Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2521 of 23 September 2024 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2521 24.9.2024
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509(1)establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) The Union is committed to a close relationship in support of a strong, independent and prosperous North Macedonia, based on the Stabilisation and Association Agreement which was signed in 2001 and entered into force in 2004, and on accession negotiations with North Macedonia which were opened in 2020.
(3) The Union recognises North Macedonia’s contribution to the Union’s common security and defence policy (CSDP), including its participation in CSDP missions and operations and EU battlegroups.
(4) On 21 March 2022, the Union approved the Strategic Compass, with the objective of becoming a stronger and more capable security provider, including through the increased use of the EPF in support of partners’ military and defence capabilities.
(5) In the Brussels Declaration of 13 December 2023, the leaders of the Union and its Member States, in consultation with the Western Balkans leaders, called for the Union to continue to work together with the region to further develop its defence capabilities and capacities, including through the EPF.
(6) On 2 July 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from North Macedonia for the Union to enhance the equipment of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia, with a focus on its Light Infantry Battalion Group.
(7) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP(2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(8) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
(a) to contribute to enhancing the capabilities and capacities of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia, in order to enhance national and regional security, stability and resilience in the defence sector, in line with the Union’s overall policy on North Macedonia;
(b) to enhance the operational effectiveness of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia, increase compliance with Union standards, improve interoperability, and thereby better protect the civilian population in crises and emergencies;
(c) to strengthen the capacities of North Macedonia with respect to its participation in the Union’s common security and defence policy missions and operations, and in Union battlegroups.
(a) technologies related to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and signal intelligence;
(b) logistics;
(c) engineering equipment;
(d) communication and information systems.
(a) compliance of the units of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements.
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting on the inventory, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) and Article 41(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 (1) establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) The Union is committed to a close relationship in support of a strong, independent and prosperous North Macedonia, based on the Stabilisation and Association Agreement which was signed in 2001 and entered into force in 2004, and on accession negotiations with North Macedonia which were opened in 2020.
(3) The Union recognises North Macedonia’s contribution to the Union’s common security and defence policy (CSDP), including its participation in CSDP missions and operations and EU battlegroups.
(4) On 21 March 2022, the Union approved the Strategic Compass, with the objective of becoming a stronger and more capable security provider, including through the increased use of the EPF in support of partners’ military and defence capabilities.
(5) In the Brussels Declaration of 13 December 2023, the leaders of the Union and its Member States, in consultation with the Western Balkans leaders, called for the Union to continue to work together with the region to further develop its defence capabilities and capacities, including through the EPF.
(6) On 2 July 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from North Macedonia for the Union to enhance the equipment of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia, with a focus on its Light Infantry Battalion Group.
(7) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(8) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Establishment, objectives, scope and duration

1. An assistance measure benefiting North Macedonia (the ‘beneficiary’) to be financed under the European Peace Facility (EPF) (the ‘assistance measure’) is hereby established.

2. The objectives of the assistance measure are the following:
(a) to contribute to enhancing the capabilities and capacities of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia, in order to enhance national and regional security, stability and resilience in the defence sector, in line with the Union’s overall policy on North Macedonia;
(b) to enhance the operational effectiveness of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia, increase compliance with Union standards, improve interoperability, and thereby better protect the civilian population in crises and emergencies;
(c) to strengthen the capacities of North Macedonia with respect to its participation in the Union’s common security and defence policy missions and operations, and in Union battlegroups.

3. To achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 2, the assistance measure shall finance the following types of equipment not designed to deliver lethal force:
(a) technologies related to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and signal intelligence;
(b) logistics;
(c) engineering equipment;
(d) communication and information systems.
The assistance measure shall also finance related supplies and services, including technical training, where needed.

4. The duration of the assistance measure shall be 36 months from the date of adoption of this Decision.

Financial arrangements

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the assistance measure shall be EUR 13 000 000.
2. All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.

Arrangements with the beneficiary

1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’) shall make the necessary arrangements with the beneficiary to ensure its compliance with the requirements and conditions established by this Decision as a condition for the provision of support under the assistance measure.

2. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions obliging the beneficiary to ensure:
(a) compliance of the units of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements.

3. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions on the suspension and termination of support under the assistance measure in the event of the beneficiary being found in breach of the obligations set out in paragraph 2.

Implementation

1. The High Representative shall be responsible for ensuring the implementation of this Decision in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF and with the Integrated Methodological Framework for assessing and identifying the required measures and controls for assistance measures under the EPF.

2. The implementation of the activities referred to in Article 1(3) shall be carried out by Défense Conseil International – DCI Group.

Monitoring, control and evaluation

1. The High Representative shall monitor the compliance by the beneficiary with the obligations set out in Article 3. That monitoring shall be used to provide awareness of the context and the risks of breaches of the obligations set out in Article 3, and to contribute to the prevention of such breaches, including violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the units of the Army of the Republic of North Macedonia supported under the assistance measure.

2. The post-shipment control of equipment and supplies shall be organised as follows:
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting on the inventory, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.

3. The High Representative shall conduct a final evaluation upon completion of the assistance measure to assess whether the assistance measure has contributed to reaching the objectives set out in Article 1(2).

Reporting

During the period of implementation, the High Representative shall provide the PSC with six-monthly reports on the implementation of the assistance measure, in accordance with Article 63 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509. The administrator for assistance measures shall regularly inform the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 on the implementation of revenue and expenditure in accordance with Article 38 of that Decision, including by providing information on the suppliers and subcontractors involved.

Suspension and termination

1. The PSC may decide to suspend wholly or partially the implementation of the assistance measure in accordance with Article 64 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509.
2. The PSC may recommend that the Council terminate the assistance measure.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2520 of 23 September 2024 concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2520 24.9.2024
(1) On 9 September 2022, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2022/1508(1), which provided for an extension of the validity of the national permits of certain Palestinians for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Common Position 2002/400/CFSP(2)for a further period of 24 months.
(2) On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 24 months,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 and Article 31(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) On 9 September 2022, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2022/1508 (1), which provided for an extension of the validity of the national permits of certain Palestinians for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Common Position 2002/400/CFSP (2) for a further period of 24 months.
(2) On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 24 months,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Member States referred to in Article 2 of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP shall extend the validity of national permits for entry and stay granted pursuant to Article 3 of that Common Position for a further period of 24 months, as from 31 January 2024.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Council Decision (EU) 2024/2517, taken by common accord with the President-elect of the Commission, of 19 September 2024 adopting the list of the other persons whom the Council proposes for appointment as Members of the Commission

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2517 23.9.2024
(1) The mandate of the Commission appointed by European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1989(2)comes to an end on 31 October 2024.
(2) A new Commission, consisting of one national of each Member State, including its President and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, should be appointed until 31 October 2029.
(3) By Decision (EU) 2024/1862(3), the European Council proposed Ms Ursula VON DER LEYEN to the European Parliament as candidate for President of the Commission, and the European Parliament elected her as President of the Commission at its Plenary Session of 18 July 2024.
(4) By Decision (EU) 2024/2086(4), the European Council, with the agreement of the President-elect of the Commission, appointed Ms Kaja KALLAS as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
(5) The Council, by common accord with the President-elect of the Commission, should adopt the list of the other persons whom it proposes for appointment as Members of the Commission until 31 October 2029.
(6) By letter of 19 September 2024, the President-elect of the Commission has notified her accord in accordance with Article 17(7), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
(7) In accordance with Article 17(7), third subparagraph, TEU, the President, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the other Members of the Commission are subject as a body to a vote of consent by the European Parliament,
Mr Magnus BRUNNER
Ms Maria Luís CASANOVA MORGADO DIAS DE ALBUQUERQUE
Mr Valdis DOMBROVSKIS
Mr Raffaele FITTO
Mr Christophe HANSEN
Mr Wopke Bastiaan HOEKSTRA
Mr Dan JØRGENSEN
Mr Constantinos KADIS
Ms Marta KOS
Mr Andrius KUBILIUS
Ms Hadja LAHBIB
Mr Michael MCGRATH
Mr Glenn MICALLEF
Ms Roxana MÎNZATU
Ms Teresa RIBERA RODRÍGUEZ
Ms Jessika ROSWALL
Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ
Mr Stéphane Séjourné
Mr Piotr Arkadiusz SERAFIN
Mr Jozef SÍKELA
Ms Ekaterina SPASOVA GECHEVA-ZAHARIEVA
Ms Dubravka ŠUICA
Mr Apostolos TZITZIKOSTAS
Mr Olivér VÁRHELYI
Ms Henna Maria VIRKKUNEN,
Ms Kaja KALLAS, appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 17(3) and (5) and Article 17(7), second subparagraph, thereof,
Having regard to European Council Decision 2013/272/EU of 22 May 2013 concerning the number of members of the European Commission (1),
Whereas:
(1) The mandate of the Commission appointed by European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1989 (2) comes to an end on 31 October 2024.
(2) A new Commission, consisting of one national of each Member State, including its President and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, should be appointed until 31 October 2029.
(3) By Decision (EU) 2024/1862 (3), the European Council proposed Ms Ursula VON DER LEYEN to the European Parliament as candidate for President of the Commission, and the European Parliament elected her as President of the Commission at its Plenary Session of 18 July 2024.
(4) By Decision (EU) 2024/2086 (4), the European Council, with the agreement of the President-elect of the Commission, appointed Ms Kaja KALLAS as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
(5) The Council, by common accord with the President-elect of the Commission, should adopt the list of the other persons whom it proposes for appointment as Members of the Commission until 31 October 2029.
(6) By letter of 19 September 2024, the President-elect of the Commission has notified her accord in accordance with Article 17(7), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
(7) In accordance with Article 17(7), third subparagraph, TEU, the President, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the other Members of the Commission are subject as a body to a vote of consent by the European Parliament,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
By common accord with Ms Ursula VON DER LEYEN, President-elect of the Commission, the Council hereby proposes the following persons for appointment as Members of the Commission until 31 October 2029:

Mr Magnus BRUNNER

Ms Maria Luís CASANOVA MORGADO DIAS DE ALBUQUERQUE

Mr Valdis DOMBROVSKIS

Mr Raffaele FITTO

Mr Christophe HANSEN

Mr Wopke Bastiaan HOEKSTRA

Mr Dan JØRGENSEN

Mr Constantinos KADIS

Ms Marta KOS

Mr Andrius KUBILIUS

Ms Hadja LAHBIB

Mr Michael MCGRATH

Mr Glenn MICALLEF

Ms Roxana MÎNZATU

Ms Teresa RIBERA RODRÍGUEZ

Ms Jessika ROSWALL

Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ

Mr Stéphane Séjourné

Mr Piotr Arkadiusz SERAFIN

Mr Jozef SÍKELA

Ms Ekaterina SPASOVA GECHEVA-ZAHARIEVA

Ms Dubravka ŠUICA

Mr Apostolos TZITZIKOSTAS

Mr Olivér VÁRHELYI

Ms Henna Maria VIRKKUNEN,

in addition to:

Ms Kaja KALLAS, appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

This Decision shall be forwarded to the European Parliament.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2504 of 23 September 2024 amending Decision 2012/285/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2504 24.9.2024
(1) On 31 May 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/285/CFSP(1).
(2) Pursuant to Article 5(2) of Decision 2012/285/CFSP, the Council reviewed the restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau, and considers that one person should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex II to that Decision, and three persons should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex III to that Decision.
(3) Decision 2012/285/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
‘16. Lieutenant Julio NA MAN’.
‘13. Tchipa NA BIDON
16. Idrissa DJALÓ
21. Lieutenant Julio NA MAN’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 31 May 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1).
(2) Pursuant to Article 5(2) of Decision 2012/285/CFSP, the Council reviewed the restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau, and considers that one person should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex II to that Decision, and three persons should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex III to that Decision.
(3) Decision 2012/285/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Annexes II and III to Decision 2012/285/CFSP are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(1)
In Annex II to Decision 2012/285/CFSP (List of persons referred to in Articles 1(1)(b)), the entry concerning the person listed below is deleted:
‘16. Lieutenant Julio NA MAN’.

(2)
In Annex III to Decision 2012/285/CFSP (List of persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 2), the entries concerning the persons listed below are deleted:
‘13. Tchipa NA BIDON 16. Idrissa DJALÓ 21. Lieutenant Julio NA MAN’.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2503 of 23 September 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1465 on a European Union action in support of the United Nations Verification and Inspection Mechanism in Yemen

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2503 24.9.2024
(1) On 18 September 2018, based on a request by the United Nations Verification and Inspection Mechanism for Yemen (UNVIM), the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1249(1)on a European Union action in support of UNVIM.
(2) On 12 October 2020, based on a request by UNVIM, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/1465(2)and renewed Union action in support of UNVIM for a period of 12 months.
(3) On 28 September 2023, based on a request by UNVIM, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/2095(3)and further renewed Union action in support of UNVIM for a period of 12 months, until 30 September 2024.
(4) United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2722 (2024) condemned the provision of arms and related materiel of all types to the Houthis, in violation of UNSCR 2216 (2015), and called for additional practical cooperation to prevent the Houthis from acquiring the materiel necessary to carry out further attacks.
(5) UNSCR 2742 (2024) extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission to support the Hodeidah Agreement in order to support the implementation of the agreement on the City of Hodeidah and the ports of Hodeidah, Saleef and Ras Issa set out in the Stockholm Agreement concluded on 13 December 2018 by the parties to the conflict in Yemen and endorsed by UNSCR 2451 (2018) and UNSCR 2452 (2019).
(6) UNVIM requested further support from the Union for 1 year.
(7) The Union should renew for 1 year its support to UNVIM for the implementation of its mandate.
(8) A new financial reference amount should be added to cover the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.
(9) Decision (CFSP) 2020/1465 should therefore be amended accordingly,
(1) in Article 3(1), the following indent is added:‘—EUR 2 200 000 for the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.’; ‘— EUR 2 200 000 for the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.’
‘— EUR 2 200 000 for the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.’
‘— EUR 2 200 000 for the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.’
(2) in Article 5, the third paragraph is replaced by the following:‘It shall expire on 30 September 2025.’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 18 September 2018, based on a request by the United Nations Verification and Inspection Mechanism for Yemen (UNVIM), the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1249 (1) on a European Union action in support of UNVIM.
(2) On 12 October 2020, based on a request by UNVIM, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/1465 (2) and renewed Union action in support of UNVIM for a period of 12 months.
(3) On 28 September 2023, based on a request by UNVIM, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/2095 (3) and further renewed Union action in support of UNVIM for a period of 12 months, until 30 September 2024.
(4) United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2722 (2024) condemned the provision of arms and related materiel of all types to the Houthis, in violation of UNSCR 2216 (2015), and called for additional practical cooperation to prevent the Houthis from acquiring the materiel necessary to carry out further attacks.
(5) UNSCR 2742 (2024) extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission to support the Hodeidah Agreement in order to support the implementation of the agreement on the City of Hodeidah and the ports of Hodeidah, Saleef and Ras Issa set out in the Stockholm Agreement concluded on 13 December 2018 by the parties to the conflict in Yemen and endorsed by UNSCR 2451 (2018) and UNSCR 2452 (2019).
(6) UNVIM requested further support from the Union for 1 year.
(7) The Union should renew for 1 year its support to UNVIM for the implementation of its mandate.
(8) A new financial reference amount should be added to cover the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.
(9) Decision (CFSP) 2020/1465 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision (CFSP) 2020/1465 is hereby amended as follows:

(1) in Article 3(1), the following indent is added:
‘—
EUR 2 200 000 for the period from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2025.’
;
(2) in Article 5, the third paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘It shall expire on 30 September 2025.’.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 1 October 2024.

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2024/2502 of 23 September 2024 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2502 24.9.2024
(1) On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.
(2) Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-209/22(2), one entry should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.
(3) Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
‘320. Shalaa Mohammed MAKHLOUF’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (1), and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.
(2) Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-209/22 (2), one entry should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.
(3) Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The following entry is deleted from the list set out in Section A (‘Persons’) of Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP:

‘320. Shalaa Mohammed MAKHLOUF’.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2500 of 23 September 2024 in support of combating the illicit trade in and proliferation of small arms and light weapons in the Member States of the League of Arab States – Phase III

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2500 24.9.2024
(1) The 2018 EU Strategy against illicit firearms, small arms & light weapons (SALW) and their ammunition entitled ‘Securing Arms, Protecting Citizens’ (the ‘EU SALW Strategy’), states that the Union gives particular prominence to regional cooperation as an efficient means of small arms control.
(2) The EU SALW Strategy notes that the Union will continue to support cooperation and assistance for the implementation of the United Nations (UN) Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (the ‘UN PoA’).
(3) In the outcome document of the fourth UN Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the UN PoA in June 2024, UN Member States have undertaken to strengthen, as appropriate, partnerships and cooperation at all levels in preventing and combating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons.
(4) The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of 2015 affirms that combating the illicit trade in SALW is necessary for the achievement of many goals, including those relating to peace, justice and strong institutions. In his Agenda for Disarmament ‘Securing our Common Future’ of 2018, the UN Secretary-General calls for an inclusive, integrated and participatory approach to small arms control at the country level and, in some situations, at the sub-regional level.
(5) The League of Arab States (LAS) is a regional organisation bringing together all Arab countries, with the purpose of promoting and strengthening cooperation among its members.
(6) In 2016, the Union and the LAS set up an EU-LAS Strategic Dialogue and established a number of working groups, including the Strategic Dialogue Working Group on Weapons of Mass Destruction and Arms Control, which defined priority areas for possible, concrete cooperation.
(7) The 2019 EU-LAS Sharm El-Sheikh Summit Declaration included a pledge to take concerted action against illicit arms trafficking.
(8) Council Decisions (CFSP) 2018/1789(1)and (CFSP) 2021/1726(2)supported phase I and phase II of a project in support of combating the illicit trade in and proliferation of SALW in the LAS Member States. The Union now wishes to continue to support the phase III of the project.
(9) Union support to the project will reflect overall Union policy related to the LAS and its Member States,
— strengthening the capacities of customs and other border agencies to detect, interdict, and report on matters of illicit firearms trafficking in the LAS region;
— strengthening the capacities of law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate and cooperate on matters of illicit firearm proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region; and
— strengthening the capacities of security and military agencies to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for SALW and ammunition in the LAS region.
— Area 1: international SALW transfer control, including risk assessment and preventing the diversion of SALW to unauthorised recipients.
— Area 2: identification and disruption of sources of illicit small arms, including capacity building for law enforcing agencies, control of land, air and maritime borders, marking and record keeping and tracing of SALW, techniques for arms investigations and tracing of arms and use of ballistic information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods.
— Area 3: other small arms measures, including stockpile management and security.
— Area 4: provision of information relevant to SALW and enhanced SALW control, such as evaluation of laws and regulations in LAS Member States and advice on possible revisions as well as translation of relevant research and studies into Arabic.
— stockpile management;
— illicit small arms and light weapons detection and identification—including their ammunition and components;
— firearm investigation; and
— use of existing knowledge management systems for customs and law enforcement officials.
1. strengthen the capacities of customs and other border agencies to detect, intercept, and report on matters of illicit firearms trafficking in the LAS region;
2. strengthen the capacities of law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate and co-operate on matters of illicit firearm proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region; and
3. strengthen the capacities of security and military agencies to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for small arms and light weapons and their ammunition in the LAS region.
Area 1: International small arms and light weapons transfer control (combating illicit arms flows).1.1.Export, import, and transit licensing and control (for example, risk assessment).1.2.Preventing the diversion of small arms and light weapons to unauthorised recipients.1.3.Detecting small arms and light weapons and their parts during the inspection of transported goods and cargo (for example, inspection methods, techniques, and equipment). 1.1. Export, import, and transit licensing and control (for example, risk assessment). 1.2. Preventing the diversion of small arms and light weapons to unauthorised recipients. 1.3. Detecting small arms and light weapons and their parts during the inspection of transported goods and cargo (for example, inspection methods, techniques, and equipment).
1.1. Export, import, and transit licensing and control (for example, risk assessment).
1.2. Preventing the diversion of small arms and light weapons to unauthorised recipients.
1.3. Detecting small arms and light weapons and their parts during the inspection of transported goods and cargo (for example, inspection methods, techniques, and equipment).
1.1. Export, import, and transit licensing and control (for example, risk assessment).
1.2. Preventing the diversion of small arms and light weapons to unauthorised recipients.
1.3. Detecting small arms and light weapons and their parts during the inspection of transported goods and cargo (for example, inspection methods, techniques, and equipment).
Area 2: Identification and disruption of sources of illicit small arms (for example, capacity-building for law-enforcement agencies).2.1.Control of land, air, and maritime borders, including technology transfer.2.2.Marking, record-keeping, and tracing of small arms.2.3.Additional techniques and methods for arms investigation and inspection (for example, use of ballistics information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods). 2.1. Control of land, air, and maritime borders, including technology transfer. 2.2. Marking, record-keeping, and tracing of small arms. 2.3. Additional techniques and methods for arms investigation and inspection (for example, use of ballistics information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods).
2.1. Control of land, air, and maritime borders, including technology transfer.
2.2. Marking, record-keeping, and tracing of small arms.
2.3. Additional techniques and methods for arms investigation and inspection (for example, use of ballistics information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods).
2.1. Control of land, air, and maritime borders, including technology transfer.
2.2. Marking, record-keeping, and tracing of small arms.
2.3. Additional techniques and methods for arms investigation and inspection (for example, use of ballistics information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods).
Area 3: Other small-arms control measures.3.1.Stockpile management and security. 3.1. Stockpile management and security.
3.1. Stockpile management and security.
3.1. Stockpile management and security.
Area 4: Provision of information relevant to illicit small arms and light weapons and enhanced small arms and light weapons control.4.1.Evaluation of the laws and regulations of LAS member states; advising on possible amendments and revisions.4.2.Translation of relevant research, published studies, and other resources into Arabic. 4.1. Evaluation of the laws and regulations of LAS member states; advising on possible amendments and revisions. 4.2. Translation of relevant research, published studies, and other resources into Arabic.
4.1. Evaluation of the laws and regulations of LAS member states; advising on possible amendments and revisions.
4.2. Translation of relevant research, published studies, and other resources into Arabic.
4.1. Evaluation of the laws and regulations of LAS member states; advising on possible amendments and revisions.
4.2. Translation of relevant research, published studies, and other resources into Arabic.
— tailored training on small arms and light weapons control systems, including stockpile management across the LAS region (see the next section); and
— post-training engagement and support to national experts to establish national frameworks that allow for implementation of the practices acquired during training.
1. customs and other border agencies will have strengthened capacities to detect, intercept, and report on matters of illicit small arms and light weapons trafficking in the LAS region;
2. law enforcement agencies will have strengthened capacities to effectively investigate and cooperate on matters of illicit small arms and light weapons proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region;
3. security and military agencies will have strengthened capacities to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for small arms, light weapons, and ammunition in the LAS region.
1.1. the completion of up to 12 national small arms and light weapons in-person training events for WCO member administrations to strengthen the ability to control the movement of illicit small arms and light weapons at the border. These training sessions target countries requesting training that did not receive prior national training during Phases 1 and 2 (entry-level training) and, or, are assessed as having the highest risk of illicit small arms and light weapons activity, or require advanced training.
1.2. Hosting of up to six regional one- or two-day online thematic workshops presenting specific topics of high interest to LAS member states. The workshops should focus on areas of specific need for capacity building (for example, identification of components of small arms and light weapons), awareness raising (for example, the use of 3D printing in illicit small arms and light weapons manufacture), and information exchange (for example, best practises in risk management for small arms and light weapons). Online forums will allow officials from LAS member states, including those in remote areas, to participate and provide a wider impact and regional ownership.
1.3. The use of entry-level training sessions to complete the accreditation process for WCO pre-accredited small arms and light weapons trainers that began in Phase 2.
1.4. Participation in activities led by other implementing partners.
1.5. Availability of WCO technical expertise on demand to advise LAS member states on updating their national curricula for small arms and light weapons training.
2.1. senior country officials understand firearms trafficking threats and the benefits of a National Firearms Taskforce;
2.2. terms of reference for National Firearms Taskforces are developed and adopted by countries;
2.3. national institutions and the National Firearms Taskforce are trained on the Interpol Firearm Recovery Protocol and Interpol instruments for international cooperation on firearm-related matters;
2.4. operational support is provided to National Firearms Taskforces (investigative leads are generated by the National Firearms taskforce with the support of Interpol).
— up to 10 in-country deployments to support the assessment and development of the capacities required to implement the Interpol Firearm Recovery Protocol;
— up to five in-depth training sessions led by Interpol trainers to support countries in developing national capacities to collect, prepare, and share information related to firearms;
— up to five national training sessions led by qualified national trainers who will be able to deliver national trainings under Interpol auspices;
— mentoring support to countries for the establishment of national firearm taskforces, delivered through sub-regional capacity-building activities or national deployment for on-the-job training;
— a workshop on the exchange of best practices on firearm investigation techniques and analysis of firearm-related intelligence, to be delivered as part of a regional event organised jointly with other implementing partners;
— participation in activities led by other implementing partners, such as online thematic fora or in-person training sessions.
3.1. Delivery of up to four one-week entry-level national training packages. If demand for entry-level training is lower than expected, remaining resources will be allocated to advanced training packages.
3.2. Development and delivery of up to six two-week national, tailored in-depth training packages.
3.3. Translation of key thematic resources into Arabic, including but not limited to training material under Phase 3. This activity may also include producing social media material in Arabic, as needed.
3.4. Undertaking an analysis of options to facilitate or support the integration of stockpile management and security into national curricula, with related national and international certification options. Regional approaches should also be assessed.
3.5. One final, wrap-up regional event, held in collaboration with the LAS Secretariat, WCO, and Interpol. The wrap-up meeting will take place in Cairo at the end of Phase 3 and provide the opportunity to participating countries to assess the main results of this phase and exchange best practices in the substantive areas covered.
3.6. Up to 10 national engagement visits will occur to foster buy-in and national ownership, in close coordination with the other implementing partners.
3.7. Participation in up to five activities led by other implementing partners, such as online thematic fora or during national in-person training sessions.
3.8. Up to two ‘pause and reflect’ (P & R) learning sessions implemented for all partners (see section 5 below).
3.9. Regular virtual and up to three in-person project planning and coordination meetings to ensure the project’s continued relevance and effectiveness.
— contextual developments: what contextual factors affected the intervention and its relevance or influenced the project delivery schedule over the past six months;
— performance: what progress was made at the outcome and output levels; and
— efficiency: whether any efficiencies were created through expenditures, workplans, resources, and internal team management.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) The 2018 EU Strategy against illicit firearms, small arms & light weapons (SALW) and their ammunition entitled ‘Securing Arms, Protecting Citizens’ (the ‘EU SALW Strategy’), states that the Union gives particular prominence to regional cooperation as an efficient means of small arms control.
(2) The EU SALW Strategy notes that the Union will continue to support cooperation and assistance for the implementation of the United Nations (UN) Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (the ‘UN PoA’).
(3) In the outcome document of the fourth UN Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the UN PoA in June 2024, UN Member States have undertaken to strengthen, as appropriate, partnerships and cooperation at all levels in preventing and combating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons.
(4) The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of 2015 affirms that combating the illicit trade in SALW is necessary for the achievement of many goals, including those relating to peace, justice and strong institutions. In his Agenda for Disarmament ‘Securing our Common Future’ of 2018, the UN Secretary-General calls for an inclusive, integrated and participatory approach to small arms control at the country level and, in some situations, at the sub-regional level.
(5) The League of Arab States (LAS) is a regional organisation bringing together all Arab countries, with the purpose of promoting and strengthening cooperation among its members.
(6) In 2016, the Union and the LAS set up an EU-LAS Strategic Dialogue and established a number of working groups, including the Strategic Dialogue Working Group on Weapons of Mass Destruction and Arms Control, which defined priority areas for possible, concrete cooperation.
(7) The 2019 EU-LAS Sharm El-Sheikh Summit Declaration included a pledge to take concerted action against illicit arms trafficking.
(8) Council Decisions (CFSP) 2018/1789 (1) and (CFSP) 2021/1726 (2) supported phase I and phase II of a project in support of combating the illicit trade in and proliferation of SALW in the LAS Member States. The Union now wishes to continue to support the phase III of the project.
(9) Union support to the project will reflect overall Union policy related to the LAS and its Member States,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. With a view to supporting the Member States of the League of Arab States (LAS) with their national implementation of the United Nations Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (the ‘UN PoA’) and the International Tracing Instrument (ITI), phase III of the project commenced by Decisions (CFSP) 2018/1789 and (CFSP) 2021/1726 shall enable LAS Member States to sustainably strengthen the effectiveness of their national small arms control and counter-proliferation frameworks, in line with the practices and standards set by the UN PoA, the ITI, and the Global Framework for Ammunition (GFA) according to their priorities and need.

2. In particular, the project will pursue the following objectives in order to combat the threat of small arms and light weapons (SALW) proliferation in the LAS region:
—
strengthening the capacities of customs and other border agencies to detect, interdict, and report on matters of illicit firearms trafficking in the LAS region;
—
strengthening the capacities of law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate and cooperate on matters of illicit firearm proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region; and
—
strengthening the capacities of security and military agencies to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for SALW and ammunition in the LAS region.

3. In order to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Union shall, by means of this Decision, support actions in, inter alia, the following priority areas:
—
Area 1: international SALW transfer control, including risk assessment and preventing the diversion of SALW to unauthorised recipients.
—
Area 2: identification and disruption of sources of illicit small arms, including capacity building for law enforcing agencies, control of land, air and maritime borders, marking and record keeping and tracing of SALW, techniques for arms investigations and tracing of arms and use of ballistic information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods.
—
Area 3: other small arms measures, including stockpile management and security.
—
Area 4: provision of information relevant to SALW and enhanced SALW control, such as evaluation of laws and regulations in LAS Member States and advice on possible revisions as well as translation of relevant research and studies into Arabic.

4. A detailed description of the project referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 is set out in the Annex to this Decision.

1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’) shall be responsible for the implementation of this Decision.

2. The technical implementation of the project referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out by Small Arms Survey (SAS), represented by the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, with the assistance of the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) and the World Customs Organization (WCO), and in close cooperation with the LAS Secretariat.

3. SAS, assisted by Interpol and the WCO, shall perform its tasks under the responsibility of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with SAS.

1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the project financed by the Union referred to in Article 1 shall be EUR 3 999 776,72.
2. The expenditure financed by the reference amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the Union budget.

3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 2. For that purpose, it shall conclude the necessary agreement with SAS. The agreement shall stipulate that SAS has to ensure the visibility of the Union’s contribution, appropriate to its size.

1. The High Representative shall report to the Council on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of 6-monthly reports prepared by SAS.

2. The Commission shall report on the financial aspects of the project referred to in Article 1.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
This Decision shall expire 36 months after the date of conclusion of the agreement referred to in Article 3(3). However, it shall expire 6 months after the date of its entry into force if no agreement has been concluded within that period.

Combating the illicit trade in and proliferation of small arms and light weapons in the Member States of the League of Arab States

Phase 3 Project description (2024–2027)

1. Background and rationale for CFSP support

The European Union-League of Arab States Project Phase 3 (EU-LAS project phase 3) will build on earlier efforts undertaken by the League of Arab States (LAS) and the European Union (EU), including those undertaken during Phases 1 (2019–2021) and 2 (2021–2024) of the project, to assist LAS member states to reduce the risks that arise from illicit small arms and light weapons and their ammunition flows and use in the Arab States Region.
The project stems from the EU-LAS Strategic Dialogue Working Group on Weapons of Mass Destruction, Small Arms and Light Weapons, and Arms Control, which defined priority areas for possible substantive cooperation at the beginning of the initiative (see section 2.1).
Phase 1 of the EU-LAS project was essential to build confidence between LAS member states and three implementing partners: the Small Arms Survey (the Survey), the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol), and the World Customs Organisation (WCO). The three organisations provided entry-level training to eight Arab countries. They fostered the exchange of best practices and lessons learned in combating the proliferation of illicit small arms through a series of regional and sub-regional meetings.
Phase 2 focused on providing technical training at the country and regional levels on the following matters:

—
stockpile management;

—
illicit small arms and light weapons detection and identification—including their ammunition and components;

—
firearm investigation; and

—
use of existing knowledge management systems for customs and law enforcement officials.

During this phase, LAS member state engagement with the project was exceptionally strong, with 18 states requesting national training and participating in the regional training programme delivered between January and the end of May 2024. National training provided participating officials with basic knowledge and expertise in small arms control. Regional training provided more in-depth instruction and takes steps designed to enable participants to share acquired knowledge and expertise with other Arab government officials. For Interpol and WCO, the in-depth training sessions also provided the opportunity to start a Training of Trainers (TOT) component, building sustainable capacity for small arms control in participating LAS member states. Two joint operations, conducted by participating LAS states and facilitated by Interpol and WCO, allowed states to implement the newly acquired knowledge. Three thematic webinars and two regional workshops were conducted, providing ample opportunities for the LAS Secretariat, member states, and the three implementing partners to engage in policy discussions and share experiences and lessons learned.
During Phase 3, the initiative will consolidate and strengthen the capacity-building efforts carried out in the previous phases. The main effort will seek to strengthen the foundations for effective and long-term sustainability. In particular, the project will continue to offer interested countries the opportunity of more national advanced substantive engagement through tailored, in-depth training and other capacity-building support provided by the three implementing partners. This engagement will allow the Survey, Interpol and WCO to assess the potential for longer-term cooperation with interested member states. In parallel, the project will continue to provide entry-level training sessions, especially to countries that did not receive them during the first two phases of the project. To the extent possible, these will involve national trainers whose capacity was developed during Phase 2.
Reducing and eradicating illicit small arms in the Arab region remains crucial to reducing all forms of violence and promoting sustainable development and prosperity in line with the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – both in the Arab States Region and in neighbouring regions, including Europe. More specifically, the project aims to strengthen the capacity of LAS member states to implement the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (the ‘UN PoA’) and the International Tracing Instrument (ITI), according to the priorities and needs identified by these states. It will also sensitise LAS member states to the recently adopted Global Framework for Through-life Conventional Ammunition Management (GFA).
This project will directly contribute to the UN Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (1) and the achievement of its SDGs. It will generate insights and expertise to help LAS countries reduce armed violence, promote peace, and build inclusive societies in order – among other things – to ‘reduce all forms of violence and related death rates’ (Target 16.1), ‘reduce illicit arms flows’ (Target 16.4), and where relevant, ‘eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls’ (Target 5.2) (2). This project is also a concrete manifestation of the pledge made in the 2019 EU-LAS Sharm El-Sheikh summit declaration (3) to take concerted action against illegal arms trafficking.
2. Project vision, objectives, and long-term sustainability

For Phase 3, the project will follow the same long-term objectives as in its previous incarnations to enable LAS member states to sustainably strengthen the effectiveness of their national small arms control and counter-proliferation frameworks, in line with the practices and standards set by the UNPOA, ITI, and GFA, according to their priorities and needs. This strengthening will be done through policy and practice, combining the use of data, evidence-based knowledge, authoritative resources and tools, tailored expert advice and training, and the convening of practitioners and policy makers in the LAS region.
Engaging with key agencies and partners responsible for curbing the threat of small arms and light weapons proliferation in the LAS region will allow the project to meet a three-pronged objective:
1. strengthen the capacities of customs and other border agencies to detect, intercept, and report on matters of illicit firearms trafficking in the LAS region;

2. strengthen the capacities of law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate and co-operate on matters of illicit firearm proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region; and

3. strengthen the capacities of security and military agencies to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for small arms and light weapons and their ammunition in the LAS region.

2.1 Project’s substantive areas for support as expressed by LAS countries

Phase 3 of the EU-LAS project, combating the illicit trade in and proliferation of small arms and light weapons in LAS member states (2024–2027), is designed to respond to the needs that LAS member states expressed at the beginning of the initiative, and keep expressing, in four priority areas:

Area 1:
International small arms and light weapons transfer control (combating illicit arms flows).
1.1. Export, import, and transit licensing and control (for example, risk assessment).
1.2. Preventing the diversion of small arms and light weapons to unauthorised recipients.
1.3. Detecting small arms and light weapons and their parts during the inspection of transported goods and cargo (for example, inspection methods, techniques, and equipment).

Area 2:
Identification and disruption of sources of illicit small arms (for example, capacity-building for law-enforcement agencies).
2.1. Control of land, air, and maritime borders, including technology transfer.
2.2. Marking, record-keeping, and tracing of small arms.
2.3. Additional techniques and methods for arms investigation and inspection (for example, use of ballistics information and identification or disruption of smuggling routes and methods).

Area 3:
Other small-arms control measures.
3.1. Stockpile management and security.

Area 4:
Provision of information relevant to illicit small arms and light weapons and enhanced small arms and light weapons control.
4.1. Evaluation of the laws and regulations of LAS member states; advising on possible amendments and revisions.
4.2. Translation of relevant research, published studies, and other resources into Arabic.

3. Proposed logic of intervention

The Survey, as coordinator for the project, held extensive consultations with the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department, Interpol, and WCO, resulting in group consensus on the following two-pronged approach.
Building national capacity to combat illicit small arms and light weapons flows through:

—
tailored training on small arms and light weapons control systems, including stockpile management across the LAS region (see the next section); and

—
post-training engagement and support to national experts to establish national frameworks that allow for implementation of the practices acquired during training.

Connecting engagement at existing national levels (where they exist) to internationally recognised certification processes and utilising national trainers (trained by the project) to strengthen relevant national or regional training institutions and national frameworks and structures.
All the project’s components are designed with a view to develop sustainable capacities among government institutions and officials in LAS member states, in partnership with the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department. The project builds upon our experience that LAS member states are the primary agents of change in designing and implementing national frameworks that promote responsible firearm control and minimise proliferation risk.
Phase 3 will continue the efforts to ensure that essential training material and knowledge resources, such as relevant and specific modules of the Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium (MOSAIC), are made available in Arabic and disseminated throughout the LAS region. This effort is particularly important in an environment where selected government personnel may rotate regularly, and an accessible, dedicated repository of information is necessary across the region.
With this in mind, the project postulates that, if law enforcement and customs officials can detect, investigate, intercept, and report on small arms and light weapons trafficking in the LAS region, and if military and security agencies can design and implement more effective stockpile management systems for small arms, light weapons, and ammunition, then countries across the LAS region will be able to understand, recognise, and address the risks that stem from illicit small arms proliferation more effectively.
The intervention will be structured around the following three outcomes:
1. customs and other border agencies will have strengthened capacities to detect, intercept, and report on matters of illicit small arms and light weapons trafficking in the LAS region;

2. law enforcement agencies will have strengthened capacities to effectively investigate and cooperate on matters of illicit small arms and light weapons proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region;

3. security and military agencies will have strengthened capacities to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for small arms, light weapons, and ammunition in the LAS region.

For all three outcomes, participants will gain knowledge and skills in training methodology and technical knowledge.
4. Description of action

Outcome 1: Customs personnel have strengthened capacities to detect, intercept, and report on matters of illicit small arms and light weapons trafficking in the LAS region.

Outcome 1 seeks to leverage progress made under previous phases and enable the final accreditation of WCO-certified small arms and light weapons expert trainers across the LAS region. A small group of customs personnel trained under Phases 1 and 2 will be involved in delivering national training sessions in LAS countries, practicing the methodological and technical skills they gained in earlier phases of the project.
By delivering training sessions, these personnel will obtain globally recognised accreditation from WCO as part of its Accredited Trainer Programme. Once the trainers are accredited, they can deliver subsequent national trainings under WCO auspices inside or outside the LAS region. These trainers will be asked to support the development of national curricula in their respective countries, further contributing to the sustainability to the endeavour.
Outputs and activities will include:

1.1. the completion of up to 12 national small arms and light weapons in-person training events for WCO member administrations to strengthen the ability to control the movement of illicit small arms and light weapons at the border. These training sessions target countries requesting training that did not receive prior national training during Phases 1 and 2 (entry-level training) and, or, are assessed as having the highest risk of illicit small arms and light weapons activity, or require advanced training.

1.2. Hosting of up to six regional one- or two-day online thematic workshops presenting specific topics of high interest to LAS member states. The workshops should focus on areas of specific need for capacity building (for example, identification of components of small arms and light weapons), awareness raising (for example, the use of 3D printing in illicit small arms and light weapons manufacture), and information exchange (for example, best practises in risk management for small arms and light weapons). Online forums will allow officials from LAS member states, including those in remote areas, to participate and provide a wider impact and regional ownership.

1.3. The use of entry-level training sessions to complete the accreditation process for WCO pre-accredited small arms and light weapons trainers that began in Phase 2.

1.4. Participation in activities led by other implementing partners.

1.5. Availability of WCO technical expertise on demand to advise LAS member states on updating their national curricula for small arms and light weapons training.

Outcome 2: Law enforcement agencies have strengthened capacities to effectively investigate and cooperate on matters of illicit small arms and light weapons proliferation and trafficking in the LAS region.

Outcome 2 seeks to increase the effectiveness of national workflows involving various national law enforcement agencies, which are necessary to collect, process, and share information on illicit firearms. This effectiveness will enhance investigations on illicit firearms trafficking and improve inter-agency and international police cooperation on organised crime.
Interpol will leverage the strength of the network of experts and trainers developed under Phases 1 and 2. The personnel selected as trainers under Phases 2 will have completed their accreditation and will be involved in delivering advanced national training sessions in LAS countries during Phase 3 to practice the methodological and technical skills they gained in earlier phases.
For countries that request more in-depth cooperation, experts trained during the previous phases will be directly involved in establishing and implementing a National Firearms Taskforce aimed at enhancing the collection, processing, and sharing of firearm-related data at the national level. This step will be instrumental in assessing countries’ capacities to implement the Interpol Firearm Recovery Protocol more effectively and actively cooperating at a regional and international level on firearm-related matters. The Firearms Recovery Protocol is an Interpol guide to uncovering firearms trafficking. It covers both law enforcement and forensics components, with the goal of both parties sharing information to solve firearms trafficking.
For this outcome to be realised, Interpol will focus on the following outputs:

2.1. senior country officials understand firearms trafficking threats and the benefits of a National Firearms Taskforce;

2.2. terms of reference for National Firearms Taskforces are developed and adopted by countries;

2.3. national institutions and the National Firearms Taskforce are trained on the Interpol Firearm Recovery Protocol and Interpol instruments for international cooperation on firearm-related matters;

2.4. operational support is provided to National Firearms Taskforces (investigative leads are generated by the National Firearms taskforce with the support of Interpol).

Activities will include:

—
up to 10 in-country deployments to support the assessment and development of the capacities required to implement the Interpol Firearm Recovery Protocol;

—
up to five in-depth training sessions led by Interpol trainers to support countries in developing national capacities to collect, prepare, and share information related to firearms;

—
up to five national training sessions led by qualified national trainers who will be able to deliver national trainings under Interpol auspices;

—
mentoring support to countries for the establishment of national firearm taskforces, delivered through sub-regional capacity-building activities or national deployment for on-the-job training;

—
a workshop on the exchange of best practices on firearm investigation techniques and analysis of firearm-related intelligence, to be delivered as part of a regional event organised jointly with other implementing partners;

—
participation in activities led by other implementing partners, such as online thematic fora or in-person training sessions.

Outcome 3: Security and military agencies have strengthened capacities to design and implement safe and secure stockpile management systems for small arms, light weapons, and ammunition in the LAS region.

Outcome 3 seeks to build on the approach developed in Phase 2. The work will focus on advanced skill development at the country level to foster and promote sustainable skills transfer to the trainees. At the same time, the Survey will continue to develop and deliver tailored national entry-level and advanced training packages on stockpile management and security.
Unlike the other two outcomes where Interpol and WCO can link project activities to global training programmes for expert operators and trainers with an established accreditation system, nothing equivalent exists at the multilateral level in the stockpile management domain.
For this reason, the Survey will map, assess, and propose concrete options for a certification process for successful participants at expert or trainer levels, as well as ensure that key resources are translated into Arabic and available for relevant audiences. These activities will contribute to the desired sustainability approach.
Outputs and activities will include:

3.1. Delivery of up to four one-week entry-level national training packages. If demand for entry-level training is lower than expected, remaining resources will be allocated to advanced training packages.

3.2. Development and delivery of up to six two-week national, tailored in-depth training packages.

3.3. Translation of key thematic resources into Arabic, including but not limited to training material under Phase 3. This activity may also include producing social media material in Arabic, as needed.

3.4. Undertaking an analysis of options to facilitate or support the integration of stockpile management and security into national curricula, with related national and international certification options. Regional approaches should also be assessed.

3.5. One final, wrap-up regional event, held in collaboration with the LAS Secretariat, WCO, and Interpol. The wrap-up meeting will take place in Cairo at the end of Phase 3 and provide the opportunity to participating countries to assess the main results of this phase and exchange best practices in the substantive areas covered.

3.6. Up to 10 national engagement visits will occur to foster buy-in and national ownership, in close coordination with the other implementing partners.

3.7. Participation in up to five activities led by other implementing partners, such as online thematic fora or during national in-person training sessions.

3.8. Up to two ‘pause and reflect’ (P & R) learning sessions implemented for all partners (see section 5 below).

3.9. Regular virtual and up to three in-person project planning and coordination meetings to ensure the project’s continued relevance and effectiveness.

5. Monitoring, evaluation, and learning

As the project coordinator, the Survey will ensure the coherence of the initiative’s monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) approach. It will incorporate practical mechanisms to learn throughout the project lifecycle and feed into programmatic adjustments should the need arise. The MEL approach will include routine and continuous process monitoring (for example, small cycle learning), as well as project mid-term or annual P & R learning sessions, to ensure external perspectives are taken into account throughout the project lifecycle and mitigate some of the complex features of the operating environment. In addition, an external evaluation will occur towards the end of the project.
Event feedback forms: Upon holding online and in-person events, the project team will elicit and collect participant feedback to maintain high-quality analysis and programming to cater to stakeholders’ needs. The resulting data is expected to be primarily quantitative and lend itself to aggregation across project activities.
Six-monthly monitoring rounds: The Survey’s team will consolidate monitoring data from the three implementing partners up to twice a year at the output and outcome levels. These sessions will focus on context, relevance, performance, assumptions, and risks. A member of the project team will document these sessions and may be supported by the Survey’s MEL Advisor. These sessions may allow the project team to discuss the following:

—
contextual developments: what contextual factors affected the intervention and its relevance or influenced the project delivery schedule over the past six months;

—
performance: what progress was made at the outcome and output levels; and

—
efficiency: whether any efficiencies were created through expenditures, workplans, resources, and internal team management.

P & R sessions, feeding into the Annual Progress Reports (APRs): The Survey will conduct up two internal reviews of the project (possibly during the annual in-person coordination meeting, which will also offer space for pause and reflection). P & R sessions will consist of a light-touch, structured, and introspective review. Recognising the complex environment in which the project will take place, the P & Rs will involve consultations with the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department, Interpol, WCO, and feedback from some of the in-country training participants to bring diverse perspectives and foster transparency and accountability.
Modalities of participation may vary and include online group sessions with external project partners and bilateral key informant interviews. These sessions will lend themselves to learning reports capturing emerging findings and recommendations for adaptation, if necessary. These learning reports will be shared with all project partners and will feed into the project’s annual reports.
6. Partnership arrangements

Phase 3 of the project will be implemented in partnership with the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department within the framework of the EU-LAS Strategic Dialogue on Weapons of Mass Destruction, Small Arms and Light Weapons, and Arms Control. The partnership with, and strong support of, the LAS Secretariat remains vital to the successful continuation of the project. During Phase 2, the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department hosted two regional meetings and attended most national and in-depth training events. In Phase 3, the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department will co-organise the regional conferences and be invited to attend training events. It will also attend one coordination meeting per year with the IPs.
Phase 3 will retain the same implementation arrangements as the previous two phases. The Survey will continue to be the project coordinator and Interpol and the WCO will lead in their respective area of expertise. During this phase, the WCO trainees who started their accreditation as trainers during Phase 2 must deliver national training modules to complete their curriculum. On the other hand, Interpol will work with accredited national trainers and experts to deliver in-person training modules and conduct other activities that support the implementation of the Firearms Recovery Protocol. For this reason, the project will require greater agility to implement the three components, and mobilise WCO and Interpol’s existing networks in the LAS countries in a more systematic manner, while keeping the LAS Secretariat informed of the planned activities.
This partnership represents a complementary and thematic cooperation model in the small arms control field. The project harnesses the knowledge and expertise of each implementing partner to offer a comprehensive knowledge- and capacity-building programme covering the major components of the UNPOA, ITI, and GFA. In this way, the project translates the concepts of international cooperation and multilateralism, as emphasised in documents such as the UNPOA and the EU Small Arms and Light Weapons Strategy, into tangible capacity and security improvements in the LAS region.
To balance the need for increased operational independence among the three implementing partners, regular coordination and planning meetings between the implementing partners and the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department will allow for coherence and efficiency in information, sharing, planning, and implementing project activities. The implementing agencies, for example, will coordinate their engagement and approaches with countries that will request support from the project. Furthermore, the implementing partners will maintain joint activities in common thematic areas, when feasible.
The implementing partners will also coordinate with governmental and non-governmental organisations working in LAS member states, as well as any EU programmes with a presence there, to ensure that all of the activities undertaken within the framework of the project complement and build upon existing initiatives. This project has leveraged EU support in recent years for developing and implementing Interpol’s Illicit Arms Records and tracing Management System (iARMS), the core component of Interpol’s EU-LAS training offer.
As necessary, and subject to funding availability, the Survey may collaborate with other specialised organisations to assist with implementing specific project components in coordination with the LAS Secretariat’s Arms Control and Disarmament Department. Depending on the needs and preferences of participating LAS member states, other organisations, including civil society organisations and certain LAS specialised agencies, could also contribute to the implementation of the project.
The implementing partners will also take appropriate measures to ensure project visibility in line with European Union guidelines.
7. Duration

The project is expected to last 36 months, from 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2027.
The operational phase will last 33 months, and the last 3 months of the project will be dedicated to reporting duties.

(1) UN (United Nations). 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN. 2015. A/RES/70/1.

(2) UN (United Nations). 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN. 2015. A/RES/70/1.

(3) Council of the EU (European Union). 2019. Sharm El-Sheikh summit declaration. 25 February 2019, para. 12.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2498 of 19 September 2024 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 concerning certain emergency measures relating to sheep pox and goat pox in Greece (notified under document C(2024) 6671)

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2498 24.9.2024
(1) Sheep pox and goat pox is an infectious viral disease affecting caprine and ovine animals and it can have a severe impact on the concerned animal population and the profitability of farming causing disturbance to movements of consignments of those animals and products thereof within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) In the event of an outbreak of sheep pox and goat pox in caprine or ovine animals, there is a serious risk of the spread of that disease to other establishments of caprine or ovine animals.
(3) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687(2)supplements the rules for the control of the listed diseases referred to in Article 9(1), points (a), (b) and (c), of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, and defined as category A, B and C diseases in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1882(3). In particular, Articles 21 and 22 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 provide for the establishment of a restricted zone in the event of an outbreak of a category A disease, including sheep pox and goat pox, and for certain measures to be applied therein. In addition, Article 21(1) of that Delegated Regulation provides that the restricted zone is to comprise a protection zone, a surveillance zone, and, if necessary, further restricted zones around or adjacent to the protection and surveillance zones.
(4) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207(4)was adopted on the basis of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and it lays down certain emergency measures relating to sheep pox and goat pox in Greece. More particularly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 provides that the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones to be established by that Member State, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, following outbreaks of that disease are to comprise at least the areas listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
(5) Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207, Greece has notified the Commission of 23 additional outbreaks of sheep pox and goat pox in establishments where ovine and caprine animals were kept in the regional unit of Evros within boundaries of already established further restricted zones as a result of previous outbreaks in the same areas and one outbreak in the regional unit of Kavala, the first outbreak in that regional unit. Nine of the new outbreaks in the regional unit of Evros are located within the boundaries of already established protection and surveillance zones in the same areas, while one is located outside those already established protection and surveillance zones, but still within the boundaries of the already established further restricted zone.
(6) Therefore, the areas listed as protection, surveillance and further restricted zones for Greece in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 should be further adjusted, spatially and temporally, in order to prevent further spread of the disease in Greece and to the rest of the Union, and the dates of regionalisation adjusted. Accordingly, it is necessary to amend the list of restricted zones set out in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
(7) The size of the zones and duration of the measures to apply in the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones should be based on the criteria set out in Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and the rules laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, including the epidemiological situation as regards sheep pox and goat pox in the areas affected by that disease and the overall epidemiological situation of sheep pox and goat pox in the Member State concerned by that disease, as well as the level of risk for the further spread of the disease. The duration of the measures should also take into account the international standards of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). In the current situation, there is high risk of further spread of the disease, in particular due to the fact that, according to the information provided by the competent authority, in the regional unit of Evros a total number of 33 outbreaks of sheep pox and goat pox have occurred in 23 days, within a radius of less than 80 km, suggesting that the disease had been present in the area for a period of time before being diagnosed and continues to circulate, while the outbreak in Kavala is the first in this area and is situated more than 150 km west of the original disease epicentre.
(8) Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of sheep pox and goat pox and the need to prevent the disease from spreading from the affected establishments in Greece to other parts of that Member State or to other Member States, the amendments to be made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 by this Decision should apply as soon as possible.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Regional unit and ADIS reference number of the outbreaks Areas established as protection and surveillance zones, part of the restricted zone in Greece referred to in Article 2 Date until applicable
Regional unit of EvrosGR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00005GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00006GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00007GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00008GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00009GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000010GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000011GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000012GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000013GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000014GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000015GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000016GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000017GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000018GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000019GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000020GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000021GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000022GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000023GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000024GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000025GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000025GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000027GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000028GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000029GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000030GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000031GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000032GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000033GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000034 Protection zone:Those parts of the regional unit of Evros, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 41.49961111, Long. 26.54605556 (2024/5), Lat. 40.96145278, Long. 26.3345 (2024/6), Lat. 40.94543, Long. 26.275696 (2024/7), Lat. 40.876278, Long. 26.202551 (2024/8), Lat. 40.952487, Long. 26.280721 (2024/9) Lat. 40.920725, Long. 26.205981 (2024/10) Lat. 41.024363, Long. 26.302547 (2024/11) ,Lat. 41.51720278, Long. 26.54510278 (2024/12),Lat. 40.959944, Long. 26.336306 (2024/13), Lat. 40.93578, Long. 26.213778 (2024/14), Lat. 40.895996, Long. 26.222777 (2024/15), Lat. 40.900261, Long. 26.22288 (2024/16), Lat. 40.891842, Long. 26.146147 (2024/17), Lat. 40.933886, Long. 26.217318 (2024/18), Lat. 40.92507, Long. 26.212431 (2024/19), Lat. 41.278291, Long. 26.276953 (2024/20), Lat. 40.883228, Long. 26.157055 (2024/21), Lat. 40.923486, Long. 26.213196 (2024/22), Lat. 40.922552, Long. 26.209702 (2024/23), Lat. 40.925647, Long. 26.1662 (2024/24), Lat. 40.883022, Long. 26.227036 (2024/25), Lat 40.904757, Long. 26.178189 (2024/26), Lat. 40.848411, Long. 26.203314 (2024/27), Lat. 41.019251, Long. 26.269386 (2024/28) , Lat. 41.48359444, Long. 26.57411944 (2024/29), Lat. 41.49358333, Long. 26.54305556 (2024/30) , Lat. 41.51486111, Long. 26.54725 (2024/31), Lat. 40.89917, Long. 26.186411 (2024/32), Lat. 40.9941149, Long. 26.155657 (2024/33), Lat. 40.832839, Long. 26.131642 (2024/34) 8.10.2024
Surveillance zone:Those parts of the regional unit of Evros, contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 41.49961111, Long. 26.54605556 (2024/5), Lat. 40.96145278, Long. 26.3345 (2024/6), Lat. 40.94543, Long. 26.275696 (2024/7), Lat. 40.876278, Long. 26.202551 (2024/8), Lat. 40.952487, Long. 26.280721 (2024/9) Lat. 40.920725, Long. 26.205981 (2024/10) Lat. 41.024363, Long. 26.302547 (2024/11), Lat. 41.51720278, Long. 26.54510278 (2024/12), Lat. 40.959944, Long. 26.336306 (2024/13), Lat. 40.93578, Long. 26.213778 (2024/14), Lat. 40.895996, Long. 26.222777 (2024/15), Lat. 40.900261, Long. 26.22288 (2024/16), Lat. 40.891842, Long. 26.146147 (2024/17), Lat. 40.933886, Long. 26.217318 (2024/18), Lat. 40.92507, Long. 26.212431 (2024/19), Lat. 41.278291, Long. 26.276953 (2024/20), Lat. 40.883228, Long. 26.157055 (2024/21), Lat. 40.923486, Long. 26.213196 (2024/22), Lat. 40.922552, Long. 26.209702 (2024/23), Lat. 40.925647, Long. 26.1662 (2024/24), Lat. 40.883022, Long. 26.227036 (2024/25) , Lat 40.904757, Long. 26.178189 (2024/26), Lat. 40.848411, Long. 26.203314 (2024/27), Lat. 41.019251, Long. 26.269386 (2024/28), Lat. 41.48359444, Long. 26.57411944 (2024/29), Lat. 41.49358333, Long. 26.54305556 (2024/30), Lat. 41.51486111, Long. 26.54725 (2024/31), Lat. 40.89917, Long. 26.186411 (2024/32), Lat. 40.9941149, Long. 26.155657 (2024/33), Lat. 40.832839, Long. 26.131642 (2024/34), excluding the areas contained in any protection zone 17.10.2024
Surveillance zone:Those parts of the regional unit of Evros, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 41.49961111, Long. 26.54605556 (2024/5), Lat. 40.96145278, Long. 26.3345 (2024/6), Lat. 40.94543, Long. 26.275696 (2024/7), Lat. 40.876278, Long. 26.202551 (2024/8), Lat. 40.952487, Long. 26.280721 (2024/9) Lat. 40.920725, Long. 26.205981 (2024/10) Lat. 41.024363, Long. 26.302547 (2024/11), Lat. 41.51720278, Long. 26.54510278 (2024/12), Lat. 40.959944, Long. 26.336306 (2024/13), Lat. 40.93578, Long. 26.213778 (2024/14), Lat. 40.895996, Long. 26.222777 (2024/15), Lat. 40.900261, Long. 26.22288 (2024/16), Lat. 40.891842, Long. 26.146147 (2024/17), Lat. 40.933886, Long. 26.217318 (2024/18), Lat. 40.92507, Long. 26.212431 (2024/19), Lat. 41.278291, Long. 26.276953 (2024/20), Lat. 40.883228, Long. 26.157055 (2024/21), Lat. 40.923486, Long. 26.213196 (2024/22), Lat. 40.922552, Long. 26.209702 (2024/23) , Lat. 40.925647, Long. 26.1662 (2024/24), Lat. 40.883022, Long. 26.227036 (2024/25), Lat 40.904757, Long. 26.178189 (2024/26), Lat. 40.848411, Long. 26.203314 (2024/27), Lat. 41.019251, Long. 26.269386 (2024/28), Lat. 41.48359444, Long. 26.57411944 (2024/29), Lat. 41.49358333, Long. 26.54305556 (2024/30), Lat. 41.51486111, Long. 26.54725 (2024/31), Lat. 40.89917, Long. 26.186411 (2024/32), Lat. 40.9941149, Long. 26.155657 (2024/33), Lat. 40.832839, Long. 26.131642 (2024/34) 9.10.2024-17.10.2024
Regional unit of KavalaGR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00035 Protection zone:Those parts of the regional unit of Kavala, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 40.855895, Long. 24.176609 (2024/35) 5.10.2024
Surveillance zone:Those parts of the regional units of Kavala and Serres, contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 40.855895, Long. 24.176609 (2024/35)excluding the areas contained in any protection zone 14.10.2024
Surveillance zone:Those parts of the regional unit of Kavala, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 40.855895, Long. 24.176609 (2024/35) 6.10.2024-14.10.2024
Regional unit Areas included in the further restricted zones established in Greece as referred to in Article 2 Date until applicable
Regional unit of Evros The regional unit of Evros excluding the areas included in any protection or surveillance zone. 17.10.2024
The regional unit of Evros 18.10.2024-16.11.2024
Regional unit of Kavala The regional unit of Kavala excluding the municipality of Thasos and the areas included in any protection or surveillance zone. 14.10.2024
The regional unit of Kavala excluding the municipality of Thasos 15.10.2024-13.11.2024
Regional unit of Serres The municipality of Amphipolis excluding the areas included in any protection or surveillance zone. 14.10.2024
The municipality of Amphipolis 15.10.2024-13.11.2024
Regional unit of Drama The municipality of Doxato 13.11.2024
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (1), and in particular Article 259(1), point (c), thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Sheep pox and goat pox is an infectious viral disease affecting caprine and ovine animals and it can have a severe impact on the concerned animal population and the profitability of farming causing disturbance to movements of consignments of those animals and products thereof within the Union and exports to third countries.
(2) In the event of an outbreak of sheep pox and goat pox in caprine or ovine animals, there is a serious risk of the spread of that disease to other establishments of caprine or ovine animals.
(3) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 (2) supplements the rules for the control of the listed diseases referred to in Article 9(1), points (a), (b) and (c), of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, and defined as category A, B and C diseases in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1882 (3). In particular, Articles 21 and 22 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 provide for the establishment of a restricted zone in the event of an outbreak of a category A disease, including sheep pox and goat pox, and for certain measures to be applied therein. In addition, Article 21(1) of that Delegated Regulation provides that the restricted zone is to comprise a protection zone, a surveillance zone, and, if necessary, further restricted zones around or adjacent to the protection and surveillance zones.
(4) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 (4) was adopted on the basis of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and it lays down certain emergency measures relating to sheep pox and goat pox in Greece. More particularly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 provides that the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones to be established by that Member State, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, following outbreaks of that disease are to comprise at least the areas listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
(5) Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207, Greece has notified the Commission of 23 additional outbreaks of sheep pox and goat pox in establishments where ovine and caprine animals were kept in the regional unit of Evros within boundaries of already established further restricted zones as a result of previous outbreaks in the same areas and one outbreak in the regional unit of Kavala, the first outbreak in that regional unit. Nine of the new outbreaks in the regional unit of Evros are located within the boundaries of already established protection and surveillance zones in the same areas, while one is located outside those already established protection and surveillance zones, but still within the boundaries of the already established further restricted zone.
(6) Therefore, the areas listed as protection, surveillance and further restricted zones for Greece in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 should be further adjusted, spatially and temporally, in order to prevent further spread of the disease in Greece and to the rest of the Union, and the dates of regionalisation adjusted. Accordingly, it is necessary to amend the list of restricted zones set out in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
(7) The size of the zones and duration of the measures to apply in the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones should be based on the criteria set out in Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and the rules laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, including the epidemiological situation as regards sheep pox and goat pox in the areas affected by that disease and the overall epidemiological situation of sheep pox and goat pox in the Member State concerned by that disease, as well as the level of risk for the further spread of the disease. The duration of the measures should also take into account the international standards of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). In the current situation, there is high risk of further spread of the disease, in particular due to the fact that, according to the information provided by the competent authority, in the regional unit of Evros a total number of 33 outbreaks of sheep pox and goat pox have occurred in 23 days, within a radius of less than 80 km, suggesting that the disease had been present in the area for a period of time before being diagnosed and continues to circulate, while the outbreak in Kavala is the first in this area and is situated more than 150 km west of the original disease epicentre.
(8) Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of sheep pox and goat pox and the need to prevent the disease from spreading from the affected establishments in Greece to other parts of that Member State or to other Member States, the amendments to be made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 by this Decision should apply as soon as possible.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Amendments to Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207

The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

A.   Protection and surveillance zones established around the confirmed outbreaks

Regional unit and ADIS reference number of the outbreaks
Areas established as protection and surveillance zones, part of the restricted zone in Greece referred to in Article 2
Date until applicable
Regional unit of Evros
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00005
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00006
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00007
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00008
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00009
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000010
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000011
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000012
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000013
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000014
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000015
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000016
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000017
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000018
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000019
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000020
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000021
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000022
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000023
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000024
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000025
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000025
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000027
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000028
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000029
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000030
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000031
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000032
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000033
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-000034
Protection zone:
Those parts of the regional unit of Evros, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 41.49961111, Long. 26.54605556 (2024/5), Lat. 40.96145278, Long. 26.3345 (2024/6), Lat. 40.94543, Long. 26.275696 (2024/7), Lat. 40.876278, Long. 26.202551 (2024/8), Lat. 40.952487, Long. 26.280721 (2024/9) Lat. 40.920725, Long. 26.205981 (2024/10) Lat. 41.024363, Long. 26.302547 (2024/11) ,
Lat. 41.51720278, Long. 26.54510278 (2024/12),
Lat. 40.959944, Long. 26.336306 (2024/13), Lat. 40.93578, Long. 26.213778 (2024/14), Lat. 40.895996, Long. 26.222777 (2024/15), Lat. 40.900261, Long. 26.22288 (2024/16), Lat. 40.891842, Long. 26.146147 (2024/17), Lat. 40.933886, Long. 26.217318 (2024/18), Lat. 40.92507, Long. 26.212431 (2024/19), Lat. 41.278291, Long. 26.276953 (2024/20), Lat. 40.883228, Long. 26.157055 (2024/21), Lat. 40.923486, Long. 26.213196 (2024/22), Lat. 40.922552, Long. 26.209702 (2024/23), Lat. 40.925647, Long. 26.1662 (2024/24), Lat. 40.883022, Long. 26.227036 (2024/25), Lat 40.904757, Long. 26.178189 (2024/26), Lat. 40.848411, Long. 26.203314 (2024/27), Lat. 41.019251, Long. 26.269386 (2024/28) , Lat. 41.48359444, Long. 26.57411944 (2024/29), Lat. 41.49358333, Long. 26.54305556 (2024/30) , Lat. 41.51486111, Long. 26.54725 (2024/31), Lat. 40.89917, Long. 26.186411 (2024/32), Lat. 40.9941149, Long. 26.155657 (2024/33), Lat. 40.832839, Long. 26.131642 (2024/34)
8.10.2024
Surveillance zone:
Those parts of the regional unit of Evros, contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 41.49961111, Long. 26.54605556 (2024/5), Lat. 40.96145278, Long. 26.3345 (2024/6), Lat. 40.94543, Long. 26.275696 (2024/7), Lat. 40.876278, Long. 26.202551 (2024/8), Lat. 40.952487, Long. 26.280721 (2024/9) Lat. 40.920725, Long. 26.205981 (2024/10) Lat. 41.024363, Long. 26.302547 (2024/11), Lat. 41.51720278, Long. 26.54510278 (2024/12), Lat. 40.959944, Long. 26.336306 (2024/13), Lat. 40.93578, Long. 26.213778 (2024/14), Lat. 40.895996, Long. 26.222777 (2024/15), Lat. 40.900261, Long. 26.22288 (2024/16), Lat. 40.891842, Long. 26.146147 (2024/17), Lat. 40.933886, Long. 26.217318 (2024/18), Lat. 40.92507, Long. 26.212431 (2024/19), Lat. 41.278291, Long. 26.276953 (2024/20), Lat. 40.883228, Long. 26.157055 (2024/21), Lat. 40.923486, Long. 26.213196 (2024/22), Lat. 40.922552, Long. 26.209702 (2024/23), Lat. 40.925647, Long. 26.1662 (2024/24), Lat. 40.883022, Long. 26.227036 (2024/25) , Lat 40.904757, Long. 26.178189 (2024/26), Lat. 40.848411, Long. 26.203314 (2024/27), Lat. 41.019251, Long. 26.269386 (2024/28), Lat. 41.48359444, Long. 26.57411944 (2024/29), Lat. 41.49358333, Long. 26.54305556 (2024/30), Lat. 41.51486111, Long. 26.54725 (2024/31), Lat. 40.89917, Long. 26.186411 (2024/32), Lat. 40.9941149, Long. 26.155657 (2024/33), Lat. 40.832839, Long. 26.131642 (2024/34), excluding the areas contained in any protection zone
17.10.2024
Surveillance zone:
Those parts of the regional unit of Evros, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 41.49961111, Long. 26.54605556 (2024/5), Lat. 40.96145278, Long. 26.3345 (2024/6), Lat. 40.94543, Long. 26.275696 (2024/7), Lat. 40.876278, Long. 26.202551 (2024/8), Lat. 40.952487, Long. 26.280721 (2024/9) Lat. 40.920725, Long. 26.205981 (2024/10) Lat. 41.024363, Long. 26.302547 (2024/11), Lat. 41.51720278, Long. 26.54510278 (2024/12), Lat. 40.959944, Long. 26.336306 (2024/13), Lat. 40.93578, Long. 26.213778 (2024/14), Lat. 40.895996, Long. 26.222777 (2024/15), Lat. 40.900261, Long. 26.22288 (2024/16), Lat. 40.891842, Long. 26.146147 (2024/17), Lat. 40.933886, Long. 26.217318 (2024/18), Lat. 40.92507, Long. 26.212431 (2024/19), Lat. 41.278291, Long. 26.276953 (2024/20), Lat. 40.883228, Long. 26.157055 (2024/21), Lat. 40.923486, Long. 26.213196 (2024/22), Lat. 40.922552, Long. 26.209702 (2024/23) , Lat. 40.925647, Long. 26.1662 (2024/24), Lat. 40.883022, Long. 26.227036 (2024/25), Lat 40.904757, Long. 26.178189 (2024/26), Lat. 40.848411, Long. 26.203314 (2024/27), Lat. 41.019251, Long. 26.269386 (2024/28), Lat. 41.48359444, Long. 26.57411944 (2024/29), Lat. 41.49358333, Long. 26.54305556 (2024/30), Lat. 41.51486111, Long. 26.54725 (2024/31), Lat. 40.89917, Long. 26.186411 (2024/32), Lat. 40.9941149, Long. 26.155657 (2024/33), Lat. 40.832839, Long. 26.131642 (2024/34)
9.10.2024-17.10.2024
Regional unit of Kavala
GR-CAPRIPOX-2024-00035
Protection zone:
Those parts of the regional unit of Kavala, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 40.855895, Long. 24.176609 (2024/35)
5.10.2024
Surveillance zone:
Those parts of the regional units of Kavala and Serres, contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 40.855895, Long. 24.176609 (2024/35)
excluding the areas contained in any protection zone
14.10.2024
Surveillance zone:
Those parts of the regional unit of Kavala, contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centred on UTM 30, ETRS89 coordinates Lat. 40.855895, Long. 24.176609 (2024/35)
6.10.2024-14.10.2024

B. Further restricted zones

Regional unit
Areas included in the further restricted zones established in Greece as referred to in Article 2
Date until applicable
Regional unit of Evros
The regional unit of Evros excluding the areas included in any protection or surveillance zone.
17.10.2024
The regional unit of Evros
18.10.2024-16.11.2024
Regional unit of Kavala
The regional unit of Kavala excluding the municipality of Thasos and the areas included in any protection or surveillance zone.
14.10.2024
The regional unit of Kavala excluding the municipality of Thasos
15.10.2024-13.11.2024
Regional unit of Serres
The municipality of Amphipolis excluding the areas included in any protection or surveillance zone.
14.10.2024
The municipality of Amphipolis
15.10.2024-13.11.2024
Regional unit of Drama
The municipality of Doxato
13.11.2024

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2496 of 23 September 2024 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Lebanese Armed Forces

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2496 24.9.2024
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509(1)establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) The 2016 Global Strategy for the Union’s Foreign and Security Policy sets the objectives of strengthening security and defence, investing in the resilience of States and societies to the east of the Union, developing an integrated approach to conflict and crises, including international human rights law and international humanitarian law.
(3) On 21 March 2022, the Union approved the Strategic Compass, with the objective of becoming a stronger and more capable security provider, including through the increased use of the EPF in support of partners’ defence capabilities.
(4) In its Conclusions of 18 April 2024, the European Council reaffirmed the Union’s objective to work with all partners in the middle east region to avoid further escalation of tensions, notably in Lebanon. It underlined the Union’s commitment to support the stability of Lebanon. In its Conclusions of 27 June 2024, the European Council expressed its concern about increasing tensions in the region, notably along the Blue Line, and growing destruction and forced displacement of civilians on both sides of the Israeli-Lebanese border. It also called for further support to the strengthening of Lebanon, including the Lebanese Armed Forces.
(5) On 21 June 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from Lebanon for the Union to enhance the capacities of the Lebanese Armed Forces.
(6) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP(2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(7) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
(a) medical equipment and support to medical structures;
(b) engineering equipment;
(c) individual equipment and supplies for military personnel.
(a) compliance of the units of the LAF supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred without the consent of the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements, at the end of their life cycle.
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting on the inventory, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) and Article 41(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 (1) establishes the European Peace Facility (EPF) for the financing by Member States of Union actions under the common foreign and security policy to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security pursuant to Article 21(2), point (c), of the Treaty. In particular, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, the EPF is to be used for the financing of assistance measures such as actions to strengthen the capacities of third States and regional and international organisations relating to military and defence matters.
(2) The 2016 Global Strategy for the Union’s Foreign and Security Policy sets the objectives of strengthening security and defence, investing in the resilience of States and societies to the east of the Union, developing an integrated approach to conflict and crises, including international human rights law and international humanitarian law.
(3) On 21 March 2022, the Union approved the Strategic Compass, with the objective of becoming a stronger and more capable security provider, including through the increased use of the EPF in support of partners’ defence capabilities.
(4) In its Conclusions of 18 April 2024, the European Council reaffirmed the Union’s objective to work with all partners in the middle east region to avoid further escalation of tensions, notably in Lebanon. It underlined the Union’s commitment to support the stability of Lebanon. In its Conclusions of 27 June 2024, the European Council expressed its concern about increasing tensions in the region, notably along the Blue Line, and growing destruction and forced displacement of civilians on both sides of the Israeli-Lebanese border. It also called for further support to the strengthening of Lebanon, including the Lebanese Armed Forces.
(5) On 21 June 2024, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy received a request from Lebanon for the Union to enhance the capacities of the Lebanese Armed Forces.
(6) Assistance measures are to be implemented taking into account the principles and requirements set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, in particular compliance with Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (2), and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.
(7) The Council reaffirms its determination to protect, promote and fulfil human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic principles and to strengthen the rule of law and good governance, in compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Establishment, objectives, scope and duration

1. An assistance measure benefiting Lebanon (the ‘beneficiary’) to be financed under the European Peace Facility (EPF) (the ‘assistance measure’) is hereby established.

2. The objective of the Assistance Measure is to contribute to strengthening the capacities of the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to enhance the national security, stability and resilience of Lebanon.
The specific objective of the proposed assistance measure (AM) is to support the enhancement of the capacities of the military medical, engineering and logistics commands.

3. To achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 2, the assistance measure shall finance the following types of equipment not designed to deliver lethal force:
(a) medical equipment and support to medical structures;
(b) engineering equipment;
(c) individual equipment and supplies for military personnel.
The assistance measure shall also finance related supplies and services, including technical training, where needed.

4. The duration of the assistance measure shall be 36 months from the date of adoption of this Decision.

Financial arrangements

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the assistance measure shall be EUR 15 000 000.
2. All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF.

Arrangements with the beneficiary

1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’) shall make the necessary arrangements with the beneficiary to ensure its compliance with the requirements and conditions established by this Decision as a condition for the provision of support under the assistance measure.

2. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions obliging the beneficiary to ensure:
(a) compliance of the units of the LAF supported under the assistance measure with relevant international law, in particular international human rights law and international humanitarian law;
(b) proper and efficient use of any assets provided under the assistance measure for the purposes for which they were provided;
(c) sufficient maintenance of any assets provided under the assistance measure to ensure their usability and operational availability over their life cycle;
(d) that any assets provided under the assistance measure are not lost, or transferred without the consent of the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 to persons or entities other than those identified in those arrangements, at the end of their life cycle.

3. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions on the suspension and termination of support under the assistance measure in the event of the beneficiary being found in breach of the obligations set out in paragraph 2.

Implementation

1. The High Representative shall be responsible for ensuring the implementation of this Decision in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2021/509, and in line with the rules for the implementation of revenue and expenditure financed under the EPF and with the Integrated Methodological Framework for assessing and identifying the required measures and controls for assistance measures under the EPF.

2. The implementation of the activities referred to in Article 1(3) of this Decision shall be carried out by the administrator for assistance measures, through an administrative arrangement with Économat des Armées in accordance with Article 37 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509.

Monitoring, control and evaluation

1. The High Representative shall monitor the compliance by the beneficiary with the obligations set out in Article 3. That monitoring shall be used to provide awareness of the context and the risks of breaches of the obligations set out in Article 3, and to contribute to the prevention of such breaches, including violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the units of the LAF supported under the assistance measure.

2. The post-shipment control of equipment and supplies shall be organised as follows:
(a) delivery verification, whereby EPF delivery certificates are to be signed by the end-user forces upon transfer of ownership;
(b) reporting on the inventory, whereby the beneficiary is to report annually on the inventory of designated items until such reporting is no longer deemed necessary by the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
(c) on-site visits, whereby the beneficiary is to grant the High Representative and the EPF auditors access to conduct on-site checks and EPF audits, upon request.

3. The High Representative shall conduct a final evaluation upon completion of the assistance measure to assess whether the assistance measure has contributed to reaching the objectives set out in Article 1(2).

Reporting

During the period of implementation, the High Representative shall provide the PSC with six-monthly reports on the implementation of the assistance measure, in accordance with Article 63 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509. The administrator for assistance measures shall regularly inform the Facility Committee established by Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 on the implementation of revenue and expenditure in accordance with Article 38 of that Decision, including by providing information on the suppliers and subcontractors involved.

Suspension and termination

1. The PSC may decide to suspend wholly or partially the implementation of the assistance measure in accordance with Article 64 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/509.
2. The PSC may recommend that the Council terminate the assistance measure.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2489 of 11 September 2024 on the request for registration, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe (notified under document C(2024) 6087)

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2489 19.9.2024
(1) A request for registration of a European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe’ was submitted to the Commission on 17 July 2024.
(2) The aims of the initiative as expressed by the organisers consist of seven objectives: (i) ‘To advocate for a strategic and holistic action plan for water in Europe, and the development and implementation of dual, complementary policies in all EU policy areas, as called for in the Declaration for an EU Blue Deal’; (ii) ‘To urge the European Commission to prioritise water as a strategic standalone priority within the EU framework and elevate water resilience to the same priority level as decarbonisation’; (iii) ‘To significantly reduce the water footprint of all segments of society and stress a paradigm shift at the European level to safeguard clean water for individuals, businesses, farmers and ecosystems; (iv) ‘To accelerate a shift towards water-efficient, circular industry and agriculture, to secure competitiveness by promoting innovative solutions such as digital tools, resource recovery, hybrid green-grey infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and inclusive governance tools’; (v) ‘To ensure the availability of the right skills for a water-smart economy, preserve jobs and create new job opportunities for workers’; (vi) ‘To promote stewardship and connectedness to aquatic environments and support restoration and protection efforts’; (vii) ‘To ensure every individual’s human right to clean and safe water and sanitation, and the restoration and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity’.
(3) An annex to the initiative provides further details on the subject matter, objectives and background to the initiative. It states that ‘access to water is now becoming uncertain’ and that ‘the European water policy landscape’ is ‘fragmented and ineffective’ in addressing current challenges. The annex explains that despite ‘the advanced state’ of the Union’s water legislation, ‘many goals remain unfulfilled due to insufficient funding, delayed implementation, and lack of comprehensive integration of water concerns into sectoral policies’. The organisers thus call for ‘a comprehensive strategic political priority on water, integrated into all EU policies’. They consider that ‘addressing water resilience necessitates a sector-specific approach’, and that it is necessary to ‘raise public awareness regarding water consumption and good practices’. The organisers also state that the water dimension should be integrated into all Union policies to ensure that ‘water resilience and sustainability are primary considerations in policy formulation and implementation’ and to recognise the ‘critical role’ of water ‘in the EU’s ecological and socioeconomic landscape’.
(4) An additional document prepared by the European Economic and Social Committee and entitled ‘Declaration for an EU Blue Deal’ has also been submitted by the group of organisers as part of their registration request.
(5) As regards the aims of the initiative, the Commission could submit a proposal for a legal act encompassing objectives (i) to (iv), (vi) and (vii) of the initiative on the basis of Article 192 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
(6) The Commission could also submit a proposal for a legal act concerning objective (v) of the initiative, based on Articles 149 or 153(2)(a) TFEU.
(7) For those reasons, the Commission considers that none of the parts of the initiative manifestly falls outside the framework of the Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties.
(8) That conclusion does not affect the assessment of whether the concrete substantive conditions required for the Commission to act, including compliance with the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity and compatibility with fundamental rights, would be met in this case.
(9) The group of organisers has provided appropriate evidence that it fulfils the requirements laid down in Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/788 and has designated the contact persons in accordance with Article 5(3), first subparagraph, of that Regulation.
(10) The initiative is not manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious, nor is it manifestly contrary to the values of the Union as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union or to the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
(11) The initiative entitled ‘ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe’ should therefore be registered.
(12) The conclusion that the conditions for registration under Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/788 are fulfilled does not imply that the Commission in any way confirms the factual correctness of the content of the initiative, which is the sole responsibility of the group of organisers of the initiative. The content of the initiative only expresses the views of the group of organisers, and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Commission,
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the European citizens’ initiative (1), and in particular Article 6(2) and (3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) A request for registration of a European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe’ was submitted to the Commission on 17 July 2024.
(2) The aims of the initiative as expressed by the organisers consist of seven objectives: (i) ‘To advocate for a strategic and holistic action plan for water in Europe, and the development and implementation of dual, complementary policies in all EU policy areas, as called for in the Declaration for an EU Blue Deal’; (ii) ‘To urge the European Commission to prioritise water as a strategic standalone priority within the EU framework and elevate water resilience to the same priority level as decarbonisation’; (iii) ‘To significantly reduce the water footprint of all segments of society and stress a paradigm shift at the European level to safeguard clean water for individuals, businesses, farmers and ecosystems; (iv) ‘To accelerate a shift towards water-efficient, circular industry and agriculture, to secure competitiveness by promoting innovative solutions such as digital tools, resource recovery, hybrid green-grey infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and inclusive governance tools’; (v) ‘To ensure the availability of the right skills for a water-smart economy, preserve jobs and create new job opportunities for workers’; (vi) ‘To promote stewardship and connectedness to aquatic environments and support restoration and protection efforts’; (vii) ‘To ensure every individual’s human right to clean and safe water and sanitation, and the restoration and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity’.
(3) An annex to the initiative provides further details on the subject matter, objectives and background to the initiative. It states that ‘access to water is now becoming uncertain’ and that ‘the European water policy landscape’ is ‘fragmented and ineffective’ in addressing current challenges. The annex explains that despite ‘the advanced state’ of the Union’s water legislation, ‘many goals remain unfulfilled due to insufficient funding, delayed implementation, and lack of comprehensive integration of water concerns into sectoral policies’. The organisers thus call for ‘a comprehensive strategic political priority on water, integrated into all EU policies’. They consider that ‘addressing water resilience necessitates a sector-specific approach’, and that it is necessary to ‘raise public awareness regarding water consumption and good practices’. The organisers also state that the water dimension should be integrated into all Union policies to ensure that ‘water resilience and sustainability are primary considerations in policy formulation and implementation’ and to recognise the ‘critical role’ of water ‘in the EU’s ecological and socioeconomic landscape’.
(4) An additional document prepared by the European Economic and Social Committee and entitled ‘Declaration for an EU Blue Deal’ has also been submitted by the group of organisers as part of their registration request.
(5) As regards the aims of the initiative, the Commission could submit a proposal for a legal act encompassing objectives (i) to (iv), (vi) and (vii) of the initiative on the basis of Article 192 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
(6) The Commission could also submit a proposal for a legal act concerning objective (v) of the initiative, based on Articles 149 or 153(2)(a) TFEU.
(7) For those reasons, the Commission considers that none of the parts of the initiative manifestly falls outside the framework of the Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties.
(8) That conclusion does not affect the assessment of whether the concrete substantive conditions required for the Commission to act, including compliance with the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity and compatibility with fundamental rights, would be met in this case.
(9) The group of organisers has provided appropriate evidence that it fulfils the requirements laid down in Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/788 and has designated the contact persons in accordance with Article 5(3), first subparagraph, of that Regulation.
(10) The initiative is not manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious, nor is it manifestly contrary to the values of the Union as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union or to the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
(11) The initiative entitled ‘ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe’ should therefore be registered.
(12) The conclusion that the conditions for registration under Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/788 are fulfilled does not imply that the Commission in any way confirms the factual correctness of the content of the initiative, which is the sole responsibility of the group of organisers of the initiative. The content of the initiative only expresses the views of the group of organisers, and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Commission,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe’ shall be registered.
This Decision is addressed to the group of organisers of the citizens’ initiative entitled ‘ECI for a Water-Smart and Resilient Europe’, represented by Constantin DEDU and Piotr SADOWSKI acting as contact persons.