Decision of the General Court of 5 February 2025 on the broadcasting of the delivery of judgments or Opinions under Article 110a(8) and Article 219(8) of the Rules of Procedure [2025/436]

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/436 3.3.2025
(1) In order to take account of developments in communication technology, and taking into consideration the need to bring European justice closer to citizens of the Union, the General Court considers it appropriate to broadcast some of its judicial activities on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
(2) The broadcasting, on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union, of the delivery of judgments or Opinions relating to cases before the General Court would enable citizens of the Union to follow those judicial activities of the General Court remotely.
(3) Articles 110a and 219 of the Rules of Procedure provide for the possibility of broadcasting hearings in direct actions and in references for a preliminary ruling, respectively. Each of those articles provides, in paragraph 8 thereof, that the General Court is to determine the implementing rules and arrangements by way of a decision, which is to be published in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.
(4) Article 246(5) of the Rules of Procedure provides that the provisions of Article 110a and Article 219 concerning the broadcasting of hearings are to apply only after the entry into force of the decision referred to, respectively, in Article 110a(8) and Article 219(8) of the Rules of Procedure.
(5) At this stage, therefore, it is necessary to lay down the rules and arrangements for implementing the broadcasting of the delivery of judgments or Opinions, without prejudice to a subsequent decision concerning the rules and arrangements for implementing the broadcasting of hearings relating to oral pleadings.
(6) In accordance with Article 49 of the Rules of Procedure, only the text of the judgment or Opinion in the language of the case or, where applicable, in another language authorised pursuant to Article 46(8) of those Rules is authentic.
(7) It is necessary to ensure that personal data are protected when the delivery of a judgment or Opinion is broadcast.
(8) In the light of the fact that information relating to judicial proceedings published on the internet may be referenced and subsequently found using search engines, the attention of the parties and the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute is drawn to Articles 66, 66a and 201 of the Rules of Procedure,
THE GENERAL COURT,
Having regard to Article 110a(8) and Article 219(8) of its Rules of Procedure,
Whereas:
(1) In order to take account of developments in communication technology, and taking into consideration the need to bring European justice closer to citizens of the Union, the General Court considers it appropriate to broadcast some of its judicial activities on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
(2) The broadcasting, on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union, of the delivery of judgments or Opinions relating to cases before the General Court would enable citizens of the Union to follow those judicial activities of the General Court remotely.
(3) Articles 110a and 219 of the Rules of Procedure provide for the possibility of broadcasting hearings in direct actions and in references for a preliminary ruling, respectively. Each of those articles provides, in paragraph 8 thereof, that the General Court is to determine the implementing rules and arrangements by way of a decision, which is to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
(4) Article 246(5) of the Rules of Procedure provides that the provisions of Article 110a and Article 219 concerning the broadcasting of hearings are to apply only after the entry into force of the decision referred to, respectively, in Article 110a(8) and Article 219(8) of the Rules of Procedure.
(5) At this stage, therefore, it is necessary to lay down the rules and arrangements for implementing the broadcasting of the delivery of judgments or Opinions, without prejudice to a subsequent decision concerning the rules and arrangements for implementing the broadcasting of hearings relating to oral pleadings.
(6) In accordance with Article 49 of the Rules of Procedure, only the text of the judgment or Opinion in the language of the case or, where applicable, in another language authorised pursuant to Article 46(8) of those Rules is authentic.
(7) It is necessary to ensure that personal data are protected when the delivery of a judgment or Opinion is broadcast.
(8) In the light of the fact that information relating to judicial proceedings published on the internet may be referenced and subsequently found using search engines, the attention of the parties and the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute is drawn to Articles 66, 66a and 201 of the Rules of Procedure,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Subject matter and scope

1. This Decision determines the rules and arrangements for implementing the broadcasting, on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union, of the delivery of judgments or Opinions relating to cases before the General Court.

2. The President of the General Court shall determine, after hearing the President of the Chamber, the judgments the delivery of which is to be broadcast. He shall also determine, after hearing the Advocate General, the Opinions the delivery of which is to be broadcast.

Broadcasting arrangements

1. When the delivery of a judgment or Opinion is to be broadcast, the parties and the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute shall be so informed.

2. The broadcasting of the delivery of judgments and Opinions shall take place live on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

3. The broadcasting may be accompanied by interpretation or subtitles.

Technical aspects

1. The broadcasting shall be carried out by the relevant departments of the Court of Justice of the European Union by means of a secure system administered or used by the institution.

2. The broadcasting shall be accessible for all users of the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union, without the need for prior registration.

Availability and storage of video recordings

1. Video recordings of the delivery of judgments or Opinions shall remain available on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Union for a period of three months after the date of delivery, unless the President of the General Court decides otherwise.

2. Where the delivery of a judgment or Opinion has been broadcast, the video recording shall be stored on the servers used by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

3. Video recordings stored in accordance with the preceding paragraph may be used by the Court of Justice of the European Union for communication purposes or forwarded, on request, to third parties.

Protection of personal data

1. In implementing this Decision, the General Court shall ensure that personal data are protected.

2. Internal control mechanisms concerning the processing of personal data in connection with the judicial functions of the General Court shall apply to measures adopted to implement the broadcasting.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/43 of 9 January 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/43 10.1.2025
(1) On 13 November 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074(1).
(2) On 13 May 2024, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2024/1339(2)renewing the restrictive measures set out in Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 until 10 January 2025. Decision (CFSP) 2024/1339 also suspended the travel restrictions applied to four natural persons included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074.
(3) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074, and considering the deepening political crisis in Venezuela, the persistent actions undermining democracy and the rule of law, as well as continued human rights violations and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including in relation to the conduct of and developments following the Presidential Elections of 28 July 2024 in Venezuela, the restrictive measures set out in that Decision should be renewed until 10 January 2026.
(4) Moreover, it is appropriate to lift the suspension on the travel restrictions introduced by Decision (CFSP) 2024/1339.
(5) Furthermore, the entries for 14 natural persons set out in Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 should be updated.
(6) Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 should therefore be amended accordingly,
(1) in Article 6, paragraph 1a is deleted;
(2) in Article 13, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:‘This Decision shall apply until 10 January 2026.’;
(3) Annex I is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
(1) in the ‘List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 6(1) and 7(1)’, entries number 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 20, 29, 37, 48 and 52 are replaced by the following:NameIdentifying informationReasonsDate of listing‘1.Néstor Luis REVEROL TORRESDate of birth: 28 October 1964Gender: malePresident of the Zuliana Region Development Corporation (Corpozulia) since April 2024. Former Minister for Electrical Energy (October 2020 – April 2024), Vice-President of Public Works and Services and Executive Secretary of the Electrical General Staff (April 2019 – April 2024). Minister for Interior, Justice and Peace from 2016 until October 2020. General in Chief of the Bolivarian National Guard since August 2020. Responsible for serious human rights violations, including the torture of (political) prisoners, and the repression of the democratic opposition in Venezuela, including the prohibition and repression of political demonstrations, committed by security forces under his command.22.1.20182.Gustavo Enrique GONZÁLEZ LÓPEZDate of birth: 2 November 1960Gender: maleGeneral Director of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) between April 2019 and October 2024. Security and Intelligence Adviser to President Maduro since January 2019, and General Director of SEBIN from February 2014 to October 2018. During the times he has served as SEBIN director, officials under his ultimate authority committed acts of arbitrary detention, torture and cruel and inhuman treatment, including sexual violence, in El Helicoide detention centre. As General Director of SEBIN, he is responsible for serious human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, inhuman and degrading treatment, and torture, and the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition in Venezuela.22.1.20187.Diosdado CABELLO RONDÓNDate of birth: 15 April 1963Gender: maleMinister of the Interior, Justice and Peace since August 2024. Member of the non-democratically elected National Assembly, former President of the Constituent Assembly and First Vice-President of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Involved in undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by using the media to publicly attack and threaten political opposition, other media and civil society and giving orders to detain individuals, including to the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN).22.1.20189.Sergio José RIVERO MARCANODate of birth: 8 November 1964Gender: maleInspector General of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) until July 2023, General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard until 16 January 2018, placed in “active reserve” in July 2023. Involved in the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Venezuela, and responsible for serious human rights violations committed by the Bolivarian National Guard under his command, including the excessive use of force, and the arbitrary detention and abuse of civil society and opposition members. His actions and policies as General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard, including the Bolivarian National Guard assaulting members of the democratically elected National Assembly and intimidating journalists reporting on the fraudulent elections for the illegitimate Constituent Assembly, have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela.25.6.201811.Iván HERNÁNDEZ DALADate of birth: 18 May 1966Gender: maleMajor-General in FANB. Director-General of the Directorate-General for Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM) between January 2014 and October 2024 and Head of the Presidential Guard between September 2015 and October 2024. As Head of the DGCIM, Iván Hernández Dala is responsible for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition and for serious human rights violations committed by members of the DGCIM under his command, including torture, the use of excessive force and the ill-treatment of detainees.25.6.201812.Delcy Eloina RODRÍGUEZ GÓMEZDate of birth: 18 May 1969Gender: femaleVice-President of Venezuela, and since August 2024, Minister of Oil. Former Minister of the Economy, Finances and Trade. Former President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and former member of the Presidential Commission for the illegitimate National Constituent Assembly. Her actions in the Presidential Commission and then as President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including usurping the powers of the National Assembly and using them to target the opposition and to prevent them from taking part in the political process.25.6.201814.Sandra OBLITAS RUZZADate of birth: 7 June 1969Gender: femaleMinister of University Education until August 2024. Rector of the Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela appointed in July 2020. Former Vice President of the National Electoral Council (CNE) and former President of the Commission of the Electoral and Civilian Register. Responsible for CNE activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including by facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process.25.6.201817.Socorro Elizabeth HERNÁNDEZ DE HERNÁNDEZDate of birth: 11 March 1952Gender: femaleMember (Rector) of the National Electoral Council (CNE) until 12 June 2020 and member of the National Electoral Board (JNE). Responsible for the CNE’s activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and manipulation of the electoral process in relation to a cancelled presidential recall election in 2016, postponement of gubernatorial elections in 2016, and the relocation of polling stations at short notice before gubernatorial elections in 2017.25.6.201818.Xavier Antonio MORENO REYESGender: maleSecretary-General of the National Electoral Council (CNE) from 2009 until June 2020. In that role, Moreno Reyes facilitated, legitimised and gave credibility to CNE decisions, since the Secretary-General of the CNE has a role in agenda-setting and formalising decisions. Moreno Reyes remained Secretary-General of CNE while democracy was severely undermined and the independent role of the CNE within the electoral process was compromised. He is therefore responsible for undermining democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process.25.6.201820.Rafael Ramón BLANCO MARRERODate of birth: 28 February 1968ID number: V-6250588Gender: maleInspector-General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army since July 2023. Former Division General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army (July 2019 – July 2023). Former deputy Director of the Directorate-General of Military Counter-Intelligence (Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM)). Responsible for serious human rights violations, including torture, the use of excessive force and the mistreatment of detainees in DGCIM facilities, that were committed by DGCIM officials under his command. Linked to the death of Captain Acosta.27.9.201929.Elvis Eduardo HIDROBO AMOROSODate of birth: 4 August 1963Place of birth: Caracas, Distrito Capital, VenezuelaID number: V-7659695Gender: malePresident of the National Electoral Commission of Venezuela (CNE) since 24 August 2023. Former Comptroller-General (between 23 October 2018 and August 2023), and former First and Second Vice-President of the non-recognised National Constituent Assembly (ANC). His actions have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including by banning opposition members from holding public office for 15 years and leading the non-recognised ANC, signing the “law against hatred”, justifying the removal of a legally-elected opposition governor, banning Juan Guaidó from running for any public office, and announcing the results of the Presidential election held in July 2024, without the CNE under his leadership publishing the official voting records of polling stations.29.6.202037.Remigio CEBALLOS ICHASODate of birth: 1 May 1963ID-number: V-6557495Gender: maleFormer Minister of the Interior and Justice of Venezuela (August 2021 – August 2024) and Vice-President of the Government for Citizen Security. Former Commander of the Operational and Strategic Command of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces of Venezuela (Comando Estratégico Operacional Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales Bolivarianas (CEOFANB)), the highest organ in the Venezuelan Armed Forces (June 2017 – July 2021). CEOFANB controls the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and the Bolivarian National Guard. CEOFANB is also responsible for coordinating FANB interventions in demonstrations. In his position as Commander of CEOFANB, he was responsible for serious human rights violations, including the use of excessive force and inhuman and degrading treatment by officials of the FANB and by subordinate forces under his command, including the Bolivarian National Guard. Various sources, including the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, attribute human rights violations to FANB and the Bolivarian National Guard.22.2.202148.Leonardo Enrique MORALES POLEOGender: maleFormer Vice-President of the National Electoral Council (Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE)) and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission (August 2020 – May 2021). Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo was appointed Vice-President of the CNE and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission on 7 August 2020 by the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia (TSJ)) although this prerogative belongs to the National Assembly. Moreover, just prior to his appointment he served in the Advanced Progressive Party (Avanzada progresista). As member (rector) and Vice-President of the CNE, he fully took part in the decision-making process of the CNE. He supported and facilitated the supervision of the electoral process that led to the non-democratic elections of the National Assembly on 6 December 2020. His actions have therefore further undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo accepted to be appointed to the CNE and remained in his position as Vice-President of the CNE while democracy was severely undermined in Venezuela.22.2.202152.Jesús Emilio VÁSQUEZ QUINTEROID-number: V-7422049Gender: maleFormer President of the Court Martial and the Military Criminal Judicial Circuit (September 2021 – August 2024). Division General since 5 July 2019 and former Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office (December 2017 – 17 September 2021). As Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office, responsible for undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. The Military Prosecutor’s Office has been linked to internal judicial prosecution in the Armed Forces, and failures to investigate incidents, including the case of the death of Captain Acosta in 2019. Moreover, military justice is being applied to civilians.22.2.2021’; Name Identifying information Reasons Date of listing ‘1. Néstor Luis REVEROL TORRES Date of birth: 28 October 1964Gender: male President of the Zuliana Region Development Corporation (Corpozulia) since April 2024. Former Minister for Electrical Energy (October 2020 – April 2024), Vice-President of Public Works and Services and Executive Secretary of the Electrical General Staff (April 2019 – April 2024). Minister for Interior, Justice and Peace from 2016 until October 2020. General in Chief of the Bolivarian National Guard since August 2020. Responsible for serious human rights violations, including the torture of (political) prisoners, and the repression of the democratic opposition in Venezuela, including the prohibition and repression of political demonstrations, committed by security forces under his command. 22.1.2018 2. Gustavo Enrique GONZÁLEZ LÓPEZ Date of birth: 2 November 1960Gender: male General Director of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) between April 2019 and October 2024. Security and Intelligence Adviser to President Maduro since January 2019, and General Director of SEBIN from February 2014 to October 2018. During the times he has served as SEBIN director, officials under his ultimate authority committed acts of arbitrary detention, torture and cruel and inhuman treatment, including sexual violence, in El Helicoide detention centre. As General Director of SEBIN, he is responsible for serious human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, inhuman and degrading treatment, and torture, and the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition in Venezuela. 22.1.2018 7. Diosdado CABELLO RONDÓN Date of birth: 15 April 1963Gender: male Minister of the Interior, Justice and Peace since August 2024. Member of the non-democratically elected National Assembly, former President of the Constituent Assembly and First Vice-President of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Involved in undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by using the media to publicly attack and threaten political opposition, other media and civil society and giving orders to detain individuals, including to the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN). 22.1.2018 9. Sergio José RIVERO MARCANO Date of birth: 8 November 1964Gender: male Inspector General of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) until July 2023, General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard until 16 January 2018, placed in “active reserve” in July 2023. Involved in the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Venezuela, and responsible for serious human rights violations committed by the Bolivarian National Guard under his command, including the excessive use of force, and the arbitrary detention and abuse of civil society and opposition members. His actions and policies as General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard, including the Bolivarian National Guard assaulting members of the democratically elected National Assembly and intimidating journalists reporting on the fraudulent elections for the illegitimate Constituent Assembly, have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. 25.6.2018 11. Iván HERNÁNDEZ DALA Date of birth: 18 May 1966Gender: male Major-General in FANB. Director-General of the Directorate-General for Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM) between January 2014 and October 2024 and Head of the Presidential Guard between September 2015 and October 2024. As Head of the DGCIM, Iván Hernández Dala is responsible for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition and for serious human rights violations committed by members of the DGCIM under his command, including torture, the use of excessive force and the ill-treatment of detainees. 25.6.2018 12. Delcy Eloina RODRÍGUEZ GÓMEZ Date of birth: 18 May 1969Gender: female Vice-President of Venezuela, and since August 2024, Minister of Oil. Former Minister of the Economy, Finances and Trade. Former President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and former member of the Presidential Commission for the illegitimate National Constituent Assembly. Her actions in the Presidential Commission and then as President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including usurping the powers of the National Assembly and using them to target the opposition and to prevent them from taking part in the political process. 25.6.2018 14. Sandra OBLITAS RUZZA Date of birth: 7 June 1969Gender: female Minister of University Education until August 2024. Rector of the Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela appointed in July 2020. Former Vice President of the National Electoral Council (CNE) and former President of the Commission of the Electoral and Civilian Register. Responsible for CNE activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including by facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process. 25.6.2018 17. Socorro Elizabeth HERNÁNDEZ DE HERNÁNDEZ Date of birth: 11 March 1952Gender: female Member (Rector) of the National Electoral Council (CNE) until 12 June 2020 and member of the National Electoral Board (JNE). Responsible for the CNE’s activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and manipulation of the electoral process in relation to a cancelled presidential recall election in 2016, postponement of gubernatorial elections in 2016, and the relocation of polling stations at short notice before gubernatorial elections in 2017. 25.6.2018 18. Xavier Antonio MORENO REYES Gender: male Secretary-General of the National Electoral Council (CNE) from 2009 until June 2020. In that role, Moreno Reyes facilitated, legitimised and gave credibility to CNE decisions, since the Secretary-General of the CNE has a role in agenda-setting and formalising decisions. Moreno Reyes remained Secretary-General of CNE while democracy was severely undermined and the independent role of the CNE within the electoral process was compromised. He is therefore responsible for undermining democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process. 25.6.2018 20. Rafael Ramón BLANCO MARRERO Date of birth: 28 February 1968ID number: V-6250588Gender: male Inspector-General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army since July 2023. Former Division General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army (July 2019 – July 2023). Former deputy Director of the Directorate-General of Military Counter-Intelligence (Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM)). Responsible for serious human rights violations, including torture, the use of excessive force and the mistreatment of detainees in DGCIM facilities, that were committed by DGCIM officials under his command. Linked to the death of Captain Acosta. 27.9.2019 29. Elvis Eduardo HIDROBO AMOROSO Date of birth: 4 August 1963Place of birth: Caracas, Distrito Capital, VenezuelaID number: V-7659695Gender: male President of the National Electoral Commission of Venezuela (CNE) since 24 August 2023. Former Comptroller-General (between 23 October 2018 and August 2023), and former First and Second Vice-President of the non-recognised National Constituent Assembly (ANC). His actions have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including by banning opposition members from holding public office for 15 years and leading the non-recognised ANC, signing the “law against hatred”, justifying the removal of a legally-elected opposition governor, banning Juan Guaidó from running for any public office, and announcing the results of the Presidential election held in July 2024, without the CNE under his leadership publishing the official voting records of polling stations. 29.6.2020 37. Remigio CEBALLOS ICHASO Date of birth: 1 May 1963ID-number: V-6557495Gender: male Former Minister of the Interior and Justice of Venezuela (August 2021 – August 2024) and Vice-President of the Government for Citizen Security. Former Commander of the Operational and Strategic Command of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces of Venezuela (Comando Estratégico Operacional Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales Bolivarianas (CEOFANB)), the highest organ in the Venezuelan Armed Forces (June 2017 – July 2021). CEOFANB controls the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and the Bolivarian National Guard. CEOFANB is also responsible for coordinating FANB interventions in demonstrations. In his position as Commander of CEOFANB, he was responsible for serious human rights violations, including the use of excessive force and inhuman and degrading treatment by officials of the FANB and by subordinate forces under his command, including the Bolivarian National Guard. Various sources, including the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, attribute human rights violations to FANB and the Bolivarian National Guard. 22.2.2021 48. Leonardo Enrique MORALES POLEO Gender: male Former Vice-President of the National Electoral Council (Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE)) and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission (August 2020 – May 2021). Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo was appointed Vice-President of the CNE and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission on 7 August 2020 by the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia (TSJ)) although this prerogative belongs to the National Assembly. Moreover, just prior to his appointment he served in the Advanced Progressive Party (Avanzada progresista). As member (rector) and Vice-President of the CNE, he fully took part in the decision-making process of the CNE. He supported and facilitated the supervision of the electoral process that led to the non-democratic elections of the National Assembly on 6 December 2020. His actions have therefore further undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo accepted to be appointed to the CNE and remained in his position as Vice-President of the CNE while democracy was severely undermined in Venezuela. 22.2.2021 52. Jesús Emilio VÁSQUEZ QUINTERO ID-number: V-7422049Gender: male Former President of the Court Martial and the Military Criminal Judicial Circuit (September 2021 – August 2024). Division General since 5 July 2019 and former Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office (December 2017 – 17 September 2021). As Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office, responsible for undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. The Military Prosecutor’s Office has been linked to internal judicial prosecution in the Armed Forces, and failures to investigate incidents, including the case of the death of Captain Acosta in 2019. Moreover, military justice is being applied to civilians. 22.2.2021’;
Name Identifying information Reasons Date of listing
‘1. Néstor Luis REVEROL TORRES Date of birth: 28 October 1964Gender: male President of the Zuliana Region Development Corporation (Corpozulia) since April 2024. Former Minister for Electrical Energy (October 2020 – April 2024), Vice-President of Public Works and Services and Executive Secretary of the Electrical General Staff (April 2019 – April 2024). Minister for Interior, Justice and Peace from 2016 until October 2020. General in Chief of the Bolivarian National Guard since August 2020. Responsible for serious human rights violations, including the torture of (political) prisoners, and the repression of the democratic opposition in Venezuela, including the prohibition and repression of political demonstrations, committed by security forces under his command. 22.1.2018
2. Gustavo Enrique GONZÁLEZ LÓPEZ Date of birth: 2 November 1960Gender: male General Director of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) between April 2019 and October 2024. Security and Intelligence Adviser to President Maduro since January 2019, and General Director of SEBIN from February 2014 to October 2018. During the times he has served as SEBIN director, officials under his ultimate authority committed acts of arbitrary detention, torture and cruel and inhuman treatment, including sexual violence, in El Helicoide detention centre. As General Director of SEBIN, he is responsible for serious human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, inhuman and degrading treatment, and torture, and the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition in Venezuela. 22.1.2018
7. Diosdado CABELLO RONDÓN Date of birth: 15 April 1963Gender: male Minister of the Interior, Justice and Peace since August 2024. Member of the non-democratically elected National Assembly, former President of the Constituent Assembly and First Vice-President of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Involved in undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by using the media to publicly attack and threaten political opposition, other media and civil society and giving orders to detain individuals, including to the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN). 22.1.2018
9. Sergio José RIVERO MARCANO Date of birth: 8 November 1964Gender: male Inspector General of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) until July 2023, General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard until 16 January 2018, placed in “active reserve” in July 2023. Involved in the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Venezuela, and responsible for serious human rights violations committed by the Bolivarian National Guard under his command, including the excessive use of force, and the arbitrary detention and abuse of civil society and opposition members. His actions and policies as General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard, including the Bolivarian National Guard assaulting members of the democratically elected National Assembly and intimidating journalists reporting on the fraudulent elections for the illegitimate Constituent Assembly, have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. 25.6.2018
11. Iván HERNÁNDEZ DALA Date of birth: 18 May 1966Gender: male Major-General in FANB. Director-General of the Directorate-General for Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM) between January 2014 and October 2024 and Head of the Presidential Guard between September 2015 and October 2024. As Head of the DGCIM, Iván Hernández Dala is responsible for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition and for serious human rights violations committed by members of the DGCIM under his command, including torture, the use of excessive force and the ill-treatment of detainees. 25.6.2018
12. Delcy Eloina RODRÍGUEZ GÓMEZ Date of birth: 18 May 1969Gender: female Vice-President of Venezuela, and since August 2024, Minister of Oil. Former Minister of the Economy, Finances and Trade. Former President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and former member of the Presidential Commission for the illegitimate National Constituent Assembly. Her actions in the Presidential Commission and then as President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including usurping the powers of the National Assembly and using them to target the opposition and to prevent them from taking part in the political process. 25.6.2018
14. Sandra OBLITAS RUZZA Date of birth: 7 June 1969Gender: female Minister of University Education until August 2024. Rector of the Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela appointed in July 2020. Former Vice President of the National Electoral Council (CNE) and former President of the Commission of the Electoral and Civilian Register. Responsible for CNE activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including by facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process. 25.6.2018
17. Socorro Elizabeth HERNÁNDEZ DE HERNÁNDEZ Date of birth: 11 March 1952Gender: female Member (Rector) of the National Electoral Council (CNE) until 12 June 2020 and member of the National Electoral Board (JNE). Responsible for the CNE’s activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and manipulation of the electoral process in relation to a cancelled presidential recall election in 2016, postponement of gubernatorial elections in 2016, and the relocation of polling stations at short notice before gubernatorial elections in 2017. 25.6.2018
18. Xavier Antonio MORENO REYES Gender: male Secretary-General of the National Electoral Council (CNE) from 2009 until June 2020. In that role, Moreno Reyes facilitated, legitimised and gave credibility to CNE decisions, since the Secretary-General of the CNE has a role in agenda-setting and formalising decisions. Moreno Reyes remained Secretary-General of CNE while democracy was severely undermined and the independent role of the CNE within the electoral process was compromised. He is therefore responsible for undermining democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process. 25.6.2018
20. Rafael Ramón BLANCO MARRERO Date of birth: 28 February 1968ID number: V-6250588Gender: male Inspector-General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army since July 2023. Former Division General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army (July 2019 – July 2023). Former deputy Director of the Directorate-General of Military Counter-Intelligence (Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM)). Responsible for serious human rights violations, including torture, the use of excessive force and the mistreatment of detainees in DGCIM facilities, that were committed by DGCIM officials under his command. Linked to the death of Captain Acosta. 27.9.2019
29. Elvis Eduardo HIDROBO AMOROSO Date of birth: 4 August 1963Place of birth: Caracas, Distrito Capital, VenezuelaID number: V-7659695Gender: male President of the National Electoral Commission of Venezuela (CNE) since 24 August 2023. Former Comptroller-General (between 23 October 2018 and August 2023), and former First and Second Vice-President of the non-recognised National Constituent Assembly (ANC). His actions have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including by banning opposition members from holding public office for 15 years and leading the non-recognised ANC, signing the “law against hatred”, justifying the removal of a legally-elected opposition governor, banning Juan Guaidó from running for any public office, and announcing the results of the Presidential election held in July 2024, without the CNE under his leadership publishing the official voting records of polling stations. 29.6.2020
37. Remigio CEBALLOS ICHASO Date of birth: 1 May 1963ID-number: V-6557495Gender: male Former Minister of the Interior and Justice of Venezuela (August 2021 – August 2024) and Vice-President of the Government for Citizen Security. Former Commander of the Operational and Strategic Command of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces of Venezuela (Comando Estratégico Operacional Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales Bolivarianas (CEOFANB)), the highest organ in the Venezuelan Armed Forces (June 2017 – July 2021). CEOFANB controls the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and the Bolivarian National Guard. CEOFANB is also responsible for coordinating FANB interventions in demonstrations. In his position as Commander of CEOFANB, he was responsible for serious human rights violations, including the use of excessive force and inhuman and degrading treatment by officials of the FANB and by subordinate forces under his command, including the Bolivarian National Guard. Various sources, including the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, attribute human rights violations to FANB and the Bolivarian National Guard. 22.2.2021
48. Leonardo Enrique MORALES POLEO Gender: male Former Vice-President of the National Electoral Council (Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE)) and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission (August 2020 – May 2021). Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo was appointed Vice-President of the CNE and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission on 7 August 2020 by the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia (TSJ)) although this prerogative belongs to the National Assembly. Moreover, just prior to his appointment he served in the Advanced Progressive Party (Avanzada progresista). As member (rector) and Vice-President of the CNE, he fully took part in the decision-making process of the CNE. He supported and facilitated the supervision of the electoral process that led to the non-democratic elections of the National Assembly on 6 December 2020. His actions have therefore further undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo accepted to be appointed to the CNE and remained in his position as Vice-President of the CNE while democracy was severely undermined in Venezuela. 22.2.2021
52. Jesús Emilio VÁSQUEZ QUINTERO ID-number: V-7422049Gender: male Former President of the Court Martial and the Military Criminal Judicial Circuit (September 2021 – August 2024). Division General since 5 July 2019 and former Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office (December 2017 – 17 September 2021). As Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office, responsible for undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. The Military Prosecutor’s Office has been linked to internal judicial prosecution in the Armed Forces, and failures to investigate incidents, including the case of the death of Captain Acosta in 2019. Moreover, military justice is being applied to civilians. 22.2.2021’;
Name Identifying information Reasons Date of listing
‘1. Néstor Luis REVEROL TORRES Date of birth: 28 October 1964Gender: male President of the Zuliana Region Development Corporation (Corpozulia) since April 2024. Former Minister for Electrical Energy (October 2020 – April 2024), Vice-President of Public Works and Services and Executive Secretary of the Electrical General Staff (April 2019 – April 2024). Minister for Interior, Justice and Peace from 2016 until October 2020. General in Chief of the Bolivarian National Guard since August 2020. Responsible for serious human rights violations, including the torture of (political) prisoners, and the repression of the democratic opposition in Venezuela, including the prohibition and repression of political demonstrations, committed by security forces under his command. 22.1.2018
2. Gustavo Enrique GONZÁLEZ LÓPEZ Date of birth: 2 November 1960Gender: male General Director of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) between April 2019 and October 2024. Security and Intelligence Adviser to President Maduro since January 2019, and General Director of SEBIN from February 2014 to October 2018. During the times he has served as SEBIN director, officials under his ultimate authority committed acts of arbitrary detention, torture and cruel and inhuman treatment, including sexual violence, in El Helicoide detention centre. As General Director of SEBIN, he is responsible for serious human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, inhuman and degrading treatment, and torture, and the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition in Venezuela. 22.1.2018
7. Diosdado CABELLO RONDÓN Date of birth: 15 April 1963Gender: male Minister of the Interior, Justice and Peace since August 2024. Member of the non-democratically elected National Assembly, former President of the Constituent Assembly and First Vice-President of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Involved in undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by using the media to publicly attack and threaten political opposition, other media and civil society and giving orders to detain individuals, including to the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN). 22.1.2018
9. Sergio José RIVERO MARCANO Date of birth: 8 November 1964Gender: male Inspector General of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) until July 2023, General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard until 16 January 2018, placed in “active reserve” in July 2023. Involved in the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Venezuela, and responsible for serious human rights violations committed by the Bolivarian National Guard under his command, including the excessive use of force, and the arbitrary detention and abuse of civil society and opposition members. His actions and policies as General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard, including the Bolivarian National Guard assaulting members of the democratically elected National Assembly and intimidating journalists reporting on the fraudulent elections for the illegitimate Constituent Assembly, have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. 25.6.2018
11. Iván HERNÁNDEZ DALA Date of birth: 18 May 1966Gender: male Major-General in FANB. Director-General of the Directorate-General for Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM) between January 2014 and October 2024 and Head of the Presidential Guard between September 2015 and October 2024. As Head of the DGCIM, Iván Hernández Dala is responsible for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition and for serious human rights violations committed by members of the DGCIM under his command, including torture, the use of excessive force and the ill-treatment of detainees. 25.6.2018
12. Delcy Eloina RODRÍGUEZ GÓMEZ Date of birth: 18 May 1969Gender: female Vice-President of Venezuela, and since August 2024, Minister of Oil. Former Minister of the Economy, Finances and Trade. Former President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and former member of the Presidential Commission for the illegitimate National Constituent Assembly. Her actions in the Presidential Commission and then as President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including usurping the powers of the National Assembly and using them to target the opposition and to prevent them from taking part in the political process. 25.6.2018
14. Sandra OBLITAS RUZZA Date of birth: 7 June 1969Gender: female Minister of University Education until August 2024. Rector of the Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela appointed in July 2020. Former Vice President of the National Electoral Council (CNE) and former President of the Commission of the Electoral and Civilian Register. Responsible for CNE activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including by facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process. 25.6.2018
17. Socorro Elizabeth HERNÁNDEZ DE HERNÁNDEZ Date of birth: 11 March 1952Gender: female Member (Rector) of the National Electoral Council (CNE) until 12 June 2020 and member of the National Electoral Board (JNE). Responsible for the CNE’s activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and manipulation of the electoral process in relation to a cancelled presidential recall election in 2016, postponement of gubernatorial elections in 2016, and the relocation of polling stations at short notice before gubernatorial elections in 2017. 25.6.2018
18. Xavier Antonio MORENO REYES Gender: male Secretary-General of the National Electoral Council (CNE) from 2009 until June 2020. In that role, Moreno Reyes facilitated, legitimised and gave credibility to CNE decisions, since the Secretary-General of the CNE has a role in agenda-setting and formalising decisions. Moreno Reyes remained Secretary-General of CNE while democracy was severely undermined and the independent role of the CNE within the electoral process was compromised. He is therefore responsible for undermining democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process. 25.6.2018
20. Rafael Ramón BLANCO MARRERO Date of birth: 28 February 1968ID number: V-6250588Gender: male Inspector-General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army since July 2023. Former Division General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army (July 2019 – July 2023). Former deputy Director of the Directorate-General of Military Counter-Intelligence (Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM)). Responsible for serious human rights violations, including torture, the use of excessive force and the mistreatment of detainees in DGCIM facilities, that were committed by DGCIM officials under his command. Linked to the death of Captain Acosta. 27.9.2019
29. Elvis Eduardo HIDROBO AMOROSO Date of birth: 4 August 1963Place of birth: Caracas, Distrito Capital, VenezuelaID number: V-7659695Gender: male President of the National Electoral Commission of Venezuela (CNE) since 24 August 2023. Former Comptroller-General (between 23 October 2018 and August 2023), and former First and Second Vice-President of the non-recognised National Constituent Assembly (ANC). His actions have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including by banning opposition members from holding public office for 15 years and leading the non-recognised ANC, signing the “law against hatred”, justifying the removal of a legally-elected opposition governor, banning Juan Guaidó from running for any public office, and announcing the results of the Presidential election held in July 2024, without the CNE under his leadership publishing the official voting records of polling stations. 29.6.2020
37. Remigio CEBALLOS ICHASO Date of birth: 1 May 1963ID-number: V-6557495Gender: male Former Minister of the Interior and Justice of Venezuela (August 2021 – August 2024) and Vice-President of the Government for Citizen Security. Former Commander of the Operational and Strategic Command of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces of Venezuela (Comando Estratégico Operacional Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales Bolivarianas (CEOFANB)), the highest organ in the Venezuelan Armed Forces (June 2017 – July 2021). CEOFANB controls the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and the Bolivarian National Guard. CEOFANB is also responsible for coordinating FANB interventions in demonstrations. In his position as Commander of CEOFANB, he was responsible for serious human rights violations, including the use of excessive force and inhuman and degrading treatment by officials of the FANB and by subordinate forces under his command, including the Bolivarian National Guard. Various sources, including the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, attribute human rights violations to FANB and the Bolivarian National Guard. 22.2.2021
48. Leonardo Enrique MORALES POLEO Gender: male Former Vice-President of the National Electoral Council (Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE)) and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission (August 2020 – May 2021). Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo was appointed Vice-President of the CNE and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission on 7 August 2020 by the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia (TSJ)) although this prerogative belongs to the National Assembly. Moreover, just prior to his appointment he served in the Advanced Progressive Party (Avanzada progresista). As member (rector) and Vice-President of the CNE, he fully took part in the decision-making process of the CNE. He supported and facilitated the supervision of the electoral process that led to the non-democratic elections of the National Assembly on 6 December 2020. His actions have therefore further undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo accepted to be appointed to the CNE and remained in his position as Vice-President of the CNE while democracy was severely undermined in Venezuela. 22.2.2021
52. Jesús Emilio VÁSQUEZ QUINTERO ID-number: V-7422049Gender: male Former President of the Court Martial and the Military Criminal Judicial Circuit (September 2021 – August 2024). Division General since 5 July 2019 and former Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office (December 2017 – 17 September 2021). As Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office, responsible for undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. The Military Prosecutor’s Office has been linked to internal judicial prosecution in the Armed Forces, and failures to investigate incidents, including the case of the death of Captain Acosta in 2019. Moreover, military justice is being applied to civilians. 22.2.2021’;
(2) the following sentence is deleted after the table:‘* Article 6(1) shall not apply to entries identified with an asterisk.’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 13 November 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 (1).
(2) On 13 May 2024, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2024/1339 (2) renewing the restrictive measures set out in Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 until 10 January 2025. Decision (CFSP) 2024/1339 also suspended the travel restrictions applied to four natural persons included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074.
(3) On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074, and considering the deepening political crisis in Venezuela, the persistent actions undermining democracy and the rule of law, as well as continued human rights violations and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including in relation to the conduct of and developments following the Presidential Elections of 28 July 2024 in Venezuela, the restrictive measures set out in that Decision should be renewed until 10 January 2026.
(4) Moreover, it is appropriate to lift the suspension on the travel restrictions introduced by Decision (CFSP) 2024/1339.
(5) Furthermore, the entries for 14 natural persons set out in Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 should be updated.
(6) Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 6, paragraph 1a is deleted;
(2) in Article 13, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘This Decision shall apply until 10 January 2026.’;
(3) Annex I is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 is amended as follows:

(1) in the ‘List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 6(1) and 7(1)’, entries number 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 20, 29, 37, 48 and 52 are replaced by the following:

Name
Identifying information
Reasons
Date of listing
‘1. Néstor Luis REVEROL TORRES
Date of birth: 28 October 1964
Gender: male
President of the Zuliana Region Development Corporation (Corpozulia) since April 2024. Former Minister for Electrical Energy (October 2020 – April 2024), Vice-President of Public Works and Services and Executive Secretary of the Electrical General Staff (April 2019 – April 2024). Minister for Interior, Justice and Peace from 2016 until October 2020. General in Chief of the Bolivarian National Guard since August 2020. Responsible for serious human rights violations, including the torture of (political) prisoners, and the repression of the democratic opposition in Venezuela, including the prohibition and repression of political demonstrations, committed by security forces under his command.
22.1.2018 2. Gustavo Enrique GONZÁLEZ LÓPEZ
Date of birth: 2 November 1960
Gender: male
General Director of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) between April 2019 and October 2024. Security and Intelligence Adviser to President Maduro since January 2019, and General Director of SEBIN from February 2014 to October 2018. During the times he has served as SEBIN director, officials under his ultimate authority committed acts of arbitrary detention, torture and cruel and inhuman treatment, including sexual violence, in El Helicoide detention centre. As General Director of SEBIN, he is responsible for serious human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, inhuman and degrading treatment, and torture, and the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition in Venezuela.
22.1.2018 7. Diosdado CABELLO RONDÓN
Date of birth: 15 April 1963
Gender: male
Minister of the Interior, Justice and Peace since August 2024. Member of the non-democratically elected National Assembly, former President of the Constituent Assembly and First Vice-President of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Involved in undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by using the media to publicly attack and threaten political opposition, other media and civil society and giving orders to detain individuals, including to the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN).
22.1.2018 9. Sergio José RIVERO MARCANO
Date of birth: 8 November 1964
Gender: male
Inspector General of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) until July 2023, General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard until 16 January 2018, placed in “active reserve” in July 2023. Involved in the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Venezuela, and responsible for serious human rights violations committed by the Bolivarian National Guard under his command, including the excessive use of force, and the arbitrary detention and abuse of civil society and opposition members. His actions and policies as General Commander of the Bolivarian National Guard, including the Bolivarian National Guard assaulting members of the democratically elected National Assembly and intimidating journalists reporting on the fraudulent elections for the illegitimate Constituent Assembly, have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela.
25.6.2018 11. Iván HERNÁNDEZ DALA
Date of birth: 18 May 1966
Gender: male
Major-General in FANB. Director-General of the Directorate-General for Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM) between January 2014 and October 2024 and Head of the Presidential Guard between September 2015 and October 2024. As Head of the DGCIM, Iván Hernández Dala is responsible for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition and for serious human rights violations committed by members of the DGCIM under his command, including torture, the use of excessive force and the ill-treatment of detainees.
25.6.2018 12. Delcy Eloina RODRÍGUEZ GÓMEZ
Date of birth: 18 May 1969
Gender: female
Vice-President of Venezuela, and since August 2024, Minister of Oil. Former Minister of the Economy, Finances and Trade. Former President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and former member of the Presidential Commission for the illegitimate National Constituent Assembly. Her actions in the Presidential Commission and then as President of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including usurping the powers of the National Assembly and using them to target the opposition and to prevent them from taking part in the political process.
25.6.2018 14. Sandra OBLITAS RUZZA
Date of birth: 7 June 1969
Gender: female
Minister of University Education until August 2024. Rector of the Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela appointed in July 2020. Former Vice President of the National Electoral Council (CNE) and former President of the Commission of the Electoral and Civilian Register. Responsible for CNE activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including by facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process.
25.6.2018 17. Socorro Elizabeth HERNÁNDEZ DE HERNÁNDEZ
Date of birth: 11 March 1952
Gender: female
Member (Rector) of the National Electoral Council (CNE) until 12 June 2020 and member of the National Electoral Board (JNE). Responsible for the CNE’s activities which have undermined democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and manipulation of the electoral process in relation to a cancelled presidential recall election in 2016, postponement of gubernatorial elections in 2016, and the relocation of polling stations at short notice before gubernatorial elections in 2017. 25.6.2018 18. Xavier Antonio MORENO REYES
Gender: male
Secretary-General of the National Electoral Council (CNE) from 2009 until June 2020. In that role, Moreno Reyes facilitated, legitimised and gave credibility to CNE decisions, since the Secretary-General of the CNE has a role in agenda-setting and formalising decisions. Moreno Reyes remained Secretary-General of CNE while democracy was severely undermined and the independent role of the CNE within the electoral process was compromised. He is therefore responsible for undermining democracy in Venezuela, including facilitating the establishment of the illegitimate Constituent Assembly and the manipulation of the electoral process.
25.6.2018 20. Rafael Ramón BLANCO MARRERO
Date of birth: 28 February 1968
ID number: V-6250588
Gender: male
Inspector-General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army since July 2023. Former Division General of the Venezuelan Bolivarian National Army (July 2019 – July 2023). Former deputy Director of the Directorate-General of Military Counter-Intelligence (Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM)). Responsible for serious human rights violations, including torture, the use of excessive force and the mistreatment of detainees in DGCIM facilities, that were committed by DGCIM officials under his command. Linked to the death of Captain Acosta.
27.9.2019 29. Elvis Eduardo HIDROBO AMOROSO
Date of birth: 4 August 1963
Place of birth: Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela
ID number: V-7659695
Gender: male
President of the National Electoral Commission of Venezuela (CNE) since 24 August 2023. Former Comptroller-General (between 23 October 2018 and August 2023), and former First and Second Vice-President of the non-recognised National Constituent Assembly (ANC). His actions have undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela, including by banning opposition members from holding public office for 15 years and leading the non-recognised ANC, signing the “law against hatred”, justifying the removal of a legally-elected opposition governor, banning Juan Guaidó from running for any public office, and announcing the results of the Presidential election held in July 2024, without the CNE under his leadership publishing the official voting records of polling stations.
29.6.2020 37. Remigio CEBALLOS ICHASO
Date of birth: 1 May 1963
ID-number: V-6557495
Gender: male
Former Minister of the Interior and Justice of Venezuela (August 2021 – August 2024) and Vice-President of the Government for Citizen Security. Former Commander of the Operational and Strategic Command of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces of Venezuela (Comando Estratégico Operacional Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales Bolivarianas (CEOFANB)), the highest organ in the Venezuelan Armed Forces (June 2017 – July 2021). CEOFANB controls the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and the Bolivarian National Guard. CEOFANB is also responsible for coordinating FANB interventions in demonstrations. In his position as Commander of CEOFANB, he was responsible for serious human rights violations, including the use of excessive force and inhuman and degrading treatment by officials of the FANB and by subordinate forces under his command, including the Bolivarian National Guard. Various sources, including the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, attribute human rights violations to FANB and the Bolivarian National Guard.
22.2.2021 48. Leonardo Enrique MORALES POLEO
Gender: male
Former Vice-President of the National Electoral Council (Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE)) and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission (August 2020 – May 2021). Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo was appointed Vice-President of the CNE and President of the Political Participation and Financing Commission on 7 August 2020 by the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia (TSJ)) although this prerogative belongs to the National Assembly. Moreover, just prior to his appointment he served in the Advanced Progressive Party (Avanzada progresista). As member (rector) and Vice-President of the CNE, he fully took part in the decision-making process of the CNE. He supported and facilitated the supervision of the electoral process that led to the non-democratic elections of the National Assembly on 6 December 2020. His actions have therefore further undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. Leonardo Enrique Morales Poleo accepted to be appointed to the CNE and remained in his position as Vice-President of the CNE while democracy was severely undermined in Venezuela.
22.2.2021 52. Jesús Emilio VÁSQUEZ QUINTERO
ID-number: V-7422049
Gender: male
Former President of the Court Martial and the Military Criminal Judicial Circuit (September 2021 – August 2024). Division General since 5 July 2019 and former Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office (December 2017 – 17 September 2021). As Attorney General of the Military Prosecutor’s Office, responsible for undermining democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela. The Military Prosecutor’s Office has been linked to internal judicial prosecution in the Armed Forces, and failures to investigate incidents, including the case of the death of Captain Acosta in 2019. Moreover, military justice is being applied to civilians.
22.2.2021’;

(2) the following sentence is deleted after the table:
‘* Article 6(1) shall not apply to entries identified with an asterisk.’.

Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 16 December 2024 laying down Rules on the European Parliament’s Open Data

Official Journalof the European Union ENC series
C/2025/341 10.1.2025
(1) Data are a strategic asset, necessary for innovation and to enable new technologies to be used, most notably artificial intelligence;
(2) Public organisations systematically make available part of their public data in the form of open data to promote transparency and accountability, to empower citizens and to improve public services through the fostering of innovation;
(3) To support that practice, Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council(1)was adopted;
(4) In its resolution of 25 March 2021 on a European strategy for data(2), the European Parliament called for measures to allow for a greater flow of data between the public sector and businesses, as well as within each of them;
(5) The European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the Court of Auditors have adopted measures formalising the openness of their data; in 2011, the European Commission adopted Decision 2011/833/EU(3), which aims to facilitate a wider re-use of public information. Following the example of the European Commission, the Council of the European Union adopted Decision (EU) 2017/1842(4)and the Court of Auditors adopted Decision No 6-2019(5), on open data policy and document re-use policies;
(6) National parliaments have also recognised the need to improve the accessibility of their public data. In 2022, the Inter-Parliamentary Union conducted an open data study and published a list(6)of the parliamentary chambers worldwide that currently offer open data on dedicated portals or websites;
(7) For Parliament, making its public data as easy to find and as interoperable as possible is the embodiment of its commitments to openness and accountability; it complements the decisions taken to strengthen integrity, independence and the accountability of the institution. Making open data available is also a way to stimulate innovation of services to Members, to enhance Parliament’s data-driven decision-making and to strengthen its outreach to citizens;
(a) ‘technical openness’: data and their metadata are offered in machine-readable, open formats;
(b) ‘legal openness’: data are subject to an open licence;
(c) ‘practical openness’: data are easily discoverable, up to date and directly accessible;
(d) ‘social openness’: with the aim to improve data quality and availability, users’ feedback is collected and considered when making data available.
THE BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
Having regard to Rule 25(2) of the Rules of Procedure,
Whereas:
(1) Data are a strategic asset, necessary for innovation and to enable new technologies to be used, most notably artificial intelligence;
(2) Public organisations systematically make available part of their public data in the form of open data to promote transparency and accountability, to empower citizens and to improve public services through the fostering of innovation;
(3) To support that practice, Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) was adopted;
(4) In its resolution of 25 March 2021 on a European strategy for data (2), the European Parliament called for measures to allow for a greater flow of data between the public sector and businesses, as well as within each of them;
(5) The European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the Court of Auditors have adopted measures formalising the openness of their data; in 2011, the European Commission adopted Decision 2011/833/EU (3), which aims to facilitate a wider re-use of public information. Following the example of the European Commission, the Council of the European Union adopted Decision (EU) 2017/1842 (4) and the Court of Auditors adopted Decision No 6-2019 (5), on open data policy and document re-use policies;
(6) National parliaments have also recognised the need to improve the accessibility of their public data. In 2022, the Inter-Parliamentary Union conducted an open data study and published a list (6) of the parliamentary chambers worldwide that currently offer open data on dedicated portals or websites;
(7) For Parliament, making its public data as easy to find and as interoperable as possible is the embodiment of its commitments to openness and accountability; it complements the decisions taken to strengthen integrity, independence and the accountability of the institution. Making open data available is also a way to stimulate innovation of services to Members, to enhance Parliament’s data-driven decision-making and to strengthen its outreach to citizens;
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Definition

Open data are public data made available in a structured, machine-readable format and published under terms and conditions that allow for easy re-use and redistribution.

Scope and objectives

1. Parliament commits itself to making available, as open data, its public data, and establishes the principles, conditions and limitations governing their re-use.

2. Parliament aims to provide as much of its public data as possible in an open data format, and, in doing so, to give priority to datasets of high public interest.

General principles

Any of the Parliament’s data which are already public may be published as open data.
To be considered ‘open’, the data must have the following four characteristics:

(a) ‘technical openness’: data and their metadata are offered in machine-readable, open formats;
(b) ‘legal openness’: data are subject to an open licence;
(c) ‘practical openness’: data are easily discoverable, up to date and directly accessible;
(d) ‘social openness’: with the aim to improve data quality and availability, users’ feedback is collected and considered when making data available.

Conditions for reuse

The re-use of Parliament’s open data is subject to the conditions laid down in the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) (7). Raw data, metadata or other documents of a comparable nature may alternatively be distributed by Parliament under the Creative Commons Universal Public Domain Dedication deed (CC0 1.0) (8).

Open Data Portal

1. Parliament hereby sets up and undertakes to maintain a European Parliament Open Data Portal to facilitate the discovery of and access to data available for re-use.

2. Parliament’s public data shall be made available via the European Parliament’s Open Data Portal in any existing language version and in formats that are open and machine-readable and that ensure that data, together with their metadata, are accessible to users, easy for them to find, and re-usable.

3. Both the data and their metadata shall comply with applicable open standards.

Oversight and monitoring

Oversight and monitoring of the implementation of these Rules shall be assigned to a specific responsible entity, within the Parliament.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force 14 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Council Decision (EU) 2025/30 of 17 December 2024 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning the amendment of Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification), Annex X (Services in general) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement (Health Technology Assessment) (Text with EEA relevance)

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/30 9.1.2025
(1) The Agreement on the European Economic Area(2)(the ‘EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994.
(2) Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend, inter alia, Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification), Annex X (Services in general) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement.
(3) Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council(3)should be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
(4) Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification), Annex X (Services in general) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.
(5) The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the attached draft decision,
(1) Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU(1)is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
(2) Annexes II and X and Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,
1. The following is inserted after the seventeenth paragraph of the introductory part of Chapter XIII:‘The EFTA States shall be fully associated with the work of the Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, including its subgroups, as established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council and shall have the same rights and obligations within it as the EU Member States.By way of derogation from the previous paragraph, the members designated by the EFTA States shall not be entitled to participate in votes. However, where voting takes place, positions of the members designated by the EFTA States shall be recorded separately upon their request.Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, where consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions by the EFTA States, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports.’
2. The following is inserted after point 22k (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1255) of Chapter XIII:‘23.32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’ ‘23. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
‘23. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
‘23. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
3. The following is inserted in the introductory part of Chapter XXX:‘The EFTA States shall be fully associated with the work of the Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, including its subgroups, as established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council and shall have the same rights and obligations within it as the EU Member States.By way of derogation from the previous paragraph, the members designated by the EFTA States shall not be entitled to participate in votes. However, where voting takes place, the positions of the members designated by the EFTA States shall be recorded separately upon their request.Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, where a consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions by the EFTA States, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports.’
4. The following point is inserted after point 15 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1207) of Chapter XXX:‘16.32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’ ‘16. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
‘16. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
‘16. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
— 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).’
‘50. Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment (Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council).’
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 114 and 168 in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area (1), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (the ‘EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994.
(2) Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend, inter alia, Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification), Annex X (Services in general) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement.
(3) Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) should be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
(4) Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification), Annex X (Services in general) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.
(5) The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the attached draft decision,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The position to be adopted on behalf of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment of Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification), Annex X (Services in general) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement, shall be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1. The following is inserted after the seventeenth paragraph of the introductory part of Chapter XIII:
‘The EFTA States shall be fully associated with the work of the Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, including its subgroups, as established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council and shall have the same rights and obligations within it as the EU Member States.
By way of derogation from the previous paragraph, the members designated by the EFTA States shall not be entitled to participate in votes. However, where voting takes place, positions of the members designated by the EFTA States shall be recorded separately upon their request.
Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, where consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions by the EFTA States, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports.’

2. The following is inserted after point 22k (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1255) of Chapter XIII:
‘23. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).
The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’

3. The following is inserted in the introductory part of Chapter XXX:
‘The EFTA States shall be fully associated with the work of the Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, including its subgroups, as established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council and shall have the same rights and obligations within it as the EU Member States.
By way of derogation from the previous paragraph, the members designated by the EFTA States shall not be entitled to participate in votes. However, where voting takes place, the positions of the members designated by the EFTA States shall be recorded separately upon their request.
Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, where a consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions by the EFTA States, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports.’

4. The following point is inserted after point 15 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1207) of Chapter XXX:
‘16. 32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).
The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’

The following is added in point 2 (Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex X to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

—
32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).’

The following point is inserted in Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement:

‘50. Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment (Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council).’

The text of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.
This Decision shall enter into force on …, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.
1.

The following is inserted after the seventeenth paragraph of the introductory part of Chapter XIII:

‘The EFTA States shall be fully associated with the work of the Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, including its subgroups, as established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council and shall have the same rights and obligations within it as the EU Member States.
By way of derogation from the previous paragraph, the members designated by the EFTA States shall not be entitled to participate in votes. However, where voting takes place, positions of the members designated by the EFTA States shall be recorded separately upon their request.
Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, where consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions by the EFTA States, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports.’
2.

The following is inserted after point 22k (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1255) of Chapter XIII:

‘23.

32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).
The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’
3.

The following is inserted in the introductory part of Chapter XXX:

‘The EFTA States shall be fully associated with the work of the Member State Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, including its subgroups, as established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council and shall have the same rights and obligations within it as the EU Member States.
By way of derogation from the previous paragraph, the members designated by the EFTA States shall not be entitled to participate in votes. However, where voting takes place, the positions of the members designated by the EFTA States shall be recorded separately upon their request.
Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, where a consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions by the EFTA States, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports.’
4.

The following point is inserted after point 15 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1207) of Chapter XXX:

‘16.

32021 R 2282: Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU (OJ L 458, 22.12.2021, p. 1).
The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
Paragraph 4(a) of Protocol 1 to this Agreement shall not apply to Article 3.’

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/18 of 9 January 2025 recognising under Article 31(2) and (4) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 that the report contains accurate data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of wheat, maize, sunflower, soybean and rapeseed in Hungary

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/18 10.1.2025
(1) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 requires biofuels, bioliquids, and biomass fuels to save significant greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels so that they can be counted towards the targets set in that Directive. For this purpose, Article 29(10) sets specific emission savings thresholds for those fuels, and Article 31 regulates how to calculate the greenhouse gas emission savings from their use. When making those calculations, it is possible to use the default values set out in Annexes V and VI to Directive (EU) 2018/2001. Instead of the default values for greenhouse gas emissions from the cultivation of agricultural raw materials, it is possible to use typical values under some conditions. These typical values, representing the average value in a specific area, may be reported to the Commission by Member States or third countries. The typical values may only be used if the Commission recognises them to be accurate.
(2) On 27 September 2024, Hungary submitted to the Commission the final report with data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of wheat, maize, sunflower, soybean and rapeseed typically produced in areas on its territory classified as level 2 in the nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2). Hungary asked for those data to be recognised as accurate in line with Article 31(4) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
(3) The Commission assessed the report and found that it contained accurate data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with cultivating wheat, maize, sunflower, soybean and rapeseed typically produced in NUTS 2 regions in Hungary.
(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Sustainability of Biofuels, Bioliquids and Biomass Fuels,
NUTS2 Region Soil N2O Embedded Fuel use Seed Drying and storage Total
Direct Indirect Fertiliser Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification Pesticide
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 45,2 2,4 45,7 9,7 3,4 54,8 1,0 18,6 180,7
HU21 Közép-Dunántúl 49,7 2,3 54,5 11,9 3,1 49,1 1,0 29,2 200,9
HU22 Nyugat-Dunántúl 74,0 13,9 52,3 11,2 3,1 45,6 0,9 40,1 241,0
HU23 Dél-Dunántúl 61,9 5,7 64,1 13,5 3,9 45,1 0,9 38,4 233,5
HU31 Észak-Magyarország 41,5 3,5 34,7 7,1 4,9 57,4 0,7 7,0 156,8
HU32 Észak-Alföld 43,9 1,8 44,0 9,6 2,6 45,7 0,9 30,6 179,1
HU33 Dél-Alföld 44,1 1,9 45,5 9,7 3,2 49,5 1,0 15,7 170,6
NUTS2 Region Soil N2O Embedded Fuel use Seed Drying and storage Total
Direct Indirect Fertiliser Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification Pesticide
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 129,2 8,4 187,3 38,5 14,2 132,4 0,9 0,2 511,1
HU21 Közép-Dunántúl 118,9 6,4 178,2 36,2 13,1 119,5 0,8 0,2 473,3
HU22 Nyugat-Dunántúl 180,2 32,2 152,7 31,5 13,5 95,2 0,7 0,2 506,1
HU23 Dél-Dunántúl 128,6 12,7 158,9 32,6 13,8 108,2 0,7 0,2 455,6
HU31 Észak-Magyarország 128,6 12,6 155,9 32,6 13,4 130,8 0,7 0,2 474,9
HU32 Észak-Alföld 98,3 5,0 135,5 28,3 7,6 141,0 0,7 0,2 416,7
HU33 Dél-Alföld 99,1 5,1 141,4 28,6 11,7 110,6 0,7 0,2 397,3
NUTS2 Region Soil N2O Embedded Fuel use Seed Drying and storage Total
Direct Indirect Fertiliser Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification Pesticide
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 65,8 3,7 73,9 15,1 8,8 121,7 1,2 9,1 299,3
HU21 Közép-Dunántúl 80,5 4,2 101,0 21,4 11,0 118,5 1,2 8,0 345,9
HU22 Nyugat-Dunántúl 134,4 24,8 108,3 22,3 11,7 98,3 1,2 9,2 410,2
HU23 Dél-Dunántúl 99,8 9,6 115,5 23,5 14,3 119,7 1,3 15,2 398,8
HU31 Észak-Magyarország 73,8 6,9 76,1 15,4 11,4 144,4 1,2 4,1 333,3
HU32 Észak-Alföld 65,1 3,0 72,3 15,5 7,6 119,9 1,2 7,4 292,0
HU33 Dél-Alföld 72,3 3,4 86,4 18,3 7,7 114,1 1,3 5,7 309,2
NUTS2 Region Soil N2O Embedded Fuel use Seed Drying and storage Total
Direct Indirect Fertiliser Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification Pesticide
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 70,4 4,2 88,8 18,7 3,2 70,7 12,1 0,2 268,4
HU21 Közép-Dunántúl 70,3 3,5 94,0 19,5 4,8 67,1 11,1 0,2 270,6
HU22 Nyugat-Dunántúl 106,3 19,2 83,8 17,5 4,8 57,2 8,8 0,2 297,6
HU23 Dél-Dunántúl 70,1 6,6 75,8 15,8 5,4 58,3 9,7 0,2 241,9
HU31 Észak-Magyarország 67,6 6,3 71,5 15,0 4,6 72,5 9,1 0,2 246,8
HU32 Észak-Alföld 55,1 2,5 64,4 13,6 2,7 66,6 11,0 0,2 216,1
HU33 Dél-Alföld 62,6 3,0 78,0 16,6 2,9 62,5 10,0 0,2 235,7
NUTS2 Region Soil N2O Embedded Fuel use Seed Drying and storage Total
Direct Indirect Fertiliser Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification Pesticide
HU10 Közép-Magyarország n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
HU21 Közép-Dunántúl 98,5 3,7 104,4 20,7 11,0 161,1 0,0 0,2 399,6
HU22 Nyugat-Dunántúl 128,2 23,6 84,8 16,4 10,3 127,7 0,0 0,2 391,2
HU23 Dél-Dunántúl 103,4 8,7 91,6 18,2 16,0 130,6 0,0 0,2 368,8
HU31 Észak-Magyarország 82,8 6,5 69,5 11,8 19,0 169,1 0,0 0,2 358,8
HU32 Észak-Alföld 74,2 2,0 50,7 11,3 12,2 95,8 0,0 0,2 246,4
HU33 Dél-Alföld 86,6 3,0 87,2 16,1 9,3 139,9 0,0 0,2 342,3
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (1), and in particular Article 31(4) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 requires biofuels, bioliquids, and biomass fuels to save significant greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels so that they can be counted towards the targets set in that Directive. For this purpose, Article 29(10) sets specific emission savings thresholds for those fuels, and Article 31 regulates how to calculate the greenhouse gas emission savings from their use. When making those calculations, it is possible to use the default values set out in Annexes V and VI to Directive (EU) 2018/2001. Instead of the default values for greenhouse gas emissions from the cultivation of agricultural raw materials, it is possible to use typical values under some conditions. These typical values, representing the average value in a specific area, may be reported to the Commission by Member States or third countries. The typical values may only be used if the Commission recognises them to be accurate.
(2) On 27 September 2024, Hungary submitted to the Commission the final report with data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of wheat, maize, sunflower, soybean and rapeseed typically produced in areas on its territory classified as level 2 in the nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2). Hungary asked for those data to be recognised as accurate in line with Article 31(4) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
(3) The Commission assessed the report and found that it contained accurate data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with cultivating wheat, maize, sunflower, soybean and rapeseed typically produced in NUTS 2 regions in Hungary.
(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Sustainability of Biofuels, Bioliquids and Biomass Fuels,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The report submitted by Hungary to the Commission on 27 September 2024 is recognised under Article 31(4) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 to contain accurate data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of wheat, maize, sunflower, soybean and rapeseed typically produced in NUTS 2 regions in Hungary. The summary of the report’s data is set out in the Annex.
If the data contained in the report as submitted for recognition to the Commission on 27 September 2024, changes in a way that might affect the accuracy of the data and consequently the basis for this Decision, Hungary shall notify the Commission of such changes immediately. The Commission services shall assess the notified changes to determine if the report still provides the accurate data for which it is recognised.
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall cease to apply on 30 January 2030.

GHG-emissions arising from the cultivation of grain maize in Hungary (kg CO2eq/tonne grain maize harvested on dry matter basis)

NUTS2
Region
Soil N2O
Embedded
Fuel use
Seed
Drying and storage
Total
Direct
Indirect
Fertiliser
Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification
Pesticide
HU10
Közép-Magyarország
45,2
2,4
45,7
9,7
3,4
54,8
1,0
18,6
180,7
HU21
Közép-Dunántúl
49,7
2,3
54,5
11,9
3,1
49,1
1,0
29,2
200,9
HU22
Nyugat-Dunántúl
74,0
13,9
52,3
11,2
3,1
45,6
0,9
40,1
241,0
HU23
Dél-Dunántúl
61,9
5,7
64,1
13,5
3,9
45,1
0,9
38,4
233,5
HU31
Észak-Magyarország
41,5
3,5
34,7
7,1
4,9
57,4
0,7
7,0
156,8
HU32
Észak-Alföld
43,9
1,8
44,0
9,6
2,6
45,7
0,9
30,6
179,1
HU33
Dél-Alföld
44,1
1,9
45,5
9,7
3,2
49,5
1,0
15,7
170,6

GHG-emissions arising from the cultivation of winter rapeseed in Hungary (kg CO2eq/tonne winter rapeseed harvested on dry matter basis)

NUTS2
Region
Soil N2O
Embedded
Fuel use
Seed
Drying and storage
Total
Direct
Indirect
Fertiliser
Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification
Pesticide
HU10
Közép-Magyarország
129,2
8,4
187,3
38,5
14,2
132,4
0,9
0,2
511,1
HU21
Közép-Dunántúl
118,9
6,4
178,2
36,2
13,1
119,5
0,8
0,2
473,3
HU22
Nyugat-Dunántúl
180,2
32,2
152,7
31,5
13,5
95,2
0,7
0,2
506,1
HU23
Dél-Dunántúl
128,6
12,7
158,9
32,6
13,8
108,2
0,7
0,2
455,6
HU31
Észak-Magyarország
128,6
12,6
155,9
32,6
13,4
130,8
0,7
0,2
474,9
HU32
Észak-Alföld
98,3
5,0
135,5
28,3
7,6
141,0
0,7
0,2
416,7
HU33
Dél-Alföld
99,1
5,1
141,4
28,6
11,7
110,6
0,7
0,2
397,3

GHG-emissions arising from the cultivation of sunflower seed in Hungary (kg CO2eq/tonne sunflower seed harvested on dry matter basis)

NUTS2
Region
Soil N2O
Embedded
Fuel use
Seed
Drying and storage
Total
Direct
Indirect
Fertiliser
Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification
Pesticide
HU10
Közép-Magyarország
65,8
3,7
73,9
15,1
8,8
121,7
1,2
9,1
299,3
HU21
Közép-Dunántúl
80,5
4,2
101,0
21,4
11,0
118,5
1,2
8,0
345,9
HU22
Nyugat-Dunántúl
134,4
24,8
108,3
22,3
11,7
98,3
1,2
9,2
410,2
HU23
Dél-Dunántúl
99,8
9,6
115,5
23,5
14,3
119,7
1,3
15,2
398,8
HU31
Észak-Magyarország
73,8
6,9
76,1
15,4
11,4
144,4
1,2
4,1
333,3
HU32
Észak-Alföld
65,1
3,0
72,3
15,5
7,6
119,9
1,2
7,4
292,0
HU33
Dél-Alföld
72,3
3,4
86,4
18,3
7,7
114,1
1,3
5,7
309,2

GHG-emissions arising from the cultivation of winter wheat in Hungary (kg CO2eq/tonne winter wheat harvested on dry matter basis)

NUTS2
Region
Soil N2O
Embedded
Fuel use
Seed
Drying and storage
Total
Direct
Indirect
Fertiliser
Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification
Pesticide
HU10
Közép-Magyarország
70,4
4,2
88,8
18,7
3,2
70,7
12,1
0,2
268,4
HU21
Közép-Dunántúl
70,3
3,5
94,0
19,5
4,8
67,1
11,1
0,2
270,6
HU22
Nyugat-Dunántúl
106,3
19,2
83,8
17,5
4,8
57,2
8,8
0,2
297,6
HU23
Dél-Dunántúl
70,1
6,6
75,8
15,8
5,4
58,3
9,7
0,2
241,9
HU31
Észak-Magyarország
67,6
6,3
71,5
15,0
4,6
72,5
9,1
0,2
246,8
HU32
Észak-Alföld
55,1
2,5
64,4
13,6
2,7
66,6
11,0
0,2
216,1
HU33
Dél-Alföld
62,6
3,0
78,0
16,6
2,9
62,5
10,0
0,2
235,7

GHG-emissions emissions arising from the cultivation of soybeans in Hungary (kg CO2eq/tonne soybeans harvested on dry matter basis)

NUTS2
Region
Soil N2O
Embedded
Fuel use
Seed
Drying and storage
Total
Direct
Indirect
Fertiliser
Neutralisation of fertiliser acidification
Pesticide
HU10
Közép-Magyarország
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
HU21
Közép-Dunántúl
98,5
3,7
104,4
20,7
11,0
161,1
0,0
0,2
399,6
HU22
Nyugat-Dunántúl
128,2
23,6
84,8
16,4
10,3
127,7
0,0
0,2
391,2
HU23
Dél-Dunántúl
103,4
8,7
91,6
18,2
16,0
130,6
0,0
0,2
368,8
HU31
Észak-Magyarország
82,8
6,5
69,5
11,8
19,0
169,1
0,0
0,2
358,8
HU32
Észak-Alföld
74,2
2,0
50,7
11,3
12,2
95,8
0,0
0,2
246,4
HU33
Dél-Alföld
86,6
3,0
87,2
16,1
9,3
139,9
0,0
0,2
342,3

Council Decision (EU) 2025/10 of 9 December 2024 amending the Decision of 30 November 2017 authorising the opening of negotiations with the CARIFORUM States for an agreement on the protection of geographic indications based on Article 145 of the CARIFORUM Agreement, as regards craft and industrial products

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/10 6.1.2025
(1) The Council Decision of 30 November 2017(1)authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the CARIFORUM States for an agreement on the protection of geographical indications. That Decision was based on Article 145 of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part (‘CARIFORUM Agreement’)(2).
(2) Regulation (EU) 2023/2411 of the European Parliament and of the Council(3)lays down a system for the protection of geographical indications for craft and industrial products. That Regulation entered into force on 16 November 2023. The CARIFORUM States have expressed interest in negotiations which would include non-agricultural products.
(3) The Addendum to the Decision of 30 November 2017 should therefore be amended to provide additional negotiating directives on craft and industrial products in order to cover the negotiations with the CARIFORUM States concerning non-agricultural products,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(3) and (4) thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Council Decision of 30 November 2017 (1) authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the CARIFORUM States for an agreement on the protection of geographical indications. That Decision was based on Article 145 of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part (‘CARIFORUM Agreement’) (2).
(2) Regulation (EU) 2023/2411 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) lays down a system for the protection of geographical indications for craft and industrial products. That Regulation entered into force on 16 November 2023. The CARIFORUM States have expressed interest in negotiations which would include non-agricultural products.
(3) The Addendum to the Decision of 30 November 2017 should therefore be amended to provide additional negotiating directives on craft and industrial products in order to cover the negotiations with the CARIFORUM States concerning non-agricultural products,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Addendum to the Council Decision of 30 November 2017 authorising the opening of negotiations with the CARIFORUM States for an agreement on the protection of geographic indications based on Article 145 of the CARIFORUM Agreement is amended in accordance with the Addendum to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Commission.

Council Decision (EU) 2025/9 of 12 December 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Monitoring and Review Committee established by the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Co-operative Republic of Guyana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union, regarding the establishment of the rules of procedure of the Joint Monitoring and Review Committee and the working procedures for arbitration

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/9 14.1.2025
(1) The Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Co-operative Republic of Guyana on forest law enforcement, governance, and trade in timber products to the European Union(1)(the ‘Agreement’) was concluded by the Union by means of Council Decision (EU) 2023/904(2)and entered into force on 1 June 2023.
(2) Pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Agreement, a Joint Monitoring and Review Committee (JMRC) has been established to facilitate the management, monitoring and review of the Agreement, including the management of the independent audit, and to facilitate dialogue and exchanges of information between the parties to the Agreement. Article 20(3) of the Agreement provides that the JMRC is to establish its own rules of procedure.
(3) Pursuant to Article 26(1) of the Agreement, where the parties to the Agreement have failed to resolve a dispute by recourse to consultations and, where applicable, mediation, it is possible for either party to request the establishment of an arbitration panel. Article 26(5) of the Agreement provides that the JMRC is to establish the working procedures for arbitration.
(4) The JMRC, during its next meeting, will adopt decisions establishing its rules of procedure and the working procedures for arbitration.
(5) The Union should determine the position to be taken within the JMRC regarding the adoption of the decisions establishing the JMRC’s rules of procedure and the working procedures for arbitration.
(6) The position of the Union within the JMRC should therefore be based on the attached draft Decisions,
1. The JMRC shall adopt its own Rules of Procedure and shall execute its functions as described in Annex X of the Agreement.
2. Pursuant to Article 20(2) of the Agreement, the Rules of Procedure are to be adopted by consensus of the Parties.
3. The Rules of Procedure shall be binding on the Parties.
1. The Rules of Procedure of the JMRC are established as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
2. This Decision shall enter into force on …
— Civil Society and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in the field of forest- or environment-related matters: two (2) observers.
— Indigenous peoples’ organisations: two (2) observers.
— Private sector: two (2) observers.
— Ministry of Natural Resources
— Ministry of Finance
— Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC)
— Or any other Ministry or Agency relevant for the implementation of the Agreement
— support on all matters related to the organisation of the meetings of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, sub-committees including on the agenda, invitations, logistics and any other matter requested by the Secretariat.
— facilitate the discussions during the meetings of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, sub-committees keep notes of the discussions and provide the draft Aide Memoire/Joint Minutes or summary of discussions as relevant.
— Identify in association with the Parties all relevant stakeholders and support as necessary the processes for the nomination/election of the representatives as stakeholder observers.
— Assist in the preparation of the Annual Report on the VPA implementation.
— Identify and report to the Secretariat any issue in relation to the implementation of the Joint Implementation Framework and/or the VPA implementation at large.
— Support upon request on issues related to funding, financing and donor coordination.
— Identify and report to the Secretariat any issue in relation to synergies with other relevant initiatives, including but not limited to the Forest Partnership between Guyana and the EU and REDD+.
— Respond to any request by the Secretariat and/or the Chairpersons of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, and sub-committees.
(a) The documents submitted to the JMRC
(b) Any statement the Chairpersons have agreed to be entered
(c) Conclusions in relation to specific items on the agenda. Conclusions reflect the outcome of discussion on a specific topic. They may, or may not, be linked to Recommendations.
(d) Recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 14 and
(e) Decisions adopted in accordance with Article 14.
(a) by the adoption of a solution mutually agreed between the Parties, on the date of adoption;
(b) by a written declaration of the mediator, after consultation with the Parties, that further efforts at mediation would be to no avail, on the date of that declaration;
(c) by a written declaration of a Party after exploring solutions mutually considered under the mediation proceeding and after having considered the opinion of the mediator, on the date of that declaration. Such declaration may not be issued before the period set out in paragraph 7 has expired; or
(d) at any stage of the proceeding by mutual agreement of the Parties, on the date of that agreement.
(1) ‘arbitration panel’ means a panel established under Article 26(1) of the Agreement;
(2) ‘arbitrator’ means a member of the arbitration panel;
(3) ‘complaining Party’ means the party to the Agreement that requests the establishment of an arbitration panel under Article 26(1) of the Agreement;
(4) ‘respondent’ means the party to the Agreement that is notified of the request for the establishment of an arbitration panel under Article 26(1) of the Agreement;
(5) ‘representative of a Party’ means an employee or any individual appointed by a Party who represents that Party for the purposes of a dispute under the Agreement;
(6) ‘day’ means a calendar day unless otherwise specified;
(7) ‘third party’ means a party that is not a disputing party, but that participates in the arbitration proceedings;
(8) ‘International Bureau’ means the International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration;
(9) ‘PCA rules’ means the Permanent Court of Arbitration Rules 2012, effective as from 17 December 2012, including any subsequent amendments;
(10) ‘PCA appointing authority’ means the authority of the Permanent Court of Arbitration identified in the PCA rules as having the responsibility of appointing arbitrators in accordance with the PCA rules.
(a) the PCA appointing authority shall communicate to each of the Parties an identical list containing at least three names;
(b) within 15 days of the receipt of the list referred to in point (a), each Party shall return the list to the International Bureau, without copying the other Party, after having deleted the name or names to which it objects and numbered the remaining names on the list in the order of its preference;
(c) after the expiration of the period of time referred to in point (b), the PCA appointing authority shall appoint the third arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the Parties;
(d) if for any reason the appointment cannot be made according to the procedure set out in this paragraph, the PCA appointing authority may exercise his or her discretion in appointing the third arbitrator.
(a) the remuneration and expenses to be paid to the arbitrators;
(b) the terms of reference of the arbitration panel; and
(c) the timetable of the proceedings.
(a) to examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the Agreement cited by the Parties, the matter referred to in the request for the establishment of the arbitration panel;
(b) to make findings on the conformity of a measure at issue with the provisions of the Agreement; and
(c) to deliver a ruling.
(a) representatives of a Party;
(b) advisers, assistants and administrative staff to the arbitrators;
(c) experts, as decided by the arbitration panel;
(d) witnesses;
(e) third parties.
(a) argument of the complaining Party;
(b) argument of the respondent.
(a) reply of the complaining Party;
(b) counter-reply of the respondent.
(a) are received by the arbitration panel within 10 days of the establishment of the arbitration panel;
(b) are directly relevant to a factual or a legal issue under consideration by the arbitration panel;
(c) contain a description of the person making the submission, including, for a natural person, his or her nationality or residence, as applicable, and, for a legal person, its place of establishment, the nature of its activities, its legal status, its general objectives and its source of financing; and
(d) specify the nature of the interest that the person has in the arbitration panel proceedings.
(a) the fees of the arbitration panel, to be stated separately for each arbitrator and to be fixed by the arbitration panel in accordance with the daily fees agreed by the Parties at the time the arbitrators were appointed;
(b) travel and other expenses incurred by the arbitrators;
(c) the costs of expert advice and of other assistance required by the arbitration panel;
(d) travel and other expenses incurred by witnesses if such expenses are approved by the arbitration panel.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Co-operative Republic of Guyana on forest law enforcement, governance, and trade in timber products to the European Union (1) (the ‘Agreement’) was concluded by the Union by means of Council Decision (EU) 2023/904 (2) and entered into force on 1 June 2023.
(2) Pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Agreement, a Joint Monitoring and Review Committee (JMRC) has been established to facilitate the management, monitoring and review of the Agreement, including the management of the independent audit, and to facilitate dialogue and exchanges of information between the parties to the Agreement. Article 20(3) of the Agreement provides that the JMRC is to establish its own rules of procedure.
(3) Pursuant to Article 26(1) of the Agreement, where the parties to the Agreement have failed to resolve a dispute by recourse to consultations and, where applicable, mediation, it is possible for either party to request the establishment of an arbitration panel. Article 26(5) of the Agreement provides that the JMRC is to establish the working procedures for arbitration.
(4) The JMRC, during its next meeting, will adopt decisions establishing its rules of procedure and the working procedures for arbitration.
(5) The Union should determine the position to be taken within the JMRC regarding the adoption of the decisions establishing the JMRC’s rules of procedure and the working procedures for arbitration.
(6) The position of the Union within the JMRC should therefore be based on the attached draft Decisions,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Joint Monitoring and Review Committee (JMRC) established by the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Co-operative Republic of Guyana on forest law enforcement, governance, and trade in timber products to the European Union shall be based on the draft Decisions of the JMRC attached to this Decision.

2. Minor technical changes to the JMRC’s draft Decisions may be agreed to by the representatives of the Union in the JMRC without a further decision of the Council.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
The working procedures for arbitration in case of dispute settlement under the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Co-operative Republic of Guyana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union are hereby adopted as set out in Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 1
Representation of the Parties 1. The JMRC shall be composed of representatives of the Parties at Ministerial and/or senior official level. 2. The representation of the EU to the JMRC shall be led by the Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Guyana (or responsible for Guyana) and shall comprise representatives from the European Commission up to a maximum number of 10 representatives. 3. The representation of Guyana to the JMRC shall be led by the Minister for Natural Resources and shall comprise the Commissioner for Forests, officials from the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Trade, Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Amerindian Affairs, any other Ministries or Government Agencies as needed, and the Forestry Commission, up to a maximum number of 10 representatives. 4. Each Party shall notify in writing the Secretariat (referred to in Article 7) the names, contact details and functions of its representatives to the JMRC. The representatives are deemed to have the authorisation of representing the Party until the date the Party has notified the Secretariat of a new representative.

Article 2
Chairmanship
The JMRC shall be jointly chaired by the Minister of Natural Resources on behalf of Guyana and the Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Guyana (or responsible for Guyana) on behalf of the EU. The Chairpersons may arrange to be represented by respective designees. The designee shall exercise all the rights of that Chairperson.

Article 3
Stakeholder observers 1. National stakeholders in Guyana from civil society, local and international NGOs, private sector and indigenous peoples shall be invited to attend as observers the meetings of the JMRC and the Technical Committee of the JMRC, hereafter referred to as ‘stakeholder observers’, except for any sessions deemed by the Chairpersons to be reserved only for the representatives of the Parties. 2. The Secretariat shall invite relevant national stakeholder organisations from the civil society, local and international NGOs, private sector and indigenous peoples to nominate/elect in accordance with their respective own procedures their observers and alternates to the JMRC and the Technical Committee of the JMRC for a period of two years, as follows:
—
Civil Society and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in the field of forest- or environment-related matters: two (2) observers.
—
Indigenous peoples’ organisations: two (2) observers.
—
Private sector: two (2) observers. 3. The stakeholder organisations shall notify in writing the Secretariat the names, organisation and contact details of their nominated/elected observers, as well as of their alternates to the Secretariat. The stakeholders will also share the selection procedure of the observers with the Secretariat. 4. Stakeholder observers may submit to the Secretariat documents in relation to specific items on the agenda no later than 7 calendar days before the JMRC meeting. If the Secretariat confirms the relevance and added value of the submitted documents it shall mark them ‘For information’ and circulate them to the representatives of the Parties. 5. Observers shall not have voting rights or any decision-making role in relation to the decisions and recommendation to be adopted by the JMRC or by one of its bodies.

Article 4
Technical Committee of the JMRC 1. The JMRC shall be assisted in the performance of its duties by a Committee composed of representatives of the Parties at official level, hereafter referred to as ‘Technical Committee of the JMRC’. 2. The Technical Committee of the JMRC, hereinafter called ‘Technical Committee’, shall prepare the meetings and the deliberations of the JMRC, implement the decisions of the JMRC where appropriate and, in general, ensure continuity of the JMRC and the proper functioning of the Agreement. It shall consider any matter referred to it by the JMRC as well as any other matter which may arise in the course of the day-to-day implementation of the Agreement. 3. The Technical Committee shall be chaired jointly by the Head of Cooperation of the Delegation of the European Union to Guyana (or responsible for Guyana) and the Commissioner for Forests or their designates. 4. The representatives of the EU to the Technical Committee shall be officials from the Delegation of the European Union to Guyana and the European Commission. 5. The representatives of Guyana to the Technical Committee shall be officials from:
—
Ministry of Natural Resources
—
Ministry of Finance
—
Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC)
—
Or any other Ministry or Agency relevant for the implementation of the Agreement 6. The Technical Committee shall meet regularly and at minimum in advance of each JMRC meetings. 7. In the event that the Technical Committee meets independently of a meeting of the JMRC, joint minutes summarizing the discussions shall be drawn upon by the Facilitator and signed by the Chairpersons. The Secretariat shall share these with the JMRC Chairpersons. 8. The JMRC Secretariat shall provide administrative support to the Technical Committee. 9. The present Rules of Procedures shall be applied mutatis mutandis by the Technical Committee 10. The Technical Committee has no decision-making power, but may submit its recommendations to the JMRC.

Article 5
Sub-committees to the JMRC 1. According to Article 3.11 of Annex V of the Agreement, the Parties may establish sub-committees to the JMRC , as appropriate,to deal with specific areas related to the implementation of the Agreement. The JMRC shall determine the purpose, composition, duration, tasks and working methods of such sub-committees. The Parties shall appoint its representatives to the sub-committees and inform the Secretariat. All relevant correspondences, documents and communications between the contact points of each sub-committee shall be forwarded also to the Secretariat. 2. At each regular meeting, the JMRC shall receive reports from each sub-committee on its activities and progress, including recommendations to the JMRC for review and appropriate action. 3. Unless otherwise agreed by the JMRC, the present Rules of Procedures shall be applied mutatis mutandis by the sub-committees. 4. The sub-committees will have no decision-making power, but may submit recommendations to the JMRC.

Article 6
Experts and implementation entities 1. The Chairpersons may invite experts to attend the meetings of the Technical Committee and/or the JMRC as well as sub-committees on an ad hoc basis to provide information on specific subjects, and only for the parts of the meeting where such specific subjects are discussed. 2. The Chairpersons may agree to invite entities involved in the implementation of the Agreement (‘implementation entities’), to attend the meetings of Technical Committee of the JMRC and/or the JMRC meetings as well as sub-committees or parts thereof as appropriate on an ad hoc basis to provide information and updates, as well as to receive guidance and advice on their activities and contribution to the implementation of the Agreement and the attainment of its objectives.

Article 7
Secretariat 1. An official of the Delegation of the European Union to Guyana and an official of the Guyana Forestry Commission shall jointly act as Secretariat of the JMRC (‘Secretariat’). Each Party shall notify to the other Party the name, function/position and contact details of the official who is the member of the Secretariat. This official is deemed to continue acting as member of the Secretariat for the Party until the date the Party has notified to the other Party a new member. 2. The Secretariat shall provide administrative support to the JMRC and the Technical Committee, as well as any sub-committees set up by the JMRC. 3. The Secretariat shall be assisted in its tasks by the Facilitator referred to in Article 8.

Article 8
Facilitation 1. The JMRC shall engage the services of a person who shall be independent and impartial, to facilitate the interactions, dialogue and discussions between the Parties as well as between the Parties and the stakeholders in relation to the implementation of the Agreement, hereafter referred to as ‘Facilitator’. 2. The tasks of the Facilitator shall include the following:
—
support on all matters related to the organisation of the meetings of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, sub-committees including on the agenda, invitations, logistics and any other matter requested by the Secretariat.
—
facilitate the discussions during the meetings of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, sub-committees keep notes of the discussions and provide the draft Aide Memoire/Joint Minutes or summary of discussions as relevant.
—
Identify in association with the Parties all relevant stakeholders and support as necessary the processes for the nomination/election of the representatives as stakeholder observers.
—
Assist in the preparation of the Annual Report on the VPA implementation.
—
Identify and report to the Secretariat any issue in relation to the implementation of the Joint Implementation Framework and/or the VPA implementation at large.
—
Support upon request on issues related to funding, financing and donor coordination.
—
Identify and report to the Secretariat any issue in relation to synergies with other relevant initiatives, including but not limited to the Forest Partnership between Guyana and the EU and REDD+.
—
Respond to any request by the Secretariat and/or the Chairpersons of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, and sub-committees. 3. The Facilitator shall operate under the guidance and supervision of the Secretariat that shall remain at all times informed of the Facilitator’s activities.

Article 9
Documents
Where the deliberations of the JMRC and/or the Technical Committee are based on written supporting documents, such documents shall be numbered and circulated by the Secretariat as documents of the JMRC and shall be referred to in the Aide Memoire and/or Joint Minutes.

Article 10
Correspondence 1. The representatives of the Parties responsible for official communications concerning the implementation of the Agreement shall be the Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Guyana for the EU (or responsible for Guyana) and the Minister responsible for Finance (for Guyana) as set out in Article 22(1) of the Agreement 2. All correspondence to the JMRC shall be directed to the Secretariat. The Secretariat will inform how submissions can be done, for example, by written correspondence, email, other. 3. The Secretariat shall ensure that correspondence addressed to the JMRC is forwarded to the Chairpersons and, where appropriate, circulated as documents referred to in Article 9 to the representatives of the Parties Correspondence from either of the Chairperson shall be sent to the recipients by the Secretariat and be numbered and circulated, where appropriate, to the other Party. 4. Either Party shall send all relevant documents to the Secretariat no later than 14 calendar days prior to the next JMRC meeting.

Article 11
Meetings 1. The JMRC shall meet at least twice a year, as provided for in Article 20(4) of the Agreement, or at the request of either Party. 2. By way of exception and if the Parties agree, the meetings of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, the sub-committees may be held virtually/by videoconference. 3. Each meeting of the JMRC shall be convened by the Secretariat at a date and place agreed by the Parties. The convening notice of the meeting shall be issued by the Secretariat to the representatives of the Parties no later than 28 calendar days prior to the start of the meeting, unless the Parties agree otherwise. 4. The Parties shall inform the Secretariat of the JMRC of the intended composition of the delegations attending the meeting no later than 14 calendar days before the start of the meeting.

Article 12
Agenda for the Meetings 1. A provisional agenda for each meeting shall be drawn up by the Secretariat on the basis of proposals made by the Parties. It shall be forwarded, together with the relevant documents, to the Chairpersons no later than 21 calendar days before the start of the meeting. 2. Additions or changes to the provisional agenda must be received by the Secretariat no later than 14 calendar days before the start of the meeting provided all relevant supporting documents are also received by the Secretariat together with the request for the additions or changes. 3. The agenda shall be adopted by the JMRC at the beginning of each meeting. Items other than those appearing on the provisional agenda may be placed on the agenda if the Parties so agree. 4. The Secretariat may with the agreement of the Chairpersons reduce the time periods specified in paragraphs 1 and 2 in order to take account of the requirements of a particular case.

Article 13
Aide-Mémoire 1. Draft minutes of each meeting shall be drawn up by the Facilitator. 2. The minutes shall, as a general rule, summarise each item on the agenda, specifying where applicable:
(a) The documents submitted to the JMRC
(b) Any statement the Chairpersons have agreed to be entered
(c) Conclusions in relation to specific items on the agenda. Conclusions reflect the outcome of discussion on a specific topic. They may, or may not, be linked to Recommendations.
(d) Recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 14 and
(e) Decisions adopted in accordance with Article 14. 3. The minutes shall also include a list of participants in the meeting. 4. The minutes shall be approved and signed by the Chairpersons at the end of the meeting (‘Aide-Memoire’). The Secretariat shall share one original copy of those authentic documents with the Parties. 5. A Technical Committee of the JMRC convening independently of a JMRC, shall issue its own minutes summarizing discussions on each item of its agenda. These discussions will be incorporated in the relevant JMRC meetings.
The Aide-Memoire shall be made public.

Article 14
Decisions and Recommendations 1. The JMRC may adopt Decisions and/or Recommendations in respect of all matters where the Agreement so provides. As provided for in Article 20(2) of the Agreement, decisions and recommendations shall be adopted by consensus. 2. Decisions and/or Recommendations shall be binding on the Parties and shall enter into force after completion of the respective internal procedures of each Party. 3. In the period between meetings, the JMRC may adopt decisions or recommendations by written procedure if the Parties so agree. A written procedure shall consist of an exchange of notes between the Parties. The Chairpersons shall have the power to exchange such notes and to confirm the agreement on any decision, as necessary. The written procedure shall have a time limit of no more than 21 calendar days within which other Party must make known any reservations or amendments it has.
Within 21 days after receipt of the written procedure, a Party may request in writing to the other Party that the proposal be discussed in the next JMRC meeting. Such request automatically suspends the written procedure.
A proposal on which there have been no reservations within the time limit set for a written procedure shall be considered adopted by the JMRC.
Adopted proposals shall be recorded in the Aide Memoire of the next meeting of the JMRC. 4. Decisions or recommendations shall be entitled ‘Decision’ or ‘Recommendation’ respectively and shall be followed by a serial number, the date of adoption and a description of their subject-matter. Each decision shall provide for the date of its entry into force. 5. Decisions and recommendations adopted by the JMRC shall be authenticated by making an authentic copy signed by the Chairpersons of the JMRC available for each Party.

Article 15
Languages 1. The official language of the JMRC shall be English. 2. Unless otherwise decided, the JMRC shall base its deliberations on documentation and proposals prepared in English.

Article 16
Publicity and Confidentiality 1. Unless otherwise decided, the meetings of the JMRC shall not be public. 2. When a Party submits information considered as confidential under its laws and regulations to the JMRC, Technical Committee, and sub-committees, the Parties shall treat that information as confidential. 3. Each Party may decide on the publication of the decisions and recommendations of the JMRC in its respective official publication.

Article 17
Expenses 1. Each Party shall meet any expenses it incurs as a result of participating in the meetings of the JMRC, the Technical Committee, and sub-committees with regard to staff, travel, and subsistence expenses, and with regard to postal and telecommunications expenses. 2. The Parties will endeavour to split the costs in connection with the organization of meetings and the reproduction of documents evenly. Ad hoc discussions between the Parties will be held in this regard.

Article 18
Field Missions
If either Party requests to conduct a field mission related to the Agreement, both Parties shall agree on the Terms of Reference and timing of the mission.

Article 19
Mediation 1. A Party may request, in writing and at any time, that the Parties enter into a mediation proceeding. The request must be sufficiently detailed to present clearly the issue at hand and the concerns of the complaining Party. Where a Party requests mediation pursuant to paragraph 1, the other Party shall consider the request and reply in writing within seven calendar days of the request. Failing this, the request for mediation shall be considered to have been dismissed. 2. Where Parties agree to seek recourse to mediation pursuant to Article 25(4) of the Agreement, the Parties shall jointly select a mediator at the beginning of the mediation proceeding, and no later than 14 calendar days after receipt of the reply to the mediation request. Failing to do so, the Parties may jointly request the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration to appoint a mediator within 7 days. 3. A mediator shall not be a citizen of either Party, unless the Parties agree otherwise. The mediator assists the Parties in an independent and impartial manner in their attempt to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute. The mediator will be guided by principles of objectivity, fairness and justice, giving consideration to, among other things, the rights and obligations of the Parties and the circumstances surrounding the dispute, including any previous practices between the Parties. The mediator may conduct the mediation proceedings in such a manner as he/she considers appropriate, taking into account the circumstances of the case, the wishes the Parties may express, including any request by a Party that the mediator hears oral statements, and any special need for a speedy settlement of the dispute. 4. The mediator may organise meetings between the Parties, consult the Parties jointly or individually, seek the assistance of, or consult, relevant experts and stakeholders, and provide any additional support requested by the Parties. 5. The mediator is expected to deliver his opinion to the Parties within 45 calendar days of his appointment. A request for additional time may be entertained by the Parties, provided there is sufficient justification. 6. Taking into account the opinion delivered by the mediator, the Parties shall endeavour to reach a mutually satisfactory solution within 30 calendar days from the notification of the mediator’s opinion. Pending a final agreement, the Parties may consider possible interim solutions. 7. The solution may be adopted by the JMRC. The Parties may decide to apply the written procedure as per Article 15(3) of the current Annex instead of convening a JMRC. Mutually satisfactory solutions shall be made public, unless the Parties decide otherwise. However, the version disclosed to the public may not contain any information classified by either Party as confidential. 8. The mediator shall submit in writing a draft factual report to the Parties, providing a brief summary of the issue at hand and any mutually satisfactory solution reached as the final outcome of the proceeding, including possible interim solutions. The mediator shall grant the Parties 15 days to comment on the draft report. After considering the comments of the Parties submitted within the deadline provided, the mediator shall submit, in writing, a final factual report to the Parties within 15 days. The factual report may not contain any interpretation of the Agreement. 9. The proceeding shall be terminated:
(a) by the adoption of a solution mutually agreed between the Parties, on the date of adoption;
(b) by a written declaration of the mediator, after consultation with the Parties, that further efforts at mediation would be to no avail, on the date of that declaration;
(c) by a written declaration of a Party after exploring solutions mutually considered under the mediation proceeding and after having considered the opinion of the mediator, on the date of that declaration. Such declaration may not be issued before the period set out in paragraph 7 has expired; or
(d) at any stage of the proceeding by mutual agreement of the Parties, on the date of that agreement. 10. Where the Parties have agreed to a solution, each Party shall take the measures necessary to implement it within the agreed time limit. The implementing Party shall inform the other Party, in writing and within the agreed time limit, of any steps or measures taken to implement the mutually satisfactory solution. 11. The Parties will endeavour to split the costs in connection with a mediation proceeding evenly. Ad hoc discussions between the Parties will be held in this regard.

Article 20
Amendments of the Annexes 1. If one of the Parties wishes to amend the provisions of the Annexes to the Agreement, it shall notify the JMRC accordingly and submit its proposal to this end. 2. The JMRC may request the Technical Committee of the JMRC to consider the proposal and express its views and suggestions. The JMRC may set up a sub-committee to support the Technical Committee of the JMRC with this work. 3. The JMRC may, upon the proposal of one Party and taking into account the views and suggestions of the Technical Committee of the JMRC adopt a decision amending the Annexes in accordance with Article 27(3) fo the Agreement and Article 14 of these Rules.

Article 21
Amendment of Rules of Procedure
The JMRC may adopt decisions amending these Rules of Procedure in accordance with Article 14 of these Rules.

Section I

Introductory provisions

Article 1
Scope of application 1. These Working Procedures for Arbitration supplement and clarify the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (the ‘Agreement’) between the European Union (the ‘Union’) and the Co-operative Republic of Guyana (‘Guyana’), in particular Article 26 thereof. 2. These Working Procedures for Arbitration aim at enabling the Union and Guyana (the ‘Parties’) to resolve disputes that can arise between them in relation to the interpretation and application of the Agreement through an arbitration mechanism.

Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of these Working Procedures for Arbitration, the following definitions apply:
(1) ‘arbitration panel’ means a panel established under Article 26(1) of the Agreement;
(2) ‘arbitrator’ means a member of the arbitration panel;
(3) ‘complaining Party’ means the party to the Agreement that requests the establishment of an arbitration panel under Article 26(1) of the Agreement;
(4) ‘respondent’ means the party to the Agreement that is notified of the request for the establishment of an arbitration panel under Article 26(1) of the Agreement;
(5) ‘representative of a Party’ means an employee or any individual appointed by a Party who represents that Party for the purposes of a dispute under the Agreement;
(6) ‘day’ means a calendar day unless otherwise specified;
(7) ‘third party’ means a party that is not a disputing party, but that participates in the arbitration proceedings;
(8) ‘International Bureau’ means the International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration;
(9) ‘PCA rules’ means the Permanent Court of Arbitration Rules 2012, effective as from 17 December 2012, including any subsequent amendments;
(10) ‘PCA appointing authority’ means the authority of the Permanent Court of Arbitration identified in the PCA rules as having the responsibility of appointing arbitrators in accordance with the PCA rules.

Article 3
Applicable law 1. The arbitration panel shall apply the Agreement as interpreted in accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and other treaties, rules and principles of international law relevant to the dispute and applicable between the Parties. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, where a dispute submitted to arbitration raises a question of interpretation and application of a provision of the Agreement defined by reference to a provision of the domestic law of a Party, the arbitration panel may consider, as appropriate, the domestic law of that Party as a matter of fact. In doing so, the arbitration panel shall follow the prevailing interpretation given to the domestic law by the courts or authorities of that Party. Any interpretation given to domestic law by the arbitration panel shall not be binding upon the courts or the authorities of that Party.

Article 4
Notifications 1. Any request, notice, written submission or other document of the arbitration panel shall be sent to both Parties and, where relevant and appropriate, to the International Bureau, at the same time.
Any request, notice, written submission or other document of a Party which is addressed to the arbitration panel shall be copied and sent to the other Party and, where relevant and appropriate, to the International Bureau at the same time.
Any request, notice, written submission or other document of a Party which is addressed to the other Party shall be copied and sent to the arbitration panel and, where relevant and appropriate, to the International Bureau at the same time. 2. Any notification of a request, notice, written submission or other document pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be made by email or, where appropriate, any other means of communication that provides a record of the sending thereof. Unless proven otherwise, such notification shall be deemed to be delivered on the date of its sending. 3. In accordance with Article 22 of the Agreement, all notifications shall be addressed to the Minister of Finance of Guyana, for Guyana, and to the Head of the Union Delegation in Guyana, for the Union. 4. Minor errors of a clerical nature in a request, notice, written submission or other document related to the arbitration panel proceedings may be corrected by delivery of a new document clearly indicating the changes. 5. If the last day for delivery of a document falls on a public holiday of Guyana or of the Union, the time period for the delivery of the document shall end on the first following business day.

Article 5
Representatives
The Parties may be represented or assisted by persons of their choice, in accordance with their internal rules and procedures. The names and addresses of such persons shall be communicated in writing to the other Party including whether the appointment is being made for the purposes of assistance or representation.

Section II

Establishment of the arbitration panel

Article 6
Appointment of arbitrators 1. Subject to paragraph 5, the Parties shall each appoint one arbitrator. The two arbitrators thus appointed shall choose the third arbitrator, who will act as the presiding arbitrator of the arbitration panel. 2. If within 30 days of the receipt of the complaining Party’s notification of the appointment of an arbitrator the respondent has not notified the complaining Party of the arbitrator it has appointed, the complaining Party may request the International Bureau to appoint the second arbitrator. The PCA appointing authority shall appoint the second arbitrator as promptly as possible. 3. If within 30 days of the appointment of the second arbitrator, the two arbitrators have not agreed on the choice of the third arbitrator, either Party may request the International Bureau, subject to paragraph 5, to appoint the third arbitrator in accordance with the applicable PCA rules. The PCA appointing authority shall appoint the third arbitrator as promptly as possible. In making the appointment, the PCA appointing authority shall use the following list-procedure:
(a) the PCA appointing authority shall communicate to each of the Parties an identical list containing at least three names;
(b) within 15 days of the receipt of the list referred to in point (a), each Party shall return the list to the International Bureau, without copying the other Party, after having deleted the name or names to which it objects and numbered the remaining names on the list in the order of its preference;
(c) after the expiration of the period of time referred to in point (b), the PCA appointing authority shall appoint the third arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the Parties;
(d) if for any reason the appointment cannot be made according to the procedure set out in this paragraph, the PCA appointing authority may exercise his or her discretion in appointing the third arbitrator. 4. In appointing arbitrators, the Parties and the PCA appointing authority may choose persons who are Members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. 5. In appointing arbitrators, the Parties and the PCA appointing authority shall not choose persons who are members, officials or other servants of the Union institutions, of the government of a Member State of the Union, or of the Government of Guyana.

Article 7
Failure to establish the arbitration panel
In the event of a failure to establish the arbitration panel pursuant to Article 6, the PCA appointing authority shall, at the request of either Party, constitute the arbitration panel and, in doing so, may revoke any appointment already made and appoint each of the arbitrators and designate one of them as the presiding arbitrator. The PCA appointing authority may, if it deems it appropriate, reappoint previous appointees.

Article 8
Independence and immunity of arbitrators 1. The arbitrators shall be independent and impartial, shall serve in their individual capacity and shall not take instructions from any organisation or government. 2. When a person is approached in connection with his or her possible appointment as an arbitrator, he or she shall disclose to the Parties and the PCA appointing authority any circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his or her impartiality or independence. An arbitrator, from the time of his or her appointment and throughout the arbitral proceedings, shall without delay disclose any circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his or her impartiality or independence to the Parties and the International Bureau and the other arbitrators. 3. The arbitrators shall enjoy immunity from legal proceedings in the Union and in Guyana with respect to acts or omissions in connection with the arbitration.

Article 9
Ex parte contacts 1. The arbitration panel shall not meet or communicate with a Party in the absence of the other Party. 2. An arbitrator shall not discuss any aspect of the subject matter of the proceedings with one or both of the Parties in the absence of the other arbitrators.

Article 10
Replacement of an arbitrator 1. In the event of death or resignation of an arbitrator during the course of the arbitration proceedings, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed or chosen in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 6, which is applicable to the appointment or choice of the arbitrator being replaced. 2. In the event that an arbitrator fails to act, or is de jure or de facto unable to perform his or her functions, the procedure for challenging and replacing an arbitrator set out in Article 11 shall apply. 3. If an arbitrator is replaced, the proceedings shall resume at the stage where the arbitrator who was replaced ceased to perform his or her functions, unless the arbitration panel decides otherwise.

Article 11
Challenge of arbitrators 1. Any Party may challenge an arbitrator if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence. 2. A Party may challenge the arbitrator appointed by it only for reasons of which it becomes aware after the appointment has been made. 3. A Party that intends to challenge an arbitrator shall send notice of this challenge within 30 days of the notification of the appointment of that arbitrator to the challenging Party or within 30 days of the date when the circumstances which may give rise to justifiable doubts as to the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence became known to that Party. 4. The notice of challenge shall be communicated to the other Party, the arbitrator who is being challenged, the other members of the arbitration panel and the International Bureau. The notice of challenge shall state the reasons for the challenge. 5. When an arbitrator has been challenged by a Party, the other Party may agree to the challenge. The arbitrator may also, after the challenge, withdraw from his or her office. This shall not imply acceptance of the validity of the grounds for the challenge. 6. If, within 15 days of the notice of challenge, the other Party does not agree to the challenge or the challenged arbitrator does not withdraw, the Party making the challenge may elect to pursue it. In that case, within 30 days of the notice of challenge, it shall seek a decision on the challenge by the PCA appointing authority. 7. In rendering a decision on the challenge, the PCA appointing authority may indicate the reasons for the decision, unless the Parties agree that no reasons shall be given. If the PCA appointing authority sustains the challenge, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed or chosen in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 6 which is applicable to the appointment or choice of the arbitrator being replaced.

Section III

Arbitration proceedings

Article 12
General provisions 1. The arbitration panel shall conduct the arbitration in such manner as it considers appropriate, provided that the Parties are treated with equality and that at an appropriate stage of the proceedings each Party is given a reasonable opportunity to present its case. The arbitration panel, in exercising its discretion, shall conduct the proceedings in a manner that seeks to avoid unnecessary delay and expenses and to provide a fair and efficient process for resolving the dispute. 2. The ruling of the arbitration panel shall be final and binding on the Union and on Guyana. 3. The Union and Guyana shall make the arbitration panel ruling publicly available in its entirety, subject to the protection of confidential information.

Article 13
Place of arbitration 1. The place of arbitration shall be The Hague, unless otherwise agreed. 2. The arbitration panel may meet at any place it deems appropriate for the inspection of goods, other property or documents. The Parties shall be given sufficient notice to enable them to be present at such an inspection.

Article 14
Confidentiality 1. Each Party and the arbitration panel shall treat as confidential any information submitted by the other Party to the arbitration panel that the other Party has designated as such. When a Party submits to the arbitration panel a written submission which contains confidential information, it shall also provide, within 15 days, a submission without the confidential information and which can be disclosed to the public. 2. Nothing in these Working Procedures for Arbitration shall preclude a Party from disclosing statements of its own positions to the public. As long as the proceedings have not been concluded, a Party shall not disclose any information designated by the other Party as confidential. 3. The arbitration panel shall meet in closed session when the submission and arguments of a Party contains confidential information. The Parties shall maintain the confidentiality of the arbitration panel hearings when the hearings are held in closed session.

Article 15
Operation of the arbitration pane1 1. The presiding arbitrator shall chair all the meetings of the arbitration panel. The arbitration panel may delegate to the presiding arbitrator the authority to make administrative and procedural decisions. 2. The arbitration panel shall conduct its activities by any means, including telephone, email, facsimile transmissions or computer links. 3. Only arbitrators shall take part in the deliberations of the arbitration panel, but the arbitration panel may permit arbitrators’ assistants to be present at its deliberations. 4. The drafting of any ruling or report shall remain the exclusive responsibility of the arbitration panel and shall not be delegated. 5. In the event that the arbitration panel considers that there is a need to change any of the time periods for the proceedings or to make any other procedural or administrative adjustment, it shall inform the Parties, in writing and after consulting them, of the reasons for the change or adjustment and of the new time period or adjustment needed.

Article 16
Time-frame of the arbitration 1. As soon as practicable after its establishment and after inviting the Parties to express their views, the arbitration panel shall establish the provisional timetable of the arbitration. The arbitration panel may, at any time, after inviting the Parties to express their views, extend or abridge this period of time. 2. Within 10 days of the establishment of the arbitration panel, either Party may submit a reasoned request to the effect that the case is urgent. In that case, the arbitration panel shall give a ruling on this request within 15 days of the receipt of such request.

Article 17
Organisational meeting 1. The Parties shall meet the arbitration panel within 30 days of its establishment in order to determine such matters as the Parties or the arbitration panel deem appropriate, including:
(a) the remuneration and expenses to be paid to the arbitrators;
(b) the terms of reference of the arbitration panel; and
(c) the timetable of the proceedings. 2. Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the terms of reference of the arbitration panel shall be:
(a) to examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the Agreement cited by the Parties, the matter referred to in the request for the establishment of the arbitration panel;
(b) to make findings on the conformity of a measure at issue with the provisions of the Agreement; and
(c) to deliver a ruling.

Article 18
Written submissions
The complaining Party shall deliver its written submission no later than 10 days after the date of establishment of the arbitration panel. The respondent shall deliver its written submission no later than 20 days after the date of delivery of the written submission of the complaining Party.

Article 19
Hearings 1. Based upon the timetable determined in the organisational meeting, after consulting with the Parties and the other arbitrators, the presiding arbitrator shall notify the Parties of the date, time and venue of the hearing. Subject to paragraph 6, this information shall be made publicly available by the Party in whose territory the hearing takes place. 2. The arbitration panel may convene additional hearings if the Parties so agree. 3. All arbitrators shall be present during the entirety of the hearing. 4. The following persons may, subject to the prior agreement of the Parties, attend the hearing, irrespective of whether the hearing is open to the public or not:
(a) representatives of a Party;
(b) advisers, assistants and administrative staff to the arbitrators;
(c) experts, as decided by the arbitration panel;
(d) witnesses;
(e) third parties. 5. No later than 7 days before the date of a hearing, each Party shall deliver to the arbitration panel and to the other Party a list of the names of persons who will make oral arguments or presentations at the hearing on behalf of that Party, other representatives who will be attending the hearing, and witnesses who will testify at the hearing. 6. The hearings of the arbitration panel shall be open to the public, unless the arbitration panel decides otherwise on its own motion or at the request of either Party. 7. The arbitration panel shall, in consultation with the Parties, decide on appropriate logistical arrangements and procedures to ensure that hearings which are open to the public are managed in an effective way. Those logistical arrangements and procedures may include the use of live web-broadcasting or closed-circuit television. 8. The arbitration panel shall conduct the hearing in the following manner, ensuring that the complaining Party and the respondent are afforded equal time in both argument and rebuttal argument:
Argument
(a) argument of the complaining Party;
(b) argument of the respondent.
Rebuttal argument
(a) reply of the complaining Party;
(b) counter-reply of the respondent. 9. The arbitration panel may direct questions to either Party or any witness at any time during the hearing. 10. The arbitration panel shall arrange for a transcript of the hearing to be prepared and delivered to the Parties within 7 days of the hearing. The Parties may comment on the transcript, and the arbitration panel may consider those comments. 11. Each Party may deliver a supplementary written submission concerning any matter that arose during the hearing within 10 days of the hearing.

Article 20
Default 1. If one of the Parties, duly notified under these Working Procedures for Arbitration, fails to appear at a hearing without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the arbitration panel may proceed with the arbitration. 2. If one of the Parties, duly required to produce documentary evidence, fails to do so within the given time limit without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the arbitration panel may make the ruling on the evidence before it.

Article 21
Questions in writing 1. The arbitration panel may at any time during the proceedings submit questions in writing to one or both Parties. Any questions submitted to one Party shall be copied and sent to the other Party. 2. Each Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of its responses to the questions submitted by the arbitration panel. The other Party shall have an opportunity to provide comments in writing on the Party’s responses within 7 days of the delivery of that copy.

Article 22
Third parties 1. Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the arbitration panel may receive unsolicited written submissions from a natural person, who is a resident or a citizen of a Party, or a legal person established in the territory of a Party that is independent from the Government of Guyana and from Union institutions and bodies, provided that the submissions:
(a) are received by the arbitration panel within 10 days of the establishment of the arbitration panel;
(b) are directly relevant to a factual or a legal issue under consideration by the arbitration panel;
(c) contain a description of the person making the submission, including, for a natural person, his or her nationality or residence, as applicable, and, for a legal person, its place of establishment, the nature of its activities, its legal status, its general objectives and its source of financing; and
(d) specify the nature of the interest that the person has in the arbitration panel proceedings. 2. The submissions shall be delivered to the Parties for their comments. The Parties may submit comments, within 15 days of the delivery of the submissions, to the arbitration panel. 3. The arbitration panel shall list in its ruling all the submissions it has received pursuant to paragraph 1. The arbitration panel shall not be obliged to address in its report the arguments made in such submissions. 4. Where the arbitration panel decides to address in its report the arguments mentioned in the submissions, it shall also take into account any comments made by the Parties pursuant to paragraph 2.

Article 23
Experts 1. The arbitration panel may appoint one or more experts to report to it, in writing, on specific issues to be determined by the panel. A copy of the expert’s terms of reference established by the panel shall be communicated to the Parties. 2. Upon receipt of the expert’s report, the arbitration panel shall send a copy to the Parties, who shall be given the opportunity to express, in writing, their opinion on the report. A Party shall be entitled to examine any document on which the expert’s report relies. 3. At the request of either Party, after delivering the report the expert may be heard at a hearing, where the Parties shall have the opportunity to question the expert. At the hearing, either Party may present expert witnesses in order to testify on the points at issue.

Section IV

The arbitration panel rulings

Article 24
Decisions
The arbitration panel shall make every effort to take decisions by consensus. Where a decision cannot be arrived at by consensus, the matter shall be decided by majority vote.

Article 25
Form of the ruling 1. The ruling shall be in writing and shall set out the findings of fact, the applicability of the relevant provisions of the Agreement, and the reasoning behind any findings and conclusions. 2. The ruling shall be signed by the arbitrators and it shall contain the date on which it was made and indicate the place of arbitration. Where any of the arbitrators fails to sign, the ruling shall state the reason for the absence of the signature(s).

Article 26
Interpretation of the ruling 1. Within 30 days of the receipt of the ruling, either Party, with notice to the other Party and to the PCA appointing authority, may request the arbitration panel to give an interpretation of the ruling. 2. The interpretation shall be given in writing within 30 days of the receipt of the request. The interpretation shall form part of the ruling and the provisions of Articles 15 and 25 shall apply, as appropriate.

Article 27
Correction of the ruling 1. Within 30 days of the receipt of the ruling, either Party, with notice to the other Party and the PCA appointing authority, may request the arbitration panel to correct any errors in computation, any clerical or typographical errors, or any errors of similar nature in the ruling. The arbitration panel may, however, make such corrections on its own initiative within 30 days of the communication of the ruling. 2. All corrections shall be in writing and shall form part of the ruling, and the provisions of Articles 15 and 25 shall apply, as appropriate.

Article 28
Additional ruling 1. Within 30 days of the receipt of the ruling, either Party, with notice to the other Party, and the PCA appointing authority may request the arbitration panel to make an additional ruling for claims presented in the arbitration proceedings but omitted from the ruling. 2. If the arbitration panel considers the request for an additional ruling to be justified and considers the omission rectifiable without any further hearings or evidence, it shall make the additional ruling within 30 days of the receipt of the request. 3. If an additional ruling is made, Articles 15 and 25 shall apply, as appropriate.

Article 29
Compliance with the arbitration panel ruling 1. The Parties shall take any measures necessary to comply in good faith with the arbitration panel ruling. The Parties shall agree within 10 days of the notification of the arbitration panel ruling on a reasonable period of time to comply with the arbitration panel ruling. In the event of disagreement between the Parties on the reasonable period of time to comply with the arbitration panel ruling, either Party shall request the original arbitration panel in writing to determine the length of the reasonable period of time and shall notify simultaneously the other Party. The reasonable period of time may be extended by mutual agreement of the Union and Guyana. 2. In the event of disagreement between the Parties concerning the compatibility of any measure with the arbitration panel ruling, a Party may request in writing the arbitration panel to rule on the matter. The arbitration panel shall notify its ruling within 90 days or in cases of urgency within 45 days of the submission of the request.
In the event of the original arbitration panel, or some of the arbitrators, being unable to reconvene to consider a request, a new arbitration panel shall be established in accordance with Article 6. The time limit for notifying the ruling shall be 60 days from the date of establishment of the new arbitration panel. 3. If the arbitration panel rules that a Party has failed to comply with the arbitration panel ruling, it shall impose a new deadline for that Party’s compliance.
If the Party persists in not complying with the arbitration panel ruling, the other Party may, upon notification to the non-compliant Party, suspend the Agreement in accordance with Article 28 thereof. Any suspension shall be proportionate to the breach of obligation concerned, taking into account the gravity of the breach and the rights in question and, whether the suspension is based on the fact that the Party persists in not complying with the arbitration panel ruling.
Any suspension shall be temporary and shall be applied only until the Party has complied with the arbitration panel ruling, or until the Parties have agreed to otherwise settle the dispute. 4. The Party shall notify the Joint Monitoring and Review Committee (JMRC) and the other Party of any measure it has taken to comply with the ruling of the arbitration panel and of its request for an end to the suspension applied by the other Party. 5. If the Parties do not reach an agreement on whether the notified measure brings the Party into compliance with the arbitration panel ruling within 45 days of the submission of the notification, either Party may request the original arbitration panel in writing to rule on the matter. Such request shall be notified simultaneously to the other Party.
In the event of the original arbitration panel, or some of the arbitrators, being unable to reconvene to consider a request, a new arbitration panel shall be established in accordance with Article 6. The arbitration panel ruling shall be notified to the Parties and to the JMRC within 75 days of the submission of the request. 6. In the event of the original arbitration panel, or some of the arbitrators, being unable to reconvene to consider a request under paragraph 2, a new arbitration panel shall be established in accordance with Article 6. The period for notifying the ruling of the new arbitration panel shall in that case be 90 days from the date of establishment of the new arbitration panel.

Article 30
Settlement or other grounds for termination 1. If, before the ruling is made, the Parties agree on a settlement of the dispute, the arbitration panel shall either issue an order for the termination of the arbitration proceedings or, if requested by both Parties and accepted by the panel, record the settlement in the form of an arbitration ruling on agreed terms. The arbitration panel is not obliged to give reasons for a ruling on agreed terms. 2. If, before the ruling is made, the continuation of the arbitration proceedings becomes impossible or is rendered nugatory for reasons other than those referred to in paragraph 1, the arbitration panel shall inform the Parties of its intention to issue an order unless a Party raises justifiable grounds for objection. The Parties shall then enter into consultations with the aim of settling the dispute.

Section V

Costs

Article 31
Costs 1. The arbitration panel shall fix the costs of arbitration in its ruling. The term ‘costs’ includes only:
(a) the fees of the arbitration panel, to be stated separately for each arbitrator and to be fixed by the arbitration panel in accordance with the daily fees agreed by the Parties at the time the arbitrators were appointed;
(b) travel and other expenses incurred by the arbitrators;
(c) the costs of expert advice and of other assistance required by the arbitration panel;
(d) travel and other expenses incurred by witnesses if such expenses are approved by the arbitration panel. 2. The costs of arbitration shall in principle be borne by the unsuccessful Party. However, the panel may apportion each of such costs between the Parties if it determines that apportionment is reasonable, taking into account the circumstances of the case. 3. No additional fees may be charged by an arbitration panel for interpreting, correcting or adding to its ruling.

Article 32
Deposit of costs 1. The arbitration panel, upon its establishment, may request each Party to deposit an equal amount as an advance on the costs referred to in Article 31. 2. During the course of the arbitration proceedings, the arbitration panel may request supplementary deposits from the Parties. 3. If the required deposits are not paid in full within 30 days of the receipt of the request, the arbitration panel shall inform the Parties so that one or another of them may make the required payment. If such payment is not made, the arbitration panel may order the suspension or termination of the arbitration proceedings. 4. After the ruling has been made, the arbitration panel shall account for the deposits received from the Parties and return any unexpended balance to the Parties.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/7 of 7 January 2025 setting up the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory ERIC (CTAO ERIC) (notified under document C(2025) 9)

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/7 8.1.2025
(1) Austria, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, Spain and the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere submitted to the Commission an application in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 to set up the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) (‘the application’). Switzerland has made known its decision to participate in CTAO ERIC initially as an observer.
(2) The applicants have agreed that Italy would be the host Member State of CTAO ERIC.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 has been incorporated in the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 72/2015(2).
(4) The Commission has, pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009, assessed the application and concluded that it meets the requirements set out in that Regulation. In the course of the assessment, the Commission obtained the views of independent experts in the field of impacts of gamma-ray astronomy, astrophysics, particle physics, plasma physics and fundamental physics.
(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009,
1. There shall be a European Research Infrastructure called the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO).
2. CTAO shall have the legal form of a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) incorporated under the provision of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 and be named Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory ERIC (CTAO ERIC).
3. CTAO ERIC shall have its statutory seat and its headquarters in Bologna, Italy.
1. The task of CTAO ERIC shall be to construct an observatory for ground-based gamma-ray astronomy as described in the ‘Scientific and Technical Description of the CTA Observatory’, (Alpha configuration) and to further operate, upgrade and decommission this facility. The construction costs are laid down in the CTAO Cost Book.
2. CTAO ERIC shall carry out the following activities among others:(a)contribute to top-level research, technological development, innovation and societal challenges and thus representing an added value for the development of the European Research Area (ERA) and beyond;(b)ensure a full scientific exploitation of the CTAO and its suite of instruments;(c)grant effective access to Users in accordance with the Access Policy set out in Article 3;(d)contribute to the dissemination of scientific results;(e)make optimum use of resources and know-how; and(f)any other action necessary related to the paragraphs from (a) to (e). (a) contribute to top-level research, technological development, innovation and societal challenges and thus representing an added value for the development of the European Research Area (ERA) and beyond; (b) ensure a full scientific exploitation of the CTAO and its suite of instruments; (c) grant effective access to Users in accordance with the Access Policy set out in Article 3; (d) contribute to the dissemination of scientific results; (e) make optimum use of resources and know-how; and (f) any other action necessary related to the paragraphs from (a) to (e).
(a) contribute to top-level research, technological development, innovation and societal challenges and thus representing an added value for the development of the European Research Area (ERA) and beyond;
(b) ensure a full scientific exploitation of the CTAO and its suite of instruments;
(c) grant effective access to Users in accordance with the Access Policy set out in Article 3;
(d) contribute to the dissemination of scientific results;
(e) make optimum use of resources and know-how; and
(f) any other action necessary related to the paragraphs from (a) to (e).
(a) contribute to top-level research, technological development, innovation and societal challenges and thus representing an added value for the development of the European Research Area (ERA) and beyond;
(b) ensure a full scientific exploitation of the CTAO and its suite of instruments;
(c) grant effective access to Users in accordance with the Access Policy set out in Article 3;
(d) contribute to the dissemination of scientific results;
(e) make optimum use of resources and know-how; and
(f) any other action necessary related to the paragraphs from (a) to (e).
3. CTAO ERIC shall pursue its principal task on a non-economic basis. However, it may carry out limited economic activities, provided that they are closely related to its principal task and that they do not jeopardise the achievement thereof. CTAO ERIC shall record the costs and revenues of its economic activities separately and shall charge market prices for them, or, if these cannot be ascertained, full costs plus a reasonable margin.
1. CTAO ERIC will provide effective access for European and international researchers (Users) based on scientific merit, technical feasibility and/or other relevant criteria pertinent to the aim of CTAO ERIC. A limited amount of Observing Time shall be made available to scientifically meritorious proposals from researchers not belonging to a Member, Strategic Partner, Third Party or Observer, hereinafter called Other Users, under specific access terms, as defined by the Council.
2. Access to CTAO can be in the form of access to CTAO Observing Time, or in the form of access to archival CTAO Data Products (Article 33). Details of access shall be defined in an Access Policy, adopted by the Council (Article 25(13)(j)), which shall define the different types of proposals and provide for an appropriate level of opportunity for large legacy programmes (Key Science Projects).
3. The Director-General is responsible for time allocation by organising and managing a peer review process during which scientific excellence and feasibility of proposals are evaluated. Procedures and evaluation criteria shall be made publicly available on the CTAO ERIC website. The Director-General shall report annually to the Council on the time allocation.
4. Users’ Time denotes the Observing Time available after Guaranteed Time Observations arising from contractual obligations of CTAO ERIC are taken into account. The Users’ Time will be split between Open Time for Standard Proposals and Key Science Project (KSP) time for large legacy programmes, International Community Observing Time for Other Users and Director General’s Discretionary Time (DDT). The definitions are in the Scientific and Technical Description of the CTA Observatory
5. Other Users shall contribute to the operation costs relating to their use of the CTAO, as defined in the Access Policy and the respective partnership agreements.
6. The provision in Article 3(5) of the Statutes shall not apply to the time allocations granted by CTAO ERIC through special agreements (e.g. hosting agreements).
1. CTAO ERIC shall be a facilitator of research and shall as a general rule encourage open access to research data. Irrespective of this principle, CTAO ERIC shall promote high-quality research and shall support a culture of ‘best practice’ through training activities.
2. CTAO ERIC shall request Users to make their research results publicly available and to make results available through CTAO ERIC.
3. CTAO ERIC shall adopt its own Dissemination Policy (Article 25(13)(l)). The Dissemination Policy shall describe the various target groups, and CTAO ERIC shall use several channels to reach the target audiences, such as web portals, newsletters, workshops, presence in conferences, articles in journals, magazines and daily newspapers.
1. The term ‘Intellectual Property’ shall be understood according to Article 2 of the Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organisation signed on 14 July 1967.
2. CTAO ERIC shall adopt its own Intellectual Property Rights Policy (Article 25(13)(m)).
3. CTAO ERIC shall be the owner of all Intellectual Property resulting from its activities under these Statutes including, but not limited to, Intellectual Property produced by staff employed by CTAO ERIC, except if covered by separate contractual agreements or where mandatory legislation or these Statutes state otherwise.
4. The background Intellectual Property of the Members or their representing entities shall remain their property. It shall be licensed to CTAO ERIC if necessary and through specific agreements.
1. CTAO ERIC shall be an equal-opportunity employer. Employment contracts shall be governed by the laws of the country or territory in which staff is employed.
2. Subject to the requirements of national legislation, each Member shall within its jurisdiction seek to facilitate the movement and residence of nationals of the Members, Observers and Strategic Partners involved in the tasks of CTAO ERIC and of the family members of such nationals.
3. The selection procedures for CTAO ERIC staff positions shall be transparent, non- discriminatory and respect equal opportunities. Recruitment and employment shall not be discriminatory.
4. CTAO ERIC shall encourage the formation of an institutionalised employee representation.
1. CTAO ERIC shall treat procurement candidates and tenderers equally and without discrimination regardless of whether they are based within the European Union. Detailed rules on procurement procedures and criteria shall be set out in the Procurement Policy adopted by Council (Article 25(12)(i) of the Statutes). This Procurement Policy shall respect the principles of transparency, competition, proportionality, mutual recognition, equal treatment, non-discrimination and sustainability.
2. Procurement by Members, Observers, Strategic Partners and Third Parties concerning CTAO ERIC activities shall be done in such a way that due consideration is given to CTAO ERIC needs, technical requirements, and specification issued by the relevant bodies.
3. The Procurement Policy shall stipulate that its provisions shall not apply to procurements made by CTAO ERIC using funds channelled through CTAO ERIC according to Article 21(4) of the Statutes. In these cases, the Basic Principles for In-Kind Contributions to CTAO ERIC and the In-Kind Contribution Framework (Annex B) shall be applied instead of the Procurement Policy.
1. The winding up of CTAO ERIC shall be decided by the Council in accordance with Article 25(13)(h) of the Statutes.
2. Without undue delay and in any event, within 10 days after adoption of the decision to wind up CTAO ERIC, CTAO ERIC shall notify the Commission about the decision.
3. Without undue delay and in any event, within 10 days of the closure of the winding up procedure, CTAO ERIC shall notify the Commission thereof.
4. CTAO ERIC shall cease to exist on the day on which the Commission publishes the appropriate notice in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.
1. Upon dissolution of CTAO ERIC or discontinuation of its tax privileges and tax allowances the Members shall not receive anything more than their paid cash contributions and the actual value of their contributions in-kind.
2. Upon dissolution of CTAO ERIC or discontinuation of its tax privileges and tax- allowances, the assets of CTAO ERIC exceeding the paid cash contributions and the actual value of the contributions in-kind shall be transferred to another public legal entity or another tax-privileged corporation or to another legal entity pursuing objects similar to those of CTAO ERIC for the promotion of science and research.
1. CTAO ERIC shall be liable for its debts.
2. The Members are not jointly liable for the debts of CTAO ERIC. The Members’ financial liability for the debts of CTAO ERIC shall be limited to their respective annual contribution.
3. CTAO ERIC shall take appropriate insurance to cover the risks specific to the construction and operation of CTAO.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 of 25 June 2009 on the Community legal framework for a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (1), and in particular Article 6(1), point (a), thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Austria, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, Spain and the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere submitted to the Commission an application in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 to set up the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) (‘the application’). Switzerland has made known its decision to participate in CTAO ERIC initially as an observer.
(2) The applicants have agreed that Italy would be the host Member State of CTAO ERIC.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 has been incorporated in the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 72/2015 (2).
(4) The Commission has, pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009, assessed the application and concluded that it meets the requirements set out in that Regulation. In the course of the assessment, the Commission obtained the views of independent experts in the field of impacts of gamma-ray astronomy, astrophysics, particle physics, plasma physics and fundamental physics.
(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory ERIC (CTAO ERIC) is set up.

2. The essential elements of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC as referred to in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 are set out in the Annex.

This Decision is addressed to the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Swiss Confederation and the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere.

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF THE STATUTES OF CTAO ERIC

1. Name and seat

(Article 1 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. There shall be a European Research Infrastructure called the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO).

2. CTAO shall have the legal form of a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) incorporated under the provision of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 and be named Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory ERIC (CTAO ERIC).

3. CTAO ERIC shall have its statutory seat and its headquarters in Bologna, Italy.

2. Tasks and activities

(Article 2 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. The task of CTAO ERIC shall be to construct an observatory for ground-based gamma-ray astronomy as described in the ‘Scientific and Technical Description of the CTA Observatory’, (Alpha configuration) and to further operate, upgrade and decommission this facility. The construction costs are laid down in the CTAO Cost Book.

2. CTAO ERIC shall carry out the following activities among others:
(a) contribute to top-level research, technological development, innovation and societal challenges and thus representing an added value for the development of the European Research Area (ERA) and beyond;
(b) ensure a full scientific exploitation of the CTAO and its suite of instruments;
(c) grant effective access to Users in accordance with the Access Policy set out in Article 3;
(d) contribute to the dissemination of scientific results;
(e) make optimum use of resources and know-how; and
(f) any other action necessary related to the paragraphs from (a) to (e).

3. CTAO ERIC shall pursue its principal task on a non-economic basis. However, it may carry out limited economic activities, provided that they are closely related to its principal task and that they do not jeopardise the achievement thereof. CTAO ERIC shall record the costs and revenues of its economic activities separately and shall charge market prices for them, or, if these cannot be ascertained, full costs plus a reasonable margin.

3. Access policy for users of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory

(Article 3 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. CTAO ERIC will provide effective access for European and international researchers (Users) based on scientific merit, technical feasibility and/or other relevant criteria pertinent to the aim of CTAO ERIC. A limited amount of Observing Time shall be made available to scientifically meritorious proposals from researchers not belonging to a Member, Strategic Partner, Third Party or Observer, hereinafter called Other Users, under specific access terms, as defined by the Council.

2. Access to CTAO can be in the form of access to CTAO Observing Time, or in the form of access to archival CTAO Data Products (Article 33). Details of access shall be defined in an Access Policy, adopted by the Council (Article 25(13)(j)), which shall define the different types of proposals and provide for an appropriate level of opportunity for large legacy programmes (Key Science Projects).

3. The Director-General is responsible for time allocation by organising and managing a peer review process during which scientific excellence and feasibility of proposals are evaluated. Procedures and evaluation criteria shall be made publicly available on the CTAO ERIC website. The Director-General shall report annually to the Council on the time allocation.

4. Users’ Time denotes the Observing Time available after Guaranteed Time Observations arising from contractual obligations of CTAO ERIC are taken into account. The Users’ Time will be split between Open Time for Standard Proposals and Key Science Project (KSP) time for large legacy programmes, International Community Observing Time for Other Users and Director General’s Discretionary Time (DDT). The definitions are in the Scientific and Technical Description of the CTA Observatory

5. Other Users shall contribute to the operation costs relating to their use of the CTAO, as defined in the Access Policy and the respective partnership agreements.

6. The provision in Article 3(5) of the Statutes shall not apply to the time allocations granted by CTAO ERIC through special agreements (e.g. hosting agreements).

4. Scientific Evaluation

(Article 4 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
The scientific and technical activities of CTAO ERIC shall be evaluated annually by the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (Article 28). Details shall be defined in a Scientific Evaluation Policy, adopted by the Council (Article 25(13)(k)).
5. Dissemination of Research Results

(Article 5 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. CTAO ERIC shall be a facilitator of research and shall as a general rule encourage open access to research data. Irrespective of this principle, CTAO ERIC shall promote high-quality research and shall support a culture of ‘best practice’ through training activities.

2. CTAO ERIC shall request Users to make their research results publicly available and to make results available through CTAO ERIC.

3. CTAO ERIC shall adopt its own Dissemination Policy (Article 25(13)(l)). The Dissemination Policy shall describe the various target groups, and CTAO ERIC shall use several channels to reach the target audiences, such as web portals, newsletters, workshops, presence in conferences, articles in journals, magazines and daily newspapers.

6. Intellectual Property Rights

(Article 6 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. The term ‘Intellectual Property’ shall be understood according to Article 2 of the Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organisation signed on 14 July 1967.
2. CTAO ERIC shall adopt its own Intellectual Property Rights Policy (Article 25(13)(m)).

3. CTAO ERIC shall be the owner of all Intellectual Property resulting from its activities under these Statutes including, but not limited to, Intellectual Property produced by staff employed by CTAO ERIC, except if covered by separate contractual agreements or where mandatory legislation or these Statutes state otherwise.

4. The background Intellectual Property of the Members or their representing entities shall remain their property. It shall be licensed to CTAO ERIC if necessary and through specific agreements.

7. Employment

(Article 7 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. CTAO ERIC shall be an equal-opportunity employer. Employment contracts shall be governed by the laws of the country or territory in which staff is employed.

2. Subject to the requirements of national legislation, each Member shall within its jurisdiction seek to facilitate the movement and residence of nationals of the Members, Observers and Strategic Partners involved in the tasks of CTAO ERIC and of the family members of such nationals.

3. The selection procedures for CTAO ERIC staff positions shall be transparent, non- discriminatory and respect equal opportunities. Recruitment and employment shall not be discriminatory.

4. CTAO ERIC shall encourage the formation of an institutionalised employee representation.

8. Procurement

(Article 8 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. CTAO ERIC shall treat procurement candidates and tenderers equally and without discrimination regardless of whether they are based within the European Union. Detailed rules on procurement procedures and criteria shall be set out in the Procurement Policy adopted by Council (Article 25(12)(i) of the Statutes). This Procurement Policy shall respect the principles of transparency, competition, proportionality, mutual recognition, equal treatment, non-discrimination and sustainability.

2. Procurement by Members, Observers, Strategic Partners and Third Parties concerning CTAO ERIC activities shall be done in such a way that due consideration is given to CTAO ERIC needs, technical requirements, and specification issued by the relevant bodies.

3. The Procurement Policy shall stipulate that its provisions shall not apply to procurements made by CTAO ERIC using funds channelled through CTAO ERIC according to Article 21(4) of the Statutes. In these cases, the Basic Principles for In-Kind Contributions to CTAO ERIC and the In-Kind Contribution Framework (Annex B) shall be applied instead of the Procurement Policy.

9. Duration

(Article 9 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
CTAO ERIC shall be established for an indefinite term.
10. Winding up

(Article 10 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. The winding up of CTAO ERIC shall be decided by the Council in accordance with Article 25(13)(h) of the Statutes.

2. Without undue delay and in any event, within 10 days after adoption of the decision to wind up CTAO ERIC, CTAO ERIC shall notify the Commission about the decision.

3. Without undue delay and in any event, within 10 days of the closure of the winding up procedure, CTAO ERIC shall notify the Commission thereof.

4. CTAO ERIC shall cease to exist on the day on which the Commission publishes the appropriate notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

11. Dissolution of CTAO ERIC or discontinuation of its tax privileges

(Article 11 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. Upon dissolution of CTAO ERIC or discontinuation of its tax privileges and tax allowances the Members shall not receive anything more than their paid cash contributions and the actual value of their contributions in-kind.

2. Upon dissolution of CTAO ERIC or discontinuation of its tax privileges and tax- allowances, the assets of CTAO ERIC exceeding the paid cash contributions and the actual value of the contributions in-kind shall be transferred to another public legal entity or another tax-privileged corporation or to another legal entity pursuing objects similar to those of CTAO ERIC for the promotion of science and research.

12. Liability regime and insurance

(Article 12 of the Statutes of CTAO ERIC)
1. CTAO ERIC shall be liable for its debts.

2. The Members are not jointly liable for the debts of CTAO ERIC. The Members’ financial liability for the debts of CTAO ERIC shall be limited to their respective annual contribution.

3. CTAO ERIC shall take appropriate insurance to cover the risks specific to the construction and operation of CTAO.

Council Decision (EU) 2024/3246 of 5 December 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the Union in the Joint Committee established by the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road, as regards the recognition of smart tachographs for the enforcement of the Agreement and the provision by the European Commission of smart tachograph certification services to Ukraine

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/3246 30.12.2024
(1) The Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road(1)(the ‘Agreement’) was signed by the Union on 29 June 2022 pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1158(2)and entered into provisional application on that date. It was concluded by the Union by Council Decision (EU) 2022/2435(3)and entered into force on 5 December 2022.
(2) The Agreement was amended by the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine amending the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road of 29 June 2022(4), which was signed by the Union on 20 June 2024 pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2024/1876(5)and entered into provisional application on that date.
(3) Pursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement, the Joint Committee established by paragraph 1 of that Article is to periodically review the functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, and may adopt decisions to that effect.
(4) The Joint Committee, in its third meeting, is to adopt a decision on the recognition of smart tachographs used by transport operators from both Parties to the Agreement which operate under the Agreement in both the Union and Ukraine, and on the provision by the European Commission of smart tachograph certification services to Ukraine.
(5) It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the Joint Committee, as the envisaged decision of the Joint Committee will be binding on the Union.
(6) Since 2019, vehicles registered in the Union are to be equipped with a smart tachograph compliant with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), while, since 2010, vehicles engaged in international road transport registered in Ukraine are to be equipped with digital tachographs in compliance with the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international transport(7)(the ‘AETR’).
(7) In comparison to the digital tachograph, the smart tachograph contains key additional functionalities as set out in Articles 8, 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, which allow better enforcement of the Agreement. The recording of the position of the vehicle enables better enforcement of Article 4 of the Agreement, while the remote early detection capability enables better enforcement of Article 5D(2), point (c)(ii), of the Agreement.
(8) In order to ensure the correct functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, it should allow road haulage operators to use more effective control devices than the digital tachographs provided under the AETR, as the result could otherwise be less effective enforcement by the competent authorities.
(9) More detailed tachograph records, as provided by the smart tachograph, would therefore significantly improve implementation of the Agreement, through the authorised use of such records under Article 5B(4) thereof.
(10) In order to ensure the correct functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, vehicles operating under the Agreement should therefore be allowed to install and use, in the Union and in Ukraine, smart tachographs complying with the relevant requirements of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799(8). That does not, however, prevent vehicles operating under the Agreement from continuing to use digital tachographs in accordance with the AETR.
(11) The European Commission should be responsible for providing the necessary certificates and keys for Ukraine to develop its smart tachograph infrastructure. Ukraine should therefore recognise the role of the European Commission in the functioning of the smart tachograph system.
(12) The position of the Union within the Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft Decision of the Joint Committee attached to this Decision,
(1) The Joint Committee adopted its Rules of Procedure by its Decision No 1/2023(2).
(2) Pursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road (the ‘Agreement’), the Joint Committee established by paragraph 1 of that Article is to periodically review the functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, and may adopt decisions to that effect.
(3) Since 2019, vehicles registered in the Union are to be equipped with a smart tachograph compliant with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council(3), while, since 2010, vehicles engaged in international road transport registered in Ukraine are to be equipped with digital tachographs in compliance with the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international transport(4)(the ‘AETR’).
(4) In comparison to the digital tachograph, the smart tachograph contains key additional functionalities as set out in Articles 8, 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, which allow better enforcement of the Agreement. The recording of the position of the vehicle enables better enforcement of Article 4 of the Agreement, while the remote early detection capability enables better enforcement of Article 5D(2), point (c)(ii), of the Agreement.
(5) In order to ensure the correct functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, it should allow road haulage operators to use more effective control devices than the digital tachographs provided under the AETR, as the result could otherwise be less effective enforcement by the competent authorities.
(6) More detailed tachograph records, as provided by the smart tachograph, would therefore significantly improve implementation of the Agreement, through the authorised use of such records under Article 5B(4) thereof.
(7) In order to ensure the correct functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, vehicles operating under the Agreement should therefore be allowed to install and use, in the Union and in Ukraine, smart tachographs complying with the relevant requirements of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799(5). That does not, however, prevent vehicles operating under the Agreement from continuing to use digital tachographs in accordance with the AETR.
(8) The European Commission should be responsible for providing the necessary certificates and keys for Ukraine to develop its smart tachograph infrastructure. Ukraine should therefore recognise the role of the European Commission in the functioning of the smart tachograph system,
(1) ‘tachograph’ means the equipment intended for installation in road vehicles to display, record, print, store and output automatically or semi-automatically details of the movement, including the speed, of such vehicles and details of certain periods of activity of their drivers;
(2) ‘smart tachograph’ means a digital tachograph complying with the following requirements:(a)automatic recording of the position of the vehicle at certain points during the daily working period, as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;(b)remote early detection of possible manipulation or misuse, as provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;(c)equipped with an interface with Intelligent Transport Systems, as provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; and(d)in compliance with the specifications set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/799, with the following adaptations:(i)‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;(ii)for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’. (a) automatic recording of the position of the vehicle at certain points during the daily working period, as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; (b) remote early detection of possible manipulation or misuse, as provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; (c) equipped with an interface with Intelligent Transport Systems, as provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; and (d) in compliance with the specifications set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/799, with the following adaptations:(i)‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;(ii)for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’. (i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’; (ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.
(a) automatic recording of the position of the vehicle at certain points during the daily working period, as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;
(b) remote early detection of possible manipulation or misuse, as provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;
(c) equipped with an interface with Intelligent Transport Systems, as provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; and
(d) in compliance with the specifications set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/799, with the following adaptations:(i)‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;(ii)for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’. (i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’; (ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.
(i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;
(ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.
(a) automatic recording of the position of the vehicle at certain points during the daily working period, as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;
(b) remote early detection of possible manipulation or misuse, as provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;
(c) equipped with an interface with Intelligent Transport Systems, as provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; and
(d) in compliance with the specifications set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/799, with the following adaptations:(i)‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;(ii)for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’. (i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’; (ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.
(i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;
(ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.
(i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;
(ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.
‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’.
‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91 in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road (1) (the ‘Agreement’) was signed by the Union on 29 June 2022 pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1158 (2) and entered into provisional application on that date. It was concluded by the Union by Council Decision (EU) 2022/2435 (3) and entered into force on 5 December 2022.
(2) The Agreement was amended by the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine amending the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road of 29 June 2022 (4), which was signed by the Union on 20 June 2024 pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2024/1876 (5) and entered into provisional application on that date.
(3) Pursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement, the Joint Committee established by paragraph 1 of that Article is to periodically review the functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, and may adopt decisions to that effect.
(4) The Joint Committee, in its third meeting, is to adopt a decision on the recognition of smart tachographs used by transport operators from both Parties to the Agreement which operate under the Agreement in both the Union and Ukraine, and on the provision by the European Commission of smart tachograph certification services to Ukraine.
(5) It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the Joint Committee, as the envisaged decision of the Joint Committee will be binding on the Union.
(6) Since 2019, vehicles registered in the Union are to be equipped with a smart tachograph compliant with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6), while, since 2010, vehicles engaged in international road transport registered in Ukraine are to be equipped with digital tachographs in compliance with the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international transport (7) (the ‘AETR’).
(7) In comparison to the digital tachograph, the smart tachograph contains key additional functionalities as set out in Articles 8, 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, which allow better enforcement of the Agreement. The recording of the position of the vehicle enables better enforcement of Article 4 of the Agreement, while the remote early detection capability enables better enforcement of Article 5D(2), point (c)(ii), of the Agreement.
(8) In order to ensure the correct functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, it should allow road haulage operators to use more effective control devices than the digital tachographs provided under the AETR, as the result could otherwise be less effective enforcement by the competent authorities.
(9) More detailed tachograph records, as provided by the smart tachograph, would therefore significantly improve implementation of the Agreement, through the authorised use of such records under Article 5B(4) thereof.
(10) In order to ensure the correct functioning of the Agreement in light of its objectives, vehicles operating under the Agreement should therefore be allowed to install and use, in the Union and in Ukraine, smart tachographs complying with the relevant requirements of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799 (8). That does not, however, prevent vehicles operating under the Agreement from continuing to use digital tachographs in accordance with the AETR.
(11) The European Commission should be responsible for providing the necessary certificates and keys for Ukraine to develop its smart tachograph infrastructure. Ukraine should therefore recognise the role of the European Commission in the functioning of the smart tachograph system.
(12) The position of the Union within the Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft Decision of the Joint Committee attached to this Decision,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the third meeting of the Joint Committee established by Article 7(1) of the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road, as regards the recognition of smart tachographs for the enforcement of that Agreement and the provision by the European Commission of smart tachograph certification services to Ukraine, shall be based on the draft Decision of the Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
Minor changes to the draft Decision of the Joint Committee may be agreed by the representatives of the Union in the Joint Committee without a further decision of the Council.
The Decision of the Joint Committee shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Definitions

For the purposes of this Decision, the following definitions apply:

(1) ‘tachograph’ means the equipment intended for installation in road vehicles to display, record, print, store and output automatically or semi-automatically details of the movement, including the speed, of such vehicles and details of certain periods of activity of their drivers;
(2) ‘smart tachograph’ means a digital tachograph complying with the following requirements:
(a) automatic recording of the position of the vehicle at certain points during the daily working period, as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;
(b) remote early detection of possible manipulation or misuse, as provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;
(c) equipped with an interface with Intelligent Transport Systems, as provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; and
(d) in compliance with the specifications set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/799, with the following adaptations:
(i) ‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’;
(ii) for the purposes of subsection 4.1, paragraph (229), of Annex IC, the distinguishing sign for Ukraine shall be ‘UA’.

Use of smart tachographs

Vehicles registered in the Union and in Ukraine equipped with smart tachographs may be used to carry out the operations referred to in Article 4 of the Agreement.

Type-approval of smart tachograph equipment and root certification

1. Type-approval of smart tachograph equipment shall follow the procedure laid down in Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, with the following adaptation:

‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’.

2. Ukraine recognises that the interoperability certificate delivered in accordance with Article 12(3) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 shall be issued by a single laboratory under the authority and responsibility of the European Commission.

3. Ukraine recognises that the European Commission acts as the single European Root Certification Authority (ERCA) within the framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/799.
4. The European Commission shall provide the competent authorities of Ukraine with the cryptographic material for the issuing of tachograph cards for drivers, workshops, companies and control authorities, in accordance with the ERCA certificate policy and the certificate policy of Ukraine.

Installation, inspection, use of equipment and enforcement

The provisions of Chapters IV to VI and Article 38 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 shall apply with the following adaptation:

‘Member State’ shall be understood as ‘Member State of the European Union and Ukraine’.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Decision (EU) 2024/3244 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 amending Council Decision 2008/971/EC as regards the forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category, its labelling and the names of the authorities responsible for the approval and control of the production

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2024/3244 23.12.2024
(1) Council Directive 1999/105/EC(3)applies, inter alia, to the marketing of forest reproductive material within the Union. That Directive concerns reproductive material of tree species and artificial hybrids thereof which are important for forestry purposes in all or part of the Union.
(2) Council Decision 2008/971/EC(4)determines the conditions under which forest reproductive material of the ‘source identified’, ‘selected’ and ‘qualified’ categories, produced in third countries listed in Annex I to that Decision, as regards the approval and registration of basic material and the subsequent production of forest reproductive material from that basic material, is to be imported into the Union. The third countries concerned have implemented the OECD Scheme for the Certification of Forest Reproductive Material Moving in International Trade (‘OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme’).
(3) The OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme was amended in 2013 to include forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category in addition to the ‘source-identified’, ‘selected’ and ‘qualified’ categories of forest reproductive material, which have been in the OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme since 2011.
(4) The national rules for the certification of forest reproductive material (‘the national rules’) in Canada, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Türkiye, the United Kingdom and the United States (‘the specified third countries’) provide that an official field inspection is to be carried out during the collection and processing of seed and the production of planting stock.
(5) According to the national rules of the specified third countries, the systems for the approval and registration of basic material and the subsequent production of forest reproductive material from that basic material are to follow the OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme. In addition, those national rules require seed and planting stock of the ‘source identified’, ‘selected’, ‘qualified’ and ‘tested’ categories to be officially certified and the seed packages to be officially closed in accordance with the OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme.
(6) In the absence of a Decision at Union level in relation to the equivalence of forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773(5)authorised temporarily, until 31 December 2024, Member States to decide on the equivalence of forest reproductive material from the ‘tested’ category produced in the third countries listed in Annex I to Decision 2008/971/EC, which include the specified third countries. That authorisation was necessary to avoid any risk of disruption of imports of forest reproductive material into Member States.
(7) An examination of the national rules of the specified third countries, as regards the ‘tested’ category, shows that the conditions for approval of basic material are considered to be equivalent to those set out in Directive 1999/105/EC, provided that the conditions set out in Annex II to Decision 2008/971/EC are met as regards seed and planting stocks.
(8) The names and addresses of some authorities responsible for the approval and control of the production, as listed in Annex I to Decision 2008/971/EC, have changed and therefore need to be updated.
(9) It is possible to use genetic modification for the production of seed or planting stock of the ‘tested’ category. Therefore, in order to ensure informed choices for the users of forest reproductive material, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document should state whether that type of modification has been used in the production of the basic material for that category, as it occurs currently with the ‘qualified’ category.
(10) In view of the addition of the ‘tested’ category in Annex II to Decision 2008/971/EC, an annex should be added to that Decision with a table indicating the categories under which forest reproductive material from the different types of basic material is allowed to be imported into the Union to ensure clarity and correct application of that Decision. This is necessary to ensure legal clarity, consistency with Directive 1999/105/EC, as well as correct application of those rules and informed choices by the operators applying that Decision.
(11) Decision 2008/971/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(12) In view of the need to ensure that this Decision enters into force before the expiry of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 on 31 December 2024, it is considered to be appropriate to invoke the exception to the eight-week period provided for in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
(13) Since the objective of this Decision, namely to extend the equivalence regime for the import of forest reproductive material established by Decision 2008/971/EC to the ‘tested’ category, cannot be achieved by the Member States but can only be achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(14) This Decision should enter into force as a matter of urgency on the day of its publication in theOfficial Journal of the European Unionin order to ensure that it enters into force before the expiry of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773.
(15) As Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 expires on 31 December 2024, this Decision should apply from 1 January 2025 in order to ensure legal clarity and continuity of the respective rules,
(1) in Article 1, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:‘This Decision determines the conditions under which forest reproductive material of the “source identified”, “selected”, “qualified” and “tested” categories produced in a third country listed in Annex I is to be imported into the Union.’;
(2) in Article 3, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:‘2.   Seed and planting stock of the “source identified”, “selected”, “qualified” and “tested” categories of species and artificial hybrids thereof listed in Annex I to Directive 1999/105/EC, produced in the third countries listed in Annex I to this Decision and officially certified by the third country authorities listed in that Annex, shall be considered equivalent to seed and planting stock complying with Directive 1999/105/EC, provided that the conditions laid down in Annex II to this Decision are met.’;
(3) the Annexes are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
(1) Annex I is replaced by the following:‘ANNEX ICountries and authoritiesCountry(1)Authority responsible for the approval and control of productionCANatural Resources Canada – Canadian Forest ServiceAtlantic Forestry Centre1350 Regent StreetFredericton NB E3C 2G6CHFederal Office for the Environment (FOEN)Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (UVEK)Forest DivisionFederal Plant Protection ServiceMonbijoustrasse 40CH-3003 BernGB(2)Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)EastbrookShaftesbury RoadCambridgeCB2 8DRNONorwegian Forest Seed Centerc/o Øyvind Meland EdvardsenBox 118, N-2301 HamarRSGroup for Forest Reproductive Material and Genetic Resources Directorate for ForestMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water ManagementMinistry of AFW – Directorate for ForestOmladinskih brigada 1Novi BeogradTRMinistry of Agriculture and ForestryGeneral Directorate of ForestryForest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Institute Directorate Sogutozu06560 AnkaraUSUnited States Department of AgricultureForest ServiceCooperative ForestryNational Seed Laboratory5675 Riggins Mill RoadDry Branch, Georgia 31020OFFICIAL STATE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES(Authorised to issue OECD certificates through cooperative agreement with USDA Forest Service)Washington State Crop Improvement Association, Inc.2575 NE Hopkins Ct.Pullman, Washington 99163 Country(1) Authority responsible for the approval and control of production CA Natural Resources Canada – Canadian Forest ServiceAtlantic Forestry Centre1350 Regent StreetFredericton NB E3C 2G6 CH Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (UVEK)Forest DivisionFederal Plant Protection ServiceMonbijoustrasse 40CH-3003 Bern GB(2) Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)EastbrookShaftesbury RoadCambridgeCB2 8DR NO Norwegian Forest Seed Centerc/o Øyvind Meland EdvardsenBox 118, N-2301 Hamar RS Group for Forest Reproductive Material and Genetic Resources Directorate for ForestMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water ManagementMinistry of AFW – Directorate for ForestOmladinskih brigada 1Novi Beograd TR Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGeneral Directorate of ForestryForest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Institute Directorate Sogutozu06560 Ankara US United States Department of AgricultureForest ServiceCooperative ForestryNational Seed Laboratory5675 Riggins Mill RoadDry Branch, Georgia 31020OFFICIAL STATE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES(Authorised to issue OECD certificates through cooperative agreement with USDA Forest Service)Washington State Crop Improvement Association, Inc.2575 NE Hopkins Ct.Pullman, Washington 99163
Country(1) Authority responsible for the approval and control of production
CA Natural Resources Canada – Canadian Forest ServiceAtlantic Forestry Centre1350 Regent StreetFredericton NB E3C 2G6
CH Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (UVEK)Forest DivisionFederal Plant Protection ServiceMonbijoustrasse 40CH-3003 Bern
GB(2) Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)EastbrookShaftesbury RoadCambridgeCB2 8DR
NO Norwegian Forest Seed Centerc/o Øyvind Meland EdvardsenBox 118, N-2301 Hamar
RS Group for Forest Reproductive Material and Genetic Resources Directorate for ForestMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water ManagementMinistry of AFW – Directorate for ForestOmladinskih brigada 1Novi Beograd
TR Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGeneral Directorate of ForestryForest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Institute Directorate Sogutozu06560 Ankara
US United States Department of AgricultureForest ServiceCooperative ForestryNational Seed Laboratory5675 Riggins Mill RoadDry Branch, Georgia 31020OFFICIAL STATE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES(Authorised to issue OECD certificates through cooperative agreement with USDA Forest Service)Washington State Crop Improvement Association, Inc.2575 NE Hopkins Ct.Pullman, Washington 99163
Country(1) Authority responsible for the approval and control of production
CA Natural Resources Canada – Canadian Forest ServiceAtlantic Forestry Centre1350 Regent StreetFredericton NB E3C 2G6
CH Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (UVEK)Forest DivisionFederal Plant Protection ServiceMonbijoustrasse 40CH-3003 Bern
GB(2) Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)EastbrookShaftesbury RoadCambridgeCB2 8DR
NO Norwegian Forest Seed Centerc/o Øyvind Meland EdvardsenBox 118, N-2301 Hamar
RS Group for Forest Reproductive Material and Genetic Resources Directorate for ForestMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water ManagementMinistry of AFW – Directorate for ForestOmladinskih brigada 1Novi Beograd
TR Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGeneral Directorate of ForestryForest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Institute Directorate Sogutozu06560 Ankara
US United States Department of AgricultureForest ServiceCooperative ForestryNational Seed Laboratory5675 Riggins Mill RoadDry Branch, Georgia 31020OFFICIAL STATE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES(Authorised to issue OECD certificates through cooperative agreement with USDA Forest Service)Washington State Crop Improvement Association, Inc.2575 NE Hopkins Ct.Pullman, Washington 99163
(2) in Annex II, Section C is replaced by the following:‘C.Additional conditions relating to the “qualified” and “tested” categories of seed and planting stock produced in third countriesAs regards seed or planting stock of the “qualified” and “tested” categories, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document shall state whether genetic modification has been used in the production of the basic material.’; ‘C. Additional conditions relating to the “qualified” and “tested” categories of seed and planting stock produced in third countriesAs regards seed or planting stock of the “qualified” and “tested” categories, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document shall state whether genetic modification has been used in the production of the basic material.’;
‘C. Additional conditions relating to the “qualified” and “tested” categories of seed and planting stock produced in third countriesAs regards seed or planting stock of the “qualified” and “tested” categories, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document shall state whether genetic modification has been used in the production of the basic material.’;
‘C. Additional conditions relating to the “qualified” and “tested” categories of seed and planting stock produced in third countriesAs regards seed or planting stock of the “qualified” and “tested” categories, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document shall state whether genetic modification has been used in the production of the basic material.’;
(3) the following annex is added:‘ANNEX IIICategories under which forest reproductive material from the different types of basic material may be imported into the UnionBasic materialCategory of forest reproductive materialSource-identifiedSelectedQualifiedTestedSeed sourcexStandxxxSeed orchardxxParents of family(ies)xxClonexxClonal mixturexx’ Basic material Category of forest reproductive material Source-identified Selected Qualified Tested Seed source x Stand x x x Seed orchard x x Parents of family(ies) x x Clone x x Clonal mixture x x’
Basic material Category of forest reproductive material
Source-identified Selected Qualified Tested
Seed source x
Stand x x x
Seed orchard x x
Parents of family(ies) x x
Clone x x
Clonal mixture x x’
Basic material Category of forest reproductive material
Source-identified Selected Qualified Tested
Seed source x
Stand x x x
Seed orchard x x
Parents of family(ies) x x
Clone x x
Clonal mixture x x’
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1) Council Directive 1999/105/EC (3) applies, inter alia, to the marketing of forest reproductive material within the Union. That Directive concerns reproductive material of tree species and artificial hybrids thereof which are important for forestry purposes in all or part of the Union.
(2) Council Decision 2008/971/EC (4) determines the conditions under which forest reproductive material of the ‘source identified’, ‘selected’ and ‘qualified’ categories, produced in third countries listed in Annex I to that Decision, as regards the approval and registration of basic material and the subsequent production of forest reproductive material from that basic material, is to be imported into the Union. The third countries concerned have implemented the OECD Scheme for the Certification of Forest Reproductive Material Moving in International Trade (‘OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme’).
(3) The OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme was amended in 2013 to include forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category in addition to the ‘source-identified’, ‘selected’ and ‘qualified’ categories of forest reproductive material, which have been in the OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme since 2011.
(4) The national rules for the certification of forest reproductive material (‘the national rules’) in Canada, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Türkiye, the United Kingdom and the United States (‘the specified third countries’) provide that an official field inspection is to be carried out during the collection and processing of seed and the production of planting stock.
(5) According to the national rules of the specified third countries, the systems for the approval and registration of basic material and the subsequent production of forest reproductive material from that basic material are to follow the OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme. In addition, those national rules require seed and planting stock of the ‘source identified’, ‘selected’, ‘qualified’ and ‘tested’ categories to be officially certified and the seed packages to be officially closed in accordance with the OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme.
(6) In the absence of a Decision at Union level in relation to the equivalence of forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 (5) authorised temporarily, until 31 December 2024, Member States to decide on the equivalence of forest reproductive material from the ‘tested’ category produced in the third countries listed in Annex I to Decision 2008/971/EC, which include the specified third countries. That authorisation was necessary to avoid any risk of disruption of imports of forest reproductive material into Member States.
(7) An examination of the national rules of the specified third countries, as regards the ‘tested’ category, shows that the conditions for approval of basic material are considered to be equivalent to those set out in Directive 1999/105/EC, provided that the conditions set out in Annex II to Decision 2008/971/EC are met as regards seed and planting stocks.
(8) The names and addresses of some authorities responsible for the approval and control of the production, as listed in Annex I to Decision 2008/971/EC, have changed and therefore need to be updated.
(9) It is possible to use genetic modification for the production of seed or planting stock of the ‘tested’ category. Therefore, in order to ensure informed choices for the users of forest reproductive material, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document should state whether that type of modification has been used in the production of the basic material for that category, as it occurs currently with the ‘qualified’ category.
(10) In view of the addition of the ‘tested’ category in Annex II to Decision 2008/971/EC, an annex should be added to that Decision with a table indicating the categories under which forest reproductive material from the different types of basic material is allowed to be imported into the Union to ensure clarity and correct application of that Decision. This is necessary to ensure legal clarity, consistency with Directive 1999/105/EC, as well as correct application of those rules and informed choices by the operators applying that Decision.
(11) Decision 2008/971/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(12) In view of the need to ensure that this Decision enters into force before the expiry of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 on 31 December 2024, it is considered to be appropriate to invoke the exception to the eight-week period provided for in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
(13) Since the objective of this Decision, namely to extend the equivalence regime for the import of forest reproductive material established by Decision 2008/971/EC to the ‘tested’ category, cannot be achieved by the Member States but can only be achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(14) This Decision should enter into force as a matter of urgency on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in order to ensure that it enters into force before the expiry of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773.
(15) As Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/773 expires on 31 December 2024, this Decision should apply from 1 January 2025 in order to ensure legal clarity and continuity of the respective rules,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Amendments to Decision 2008/971/EC

Decision 2008/971/EC is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 1, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘This Decision determines the conditions under which forest reproductive material of the “source identified”, “selected”, “qualified” and “tested” categories produced in a third country listed in Annex I is to be imported into the Union.’
;
(2) in Article 3, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
‘2. Seed and planting stock of the “source identified”, “selected”, “qualified” and “tested” categories of species and artificial hybrids thereof listed in Annex I to Directive 1999/105/EC, produced in the third countries listed in Annex I to this Decision and officially certified by the third country authorities listed in that Annex, shall be considered equivalent to seed and planting stock complying with Directive 1999/105/EC, provided that the conditions laid down in Annex II to this Decision are met.’
;
(3) the Annexes are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Entry into force and application

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 January 2025.

The Annexes to Decision 2008/971/EC are amended as follows:

(1) Annex I is replaced by the following:
‘ANNEX I
Countries and authorities
Country (1) Authority responsible for the approval and control of production
CA
Natural Resources Canada – Canadian Forest Service
Atlantic Forestry Centre
1350 Regent Street
Fredericton NB E3C 2G6
CH
Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)
Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (UVEK)
Forest Division
Federal Plant Protection Service
Monbijoustrasse 40
CH-3003 Bern
GB (2) Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Eastbrook
Shaftesbury Road
Cambridge
CB2 8DR
NO
Norwegian Forest Seed Center
c/o Øyvind Meland Edvardsen
Box 118, N-2301 Hamar
RS
Group for Forest Reproductive Material and Genetic Resources Directorate for Forest
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management
Ministry of AFW – Directorate for Forest
Omladinskih brigada 1
Novi Beograd
TR
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
General Directorate of Forestry
Forest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Institute Directorate Sogutozu
06560 Ankara
US
United States Department of Agriculture
Forest Service
Cooperative Forestry
National Seed Laboratory
5675 Riggins Mill Road
Dry Branch, Georgia 31020
OFFICIAL STATE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES
(Authorised to issue OECD certificates through cooperative agreement with USDA Forest Service)
Washington State Crop Improvement Association, Inc.
2575 NE Hopkins Ct.
Pullman, Washington 99163

(2) in Annex II, Section C is replaced by the following:
‘C.
Additional conditions relating to the “qualified” and “tested” categories of seed and planting stock produced in third countries
As regards seed or planting stock of the “qualified” and “tested” categories, the OECD label and the supplier’s label or document shall state whether genetic modification has been used in the production of the basic material.’;

(3) the following annex is added:
‘ANNEX III
Categories under which forest reproductive material from the different types of basic material may be imported into the Union
Basic material
Category of forest reproductive material
Source-identified
Selected
Qualified
Tested
Seed source
x

Stand
x
x

x
Seed orchard

x
x
Parents of family(ies)

x
x
Clone

x
x
Clonal mixture

x
x’

(1) CA – Canada, CH – Switzerland, GB – United Kingdom, NO – Norway, RS – Serbia, TR – Türkiye, US – United States.

(2) In accordance with the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 5(4) of the Windsor Framework (see Joint Declaration No 1/2023 of the Union and the United Kingdom in the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 24 March 2023 (OJ L 102, 17.4.2023, p. 87)) in conjunction with Annex 2 to that Framework, for the purposes of this Annex, references to the United Kingdom do not include Northern Ireland.’