carried out as provided for in Article 5(e)(i).
Where the competent authority decides to replace the control area by a monitoring area, it may change the shape and size of that monitoring area provided such monitoring area remains at least 1 km in radius or a band of 1 km in width from the banks of a river or the shores of a lake or coast for a length of at least 3 km. The measures provided for in Article 5(b), (c) and (d) and Article 6(h) and (i) shall be maintained until the end of the 30 day period from the date of the establishment of the control and monitoring areas in accordance with Article 3(1).

Information obligations of affected Member State
Article 16
The affected Member State shall regularly provide to the Commission and the other Member States:
(a)
the necessary information on the epidemiology of HPAI H5N1, and where appropriate the additional control and surveillance measures and the awareness campaigns provided for in Article 5; and
(b)
in advance notification, where the competent authority intends that the measures provided for in Article 7 and 8 are no longer applicable.

Repeals
Article 17
Decision 2006/115/EC is repealed.

Compliance
Article 18
Member States shall immediately adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
The affected Member State shall apply those measures as soon as it reasonably suspects the presence of HPAI H5N1 in a wild bird.

Addressee
Article 19
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC(3), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread from wild birds to domestic birds, notably poultry, and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through international trade in live birds or their products.
(2) Cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of the subtype virus H5N1, hereinafter ‘HPAI H5N1’, have been suspected or confirmed in several Member States. Taking into account the epidemiological situation, Commission Decision 2006/115/EC of 17 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decisions 2006/86/EC, 2006/90/EC, 2006/91/EC, 2006/94/EC, 2006/104/EC and 2006/105/EC(4)was adopted.
(3) The measures laid down in Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(5)were reviewed in-depth in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risk of avian influenza for animal and public health, the development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the experience gained during recent outbreaks of that disease in the Community as well as in third countries. Taking account of that review, Directive 92/40/EEC was repealed and replaced by Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC(6), which is to be transposed by Member States by 1 July 2007.
(4) Pending the transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC and given the current disease situation in relation to avian influenza in the Community, it was necessary to lay down transitional measures to be applied on holdings where outbreaks of avian influenza caused by HPAI viruses are suspected or confirmed in poultry or other captive birds.
(5) Those transitional measures, which are laid down in Commission Decision 2006/416/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain transitional measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry or other captive birds in the Community(7), should enable the Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by the different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved, while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific scenario are the most appropriate.
(6) With progress made in transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC by certain Member States, any reference to the transitional measures should be construed as a reference to the corresponding paragraph in Directive 2005/94/EC.
(7) In order to complement the measures pursuant to Directive 92/40/EEC Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the Community(8)was adopted.
(8) Decision 2006/135/EC has now been replaced by Commission Decision 2006/415/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in poultry in the Community and repealing Decision 2006/135/EC(9)in order to harmonise the interaction between the transitional measures to be taken in case of a HPAI outbreak in poultry and the additional restrictions in case of a HPAI H5N1 suspected or confirmed outbreak in poultry or other captive birds.
(9) Experience with the implementation of Decision 2006/115/EC in affected Member States has shown that certain adjustments for the establishment of the restricted zones and for certain restrictions of movements of live poultry or products derived from them should be permitted on the basis of a risk assessment performed by the competent authority taking into account the level of risk influenced by geographical, limnological, ecological and epizootiological factors.
(10) In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, it is appropriate to apply for the purposes of this Decision certain definitions provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC, Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin(10)and Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
(11) A control and a monitoring area should be established around the place where HPAI of H5 subtype was detected in wild birds. Those areas should be limited to what is necessary to prevent virus introduction into commercial and non-commercial poultry flocks.
(12) In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, the biosecurity measures provided for in Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk(11)should be taken into account in control and monitoring areas, independently of the defined risk status of the area where highly pathogenic avian influenza is suspected or confirmed in wild birds.
(13) It is appropriate to restrict the movement of, in particular, live poultry and other captive birds, day-old chicks, hatching eggs and products of avian origin from the established control and monitoring areas. However, the dispatch under official control from these areas may only be authorised under certain conditions to avoid the possible spread of the disease.
(14) Specific derogations should also be provided for hatching eggs or SPF-eggs used in specialised laboratories or institutes for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical purposes, as they pose a negligible risk for the spread of infection.
(15) The transport of hatching eggs from the control area should be permitted under certain conditions. The dispatch of hatching eggs to other Member States may be permitted subject in particular to compliance with the conditions referred to in Directive 2005/94/EC. In such cases, the animal health certificates provided for in accordance with Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(12)should include a reference to this Decision.
(16) The dispatch from the control area of meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products derived from poultry and farmed feathered game produced in compliance with certain requirements of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(13)and subject to official veterinary controls including ante- and post mortem inspection should be permitted.
(17) The same official animal health controls apply for meat derived from poultry and farmed feathered game originating from the control area and produced in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005, which provides for transitional measures allowing the use of a national identification mark for products of animal origin intended for human consumption and which may only be marketed in the territory of the Member State where they are produced.
(18) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption(14)establishes a list of treatments rendering meat from restricted areas safe, and provides for the possibility to establish a specific health mark and the health mark required for meat not authorised for placing on the market for animal health reasons. It is appropriate to permit the dispatch from the control area of meat derived from poultry and farmed feathered game bearing the health mark provided for in that Directive and destined for treatment within the affected Member State to ensure inactivation of the avian influenza virus. Meat products having undergone such treatment may then be dispatched to other Member States and third countries.
(19) It is necessary to limit the dispatch from the control area of animal by-products of avian origin to those complying with specific conditions for the production, use, treatment or disposal as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(15)that prevent the possible spread of avian influenza virus.
(20) It is necessary to specify the minimum duration of the measures provided for in this Decision which should take account of the incubation period of the disease and the requirements of Directive 2005/94/EC. However it is also necessary to introduce conditions for granting specific derogations following the positive outcome of a risk assessment by the competent authorities.
(21) In the interests of clarity of Community legislation, Decision 2006/115/EC should be repealed and replaced by the present Decision.
(22) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Subject-matter and scope

1. This Decision lays down certain protection measures to be applied in cases where highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) caused by the highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5 is detected and the neuraminidase type N1 (H5N1) is suspected or confirmed in wild birds, in a Member State (the affected Member State), in order to prevent the spread of avian influenza from wild birds to poultry or other captive birds, as well as the contamination of products thereof.
2. This Decision shall apply without prejudice to:
(a)
Decision 2006/416/EC; or
(b)
Decision 2006/415/EC and other protective measures in relation to an outbreak of HPAI in poultry or other captive birds caused by an avian influenza virus of the subtype H5 where the neuraminidase type N1 is suspected or confirmed HPAI H5N1.

Definitions

For the purpose of this Decision, the definitions in Directive 2005/94/EC shall apply.
The following definitions shall also apply:
(a)
‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation laid by poultry as defined in Article 2(4) of Directive 2005/94/EC;
(b)
‘wild feathered game’ means, as far as avian species are concerned, game as defined in point 1.5, second indent, and in point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c)
‘other captive birds’ means birds as defined in Article 2(6) of Directive 2005/94/EC, excluding:
(i)
pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;
(ii)
birds for zoos, circuses, amusement parks and experimental laboratories and sentinel birds placed by the competent authority in the frame of surveillance and research activities.

Establishment of control and monitoring areas

1. The affected Member State shall establish around the area where the presence of HPAI caused by avian influenza A virus of subtype H5 is confirmed in wild birds and the neuraminidase type N1 is either suspected or confirmed:
(a)
a control area with a radius of at least three kilometres (the control area); and
(b)
a monitoring area with a radius of initially at least 10 kilometres, including the control area (the monitoring area).
2. The establishment of the control and the monitoring areas shall take account of geographical, limnological, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to the species of wild birds, the characteristics of the avian influenza viruses and the monitoring facilities.
3. The affected Member State shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the details of any control and monitoring areas and shall, as appropriate, inform the public of the measures taken.
4. If the control or the monitoring areas cover the territories of more than one Member State, the competent authorities of those Member States shall collaborate in order to establish those areas.
5. If wild birds are suspected or confirmed to be infected with HPAI H5N1 in a protection or surveillance zone established pursuant to Article 11(1) of Decision 2006/416/EC (the protection or surveillance zones) due to such infection in poultry or other captive birds, the competent authority shall:
(a)
establish control and monitoring areas; and
(b)
undertake a risk assessment to consider whether the radius of the control and monitoring areas needs to be extended to overlap with the protection and surveillance zones.
The competent authority may apply the protection measures provided for in Article 5(b), (c) and (d), in any parts of the protection and surveillance zones that do not overlap with the control and monitoring areas when the risk assessment indicates that there is a risk of spread of HPAI H5N1 to poultry or other captive birds in those parts.

Derogations from measures provided for in Article 3(1)

1. By way of derogation from Article 3(1), the affected Member State may refrain from the establishment of control and monitoring areas on basis of the favourable results of a risk assessment by the competent authority.
That assessment shall take into account geographical considerations, the ecology of the infected bird species and lead the competent authority to conclude that HPAI H5N1 is not present in the area in poultry or other captive birds or wild birds, or that the infected wild bird did not present a risk of spreading that virus to poultry or other captive birds or wild birds in the locality.
In those circumstances the competent authority shall attempt, where necessary in liaison with the competent authorities of other Member States or third countries, to establish with the help of ornithological experts whether the wild birds are resident or migrating, such that an assessment can be made as to whether HPAI H5N1 exists in wild birds in other areas under their jurisdiction.
2. By way of derogation from Article 3(1) (a) and on the basis of favourable results to a risk assessment which has taken into account at least the criteria referred to in Article 3(2) and confirmed the existence of sufficient protection of the local poultry or other captive birds based on natural barriers or the absence of suitable habitats for wild birds presenting a risk of spreading HPAI H5N1 the control area may be:
(a)
amended to an area of sufficient size but in any event not less than of 1 km in radius; or
(b)
established as a band of 1 km in width from the banks of a river or the shores of a lake or coast for a length of at least 3 km.
In this case and by way of derogation from Article 3(1)(b) the competent authority shall then also adapt the shape and the size of the monitoring area accordingly to separate the control area from the unaffected parts of the territory.

Measures in the control area

The affected Member State shall ensure that at least the following measures are applied in the control area:
(a)
the identification of all commercial poultry holdings and non-commercial holdings;
(b)
the implementation of the biosecurity measures laid down in Decision 2005/734/EC for poultry and other captive birds, including disinfection at the entrances and exits to premises where poultry or other captive birds are kept;
(c)
intensified official surveillance of wild bird populations, in particular water fowl, and further monitoring for dead or sick birds, if necessary with the co-operation of hunters and bird-watchers, and the reporting of dead bird findings to the competent authority and the removal, as far as possible, of carcasses of dead birds by personnel who have been specifically instructed on measures to protect themselves from infection with the virus and to prevent the spread of the virus to susceptible animals;
(d)
campaigns to inform the public and to increase disease awareness among owners of poultry or other captive birds, hunters, bird-watchers and those providing the services of water-related recreation;
(e)
periodic and documented visits to all commercial poultry holdings and targeted visits to non-commercial poultry holdings, prioritising those considered to be at greater risk, which must include:
(i)
a clinical inspection of the poultry or other captive birds including, if necessary, the collection of samples for laboratory examination targeting poultry or other captive birds that had not been confined prior to the positive finding in a wild bird and in particular ducks and geese;
(ii)
an assessment of the implementation of the biosecurity measures referred to in point (b).

Prohibitions in the control area

The affected Member State shall ensure that the following are prohibited in the control area:
(a)
the removal of poultry or other captive birds from the holding on which they are kept;
(b)
the assembly of poultry or other captive birds at fairs, markets, shows or other gatherings;
(c)
the transport through the control area of poultry or other captive birds, except transit through the control area by road or rail without unloading or stopping;
(d)
the dispatch of hatching eggs collected from holdings which on the date of collection were situated in the control area;
(e)
the dispatch from the control area of fresh meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products from poultry originating from the control area and wild feathered game taken from the wild in that area;
(f)
the transport or spread of unprocessed manure from holdings of poultry or other captive birds within the control area, except the transport for treatment in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002;
(g)
the dispatch to other Member States and third countries of animal by-products of avian origin derived from poultry or other captive birds or wild feathered game originating from the control area;
(h)
the hunting of wild birds or otherwise taking them from the wild, unless authorised by the competent authority for specific purposes;
(i)
the release of game birds from captivity into the wild.

Measures in the monitoring area

The affected Member State shall ensure that at least the measures provided for in Article 5(a) to (d) are applied in the monitoring area.

Prohibitions in the monitoring area

The affected Member State shall ensure that the following are prohibited in the monitoring area:
(a)
the removal of poultry or other captive birds out of the monitoring area for the first 15 days following the date of establishment of that area;
(b)
the assembly of poultry or other captive birds at fairs, markets, shows or other gatherings;
(c)
the hunting of wild birds or otherwise taking them from the wild, unless authorised by the competent authority for specific purposes;
(d)
the release of game birds from captivity into the wild.

Derogations for live birds and day-old chicks

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(a), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of:
(a)
poultry to holdings under official control situated in the control and monitoring areas;
(b)
ready-to-lay pullets and turkeys for fattening to holdings under official control in the same Member State on which the poultry must remain for at least 21 days following the date of arrival of those poultry.
2. By way of derogation from Article 6(a) and Article 8(a), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of:
(a)
poultry for immediate slaughter to a slaughterhouse located in the control or monitoring area or, if that is not possible, to a slaughterhouse designated by the competent authority outside those areas;
(b)
poultry from the monitoring area to holdings under official control on its territory;
(c)
day-old chicks, hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated in the control area, to a holding or shed of that holding in the same Member State, preferably located outside that area, subject to the following conditions:
(i)
appropriate biosecurity measures are applied during transport and at the holding of destination;
(ii)
the holding of destination is placed under official surveillance following the arrival of the day-old-chicks;
(iii)
the poultry must remain on the holding of destination for at least 21 days from the date of their arrival, if that holding is situated outside the control or monitoring area.
(d)
day-old chicks hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated in the monitoring area to holdings under official control on its territory;
(e)
day-old chicks hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated outside the control or monitoring area to any holding, provided that the hatchery of dispatch can ensure by its logistics and by its hygienic working conditions that no contact has occurred between those eggs and any other hatching eggs or day-old chicks originating from poultry flocks within the monitoring area and which are therefore of a different health status.

Derogations for hatching eggs

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(d), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of hatching eggs collected from holdings that were situated in the control area on the date of collection:
(a)
to a hatchery designated by the competent authority within its territory;
(b)
to any hatchery provided that:
(i)
poultry on the holding have tested negative in a serological survey for HPAI H5N1 capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence; and
(ii)
the conditions provided for in Article 21(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Decision 2006/416/EC are fulfilled;
(c)
to an establishment for the manufacture of egg products as set out in Chapter II of Section X of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 to be handled and treated in accordance with Chapter XI of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council(16); or
(d)
for disposal.
2. By way of derogation from Article 6(d), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch of hatching eggs or SPF-eggs collected on holdings in the control area to designated laboratories, institutes or vaccine manufacturers for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical uses.
3. The animal health certificates accompanying consignments of hatching eggs referred to in paragraph 1(b) and paragraph 2 dispatched to other Member States shall include the following:
‘This consignment complies with the animal health conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2006/563/EC’.

Derogations for meat, minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products

By way of derogation from Article 6(e), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch from the control area of:
(a)
fresh meat from poultry including meat of farmed feathered game, originating in or outside that area and:
(i)
produced in accordance with Annex II and Sections II and III of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004; and
(ii)
controlled in accordance with Sections I, II, III, and Chapters V and VII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(b)
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products containing meat referred to in point (a) and produced in accordance with Sections V and VI of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c)
fresh meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat from poultry, including meat of farmed feathered game and meat preparations and meat products containing such meat, obtained from slaughter poultry or farmed feathered game originating in or outside the control area to its national territory, provided such meat:
(i)
has been identified in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2002/99/EC, either with the mark provided for in Annex II to that Directive or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005;
(ii)
has been obtained, cut, stored and transported separately from other fresh meat from poultry or farmed feathered game destined for dispatch to other Member States or for exports to third countries; and
(iii)
is used in such a way as to avoid it being introduced into meat products or meat preparations intended for placing on the market in other Member States or for export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment, as required for avian influenza specified in table 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
(d)
fresh meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat from poultry, farmed feathered game and wild feathered game taken from the wild in the area before the control area was established or outside the control area, and meat preparations and meat products containing such meat, produced in establishments in the control area.

Derogations for animal by-products

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(g), the affected Member State shall authorise:
(a)
the dispatch from the control area of animal by-products of avian origin which:
(i)
comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:
—
Annex V;
—
Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), Chapter VI(A) and (B), and Chapters VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII; and
—
Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to designated plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of that virus; or
(iii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid the spread of the avian influenza virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(b)
the dispatch from the control area to other Member States of untreated feathers or parts of feathers in accordance with point 1(a) of Section A of Chapter VIII of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, produced from poultry or farmed feathered game;
(c)
the dispatch from the control area of feathers and parts of feathers that have been treated with a steam current, or by some other method that ensures that no pathogens remain, produced from poultry or wild feathered game;
2. The affected Member State shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph (1)(b) and (c) of Article are accompanied by a commercial document in accordance with Chapter X of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 stating, in the case of the products referred to in paragraph 1(c) of this Article, in point 6.1 of that document that those products have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring that no pathogens remain.
However, that commercial document shall not be required for processed decorative feathers, processed feathers carried by travellers for their private use or consignments of processed feathers sent to private individuals for non-industrial purposes.
3. By derogation from Article 6(f) the transport or spread of unprocessed manure from poultry holdings within the control area may be authorised if originating from stables or sheds:
(a)
from where poultry has been moved in accordance with paragraph 1 Article 9(1)(a) and (b) or (2)(a); or
(b)
where poultry and farmed feathered game have been kept for the production of fresh meat produced in compliance with the provisions of Article 11.

Conditions for movements

1. Where movements of animals or products thereof covered by this Decision are authorised under Articles 9, 10, 11 or 12, the authorisation shall be based on the favourable results of a risk assessment carried out by the competent authority, and all appropriate biosecurity measures shall be taken to avoid the spread of avian influenza.
2. Where the dispatch, movement or transport of products referred to in paragraph 1 are authorised under Articles 10, 11 or 12, they must be obtained, handled, treated, stored and transported without compromising the animal health status of other products fulfilling all the animal health requirements for trade, placing on the market or export to third countries.

Duration of the measures in the control and monitoring areas

1. If the neuraminidase type is confirmed as being different from N1, the measures provided for in Articles 5 to 8 shall no longer apply.
2. If the presence of HPAI H5N1 is confirmed in wild birds, the measures provided for in Articles 5 to 8 shall apply for as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, limnological, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza and for at least 21 days in the case of the control area and 30 days in the case of the monitoring area following the date of collection from wild birds of the samples on which a HPAI H5N1 virus was confirmed.

Derogations concerning the duration of measures in the control and monitoring areas

1. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), the competent authority may decide, following the favourable outcome of a risk assessment taking into account the criteria in Article 3(2), to suspend the measures provided for in Article 6(a) to (g) in the control area and those provided for in Article 8 in the monitoring area, even where further infected wild birds have been found, provided that at least 21 days have lapsed since the initial establishment of the control and monitoring areas and there has been no outbreak of HPAI H5N1 and no suspicion of avian influenza in poultry and other captive birds in those areas.
2. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), where, in accordance with Article 3(5), a control or monitoring area overlap with a surveillance zone and that surveillance zone has been lifted, the competent authority may, on the basis of a favourable outcome of a risk assessment, suspend some or all of the measures provided for in Article 5(a) and (e) and of Article 6 in the control area.
3. By way of derogation from Article 14(2), the competent authority may decide to replace the control area by a monitoring area subject to the following conditions:
(a)
favourable results of a risk assessment, taking into account the criteria in Article 3(2);
(b)
the completion of the measures provided for in Article 5(a);
(c)
at least one visit to each holding has been made as provided for in Article 5(e);
(d)
negative results have been obtained for all laboratory tests carried out as provided for in Article 5(e)(i).
Where the competent authority decides to replace the control area by a monitoring area, it may change the shape and size of that monitoring area provided such monitoring area remains at least 1 km in radius or a band of 1 km in width from the banks of a river or the shores of a lake or coast for a length of at least 3 km. The measures provided for in Article 5(b), (c) and (d) and Article 6(h) and (i) shall be maintained until the end of the 30 day period from the date of the establishment of the control and monitoring areas in accordance with Article 3(1).

Information obligations of affected Member State

The affected Member State shall regularly provide to the Commission and the other Member States:
(a)
the necessary information on the epidemiology of HPAI H5N1, and where appropriate the additional control and surveillance measures and the awareness campaigns provided for in Article 5; and
(b)
in advance notification, where the competent authority intends that the measures provided for in Article 7 and 8 are no longer applicable.

Repeals

Decision 2006/115/EC is repealed.

Compliance

Member States shall immediately adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
The affected Member State shall apply those measures as soon as it reasonably suspects the presence of HPAI H5N1 in a wild bird.

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Pending: 32006D0524

28.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 207/30
(1) The terms of office of the present members of the European Economic and Social Committee expire on 20 September 2006. The members of that Committee should therefore be appointed for a further period of four years as from 21 September 2006.
(2) The Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourg, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak Governments have submitted lists containing a number of candidates equal to the number of seats allocated to them by the Treaties.
(3) The Italian Government has submitted a list containing 22 candidates. At a later stage it will propose two further candidates to complete this list and arrive at a number of candidates equal to the number of seats allocated to it by the Treaties,
Ms Helena ČORNEJOVÁHead of the Socio-Economic Department, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
Ms Vladimíra DRBALOVÁDirector of the Department of International Organisations and EU Affairs, Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (SP)
Mr Roman HAKENExecutive Director of the Center for Community Organizing (CCO)
Mr Ludvík JÍROVECDirector of Corporate Company STAŇKOV Inc. (Společný podnik STAŇKOV a.s.), member of the Czech Agrarian Chamber
Mr Vladimír MATOUŠEKAdvisor in the International Department, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
Mr Jaroslav NĚMECDirector of the Archdiocesan Charity Prague, Chair of the Board of the Central Bohemian Regional Council of Humanitarian Organisations
Ms Dana ŠTECHOVÁAdvisor of the International Department, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
Mr Josef SUCHELAdvisor in social affairs, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
Mr Pavel TRANTINADirector of the Secretariat and Chair of the Board of the Czech Council for Children and Youth
Mr Ivan VOLEŠDeputy Secretary, Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic (HK ČR)
Mr Josef ZBOŘILMember of the Board of Directors, Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (SP)
Ms Marie ZVOLSKÁMember of the Confederation of Employers’ and Entrepreneurs’ Associations of the Czech Republic
Frau Karin ALLEWELDTReferatsleiterin internationale Gewerkschaftspolitik beim Bundesvorstand des DGB
Frau Annelie BUNTENBACHMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes des DGB
Diplom-Volkswirt Peter CLEVERMitglied der Hauptgeschäftsführung Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände
Dr. Göke FRERICHSPräsidiumsmitglied Bundesverband des Deutschen Groß- und Außenhandels
Dr. Renate HEINISCHBundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Senioren-Organisationen (BAGSO) e.V.
Herr Adalbert KIENLEStellvertretender Generalsekretär Deutscher Bauernverband e.V.
Diplom-Volkswirt Peter KORNLeiter des Bereichs Umwelt und Energie und Leiter des Deutschen Industrie- und Handelskammertags (DIHK) in Brüssel
Herr Jochen LEHNHOFFMitglied des Vorstandes Bundesverband der deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken e.V.
Herr Claus MATECKIMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes des DGB
Herr Arno METZLERHauptgeschäftsführer Bundesverband der Freien Berufe
Herr Erhard OTTMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes von Ver.di
Dr. Volker J. PETERSENStellvertretender Generalsekretär Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V.
Herr Lutz RIBBEDirektor bei der Stiftung Europäisches Naturerbe und Mitglied des Bundesvorstandes BUND
Herr Jörg RUSCHEGeschäftsführer Bundesverband der Deutschen Binnenschifffahrt e.V.
Herr Manfred SCHALLMEYERBeauftragter des 1. Vorsitzenden der IG Metall
Herr Hanns-Eberhard SCHLEYERGeneralsekretär des Zentralverbandes des Deutschen Handwerks (ZDH)
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Heiko STEFFENSVerbraucherzentrale Bundesverband
Herr Frank STÖHRStellvertretender Bundesvorsitzender dbb Beamtenbund und Tarifunion
Graf Alexander von SCHWERINBetriebsrat DVG
Dr. Ludolf von WARTENBERGHauptgeschäftsführer und Mitglied des Präsidiums Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie
Herr Hans-Joachim WILMSStellvertretender Bundesvorsitzender Bundesvorstand IG Bauen-Agrar-Umwelt Büro Berlin, VB III
Prof. Dr. Gerd WOLFDirektor a.D. am Institut für Plasmaphysik des Forschungszentrums Jülich
Herr Wilfried WOLLERMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Hauptvorstandes der IG Bergbau, Chemie, Energie
Gräfin Soscha zu EULENBURGVizepräsidentin der Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege und Vizepräsidentin des Deutschen Roten Kreuzes DRK-Generalsekretariat
Ms Eve PÄÄRENDSONEstonian Employers’ Confederation
Ms Kristina TSHISTOVAEstonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Ms Liina CARRConfederation of Estonian Trade Unions
Ms Mare VIIESEstonian Employees’ Unions’ Confederation
Ms Mall HELLAMNetwork of the Estonian Nonprofit Organiszations (NENO)
Mr Meelis JOOSTThe Estonian Chamber of Disabled People
Mr Kaul NURMEstonian Farmers' Federation
D. Pedro BARATO TRIGUEROPresidente Nacional de ASAJA
D. Rafael BARBADILLO LÓPEZSubdirector General de la Federación Española de Empresas de Transportes de Viajeros (ASINTRA)
D. Miguel Ángel CABRA DE LUNAVocal de la Junta Directiva de la Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social
DaLourdes CAVERO MESTREMiembro de la Junta Directiva de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
D. Francisco CEBALLO HERREROAsociación General de Consumidores (Asgeco)
DaMaCarmen COBANO SUÁREZUnión de Pequeños Agricultores y Ganaderos (UPA)
D. José María ESPUNY MOYANOConsejero de la Federación Española de Industrias de Alimentación y Bebidas (FIAB)
D. José Isaías RODRÍGUEZ GARCÍA-CARODirector para la Unión Europea de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
DaLaura GONZÁLEZ DE TXABARRI ETXANIZMiembro del Comité Ejecutivo de la Confederación Sindical ELA, Responsable del Departamento Internacional
D. Bernardo HERNÁNDEZ BATALLERAsociación de Usuarios de Comunicación (AUC)
DaMargarita LÓPEZ ALMENDARIZMiembro del Comité Ejecutivo de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
D. Juán MENDOZA CASTROColaborador de UGT para asuntos internacionales
D. Juan MORENO PRECIADOSMiembro de la Secretaría Confederal de Acción Sindical Internacional de CC.OO.
D. Ángel PANERO FLORESMiembro de la Junta Directiva de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
D. Luis Miguel PARIZA CASTAÑOSMiembro de la Secretaría Confederal de Acción Sindical Internacional de CC.OO.
D. Javier SÁNCHEZ ANSÓMiembro de la Comisión Ejecutiva de COAG, Responsable de Relaciones Internacionales, Estructuras Agrarias y Desarrollo Rural
DaMaría Candelas SÁNCHEZ MIGUELMiembro de la Secretaría Confederal de Acción Sindical Internacional de CC.OO.
D. Sergio SANTILLÁN CABEZAAbogado, Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT)
D. Gabriel SARRÓ IPARRAGUIRREGerente de la Organización de Productores Asociados de Grandes Atuneros Congelados (OPAGAC)
D. José SARTORIUS ÁLVAREZ DE BOHÓRQUEZConsejero del Banco Popular Español
D. José Maria ZUFIAUR NARVAIZADirector del grupo de análisis sociolaborales LABOUR
M. Jean-Paul BASTIANVice-président, FNSEA (Fédération nationale des syndicats d’exploitants agricoles)
Mme Laure BATUTAssistante confédérale au secteur international et Europe (Force ouvrière)
M. Jean-Michel BLOCH-LAINEPrésident, UNIOPSS (Union nationale interfédérale des œuvres et organismes privés sanitaires et sociaux)
M. Lucien BOUISConseiller du président de l’UNAF, UNAF (Union nationale des associations familiales)
M. Gilbert BROSVice-président, APCA (Assemblée permanente des chambres d’agriculture)
M. Stéphane BUFFETAUTChargé de mission Europe, UTP (Union des transports publics)
M. Bruno CLERGEOTMembre du conseil confédéral, CNMCCA (Confédération nationale de la mutualité, de la coopération et du crédit agricoles)
M. Hervé COUPEAUMembre du bureau, CNJA (Centre national des jeunes agriculteurs)
M. Gérard DANTINChargé de mission au sein du secteur Europe et international, CFDT (Confédération française démocratique du travail)
Francis DAVOUSTVice-président du Conseil national des professions de l’automobile (CNPA), UPA (Union professionnelle artisanale) et APCMA
M. Pierre GENDREAssistant confédéral au secteur international et Europe, FO (Force ouvrière)
M. Hubert GHIGONISVice-président, CGPME (Confédération générale des petites et moyennes entreprises)
M. Bernard HUVELINVice-président de la Fédération française du bâtiment, MEDEF (Mouvement des entreprises de France)
Mme An LENOUAIL-MARLIEREMembre de la Confédération exécutive confédérale, CGT (Confédération générale du travail)
M. Georges LIAROKAPISDélégué national, pôle service — cadre de vie — Europe et international, CGC/CFE (Confédération générale des cadres)
Mme Reine-Claude MADER-SAUSSAYESecrétaire générale de la confédération de la consommation, du logement et du cadre de vie, membre du conseil de la concurrence, CLVC (Association consommation, logement et cadre de vie)
M. Henri MALOSSEDirecteur, conseiller pour les affaires européennes auprès de la présidence de l’ACFCI, ACFCI (Assemblée des chambres françaises de commerce et d’industrie)
M. André-Luc MOLINIERDirecteur adjoint — coordination Europe, MEDEF (Mouvement des entreprises de France)
Mme Béatrice OUINChargée de mission au sein du secteur Europe et international, CFDT (Confédération française démocratique du travail)
M. Jean-Paul PANZANIMembre du comité exécutif, président des mutuelles de France, FNMF (Fédération nationale de la mutualité française)
Mme Evelyne PICHENOTPrésidente de la délégation pour l’Union européenne du Conseil économique et social, CES (Conseil économique et social)
Mme Nicole PRUD’HOMMEVice-présidente, CFTC (Confédération française des travailleurs chrétiens)
M. Jacques REIGNAULTVice-président délégué, président de la commission des affaires européennes et internationales, UNAPL (Union nationale des professions libérales)
M. Daniel RETUREAUConseiller à l’espace confédéral Europe-international, CGT (Confédération générale du travail)
Sig. Maurizio ANGELOin rappresentanza CIDA
Sig. Paolo BEDONIin rappresentanza di COLDIRETTI
Sig. Umberto BURANIin rappresentanza di ABI
Sig. Mario CAMPLIin rappresentanza LEGA NAZIONALE COOPERATIVE E MUTUE
Sig. Claudio CAPPELLINIin rappresentanza di CONFARTIGIANATO
Sig. Francesco CAVALAROin rappresentanza CISAL (Confederazione Italiana Sindacati Autonomi Lavoratori)
Sig. Carmelo CEDRONEin rappresentanza UIL
Sig. Franco CHIRIACOin rappresentanza CGIL
Sig. Roberto CONFALONIERIin rappresentanza CONFEDIR
Sig.ra Susanna FLORIOin rappresentanza CGIL
Sig. Angelo GRASSOin rappresentanza Confcooperative
Sig. Edgardo Maria IOZIAin rappresentanza UIL
Sig. Luca JAHIERin rappresentanza ACLI
Sig. Sandro MASCIAin rappresentanza di CONFAGRICOLTURA
Sig.ra Rosa Angela MAUROin rappresentanza SIN.PA
Sig. Paolo NICOLETTIin rappresentanza di CONFINDUSTRIA
Sig. Antonio PEZZINIin rappresentanza di CONFINDUSTRIA
Sig.ra Renata POLVERINIin rappresentanza UGL
Sig. Virgilio RANOCCHIARIin rappresentanza di CONFINDUSTRIA
Sig. Corrado ROSSITTOin rappresentanza CIU
Sig. Claudio ROTTIin rappresentanza di CONFCOMMERCIO
Sig. Valerio SALVATOREin rappresentanza CONFSAL
Ms Gunta ANČAThe Latvian Umbrella Body for Disability Organisations SUSTENTO, Chairperson
Mr Andris BĒRZIŅŠParex Bank, member of the Board; ABkonsultants, owner
Mr Vitālijs GAVRILOVS20 Ice-Balt Invest ehf, Vice-chairman; LTD “Vitalian”, Chairman of the Board; JSC Grindex, Vice-chairman of the Board
Ms Irina HOMKOFree Trade Union Confederation of Latvia, Expert in social and economic and health care matters
Mr Viesturs KOCIŅŠLatvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Head of the Foreign Trade Document Department
Mr Armands KRAUZELatvian Beekeepers Association, Board Chairman, project manager
Mr Pēteris KRĪGERSFree Trade Union Confederation of Latvia, President; Member of Consultative board of Latvian Social insurance government agency
Mr Danukas ARLAUSKASDirector General, Lithuanian Confederation of Business Employers
Mr Linas LASIAUSKASDeputy Director General, Lithuanian Apparel and Textile Industry Association
Mr Vitas MAČIULISDirector General, Association of Lithuanian Chambers of Commerce, Industry and Crafts
Mr Gintaras MORKISDeputy Director General, Lithuanian Confederation of Industrialists
Ms Daiva KVEDARAITĖDirector, Information and external relations centre of Lithuanian Trade Union „Solidarumas“
Mr Algirdas Aleksandras KVEDARAVIČIUSVice-chairperson, Lithuanian Trade Union Confederation
Ms Inga PREIDIENĖVice-chairperson, Lithuanian Labour Federation Youth Organization
Mr Zenonas Rokus RUDZIKASPresident, Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
Mr Algirdas ŠIUPŠINSKASMember of the Board, Lithuanian Consumer Association
M. Paul JUNCKSecrétaire général Arcelor
M. Raymond HENCKSMembre du comité exécutif de la Confédération générale de la fonction publique (CGFP)
M. Jean-Claude REDINGPrésident de la Confédération générale du travail — Luxembourg (CGT-L/OGBL)
Mme Josiane WILLEMSDirecteur de la Centrale paysanne luxembourgeoise (CPL)
M. Paul RECKINGERPrésident de la chambre des métiers du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg
M. Robert SCHADECKCoordinateur de mesures sociales de réinsertion (Confédération luxembourgeoise des syndicats chrétiens — LCGB)
Mr Miklós BARABÁSDirector, European House Society
Ms Ágnes CSERVice-chairman, Forum for the Co-Operation of Trade Unions, Confederation of Unions of Professionals
Mr Antal CSUPORTActing Director, National Association of Strategic and Public Utility Companies
Mr István GARAIActing chairman, National Association for Consumer Protection
Dr Mária HERCZOGTechnical leader, Family, Youth, Children Public Benefit Organisation
Mr József KAPUVÁRIMember of the Board, National Confederation of Hungarian Trade Unions
Ms Erika KOLLERHead of International Department, Democratic League of Free Trade Unions
Mr Tamás NAGYChairman, National Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives and Producers
Dr Miklós PÁSZTORExpert, National Federation of Worker's Councils
Dr János TÓTHChairman responsible for International Affairs, Association of the Hungarian Industrial Parks
Dr Péter VADÁSZCo-chairman, Federation of Hungarian Employers and Industrialists
Mr János VÉRTESDirector of International Relations, National Federation of Traders and Caterers
Ms Grace ATTARDPresident of the National Council of Women
Mr Edwin CALLEJAFederation of Industries (FOI)
Ms Anna Maria DARMANINUnion Ħaddiema Magħqudin
Mr Michael PARNISGeneral Workers Union
Ms Sylvia SCIBERRASMalta Chamber of Small and Medium Enterprises (GRTU)
Frau Mag. Eva BELABEDLeiterin der Stabstelle EWSA und Internationale Angelegenheiten, Arbeiterkammer Oberösterreich
Herr Mag. Thomas DELAPINAMitglied der wissenschaftlichen Abteilung, Arbeiterkammer Wien; Geschäftsführer des Beirats für Wirtschafts- und Sozialfragen
Herr Mag. Wolfgang GREIFBereichsleiter der Abteilung Europa, Konzerne und internationale Beziehungen in der Gewerkschaft der Privatangestellten
Frau Waltraud KLASNICLandeshauptmann a.D.
Herr Dr. Johannes KLEEMANN„Konsulent der Industriellenvereinigung, ehem. Vorstandsmitglied der Industriellenvereinigung“
Herr Mag. Hans KLETZMAYRVorsitzender des „Nationalkomitees der Österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft“
Herr Dipl.-Ing. Johann KÖLTRINGERHauptabteilungsleiter des Österreichischen Raiffeisenverbandes
Herr Mag. Heinz PETERDirektor der Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Vorarlberg
Frau Mag. Evelyn REGNERLeiterin des ÖGB Europabüros in Brüssel
Frau Mag. Christa SCHWENGReferentin — Wirtschaftskammer Österreich, Abteilung für Sozialpolitik und Gesundheit
Frau Dr. Anne-Marie SIGMUNDEuropabeauftragte des Bundeskomitees der freien Berufe Österreichs
Herr Gustav ZÖHRERInternationaler Sekretär der Gewerkschaft Metall-Textil
G. Bojan HRIBARsekretar Sindikata vzgoje, izobraževanja in raziskovalne dejavnosti
G. Martin NOSEčlan upravnega odbora Kmetijsko gozdarske zbornice Slovenije in direktor Zadružne zveze Slovenije
G. Dušan REBOLJpredsednik Konfederacije sindikatov Pergam Slovenije
Ga. Metka ROKSANDIĆizvršna sekretarka Predsedstva Zveze svobodnih sindikatov Slovenije
G. Primož ŠPORARdirektor Pravno-informacijskega centra nevladnih organizacij
G. Mag. Cveto STANTIČpodpredsednik Gospodarske zbornice Slovenije
G. Dare STOJANčlan upravnega odbora Obrtne zbornice Slovenije in predsednik Združenja delodajalcev obrtnih dejavnosti Slovenije
Vladimír BÁLEŠprezident, Slovenská rektorská konferencia
Martin CHRENriaditeľ, Nadácia F. A. Hayeka
Martin KREKÁČprezident, Centrum pre hospodársky rozvoj – Podnikateľská aliancia Slovenska
Vladimír MOJŠviceprezident, Konfederácia odborových zväzov
Ján ORAVECčlen prezídia, Republiková únia zamestnávateľov
Naile PROKEŠOVÁporadca, Konfederácia odborových zväzov
Eugen ŠKULTÉTYviceprezident, Konfederácia odborových zväzov
Juraj STERNpredseda správnej rady, Slovenská spoločnosť pre zahraničnú politiku
Patrik ZOLTVÁNYčlen, Republiková únia zamestnávateľov
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,
(1) The terms of office of the present members of the European Economic and Social Committee expire on 20 September 2006. The members of that Committee should therefore be appointed for a further period of four years as from 21 September 2006.
(2) The Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourg, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak Governments have submitted lists containing a number of candidates equal to the number of seats allocated to them by the Treaties.
(3) The Italian Government has submitted a list containing 22 candidates. At a later stage it will propose two further candidates to complete this list and arrive at a number of candidates equal to the number of seats allocated to it by the Treaties,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1
The persons listed in the Annex to this Decision are hereby appointed members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2006 to 20 September 2010.

Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,
(1) The terms of office of the present members of the European Economic and Social Committee expire on 20 September 2006. The members of that Committee should therefore be appointed for a further period of four years as from 21 September 2006.
(2) The Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourg, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak Governments have submitted lists containing a number of candidates equal to the number of seats allocated to them by the Treaties.
(3) The Italian Government has submitted a list containing 22 candidates. At a later stage it will propose two further candidates to complete this list and arrive at a number of candidates equal to the number of seats allocated to it by the Treaties,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
The persons listed in the Annex to this Decision are hereby appointed members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2006 to 20 September 2010.
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Czech Republic

ANNEX
| Ms Helena ČORNEJOVÁHead of the Socio-Economic Department, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
| Ms Vladimíra DRBALOVÁDirector of the Department of International Organisations and EU Affairs, Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (SP)
| Mr Roman HAKENExecutive Director of the Center for Community Organizing (CCO)
| Mr Ludvík JÍROVECDirector of Corporate Company STAŇKOV Inc. (Společný podnik STAŇKOV a.s.), member of the Czech Agrarian Chamber
| Mr Vladimír MATOUŠEKAdvisor in the International Department, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
| Mr Jaroslav NĚMECDirector of the Archdiocesan Charity Prague, Chair of the Board of the Central Bohemian Regional Council of Humanitarian Organisations
| Ms Dana ŠTECHOVÁAdvisor of the International Department, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
| Mr Josef SUCHELAdvisor in social affairs, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS)
| Mr Pavel TRANTINADirector of the Secretariat and Chair of the Board of the Czech Council for Children and Youth
| Mr Ivan VOLEŠDeputy Secretary, Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic (HK ČR)
| Mr Josef ZBOŘILMember of the Board of Directors, Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (SP)
| Ms Marie ZVOLSKÁMember of the Confederation of Employers’ and Entrepreneurs’ Associations of the Czech RepublicGermany
| Frau Karin ALLEWELDTReferatsleiterin internationale Gewerkschaftspolitik beim Bundesvorstand des DGB
| Frau Annelie BUNTENBACHMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes des DGB
| Diplom-Volkswirt Peter CLEVERMitglied der Hauptgeschäftsführung Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände
| Dr. Göke FRERICHSPräsidiumsmitglied Bundesverband des Deutschen Groß- und Außenhandels
| Dr. Renate HEINISCHBundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Senioren-Organisationen (BAGSO) e.V.
| Herr Adalbert KIENLEStellvertretender Generalsekretär Deutscher Bauernverband e.V.
| Diplom-Volkswirt Peter KORNLeiter des Bereichs Umwelt und Energie und Leiter des Deutschen Industrie- und Handelskammertags (DIHK) in Brüssel
| Herr Jochen LEHNHOFFMitglied des Vorstandes Bundesverband der deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken e.V.
| Herr Claus MATECKIMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes des DGB
| Herr Arno METZLERHauptgeschäftsführer Bundesverband der Freien Berufe
| Herr Erhard OTTMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes von Ver.di
| Dr. Volker J. PETERSENStellvertretender Generalsekretär Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V.
| Herr Lutz RIBBEDirektor bei der Stiftung Europäisches Naturerbe und Mitglied des Bundesvorstandes BUND
| Herr Jörg RUSCHEGeschäftsführer Bundesverband der Deutschen Binnenschifffahrt e.V.
| Herr Manfred SCHALLMEYERBeauftragter des 1. Vorsitzenden der IG Metall
| Herr Hanns-Eberhard SCHLEYERGeneralsekretär des Zentralverbandes des Deutschen Handwerks (ZDH)
| Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Heiko STEFFENSVerbraucherzentrale Bundesverband
| Herr Frank STÖHRStellvertretender Bundesvorsitzender dbb Beamtenbund und Tarifunion
| Graf Alexander von SCHWERINBetriebsrat DVG
| Dr. Ludolf von WARTENBERGHauptgeschäftsführer und Mitglied des Präsidiums Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie
| Herr Hans-Joachim WILMSStellvertretender Bundesvorsitzender Bundesvorstand IG Bauen-Agrar-Umwelt Büro Berlin, VB III
| Prof. Dr. Gerd WOLFDirektor a.D. am Institut für Plasmaphysik des Forschungszentrums Jülich
| Herr Wilfried WOLLERMitglied des Geschäftsführenden Hauptvorstandes der IG Bergbau, Chemie, Energie
| Gräfin Soscha zu EULENBURGVizepräsidentin der Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege und Vizepräsidentin des Deutschen Roten Kreuzes DRK-GeneralsekretariatEstonia
| Ms Eve PÄÄRENDSONEstonian Employers’ Confederation
| Ms Kristina TSHISTOVAEstonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
| Ms Liina CARRConfederation of Estonian Trade Unions
| Ms Mare VIIESEstonian Employees’ Unions’ Confederation
| Ms Mall HELLAMNetwork of the Estonian Nonprofit Organiszations (NENO)
| Mr Meelis JOOSTThe Estonian Chamber of Disabled People
| Mr Kaul NURMEstonian Farmers’ FederationSpain
| D. Pedro BARATO TRIGUEROPresidente Nacional de ASAJA
| D. Rafael BARBADILLO LÓPEZSubdirector General de la Federación Española de Empresas de Transportes de Viajeros (ASINTRA)
| D. Miguel Ángel CABRA DE LUNAVocal de la Junta Directiva de la Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social
| DaLourdes CAVERO MESTREMiembro de la Junta Directiva de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
| D. Francisco CEBALLO HERREROAsociación General de Consumidores (Asgeco)
| DaMaCarmen COBANO SUÁREZUnión de Pequeños Agricultores y Ganaderos (UPA)
| D. José María ESPUNY MOYANOConsejero de la Federación Española de Industrias de Alimentación y Bebidas (FIAB)
| D. José Isaías RODRÍGUEZ GARCÍA-CARODirector para la Unión Europea de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
| DaLaura GONZÁLEZ DE TXABARRI ETXANIZMiembro del Comité Ejecutivo de la Confederación Sindical ELA, Responsable del Departamento Internacional
| D. Bernardo HERNÁNDEZ BATALLERAsociación de Usuarios de Comunicación (AUC)
| DaMargarita LÓPEZ ALMENDARIZMiembro del Comité Ejecutivo de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
| D. Juán MENDOZA CASTROColaborador de UGT para asuntos internacionales
| D. Juan MORENO PRECIADOSMiembro de la Secretaría Confederal de Acción Sindical Internacional de CC.OO.
| D. Ángel PANERO FLORESMiembro de la Junta Directiva de la Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
| D. Luis Miguel PARIZA CASTAÑOSMiembro de la Secretaría Confederal de Acción Sindical Internacional de CC.OO.
| D. Javier SÁNCHEZ ANSÓMiembro de la Comisión Ejecutiva de COAG, Responsable de Relaciones Internacionales, Estructuras Agrarias y Desarrollo Rural
| DaMaría Candelas SÁNCHEZ MIGUELMiembro de la Secretaría Confederal de Acción Sindical Internacional de CC.OO.
| D. Sergio SANTILLÁN CABEZAAbogado, Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT)
| D. Gabriel SARRÓ IPARRAGUIRREGerente de la Organización de Productores Asociados de Grandes Atuneros Congelados (OPAGAC)
| D. José SARTORIUS ÁLVAREZ DE BOHÓRQUEZConsejero del Banco Popular Español
| D. José Maria ZUFIAUR NARVAIZADirector del grupo de análisis sociolaborales LABOURFrance
| M. Jean-Paul BASTIANVice-président, FNSEA (Fédération nationale des syndicats d’exploitants agricoles)
| Mme Laure BATUTAssistante confédérale au secteur international et Europe (Force ouvrière)
| M. Jean-Michel BLOCH-LAINEPrésident, UNIOPSS (Union nationale interfédérale des œuvres et organismes privés sanitaires et sociaux)
| M. Lucien BOUISConseiller du président de l’UNAF, UNAF (Union nationale des associations familiales)
| M. Gilbert BROSVice-président, APCA (Assemblée permanente des chambres d’agriculture)
| M. Stéphane BUFFETAUTChargé de mission Europe, UTP (Union des transports publics)
| M. Bruno CLERGEOTMembre du conseil confédéral, CNMCCA (Confédération nationale de la mutualité, de la coopération et du crédit agricoles)
| M. Hervé COUPEAUMembre du bureau, CNJA (Centre national des jeunes agriculteurs)
| M. Gérard DANTINChargé de mission au sein du secteur Europe et international, CFDT (Confédération française démocratique du travail)
| Francis DAVOUSTVice-président du Conseil national des professions de l’automobile (CNPA), UPA (Union professionnelle artisanale) et APCMA
| M. Pierre GENDREAssistant confédéral au secteur international et Europe, FO (Force ouvrière)
| M. Hubert GHIGONISVice-président, CGPME (Confédération générale des petites et moyennes entreprises)
| M. Bernard HUVELINVice-président de la Fédération française du bâtiment, MEDEF (Mouvement des entreprises de France)
| Mme An LENOUAIL-MARLIEREMembre de la Confédération exécutive confédérale, CGT (Confédération générale du travail)
| M. Georges LIAROKAPISDélégué national, pôle service — cadre de vie — Europe et international, CGC/CFE (Confédération générale des cadres)
| Mme Reine-Claude MADER-SAUSSAYESecrétaire générale de la confédération de la consommation, du logement et du cadre de vie, membre du conseil de la concurrence, CLVC (Association consommation, logement et cadre de vie)
| M. Henri MALOSSEDirecteur, conseiller pour les affaires européennes auprès de la présidence de l’ACFCI, ACFCI (Assemblée des chambres françaises de commerce et d’industrie)
| M. André-Luc MOLINIERDirecteur adjoint — coordination Europe, MEDEF (Mouvement des entreprises de France)
| Mme Béatrice OUINChargée de mission au sein du secteur Europe et international, CFDT (Confédération française démocratique du travail)
| M. Jean-Paul PANZANIMembre du comité exécutif, président des mutuelles de France, FNMF (Fédération nationale de la mutualité française)
| Mme Evelyne PICHENOTPrésidente de la délégation pour l’Union européenne du Conseil économique et social, CES (Conseil économique et social)
| Mme Nicole PRUD’HOMMEVice-présidente, CFTC (Confédération française des travailleurs chrétiens)
| M. Jacques REIGNAULTVice-président délégué, président de la commission des affaires européennes et internationales, UNAPL (Union nationale des professions libérales)
| M. Daniel RETUREAUConseiller à l’espace confédéral Europe-international, CGT (Confédération générale du travail)Italy
| Sig. Maurizio ANGELOin rappresentanza CIDA
| Sig. Paolo BEDONIin rappresentanza di COLDIRETTI
| Sig. Umberto BURANIin rappresentanza di ABI
| Sig. Mario CAMPLIin rappresentanza LEGA NAZIONALE COOPERATIVE E MUTUE
| Sig. Claudio CAPPELLINIin rappresentanza di CONFARTIGIANATO
| Sig. Francesco CAVALAROin rappresentanza CISAL (Confederazione Italiana Sindacati Autonomi Lavoratori)
| Sig. Carmelo CEDRONEin rappresentanza UIL
| Sig. Franco CHIRIACOin rappresentanza CGIL
| Sig. Roberto CONFALONIERIin rappresentanza CONFEDIR
| Sig.ra Susanna FLORIOin rappresentanza CGIL
| Sig. Angelo GRASSOin rappresentanza Confcooperative
| Sig. Edgardo Maria IOZIAin rappresentanza UIL
| Sig. Luca JAHIERin rappresentanza ACLI
| Sig. Sandro MASCIAin rappresentanza di CONFAGRICOLTURA
| Sig.ra Rosa Angela MAUROin rappresentanza SIN.PA
| Sig. Paolo NICOLETTIin rappresentanza di CONFINDUSTRIA
| Sig. Antonio PEZZINIin rappresentanza di CONFINDUSTRIA
| Sig.ra Renata POLVERINIin rappresentanza UGL
| Sig. Virgilio RANOCCHIARIin rappresentanza di CONFINDUSTRIA
| Sig. Corrado ROSSITTOin rappresentanza CIU
| Sig. Claudio ROTTIin rappresentanza di CONFCOMMERCIO
| Sig. Valerio SALVATOREin rappresentanza CONFSALLatvia
| Ms Gunta ANČAThe Latvian Umbrella Body for Disability Organisations SUSTENTO, Chairperson
| Mr Andris BĒRZIŅŠParex Bank, member of the Board; ABkonsultants, owner
| Mr Vitālijs GAVRILOVS20 Ice-Balt Invest ehf, Vice-chairman; LTD “Vitalian”, Chairman of the Board; JSC Grindex, Vice-chairman of the Board
| Ms Irina HOMKOFree Trade Union Confederation of Latvia, Expert in social and economic and health care matters
| Mr Viesturs KOCIŅŠLatvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Head of the Foreign Trade Document Department
| Mr Armands KRAUZELatvian Beekeepers Association, Board Chairman, project manager
| Mr Pēteris KRĪGERSFree Trade Union Confederation of Latvia, President; Member of Consultative board of Latvian Social insurance government agencyLithuania
| Mr Danukas ARLAUSKASDirector General, Lithuanian Confederation of Business Employers
| Mr Linas LASIAUSKASDeputy Director General, Lithuanian Apparel and Textile Industry Association
| Mr Vitas MAČIULISDirector General, Association of Lithuanian Chambers of Commerce, Industry and Crafts
| Mr Gintaras MORKISDeputy Director General, Lithuanian Confederation of Industrialists
| Ms Daiva KVEDARAITĖDirector, Information and external relations centre of Lithuanian Trade Union „Solidarumas“
| Mr Algirdas Aleksandras KVEDARAVIČIUSVice-chairperson, Lithuanian Trade Union Confederation
| Ms Inga PREIDIENĖVice-chairperson, Lithuanian Labour Federation Youth Organization
| Mr Zenonas Rokus RUDZIKASPresident, Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
| Mr Algirdas ŠIUPŠINSKASMember of the Board, Lithuanian Consumer AssociationLuxembourg
| M. Paul JUNCKSecrétaire général Arcelor
| M. Raymond HENCKSMembre du comité exécutif de la Confédération générale de la fonction publique (CGFP)
| M. Jean-Claude REDINGPrésident de la Confédération générale du travail — Luxembourg (CGT-L/OGBL)
| Mme Josiane WILLEMSDirecteur de la Centrale paysanne luxembourgeoise (CPL)
| M. Paul RECKINGERPrésident de la chambre des métiers du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg
| M. Robert SCHADECKCoordinateur de mesures sociales de réinsertion (Confédération luxembourgeoise des syndicats chrétiens — LCGB)Hungary
| Mr Miklós BARABÁSDirector, European House Society
| Ms Ágnes CSERVice-chairman, Forum for the Co-Operation of Trade Unions, Confederation of Unions of Professionals
| Mr Antal CSUPORTActing Director, National Association of Strategic and Public Utility Companies
| Mr István GARAIActing chairman, National Association for Consumer Protection
| Dr Mária HERCZOGTechnical leader, Family, Youth, Children Public Benefit Organisation
| Mr József KAPUVÁRIMember of the Board, National Confederation of Hungarian Trade Unions
| Ms Erika KOLLERHead of International Department, Democratic League of Free Trade Unions
| Mr Tamás NAGYChairman, National Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives and Producers
| Dr Miklós PÁSZTORExpert, National Federation of Worker’s Councils
| Dr János TÓTHChairman responsible for International Affairs, Association of the Hungarian Industrial Parks
| Dr Péter VADÁSZCo-chairman, Federation of Hungarian Employers and Industrialists
| Mr János VÉRTESDirector of International Relations, National Federation of Traders and CaterersMalta
| Ms Grace ATTARDPresident of the National Council of Women
| Mr Edwin CALLEJAFederation of Industries (FOI)
| Ms Anna Maria DARMANINUnion Ħaddiema Magħqudin
| Mr Michael PARNISGeneral Workers Union
| Ms Sylvia SCIBERRASMalta Chamber of Small and Medium Enterprises (GRTU)Austria
| Frau Mag. Eva BELABEDLeiterin der Stabstelle EWSA und Internationale Angelegenheiten, Arbeiterkammer Oberösterreich
| Herr Mag. Thomas DELAPINAMitglied der wissenschaftlichen Abteilung, Arbeiterkammer Wien; Geschäftsführer des Beirats für Wirtschafts- und Sozialfragen
| Herr Mag. Wolfgang GREIFBereichsleiter der Abteilung Europa, Konzerne und internationale Beziehungen in der Gewerkschaft der Privatangestellten
| Frau Waltraud KLASNICLandeshauptmann a.D.
| Herr Dr. Johannes KLEEMANN„Konsulent der Industriellenvereinigung, ehem. Vorstandsmitglied der Industriellenvereinigung“
| Herr Mag. Hans KLETZMAYRVorsitzender des „Nationalkomitees der Österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft“
| Herr Dipl.-Ing. Johann KÖLTRINGERHauptabteilungsleiter des Österreichischen Raiffeisenverbandes
| Herr Mag. Heinz PETERDirektor der Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Vorarlberg
| Frau Mag. Evelyn REGNERLeiterin des ÖGB Europabüros in Brüssel
| Frau Mag. Christa SCHWENGReferentin — Wirtschaftskammer Österreich, Abteilung für Sozialpolitik und Gesundheit
| Frau Dr. Anne-Marie SIGMUNDEuropabeauftragte des Bundeskomitees der freien Berufe Österreichs
| Herr Gustav ZÖHRERInternationaler Sekretär der Gewerkschaft Metall-TextilSlovenia
| G. Bojan HRIBARsekretar Sindikata vzgoje, izobraževanja in raziskovalne dejavnosti
| G. Martin NOSEčlan upravnega odbora Kmetijsko gozdarske zbornice Slovenije in direktor Zadružne zveze Slovenije
| G. Dušan REBOLJpredsednik Konfederacije sindikatov Pergam Slovenije
| Ga. Metka ROKSANDIĆizvršna sekretarka Predsedstva Zveze svobodnih sindikatov Slovenije
| G. Primož ŠPORARdirektor Pravno-informacijskega centra nevladnih organizacij
| G. Mag. Cveto STANTIČpodpredsednik Gospodarske zbornice Slovenije
| G. Dare STOJANčlan upravnega odbora Obrtne zbornice Slovenije in predsednik Združenja delodajalcev obrtnih dejavnosti SlovenijeSlovakia
| Vladimír BÁLEŠprezident, Slovenská rektorská konferencia
| Martin CHRENriaditeľ, Nadácia F. A. Hayeka
| Martin KREKÁČprezident, Centrum pre hospodársky rozvoj – Podnikateľská aliancia Slovenska
| Vladimír MOJŠviceprezident, Konfederácia odborových zväzov
| Ján ORAVECčlen prezídia, Republiková únia zamestnávateľov
| Naile PROKEŠOVÁporadca, Konfederácia odborových zväzov
| Eugen ŠKULTÉTYviceprezident, Konfederácia odborových zväzov
| Juraj STERNpredseda správnej rady, Slovenská spoločnosť pre zahraničnú politiku
| Patrik ZOLTVÁNYčlen, Republiková únia zamestnávateľov

Pending: 32006D0415

16.6.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 164/51
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. Under certain circumstances the disease may also pose a risk to human health. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread to other holdings, to wild birds and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through the international trade in live birds or their products.
(2) Where a highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus of the subtype H5 is detected in a sample collected from poultry on the territory of a Member State and where, pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type, the clinical picture and the epidemiological circumstances justify the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 or the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza of that subtype has been confirmed, the affected Member State should apply certain protection measures to minimise the risk of disease spread.
(3) Such protection measures were adopted by Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the Community(5)to be implemented in addition to those adopted in the framework of Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(6), in particular as regards the movement of certain birds and of products from poultry and other birds originating in the zone affected by the disease.
(4) The measures laid down in Directive 92/40/EEC have been fundamentally reviewed in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risks of avian influenza for animal and public health, the development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the lessons learnt during recent outbreaks of this disease in the Community as well as in third countries. Taking account of that review, Directive 92/40/EEC was repealed and replaced by Directive 2005/94/EC, which is to be transposed by Member States into national law by 1 July 2007.
(5) Pending the transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC and given the current disease situation in relation to avian influenza in the Community it was necessary to lay down transitional measures to be applied on holdings where outbreaks of avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses are suspected or confirmed in poultry or other captive birds.
(6) Those transitional measures which are laid down in Commission Decision 2006/416/EC(7)should enable the Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by the different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved, while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific scenario are the most appropriate.
(7) With progress made in transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC by certain Member States, any reference to the transitional measures should be construed as a reference to the corresponding paragraph in Directive 2005/94/EC.
(8) However, given the particular disease risk and the epidemiological situation with regard to highly pathogenic avian influenza and taking into account the severe economic impact the disease may have, in particular when occurring in densely populated poultry areas, certain supplementary measures as adopted under Decision 2006/135/EC should be maintained. Those measures should aim at reinforcing the local control measures, regionalising the affected Member State by separating the affected part of the territory from the disease free part thereof, and providing reassurance to the poultry sector and the trade partners about the safety of products dispatched from the disease free part of the country.
(9) The measures provided for in Decision 2006/135/EC should be brought in line with those laid down in Decision 2006/416/EC and it is therefore appropriate for reasons of clarity and consistency to repeal Decision 2006/135/EC and replace it by the present Decision which only retains the additional control measures applicable to the specific disease situation with respect to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the H5N1 subtype.
(10) Taking account of the differences in disease risk in case of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, the affected Member State in close collaboration with the Commission should establish a high-risk area and a low-risk area which should be separated from the disease-free part of the territory.
(11) If the epidemiological situation so requires, measures appropriate in relation to the areas concerned by the outbreak or suspected outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza should be taken, in particular by describing these areas, and keeping this description updated depending on the situation, in the Annex to the present Decision in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC and Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC.
(12) The measures laid down in Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by Influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk(8)should be implemented in the areas affected by the disease.
(13) In the interests of consistency, it is appropriate for the purposes of this Decision to apply certain definitions provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC, Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(9), Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin(10), Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
(14) Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(11)provides for approved bodies, institutes and centres and a model certificate to accompany animals or their gametes between such approved premises in different Member States. A derogation from the transport restrictions should be envisaged for birds coming from and going to bodies, institutes and centres approved in accordance with that Directive.
(15) Transport of hatching eggs from the protection zones should be permitted under certain conditions. The dispatch of hatching eggs to other countries should be permitted subject in particular to compliance with the conditions referred to in Directive 2005/94/EC. In such cases the animal health certificates provided for in accordance with Directive 90/539/EEC should include a reference to this Decision.
(16) The dispatch from protection zones of meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat, meat preparations and meat products from wild feathered game should be permitted subject to certain conditions, in particular as regards compliance with certain requirements of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(12).
(17) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption(13)establishes a list of treatments rendering meat from restricted areas safe, provides for the possibility to establish a specific identification mark and sets out the identification mark required for meat not authorised for placing on the market for animal health reasons. It is appropriate to permit the dispatch from the protection zones of meat bearing the health mark provided for in that Directive and meat products subjected to treatment referred to therein.
(18) Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005 provides for transitional measures allowing the use of a national identification mark for products of animal origin intended for human consumption which may only be marketed in the territory of the Member State where they are produced.
(19) Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(14)authorises the placing on the market of a range of animal by-products originating in areas of the Community under animal health restrictions, because those products are considered safe due to the specific conditions of production, processing and utilisation that effectively inactivate possible pathogens or prevent contact with susceptible animals.
(20) Taking account of the measures in place following an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in a backyard poultry flock in Denmark and the establishment of areas A and B in accordance with Article 2(4)(b) and (c) of Decision 2006/135/EC these areas should continue to be listed in the Annex of this Decision and further areas A and B should be included following a recent outbreak of avian influenza of the subtype H5 in a geese flock in Hungary.
(21) Decision 2006/135/EC should therefore be repealed and replaced by this Decision.
(22) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
(a) ‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation laid by poultry as defined in Article 2(4) of Directive 2005/94/EC;
(b) ‘wild feathered game’ means game as defined in point 1.5, second indent, and as far as avian species are concerned, in point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c) ‘other captive birds’ means birds as defined in point 6 of Article 2 of Directive 2005/94/EC, including:(i)pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; and(ii)birds destined for approved bodies, institutes or centres as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 92/65/EEC. (i) pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; and (ii) birds destined for approved bodies, institutes or centres as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 92/65/EEC.
(i) pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; and
(ii) birds destined for approved bodies, institutes or centres as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 92/65/EEC.
(i) pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; and
(ii) birds destined for approved bodies, institutes or centres as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 92/65/EEC.
(a) notify the Commission and the other Member States;
(b) apply the measures provided for in Article 5:(i)for at least 21 days in the case of the protection zone and 30 days in the case of the surveillance zone after the date of completion of the preliminary cleansing and disinfection on the outbreak holding in accordance with Article 7(7) of Decision 2006/416/EC; and(ii)as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza; or(iii)until the date indicated for the affected Member State in the Annex; (i) for at least 21 days in the case of the protection zone and 30 days in the case of the surveillance zone after the date of completion of the preliminary cleansing and disinfection on the outbreak holding in accordance with Article 7(7) of Decision 2006/416/EC; and (ii) as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza; or (iii) until the date indicated for the affected Member State in the Annex;
(i) for at least 21 days in the case of the protection zone and 30 days in the case of the surveillance zone after the date of completion of the preliminary cleansing and disinfection on the outbreak holding in accordance with Article 7(7) of Decision 2006/416/EC; and
(ii) as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza; or
(iii) until the date indicated for the affected Member State in the Annex;
(i) for at least 21 days in the case of the protection zone and 30 days in the case of the surveillance zone after the date of completion of the preliminary cleansing and disinfection on the outbreak holding in accordance with Article 7(7) of Decision 2006/416/EC; and
(ii) as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza; or
(iii) until the date indicated for the affected Member State in the Annex;
(c) keep the Commission and the other Member States informed about any development with regard to areas A and B.
(a) no live poultry and other captive birds, except birds referred to in Article 2(c)(i) and (ii), and hatching eggs of poultry, other captive birds, except those from birds referred to in Article 2(c)(ii), and of wild feathered game birds are dispatched from area B to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States or to third countries;
(b) no products intended for human consumption derived from wild feathered game, are dispatched from areas A and B to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States and to third countries;
(c) no animal by-products derived entirely or partially from avian species from areas A and B and subject to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 are transported between areas A and B or dispatched from those areas to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States or to third countries;
(d) no poultry or other captive birds are gathered at gatherings within area B such as fairs, markets or shows.
(a) the competent authorities have agreed;
(b) no other poultry is kept on the designated holding;
(c) the designated holding is placed under official surveillance;
(d) the poultry remain on the designated holding for at least 21 days.
(a) to holdings under official control in the affected Member State, preferably situated outside area A;
(b) to any holding, preferably situated outside area A, provided that the day-old chicks are hatched from eggs complying with the requirements in Article 7(1)(b);
(c) to any holding, preferably situated outside area A, provided that the day-old chicks are hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated outside areas A and B and were transported in disinfected packaging.
(a) collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area B, to a designated hatchery in the affected Member State, or following agreement between the competent authorities, to a designated hatchery in another Member State or third country;
(b) collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area B, on which the poultry have tested negative in a serological survey for avian influenza capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence and traceability is ensured, to any hatchery.
(a) meat products produced from meat from wild feathered game originating in area A or B which were subjected to a treatment as required for avian influenza in row 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC;
(b) fresh meat from wild feathered game originating outside the areas A and B and produced in establishments within area A or B in accordance with Section IV of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and controlled in accordance with Chapter VIII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(c) minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products containing meat referred to in point (b) and produced in establishments situated in area A or B in accordance with Sections V and VI of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
(a) the dispatch from area A or B of animal by-products of avian origin which:(i)comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V,—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or(ii)are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to designated, plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; or(iii)are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; (i) comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V,—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or — Annex V, — Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and — Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or (ii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to designated, plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; or (iii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(i) comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V,—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or — Annex V, — Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and — Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
— Annex V,
— Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and
— Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to designated, plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; or
(iii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(i) comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:—Annex V,—Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and—Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or — Annex V, — Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and — Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
— Annex V,
— Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and
— Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
— Annex V,
— Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and
— Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to designated, plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; or
(iii) are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(b) the dispatch from area B of untreated feathers or parts of feathers in accordance with point 1(a) of Section A of Chapter VIII of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, produced from poultry or farmed feathered game;
(c) the dispatch from area A or B of feathers and parts of feathers that have been treated with a steam current, or by some other method that ensures that no pathogens remain, produced from poultry or wild feathered game.
ISO Country Code Member State Area A Date until applicable Art. 4(4)(b)
Code (if available) Name
DK DENMARK In the county of Funen the municipalities of:ÅRSLEVKERTEMINDELANGESKOVMUNKEBONYBORGODENSEØRBÆKOTTERUPRINGERYSLINGEULLERSLEV ÅRSLEV KERTEMINDE LANGESKOV MUNKEBO NYBORG ODENSE ØRBÆK OTTERUP RINGE RYSLINGE ULLERSLEV 28.6.2006
ÅRSLEV
KERTEMINDE
LANGESKOV
MUNKEBO
NYBORG
ODENSE
ØRBÆK
OTTERUP
RINGE
RYSLINGE
ULLERSLEV
HU HUNGARY In the county of Bács-Kiskun the municipalities of:KISKŐRÖSKECELIMREHEGYORGOVÁNYKASKANTYÚBÓCSASOLTVADKERTTÁZLÁRPIRTÓKISKUNHALASJAKABSZÁLLÁSBUGACPUSZTAHÁZABUGACSZANKKISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁRHARKAKÖTÖNYFÜLÖPJAKABMÓRICGÁTPETŐFISZÁLLÁSJÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓKISKUNMAJSAKISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZAGÁTÉRPÁLMONOSTORAKÖMPÖCCSÓLYOSPÁLOS KISKŐRÖS KECEL IMREHEGY ORGOVÁNY KASKANTYÚ BÓCSA SOLTVADKERT TÁZLÁR PIRTÓ KISKUNHALAS JAKABSZÁLLÁS BUGACPUSZTAHÁZA BUGAC SZANK KISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁR HARKAKÖTÖNY FÜLÖPJAKAB MÓRICGÁT PETŐFISZÁLLÁS JÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓ KISKUNMAJSA KISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZA GÁTÉR PÁLMONOSTORA KÖMPÖC CSÓLYOSPÁLOS 9.7.2006
KISKŐRÖS
KECEL
IMREHEGY
ORGOVÁNY
KASKANTYÚ
BÓCSA
SOLTVADKERT
TÁZLÁR
PIRTÓ
KISKUNHALAS
JAKABSZÁLLÁS
BUGACPUSZTAHÁZA
BUGAC
SZANK
KISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁR
HARKAKÖTÖNY
FÜLÖPJAKAB
MÓRICGÁT
PETŐFISZÁLLÁS
JÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓ
KISKUNMAJSA
KISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZA
GÁTÉR
PÁLMONOSTORA
KÖMPÖC
CSÓLYOSPÁLOS
In the county Csongrád the municipalities of:ÜLLÉSBORDÁNYZSOMBÓSZATYMAZSÁNDORFALVAFELGYŐFORRÁSKÚTBALÁSTYADÓCKISTELEKÓPUSZTASZERCSONGRÁDBAKSCSENGELEPUSZTASZERCSANYTELEKTÖMÖRKÉNY ÜLLÉS BORDÁNY ZSOMBÓ SZATYMAZ SÁNDORFALVA FELGYŐ FORRÁSKÚT BALÁSTYA DÓC KISTELEK ÓPUSZTASZER CSONGRÁD BAKS CSENGELE PUSZTASZER CSANYTELEK TÖMÖRKÉNY 9.7.2006
ÜLLÉS
BORDÁNY
ZSOMBÓ
SZATYMAZ
SÁNDORFALVA
FELGYŐ
FORRÁSKÚT
BALÁSTYA
DÓC
KISTELEK
ÓPUSZTASZER
CSONGRÁD
BAKS
CSENGELE
PUSZTASZER
CSANYTELEK
TÖMÖRKÉNY
ÅRSLEV
KERTEMINDE
LANGESKOV
MUNKEBO
NYBORG
ODENSE
ØRBÆK
OTTERUP
RINGE
RYSLINGE
ULLERSLEV
KISKŐRÖS
KECEL
IMREHEGY
ORGOVÁNY
KASKANTYÚ
BÓCSA
SOLTVADKERT
TÁZLÁR
PIRTÓ
KISKUNHALAS
JAKABSZÁLLÁS
BUGACPUSZTAHÁZA
BUGAC
SZANK
KISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁR
HARKAKÖTÖNY
FÜLÖPJAKAB
MÓRICGÁT
PETŐFISZÁLLÁS
JÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓ
KISKUNMAJSA
KISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZA
GÁTÉR
PÁLMONOSTORA
KÖMPÖC
CSÓLYOSPÁLOS
ÜLLÉS
BORDÁNY
ZSOMBÓ
SZATYMAZ
SÁNDORFALVA
FELGYŐ
FORRÁSKÚT
BALÁSTYA
DÓC
KISTELEK
ÓPUSZTASZER
CSONGRÁD
BAKS
CSENGELE
PUSZTASZER
CSANYTELEK
TÖMÖRKÉNY
ISO Country Code Member State Area B Date until applicable Art. 4(4)(b)
Code (if available) Name
DK DENMARK ADNS The county of: 28.6.2006
00700 FUNEN
HU HUNGARY ADNS The counties of: 9.7.2006
00003 BÁCS-KISKUN
00006 CSONGRÁD
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC(3), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC(4), and in particular Article 66(2) thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. Under certain circumstances the disease may also pose a risk to human health. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread to other holdings, to wild birds and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through the international trade in live birds or their products.
(2) Where a highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus of the subtype H5 is detected in a sample collected from poultry on the territory of a Member State and where, pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type, the clinical picture and the epidemiological circumstances justify the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 or the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza of that subtype has been confirmed, the affected Member State should apply certain protection measures to minimise the risk of disease spread.
(3) Such protection measures were adopted by Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the Community(5)to be implemented in addition to those adopted in the framework of Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(6), in particular as regards the movement of certain birds and of products from poultry and other birds originating in the zone affected by the disease.
(4) The measures laid down in Directive 92/40/EEC have been fundamentally reviewed in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risks of avian influenza for animal and public health, the development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the lessons learnt during recent outbreaks of this disease in the Community as well as in third countries. Taking account of that review, Directive 92/40/EEC was repealed and replaced by Directive 2005/94/EC, which is to be transposed by Member States into national law by 1 July 2007.
(5) Pending the transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC and given the current disease situation in relation to avian influenza in the Community it was necessary to lay down transitional measures to be applied on holdings where outbreaks of avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses are suspected or confirmed in poultry or other captive birds.
(6) Those transitional measures which are laid down in Commission Decision 2006/416/EC(7)should enable the Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by the different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved, while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific scenario are the most appropriate.
(7) With progress made in transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC by certain Member States, any reference to the transitional measures should be construed as a reference to the corresponding paragraph in Directive 2005/94/EC.
(8) However, given the particular disease risk and the epidemiological situation with regard to highly pathogenic avian influenza and taking into account the severe economic impact the disease may have, in particular when occurring in densely populated poultry areas, certain supplementary measures as adopted under Decision 2006/135/EC should be maintained. Those measures should aim at reinforcing the local control measures, regionalising the affected Member State by separating the affected part of the territory from the disease free part thereof, and providing reassurance to the poultry sector and the trade partners about the safety of products dispatched from the disease free part of the country.
(9) The measures provided for in Decision 2006/135/EC should be brought in line with those laid down in Decision 2006/416/EC and it is therefore appropriate for reasons of clarity and consistency to repeal Decision 2006/135/EC and replace it by the present Decision which only retains the additional control measures applicable to the specific disease situation with respect to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the H5N1 subtype.
(10) Taking account of the differences in disease risk in case of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, the affected Member State in close collaboration with the Commission should establish a high-risk area and a low-risk area which should be separated from the disease-free part of the territory.
(11) If the epidemiological situation so requires, measures appropriate in relation to the areas concerned by the outbreak or suspected outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza should be taken, in particular by describing these areas, and keeping this description updated depending on the situation, in the Annex to the present Decision in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC and Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC.
(12) The measures laid down in Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by Influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk(8)should be implemented in the areas affected by the disease.
(13) In the interests of consistency, it is appropriate for the purposes of this Decision to apply certain definitions provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC, Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(9), Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin(10), Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
(14) Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(11)provides for approved bodies, institutes and centres and a model certificate to accompany animals or their gametes between such approved premises in different Member States. A derogation from the transport restrictions should be envisaged for birds coming from and going to bodies, institutes and centres approved in accordance with that Directive.
(15) Transport of hatching eggs from the protection zones should be permitted under certain conditions. The dispatch of hatching eggs to other countries should be permitted subject in particular to compliance with the conditions referred to in Directive 2005/94/EC. In such cases the animal health certificates provided for in accordance with Directive 90/539/EEC should include a reference to this Decision.
(16) The dispatch from protection zones of meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat, meat preparations and meat products from wild feathered game should be permitted subject to certain conditions, in particular as regards compliance with certain requirements of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(12).
(17) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption(13)establishes a list of treatments rendering meat from restricted areas safe, provides for the possibility to establish a specific identification mark and sets out the identification mark required for meat not authorised for placing on the market for animal health reasons. It is appropriate to permit the dispatch from the protection zones of meat bearing the health mark provided for in that Directive and meat products subjected to treatment referred to therein.
(18) Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005 provides for transitional measures allowing the use of a national identification mark for products of animal origin intended for human consumption which may only be marketed in the territory of the Member State where they are produced.
(19) Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(14)authorises the placing on the market of a range of animal by-products originating in areas of the Community under animal health restrictions, because those products are considered safe due to the specific conditions of production, processing and utilisation that effectively inactivate possible pathogens or prevent contact with susceptible animals.
(20) Taking account of the measures in place following an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in a backyard poultry flock in Denmark and the establishment of areas A and B in accordance with Article 2(4)(b) and (c) of Decision 2006/135/EC these areas should continue to be listed in the Annex of this Decision and further areas A and B should be included following a recent outbreak of avian influenza of the subtype H5 in a geese flock in Hungary.
(21) Decision 2006/135/EC should therefore be repealed and replaced by this Decision.
(22) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Subject matter and scope
Article 1
1. This Decision lays down certain protection measures to be applied in cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the territory of a Member State (the ‘affected Member State’), caused by a highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5 suspected (‘suspected outbreak’) or confirmed (‘outbreak’) to be of the neuraminidase type N1, in order to prevent the spread of avian influenza into the disease free parts of the Community through movement of poultry, other birds as well as products thereof.
2. The measures laid down in this Decision shall be applied without prejudice to the measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry taken in accordance with Decision 2006/416/EC.

Definitions
Article 2
For the purpose of this Decision, the definitions in Directive 2005/94/EC shall apply. In addition, the following definitions shall apply:
(a)
‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation laid by poultry as defined in Article 2(4) of Directive 2005/94/EC;
(b)
‘wild feathered game’ means game as defined in point 1.5, second indent, and as far as avian species are concerned, in point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c)
‘other captive birds’ means birds as defined in point 6 of Article 2 of Directive 2005/94/EC, including:
(i)
pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; and
(ii)
birds destined for approved bodies, institutes or centres as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 92/65/EEC.

Areas A and B
Article 3
1. The area listed in Part A of the Annex, (‘area A’), is classified as the high risk area consisting of the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 11 of Decision 2006/416/EC.
2. The area listed in Part B of the Annex, (‘area B’), is classified as the low risk area which may include all or parts of the further restricted zone established in accordance with Article 11 of Decision 2006/416/EC, and which shall separate area A from the disease free part of the affected Member State, if such part is identified, or neighbouring countries.

Establishment of areas A and B
Article 4
1. Immediately following a suspected or confirmed outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5 suspected or confirmed to be of the neuraminidase type N1, the affected Member State shall establish area A, having regard to the legal requirements as set out in Article 11 of Decision 2006/416/EC, and area B having regard to geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza, and notify them to the Commission, to the other Member States and, as appropriate, to the public.
2. The Commission, in collaboration with the affected Member State, shall examine the areas established by the affected Member State and take the appropriate measures in relation to those areas pursuant to Article 9(3) and (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC and Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC.
3. If the neuraminidase type is confirmed as being different from N1, the affected Member State shall abolish the measures taken by it in relation to the areas concerned and notify the Commission and the other Member States.
The Commission, in collaboration with the affected Member State, shall take the appropriate measures pursuant to Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC and Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC.
4. If the presence of a highly pathogenic influenza A virus of the subtype H5N1 is confirmed in poultry, the affected Member States shall:
(a)
notify the Commission and the other Member States;
(b)
apply the measures provided for in Article 5:
(i)
for at least 21 days in the case of the protection zone and 30 days in the case of the surveillance zone after the date of completion of the preliminary cleansing and disinfection on the outbreak holding in accordance with Article 7(7) of Decision 2006/416/EC; and
(ii)
as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza; or
(iii)
until the date indicated for the affected Member State in the Annex;
(c)
keep the Commission and the other Member States informed about any development with regard to areas A and B.
The Commission, in collaboration with the affected Member State, shall take the appropriate measures pursuant to Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC and Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC.

General prohibition
Article 5
In addition to the restrictions on movement of poultry, other captive birds, their hatching eggs and products derived from such birds laid down in Decision 2006/416/EC for holdings in the protection, surveillance and further restriction zones, the affected Member State shall ensure that:
(a)
no live poultry and other captive birds, except birds referred to in Article 2(c)(i) and (ii), and hatching eggs of poultry, other captive birds, except those from birds referred to in Article 2(c)(ii), and of wild feathered game birds are dispatched from area B to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States or to third countries;
(b)
no products intended for human consumption derived from wild feathered game, are dispatched from areas A and B to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States and to third countries;
(c)
no animal by-products derived entirely or partially from avian species from areas A and B and subject to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 are transported between areas A and B or dispatched from those areas to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States or to third countries;
(d)
no poultry or other captive birds are gathered at gatherings within area B such as fairs, markets or shows.

Derogations for live poultry and day-old chicks
Article 6
1. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the direct transport of poultry from holdings in area B, to slaughterhouses in the affected Member State designated by the competent authority, or following agreement between the competent authorities, to a designated slaughterhouse in another Member State or third country.
2. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the direct transport of poultry from holdings in area B to holdings under official control in the same Member State where the poultry shall remain for at least 21 days.
3. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the direct transport of poultry from holdings in area B to a designated holding in another Member State or a third country, provided that:
(a)
the competent authorities have agreed;
(b)
no other poultry is kept on the designated holding;
(c)
the designated holding is placed under official surveillance;
(d)
the poultry remain on the designated holding for at least 21 days.
4. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of day-old chicks from a hatchery situated in area B:
(a)
to holdings under official control in the affected Member State, preferably situated outside area A;
(b)
to any holding, preferably situated outside area A, provided that the day-old chicks are hatched from eggs complying with the requirements in Article 7(1)(b);
(c)
to any holding, preferably situated outside area A, provided that the day-old chicks are hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated outside areas A and B and were transported in disinfected packaging.
5. The animal health certificates accompanying consignments of poultry or day-old chicks referred to in paragraph 1, 2, 3 and 4(b) and (c) to other Member States shall include the words:
‘The consignment complies with the animal health conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2006/415/EC’.
6. Movements pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 shall be executed under official control. They shall be authorised only after the official veterinarian has ascertained that the holding of origin is not subject to any suspicion relating to highly pathogenic avian influenza. The means of transport used must be cleaned and disinfected before and after use.

Derogations for hatching eggs and SPF-eggs
Article 7
1. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch of hatching eggs
(a)
collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area B, to a designated hatchery in the affected Member State, or following agreement between the competent authorities, to a designated hatchery in another Member State or third country;
(b)
collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area B, on which the poultry have tested negative in a serological survey for avian influenza capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence and traceability is ensured, to any hatchery.
2. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State shall authorise the dispatch of hatching eggs or SPF-eggs for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical uses collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area A or B to designated laboratories, institutes, pharmaceutical or vaccine producers in the affected Member State, or following agreement between the competent authorities, in another Member State or a third country.
3. The animal health certificates accompanying consignments of hatching eggs referred to in paragraphs 1(a) and (b) and 2 to other Member States shall include the words:
‘The consignment complies with the animal health conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2006/415/EC’.
4. Movements which are permitted pursuant to paragraph 1 or 2 shall be executed under official control. They shall be authorised only after the official veterinarian has ascertained that the holding of origin is not subject to any suspicion relating to highly pathogenic avian influenza. The means of transport used must be cleaned and disinfected before and after use.

Derogations for meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of wild feathered game and meat preparations and meat products prepared from such meat
Article 8
1. By way of derogation from Article 5(b), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch onto the national market of fresh meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat and meat preparations or meat products from wild feathered game originating in area A or B, if such meat is marked with the health mark referred to in Annex II to Directive 2002/99/EC or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005.
2. By way of derogation from Article 5(b), the affected Member State shall authorise the dispatch of:
(a)
meat products produced from meat from wild feathered game originating in area A or B which were subjected to a treatment as required for avian influenza in row 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC;
(b)
fresh meat from wild feathered game originating outside the areas A and B and produced in establishments within area A or B in accordance with Section IV of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and controlled in accordance with Chapter VIII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(c)
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products containing meat referred to in point (b) and produced in establishments situated in area A or B in accordance with Sections V and VI of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.

Derogation for animal by-products
Article 9
1. By way of derogation from Article 5(c), the affected Member State shall authorise:
(a)
the dispatch from area A or B of animal by-products of avian origin which:
(i)
comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:
—
Annex V,
—
Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and
—
Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to designated, plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; or
(iii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(b)
the dispatch from area B of untreated feathers or parts of feathers in accordance with point 1(a) of Section A of Chapter VIII of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, produced from poultry or farmed feathered game;
(c)
the dispatch from area A or B of feathers and parts of feathers that have been treated with a steam current, or by some other method that ensures that no pathogens remain, produced from poultry or wild feathered game.
2. The affected Member State shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c) of this Article are accompanied by a commercial document in accordance with Chapter X of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 stating, in the case of the products referred to in paragraph 1(c) of this Article, in point 6.1 of that document that those products have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring that no pathogens remain.
However, that commercial document shall not be required for processed decorative feathers, processed feathers carried by travellers for their private use or consignments of processed feathers sent to private individuals for non-industrial purpose.

Conditions for movements
Article 10
1. Where movements of animals or products thereof covered by this Decision are authorised under Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9, the authorisation shall be based on the favourable outcome of a risk assessment carried out by the competent authority and all appropriate biosecurity measures shall be taken to avoid the spread of avian influenza.
2. Where the dispatch, movement or transport of products referred to in paragraph 1 are authorised under Articles 7, 8 and 9, subject to justified conditions or limitations, they must be obtained, handled, treated, stored and transported without compromising the animal health status of other products fulfilling all the animal health requirements for trade, placing on the market or export to third countries.

Compliance and information
Article 11
All Member States shall immediately adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
The affected Member State shall apply those measures as soon as it reasonably suspects the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the subtype H5N1 in poultry.
The affected Member State shall regularly provide to the Commission and the other Member States the necessary information on the epidemiology of the disease and, where appropriate the additional control and surveillance measures and the awareness campaigns implemented.

Validity
Article 12
This Decision shall apply until 30 June 2007.

Repeal
Article 13
Decision 2006/135/EC is repealed.

Addressee
Article 14
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC(3), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC(4), and in particular Article 66(2) thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. Under certain circumstances the disease may also pose a risk to human health. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread to other holdings, to wild birds and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through the international trade in live birds or their products.
(2) Where a highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus of the subtype H5 is detected in a sample collected from poultry on the territory of a Member State and where, pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type, the clinical picture and the epidemiological circumstances justify the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 or the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza of that subtype has been confirmed, the affected Member State should apply certain protection measures to minimise the risk of disease spread.
(3) Such protection measures were adopted by Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the Community(5)to be implemented in addition to those adopted in the framework of Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza(6), in particular as regards the movement of certain birds and of products from poultry and other birds originating in the zone affected by the disease.
(4) The measures laid down in Directive 92/40/EEC have been fundamentally reviewed in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risks of avian influenza for animal and public health, the development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the lessons learnt during recent outbreaks of this disease in the Community as well as in third countries. Taking account of that review, Directive 92/40/EEC was repealed and replaced by Directive 2005/94/EC, which is to be transposed by Member States into national law by 1 July 2007.
(5) Pending the transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC and given the current disease situation in relation to avian influenza in the Community it was necessary to lay down transitional measures to be applied on holdings where outbreaks of avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses are suspected or confirmed in poultry or other captive birds.
(6) Those transitional measures which are laid down in Commission Decision 2006/416/EC(7)should enable the Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by the different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved, while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific scenario are the most appropriate.
(7) With progress made in transposition of Directive 2005/94/EC by certain Member States, any reference to the transitional measures should be construed as a reference to the corresponding paragraph in Directive 2005/94/EC.
(8) However, given the particular disease risk and the epidemiological situation with regard to highly pathogenic avian influenza and taking into account the severe economic impact the disease may have, in particular when occurring in densely populated poultry areas, certain supplementary measures as adopted under Decision 2006/135/EC should be maintained. Those measures should aim at reinforcing the local control measures, regionalising the affected Member State by separating the affected part of the territory from the disease free part thereof, and providing reassurance to the poultry sector and the trade partners about the safety of products dispatched from the disease free part of the country.
(9) The measures provided for in Decision 2006/135/EC should be brought in line with those laid down in Decision 2006/416/EC and it is therefore appropriate for reasons of clarity and consistency to repeal Decision 2006/135/EC and replace it by the present Decision which only retains the additional control measures applicable to the specific disease situation with respect to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the H5N1 subtype.
(10) Taking account of the differences in disease risk in case of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, the affected Member State in close collaboration with the Commission should establish a high-risk area and a low-risk area which should be separated from the disease-free part of the territory.
(11) If the epidemiological situation so requires, measures appropriate in relation to the areas concerned by the outbreak or suspected outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza should be taken, in particular by describing these areas, and keeping this description updated depending on the situation, in the Annex to the present Decision in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC and Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC.
(12) The measures laid down in Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by Influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk(8)should be implemented in the areas affected by the disease.
(13) In the interests of consistency, it is appropriate for the purposes of this Decision to apply certain definitions provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC, Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(9), Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin(10), Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
(14) Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(11)provides for approved bodies, institutes and centres and a model certificate to accompany animals or their gametes between such approved premises in different Member States. A derogation from the transport restrictions should be envisaged for birds coming from and going to bodies, institutes and centres approved in accordance with that Directive.
(15) Transport of hatching eggs from the protection zones should be permitted under certain conditions. The dispatch of hatching eggs to other countries should be permitted subject in particular to compliance with the conditions referred to in Directive 2005/94/EC. In such cases the animal health certificates provided for in accordance with Directive 90/539/EEC should include a reference to this Decision.
(16) The dispatch from protection zones of meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat, meat preparations and meat products from wild feathered game should be permitted subject to certain conditions, in particular as regards compliance with certain requirements of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(12).
(17) Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption(13)establishes a list of treatments rendering meat from restricted areas safe, provides for the possibility to establish a specific identification mark and sets out the identification mark required for meat not authorised for placing on the market for animal health reasons. It is appropriate to permit the dispatch from the protection zones of meat bearing the health mark provided for in that Directive and meat products subjected to treatment referred to therein.
(18) Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005 provides for transitional measures allowing the use of a national identification mark for products of animal origin intended for human consumption which may only be marketed in the territory of the Member State where they are produced.
(19) Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(14)authorises the placing on the market of a range of animal by-products originating in areas of the Community under animal health restrictions, because those products are considered safe due to the specific conditions of production, processing and utilisation that effectively inactivate possible pathogens or prevent contact with susceptible animals.
(20) Taking account of the measures in place following an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in a backyard poultry flock in Denmark and the establishment of areas A and B in accordance with Article 2(4)(b) and (c) of Decision 2006/135/EC these areas should continue to be listed in the Annex of this Decision and further areas A and B should be included following a recent outbreak of avian influenza of the subtype H5 in a geese flock in Hungary.
(21) Decision 2006/135/EC should therefore be repealed and replaced by this Decision.
(22) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Subject matter and scope

1. This Decision lays down certain protection measures to be applied in cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry in the territory of a Member State (the ‘affected Member State’), caused by a highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5 suspected (‘suspected outbreak’) or confirmed (‘outbreak’) to be of the neuraminidase type N1, in order to prevent the spread of avian influenza into the disease free parts of the Community through movement of poultry, other birds as well as products thereof.
2. The measures laid down in this Decision shall be applied without prejudice to the measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry taken in accordance with Decision 2006/416/EC.

Definitions

For the purpose of this Decision, the definitions in Directive 2005/94/EC shall apply. In addition, the following definitions shall apply:
(a)
‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation laid by poultry as defined in Article 2(4) of Directive 2005/94/EC;
(b)
‘wild feathered game’ means game as defined in point 1.5, second indent, and as far as avian species are concerned, in point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;
(c)
‘other captive birds’ means birds as defined in point 6 of Article 2 of Directive 2005/94/EC, including:
(i)
pet animals of the bird species as referred to in Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003; and
(ii)
birds destined for approved bodies, institutes or centres as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 92/65/EEC.

Areas A and B

1. The area listed in Part A of the Annex, (‘area A’), is classified as the high risk area consisting of the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 11 of Decision 2006/416/EC.
2. The area listed in Part B of the Annex, (‘area B’), is classified as the low risk area which may include all or parts of the further restricted zone established in accordance with Article 11 of Decision 2006/416/EC, and which shall separate area A from the disease free part of the affected Member State, if such part is identified, or neighbouring countries.

Establishment of areas A and B

1. Immediately following a suspected or confirmed outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5 suspected or confirmed to be of the neuraminidase type N1, the affected Member State shall establish area A, having regard to the legal requirements as set out in Article 11 of Decision 2006/416/EC, and area B having regard to geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza, and notify them to the Commission, to the other Member States and, as appropriate, to the public.
2. The Commission, in collaboration with the affected Member State, shall examine the areas established by the affected Member State and take the appropriate measures in relation to those areas pursuant to Article 9(3) and (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC and Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC.
3. If the neuraminidase type is confirmed as being different from N1, the affected Member State shall abolish the measures taken by it in relation to the areas concerned and notify the Commission and the other Member States.
The Commission, in collaboration with the affected Member State, shall take the appropriate measures pursuant to Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC and Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC.
4. If the presence of a highly pathogenic influenza A virus of the subtype H5N1 is confirmed in poultry, the affected Member States shall:
(a)
notify the Commission and the other Member States;
(b)
apply the measures provided for in Article 5:
(i)
for at least 21 days in the case of the protection zone and 30 days in the case of the surveillance zone after the date of completion of the preliminary cleansing and disinfection on the outbreak holding in accordance with Article 7(7) of Decision 2006/416/EC; and
(ii)
as long as is necessary having regard to the geographical, administrative, ecological and epizootiological factors relating to avian influenza; or
(iii)
until the date indicated for the affected Member State in the Annex;
(c)
keep the Commission and the other Member States informed about any development with regard to areas A and B.
The Commission, in collaboration with the affected Member State, shall take the appropriate measures pursuant to Article 9(3) or (4) of Directive 89/662/EEC and Article 10(3) or (4) of Directive 90/425/EEC.

General prohibition

In addition to the restrictions on movement of poultry, other captive birds, their hatching eggs and products derived from such birds laid down in Decision 2006/416/EC for holdings in the protection, surveillance and further restriction zones, the affected Member State shall ensure that:
(a)
no live poultry and other captive birds, except birds referred to in Article 2(c)(i) and (ii), and hatching eggs of poultry, other captive birds, except those from birds referred to in Article 2(c)(ii), and of wild feathered game birds are dispatched from area B to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States or to third countries;
(b)
no products intended for human consumption derived from wild feathered game, are dispatched from areas A and B to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States and to third countries;
(c)
no animal by-products derived entirely or partially from avian species from areas A and B and subject to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 are transported between areas A and B or dispatched from those areas to the remaining part of the territory of the affected Member State, if applicable, or to other Member States or to third countries;
(d)
no poultry or other captive birds are gathered at gatherings within area B such as fairs, markets or shows.

Derogations for live poultry and day-old chicks

1. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the direct transport of poultry from holdings in area B, to slaughterhouses in the affected Member State designated by the competent authority, or following agreement between the competent authorities, to a designated slaughterhouse in another Member State or third country.
2. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the direct transport of poultry from holdings in area B to holdings under official control in the same Member State where the poultry shall remain for at least 21 days.
3. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the direct transport of poultry from holdings in area B to a designated holding in another Member State or a third country, provided that:
(a)
the competent authorities have agreed;
(b)
no other poultry is kept on the designated holding;
(c)
the designated holding is placed under official surveillance;
(d)
the poultry remain on the designated holding for at least 21 days.
4. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the transport of day-old chicks from a hatchery situated in area B:
(a)
to holdings under official control in the affected Member State, preferably situated outside area A;
(b)
to any holding, preferably situated outside area A, provided that the day-old chicks are hatched from eggs complying with the requirements in Article 7(1)(b);
(c)
to any holding, preferably situated outside area A, provided that the day-old chicks are hatched from eggs collected from holdings which were on the date of collection situated outside areas A and B and were transported in disinfected packaging.
5. The animal health certificates accompanying consignments of poultry or day-old chicks referred to in paragraph 1, 2, 3 and 4(b) and (c) to other Member States shall include the words:
‘The consignment complies with the animal health conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2006/415/EC’.
6. Movements pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 shall be executed under official control. They shall be authorised only after the official veterinarian has ascertained that the holding of origin is not subject to any suspicion relating to highly pathogenic avian influenza. The means of transport used must be cleaned and disinfected before and after use.

Derogations for hatching eggs and SPF-eggs

1. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch of hatching eggs
(a)
collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area B, to a designated hatchery in the affected Member State, or following agreement between the competent authorities, to a designated hatchery in another Member State or third country;
(b)
collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area B, on which the poultry have tested negative in a serological survey for avian influenza capable of detecting 5 % prevalence of disease with at least a 95 % level of confidence and traceability is ensured, to any hatchery.
2. By way of derogation from Article 5(a), the affected Member State shall authorise the dispatch of hatching eggs or SPF-eggs for scientific, diagnostic or pharmaceutical uses collected from holdings situated on the day of collection in area A or B to designated laboratories, institutes, pharmaceutical or vaccine producers in the affected Member State, or following agreement between the competent authorities, in another Member State or a third country.
3. The animal health certificates accompanying consignments of hatching eggs referred to in paragraphs 1(a) and (b) and 2 to other Member States shall include the words:
‘The consignment complies with the animal health conditions laid down in Commission Decision 2006/415/EC’.
4. Movements which are permitted pursuant to paragraph 1 or 2 shall be executed under official control. They shall be authorised only after the official veterinarian has ascertained that the holding of origin is not subject to any suspicion relating to highly pathogenic avian influenza. The means of transport used must be cleaned and disinfected before and after use.

Derogations for meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of wild feathered game and meat preparations and meat products prepared from such meat

1. By way of derogation from Article 5(b), the affected Member State may authorise the dispatch onto the national market of fresh meat, minced meat, mechanically separated meat and meat preparations or meat products from wild feathered game originating in area A or B, if such meat is marked with the health mark referred to in Annex II to Directive 2002/99/EC or the national mark established in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005.
2. By way of derogation from Article 5(b), the affected Member State shall authorise the dispatch of:
(a)
meat products produced from meat from wild feathered game originating in area A or B which were subjected to a treatment as required for avian influenza in row 1(a), (b) or (c) of Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC;
(b)
fresh meat from wild feathered game originating outside the areas A and B and produced in establishments within area A or B in accordance with Section IV of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and controlled in accordance with Chapter VIII of Section IV of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
(c)
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products containing meat referred to in point (b) and produced in establishments situated in area A or B in accordance with Sections V and VI of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.

Derogation for animal by-products

1. By way of derogation from Article 5(c), the affected Member State shall authorise:
(a)
the dispatch from area A or B of animal by-products of avian origin which:
(i)
comply with the conditions set out in the following Annexes, or parts thereof, to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002:
—
Annex V,
—
Chapters II(A), III(B), IV(A), VI(A and B), VII(A), VIII(A), IX(A) and X(A) of Annex VII, and
—
Chapter II(B), Chapter III(II)(A) and Chapter VII(A)(1)(a) of Annex VIII; or
(ii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to designated, plants approved in accordance with Articles 12 to 15 or Articles 17 or 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for disposal, further transformation or use which ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus; or
(iii)
are transported under biosecurity measures to avoid spread of the virus to users or collection centres authorised and registered in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 for the feeding of animals after a treatment in accordance with points (5)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Annex IX to that Regulation to ensure at least the inactivation of the avian influenza virus;
(b)
the dispatch from area B of untreated feathers or parts of feathers in accordance with point 1(a) of Section A of Chapter VIII of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, produced from poultry or farmed feathered game;
(c)
the dispatch from area A or B of feathers and parts of feathers that have been treated with a steam current, or by some other method that ensures that no pathogens remain, produced from poultry or wild feathered game.
2. The affected Member State shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c) of this Article are accompanied by a commercial document in accordance with Chapter X of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 stating, in the case of the products referred to in paragraph 1(c) of this Article, in point 6.1 of that document that those products have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring that no pathogens remain.
However, that commercial document shall not be required for processed decorative feathers, processed feathers carried by travellers for their private use or consignments of processed feathers sent to private individuals for non-industrial purpose.

Conditions for movements

1. Where movements of animals or products thereof covered by this Decision are authorised under Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9, the authorisation shall be based on the favourable outcome of a risk assessment carried out by the competent authority and all appropriate biosecurity measures shall be taken to avoid the spread of avian influenza.
2. Where the dispatch, movement or transport of products referred to in paragraph 1 are authorised under Articles 7, 8 and 9, subject to justified conditions or limitations, they must be obtained, handled, treated, stored and transported without compromising the animal health status of other products fulfilling all the animal health requirements for trade, placing on the market or export to third countries.

Compliance and information

All Member States shall immediately adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
The affected Member State shall apply those measures as soon as it reasonably suspects the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the subtype H5N1 in poultry.
The affected Member State shall regularly provide to the Commission and the other Member States the necessary information on the epidemiology of the disease and, where appropriate the additional control and surveillance measures and the awareness campaigns implemented.

Validity

This Decision shall apply until 30 June 2007.

Repeal

Decision 2006/135/EC is repealed.

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

PART A

ANNEXArea A as established in accordance with Article 4(2):

ISO Country Code | Member State | Area A | Date until applicable Art. 4(4)(b)
Code (if available) | Name
DK | DENMARK | | In the county of Funen the municipalities of:ÅRSLEVKERTEMINDELANGESKOVMUNKEBONYBORGODENSEØRBÆKOTTERUPRINGERYSLINGEULLERSLEV | | ÅRSLEV | | KERTEMINDE | | LANGESKOV | | MUNKEBO | | NYBORG | | ODENSE | | ØRBÆK | | OTTERUP | | RINGE | | RYSLINGE | | ULLERSLEV | 28.6.2006
| ÅRSLEV
| KERTEMINDE
| LANGESKOV
| MUNKEBO
| NYBORG
| ODENSE
| ØRBÆK
| OTTERUP
| RINGE
| RYSLINGE
| ULLERSLEV
HU | HUNGARY | | In the county of Bács-Kiskun the municipalities of:KISKŐRÖSKECELIMREHEGYORGOVÁNYKASKANTYÚBÓCSASOLTVADKERTTÁZLÁRPIRTÓKISKUNHALASJAKABSZÁLLÁSBUGACPUSZTAHÁZABUGACSZANKKISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁRHARKAKÖTÖNYFÜLÖPJAKABMÓRICGÁTPETŐFISZÁLLÁSJÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓKISKUNMAJSAKISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZAGÁTÉRPÁLMONOSTORAKÖMPÖCCSÓLYOSPÁLOS | | KISKŐRÖS | | KECEL | | IMREHEGY | | ORGOVÁNY | | KASKANTYÚ | | BÓCSA | | SOLTVADKERT | | TÁZLÁR | | PIRTÓ | | KISKUNHALAS | | JAKABSZÁLLÁS | | BUGACPUSZTAHÁZA | | BUGAC | | SZANK | | KISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁR | | HARKAKÖTÖNY | | FÜLÖPJAKAB | | MÓRICGÁT | | PETŐFISZÁLLÁS | | JÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓ | | KISKUNMAJSA | | KISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZA | | GÁTÉR | | PÁLMONOSTORA | | KÖMPÖC | | CSÓLYOSPÁLOS | 9.7.2006
| KISKŐRÖS
| KECEL
| IMREHEGY
| ORGOVÁNY
| KASKANTYÚ
| BÓCSA
| SOLTVADKERT
| TÁZLÁR
| PIRTÓ
| KISKUNHALAS
| JAKABSZÁLLÁS
| BUGACPUSZTAHÁZA
| BUGAC
| SZANK
| KISKUNMAJSA-BODOGLÁR
| HARKAKÖTÖNY
| FÜLÖPJAKAB
| MÓRICGÁT
| PETŐFISZÁLLÁS
| JÁSZSZENTLÁSZLÓ
| KISKUNMAJSA
| KISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZA
| GÁTÉR
| PÁLMONOSTORA
| KÖMPÖC
| CSÓLYOSPÁLOS
| In the county Csongrád the municipalities of:ÜLLÉSBORDÁNYZSOMBÓSZATYMAZSÁNDORFALVAFELGYŐFORRÁSKÚTBALÁSTYADÓCKISTELEKÓPUSZTASZERCSONGRÁDBAKSCSENGELEPUSZTASZERCSANYTELEKTÖMÖRKÉNY | | ÜLLÉS | | BORDÁNY | | ZSOMBÓ | | SZATYMAZ | | SÁNDORFALVA | | FELGYŐ | | FORRÁSKÚT | | BALÁSTYA | | DÓC | | KISTELEK | | ÓPUSZTASZER | | CSONGRÁD | | BAKS | | CSENGELE | | PUSZTASZER | | CSANYTELEK | | TÖMÖRKÉNY | 9.7.2006
| ÜLLÉS
| BORDÁNY
| ZSOMBÓ
| SZATYMAZ
| SÁNDORFALVA
| FELGYŐ
| FORRÁSKÚT
| BALÁSTYA
| DÓC
| KISTELEK
| ÓPUSZTASZER
| CSONGRÁD
| BAKS
| CSENGELE
| PUSZTASZER
| CSANYTELEK
| TÖMÖRKÉNYPART BArea B as established in accordance with Article 4(2):

ISO Country Code | Member State | Area B | Date until applicable Art. 4(4)(b)
Code (if available) | Name
DK | DENMARK | ADNS | The county of: | 28.6.2006
00700 | FUNEN
HU | HUNGARY | ADNS | The counties of: | 9.7.2006
00003 | BÁCS-KISKUN
00006 | CSONGRÁD

Pending: 32006D0401

14.6.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/20
(1) To ensure sound financial management of the assistance granted from the European Refugee Fund (the Fund), common guidelines should be adopted for the organisation of the tasks of the authorities responsible for implementing co-financed actions.
(2) To ensure that the Community funds are utilised in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, management and control systems should be introduced that provide a sufficient audit trail, and lend the Commission any assistance it requires to carry out checks, especially sample checks.
(3) To ensure that Community funds are used efficiently and appropriately, uniform criteria should be established for the checks carried out by the Member States under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
(4) To ensure uniform treatment of the declarations of expenditure for which assistance is requested from the Fund under Article 24 of Decision 2004/904/EC, a model declaration of expenditure should be produced.
(5) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
(6) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Decision in 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
(7) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 11 of Decision 2004/904/EC,
1. ‘Responsible Authority’: any functional body of the Member State or national public body designated by a Member State under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
2. ‘Delegated Authority’: any public administration, or private-law body governed by the law of the Member State and which has a public-service mission, to which the Responsible Authority delegates some or all of its implementation tasks under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
3. ‘Certifying Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the certification of declarations of expenditure under Article 24, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
4. ‘Control Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the checks and audits on actions under Article 25, paragraph 1(a) of Decision 2004/904/EC.
1. a clear definition of the functions of the bodies and/or individuals concerned in the management and control and a clear allocation of functions within each body;
2. a clear separation of functions between bodies, departments and/or individuals concerned in the management, control and certification of expenditure;
3. adequate resources for each body or department to carry out the functions which have been allocated to it throughout the period of implementation of actions financed by the Fund;
4. effective internal control arrangements in the Responsible Authority and any delegated authority;
5. reliable accounting, monitoring and financial reporting systems which shall be in computerised form;
6. an effective system of reporting and monitoring where the performance of tasks is delegated;
7. the existence of detailed manuals of procedures in relation to the functions to be performed;
8. effective arrangements for the audit of the functioning of the system;
9. systems and procedures to ensure a sufficient audit trail;
10. reporting and monitoring procedures for irregularities and of recovery of amounts unduly paid.
— a Responsible Authority,
— a Certifying Authority,
— a Control Authority.
(a) submitting to the Commission the multi-annual programme in accordance with the model defined in Annex 1;
(b) submitting to the Commission the annual programme in accordance with the model defined in Annex 2;
(c) ensuring that projects are selected for funding in accordance with the conditions and criteria laid down in articles 14 and 20 of Decision 2004/904/EC and in compliance with the standard procedures set out in Article 10 of this Decision, without prejudice to additional criteria as defined in applicable Community and national rules;
(d) ensuring an efficient administrative, contractual and financial management of actions, in compliance with the standard procedures set out in Article 11 of this Decision;
(e) ensuring the legality and regularity of the transactions.
(a) include an appropriate mix of types and sizes of projects;
(b) take account of any risk factors which have been identified by national or Community controls and the cost benefit aspects, taking into account controls carried out previously;
(c) ensure that the sampling method employed for the checks defined in Article 25 selects projects which are representative of the underlying population in each annual programme.
(a) the effective application of the management and control systems and the possible shortcomings and their seriousness;
(b) the presence of a sufficient audit trail;
(c) for an adequate number of accounting records, the correspondence of those records with the supporting documents kept by the responsible authority or any delegated body, the beneficiaries of grants and, where appropriate, the other organisations or firms involved in project implementation;
(d) that the expenditure items correspond to the eligibility requirements as set in Commission Decision C(2006)51 final/1, to the requirements specified during the national selection procedure, to the terms of the grant agreement or other legal instrument granting the subsidy and to the works actually executed;
(e) that the use or intended use of the project is consistent with the objectives set out in Articles 4 to 7 of Decision 2004/904/EC and benefits the target population defined in Article 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC;
(f) that the Community financial contributions comply with the conditions provided for in Article 20 of Decision 2004/904/EC or in any other applicable Community provisions and are paid to beneficiaries without any reductions or delays;
(g) that the appropriate co-financing has in fact been made available.
1. the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
2. the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
3. for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the Fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
4. the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
5. the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
(a) reconciliation of certified declarations of expenditure submitted to the Commission with the individual expenditure records and supporting documents kept at the various administrative levels of the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority, and by the final beneficiaries;and
(b) verification of the allocation and transfers of the Community funding granted under the Fund as well as of sources of co-financing of the project.
(a) the Control Authority;
(b) the Certifying Authority;
(c) the officials and authorised representatives of the Commission, including the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), and the European Court of Auditors.
(a) organisation of the selection and award procedures in compliance with the principles of transparency and equal treatment, and, where applicable, with applicable public procurement rules, and taking all necessary measures to avoid any possible conflict of interest;
(b) advertising of calls for proposals and calls for tenders via the suitable channels at national and regional level;
(c) receipt of applications, acknowledgement of receipt, registration and filing of applications for co-financing;
(d) formal, qualitative and budgetary analysis and assessment of applications using the criteria defined in the calls for proposals or calls for tender;
(e) organisation of meetings and liaison with selection or evaluation panels;
(f) consultations with relevant bodies as regards complementarity of the proposed actions with other regional, national and Community financial instruments;
(g) adoption of the decision on selection of projects at an appropriate level of the Responsible Authority;
(h) publication of the results of the selection and award procedure;
(i) written information to each applicant on the results of the selection process containing an explanation relating to the selection decisions.
(a) the signature of contracts, grant agreements or any equivalent form of legal instrument with selected beneficiaries;
(b) follow-up of agreements and any amendments thereto by establishing a system for the administrative monitoring of projects (exchange of correspondence, issue and monitoring of amendments and reminder letters, receipt and processing of reports, etc.);
(c) analysis of activity reports and financial reports on the projects, verification of the delivery of the products and services co-financed including, where appropriate, on the spot verifications;
(d) verification of the reality of expenditure declared for projects and the eligibility of such expenditure with the conditions laid down in Decision C(2006)51 final/1 and national rules;
(e) conditions for receiving, verifying and endorsing requests for payment, authorising and paying expenses and entering them in the accounts;
(f) recovery of unused funds or funds used by the beneficiaries for ineligible expenditure.
(a) the amount of the grant and the maximum percentage with regard to the eligible and total costs of the project;
(b) a detailed description and timetable of the supported project;
(c) the agreed forward budget and financing plan for the project;
(d) the timetable and provisions for implementation of the agreement (reporting obligations, amendments, termination, …);
(e) a definition of eligible costs;
(f) conditions relating to the payment of the grant and bookkeeping requirements.
(a) the final report on the implementation of the annual programme drawn-up in accordance with the model defined in Annex 4;
(b) the final declaration of expenditure drawn up in accordance with the model defined in Annex 6, certified by the Certifying Authority;
(c) the report drawn up by the Control Authority on the checks carried out.
(d) a request for payment or declaration of reimbursement due drawn-up in accordance with the model in Annex 5.
1. an overview of trends in relation to the target groups referred to in Article 3 as from 2003 including a succinct description of the social conditions for asylum seekers, refugees and displaced persons (resettlement if applicable);
2. an indication of public resources actually spent on reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return as from the beginning of 2003;
3. main results of actions/projects financed by national funding (outwith ERF) since 2003 with regard to reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return. Please provide a global assessment of the impact of these actions/projects;
4. main results of the actions/projects co-financed in your country by the European Refugee Fund in its previous year(s) with regards to reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return. Please provide a global assessment of the impact of these projects;
5. an analysis of the deficits within your country with regard to reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return.
(a) The Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003(1)of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State Responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national;
(b) The Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000(2)of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention;
(c) The Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2002(3)of 28th February 2002 laying down certain rules to implement Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention;
(d) The Council Directive 2001/55/EC(4)of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof;
(e) The Council Directive 2003/9/EC(5)of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers;
(f) The Council Directive 2003/86/EC(6)of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification; as far as provisions related to refugees are concerned;
(g) The Council Directive 2004/83/EC(7)of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted.
— achieving a single procedure for the assessment of claims for international protection;
— strengthening of compilation, evaluation and the effective use of information on countries or regions of origin;
— strategies to address particular pressures on the asylum systems and reception capacities of Member States resulting,inter alia, from their geographical location;
— independent, qualitative reviews of the asylum systems in Member States, undertaken in co-operation with the asylum authorities;
— strengthening the quality of first instance decision making to expedite end-to-end procedure and ensure robust final decisions;
— actions to reinforce the integrity of the asylum systems of Member States, in particular through the voluntary return of eligible persons;
— strategies to identify and address caseloads where a simplified or accelerated procedure or particular arrangement for reception may be appropriate.
(a) Give a presentation of an appropriate strategy to achieve the objectives stated above (4) and the priority attached to their attainment. Please describe briefly the kinds of action envisaged to implement these priorities; How do these requirements address the priorities identified above.……………………………………………………………………………………
(b) Describe the consultation process undertaken with the appropriate partners provided for in Article 13(3a).………………
Public Allocations Private Total
Community (ERF) State Regions Local Authorities
Reception and asylum procedures Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2005 0,00
2006 0,00
2007 0,00
Integration Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2005 0,00
2006 0,00
2007 0,00
Voluntary Return Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2005 0,00
2006 0,00
2007 0,00
Technical assistance Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2005 0,00
2006 0,00
2007 0,00
Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2005 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2006 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2007 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
— Placing the EU logo and indication of ERF co-financing on all materials produced by the national responsible authority for implementing the national programme (calls for project proposals, guidelines, application forms, letters to applicants, etc.).
— Informing all project beneficiaries of ERF co-financing.
— Placing the EU logo on all equipment purchased for the project.
— Placing the EU logo and indication of ERF co-financing on all relevant publicity materials, leaflets, letterhead, PR work, etc.
— Placing the EU logo and indication of ERF co-financing on grant recipients’ premises (e.g. on office walls, entrances, etc.).
— Informing the audience of ERF co-financing when projects are mentioned at seminars or conferences.
Public body Public law establishment or agency
Public body Public law establishment or agency
Private body Other (please specify) …
Function Name Status
Function Name Status
Tasks Units/Departments/persons responsible
Preparation of the national multi-annual and annual programme
Publication of calls for proposals (grants)
Receipt and registration of proposals
Administrative analysis of proposals (eligibility)
Financial analysis of proposals
Evaluation of proposals
Technical analysis of proposals
Selection of proposals (decision)
Notification of decisions to grant applicants
Preparation of related grant agreements
Signing of grant agreements
Monitoring of project implementation
Receipt of payment applications/invoices
Analysis of recipients’ payment applications/invoices
Authorisation of payments
Checks on projects(1)
Payment function
Preparation and publication of Call for Tender
Receipt and registration of tender offers
Administrative analysis of tenders
Financial analysis of tenders
Technical analysis of tenders
Tender Award Procedure
Signing of contracts
Drafting annual implementation report
Drafting of expenditure statements by the Member State sent to the European Commission
Drafting of payment applications by the Member State sent to the European Commission
Sending of payment applications from the Member State to the European Commission
Audit of management systems(2)
Evaluation(1)
Specific budget line in the national budget Non-budget item
Specific special bank account Other (please specify) …
Levels Account name Person responsible
Arrival of funds paid by the EC
Final recipient
Yes No
Yes No
— Preparation and validation of the calls for proposals/Call for TenderIs provision made for this?Y/N/NAEntity/Department responsibleForm of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)Documents to be attached2005 call for proposals (including application forms); Call for Tenders Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Documents to be attached 2005 call for proposals (including application forms); Call for Tenders
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Documents to be attached
2005 call for proposals (including application forms); Call for Tenders
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Documents to be attached
2005 call for proposals (including application forms); Call for Tenders
— Who is consulted before the calls for proposals/Call for Tender are finalised?Other departmentsOther national authoritiesEuropean CommissionOther (please specify) … Other departments Other national authorities European Commission Other  (please specify) …
Other departments
Other national authorities
European Commission
Other  (please specify) …
Other departments
Other national authorities
European Commission
Other  (please specify) …
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
— Publication arrangements:
— National Official Journal and the Official Journal of EC (if required under procurement procedure)
— specific internet sites
— general press
— specialist press
— brochures and folders
— Other  (please specify) …
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Documents to be attached
Existing documents or drafts
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
— Receipt of the proposal/Tender is confirmed by:—acknowledgement of receipt—letter/fax/e-mail—other (please specify) …—no confirmation — acknowledgement of receipt — letter/fax/e-mail — other  (please specify) … — no confirmation
— acknowledgement of receipt
— letter/fax/e-mail
— other  (please specify) …
— no confirmation
— acknowledgement of receipt
— letter/fax/e-mail
— other  (please specify) …
— no confirmation
— Verification of compliance with dispatch/receipt dates and that proposals/tender documents received are complete:Is provision made for this?Y/N/NAEntity/Department responsibleForm of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
(a) Administrative analysis(information on applicants, checks on eligibility criteria, etc.)Is provision made for this?Y/N/NAEntity/Department responsibleForm of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
(b) Technical analysis(analysis in the light of the selection and award criteria as defined in the call for proposals/Tender specifications)Is provision made for this?Y/N/NAEntity/Department responsibleForm of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)Have precise selection and award criteria been defined?YesNoIf so, are they set out in a document (analytical checklist, etc.)?YesNo Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Yes No Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Yes No
Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Yes No
Yes No
(c) Financial analysisIs provision made for this?Y/N/NAEntity/Department responsibleForm of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)Have precise criteria been defined (reference values/ceilings per type of expenditure)?YesNoIf yes, are they set out in a document (checklist, etc.)?YesNo Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Yes No Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Yes No
Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Yes No
Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Yes No
Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.) Documents to be attached
Specimen funding agreement(s)
Payment Amount(% of total) Payment condition(reports to be presented by recipients) Scheduled date(in relation to project completion)
First pre-financement
Second pre-financing
Balance
Yes No
Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Yes No
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
First pre-financement(Y/N) Second pre-financement(Y/N) Final(Y/N)
Whether the amount applied for tallies with the amount specified in the agreement
Whether the applicant is the correct person and whether the bank account to which the funding is to be paid is valid
Whether the project has been completed in accordance with the provisions of the funding agreement
Exhaustive, detailed list of project expenditure
Checking of calculations in the recipient’s expenditure statement
Whether declared expenditure tallies with the budget forecast
Supporting evidence for declared expenditure
Percentage of declared expenditure checked against supporting evidence: … %
Certification of expenditure by an external body (accountant, auditor, etc.)
Whether declared expenditure complies with the rules laid down in Commission Decision …
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
First pre-financement Advance(Y/N) Second pre-financement Interim(Y/N) Final(Y/N)
Existence of a valid legal commitment for the project (funding agreement)
Valid payment/recovery order authorisation (checklist)
Payment/recovery order duly signed by the authorised signatory
Recipient’s exact legal status and banking data
Correct accounting entry for the payment/recovery demand
Bank transfer Cheque Other
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Individual/Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible(3) Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Indicators Yes No
Structure of checks:
—centralised — centralised
— centralised
—decentralised — decentralised
— decentralised
—externalised — externalised
— externalised
Number of persons carrying out checks
Types of checks:
Checks based on risk analysis?
—ex ante — ex ante
— ex ante
—during project implementation — during project implementation
— during project implementation
—ex post — ex post
— ex post
An annual programme is drawn-up taking account of the sampling methods defined in Article 7
— centralised
— decentralised
— externalised
— ex ante
— during project implementation
— ex post
Yes No
Ensuring that project selection procedures are complied with
Checking that the project’s aims tally with the objectives set out in the ERF national implementation programme
Checking that the expenditure carried over by funding recipients tallies with the supporting documents
Checking that expenditure corresponds to Community requirements, the requirements specified during the national selection procedure, the terms of the contract or instrument granting the funding and the works actually executed
Checking that national co-financing is actually provided
Checking compliance with procedures and circuits defined by the responsible authority/intermediary as regards the analysis, authorisation and implementation of payments to recipients
Checking that the amount of funding respects the limits laid down in Article 23 of Decision 2004/904/EC
Checking that funding has actually been paid to recipients
Checking the audit trail
Checking that accepted project expenditure and revenue tallies with the amounts of expenditure and revenue declared by the responsible authority in the expenditure statements submitted to the European Commission
(a) To whom are reports sent?the recipients of checked projectsthe responsible authority’s management boardthe responsible authority’s internal audit departmentthe national audit authoritiesother (please specify) … the recipients of checked projects the responsible authority’s management board the responsible authority’s internal audit department the national audit authorities other (please specify) …
the recipients of checked projects
the responsible authority’s management board
the responsible authority’s internal audit department
the national audit authorities
other (please specify) …
the recipients of checked projects
the responsible authority’s management board
the responsible authority’s internal audit department
the national audit authorities
other (please specify) …
(b) What follow-up is given to these reports:—in terms of the projects concerned (financial corrections, checks on other projects launched by the same recipients, etc.)………—in terms of the responsible authority/intermediary (amendments and corrections to procedures/manuals of procedures, checklists, etc.)…………… — in terms of the projects concerned (financial corrections, checks on other projects launched by the same recipients, etc.)……… — in terms of the responsible authority/intermediary (amendments and corrections to procedures/manuals of procedures, checklists, etc.)……………
— in terms of the projects concerned (financial corrections, checks on other projects launched by the same recipients, etc.)………
— in terms of the responsible authority/intermediary (amendments and corrections to procedures/manuals of procedures, checklists, etc.)……………
— in terms of the projects concerned (financial corrections, checks on other projects launched by the same recipients, etc.)………
— in terms of the responsible authority/intermediary (amendments and corrections to procedures/manuals of procedures, checklists, etc.)……………
Yes No
Internal audit department of the responsible authority/intermediary
Audit department of another body
National audit body (Court of Auditors)
Yes No
Documents Unit/Department responsible How long for?
National multi-annual and annual programme
European Commission decision on multi-annual and annual programme
Call for proposals/Call for tenders
Applicant files/Contract files
Administrative, technical and financial analysis of proposals received (evaluation grids) and evaluation committee reports
Funding decision or rejection
Project funding agreement
Financial commitment decisions corresponding to projects
Progress reports and final reports submitted by funding recipients
Financial reports and payment applications submitted by funded projects
Supporting documents for expenditure and revenue for funded projects
Payment/recovery authorisations for funding (checklists)
Payment/recovery orders for funding
Proof of payment/recovery of funding
Reports on checks carried out on projects
Reports on checks carried out at national level on management and control systems
Expenditure statements sent to the European Commission
Payment requests sent to the European Commission
Final implementation reports sent to the European Commission
Proof of payment received from the European Commission
Is provision made for this?Y/N/NA Entity/Department responsible(4) Form of procedure (manual, circular, guide to procedures, checklists, etc.)
Mid-term evaluation Final evaluation
Yes No
Resources and project completion indicators(mark X if yes) Action completion indicators(mark X if yes) Action result indicators(mark X if yes) Action impact indicators (consequences)(mark X if yes)
1.Reception conditions and asylum procedures 1. Reception conditions and asylum procedures
1. Reception conditions and asylum procedures
—help for individuals — help for individuals
— help for individuals
—structural assistance — structural assistance
— structural assistance
2.Integration 2. Integration
2. Integration
—help for individuals — help for individuals
— help for individuals
—structural assistance — structural assistance
— structural assistance
3.Voluntary return 3. Voluntary return
3. Voluntary return
—help for individuals — help for individuals
— help for individuals
—structural assistance — structural assistance
— structural assistance
1. Reception conditions and asylum procedures
— help for individuals
— structural assistance
2. Integration
— help for individuals
— structural assistance
3. Voluntary return
— help for individuals
— structural assistance
i. Requirements justifying implementation of action……
ii. Purpose of the action……
iii. Financial plan(*1)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 % State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 % National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 % Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
iv. Timetable(Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme project expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005)Start date: …End date: …
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Refer to the actions detailed under Article 5 of Decision 2004/904/EC
vi. Target groupsPersons defined under Article 3 of ERF Decision 2004/904/EC(specify the legal status)
vii. Grant recipients(NGOs, federal, national, regional or local authorities, other non-profit organisations …)
viii. National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision is involved
ix. Expected quantified resultsThe list of examples detailed below is illustrative not exhaustive:—Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify).—Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care.—Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities.—Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures.—Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country.—Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups.—Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries.—Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.).—Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications.—Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance).—Other (specify). — Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify). — Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care. — Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities. — Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures. — Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country. — Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups. — Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries. — Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.). — Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications. — Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance). — Other (specify).
— Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify).
— Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care.
— Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities.
— Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures.
— Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country.
— Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups.
— Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries.
— Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.).
— Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications.
— Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance).
— Other (specify).
— Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify).
— Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care.
— Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities.
— Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures.
— Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country.
— Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups.
— Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries.
— Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.).
— Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications.
— Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance).
— Other (specify).
x. Visibility of ERF co-financingDescribe mechanisms for assuring visibility of ERF funding for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.……
xi. Complementarity with similar actions financed by other instruments and additionality to national measuresPlease demonstrate that the proposed actions are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar actions financed by other national or Community instruments and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national actions.……
i. Requirements justifying implementation of the action……
ii. Purpose of the action……
iii. Financial plan(*2)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 % State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 % National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 % Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
iv. Timetable(Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme project expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005)Start date: …End date: …
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Refer to the actions detailed under Article 6 of Decision 2004/904/EC.……………
vi. Target groupsPersons defined under Article 3 of ERF Decision, whose stay in the Member State is of a lasting and/or stable nature (attention: no asylum seekers, nor illegal migrants or migrants should be involved).
vii. Grant recipients(NGOs, federal, national, regional or local authorities, other non-profit organisations …).
viii. National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision 2004/904/EC is involved.
ix. Expected quantified resultsThe list of examples detailed below is illustrative not exhaustive:—Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided;—No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;—Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life;—Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.);—Number of health care services provided;—Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training);—Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries;—Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.);—Concrete improvements in integrating refugees;—Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions;—Other (specify). — Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided; — No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; — Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life; — Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.); — Number of health care services provided; — Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training); — Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries; — Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.); — Concrete improvements in integrating refugees; — Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions; — Other (specify).
— Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided;
— No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
— Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life;
— Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.);
— Number of health care services provided;
— Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training);
— Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries;
— Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.);
— Concrete improvements in integrating refugees;
— Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions;
— Other (specify).
— Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided;
— No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
— Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life;
— Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.);
— Number of health care services provided;
— Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training);
— Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries;
— Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.);
— Concrete improvements in integrating refugees;
— Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions;
— Other (specify).
x. Visibility of ERF co-financingDescribe mechanisms for assuring visibility of ERF funding for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.……………
xi. Complementarity with similar measures financed by other instruments and additionality to national measures.The Member State should demonstrate that the proposed measures are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar actions financed by other national or community instruments, and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national actions.……………
i. Requirements justifying implementation of the action……
ii. Purpose of the action……
iii. Financial plan(*3)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 % State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 % National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 % Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
iv. Timetable(Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme project expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005).Start date: …End date: …
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Refer to the actions detailed under Article 7 of Decision 2004/904/EC.……………
vi. Post-return follow-upDescribe the system set up for monitoring and follow-up after voluntary return.
vii. Target groupsPersons defined under Article 3 of ERF Decision, provided that they have not acquired a new nationality (naturalised persons) and have not left the territory of the Member State (specify.)
viii. Grant recipients(NGOs, federal, national, regional or local authorities, other non-profit organisations …).
ix. National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision 2004/904/EC is involved.
x. Expected quantified resultsThe list of examples detailed below is illustrative not exhaustive:—Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes;—Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country;—Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support;—Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.);—Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters;—Value of financial assistance to returnees;—Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States;—Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries;—Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence);—Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC;—Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes;—Other (specify). — Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes; — Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country; — Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support; — Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.); — Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters; — Value of financial assistance to returnees; — Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States; — Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries; — Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence); — Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC; — Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes; — Other (specify).
— Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes;
— Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country;
— Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support;
— Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.);
— Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters;
— Value of financial assistance to returnees;
— Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States;
— Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries;
— Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence);
— Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC;
— Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes;
— Other (specify).
— Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes;
— Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country;
— Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support;
— Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.);
— Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters;
— Value of financial assistance to returnees;
— Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States;
— Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries;
— Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence);
— Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC;
— Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes;
— Other (specify).
xi. Visibility of ERF co-financingDescribe mechanisms for assuring visibility of ERF funding for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.……………
xii. Complementarity with similar actions financed by other instruments and additionality to national actionsThe Member State should demonstrate that the proposed actions are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar actions financed by other national (including regional and local) or Community instruments and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national actions.
i. Requirements justifying making use of the technical assistanceDetailed description of the resources available and of additional needs required for implementing the ERF programme.……
ii. Purpose of the technical assistance (Article 18 of 2004/904/EC)……
iii. Financial plan(*4)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 % State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 % Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 % National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 % Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 % Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
iv. Timetable(Starting dates for technical assistance measures should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005 until 31 December 2006)Start date: …End date: …
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Actions to cover technical and administrative assistance related to the preparation, monitoring and evaluation of actions of the programme, for example:(a)costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply;(b)information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing;(c)costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects;(d)expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases:(e)permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.(f)temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above. (a) costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply; (b) information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing; (c) costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects; (d) expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases: (e) permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above. (f) temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
(a) costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply;
(b) information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing;
(c) costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects;
(d) expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases:
(e) permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
(f) temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
(a) costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply;
(b) information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing;
(c) costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects;
(d) expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases:
(e) permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
(f) temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
vi. Procurement ProcedurePublic authority implementing the ERF programme (and other implementing bodies involved in the implementation, if relevant). Specify in particular under which procurement procedures the technical assistance expenditure is to be managed.
vii. National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision.
viii. Expected quantified resultse. g.:—Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF—Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days)—Evaluation of project proposals (specify number):—Selection of projects (expected number):—Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days)—Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits):—Evaluation reports (specify No person/days)—Publicity initiatives (specify)—Equipment leased or purchased (specify)—Other (specify) — Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF — Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days) — Evaluation of project proposals (specify number): — Selection of projects (expected number): — Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days) — Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits): — Evaluation reports (specify No person/days) — Publicity initiatives (specify) — Equipment leased or purchased (specify) — Other (specify)
— Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF
— Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days)
— Evaluation of project proposals (specify number):
— Selection of projects (expected number):
— Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days)
— Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits):
— Evaluation reports (specify No person/days)
— Publicity initiatives (specify)
— Equipment leased or purchased (specify)
— Other (specify)
— Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF
— Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days)
— Evaluation of project proposals (specify number):
— Selection of projects (expected number):
— Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days)
— Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits):
— Evaluation reports (specify No person/days)
— Publicity initiatives (specify)
— Equipment leased or purchased (specify)
— Other (specify)
ix. Visibility of ERF co-financingERF funding shall be made clearly visible for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.
x. Complementarity with similar measures financed by other instruments and additionality to national measuresMember State should demonstrate that the proposed measures are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar measures financed by other national, community or international instruments and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national measures.
European Refugee Fund allocation A 0,00 € 0,00 %
State allocations B 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions C 0,00 € 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities D 0,00 € 0,00 %
National Allocations E = B+C+D 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations F = A+E 0,00 € 0,00 %
Private Allocations G 0,00 € 0,00 %
Total Cost H = F+G 0,00 € 0,00 %
European Commission
Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security
Unit B/4 European Refugee Fund
B-1049 Brussels
— Start date of implementation of national annual programme:
— End date of national annual programme (final date for execution of expenditure as set out in co-financing decision):
ERF NATIONAL PROGRAMMES COUNTRY
Situation as of Programme Year
Programmed(1) Commitments(2) Payments(3) % payments(4=3/2)
Total costs(a) ERF Funding(b) Total costs(a) Total eligible costs(b) ERF Funding(c) Total costs(a) Total eligible costs(b) ERF Funding final due(c) ERF Funding paid(d) Total costs(a) ERF Funding Final due(b) ERF Funding paid(c) ERF still to pay/to recover by the RA(5)
Activity A – Reception & Asylum Procedures
Action 1
Action 2
Action 3
Total Activity A 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Activity B – Integration
Action 1
Action 2
Total Activity B 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Activity C – Voluntary Return
Action 1
Action 2
Total Activity C 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Activity D – Projects covering more than one activity
Action 1
Action 2
Total Activity D 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
TOTAL ACTIONS 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Total E Technical Assistance
GRAND TOTAL 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
(1)Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).(1a)Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.(1b)ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.(2)Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.(2a)Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.(2b)Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).(2c)ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.(3)Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.(3a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.(3b)Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).(3c)ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.(3d)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).(4)Variation between committed and paid to date.(4a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).(4b)ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(4c)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(5)ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d). (1) Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage). (1a) Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme. (1b) ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme. (2) Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation. (2a) Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision. (2b) Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind). (2c) ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary. (3) Paid = actually incurred and paid to date. (3a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority. (3b) Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind). (3c) ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority. (3d) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered). (4) Variation between committed and paid to date. (4a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a). (4b) ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). (4c) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). (5) ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(1) Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).
(1a) Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(1b) ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(2) Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.
(2a) Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.
(2b) Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).
(2c) ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.
(3) Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.
(3a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3b) Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).
(3c) ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3d) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).
(4) Variation between committed and paid to date.
(4a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).
(4b) ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(4c) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(5) ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(1) Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).
(1a) Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(1b) ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(2) Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.
(2a) Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.
(2b) Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).
(2c) ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.
(3) Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.
(3a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3b) Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).
(3c) ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3d) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).
(4) Variation between committed and paid to date.
(4a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).
(4b) ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(4c) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(5) ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(in Euro)
Activities Total expenditure
Eligible expenditure Contributions in kind Total expenditure
Direct eligible costs Indirect eligible costs Total eligible expenditure
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 1
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 3
(A)Total Reception & Asylum Procedures (A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
(A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
Integration Action 1
Integration Action 2
(B)Total Integration (B) Total Integration
(B) Total Integration
Voluntary Return Action 1
Voluntary Return Action 2
(C)Total Voluntary Return (C) Total Voluntary Return
(C) Total Voluntary Return
Mixed Action 1
Mixed Action 2
(D)Total Projects covering more than one activity (D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance (E) Technical assistance
(E) Technical assistance
GRAND TOTAL
(A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
(B) Total Integration
(C) Total Voluntary Return
(D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E) Technical assistance
European Commission
Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security
Unit B/4 European Refugee Fund
B-1049 Brussels
— Start date of implementation of national annual programme:
— End date of national annual programme (final date for execution of expenditure as set out in co-financing decision):
ERF NATIONAL PROGRAMMES COUNTRY
Situation as of Programme Year
Programmed(1) Commitments(2) Payments(3) % payments(4=3/2)
Total costs(a) ERF Funding(b) Total costs(a) Total eligible costs(b) ERF Funding(c) Total costs(a) Total eligible costs(b) ERF Funding final due(c) ERF Funding paid(d) Total costs(a) ERF Funding Final due(b) ERF Funding paid(c) ERF still to pay/to recover by the RA(5)
Activity A – Reception & Asylum Procedures
Action 1
Action 2
Action 3
Total Activity A 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Activity B – Integration
Action 1
Action 2
Total Activity B 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Activity C – Voluntary Return
Action 1
Action 2
Total Activity C 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Activity D – Projects covering more than one activity
Action 1
Action 2
Total Activity D 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
TOTAL ACTIONS 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Total E Technical Assistance
GRAND TOTAL 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
(1)Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).(1a)Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.(1b)ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.(2)Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.(2a)Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.(2b)Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).(2c)ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.(3)Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.(3a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.(3b)Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).(3c)ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.(3d)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).(4)Variation between committed and paid to date.(4a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).(4b)ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(4c)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(5)ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d). (1) Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage). (1a) Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme. (1b) ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme. (2) Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation. (2a) Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision. (2b) Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind). (2c) ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary. (3) Paid = actually incurred and paid to date. (3a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority. (3b) Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind). (3c) ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority. (3d) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered). (4) Variation between committed and paid to date. (4a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a). (4b) ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). (4c) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). (5) ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(1) Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).
(1a) Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(1b) ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(2) Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.
(2a) Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.
(2b) Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).
(2c) ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.
(3) Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.
(3a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3b) Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).
(3c) ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3d) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).
(4) Variation between committed and paid to date.
(4a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).
(4b) ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(4c) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(5) ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(1) Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).
(1a) Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(1b) ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(2) Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.
(2a) Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.
(2b) Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).
(2c) ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.
(3) Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.
(3a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3b) Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).
(3c) ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3d) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).
(4) Variation between committed and paid to date.
(4a) Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).
(4b) ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(4c) ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(5) ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(in Euro)
Activities Total expenditure
Eligible expenditure Contributions in kind Total expenditure
Direct eligible costs Indirect eligible costs Total eligible expenditure
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 1
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 3
(A)Total Reception & Asylum Procedures (A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
(A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
Integration Action 1
Integration Action 2
(B)Total Integration (B) Total Integration
(B) Total Integration
Voluntary Return Action 1
Voluntary Return Action 2
(C)Total Voluntary Return (C) Total Voluntary Return
(C) Total Voluntary Return
Mixed Action 1
Mixed Action 2
(D)Total Projects covering more than one activity (D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance (E) Technical assistance
(E) Technical assistance
GRAND TOTAL
(A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
(B) Total Integration
(C) Total Voluntary Return
(D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E) Technical assistance
Activities Sources of income
Public Private Contributions in kind Total
Community (ERF)(ERF Funding maximum due) State Regions Local authorities
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 1 0,00
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2 0,00
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 3 0,00
(A)Total Reception & Asylum Procedures (A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
(A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
Integration Action 1 0,00
Integration Action 2 0,00
(B)Total Integration (B) Total Integration 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
(B) Total Integration
Voluntary Return Action 1 0,00
Voluntary Return Action 2 0,00
(C)Total Voluntary Return (C) Total Voluntary Return 0,00
(C) Total Voluntary Return
Mixed Action 1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Mixed Action 2 0,00
(D)Total Projects covering more than one activity (D) Total Projects covering more than one activity 0,00
(D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance (E) Technical assistance 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
(E) Technical assistance
Grand Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
(A) Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
(B) Total Integration
(C) Total Voluntary Return
(D) Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E) Technical assistance
Project Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2
Amount to be repaid
Debtor
Issue date of the collection document
Authority which issued the collection document
Actual recovery date
Amount recovered
Project Reception Action 3
Amount to be repaid
Debtor
Issue date of the collection document
Authority which issued the collection document
Actual recovery date
Amount recovered
Action Project as described in national implementation programme Implementation
A – Reception Project 1 – Create reception infrastructure for 1 000 persons —creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at …—increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at … — creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at … — increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at …
— creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at …
— increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at …
— creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at …
— increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at …
Delete as appropriate
(a)the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC (a) the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC —has been supplied—is enclosed — has been supplied — is enclosed
(a) the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC
— has been supplied
— is enclosed
(b)the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC (b) the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC —has been supplied—is enclosed — has been supplied — is enclosed
(b) the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC
— has been supplied
— is enclosed
(c)the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned (c) the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned
(c) the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned
(d)any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC (d) any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC —have been acted upon—explanations have been given—no recommendations made — have been acted upon — explanations have been given — no recommendations made
(d) any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC
— have been acted upon
— explanations have been given
— no recommendations made
(e)any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC (e) any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC —have been acted upon—have been commented on—no expenditure included—no requests made — have been acted upon — have been commented on — no expenditure included — no requests made
(e) any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC
— have been acted upon
— have been commented on
— no expenditure included
— no requests made
(a) the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC
— has been supplied
— is enclosed
(b) the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC
— has been supplied
— is enclosed
(c) the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned
(d) any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC
— have been acted upon
— explanations have been given
— no recommendations made
(e) any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC
— have been acted upon
— have been commented on
— no expenditure included
— no requests made
Beneficiary
Bank
Account no
Account holder (if different from beneficiary)
Date Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of competent authority
1. I, … (state name in capitals, title and department) hereby submit the final declaration of expenditure for the European Refugee Fund annual programme for the year … and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing.
2. I can provide assurance on the national annual programme for the year … that:(a)the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;(b)the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;(c)for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;(d)the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;(e)the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure. (a) the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents; (b) the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules; (c) for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure; (d) the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account; (e) the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
(a) the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
(b) the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
(c) for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
(d) the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
(e) the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
(a) the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
(b) the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
(c) for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
(d) the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
(e) the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
Date Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of responsible authority.
(in Euros)
Activity Total eligible expenditure paid(1)
Public Private Total
Community (ERF) State Regions Local authorities
(A)Reception & asylum procedures (A) Reception & asylum procedures
(A) Reception & asylum procedures
(B)Integration (B) Integration
(B) Integration
(C)Voluntary return (C) Voluntary return
(C) Voluntary return
(D)Projects covering more than one activity (D) Projects covering more than one activity
(D) Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance (E) Technical assistance
(E) Technical assistance
Total 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
ERF Total
(A) Reception & asylum procedures
(B) Integration
(C) Voluntary return
(D) Projects covering more than one activity
(E) Technical assistance
Amount to be repaid
Debtor
Issue date of the collection document
Authority which issued the collection document
Actual recovery date
Amount recovered
Date Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of responsible authority
(a) the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
(b) the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
(c) for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
(d) the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
(e) the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
1. The scope of the examination has been limited by the following:(a)…(b)…(c)etc(Indicate any obstacles encountered in the examination, for example systemic problems, management weaknesses, lack of audit trail, lack of supporting documentation, cases under legal proceedings, etc; estimate the amounts of expenditure affected by these obstacles and the corresponding Community co-financing) (a) … (b) … (c) etc
(a) …
(b) …
(c) etc
(a) …
(b) …
(c) etc
2. The examination, together with the conclusions of other national or Community controls to which I have had access, reveal a low/high (indicate as appropriate; if high please explain) frequency of errors/irregularities. The errors/irregularities reported have been satisfactorily dealt with by the responsible authorities and they do not appear to affect the amount of Community co-financing payable, with the following exceptions:(a)…(b)…(c)etc(Indicate the errors/irregularities which have not been satisfactorily dealt with, and for each case, the possible systemic character and extent of the problem and the amounts of Community co-financing which appear to be affected) (a) … (b) … (c) etc
(a) …
(b) …
(c) etc
(a) …
(b) …
(c) etc
(a) In the light of the examination and the conclusion of other national or community checks to which I have access, it is my opinion that the final statement of expenditure presents fairly, in all material aspects, the expenditure incurred in accordance with Decision 2004/904/EC, and the request to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing appears to be valid.
(b) Except for the matters referred to at point 3 and/or the errors/irregularities referred to at point 4 which do not appear to have been satisfactorily dealt with, it is my opinion, based on the examination and the conclusions of other national or Community checks to which I have had access, that the final statement presents fairly, in all material respects the expenditure incurred in accordance with Decision 2004/904/EC and its implementing rules, and that the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing appears to be valid.
(c) in view of the matters referred to at point 3 and/or given the high frequency of errors reported at point 4, I am not in a position to express an opinion on the final statement of expenditure and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing.
Date Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of certifying authority.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/904/EC of 2 December 2004 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2005 to 2010(1), and in particular Article 13, paragraph 5 thereof,
(1) To ensure sound financial management of the assistance granted from the European Refugee Fund (the Fund), common guidelines should be adopted for the organisation of the tasks of the authorities responsible for implementing co-financed actions.
(2) To ensure that the Community funds are utilised in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, management and control systems should be introduced that provide a sufficient audit trail, and lend the Commission any assistance it requires to carry out checks, especially sample checks.
(3) To ensure that Community funds are used efficiently and appropriately, uniform criteria should be established for the checks carried out by the Member States under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
(4) To ensure uniform treatment of the declarations of expenditure for which assistance is requested from the Fund under Article 24 of Decision 2004/904/EC, a model declaration of expenditure should be produced.
(5) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
(6) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Decision in 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
(7) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 11 of Decision 2004/904/EC,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
This Decision lays down the detailed rules for implementing Decision 2004/904/EC as regards management and control systems and rules for the administrative and financial management for funding granted from the European Refugee Fund ‘the Fund’ and managed by the Member States.

Article 2
For the purposes of this Decision the following definition shall be used:
1.
‘Responsible Authority’: any functional body of the Member State or national public body designated by a Member State under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
2.
‘Delegated Authority’: any public administration, or private-law body governed by the law of the Member State and which has a public-service mission, to which the Responsible Authority delegates some or all of its implementation tasks under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
3.
‘Certifying Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the certification of declarations of expenditure under Article 24, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
4.
‘Control Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the checks and audits on actions under Article 25, paragraph 1(a) of Decision 2004/904/EC.

General principles
Article 3
The management and control systems set up by Member States shall provide for:
1.
a clear definition of the functions of the bodies and/or individuals concerned in the management and control and a clear allocation of functions within each body;
2.
a clear separation of functions between bodies, departments and/or individuals concerned in the management, control and certification of expenditure;
3.
adequate resources for each body or department to carry out the functions which have been allocated to it throughout the period of implementation of actions financed by the Fund;
4.
effective internal control arrangements in the Responsible Authority and any delegated authority;
5.
reliable accounting, monitoring and financial reporting systems which shall be in computerised form;
6.
an effective system of reporting and monitoring where the performance of tasks is delegated;
7.
the existence of detailed manuals of procedures in relation to the functions to be performed;
8.
effective arrangements for the audit of the functioning of the system;
9.
systems and procedures to ensure a sufficient audit trail;
10.
reporting and monitoring procedures for irregularities and of recovery of amounts unduly paid.

Designation of authorities
Article 4
1. The Member State shall designate the following:
—
a Responsible Authority,
—
a Certifying Authority,
—
a Control Authority.
2. The Member State shall lay down all the arrangements governing its relations with the said authorities. Without prejudice to the provisions of this Decision, the Member State lays down all the arrangements governing the relations between the said authorities, which shall act in full compliance with the institutional, legal and financial systems of the Member State concerned.
3. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 3, point (2), some or all of the management, certification and control functions may be implemented within the same body.

Responsible Authority
Article 5
1. The Responsible Authority shall be responsible for the management and the implementation of multi-annual and annual programmes supported by the Fund in an efficient, effective and correct way, and in particular for:
(a)
submitting to the Commission the multi-annual programme in accordance with the model defined in Annex 1;
(b)
submitting to the Commission the annual programme in accordance with the model defined in Annex 2;
(c)
ensuring that projects are selected for funding in accordance with the conditions and criteria laid down in articles 14 and 20 of Decision 2004/904/EC and in compliance with the standard procedures set out in Article 10 of this Decision, without prejudice to additional criteria as defined in applicable Community and national rules;
(d)
ensuring an efficient administrative, contractual and financial management of actions, in compliance with the standard procedures set out in Article 11 of this Decision;
(e)
ensuring the legality and regularity of the transactions.
2. The Responsible Authority shall set up procedures to ensure that all documents regarding expenditure and checks required for a sufficient audit trail are held in accordance with the requirements of Article 9.
3. The Responsible Authority shall ensure that the Control Authority receives, for the purposes of carrying out the checks defined in Article 25, paragraph 1 (a) of Decision 2004/904/EC, all necessary information on management procedures operated and the projects co-financed by the Fund.
4. The Responsible Authority shall ensure that the Certifying Authority receives, for the purpose of its tasks, all necessary information on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the Fund and the results of the controls carried out by the Control Authority.
5. The Responsible Authority shall receive the payments made by the Commission, and be responsible for making payments to the beneficiaries. It shall submit to the Commission the requests for payment drawn up in accordance with Annex 5, accompanied, where relevant, by the progress or final report for which models are provided in Annexes 3 and 4, and by the declaration of expenditure drawn-up in accordance with Annex 6, duly certified by the Certifying Authority.
6. The Responsible Authority shall ensure that reports on the implementation and evaluation of actions co-financed by the Fund are carried out in accordance with the timetable defined in article 28 of Decision 2004/904/EC.

Delegation of tasks by the Responsible Authority
Article 6
Where all or some of the Responsible Authority’s tasks are delegated to a Delegated Authority, the Responsible Authority shall define precisely the scope of the tasks delegated, and set out detailed procedures for the implementation of the delegated tasks, which shall comply with the conditions laid down in Article 3.
These procedures shall include supplying the Responsible Authority with regular information on the effective performance of the delegated tasks and a description of the means deployed.
The tasks that are delegated by the Responsible Authority shall be communicated to and acknowledged by the Delegated Authority.

Control Authority
Article 7
1. The Control Authority shall be responsible for ensuring the organisation of checks defined in Article 25, paragraph 1(a) of Decision 2004/904/EC in accordance with international standards.
2. The checks referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover a material sample of the co-financed projects, selected on the basis of a risk analysis, and representing at least 10 % of the total eligible expenditure for each annual programme. The sampling method shall take into account the following requirements:
(a)
include an appropriate mix of types and sizes of projects;
(b)
take account of any risk factors which have been identified by national or Community controls and the cost benefit aspects, taking into account controls carried out previously;
(c)
ensure that the sampling method employed for the checks defined in Article 25 selects projects which are representative of the underlying population in each annual programme.
3. When carrying out checks, the Control Authority shall verify the following:
(a)
the effective application of the management and control systems and the possible shortcomings and their seriousness;
(b)
the presence of a sufficient audit trail;
(c)
for an adequate number of accounting records, the correspondence of those records with the supporting documents kept by the responsible authority or any delegated body, the beneficiaries of grants and, where appropriate, the other organisations or firms involved in project implementation;
(d)
that the expenditure items correspond to the eligibility requirements as set in Commission Decision C(2006)51 final/1, to the requirements specified during the national selection procedure, to the terms of the grant agreement or other legal instrument granting the subsidy and to the works actually executed;
(e)
that the use or intended use of the project is consistent with the objectives set out in Articles 4 to 7 of Decision 2004/904/EC and benefits the target population defined in Article 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC;
(f)
that the Community financial contributions comply with the conditions provided for in Article 20 of Decision 2004/904/EC or in any other applicable Community provisions and are paid to beneficiaries without any reductions or delays;
(g)
that the appropriate co-financing has in fact been made available.
4. The final report on the implementation of the annual programme defined in Article 28, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC shall include the results of all checks carried out by the Control Authority and a description of actions taken by the Responsible Authority with regard to the anomalies or irregularities discovered.

Certifying authority
Article 8
The Certifying Authority shall be responsible for certifying the statements of expenditure drawn up by the Responsible Authority in accordance with Article 24 of Decision 2004/904/EC, following the model provided in Annex 6.
The certification shall provide assurance that:
1.
the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
2.
the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
3.
for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the Fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
4.
the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
5.
the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.

Audit Trail
Article 9
1. Member States’ management and control systems shall provide an adequate audit trail.
2. An audit trail shall be considered sufficient where it permits:
(a)
reconciliation of certified declarations of expenditure submitted to the Commission with the individual expenditure records and supporting documents kept at the various administrative levels of the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority, and by the final beneficiaries;
and
(b)
verification of the allocation and transfers of the Community funding granted under the Fund as well as of sources of co-financing of the project.
3. The Responsible Authority shall introduce procedures to ensure that a record is kept of the location of all documents relating to particular payments made under the European Refugee Fund, and that the documents can be produced for inspection if requested by:
(a)
the Control Authority;
(b)
the Certifying Authority;
(c)
the officials and authorised representatives of the Commission, including the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), and the European Court of Auditors.
4. For a period of five years following the payment by the Commission of the final balance in respect of each annual programme, the Responsible Authority shall keep available for the Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Court of Auditors all the supporting documents, i.e. the originals or versions certified to be in conformity with the originals on commonly accepted data carriers, regarding expenditure and checks on the project concerned. This period shall be interrupted in the case of legal proceedings or at the duly motivated request of the Commission.

Selection and award procedures
Article 10
The Responsible Authority shall lay down detailed procedures for the selection of actions to be co-financed by the Fund, coveringinter alia:
(a)
organisation of the selection and award procedures in compliance with the principles of transparency and equal treatment, and, where applicable, with applicable public procurement rules, and taking all necessary measures to avoid any possible conflict of interest;
(b)
advertising of calls for proposals and calls for tenders via the suitable channels at national and regional level;
(c)
receipt of applications, acknowledgement of receipt, registration and filing of applications for co-financing;
(d)
formal, qualitative and budgetary analysis and assessment of applications using the criteria defined in the calls for proposals or calls for tender;
(e)
organisation of meetings and liaison with selection or evaluation panels;
(f)
consultations with relevant bodies as regards complementarity of the proposed actions with other regional, national and Community financial instruments;
(g)
adoption of the decision on selection of projects at an appropriate level of the Responsible Authority;
(h)
publication of the results of the selection and award procedure;
(i)
written information to each applicant on the results of the selection process containing an explanation relating to the selection decisions.

Procedures for the administrative, contractual and financial management of actions
Article 11
1. The Responsible Authority shall lay down detailed procedures for the management of actions, coveringinter alia:
(a)
the signature of contracts, grant agreements or any equivalent form of legal instrument with selected beneficiaries;
(b)
follow-up of agreements and any amendments thereto by establishing a system for the administrative monitoring of projects (exchange of correspondence, issue and monitoring of amendments and reminder letters, receipt and processing of reports, etc.);
(c)
analysis of activity reports and financial reports on the projects, verification of the delivery of the products and services co-financed including, where appropriate, on the spot verifications;
(d)
verification of the reality of expenditure declared for projects and the eligibility of such expenditure with the conditions laid down in Decision C(2006)51 final/1 and national rules;
(e)
conditions for receiving, verifying and endorsing requests for payment, authorising and paying expenses and entering them in the accounts;
(f)
recovery of unused funds or funds used by the beneficiaries for ineligible expenditure.
2. The contracts or grant agreements referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall defineinter alia:
(a)
the amount of the grant and the maximum percentage with regard to the eligible and total costs of the project;
(b)
a detailed description and timetable of the supported project;
(c)
the agreed forward budget and financing plan for the project;
(d)
the timetable and provisions for implementation of the agreement (reporting obligations, amendments, termination, …);
(e)
a definition of eligible costs;
(f)
conditions relating to the payment of the grant and bookkeeping requirements.
3. The Responsible Authority shall establish a system to record and maintain in a computerised form detailed accounting records on each project under the annual programmes, and shall provide for adequate data collection on implementation of the projects for the purposes of financial management, monitoring, control and evaluation.

Responsibilities of the Member States
Article 12
1. Member States shall be responsible for ensuring sound financial management of actions financed by the Fund and the legality and regularity of underlying transactions. They shall ensure that Responsible Authorities, including any Delegated Authority, Certifying Authorities, Control Authorities and any other bodies concerned receive adequate guidance on the provision of management and control systems which ensure that Community funds are used efficiently and correctly.
2. The Member States shall ensure that management and control systems have been set up in accordance with the requirements in Articles 3 to 11. They shall be responsible for ensuring that the systems function effectively throughout the period of implementation of actions financed by the Fund.
3. When presenting the proposal for the annual programme 2005, the Member States shall submit to the Commission a description of the systems covering the organisation and procedures of the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority, as well as the Certifying and Control Authorities, in accordance with the requirements laid down in Articles 3 to 11.
4. Member States shall provide an updated description of management and control systems whenever substantial changes are made to the systems and procedures.

Responsibilities of the Commission
Article 13
1. Within 12 months of receiving the description provided for in Article 12, paragraph 3, the Commission shall carry out a documentary analysis of the management and control systems set up by the Member State, as well as an on the spot check of the implementation procedures, control systems, accounting procedures and the procurement and grant allocation procedures followed by the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority. The Commission shall inform the Member State of any shortcomings or deficiencies found in the systems and of corrective measures required.
2. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 26 of Council Decision 2004/904/EC, the Commission shall review the procedures or systems set up by the Member States whenever substantial changes are made.

Cooperation with the Control Authorities of the Member States
Article 14
1. The Commission shall cooperate with the control authorities designated by the Member States to coordinate their respective control plans and audit methods and shall immediately exchange the results of the audits carried out on management and control systems in order to make the best possible use of control resources and to avoid unjustified duplication of work.
2. The Commission and the Control Authorities shall meet on a regular basis, and at least once a year, in order to examine together results of controls included in the annual reports presented under Article 28, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC, and to exchange views on other issues relating to the improvement of the management and control systems.

Multiannual and annual programmes
Article 15
1. Draft multi-annual and annual programmes referred to in Article 16 of Decision 2004/904/EC shall be submitted to the Commission in euro.
2. Member States which do not have the euro as their currency on the date of submission of the draft multiannual or annual programme shall present the financial information contained in Annexes 1 and 2 to this decision both in euro and in national currency. The exchange rate used for the conversion of national currency in euro is the daily rate published in the C series of theOfficial Journal of the European Unionon the last working day of the month preceding the month in which the draft multiannual or annual programme is submitted to the Commission.

Reports, declarations of expenditure and requests for payments.
Article 16
1. Progress reports, final implementation reports, declarations of expenditure and requests for payment referred to in Decision 2004/904/EC shall be submitted to the Commission in euro.
2. Member States which do not have the euro as their currency on the date of submission of the reports may submit the financial information contained in Annexes 3, 4, and 6 both in national currency and euro. In this case the exchange rate used for the conversion of national currency in euro for expenditure incurred in national currency shall be the daily rate published in theOfficial Journal of the European Unionon the last working day of the month preceding the month in which the expenditure was recorded in the accounts of the Responsible Authority.
3. When the euro becomes the currency of a Member State that has implemented the conversion procedure set out in the preceding paragraph, that conversion procedure shall continue to apply to all expenditure recorded in the accounts by the Responsible Authority before the date of entry into force of the fixed conversion rate between the national currency and the euro.

Clearance of accounts
Article 17
1. Within nine months of the end date of eligibility of costs defined in the annual decision on co-financing by the Fund, the Responsible Authority shall submit to the Commission the following documents:
(a)
the final report on the implementation of the annual programme drawn-up in accordance with the model defined in Annex 4;
(b)
the final declaration of expenditure drawn up in accordance with the model defined in Annex 6, certified by the Certifying Authority;
(c)
the report drawn up by the Control Authority on the checks carried out.
(d)
a request for payment or declaration of reimbursement due drawn-up in accordance with the model in Annex 5.
2. The nine months period referred to in paragraph 1 shall be interrupted if the Commission has adopted a decision suspending payments of the co-financing for the relevant annual programme in accordance with the provisions of Article 26, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC. The period shall start to run again from the date when the Commission decision referred to in Article 26, paragraph 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC has been notified to the Member State.
3. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC, the Commission shall, within 6 months of receiving the documents referred to in paragraph 1, inform the Member State of the amount of expenditure recognised as chargeable to the Fund, and of any financial corrections deriving from the difference between declared expenditure and expenditure recognised as chargeable to the budget. The Member State shall have three months to present its comments.
4. Within three months of receiving the Member State’s comments, the Commission shall decide on the amount of expenditure recognised as chargeable to the Fund, and recover the balance arising from the difference between final recognised expenditure and the sums already paid to the Member States.
5. Should the Responsible Authority fail to provide the documents required in paragraph 1 by the due date and in an acceptable format, the Commission shall automatically cancel the co-financing of the Fund for the period covered by the co-financing decision, issue a recovery order for all the sums already paid as pre-financing under the co-financing decision and decommit all related outstanding amounts.
6. The automatic cancellation procedure defined in paragraph 5 shall be suspended, for the amount of the projects concerned, where legal proceedings or administrative appeal having suspensory effects are ongoing at Member State level at the time of submission of the documents defined in paragraph 1. The Member State shall, in the partial final report submitted, give detailed information on such projects, and send reports on progress made with regard to these projects every 6 months. Within 3 months of the conclusion of the legal proceedings or administrative appeal procedure, the Member State shall present the documents required in paragraph 1 for the projects concerned.

Final provisions
Article 18
Member States may apply national rules on control that are more rigorous than those prescribed in this Decision.

Article 19
The present decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/904/EC of 2 December 2004 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2005 to 2010(1), and in particular Article 13, paragraph 5 thereof,
(1) To ensure sound financial management of the assistance granted from the European Refugee Fund (the Fund), common guidelines should be adopted for the organisation of the tasks of the authorities responsible for implementing co-financed actions.
(2) To ensure that the Community funds are utilised in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, management and control systems should be introduced that provide a sufficient audit trail, and lend the Commission any assistance it requires to carry out checks, especially sample checks.
(3) To ensure that Community funds are used efficiently and appropriately, uniform criteria should be established for the checks carried out by the Member States under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
(4) To ensure uniform treatment of the declarations of expenditure for which assistance is requested from the Fund under Article 24 of Decision 2004/904/EC, a model declaration of expenditure should be produced.
(5) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
(6) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Decision in 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
(7) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 11 of Decision 2004/904/EC,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
This Decision lays down the detailed rules for implementing Decision 2004/904/EC as regards management and control systems and rules for the administrative and financial management for funding granted from the European Refugee Fund ‘the Fund’ and managed by the Member States.
For the purposes of this Decision the following definition shall be used:
1.
‘Responsible Authority’: any functional body of the Member State or national public body designated by a Member State under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
2.
‘Delegated Authority’: any public administration, or private-law body governed by the law of the Member State and which has a public-service mission, to which the Responsible Authority delegates some or all of its implementation tasks under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
3.
‘Certifying Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the certification of declarations of expenditure under Article 24, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
4.
‘Control Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the checks and audits on actions under Article 25, paragraph 1(a) of Decision 2004/904/EC.

General principles

The management and control systems set up by Member States shall provide for:
1.
a clear definition of the functions of the bodies and/or individuals concerned in the management and control and a clear allocation of functions within each body;
2.
a clear separation of functions between bodies, departments and/or individuals concerned in the management, control and certification of expenditure;
3.
adequate resources for each body or department to carry out the functions which have been allocated to it throughout the period of implementation of actions financed by the Fund;
4.
effective internal control arrangements in the Responsible Authority and any delegated authority;
5.
reliable accounting, monitoring and financial reporting systems which shall be in computerised form;
6.
an effective system of reporting and monitoring where the performance of tasks is delegated;
7.
the existence of detailed manuals of procedures in relation to the functions to be performed;
8.
effective arrangements for the audit of the functioning of the system;
9.
systems and procedures to ensure a sufficient audit trail;
10.
reporting and monitoring procedures for irregularities and of recovery of amounts unduly paid.

Designation of authorities

1. The Member State shall designate the following:
—
a Responsible Authority,
—
a Certifying Authority,
—
a Control Authority.
2. The Member State shall lay down all the arrangements governing its relations with the said authorities. Without prejudice to the provisions of this Decision, the Member State lays down all the arrangements governing the relations between the said authorities, which shall act in full compliance with the institutional, legal and financial systems of the Member State concerned.
3. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 3, point (2), some or all of the management, certification and control functions may be implemented within the same body.

Responsible Authority

1. The Responsible Authority shall be responsible for the management and the implementation of multi-annual and annual programmes supported by the Fund in an efficient, effective and correct way, and in particular for:
(a)
submitting to the Commission the multi-annual programme in accordance with the model defined in Annex 1;
(b)
submitting to the Commission the annual programme in accordance with the model defined in Annex 2;
(c)
ensuring that projects are selected for funding in accordance with the conditions and criteria laid down in articles 14 and 20 of Decision 2004/904/EC and in compliance with the standard procedures set out in Article 10 of this Decision, without prejudice to additional criteria as defined in applicable Community and national rules;
(d)
ensuring an efficient administrative, contractual and financial management of actions, in compliance with the standard procedures set out in Article 11 of this Decision;
(e)
ensuring the legality and regularity of the transactions.
2. The Responsible Authority shall set up procedures to ensure that all documents regarding expenditure and checks required for a sufficient audit trail are held in accordance with the requirements of Article 9.
3. The Responsible Authority shall ensure that the Control Authority receives, for the purposes of carrying out the checks defined in Article 25, paragraph 1 (a) of Decision 2004/904/EC, all necessary information on management procedures operated and the projects co-financed by the Fund.
4. The Responsible Authority shall ensure that the Certifying Authority receives, for the purpose of its tasks, all necessary information on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the Fund and the results of the controls carried out by the Control Authority.
5. The Responsible Authority shall receive the payments made by the Commission, and be responsible for making payments to the beneficiaries. It shall submit to the Commission the requests for payment drawn up in accordance with Annex 5, accompanied, where relevant, by the progress or final report for which models are provided in Annexes 3 and 4, and by the declaration of expenditure drawn-up in accordance with Annex 6, duly certified by the Certifying Authority.
6. The Responsible Authority shall ensure that reports on the implementation and evaluation of actions co-financed by the Fund are carried out in accordance with the timetable defined in article 28 of Decision 2004/904/EC.

Delegation of tasks by the Responsible Authority

Where all or some of the Responsible Authority’s tasks are delegated to a Delegated Authority, the Responsible Authority shall define precisely the scope of the tasks delegated, and set out detailed procedures for the implementation of the delegated tasks, which shall comply with the conditions laid down in Article 3.
These procedures shall include supplying the Responsible Authority with regular information on the effective performance of the delegated tasks and a description of the means deployed.
The tasks that are delegated by the Responsible Authority shall be communicated to and acknowledged by the Delegated Authority.

Control Authority

1. The Control Authority shall be responsible for ensuring the organisation of checks defined in Article 25, paragraph 1(a) of Decision 2004/904/EC in accordance with international standards.
2. The checks referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover a material sample of the co-financed projects, selected on the basis of a risk analysis, and representing at least 10 % of the total eligible expenditure for each annual programme. The sampling method shall take into account the following requirements:
(a)
include an appropriate mix of types and sizes of projects;
(b)
take account of any risk factors which have been identified by national or Community controls and the cost benefit aspects, taking into account controls carried out previously;
(c)
ensure that the sampling method employed for the checks defined in Article 25 selects projects which are representative of the underlying population in each annual programme.
3. When carrying out checks, the Control Authority shall verify the following:
(a)
the effective application of the management and control systems and the possible shortcomings and their seriousness;
(b)
the presence of a sufficient audit trail;
(c)
for an adequate number of accounting records, the correspondence of those records with the supporting documents kept by the responsible authority or any delegated body, the beneficiaries of grants and, where appropriate, the other organisations or firms involved in project implementation;
(d)
that the expenditure items correspond to the eligibility requirements as set in Commission Decision C(2006)51 final/1, to the requirements specified during the national selection procedure, to the terms of the grant agreement or other legal instrument granting the subsidy and to the works actually executed;
(e)
that the use or intended use of the project is consistent with the objectives set out in Articles 4 to 7 of Decision 2004/904/EC and benefits the target population defined in Article 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC;
(f)
that the Community financial contributions comply with the conditions provided for in Article 20 of Decision 2004/904/EC or in any other applicable Community provisions and are paid to beneficiaries without any reductions or delays;
(g)
that the appropriate co-financing has in fact been made available.
4. The final report on the implementation of the annual programme defined in Article 28, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC shall include the results of all checks carried out by the Control Authority and a description of actions taken by the Responsible Authority with regard to the anomalies or irregularities discovered.

Certifying authority

The Certifying Authority shall be responsible for certifying the statements of expenditure drawn up by the Responsible Authority in accordance with Article 24 of Decision 2004/904/EC, following the model provided in Annex 6.
The certification shall provide assurance that:
1.
the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
2.
the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
3.
for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the Fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
4.
the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
5.
the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.

Audit Trail

1. Member States’ management and control systems shall provide an adequate audit trail.
2. An audit trail shall be considered sufficient where it permits:
(a)
reconciliation of certified declarations of expenditure submitted to the Commission with the individual expenditure records and supporting documents kept at the various administrative levels of the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority, and by the final beneficiaries;
and
(b)
verification of the allocation and transfers of the Community funding granted under the Fund as well as of sources of co-financing of the project.
3. The Responsible Authority shall introduce procedures to ensure that a record is kept of the location of all documents relating to particular payments made under the European Refugee Fund, and that the documents can be produced for inspection if requested by:
(a)
the Control Authority;
(b)
the Certifying Authority;
(c)
the officials and authorised representatives of the Commission, including the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), and the European Court of Auditors.
4. For a period of five years following the payment by the Commission of the final balance in respect of each annual programme, the Responsible Authority shall keep available for the Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Court of Auditors all the supporting documents, i.e. the originals or versions certified to be in conformity with the originals on commonly accepted data carriers, regarding expenditure and checks on the project concerned. This period shall be interrupted in the case of legal proceedings or at the duly motivated request of the Commission.

Selection and award procedures

The Responsible Authority shall lay down detailed procedures for the selection of actions to be co-financed by the Fund, coveringinter alia:
(a)
organisation of the selection and award procedures in compliance with the principles of transparency and equal treatment, and, where applicable, with applicable public procurement rules, and taking all necessary measures to avoid any possible conflict of interest;
(b)
advertising of calls for proposals and calls for tenders via the suitable channels at national and regional level;
(c)
receipt of applications, acknowledgement of receipt, registration and filing of applications for co-financing;
(d)
formal, qualitative and budgetary analysis and assessment of applications using the criteria defined in the calls for proposals or calls for tender;
(e)
organisation of meetings and liaison with selection or evaluation panels;
(f)
consultations with relevant bodies as regards complementarity of the proposed actions with other regional, national and Community financial instruments;
(g)
adoption of the decision on selection of projects at an appropriate level of the Responsible Authority;
(h)
publication of the results of the selection and award procedure;
(i)
written information to each applicant on the results of the selection process containing an explanation relating to the selection decisions.

Procedures for the administrative, contractual and financial management of actions

1. The Responsible Authority shall lay down detailed procedures for the management of actions, coveringinter alia:
(a)
the signature of contracts, grant agreements or any equivalent form of legal instrument with selected beneficiaries;
(b)
follow-up of agreements and any amendments thereto by establishing a system for the administrative monitoring of projects (exchange of correspondence, issue and monitoring of amendments and reminder letters, receipt and processing of reports, etc.);
(c)
analysis of activity reports and financial reports on the projects, verification of the delivery of the products and services co-financed including, where appropriate, on the spot verifications;
(d)
verification of the reality of expenditure declared for projects and the eligibility of such expenditure with the conditions laid down in Decision C(2006)51 final/1 and national rules;
(e)
conditions for receiving, verifying and endorsing requests for payment, authorising and paying expenses and entering them in the accounts;
(f)
recovery of unused funds or funds used by the beneficiaries for ineligible expenditure.
2. The contracts or grant agreements referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall defineinter alia:
(a)
the amount of the grant and the maximum percentage with regard to the eligible and total costs of the project;
(b)
a detailed description and timetable of the supported project;
(c)
the agreed forward budget and financing plan for the project;
(d)
the timetable and provisions for implementation of the agreement (reporting obligations, amendments, termination, …);
(e)
a definition of eligible costs;
(f)
conditions relating to the payment of the grant and bookkeeping requirements.
3. The Responsible Authority shall establish a system to record and maintain in a computerised form detailed accounting records on each project under the annual programmes, and shall provide for adequate data collection on implementation of the projects for the purposes of financial management, monitoring, control and evaluation.

Responsibilities of the Member States

1. Member States shall be responsible for ensuring sound financial management of actions financed by the Fund and the legality and regularity of underlying transactions. They shall ensure that Responsible Authorities, including any Delegated Authority, Certifying Authorities, Control Authorities and any other bodies concerned receive adequate guidance on the provision of management and control systems which ensure that Community funds are used efficiently and correctly.
2. The Member States shall ensure that management and control systems have been set up in accordance with the requirements in Articles 3 to 11. They shall be responsible for ensuring that the systems function effectively throughout the period of implementation of actions financed by the Fund.
3. When presenting the proposal for the annual programme 2005, the Member States shall submit to the Commission a description of the systems covering the organisation and procedures of the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority, as well as the Certifying and Control Authorities, in accordance with the requirements laid down in Articles 3 to 11.
4. Member States shall provide an updated description of management and control systems whenever substantial changes are made to the systems and procedures.

Responsibilities of the Commission

1. Within 12 months of receiving the description provided for in Article 12, paragraph 3, the Commission shall carry out a documentary analysis of the management and control systems set up by the Member State, as well as an on the spot check of the implementation procedures, control systems, accounting procedures and the procurement and grant allocation procedures followed by the Responsible Authority and any Delegated Authority. The Commission shall inform the Member State of any shortcomings or deficiencies found in the systems and of corrective measures required.
2. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 26 of Council Decision 2004/904/EC, the Commission shall review the procedures or systems set up by the Member States whenever substantial changes are made.

Cooperation with the Control Authorities of the Member States

1. The Commission shall cooperate with the control authorities designated by the Member States to coordinate their respective control plans and audit methods and shall immediately exchange the results of the audits carried out on management and control systems in order to make the best possible use of control resources and to avoid unjustified duplication of work.
2. The Commission and the Control Authorities shall meet on a regular basis, and at least once a year, in order to examine together results of controls included in the annual reports presented under Article 28, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC, and to exchange views on other issues relating to the improvement of the management and control systems.

Multiannual and annual programmes

1. Draft multi-annual and annual programmes referred to in Article 16 of Decision 2004/904/EC shall be submitted to the Commission in euro.
2. Member States which do not have the euro as their currency on the date of submission of the draft multiannual or annual programme shall present the financial information contained in Annexes 1 and 2 to this decision both in euro and in national currency. The exchange rate used for the conversion of national currency in euro is the daily rate published in the C series of theOfficial Journal of the European Unionon the last working day of the month preceding the month in which the draft multiannual or annual programme is submitted to the Commission.

Reports, declarations of expenditure and requests for payments.

1. Progress reports, final implementation reports, declarations of expenditure and requests for payment referred to in Decision 2004/904/EC shall be submitted to the Commission in euro.
2. Member States which do not have the euro as their currency on the date of submission of the reports may submit the financial information contained in Annexes 3, 4, and 6 both in national currency and euro. In this case the exchange rate used for the conversion of national currency in euro for expenditure incurred in national currency shall be the daily rate published in theOfficial Journal of the European Unionon the last working day of the month preceding the month in which the expenditure was recorded in the accounts of the Responsible Authority.
3. When the euro becomes the currency of a Member State that has implemented the conversion procedure set out in the preceding paragraph, that conversion procedure shall continue to apply to all expenditure recorded in the accounts by the Responsible Authority before the date of entry into force of the fixed conversion rate between the national currency and the euro.

Clearance of accounts

1. Within nine months of the end date of eligibility of costs defined in the annual decision on co-financing by the Fund, the Responsible Authority shall submit to the Commission the following documents:
(a)
the final report on the implementation of the annual programme drawn-up in accordance with the model defined in Annex 4;
(b)
the final declaration of expenditure drawn up in accordance with the model defined in Annex 6, certified by the Certifying Authority;
(c)
the report drawn up by the Control Authority on the checks carried out.
(d)
a request for payment or declaration of reimbursement due drawn-up in accordance with the model in Annex 5.
2. The nine months period referred to in paragraph 1 shall be interrupted if the Commission has adopted a decision suspending payments of the co-financing for the relevant annual programme in accordance with the provisions of Article 26, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC. The period shall start to run again from the date when the Commission decision referred to in Article 26, paragraph 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC has been notified to the Member State.
3. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC, the Commission shall, within 6 months of receiving the documents referred to in paragraph 1, inform the Member State of the amount of expenditure recognised as chargeable to the Fund, and of any financial corrections deriving from the difference between declared expenditure and expenditure recognised as chargeable to the budget. The Member State shall have three months to present its comments.
4. Within three months of receiving the Member State’s comments, the Commission shall decide on the amount of expenditure recognised as chargeable to the Fund, and recover the balance arising from the difference between final recognised expenditure and the sums already paid to the Member States.
5. Should the Responsible Authority fail to provide the documents required in paragraph 1 by the due date and in an acceptable format, the Commission shall automatically cancel the co-financing of the Fund for the period covered by the co-financing decision, issue a recovery order for all the sums already paid as pre-financing under the co-financing decision and decommit all related outstanding amounts.
6. The automatic cancellation procedure defined in paragraph 5 shall be suspended, for the amount of the projects concerned, where legal proceedings or administrative appeal having suspensory effects are ongoing at Member State level at the time of submission of the documents defined in paragraph 1. The Member State shall, in the partial final report submitted, give detailed information on such projects, and send reports on progress made with regard to these projects every 6 months. Within 3 months of the conclusion of the legal proceedings or administrative appeal procedure, the Member State shall present the documents required in paragraph 1 for the projects concerned.

Final provisions

Member States may apply national rules on control that are more rigorous than those prescribed in this Decision.
The present decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

1.   MEMBER STATE

ANNEX 1EUROPEAN REFUGEE FUNDDRAFT MULTI-ANNUAL PROGRAMME (2005-2007)…
2. RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY UNDER ARTICLE 13 OF ERF DECISION (FUNCTIONAL BODY OF THE MEMBER STATE OR NATIONAL PUBLIC BODY)The responsible authority within the meaning of Article 13 of Decision 2004/904/ECName: …
Address: …
Name of person responsible: …
Contact person: …
Function of contact person: …
Tel.: …
Fax: …
E-mail: …
Delegated authority within the meaning of Article 13(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC (where appropriate)(attach the official document whereby the responsible authority delegated responsibility for implementing ERF actions to the delegated body)
Name: …
Address: …
Name of person responsible: …
Contact person: …
Function of contact person: …
Tel.: …
Fax: …
E-mail: …
3. SITUATION IN THE MEMBER STATEProvide description of the current situation in your country, as regards arrangements for reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return of the target groups covered by Article 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC. This description should include:

1. | an overview of trends in relation to the target groups referred to in Article 3 as from 2003 including a succinct description of the social conditions for asylum seekers, refugees and displaced persons (resettlement if applicable);
2. | an indication of public resources actually spent on reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return as from the beginning of 2003;
3. | main results of actions/projects financed by national funding (outwith ERF) since 2003 with regard to reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return. Please provide a global assessment of the impact of these actions/projects;
4. | main results of the actions/projects co-financed in your country by the European Refugee Fund in its previous year(s) with regards to reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return. Please provide a global assessment of the impact of these projects;
5. | an analysis of the deficits within your country with regard to reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return.…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
4. ANALYSIS OF REQUIREMENTS IN THE MEMBER STATEProvide an analysis of requirements in your country in terms of reception, asylum procedures, integration and voluntary return and an indication of the operational objectives designed to meet these requirements during the period covered by the programme (2005-2007), taking into account the Commission’s multi-annual planning guidelines on priorities as detailed below:
Priority 1Implementation of the main actions including those related to integration set out in:

(a) | The Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003(1)of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State Responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national;
(b) | The Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000(2)of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention;
(c) | The Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2002(3)of 28th February 2002 laying down certain rules to implement Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention;
(d) | The Council Directive 2001/55/EC(4)of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof;
(e) | The Council Directive 2003/9/EC(5)of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers;
(f) | The Council Directive 2003/86/EC(6)of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification; as far as provisions related to refugees are concerned;
(g) | The Council Directive 2004/83/EC(7)of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted.…
…
…
Priority 2The preparation of the implementation of principles and measures foreseen in the Council Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status in Member States which will be adopted in 2005.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Priority 3The implementation of actions aimed at improving the quality of procedures for the examination of claims for international protection in Member States, for example through:

— | achieving a single procedure for the assessment of claims for international protection;
— | strengthening of compilation, evaluation and the effective use of information on countries or regions of origin;
— | strategies to address particular pressures on the asylum systems and reception capacities of Member States resulting,inter alia, from their geographical location;
— | independent, qualitative reviews of the asylum systems in Member States, undertaken in co-operation with the asylum authorities;
— | strengthening the quality of first instance decision making to expedite end-to-end procedure and ensure robust final decisions;
— | actions to reinforce the integrity of the asylum systems of Member States, in particular through the voluntary return of eligible persons;
— | strategies to identify and address caseloads where a simplified or accelerated procedure or particular arrangement for reception may be appropriate.…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Priority 4The implementation of measures relating to asylum seekers, refugees or beneficiaries of temporary or subsidiary protection, minors, in the respect of the principle of the best interests of the child.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Priority 5 (optional)For Member States having established or willing to establish resettlement schemes, actions which address, in particular, the reception and orientation of persons admitted to the Member States under such schemes and the management of such schemes.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
5. STRATEGY TO ACHIEVE THESE OBJECTIVES
(a) | Give a presentation of an appropriate strategy to achieve the objectives stated above (4) and the priority attached to their attainment. Please describe briefly the kinds of action envisaged to implement these priorities; How do these requirements address the priorities identified above.……………………………………………………………………………………
(b) | Describe the consultation process undertaken with the appropriate partners provided for in Article 13(3a).………………6. COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER INSTRUMENTSPlease indicate whether and in which way this strategy is compatible with other regional, national and Community instruments.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
7. INDICATIVE FINANCING PLANPlease prepare an indicative financing plan which sets out, for each year and action the Fund’s proposed financial contribution and also the overall amount of public and/or private co-financing.
Indicative Financing plan (3 year multi-annual planning period)
| Public Allocations | Private | Total
Community (ERF) | State | Regions | Local Authorities
Reception and asylum procedures | Total | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2005 | | | | | | 0,00
2006 | | | | | | 0,00
2007 | | | | | | 0,00
Integration | Total | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2005 | | | | | | 0,00
2006 | | | | | | 0,00
2007 | | | | | | 0,00
Voluntary Return | Total | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2005 | | | | | | 0,00
2006 | | | | | | 0,00
2007 | | | | | | 0,00
Technical assistance | Total | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2005 | | | | | | 0,00
2006 | | | | | | 0,00
2007 | | | | | | 0,00
Total | | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2005 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2006 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
2007 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00Please refer to Article 15 of this Decision.
8. VISIBILITY OF ERF CO-FINANCINGERF funding must be made clearly visible for any activity linked to the actions financed under the programme. Ways to ensure visibility include:

— | Placing the EU logo and indication of ERF co-financing on all materials produced by the national responsible authority for implementing the national programme (calls for project proposals, guidelines, application forms, letters to applicants, etc.).
— | Informing all project beneficiaries of ERF co-financing.
— | Placing the EU logo on all equipment purchased for the project.
— | Placing the EU logo and indication of ERF co-financing on all relevant publicity materials, leaflets, letterhead, PR work, etc.
— | Placing the EU logo and indication of ERF co-financing on grant recipients’ premises (e.g. on office walls, entrances, etc.).
— | Informing the audience of ERF co-financing when projects are mentioned at seminars or conferences.The following acknowledgement should be used for ERF co-financing: ‘project co-financed by the European Refugee Fund’.
The EU logo can be downloaded from: http://europa.eu.int/abc/symbols/emblem/index_en.htm
Any publications that acknowledge ERF-co-funding must specify that the publication reflects the author’s view and that the Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information.

(1)
OJ L 50, 25.2.2003, p. 1.
(2)
OJ L 316, 15.12.2000, p. 1.
(3)
OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 1.
(4)
OJ L 212, 7.8.2001, p. 12.
(5)
OJ L 31, 6.2.2003, p. 18.
(6)
OJ L 251, 3.10.2003, p. 12.
(7)
OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p. 12.

1.   MEMBER STATE

ANNEX 2EUROPEAN REFUGEE FUNDDRAFT ANNUAL PROGRAMME 2005…
2. GENERAL RULES FOR SELECTION OF PROJECTS TO BE FINANCED UNDER THE ANNUAL PROGRAMMEAre the general rules for selection of projects to be financed under the annual programme in conformity with those laid down in the multi-annual Programme? If not, could you provide details of any changes below.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
3. ACTIONS3.1. Action A: Reception conditions and asylum procedures
i. | Requirements justifying implementation of action……
ii. | Purpose of the action……
iii. | Financial plan(*1)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % | European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
iv. | Timetable(Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme project expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005)Start date: …End date: …
v. | Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Refer to the actions detailed under Article 5 of Decision 2004/904/EC
vi. | Target groupsPersons defined under Article 3 of ERF Decision 2004/904/EC(specify the legal status)
vii. | Grant recipients(NGOs, federal, national, regional or local authorities, other non-profit organisations …)
viii. | National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision is involved
ix. | Expected quantified resultsThe list of examples detailed below is illustrative not exhaustive:—Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify).—Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care.—Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities.—Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures.—Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country.—Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups.—Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries.—Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.).—Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications.—Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance).—Other (specify). | — | Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify). | — | Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care. | — | Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities. | — | Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures. | — | Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country. | — | Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups. | — | Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries. | — | Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.). | — | Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications. | — | Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance). | — | Other (specify).
— | Improvement in accommodation infrastructure or services (quantify).
— | Provision of material aid and medical or psychological care.
— | Provision of social assistance, information or help with administrative formalities.
— | Provision of support services such as translation and training to help improve reception conditions and the efficiency and quality of asylum procedures.
— | Improvement of provision of information for local communities who will be interacting with those being received in the host country.
— | Type and amount of special assistance to vulnerable groups.
— | Contact time (by specialist legal or other counsellors) with target group beneficiaries.
— | Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.).
— | Concrete improvements in processing asylum applications.
— | Improvements in representation of asylum seekers (e.g. legal assistance).
— | Other (specify).
x. | Visibility of ERF co-financingDescribe mechanisms for assuring visibility of ERF funding for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.……
xi. | Complementarity with similar actions financed by other instruments and additionality to national measuresPlease demonstrate that the proposed actions are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar actions financed by other national or Community instruments and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national actions.……3.2. Action B: Integration of persons referred to in Article 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC whose stay in the Member State is of a lasting and stable nature
i. | Requirements justifying implementation of the action……
ii. | Purpose of the action……
iii. | Financial plan(*2)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % | European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
iv. | Timetable(Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme project expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005)Start date: …End date: …
v. | Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Refer to the actions detailed under Article 6 of Decision 2004/904/EC.……………
vi. | Target groupsPersons defined under Article 3 of ERF Decision, whose stay in the Member State is of a lasting and/or stable nature (attention: no asylum seekers, nor illegal migrants or migrants should be involved).
vii. | Grant recipients(NGOs, federal, national, regional or local authorities, other non-profit organisations …).
viii. | National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision 2004/904/EC is involved.
ix. | Expected quantified resultsThe list of examples detailed below is illustrative not exhaustive:—Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided;—No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;—Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life;—Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.);—Number of health care services provided;—Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training);—Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries;—Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.);—Concrete improvements in integrating refugees;—Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions;—Other (specify). | — | Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided; | — | No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; | — | Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life; | — | Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.); | — | Number of health care services provided; | — | Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training); | — | Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries; | — | Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.); | — | Concrete improvements in integrating refugees; | — | Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions; | — | Other (specify).
— | Provision of advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, integration into the labour market, medical psychological and social care Materials and services provided;
— | No of actions enabling recipients to adapt to the society of the Member State in socio-cultural terms, and to share in the values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
— | Provision of actions to promote durable and sustainable participation in civic and cultural life;
— | Monetary value of direct support (food, clothing, accommodation, etc.);
— | Number of health care services provided;
— | Number of hours of education or training provided (e.g. language or vocational training);
— | Contact time by social counsellors with target group beneficiaries;
— | Number of users of products produced by the projects (information resources, translation of documents, etc.);
— | Concrete improvements in integrating refugees;
— | Provision of actions that promote equality of access and equality of outcomes in relation to these people’s dealings with public institutions;
— | Other (specify).
x. | Visibility of ERF co-financingDescribe mechanisms for assuring visibility of ERF funding for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.……………
xi. | Complementarity with similar measures financed by other instruments and additionality to national measures.The Member State should demonstrate that the proposed measures are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar actions financed by other national or community instruments, and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national actions.……………3.3. Action C: Voluntary return of persons referred to in Article 3 of Decision 2004/904/EC provided that they have not acquired a new nationality and have not left the territory of the Member State
i. | Requirements justifying implementation of the action……
ii. | Purpose of the action……
iii. | Financial plan(*3)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % | European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
iv. | Timetable(Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme project expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005).Start date: …End date: …
v. | Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Refer to the actions detailed under Article 7 of Decision 2004/904/EC.……………
vi. | Post-return follow-upDescribe the system set up for monitoring and follow-up after voluntary return.
vii. | Target groupsPersons defined under Article 3 of ERF Decision, provided that they have not acquired a new nationality (naturalised persons) and have not left the territory of the Member State (specify.)
viii. | Grant recipients(NGOs, federal, national, regional or local authorities, other non-profit organisations …).
ix. | National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision 2004/904/EC is involved.
x. | Expected quantified resultsThe list of examples detailed below is illustrative not exhaustive:—Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes;—Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country;—Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support;—Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.);—Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters;—Value of financial assistance to returnees;—Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States;—Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries;—Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence);—Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC;—Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes;—Other (specify). | — | Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes; | — | Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country; | — | Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support; | — | Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.); | — | Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters; | — | Value of financial assistance to returnees; | — | Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States; | — | Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries; | — | Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence); | — | Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC; | — | Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes; | — | Other (specify).
— | Number of users of information and advisory services concerning voluntary return initiatives or programmes;
— | Number of individuals (professionals, heads of families, family members) that return to their home country;
— | Number of persons who stayed, but received return-related support;
— | Additional economic benefit to the country of origin (e.g. number of jobs created, businesses set up, etc.);
— | Provision of information on aspects relevant to return, including the economic, administrative and political situation in the country of origin, employment opportunities, property rights and other legal matters;
— | Value of financial assistance to returnees;
— | Co-operation with similar projects in other Member States;
— | Contact time by counsellors with target group beneficiaries;
— | Number of users of products produced by the projects (information on the situation in the country or region of origin or former habitual residence);
— | Quantified impact of action by communities of origin resident in the European Union to facilitate the voluntary return of the persons referred to in Council decision 2004/904/EC;
— | Provision of actions which facilitate the organisation and implementation of national voluntary return initiatives or programmes;
— | Other (specify).
xi. | Visibility of ERF co-financingDescribe mechanisms for assuring visibility of ERF funding for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.……………
xii. | Complementarity with similar actions financed by other instruments and additionality to national actionsThe Member State should demonstrate that the proposed actions are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar actions financed by other national (including regional and local) or Community instruments and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national actions.4. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
i. | Requirements justifying making use of the technical assistanceDetailed description of the resources available and of additional needs required for implementing the ERF programme.……
ii. | Purpose of the technical assistance (Article 18 of 2004/904/EC)……
iii. | Financial plan(*4)European Refugee Fund allocationA0,00 €0,00 %State allocationsB0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from RegionsC0,00 €0,00 %Allocations from Local AuthoritiesD0,00 €0,00 %National AllocationsE = B+C+D0,00 €0,00 %Total Public AllocationsF = A+E0,00 €0,00 %Private AllocationsG0,00 €0,00 %Total CostH = F+G0,00 €0,00 % | European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 % | Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
iv. | Timetable(Starting dates for technical assistance measures should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year. By way of exception starting dates for projects under the 2005 programme should be in the period between 1.1.2005 and 30.6.2006. For the 2005 annual programme expenditure may be eligible as from 1 January 2005 until 31 December 2006)Start date: …End date: …
v. | Actions to be implemented (operational outline)Actions to cover technical and administrative assistance related to the preparation, monitoring and evaluation of actions of the programme, for example:(a)costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply;(b)information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing;(c)costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects;(d)expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases:(e)permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.(f)temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above. | (a) | costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply; | (b) | information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing; | (c) | costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects; | (d) | expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases: | (e) | permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above. | (f) | temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
(a) | costs linked to preparation, selection, evaluation, and follow-up of the operations co-financed by the ERF. This can include leasing or purchase of computerised systems the need of which is duly justified by the responsible authority and proportional to the size of the programme. The equipment leased or purchased can be used for the implementation of the programme only. Eligibility rules on leasing apply;
(b) | information actions and costs linked to the visibility of ERF co-financing;
(c) | costs linked to audits and on-the-spot controls and checks of the projects;
(d) | expenditure related to remuneration, including social security contributions, is eligible only in the following cases:
(e) | permanent officials, temporarily seconded by formal decision of the responsible authority, entrusted with executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
(f) | temporary agents or private sector staff employed solely for the purpose of executing the tasks enumerated in points 2 to 4 above.
vi. | Procurement ProcedurePublic authority implementing the ERF programme (and other implementing bodies involved in the implementation, if relevant). Specify in particular under which procurement procedures the technical assistance expenditure is to be managed.
vii. | National authorities involvedSpecify if other than responsible authority under Article 13 of ERF Decision.
viii. | Expected quantified resultse. g.:—Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF—Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days)—Evaluation of project proposals (specify number):—Selection of projects (expected number):—Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days)—Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits):—Evaluation reports (specify No person/days)—Publicity initiatives (specify)—Equipment leased or purchased (specify)—Other (specify) | — | Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF | — | Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days) | — | Evaluation of project proposals (specify number): | — | Selection of projects (expected number): | — | Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days) | — | Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits): | — | Evaluation reports (specify No person/days) | — | Publicity initiatives (specify) | — | Equipment leased or purchased (specify) | — | Other (specify)
— | Quantified improvement in implementation of ERF
— | Improvements in preparation of call for proposals and preparation of programme (specify person/days)
— | Evaluation of project proposals (specify number):
— | Selection of projects (expected number):
— | Follow-up of projects and management of programme (specify No person/days)
— | Audit and on-the-spot checks (specify number of audits/visits):
— | Evaluation reports (specify No person/days)
— | Publicity initiatives (specify)
— | Equipment leased or purchased (specify)
— | Other (specify)
ix. | Visibility of ERF co-financingERF funding shall be made clearly visible for any activity linked to the projects financed under this measure.
x. | Complementarity with similar measures financed by other instruments and additionality to national measuresMember State should demonstrate that the proposed measures are fully integrated and co-ordinated with similar measures financed by other national, community or international instruments and also that they are complementary to and not replacing national measures.5. INDICATIVE TOTAL FINANCING PLAN FOR YEAR (*5)

European Refugee Fund allocation | A | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
State allocations | B | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Regions | C | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Allocations from Local Authorities | D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
National Allocations | E = B+C+D | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Public Allocations | F = A+E | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Private Allocations | G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
Total Cost | H = F+G | 0,00 € | 0,00 %
(*1) Please refer to Article 15 of this Decision.
(*2) Please refer to Article 15 of this Decision.
(*3) Please refer to Article 15 of this Decision.
(*4) Max 7 % of MS annual allocation, plus EUR 30 000. No obligation for co-financing. Please refer to Article 15 of this Decision.
(*5) Please refer to Article 15 of this Decision.

A.   PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT

ANNEX 3MODEL PROGRESS REPORT(Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC)To be sent to:

European Commission
Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security
Unit B/4 European Refugee Fund
B-1049 Brussels

Member State: …
Annual programme year: …
Responsible authority: …
(name of contact person, department or organisation, address, fax, telephone, e-mail)
Due date: when 70 % of the amount of the initial payment incurred at final beneficiary level.
1. Description of annual programme management structures, financial circuits, methodology and criteria for project selection, monitoring system (if identical to information given in request for co-financing: simply refer to request for co-financing):
2. Project selection: steps taken and results obtained (e.g. date of publication of call for proposals, number of requesters, number of projects selected, average cost of selected projects). Description of technical assistance activities undertaken in implementing the programme:
3. Information and publicity: activities undertaken. Detailed description of how visibility was afforded to Community co-financing. All project documentation and publications must mention EU co-financing, ‘This project is co-financed by the European Refugee Fund’:
4. Information on the controls carried out in accordance with Article 25§1 of Decision 2004/904/EC:
5. Information on the risks linked to the activities (a risk being the possibility of an event occurring that will have an impact on the achievement of objectives):
B. PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION1. Timetable
— | Start date of implementation of national annual programme:
— | End date of national annual programme (final date for execution of expenditure as set out in co-financing decision):2. Financial aspectsFinancial report table (specify date – no earlier than one month before submission of the summary report)
FINANCIAL REPORT(Progress Report Article 23.3)
ERF NATIONAL PROGRAMMES | COUNTRY
Situation as of | Programme Year

| Programmed(1) | Commitments(2) | Payments(3) | % payments(4=3/2) |
| Total costs(a) | ERF Funding(b) | Total costs(a) | Total eligible costs(b) | ERF Funding(c) | Total costs(a) | Total eligible costs(b) | ERF Funding final due(c) | ERF Funding paid(d) | Total costs(a) | ERF Funding Final due(b) | ERF Funding paid(c) | ERF still to pay/to recover by the RA(5)
Activity A – Reception & Asylum Procedures | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity A | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Activity B – Integration | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity B | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Activity C – Voluntary Return | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity C | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Activity D – Projects covering more than one activity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity D | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
TOTAL ACTIONS | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Total E Technical Assistance | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GRAND TOTAL | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
(1)Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).(1a)Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.(1b)ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.(2)Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.(2a)Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.(2b)Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).(2c)ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.(3)Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.(3a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.(3b)Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).(3c)ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.(3d)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).(4)Variation between committed and paid to date.(4a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).(4b)ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(4c)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(5)ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d). | (1) | Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage). | (1a) | Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme. | (1b) | ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme. | (2) | Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation. | (2a) | Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision. | (2b) | Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind). | (2c) | ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary. | (3) | Paid = actually incurred and paid to date. | (3a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority. | (3b) | Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind). | (3c) | ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority. | (3d) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered). | (4) | Variation between committed and paid to date. | (4a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a). | (4b) | ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). | (4c) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). | (5) | ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(1) | Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).
(1a) | Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(1b) | ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(2) | Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.
(2a) | Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.
(2b) | Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).
(2c) | ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.
(3) | Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.
(3a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3b) | Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).
(3c) | ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3d) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).
(4) | Variation between committed and paid to date.
(4a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).
(4b) | ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(4c) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(5) | ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURE ERF ANNUAL PROGRAMME(Article 23.3 and 24 of Council Decision)Commission reference number:
Country:
Date:

(in Euro)
Activities | Total expenditure
Eligible expenditure | Contributions in kind | Total expenditure
Direct eligible costs | Indirect eligible costs | Total eligible expenditure
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 1 | | | | |
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2 | | | | |
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 3 | | | | |
(A)Total Reception & Asylum Procedures | (A) | Total Reception & Asylum Procedures | | | | |
(A) | Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
Integration Action 1 | | | | |
Integration Action 2 | | | | |
(B)Total Integration | (B) | Total Integration | | | | |
(B) | Total Integration
Voluntary Return Action 1 | | | | |
Voluntary Return Action 2 | | | | |
(C)Total Voluntary Return | (C) | Total Voluntary Return | | | | |
(C) | Total Voluntary Return
Mixed Action 1 | | | | |
Mixed Action 2 | | | | |
(D)Total Projects covering more than one activity | (D) | Total Projects covering more than one activity | | | | |
(D) | Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance | (E) | Technical assistance | | | | |
(E) | Technical assistance
GRAND TOTAL | | | | | (b) Payments received from the Commission with corresponding dates:
3. Implementation of programme actions:(a) Principal objectives of selected projects by activity (please use the appropriate indicators as described in the request for co-financing: give examples of selected projects):
(b) Quantification of results expected (please update the quantification of the indicators by measure contained in the request for co-financing):
(c) Problems encountered in implementing the national annual programme:
(d) Any other remarks on implementation:

A.   OPERATIONAL CONTEXT

ANNEX 4MODEL FINAL REPORT(Article 23(4) of Decision 2004/904/EC)To be sent to:

European Commission
Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security
Unit B/4 European Refugee Fund
B-1049 Brussels

Member State: …
Annual programme year: …
Responsible authority: …
(name of contact person, department or organisation, address, fax, telephone, e-mail)
Due date: no more than nine months after the eligible deadline for the annual programme.
1. Description of any significant developments in the situation in the Member State, as compared to the situation described in the annual programme:
2. Consequences of the above developments on the implementation of the programme:
3. Measure undertaken to ensure coherence and complementary with other related policies at national or European level (including competition, public procurement, equal opportunities and environment policies):
B. PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT1. Description of programme management structures, financial circuits, methodology and criteria for project selection, monitoring and control system (if identical to information given in request for co-financing: simply refer to request for co-financing):
2. Details of any modifications to programme management and monitoring systems:
3. Description of technical assistance activities undertaken in implementing the programme: results obtained:
4. Information and publicity: activities undertaken. Detailed description of how visibility was afforded to Community co-financing. All project documentation and publications shall mention EU co-financing. ‘This project is co-financed by the European Refugee Fund’. (Attach a copy of all project-related publications, press articles, etc.):
5. Information on the controls carried out in accordance with Article 24(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC, including an explanation on the cost-benefit aspects of the sampling method in accordance with Article 7(2) of this Decision:
6. Information on the risks linked to the activities: (a risk being the possibility of an event occurring that will have an impact on the achievement of objectives:.
C. PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION1. Timetable
— | Start date of implementation of national annual programme:
— | End date of national annual programme (final date for execution of expenditure as set out in co-financing decision):2. Financial aspectsFinancial report table (specify date – no earlier than one month before submission of the summary report)
FINANCIAL REPORT(Final Report Article 23.4, 24.3 and 28.2)
ERF NATIONAL PROGRAMMES | COUNTRY
Situation as of | Programme Year

| Programmed(1) | Commitments(2) | Payments(3) | % payments(4=3/2) |
| Total costs(a) | ERF Funding(b) | Total costs(a) | Total eligible costs(b) | ERF Funding(c) | Total costs(a) | Total eligible costs(b) | ERF Funding final due(c) | ERF Funding paid(d) | Total costs(a) | ERF Funding Final due(b) | ERF Funding paid(c) | ERF still to pay/to recover by the RA(5)
Activity A – Reception & Asylum Procedures | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity A | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Activity B – Integration | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity B | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Activity C – Voluntary Return | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity C | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Activity D – Projects covering more than one activity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Action 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Activity D | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
TOTAL ACTIONS | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
Total E Technical Assistance | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GRAND TOTAL | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | | 0,00 | | | |
(1)Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).(1a)Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.(1b)ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.(2)Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.(2a)Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.(2b)Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).(2c)ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.(3)Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.(3a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.(3b)Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).(3c)ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.(3d)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).(4)Variation between committed and paid to date.(4a)Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).(4b)ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(4c)ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).(5)ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d). | (1) | Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage). | (1a) | Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme. | (1b) | ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme. | (2) | Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation. | (2a) | Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision. | (2b) | Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind). | (2c) | ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary. | (3) | Paid = actually incurred and paid to date. | (3a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority. | (3b) | Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind). | (3c) | ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority. | (3d) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered). | (4) | Variation between committed and paid to date. | (4a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a). | (4b) | ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). | (4c) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b). | (5) | ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).
(1) | Programmed = as programmed in the agreed annual programme (sometimes no detail by project at this stage).
(1a) | Total costs = total cost of actions as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(1b) | ERF Funding = amount of ERF Funding per action as forecast in the approved annual programme.
(2) | Committed = as agreed by the cofinancing agreement/financing decision between the Responsible Authority and the beneficiary organisation.
(2a) | Total cost = total cost of the action agreed by Grant Agreement/Financing Decision.
(2b) | Total eligible costs = total eligible costs of the action as agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision (= Total cost – Contributions in kind).
(2c) | ERF Funding = maximum amount of ERF funding agreed in the Grant Agreement/Financing Decision between Responsible Authority and beneficiary.
(3) | Paid = actually incurred and paid to date.
(3a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3b) | Total eligible costs = eligible costs of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (= Total cost – contributions in kind).
(3c) | ERF Funding Max due = final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and expenditure approved by the Responsible Authority.
(3d) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date by the Responsible Authority to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered).
(4) | Variation between committed and paid to date.
(4a) | Total cost = total cost of the action incurred by the beneficiary as approved by the Responsible Authority (3a)/total cost of the action agreed in Grant Agreement or Financing Decision (2a).
(4b) | ERF Funding final due = final amount of ERF funding due (3c)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(4c) | ERF Funding paid = amount of ERF funding paid to date to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement or financing Decision (3d)/amount of ERF Funding granted to the action (2b).
(5) | ERF still to pay/recover = difference between final amount of ERF funding due to the beneficiary in accordance with the provisions of the grant agreement/financing Decision and amount of ERF funding paid to date by the RA to the beneficiary (including amounts recovered) – (5) = 3(c) – 3(d).FINAL DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURE ERF ANNUAL PROGRAMME(Article 23.3 and 24.3 of Council Decision)Commission reference number:
Country:
Date:

(in Euro)
Activities | Total expenditure
Eligible expenditure | Contributions in kind | Total expenditure
Direct eligible costs | Indirect eligible costs | Total eligible expenditure
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 1 | | | | |
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2 | | | | |
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 3 | | | | |
(A)Total Reception & Asylum Procedures | (A) | Total Reception & Asylum Procedures | | | | |
(A) | Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
Integration Action 1 | | | | |
Integration Action 2 | | | | |
(B)Total Integration | (B) | Total Integration | | | | |
(B) | Total Integration
Voluntary Return Action 1 | | | | |
Voluntary Return Action 2 | | | | |
(C)Total Voluntary Return | (C) | Total Voluntary Return | | | | |
(C) | Total Voluntary Return
Mixed Action 1 | | | | |
Mixed Action 2 | | | | |
(D)Total Projects covering more than one activity | (D) | Total Projects covering more than one activity | | | | |
(D) | Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance | (E) | Technical assistance | | | | |
(E) | Technical assistance
GRAND TOTAL | | | | |

Activities | Sources of income
Public | Private | Contributions in kind | Total
Community (ERF)(ERF Funding maximum due) | State | Regions | Local authorities
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 1 | | | | | | | 0,00
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2 | | | | | | | 0,00
Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 3 | | | | | | | 0,00
(A)Total Reception & Asylum Procedures | (A) | Total Reception & Asylum Procedures | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
(A) | Total Reception & Asylum Procedures
Integration Action 1 | | | | | | | 0,00
Integration Action 2 | | | | | | | 0,00
(B)Total Integration | (B) | Total Integration | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
(B) | Total Integration
Voluntary Return Action 1 | | | | | | | 0,00
Voluntary Return Action 2 | | | | | | | 0,00
(C)Total Voluntary Return | (C) | Total Voluntary Return | | | | | | | 0,00
(C) | Total Voluntary Return
Mixed Action 1 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
Mixed Action 2 | | | | | | | 0,00
(D)Total Projects covering more than one activity | (D) | Total Projects covering more than one activity | | | | | | | 0,00
(D) | Total Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance | (E) | Technical assistance | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
(E) | Technical assistance
Grand Total | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
| 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
Appendix to the statement of expenditure
Amounts recovered included in this declaration of expenditure
Project Reception & Asylum Procedures Action 2
Amount to be repaid

Debtor

Issue date of the collection document

Authority which issued the collection document

Actual recovery date

Amount recovered

Project Reception Action 3
Amount to be repaid

Debtor

Issue date of the collection document

Authority which issued the collection document

Actual recovery date

Amount recovered

(b) Payments received from the Commission with corresponding dates:
3. Implementation and programme measures(a) Description of means used in practical and concrete terms to implement the actins foreseen in the national annual programme:
Example:

Action | Project as described in national implementation programme | Implementation
A – Reception | Project 1 – Create reception infrastructure for 1 000 persons | —creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at …—increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at … | — | creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at … | — | increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at …
— | creation of a reception centre for 450 persons located at …
— | increased capacity to 500 persons of existing centres located at …(b) Outputs and impacts achieved (qualitative and quantitative description using relevant indicators as set out in the request for co-financing), assessment of effectiveness (compared to forecasts) and value for money:
(c) Any other remarks on implementation:
4. If applicable, description of any transnational activities and/or impact of the programme:
5. Detailed description of problems encountered in implementation of the national annual programme:
E. REPORT OF THE CONTROL AUTHORITY1. Details of any modifications to the control system:
2. Results of these activities, irregularities detected and communicated, actions taken by Responsible Authority:
3. Appropriate action taken by Responsible Authority after comments resulting from control missions from the European Union (Court of Auditors, European Commission):
4. Detailed information on cases of irregularities detected, where there is a suspicion of fraud and appropriate action may be considered:
ANNEXES TO THE FINAL REPORTA. List of projects approved by activity
B. Summary description of individual projects half a page each plus summary financial indicators, budget committed per project in tabular form, final expenditure per project
C. Independent evaluation

ANNEX 5EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEUROPEAN REFUGEE FUNDREQUEST FOR PAYMENT(to be sent via the official channels to Unit B4 of DG Justice, Freedom and Security, LX 46, B-1049 Brussels)
Name of programme: …
Commission Decision No … of ….
Pursuant to Article 13 of Decision 2004/904/EC, I, the undersigned (name in capitals, stamp, position and signature of competent authority), representing the authority responsible for implementing the European Refugee Fund request payment of the amount of EUR … as an second pre-financing payment/final payment. This request for payment meets admissibility requirements because:

Delete as appropriate
(a)the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC | (a) | the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC | —has been supplied—is enclosed | — | has been supplied | — | is enclosed
(a) | the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC
— | has been supplied
— | is enclosed
(b)the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC | (b) | the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC | —has been supplied—is enclosed | — | has been supplied | — | is enclosed
(b) | the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC
— | has been supplied
— | is enclosed
(c)the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned | (c) | the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned |
(c) | the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned
(d)any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC | (d) | any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC | —have been acted upon—explanations have been given—no recommendations made | — | have been acted upon | — | explanations have been given | — | no recommendations made
(d) | any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC
— | have been acted upon
— | explanations have been given
— | no recommendations made
(e)any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC | (e) | any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC | —have been acted upon—have been commented on—no expenditure included—no requests made | — | have been acted upon | — | have been commented on | — | no expenditure included | — | no requests made
(e) | any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC
— | have been acted upon
— | have been commented on
— | no expenditure included
— | no requests madePayment should be made to:

Beneficiary |
Bank |
Account no |
Account holder (if different from beneficiary) |

Date | Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of competent authority

DECLARATION BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY

ANNEX 6EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEUROPEAN REFUGEE FUNDMODEL FOR THE DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURE (Article 25)To the European Commission, Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security
(to be sent via the official channels to Unit B4 of DG Justice, Freedom and Security, LX 46, B-1049 Brussels)

1. | I, … (state name in capitals, title and department) hereby submit the final declaration of expenditure for the European Refugee Fund annual programme for the year … and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing.
2. | I can provide assurance on the national annual programme for the year … that:(a)the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;(b)the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;(c)for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;(d)the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;(e)the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure. | (a) | the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents; | (b) | the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules; | (c) | for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure; | (d) | the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account; | (e) | the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
(a) | the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
(b) | the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
(c) | for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
(d) | the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
(e) | the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.
Date | Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of responsible authority.EXPENDITURE BY ACTIVITYCommission reference number:
Name:
Date:

(in Euros)
Activity | Total eligible expenditure paid(1)
Public | Private | Total
Community (ERF) | State | Regions | Local authorities
(A)Reception & asylum procedures | (A) | Reception & asylum procedures | | | | | |
(A) | Reception & asylum procedures
(B)Integration | (B) | Integration | | | | | |
(B) | Integration
(C)Voluntary return | (C) | Voluntary return | | | | | |
(C) | Voluntary return
(D)Projects covering more than one activity | (D) | Projects covering more than one activity | | | | | |
(D) | Projects covering more than one activity
(E)Technical assistance | (E) | Technical assistance | | | | | |
(E) | Technical assistance
Total | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00
ERF Total | | | | | |
Appendix to the statement of expenditure
Amounts recovered since the last declaration of expenditure included in this declaration of expenditure (grouped by measure)
Amount to be repaid

Debtor

Issue date of the collection document

Authority which issued the collection document

Actual recovery date

Amount recovered

Date
Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of responsible authority
CERTIFICATIONI, … (state name in capitals, title and department), have examined the final statement of expenditure for the European Refugee Fund in … (indicate period covered) and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance.
SCOPE OF THE EXAMINATIONThe certification aimed to provide assurance that:

(a) | the statement of expenditure is accurate and results from reliable accounting systems and is based on verifiable supporting documents;
(b) | the expenditure declared complies with applicable Community and national rules and has been incurred in respect of projects selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the annual programme and complying with the applicable Community and national rules;
(c) | for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
(d) | the results of all audits carried out by the Control Authority have been duly taken into account;
(e) | the recovery of any amounts of Community funds found to have been unduly paid as a result of irregularities detected, together with interest where appropriate has been duly deducted from the declaration of expenditure.OBSERVATIONS
1. | The scope of the examination has been limited by the following:(a)…(b)…(c)etc(Indicate any obstacles encountered in the examination, for example systemic problems, management weaknesses, lack of audit trail, lack of supporting documentation, cases under legal proceedings, etc; estimate the amounts of expenditure affected by these obstacles and the corresponding Community co-financing) | (a) | … | (b) | … | (c) | etc
(a) | …
(b) | …
(c) | etc
2. | The examination, together with the conclusions of other national or Community controls to which I have had access, reveal a low/high (indicate as appropriate; if high please explain) frequency of errors/irregularities. The errors/irregularities reported have been satisfactorily dealt with by the responsible authorities and they do not appear to affect the amount of Community co-financing payable, with the following exceptions:(a)…(b)…(c)etc(Indicate the errors/irregularities which have not been satisfactorily dealt with, and for each case, the possible systemic character and extent of the problem and the amounts of Community co-financing which appear to be affected) | (a) | … | (b) | … | (c) | etc
(a) | …
(b) | …
(c) | etcCONCLUSIONEither:
If no obstacles were encountered in the examination, the frequency of errors found is low and all problems have been satisfactorily dealt with:

(a) | In the light of the examination and the conclusion of other national or community checks to which I have access, it is my opinion that the final statement of expenditure presents fairly, in all material aspects, the expenditure incurred in accordance with Decision 2004/904/EC, and the request to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing appears to be valid.Or:
If certain obstacles were encountered in the examination, but the frequency of errors is not high, or if some problems have not been satisfactorily dealt with:

(b) | Except for the matters referred to at point 3 and/or the errors/irregularities referred to at point 4 which do not appear to have been satisfactorily dealt with, it is my opinion, based on the examination and the conclusions of other national or Community checks to which I have had access, that the final statement presents fairly, in all material respects the expenditure incurred in accordance with Decision 2004/904/EC and its implementing rules, and that the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing appears to be valid.Or:
If major obstacles were encountered in the examination or the frequency of errors found is high even if the reported errors/irregularities have been satisfactorily dealt with:

(c) | in view of the matters referred to at point 3 and/or given the high frequency of errors reported at point 4, I am not in a position to express an opinion on the final statement of expenditure and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing.
Date | Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of certifying authority.
(1) Please refer to Article 16 of this Decision.

Pending: 32006D0400

14.6.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/11
(1) To allow recovery, pursuant to Article 24(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC, of amounts unduly paid, Member States should inform the Commission of cases of irregularities detected and the progress of administrative or legal proceedings.
(2) Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC lays down that Member States must make the financial corrections required in connection with the individual or systemic irregularity by cancelling all or part of the Community contribution. To ensure that this provision is applied uniformly throughout the Community, it is necessary to lay down rules for determining the corrections to be made and to provide for the Commission to be informed.
(3) If a Member State fails to comply with its obligations under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC the Commission may itself make the financial corrections under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC. To ensure that this provision is applied by the Commission in a transparent manner, it is necessary to lay down rules for determining the corrections to be made by the Commission and to provide for the Member States’ right to submit comments.
(4) These rules should be in accordance with Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(2)(hereafter ‘Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation’).
(5) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
(6) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
(7) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
(a) extrapolation, using a representative sample of transactions that are homogeneous in nature;or
(b) a flat-rate, in which case it shall assess the seriousness of the infringement of the rules and the extent and financial implications of the irregularity established.
(a) Irregularity is defined in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2988/95(1). Irregularities can be one-off or systemic;
(b) A systemic irregularity is a recurrent error due to serious failings in management and control systems designed to ensure correct accounting and compliance with the rules and regulations in force.—If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required.—If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged.—Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC.—If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made. — If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required. — If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged. — Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC. — If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made.
— If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required.
— If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged.
— Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC.
— If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made.
— If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required.
— If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged.
— Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC.
— If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made.
(c) The amount of the financial correction will be assessed wherever possible on the basis of individual files and be equal to the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the Fund in the cases concerned. Specifically quantified corrections for each individual project concerned are not always possible or practicable, however, or it may be disproportionate to cancel the entire expenditure in question. In such cases, the Commission has to determine corrections on the basis of extrapolation or at flat-rates.
(d) Where there is evidence that individual quantifiable irregularities of the same type have occurred in a great number of other operations, or throughout a measure or programme, but it is not cost-effective to determine the irregular expenditure for each project individually, the financial correction may be based on extrapolation.—Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. — Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
— Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
— Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
(e) In the case of individual breaches or systemic irregularities whose financial impact is not precisely quantifiable because it is subject to too many variables or is diffuse in its effects, such as those resulting from a failure to undertake checks effectively in order to prevent or detect the irregularity or to comply with a condition of the assistance or a Community rule, but where it would be disproportionate to refuse all the assistance concerned, flat rates should be applied.—Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction. — Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction.
— Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction.
— Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction.
(f) In areas where there is a margin for discretion in evaluating the gravity of the infringement, as in cases of disregard of environmental conditions, corrections shall be subject to the following conditions: a significant failure to respect the rules and a clearly identifiable link with the action receiving Community funding.
(g) Irrespective of the kind of corrections proposed by the Commission, the Member State is always given the opportunity to demonstrate that the real loss or risk to the Fund and the extent or gravity of the irregularity was less than that assessed by the Commission services. The procedure and time-limits are set out in Article 13(4) to (6) of this Decision.
(h) Unlike the case with corrections made by the Member State under Article 25 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, financial corrections decided by the Commission under Article 26(3) always involve a net reduction to the Community funding committed to the programme concerned.
(i) Where the Member State's audit system — Court of Auditors, internal or external audits — has detected the irregularities and the Member State takes appropriate corrective action under Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC within a reasonable period of time, no financial corrections can be imposed by the Commission under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC and the Member State is free to re-use the funds. In other cases the Commission may make corrections on the basis of the findings of national audit bodies, as where an EU audit body establishes the irregularity. When the Commission bases its position on the facts established and fully documented by other EU audit bodies, it will form its own conclusions regarding their financial consequences, after examining any replies from the Member State.
1. whether the irregularity is related to an individual case, multiple cases or all cases;
2. whether the deficiency relates to the effectiveness of the management and control system generally, or to the effectiveness of a particular element of the system, i.e. the operation of particular functions necessary to ensure the legality, regularity and eligibility of expenditure declared for co-financing from the Fund under the applicable national and Community rules (see section 2.2 below);
3. the importance of the deficiency within the totality of the administrative, physical and other controls foreseen;
4. the vulnerability to fraud of the measures, having regard particularly to the economic incentive.
1. Provision and application of procedures for grant applications, appraisal of applications, selection of projects for funding and selection of contractors/suppliers, appropriate publication of calls for grant applications according to the procedures for the programme concerned:(a)compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable;(b)appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies;(c)selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. (a) compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable; (b) appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies; (c) selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. — projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme, — reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out, — observance of State aid rules, — observance of eligibility rules, — inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
(a) compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable;
(b) appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies;
(c) selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. — projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme, — reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out, — observance of State aid rules, — observance of eligibility rules, — inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
— projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,
— reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,
— observance of State aid rules,
— observance of eligibility rules,
— inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
(a) compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable;
(b) appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies;
(c) selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. — projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme, — reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out, — observance of State aid rules, — observance of eligibility rules, — inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
— projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,
— reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,
— observance of State aid rules,
— observance of eligibility rules,
— inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
— projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,
— reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,
— observance of State aid rules,
— observance of eligibility rules,
— inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
2. Adequate verification of delivery of co-financed products and services and of eligibility of expenditure charged to programme by the responsible authority designated under Article 13 of Decision 2004/904/EC and the intermediary organisations between the grant recipient and the responsible authority:(a)verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts' reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot;(b)verification of observance of conditions of grant approval;(c)verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made;(d)adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim;(e)maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system;(f)maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system;(g)taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. (a) verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts' reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot; (b) verification of observance of conditions of grant approval; (c) verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made; (d) adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim; (e) maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system; (f) maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system; (g) taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. — expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions, — the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
(a) verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts' reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot;
(b) verification of observance of conditions of grant approval;
(c) verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made;
(d) adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim;
(e) maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system;
(f) maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system;
(g) taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. — expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions, — the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
— expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,
— the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
(a) verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts' reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot;
(b) verification of observance of conditions of grant approval;
(c) verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made;
(d) adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim;
(e) maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system;
(f) maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system;
(g) taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. — expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions, — the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
— expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,
— the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
— expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,
— the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
3. Sufficient quantity and quality of sample checks on projects and adequate follow-up:(a)carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor;(b)the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate;(c)adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence;(d)follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. (a) carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor; (b) the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate; (c) adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence; (d) follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. — appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate, — action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
(a) carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor;
(b) the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate;
(c) adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence;
(d) follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. — appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate, — action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
— appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,
— action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
(a) carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor;
(b) the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate;
(c) adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence;
(d) follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. — appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate, — action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
— appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,
— action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
— appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,
— action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
(a) satisfactory administrative controls in the form of standard checklists or equivalent means and proper documentation of results, to ensure for instance:—that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable,—reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded; — that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable, — reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded;
— that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable,
— reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded;
— that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable,
— reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded;
(b) proper supervision of claims processing and authorisation procedures;
(c) satisfactory procedures to ensure proper dissemination of information about Community rules;
(d) ensuring timely payment of Community funding to beneficiaries.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/904/EC of 2 December 2004 establishing a European Refugee Fund for the period 2005 to 2010(1), and in particular Article 25(3) and 26(5) thereof,
Having consulted the Committee established by Article 11(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC,
(1) To allow recovery, pursuant to Article 24(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC, of amounts unduly paid, Member States should inform the Commission of cases of irregularities detected and the progress of administrative or legal proceedings.
(2) Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC lays down that Member States must make the financial corrections required in connection with the individual or systemic irregularity by cancelling all or part of the Community contribution. To ensure that this provision is applied uniformly throughout the Community, it is necessary to lay down rules for determining the corrections to be made and to provide for the Commission to be informed.
(3) If a Member State fails to comply with its obligations under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC the Commission may itself make the financial corrections under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC. To ensure that this provision is applied by the Commission in a transparent manner, it is necessary to lay down rules for determining the corrections to be made by the Commission and to provide for the Member States’ right to submit comments.
(4) These rules should be in accordance with Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(2)(hereafter ‘Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation’).
(5) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
(6) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
(7) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. Investigations of systematic irregularities under Article 26(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall cover all projects liable to be affected.
2. When cancelling all or part of the Community contribution, Member States shall take into account the nature and gravity of the irregularities and the financial loss to the fund.
3. Member States shall inform the Commission, in a list annexed to the report referred to in Article 28(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, of any proceedings to cancel assistance initiated in the course of the preceding year.

Article 2
1. Where amounts need to be recovered following the cancellation of the Community contribution under Article 25(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC, the department or organisation responsible shall initiate the recovery procedure and inform the responsible authority. Information on recovery shall be passed on to the Commission and the accounts shall be kept in accordance with Article 3 of this Decision.
2. Member States shall inform the Commission in the report referred to in Article 28(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC how they have decided or propose to re-use the funds cancelled.

Article 3
1. Any functional body of the Member State or national public body designated by a Member State under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC (hereafter ‘Responsible Authority’) shall keep an account of amounts recoverable from payments of Community assistance that have already been made and shall ensure that the amounts are recovered without delay. After recovery, the Responsible Authority shall reduce its next declaration of expenditure to the Commission by an amount equal to the sums recovered, or, if this amount is insufficient, it shall reimburse the Community. The amounts to be recovered shall accrue interest from their due date at the rate laid down in accordance with Article 86 of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation.
2. When submitting the report referred to in Article 28(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, Member States shall send the Commission a list of irregularities detected, indicating the amounts recovered or awaiting recovery and if appropriate, any administrative or judicial proceedings launched with a view to recovering amounts unduly paid.

Article 4
1. The amount of financial corrections made by the Commission under Article 26(3b) of Decision 2004/904/EC for individual or systemic irregularities shall be assessed wherever possible and practicable on the basis of individual files and be equal to the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the Fund, having regard to the principle of proportionality.
2. Where it is not possible or practicable to quantify precisely the amount of irregular expenditure or where it would be disproportionate to cancel all the expenditure concerned, the Commission shall base its financial corrections on:
(a)
extrapolation, using a representative sample of transactions that are homogeneous in nature;
or
(b)
a flat-rate, in which case it shall assess the seriousness of the infringement of the rules and the extent and financial implications of the irregularity established.
3. Where the Commission bases its position on facts established by auditors from outside its own departments it shall draw its own conclusions on the financial implications after examining the measures taken by the Member State concerned under Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC.
4. The period of time within which the Member State concerned may respond to a request under Article 26(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall be two months. In duly justified cases, a longer period may be agreed by the Commission.
5. Where the Commission proposes financial corrections determined by extrapolation or at a flat rate, the Member State shall be given the opportunity to demonstrate, on the basis of an examination of the files concerned, that the actual extent of irregularity was less than the Commission’s assessment. In agreement with the Commission, the Member State may limit the scope of this examination to an appropriate proportion or sample of the files concerned. Except in duly justified cases, the time allowed for this examination shall not exceed a further period of two months after the two-month period referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall take account of any evidence supplied by the Member State within the time-limits.
6. Where the Commission suspends payments under Article 26(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC or where after expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 4, the reasons for the suspension remain or the Member State concerned has not notified the Commission of the measures taken to correct the irregularities, Article 26(3) will apply.
7. Guidelines on the principles, criteria and indicative scales to be applied by Commission departments in determining the flat-rate corrections are set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 5
1. Any repayment to the Commission under Article 26(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall be made by the deadline set in the recovery order drawn up in accordance with Article 81 of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation.
2. Any delay in effecting repayment shall give rise to interest on account of late payment, starting on the due date referred to in paragraph 1 and ending on the date of actual repayment. The applicable rate of interest shall be that referred to in Article 3(1) of this Decision.
3. A financial correction under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall not prejudice the Member State’s obligation to pursue recoveries under Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC and Article 2(1) of this Decision and to recover State aid under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.

Article 6
Member States may apply national rules on financial corrections that are more rigorous than those prescribed here.

Article 7
The present decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/904/EC of 2 December 2004 establishing a European Refugee Fund for the period 2005 to 2010(1), and in particular Article 25(3) and 26(5) thereof,
Having consulted the Committee established by Article 11(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC,
(1) To allow recovery, pursuant to Article 24(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC, of amounts unduly paid, Member States should inform the Commission of cases of irregularities detected and the progress of administrative or legal proceedings.
(2) Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC lays down that Member States must make the financial corrections required in connection with the individual or systemic irregularity by cancelling all or part of the Community contribution. To ensure that this provision is applied uniformly throughout the Community, it is necessary to lay down rules for determining the corrections to be made and to provide for the Commission to be informed.
(3) If a Member State fails to comply with its obligations under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC the Commission may itself make the financial corrections under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC. To ensure that this provision is applied by the Commission in a transparent manner, it is necessary to lay down rules for determining the corrections to be made by the Commission and to provide for the Member States’ right to submit comments.
(4) These rules should be in accordance with Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(2)(hereafter ‘Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation’).
(5) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
(6) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
(7) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Council Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. Investigations of systematic irregularities under Article 26(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall cover all projects liable to be affected.
2. When cancelling all or part of the Community contribution, Member States shall take into account the nature and gravity of the irregularities and the financial loss to the fund.
3. Member States shall inform the Commission, in a list annexed to the report referred to in Article 28(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, of any proceedings to cancel assistance initiated in the course of the preceding year.
1. Where amounts need to be recovered following the cancellation of the Community contribution under Article 25(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC, the department or organisation responsible shall initiate the recovery procedure and inform the responsible authority. Information on recovery shall be passed on to the Commission and the accounts shall be kept in accordance with Article 3 of this Decision.
2. Member States shall inform the Commission in the report referred to in Article 28(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC how they have decided or propose to re-use the funds cancelled.
1. Any functional body of the Member State or national public body designated by a Member State under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC (hereafter ‘Responsible Authority’) shall keep an account of amounts recoverable from payments of Community assistance that have already been made and shall ensure that the amounts are recovered without delay. After recovery, the Responsible Authority shall reduce its next declaration of expenditure to the Commission by an amount equal to the sums recovered, or, if this amount is insufficient, it shall reimburse the Community. The amounts to be recovered shall accrue interest from their due date at the rate laid down in accordance with Article 86 of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation.
2. When submitting the report referred to in Article 28(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, Member States shall send the Commission a list of irregularities detected, indicating the amounts recovered or awaiting recovery and if appropriate, any administrative or judicial proceedings launched with a view to recovering amounts unduly paid.
1. The amount of financial corrections made by the Commission under Article 26(3b) of Decision 2004/904/EC for individual or systemic irregularities shall be assessed wherever possible and practicable on the basis of individual files and be equal to the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the Fund, having regard to the principle of proportionality.
2. Where it is not possible or practicable to quantify precisely the amount of irregular expenditure or where it would be disproportionate to cancel all the expenditure concerned, the Commission shall base its financial corrections on:
(a)
extrapolation, using a representative sample of transactions that are homogeneous in nature;
or
(b)
a flat-rate, in which case it shall assess the seriousness of the infringement of the rules and the extent and financial implications of the irregularity established.
3. Where the Commission bases its position on facts established by auditors from outside its own departments it shall draw its own conclusions on the financial implications after examining the measures taken by the Member State concerned under Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC.
4. The period of time within which the Member State concerned may respond to a request under Article 26(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall be two months. In duly justified cases, a longer period may be agreed by the Commission.
5. Where the Commission proposes financial corrections determined by extrapolation or at a flat rate, the Member State shall be given the opportunity to demonstrate, on the basis of an examination of the files concerned, that the actual extent of irregularity was less than the Commission’s assessment. In agreement with the Commission, the Member State may limit the scope of this examination to an appropriate proportion or sample of the files concerned. Except in duly justified cases, the time allowed for this examination shall not exceed a further period of two months after the two-month period referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall take account of any evidence supplied by the Member State within the time-limits.
6. Where the Commission suspends payments under Article 26(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC or where after expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 4, the reasons for the suspension remain or the Member State concerned has not notified the Commission of the measures taken to correct the irregularities, Article 26(3) will apply.
7. Guidelines on the principles, criteria and indicative scales to be applied by Commission departments in determining the flat-rate corrections are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
1. Any repayment to the Commission under Article 26(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall be made by the deadline set in the recovery order drawn up in accordance with Article 81 of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation.
2. Any delay in effecting repayment shall give rise to interest on account of late payment, starting on the due date referred to in paragraph 1 and ending on the date of actual repayment. The applicable rate of interest shall be that referred to in Article 3(1) of this Decision.
3. A financial correction under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC shall not prejudice the Member State’s obligation to pursue recoveries under Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC and Article 2(1) of this Decision and to recover State aid under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Member States may apply national rules on financial corrections that are more rigorous than those prescribed here.
The present decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

1.   PRINCIPLES

ANNEXGUIDELINES ON THE PRINCIPLES, CRITERIA AND INDICATIVE SCALES TO BE APPLIED BY COMMISSION DEPARTMENTS IN DETERMINING FINANCIAL CORRECTIONS UNDER ARTICLES 25 AND 26 OF COUNCIL DECISION 2004/904/ECThe purpose of financial corrections is to restore a situation where 100 % of the expenditure declared for co-financing from the Fund is in line with the applicable national and Community rules and regulations. This allows the establishment of a number of key principles for the Commission departments to apply in determining financial corrections:

(a) | Irregularity is defined in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2988/95(1). Irregularities can be one-off or systemic;
(b) | A systemic irregularity is a recurrent error due to serious failings in management and control systems designed to ensure correct accounting and compliance with the rules and regulations in force.—If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required.—If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged.—Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC.—If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made. | — | If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required. | — | If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged. | — | Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC. | — | If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made.
— | If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, and all reasonable measures are taken to prevent, detect and correct fraud and irregularity, no financial corrections will be required.
— | If the applicable rules and regulations are respected, but the management and control systems need to be improved, pertinent recommendations should be made to the Member State, but no financial corrections need be envisaged.
— | Where only errors relating to sums of less than 4 000 euro are found, the Member State should be urged to correct the errors without opening financial correction proceedings under Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2004/904/EC.
— | If there are serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities, in particular failures to respect the applicable rules and regulations, financial corrections should always be made.
(c) | The amount of the financial correction will be assessed wherever possible on the basis of individual files and be equal to the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the Fund in the cases concerned. Specifically quantified corrections for each individual project concerned are not always possible or practicable, however, or it may be disproportionate to cancel the entire expenditure in question. In such cases, the Commission has to determine corrections on the basis of extrapolation or at flat-rates.
(d) | Where there is evidence that individual quantifiable irregularities of the same type have occurred in a great number of other operations, or throughout a measure or programme, but it is not cost-effective to determine the irregular expenditure for each project individually, the financial correction may be based on extrapolation.—Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. | — | Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
— | Extrapolation can be used only where a homogeneous population or subset of projects sharing similar characteristics can be identified and shown to have been affected by the deficiency. In this case, the results of a thorough examination of a representative sample of the individual files concerned selected at random are extrapolated to all the files making up the population identified, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
(e) | In the case of individual breaches or systemic irregularities whose financial impact is not precisely quantifiable because it is subject to too many variables or is diffuse in its effects, such as those resulting from a failure to undertake checks effectively in order to prevent or detect the irregularity or to comply with a condition of the assistance or a Community rule, but where it would be disproportionate to refuse all the assistance concerned, flat rates should be applied.—Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction. | — | Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction.
— | Flat rate corrections are determined in accordance with the seriousness of the deficiency in the management and control system or the individual breach and the financial implications of the irregularity. A list of what the Commission considers to be key and ancillary elements of systems for the purpose of assessing the seriousness of deficiencies is given in section 2.2 and an indicative scale of flat rates for corrections in section 2.3. Flat-rate corrections are applied to all expenditure under the measure or measures concerned unless the deficiencies were limited to certain areas of expenditure (individual projects or types of project), in which case they are applied to those areas of expenditure only. The same expenditure will not normally be subject to more than one correction.
(f) | In areas where there is a margin for discretion in evaluating the gravity of the infringement, as in cases of disregard of environmental conditions, corrections shall be subject to the following conditions: a significant failure to respect the rules and a clearly identifiable link with the action receiving Community funding.
(g) | Irrespective of the kind of corrections proposed by the Commission, the Member State is always given the opportunity to demonstrate that the real loss or risk to the Fund and the extent or gravity of the irregularity was less than that assessed by the Commission services. The procedure and time-limits are set out in Article 13(4) to (6) of this Decision.
(h) | Unlike the case with corrections made by the Member State under Article 25 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, financial corrections decided by the Commission under Article 26(3) always involve a net reduction to the Community funding committed to the programme concerned.
(i) | Where the Member State’s audit system — Court of Auditors, internal or external audits — has detected the irregularities and the Member State takes appropriate corrective action under Article 25(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC within a reasonable period of time, no financial corrections can be imposed by the Commission under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC and the Member State is free to re-use the funds. In other cases the Commission may make corrections on the basis of the findings of national audit bodies, as where an EU audit body establishes the irregularity. When the Commission bases its position on the facts established and fully documented by other EU audit bodies, it will form its own conclusions regarding their financial consequences, after examining any replies from the Member State.2. CRITERIA AND SCALES FOR FLAT-RATE CORRECTIONS2.1. CriteriaAs noted in paragraph 1(c) above, flat-rate corrections may be envisaged when the information resulting from the enquiry does not permit the financial impact of an individual case or several cases of irregularities to be evaluated precisely by statistical means, or by reference to other verifiable data, but does lead to the conclusion that the Member State has failed to carry out adequate verification of the eligibility of claims paid.
Flat-rate corrections should be considered when the Commission finds a failure to adequately effect any control which is explicitly required by a regulation, or implicitly required in order to respect an explicit rule (the limiting of aid to a certain type of project, for example), and whose absence could lead to systemic irregularity. They should also be considered where the Commission finds serious deficiencies in management and control systems resulting in large-scale breaches of applicable rules and regulations, or where it detects individual breaches. Flat-rate corrections can also be appropriate when the Member States’ own control departments discover such irregularities but the Member State fails to take appropriate corrective action within a reasonable period of time.
In determining whether a flat-rate financial correction should result and, if so, at what rate, the general consideration shall be the assessment of the degree of risk of loss to which Community funds were exposed as a consequence of the control deficiency. Thus the correction should be in compliance with the principle of proportionality. The specific elements to be taken into account should include the following:

1. | whether the irregularity is related to an individual case, multiple cases or all cases;
2. | whether the deficiency relates to the effectiveness of the management and control system generally, or to the effectiveness of a particular element of the system, i.e. the operation of particular functions necessary to ensure the legality, regularity and eligibility of expenditure declared for co-financing from the Fund under the applicable national and Community rules (see section 2.2 below);
3. | the importance of the deficiency within the totality of the administrative, physical and other controls foreseen;
4. | the vulnerability to fraud of the measures, having regard particularly to the economic incentive.2.2. Classification of elements of management and control systems for the purpose of applying flat-rates of financial corrections for system deficiencies or individual breachesManagement and control systems for the Fund consist of various elements or functions of greater or lesser importance for ensuring the legality, regularity and eligibility of expenditure declared for co-financing. For the purpose of assessing flat-rate corrections for deficiencies in such systems or individual cases of irregularity, it is useful to classify the functions of management and control systems into key and ancillary elements.
Key elements are those designed and essential to ensure the legality and regularity and indeed the substance of projects supported by the Fund, ancillary elements those that contribute to the quality of a management and control system and help ensure that the system keeps performing well in relation to its key functions.
The list below contains the majority of elements of good management and control systems and good audit practice. The seriousness of deficiencies and individual breaches varies considerably, and cases will therefore be assessed by the Commission, having regard, in particular, to section 2.4 below.
2.2.1. Key elements for ensuring eligibility for co-financing
1. | Provision and application of procedures for grant applications, appraisal of applications, selection of projects for funding and selection of contractors/suppliers, appropriate publication of calls for grant applications according to the procedures for the programme concerned:(a)compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable;(b)appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies;(c)selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. | (a) | compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable; | (b) | appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies; | (c) | selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. | — | projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme, | — | reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out, | — | observance of State aid rules, | — | observance of eligibility rules, | — | inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
(a) | compliance, where applicable, with rules on publicity, equality of opportunity and public procurement, and with Treaty rules and principles of equality of treatment and non-discrimination where EC public procurement directives are not applicable;
(b) | appraisal of grant applications in accordance with programme criteria and procedures, including compliance with rules on environmental impact assessment, equality of opportunity legislation and policies;
(c) | selection of projects for funding:—projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,—reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,—observance of State aid rules,—observance of eligibility rules,—inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision. | — | projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme, | — | reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out, | — | observance of State aid rules, | — | observance of eligibility rules, | — | inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
— | projects selected correspond to objectives and published criteria of programme,
— | reasons for acceptance or rejection of applications are clearly set out,
— | observance of State aid rules,
— | observance of eligibility rules,
— | inclusion of terms and conditions of funding in approval decision.
2. | Adequate verification of delivery of co-financed products and services and of eligibility of expenditure charged to programme by the responsible authority designated under Article 13 of Decision 2004/904/EC and the intermediary organisations between the grant recipient and the responsible authority:(a)verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts’ reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot;(b)verification of observance of conditions of grant approval;(c)verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made;(d)adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim;(e)maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system;(f)maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system;(g)taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. | (a) | verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts’ reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot; | (b) | verification of observance of conditions of grant approval; | (c) | verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made; | (d) | adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim; | (e) | maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system; | (f) | maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system; | (g) | taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. | — | expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions, | — | the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
(a) | verification of the reality of ‘deliverables’ (services, works, supplies, etc.) against plans, invoices, acceptance documents, experts’ reports, etc., and, where appropriate, on the spot;
(b) | verification of observance of conditions of grant approval;
(c) | verification of the eligibility of expenditure for which a claim is made;
(d) | adequate follow-up of all outstanding questions before acceptance of claim;
(e) | maintenance of an adequate and reliable accounting system;
(f) | maintenance of the audit trail at all levels from grant recipient up through the system;
(g) | taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:—expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,—the co-financed projects have actually been carried out. | — | expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions, | — | the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
— | expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,
— | the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
3. | Sufficient quantity and quality of sample checks on projects and adequate follow-up:(a)carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor;(b)the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate;(c)adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence;(d)follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. | (a) | carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor; | (b) | the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate; | (c) | adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence; | (d) | follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. | — | appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate, | — | action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
(a) | carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor;
(b) | the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate;
(c) | adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence;
(d) | follow-up to checks, ensuring:—appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,—action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities. | — | appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate, | — | action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
— | appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,
— | action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.2.2.2. Ancillary elements
(a) | satisfactory administrative controls in the form of standard checklists or equivalent means and proper documentation of results, to ensure for instance:—that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable,—reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded; | — | that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable, | — | reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded;
— | that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable,
— | reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded;
(b) | proper supervision of claims processing and authorisation procedures;
(c) | satisfactory procedures to ensure proper dissemination of information about Community rules;
(d) | ensuring timely payment of Community funding to beneficiaries.2.3. Indicative scales of flat-rate corrections100 % correctionThe rate of correction may be fixed at 100 % when the deficiencies in the Member State’s management and control system are, or an individual breach is, so serious as to constitute a complete failure to comply with Community rules, so rendering all the payments irregular.
25 % correctionWhen a Member State’s application of its management and control system is gravely deficient, and there is evidence of widespread irregularity, and negligence in countering irregular or fraudulent practices, a correction of 25 % is justified, as it can then reasonably be assumed that the freedom to submit irregular claims with impunity will occasion exceptionally high losses to the Fund. A correction at this rate is also appropriate for irregularities in an individual case which are serious but do not invalidate the whole project.
10 % correctionWhen one or more key elements of the system do not function or function so poorly or so infrequently that they are completely ineffective in determining the eligibility of the claim or preventing irregularity, a correction of 10 % is justified, as it can reasonably be concluded that there was a high risk of widespread loss to the Fund. This rate of correction is also appropriate for individual irregularities of moderate seriousness in relation to key elements of the system.
5 % correctionWhen all the key elements of the system function, but not with the consistency, frequency, or depth required by the regulations, then a correction of 5 % is justified, as it can reasonably be concluded that they do not provide a sufficient level of assurance of the regularity of claims, and that the risk to the Fund was significant. A 5 % correction can also be appropriate for less serious irregularities in individual projects in relation to key elements.
The fact that the way in which a system operates is perfectible is not in itself sufficient grounds for a financial correction. There must be a serious deficiency of compliance with explicit Community rules or standards of good practice and the deficiency must expose the Fund to a real risk of loss or irregularity.
2 % correctionWhen performance is adequate in relation to the key elements of the system, but there is a complete failure to operate one or more ancillary elements, a correction of 2 % is justified in view of the lower risk of loss to the Fund, and the lesser seriousness of the infringement.
A 2 % correction will be increased to 5 % if the same deficiency is established in relation to expenditure after the date of the first correction imposed and the Member State has failed to take adequate corrective measures for the part of the system at fault after the first correction.
A correction of 2 % is also justified where the Commission has informed the Member State, without imposing any correction, of the need to make improvements to ancillary elements of the system that are in place but do not operate satisfactorily, but the Member State has not taken the necessary action.
Corrections are only imposed for deficiencies in ancillary elements of management and control systems where no deficiencies have been identified in key elements. If there are deficiencies in relation to ancillary elements as well as in key elements, corrections are only made at the rate applicable to the key elements.
2.4. Borderline casesWhere the correction resulting from a strict application of these guidelines would be clearly disproportionate, a lower rate of correction may be proposed.
For example, where the deficiencies arose from difficulties in the interpretation of Community rules or requirements (except in cases where it should reasonably be expected that the Member State raise such difficulties with the Commission), and the national authorities took effective steps to remedy the deficiencies as soon as they were brought to light, this mitigating factor may be taken into account and a lower rate or no correction may be proposed. Similarly, due regard should be paid to claims of legal security when the deficiencies were not reported following earlier audits by the Commission’s services.
In general, the fact that deficient management or control systems were improved immediately after the deficiencies were reported to the Member State is not considered as a mitigating factor when assessing the financial impact of the systemic irregularities before the improvement was made.
2.5. Basis of assessmentWhenever the situation in other Member States is known, the Commission should perform (there should be) a comparison between them to ensure equal treatment in the assessment of the rates of correction.
The rate of correction should be applied to that part of the expenditure placed at risk. When the deficiency results from a failure by the Member State to adopt an appropriate control system, then the correction should be applied to the entire expenditure for which that control system was required. When there is reason to suppose that the deficiency is limited to that of a particular authority’s or region’s application of the control system adopted by the Member State, the correction should be limited to the expenditure controlled by that authority or region. When the deficiency relates for example to verification of the criteria for eligibility for a higher rate of aid, then the correction should be based on the difference between the higher and lower rate of aid.
The correction should normally concern the expenditure of the measure over the period being examined, for example one financial year. However, when the irregularity results from systemic deficiencies, which are evidently long-standing and affecting several years’ expenditure, then the correction should concern all the expenditure declared by the Member State while the system deficiency obtained until the month in which it was remedied.
When several deficiencies are found in the same system, the flat rates of correction are not cumulated, the most serious deficiency being taken as an indication of the risks presented by the control system as a whole(2). They are applied to the expenditure remaining after deduction of the amounts refused for individual files. In the case of the Member State’s non-application of penalties prescribed by Community law, the financial correction should be the amount of the penalties not applied, together with 2 % of the remaining claims, as the non-application of penalties increases the risk that irregular claims will be submitted.
3. APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF NET FINANCIAL CORRECTIONSWhere the Member State made the financial correction proposed in the procedure under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, the Commission need not impose a net reduction in the funding, but may allow the Member State to reallocate the sums released. However, financial corrections imposed by the Commission under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC after completion of the procedure laid down by Article 26(3) and (4) of the same Decision will in all cases involve a net reduction in the indicative allocation of assistance from the Fund.
A net correction is automatically made if the Commission considers that the Member State has not taken satisfactory account of conclusions on irregularities detected by Community or national bodies and/or if the irregularity is related to a serious deficiency in the management or control system of the Member State or of the management or payment authorities.
Any sum due to the Commission as a result of net corrections is to be paid together with interest under Article 26(4) of Decision 2004/904/EC and in accordance with Article 3(1) of this Decision.

(1)
OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1.
(2) See also section 2.3 (2 % correction).

Pending: 32006D0383

2.6.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 148/50
(1) By Commission Decision 2005/1/EC(2), the Czech Republic was authorised to apply four methods for grading pig carcasses.
(2) The Czech Republic has requested the Commission to authorise two new methods for grading pig carcasses and has submitted the results of its dissection trials, by presenting part two of the protocol provided for in Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for application of the Community scale for grading pig carcasses(3).
(3) The evaluation of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorising the new methods are fulfilled.
(4) Due to technical reasons in slaughterhouses, the Czech Republic requested to fix the limit for using the grading method ‘Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)’ at the previous weekly amount expressed in annual average.
(5) Decision 2005/1/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,
1. Article 1 is amended as follows:(a)In the first paragraph of Article 1, the following fifth and sixth indents are added:‘—the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,—the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’(b)The second paragraph is replaced by the following:‘The grading method “Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)” may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs in annual average.’ (a) In the first paragraph of Article 1, the following fifth and sixth indents are added:‘—the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,—the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’ ‘— the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex, — the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’ (b) The second paragraph is replaced by the following:‘The grading method “Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)” may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs in annual average.’
(a) In the first paragraph of Article 1, the following fifth and sixth indents are added:‘—the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,—the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’ ‘— the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex, — the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
‘— the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,
— the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
(b) The second paragraph is replaced by the following:‘The grading method “Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)” may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs in annual average.’
(a) In the first paragraph of Article 1, the following fifth and sixth indents are added:‘—the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,—the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’ ‘— the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex, — the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
‘— the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,
— the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
‘— the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,
— the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
(b) The second paragraph is replaced by the following:‘The grading method “Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)” may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs in annual average.’
2. The Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
1. Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by use of the method termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05”.
2. The grading apparatus IS-D-05 is a device for measuring the lean meat and fat thickness on the basis of response analysis of the range of ultrasonic impulses which are transmitted in sequence into the carcass in the specified place. Ultrasonic probe scans treated carcasses with the set of 3 × 100 ultrasonic impulses at frequency of 4 MHz in the time of scanning.
3. The lean meat content of the carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula:= 60,69798 – 0,89211 S (IS-D-05) + 0,10560 M (IS-D-05)where:= the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass,S (IS-D-05)= backfat thickness including skin (mm) at the point of measurement at 70 mm off the midline of the carcass between the second and the third last ribs (mm),M (IS-D-05)= muscle depth at the point of measurement (mm).The formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms.
1. Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by use of the method termed “Needle IS-D-15”.
2. The grading apparatus IS-D-15 is a device using a sharp needle probe which is inserted into a given place of the carcass; the insertion depth is about 140 mm. A special engineered optical set is located behind the needle that by the means of an optical channel enlightens the surrounding tissue or area and scans the amount of reflected light energy with the defined wavelength. The terminal is also equipped with a precise contactless measuring device which determines the current insertion depth with 46 micrometer precision.
3. The lean meat content of the carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula:= 60,92452 – 0,77248 S (IS-D-15) + 0,11329 M (IS-D-15)where:= the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass,S (IS-D-15)= backfat thickness including skin (mm) at the point of measurement at 70 mm off the midline of the carcass between the second and the third last ribs (mm),M (IS-D-15)= muscle depth at the point of measurement (mm).The formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms‘
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcasses(1), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,
(1) By Commission Decision 2005/1/EC(2), the Czech Republic was authorised to apply four methods for grading pig carcasses.
(2) The Czech Republic has requested the Commission to authorise two new methods for grading pig carcasses and has submitted the results of its dissection trials, by presenting part two of the protocol provided for in Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for application of the Community scale for grading pig carcasses(3).
(3) The evaluation of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorising the new methods are fulfilled.
(4) Due to technical reasons in slaughterhouses, the Czech Republic requested to fix the limit for using the grading method ‘Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)’ at the previous weekly amount expressed in annual average.
(5) Decision 2005/1/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Decision 2005/1/EC is amended as follows:
1.
Article 1 is amended as follows:
(a)
In the first paragraph of Article 1, the following fifth and sixth indents are added:
‘—
the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,
—
the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
(b)
The second paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘The grading method “Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)” may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs in annual average.’
2.
The Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Czech Republic.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcasses(1), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,
(1) By Commission Decision 2005/1/EC(2), the Czech Republic was authorised to apply four methods for grading pig carcasses.
(2) The Czech Republic has requested the Commission to authorise two new methods for grading pig carcasses and has submitted the results of its dissection trials, by presenting part two of the protocol provided for in Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for application of the Community scale for grading pig carcasses(3).
(3) The evaluation of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorising the new methods are fulfilled.
(4) Due to technical reasons in slaughterhouses, the Czech Republic requested to fix the limit for using the grading method ‘Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)’ at the previous weekly amount expressed in annual average.
(5) Decision 2005/1/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision 2005/1/EC is amended as follows:
1.
Article 1 is amended as follows:
(a)
In the first paragraph of Article 1, the following fifth and sixth indents are added:
‘—
the apparatus termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex,
—
the apparatus termed “Needle IS-D-15” and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex.’
(b)
The second paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘The grading method “Zwei-Punkte-Messverfahren (ZP)” may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs in annual average.’
2.
The Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Czech Republic.
ANNEXIn the Annex to Decision 2005/1/EC the following Part 5 and Part 6 are added:

‘PART 5
Ultra-sound IS-D-05 1. Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by use of the method termed “Ultra-sound IS-D-05”. 2. The grading apparatus IS-D-05 is a device for measuring the lean meat and fat thickness on the basis of response analysis of the range of ultrasonic impulses which are transmitted in sequence into the carcass in the specified place. Ultrasonic probe scans treated carcasses with the set of 3 × 100 ultrasonic impulses at frequency of 4 MHz in the time of scanning. 3. The lean meat content of the carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula:
= 60,69798 – 0,89211 S (IS-D-05) + 0,10560 M (IS-D-05)
where:
= the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass,
S (IS-D-05)= backfat thickness including skin (mm) at the point of measurement at 70 mm off the midline of the carcass between the second and the third last ribs (mm),
M (IS-D-05)= muscle depth at the point of measurement (mm).
The formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms.
PART 6
Needle IS-D-15 1. Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by use of the method termed “Needle IS-D-15”. 2. The grading apparatus IS-D-15 is a device using a sharp needle probe which is inserted into a given place of the carcass; the insertion depth is about 140 mm. A special engineered optical set is located behind the needle that by the means of an optical channel enlightens the surrounding tissue or area and scans the amount of reflected light energy with the defined wavelength. The terminal is also equipped with a precise contactless measuring device which determines the current insertion depth with 46 micrometer precision. 3. The lean meat content of the carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula:
= 60,92452 – 0,77248 S (IS-D-15) + 0,11329 M (IS-D-15)
where:
= the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass,
S (IS-D-15)= backfat thickness including skin (mm) at the point of measurement at 70 mm off the midline of the carcass between the second and the third last ribs (mm),
M (IS-D-15)= muscle depth at the point of measurement (mm).
The formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms‘

Pending: 32006D0265

4.4.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 95/9
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
(2) Switzerland has notified to the Commission the isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case in a wild species. The clinical picture allows the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type and of the pathogenicity index.
(3) In view of the animal health risk of disease introduction into the Community, it is therefore appropriate as an immediate measure to suspend imports of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game birds, live birds other than poultry and hatching eggs of these species from Switzerland.
(4) Furthermore the importation into the Community from Switzerland should be suspended for fresh meat of wild feathered game and importation of minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species.
(5) Certain products derived from poultry slaughtered before 1 February 2006 should continue to be authorised, taking into account the incubation period of the disease.
(6) Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC(4)lays down the list of third countries from which Member States may authorise the importation of meat products and establishes treatment regimes considered effective in inactivating the respective pathogens. In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via such products, appropriate treatment must be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from. It appears therefore appropriate, that imports of wild feathered game meat products originating in Switzerland and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product should continue to be authorised.
(7) Account should be taken of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation in trade on agricultural products (the ‘Agreement’)(5).
(8) Following the notification of an isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case in a wild species, consultations have been held between the competent Commission services and the Swiss authorities in accordance with Article 20(1) of Annex 11 of the Agreement. With a view to finding appropriate solutions in accordance with this provision, Switzerland has notified that they will apply the equivalent measures as those adopted in the Community in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/115/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decisions 2006/86/EC, 2006/90/EC, 2006/91/EC, 2006/94/EC, 2006/104/EC and 2006/105/EC(6)and Commission Decision 2006/135/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic influenza in poultry in the Community(7).
(9) Switzerland has notified their intention to immediately notify the Commission of any future changes to the ongoing animal health status of Switzerland, including specifically any further outbreaks of avian influenza that may occur and the areas concerned. The Commission should notifiy those areas immediately to the Member States.
(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
— live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game, live birds other than poultry as defined in Article 1, third indent, of Decision 2000/666/EC, including birds accompanying their owners (pet birds), and hatching eggs of these species,
— fresh meat of wild feathered game,
— minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game,
— raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game, and
— non-treated game trophies from any birds.
ISO country code Name of country Part of territory
CH Switzerland In Switzerland: all areas of the territory of Switzerland for which the authorities of Switzerland have formally applied equivalent restrictions to those laid down in Commission Decision 2006/115/EC and Commission Decision 2006/135/EC.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), and in particular Article 18(1), (3) and (6) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(2), and in particular Article 22(1), (5) and (6) thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of 26 May 2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC(3), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
(2) Switzerland has notified to the Commission the isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case in a wild species. The clinical picture allows the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type and of the pathogenicity index.
(3) In view of the animal health risk of disease introduction into the Community, it is therefore appropriate as an immediate measure to suspend imports of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game birds, live birds other than poultry and hatching eggs of these species from Switzerland.
(4) Furthermore the importation into the Community from Switzerland should be suspended for fresh meat of wild feathered game and importation of minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species.
(5) Certain products derived from poultry slaughtered before 1 February 2006 should continue to be authorised, taking into account the incubation period of the disease.
(6) Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC(4)lays down the list of third countries from which Member States may authorise the importation of meat products and establishes treatment regimes considered effective in inactivating the respective pathogens. In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via such products, appropriate treatment must be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from. It appears therefore appropriate, that imports of wild feathered game meat products originating in Switzerland and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product should continue to be authorised.
(7) Account should be taken of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation in trade on agricultural products (the ‘Agreement’)(5).
(8) Following the notification of an isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case in a wild species, consultations have been held between the competent Commission services and the Swiss authorities in accordance with Article 20(1) of Annex 11 of the Agreement. With a view to finding appropriate solutions in accordance with this provision, Switzerland has notified that they will apply the equivalent measures as those adopted in the Community in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/115/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decisions 2006/86/EC, 2006/90/EC, 2006/91/EC, 2006/94/EC, 2006/104/EC and 2006/105/EC(6)and Commission Decision 2006/135/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic influenza in poultry in the Community(7).
(9) Switzerland has notified their intention to immediately notify the Commission of any future changes to the ongoing animal health status of Switzerland, including specifically any further outbreaks of avian influenza that may occur and the areas concerned. The Commission should notifiy those areas immediately to the Member States.
(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. Member States shall suspend imports or introduction into the Community of the following from the part of the territory of Switzerland referred to in the Annex:
—
live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game, live birds other than poultry as defined in Article 1, third indent, of Decision 2000/666/EC, including birds accompanying their owners (pet birds), and hatching eggs of these species,
—
fresh meat of wild feathered game,
—
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game,
—
raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game, and
—
non-treated game trophies from any birds.
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall authorise the importation of the products covered by paragraph 1 second to fourth indent, which have been obtained from birds slaughtered before 1 February 2006.
3. In the veterinary certificates/commercial documents accompanying consignments of the products referred to in paragraph 2 the following words as appropriate to the species shall be included:
‘Fresh meat of wild feathered game/minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat or meat product consisting of, or containing meat of wild feathered game/raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game(*1)obtained from birds slaughtered before 1 February 2006 and in accordance with Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2006/265/EC.
4. By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall authorise the importation of meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game under the condition that the meat of these species has undergone at least one of the specific treatments referred to under points B, C or D in Part IV of Annex II to Commission Decision 2005/432/EC.

Article 2
Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3
This Decision shall apply until 31 May 2006.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), and in particular Article 18(1), (3) and (6) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(2), and in particular Article 22(1), (5) and (6) thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of 26 May 2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC(3), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming. There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
(2) Switzerland has notified to the Commission the isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case in a wild species. The clinical picture allows the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type and of the pathogenicity index.
(3) In view of the animal health risk of disease introduction into the Community, it is therefore appropriate as an immediate measure to suspend imports of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game birds, live birds other than poultry and hatching eggs of these species from Switzerland.
(4) Furthermore the importation into the Community from Switzerland should be suspended for fresh meat of wild feathered game and importation of minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species.
(5) Certain products derived from poultry slaughtered before 1 February 2006 should continue to be authorised, taking into account the incubation period of the disease.
(6) Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC(4)lays down the list of third countries from which Member States may authorise the importation of meat products and establishes treatment regimes considered effective in inactivating the respective pathogens. In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via such products, appropriate treatment must be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from. It appears therefore appropriate, that imports of wild feathered game meat products originating in Switzerland and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product should continue to be authorised.
(7) Account should be taken of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation in trade on agricultural products (the ‘Agreement’)(5).
(8) Following the notification of an isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case in a wild species, consultations have been held between the competent Commission services and the Swiss authorities in accordance with Article 20(1) of Annex 11 of the Agreement. With a view to finding appropriate solutions in accordance with this provision, Switzerland has notified that they will apply the equivalent measures as those adopted in the Community in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/115/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decisions 2006/86/EC, 2006/90/EC, 2006/91/EC, 2006/94/EC, 2006/104/EC and 2006/105/EC(6)and Commission Decision 2006/135/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic influenza in poultry in the Community(7).
(9) Switzerland has notified their intention to immediately notify the Commission of any future changes to the ongoing animal health status of Switzerland, including specifically any further outbreaks of avian influenza that may occur and the areas concerned. The Commission should notifiy those areas immediately to the Member States.
(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. Member States shall suspend imports or introduction into the Community of the following from the part of the territory of Switzerland referred to in the Annex:
—
live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game, live birds other than poultry as defined in Article 1, third indent, of Decision 2000/666/EC, including birds accompanying their owners (pet birds), and hatching eggs of these species,
—
fresh meat of wild feathered game,
—
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game,
—
raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game, and
—
non-treated game trophies from any birds.
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall authorise the importation of the products covered by paragraph 1 second to fourth indent, which have been obtained from birds slaughtered before 1 February 2006.
3. In the veterinary certificates/commercial documents accompanying consignments of the products referred to in paragraph 2 the following words as appropriate to the species shall be included:
‘Fresh meat of wild feathered game/minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat or meat product consisting of, or containing meat of wild feathered game/raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game(*1)obtained from birds slaughtered before 1 February 2006 and in accordance with Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2006/265/EC.
4. By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall authorise the importation of meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game under the condition that the meat of these species has undergone at least one of the specific treatments referred to under points B, C or D in Part IV of Annex II to Commission Decision 2005/432/EC.
Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision shall apply until 31 May 2006.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEXPart of the territory of Switzerland referred to in Article 1(1)

ISO country code | Name of country | Part of territory
CH | Switzerland | In Switzerland: all areas of the territory of Switzerland for which the authorities of Switzerland have formally applied equivalent restrictions to those laid down in Commission Decision 2006/115/EC and Commission Decision 2006/135/EC.

Pending: 32006D0252

29.3.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 91/48
(1) Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 lays down the procedure for the establishment of rules in respect of flavouring substances used or intended to be used in foodstuffs. That Regulation provides for the adoption of a register of flavouring substances (the register) following notification by the Member States of a list of the flavouring substances which may be used in or on foodstuffs marketed in their territory and on the basis of scrutiny by the Commission of that notification. That register was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC(2).
(2) In addition, Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 provides for a programme for the evaluation of flavouring substances in order to check whether they comply with the general criteria for the use of flavouring substances set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(3) The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) concluded during its 65th meeting of 7 to 16 June 2005 that the acetamide (FL 16.047) is clearly carcinogenic in both mice and rats, and although the mechanism of tumour formation is unknown, the possibility of a genotoxic mechanism can not be discounted. The JECFA considered it inappropriate for such a compound to be used as a flavouring agent. Accordingly acetamide does not comply with the general criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 and should be deleted from the register.
(4) Decision 1999/217/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 1996 laying down a Community procedure for flavouring substances used or intended for use in or on foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
(1) Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 lays down the procedure for the establishment of rules in respect of flavouring substances used or intended to be used in foodstuffs. That Regulation provides for the adoption of a register of flavouring substances (the register) following notification by the Member States of a list of the flavouring substances which may be used in or on foodstuffs marketed in their territory and on the basis of scrutiny by the Commission of that notification. That register was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC(2).
(2) In addition, Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 provides for a programme for the evaluation of flavouring substances in order to check whether they comply with the general criteria for the use of flavouring substances set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(3) The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) concluded during its 65th meeting of 7 to 16 June 2005 that the acetamide (FL 16.047) is clearly carcinogenic in both mice and rats, and although the mechanism of tumour formation is unknown, the possibility of a genotoxic mechanism can not be discounted. The JECFA considered it inappropriate for such a compound to be used as a flavouring agent. Accordingly acetamide does not comply with the general criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 and should be deleted from the register.
(4) Decision 1999/217/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
In Part A of the Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC, the row set out in the table for the substance attributed with FL-number 16.047 (acetamide) is deleted.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 1996 laying down a Community procedure for flavouring substances used or intended for use in or on foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
(1) Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 lays down the procedure for the establishment of rules in respect of flavouring substances used or intended to be used in foodstuffs. That Regulation provides for the adoption of a register of flavouring substances (the register) following notification by the Member States of a list of the flavouring substances which may be used in or on foodstuffs marketed in their territory and on the basis of scrutiny by the Commission of that notification. That register was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC(2).
(2) In addition, Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 provides for a programme for the evaluation of flavouring substances in order to check whether they comply with the general criteria for the use of flavouring substances set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(3) The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) concluded during its 65th meeting of 7 to 16 June 2005 that the acetamide (FL 16.047) is clearly carcinogenic in both mice and rats, and although the mechanism of tumour formation is unknown, the possibility of a genotoxic mechanism can not be discounted. The JECFA considered it inappropriate for such a compound to be used as a flavouring agent. Accordingly acetamide does not comply with the general criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 and should be deleted from the register.
(4) Decision 1999/217/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
In Part A of the Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC, the row set out in the table for the substance attributed with FL-number 16.047 (acetamide) is deleted.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Pending: 32006D0247

28.3.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 89/52
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and other birds, causing mortality and disturbance which can quickly take on epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce the profitability of poultry farming sharply. There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced into the Community via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
(2) Bulgaria has notified to the Commission the isolation of an influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 Asian strain collected from a clinical case in wild birds.
(3) Bulgaria is included in the list in Part I of Annex I to Commission Decision 96/482/EC of 12 July 1996 laying down animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the importation of poultry and hatching eggs other than ratites and eggs thereof from third countries including animal health measures to be applied after such importation(3). That list sets out the third countries or parts of third countries which are authorised to use the model certificates A to D as laid down in the Annex to that Decision. Imports of live poultry, hatching eggs and day old chicks from the third countries or parts thereof on the list in Part I of Annex I to that Decision are authorised into the Community.
(4) Bulgaria is included in the list in Annexes I and II to Commission Decision 2000/585/EC of 7 September 2000, drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and certain wild and farmed game meat, and laying down the animal and public health and the veterinary certification conditions for such imports(4). Therefore, imports into the Community of meat from wild feathered game from Bulgaria is permitted.
(5) In the light of the current epidemiological situation in Bulgaria, it is appropriate to suspend imports of live poultry, ratities and farmed and wild feathered game and hatching eggs of those species coming from the whole territory of Bulgaria.
(6) In addition to that suspension, it is also appropriate to suspend imports of fresh meat of wild feathered game and imports of minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species, as well as certain other products of birds coming from Bulgaria.
(7) Commission Decision 2003/812/EC of 17 November 2003 drawing up lists of third countries from which Member States are to authorise imports of certain products for human consumption subject to Council Directive 92/118/EEC(5)provides that the list of third countries or parts of third countries from which Member States are to authorise the imports of eggs intended for human consumption are those listed in the Annex to Commission Decision 94/85/EC of 16 February 1994 drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of fresh poultry meat(6). Taking into account the forthcoming laying season for wild birds, the imports of eggs for human consumption collected from wild birds should also be prohibited from Bulgaria.
(8) Taking account of the current epidemiology situation in Bulgaria and the fact that that country has applied certain disease control measures and has sent further information on the disease situation to the Commission, it is appropriate to limit the suspension of imports of certain products from birds to those parts of the territory of Bulgaria that are affected and/or at risk from avian influenza.
(9) Certain products derived from wild feathered game hunted before 1 August 2005 should continue to be authorised from those parts of Bulgaria, taking into account the epidemiology of the disease in those parts of that country.
(10) Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC(7)lays down the list of third countries or parts thereof from which meat products are authorised for importation into the Community and establishes treatment regimes for meat products considered effective in inactivating certain pathogens.
(11) In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via the products covered by Decision 2005/432/EC, appropriate treatment should be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from. It is therefore appropriate that imports of wild feathered game meat products, originating in Bulgaria and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product, should continue to be authorised for importation into the Community.
(12) In order to authorise imports of meat products subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to inactivate any possible virus in the meat, it is necessary to specify the required treatment for meat from wild feathered game in the health certificates drawn up in accordance with Annexes III and IV to Decision 2005/432/EC.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision shall apply without prejudice to the measures relating to outbreaks of Newcastle Disease in Bulgaria as provided for in Decision 2005/648/EC of 8 September 2005 concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria(8).
(14) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
(a) live poultry, ratites and farmed and wild feathered game, and hatching eggs of these species coming from the part of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Part A of the Annex;
(b) the following products coming from the part of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Part B of the Annex:(i)fresh meat of wild feathered game;(ii)minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game;(iii)raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game;(iv)eggs for human consumption from wild game birds;(v)non-treated game trophies from any birds;(vi)untreated feathers and parts of feathers;(vii)unprocessed manure from poultry or any other birds. (i) fresh meat of wild feathered game; (ii) minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game; (iii) raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game; (iv) eggs for human consumption from wild game birds; (v) non-treated game trophies from any birds; (vi) untreated feathers and parts of feathers; (vii) unprocessed manure from poultry or any other birds.
(i) fresh meat of wild feathered game;
(ii) minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game;
(iii) raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game;
(iv) eggs for human consumption from wild game birds;
(v) non-treated game trophies from any birds;
(vi) untreated feathers and parts of feathers;
(vii) unprocessed manure from poultry or any other birds.
(i) fresh meat of wild feathered game;
(ii) minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game;
(iii) raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game;
(iv) eggs for human consumption from wild game birds;
(v) non-treated game trophies from any birds;
(vi) untreated feathers and parts of feathers;
(vii) unprocessed manure from poultry or any other birds.
ISO-country code Name of country Description of part of territory
BG Bulgaria — Whole of the territory of Bulgaria
ISO-country code Name of country Description of part of territory
BG Bulgaria In Bulgaria the the counties of—Vidin—Montana—Vratsa—Pleven—Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771)—Russe—Razgrad—Silistra—Dobrich—Varna—Burgas — Vidin — Montana — Vratsa — Pleven — Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771) — Russe — Razgrad — Silistra — Dobrich — Varna — Burgas
— Vidin
— Montana
— Vratsa
— Pleven
— Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771)
— Russe
— Razgrad
— Silistra
— Dobrich
— Varna
— Burgas
— Vidin
— Montana
— Vratsa
— Pleven
— Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771)
— Russe
— Razgrad
— Silistra
— Dobrich
— Varna
— Burgas
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(2), and in particular Article 22 thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and other birds, causing mortality and disturbance which can quickly take on epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce the profitability of poultry farming sharply. There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced into the Community via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
(2) Bulgaria has notified to the Commission the isolation of an influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 Asian strain collected from a clinical case in wild birds.
(3) Bulgaria is included in the list in Part I of Annex I to Commission Decision 96/482/EC of 12 July 1996 laying down animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the importation of poultry and hatching eggs other than ratites and eggs thereof from third countries including animal health measures to be applied after such importation(3). That list sets out the third countries or parts of third countries which are authorised to use the model certificates A to D as laid down in the Annex to that Decision. Imports of live poultry, hatching eggs and day old chicks from the third countries or parts thereof on the list in Part I of Annex I to that Decision are authorised into the Community.
(4) Bulgaria is included in the list in Annexes I and II to Commission Decision 2000/585/EC of 7 September 2000, drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and certain wild and farmed game meat, and laying down the animal and public health and the veterinary certification conditions for such imports(4). Therefore, imports into the Community of meat from wild feathered game from Bulgaria is permitted.
(5) In the light of the current epidemiological situation in Bulgaria, it is appropriate to suspend imports of live poultry, ratities and farmed and wild feathered game and hatching eggs of those species coming from the whole territory of Bulgaria.
(6) In addition to that suspension, it is also appropriate to suspend imports of fresh meat of wild feathered game and imports of minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species, as well as certain other products of birds coming from Bulgaria.
(7) Commission Decision 2003/812/EC of 17 November 2003 drawing up lists of third countries from which Member States are to authorise imports of certain products for human consumption subject to Council Directive 92/118/EEC(5)provides that the list of third countries or parts of third countries from which Member States are to authorise the imports of eggs intended for human consumption are those listed in the Annex to Commission Decision 94/85/EC of 16 February 1994 drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of fresh poultry meat(6). Taking into account the forthcoming laying season for wild birds, the imports of eggs for human consumption collected from wild birds should also be prohibited from Bulgaria.
(8) Taking account of the current epidemiology situation in Bulgaria and the fact that that country has applied certain disease control measures and has sent further information on the disease situation to the Commission, it is appropriate to limit the suspension of imports of certain products from birds to those parts of the territory of Bulgaria that are affected and/or at risk from avian influenza.
(9) Certain products derived from wild feathered game hunted before 1 August 2005 should continue to be authorised from those parts of Bulgaria, taking into account the epidemiology of the disease in those parts of that country.
(10) Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC(7)lays down the list of third countries or parts thereof from which meat products are authorised for importation into the Community and establishes treatment regimes for meat products considered effective in inactivating certain pathogens.
(11) In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via the products covered by Decision 2005/432/EC, appropriate treatment should be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from. It is therefore appropriate that imports of wild feathered game meat products, originating in Bulgaria and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product, should continue to be authorised for importation into the Community.
(12) In order to authorise imports of meat products subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to inactivate any possible virus in the meat, it is necessary to specify the required treatment for meat from wild feathered game in the health certificates drawn up in accordance with Annexes III and IV to Decision 2005/432/EC.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision shall apply without prejudice to the measures relating to outbreaks of Newcastle Disease in Bulgaria as provided for in Decision 2005/648/EC of 8 September 2005 concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria(8).
(14) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Member States shall suspend imports of:
(a)
live poultry, ratites and farmed and wild feathered game, and hatching eggs of these species coming from the part of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Part A of the Annex;
(b)
the following products coming from the part of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Part B of the Annex:
(i)
fresh meat of wild feathered game;
(ii)
minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game;
(iii)
raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game;
(iv)
eggs for human consumption from wild game birds;
(v)
non-treated game trophies from any birds;
(vi)
untreated feathers and parts of feathers;
(vii)
unprocessed manure from poultry or any other birds.

Article 2
1. By way of derogation from Article 1, Member States shall authorise imports of the products referred to in point (b)(i),(ii) and (iii) of that Article, which have been obtained from birds hunted before 1 August 2005.
2. In the veterinary certificates/commercial documents accompanying consignments of the products referred to in Article 1(b)(i),(ii) and (iii), the following words as appropriate to the species shall be included:
‘Fresh meat of wild feathered game/meat product consisting of, or containing meat of wild feathered game/meat preparation consisting of, or containing meat of wild feathered game/raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game(1)obtained from birds hunted before 1 August 2005.
3. By way of derogation from Article 1(b)(ii), Member States shall authorise imports of meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game provided that the meat of such species has undergone at least one of the specific treatments referred to in points B, C or D in Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2005/432/EC.
4. The specific treatment applied in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article shall be specified in point 9.1 column B in the veterinary certificate drawn up in accordance with the model set out in Annex III to Decision 2005/432/EC, and the following wording shall be added to that certificate:
‘Meat products treated in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/247/EC’.
5. The specific treatment applied in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article shall be certified by adding the following wording to the veterinary certificate drawn up in accordance with the model set out Annex IV to Decision 2005/432/EC:
‘Meat products treated in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/247/EC’.

Article 3
Member States shall ensure that for the importation of treated feathers or parts of feathers, the consignment is accompanied by a commercial document stating that the treated feathers or parts thereof have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring that no pathogens remain.
However, that commercial document shall not be required for treated decorative feathers, treated feathers carried by travellers for their private use or consignments of treated feathers sent to private individuals for non-industrial purpose.

Article 4
Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 5
This Decision shall apply until 31 May 2006.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(2), and in particular Article 22 thereof,
(1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and other birds, causing mortality and disturbance which can quickly take on epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce the profitability of poultry farming sharply. There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced into the Community via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
(2) Bulgaria has notified to the Commission the isolation of an influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 Asian strain collected from a clinical case in wild birds.
(3) Bulgaria is included in the list in Part I of Annex I to Commission Decision 96/482/EC of 12 July 1996 laying down animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the importation of poultry and hatching eggs other than ratites and eggs thereof from third countries including animal health measures to be applied after such importation(3). That list sets out the third countries or parts of third countries which are authorised to use the model certificates A to D as laid down in the Annex to that Decision. Imports of live poultry, hatching eggs and day old chicks from the third countries or parts thereof on the list in Part I of Annex I to that Decision are authorised into the Community.
(4) Bulgaria is included in the list in Annexes I and II to Commission Decision 2000/585/EC of 7 September 2000, drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and certain wild and farmed game meat, and laying down the animal and public health and the veterinary certification conditions for such imports(4). Therefore, imports into the Community of meat from wild feathered game from Bulgaria is permitted.
(5) In the light of the current epidemiological situation in Bulgaria, it is appropriate to suspend imports of live poultry, ratities and farmed and wild feathered game and hatching eggs of those species coming from the whole territory of Bulgaria.
(6) In addition to that suspension, it is also appropriate to suspend imports of fresh meat of wild feathered game and imports of minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species, as well as certain other products of birds coming from Bulgaria.
(7) Commission Decision 2003/812/EC of 17 November 2003 drawing up lists of third countries from which Member States are to authorise imports of certain products for human consumption subject to Council Directive 92/118/EEC(5)provides that the list of third countries or parts of third countries from which Member States are to authorise the imports of eggs intended for human consumption are those listed in the Annex to Commission Decision 94/85/EC of 16 February 1994 drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of fresh poultry meat(6). Taking into account the forthcoming laying season for wild birds, the imports of eggs for human consumption collected from wild birds should also be prohibited from Bulgaria.
(8) Taking account of the current epidemiology situation in Bulgaria and the fact that that country has applied certain disease control measures and has sent further information on the disease situation to the Commission, it is appropriate to limit the suspension of imports of certain products from birds to those parts of the territory of Bulgaria that are affected and/or at risk from avian influenza.
(9) Certain products derived from wild feathered game hunted before 1 August 2005 should continue to be authorised from those parts of Bulgaria, taking into account the epidemiology of the disease in those parts of that country.
(10) Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC(7)lays down the list of third countries or parts thereof from which meat products are authorised for importation into the Community and establishes treatment regimes for meat products considered effective in inactivating certain pathogens.
(11) In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via the products covered by Decision 2005/432/EC, appropriate treatment should be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from. It is therefore appropriate that imports of wild feathered game meat products, originating in Bulgaria and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product, should continue to be authorised for importation into the Community.
(12) In order to authorise imports of meat products subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to inactivate any possible virus in the meat, it is necessary to specify the required treatment for meat from wild feathered game in the health certificates drawn up in accordance with Annexes III and IV to Decision 2005/432/EC.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision shall apply without prejudice to the measures relating to outbreaks of Newcastle Disease in Bulgaria as provided for in Decision 2005/648/EC of 8 September 2005 concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria(8).
(14) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Member States shall suspend imports of:
(a)
live poultry, ratites and farmed and wild feathered game, and hatching eggs of these species coming from the part of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Part A of the Annex;
(b)
the following products coming from the part of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Part B of the Annex:
(i)
fresh meat of wild feathered game;
(ii)
minced meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game;
(iii)
raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game;
(iv)
eggs for human consumption from wild game birds;
(v)
non-treated game trophies from any birds;
(vi)
untreated feathers and parts of feathers;
(vii)
unprocessed manure from poultry or any other birds.
1. By way of derogation from Article 1, Member States shall authorise imports of the products referred to in point (b)(i),(ii) and (iii) of that Article, which have been obtained from birds hunted before 1 August 2005.
2. In the veterinary certificates/commercial documents accompanying consignments of the products referred to in Article 1(b)(i),(ii) and (iii), the following words as appropriate to the species shall be included:
‘Fresh meat of wild feathered game/meat product consisting of, or containing meat of wild feathered game/meat preparation consisting of, or containing meat of wild feathered game/raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game(1)obtained from birds hunted before 1 August 2005.
3. By way of derogation from Article 1(b)(ii), Member States shall authorise imports of meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game provided that the meat of such species has undergone at least one of the specific treatments referred to in points B, C or D in Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2005/432/EC.
4. The specific treatment applied in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article shall be specified in point 9.1 column B in the veterinary certificate drawn up in accordance with the model set out in Annex III to Decision 2005/432/EC, and the following wording shall be added to that certificate:
‘Meat products treated in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/247/EC’.
5. The specific treatment applied in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article shall be certified by adding the following wording to the veterinary certificate drawn up in accordance with the model set out Annex IV to Decision 2005/432/EC:
‘Meat products treated in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/247/EC’.
Member States shall ensure that for the importation of treated feathers or parts of feathers, the consignment is accompanied by a commercial document stating that the treated feathers or parts thereof have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring that no pathogens remain.
However, that commercial document shall not be required for treated decorative feathers, treated feathers carried by travellers for their private use or consignments of treated feathers sent to private individuals for non-industrial purpose.
Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision shall apply until 31 May 2006.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEXParts of the territory of Bulgaria referred to in Article 1(a) and (b) respectively:PART A
ISO-country code | Name of country | Description of part of territory
BG | Bulgaria | — Whole of the territory of Bulgaria
PART B
ISO-country code | Name of country | Description of part of territory
BG | Bulgaria | In Bulgaria the the counties of—Vidin—Montana—Vratsa—Pleven—Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771)—Russe—Razgrad—Silistra—Dobrich—Varna—Burgas | — | Vidin | — | Montana | — | Vratsa | — | Pleven | — | Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771) | — | Russe | — | Razgrad | — | Silistra | — | Dobrich | — | Varna | — | Burgas
— | Vidin
— | Montana
— | Vratsa
— | Pleven
— | Veliko Tarnovo (the area north of motorway E 771)
— | Russe
— | Razgrad
— | Silistra
— | Dobrich
— | Varna
— | Burgas