Council Decision (EU) 2024/2751 of 14 October 2024 on the conclusion of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2751 31.10.2024
(1) On 19 January 2009, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a multiparty trade agreement on behalf of the European Union and its Member States with the Member Countries of the Andean Community which shared the aim of reaching an ambitious, comprehensive and balanced trade agreement.
(2) Those negotiations have been concluded and the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 23 March 2011.
(3) In accordance with Council Decision No 2012/735/EU(2), the Agreement was signed on behalf of the Union on 26 June 2012, subject to its conclusion, and has been applied on a provisional basis.
(4) The Agreement should be approved.
(5) The Agreement does not affect the rights of investors of the Member States to benefit from any more favourable treatment provided for in any agreement relating to investment to which a Member State and a signatory Andean Country are Parties.
(6) Pursuant to Article 218(7) of the Treaty, it is appropriate for the Council to authorise the Commission to approve modifications of the Agreement concerning geographical indications to be adopted by the Trade Committee, as proposed by the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property pursuant to Article 209(2) of the Agreement.
(7) It is appropriate to set out the relevant procedures for the protection of those geographical indications which are given protection pursuant to the Agreement.
(8) The Agreement should not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts and tribunals,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91, Article 100(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),
Whereas:
(1) On 19 January 2009, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a multiparty trade agreement on behalf of the European Union and its Member States with the Member Countries of the Andean Community which shared the aim of reaching an ambitious, comprehensive and balanced trade agreement.
(2) Those negotiations have been concluded and the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 23 March 2011.
(3) In accordance with Council Decision No 2012/735/EU (2), the Agreement was signed on behalf of the Union on 26 June 2012, subject to its conclusion, and has been applied on a provisional basis.
(4) The Agreement should be approved.
(5) The Agreement does not affect the rights of investors of the Member States to benefit from any more favourable treatment provided for in any agreement relating to investment to which a Member State and a signatory Andean Country are Parties.
(6) Pursuant to Article 218(7) of the Treaty, it is appropriate for the Council to authorise the Commission to approve modifications of the Agreement concerning geographical indications to be adopted by the Trade Committee, as proposed by the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property pursuant to Article 209(2) of the Agreement.
(7) It is appropriate to set out the relevant procedures for the protection of those geographical indications which are given protection pursuant to the Agreement.
(8) The Agreement should not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts and tribunals,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part (3), is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
The President of the Council shall designate the person(s) empowered to proceed on behalf of the Union to give the notification referred to in Article 330(1) of the Agreement, in order to express the consent of the Union to be bound by the Agreement.
For the purposes of Article 209(2) of the Agreement, modifications of the Agreement concerning geographical indications to be adopted by the Trade Committee, as proposed by the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, shall be approved by the Commission on behalf of the Union. Where interested parties cannot reach agreement following objections relating to a geographical indication, the Commission shall adopt such a position on the basis of the procedure laid down in Article 15(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (4).
1. A name protected under Appendix 1 of Annex XIII (Lists of Geographical Indications) of the Agreement may be used by any operator marketing agricultural products, foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines or spirits which comply with the corresponding specification.

2. The Member States and the institutions of the Union shall enforce the protection provided for in Article 210 of the Agreement, including at the request of an interested party.

The Agreement shall not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts and tribunals.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2743 of 21 October 2024 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2024) 7450)

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2743 22.10.2024
(1) Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious viral disease in birds and can have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries. HPAI viruses can infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations. Therefore, the presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept. In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept.
(2) Regulation (EU) 2016/429 establishes the legislative framework for the prevention and control of diseases that are transmissible to animals or humans. HPAI falls within the definition of a listed disease in that Regulation, and it is subject to the disease prevention and control rules laid down therein. In addition, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687(2)supplements Regulation (EU) 2016/429 as regards the rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases, including disease control measures for HPAI.
(3) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447(3)was adopted within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and it lays down emergency measures at Union level in relation to outbreaks of HPAI.
(4) More particularly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 provides that the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones, established by the Member States concerned following outbreaks of HPAI, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection, surveillance and further restricted zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
(5) The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2681(4)following outbreaks of HPAI in poultry in Bulgaria, Czechia, Germany, France, Italy and Hungary, which needed to be reflected in that Annex.
(6) Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2681, Italy, Hungary. Austria and Poland have notified the Commission of outbreaks of HPAI, in establishments where poultry were kept located in Emilia-Romagna and Lombardy regions in Italy, in Békés and Csongrád-Csanád counties in Hungary, in Oberösterreich federal state in Austria and in Dolnośląskie voivodeship in Poland.
(7) Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland have taken the necessary disease control measures required in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around the outbreaks.
(8) The Commission has examined the disease control measures taken by Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland, and it is satisfied that the boundaries of the protection and surveillances zones established by those Member States are at a sufficient distance from the establishments where the outbreaks of HPAI have been confirmed.
(9) In the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447, there are currently no areas listed as protection and surveillance zones for Austria and Poland.
(10) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at Union level, in collaboration with Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland the protection and surveillance zones duly established by those Member States in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687.
(11) Therefore, the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones for Italy and Hungary in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 should be amended.
(12) In addition, protection and surveillance zones should be listed for Austria and Poland in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447.
(13) Accordingly, the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 should be amended to update regionalisation at Union level to take account of the protection and surveillance zones duly established by Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, and the duration of the measures applicable therein.
(14) Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(15) Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of HPAI, it is important that the amendments to be made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 by this Decision take effect as soon as possible.
(16) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Plovdiv region
BG-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Rakovski municipality:—StryamaMaritsa municipality:—Kalekovets—Trilistnik — Stryama — Kalekovets — Trilistnik 28.10.2024
— Stryama
— Kalekovets
— Trilistnik
— Stryama
— Kalekovets
— Trilistnik
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
CZ-HPAI(P)-2024-00007 Pilsen Region:Kovčín (671541); Loužná (700657); Milčice (671550); Myslív (700665); Nový Dvůr u Myslíva (700681); Žďár u Nalžovských Hor (765465); Nehodiv (700673); Strážovice u Pačejova (717312). 25.10.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
SACHSEN
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Landkreis Vogtlandkreis—Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind — Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind 20.10.2024
— Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
— Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Département Finistère (29):
FR-HPAI(P)-2024-00008 —CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet—HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly—TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769—LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune—MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34 — CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet — HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly — TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769 — LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune — MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34 23.10.2024
— CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet
— HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly
— TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769
— LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune
— MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34
— CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet
— HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly
— TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769
— LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune
— MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Veneto region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00002 The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.380407317, E 12.166908269 29.10.2024
Emilia-Romagna region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00003 The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.841417, E 12.076442 14.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00007 The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.794457, E 12.118517 8.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00008 The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.752494, E 12.158957 14.11.2024
Lombardia region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00004 The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.308341, E 10.30903 6.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00005 The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.416245, E 9.77548400000001 7.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00006 The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.420518, E 9.77307500000001 8.11.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Békés vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00015HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00018HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00019 Füzesgyarmat és Szeghalom települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 27.10.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Békésszentandrás település közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 27.10.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020 Szarvas település közigazgatási területének a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 4.11.2024
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Mesterszállás és Öcsöd települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 27.10.2024
Hajdú-Bihar vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017 Biharnagybajom és Sárrétudvari települések közigazgatási területének a 47.151233 és a 21.174322 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 27.10.2024
Csongrád-Csanád vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021 Pusztaszer és Kistelek települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 5.11.2024
Bács-Kiskun vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021 Pálmonostora települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 5.11.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Oberösterreich
AT-HPAI(P)-2024-00001 im Bezirk Braunau die Katastralgemeinden Mattighofen, Humertsham, Furth, Schalchen, Unterlochen und Weinberg 31.10.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00027PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00028PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00029 W województwie dolnośląskim:1)w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;2)w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa. 1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; 2) w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa. 5.11.2024
1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,
b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
2) w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa.
1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,
b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,
b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
2) w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa.
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
BG-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Maritsa municipality:—Yasno pole—Dink—Krislovo—Kalekovets—Trud—Zhelyazno—Voyvodinovo—Skutare—Rogosh—Manole—Manolsko KonareRakovski municipality:—Rakovski—Momino seloPlovdiv municipality:—Plovdiv — Yasno pole — Dink — Krislovo — Kalekovets — Trud — Zhelyazno — Voyvodinovo — Skutare — Rogosh — Manole — Manolsko Konare — Rakovski — Momino selo — Plovdiv 6.11.2024
— Yasno pole
— Dink
— Krislovo
— Kalekovets
— Trud
— Zhelyazno
— Voyvodinovo
— Skutare
— Rogosh
— Manole
— Manolsko Konare
— Rakovski
— Momino selo
— Plovdiv
Rakovski municipality:—StryamaMaritsa municipality:—Kalekovets—Trilistnik — Stryama — Kalekovets — Trilistnik 29.10.2024 – 6.11.2024
— Stryama
— Kalekovets
— Trilistnik
— Yasno pole
— Dink
— Krislovo
— Kalekovets
— Trud
— Zhelyazno
— Voyvodinovo
— Skutare
— Rogosh
— Manole
— Manolsko Konare
— Rakovski
— Momino selo
— Plovdiv
— Stryama
— Kalekovets
— Trilistnik
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
CZ-HPAI(P)-2024-00006 Central Bohemian RegionBezděkov pod Třemšínem (603601); Bor u Březnice (607240); Přední Poříčí (614319); Chraštice (654078); Chrást u Tochovic (653756); Oslí (653772); Hlubyně (639702); Horčápsko (641944); Leletice (679917); Vacíkov (775941); Kamenná u Příbramě (662691); Modřovice (697966); Nestrašovice (761320); Ostrov u Tochovic (715743); Stražiště (722961); Nesvačily pod Třemšínem (703851); Pňovice pod Třemšínem (722839); Rožmitál pod Třemšínem (742848); Skuhrov pod Třemšínem (722847); Strýčkovy (757357); Hoděmyšl (785482); Starosedlský Hrádek (754862); Kletice (761311); Svojšice (761338); Těchařovice (785288); Hořejany (767701); Tochovice (767719); Třebsko (770523); Tušovice (761346); Pročevily (784818); Volenice u Březnice (784826); Vrančice (785296); Vševily (603619); Zalužany (790761).South Bohemian RegionBoudy (695483); Krsice (623831); Horosedly (644781); Lety (680770); Minice u Mišovic (696188); Lučkovice (695491); Boješice (606898); Kakovice (696170); Mirovice (695726); Ohař (606901); Plíškovice (721875); Touškov (767883); Mišovice (696196); Pohoří u Mirovic (696200); Myslín (700631); Dolní Nerestce (703699); Horní Nerestce (703702); Rakovice (623849); Bezdědovice (603457); Bělčice (601870); Hostišovice (645796); Podruhlí (645818); Tisov (767191); Újezdec u Bělčic (774031); Záhrobí (790281); Závišín u Bělčic (791288); Drahenický Málkov (631558); Skaličany (748005); Chobot (775754); Hornosín (644765); Kožlí u Myštic (700835); Myštice (700851); Vahlovice (700894); Výšice (700908); Uzenice (775771); Uzeničky (775789). 2.11.2024
Central Bohemian RegionBřeznice (614271); Martinice u Březnice (692085); Drahenice (631540); Hudčice (649236); Koupě (671207); Počaply u Březnice (722952); Bubovice u Březnice (784800).South Bohemian RegionRáztely (721883); Svučice (761621). 10.10.2024- 2.11.2024
CZ-HPAI(P)-2024-00007 Pilsen Region:Břežany (614891); Hnačov (721450); Horažďovická Lhota (770213); Třebomyslice u Horažďovic (770221); Hradešice (647420); Smrkovec u Hradešic (647438); Černice u Defurových Lažan (625345); Defurovy Lažany (625353); Dobrotice u Chanovic (650617); Holkovice (650625); Chanovice (650633); Újezd u Chanovic (625361); Chlumy (651851); Podhůří u Nepomuka (723801); Řesanice (664324); Klášter u Nepomuka (665495); Kozlovice u Nepomuka (671746); Kramolín u Nepomuka (673099); Kvášňovice (678228); Malý Bor (691399); Maňovice u Pačejova (717282); Bezděkovec (694541); Maňovice (694550); Mileč (694568); Záhoří u Milče (694576); Želvice (694584); Mlýnské Struhadlo (773964); Mohelnice u Nepomuka (697982); Letovy (695815); Nalžovské Hory (701521); Neprochovy (703524); Těchonice (765457); Velenovy (777803); Nekvasovy (702757); Dvorec (703460); Nepomuk (703478); Klikařov (704211); Neurazy (704229); Nová Ves u Nepomuka (705942); Radochovy (738191); Soběsuky u Nepomuka (751855); Vojovice (784613); Olšany u Kvášňovic (678236); Kotouň (713023); Nová Ves u Horažďovic (713031); Oselce (713040); Pačejov (717304); Týřovice u Pačejova (717321); Velešice u Pačejova (717339); Bližanovy (687588); Kvasetice (687596); Lovčice u Klatov (687600); Mlynářovice (773956); Plánice (721476); Pohoří u Lovčic (687618); Štipoklasy u Lovčic (687626); Polánka u Nepomuka (725056); Třebčice (697991); Tužice (791326); Újezd u Plánice (773972); Jetenovice (779521); Velký Bor u Horažďovic (779539); Plichtice (791300); Skránčice (791318); Zavlekov (791334); Zborovy (721484). 3.11.2024
Pilsen Region:Kovčín (671541); Loužná (700657); Milčice (671550); Myslív (700665); Nový Dvůr u Myslíva (700681); Žďár u Nalžovských Hor (765465); Nehodiv (700673); Strážovice u Pačejova (717312). 26.10.2024 – 3.11.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00013DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00014DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00015 SACHSENLandkreis Leipzigbeginnend von der Ländergrenze zu Sachsen-Anhalt auf der Höhe der B87 bis Ortseingang Döhlen, den Ortsteil Döhlen einschließend, nordöstlich nach Quesitz und den Ortsteil Quesitz einschließend, südlich des Solarparks den Pappelweg östlich entlang bis zur Abzweigung nach Markranstädt, dieser nördlich folgend und dann südlich des Stadions Südstraße Markranstädt weiter östlich zur Südstraße Markranstädt, anschließend das Waldgebiet nordwestlich/nördlich des Gewerbegebiets GE 3 Nord und nördlich der Siebenschachthäuser mit der Waldgrenze einschließend bis zur Landkreisgrenze Stadt Leipzig im Seegebiet Kulkwitzer See; die westliche, nördliche und östliche Grenze des Beobachtungsgebiets entspricht der LandkreisgrenzeLandkreis Nordsachsen—Gemeinde Wiedemar: Ortsteil Rabutz: Südlich Kretschiner Weg, Südlich Teichstraße; Ortsteil Werlitzsch: Südlich Straße K7433 bis Autobahn A9, westlich Autobahn A9—Gemeinde Schkeuditz: Ortsteil Kursdorf: südlich Autobahn A14, Ortsteil Schkeuditz, Ortsteil Kleinliebenau, Ortsteil DölzigStadt Leipzigbeginnend mit der Stadtgrenze, entlang am Fahrradweg Neue Luppe, Am Pfingstanger, Lützschenaer Straße, einschließlich Jakobiwinkel und Mühlenplatz, Weiter über Burghausener Straße, Gundorfer Straße, Miltitzer Straße, Bahnschienen ab KGV „Dr. Karl Foerster e.V.“, endend mit der StadtgrenzeSACHSEN-ANHALTLandkreis Saalekreisbetroffene Gemarkungen: Dieskau, Dölbau, Gröbers, Großkugel, Schkopau, Döllnitz, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz, Luppenau, Merseburg, Meuschau, Wallendorf, Zöschen, Zweimen, Horburg-Maßlau, Kötschlitz, Günthersdorf, Rodden, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Leuna, Spergau, Bad Dürrenberg, Tollwitz, NempitzStadt Halle (Saale)Alle Bereiche der Stadtviertel Radewell/Osendorf und Planena, die südöstlich der folgenden Linie liegen:Bahnlinie Halle-Ammendorf nach Schkopau bis Regensburger Straße, Regensburger Straße bis Straße der Bergarbeiter, Straße der Bergarbeiter bis zum Weg um den Osendorfer See, mündend an der Straße Am TagebauBurgenlandkreisGemarkung Lützen: nordwestlich der B87 zwischen Gustav-Adolf-Gedenkstätte Lützen und KreisgrenzeGemarkung Wengelsdorf: nordöstlich vom Rittergut und der Auenstraße bis zur Kreisgrenze — Gemeinde Wiedemar: Ortsteil Rabutz: Südlich Kretschiner Weg, Südlich Teichstraße; Ortsteil Werlitzsch: Südlich Straße K7433 bis Autobahn A9, westlich Autobahn A9 — Gemeinde Schkeuditz: Ortsteil Kursdorf: südlich Autobahn A14, Ortsteil Schkeuditz, Ortsteil Kleinliebenau, Ortsteil Dölzig 21.10.2024
— Gemeinde Wiedemar: Ortsteil Rabutz: Südlich Kretschiner Weg, Südlich Teichstraße; Ortsteil Werlitzsch: Südlich Straße K7433 bis Autobahn A9, westlich Autobahn A9
— Gemeinde Schkeuditz: Ortsteil Kursdorf: südlich Autobahn A14, Ortsteil Schkeuditz, Ortsteil Kleinliebenau, Ortsteil Dölzig
SACHSEN-ANHALTLandkreis Saalekreis—Gemarkung Wallendorf, Zöschen und Zweimen—teilweise betroffen: Gemarkung Kötzschlitz, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Friedensdorf, Luppenau, Burgliebenau, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz und Horburg-Maßlau:—beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See. — Gemarkung Wallendorf, Zöschen und Zweimen — teilweise betroffen: Gemarkung Kötzschlitz, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Friedensdorf, Luppenau, Burgliebenau, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz und Horburg-Maßlau:—beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See. — beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See. 12.10.2024 – 21.10.2024
— Gemarkung Wallendorf, Zöschen und Zweimen
— teilweise betroffen: Gemarkung Kötzschlitz, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Friedensdorf, Luppenau, Burgliebenau, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz und Horburg-Maßlau:—beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See. — beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See.
— beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See.
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 SACHSENLandkreis Vogtlandkreis—Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Klingenthal, Schöneck/Vogtl., Grünbach, Werda, Neustadt/Vogtl., Bergen, Falkenstein/Vogtl., Ellefeld, Rodewisch und Auerbach die über das in der Schutzzone beschriebene Gebiet hinausgehen und innerhalb des Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sindLandkreis Erzgebirgskreis—Teile der Gemeinden Schönheide und Eibenstock, die innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind — Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Klingenthal, Schöneck/Vogtl., Grünbach, Werda, Neustadt/Vogtl., Bergen, Falkenstein/Vogtl., Ellefeld, Rodewisch und Auerbach die über das in der Schutzzone beschriebene Gebiet hinausgehen und innerhalb des Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind — Teile der Gemeinden Schönheide und Eibenstock, die innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind 29.10.2024
— Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Klingenthal, Schöneck/Vogtl., Grünbach, Werda, Neustadt/Vogtl., Bergen, Falkenstein/Vogtl., Ellefeld, Rodewisch und Auerbach die über das in der Schutzzone beschriebene Gebiet hinausgehen und innerhalb des Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
— Teile der Gemeinden Schönheide und Eibenstock, die innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
Landkreis Vogtlandkreis—Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind — Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind 21.10.2024 -29.10.2024
— Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
— Gemeinde Wiedemar: Ortsteil Rabutz: Südlich Kretschiner Weg, Südlich Teichstraße; Ortsteil Werlitzsch: Südlich Straße K7433 bis Autobahn A9, westlich Autobahn A9
— Gemeinde Schkeuditz: Ortsteil Kursdorf: südlich Autobahn A14, Ortsteil Schkeuditz, Ortsteil Kleinliebenau, Ortsteil Dölzig
— Gemarkung Wallendorf, Zöschen und Zweimen
— teilweise betroffen: Gemarkung Kötzschlitz, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Friedensdorf, Luppenau, Burgliebenau, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz und Horburg-Maßlau:—beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See. — beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See.
— beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See.
— beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See.
— Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Klingenthal, Schöneck/Vogtl., Grünbach, Werda, Neustadt/Vogtl., Bergen, Falkenstein/Vogtl., Ellefeld, Rodewisch und Auerbach die über das in der Schutzzone beschriebene Gebiet hinausgehen und innerhalb des Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
— Teile der Gemeinden Schönheide und Eibenstock, die innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
— Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26'07.1"N 12°25'02.8"E sind
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Département Finistère (29):
FR-HPAI(P)-2024-00008 —CARANTEC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP—HENVIC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP—SAINT POL DE LEON- A l’Est de la D788 jusqu’au rond point de Kergompez puis à l’Est de D58—PLOUENAN- Toute la commune—MESPAUL- A l’Est de la rivière l’Horn—PLOUVORN- A l’Est de la D75 puis au Nord de la D19—GUICLAN- A l’Est d’une ligne passant par les lieux dits Kerdeland, Papillonou, Eglise du bourg de Guiclan et le moulin de Kernabat—SAINT THEGONNEC LOC EGUINER- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Hellin braz au lieu dit Pont Toulzac’h—TAULE- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP—SAINTE SEVE- Toute la commune—PLEYBER CHRIST- Au Nord de la D712—SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS- Toute la commune—PLOURIN LES MORLAIX- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Moulin des près au lieu dit l’Ermitage—MORLAIX- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP—PLOUIGNEAU- A l’Ouest d’une ligne allant du Moulin de Tromorgant au lieu dit de Toulgoat—PLOUEZOC’H- Toute la commune—SAINT JEAN DU DOIGT- Au Sud de la D78—PLOUGASNOU- Toute la commune — CARANTEC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP — HENVIC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP — SAINT POL DE LEON- A l’Est de la D788 jusqu’au rond point de Kergompez puis à l’Est de D58 — PLOUENAN- Toute la commune — MESPAUL- A l’Est de la rivière l’Horn — PLOUVORN- A l’Est de la D75 puis au Nord de la D19 — GUICLAN- A l’Est d’une ligne passant par les lieux dits Kerdeland, Papillonou, Eglise du bourg de Guiclan et le moulin de Kernabat — SAINT THEGONNEC LOC EGUINER- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Hellin braz au lieu dit Pont Toulzac’h — TAULE- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP — SAINTE SEVE- Toute la commune — PLEYBER CHRIST- Au Nord de la D712 — SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS- Toute la commune — PLOURIN LES MORLAIX- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Moulin des près au lieu dit l’Ermitage — MORLAIX- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP — PLOUIGNEAU- A l’Ouest d’une ligne allant du Moulin de Tromorgant au lieu dit de Toulgoat — PLOUEZOC’H- Toute la commune — SAINT JEAN DU DOIGT- Au Sud de la D78 — PLOUGASNOU- Toute la commune 1.11.2024
— CARANTEC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— HENVIC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— SAINT POL DE LEON- A l’Est de la D788 jusqu’au rond point de Kergompez puis à l’Est de D58
— PLOUENAN- Toute la commune
— MESPAUL- A l’Est de la rivière l’Horn
— PLOUVORN- A l’Est de la D75 puis au Nord de la D19
— GUICLAN- A l’Est d’une ligne passant par les lieux dits Kerdeland, Papillonou, Eglise du bourg de Guiclan et le moulin de Kernabat
— SAINT THEGONNEC LOC EGUINER- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Hellin braz au lieu dit Pont Toulzac’h
— TAULE- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— SAINTE SEVE- Toute la commune
— PLEYBER CHRIST- Au Nord de la D712
— SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS- Toute la commune
— PLOURIN LES MORLAIX- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Moulin des près au lieu dit l’Ermitage
— MORLAIX- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— PLOUIGNEAU- A l’Ouest d’une ligne allant du Moulin de Tromorgant au lieu dit de Toulgoat
— PLOUEZOC’H- Toute la commune
— SAINT JEAN DU DOIGT- Au Sud de la D78
— PLOUGASNOU- Toute la commune
—CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet—HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly—TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769—LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune—MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34 — CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet — HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly — TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769 — LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune — MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34 24.10.2024 – 1.11.2024
— CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet
— HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly
— TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769
— LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune
— MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34
— CARANTEC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— HENVIC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— SAINT POL DE LEON- A l’Est de la D788 jusqu’au rond point de Kergompez puis à l’Est de D58
— PLOUENAN- Toute la commune
— MESPAUL- A l’Est de la rivière l’Horn
— PLOUVORN- A l’Est de la D75 puis au Nord de la D19
— GUICLAN- A l’Est d’une ligne passant par les lieux dits Kerdeland, Papillonou, Eglise du bourg de Guiclan et le moulin de Kernabat
— SAINT THEGONNEC LOC EGUINER- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Hellin braz au lieu dit Pont Toulzac’h
— TAULE- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— SAINTE SEVE- Toute la commune
— PLEYBER CHRIST- Au Nord de la D712
— SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS- Toute la commune
— PLOURIN LES MORLAIX- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Moulin des près au lieu dit l’Ermitage
— MORLAIX- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
— PLOUIGNEAU- A l’Ouest d’une ligne allant du Moulin de Tromorgant au lieu dit de Toulgoat
— PLOUEZOC’H- Toute la commune
— SAINT JEAN DU DOIGT- Au Sud de la D78
— PLOUGASNOU- Toute la commune
— CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet
— HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly
— TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769
— LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune
— MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Veneto region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00002 The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.380407317, E 12.166908269 7.11.2024
The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.380407317, E 12.166908269 30.10.2024 – 7.11.2024
Emilia-Romagna region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00003 The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.841417, E 12.076442 23.11.2024
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.841417, E 12.076442 15.11.2024 – 23.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00007 The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.794457, E 12.118517 17.11.2024
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.794457, E 12.118517 9.11.2024 – 17.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00008 The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.752494, E 12.158957 23.11.2024
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.752494, E 12.158957 15.11.2024 – 23.11.2024
Lombardia region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00004 The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.308341, E 10.30903 15.11.2024
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.308341, E 10.30903 7.11.2024 – 15.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00005 The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.416245, E 9.77548400000001 16.11.2024
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.416245, E 9.77548400000001 8.11.2024 – 16.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00006 The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.420518, E 9.77307500000001 17.11.2024
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.420518, E 9.77307500000001 9.11.2024 – 17.11.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Békés vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00015HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00018HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00019 Bucsa, Füzesgyarmat, Kertészsziget és Szeghalom települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe. 5.11.2024
Füzesgyarmat és Szeghalom települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 28.10.2024 – 5.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020 Békésszentandrás, Csabacsűd, Kardos, Örménykút és Szarvas települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107, valamint a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe. 13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Békésszentandrás település közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 28.10.2024 – 13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020 Szarvas település közigazgatási területének a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 5.11.2024 – 13.11.2024
Hajdú-Bihar vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00015HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00018HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00019 Biharnagybajom, Csökmő, Darvas, Nagyrábé, Sárrétudvari és Szerep települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe 5.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017 Biharnagybajom és Sárrétudvari települések közigazgatási területének a 47.151233 és a 21.174322 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 28.10.2024 -5.11.2024
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020 Kunszentmárton, Mesterszállás, Mezőhék, Mezőtúr, Öcsöd és Tiszaföldvár települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107, valamint a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe. 13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016 Mesterszállás és Öcsöd települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 28.10.2024 – 13.11.2024
Csongrád-Csanád vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020 Eperjes és Szentes települések közigazgatási területének a a 46.893317 és a 20.424107, valamint a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021 Baks, Csanytelek, Felgyő és Ópusztaszer települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.Csengele, Kistelek, Pusztaszer és Tömörkény települések védőkörzeten kívül eső teljes közigazgatási területe. 14.11.2024
Pusztaszer és Kistelek települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 6.11.2024 – 14.11.2024
Bács-Kiskun vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021 Gátér és Petőfiszállás települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.Pálmonostora település védőkörzeten kívül eső teljes közigazgatási területe. 14.11.2024
Pálmonostora települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. 6.11.2024 – 14.11.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Oberösterreich
AT-HPAI(P)-2024-00001 im Bezirk Braunau die Katastralgemeinden Auerbach, Irnprechting, Biburg, Hartberg, St. Georgen an der Mattig, Haselreith, Aschau, Feldkirchen bei Mattighofen, Gstaig, Wiesing, Sandthal, Helpfau, Kager, St. Florian, Uttendorf, Jeging, Sauldorf, Siegertshaft, Heiligenstadt, Oberweissau, Oberminathal, Schnellberg, Schweigetsreith, Mauerkirchen, Spitzenberg, Grubedt, Waasen, Achenlohe, Munderfing, Apfenthal, Neukirchen an der Enknach, Pfaffstätt, Erlach, Gschwendt, Pischelsdorf, St. Georgen, Obertreubach und Schalchen 9.11.2024
im Bezirk Braunau die Katastralgemeinden Mattighofen, Humertsham, Furth, Schalchen, Unterlochen und Weinberg 1.11.2024 – 9.11.2024
ADIS reference number of the outbreak Area comprising: Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00027PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00028PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00029 W województwie dolnośląskim:1)w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,b)w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,c)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,d)w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,e)w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek,2)w powiecie wrocławskim, w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Dobroszów Oleśnicki, Dąbrowica,Łosice, Szczodre, Domaszczyn, Olszyca, Domaszczyn Mały, Pruszowice, Bukowina, Bąków,Budziwojowice, Łozina, Tokary, Michałowice, Kępa, Jaksonowice, Bierzyce, Zaprężyn, Krakowiany,Węgrów, Ramiszów, część miejscowości Mirków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonejprzez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, część miejscowości Długołęka położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, częśćmiejscowości Byków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicę Wrocławskąoraz Aleję Czereśniową;3)część miasta Wrocławia położona na północ od linii wyznaczonej przez rzekę Odrę, Starą Odrę orazlinię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica. 1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,b)w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,c)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,d)w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,e)w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek, a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice, b) w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków, c) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków, d) w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną, e) w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek, 2) w powiecie wrocławskim, w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Dobroszów Oleśnicki, Dąbrowica,Łosice, Szczodre, Domaszczyn, Olszyca, Domaszczyn Mały, Pruszowice, Bukowina, Bąków,Budziwojowice, Łozina, Tokary, Michałowice, Kępa, Jaksonowice, Bierzyce, Zaprężyn, Krakowiany,Węgrów, Ramiszów, część miejscowości Mirków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonejprzez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, część miejscowości Długołęka położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, częśćmiejscowości Byków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicę Wrocławskąoraz Aleję Czereśniową; 3) część miasta Wrocławia położona na północ od linii wyznaczonej przez rzekę Odrę, Starą Odrę orazlinię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica. 14.11.2024
1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,b)w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,c)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,d)w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,e)w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek, a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice, b) w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków, c) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków, d) w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną, e) w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek,
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,
b) w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,
c) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,
d) w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,
e) w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek,
2) w powiecie wrocławskim, w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Dobroszów Oleśnicki, Dąbrowica,Łosice, Szczodre, Domaszczyn, Olszyca, Domaszczyn Mały, Pruszowice, Bukowina, Bąków,Budziwojowice, Łozina, Tokary, Michałowice, Kępa, Jaksonowice, Bierzyce, Zaprężyn, Krakowiany,Węgrów, Ramiszów, część miejscowości Mirków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonejprzez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, część miejscowości Długołęka położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, częśćmiejscowości Byków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicę Wrocławskąoraz Aleję Czereśniową;
3) część miasta Wrocławia położona na północ od linii wyznaczonej przez rzekę Odrę, Starą Odrę orazlinię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica.
W województwie dolnośląskim:1)w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;2)w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa. 1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; 2) w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa. 6.11.2024 – 14.11.2024
1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,
b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
2) w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa.
1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,b)w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,c)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,d)w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,e)w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek, a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice, b) w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków, c) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków, d) w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną, e) w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek,
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,
b) w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,
c) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,
d) w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,
e) w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek,
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice,
b) w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków,
c) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej napołudnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków,
d) w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, częśćmiejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicęTrzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną,
e) w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek,
2) w powiecie wrocławskim, w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Dobroszów Oleśnicki, Dąbrowica,Łosice, Szczodre, Domaszczyn, Olszyca, Domaszczyn Mały, Pruszowice, Bukowina, Bąków,Budziwojowice, Łozina, Tokary, Michałowice, Kępa, Jaksonowice, Bierzyce, Zaprężyn, Krakowiany,Węgrów, Ramiszów, część miejscowości Mirków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonejprzez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, część miejscowości Długołęka położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, częśćmiejscowości Byków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicę Wrocławskąoraz Aleję Czereśniową;
3) część miasta Wrocławia położona na północ od linii wyznaczonej przez rzekę Odrę, Starą Odrę orazlinię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica.
1) w powiecie trzebnickim:a)w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,b)w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,
b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
a) w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice,
b) w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo;
2) w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa.
Area comprising: Date until measures are to remain applicable in accordance with Article 3a
* In accordance with the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 5(4) of the Windsor Framework (see Joint Declaration No 1/2023 of the Union and the United Kingdom in the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 24 March 2023,OJ L 102, 17.4.2023, p.87) in conjunction with Annex 2 to that Framework, for the purposes of this Annex, references to Member State include the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (1), and in particular Article 259(1), point (c), thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious viral disease in birds and can have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries. HPAI viruses can infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations. Therefore, the presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept. In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept.
(2) Regulation (EU) 2016/429 establishes the legislative framework for the prevention and control of diseases that are transmissible to animals or humans. HPAI falls within the definition of a listed disease in that Regulation, and it is subject to the disease prevention and control rules laid down therein. In addition, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 (2) supplements Regulation (EU) 2016/429 as regards the rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases, including disease control measures for HPAI.
(3) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 (3) was adopted within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and it lays down emergency measures at Union level in relation to outbreaks of HPAI.
(4) More particularly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 provides that the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones, established by the Member States concerned following outbreaks of HPAI, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection, surveillance and further restricted zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
(5) The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2681 (4) following outbreaks of HPAI in poultry in Bulgaria, Czechia, Germany, France, Italy and Hungary, which needed to be reflected in that Annex.
(6) Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2681, Italy, Hungary. Austria and Poland have notified the Commission of outbreaks of HPAI, in establishments where poultry were kept located in Emilia-Romagna and Lombardy regions in Italy, in Békés and Csongrád-Csanád counties in Hungary, in Oberösterreich federal state in Austria and in Dolnośląskie voivodeship in Poland.
(7) Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland have taken the necessary disease control measures required in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around the outbreaks.
(8) The Commission has examined the disease control measures taken by Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland, and it is satisfied that the boundaries of the protection and surveillances zones established by those Member States are at a sufficient distance from the establishments where the outbreaks of HPAI have been confirmed.
(9) In the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447, there are currently no areas listed as protection and surveillance zones for Austria and Poland.
(10) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at Union level, in collaboration with Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland the protection and surveillance zones duly established by those Member States in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687.
(11) Therefore, the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones for Italy and Hungary in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 should be amended.
(12) In addition, protection and surveillance zones should be listed for Austria and Poland in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447.
(13) Accordingly, the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 should be amended to update regionalisation at Union level to take account of the protection and surveillance zones duly established by Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, and the duration of the measures applicable therein.
(14) Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(15) Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of HPAI, it is important that the amendments to be made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 by this Decision take effect as soon as possible.
(16) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2447 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Part A

Protection zones in the concerned Member States* as referred to in Article 1, point (a), and Article 2:

Member State: Bulgaria

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Plovdiv region
BG-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Rakovski municipality:
—
Stryama
Maritsa municipality:
—
Kalekovets
—
Trilistnik
28.10.2024

Member State: Czechia

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
CZ-HPAI(P)-2024-00007
Pilsen Region:
Kovčín (671541); Loužná (700657); Milčice (671550); Myslív (700665); Nový Dvůr u Myslíva (700681); Žďár u Nalžovských Hor (765465); Nehodiv (700673); Strážovice u Pačejova (717312).
25.10.2024

Member State: Germany

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
SACHSEN
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Landkreis Vogtlandkreis
—
Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26’07.1″N 12°25’02.8″E sind
20.10.2024

Member State: France

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Département Finistère (29):
FR-HPAI(P)-2024-00008
—
CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet
—
HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly
—
TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769
—
LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune
—
MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34
23.10.2024

Member State: Italy

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Veneto region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00002
The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.380407317, E 12.166908269
29.10.2024
Emilia-Romagna region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00003
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.841417, E 12.076442
14.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00007
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.794457, E 12.118517
8.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00008
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.752494, E 12.158957
14.11.2024
Lombardia region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00004
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.308341, E 10.30903
6.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00005
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.416245, E 9.77548400000001
7.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00006
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.420518, E 9.77307500000001
8.11.2024

Member State: Hungary

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Békés vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00015
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00018
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00019
Füzesgyarmat és Szeghalom települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
27.10.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Békésszentandrás település közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
27.10.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020
Szarvas település közigazgatási területének a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
4.11.2024
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Mesterszállás és Öcsöd települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
27.10.2024
Hajdú-Bihar vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017
Biharnagybajom és Sárrétudvari települések közigazgatási területének a 47.151233 és a 21.174322 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
27.10.2024
Csongrád-Csanád vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021
Pusztaszer és Kistelek települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
5.11.2024
Bács-Kiskun vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021
Pálmonostora települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
5.11.2024

Member State: Austria

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Oberösterreich
AT-HPAI(P)-2024-00001
im Bezirk Braunau die Katastralgemeinden Mattighofen, Humertsham, Furth, Schalchen, Unterlochen und Weinberg
31.10.2024

Member State: Poland

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00027
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00028
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00029
W województwie dolnośląskim: 1)
w powiecie trzebnickim: a)
w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b)
w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; 2)
w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa.
5.11.2024

Part B

Surveillance zones in the concerned Member States* as referred to in Article 1, point (a), and Article 3:

Member State: Bulgaria

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
BG-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Maritsa municipality:
—
Yasno pole
—
Dink
—
Krislovo
—
Kalekovets
—
Trud
—
Zhelyazno
—
Voyvodinovo
—
Skutare
—
Rogosh
—
Manole
—
Manolsko Konare
Rakovski municipality:
—
Rakovski
—
Momino selo
Plovdiv municipality:
—
Plovdiv
6.11.2024
Rakovski municipality:
—
Stryama
Maritsa municipality:
—
Kalekovets
—
Trilistnik
29.10.2024 – 6.11.2024

Member State: Czechia

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
CZ-HPAI(P)-2024-00006
Central Bohemian Region
Bezděkov pod Třemšínem (603601); Bor u Březnice (607240); Přední Poříčí (614319); Chraštice (654078); Chrást u Tochovic (653756); Oslí (653772); Hlubyně (639702); Horčápsko (641944); Leletice (679917); Vacíkov (775941); Kamenná u Příbramě (662691); Modřovice (697966); Nestrašovice (761320); Ostrov u Tochovic (715743); Stražiště (722961); Nesvačily pod Třemšínem (703851); Pňovice pod Třemšínem (722839); Rožmitál pod Třemšínem (742848); Skuhrov pod Třemšínem (722847); Strýčkovy (757357); Hoděmyšl (785482); Starosedlský Hrádek (754862); Kletice (761311); Svojšice (761338); Těchařovice (785288); Hořejany (767701); Tochovice (767719); Třebsko (770523); Tušovice (761346); Pročevily (784818); Volenice u Březnice (784826); Vrančice (785296); Vševily (603619); Zalužany (790761).
South Bohemian Region
Boudy (695483); Krsice (623831); Horosedly (644781); Lety (680770); Minice u Mišovic (696188); Lučkovice (695491); Boješice (606898); Kakovice (696170); Mirovice (695726); Ohař (606901); Plíškovice (721875); Touškov (767883); Mišovice (696196); Pohoří u Mirovic (696200); Myslín (700631); Dolní Nerestce (703699); Horní Nerestce (703702); Rakovice (623849); Bezdědovice (603457); Bělčice (601870); Hostišovice (645796); Podruhlí (645818); Tisov (767191); Újezdec u Bělčic (774031); Záhrobí (790281); Závišín u Bělčic (791288); Drahenický Málkov (631558); Skaličany (748005); Chobot (775754); Hornosín (644765); Kožlí u Myštic (700835); Myštice (700851); Vahlovice (700894); Výšice (700908); Uzenice (775771); Uzeničky (775789).
2.11.2024
Central Bohemian Region
Březnice (614271); Martinice u Březnice (692085); Drahenice (631540); Hudčice (649236); Koupě (671207); Počaply u Březnice (722952); Bubovice u Březnice (784800).
South Bohemian Region
Ráztely (721883); Svučice (761621).
10.10.2024- 2.11.2024
CZ-HPAI(P)-2024-00007
Pilsen Region:
Břežany (614891); Hnačov (721450); Horažďovická Lhota (770213); Třebomyslice u Horažďovic (770221); Hradešice (647420); Smrkovec u Hradešic (647438); Černice u Defurových Lažan (625345); Defurovy Lažany (625353); Dobrotice u Chanovic (650617); Holkovice (650625); Chanovice (650633); Újezd u Chanovic (625361); Chlumy (651851); Podhůří u Nepomuka (723801); Řesanice (664324); Klášter u Nepomuka (665495); Kozlovice u Nepomuka (671746); Kramolín u Nepomuka (673099); Kvášňovice (678228); Malý Bor (691399); Maňovice u Pačejova (717282); Bezděkovec (694541); Maňovice (694550); Mileč (694568); Záhoří u Milče (694576); Želvice (694584); Mlýnské Struhadlo (773964); Mohelnice u Nepomuka (697982); Letovy (695815); Nalžovské Hory (701521); Neprochovy (703524); Těchonice (765457); Velenovy (777803); Nekvasovy (702757); Dvorec (703460); Nepomuk (703478); Klikařov (704211); Neurazy (704229); Nová Ves u Nepomuka (705942); Radochovy (738191); Soběsuky u Nepomuka (751855); Vojovice (784613); Olšany u Kvášňovic (678236); Kotouň (713023); Nová Ves u Horažďovic (713031); Oselce (713040); Pačejov (717304); Týřovice u Pačejova (717321); Velešice u Pačejova (717339); Bližanovy (687588); Kvasetice (687596); Lovčice u Klatov (687600); Mlynářovice (773956); Plánice (721476); Pohoří u Lovčic (687618); Štipoklasy u Lovčic (687626); Polánka u Nepomuka (725056); Třebčice (697991); Tužice (791326); Újezd u Plánice (773972); Jetenovice (779521); Velký Bor u Horažďovic (779539); Plichtice (791300); Skránčice (791318); Zavlekov (791334); Zborovy (721484).
3.11.2024
Pilsen Region:
Kovčín (671541); Loužná (700657); Milčice (671550); Myslív (700665); Nový Dvůr u Myslíva (700681); Žďár u Nalžovských Hor (765465); Nehodiv (700673); Strážovice u Pačejova (717312).
26.10.2024 – 3.11.2024

Member State: Germany

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00013
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00014
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00015
SACHSEN
Landkreis Leipzig
beginnend von der Ländergrenze zu Sachsen-Anhalt auf der Höhe der B87 bis Ortseingang Döhlen, den Ortsteil Döhlen einschließend, nordöstlich nach Quesitz und den Ortsteil Quesitz einschließend, südlich des Solarparks den Pappelweg östlich entlang bis zur Abzweigung nach Markranstädt, dieser nördlich folgend und dann südlich des Stadions Südstraße Markranstädt weiter östlich zur Südstraße Markranstädt, anschließend das Waldgebiet nordwestlich/nördlich des Gewerbegebiets GE 3 Nord und nördlich der Siebenschachthäuser mit der Waldgrenze einschließend bis zur Landkreisgrenze Stadt Leipzig im Seegebiet Kulkwitzer See; die westliche, nördliche und östliche Grenze des Beobachtungsgebiets entspricht der Landkreisgrenze
Landkreis Nordsachsen
—
Gemeinde Wiedemar: Ortsteil Rabutz: Südlich Kretschiner Weg, Südlich Teichstraße; Ortsteil Werlitzsch: Südlich Straße K7433 bis Autobahn A9, westlich Autobahn A9
—
Gemeinde Schkeuditz: Ortsteil Kursdorf: südlich Autobahn A14, Ortsteil Schkeuditz, Ortsteil Kleinliebenau, Ortsteil Dölzig
Stadt Leipzig
beginnend mit der Stadtgrenze, entlang am Fahrradweg Neue Luppe, Am Pfingstanger, Lützschenaer Straße, einschließlich Jakobiwinkel und Mühlenplatz, Weiter über Burghausener Straße, Gundorfer Straße, Miltitzer Straße, Bahnschienen ab KGV „Dr. Karl Foerster e.V.“, endend mit der Stadtgrenze
SACHSEN-ANHALT
Landkreis Saalekreis
betroffene Gemarkungen: Dieskau, Dölbau, Gröbers, Großkugel, Schkopau, Döllnitz, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz, Luppenau, Merseburg, Meuschau, Wallendorf, Zöschen, Zweimen, Horburg-Maßlau, Kötschlitz, Günthersdorf, Rodden, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Leuna, Spergau, Bad Dürrenberg, Tollwitz, Nempitz
Stadt Halle (Saale)
Alle Bereiche der Stadtviertel Radewell/Osendorf und Planena, die südöstlich der folgenden Linie liegen:
Bahnlinie Halle-Ammendorf nach Schkopau bis Regensburger Straße, Regensburger Straße bis Straße der Bergarbeiter, Straße der Bergarbeiter bis zum Weg um den Osendorfer See, mündend an der Straße Am Tagebau
Burgenlandkreis
Gemarkung Lützen: nordwestlich der B87 zwischen Gustav-Adolf-Gedenkstätte Lützen und Kreisgrenze
Gemarkung Wengelsdorf: nordöstlich vom Rittergut und der Auenstraße bis zur Kreisgrenze
21.10.2024
SACHSEN-ANHALT
Landkreis Saalekreis
—
Gemarkung Wallendorf, Zöschen und Zweimen
—
teilweise betroffen: Gemarkung Kötzschlitz, Kötzschau, Kreypau, Friedensdorf, Luppenau, Burgliebenau, Lochau, Raßnitz, Röglitz, Ermlitz und Horburg-Maßlau:
—
beginnend am Wallendorfer See, auf Höhe der westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Wallendorf, dem die Wasserflächen Wallendorfer See und Kiesgrube Merseburg Ost einschließenden nordwestlich umrundenden Feldweg bis zum südlichen Deichfeldweg der Weißen Elster folgend, Deichfeldweg Richtung Osten bis Höhe der Elsterbrücke vor Ermlitz, in südlicher Richtung dem Feldweg folgend bis Burgauenstraße, auf der Straße ein kurzes Stück westlich, danach dem nächsten Feldweg in Richtung Südosten folgend bis Kötschlitzer Allee, der südlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Horburg-Maßlau nach Westen folgend bis zur östlichen Gemarkungsgrenze von Zweimen, dieser südlich folgend bis Höhe Klinkengraben, Ortslage Kötschlitz auslassend, Ortslage Zschöchergen einschließend, bis Höhe Saale-Elster-Kanal; den Kanal kreuzend, Gemarkungsgrenze Kötschlitz Richtung Süden und Westen folgend, auf Gemarkungsgrenze Zweimen übergehend, dieser westlich folgend bis Gemarkungsgrenze Zöschen, dieser westlich folgend bis Hochspannungsleitung, Gemarkung Kötzschau schneidend der Hochspannungsleitung südlich folgend, Ortslage Schladebach und alle weiteren Ortslagen der Gemarkung Kötzschau ausschließend; vor Schladebach in Richtung Westen, die Kiesgrube und das gesamte Feuchtgebiet einschließend, östlich vor Wüsteneutzsch der Feuchtgebietsgrenze nach Norden folgend bis L184, L184 folgend bis zur westlichen Gemarkungsgrenze Wallendorf, dieser folgend bis zum Wallendorfer See.
12.10.2024 – 21.10.2024
DE-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
SACHSEN
Landkreis Vogtlandkreis
—
Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Klingenthal, Schöneck/Vogtl., Grünbach, Werda, Neustadt/Vogtl., Bergen, Falkenstein/Vogtl., Ellefeld, Rodewisch und Auerbach die über das in der Schutzzone beschriebene Gebiet hinausgehen und innerhalb des Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26’07.1″N 12°25’02.8″E sind
Landkreis Erzgebirgskreis
—
Teile der Gemeinden Schönheide und Eibenstock, die innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 10 km liegen, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26’07.1″N 12°25’02.8″E sind
29.10.2024
Landkreis Vogtlandkreis
—
Teile der Gemeinden Muldenhammer, Grünbach, Falkenstein/Vogtl. und Auerbach innerhalb eines Kreises mit einem Radius von 3 km, dessen Mittelpunkt die GPS-Koordinaten 50°26’07.1″N 12°25’02.8″E sind
21.10.2024 -29.10.2024

Member State: France

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Département Finistère (29):
FR-HPAI(P)-2024-00008
—
CARANTEC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
—
HENVIC- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
—
SAINT POL DE LEON- A l’Est de la D788 jusqu’au rond point de Kergompez puis à l’Est de D58
—
PLOUENAN- Toute la commune
—
MESPAUL- A l’Est de la rivière l’Horn
—
PLOUVORN- A l’Est de la D75 puis au Nord de la D19
—
GUICLAN- A l’Est d’une ligne passant par les lieux dits Kerdeland, Papillonou, Eglise du bourg de Guiclan et le moulin de Kernabat
—
SAINT THEGONNEC LOC EGUINER- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Hellin braz au lieu dit Pont Toulzac’h
—
TAULE- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
—
SAINTE SEVE- Toute la commune
—
PLEYBER CHRIST- Au Nord de la D712
—
SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS- Toute la commune
—
PLOURIN LES MORLAIX- Au Nord d’une ligne allant du lieu dit Moulin des près au lieu dit l’Ermitage
—
MORLAIX- Le reste de la commune non couvert par la ZP
—
PLOUIGNEAU- A l’Ouest d’une ligne allant du Moulin de Tromorgant au lieu dit de Toulgoat
—
PLOUEZOC’H- Toute la commune
—
SAINT JEAN DU DOIGT- Au Sud de la D78
—
PLOUGASNOU- Toute la commune
1.11.2024
—
CARANTEC- Au Sud Est d’une ligne allant du Lieu dit Roch’ c’hlaz au lieu dit Kerlouquet
—
HENVIC- A l’Est du cours d’eau passant par le lieu dit de Kerilly
—
TAULE- A l’Est de la route communale qui relie le lieu dit Ty pont au lieu dit la Penzé, puis au Nord de la D769
—
LOCQUENOLE- Toute la commune
—
MORLAIX- A l’Ouest du GR34
24.10.2024 – 1.11.2024

Member State: Italy

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Veneto region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00002
The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.380407317, E 12.166908269
7.11.2024
The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.380407317, E 12.166908269
30.10.2024 – 7.11.2024
Emilia-Romagna region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00003
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.841417, E 12.076442
23.11.2024
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.841417, E 12.076442
15.11.2024 – 23.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00007
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.794457, E 12.118517
17.11.2024
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.794457, E 12.118517
9.11.2024 – 17.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00008
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.752494, E 12.158957
23.11.2024
The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.752494, E 12.158957
15.11.2024 – 23.11.2024
Lombardia region:
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00004
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.308341, E 10.30903
15.11.2024
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.308341, E 10.30903
7.11.2024 – 15.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00005
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.416245, E 9.77548400000001
16.11.2024
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.416245, E 9.77548400000001
8.11.2024 – 16.11.2024
IT-HPAI(P)-2024-00006
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.420518, E 9.77307500000001
17.11.2024
The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 45.420518, E 9.77307500000001
9.11.2024 – 17.11.2024

Member State: Hungary

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Békés vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00015
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00018
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00019
Bucsa, Füzesgyarmat, Kertészsziget és Szeghalom települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe.
5.11.2024
Füzesgyarmat és Szeghalom települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
28.10.2024 – 5.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020
Békésszentandrás, Csabacsűd, Kardos, Örménykút és Szarvas települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107, valamint a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe.
13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Békésszentandrás település közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
28.10.2024 – 13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020
Szarvas település közigazgatási területének a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
5.11.2024 – 13.11.2024
Hajdú-Bihar vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00015
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00018
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00019
Biharnagybajom, Csökmő, Darvas, Nagyrábé, Sárrétudvari és Szerep települések közigazgatási területének a 47.125795 és a 21.189828, a 47.151233 és a 21.174322, a 47.130782 és a 21.191448, valamint a 47.127623 és a 21.190594 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe
5.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00017
Biharnagybajom és Sárrétudvari települések közigazgatási területének a 47.151233 és a 21.174322 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
28.10.2024 -5.11.2024
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020
Kunszentmárton, Mesterszállás, Mezőhék, Mezőtúr, Öcsöd és Tiszaföldvár települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107, valamint a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül és védőkörzeten kívül eső területe.
13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
Mesterszállás és Öcsöd települések közigazgatási területének a 46.893317 és a 20.424107 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
28.10.2024 – 13.11.2024
Csongrád-Csanád vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00016
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00020
Eperjes és Szentes települések közigazgatási területének a a 46.893317 és a 20.424107, valamint a 46.851265 és a 20.590212 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
13.11.2024
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021
Baks, Csanytelek, Felgyő és Ópusztaszer települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
Csengele, Kistelek, Pusztaszer és Tömörkény települések védőkörzeten kívül eső teljes közigazgatási területe.
14.11.2024
Pusztaszer és Kistelek települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
6.11.2024 – 14.11.2024
Bács-Kiskun vármegye
HU-HPAI(P)-2024-00021
Gátér és Petőfiszállás települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
Pálmonostora település védőkörzeten kívül eső teljes közigazgatási területe.
14.11.2024
Pálmonostora települések közigazgatási területének a 46.553900 és a 19.983400 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
6.11.2024 – 14.11.2024

Member State: Austria

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
Oberösterreich
AT-HPAI(P)-2024-00001
im Bezirk Braunau die Katastralgemeinden Auerbach, Irnprechting, Biburg, Hartberg, St. Georgen an der Mattig, Haselreith, Aschau, Feldkirchen bei Mattighofen, Gstaig, Wiesing, Sandthal, Helpfau, Kager, St. Florian, Uttendorf, Jeging, Sauldorf, Siegertshaft, Heiligenstadt, Oberweissau, Oberminathal, Schnellberg, Schweigetsreith, Mauerkirchen, Spitzenberg, Grubedt, Waasen, Achenlohe, Munderfing, Apfenthal, Neukirchen an der Enknach, Pfaffstätt, Erlach, Gschwendt, Pischelsdorf, St. Georgen, Obertreubach und Schalchen
9.11.2024
im Bezirk Braunau die Katastralgemeinden Mattighofen, Humertsham, Furth, Schalchen, Unterlochen und Weinberg
1.11.2024 – 9.11.2024

Member State: Poland

ADIS reference number of the outbreak
Area comprising:
Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00027
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00028
PL-HPAI(P)-2024-00029
W województwie dolnośląskim: 1)
w powiecie trzebnickim: a)
w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Krzyżanowice, Raków, Cienin, Psary, Szymanów,
Kryniczno, Rogoż, Szewce, Biskupice, b)
w gminie Oborniki Śląskie, miejscowości: Zajączków, Wilczyn, Borkowice, Kowale, Swaratowice,
Paniowice, Pęgów, Kotowice, Golędzinów, Oborniki Śląskie, Kuraszków, Przecławice, Lubnów, Nowosielce, Piekary, Raków, c)
w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Skarszyn, Boleścin, Piotrowice, Piersno, Raszów,
Węgrzynów, Droszów, Malczów, Rzepotowice, Marcinowo, Nowy Dwór, Księginice, Jaszyce,
Cerekwica, Sulisławice, Świątniki, miasto Trzebnica, cześć miejscowości Masłów położonej na
południe od linii wyznaczonej przez drogę łączącą miejscowości Ligota i Kałowice, Małuszyn,
Kobylice, Szczytkowice, Ligota, Brzyków, d)
w gminie Zawonia, miejscowości: Kałowice, Sucha Wielka, Pstrzejowice, Sędzice, Sucha Mała,
Tarnowiec, Cielętniki, Cegielnia, Czachowo, Głuchów Dolny, Radłów, Skotniki, Miłonowice, część
miejscowości Zawonia położonej na południowy zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicę
Trzebnicką i ulicę Szkolną, e)
w gminie Prusice, miejscowości: Kosinowo, Kopaszyn, Pawłów Trzebnicki, Świerzów, Wszemirów, Żłobki, Kuraszówek, 2)
w powiecie wrocławskim, w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Dobroszów Oleśnicki, Dąbrowica,
Łosice, Szczodre, Domaszczyn, Olszyca, Domaszczyn Mały, Pruszowice, Bukowina, Bąków,
Budziwojowice, Łozina, Tokary, Michałowice, Kępa, Jaksonowice, Bierzyce, Zaprężyn, Krakowiany,
Węgrów, Ramiszów, część miejscowości Mirków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej
przez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, część miejscowości Długołęka położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica, część
miejscowości Byków położonej na północny zachód od linii wyznaczonej przez ulicę Wrocławską
oraz Aleję Czereśniową; 3)
część miasta Wrocławia położona na północ od linii wyznaczonej przez rzekę Odrę, Starą Odrę oraz
linię kolejową Wrocław Nadodrze – Oleśnica.
14.11.2024
W województwie dolnośląskim: 1)
w powiecie trzebnickim: a)
w gminie Wisznia Mała, miejscowości: Pierwoszów, Małe Siedliczki, Wisznia Mała, Ligota Piękna, Malin, Kalina, Wysoki Kościół, Machnice, Strzeszów, Piotrkowiczki, Mienice, Ozorowice, b)
w gminie Trzebnica, miejscowości: Brochocin, Taczów Mały, Głuchów Górny, Taczów Wielki, Będkowo; 2)
w powiecie wrocławskim w gminie Długołęka, miejscowości: Siedlec, Pasikurowice, Godzieszowa.
6.11.2024 – 14.11.2024

Part C

Further restricted zones in the concerned Member States* as referred to in Article 1, point (b), and Article 4:

Member State: None

Area comprising:
Date until measures are to remain applicable in accordance with Article 3a

*
In accordance with the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 5(4) of the Windsor Framework (see Joint Declaration No 1/2023 of the Union and the United Kingdom in the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 24 March 2023, OJ L 102, 17.4.2023, p.87) in conjunction with Annex 2 to that Framework, for the purposes of this Annex, references to Member State include the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2740 of 24 October 2024 granting a derogation allowing Ireland to use means other than electronic data-processing techniques for the exchange and storage of information for the release into free circulation of goods in postal consignments availing of relief under Articles 25 to 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 sent by a private individual in the United Kingdom to a private individual in Ireland (notified under document C(2024) 7322)

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2740 28.10.2024
(1) Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 requires that all exchanges of information between customs authorities and between economic operators and customs authorities, and the storage of such information, as required under the customs legislation, be made using electronic data-processing techniques.
(2) Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 provides for the possibility to adopt decisions in exceptional cases to allow one or several Member States to derogate from using electronic data processing techniques for the exchange and storage of information, if such derogation is justified by the specific situation of the requesting Member State and is granted for a specific period of time.
(3) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2879(2)establishes the work programme relating to the development and deployment of the electronic systems provided for in the Union Customs Code (‘the work programme’). The work programme lists the electronic systems to be developed and the dates on which those systems are expected to become operational. It also specifies the implementation and dates of deployment for the National Import System (‘NIS’) and component 2 of the Special Procedures that together cover the customs procedures for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union in accordance with Articles 158, 162, 163, 166, 167, 170 to 174, 201, 240, 250, 254 and 256 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. It also specifies the implementation and dates of deployment of the various ‘steps’ of Release 3 of the Import Control System 2 (‘ICS2’) in accordance with Article 6(1), Articles 16, 46, 47 and 127 to 132, of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
(4) In accordance with Articles 143a and 144 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446(3), import declarations for release for free circulation of consignments of low value by postal operators are to be lodged in Member States’ National Import systems.
(5) Furthermore, Article 278(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 specifies the deadline until which means other than the electronic data-processing techniques may be used on a transitional basis to implement the provisions related to the customs declaration in relation to goods brought into the customs territory of the Union.
(6) Although Ireland has deployed the necessary electronic systems on time, in compliance with the deadlines specified in the work programme, the postal operator in Ireland is not yet in a position to comply fully with the requirements of Articles 143a and 144 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 and Article 278(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. This is due to an exceptional circumstance caused by the United Kingdom’s postal operator’s inability to provide sufficient data to the Irish postal operator to allow for the creation of an electronic import declaration, for certain goods in postal consignments, benefiting from relief from customs duty and taxes under Articles 25, 26 and 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009(4)and Articles 1 and 2 of Council Directive 2006/79/EC(5)(‘gift relief’). This concerns such goods where they are sent by private individuals in the United Kingdom to private individuals in Ireland.
(7) The specific historical and geographical relationship between Ireland and the United Kingdom and the high volumes of consignments benefitting from gift relief the Irish postal operator receives from private individuals in the United Kingdom on a daily basis, justifies the granting of a derogation in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, requested by the customs authority of Ireland on 5 March 2024. Therefore, such derogation should temporarily allow Ireland to use means other than electronic data-processing techniques for the exchange and storage of information in relation to the release for free circulation of goods in postal consignments, benefiting from gift relief and sent by private individuals in the United Kingdom to private individuals in Ireland.
(8) In applying this Decision, the customs authority of Ireland should continue to request presentation of consignments to customs where the data provided by the United Kingdom postal operator is incomplete or not of sufficient quality to submit an electronic declaration and to carry out physical controls for risk-assessment purposes on those consignments.
(9) The duration of the derogation should be based on the deadline for the implementation of the obligations related to release 3 of ICS2, specified in the Annex to the work programme as 1 September 2025, and in accordance with Article 127 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and Article 183 (1a), points (a) and (b), of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447(6).
(10) From that date, the obligation to lodge an entry summary declaration will supersede the requirement to create an electronic import declaration. Postal operators, including the UK postal operator, are to lodge entry summary declarations using ICS2 which should provide the Irish postal operator with sufficient data to create an electronic import declaration. Where the data received after that date is not sufficient to create an electronic import declaration, Ireland would be expected to capture the data manually from the CN22/CN23 form provided, or to return the consignments.
(11) In accordance with the request submitted by Ireland, and in line with the emergence of the realities of the specific situation facing Ireland, upon which this Decision is based, this Decision should apply retroactively from 1 April 2024 and it should apply until 1 September 2025, at the latest,
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (1), and in particular Article 6(4) in conjunction with Article 8(2) thereof,
After consulting the Customs Code Committee,
Whereas:
(1) Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 requires that all exchanges of information between customs authorities and between economic operators and customs authorities, and the storage of such information, as required under the customs legislation, be made using electronic data-processing techniques.
(2) Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 provides for the possibility to adopt decisions in exceptional cases to allow one or several Member States to derogate from using electronic data processing techniques for the exchange and storage of information, if such derogation is justified by the specific situation of the requesting Member State and is granted for a specific period of time.
(3) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2879 (2) establishes the work programme relating to the development and deployment of the electronic systems provided for in the Union Customs Code (‘the work programme’). The work programme lists the electronic systems to be developed and the dates on which those systems are expected to become operational. It also specifies the implementation and dates of deployment for the National Import System (‘NIS’) and component 2 of the Special Procedures that together cover the customs procedures for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union in accordance with Articles 158, 162, 163, 166, 167, 170 to 174, 201, 240, 250, 254 and 256 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. It also specifies the implementation and dates of deployment of the various ‘steps’ of Release 3 of the Import Control System 2 (‘ICS2’) in accordance with Article 6(1), Articles 16, 46, 47 and 127 to 132, of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
(4) In accordance with Articles 143a and 144 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 (3), import declarations for release for free circulation of consignments of low value by postal operators are to be lodged in Member States’ National Import systems.
(5) Furthermore, Article 278(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 specifies the deadline until which means other than the electronic data-processing techniques may be used on a transitional basis to implement the provisions related to the customs declaration in relation to goods brought into the customs territory of the Union.
(6) Although Ireland has deployed the necessary electronic systems on time, in compliance with the deadlines specified in the work programme, the postal operator in Ireland is not yet in a position to comply fully with the requirements of Articles 143a and 144 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 and Article 278(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. This is due to an exceptional circumstance caused by the United Kingdom’s postal operator’s inability to provide sufficient data to the Irish postal operator to allow for the creation of an electronic import declaration, for certain goods in postal consignments, benefiting from relief from customs duty and taxes under Articles 25, 26 and 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 (4) and Articles 1 and 2 of Council Directive 2006/79/EC (5) (‘gift relief’). This concerns such goods where they are sent by private individuals in the United Kingdom to private individuals in Ireland.
(7) The specific historical and geographical relationship between Ireland and the United Kingdom and the high volumes of consignments benefitting from gift relief the Irish postal operator receives from private individuals in the United Kingdom on a daily basis, justifies the granting of a derogation in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, requested by the customs authority of Ireland on 5 March 2024. Therefore, such derogation should temporarily allow Ireland to use means other than electronic data-processing techniques for the exchange and storage of information in relation to the release for free circulation of goods in postal consignments, benefiting from gift relief and sent by private individuals in the United Kingdom to private individuals in Ireland.
(8) In applying this Decision, the customs authority of Ireland should continue to request presentation of consignments to customs where the data provided by the United Kingdom postal operator is incomplete or not of sufficient quality to submit an electronic declaration and to carry out physical controls for risk-assessment purposes on those consignments.
(9) The duration of the derogation should be based on the deadline for the implementation of the obligations related to release 3 of ICS2, specified in the Annex to the work programme as 1 September 2025, and in accordance with Article 127 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and Article 183 (1a), points (a) and (b), of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 (6).
(10) From that date, the obligation to lodge an entry summary declaration will supersede the requirement to create an electronic import declaration. Postal operators, including the UK postal operator, are to lodge entry summary declarations using ICS2 which should provide the Irish postal operator with sufficient data to create an electronic import declaration. Where the data received after that date is not sufficient to create an electronic import declaration, Ireland would be expected to capture the data manually from the CN22/CN23 form provided, or to return the consignments.
(11) In accordance with the request submitted by Ireland, and in line with the emergence of the realities of the specific situation facing Ireland, upon which this Decision is based, this Decision should apply retroactively from 1 April 2024 and it should apply until 1 September 2025, at the latest,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
By way of derogation from Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, and Articles 143a and 144 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, where the electronic data provided by the United Kingdom postal operator is insufficient to create an electronic import declaration, the customs authority of Ireland shall allow its national postal operator to release goods in postal consignments for free circulation without submitting an electronic import declaration in their National Import system, provided the goods benefit from relief under Articles 25 to 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 and Articles 1 and 2 of Directive 2006/79/EC and are sent by a private individual in the United Kingdom to a private individual in Ireland.
Such goods shall continue to be presented to customs and may be subject to physical controls for risk assessment purposes.
This Decision shall apply from 1 April 2024 until 1 September 2025, or until such time as Ireland is in a position to comply with the requirements of Articles 143a and 144 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, whichever date is sooner.
This Decision is addressed to Ireland.

Council Decision (EU) 2024/2738 of 10 October 2024 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the authorities of the Republic of Armenia competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2738 31.10.2024
(1) Articles 47(1) and 52(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)provide that Eurojust may establish and maintain cooperation with authorities of third countries on the basis of a cooperation strategy.
(2) Pursuant to Article 56(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 Eurojust may transfer personal data to an authority of a third country provided that, inter alia, an international agreement has been concluded between the Union and that third country pursuant to Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) that provides for adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.
(3) In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2024/447(3), the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the authorities of the Republic of Armenia competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 5 April 2024, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
(4) The Agreement enables the transfer of personal data between Eurojust and the competent authorities of the Republic of Armenia, with a view to fighting serious crime and terrorism and protecting the security of the Union and its citizens.
(5) The Agreement ensures full respect of the fundamental rights of the Union, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to the protection of personal data, and the right to an effective remedy and a fair trial, laid down in Articles 7, 8 and 47 of the Charter of Fundament Rights of the European Union, respectively. In particular, the Agreement includes adequate safeguards for the protection of personal data transferred by Eurojust under the Agreement.
(6) Pursuant to Article 218(7) TFEU, it is appropriate that the Council authorise the Commission to approve on the Union’s behalf the modifications of Annexes I, II and III to the Agreement, to agree modalities for the continued use and storage of the information that has already been communicated between the Parties pursuant to the Agreement, and to update the information about the addressee of notifications.
(7) Ireland is bound by Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 and is therefore taking part in the adoption of this Decision.
(8) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(9) The European Data Protection Supervisor delivered its opinion 52/2023 on 11 December 2023.
(10) The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 16(2) and Article 85, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),
Whereas:
(1) Articles 47(1) and 52(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) provide that Eurojust may establish and maintain cooperation with authorities of third countries on the basis of a cooperation strategy.
(2) Pursuant to Article 56(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 Eurojust may transfer personal data to an authority of a third country provided that, inter alia, an international agreement has been concluded between the Union and that third country pursuant to Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) that provides for adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.
(3) In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2024/447 (3), the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the authorities of the Republic of Armenia competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 5 April 2024, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
(4) The Agreement enables the transfer of personal data between Eurojust and the competent authorities of the Republic of Armenia, with a view to fighting serious crime and terrorism and protecting the security of the Union and its citizens.
(5) The Agreement ensures full respect of the fundamental rights of the Union, in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to the protection of personal data, and the right to an effective remedy and a fair trial, laid down in Articles 7, 8 and 47 of the Charter of Fundament Rights of the European Union, respectively. In particular, the Agreement includes adequate safeguards for the protection of personal data transferred by Eurojust under the Agreement.
(6) Pursuant to Article 218(7) TFEU, it is appropriate that the Council authorise the Commission to approve on the Union’s behalf the modifications of Annexes I, II and III to the Agreement, to agree modalities for the continued use and storage of the information that has already been communicated between the Parties pursuant to the Agreement, and to update the information about the addressee of notifications.
(7) Ireland is bound by Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 and is therefore taking part in the adoption of this Decision.
(8) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(9) The European Data Protection Supervisor delivered its opinion 52/2023 on 11 December 2023.
(10) The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the authorities of the Republic of Armenia competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters (‘the Agreement’) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 29(2) of the Agreement (4).
1. For the purposes of Article 30(2) of the Agreement, the position to be taken on behalf of the Union on the modifications of Annexes I, II and III to the Agreement shall be approved by the Commission after consultation with the Council.

2. For the purpose of Article 33(3) of the Agreement, the Commission shall be authorised, after consultation with the Council, to agree modalities for the continued use and storage of the information that has already been communicated before the termination of the Agreement between the Parties pursuant to the Agreement.

3. For the purpose of Article 34(2) of the Agreement, the Commission shall be authorised to update the information about the addressee of notifications made in accordance with the Agreement after consultation with the Council.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Decision (EU) 2024/2734 of 21 October 2024 on the financial contributions to be paid by the parties to the European Development Fund as a third instalment for 2024

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2734 22.10.2024
(1) In accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1877, the European Investment Bank (EIB) is to send to the Commission its updated estimates of commitments and payments under the instruments it manages.
(2) In accordance with Article 19(5) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1877, the Commission is to present a proposal by 10 October 2024, specifying the amount of the third instalment of the contribution for 2024.
(3) Pursuant to Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1877, calls for contributions are to first use up the amounts provided for in previous European Development Funds (EDF). Therefore, a call for funds pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1877 should be made for the EIB and for the Commission.
(4) Pursuant to Article 152 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Withdrawal Agreement’), the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the ‘United Kingdom’) is to remain party to the EDF until the closure of the 11th EDF and all previous unclosed EDFs. However, pursuant to Article 153 of the Withdrawal Agreement, the United Kingdom’s share in decommitted funds from projects under the 11th EDF, where those funds have been decommitted after 31 December 2020, or previous EDFs is not to be reused.
(5) Council Decision (EU) 2023/2586(3)sets the annual amount of the contribution to be paid by the parties to the EDF for 2024 at EUR 1 200 000 000 for the Commission, and at EUR 300 000 000 for the EIB.
(6) In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Decision, this Decision should enter into force on the day of its publication in theOfficial Journal of the European Union,
(a) for the Commission, EUR 250 000 000; and
(b) for the European Investment Bank (EIB), EUR 100 000 000.
MEMBER STATES & UK Key 11th EDF % 3rd instalment 2024 (EUR) Total
Commission EIB
11th EDF 11th EDF
BELGIUM 3,24927 8 123 175 3 249 270 11 372 445
BULGARIA 0,21853 546 325 218 530 764 855
CZECHIA 0,79745 1 993 625 797 450 2 791 075
DENMARK 1,98045 4 951 125 1 980 450 6 931 575
GERMANY 20,57980 51 449 500 20 579 800 72 029 300
ESTONIA 0,08635 215 875 86 350 302 225
IRELAND 0,94006 2 350 150 940 060 3 290 210
GREECE 1,50735 3 768 375 1 507 350 5 275 725
SPAIN 7,93248 19 831 200 7 932 480 27 763 680
FRANCE 17,81269 44 531 725 17 812 690 62 344 415
CROATIA 0,22518 562 950 225 180 788 130
ITALY 12,53009 31 325 225 12 530 090 43 855 315
CYPRUS 0,11162 279 050 111 620 390 670
LATVIA 0,11612 290 300 116 120 406 420
LITHUANIA 0,18077 451 925 180 770 632 695
LUXEMBOURG 0,25509 637 725 255 090 892 815
HUNGARY 0,61456 1 536 400 614 560 2 150 960
MALTA 0,03801 95 025 38 010 133 035
NETHERLANDS 4,77678 11 941 950 4 776 780 16 718 730
AUSTRIA 2,39757 5 993 925 2 397 570 8 391 495
POLAND 2,00734 5 018 350 2 007 340 7 025 690
PORTUGAL 1,19679 2 991 975 1 196 790 4 188 765
ROMANIA 0,71815 1 795 375 718 150 2 513 525
SLOVENIA 0,22452 561 300 224 520 785 820
SLOVAKIA 0,37616 940 400 376 160 1 316 560
FINLAND 1,50909 3 772 725 1 509 090 5 281 815
SWEDEN 2,93911 7 347 775 2 939 110 10 286 885
UNITED KINGDOM(*1) 14,67862 36 696 550 14 678 620 51 375 170
TOTAL EU-27 & UK 100,00 250 000 000 100 000 000 350 000 000
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union applies (1), and in particular Article 7(2) in conjunction with Article 14(3) thereof,
Having regard to the Council Regulation (EU) 2018/1877 of 26 November 2018 on the financial regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2015/323 (2), and in particular Article 19(5) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) In accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1877, the European Investment Bank (EIB) is to send to the Commission its updated estimates of commitments and payments under the instruments it manages.
(2) In accordance with Article 19(5) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1877, the Commission is to present a proposal by 10 October 2024, specifying the amount of the third instalment of the contribution for 2024.
(3) Pursuant to Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1877, calls for contributions are to first use up the amounts provided for in previous European Development Funds (EDF). Therefore, a call for funds pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1877 should be made for the EIB and for the Commission.
(4) Pursuant to Article 152 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Withdrawal Agreement’), the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the ‘United Kingdom’) is to remain party to the EDF until the closure of the 11th EDF and all previous unclosed EDFs. However, pursuant to Article 153 of the Withdrawal Agreement, the United Kingdom’s share in decommitted funds from projects under the 11th EDF, where those funds have been decommitted after 31 December 2020, or previous EDFs is not to be reused.
(5) Council Decision (EU) 2023/2586 (3) sets the annual amount of the contribution to be paid by the parties to the EDF for 2024 at EUR 1 200 000 000 for the Commission, and at EUR 300 000 000 for the EIB.
(6) In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Decision, this Decision should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The amount of the contributions to be paid by the parties to the European Development Fund (EDF) as the third instalment for 2024 is hereby set at EUR 350 000 000. It shall be paid as follows:

(a) for the Commission, EUR 250 000 000; and
(b) for the European Investment Bank (EIB), EUR 100 000 000.

The individual EDF contributions shall be paid by the parties to the EDF to the Commission and to the EIB as the third instalment for 2024, as set out in the Annex.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

MEMBER STATES & UK
Key 11th EDF %
3rd instalment 2024 (EUR)
Total
Commission
EIB
11th EDF
11th EDF
BELGIUM
3,24927
8 123 175
3 249 270
11 372 445
BULGARIA
0,21853
546 325
218 530
764 855
CZECHIA
0,79745
1 993 625
797 450
2 791 075
DENMARK
1,98045
4 951 125
1 980 450
6 931 575
GERMANY
20,57980
51 449 500
20 579 800
72 029 300
ESTONIA
0,08635
215 875
86 350
302 225
IRELAND
0,94006
2 350 150
940 060
3 290 210
GREECE
1,50735
3 768 375
1 507 350
5 275 725
SPAIN
7,93248
19 831 200
7 932 480
27 763 680
FRANCE
17,81269
44 531 725
17 812 690
62 344 415
CROATIA
0,22518
562 950
225 180
788 130
ITALY
12,53009
31 325 225
12 530 090
43 855 315
CYPRUS
0,11162
279 050
111 620
390 670
LATVIA
0,11612
290 300
116 120
406 420
LITHUANIA
0,18077
451 925
180 770
632 695
LUXEMBOURG
0,25509
637 725
255 090
892 815
HUNGARY
0,61456
1 536 400
614 560
2 150 960
MALTA
0,03801
95 025
38 010
133 035
NETHERLANDS
4,77678
11 941 950
4 776 780
16 718 730
AUSTRIA
2,39757
5 993 925
2 397 570
8 391 495
POLAND
2,00734
5 018 350
2 007 340
7 025 690
PORTUGAL
1,19679
2 991 975
1 196 790
4 188 765
ROMANIA
0,71815
1 795 375
718 150
2 513 525
SLOVENIA
0,22452
561 300
224 520
785 820
SLOVAKIA
0,37616
940 400
376 160
1 316 560
FINLAND
1,50909
3 772 725
1 509 090
5 281 815
SWEDEN
2,93911
7 347 775
2 939 110
10 286 885
UNITED KINGDOM (*1)
14,67862
36 696 550
14 678 620
51 375 170
TOTAL EU-27 & UK
100,00
250 000 000
100 000 000
350 000 000

(*1) Further to Article 153 of the Withdrawal Agreement, in March 2023 the United Kingdom formally requested that the Commission refund the United Kingdom’s outstanding share of the 10th and 11th EDF reserves by netting out the United Kingdom’s outstanding contribution. This netting-out will be reflected in the respective payment instructions.

Council Decision (EU) 2024/2728 of 14 October 2024 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2728 31.10.2024
(1) On 19 January 2009 the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a multiparty trade agreement on behalf of the Union and its Member States with the Member Countries of the Andean Community which shared the aim of reaching an ambitious, comprehensive and balanced trade agreement.
(2) On 26 June 2012 the Union signed the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part(2)(‘the Agreement’). The Agreement has been provisionally applied since 1 March 2013 for Peru and since 1 August 2013 for Colombia.
(3) Article 329 of the Agreement lays down the provisions regarding the accession of other Member Countries of the Andean Community to the Agreement.
(4) On 17 July 2014 the Union and Ecuador concluded their negotiations on the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador (‘the Protocol’).
(5) The text of the Protocol was approved by the Trade Committee established pursuant to the Agreement at its meeting on 8 February 2016, as required by Article 329(4) of the Agreement.
(6) Pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2016/2369(3), the Protocol was signed on 11 November 2016, subject to its conclusion at a later date. The Protocol has been provisionally applied since 1 January 2017, pending its entry into force.
(7) The Protocol should be approved,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91, Article 100(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6), thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament, (1) Whereas:
(1) On 19 January 2009 the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a multiparty trade agreement on behalf of the Union and its Member States with the Member Countries of the Andean Community which shared the aim of reaching an ambitious, comprehensive and balanced trade agreement.
(2) On 26 June 2012 the Union signed the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part (2) (‘the Agreement’). The Agreement has been provisionally applied since 1 March 2013 for Peru and since 1 August 2013 for Colombia.
(3) Article 329 of the Agreement lays down the provisions regarding the accession of other Member Countries of the Andean Community to the Agreement.
(4) On 17 July 2014 the Union and Ecuador concluded their negotiations on the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador (‘the Protocol’).
(5) The text of the Protocol was approved by the Trade Committee established pursuant to the Agreement at its meeting on 8 February 2016, as required by Article 329(4) of the Agreement.
(6) Pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2016/2369 (3), the Protocol was signed on 11 November 2016, subject to its conclusion at a later date. The Protocol has been provisionally applied since 1 January 2017, pending its entry into force.
(7) The Protocol should be approved,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador is hereby approved on behalf of the Union. (4)
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 27(2) of the Protocol. (5)
The Protocol shall not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts or tribunals.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2723 of 21 October 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 on the European Union CSDP Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUAM RCA)

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2723 22.10.2024
(1) On 9 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110(1), which established the European Union CSDP Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUAM RCA) with an initial mandate after its launch of 2 years until 8 August 2022.
(2) On 9 July 2024, based on the Strategic Assessment of the EU Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) and of EUAM RCA, the Political and Security Committee recommended that the mandate of EUAM RCA be extended until 7 August 2026 and that a strategic review of both Missions be conducted in due course.
(3) On 22 July 2024, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2024/2003(2), which extended EUAM RCA in a first phase until 31 October 2024 with an unchanged reference amount.
(4) The mandate of EUAM RCA should be further extended, with a new reference amount, until 7 August 2026.
(5) Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 should be amended accordingly.
(6) EUAM RCA will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union,
(1) in Article 13(1), the following subparagraph is added:‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM RCA for the period from 1 November 2024 until 7 August 2026 shall be EUR 24 844 975,68.’;
(2) in Article 17, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:‘Without prejudice to a strategic review to be conducted by PSC in the first quarter of 2026, the mandate of EUAM RCA shall end on 7 August 2026.’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 9 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 (1), which established the European Union CSDP Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUAM RCA) with an initial mandate after its launch of 2 years until 8 August 2022.
(2) On 9 July 2024, based on the Strategic Assessment of the EU Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) and of EUAM RCA, the Political and Security Committee recommended that the mandate of EUAM RCA be extended until 7 August 2026 and that a strategic review of both Missions be conducted in due course.
(3) On 22 July 2024, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2024/2003 (2), which extended EUAM RCA in a first phase until 31 October 2024 with an unchanged reference amount.
(4) The mandate of EUAM RCA should be further extended, with a new reference amount, until 7 August 2026.
(5) Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 should be amended accordingly.
(6) EUAM RCA will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 13(1), the following subparagraph is added:
‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM RCA for the period from 1 November 2024 until 7 August 2026 shall be EUR 24 844 975,68.’
;
(2) in Article 17, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘Without prejudice to a strategic review to be conducted by PSC in the first quarter of 2026, the mandate of EUAM RCA shall end on 7 August 2026.’.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2722 of 21 October 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2722 22.10.2024
(1) On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763(1).
(2) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 31 October 2025.
(3) Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 should therefore be amended accordingly,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 (1).
(2) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 31 October 2025.
(3) Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
In Article 6 of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2025.’.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Council Decision (EU) 2024/2713 of 10 October 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Council of Members of the International Olive Council with respect to the accession of San Marino to the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 2015

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2713 18.10.2024
(1) The International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 2015 (the ‘Agreement’) was concluded on behalf of the Union by means of Council Decision (EU) 2019/848(1).
(2) Pursuant to Article 29 of the Agreement, the Council of Members of the International Olive Council (the ‘Council of Members’) is to establish the conditions for the accession of a Government to the Agreement.
(3) The Government of San Marino has formally applied to accede to the Agreement. The Council of Members will therefore be invited, during a future session thereof, or within the framework of a procedure for adoption of decisions by the Council of Members by exchange of correspondence, to establish the conditions for the accession of San Marino, in respect of the participation shares in the International Olive Council (IOC) and the time limit for the deposit of the instrument of accession.
(4) Given that San Marino is developing its olive sector as regards consumption and intends to develop its production, its accession could, under certain conditions, reinforce the IOC, in particular as regards the achievement of uniformity in national and international legislation relating to the characteristics of olive products in order to prevent any obstacle to trade.
(5) It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Council of Members, as the decisions to be adopted will have legal effects on the Union by impacting the decisional balance within the Council of Members when decisions are not adopted by consensus in accordance with Article 10(4) of the Agreement,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207 (4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 2015 (the ‘Agreement’) was concluded on behalf of the Union by means of Council Decision (EU) 2019/848 (1).
(2) Pursuant to Article 29 of the Agreement, the Council of Members of the International Olive Council (the ‘Council of Members’) is to establish the conditions for the accession of a Government to the Agreement.
(3) The Government of San Marino has formally applied to accede to the Agreement. The Council of Members will therefore be invited, during a future session thereof, or within the framework of a procedure for adoption of decisions by the Council of Members by exchange of correspondence, to establish the conditions for the accession of San Marino, in respect of the participation shares in the International Olive Council (IOC) and the time limit for the deposit of the instrument of accession.
(4) Given that San Marino is developing its olive sector as regards consumption and intends to develop its production, its accession could, under certain conditions, reinforce the IOC, in particular as regards the achievement of uniformity in national and international legislation relating to the characteristics of olive products in order to prevent any obstacle to trade.
(5) It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Council of Members, as the decisions to be adopted will have legal effects on the Union by impacting the decisional balance within the Council of Members when decisions are not adopted by consensus in accordance with Article 10(4) of the Agreement,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Council of Members of the International Olive Council (the ‘Council of Members’) during a future session thereof, or within the framework of a procedure for adoption of decisions by the Council of Members by exchange of correspondence, as regards the conditions for the accession of the Government of San Marino to the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 2015, is set out in the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

The Union shall support the accession of the Government of San Marino to the Agreement, at a future session of the Council of Members or within the framework of a procedure for adoption by the Council of Members by exchange of correspondence, provided that the participation shares of San Marino are calculated according to the formula specified in Article 11 of the Agreement and that the time limit for the deposit of the instrument of accession does not exceed 18 months following the decision of the Council of Members. If the deposit of the instrument of accession is delayed, the Union may support, in subsequent decisions to be adopted by the Council of Members, the extension of the time limit for the deposit of the instrument of accession.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2712 of 23 October 2024 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Phenogen in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2024) 7275)

January 13, 2026
Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/2712 28.10.2024
(1) On 23 April 2019, the company Synthèse élevage SARL (‘the applicant’) submitted an application for the mutual recognition in parallel, in accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, of the biocidal product Phenogen identified by the case numbers BC-DV051147-24, BC-WW051333-08, BC-VN051246-22, BC-DN051247-38, BC-DG051329-48 (‘the product’). The product is a disinfectant of product-type 3 to be used by professionals for disinfection of livestock housings, equipment, and transportation vehicles, and contains as active substances chlorocresol and L(+) lactic acid. France is the reference Member State responsible for the evaluation of the application as referred to in Article 34(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
(2) On 26 November 2021, Germany referred objections to the coordination group pursuant to Article 35(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, indicating that the conditions of the authorisation set by France do not ensure that the product meets the conditions laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii) and point (e), of that Regulation.
(3) Germany considers that the dietary risk assessment for consumers performed by France does not ensure that the condition laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 is met, since the experimental data from chlorocresol residue studies in pigs and poultry (‘the experimental data’) used for the refinement of livestock exposure assessment were not suitable, as metabolites of chlorocresol were not measured, and as only one of the three studies presented in the application for product authorisation covers the application rate of the product. Germany considers that when experimental data are not used for the refinement of the risk assessment, it cannot be excluded that the residues of chlorocresol in edible tissues will exceed the maximum residue level (MRL) of 0,01 mg/kg established for chlorocresol in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2). France considers it unlikely that metabolites will be produced during the use of the product due to the properties of chlorocresol. France pointed out that the experimental data were used for the assessment of the application for approval of the active substance to conclude that no residues were expected in livestock edible tissues after use of chlorocresol at a rate of 2 000 mg/m2, whereas the application rate for the product is lower than the one assessed for the approval of chlorocresol, namely maximum of 1 200 mg/m2. France confirmed that, when the experimental data are not considered, the estimation of residues of chlorocresol in edible tissues when using the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Pesticide Residue Intake Model (PRIMo model)(3)exceeds the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg established for chlorocresol in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. To ensure that the MRL for chlorocresol in edible tissues is not exceeded by the use of the product, Germany proposed as a risk mitigation measure the rinsing of surfaces with water after the application of the product and proposed that, in the absence of experimental studies regarding efficacy of rinsing, a default factor of 90 % be used for efficacy of rinsing for water soluble compounds including chlorocresol. France disagreed as it considers that the efficacy of rinsing was not supported by experimental data; moreover, in the instruction for use provided in the application for authorisation of the product, the applicant included the following instruction: ‘the surfaces must not be rinsed after application’.
(4) The second point of disagreement raised by Germany concerns the dermal absorption value used by France for the assessment of exposure of livestock. Germany considers that the default dermal absorption value for water-based dilutions of 50 % established in the EFSA guidance on dermal absorption(4)only applies to human skin and is not applicable by analogy to animals. As there is no data on livestock dermal absorption, France believes that the dermal absorption value of 50 % should be used for livestock as it represents the worst case scenario, and points out that the dermal absorption value of 50 % was used for the evaluation of the application for approval of chlorocresol. To refine the assessment on exposure of livestock, Germany proposed the application of a default transfer coefficient for dislodgeable residues transferred from treated surfaces as established in the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Human Health Exposure Methodology(5), and the application of empirical transfer factors from a study by Leeman et al. (2007), as established in the European Medicines Agency guideline on risk characterisation and assessment of maximum residue limits for biocides(6)to estimate the maximum transfer of an external oral dose to livestock edible tissues. France considers that even considering those two refinement factors, the estimation of residues in edible tissues exceeds the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg established for chlorocresol in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(5) As the coordination group did not reach an agreement, on 17 May 2022, France referred the unresolved objections to the Commission pursuant to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, and provided the Commission with a detailed statement of the matter on which Member States were unable to reach agreement and the reasons for their disagreement. That statement was forwarded to the Member States concerned and the applicant.
(6) On 21 November 2022, the Commission requested ECHA to determine whether the experimental data submitted in the application for approval of chlorocresol can be used for the refinement of livestock exposure assessment to the product, and to assess the risks for consumers and whether the use of the product would lead to an exceedance of the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg established in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. ECHA was also requested to determine the dermal absorption value to be used for the livestock exposure assessment of the product and to assess the risks for consumers using that value and whether the use of the product considering that value would lead to an exceedance of the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg.
(7) The Commission also requested ECHA to determine the consequences of the refinements proposed by Germany as regards the residue levels in edible tissues and the potential risks for consumers.
(8) On 2 March 2023, the Biocidal Products Committee of ECHA adopted its opinion(7).
(9) ECHA considers that the experimental data can be used for the refinement of livestock exposure assessment to the product, and those data lead to the conclusion that there would be no exceedance of the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg , even if the rate of application of the product is covered by only one of the studies, provided that rinsing of the surfaces on which the product is applied before letting the animals enter the facilities is required in the instructions for use. ECHA is of the opinion that although there is no study measuring the efficacy of rinsing to reduce the levels of chlorocresol on the treated surface, it is reasonable to assume a 90 % reduction. ECHA confirmed that the experimental data used for the assessment of the application for approval of chlorocresol lead to the conclusion that no residues were expected in livestock edible tissues after use of chlorocresol at a rate of 2 000 mg/m2. However, two of the studies were performed using an application rate 10 times lower than the one intended for the product while in the third study, the application rate was 1,5 times higher than the one intended for the product. Furthermore, the assessment report for the approval of chlorocresol(8)indicates that an updated assessment of the risk in food and feed areas may be required at product authorisation stage.
(10) ECHA suggested that a protection factor for furs and feathers of 50 % can be used, whereas the livestock dermal absorption value should be 100 %. According to ECHA, when considering the experimental data, the 50 % systemic availability and residues transfer coefficient of chlorocresol and the 100 % dermal absorption value for livestock, the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg would not be exceeded.
(11) ECHA pointed out that, even without considering the experimental data, the consumer exposure does not exceed the acceptable daily intake of chlorocresol established in the active substance assessment report of 0,3 mg/kg of body weight.
(12) Article 19(1), point (b)(iii), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 establishes as a condition for authorisation that a biocidal product has no immediate or delayed unacceptable effects itself, or as a result of its residues, on the health of humans, including that of vulnerable groups, or animals, directly or through drinking water, food, feed, air, or through other indirect effects, while Article 19(1), point (e), of that Regulation provides that biocidal products are to be authorised provided that, where appropriate, MRLs for food and feed or specific migration limits or limits for the residual content in food contact materials have been established in accordance with relevant Union legislation.
(13) Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 sets a default MRL of 0,01 mg/kg for pesticide residues in food of animal origin for which no specific MRLs are set. According to Article 3(2), point (c), of that Regulation, pesticide residues are residues, including active substances, metabolites and/or breakdown or reaction products of active substances currently or formerly used in plant protection products as defined in Article 2, point 1, of Council Directive 91/414/EEC(9), which are present in or on the products covered by Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, including in particular those which may arise as a result of use in plant protection, in veterinary medicine and as a biocide. After analysis, it appears that chlorocresol was never used as an active substance in plant protection products under Directive 91/414/EEC or Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council(10). As there is no evidence that chlorocresol is currently or was formerly used in plant protection products, the Commission concludes that chlorocresol does not fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that the default value of 0.01 mg/kg set out in Article 18(1), point (b), of that Regulation does not apply to the biocidal active substance chlorocresol.
(14) The active substance chlorocresol is used as a biocide in animal husbandry, and is classified as a substance for which no MRL is required pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010(11). Chlorocresol has indeed been evaluated by the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products which has concluded(12)that there is no need to establish a MRL for chlorocresol in all food-producing species as chlorocresol is considered to have low toxicity, is rapidly metabolised and excreted, with no potential to accumulate in tissues and has been safely used in human medicine for many years.
(15) Taking into account the arguments raised by France, Germany and the ECHA opinion, the Commission considers that the product meets the condition laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, as there is no dietary risk for the consumer arising from the use of the product considering that the consumer exposure does not exceed the acceptable daily intake of chlorocresol. For the same reason, the Commission also considers that it is not necessary that the instruction to rinse surfaces in which the product has been applied before letting the animals enter the facilities, is included in the summary of product characteristics.
(16) The Commission considers that the product also meets the condition set in Article 19(1), point (e), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 as chlorocresol is classified as a substance for which no MRL is required pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 and is not within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(17) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1), and in particular Article 36(3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) On 23 April 2019, the company Synthèse élevage SARL (‘the applicant’) submitted an application for the mutual recognition in parallel, in accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, of the biocidal product Phenogen identified by the case numbers BC-DV051147-24, BC-WW051333-08, BC-VN051246-22, BC-DN051247-38, BC-DG051329-48 (‘the product’). The product is a disinfectant of product-type 3 to be used by professionals for disinfection of livestock housings, equipment, and transportation vehicles, and contains as active substances chlorocresol and L(+) lactic acid. France is the reference Member State responsible for the evaluation of the application as referred to in Article 34(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
(2) On 26 November 2021, Germany referred objections to the coordination group pursuant to Article 35(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, indicating that the conditions of the authorisation set by France do not ensure that the product meets the conditions laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii) and point (e), of that Regulation.
(3) Germany considers that the dietary risk assessment for consumers performed by France does not ensure that the condition laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 is met, since the experimental data from chlorocresol residue studies in pigs and poultry (‘the experimental data’) used for the refinement of livestock exposure assessment were not suitable, as metabolites of chlorocresol were not measured, and as only one of the three studies presented in the application for product authorisation covers the application rate of the product. Germany considers that when experimental data are not used for the refinement of the risk assessment, it cannot be excluded that the residues of chlorocresol in edible tissues will exceed the maximum residue level (MRL) of 0,01 mg/kg established for chlorocresol in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2). France considers it unlikely that metabolites will be produced during the use of the product due to the properties of chlorocresol. France pointed out that the experimental data were used for the assessment of the application for approval of the active substance to conclude that no residues were expected in livestock edible tissues after use of chlorocresol at a rate of 2 000 mg/m2, whereas the application rate for the product is lower than the one assessed for the approval of chlorocresol, namely maximum of 1 200 mg/m2. France confirmed that, when the experimental data are not considered, the estimation of residues of chlorocresol in edible tissues when using the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Pesticide Residue Intake Model (PRIMo model) (3) exceeds the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg established for chlorocresol in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. To ensure that the MRL for chlorocresol in edible tissues is not exceeded by the use of the product, Germany proposed as a risk mitigation measure the rinsing of surfaces with water after the application of the product and proposed that, in the absence of experimental studies regarding efficacy of rinsing, a default factor of 90 % be used for efficacy of rinsing for water soluble compounds including chlorocresol. France disagreed as it considers that the efficacy of rinsing was not supported by experimental data; moreover, in the instruction for use provided in the application for authorisation of the product, the applicant included the following instruction: ‘the surfaces must not be rinsed after application’.
(4) The second point of disagreement raised by Germany concerns the dermal absorption value used by France for the assessment of exposure of livestock. Germany considers that the default dermal absorption value for water-based dilutions of 50 % established in the EFSA guidance on dermal absorption (4) only applies to human skin and is not applicable by analogy to animals. As there is no data on livestock dermal absorption, France believes that the dermal absorption value of 50 % should be used for livestock as it represents the worst case scenario, and points out that the dermal absorption value of 50 % was used for the evaluation of the application for approval of chlorocresol. To refine the assessment on exposure of livestock, Germany proposed the application of a default transfer coefficient for dislodgeable residues transferred from treated surfaces as established in the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Human Health Exposure Methodology (5), and the application of empirical transfer factors from a study by Leeman et al. (2007), as established in the European Medicines Agency guideline on risk characterisation and assessment of maximum residue limits for biocides (6) to estimate the maximum transfer of an external oral dose to livestock edible tissues. France considers that even considering those two refinement factors, the estimation of residues in edible tissues exceeds the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg established for chlorocresol in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(5) As the coordination group did not reach an agreement, on 17 May 2022, France referred the unresolved objections to the Commission pursuant to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, and provided the Commission with a detailed statement of the matter on which Member States were unable to reach agreement and the reasons for their disagreement. That statement was forwarded to the Member States concerned and the applicant.
(6) On 21 November 2022, the Commission requested ECHA to determine whether the experimental data submitted in the application for approval of chlorocresol can be used for the refinement of livestock exposure assessment to the product, and to assess the risks for consumers and whether the use of the product would lead to an exceedance of the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg established in accordance with Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. ECHA was also requested to determine the dermal absorption value to be used for the livestock exposure assessment of the product and to assess the risks for consumers using that value and whether the use of the product considering that value would lead to an exceedance of the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg.
(7) The Commission also requested ECHA to determine the consequences of the refinements proposed by Germany as regards the residue levels in edible tissues and the potential risks for consumers.
(8) On 2 March 2023, the Biocidal Products Committee of ECHA adopted its opinion (7).
(9) ECHA considers that the experimental data can be used for the refinement of livestock exposure assessment to the product, and those data lead to the conclusion that there would be no exceedance of the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg , even if the rate of application of the product is covered by only one of the studies, provided that rinsing of the surfaces on which the product is applied before letting the animals enter the facilities is required in the instructions for use. ECHA is of the opinion that although there is no study measuring the efficacy of rinsing to reduce the levels of chlorocresol on the treated surface, it is reasonable to assume a 90 % reduction. ECHA confirmed that the experimental data used for the assessment of the application for approval of chlorocresol lead to the conclusion that no residues were expected in livestock edible tissues after use of chlorocresol at a rate of 2 000 mg/m2. However, two of the studies were performed using an application rate 10 times lower than the one intended for the product while in the third study, the application rate was 1,5 times higher than the one intended for the product. Furthermore, the assessment report for the approval of chlorocresol (8) indicates that an updated assessment of the risk in food and feed areas may be required at product authorisation stage.
(10) ECHA suggested that a protection factor for furs and feathers of 50 % can be used, whereas the livestock dermal absorption value should be 100 %. According to ECHA, when considering the experimental data, the 50 % systemic availability and residues transfer coefficient of chlorocresol and the 100 % dermal absorption value for livestock, the MRL of 0,01 mg/kg would not be exceeded.
(11) ECHA pointed out that, even without considering the experimental data, the consumer exposure does not exceed the acceptable daily intake of chlorocresol established in the active substance assessment report of 0,3 mg/kg of body weight.
(12) Article 19(1), point (b)(iii), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 establishes as a condition for authorisation that a biocidal product has no immediate or delayed unacceptable effects itself, or as a result of its residues, on the health of humans, including that of vulnerable groups, or animals, directly or through drinking water, food, feed, air, or through other indirect effects, while Article 19(1), point (e), of that Regulation provides that biocidal products are to be authorised provided that, where appropriate, MRLs for food and feed or specific migration limits or limits for the residual content in food contact materials have been established in accordance with relevant Union legislation.
(13) Article 18(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 sets a default MRL of 0,01 mg/kg for pesticide residues in food of animal origin for which no specific MRLs are set. According to Article 3(2), point (c), of that Regulation, pesticide residues are residues, including active substances, metabolites and/or breakdown or reaction products of active substances currently or formerly used in plant protection products as defined in Article 2, point 1, of Council Directive 91/414/EEC (9), which are present in or on the products covered by Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, including in particular those which may arise as a result of use in plant protection, in veterinary medicine and as a biocide. After analysis, it appears that chlorocresol was never used as an active substance in plant protection products under Directive 91/414/EEC or Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (10). As there is no evidence that chlorocresol is currently or was formerly used in plant protection products, the Commission concludes that chlorocresol does not fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that the default value of 0.01 mg/kg set out in Article 18(1), point (b), of that Regulation does not apply to the biocidal active substance chlorocresol.
(14) The active substance chlorocresol is used as a biocide in animal husbandry, and is classified as a substance for which no MRL is required pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 (11). Chlorocresol has indeed been evaluated by the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products which has concluded (12) that there is no need to establish a MRL for chlorocresol in all food-producing species as chlorocresol is considered to have low toxicity, is rapidly metabolised and excreted, with no potential to accumulate in tissues and has been safely used in human medicine for many years.
(15) Taking into account the arguments raised by France, Germany and the ECHA opinion, the Commission considers that the product meets the condition laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, as there is no dietary risk for the consumer arising from the use of the product considering that the consumer exposure does not exceed the acceptable daily intake of chlorocresol. For the same reason, the Commission also considers that it is not necessary that the instruction to rinse surfaces in which the product has been applied before letting the animals enter the facilities, is included in the summary of product characteristics.
(16) The Commission considers that the product also meets the condition set in Article 19(1), point (e), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 as chlorocresol is classified as a substance for which no MRL is required pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 and is not within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
(17) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The biocidal product Phenogen identified by the case numbers BC-DV051147-24, BC-WW051333-08, BC-VN051246-22, BC-DN051247-38, BC-DG051329-48 in the Register for Biocidal Products meets the condition for authorisation laid down in Article 19(1), point (b)(iii), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
The biocidal product Phenogen identified by the case numbers BC-DV051147-24, BC-WW051333-08, BC-VN051246-22, BC-DN051247-38, BC-DG051329-48 in the Register for Biocidal Products meets the condition for authorisation laid down in Article 19(1), point (e), of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.