Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1981 of 15 July 2024 appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1981 17.7.2024
(1) Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union (‘the Military Committee’) is to be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. Article 3(2) of that Decision states that the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee is three years, unless the Council decides otherwise.
(2) On 12 May 2022, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2022/735(2), appointing General Robert BRIEGER as Chairman of the Military Committee from 16 May 2022 to 31 May 2025.
(3) At its meeting on 15 May 2024, the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Seán CLANCY be appointed as Chairman of the Military Committee for a period of three years, from 1 June 2025 to 31 May 2028,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240 thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision 2001/79/CFSP of 22 January 2001 setting up the Military Committee of the European Union (1),
Whereas:
(1) Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union (‘the Military Committee’) is to be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. Article 3(2) of that Decision states that the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee is three years, unless the Council decides otherwise.
(2) On 12 May 2022, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2022/735 (2), appointing General Robert BRIEGER as Chairman of the Military Committee from 16 May 2022 to 31 May 2025.
(3) At its meeting on 15 May 2024, the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Seán CLANCY be appointed as Chairman of the Military Committee for a period of three years, from 1 June 2025 to 31 May 2028,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
General Seán CLANCY is hereby appointed as Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union from 1 June 2025 to 31 May 2028.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1980 of 15 July 2024 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Beninese Armed Forces with military equipment designed to deliver lethal force

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1980 16.7.2024
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509(1)establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) The northern regions of the coastal countries of the Gulf of Guinea, namely Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo, have been experiencing deteriorating security conditions in connection with the crisis affecting the central Sahel.
(3) In light of the deteriorating security environment in the wider region, strengthening the defence and security forces of Benin is important in order to enable and support stabilisation efforts in that country. In that context, and fully cognisant of the need for an integrated response to that security environment, ensuring long-term peace and security in Benin is a key priority for the Union.
(4) On 5 January 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from Benin for the Union to assist the Beninese Armed Forces with training ammunition and small arms for operational use to strengthen the pre-deployment training and operational capacities of the military units deployed in the North of Benin within Operation Mirador, in order to contain the expansion of the threat posed by non-state armed groups from Burkina Faso and Niger, and to counteract and reduce the opportunities for those groups to commit terrorist attacks.
(5) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP(2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(6) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
(a) to enhance the capabilities of the Beninese Armed Forces to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Benin and its civilian population against internal and external aggressions;
(b) to contribute to peace and stability in the region.
(a) ammunition for the units of the Beninese Armed Forces located in the north of Benin for the specific purpose of pre-deployment training;
(b) small arms for the units of the Beninese Armed Forces deployed in the north of Benin within Operation Mirador for operational purposes.
(a) compliance of the units of the Beninese Armed Forces supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred without the consent of the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements, at the end of their life cycle.
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the activities conducted with the equipment provided under the assistance measure and on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) and Article 41(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 (1) establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) The northern regions of the coastal countries of the Gulf of Guinea, namely Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo, have been experiencing deteriorating security conditions in connection with the crisis affecting the central Sahel.
(3) In light of the deteriorating security environment in the wider region, strengthening the defence and security forces of Benin is important in order to enable and support stabilisation efforts in that country. In that context, and fully cognisant of the need for an integrated response to that security environment, ensuring long-term peace and security in Benin is a key priority for the Union.
(4) On 5 January 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from Benin for the Union to assist the Beninese Armed Forces with training ammunition and small arms for operational use to strengthen the pre-deployment training and operational capacities of the military units deployed in the North of Benin within Operation Mirador, in order to contain the expansion of the threat posed by non-state armed groups from Burkina Faso and Niger, and to counteract and reduce the opportunities for those groups to commit terrorist attacks.
(5) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(6) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Establishment, objectives, scope and duration

1. An assistance measure benefiting Benin (the ‘beneficiary’) to be financed under the European Peace Facility (EPF) (the ‘assistance measure’) is hereby established.

2. The objectives of the assistance measure are the following:
(a) to enhance the capabilities of the Beninese Armed Forces to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Benin and its civilian population against internal and external aggressions;
(b) to contribute to peace and stability in the region.

3. To achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 2, the assistance measure shall finance the following types of equipment designed to deliver lethal force:
(a) ammunition for the units of the Beninese Armed Forces located in the north of Benin for the specific purpose of pre-deployment training;
(b) small arms for the units of the Beninese Armed Forces deployed in the north of Benin within Operation Mirador for operational purposes.

4. The duration of the assistance measure shall be 24 months from the date of adoption of this Decision.

Financial arrangements

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the assistance measure shall be EUR 5 000 000.
2. All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.

Arrangements with the beneficiary

1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’) shall make the necessary arrangements with the beneficiary to ensure its compliance with the requirements and conditions established by this Decision as a condition for the provision of support under the assistance measure.

2. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions obliging the beneficiary to ensure:
(a) compliance of the units of the Beninese Armed Forces supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred without the consent of the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements, at the end of their life cycle.

3. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions on the suspension and termination of support under the assistance measure in the event of the beneficiary being found in breach of the obligations set out in paragraph 2.

Implementation

1. The High Representative shall be responsible for ensuring the implementation of this Decision in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF and with the Integrated Methodological Framework for assessing and identifying the required measures and controls for assistance measures under the EPF.

2. The implementation of the activities referred to in Article 1(3) shall be carried out by Défense Conseil International – DCI Group.

Monitoring, control and evaluation

1. The High Representative shall monitor the compliance by the beneficiary with the obligations set out in Article 3. That monitoring shall be used to provide awareness of the context and the risks of breaches of the obligations set out in Article 3, and to contribute to the prevention of such breaches, including violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the units of the Beninese Armed Forces supported under the assistance measure.

2. The post-shipment control of equipment and supplies shall be organised as follows:
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the activities conducted with the equipment provided under the assistance measure and on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.

3. The High Representative shall conduct a final evaluation upon completion of the assistance measure to assess whether the assistance measure has contributed to reaching the objective set out in Article 1(2).

Reporting

During the period of implementation, the High Representative shall provide the PSC with six-monthly reports on the implementation of the assistance measure, in accordance with Article 63 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509. The administrator for assistance measures shall regularly inform the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 on the implementation of revenue and expenditure in accordance with Article 38 of that Decision, including by providing information on the suppliers and subcontractors involved.

Suspension and termination

1. The PSC may decide to suspend wholly or partially the implementation of the assistance measure in accordance with Article 64 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509.
2. The PSC may recommend that the Council terminate the assistance measure.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1979 of 15 July 2024 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Albanian Armed Forces

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1979 16.7.2024
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509(1)establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) On 21 March 2022, the Union approved the Strategic Compass, with the objective of becoming a stronger and more capable security provider, including through the increased use of the EPF in support of partners’ military and defence capabilities.
(3) In the Brussels Declaration of 13 December 2023, the leaders of the Union and its Member States, in consultation with Western Balkans leaders, called for the Union to continue to work together with the region to further develop its defence capabilities and capacities, including through the EPF.
(4) The Union is committed to a close relationship in support of a strong, independent and prosperous Albania, based on the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, which was signed in 2006 and entered into force in 2009, and the accession negotiations that were opened in 2022.
(5) The Union recognises Albania’s contribution to the Union’s common security and defence policy (CSDP), including its participation in CSDP missions and operations and Union battlegroups.
(6) On 24 April 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from Albania for the Union to assist the Albanian Armed Forces in improving their operational effectiveness in terms of mobility, manoeuvrability and protection.
(7) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP(2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(8) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
(a) to contribute to strengthening the capacities of the Albanian Armed Forces in order to enhance national security, stability and resilience in the defence sector, in line with the Union’s overall policy on Albania;
(b) to enhance the operational effectiveness of the Albanian Land Force as the end-user of the assistance measure, in terms of mobility, manoeuvrability and protection; increase compliance with Union standards; improve interoperability; and thereby better protect the civilian population in crises and emergencies;
(c) to strengthen the capacities of Albania with respect to its participation in Union military common security and defence policy missions and operations, and Union battlegroups.
(a) compliance of the units of the Albanian Armed Forces supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred without the consent of the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements, at the end of their life cycle.
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting on the inventory, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) and Article 41(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 (1) establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) On 21 March 2022, the Union approved the Strategic Compass, with the objective of becoming a stronger and more capable security provider, including through the increased use of the EPF in support of partners’ military and defence capabilities.
(3) In the Brussels Declaration of 13 December 2023, the leaders of the Union and its Member States, in consultation with Western Balkans leaders, called for the Union to continue to work together with the region to further develop its defence capabilities and capacities, including through the EPF.
(4) The Union is committed to a close relationship in support of a strong, independent and prosperous Albania, based on the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, which was signed in 2006 and entered into force in 2009, and the accession negotiations that were opened in 2022.
(5) The Union recognises Albania’s contribution to the Union’s common security and defence policy (CSDP), including its participation in CSDP missions and operations and Union battlegroups.
(6) On 24 April 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from Albania for the Union to assist the Albanian Armed Forces in improving their operational effectiveness in terms of mobility, manoeuvrability and protection.
(7) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(8) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Establishment, objectives, scope and duration

1. An assistance measure benefiting Albania (the ‘beneficiary’) to be financed under the European Peace Facility (EPF) (the ‘assistance measure’) is hereby established.

2. The objectives of the assistance measure are the following:
(a) to contribute to strengthening the capacities of the Albanian Armed Forces in order to enhance national security, stability and resilience in the defence sector, in line with the Union’s overall policy on Albania;
(b) to enhance the operational effectiveness of the Albanian Land Force as the end-user of the assistance measure, in terms of mobility, manoeuvrability and protection; increase compliance with Union standards; improve interoperability; and thereby better protect the civilian population in crises and emergencies;
(c) to strengthen the capacities of Albania with respect to its participation in Union military common security and defence policy missions and operations, and Union battlegroups.

3. To achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 2, the assistance measure shall finance light armoured multipurpose vehicles that are not designed to deliver lethal force. The assistance measure shall also finance related supplies and services, including technical training, where needed.

4. The duration of the assistance measure shall be 36 months from the date of adoption of this Decision.

Financial arrangements

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the assistance measure shall be EUR 13 000 000.
2. All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.

Arrangements with the beneficiary

1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’) shall make the necessary arrangements with the beneficiary to ensure its compliance with the requirements and conditions established by this Decision as a condition for the provision of support under the assistance measure.

2. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions obliging the beneficiary to ensure:
(a) compliance of the units of the Albanian Armed Forces supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred without the consent of the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements, at the end of their life cycle.

3. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions on the suspension and termination of support under the assistance measure in the event of the beneficiary being found in breach of the obligations set out in paragraph 2.

Implementation

1. The High Representative shall be responsible for ensuring the implementation of this Decision in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF and with the Integrated Methodological Framework for assessing and identifying the required measures and controls for assistance measures under the EPF.

2. The implementation of the activities referred to in Article 1(3) shall be carried out by the Ministry of Defence of Italy through its Agenzia Industrie Difesa.

Monitoring, control and evaluation

1. The High Representative shall monitor the compliance by the beneficiary with the obligations set out in Article 3. That monitoring shall be used to provide awareness of the context and the risks of breaches of the obligations set out in Article 3, and to contribute to the prevention of such breaches, including violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the units of the Albanian Armed Forces supported under the assistance measure.

2. The post-shipment control of equipment and supplies shall be organised as follows:
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting on the inventory, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.

3. The High Representative shall conduct a final evaluation upon completion of the assistance measure to assess whether the assistance measure has contributed to reaching the objectives set out in Article 1(2).

Reporting

During the period of implementation, the High Representative shall provide the PSC with six-monthly reports on the implementation of the assistance measure, in accordance with Article 63 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509. The administrator for assistance measures shall regularly inform the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 on the implementation of revenue and expenditure in accordance with Article 38 of that Decision, including by providing information on the suppliers and subcontractors involved.

Suspension and termination

1. The PSC may decide to suspend wholly or partially the implementation of the assistance measure in accordance with Article 64 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509.
2. The PSC may recommend that the Council terminate the assistance measure.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2024/1974 of 12 July 2024 establishing the framework for allocating costs related to borrowing and debt management operations under the diversified funding strategy

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1974 18.7.2024
(1) Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2022/2434 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)introduced the diversified funding strategy as a single funding method for the implementation of borrowing and debt management operations carried out by the Commission into Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. The diversified funding strategy, except in duly justified cases, applies to programmes of financial assistance for which the basic acts have entered into force on or after 9 November 2022.
(2) The Commission should establish the necessary arrangements for the implementation of the diversified funding strategy. The application of the diversified funding strategy requires the adoption of a set of rules to determine the allocation of respective costs to the relevant financial assistance programmes, which should ensure that all costs incurred by the Union that relate to financial assistance are charged to the beneficiary of the proceeds of borrowing.
(3) The methodology for allocating costs related to the implementation of the diversified funding strategy under NextGenerationEU (NGEU) was established [for the first time] by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1095(3). Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545(4)has extended those arrangements to all borrowing and debt management operations carried out under the diversified funding strategy pursuant to Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 via targeted adjustments to the cost allocation methodology.
(4) The obligation to cover costs relating to the financial assistance should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5), point (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and in line with the budgetary principles of sound financial management and equilibrium. All costs should be charged to the beneficiaries based on a single-cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs.
(5) The cost allocation methodology should ensure that there is no cross-subsidisation of costs of one category of beneficiary by another. Costs of loans should be fully imputed to the beneficiaries of those loans, on the one hand, and, where applicable, costs of non-repayables to the general budget of the Union, on the other hand, based on actual costs incurred for raising and disbursing the respective share of proceeds to the different beneficiaries. The methodology should cover all the costs incurred by the Union for borrowing and debt management operations, including all administrative costs, and should ensure that different categories of costs be calculated for each disbursement.
(6) To ensure fair and equal treatment between beneficiaries, a common and unified methodology for costs should be implemented, applicable to all type of disbursements, namely those repaid by the general budget of the Union and those repaid by beneficiaries. Costs should be imputed to the beneficiaries on the basis of the share of proceeds received.
(7) This cost allocation methodology should distinguish between three categories of cost: the cost of funding, the cost of liquidity management and administrative costs. The cost of funding derives from the interest rate and other charges that the Commission is to pay on the different instruments issued to finance the disbursements in question. The costs of liquidity management are the costs incurred as a result of amounts issued and held temporarily on liquidity accounts as reserves to meet upcoming payments. This ongoing operational overhead is an essential feature of the diversified funding strategy and should be shared fairly by all beneficiaries. The third cost category is the administrative costs of maintaining the technical and operational capacity to implement a diversified funding strategy, which arise directly as a result of the implementation of the diversified funding strategy.
(8) If financial assistance programmes, funded via the diversified funding strategy, have a different duration and structure to NGEU and the loans under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463 of the European Parliament and of the Council(5), it is appropriate to allow for additional flexibility via the amendment of the cost allocation methodology. Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545 provides that the suitability of the NGEU costing methodology is to be reviewed in the case of adoption of new programmes of financial assistance having a different duration and structure.
(9) To provide the desired flexibility, the cost allocation methodology should include the concept of programme compartments to organise and monitor the allocation of disbursements and related funding instruments per programme. This would allow for the assignment of funding instruments to programme-specific financial characteristics, and provide for tailored liability management through a calibrated choice of maturities. The introduction of programme compartments would avoid cross-subsidisation of costs from one programme to another.
(10) This should also be in line with the framework of the governance system established by Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825(6), which provides that the attribution of funding instruments across programmes is to be determined having regard to the respective maturity targets and the specific constraints of the different programmes.
(11) The average maturity target and tentative amounts of funding operations should be indicated per programme via funding plan decisions adopted under Article 4 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825. The targets set per programme, within the overall limits set by the annual borrowing decision, provide a non-binding orientation as to levels to be reached at the end of the funding period, assuming funding needs remain unchanged. During the period when a programme or time compartment is constituted, the weighted average maturity of funding instruments per programme might differ from the end-of-period objective. The Commission should allocate funding instruments to the different compartments over the relevant semesters, taking into account the remaining borrowing transactions planned for in the rest of the funding period. In doing so, the Commission should ensure, to the best of its ability, the equitable achievement of the different average maturity targets for each programme of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, and non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053(7), over the entire funding period. When executing borrowing operations, the Commission should prioritise the achievement of the most advantageous terms, and consider the equitable achievement of the respective average maturity targets across programme compartments at the level of the allocation as a secondary objective. The Commission should update and monitor the achievement of such targets on a regular basis.
(12) A programme compartment should be created upon the entry into force of any new financial assistance programme which is to be financed by transactions implemented under the diversified funding strategy. Programme compartments should either be dedicated to one sole beneficiary or to several beneficiaries, depending on whether the basic act of a programme allows for only one or several beneficiaries of the financial assistance.
(13) For programmes which allow the award of financial assistance to more than one beneficiary, disbursements and related funding instruments within the dedicated programme compartment should be further compartmentalised into time compartments to ensure that the cost of funding charged to the disbursement of that beneficiary is closely linked to the prevailing market rates at the time of the disbursement. The cost of funding is stabilized at the closure of the time compartment.
(14) It is not necessary that a programme compartment related to a financial assistance programme designed to serve a single beneficiary is subdivided into time-compartments given that all costs accrue to the same beneficiary.
(15) The addition of programme compartments under this Decision should not have an impact on the existing cost allocation for any of the programmes to which the existing cost allocation methodology already applies. To achieve this, disbursements made before the entry into force of this Decision, under NGEU, Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, and any other CAM programme in force before its entry into force, as well as funding instruments already allocated to existing time compartments under Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545, should be bundled under a dedicated legacy programme compartment with time compartments. Such legacy programme compartment should include all the time compartments already established for the funding of those programmes as well as any future disbursements and related funding instruments relating to these programmes. This will ensure that the attribution of cost incurred by the Commission based on the existing allocation methodology remains unaffected by the new approach.
(16) The calculation of the cost of funding that results from borrowing transactions should be derived from the costs arising from all borrowing operations within a programme compartment and, in the case of a multi-beneficiary programme, any corresponding time compartment. Loan beneficiaries or, for the external assigned revenue under Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2020/2094(8), the general budget of the Union should be charged on equal footing when the costs are allocated to the beneficiaries of a same compartment. This method where costs are determined over the duration of a programme or time compartment, avoids the ‘point-in-time’ arbitrariness that characterises the traditional back-to-back method where the costs for any particular beneficiary reflected the terms that could be obtained on the particular day that the borrowing took place.
(17) A programme compartment should be active during the entire period in which disbursements of a dedicated programme take place. Within a multi-beneficiary programme compartment, there should only be one active time compartment at any point in time. As a rule, time compartments, when established, should run for a semester starting on 1 January or on 1 July. For the legacy programme compartment, the first time compartment should cover the period from 1 June 2021 until 31 December 2021 reflecting the timing for the launch of NGEU funding operations. As a general rule, the first time compartment of a given programme should be created in the period in which the first disbursement is made. Any time or programme compartment should remain active until the amount of long-term funding allocated to it matches the amount of disbursements. However, in the case of a mismatch at the end of the semester, a time compartment should remain active until the amount of disbursement and long-term funding match. In that case, it should be possible to temporarily continue allocating disbursements to the active time compartment, while simultaneously attribute funding instruments to the following time compartment.
(18) While the cost of funding may vary during the period in which a programme compartment or, when applicable, time compartment, is active because of differences in funding conditions beyond the control of the Commission, the Commission should manage borrowing and debt management operations in order to ensure that each programme compartment and, when applicable, time compartment, achieve their respective maturity target to a comparable degree while always prioritizing the achievement of the most advantageous terms across programmes.
(19) The Commission’s funding strategy enables better management of interest rate risk and other financial risks. While interest rates charged to loan beneficiaries are expected to be stable, periodic and marginal recalculation of rates might be necessary when maturing long-term funding instruments need to be replaced. If warranted, the Commission will develop its capacity to use derivatives such as swaps to manage any remaining interest rate risk and offer the option of fixed interest rate loans to a beneficiary. The costs of this fixed interest rate facility should be borne fully and exclusively by the beneficiary exercising this option.
(20) The amounts of disbursements in a programme compartment or, where applicable, a time compartment, should equal the amount of long-term funding instruments attributed to that particular programme compartment or time compartment. In most cases for the compartments of multi-beneficiary programmes, the disbursement of proceeds should occur in, and be attributed to, the same time compartment as the issuance of the long-term funding instruments used to raise the proceeds. However, unforeseen delays with disbursements might result in situations where the proceeds of the long-term funding have been raised but it is not possible to disburse them as initially scheduled. This possibility should be taken into account in the allocation of disbursement to the different time compartments.
(21) It is appropriate to provide also for the possibility to anticipate, in the preceding time compartment, disbursement needs arising early in the life of the next time compartment. To cater for such situations and ensure funding on advantageous terms, there should be the possibility to attribute long-term funding instruments to the following time compartment.
(22) The ability to manage liquidity of the funding operations by accessing short-term borrowing and holding cash for prudential purposes is a central and defining feature of the diversified funding strategy. This liquidity management should enable the Commission to meet all payment needs and adapt issuance to market conditions. It is appropriate to lay down methods for calculation of costs related to liquidity management referred to in Articles 6 and 8 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825. They should include costs stemming from issuance of short-term funding instruments, holding some proceeds on a temporary basis on a liquidity account in order to guarantee the ability to make all payments on demand and the management of interest rate and other financial risk. Costs incurred in relation to buy backs and/or holding of own bonds for the purposes of liquidity management should also be considered as liquidity management costs. This Decision should establish a basis for calculating these liquidity costs and charging them on a fair and equitable basis to all relevant beneficiaries of proceeds over the course of the year in question.
(23) Liquidity management operations should help to minimise liquidity management costs that may be incurred when holding cash for prudential purposes. The return on investment of liquidity holdings, resulting from secured or unsecured money market transactions, should comprise the daily interest in relation to each transaction and a potential trading fee or agio/disagio. The return on investment of these operations should be the sum of costs of issuing and holding such liquidity and any, return on investment of such holdings, should be attributed quarterly to outstanding disbursements on a pro rata basis.
(24) Higher disbursements than the amount of long-term funding instruments allocated to the respective programme compartment or, where applicable, time compartment, or interest payments, might result in a liquidity deficit of that compartment. Lower disbursements than the amount of long-term funding instruments allocated to the respective programme compartment or, where applicable, time compartment, or redemption payments, might result in a liquidity surplus. Compensating these liquidity surpluses or deficits are unavoidable requirements of the implementation of the diversified funding strategy. These costs should not be borne by the respective compartments, but should be isolated and managed as part of a distinct liquidity management overhead. This Decision should establish a mechanism to disentangle costs arising from liquidity deficits or surpluses in order to allow their absorption by the wider funding programme in the form of liquidity management costs. The Commission should use the liquidity management compartment to level any positive or negative cash balances in the single beneficiary programme compartments or multi beneficiary time compartments to the total amount of disbursements.
(25) Implementing the diversified funding strategy requires the acquisition of new capacities needed to obtain the most advantageous access to capital markets and ensure the maintenance of such infrastructure in a continuous and effective manner. This includes the costs needed to maintain liquidity accounts, to acquire capacity to run auctions for EU-bills and bonds, and to implement new internal data-processing capacities. Such costs that result directly from the implementation of borrowing and disbursement operations should be treated as overheads that distinguish costs related to the set-up and to the maintenance of borrowing and payment infrastructure. These costs should be captured by the cost of service for administrative overheads.
(26) The cost of service for administrative overheads combines all administrative costs incurred directly in the implementation of the diversified funding strategy. These costs are to occur either as set-up costs, relating to one-off costs of building operational capacities or as recurring costs, which are unavoidable costs directly attributable to borrowing and debt management operations under the diversified funding strategy and which occur over time. While the recurring costs are regular annual costs charged to the disbursements that take place in a given year, the set-up costs should be imputed as one-off charges.
(27) Costs related to the set-up and capacity building of these operations have been incurred since 2021 and have already been attributed to beneficiaries of NGEU financial support programmes, through a specific set-up cost overhead. Therefore, the beneficiaries of other programmes of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 should not bear costs related to this previous capacity building but only future expenditure related to the maintenance of this infrastructure or its further development. The share of administrative costs of programmes of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, other than NGEU, should be determined by the share of the programme in proceeds raised though the diversified funding strategy during the year in which the relevant administrative costs were incurred.
(28) Administrative costs included in the cost of service for administrative overheads should be confined to a closed list of eligible costs, which are directly related to the diversified funding strategy. Contractual fees for recruitment of external consultants are part of the list of eligible administrative expenditure following agreements reached in the context of the Annual Budget for 2023. The extension of the list of eligible administrative expenditures has been communicated to Member States authorities prior to the adoption of this Decision. Aggregate cost of service for administrative overheads represents a very limited share of aggregate costs from diversified funding strategy operations.
(29) Theex postinvoicing process is designed to ensure that costs are recovered in the following year and until the moment costs are no longer generated by borrowing, debt management and payment operations under the diversified funding strategy.
(30) Exceptionally, the Union may bear the cost of interests and administrative costs related to the borrowing and lending, such as for the financial assistance loans to Ukraine granted under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, and Regulation (EU) 2024/792 of the European Parliament and of the Council(9). Under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, the necessary resources are to be provided by contributions from Member States in accordance with Article 5(1) of that Regulation, insofar as those costs are not covered through other means. In such a case, the invoicing of costs should be aligned with the invoicing of costs in respect to disbursements as external assigned revenue under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094 and be grouped per quarter.
(31) The Commission should issue a confirmation notice concerning each disbursement, including non-repayable support within the meaning of Article 2(2), points (a) and (c), of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094, repayable support to Members States within the meaning of Article 2(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094, and loans to a Member State or third country under programmes for financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046.
(32) Loans under the diversified funding strategy should be implemented on harmonised financial terms (maturity and repayment profile) for each disbursement belonging to the same assistance programme, subject to their compatibility with the diversified funding strategy. For non-repayable support, the confirmation notice should be the main supporting element determining these financial terms for the general budget of the Union. The confirmation notice is to determine the claim for cost based on its financial terms. These terms should include the date of disbursement, the amount of financial support, the date of cost of funding payments and the maturity date. The confirmation notice constitutes the essential basis underpinning the EU’s budgetary planning, financial circuits and accounting for non-repayable support.
(33) The loan agreements should refer to this Decision as the method for calculating and charging the costs of the loans.
(34) This Decision should apply to all borrowing transactions and disbursements under the NGEU programme, including those that have occurred prior to its entry into force.
(35) Given the urgent need to provide financial assistance, among other policy priorities, to Ukraine in July 2024 under the Ukraine Facility in the most adequate and advantageous manner, this decision should enter into force as a matter of urgency.
(1) ‘beneficiary’ means a Member State or a third country that is a party to a loan agreement under a CAM programme, or the general budget of the Union for non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053;
(2) ‘disbursement’ means the transfer of proceeds obtained through borrowing and debt management operations to finance repayable or non-repayable support to a beneficiary;
(3) ‘funding instruments’ means bonds, notes, commercial paper, EU-bills or any other appropriate short and/or long-term financial transactions under the diversified funding strategy;
(4) ‘interest period’ means a period of twelve (12) months, or such other period which may be specified in the confirmation notice, commencing on the date of disbursement or the previous interest payment date;
(5) ‘liquidity management’ means management of cash flows related to funding instruments and disbursements;
(6) ‘loan agreement’ means an agreement on loan support between the European Union represented by the Commission and a beneficiary under a CAM programme;
(7) ‘borrowing operations’ means operations referred to in Article 2(1) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(8) ‘debt management operations’ means operations referred to in Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(9) ‘liquidity management operations’ means operations referred to in Article 2(3) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(10) ‘short-term funding’ means funding referred to in Article 2(16) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(11) ‘long-term funding’ means funding referred to in Article 2(10) of the Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(12) ‘single-beneficiary programme’ means a CAM programme whose basic act allows the disbursement of loans or grants to one beneficiary;
(13) ‘multi-beneficiary programme’ means a CAM programme whose basic act allows the disbursement of loans or grants to more than one beneficiary;
(14) ‘NGEU programme’ or ‘NGEU’ means any programme financed under Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094, in so far as it implements measures referred to in Article 1(2) of that Regulation;
(15) ‘Recovery and Resilience Facility loans’ (‘RRF loans’) mean loan support under Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(16) ‘Ukraine Facility’ means the facility established by Regulation (EU) 2024/792 to provide support for Ukraine for the period 2024 to 2027.
(17) ‘MFA+’ means the instrument established by Regulation (EU) 2022/2463 for providing support to Ukraine for 2023.
(a) cost of funding;
(b) cost of liquidity management;
(c) cost of service for administrative overheads.
(a) the aggregate amounts and average maturity target planned under the diversified funding strategy, as set out in decisions adopted under Article 4 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(b) any requirements stemming from the underlying basic acts, and in particular, the average maturity ceilings of each CAM programme and maximum amount of liabilities that the general budget of the Union is in position to commit to in a given year under that CAM programme;
(c) the loan maturities set out in the loan agreements concluded between the Union represented by the Commission and the beneficiary;
(d) any material update to funding or disbursement planning, contained in a decision under Article 4 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825.
(a) the amount of the disbursement,
(b) the maturity,
(c) the repayment schedule,
(d) the attribution of the disbursement to a time compartment,
(e) interest period indicating the payment date.
Step 1: Calculation of the daily total costs of an individual funding instrument in a programme compartment or time compartment or in the liquidity management compartmentThe daily accruals shall be calculated:Leap years shall be integrated in the calculation of daily accruals for each individual long-term funding instrument as follows:For bond taps, i.e. an increase in size of a past issuance, the first coupon may be calculated as a short or long coupon, running from the tap settlement date to the next coupon date. Coupon payments should be calculated as follows, unless otherwise agreed with investors:First, by calculating accrued interests running from previous coupon payment date, for each individual long-term funding instrument, these accrued interests shall be calculated as follows:For short and long coupons, payments should be calculated as follows:Accrued interests received from investors at issuance temporarily increase liquidity holdings until such time that they are netted with the first coupon payment. Accrued interests are reflected in cost calculations via the liquidity compartment, however they are not part of the daily accruals attached to the funding instruments and its relevant programme compartments or time compartment. All costs or return from borrowing and debt management operations incurred by the Commission are transferred to beneficiaries under this methodology.The sum of daily accruals implementing the above method for each individual funding instrument shall be equal to the sum of daily accruals over its entire accrual period, as such:For each funding instrument, the agio/disagio shall be linearly distributed over the lifetime of the instrument:agio/disagiodaily= (100-issuance price):(maturity date-issuance date)where Issuance price = All-in Price (including bank fees)For each debt and/or liquidity management transaction, the sum of daily accruals implementing the method for each individual funding or investment instrument shall be calculated as follows:For each debt and liquidity management instrument, transaction fees shall be linearly distributed over the lifetime of the instrument:Transactionfeesdaily= fees:(maturity date-issuance date)For each funding instrument, the daily total costs shall be calculated:CoFdaily per instrument= ACCdaily*+agio/disagiodaily*The ACCdailywill take into account leap year or non-leap year accrual as described in Step 1. * The ACCdailywill take into account leap year or non-leap year accrual as described in Step 1.
* The ACCdailywill take into account leap year or non-leap year accrual as described in Step 1.
* The ACCdailywill take into account leap year or non-leap year accrual as described in Step 1.
Step 2: Calculation of the aggregate daily total costs of fundingFor each programme compartment or time compartment, the daily total costs for the programme compartment or time compartment before the levelling referred to in Article 7 shall be the sum of all daily total costs of each funding instrument attributed to the programme compartment or time compartment:CoFdailyC(x)pre-levelling=∑ CoFdaily per instrument allocated to the C(x)For the liquidity management compartment the Cost of Funding shall be:CoFdailyLMCpre-levelling=∑ CoFdaily per instrument allocated to the LMC
Step 3: Calculation of the liquidity balances in the programme compartment or time compartmentsThe level of liquidity holdings shall be calculated on daily basis as follows:LiquidityC(x)= Inflows [Issuance proceeds + Interestloans/grants+ Repaymentsloans/grants] – Outflows [Disbursements + Couponsoutstanding debt+ Debt Redemptions]When LiquidityC(x)is negative, it shall indicate the amount of deficit of the programme compartment or time compartment, that shall be defined as LiquidityC(deficit)and when positive, it shall indicate the amount of liquidity surplus of the programme compartment or time compartment, that shall be defined as LiquidityC(surplus)
Step 4: Calculation of the cost of funding of funding instruments affected by liquidity surplusThis step identifies the part of the CoF of the programme compartments or time compartments with a liquidity surplus that can be attributed to the liquidity held in that programme compartment or time compartment.The costs of funding related to the funding instruments shall be calculated as follows:CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus)=CoFdailyC(surplus)pre-levelling* LiquidityC(surplus): TotalC(surplus)CoFdailyC(surplus)post-levelling= CoFdailyC(surplus)pre-levelling– CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus)
Step 5: Calculation of the cost of liquidity management compartment in case cost of funding are attributed to it from the programme compartment or time compartment with liquidity surplusIn case the liquidity management compartment receives surplus from the programme compartment or time compartment, the cost of liquidity management compartment shall be calculated as follows:CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling= CoFdailyLMCpre-levelling+ ∑ CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus)
Step 6: Calculation of the cost of funding of the programme compartment or time compartment with liquidity deficitAny liquidity deficit in a programme compartment or time compartment is levelled with a transfer of liquidity from the liquidity management compartment at its daily costs of funding (Step 5).For programme compartments or time compartments with a positive liquidity balance, the post-levelling cost of funding already result from Step 4 above.CoFLiquidity transfer from LMC= CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling* Transfer amount: Total LMCCoFdailyC(deficit)post-levelling= CoFdailyC(deficit)pre-levelling+ CoFLiquidity transfer from LMCThe liquidity management compartment is therefore the result of short-term funding instruments outstanding, in addition to any transfers of surplus from other programme compartments or time compartments minus any transfers to compensate deficits from other programme compartments or time compartments. Cost transfers follow a step-by-step approach where, first costs associated to surpluses in other programme compartments or time compartments feed in the liquidity management compartment, and second, average cost of outstanding short term funding instruments and surpluses from other programme compartments or time compartments, is then transferred to other programme compartments or time compartments in deficit. Liquidity holdings are the result of this levelling as well as any costs or returns from said holdings that have not been yet transferred to beneficiaries. Liquidity holdings also reflect the time mismatch between the moment where coupon or accrued interests are paid and received from investors and charged to beneficiaries.The level of liquidity holdings in the liquidity management compartment shall be calculated on daily basis as follows:TotalLMC(x)= Inflows [Issuance proceeds + LiquidityC(surplus)] – Outflows [LiquidityC(deficit)+ Debt Redemptions]HoldingsLMC(x)= TotalLMC(x)+ RoI of liquidity holdingsdaily+ LIQMannual payments+ Inflows of liquidity holdingsdaily– Outflows of liquidity holdingsdailyWhile the cost of funding may vary between programme compartments and between time compartments because of differences in funding conditions beyond the control of the Commission, the Commission shall manage borrowing and debt management operations in order to ensure that each programme compartment or time compartment bears maturity profiles that, to the greatest extent possible, are set close to their targets as defined this Decision.
Step 7: Calculation of the daily cost of funding of a disbursementThe daily cost of funding of disbursement shall be the amount of the disbursement multiplied by the relative share of the disbursement in relation to the programme compartment or time compartment to which it is allocated.CoF of disbursement in C(x) =CoFdailyC(x)post-levelling* outstand amount of disbursement: ∑ outstanding disbursements in C(x)
(1) The set-up costs for RRF loans shall be calculated as follows:set-up costsfor RRF loans= 48 %*∑ set-up cost items
(2) The set-up costs for RRF loans shall be allocated for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023 to each Member State having signed an RRF loan agreement as follows:set-up costsper RRF loan signed= set-up costsfor RRF loans*amount of loan signed per Member Stateend of year: total maximum amount of RRF loans
(3) As of 1 January 2024, any unallocated set-up costs shall be calculated as follows:unallocated set-up cost for RRF loans = set-up costsfor RRF loans– ∑ allocated set-up cost items to RRF loansin 2021, 2022 and 2023
ACCdaily Accrued interest costs broken down by day
ACCdaily leap year Accrued interest costs broken down by day for a leap year (366 days). ACC non leap year is 365 days.
ACCcoupon tap Accrued interests calculated for short and long coupon (days from original issue date or coupon date to new settlement date)
ACCtotal Accrued interests calculated as sum of daily accruals of a funding or investment instrument over entire accrual period (start to maturity)
ADMIN CostsAnnual Sum of administrative costs during the calendar year
agio/disagiodaily agio or disagio broken down by day
Beneficiary Member State or a third country that is a party to a loan agreement under a CAM programme, or the Union budget for non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053
CoF Cost of Funding
CoF of an individual claim in C(x) CoF of a claim in programme compartment X or time compartment X
CoFdaily per instrument CoF per day per funding instrument
CoFdailyC(deficit)post-levelling CoF per day after the levelling for the programme compartment or time compartment with an initial liquidity deficit
CoFdailyC(surplus)post-levelling CoF per day after the levelling for the programme compartment or time compartment with an initial liquidity surplus
CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling CoF per day for the LMC after the levelling
CoFdailyLMCpre-levelling CoF per day for the LMC before the levelling
CoFdailyC(x)pre-levelling CoF per day before the levelling of programme compartment X or time compartment X
CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus) CoF per day related to the liquidity surplus in the programme compartment or time compartment
CoFLiquidity transfer from LMC CoF per day related to the liquidity that is transferred to the LMC
CoSAnnual Sum of administrative cost of service during the calendar year
Coupon Interests paid by the issuer on the bond
Coupontap Amount of interests paid by the issuer on the bond in the case of a bond tap, for short or long coupons, including accrued interests
C(x) Total sum of claims and liquidity of programme compartment X or time compartment X
HoldingsLMC(x) Daily cash position of the funding pool post levelling and after taking into consideration RoI holdings and interests charged to beneficiaries
LiquidityC(x) Amount of liquidity in programme compartment X or time compartment X
LMC Costsquarter Costs of the liquidity management over a quarter
LIQMquarter Liquidity management carry calculated as the sum of daily costs (LMC) and return of liquidity over the quarter
LIQMannual payments Liquidity management carry calculated as the sum of daily costs (LMC) and return of liquidity over past periods
Notional Nominal amount
RoI of liquidity holdingsquarter Return on investment of the liquidity holdings over a quarter
TotalLMC(x Daily liquidity position of the liquidity management compartment before RoI holdings and interest charged to beneficiaries, taking into account short term funding proceeds, surpluses and deficits from programme compartments and time compartments and debt redemption payments
Correlation table
Decision (EU) 2022/2545 This Decision
Article 1 Article 1
Article 2 Article 2
Article 3 Article 3
Article 4 Article 4
Article 4 Article 5
Article 5 Article 6
Article 6 Article 7
Article 7 Article 8
Article 8 Article 9
Article 9 Article 10
Article 10 Article 11
Article 11 Article 12
Article 12 Article 13
Article 13 Article 14
Article 14 Article 15
Article 15 Article 16
Article 16 Article 17
Article 17 Article 18
Article 18 Article 19
Article 19 Article 20
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (1), and in particular Article 220a(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2022/2434 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) introduced the diversified funding strategy as a single funding method for the implementation of borrowing and debt management operations carried out by the Commission into Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. The diversified funding strategy, except in duly justified cases, applies to programmes of financial assistance for which the basic acts have entered into force on or after 9 November 2022.
(2) The Commission should establish the necessary arrangements for the implementation of the diversified funding strategy. The application of the diversified funding strategy requires the adoption of a set of rules to determine the allocation of respective costs to the relevant financial assistance programmes, which should ensure that all costs incurred by the Union that relate to financial assistance are charged to the beneficiary of the proceeds of borrowing.
(3) The methodology for allocating costs related to the implementation of the diversified funding strategy under NextGenerationEU (NGEU) was established [for the first time] by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1095 (3). Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545 (4) has extended those arrangements to all borrowing and debt management operations carried out under the diversified funding strategy pursuant to Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 via targeted adjustments to the cost allocation methodology.
(4) The obligation to cover costs relating to the financial assistance should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5), point (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and in line with the budgetary principles of sound financial management and equilibrium. All costs should be charged to the beneficiaries based on a single-cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs.
(5) The cost allocation methodology should ensure that there is no cross-subsidisation of costs of one category of beneficiary by another. Costs of loans should be fully imputed to the beneficiaries of those loans, on the one hand, and, where applicable, costs of non-repayables to the general budget of the Union, on the other hand, based on actual costs incurred for raising and disbursing the respective share of proceeds to the different beneficiaries. The methodology should cover all the costs incurred by the Union for borrowing and debt management operations, including all administrative costs, and should ensure that different categories of costs be calculated for each disbursement.
(6) To ensure fair and equal treatment between beneficiaries, a common and unified methodology for costs should be implemented, applicable to all type of disbursements, namely those repaid by the general budget of the Union and those repaid by beneficiaries. Costs should be imputed to the beneficiaries on the basis of the share of proceeds received.
(7) This cost allocation methodology should distinguish between three categories of cost: the cost of funding, the cost of liquidity management and administrative costs. The cost of funding derives from the interest rate and other charges that the Commission is to pay on the different instruments issued to finance the disbursements in question. The costs of liquidity management are the costs incurred as a result of amounts issued and held temporarily on liquidity accounts as reserves to meet upcoming payments. This ongoing operational overhead is an essential feature of the diversified funding strategy and should be shared fairly by all beneficiaries. The third cost category is the administrative costs of maintaining the technical and operational capacity to implement a diversified funding strategy, which arise directly as a result of the implementation of the diversified funding strategy.
(8) If financial assistance programmes, funded via the diversified funding strategy, have a different duration and structure to NGEU and the loans under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5), it is appropriate to allow for additional flexibility via the amendment of the cost allocation methodology. Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545 provides that the suitability of the NGEU costing methodology is to be reviewed in the case of adoption of new programmes of financial assistance having a different duration and structure.
(9) To provide the desired flexibility, the cost allocation methodology should include the concept of programme compartments to organise and monitor the allocation of disbursements and related funding instruments per programme. This would allow for the assignment of funding instruments to programme-specific financial characteristics, and provide for tailored liability management through a calibrated choice of maturities. The introduction of programme compartments would avoid cross-subsidisation of costs from one programme to another.
(10) This should also be in line with the framework of the governance system established by Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 (6), which provides that the attribution of funding instruments across programmes is to be determined having regard to the respective maturity targets and the specific constraints of the different programmes.
(11) The average maturity target and tentative amounts of funding operations should be indicated per programme via funding plan decisions adopted under Article 4 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825. The targets set per programme, within the overall limits set by the annual borrowing decision, provide a non-binding orientation as to levels to be reached at the end of the funding period, assuming funding needs remain unchanged. During the period when a programme or time compartment is constituted, the weighted average maturity of funding instruments per programme might differ from the end-of-period objective. The Commission should allocate funding instruments to the different compartments over the relevant semesters, taking into account the remaining borrowing transactions planned for in the rest of the funding period. In doing so, the Commission should ensure, to the best of its ability, the equitable achievement of the different average maturity targets for each programme of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, and non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 (7), over the entire funding period. When executing borrowing operations, the Commission should prioritise the achievement of the most advantageous terms, and consider the equitable achievement of the respective average maturity targets across programme compartments at the level of the allocation as a secondary objective. The Commission should update and monitor the achievement of such targets on a regular basis.
(12) A programme compartment should be created upon the entry into force of any new financial assistance programme which is to be financed by transactions implemented under the diversified funding strategy. Programme compartments should either be dedicated to one sole beneficiary or to several beneficiaries, depending on whether the basic act of a programme allows for only one or several beneficiaries of the financial assistance.
(13) For programmes which allow the award of financial assistance to more than one beneficiary, disbursements and related funding instruments within the dedicated programme compartment should be further compartmentalised into time compartments to ensure that the cost of funding charged to the disbursement of that beneficiary is closely linked to the prevailing market rates at the time of the disbursement. The cost of funding is stabilized at the closure of the time compartment.
(14) It is not necessary that a programme compartment related to a financial assistance programme designed to serve a single beneficiary is subdivided into time-compartments given that all costs accrue to the same beneficiary.
(15) The addition of programme compartments under this Decision should not have an impact on the existing cost allocation for any of the programmes to which the existing cost allocation methodology already applies. To achieve this, disbursements made before the entry into force of this Decision, under NGEU, Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, and any other CAM programme in force before its entry into force, as well as funding instruments already allocated to existing time compartments under Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545, should be bundled under a dedicated legacy programme compartment with time compartments. Such legacy programme compartment should include all the time compartments already established for the funding of those programmes as well as any future disbursements and related funding instruments relating to these programmes. This will ensure that the attribution of cost incurred by the Commission based on the existing allocation methodology remains unaffected by the new approach.
(16) The calculation of the cost of funding that results from borrowing transactions should be derived from the costs arising from all borrowing operations within a programme compartment and, in the case of a multi-beneficiary programme, any corresponding time compartment. Loan beneficiaries or, for the external assigned revenue under Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2020/2094 (8), the general budget of the Union should be charged on equal footing when the costs are allocated to the beneficiaries of a same compartment. This method where costs are determined over the duration of a programme or time compartment, avoids the ‘point-in-time’ arbitrariness that characterises the traditional back-to-back method where the costs for any particular beneficiary reflected the terms that could be obtained on the particular day that the borrowing took place.
(17) A programme compartment should be active during the entire period in which disbursements of a dedicated programme take place. Within a multi-beneficiary programme compartment, there should only be one active time compartment at any point in time. As a rule, time compartments, when established, should run for a semester starting on 1 January or on 1 July. For the legacy programme compartment, the first time compartment should cover the period from 1 June 2021 until 31 December 2021 reflecting the timing for the launch of NGEU funding operations. As a general rule, the first time compartment of a given programme should be created in the period in which the first disbursement is made. Any time or programme compartment should remain active until the amount of long-term funding allocated to it matches the amount of disbursements. However, in the case of a mismatch at the end of the semester, a time compartment should remain active until the amount of disbursement and long-term funding match. In that case, it should be possible to temporarily continue allocating disbursements to the active time compartment, while simultaneously attribute funding instruments to the following time compartment.
(18) While the cost of funding may vary during the period in which a programme compartment or, when applicable, time compartment, is active because of differences in funding conditions beyond the control of the Commission, the Commission should manage borrowing and debt management operations in order to ensure that each programme compartment and, when applicable, time compartment, achieve their respective maturity target to a comparable degree while always prioritizing the achievement of the most advantageous terms across programmes.
(19) The Commission’s funding strategy enables better management of interest rate risk and other financial risks. While interest rates charged to loan beneficiaries are expected to be stable, periodic and marginal recalculation of rates might be necessary when maturing long-term funding instruments need to be replaced. If warranted, the Commission will develop its capacity to use derivatives such as swaps to manage any remaining interest rate risk and offer the option of fixed interest rate loans to a beneficiary. The costs of this fixed interest rate facility should be borne fully and exclusively by the beneficiary exercising this option.
(20) The amounts of disbursements in a programme compartment or, where applicable, a time compartment, should equal the amount of long-term funding instruments attributed to that particular programme compartment or time compartment. In most cases for the compartments of multi-beneficiary programmes, the disbursement of proceeds should occur in, and be attributed to, the same time compartment as the issuance of the long-term funding instruments used to raise the proceeds. However, unforeseen delays with disbursements might result in situations where the proceeds of the long-term funding have been raised but it is not possible to disburse them as initially scheduled. This possibility should be taken into account in the allocation of disbursement to the different time compartments.
(21) It is appropriate to provide also for the possibility to anticipate, in the preceding time compartment, disbursement needs arising early in the life of the next time compartment. To cater for such situations and ensure funding on advantageous terms, there should be the possibility to attribute long-term funding instruments to the following time compartment.
(22) The ability to manage liquidity of the funding operations by accessing short-term borrowing and holding cash for prudential purposes is a central and defining feature of the diversified funding strategy. This liquidity management should enable the Commission to meet all payment needs and adapt issuance to market conditions. It is appropriate to lay down methods for calculation of costs related to liquidity management referred to in Articles 6 and 8 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825. They should include costs stemming from issuance of short-term funding instruments, holding some proceeds on a temporary basis on a liquidity account in order to guarantee the ability to make all payments on demand and the management of interest rate and other financial risk. Costs incurred in relation to buy backs and/or holding of own bonds for the purposes of liquidity management should also be considered as liquidity management costs. This Decision should establish a basis for calculating these liquidity costs and charging them on a fair and equitable basis to all relevant beneficiaries of proceeds over the course of the year in question.
(23) Liquidity management operations should help to minimise liquidity management costs that may be incurred when holding cash for prudential purposes. The return on investment of liquidity holdings, resulting from secured or unsecured money market transactions, should comprise the daily interest in relation to each transaction and a potential trading fee or agio/disagio. The return on investment of these operations should be the sum of costs of issuing and holding such liquidity and any, return on investment of such holdings, should be attributed quarterly to outstanding disbursements on a pro rata basis.
(24) Higher disbursements than the amount of long-term funding instruments allocated to the respective programme compartment or, where applicable, time compartment, or interest payments, might result in a liquidity deficit of that compartment. Lower disbursements than the amount of long-term funding instruments allocated to the respective programme compartment or, where applicable, time compartment, or redemption payments, might result in a liquidity surplus. Compensating these liquidity surpluses or deficits are unavoidable requirements of the implementation of the diversified funding strategy. These costs should not be borne by the respective compartments, but should be isolated and managed as part of a distinct liquidity management overhead. This Decision should establish a mechanism to disentangle costs arising from liquidity deficits or surpluses in order to allow their absorption by the wider funding programme in the form of liquidity management costs. The Commission should use the liquidity management compartment to level any positive or negative cash balances in the single beneficiary programme compartments or multi beneficiary time compartments to the total amount of disbursements.
(25) Implementing the diversified funding strategy requires the acquisition of new capacities needed to obtain the most advantageous access to capital markets and ensure the maintenance of such infrastructure in a continuous and effective manner. This includes the costs needed to maintain liquidity accounts, to acquire capacity to run auctions for EU-bills and bonds, and to implement new internal data-processing capacities. Such costs that result directly from the implementation of borrowing and disbursement operations should be treated as overheads that distinguish costs related to the set-up and to the maintenance of borrowing and payment infrastructure. These costs should be captured by the cost of service for administrative overheads.
(26) The cost of service for administrative overheads combines all administrative costs incurred directly in the implementation of the diversified funding strategy. These costs are to occur either as set-up costs, relating to one-off costs of building operational capacities or as recurring costs, which are unavoidable costs directly attributable to borrowing and debt management operations under the diversified funding strategy and which occur over time. While the recurring costs are regular annual costs charged to the disbursements that take place in a given year, the set-up costs should be imputed as one-off charges.
(27) Costs related to the set-up and capacity building of these operations have been incurred since 2021 and have already been attributed to beneficiaries of NGEU financial support programmes, through a specific set-up cost overhead. Therefore, the beneficiaries of other programmes of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 should not bear costs related to this previous capacity building but only future expenditure related to the maintenance of this infrastructure or its further development. The share of administrative costs of programmes of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, other than NGEU, should be determined by the share of the programme in proceeds raised though the diversified funding strategy during the year in which the relevant administrative costs were incurred.
(28) Administrative costs included in the cost of service for administrative overheads should be confined to a closed list of eligible costs, which are directly related to the diversified funding strategy. Contractual fees for recruitment of external consultants are part of the list of eligible administrative expenditure following agreements reached in the context of the Annual Budget for 2023. The extension of the list of eligible administrative expenditures has been communicated to Member States authorities prior to the adoption of this Decision. Aggregate cost of service for administrative overheads represents a very limited share of aggregate costs from diversified funding strategy operations.
(29) The ex post invoicing process is designed to ensure that costs are recovered in the following year and until the moment costs are no longer generated by borrowing, debt management and payment operations under the diversified funding strategy.
(30) Exceptionally, the Union may bear the cost of interests and administrative costs related to the borrowing and lending, such as for the financial assistance loans to Ukraine granted under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, and Regulation (EU) 2024/792 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9). Under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, the necessary resources are to be provided by contributions from Member States in accordance with Article 5(1) of that Regulation, insofar as those costs are not covered through other means. In such a case, the invoicing of costs should be aligned with the invoicing of costs in respect to disbursements as external assigned revenue under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094 and be grouped per quarter.
(31) The Commission should issue a confirmation notice concerning each disbursement, including non-repayable support within the meaning of Article 2(2), points (a) and (c), of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094, repayable support to Members States within the meaning of Article 2(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094, and loans to a Member State or third country under programmes for financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046.
(32) Loans under the diversified funding strategy should be implemented on harmonised financial terms (maturity and repayment profile) for each disbursement belonging to the same assistance programme, subject to their compatibility with the diversified funding strategy. For non-repayable support, the confirmation notice should be the main supporting element determining these financial terms for the general budget of the Union. The confirmation notice is to determine the claim for cost based on its financial terms. These terms should include the date of disbursement, the amount of financial support, the date of cost of funding payments and the maturity date. The confirmation notice constitutes the essential basis underpinning the EU’s budgetary planning, financial circuits and accounting for non-repayable support.
(33) The loan agreements should refer to this Decision as the method for calculating and charging the costs of the loans.
(34) This Decision should apply to all borrowing transactions and disbursements under the NGEU programme, including those that have occurred prior to its entry into force.
(35) Given the urgent need to provide financial assistance, among other policy priorities, to Ukraine in July 2024 under the Ukraine Facility in the most adequate and advantageous manner, this decision should enter into force as a matter of urgency.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Subject matter, scope and governing principle

1. This Decision establishes a single and unified methodology to allocate costs incurred as a result of borrowing and debt management operations conducted under programmes of financial assistance within the scope of Article 220a of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 (‘CAM programmes’).

2. The implementation of the cost allocation methodology shall be guided by the principles of fairness and equal treatment, ensuring that costs are spread based on the relative share of support received.

Definitions

For the purposes of this Decision, the following definitions apply:

(1) ‘beneficiary’ means a Member State or a third country that is a party to a loan agreement under a CAM programme, or the general budget of the Union for non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053;
(2) ‘disbursement’ means the transfer of proceeds obtained through borrowing and debt management operations to finance repayable or non-repayable support to a beneficiary;
(3) ‘funding instruments’ means bonds, notes, commercial paper, EU-bills or any other appropriate short and/or long-term financial transactions under the diversified funding strategy;
(4) ‘interest period’ means a period of twelve (12) months, or such other period which may be specified in the confirmation notice, commencing on the date of disbursement or the previous interest payment date;
(5) ‘liquidity management’ means management of cash flows related to funding instruments and disbursements;
(6) ‘loan agreement’ means an agreement on loan support between the European Union represented by the Commission and a beneficiary under a CAM programme;
(7) ‘borrowing operations’ means operations referred to in Article 2(1) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(8) ‘debt management operations’ means operations referred to in Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(9) ‘liquidity management operations’ means operations referred to in Article 2(3) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(10) ‘short-term funding’ means funding referred to in Article 2(16) of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(11) ‘long-term funding’ means funding referred to in Article 2(10) of the Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(12) ‘single-beneficiary programme’ means a CAM programme whose basic act allows the disbursement of loans or grants to one beneficiary;
(13) ‘multi-beneficiary programme’ means a CAM programme whose basic act allows the disbursement of loans or grants to more than one beneficiary;
(14) ‘NGEU programme’ or ‘NGEU’ means any programme financed under Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094, in so far as it implements measures referred to in Article 1(2) of that Regulation;
(15) ‘Recovery and Resilience Facility loans’ (‘RRF loans’) mean loan support under Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council (10);
(16) ‘Ukraine Facility’ means the facility established by Regulation (EU) 2024/792 to provide support for Ukraine for the period 2024 to 2027.

(17) ‘MFA+’ means the instrument established by Regulation (EU) 2022/2463 for providing support to Ukraine for 2023.

Types of costs

The following categories of costs shall be established:

(a) cost of funding;
(b) cost of liquidity management;
(c) cost of service for administrative overheads.

Constitution of programme compartments and time compartments

1. A programme compartment shall cover one CAM programme. It shall be established following the entry into force of each CAM programme.

2. Each programme compartment for a multi-beneficiary programme shall also comprise time compartments. A time compartment shall cover the semester starting on 1 January or on 1 July. When a new CAM programme enters into force, the first time compartment shall fall in the semester in which the first disbursement is made and shall end on 30 June or 31 December. For any given programme compartment, only one time compartment shall be active, at any point in time, with the exception of the derogation under Article 5(6) of this Decision.

3. Any time compartment shall remain active until the amount of disbursements of financial assistance reaches the amount of corresponding long-term funding instruments allocated to it.

4. Programme compartments for single-beneficiary programmes shall not comprise time compartments.

5. Programme compartments shall remain active until the overall amount of disbursements of financial assistance reaches the overall amount of corresponding long term funding instruments allocated to it.

Allocation of funding instruments and disbursements to programme compartments and time compartments

1. Disbursements under a given CAM programme, and the related funding instruments allocated to it, shall be attributed to the programme compartment established for that CAM programme. Disbursements under a given multi-beneficiary programme, and the related funding instruments, shall be attributed to the time compartment that is active at the moment in which the disbursement is made.

2. A disbursement shall remain attributed to the same programme compartment or time compartment in respect to any outstanding amount which is yet to be repaid.

3. Long-term funding instruments, other than those referred to in paragraph 7, shall be attributed to programme compartments and, if applicable, time compartments that are active at the moment of the conclusion of the borrowing operation generating them.

4. However, funding instruments raised with a view to funding a disbursement in the following time compartment may be attributed to that time compartment.

5. Where the amount of disbursements at the end of the semester of a time compartment exceeds the amount of long-term funding instruments, the long-term funding instruments generated from the borrowing operations after the end of the semester of the time compartment shall be attributed to that time compartment until the amount of long-term funding instruments reaches the amount of disbursements of that time compartment.

6. The attribution of long-term funding instruments to a programme compartment or time compartment shall take place at the moment where the transaction is executed while ensuring, to the best degree, an equitable achievement of the different average maturity targets for each CAM programme over the current funding period and taking into consideration the following factors:
(a) the aggregate amounts and average maturity target planned under the diversified funding strategy, as set out in decisions adopted under Article 4 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825;
(b) any requirements stemming from the underlying basic acts, and in particular, the average maturity ceilings of each CAM programme and maximum amount of liabilities that the general budget of the Union is in position to commit to in a given year under that CAM programme;
(c) the loan maturities set out in the loan agreements concluded between the Union represented by the Commission and the beneficiary;
(d) any material update to funding or disbursement planning, contained in a decision under Article 4 of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825.
7. Any long-term funding instrument shall remain in part or in full attributed to the same programme compartment or time compartment in respect of any outstanding amount which is yet to be repaid.

8. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, where the notional amount of long-term funding instruments attributed to a preceding time compartment of the same programme compartment exceeds the amount of disbursements attributed to that compartment in accordance with that paragraph, the disbursements shall continue to be allocated to that time compartment, which will therefore remain active, until the amount of disbursements made reaches the amount of long-term funding instruments.

9. Long-term funding instruments replacing maturing long-term funding instruments shall be attributed to the same programme compartment or time compartment. Article 7 shall apply in the case of a mismatch between the maturity date of the maturing long-term instrument and the date of borrowing of the long-term instrument replacing it.

Liquidity management compartment

1. The liquidity management compartment shall operate until the borrowing operations authorised in CAM programmes are fully repaid.

2. Short-term funding instruments, liquidity management operations and debt management operations and the costs arising from them shall be attributed to the liquidity management compartment.

Levelling of liquidity balances

1. The level of liquidity holdings in any programme compartment and time compartment shall be calculated on a daily basis as the difference between inflows and outflows, as set out in step 3 of point 1 of the Annex.

2. Any positive amount referred to in paragraph 1 (‘liquidity surplus’) shall be on a daily basis allocated from the respective programme compartment or time compartment to the liquidity management compartment, as set out in step 4 of point 1 of the Annex, at the cost of funding of the relevant programme compartment or time compartment on that day.

3. Any amount corresponding to the negative amount referred to in paragraph 1 (‘liquidity deficit’) shall, on a daily basis, be taken from the liquidity management compartment and attributed to the respective programme compartment or time compartment, as set out in step 6 of point 1 of the Annex, at the cost of funding of the liquidity management compartment, including all transfers set out in paragraph 2, on that day.

Calculation of cost of funding of programme compartments and time compartments

1. Costs of funding of all programme compartments and time compartments shall be calculated on a daily basis.

2. The cost of funding a funding instrument shall comprise the daily interest in relation to each funding instrument and a potential agio/disagio based on the all-in issuance price.

3. The daily cost of funding of a programme compartment or time compartment shall comprise the daily cost of funding of the funding instruments attributed to that programme compartment or time compartment after the results of the application of Article 7(2) and (3).

Calculation of cost of liquidity management

1. The cost of liquidity management shall be the sum of the cost of carry in the liquidity management compartment, as set out in point 2 of the Annex.

2. The cost of carry shall be the difference between the interest accrued under the relevant funding instruments of the liquidity management compartment, the costs and returns resulting from the levelling of any liquidity surpluses or liquidity deficits referred to in Article 7(2) and (3), and the return on investment generated by the holdings.

3. The return on investment of liquidity holdings shall comprise any related costs of the investment.

4. The costs of liquidity management shall be calculated on a daily basis.

Allocation of costs of liquidity management

1. The costs of liquidity management shall be calculated as the sum of the daily costs of liquidity management over a quarter. These costs shall be attributed to each disbursement on a pro rata basis of the relative share of the disbursement to total outstanding amounts of disbursements at the end of the quarter.

Attribution of cost of funding to a disbursement

1. The disbursements of the same programme compartment or time compartment shall bear the same average daily cost of funding until their repayment.

2. For each outstanding disbursement, the daily cost of funding shall be calculated by multiplying the total cost of funding of the programme compartment or time compartment after application of Article 7(2) and (3) with the disbursement amount divided by the total outstanding amounts of disbursements of the programme compartment to which the disbursement is attributed.

Cost of service for administrative overheads

The cost of service for administrative overheads shall comprise recurring administrative costs for beneficiaries. It shall comprise set-up costs for RRF loans, within the limits indicated in Article 14 and Article 21(5). The cost of service for administrative overheads shall be calculated in accordance with point 3 of the Annex.

Recurring administrative costs

1. Recurring administrative costs shall comprise any costs incurred by the Commission in the execution of the borrowing and debt management operations, comprised of the following types: legal fees such as those incurred for legal advice and opinions, debt and liquidity management fees, account management and payment management costs, costs for external audit, auction platform maintenance fees, rating agency fees, listing, taxes, registration, publication and settlement fees, information-technology, market related research, consulting fees and other investor relations expenses and management tools well as contractual agent and training fees related to the implementation of the diversified funding strategy.

2. To the extent that such costs are common to borrowing operations implemented for other financial assistance programmes, the costs included in the calculation shall be calculated based on the pro rata share attributed to borrowing and debt management operations assigned to that CAM programme in the relevant calendar year.

3. Recurring administrative costs shall be calculated for each disbursement received under each loan agreement on a pro rata basis of the disbursement to the total amounts of outstanding disbursements made under the different CAM programmes at the end of the calendar year.

Set-up costs for RRF loans

1. Set-up costs for RRF loans shall comprise any costs incurred by the Commission in building the capacity for conducting NGEU borrowing, debt management and payment management operations. They include costs related to the establishment of NGEU accounts, the establishment of an auction platform, an investor management tool, other information-technology costs and market related research and consulting fees.

2. Member States which sign RRF loan agreements shall bear 48 % of the total set up costs.

3. In 2021, 2022 and 2023, Member States shall pay the set-up costs referred to in paragraph 1 on a pro rata basis of the amount of loan under the signed RRF loan agreement to the total amount of loans under all signed RRF loan agreements, as set out in point 3(2)(i) and (ii) of the Annex.

4. By 30 June 2024, any unallocated set-up costs to Member States which have signed RRF loan agreements shall be allocated on a pro rata basis to the amount of loans signed under each RRF loan agreement to the total amounts of loans under all signed RRF loan agreements until 31 December 2023, as set out in point 3(2)(iii) of the Annex.

5. No additional set-up costs for borrowing operations shall be due after the end of the year 2023 or allocated to CAM programmes, unless they fall within the scope of Article 5(1) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053.

Confirmation notice

1. In relation to each disbursement, a confirmation notice shall be established which contains the terms giving rise to the cost claim from the Commission.

2. The confirmation notice shall determine terms for cost of funding payment and principal repayment to be repaid from the general budget of the Union under Article 5(1) first subparagraph, of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 for non-repayable support and by the beneficiaries of loan agreements.

3. The confirmation notice shall contain the following elements:
(a) the amount of the disbursement,
(b) the maturity,
(c) the repayment schedule,
(d) the attribution of the disbursement to a time compartment,
(e) interest period indicating the payment date.

4. The confirmation notice for loans shall also contain any additional elements indicated in the loan agreements.

Invoicing of costs of funding

1. The cost of funding shall be calculated in relation to each disbursement at the end of the interest period determined in the confirmation notice.

2. The invoicing shall take place at the end of the interest period set out in the confirmation notice. In relation to disbursements where the general budget of the Union is liable for their costs or redemption of principal, such as disbursements registered as external assigned revenue under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2020/2094 and MFA+ instrument, where Ukraine requests subsidisation of related costs, and to loan disbursements under the Ukraine Facility, the invoices may be grouped per quarter or in an annual invoice covering four quarters of the year.

Invoicing of cost of liquidity management

The cost of liquidity management shall be invoiced at the beginning of each calendar year for cost incurred during the previous calendar year.

Invoicing of cost of service for administrative overheads

1. Beneficiaries of loans shall be invoiced at the beginning of each calendar year for the cost of service for administrative overheads incurred during the previous calendar year.

2. Payments by beneficiaries for the costs of service shall constitute internal assigned revenue within the meaning of Article 21(3), point (a), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046.

Repeal

1. Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2545 is hereby repealed.

2. References to the repealed Decision shall be construed as references to this Decision and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II.

Transitional and final provisions

1. A legacy programme compartment with time compartments is established with this Decision. Such legacy programme compartment shall be constituted by all disbursements attributed to time compartments prior to the entry into force of this Decision, and related funding instruments allocated to them, under NGEU, Regulation (EU) 2022/2463, and any other CAM programme in force before 19 July 2024.
2. Disbursements under NGEU made from 19 July 2024, and related funding instruments, shall be attributed to the legacy programme compartment and respective time compartments within it.

3. The first time compartment of the legacy programme compartment shall remain with a constitution period of 7 months, from 1 June 2021 to 31 December 2021. Without prejudice to Article 4(1), new programmes compartments shall be established for CAM programmes whose basic act entered into force in the period from 1 January 2024 until 19 July 2024.
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, disbursements under those CAM programmes made from 19 July 2024, and funding instruments allocated to them, shall be attributed to the respective new programme compartment and, as appropriate, time compartments.

5. Without prejudice to Article 14, set-up costs for RRF loans shall remain due by the relevant beneficiaries.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

1.   Calculation of the cost of funding

For the purpose of the formulas set out in this Annex, ‘C’ stands indifferently for programme compartment or time compartment, as the costs attributed to one or the other follow the same levelling methodology.

The cost of funding shall be calculated in the following steps:

Step 1: Calculation of the daily total costs of an individual funding instrument in a programme compartment or time compartment or in the liquidity management compartment
The daily accruals shall be calculated:
Leap years shall be integrated in the calculation of daily accruals for each individual long-term funding instrument as follows:
For bond taps, i.e. an increase in size of a past issuance, the first coupon may be calculated as a short or long coupon, running from the tap settlement date to the next coupon date. Coupon payments should be calculated as follows, unless otherwise agreed with investors:
First, by calculating accrued interests running from previous coupon payment date, for each individual long-term funding instrument, these accrued interests shall be calculated as follows:
For short and long coupons, payments should be calculated as follows:
Accrued interests received from investors at issuance temporarily increase liquidity holdings until such time that they are netted with the first coupon payment. Accrued interests are reflected in cost calculations via the liquidity compartment, however they are not part of the daily accruals attached to the funding instruments and its relevant programme compartments or time compartment. All costs or return from borrowing and debt management operations incurred by the Commission are transferred to beneficiaries under this methodology.
The sum of daily accruals implementing the above method for each individual funding instrument shall be equal to the sum of daily accruals over its entire accrual period, as such:
For each funding instrument, the agio/disagio shall be linearly distributed over the lifetime of the instrument:
agio/disagiodaily = (100-issuance price):(maturity date-issuance date)
where Issuance price = All-in Price (including bank fees)
For each debt and/or liquidity management transaction, the sum of daily accruals implementing the method for each individual funding or investment instrument shall be calculated as follows:
For each debt and liquidity management instrument, transaction fees shall be linearly distributed over the lifetime of the instrument:
Transactionfeesdaily = fees:(maturity date-issuance date)
For each funding instrument, the daily total costs shall be calculated:
CoFdaily per instrument = ACCdaily* +agio/disagiodaily
*
The ACCdaily will take into account leap year or non-leap year accrual as described in Step 1.

Step 2: Calculation of the aggregate daily total costs of funding
For each programme compartment or time compartment, the daily total costs for the programme compartment or time compartment before the levelling referred to in Article 7 shall be the sum of all daily total costs of each funding instrument attributed to the programme compartment or time compartment:
CoFdailyC(x)pre-levelling=∑ CoFdaily per instrument allocated to the C(x) For the liquidity management compartment the Cost of Funding shall be:
CoFdailyLMCpre-levelling=∑ CoFdaily per instrument allocated to the LMC

Step 3: Calculation of the liquidity balances in the programme compartment or time compartments
The level of liquidity holdings shall be calculated on daily basis as follows:
LiquidityC(x) = Inflows [Issuance proceeds + Interestloans/grants + Repaymentsloans/grants] – Outflows [Disbursements + Couponsoutstanding debt + Debt Redemptions]
When LiquidityC(x) is negative, it shall indicate the amount of deficit of the programme compartment or time compartment, that shall be defined as LiquidityC(deficit) and when positive, it shall indicate the amount of liquidity surplus of the programme compartment or time compartment, that shall be defined as LiquidityC(surplus)

Step 4: Calculation of the cost of funding of funding instruments affected by liquidity surplus
This step identifies the part of the CoF of the programme compartments or time compartments with a liquidity surplus that can be attributed to the liquidity held in that programme compartment or time compartment.
The costs of funding related to the funding instruments shall be calculated as follows:
CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus) =
CoFdailyC(surplus)pre-levelling * Liquidity C(surplus): TotalC(surplus)
CoFdailyC(surplus)post-levelling = CoFdailyC(surplus)pre-levelling – CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus)

Step 5: Calculation of the cost of liquidity management compartment in case cost of funding are attributed to it from the programme compartment or time compartment with liquidity surplus
In case the liquidity management compartment receives surplus from the programme compartment or time compartment, the cost of liquidity management compartment shall be calculated as follows:
CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling = CoFdailyLMCpre-levelling + ∑ CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus)

Step 6: Calculation of the cost of funding of the programme compartment or time compartment with liquidity deficit
Any liquidity deficit in a programme compartment or time compartment is levelled with a transfer of liquidity from the liquidity management compartment at its daily costs of funding (Step 5).
For programme compartments or time compartments with a positive liquidity balance, the post-levelling cost of funding already result from Step 4 above.
CoFLiquidity transfer from LMC = CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling * Transfer amount: Total LMC
CoFdailyC(deficit)post-levelling = CoFdailyC(deficit)pre-levelling + CoFLiquidity transfer from LMC
The liquidity management compartment is therefore the result of short-term funding instruments outstanding, in addition to any transfers of surplus from other programme compartments or time compartments minus any transfers to compensate deficits from other programme compartments or time compartments. Cost transfers follow a step-by-step approach where, first costs associated to surpluses in other programme compartments or time compartments feed in the liquidity management compartment, and second, average cost of outstanding short term funding instruments and surpluses from other programme compartments or time compartments, is then transferred to other programme compartments or time compartments in deficit. Liquidity holdings are the result of this levelling as well as any costs or returns from said holdings that have not been yet transferred to beneficiaries. Liquidity holdings also reflect the time mismatch between the moment where coupon or accrued interests are paid and received from investors and charged to beneficiaries.
The level of liquidity holdings in the liquidity management compartment shall be calculated on daily basis as follows:
TotalLMC(x) = Inflows [Issuance proceeds + Liquidity C(surplus)] – Outflows [LiquidityC(deficit) + Debt Redemptions]
HoldingsLMC(x) = TotalLMC(x) + RoI of liquidity holdingsdaily + LIQMannual payments + Inflows of liquidity holdingsdaily – Outflows of liquidity holdingsdaily
While the cost of funding may vary between programme compartments and between time compartments because of differences in funding conditions beyond the control of the Commission, the Commission shall manage borrowing and debt management operations in order to ensure that each programme compartment or time compartment bears maturity profiles that, to the greatest extent possible, are set close to their targets as defined this Decision.

Step 7: Calculation of the daily cost of funding of a disbursement
The daily cost of funding of disbursement shall be the amount of the disbursement multiplied by the relative share of the disbursement in relation to the programme compartment or time compartment to which it is allocated.
CoF of disbursement in C(x) =
CoFdailyC(x)post-levelling * outstand amount of disbursement: ∑ outstanding disbursements in C(x)
2. Calculation of Cost of Liquidity Management

The costs of liquidity management per disbursement shall be calculated as the sum of the daily costs of the liquidity management compartment holding after the levelling of liquidity balances of the programme compartments or time compartments over the calculation period. Returns or costs in case of negative rates are calculated on the basis of liquidity available after levelling, i.e. increased by liquidity surpluses and reduced by liquidity deficits, as described in point 1 step 6. Any exceptional fees or penalties paid or received shall be integrated in the calculation of liquidity management costs and added to the return on the transaction at payment date. Any returns shall be deducted as follows:
LIQMquarter= ∑ CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling over the quarter – RoI of liquidity holdingsquarter

The LIQM shall be attributed to each disbursement as follows:
LIQM of disbursement =
LIQMquarter *
∑ outstanding disbursementend of quarter: ∑ outstanding disbursementsend of quarter

3. Calculation of Cost of Service for administrative overheads

3.1. Calculation of recurring administrative costs

Recurring administrative costs shall be calculated as follows:
annual recurring administrative costs total = ∑ recurring administrative cost items for calendar year
Recurring administrative costs shall be allocated as follows:
annual recurring administrative costs per beneficiary =
annual recurring administrative costs total *
∑ disbursement outstanding towards beneficiaryend of year: ∑ outstanding disbursementsend of year

3.2. Calculation and allocation of set-up costs

The set-up costs per beneficiary of RRF loans shall be calculated in the following three steps:

(1) The set-up costs for RRF loans shall be calculated as follows:
set-up costs for RRF loans = 48 %*∑ set-up cost items

(2) The set-up costs for RRF loans shall be allocated for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023 to each Member State having signed an RRF loan agreement as follows:
set-up costs per RRF loan signed = set-up costs for RRF loans*
amount of loan signed per Member State end of year: total maximum amount of RRF loans

(3) As of 1 January 2024, any unallocated set-up costs shall be calculated as follows:
unallocated set-up cost for RRF loans = set-up costs for RRF loans – ∑ allocated set-up cost items to RRF loans in 2021, 2022 and 2023

They shall be allocated as additional set-up costs to disbursements to Member States under RRF loan agreement as follows:
additional set-up costs per beneficiary = unallocated set-up cost for RRF loans end 2023*
∑ amounts of loan signed per beneficiary end 2023: total amount of loans under signed RRF loan agreements end 2023

3.3. Calculation of Cost of Service per beneficiary

CoSAnnual = ∑ Recurring administrative cost items + ∑ Set-up administrative cost items
4. Glossary of acronyms

ACCdaily
Accrued interest costs broken down by day
ACCdaily leap year
Accrued interest costs broken down by day for a leap year (366 days). ACC non leap year is 365 days.
ACCcoupon tap
Accrued interests calculated for short and long coupon (days from original issue date or coupon date to new settlement date)
ACCtotal
Accrued interests calculated as sum of daily accruals of a funding or investment instrument over entire accrual period (start to maturity)
ADMIN CostsAnnual
Sum of administrative costs during the calendar year
agio/disagiodaily
agio or disagio broken down by day
Beneficiary
Member State or a third country that is a party to a loan agreement under a CAM programme, or the Union budget for non-repayable support under Article 5(1) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053
CoF
Cost of Funding
CoF of an individual claim in C(x) CoF of a claim in programme compartment X or time compartment X
CoFdaily per instrument
CoF per day per funding instrument
CoFdailyC(deficit)post-levelling
CoF per day after the levelling for the programme compartment or time compartment with an initial liquidity deficit
CoFdailyC(surplus)post-levelling
CoF per day after the levelling for the programme compartment or time compartment with an initial liquidity surplus
CoFdailyLMCpost-levelling
CoF per day for the LMC after the levelling
CoFdailyLMCpre-levelling
CoF per day for the LMC before the levelling
CoFdailyC(x)pre-levelling
CoF per day before the levelling of programme compartment X or time compartment X
CoFLiquidity surplusC(surplus)
CoF per day related to the liquidity surplus in the programme compartment or time compartment
CoFLiquidity transfer from LMC
CoF per day related to the liquidity that is transferred to the LMC
CoS Annual
Sum of administrative cost of service during the calendar year
Coupon
Interests paid by the issuer on the bond
Coupon
tap
Amount of interests paid by the issuer on the bond in the case of a bond tap, for short or long coupons, including accrued interests
C(x) Total sum of claims and liquidity of programme compartment X or time compartment X
HoldingsLMC(x) Daily cash position of the funding pool post levelling and after taking into consideration RoI holdings and interests charged to beneficiaries
LiquidityC(x) Amount of liquidity in programme compartment X or time compartment X
LMC Costsquarter
Costs of the liquidity management over a quarter
LIQMquarter
Liquidity management carry calculated as the sum of daily costs (LMC) and return of liquidity over the quarter
LIQMannual payments
Liquidity management carry calculated as the sum of daily costs (LMC) and return of liquidity over past periods
Notional
Nominal amount
RoI of liquidity holdingsquarter
Return on investment of the liquidity holdings over a quarter
TotalLMC(x
Daily liquidity position of the liquidity management compartment before RoI holdings and interest charged to beneficiaries, taking into account short term funding proceeds, surpluses and deficits from programme compartments and time compartments and debt redemption payments

Correlation table
Decision (EU) 2022/2545
This Decision
Article 1
Article 1
Article 2
Article 2
Article 3
Article 3
Article 4
Article 4
Article 4
Article 5
Article 5
Article 6
Article 6
Article 7
Article 7
Article 8
Article 8
Article 9
Article 9
Article 10
Article 10
Article 11
Article 11
Article 12
Article 12
Article 13
Article 13
Article 14
Article 14
Article 15
Article 15
Article 16
Article 16
Article 17
Article 17
Article 18
Article 18
Article 19
Article 19
Article 20

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1972 of 15 July 2024 amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1972 16.7.2024
(1) On 11 December 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315.
(2) Article 4(2), point (e), of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 provides that the Council is to establish the list of projects to be developed under permanent structured cooperation (PESCO), reflecting both support for capability development and the provision of substantial support within means and capabilities to common security and defence policy (CSDP) operations and missions.
(3) On 6 March 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/340(2)establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO.
(4) On 6 March 2018, the Council also adopted a Recommendation concerning a roadmap for the implementation of PESCO(3)(the ‘Recommendation’).
(5) Paragraph 9 of the Recommendation specified that the Council should update the list of PESCO projects by November 2018 to include the next set of projects, in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 5 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315, which provides in particular that the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy may make a recommendation concerning the identification and evaluation of PESCO projects, on the basis of assessments provided by the PESCO secretariat, for the Council to take a decision, following military advice by the Military Committee of the European Union (EUMC).
(6) On 25 June 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/909(4)establishing a common set of governance rules for PESCO projects.
(7) On 19 November 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1797(5)amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340.
(8) On 16 November 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/2008(6)amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340.
(9) On 22 May 2023, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/995(7)amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340.
(10) On 13 November 2023, the Council adopted a Recommendation assessing the progress made by the participating Member States to fulfil commitments undertaken in the framework of PESCO(8).
(11) On 30 April 2024, the PESCO Secretariat informed the Council that the project members of the projects ‘European Union Force Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC)’ and ‘European Medical Command (EMC)’ had decided to close those projects.
(12) Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 should therefore be amended and updated,
(1) in Article 1, the following projects are removed, and the entries corresponding to their numbers left blank:‘1.European Medical Command;’; and,‘17.EUFOR Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC);’; ‘1. European Medical Command;’; and, ‘17. EUFOR Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC);’
‘1. European Medical Command;’; and,
‘17. EUFOR Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC);’
‘1. European Medical Command;’; and,
‘17. EUFOR Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC);’
(2) Annex II is replaced in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Project Project Members
1. European Secure Software defined Radio (ESSOR) France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Finland
2. Network of Logistic Hubs in Europe and support to Operations (NetLogHubs) Germany, Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia
3. Military Mobility Netherlands, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden
4. European Training Certification Centre for European Armies Italy, Greece
5. Energy Operational Function (EOF) France, Belgium, Spain, Italy, Slovenia
6. Deployable Military Disaster Relief Capability Package (DM-DRCP) Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Croatia, Austria
7. Maritime (semi-) Autonomous Systems for Mine Countermeasures (MAS MCM) Belgium, Ireland, Greece, France, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden
8. Harbour & Maritime Surveillance and Protection (HARMSPRO) Italy, Greece, Poland, Portugal
9. Upgrade of Maritime Surveillance (UMS) Greece, Bulgaria, Ireland, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus
10. Cyber Threats and Incident Response Information Sharing Platform (CTISP) Greece, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Hungary, Portugal
11. Cyber Rapid Response Teams and Mutual Assistance in Cyber Security (CRRT) Lithuania, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Croatia, Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia
12. Strategic Command and Control (C2) System for CSDP Missions and Operations (EUMILCOM) Spain, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal
13. Armoured Infantry Fighting Vehicle / Amphibious Assault Vehicle / Light Armoured Vehicle (AIFV/AAV/LAV) Italy, Greece, Slovakia
14. Helicopter Hot and High Training (H3 Training) Greece, Italy, Romania
15. Joint EU Intelligence School (JEIS) Greece, Cyprus
16. Integrated Unmanned Ground System (iUGS) Estonia, Belgium, Czechia, Germany, Spain, France, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Finland
17. EU Beyond Line Of Sight (BLOS) Land Battlefield Missile Systems France, Belgium, Cyprus, Sweden
18. Deployable Modular Underwater Intervention Capability Package (DIVEPACK) Bulgaria, Greece, France, Italy, Romania
19. European Medium Altitude Long Endurance Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems – MALE RPAS (Eurodrone) Germany, Czechia, Spain, France, Italy
20. European Attack Helicopters TIGER Mark III France, Spain
21. Counter Unmanned Aerial System (C-UAS) Italy, Czechia, Sweden
22. European High Atmosphere Airship Platform (EHAAP) – Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Capability Italy, France
23. One Deployable Special Operations Forces (SOF) Tactical Command and Control (C2) Command Post (CP) for Small Joint Operations (SJO) – (SOCC) for SJO Greece, Cyprus
24. Electromagnetic Warfare Capability and Interoperability Programme for Future Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (JISR) Czechia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania
25. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Surveillance as a Service (CBRN SaaS) Austria, France, Croatia, Hungary, Slovenia
26. Geo-meteorological and Oceanographic (GeoMETOC) Support Coordination Element (GMSCE) Germany, Belgium, Greece, France, Luxembourg, Austria, Portugal, Romania
27. EU Radio Navigation Solution (EURAS) France, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, Poland, Sweden
28. European Military Space Surveillance Awareness Network (EU-SSA-N) Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Netherlands
29. Integrated European Joint Training and Simulation Centre (EUROSIM) Hungary, Germany, France, Poland, Slovenia
30. EU Cyber Academia and Innovation Hub (EU CAIH) Portugal, Bulgaria, Spain, Romania
31. Special Operations Forces Medical Training Centre (SMTC) Poland, Hungary
32. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Defence Training Range (CBRNDTR) Romania, France, Italy
33. European Union Network of Diving Centres (EUNDC) Romania, Bulgaria, Germany, France
34. Maritime Unmanned Anti-Submarine System (MUSAS) Portugal, Spain, France, Sweden
35. European Patrol Corvette (EPC) Italy, Greece, Spain, France, Romania
36. Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) Spain, France, Sweden
37. Cyber and Information Domain Coordination Centre (CIDCC) Germany, France, Hungary, Netherlands
38. Timely Warning and Interception with Space-based TheatER surveillance (TWISTER) France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Finland
39. Materials and components for technological EU competitiveness (MAC-EU) France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Romania
40. EU Collaborative Warfare Capabilities (ECoWAR) France, Belgium, Spain, Poland, Romania, Sweden
41. European Global Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) Insertion Architecture System (GLORIA) Italy, France, Romania
42. Main Battle Tank Simulation and Testing Center (MBT- SIMTEC) Greece, Cyprus
43. EU Military Partnership (EU MP) France, Estonia, Italy, Austria
44. Essential Elements of European Escort (4E) Spain, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Sweden
45. Medium size Semi-Autonomous Surface Vehicle (M-SASV) Estonia, France, Latvia, Romania
46. Strategic Air Transport for Outsized Cargo (SATOC) Germany, Czechia, France, Netherlands
47. Next Generation Small RPAS (NGSR) Spain, Hungary, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia
48. Rotorcraft Docking Station for Drones (RDSD) Italy, France
49. Small Scalable Weapons (SSW) Italy, France
50. Air Power France, Greece, Croatia, Sweden
51. Future Medium-size Tactical Cargo (FMTC) France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Sweden
52. Cyber Ranges Federations (CRF) Estonia, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Austria, Finland
53. Automated Modelling, Identification and Damage Assessment of Urban Terrain (AMIDA-UT) Portugal, Spain, France, Austria
54. Common Hub for Governmental Imagery (CoHGI) Germany, Spain, France, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria, Romania
55. Defence of Space Assets (DoSA) France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania
56. European Defence Airlift – Training Academy (EDA-TA) France, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Portugal
57. Integrated Unmanned Ground Systems 2 (iUGS 2) Estonia, Germany, France, Italy, Latvia, Hungary, Netherlands, Finland, Sweden
58. Counter Battery Sensors (CoBaS) France, Netherlands
59. Anti-Torpedo Torpedo (ATT) Germany, Netherlands
60. Critical Seabed Infrastructure Protection (CSIP) Italy, Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Portugal, Sweden
61. Future Short-Range Air to Air Missile (FSRM) Germany, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Sweden
62. Next Generation Medium Helicopter (NGMH) Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Finland
63. Integrated Multi-Layer Air and Missile Defence System (IMLAMD) Italy, France, Hungary, Sweden
64. Arctic Command & Control Effector and Sensor System (ACCESS) Finland, Estonia, France, Sweden
65. Robust Communication Infrastructure and Networks (ROCOMIN) Sweden, Estonia, Germany, France
66. ROLE 2F Spain, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Portugal, Finland, Sweden’
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 46(6) thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 of 11 December 2017 establishing permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and determining the list of participating Member States (1),
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 11 December 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315.
(2) Article 4(2), point (e), of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 provides that the Council is to establish the list of projects to be developed under permanent structured cooperation (PESCO), reflecting both support for capability development and the provision of substantial support within means and capabilities to common security and defence policy (CSDP) operations and missions.
(3) On 6 March 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 (2) establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO.
(4) On 6 March 2018, the Council also adopted a Recommendation concerning a roadmap for the implementation of PESCO (3) (the ‘Recommendation’).
(5) Paragraph 9 of the Recommendation specified that the Council should update the list of PESCO projects by November 2018 to include the next set of projects, in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 5 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315, which provides in particular that the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy may make a recommendation concerning the identification and evaluation of PESCO projects, on the basis of assessments provided by the PESCO secretariat, for the Council to take a decision, following military advice by the Military Committee of the European Union (EUMC).
(6) On 25 June 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/909 (4) establishing a common set of governance rules for PESCO projects.
(7) On 19 November 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1797 (5) amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340.
(8) On 16 November 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/2008 (6) amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340.
(9) On 22 May 2023, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/995 (7) amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340.
(10) On 13 November 2023, the Council adopted a Recommendation assessing the progress made by the participating Member States to fulfil commitments undertaken in the framework of PESCO (8).
(11) On 30 April 2024, the PESCO Secretariat informed the Council that the project members of the projects ‘European Union Force Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC)’ and ‘European Medical Command (EMC)’ had decided to close those projects.
(12) Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 should therefore be amended and updated,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 1, the following projects are removed, and the entries corresponding to their numbers left blank:
‘1. European Medical Command;’; and,
‘17. EUFOR Crisis Response Operation Core (EUFOR CROC);’
;
(2) Annex II is replaced in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Annex II to Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 is replaced by the following:

‘ANNEX II
CONSOLIDATED UPDATED LIST OF THE PROJECT MEMBERS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL PROJECT

Project
Project Members 1. European Secure Software defined Radio (ESSOR)
France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Finland 2. Network of Logistic Hubs in Europe and support to Operations (NetLogHubs)
Germany, Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia 3. Military Mobility
Netherlands, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden 4. European Training Certification Centre for European Armies
Italy, Greece 5. Energy Operational Function (EOF)
France, Belgium, Spain, Italy, Slovenia 6. Deployable Military Disaster Relief Capability Package (DM-DRCP)
Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Croatia, Austria 7. Maritime (semi-) Autonomous Systems for Mine Countermeasures (MAS MCM)
Belgium, Ireland, Greece, France, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden 8. Harbour & Maritime Surveillance and Protection (HARMSPRO)
Italy, Greece, Poland, Portugal 9. Upgrade of Maritime Surveillance (UMS)
Greece, Bulgaria, Ireland, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus 10. Cyber Threats and Incident Response Information Sharing Platform (CTISP)
Greece, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Hungary, Portugal 11. Cyber Rapid Response Teams and Mutual Assistance in Cyber Security (CRRT)
Lithuania, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Croatia, Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia 12. Strategic Command and Control (C2) System for CSDP Missions and Operations (EUMILCOM)
Spain, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal 13. Armoured Infantry Fighting Vehicle / Amphibious Assault Vehicle / Light Armoured Vehicle (AIFV/AAV/LAV)
Italy, Greece, Slovakia 14. Helicopter Hot and High Training (H3 Training)
Greece, Italy, Romania 15. Joint EU Intelligence School (JEIS)
Greece, Cyprus 16. Integrated Unmanned Ground System (iUGS)
Estonia, Belgium, Czechia, Germany, Spain, France, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Finland 17. EU Beyond Line Of Sight (BLOS) Land Battlefield Missile Systems
France, Belgium, Cyprus, Sweden 18. Deployable Modular Underwater Intervention Capability Package (DIVEPACK)
Bulgaria, Greece, France, Italy, Romania 19. European Medium Altitude Long Endurance Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems – MALE RPAS (Eurodrone)
Germany, Czechia, Spain, France, Italy 20. European Attack Helicopters TIGER Mark III
France, Spain 21. Counter Unmanned Aerial System (C-UAS)
Italy, Czechia, Sweden 22. European High Atmosphere Airship Platform (EHAAP) – Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Capability
Italy, France 23. One Deployable Special Operations Forces (SOF) Tactical Command and Control (C2) Command Post (CP) for Small Joint Operations (SJO) – (SOCC) for SJO
Greece, Cyprus 24. Electromagnetic Warfare Capability and Interoperability Programme for Future Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (JISR)
Czechia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania 25. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Surveillance as a Service (CBRN SaaS)
Austria, France, Croatia, Hungary, Slovenia 26. Geo-meteorological and Oceanographic (GeoMETOC) Support Coordination Element (GMSCE)
Germany, Belgium, Greece, France, Luxembourg, Austria, Portugal, Romania 27. EU Radio Navigation Solution (EURAS)
France, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, Poland, Sweden 28. European Military Space Surveillance Awareness Network (EU-SSA-N)
Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Netherlands 29. Integrated European Joint Training and Simulation Centre (EUROSIM)
Hungary, Germany, France, Poland, Slovenia 30. EU Cyber Academia and Innovation Hub (EU CAIH)
Portugal, Bulgaria, Spain, Romania 31. Special Operations Forces Medical Training Centre (SMTC)
Poland, Hungary 32. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Defence Training Range (CBRNDTR)
Romania, France, Italy 33. European Union Network of Diving Centres (EUNDC)
Romania, Bulgaria, Germany, France 34. Maritime Unmanned Anti-Submarine System (MUSAS)
Portugal, Spain, France, Sweden 35. European Patrol Corvette (EPC)
Italy, Greece, Spain, France, Romania 36. Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA)
Spain, France, Sweden 37. Cyber and Information Domain Coordination Centre (CIDCC) Germany, France, Hungary, Netherlands 38. Timely Warning and Interception with Space-based TheatER surveillance (TWISTER)
France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Finland 39. Materials and components for technological EU competitiveness (MAC-EU)
France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Romania 40. EU Collaborative Warfare Capabilities (ECoWAR)
France, Belgium, Spain, Poland, Romania, Sweden 41. European Global Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) Insertion Architecture System (GLORIA)
Italy, France, Romania 42. Main Battle Tank Simulation and Testing Center (MBT- SIMTEC)
Greece, Cyprus 43. EU Military Partnership (EU MP)
France, Estonia, Italy, Austria 44. Essential Elements of European Escort (4E)
Spain, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Sweden 45. Medium size Semi-Autonomous Surface Vehicle (M-SASV)
Estonia, France, Latvia, Romania 46. Strategic Air Transport for Outsized Cargo (SATOC)
Germany, Czechia, France, Netherlands 47. Next Generation Small RPAS (NGSR)
Spain, Hungary, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia 48. Rotorcraft Docking Station for Drones (RDSD)
Italy, France 49. Small Scalable Weapons (SSW)
Italy, France 50. Air Power
France, Greece, Croatia, Sweden 51. Future Medium-size Tactical Cargo (FMTC)
France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Sweden 52. Cyber Ranges Federations (CRF)
Estonia, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Austria, Finland 53. Automated Modelling, Identification and Damage Assessment of Urban Terrain (AMIDA-UT)
Portugal, Spain, France, Austria 54. Common Hub for Governmental Imagery (CoHGI)
Germany, Spain, France, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria, Romania 55. Defence of Space Assets (DoSA)
France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania 56. European Defence Airlift – Training Academy (EDA-TA)
France, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Portugal 57. Integrated Unmanned Ground Systems 2 (iUGS 2)
Estonia, Germany, France, Italy, Latvia, Hungary, Netherlands, Finland, Sweden 58. Counter Battery Sensors (CoBaS)
France, Netherlands 59. Anti-Torpedo Torpedo (ATT)
Germany, Netherlands 60. Critical Seabed Infrastructure Protection (CSIP)
Italy, Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Portugal, Sweden 61. Future Short-Range Air to Air Missile (FSRM)
Germany, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Sweden 62. Next Generation Medium Helicopter (NGMH)
Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Finland 63. Integrated Multi-Layer Air and Missile Defence System (IMLAMD)
Italy, France, Hungary, Sweden 64. Arctic Command & Control Effector and Sensor System (ACCESS)
Finland, Estonia, France, Sweden 65. Robust Communication Infrastructure and Networks (ROCOMIN)
Sweden, Estonia, Germany, France 66. ROLE 2F
Spain, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Portugal, Finland, Sweden’

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1970 of 15 July 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1970 16.7.2024
(1) On 20 July 2023, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532(1).
(2) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 27 July 2025 and the entries concerning four persons and two entities listed in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 should be updated.
(3) Furthermore, it is appropriate to clarify the existing derogation under Article 3(8) of Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532.
(4) Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 should therefore be amended accordingly,
(1) Article 3 is amended as follows:(a)paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:‘9.   In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, the authorisation shall be considered granted.’;(b)the following paragraphs are added:‘10.   The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 and 9 within 2 weeks of such authorisation.11.   The prohibitions in Article 3(1) and (2) shall not apply until 27 October 2023 to obligations arising from a contract concluded before 26 July 2023, or ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such a contract.’; (a) paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:‘9.   In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, the authorisation shall be considered granted.’; (b) the following paragraphs are added:‘10.   The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 and 9 within 2 weeks of such authorisation.11.   The prohibitions in Article 3(1) and (2) shall not apply until 27 October 2023 to obligations arising from a contract concluded before 26 July 2023, or ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such a contract.’;
(a) paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:‘9.   In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, the authorisation shall be considered granted.’;
(b) the following paragraphs are added:‘10.   The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 and 9 within 2 weeks of such authorisation.11.   The prohibitions in Article 3(1) and (2) shall not apply until 27 October 2023 to obligations arising from a contract concluded before 26 July 2023, or ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such a contract.’;
(a) paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:‘9.   In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, the authorisation shall be considered granted.’;
(b) the following paragraphs are added:‘10.   The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 and 9 within 2 weeks of such authorisation.11.   The prohibitions in Article 3(1) and (2) shall not apply until 27 October 2023 to obligations arising from a contract concluded before 26 July 2023, or ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such a contract.’;
(2) Article 10 is replaced by the following:‘Article 10This Decision shall apply until 27 July 2025 and shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.The exceptions referred to in Article 3(7), (8) and (9) as regards Article 3(1) and (2) shall be reviewed at regular intervals, and at least every 12 months, or at the urgent request of any Member State, the High Representative or the Commission following a fundamental change in circumstances.’;
(3) the Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
(1) in the list entitled ‘A. Natural persons’, entries 1, 2, 3 and 6 are replaced by the following:Names (Transliteration into Latin script)NamesIdentifying informationReasons for listingDate of listing‘1.Hadi ZAHOURIANهادی ظهوریان(Farsi spelling)Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Tehran, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0055312047 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat AsmariHadi Zahourian is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Hadi Zahourian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.11.12.20232.Mohammad Shahab KHANIANمحمد شهاب خانیان(Farsi spelling)Position(s): Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Mashhad, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0930588411 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat AsmariMohammad Shahab Khanian is Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Deputy CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Mohammad Shahab Khanian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.11.12.20233.Ehsan Rahat VARNOSFADRANIاحسان راحت وارنوسفدرانی(Farsi spelling)Position(s): Chief scientist of Shakad Sanat AsmariDOB: 1983POB: Bahman, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Shakad Sanat AsmariEhsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is the Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Chief scientist and former CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.11.12.20236.Ehsan IMANINEJADa.k.a. Ehsan IMANIJADاحسان ایمانی نژاد(Farsi spelling)Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz SharifDOB: 1982POB: Shahrivar, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Saad Sazeh Faraz SharifEhsan Imaninejad is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif.Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif (a.k.a. Daria Fanavar Borhan Sharif) is an Iranian company that offers aerospace engineering services and manufactures parts of the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As CEO of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif, Ehsan Imaninejad is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.11.12.2023’; Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing ‘1. Hadi ZAHOURIAN هادی ظهوریان(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Tehran, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0055312047 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Hadi Zahourian is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Hadi Zahourian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023 2. Mohammad Shahab KHANIAN محمد شهاب خانیان(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Mashhad, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0930588411 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Mohammad Shahab Khanian is Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Deputy CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Mohammad Shahab Khanian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023 3. Ehsan Rahat VARNOSFADRANI احسان راحت وارنوسفدرانی(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief scientist of Shakad Sanat AsmariDOB: 1983POB: Bahman, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is the Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Chief scientist and former CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023 6. Ehsan IMANINEJADa.k.a. Ehsan IMANIJAD احسان ایمانی نژاد(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz SharifDOB: 1982POB: Shahrivar, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif Ehsan Imaninejad is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif.Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif (a.k.a. Daria Fanavar Borhan Sharif) is an Iranian company that offers aerospace engineering services and manufactures parts of the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As CEO of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif, Ehsan Imaninejad is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023’;
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘1. Hadi ZAHOURIAN هادی ظهوریان(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Tehran, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0055312047 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Hadi Zahourian is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Hadi Zahourian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
2. Mohammad Shahab KHANIAN محمد شهاب خانیان(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Mashhad, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0930588411 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Mohammad Shahab Khanian is Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Deputy CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Mohammad Shahab Khanian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
3. Ehsan Rahat VARNOSFADRANI احسان راحت وارنوسفدرانی(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief scientist of Shakad Sanat AsmariDOB: 1983POB: Bahman, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is the Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Chief scientist and former CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
6. Ehsan IMANINEJADa.k.a. Ehsan IMANIJAD احسان ایمانی نژاد(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz SharifDOB: 1982POB: Shahrivar, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif Ehsan Imaninejad is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif.Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif (a.k.a. Daria Fanavar Borhan Sharif) is an Iranian company that offers aerospace engineering services and manufactures parts of the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As CEO of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif, Ehsan Imaninejad is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023’;
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘1. Hadi ZAHOURIAN هادی ظهوریان(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Tehran, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0055312047 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Hadi Zahourian is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Hadi Zahourian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
2. Mohammad Shahab KHANIAN محمد شهاب خانیان(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat AsmariPOB: Mashhad, IranNationality: IranianGender: MalePassport number: 0930588411 (National ID)Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Mohammad Shahab Khanian is Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Deputy CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Mohammad Shahab Khanian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
3. Ehsan Rahat VARNOSFADRANI احسان راحت وارنوسفدرانی(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief scientist of Shakad Sanat AsmariDOB: 1983POB: Bahman, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is the Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As the Chief scientist and former CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
6. Ehsan IMANINEJADa.k.a. Ehsan IMANIJAD احسان ایمانی نژاد(Farsi spelling) Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz SharifDOB: 1982POB: Shahrivar, IranNationality: IranianGender: MaleAssociated entities: Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif Ehsan Imaninejad is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif.Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif (a.k.a. Daria Fanavar Borhan Sharif) is an Iranian company that offers aerospace engineering services and manufactures parts of the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).As CEO of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif, Ehsan Imaninejad is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023’;
(2) in the list entitled ‘B. Legal persons, entities and bodies’, entries 1 and 4 are replaced by the following:Names (Transliteration into Latin script)NamesIdentifying informationReasons for listingDate of listing‘1.Shakad Sanat Asmariشکاد صنعت آسماری(Farsi spelling)Address: Haft-e Tir Sq, 378 Moftah Shomali St, third floor, Tehran, Iran, postal code 1588944546Type of entity: Limited Liability CompanyPlace of registration: Tehran, IranDate of registration: 24.10.2016Principal place of business: IranShakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.11.12.2023National ID: 14006189580Registration number: 498744Associated individuals: Hadi Zahourian (Chief Executive Officer); Mohammad Shahab Khanian (Deputy Chief Executive Officer); Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani (Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer)4.Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Companya.k.a.Sarmad Electronics; Sarmad Electronic Sepahan; Sarmad Electronics Co.سرمد الکترونیک سپاهان(Farsi spelling)Address: Second Floor, No 309, Alley 28, South Abou Na’im Street, Jaber Ansari Street, Isfahan, IranPlace of registration: IranDate of registration: 2014Principal place of business: IranSarmad Electronic Sepahan Company is an Iranian company that produces the specific components used in Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).Those UAVs are deployed by Russia in its war of aggression against Ukraine. Servomotors and flowmotors in detached Iranian UAVs found on the Ukrainian battlefield have been traced back directly to Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company.The company itself advertises its activities in Iran by claiming to be active in large sensitive industries in the country, including that of UAVs.It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.11.12.2023’. Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing ‘1. Shakad Sanat Asmari شکاد صنعت آسماری(Farsi spelling) Address: Haft-e Tir Sq, 378 Moftah Shomali St, third floor, Tehran, Iran, postal code 1588944546Type of entity: Limited Liability CompanyPlace of registration: Tehran, IranDate of registration: 24.10.2016Principal place of business: Iran Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023 National ID: 14006189580Registration number: 498744Associated individuals: Hadi Zahourian (Chief Executive Officer); Mohammad Shahab Khanian (Deputy Chief Executive Officer); Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani (Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer) 4. Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Companya.k.a.Sarmad Electronics; Sarmad Electronic Sepahan; Sarmad Electronics Co. سرمد الکترونیک سپاهان(Farsi spelling) Address: Second Floor, No 309, Alley 28, South Abou Na’im Street, Jaber Ansari Street, Isfahan, IranPlace of registration: IranDate of registration: 2014Principal place of business: Iran Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company is an Iranian company that produces the specific components used in Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).Those UAVs are deployed by Russia in its war of aggression against Ukraine. Servomotors and flowmotors in detached Iranian UAVs found on the Ukrainian battlefield have been traced back directly to Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company.The company itself advertises its activities in Iran by claiming to be active in large sensitive industries in the country, including that of UAVs.It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023’.
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘1. Shakad Sanat Asmari شکاد صنعت آسماری(Farsi spelling) Address: Haft-e Tir Sq, 378 Moftah Shomali St, third floor, Tehran, Iran, postal code 1588944546Type of entity: Limited Liability CompanyPlace of registration: Tehran, IranDate of registration: 24.10.2016Principal place of business: Iran Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
National ID: 14006189580Registration number: 498744Associated individuals: Hadi Zahourian (Chief Executive Officer); Mohammad Shahab Khanian (Deputy Chief Executive Officer); Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani (Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer)
4. Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Companya.k.a.Sarmad Electronics; Sarmad Electronic Sepahan; Sarmad Electronics Co. سرمد الکترونیک سپاهان(Farsi spelling) Address: Second Floor, No 309, Alley 28, South Abou Na’im Street, Jaber Ansari Street, Isfahan, IranPlace of registration: IranDate of registration: 2014Principal place of business: Iran Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company is an Iranian company that produces the specific components used in Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).Those UAVs are deployed by Russia in its war of aggression against Ukraine. Servomotors and flowmotors in detached Iranian UAVs found on the Ukrainian battlefield have been traced back directly to Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company.The company itself advertises its activities in Iran by claiming to be active in large sensitive industries in the country, including that of UAVs.It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023’.
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘1. Shakad Sanat Asmari شکاد صنعت آسماری(Farsi spelling) Address: Haft-e Tir Sq, 378 Moftah Shomali St, third floor, Tehran, Iran, postal code 1588944546Type of entity: Limited Liability CompanyPlace of registration: Tehran, IranDate of registration: 24.10.2016Principal place of business: Iran Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023
National ID: 14006189580Registration number: 498744Associated individuals: Hadi Zahourian (Chief Executive Officer); Mohammad Shahab Khanian (Deputy Chief Executive Officer); Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani (Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer)
4. Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Companya.k.a.Sarmad Electronics; Sarmad Electronic Sepahan; Sarmad Electronics Co. سرمد الکترونیک سپاهان(Farsi spelling) Address: Second Floor, No 309, Alley 28, South Abou Na’im Street, Jaber Ansari Street, Isfahan, IranPlace of registration: IranDate of registration: 2014Principal place of business: Iran Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company is an Iranian company that produces the specific components used in Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).Those UAVs are deployed by Russia in its war of aggression against Ukraine. Servomotors and flowmotors in detached Iranian UAVs found on the Ukrainian battlefield have been traced back directly to Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company.The company itself advertises its activities in Iran by claiming to be active in large sensitive industries in the country, including that of UAVs.It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme. 11.12.2023’.
The Council of the European Union,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 20 July 2023, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 (1).
(2) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 27 July 2025 and the entries concerning four persons and two entities listed in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 should be updated.
(3) Furthermore, it is appropriate to clarify the existing derogation under Article 3(8) of Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532.
(4) Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 is amended as follows:

(1) Article 3 is amended as follows:
(a) paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:
‘9. In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, the authorisation shall be considered granted.’
;
(b) the following paragraphs are added:
‘10. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 and 9 within 2 weeks of such authorisation. 11. The prohibitions in Article 3(1) and (2) shall not apply until 27 October 2023 to obligations arising from a contract concluded before 26 July 2023, or ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such a contract.’
;
(2) Article 10 is replaced by the following:
‘Article 10
This Decision shall apply until 27 July 2025 and shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.
The exceptions referred to in Article 3(7), (8) and (9) as regards Article 3(1) and (2) shall be reviewed at regular intervals, and at least every 12 months, or at the urgent request of any Member State, the High Representative or the Commission following a fundamental change in circumstances.
’;
(3) the Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, entitled ‘List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 3’, is amended as follows:

(1) in the list entitled ‘A. Natural persons’, entries 1, 2, 3 and 6 are replaced by the following:

Names (Transliteration into Latin script)
Names
Identifying information
Reasons for listing
Date of listing
‘1. Hadi ZAHOURIAN
هادی ظهوریان
(Farsi spelling)
Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari
POB: Tehran, Iran
Nationality: Iranian
Gender: Male
Passport number: 0055312047 (National ID)
Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari
Hadi Zahourian is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.
Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
As the CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Hadi Zahourian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.
11.12.2023 2. Mohammad Shahab KHANIAN
محمد شهاب خانیان
(Farsi spelling)
Position(s): Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari
POB: Mashhad, Iran
Nationality: Iranian
Gender: Male
Passport number: 0930588411 (National ID)
Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari
Mohammad Shahab Khanian is Deputy Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.
Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
As the Deputy CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Mohammad Shahab Khanian is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.
11.12.2023 3. Ehsan Rahat VARNOSFADRANI
احسان راحت وارنوسفدرانی
(Farsi spelling)
Position(s): Chief scientist of Shakad Sanat Asmari
DOB: 1983
POB: Bahman, Iran
Nationality: Iranian
Gender: Male
Associated entities: Shakad Sanat Asmari
Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is the Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Shakad Sanat Asmari.
Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
As the Chief scientist and former CEO of Shakad Sanat Asmari, Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.
11.12.2023 6. Ehsan IMANINEJAD
a.k.a. Ehsan IMANIJAD
احسان ایمانی نژاد
(Farsi spelling)
Position(s): Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif
DOB: 1982
POB: Shahrivar, Iran
Nationality: Iranian
Gender: Male
Associated entities: Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif
Ehsan Imaninejad is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif.
Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif (a.k.a. Daria Fanavar Borhan Sharif) is an Iranian company that offers aerospace engineering services and manufactures parts of the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
As CEO of Saad Sazeh Faraz Sharif, Ehsan Imaninejad is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.
11.12.2023’;

(2) in the list entitled ‘B. Legal persons, entities and bodies’, entries 1 and 4 are replaced by the following:

Names (Transliteration into Latin script)
Names
Identifying information
Reasons for listing
Date of listing
‘1. Shakad Sanat Asmari
شکاد صنعت آسماری
(Farsi spelling)
Address: Haft-e Tir Sq, 378 Moftah Shomali St, third floor, Tehran, Iran, postal code 1588944546
Type of entity: Limited Liability Company
Place of registration: Tehran, Iran
Date of registration: 24.10.2016
Principal place of business: Iran
Shakad Sanat Asmari is an Iranian company that develops and manufactures components for the Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.
11.12.2023

National ID: 14006189580
Registration number: 498744
Associated individuals: Hadi Zahourian (Chief Executive Officer); Mohammad Shahab Khanian (Deputy Chief Executive Officer); Ehsan Rahat Varnosfadrani (Chief scientist and former Chief Executive Officer)

4. Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company
a.k.a.
Sarmad Electronics; Sarmad Electronic Sepahan; Sarmad Electronics Co.
سرمد الکترونیک سپاهان
(Farsi spelling)
Address: Second Floor, No 309, Alley 28, South Abou Na’im Street, Jaber Ansari Street, Isfahan, Iran
Place of registration: Iran
Date of registration: 2014
Principal place of business: Iran
Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company is an Iranian company that produces the specific components used in Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
Those UAVs are deployed by Russia in its war of aggression against Ukraine. Servomotors and flowmotors in detached Iranian UAVs found on the Ukrainian battlefield have been traced back directly to Sarmad Electronic Sepahan Company.
The company itself advertises its activities in Iran by claiming to be active in large sensitive industries in the country, including that of UAVs.
It is therefore supporting and involved in Iran’s UAV programme.
11.12.2023’.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1969 of 15 July 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1969 16.7.2024
(1) On 30 July 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277(1), which concerns restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon.
(2) Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 applies until 31 July 2024. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 31 July 2025.
(3) Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 should therefore be amended accordingly,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 30 July 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 (1), which concerns restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon.
(2) Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 applies until 31 July 2024. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 31 July 2025.
(3) Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
In Article 9 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 July 2025 and shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1968 of 15 July 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Haiti

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1968 16.7.2024
(1) On 25 November 2022, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319(1).
(2) On 28 July 2023, in light of the further deteriorating political, economic, humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/1574(2), which amended Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319 and established a new framework of additional restrictive measures.
(3) On the basis of a review of the measures referred to in Article 2a(1) and Article 3a(1) and (2) of Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319, and in view of the gravity of the situation in Haiti, those measures should be renewed until 29 July 2025.
(4) Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319 should therefore be amended accordingly,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 25 November 2022, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319 (1).
(2) On 28 July 2023, in light of the further deteriorating political, economic, humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/1574 (2), which amended Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319 and established a new framework of additional restrictive measures.
(3) On the basis of a review of the measures referred to in Article 2a(1) and Article 3a(1) and (2) of Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319, and in view of the gravity of the situation in Haiti, those measures should be renewed until 29 July 2025.
(4) Decision (CFSP) 2022/2319 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
In Article 8(2), the date ‘29 July 2024’ is replaced by ‘29 July 2025’.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1967 of 15 July 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1967 15.7.2024
(1) On 7 December 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999(1).
(2) On 8 December 2020, in the Declaration by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’), on behalf of the European Union, regarding the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, the Union and its Member States reaffirmed their strong commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights around the world. The EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime underscores the Union’s determination to enhance its role in addressing serious human rights violations and abuses worldwide. Achieving the effective enjoyment of human rights by everyone is a strategic goal of the Union. Respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights is a fundamental value of the Union and its common foreign and security policy.
(3) In his statement of 16 December 2023, the High Representative stressed the Union’s concern about increased violence against Palestinians by extremist settlers in the occupied West Bank, which has reached unprecedented levels. The Union has continued to reiterate its firm condemnation of settler violence and called for accountability. The Union has also called on Israel to prevent settler violence and ensure that the perpetrators of crimes are held accountable. Since the Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel on 7 October 2023, settler violence has increased drastically.
(4) In their joint statement of 20 May 2024 on attacks on medical and civilian infrastructure in Gaza and the West Bank, the High Representative and the Commissioner for Crisis Management called the suffering of the civilian population in Gaza a human tragedy and expressed the Union’s deep concern. They reiterated their calls for an immediate ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, and full humanitarian access.
(5) In that context, five persons and three entities should be included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999.
(6) Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 should therefore be amended accordingly,
(1) the following entries are added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies under heading ‘A. Natural persons’:Names (Transliteration into Latin script)NamesIdentifying informationReasons for listingDate of listing‘110.Moshe SHARVITמשה שרביט(Hebrew spelling)DOB: 13.11.1994Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 206223000Address: Tirzah Valley Farm outpost, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Moshe’s FarmMoshe Sharvit is an Israeli settler in the Jordan Valley who lives in an outpost near a village, called “Tirza Valley Farm” and also known as “Moshe’s Farm”.Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank. His harassment against those communities has escalated since October 2023.Moshe Sharvit has frequently harassed Palestinians verbally and physically, demanding that they leave their homes and properties. In October 2023, that behaviour resulted in Palestinian civilians fleeing their village of Ein Shibli. He used threatening language against Palestinian men, women and children and physically attacked an elderly person. His actions include hurling stones at Palestinians and their livestock, intentionally driving into herds and cultivated fields, deploying dogs to attack Palestinians and their livestock, and physically abusing animals by using clubs and whips.Therefore, Moshe Sharvit is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.2024111.Zvi BAR YOSEFa.k.a. Zvi BAR-YOSEFDOB: 20.9.1992Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 204377998Associated entities: Zvi’s FarmZvi Bar Yosef established the unauthorised outpost known as “Zvi’s Farm” in the West Bank, east of the Halamish settlement. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi Bar Yosef is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.2024112.Isaschar MANNEa.k.a. Issachar MANNיששכר מן(Hebrew spelling)DOB: 10.5.1983Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 038826939Isaschar Manne, who established the unauthorised Manne Farm outpost in the South Hebron Hills, has repeatedly invaded private lands of the residents of the village of Ta’ala and prevented Palestinians from moving about freely, for instance by preventing Palestinian children from reaching their school in Tuba, Masafer Yatta.Since 2018, there have been several accounts of Isaschar Manne barging into shepherds’ homes, and threatening and harassing them. Manne, who is often armed, has prevented Palestinian shepherds from accessing their pastures, thus depriving them of the possibility to cultivate their land and provide for their needs.Therefore, Isaschar Manne is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to property, the right to private and family life and the right to education. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.2024113.Baruch MARZELPosition(s): Member of Otzma YehuditDOB: 23.4.1959POB: Boston, USANationality: American, IsraeliGender: maleAddress: Tel Rumeida settlement, Hebron, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesBaruch Marzel is a member of the far-right political party “Otzma Yehudit”, which represents one of Israel’s most extremist ideologies and is part of the Kahanist movement. In the 1990s, he was the leader of the Kahane party until it was banned by the Israeli authorities in 1994.In 2019, Baruch Marzel was banned by the Israeli Supreme Court from standing in parliamentary elections because the court found that he had made numerous racist remarks.Baruch Marzel calls for the creation of a Greater Israel where Palestinians would have no place. He openly calls for an ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and denies the Palestinians’ right to their own land.Therefore, Baruch Marzel is responsible for serious human rights abuses, in particular systematic advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.2024114.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” GOPSTEINבן ציון גופשטיין(Hebrew spelling)Position: founder and leader of LehavaDOB: 10.9.1969Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 024526394Address: Givat HaAvot, Kiryat Arba, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: LehavaBen-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein, who lives in the settlement of Kiryat Arba (West Bank), is the founder and leader of the extremist organisation “Lehava”, a spin-off from the Kahanist movement, with the goal to “fight assimilation in the Holy Land”.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein promotes a vision that denies all Palestinians their rights and calls for an end to the Palestinian presence in Israel and in the Palestinian Territories.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein openly called for a war against the Palestinians. He was banned by Israel’s Supreme Court from running in the 2019 Knesset elections because he “systematically incites racism against the Arab public”.Therefore, Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses consisting of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.2024’ Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing ‘110. Moshe SHARVIT משה שרביט(Hebrew spelling) DOB: 13.11.1994Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 206223000Address: Tirzah Valley Farm outpost, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Moshe’s Farm Moshe Sharvit is an Israeli settler in the Jordan Valley who lives in an outpost near a village, called “Tirza Valley Farm” and also known as “Moshe’s Farm”.Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank. His harassment against those communities has escalated since October 2023.Moshe Sharvit has frequently harassed Palestinians verbally and physically, demanding that they leave their homes and properties. In October 2023, that behaviour resulted in Palestinian civilians fleeing their village of Ein Shibli. He used threatening language against Palestinian men, women and children and physically attacked an elderly person. His actions include hurling stones at Palestinians and their livestock, intentionally driving into herds and cultivated fields, deploying dogs to attack Palestinians and their livestock, and physically abusing animals by using clubs and whips.Therefore, Moshe Sharvit is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024 111. Zvi BAR YOSEFa.k.a. Zvi BAR-YOSEF DOB: 20.9.1992Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 204377998Associated entities: Zvi’s Farm Zvi Bar Yosef established the unauthorised outpost known as “Zvi’s Farm” in the West Bank, east of the Halamish settlement. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi Bar Yosef is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024 112. Isaschar MANNEa.k.a. Issachar MANN יששכר מן(Hebrew spelling) DOB: 10.5.1983Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 038826939 Isaschar Manne, who established the unauthorised Manne Farm outpost in the South Hebron Hills, has repeatedly invaded private lands of the residents of the village of Ta’ala and prevented Palestinians from moving about freely, for instance by preventing Palestinian children from reaching their school in Tuba, Masafer Yatta.Since 2018, there have been several accounts of Isaschar Manne barging into shepherds’ homes, and threatening and harassing them. Manne, who is often armed, has prevented Palestinian shepherds from accessing their pastures, thus depriving them of the possibility to cultivate their land and provide for their needs.Therefore, Isaschar Manne is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to property, the right to private and family life and the right to education. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024 113. Baruch MARZEL Position(s): Member of Otzma YehuditDOB: 23.4.1959POB: Boston, USANationality: American, IsraeliGender: maleAddress: Tel Rumeida settlement, Hebron, Occupied Palestinian Territories Baruch Marzel is a member of the far-right political party “Otzma Yehudit”, which represents one of Israel’s most extremist ideologies and is part of the Kahanist movement. In the 1990s, he was the leader of the Kahane party until it was banned by the Israeli authorities in 1994.In 2019, Baruch Marzel was banned by the Israeli Supreme Court from standing in parliamentary elections because the court found that he had made numerous racist remarks.Baruch Marzel calls for the creation of a Greater Israel where Palestinians would have no place. He openly calls for an ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and denies the Palestinians’ right to their own land.Therefore, Baruch Marzel is responsible for serious human rights abuses, in particular systematic advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024 114. Ben-Zion “Bentzi” GOPSTEIN בן ציון גופשטיין(Hebrew spelling) Position: founder and leader of LehavaDOB: 10.9.1969Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 024526394Address: Givat HaAvot, Kiryat Arba, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Lehava Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein, who lives in the settlement of Kiryat Arba (West Bank), is the founder and leader of the extremist organisation “Lehava”, a spin-off from the Kahanist movement, with the goal to “fight assimilation in the Holy Land”.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein promotes a vision that denies all Palestinians their rights and calls for an end to the Palestinian presence in Israel and in the Palestinian Territories.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein openly called for a war against the Palestinians. He was banned by Israel’s Supreme Court from running in the 2019 Knesset elections because he “systematically incites racism against the Arab public”.Therefore, Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses consisting of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024’
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘110. Moshe SHARVIT משה שרביט(Hebrew spelling) DOB: 13.11.1994Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 206223000Address: Tirzah Valley Farm outpost, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Moshe’s Farm Moshe Sharvit is an Israeli settler in the Jordan Valley who lives in an outpost near a village, called “Tirza Valley Farm” and also known as “Moshe’s Farm”.Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank. His harassment against those communities has escalated since October 2023.Moshe Sharvit has frequently harassed Palestinians verbally and physically, demanding that they leave their homes and properties. In October 2023, that behaviour resulted in Palestinian civilians fleeing their village of Ein Shibli. He used threatening language against Palestinian men, women and children and physically attacked an elderly person. His actions include hurling stones at Palestinians and their livestock, intentionally driving into herds and cultivated fields, deploying dogs to attack Palestinians and their livestock, and physically abusing animals by using clubs and whips.Therefore, Moshe Sharvit is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
111. Zvi BAR YOSEFa.k.a. Zvi BAR-YOSEF DOB: 20.9.1992Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 204377998Associated entities: Zvi’s Farm Zvi Bar Yosef established the unauthorised outpost known as “Zvi’s Farm” in the West Bank, east of the Halamish settlement. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi Bar Yosef is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
112. Isaschar MANNEa.k.a. Issachar MANN יששכר מן(Hebrew spelling) DOB: 10.5.1983Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 038826939 Isaschar Manne, who established the unauthorised Manne Farm outpost in the South Hebron Hills, has repeatedly invaded private lands of the residents of the village of Ta’ala and prevented Palestinians from moving about freely, for instance by preventing Palestinian children from reaching their school in Tuba, Masafer Yatta.Since 2018, there have been several accounts of Isaschar Manne barging into shepherds’ homes, and threatening and harassing them. Manne, who is often armed, has prevented Palestinian shepherds from accessing their pastures, thus depriving them of the possibility to cultivate their land and provide for their needs.Therefore, Isaschar Manne is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to property, the right to private and family life and the right to education. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
113. Baruch MARZEL Position(s): Member of Otzma YehuditDOB: 23.4.1959POB: Boston, USANationality: American, IsraeliGender: maleAddress: Tel Rumeida settlement, Hebron, Occupied Palestinian Territories Baruch Marzel is a member of the far-right political party “Otzma Yehudit”, which represents one of Israel’s most extremist ideologies and is part of the Kahanist movement. In the 1990s, he was the leader of the Kahane party until it was banned by the Israeli authorities in 1994.In 2019, Baruch Marzel was banned by the Israeli Supreme Court from standing in parliamentary elections because the court found that he had made numerous racist remarks.Baruch Marzel calls for the creation of a Greater Israel where Palestinians would have no place. He openly calls for an ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and denies the Palestinians’ right to their own land.Therefore, Baruch Marzel is responsible for serious human rights abuses, in particular systematic advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
114. Ben-Zion “Bentzi” GOPSTEIN בן ציון גופשטיין(Hebrew spelling) Position: founder and leader of LehavaDOB: 10.9.1969Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 024526394Address: Givat HaAvot, Kiryat Arba, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Lehava Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein, who lives in the settlement of Kiryat Arba (West Bank), is the founder and leader of the extremist organisation “Lehava”, a spin-off from the Kahanist movement, with the goal to “fight assimilation in the Holy Land”.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein promotes a vision that denies all Palestinians their rights and calls for an end to the Palestinian presence in Israel and in the Palestinian Territories.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein openly called for a war against the Palestinians. He was banned by Israel’s Supreme Court from running in the 2019 Knesset elections because he “systematically incites racism against the Arab public”.Therefore, Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses consisting of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024’
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘110. Moshe SHARVIT משה שרביט(Hebrew spelling) DOB: 13.11.1994Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 206223000Address: Tirzah Valley Farm outpost, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Moshe’s Farm Moshe Sharvit is an Israeli settler in the Jordan Valley who lives in an outpost near a village, called “Tirza Valley Farm” and also known as “Moshe’s Farm”.Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank. His harassment against those communities has escalated since October 2023.Moshe Sharvit has frequently harassed Palestinians verbally and physically, demanding that they leave their homes and properties. In October 2023, that behaviour resulted in Palestinian civilians fleeing their village of Ein Shibli. He used threatening language against Palestinian men, women and children and physically attacked an elderly person. His actions include hurling stones at Palestinians and their livestock, intentionally driving into herds and cultivated fields, deploying dogs to attack Palestinians and their livestock, and physically abusing animals by using clubs and whips.Therefore, Moshe Sharvit is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
111. Zvi BAR YOSEFa.k.a. Zvi BAR-YOSEF DOB: 20.9.1992Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 204377998Associated entities: Zvi’s Farm Zvi Bar Yosef established the unauthorised outpost known as “Zvi’s Farm” in the West Bank, east of the Halamish settlement. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi Bar Yosef is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
112. Isaschar MANNEa.k.a. Issachar MANN יששכר מן(Hebrew spelling) DOB: 10.5.1983Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 038826939 Isaschar Manne, who established the unauthorised Manne Farm outpost in the South Hebron Hills, has repeatedly invaded private lands of the residents of the village of Ta’ala and prevented Palestinians from moving about freely, for instance by preventing Palestinian children from reaching their school in Tuba, Masafer Yatta.Since 2018, there have been several accounts of Isaschar Manne barging into shepherds’ homes, and threatening and harassing them. Manne, who is often armed, has prevented Palestinian shepherds from accessing their pastures, thus depriving them of the possibility to cultivate their land and provide for their needs.Therefore, Isaschar Manne is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to property, the right to private and family life and the right to education. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
113. Baruch MARZEL Position(s): Member of Otzma YehuditDOB: 23.4.1959POB: Boston, USANationality: American, IsraeliGender: maleAddress: Tel Rumeida settlement, Hebron, Occupied Palestinian Territories Baruch Marzel is a member of the far-right political party “Otzma Yehudit”, which represents one of Israel’s most extremist ideologies and is part of the Kahanist movement. In the 1990s, he was the leader of the Kahane party until it was banned by the Israeli authorities in 1994.In 2019, Baruch Marzel was banned by the Israeli Supreme Court from standing in parliamentary elections because the court found that he had made numerous racist remarks.Baruch Marzel calls for the creation of a Greater Israel where Palestinians would have no place. He openly calls for an ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and denies the Palestinians’ right to their own land.Therefore, Baruch Marzel is responsible for serious human rights abuses, in particular systematic advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
114. Ben-Zion “Bentzi” GOPSTEIN בן ציון גופשטיין(Hebrew spelling) Position: founder and leader of LehavaDOB: 10.9.1969Nationality: IsraeliGender: maleID number: 024526394Address: Givat HaAvot, Kiryat Arba, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated entities: Lehava Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein, who lives in the settlement of Kiryat Arba (West Bank), is the founder and leader of the extremist organisation “Lehava”, a spin-off from the Kahanist movement, with the goal to “fight assimilation in the Holy Land”.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein promotes a vision that denies all Palestinians their rights and calls for an end to the Palestinian presence in Israel and in the Palestinian Territories.Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein openly called for a war against the Palestinians. He was banned by Israel’s Supreme Court from running in the 2019 Knesset elections because he “systematically incites racism against the Arab public”.Therefore, Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses consisting of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024’
(2) the following entries are added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies under heading ‘B. Legal persons, entities and bodies’:Names (Transliteration into Latin script)NamesIdentifying informationReasons for listingDate of listing‘29.Moshe’s Farma.k.a. Tirza Valley Farm Outpostהחווה של משה(Hebrew spelling)Address: West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesDate of registration: 2021Associated individuals: Moshe SharvitMoshe’s Farm is owned by Israeli settler Moshe Sharvit, and was founded by him in 2020. Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank.Moshe’s Farm is an illegal outpost located approximately 1,5 kilometers southeast of the Hamra settlement, in the West Bank. Moshe’s Farm has expanded since its founding, and currently includes several residential buildings, a guest lodge for travelers and an events complex. The guest lodge can accommodate up to 100 people, and all buildings were set up without permits and are thus illegal. Since the establishment of Moshe’s Farm, it has been a hub of violence and harassment against Palestinian shepherding communities and been the base from which Moshe Sharvit and other farm residents perpetrate violence and harassment against Palestinians.Therefore, Moshe’s Farm is an entity associated with Moshe Sharvit, listed for serious and systematic abuses of human rights, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.202430.Zvi’s Farmהחווה של צב(Hebrew spelling)Address: Halamish, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated individuals: Zvi Bar YosefZvi’s Farm is an illegal, unauthorised farming outpost on Palestinian territory, close to Halamish, in the West Bank.Zvi’s Farm is situated in a stretch of the West Bank which is under full Israeli military control and is home to Palestinian residents.Zvi’s Farm is operated by Zvi Bar Yosef, who uses the outpost as a base from which he perpetrates violence against Palestinian residents and prevents Palestinian farmers from accessing and using their lands. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi’s Farm is an entity associated with Zvi Bar Yosef, listed for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.202431.Tzav 9a.k.a. Tsav 9; Order 9Website:https://www.tzav9.co.il/faq/Tzav 9 is an Israeli group of violent activists co-founded in January 2024 by Reut Ben Haim and Aviad Shlomo Sarid. Reut Ben Haim and Yossef (Sefi) Ben Haim currently head the group.According to its website, Tzav 9’s two main missions are to block supply trucks delivering humanitarian aid, including food, water and fuel, to Gaza and to tarnish the legitimacy of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East in Israel.Since January 2024, Tzav 9 has regularly blocked humanitarian aid trucks. On 18 January 2024, the group carried out the first blockages of aid deliveries in Kerem Shalom. On 13 May 2024 at Tarqumiyah checkpoint, Tzav 9 participated in a violent protest against a truck driver. On 16 May 2024 in Binyamin, Tzav 9 was involved in an attack against a food truck. Other incidents took place, inter alia, in the areas of Kerem Shalom and Nitzana. The actions carried out include violent protests, attacks against food trucks and the destruction of food. Those actions contributed further to the already dire situation of the civilian population in Gaza.Therefore, Tzav 9 is responsible for serious human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.15.7.2024’. Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing ‘29. Moshe’s Farma.k.a. Tirza Valley Farm Outpost החווה של משה(Hebrew spelling) Address: West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesDate of registration: 2021Associated individuals: Moshe Sharvit Moshe’s Farm is owned by Israeli settler Moshe Sharvit, and was founded by him in 2020. Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank.Moshe’s Farm is an illegal outpost located approximately 1,5 kilometers southeast of the Hamra settlement, in the West Bank. Moshe’s Farm has expanded since its founding, and currently includes several residential buildings, a guest lodge for travelers and an events complex. The guest lodge can accommodate up to 100 people, and all buildings were set up without permits and are thus illegal. Since the establishment of Moshe’s Farm, it has been a hub of violence and harassment against Palestinian shepherding communities and been the base from which Moshe Sharvit and other farm residents perpetrate violence and harassment against Palestinians.Therefore, Moshe’s Farm is an entity associated with Moshe Sharvit, listed for serious and systematic abuses of human rights, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024 30. Zvi’s Farm החווה של צב(Hebrew spelling) Address: Halamish, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated individuals: Zvi Bar Yosef Zvi’s Farm is an illegal, unauthorised farming outpost on Palestinian territory, close to Halamish, in the West Bank.Zvi’s Farm is situated in a stretch of the West Bank which is under full Israeli military control and is home to Palestinian residents.Zvi’s Farm is operated by Zvi Bar Yosef, who uses the outpost as a base from which he perpetrates violence against Palestinian residents and prevents Palestinian farmers from accessing and using their lands. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi’s Farm is an entity associated with Zvi Bar Yosef, listed for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024 31. Tzav 9a.k.a. Tsav 9; Order 9 Website:https://www.tzav9.co.il/faq/ Tzav 9 is an Israeli group of violent activists co-founded in January 2024 by Reut Ben Haim and Aviad Shlomo Sarid. Reut Ben Haim and Yossef (Sefi) Ben Haim currently head the group.According to its website, Tzav 9’s two main missions are to block supply trucks delivering humanitarian aid, including food, water and fuel, to Gaza and to tarnish the legitimacy of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East in Israel.Since January 2024, Tzav 9 has regularly blocked humanitarian aid trucks. On 18 January 2024, the group carried out the first blockages of aid deliveries in Kerem Shalom. On 13 May 2024 at Tarqumiyah checkpoint, Tzav 9 participated in a violent protest against a truck driver. On 16 May 2024 in Binyamin, Tzav 9 was involved in an attack against a food truck. Other incidents took place, inter alia, in the areas of Kerem Shalom and Nitzana. The actions carried out include violent protests, attacks against food trucks and the destruction of food. Those actions contributed further to the already dire situation of the civilian population in Gaza.Therefore, Tzav 9 is responsible for serious human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024’.
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘29. Moshe’s Farma.k.a. Tirza Valley Farm Outpost החווה של משה(Hebrew spelling) Address: West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesDate of registration: 2021Associated individuals: Moshe Sharvit Moshe’s Farm is owned by Israeli settler Moshe Sharvit, and was founded by him in 2020. Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank.Moshe’s Farm is an illegal outpost located approximately 1,5 kilometers southeast of the Hamra settlement, in the West Bank. Moshe’s Farm has expanded since its founding, and currently includes several residential buildings, a guest lodge for travelers and an events complex. The guest lodge can accommodate up to 100 people, and all buildings were set up without permits and are thus illegal. Since the establishment of Moshe’s Farm, it has been a hub of violence and harassment against Palestinian shepherding communities and been the base from which Moshe Sharvit and other farm residents perpetrate violence and harassment against Palestinians.Therefore, Moshe’s Farm is an entity associated with Moshe Sharvit, listed for serious and systematic abuses of human rights, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
30. Zvi’s Farm החווה של צב(Hebrew spelling) Address: Halamish, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated individuals: Zvi Bar Yosef Zvi’s Farm is an illegal, unauthorised farming outpost on Palestinian territory, close to Halamish, in the West Bank.Zvi’s Farm is situated in a stretch of the West Bank which is under full Israeli military control and is home to Palestinian residents.Zvi’s Farm is operated by Zvi Bar Yosef, who uses the outpost as a base from which he perpetrates violence against Palestinian residents and prevents Palestinian farmers from accessing and using their lands. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi’s Farm is an entity associated with Zvi Bar Yosef, listed for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
31. Tzav 9a.k.a. Tsav 9; Order 9 Website:https://www.tzav9.co.il/faq/ Tzav 9 is an Israeli group of violent activists co-founded in January 2024 by Reut Ben Haim and Aviad Shlomo Sarid. Reut Ben Haim and Yossef (Sefi) Ben Haim currently head the group.According to its website, Tzav 9’s two main missions are to block supply trucks delivering humanitarian aid, including food, water and fuel, to Gaza and to tarnish the legitimacy of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East in Israel.Since January 2024, Tzav 9 has regularly blocked humanitarian aid trucks. On 18 January 2024, the group carried out the first blockages of aid deliveries in Kerem Shalom. On 13 May 2024 at Tarqumiyah checkpoint, Tzav 9 participated in a violent protest against a truck driver. On 16 May 2024 in Binyamin, Tzav 9 was involved in an attack against a food truck. Other incidents took place, inter alia, in the areas of Kerem Shalom and Nitzana. The actions carried out include violent protests, attacks against food trucks and the destruction of food. Those actions contributed further to the already dire situation of the civilian population in Gaza.Therefore, Tzav 9 is responsible for serious human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024’.
Names (Transliteration into Latin script) Names Identifying information Reasons for listing Date of listing
‘29. Moshe’s Farma.k.a. Tirza Valley Farm Outpost החווה של משה(Hebrew spelling) Address: West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesDate of registration: 2021Associated individuals: Moshe Sharvit Moshe’s Farm is owned by Israeli settler Moshe Sharvit, and was founded by him in 2020. Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank.Moshe’s Farm is an illegal outpost located approximately 1,5 kilometers southeast of the Hamra settlement, in the West Bank. Moshe’s Farm has expanded since its founding, and currently includes several residential buildings, a guest lodge for travelers and an events complex. The guest lodge can accommodate up to 100 people, and all buildings were set up without permits and are thus illegal. Since the establishment of Moshe’s Farm, it has been a hub of violence and harassment against Palestinian shepherding communities and been the base from which Moshe Sharvit and other farm residents perpetrate violence and harassment against Palestinians.Therefore, Moshe’s Farm is an entity associated with Moshe Sharvit, listed for serious and systematic abuses of human rights, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
30. Zvi’s Farm החווה של צב(Hebrew spelling) Address: Halamish, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian TerritoriesAssociated individuals: Zvi Bar Yosef Zvi’s Farm is an illegal, unauthorised farming outpost on Palestinian territory, close to Halamish, in the West Bank.Zvi’s Farm is situated in a stretch of the West Bank which is under full Israeli military control and is home to Palestinian residents.Zvi’s Farm is operated by Zvi Bar Yosef, who uses the outpost as a base from which he perpetrates violence against Palestinian residents and prevents Palestinian farmers from accessing and using their lands. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.Therefore, Zvi’s Farm is an entity associated with Zvi Bar Yosef, listed for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024
31. Tzav 9a.k.a. Tsav 9; Order 9 Website:https://www.tzav9.co.il/faq/ Tzav 9 is an Israeli group of violent activists co-founded in January 2024 by Reut Ben Haim and Aviad Shlomo Sarid. Reut Ben Haim and Yossef (Sefi) Ben Haim currently head the group.According to its website, Tzav 9’s two main missions are to block supply trucks delivering humanitarian aid, including food, water and fuel, to Gaza and to tarnish the legitimacy of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East in Israel.Since January 2024, Tzav 9 has regularly blocked humanitarian aid trucks. On 18 January 2024, the group carried out the first blockages of aid deliveries in Kerem Shalom. On 13 May 2024 at Tarqumiyah checkpoint, Tzav 9 participated in a violent protest against a truck driver. On 16 May 2024 in Binyamin, Tzav 9 was involved in an attack against a food truck. Other incidents took place, inter alia, in the areas of Kerem Shalom and Nitzana. The actions carried out include violent protests, attacks against food trucks and the destruction of food. Those actions contributed further to the already dire situation of the civilian population in Gaza.Therefore, Tzav 9 is responsible for serious human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. 15.7.2024’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 7 December 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 (1).
(2) On 8 December 2020, in the Declaration by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’), on behalf of the European Union, regarding the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, the Union and its Member States reaffirmed their strong commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights around the world. The EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime underscores the Union’s determination to enhance its role in addressing serious human rights violations and abuses worldwide. Achieving the effective enjoyment of human rights by everyone is a strategic goal of the Union. Respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights is a fundamental value of the Union and its common foreign and security policy.
(3) In his statement of 16 December 2023, the High Representative stressed the Union’s concern about increased violence against Palestinians by extremist settlers in the occupied West Bank, which has reached unprecedented levels. The Union has continued to reiterate its firm condemnation of settler violence and called for accountability. The Union has also called on Israel to prevent settler violence and ensure that the perpetrators of crimes are held accountable. Since the Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel on 7 October 2023, settler violence has increased drastically.
(4) In their joint statement of 20 May 2024 on attacks on medical and civilian infrastructure in Gaza and the West Bank, the High Representative and the Commissioner for Crisis Management called the suffering of the civilian population in Gaza a human tragedy and expressed the Union’s deep concern. They reiterated their calls for an immediate ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, and full humanitarian access.
(5) In that context, five persons and three entities should be included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999.
(6) Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 is amended as follows:

(1) the following entries are added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies under heading ‘A. Natural persons’:

Names (Transliteration into Latin script)
Names
Identifying information
Reasons for listing
Date of listing
‘110. Moshe SHARVIT
משה שרביט
(Hebrew spelling)
DOB: 13.11.1994
Nationality: Israeli
Gender: male
ID number: 206223000
Address: Tirzah Valley Farm outpost, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territories
Associated entities: Moshe’s Farm
Moshe Sharvit is an Israeli settler in the Jordan Valley who lives in an outpost near a village, called “Tirza Valley Farm” and also known as “Moshe’s Farm”.
Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank. His harassment against those communities has escalated since October 2023. Moshe Sharvit has frequently harassed Palestinians verbally and physically, demanding that they leave their homes and properties. In October 2023, that behaviour resulted in Palestinian civilians fleeing their village of Ein Shibli. He used threatening language against Palestinian men, women and children and physically attacked an elderly person. His actions include hurling stones at Palestinians and their livestock, intentionally driving into herds and cultivated fields, deploying dogs to attack Palestinians and their livestock, and physically abusing animals by using clubs and whips.
Therefore, Moshe Sharvit is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024 111. Zvi BAR YOSEF
a.k.a. Zvi BAR-YOSEF

DOB: 20.9.1992
Nationality: Israeli
Gender: male
ID number: 204377998
Associated entities: Zvi’s Farm
Zvi Bar Yosef established the unauthorised outpost known as “Zvi’s Farm” in the West Bank, east of the Halamish settlement. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.
In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.
Therefore, Zvi Bar Yosef is responsible for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024 112. Isaschar MANNE
a.k.a. Issachar MANN
יששכר מן
(Hebrew spelling)
DOB: 10.5.1983
Nationality: Israeli
Gender: male
ID number: 038826939
Isaschar Manne, who established the unauthorised Manne Farm outpost in the South Hebron Hills, has repeatedly invaded private lands of the residents of the village of Ta’ala and prevented Palestinians from moving about freely, for instance by preventing Palestinian children from reaching their school in Tuba, Masafer Yatta.
Since 2018, there have been several accounts of Isaschar Manne barging into shepherds’ homes, and threatening and harassing them. Manne, who is often armed, has prevented Palestinian shepherds from accessing their pastures, thus depriving them of the possibility to cultivate their land and provide for their needs.
Therefore, Isaschar Manne is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to property, the right to private and family life and the right to education. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024 113. Baruch MARZEL

Position(s): Member of Otzma Yehudit
DOB: 23.4.1959
POB: Boston, USA
Nationality: American, Israeli
Gender: male
Address: Tel Rumeida settlement, Hebron, Occupied Palestinian Territories
Baruch Marzel is a member of the far-right political party “Otzma Yehudit”, which represents one of Israel’s most extremist ideologies and is part of the Kahanist movement. In the 1990s, he was the leader of the Kahane party until it was banned by the Israeli authorities in 1994. In 2019, Baruch Marzel was banned by the Israeli Supreme Court from standing in parliamentary elections because the court found that he had made numerous racist remarks.
Baruch Marzel calls for the creation of a Greater Israel where Palestinians would have no place. He openly calls for an ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and denies the Palestinians’ right to their own land.
Therefore, Baruch Marzel is responsible for serious human rights abuses, in particular systematic advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024 114. Ben-Zion “Bentzi” GOPSTEIN
בן ציון גופשטיין
(Hebrew spelling)
Position: founder and leader of Lehava
DOB: 10.9.1969
Nationality: Israeli
Gender: male
ID number: 024526394
Address: Givat HaAvot, Kiryat Arba, Occupied Palestinian Territories
Associated entities: Lehava
Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein, who lives in the settlement of Kiryat Arba (West Bank), is the founder and leader of the extremist organisation “Lehava”, a spin-off from the Kahanist movement, with the goal to “fight assimilation in the Holy Land”.
Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein promotes a vision that denies all Palestinians their rights and calls for an end to the Palestinian presence in Israel and in the Palestinian Territories.
Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein openly called for a war against the Palestinians. He was banned by Israel’s Supreme Court from running in the 2019 Knesset elections because he “systematically incites racism against the Arab public”.
Therefore, Ben-Zion “Bentzi” Gopstein is responsible for systematic and serious human rights abuses consisting of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred, which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024’

(2) the following entries are added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies under heading ‘B. Legal persons, entities and bodies’:

Names (Transliteration into Latin script)
Names
Identifying information
Reasons for listing
Date of listing
‘29. Moshe’s Farm
a.k.a. Tirza Valley Farm Outpost
החווה של משה
(Hebrew spelling)
Address: West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territories
Date of registration: 2021
Associated individuals: Moshe Sharvit
Moshe’s Farm is owned by Israeli settler Moshe Sharvit, and was founded by him in 2020. Moshe Sharvit is engaged in settler violence and threats towards Palestinian residents in shepherding communities close to his hilltop outpost in the West Bank.
Moshe’s Farm is an illegal outpost located approximately 1,5 kilometers southeast of the Hamra settlement, in the West Bank. Moshe’s Farm has expanded since its founding, and currently includes several residential buildings, a guest lodge for travelers and an events complex. The guest lodge can accommodate up to 100 people, and all buildings were set up without permits and are thus illegal. Since the establishment of Moshe’s Farm, it has been a hub of violence and harassment against Palestinian shepherding communities and been the base from which Moshe Sharvit and other farm residents perpetrate violence and harassment against Palestinians.
Therefore, Moshe’s Farm is an entity associated with Moshe Sharvit, listed for serious and systematic abuses of human rights, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024 30. Zvi’s Farm
החווה של צב
(Hebrew spelling)
Address: Halamish, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territories
Associated individuals: Zvi Bar Yosef
Zvi’s Farm is an illegal, unauthorised farming outpost on Palestinian territory, close to Halamish, in the West Bank.
Zvi’s Farm is situated in a stretch of the West Bank which is under full Israeli military control and is home to Palestinian residents.
Zvi’s Farm is operated by Zvi Bar Yosef, who uses the outpost as a base from which he perpetrates violence against Palestinian residents and prevents Palestinian farmers from accessing and using their lands. The outpost has taken over some 2,500 dunams / 620 acres that were cultivated by the villages of Jibya, Kaubar (Kobar) and Umm Safa.
In 2019, 2021 and 2023, Zvi Bar Yosef repeatedly attacked and committed acts of violence against Palestinians from those villages, causing severe injuries to some of them.
Therefore, Zvi’s Farm is an entity associated with Zvi Bar Yosef, listed for serious and systematic human rights abuses, including abuses of the right to physical and mental integrity, the right to property and the right to private and family life. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024 31. Tzav 9
a.k.a. Tsav 9; Order 9

Website: https://www.tzav9.co.il/faq/
Tzav 9 is an Israeli group of violent activists co-founded in January 2024 by Reut Ben Haim and Aviad Shlomo Sarid. Reut Ben Haim and Yossef (Sefi) Ben Haim currently head the group.
According to its website, Tzav 9’s two main missions are to block supply trucks delivering humanitarian aid, including food, water and fuel, to Gaza and to tarnish the legitimacy of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East in Israel.
Since January 2024, Tzav 9 has regularly blocked humanitarian aid trucks. On 18 January 2024, the group carried out the first blockages of aid deliveries in Kerem Shalom. On 13 May 2024 at Tarqumiyah checkpoint, Tzav 9 participated in a violent protest against a truck driver. On 16 May 2024 in Binyamin, Tzav 9 was involved in an attack against a food truck. Other incidents took place, inter alia, in the areas of Kerem Shalom and Nitzana. The actions carried out include violent protests, attacks against food trucks and the destruction of food. Those actions contributed further to the already dire situation of the civilian population in Gaza.
Therefore, Tzav 9 is responsible for serious human rights abuses, including abuse of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental integrity. Those abuses are also of serious concern as regards the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
15.7.2024’.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1964 of 15 July 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 concerning restrictive measures against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/1964 16.7.2024
(1) On 15 October 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544(1).
(2) In its conclusions of 20 May 2021 on the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council ‘on the EU’s humanitarian action: new challenges, same principles’, the Council reaffirmed its commitment to avoid and, where unavoidable, mitigate to the maximum extent any potential unintended negative impacts of Union restrictive measures on principled humanitarian action. The Council reiterated that Union restrictive measures comply with all obligations under international law, in particular international human rights law, international humanitarian law and international refugee law. It underlined the importance of fully adhering to humanitarian principles and international humanitarian law in Union sanctions policy, including through the consistent inclusion of humanitarian exceptions in Union restrictive measures regimes, where relevant, and by ensuring that an effective framework is in place for the use of such exceptions by humanitarian organisations.
(3) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544, and in order to facilitate principled humanitarian action by impartial humanitarian actors, certain organisations and agencies acting as humanitarian partners of the Union should be exempted from the prohibition to make funds or economic resources available to designated persons, entities and bodies, for exclusively humanitarian purposes. In addition, a derogation mechanism should be introduced for those organisations and actors involved in humanitarian activities that cannot benefit from that humanitarian exemption. Furthermore, a review clause related to those exceptions should be introduced.
(4) Further action by the Union is needed in order to implement certain measures.
(5) Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 should therefore be amended accordingly,
(1) in Article 3, the following paragraphs are added:‘7.   Paragraph 2 shall not apply to organisations and agencies which are pillar-assessed by the Union and with which the Union has signed a financial framework partnership agreement on the basis of which the organisations and agencies act as humanitarian partners of the Union, provided that the provision of the funds or economic resources referred to in paragraph 2 is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes.8.   In cases not covered by paragraph 7, and by way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may grant specific or general authorisations, under such general or specific conditions as they deem appropriate, to release certain frozen funds or economic resources or to make available certain funds or economic resources, provided that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes.9.   In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the relevant competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, that authorisation shall be considered granted.10.   The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 or 9 within two weeks of such authorisation.’;
(2) in Article 8, the following paragraph is added:‘The exceptions referred to in Article 3(7), (8) and (9) as regards Article 3(1) and (2) shall be reviewed at regular intervals, and at least every 12 months, or at the urgent request of any Member State, of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, or of the Commission, following a fundamental change in circumstances.’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 15 October 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 (1).
(2) In its conclusions of 20 May 2021 on the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council ‘on the EU’s humanitarian action: new challenges, same principles’, the Council reaffirmed its commitment to avoid and, where unavoidable, mitigate to the maximum extent any potential unintended negative impacts of Union restrictive measures on principled humanitarian action. The Council reiterated that Union restrictive measures comply with all obligations under international law, in particular international human rights law, international humanitarian law and international refugee law. It underlined the importance of fully adhering to humanitarian principles and international humanitarian law in Union sanctions policy, including through the consistent inclusion of humanitarian exceptions in Union restrictive measures regimes, where relevant, and by ensuring that an effective framework is in place for the use of such exceptions by humanitarian organisations.
(3) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544, and in order to facilitate principled humanitarian action by impartial humanitarian actors, certain organisations and agencies acting as humanitarian partners of the Union should be exempted from the prohibition to make funds or economic resources available to designated persons, entities and bodies, for exclusively humanitarian purposes. In addition, a derogation mechanism should be introduced for those organisations and actors involved in humanitarian activities that cannot benefit from that humanitarian exemption. Furthermore, a review clause related to those exceptions should be introduced.
(4) Further action by the Union is needed in order to implement certain measures.
(5) Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 3, the following paragraphs are added:
‘7. Paragraph 2 shall not apply to organisations and agencies which are pillar-assessed by the Union and with which the Union has signed a financial framework partnership agreement on the basis of which the organisations and agencies act as humanitarian partners of the Union, provided that the provision of the funds or economic resources referred to in paragraph 2 is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes. 8. In cases not covered by paragraph 7, and by way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may grant specific or general authorisations, under such general or specific conditions as they deem appropriate, to release certain frozen funds or economic resources or to make available certain funds or economic resources, provided that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes. 9. In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the relevant competent authority within five working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 8, that authorisation shall be considered granted. 10. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisations granted under paragraphs 8 or 9 within two weeks of such authorisation.’
;
(2) in Article 8, the following paragraph is added:
‘The exceptions referred to in Article 3(7), (8) and (9) as regards Article 3(1) and (2) shall be reviewed at regular intervals, and at least every 12 months, or at the urgent request of any Member State, of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, or of the Commission, following a fundamental change in circumstances.’.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.