Pending: 32010D0450

12.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 211/42
(1) On 18 July 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP(1)concerning the appointment of a European Union Special Representative (hereinafter the EUSR) for Sudan.
(2) Mrs Rosalind MARSDEN should be appointed as EUSR for Sudan from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011. However, the mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (hereinafter the HR) following the entry into force of the Decision establishing the European External Action Service.
(3) The EUSR will implement her mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the Common Foreign and Security Policy objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
(a) liaise with the Government of Sudan, the Government of Southern Sudan, the Darfur armed movements and other Sudanese parties as well as civil society and non-governmental organisations and maintain close cooperation with the AU, and the UN with the aim of pursuing the Union’s policy objectives;
(b) promote a consistent international approach towards Sudan maintaining close contacts with the AU, and in particular the AU High-Level Implementation Panel for Sudan (AUHIP), the UN, including close and regular consultations with the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS), and the AU/UN hybrid operation in Darfur (UNAMID), the Inter-Governmental Agency for Development (IGAD), the League of Arab States (LAS) and regional and other key stakeholders including the US Special Envoy;
(c) participate in the work of the International Consultative Forum with regard to coherent international efforts towards Sudan;
(d) to maintain regular high level political contacts with IGAD and the main regional stakeholders, in view of further developments in the implementation of the CPA and their impact on Sudan’s integration in the region to actively engage with regional and key African States to strengthen consensus behind CPA implementation including respect for the outcome of the referendum on self-determination for South Sudan;
(e) support the work of the Joint UN/AU Mediator and the AUHIP with regard to international efforts to facilitate a lasting peace agreement for Darfur and follow closely the negotiation process, inter alia facilitated by the Governments of Qatar, Egypt, Libya and others;
(f) with regard to the fight against impunity in Sudan and respect for human rights, including the rights of children and women, follow the situation and maintain regular contacts with the Sudanese authorities, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the AU and the UN, in particular with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the human rights observers active in the region;
(g) represent the Union, whenever possible, at the CPA Assessment and Evaluation Commission;
(h) without prejudice to the independence of EU electoral observation missions (EU EOM), closely accompany the preparation and deployment of any future EOM in Sudan and promote the follow-up to recommendations made; and
(i) actively contribute to the formulation of a future EU strategy and engagement following the end of the CPA, also in terms of promoting constructive relations between Khartoum and Juba, irrespective of the outcome of the referenda.
(a) advise and report on the definition of EU positions in international forums in order to proactively promote and strengthen a consistent EU policy approach towards Sudan;
(b) maintain an overview of all activities of the Union and cooperate closely with the Union delegation in Khartoum and the Union delegation to the AU in Addis Ababa;
(c) support the political process and activities relating to the implementation of the CPA, and the negotiation of the arrangements necessary for the post-referendum period as well as efforts in the area of institution-building in South Sudan;
(d) contribute to the implementation of the EU policy regarding UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008) on women, peace and security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments in this regard; and
(e) follow up and report on compliance by the Sudanese parties with the relevant UNSCRs, notably 1556 (2004), 1564 (2004), 1590 (2005), 1591 (2005), 1593 (2005), 1612 (2005), 1663 (2006), 1672 (2006), 1679 (2006), 1769 (2007), 1778 (2007), 1881 (2009), 1882 (2009), 1891 (2009), 1919 (2010).
(a) establishing a mission-specific security plan based on guidance from the General Secretariat of the Council, including mission-specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the mission area, as well as management of security incidents and including a mission contingency and evacuation plan;
(b) ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance as required by the conditions in the mission area;
(c) ensuring that all members of her team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the mission area, based on the risk ratings assigned to the mission area by the General Secretariat of the Council;
(d) ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the HR, the Council and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the mid-term and mandate implementation reports.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular, Articles 28, 31(2) and 33 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 18 July 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP(1)concerning the appointment of a European Union Special Representative (hereinafter the EUSR) for Sudan.
(2) Mrs Rosalind MARSDEN should be appointed as EUSR for Sudan from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011. However, the mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (hereinafter the HR) following the entry into force of the Decision establishing the European External Action Service.
(3) The EUSR will implement her mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the Common Foreign and Security Policy objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Appointment
Article 1
Mrs Rosalind MARSDEN is hereby appointed as the EUSR for Sudan from 1 September 2010 until 31 August 2011. The mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the HR following the entry into force of the Decision establishing the European External Action Service.

Policy objectives
Article 2
The mandate of the EUSR shall be based on the policy objectives of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the EU’ or ‘the Union’) in Sudan, working with the Sudanese parties, the African Union (AU) and the United Nations (UN) and other national, regional and international stakeholders to achieve a peaceful transition under the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), including the organisation of credible referenda on Abyei and on self-determination of South Sudan in January 2011. This includes actively contributing to the full and timely implementation of the CPA and post-referendum arrangements; supporting institution building and fostering stability, security and development in South Sudan irrespective of the outcome of the referendum on self-determination; improving security and facilitating a political solution to the conflict in Darfur; promoting justice, reconciliation and respect for human rights, including full cooperation with the International Criminal Court; and improving humanitarian access throughout Sudan.

Mandate
Article 3
1. In order to achieve the policy objectives, the EUSR’s mandate shall be to:
(a)
liaise with the Government of Sudan, the Government of Southern Sudan, the Darfur armed movements and other Sudanese parties as well as civil society and non-governmental organisations and maintain close cooperation with the AU, and the UN with the aim of pursuing the Union’s policy objectives;
(b)
promote a consistent international approach towards Sudan maintaining close contacts with the AU, and in particular the AU High-Level Implementation Panel for Sudan (AUHIP), the UN, including close and regular consultations with the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS), and the AU/UN hybrid operation in Darfur (UNAMID), the Inter-Governmental Agency for Development (IGAD), the League of Arab States (LAS) and regional and other key stakeholders including the US Special Envoy;
(c)
participate in the work of the International Consultative Forum with regard to coherent international efforts towards Sudan;
(d)
to maintain regular high level political contacts with IGAD and the main regional stakeholders, in view of further developments in the implementation of the CPA and their impact on Sudan’s integration in the region to actively engage with regional and key African States to strengthen consensus behind CPA implementation including respect for the outcome of the referendum on self-determination for South Sudan;
(e)
support the work of the Joint UN/AU Mediator and the AUHIP with regard to international efforts to facilitate a lasting peace agreement for Darfur and follow closely the negotiation process, inter alia facilitated by the Governments of Qatar, Egypt, Libya and others;
(f)
with regard to the fight against impunity in Sudan and respect for human rights, including the rights of children and women, follow the situation and maintain regular contacts with the Sudanese authorities, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the AU and the UN, in particular with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the human rights observers active in the region;
(g)
represent the Union, whenever possible, at the CPA Assessment and Evaluation Commission;
(h)
without prejudice to the independence of EU electoral observation missions (EU EOM), closely accompany the preparation and deployment of any future EOM in Sudan and promote the follow-up to recommendations made; and
(i)
actively contribute to the formulation of a future EU strategy and engagement following the end of the CPA, also in terms of promoting constructive relations between Khartoum and Juba, irrespective of the outcome of the referenda.
2. For the purpose of the fulfilment of her mandate, the EUSR shall, inter alia:
(a)
advise and report on the definition of EU positions in international forums in order to proactively promote and strengthen a consistent EU policy approach towards Sudan;
(b)
maintain an overview of all activities of the Union and cooperate closely with the Union delegation in Khartoum and the Union delegation to the AU in Addis Ababa;
(c)
support the political process and activities relating to the implementation of the CPA, and the negotiation of the arrangements necessary for the post-referendum period as well as efforts in the area of institution-building in South Sudan;
(d)
contribute to the implementation of the EU policy regarding UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008) on women, peace and security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments in this regard; and
(e)
follow up and report on compliance by the Sudanese parties with the relevant UNSCRs, notably 1556 (2004), 1564 (2004), 1590 (2005), 1591 (2005), 1593 (2005), 1612 (2005), 1663 (2006), 1672 (2006), 1679 (2006), 1769 (2007), 1778 (2007), 1881 (2009), 1882 (2009), 1891 (2009), 1919 (2010).

Implementation of the mandate
Article 4
1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The Political and Security Committee (hereinafter the PSC) shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.

Financing
Article 5
1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR for the period from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 shall be EUR 1 820 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team
Article 6
1. Within the limits of her mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting her team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of her team.
2. Member States and institutions of the Union may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of personnel who are seconded by a Member State or an institution of the Union to the EUSR shall be covered by the Member State or the institution of the Union concerned respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the General Secretariat of the Council may also be posted to the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State or Union institution and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the mandate of the EUSR.
4. Offices of the EUSR shall be maintained in Khartoum and in Juba, comprising a political advisor and the necessary administrative and logistic support staff. In accordance with the EUSR’s mandate as described in Article 3, a sub-office in Darfur may also be established if the existing offices in Khartoum and Juba cannot provide all necessary support to EUSR staff deployed in the Darfur region.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and her staff
Article 7
The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the mission of the EUSR and the members of her staff shall be agreed with the host party/parties, as appropriate. Member States and the Commission shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information
Article 8
The EUSR and the members of her team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations(2), in particular when managing EU classified information.

Access to information and logistical support
Article 9
1. Member States, the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union delegation and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security
Article 10
In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in conformity with her mandate and the security situation in her geographical area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under her direct authority, notably by:
(a)
establishing a mission-specific security plan based on guidance from the General Secretariat of the Council, including mission-specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the mission area, as well as management of security incidents and including a mission contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance as required by the conditions in the mission area;
(c)
ensuring that all members of her team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the mission area, based on the risk ratings assigned to the mission area by the General Secretariat of the Council;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the HR, the Council and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the mid-term and mandate implementation reports.

Reporting
Article 11
1. The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with oral and written reports. The EUSR shall also report as necessary to Council working parties. Regular written reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. Upon recommendation of the HR or the PSC, the EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports.
2. The EUSR shall regularly report to the PSC on the situation in Darfur and on the situation in Sudan as a whole.

Coordination
Article 12
1. The EUSR shall promote overall Union political coordination. She shall help to ensure that all Union instruments in the field are engaged coherently to attain the Union’s policy objectives. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region. The EUSR shall provide Member States’ missions and the Union’s delegations with regular briefings.
2. In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with the Heads of the Union delegations, including in Khartoum and in Addis Ababa and Member States’ Heads of Mission. They shall make best efforts to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR shall also liaise with other international and regional actors in the field.

Review
Article 13
The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the HR, the Council and the Commission with a progress report before the end of February 2011 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report at the end of the mandate.

Entry into force
Article 14
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular, Articles 28, 31(2) and 33 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
(1) On 18 July 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP(1)concerning the appointment of a European Union Special Representative (hereinafter the EUSR) for Sudan.
(2) Mrs Rosalind MARSDEN should be appointed as EUSR for Sudan from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011. However, the mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (hereinafter the HR) following the entry into force of the Decision establishing the European External Action Service.
(3) The EUSR will implement her mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the Common Foreign and Security Policy objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Appointment

Mrs Rosalind MARSDEN is hereby appointed as the EUSR for Sudan from 1 September 2010 until 31 August 2011. The mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the HR following the entry into force of the Decision establishing the European External Action Service.

Policy objectives

The mandate of the EUSR shall be based on the policy objectives of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the EU’ or ‘the Union’) in Sudan, working with the Sudanese parties, the African Union (AU) and the United Nations (UN) and other national, regional and international stakeholders to achieve a peaceful transition under the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), including the organisation of credible referenda on Abyei and on self-determination of South Sudan in January 2011. This includes actively contributing to the full and timely implementation of the CPA and post-referendum arrangements; supporting institution building and fostering stability, security and development in South Sudan irrespective of the outcome of the referendum on self-determination; improving security and facilitating a political solution to the conflict in Darfur; promoting justice, reconciliation and respect for human rights, including full cooperation with the International Criminal Court; and improving humanitarian access throughout Sudan.

Mandate

1. In order to achieve the policy objectives, the EUSR’s mandate shall be to:
(a)
liaise with the Government of Sudan, the Government of Southern Sudan, the Darfur armed movements and other Sudanese parties as well as civil society and non-governmental organisations and maintain close cooperation with the AU, and the UN with the aim of pursuing the Union’s policy objectives;
(b)
promote a consistent international approach towards Sudan maintaining close contacts with the AU, and in particular the AU High-Level Implementation Panel for Sudan (AUHIP), the UN, including close and regular consultations with the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS), and the AU/UN hybrid operation in Darfur (UNAMID), the Inter-Governmental Agency for Development (IGAD), the League of Arab States (LAS) and regional and other key stakeholders including the US Special Envoy;
(c)
participate in the work of the International Consultative Forum with regard to coherent international efforts towards Sudan;
(d)
to maintain regular high level political contacts with IGAD and the main regional stakeholders, in view of further developments in the implementation of the CPA and their impact on Sudan’s integration in the region to actively engage with regional and key African States to strengthen consensus behind CPA implementation including respect for the outcome of the referendum on self-determination for South Sudan;
(e)
support the work of the Joint UN/AU Mediator and the AUHIP with regard to international efforts to facilitate a lasting peace agreement for Darfur and follow closely the negotiation process, inter alia facilitated by the Governments of Qatar, Egypt, Libya and others;
(f)
with regard to the fight against impunity in Sudan and respect for human rights, including the rights of children and women, follow the situation and maintain regular contacts with the Sudanese authorities, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the AU and the UN, in particular with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the human rights observers active in the region;
(g)
represent the Union, whenever possible, at the CPA Assessment and Evaluation Commission;
(h)
without prejudice to the independence of EU electoral observation missions (EU EOM), closely accompany the preparation and deployment of any future EOM in Sudan and promote the follow-up to recommendations made; and
(i)
actively contribute to the formulation of a future EU strategy and engagement following the end of the CPA, also in terms of promoting constructive relations between Khartoum and Juba, irrespective of the outcome of the referenda.
2. For the purpose of the fulfilment of her mandate, the EUSR shall, inter alia:
(a)
advise and report on the definition of EU positions in international forums in order to proactively promote and strengthen a consistent EU policy approach towards Sudan;
(b)
maintain an overview of all activities of the Union and cooperate closely with the Union delegation in Khartoum and the Union delegation to the AU in Addis Ababa;
(c)
support the political process and activities relating to the implementation of the CPA, and the negotiation of the arrangements necessary for the post-referendum period as well as efforts in the area of institution-building in South Sudan;
(d)
contribute to the implementation of the EU policy regarding UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008) on women, peace and security, including by monitoring and reporting on developments in this regard; and
(e)
follow up and report on compliance by the Sudanese parties with the relevant UNSCRs, notably 1556 (2004), 1564 (2004), 1590 (2005), 1591 (2005), 1593 (2005), 1612 (2005), 1663 (2006), 1672 (2006), 1679 (2006), 1769 (2007), 1778 (2007), 1881 (2009), 1882 (2009), 1891 (2009), 1919 (2010).

Implementation of the mandate

1. The EUSR shall be responsible for the implementation of the mandate acting under the authority of the HR.
2. The Political and Security Committee (hereinafter the PSC) shall maintain a privileged link with the EUSR and shall be the EUSR’s primary point of contact with the Council. The PSC shall provide the EUSR with strategic guidance and political direction within the framework of the mandate, without prejudice to the powers of the HR.

Financing

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR for the period from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 shall be EUR 1 820 000.
2. The expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
3. The management of the expenditure shall be subject to a contract between the EUSR and the Commission. The EUSR shall be accountable to the Commission for all expenditure.

Constitution and composition of the team

1. Within the limits of her mandate and the corresponding financial means made available, the EUSR shall be responsible for constituting her team. The team shall include the expertise on specific policy issues as required by the mandate. The EUSR shall keep the Council and the Commission promptly informed of the composition of her team.
2. Member States and institutions of the Union may propose the secondment of staff to work with the EUSR. The salary of personnel who are seconded by a Member State or an institution of the Union to the EUSR shall be covered by the Member State or the institution of the Union concerned respectively. Experts seconded by Member States to the General Secretariat of the Council may also be posted to the EUSR. International contracted staff shall have the nationality of a Member State.
3. All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State or Union institution and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the mandate of the EUSR.
4. Offices of the EUSR shall be maintained in Khartoum and in Juba, comprising a political advisor and the necessary administrative and logistic support staff. In accordance with the EUSR’s mandate as described in Article 3, a sub-office in Darfur may also be established if the existing offices in Khartoum and Juba cannot provide all necessary support to EUSR staff deployed in the Darfur region.

Privileges and immunities of the EUSR and her staff

The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the mission of the EUSR and the members of her staff shall be agreed with the host party/parties, as appropriate. Member States and the Commission shall grant all necessary support to such effect.

Security of EU classified information

The EUSR and the members of her team shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations(2), in particular when managing EU classified information.

Access to information and logistical support

1. Member States, the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council shall ensure that the EUSR is given access to any relevant information.
2. The Union delegation and/or Member States, as appropriate, shall provide logistical support in the region.

Security

In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in conformity with her mandate and the security situation in her geographical area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under her direct authority, notably by:
(a)
establishing a mission-specific security plan based on guidance from the General Secretariat of the Council, including mission-specific physical, organisational and procedural security measures, governing management of the secure movement of personnel to, and within, the mission area, as well as management of security incidents and including a mission contingency and evacuation plan;
(b)
ensuring that all personnel deployed outside the Union are covered by high risk insurance as required by the conditions in the mission area;
(c)
ensuring that all members of her team to be deployed outside the Union, including locally contracted personnel, have received appropriate security training before or upon arriving in the mission area, based on the risk ratings assigned to the mission area by the General Secretariat of the Council;
(d)
ensuring that all agreed recommendations made following regular security assessments are implemented and providing the HR, the Council and the Commission with written reports on their implementation and on other security issues within the framework of the mid-term and mandate implementation reports.

Reporting

1. The EUSR shall regularly provide the HR and the PSC with oral and written reports. The EUSR shall also report as necessary to Council working parties. Regular written reports shall be circulated through the COREU network. Upon recommendation of the HR or the PSC, the EUSR may provide the Foreign Affairs Council with reports.
2. The EUSR shall regularly report to the PSC on the situation in Darfur and on the situation in Sudan as a whole.

Coordination

1. The EUSR shall promote overall Union political coordination. She shall help to ensure that all Union instruments in the field are engaged coherently to attain the Union’s policy objectives. The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region. The EUSR shall provide Member States’ missions and the Union’s delegations with regular briefings.
2. In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with the Heads of the Union delegations, including in Khartoum and in Addis Ababa and Member States’ Heads of Mission. They shall make best efforts to assist the EUSR in the implementation of the mandate. The EUSR shall also liaise with other international and regional actors in the field.

Review

The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review. The EUSR shall present the HR, the Council and the Commission with a progress report before the end of February 2011 and a comprehensive mandate implementation report at the end of the mandate.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Pending: 32010D0433

6.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 205/7
(1) Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is the description of the most prominent clinical signs of the infection with the bovine herpes virus type 1 (BHV1). As many infections with that virus run a subclinical course, control measures should be directed to the eradication of the infection rather than to the suppression of symptoms.
(2) Annex E (II) to Directive 64/432/EEC lists ‘infectious bovine rhinotracheitis’ among the diseases for which national control programmes may be approved and additional guarantees requested.
(3) Commission Decision 2004/558/EC of 15 July 2004 implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States(2)lists in Annex I the Member States or parts thereof which implement a programme for the eradication of BHV1 and in Annex II those which have already attained freedom from this disease. Annex III to that Decision sets up criteria for a holding considered to be free of BHV1 infection.
(4) In order to prevent transmission of BHV1 into BHV1-free holdings, the Decision requires for the movement of bovine animals from an area without BHV1 status or listed in Annex I to a holding situated in an area listed in Annex II that a test for the presence of antibodies to the BHV1 virus is carried out with negative result on samples taken during a 30 days pre-movement quarantine.
(5) Based on current experience with the implementation of approved programmes for the eradication of BHV1 infection, direct movement of bovine animals from holdings free of BHV1 infection to enclosed fattening units in Member States or parts thereof which are free of BHV1 infection could be allowed, provided a channelling system is implemented by which the competent authorities at the place of the fattening unit ensure additional testing at arrival and removal of the animals only to the slaughterhouse.
(6) At present, all regions of Germany with the exception of the administrative units of Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz and Oberfranken in the federal state of Bavaria are listed in Annex I to Decision 2004/558/EC.
(7) Germany has now submitted documentation in support of its application to declare also the administrative units of Regierungsbezirke Mittelfranken and Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria free of BHV1 infection and provided rules for the national movement of bovine animals within and into this part of its territory. Accordingly, Germany has requested the application of the additional guaranties, in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC, to be extended to those administrative units in Bavaria.
(8) Following the evaluation of the application submitted by Germany, it is appropriate that those two BHV1-free administrative units in Germany be no longer listed in Annex I, but be included in Annex II to Decision 2004/558/EC and to extend the application of the additional guaranties established in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC to them.
(9) Decision 2004/558/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
1. Article 2(2)(b)(ii) is replaced by the following:‘(ii)they are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status to a holding of unknown BHV1 status in the Member State of destination listed in Annex I, where according to the approved national eradication programme all animals are fattened indoors, and from which they can only be transported to the slaughterhouse;’; ‘(ii) they are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status to a holding of unknown BHV1 status in the Member State of destination listed in Annex I, where according to the approved national eradication programme all animals are fattened indoors, and from which they can only be transported to the slaughterhouse;’;
‘(ii) they are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status to a holding of unknown BHV1 status in the Member State of destination listed in Annex I, where according to the approved national eradication programme all animals are fattened indoors, and from which they can only be transported to the slaughterhouse;’;
‘(ii) they are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status to a holding of unknown BHV1 status in the Member State of destination listed in Annex I, where according to the approved national eradication programme all animals are fattened indoors, and from which they can only be transported to the slaughterhouse;’;
2. Article 3 is amended as follows:(a)in paragraph 3, point (b) is replaced by the following:‘(b)after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’(b)the following paragraphs are added:‘4.   By way of derogation to paragraph 1(a) and (b), the competent authority in the Member State of destination may authorise the introduction of bovine animals intended for meat production onto a BHV1-free holding as defined in Annex III (BHV1-free holding) situated in a region of that Member State listed in Annex II under the following conditions:(a)the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;(b)the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;(c)for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;(d)the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);(e)on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;(f)the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.5.   The Member State of destination referred to in paragraph 4 shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the regions listed in Annex II in which the provisions of paragraph 4 are going to be implemented and the date of intended application.’; (a) in paragraph 3, point (b) is replaced by the following:‘(b)after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’ ‘(b) after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’ (b) the following paragraphs are added:‘4.   By way of derogation to paragraph 1(a) and (b), the competent authority in the Member State of destination may authorise the introduction of bovine animals intended for meat production onto a BHV1-free holding as defined in Annex III (BHV1-free holding) situated in a region of that Member State listed in Annex II under the following conditions:(a)the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;(b)the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;(c)for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;(d)the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);(e)on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;(f)the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.5.   The Member State of destination referred to in paragraph 4 shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the regions listed in Annex II in which the provisions of paragraph 4 are going to be implemented and the date of intended application.’; (a) the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings; (b) the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status; (c) for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days; (d) the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c); (e) on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse; (f) the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. (i) either with negative result in each case; or (ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(a) in paragraph 3, point (b) is replaced by the following:‘(b)after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’ ‘(b) after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
‘(b) after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
(b) the following paragraphs are added:‘4.   By way of derogation to paragraph 1(a) and (b), the competent authority in the Member State of destination may authorise the introduction of bovine animals intended for meat production onto a BHV1-free holding as defined in Annex III (BHV1-free holding) situated in a region of that Member State listed in Annex II under the following conditions:(a)the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;(b)the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;(c)for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;(d)the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);(e)on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;(f)the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.5.   The Member State of destination referred to in paragraph 4 shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the regions listed in Annex II in which the provisions of paragraph 4 are going to be implemented and the date of intended application.’; (a) the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings; (b) the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status; (c) for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days; (d) the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c); (e) on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse; (f) the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. (i) either with negative result in each case; or (ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(a) the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;
(b) the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;
(c) for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;
(d) the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);
(e) on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;
(f) the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. (i) either with negative result in each case; or (ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(i) either with negative result in each case; or
(ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
— either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(a) in paragraph 3, point (b) is replaced by the following:‘(b)after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’ ‘(b) after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
‘(b) after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
‘(b) after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
(b) the following paragraphs are added:‘4.   By way of derogation to paragraph 1(a) and (b), the competent authority in the Member State of destination may authorise the introduction of bovine animals intended for meat production onto a BHV1-free holding as defined in Annex III (BHV1-free holding) situated in a region of that Member State listed in Annex II under the following conditions:(a)the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;(b)the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;(c)for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;(d)the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);(e)on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;(f)the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.5.   The Member State of destination referred to in paragraph 4 shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the regions listed in Annex II in which the provisions of paragraph 4 are going to be implemented and the date of intended application.’; (a) the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings; (b) the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status; (c) for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days; (d) the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c); (e) on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse; (f) the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. (i) either with negative result in each case; or (ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(a) the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;
(b) the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;
(c) for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;
(d) the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);
(e) on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;
(f) the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. (i) either with negative result in each case; or (ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(i) either with negative result in each case; or
(ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
— either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(a) the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;
(b) the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;
(c) for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;
(d) the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);
(e) on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;
(f) the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):(i)either with negative result in each case; or(ii)the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. (i) either with negative result in each case; or (ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(i) either with negative result in each case; or
(ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
— either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
(i) either with negative result in each case; or
(ii) the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and—either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or—the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III. — either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or — the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
— either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
— either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
— the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
3. Annex I is replaced by the text in Annex I to the present Decision;
4. Annex II is replaced by the text in Annex II to the present Decision.
Member States Regions of Member States to which the additional guarantees for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis apply in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 64/432/EEC
Czech Republic All regions
Germany All regions, except Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz, Oberfranken, Mittelfranken and Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria
Italy The Autonomous Region of Friuli Venezia GiuliaThe Autonomous Province of Trento’
Member States Regions of Member States to which the additional guarantees for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis apply in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC
Austria All regions
Germany Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz, Oberfranken, Mittelfranken und Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria
Denmark All regions
Italy Province of Bolzano
Finland All regions
Sweden All regions’
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine(1), and in particular Articles 9(2) and 10(2) thereto,
(1) Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is the description of the most prominent clinical signs of the infection with the bovine herpes virus type 1 (BHV1). As many infections with that virus run a subclinical course, control measures should be directed to the eradication of the infection rather than to the suppression of symptoms.
(2) Annex E (II) to Directive 64/432/EEC lists ‘infectious bovine rhinotracheitis’ among the diseases for which national control programmes may be approved and additional guarantees requested.
(3) Commission Decision 2004/558/EC of 15 July 2004 implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States(2)lists in Annex I the Member States or parts thereof which implement a programme for the eradication of BHV1 and in Annex II those which have already attained freedom from this disease. Annex III to that Decision sets up criteria for a holding considered to be free of BHV1 infection.
(4) In order to prevent transmission of BHV1 into BHV1-free holdings, the Decision requires for the movement of bovine animals from an area without BHV1 status or listed in Annex I to a holding situated in an area listed in Annex II that a test for the presence of antibodies to the BHV1 virus is carried out with negative result on samples taken during a 30 days pre-movement quarantine.
(5) Based on current experience with the implementation of approved programmes for the eradication of BHV1 infection, direct movement of bovine animals from holdings free of BHV1 infection to enclosed fattening units in Member States or parts thereof which are free of BHV1 infection could be allowed, provided a channelling system is implemented by which the competent authorities at the place of the fattening unit ensure additional testing at arrival and removal of the animals only to the slaughterhouse.
(6) At present, all regions of Germany with the exception of the administrative units of Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz and Oberfranken in the federal state of Bavaria are listed in Annex I to Decision 2004/558/EC.
(7) Germany has now submitted documentation in support of its application to declare also the administrative units of Regierungsbezirke Mittelfranken and Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria free of BHV1 infection and provided rules for the national movement of bovine animals within and into this part of its territory. Accordingly, Germany has requested the application of the additional guaranties, in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC, to be extended to those administrative units in Bavaria.
(8) Following the evaluation of the application submitted by Germany, it is appropriate that those two BHV1-free administrative units in Germany be no longer listed in Annex I, but be included in Annex II to Decision 2004/558/EC and to extend the application of the additional guaranties established in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC to them.
(9) Decision 2004/558/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Decision 2004/558/EC is amended as follows:
1.
Article 2(2)(b)(ii) is replaced by the following:
‘(ii)
they are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status to a holding of unknown BHV1 status in the Member State of destination listed in Annex I, where according to the approved national eradication programme all animals are fattened indoors, and from which they can only be transported to the slaughterhouse;’;
2.
Article 3 is amended as follows:
(a)
in paragraph 3, point (b) is replaced by the following:
‘(b)
after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
(b)
the following paragraphs are added:
‘4. By way of derogation to paragraph 1(a) and (b), the competent authority in the Member State of destination may authorise the introduction of bovine animals intended for meat production onto a BHV1-free holding as defined in Annex III (BHV1-free holding) situated in a region of that Member State listed in Annex II under the following conditions:
(a)
the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;
(b)
the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;
(c)
for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;
(d)
the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);
(e)
on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;
(f)
the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):
(i)
either with negative result in each case; or
(ii)
the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and
—
either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
—
the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
—
the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
—
the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
5. The Member State of destination referred to in paragraph 4 shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the regions listed in Annex II in which the provisions of paragraph 4 are going to be implemented and the date of intended application.’;
3.
Annex I is replaced by the text in Annex I to the present Decision;
4.
Annex II is replaced by the text in Annex II to the present Decision.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine(1), and in particular Articles 9(2) and 10(2) thereto,
(1) Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is the description of the most prominent clinical signs of the infection with the bovine herpes virus type 1 (BHV1). As many infections with that virus run a subclinical course, control measures should be directed to the eradication of the infection rather than to the suppression of symptoms.
(2) Annex E (II) to Directive 64/432/EEC lists ‘infectious bovine rhinotracheitis’ among the diseases for which national control programmes may be approved and additional guarantees requested.
(3) Commission Decision 2004/558/EC of 15 July 2004 implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States(2)lists in Annex I the Member States or parts thereof which implement a programme for the eradication of BHV1 and in Annex II those which have already attained freedom from this disease. Annex III to that Decision sets up criteria for a holding considered to be free of BHV1 infection.
(4) In order to prevent transmission of BHV1 into BHV1-free holdings, the Decision requires for the movement of bovine animals from an area without BHV1 status or listed in Annex I to a holding situated in an area listed in Annex II that a test for the presence of antibodies to the BHV1 virus is carried out with negative result on samples taken during a 30 days pre-movement quarantine.
(5) Based on current experience with the implementation of approved programmes for the eradication of BHV1 infection, direct movement of bovine animals from holdings free of BHV1 infection to enclosed fattening units in Member States or parts thereof which are free of BHV1 infection could be allowed, provided a channelling system is implemented by which the competent authorities at the place of the fattening unit ensure additional testing at arrival and removal of the animals only to the slaughterhouse.
(6) At present, all regions of Germany with the exception of the administrative units of Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz and Oberfranken in the federal state of Bavaria are listed in Annex I to Decision 2004/558/EC.
(7) Germany has now submitted documentation in support of its application to declare also the administrative units of Regierungsbezirke Mittelfranken and Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria free of BHV1 infection and provided rules for the national movement of bovine animals within and into this part of its territory. Accordingly, Germany has requested the application of the additional guaranties, in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC, to be extended to those administrative units in Bavaria.
(8) Following the evaluation of the application submitted by Germany, it is appropriate that those two BHV1-free administrative units in Germany be no longer listed in Annex I, but be included in Annex II to Decision 2004/558/EC and to extend the application of the additional guaranties established in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC to them.
(9) Decision 2004/558/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Decision 2004/558/EC is amended as follows:
1.
Article 2(2)(b)(ii) is replaced by the following:
‘(ii)
they are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status to a holding of unknown BHV1 status in the Member State of destination listed in Annex I, where according to the approved national eradication programme all animals are fattened indoors, and from which they can only be transported to the slaughterhouse;’;
2.
Article 3 is amended as follows:
(a)
in paragraph 3, point (b) is replaced by the following:
‘(b)
after the second indent: “Article 3 paragraph … point … of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC”;’
(b)
the following paragraphs are added:
‘4. By way of derogation to paragraph 1(a) and (b), the competent authority in the Member State of destination may authorise the introduction of bovine animals intended for meat production onto a BHV1-free holding as defined in Annex III (BHV1-free holding) situated in a region of that Member State listed in Annex II under the following conditions:
(a)
the animals must not have been vaccinated against BHV1 and must originate in and have remained since birth on BHV1-free holdings;
(b)
the animals are transported without coming into contact with animals of lesser health status;
(c)
for at least 30 days immediately prior to dispatch, or since birth where the animals are less than 30 days old, the animals have remained on the holding of origin, or in an isolation facility approved by the competent authority, which is situated in a Member State in which infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is a compulsorily notifiable disease and in which within an area of 5 km radius around the holding or isolation facility there was no clinical or pathological evidence of BHV1 infection during the past 30 days;
(d)
the animals have been subjected with negative result either to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 in the case the animals originate from a BHV1 vaccinated herd, or in all other cases to a serological test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 7 days prior to dispatch from the holding referred to in point (c);
(e)
on the BHV1-free holding of destination all animals are fattened indoors and are only removed to be transported to the slaughterhouse;
(f)
the animals referred to in point (d) are subjected to a serological test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood taken within 21 to 28 days after arrival in the holding referred to in point (e):
(i)
either with negative result in each case; or
(ii)
the BHV1-free status of the holding remains suspended until the infected animals have been slaughtered within less than 45 days after arrival on the holding, and
—
either the animals in direct contact with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the gE-glycoprotein of the BHV1 or the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
—
the animals which shared a common airspace with the infected animals have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
—
the remaining animals on the holding have reacted with negative results to a test for antibodies against the entire BHV1 carried out on a sample of blood collected not earlier than 28 days following the removal of the infected animals, or
—
the BHV1-free status is restored in accordance with point 4 of Annex III.
5. The Member State of destination referred to in paragraph 4 shall notify to the Commission and to the other Member States the regions listed in Annex II in which the provisions of paragraph 4 are going to be implemented and the date of intended application.’;
3.
Annex I is replaced by the text in Annex I to the present Decision;
4.
Annex II is replaced by the text in Annex II to the present Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEX I
‘ANNEX I
Member States
Regions of Member States to which the additional guarantees for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis apply in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 64/432/EEC
Czech Republic
All regions
Germany
All regions, except Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz, Oberfranken, Mittelfranken and Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria
Italy
The Autonomous Region of Friuli Venezia Giulia
The Autonomous Province of Trento’
ANNEX II
‘ANNEX II
Member States
Regions of Member States to which the additional guarantees for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis apply in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC
Austria
All regions
Germany
Regierungsbezirke Oberpfalz, Oberfranken, Mittelfranken und Unterfranken in the federal state of Bavaria
Denmark
All regions
Italy
Province of Bolzano
Finland
All regions
Sweden
All regions’

Pending: 32010D0432

4.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 202/11
(1) On 26 May 2005, Dow AgroSciences Europe on behalf of Dow AgroSciences Europe and Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted to the competent authority of the Netherlands an application, in accordance with Article 5 and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize (the application).
(2) The application also covers the placing on the market of products other than food and feed containing or consisting of 1507×59122 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(2)and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC. It also includes a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(3) On 6 May 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 6 and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. It considered that 1507×59122 maize is as safe as its non-genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore it concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses(3). In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
(4) In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
(5) Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
(6) A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms(4).
(7) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize. However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and products other than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
(8) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects. Those results should be presented in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/770/EC of 13 October 2009 establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5).
(9) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food and feed, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(10) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(11) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC(6), lays down labelling requirements for products consisting of, or containing GMOs.
(12) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms(7).
(13) The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
(14) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman.
(15) At its meeting on 29 June 2010, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal. The Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded. It is accordingly for the Commission to adopt the measures,
(a) foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
(b) feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
(c) products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.
(a) Dow AgroSciences Europe, United Kingdom, representing Mycogen Seeds, United States; and
(b) Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Belgium, representing Pioneer Hi-Bred International, United States.
(a) Dow AgroSciences Europe, European Development Centre, 3 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, United Kingdom; and
(b) Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
Name : Dow AgroSciences Europe
Address : European Development Centre, 3 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, United Kingdom
Name : Pioneer Overseas Corporation
Address : Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium
1. foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
2. feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
3. products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.
1. for the purposes of the specific labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
2. the words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c) of this Decision.
— event specific real-time quantitative PCR based methods for genetically modified maize DAS-Ø15Ø7 and DAS-59122-7 maize validated on DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize,
— validated by the Community reference laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdoss.htm
— reference material: ERM®-BF418 (for DAS-Ø15Ø7) and ERM®-BF424 (for DAS-59122-7) accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) at https://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/rmcatalogue
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed(1), and in particular Article 7(3) and Article 19(3) thereof,
(1) On 26 May 2005, Dow AgroSciences Europe on behalf of Dow AgroSciences Europe and Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted to the competent authority of the Netherlands an application, in accordance with Article 5 and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize (the application).
(2) The application also covers the placing on the market of products other than food and feed containing or consisting of 1507×59122 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(2)and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC. It also includes a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(3) On 6 May 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 6 and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. It considered that 1507×59122 maize is as safe as its non-genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore it concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses(3). In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
(4) In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
(5) Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
(6) A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms(4).
(7) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize. However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and products other than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
(8) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects. Those results should be presented in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/770/EC of 13 October 2009 establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5).
(9) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food and feed, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(10) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(11) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC(6), lays down labelling requirements for products consisting of, or containing GMOs.
(12) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms(7).
(13) The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
(14) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman.
(15) At its meeting on 29 June 2010, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal. The Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded. It is accordingly for the Commission to adopt the measures,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Genetically modified organism and unique identifier
Article 1
Genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) 1507×59122, as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, is assigned the unique identifier DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.

Authorisation
Article 2
The following products are authorised for the purposes of Article 4(2) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
(a)
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
(b)
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
(c)
products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.

Labelling
Article 3
1. For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’.
2. The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c).

Monitoring for environmental effects
Article 4
1. The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
2. The authorisation holder shall submit to the Commission annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan in accordance with Decision 2009/770/EC.

Community register
Article 5
The information set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Authorisation holders
Article 6
1. The authorisation holders shall be:
(a)
Dow AgroSciences Europe, United Kingdom, representing Mycogen Seeds, United States; and
(b)
Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Belgium, representing Pioneer Hi-Bred International, United States.
2. Both authorisation holders shall be responsible for fulfilling the duties imposed on authorisation holders by this Decision and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Validity
Article 7
This Decision shall apply for a period of 10 years from the date of its notification.

Addressees
Article 8
This Decision is addressed to:
(a)
Dow AgroSciences Europe, European Development Centre, 3 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, United Kingdom; and
(b)
Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed(1), and in particular Article 7(3) and Article 19(3) thereof,
(1) On 26 May 2005, Dow AgroSciences Europe on behalf of Dow AgroSciences Europe and Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted to the competent authority of the Netherlands an application, in accordance with Article 5 and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize (the application).
(2) The application also covers the placing on the market of products other than food and feed containing or consisting of 1507×59122 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(2)and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC. It also includes a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(3) On 6 May 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 6 and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. It considered that 1507×59122 maize is as safe as its non-genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore it concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses(3). In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
(4) In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
(5) Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
(6) A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms(4).
(7) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 1507×59122 maize. However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and products other than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
(8) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects. Those results should be presented in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/770/EC of 13 October 2009 establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5).
(9) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food and feed, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(10) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(11) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC(6), lays down labelling requirements for products consisting of, or containing GMOs.
(12) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms(7).
(13) The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
(14) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman.
(15) At its meeting on 29 June 2010, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal. The Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded. It is accordingly for the Commission to adopt the measures,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Genetically modified organism and unique identifier

Genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) 1507×59122, as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, is assigned the unique identifier DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.

Authorisation

The following products are authorised for the purposes of Article 4(2) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
(a)
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
(b)
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
(c)
products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.

Labelling

1. For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’.
2. The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c).

Monitoring for environmental effects

1. The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
2. The authorisation holder shall submit to the Commission annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan in accordance with Decision 2009/770/EC.

Community register

The information set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Authorisation holders

1. The authorisation holders shall be:
(a)
Dow AgroSciences Europe, United Kingdom, representing Mycogen Seeds, United States; and
(b)
Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Belgium, representing Pioneer Hi-Bred International, United States.
2. Both authorisation holders shall be responsible for fulfilling the duties imposed on authorisation holders by this Decision and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Validity

This Decision shall apply for a period of 10 years from the date of its notification.

Addressees

This Decision is addressed to:
(a)
Dow AgroSciences Europe, European Development Centre, 3 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, United Kingdom; and
(b)
Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.

(a)   Applicants and authorisation holders:

ANNEX
Name | : | Dow AgroSciences Europe
Address | : | European Development Centre, 3 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, United KingdomOn behalf of Mycogen Seeds c/o Dow AgroSciences LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268-1054, United States of America
and

Name | : | Pioneer Overseas Corporation
Address | : | Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, BelgiumOn behalf of Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 7100 NW 62nd Avenue, PO Box 1014, Johnston, IA 50131-1014, United States of America
(b) Designation and specification of the products:

1. | foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
2. | feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize;
3. | products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.The genetically modified DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize, as described in the application, is produced by crosses between maize containing DAS-Ø15Ø7 and DAS-59122-7 events and expresses the Cry1F protein which confers protection against certain lepidopteran pests, the Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins which confer protection against certain coleopteran pests and the PAT protein, used as a selectable marker, which confers tolerance to the glufosinate-ammonium herbicide.
(c) Labelling:

1. | for the purposes of the specific labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
2. | the words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c) of this Decision.(d) Method for detection:

— | event specific real-time quantitative PCR based methods for genetically modified maize DAS-Ø15Ø7 and DAS-59122-7 maize validated on DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7 maize,
— | validated by the Community reference laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdoss.htm
— | reference material: ERM®-BF418 (for DAS-Ø15Ø7) and ERM®-BF424 (for DAS-59122-7) accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) at https://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/rmcatalogue(e) Unique identifier:
DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7.
(f) Information required under Annex II to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity:
Biosafety Clearing House, Record ID: see [to be completed when notified].
(g) Conditions or restrictions on the placing on the market, use or handling of the products:
Not required.
(h) Monitoring plan:
Monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
[Link:plan published on the Internet]
(i) Post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food for human consumption:
Not required.
Note: Links to relevant documents may need to be modified over time. Those modifications will be made available to the public via the updating of the Community register of genetically modified food and feed.

Pending: 32010D0428

3.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 201/41
(1) On 26 August 2005, Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted to the competent authority of the United Kingdom an application, in accordance with Article 5 and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize (the application).
(2) The application also covers the placing on the market of products other than food and feed containing or consisting of 59122x1507xNK603 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(2)and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC. It also includes a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(3) On 8 April 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 6 and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. It considered that 59122x1507xNK603 maize is as safe as its non-genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore it concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses(3). In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
(4) In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
(5) Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
(6) A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms(4).
(7) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize. However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and products other than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
(8) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects. Those results should be presented in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/770/EC of 13 October 2009 establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5).
(9) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food and feed, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(10) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(11) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC(6), lays down labelling requirements for products consisting of, or containing GMOs.
(12) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms(7).
(13) The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
(14) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman.
(15) At its meeting on 29 June 2010, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal. The Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded. It is accordingly for the Commission to adopt the measures,
(a) foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
(b) feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
(c) products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.
Name : Pioneer Overseas Corporation
Address : Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium
1. foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
2. feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
3. products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.
1. for the purposes of the specific labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
2. the words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c) of this Decision.
— event specific real-time quantitative PCR-based methods for genetically modified maize DAS-59122-7, DAS-Ø15Ø7 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize validated on DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize,
— validated on seeds by the Community reference laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdoss.htm
— reference material: ERM®-BF424 (for DAS-59122-7), ERM®-BF418 (for DAS-Ø15Ø7) and ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) at https://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/rmcatalogue
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed(1), and in particular Articles 7(3) and 19(3) thereof,
(1) On 26 August 2005, Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted to the competent authority of the United Kingdom an application, in accordance with Article 5 and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize (the application).
(2) The application also covers the placing on the market of products other than food and feed containing or consisting of 59122x1507xNK603 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(2)and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC. It also includes a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(3) On 8 April 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 6 and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. It considered that 59122x1507xNK603 maize is as safe as its non-genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore it concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses(3). In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
(4) In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
(5) Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
(6) A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms(4).
(7) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize. However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and products other than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
(8) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects. Those results should be presented in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/770/EC of 13 October 2009 establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5).
(9) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food and feed, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(10) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(11) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC(6), lays down labelling requirements for products consisting of, or containing GMOs.
(12) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms(7).
(13) The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
(14) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman.
(15) At its meeting on 29 June 2010, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal. The Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded. It is accordingly for the Commission to adopt the measures,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Genetically modified organism and unique identifier
Article 1
Genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) 59122x1507xNK603, as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, is assigned the unique identifier DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.

Authorisation
Article 2
The following products are authorised for the purposes of Article 4(2) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
(a)
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
(b)
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
(c)
products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.

Labelling
Article 3
1. For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’.
2. The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c).

Monitoring for environmental effects
Article 4
1. The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
2. The authorisation holder shall submit to the Commission annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan in accordance with Decision 2009/770/EC.

Community register
Article 5
The information set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Authorisation holder
Article 6
The authorisation holder shall be Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Belgium, representing Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., United States.

Validity
Article 7
This Decision shall apply for a period of 10 years from the date of its notification.

Addressee
Article 8
This Decision is addressed to Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed(1), and in particular Articles 7(3) and 19(3) thereof,
(1) On 26 August 2005, Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted to the competent authority of the United Kingdom an application, in accordance with Article 5 and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize (the application).
(2) The application also covers the placing on the market of products other than food and feed containing or consisting of 59122x1507xNK603 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 5(5) and Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC(2)and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC. It also includes a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
(3) On 8 April 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 6 and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. It considered that 59122x1507xNK603 maize is as safe as its non-genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore it concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses(3). In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 6(4) and Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
(4) In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
(5) Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
(6) A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms(4).
(7) On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from 59122x1507xNK603 maize. However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and products other than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
(8) The authorisation holder should submit annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan for environmental effects. Those results should be presented in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/770/EC of 13 October 2009 establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5).
(9) The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food and feed, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in Article 6(5)(e) and Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(10) All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
(11) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC(6), lays down labelling requirements for products consisting of, or containing GMOs.
(12) This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Article 9(1) and Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms(7).
(13) The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
(14) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman.
(15) At its meeting on 29 June 2010, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal. The Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded. It is accordingly for the Commission to adopt the measures,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Genetically modified organism and unique identifier

Genetically modified maize (Zea maysL.) 59122x1507xNK603, as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, is assigned the unique identifier DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.

Authorisation

The following products are authorised for the purposes of Article 4(2) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
(a)
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
(b)
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
(c)
products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.

Labelling

1. For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’.
2. The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c).

Monitoring for environmental effects

1. The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
2. The authorisation holder shall submit to the Commission annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring plan in accordance with Decision 2009/770/EC.

Community register

The information set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Authorisation holder

The authorisation holder shall be Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Belgium, representing Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., United States.

Validity

This Decision shall apply for a period of 10 years from the date of its notification.

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to Pioneer Overseas Corporation, Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.

(a)   Applicant and authorisation holder:

ANNEX
Name | : | Pioneer Overseas Corporation
Address | : | Avenue des Arts 44, 1040 Brussels, BelgiumOn behalf of Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 7100 NW 62nd Avenue, PO Box 1014, Johnston, IA 50131-1014, United States of America
(b) Designation and specification of the products:

1. | foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
2. | feed containing, consisting of, or produced from DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize;
3. | products other than food and feed containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize for the same uses as any other maize with the exception of cultivation.The genetically modified DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize, as described in the application, is produced by crosses between maize containing DAS-59122-7, DAS-Ø15Ø7 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 events and expresses the Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins which confer protection against certain coleopteran pests, the Cry1F protein which confers protection against certain lepidopteran pests, the PAT protein, used as a selectable marker, which confers tolerance to the glufosinate-ammonium herbicide and the CP4 EPSPS protein which confers tolerance to glyphosate herbicide.
(c) Labelling:

1. | for the purposes of the specific labelling requirements laid down in Article 13(1) and Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘maize’;
2. | the words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize referred to in Article 2(b) and (c) of this Decision.(d) Method for detection:

— | event specific real-time quantitative PCR-based methods for genetically modified maize DAS-59122-7, DAS-Ø15Ø7 and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize validated on DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6 maize,
— | validated on seeds by the Community reference laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdoss.htm
— | reference material: ERM®-BF424 (for DAS-59122-7), ERM®-BF418 (for DAS-Ø15Ø7) and ERM®-BF415 (for MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) accessible via the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) at https://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/rmcatalogue(e) Unique identifier:
DAS-59122-7xDAS-Ø15Ø7xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6.
(f) Information required under Annex II to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity:
Biosafety Clearing House, Record ID: see [to be completed when notified].
(g) Conditions or restrictions on the placing on the market, use or handling of the products:
Not required.
(h) Monitoring plan:
Monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
[Link:plan published on the Internet]
(i) Post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food for human consumption:
Not required.
Note: Links to relevant documents may need to be modified over time. Those modifications will be made available to the public via the updating of the Community register of genetically modified food and feed.

Pending: 32010D0427

3.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 201/30
(1) The purpose of this Decision is to establish the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’), a functionally autonomous body of the Union under the authority of the High Representative, set up by Article 27(3) of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’), as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. This Decision and, in particular, the reference to the term ‘High Representative’ will be interpreted in accordance with his/her different functions under Article 18 TEU.
(2) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 21(3) TEU, the Union will ensure consistency between the different areas of its external action and between those areas and its other policies. The Council and the Commission, assisted by the High Representative, will ensure that consistency and will cooperate to that effect.
(3) The EEAS will support the High Representative, who is also a Vice-President of the Commission and the President of the Foreign Affairs Council, in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy (‘CFSP’) of the Union and to ensure the consistency of the Union’s external action as outlined, notably, in Articles 18 and 27 TEU. The EEAS will support the High Representative in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council. The EEAS will also support the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission, in respect of his/her responsibilities within the Commission for responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations, and in coordinating other aspects of the Union’s external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the Commission services.
(4) In its contribution to the Union’s external cooperation programmes, the EEAS should seek to ensure that the programmes fulfil the objectives for external action as set out in Article 21 TUE, in particular in paragraph (2)(d) thereof, and that they respect the objectives of the Union’s development policy in line with Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’). In this context, the EEAS should also promote the fulfilment of the objectives of the European Consensus on Development(1)and the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid(2).
(5) It results from the Treaty of Lisbon that, in order to implement its provisions, the EEAS must be operational as soon as possible after the entry into force of that Treaty.
(6) The European Parliament will fully play its role in the external action of the Union, including its functions of political control as provided for in Article 14(1) TEU, as well as in legislative and budgetary matters as laid down in the Treaties. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 36 TEU, the High Representative will regularly consult the European Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the CFSP and will ensure that the views of the European Parliament are duly taken into consideration. The EEAS will assist the High Representative in this regard. Specific arrangements should be made with regard to access for Members of the European Parliament to classified documents and information in the area of CFSP. Until the adoption of such arrangements, existing provisions under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy(3)will apply.
(7) The High Representative, or his/her representative, should exercise the responsibilities provided for by the respective acts founding the European Defence Agency(4), the European Union Satellite Centre(5), the European Union Institute for Security Studies(6), and the European Security and Defence College(7). The EEAS should provide those entities with the support currently provided by the General Secretariat of the Council.
(8) Provisions should be adopted relating to the staff of the EEAS and their recruitment where such provisions are necessary to establish the organisation and functioning of the EEAS. In parallel, necessary amendments should be made, in accordance with Article 336 TFEU, to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities(8)(‘CEOS’) without prejudice to Article 298 TFEU. For matters relating to its staff, the EEAS should be treated as an institution within the meaning of the Staff Regulations and the CEOS. The High Representative will be the Appointing Authority, in relation both to officials subject to the Staff Regulations and agents subject to the CEOS. The number of officials and servants of the EEAS will be decided each year as part of the budgetary procedure and will be reflected in the establishment plan.
(9) The staff of the EEAS should carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interest of the Union in mind.
(10) Recruitment should be based on merit whilst ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance. The staff of the EEAS should comprise a meaningful presence of nationals from all the Member States. The review foreseen for 2013 should also cover this issue, including, as appropriate, suggestions for additional specific measures to correct possible imbalances.
(11) In accordance with Article 27(3) TEU, the EEAS will comprise officials from the General Secretariat of the Council and from the Commission, as well as personnel coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. For that purpose, the relevant departments and functions in the General Secretariat of the Council and in the Commission will be transferred to the EEAS, together with officials and temporary agents occupying a post in such departments or functions. Before 1 July 2013, the EEAS will recruit exclusively officials originating from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission, as well as staff coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. After that date, all officials and other servants of the European Union should be able to apply for vacant posts in the EEAS.
(12) The EEAS may, in specific cases, have recourse to specialised seconded national experts (‘SNEs’), over whom the High Representative will have authority. SNEs in posts in the EEAS will not be counted in the one third of all EEAS staff at Administrator (‘AD’) level which staff from Member States should represent when the EEAS will have reached its full capacity. Their transfer in the phase of setting up of the EEAS will not be automatic and will be made with the consent of the authorities of the originating Member States. By the date of expiry of the contract of an SNE transferred to the EEAS under Article 7, the relevant function will be converted into a temporary agent post in cases where the function performed by the SNE corresponds to a function normally carried out by staff at AD level, provided that the necessary post is available under the establishment plan.
(13) The Commission and the EEAS will agree on detailed arrangements relating to the issuing of instructions from the Commission to delegations. These should provide in particular that when the Commission will issue instructions to delegations, it will simultaneously provide a copy thereof to the Head of Delegation and to the EEAS central administration.
(14) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(9)(the ‘Financial Regulation’) should be amended in order to include the EEAS in Article 1 thereof, with a specific section in the Union budget. In accordance with the applicable rules, and as is the case for other institutions, a part of the annual report of the Court of Auditors will also be dedicated to the EEAS, and the EEAS will respond to such reports. The EEAS will be subject to the procedures regarding the discharge as provided for in Article 319 TFEU and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The High Representative will provide the European Parliament with all necessary support for the exercise of the European Parliament’s right as discharge authority. The implementation of the operational budget will be the Commission’s responsibility in accordance with Article 317 TFEU. Decisions having a financial impact will, in particular, comply with the responsibilities laid down in Title IV of the Financial Regulation, especially Articles 64 to 68 thereof regarding liability of financial actors, and Article 75 thereof regarding expenditure operations.
(15) The establishment of the EEAS should be guided by the principle of cost-efficiency aiming towards budget neutrality. To this end, transitional arrangements and a gradual build-up of capacity will have to be used. Unnecessary duplication of tasks, functions and resources with other structures should be avoided. All opportunities for rationalisation should be availed of.In addition, a number of additional posts for Member States’ temporary agents will be necessary, which will have to be financed within the framework of the current multiannual financial framework.
(16) Rules should be laid down covering the activities of the EEAS and its staff as regards security, the protection of classified information, and transparency.
(17) It is recalled that the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union will apply to the EEAS, its officials and other agents, who will be subject either to the Staff Regulations or the CEOS.
(18) The European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community continue to be served by a single institutional framework. It is therefore essential to ensure consistency between the external relations of both, and to allow the Union Delegations to undertake the representation of the European Atomic Energy Community in third countries and at international organisations.
(19) The High Representative should, by mid-2013, provide a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, accompanied, if necessary, by proposals for a revision of this Decision. Such a revision should be adopted no later than the beginning of 2014,
— in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy (‘CFSP’) of the European Union, including the Common Security and Defence Policy (‘CSDP’), to contribute by his/her proposals to the development of that policy, which he/she shall carry out as mandated by the Council and to ensure the consistency of the Union’s external action,
— in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council,
— in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission for fulfilling within the Commission the responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations, and in coordinating other aspects of the Union’s external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the services of the Commission.
(a) It shall, in particular, include:—a number of directorates-general comprising geographic desks covering all countries and regions of the world, as well as multilateral and thematic desks. These departments shall coordinate as necessary with the General Secretariat of the Council and with the relevant services of the Commission,—a directorate-general for administrative, staffing, budgetary, security and communication and information system matters, working in the EEAS framework managed by the Executive Secretary-General. The High Representative shall appoint, in accordance with the normal rules of recruitment, a Director-General for budget and administration who shall work under the authority of the High Representative. He/she shall be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He/she shall follow the same budget lines and administrative rules as are applicable in the part of Section III of the Union’s budget which falls under Heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework,—the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative, and which shall assist him/her in the task of conducting the Union’s CFSP in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty while respecting, in accordance with Article 40 TEU, the other competences of the Union.The specificities of these structures, as well as the particularities of their functions, recruitment and the status of the staff shall be respected.Full coordination between all the structures of the EEAS shall be ensured. — a number of directorates-general comprising geographic desks covering all countries and regions of the world, as well as multilateral and thematic desks. These departments shall coordinate as necessary with the General Secretariat of the Council and with the relevant services of the Commission, — a directorate-general for administrative, staffing, budgetary, security and communication and information system matters, working in the EEAS framework managed by the Executive Secretary-General. The High Representative shall appoint, in accordance with the normal rules of recruitment, a Director-General for budget and administration who shall work under the authority of the High Representative. He/she shall be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He/she shall follow the same budget lines and administrative rules as are applicable in the part of Section III of the Union’s budget which falls under Heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework, — the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative, and which shall assist him/her in the task of conducting the Union’s CFSP in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty while respecting, in accordance with Article 40 TEU, the other competences of the Union.
— a number of directorates-general comprising geographic desks covering all countries and regions of the world, as well as multilateral and thematic desks. These departments shall coordinate as necessary with the General Secretariat of the Council and with the relevant services of the Commission,
— a directorate-general for administrative, staffing, budgetary, security and communication and information system matters, working in the EEAS framework managed by the Executive Secretary-General. The High Representative shall appoint, in accordance with the normal rules of recruitment, a Director-General for budget and administration who shall work under the authority of the High Representative. He/she shall be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He/she shall follow the same budget lines and administrative rules as are applicable in the part of Section III of the Union’s budget which falls under Heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework,
— the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative, and which shall assist him/her in the task of conducting the Union’s CFSP in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty while respecting, in accordance with Article 40 TEU, the other competences of the Union.
— a number of directorates-general comprising geographic desks covering all countries and regions of the world, as well as multilateral and thematic desks. These departments shall coordinate as necessary with the General Secretariat of the Council and with the relevant services of the Commission,
— a directorate-general for administrative, staffing, budgetary, security and communication and information system matters, working in the EEAS framework managed by the Executive Secretary-General. The High Representative shall appoint, in accordance with the normal rules of recruitment, a Director-General for budget and administration who shall work under the authority of the High Representative. He/she shall be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He/she shall follow the same budget lines and administrative rules as are applicable in the part of Section III of the Union’s budget which falls under Heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework,
— the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative, and which shall assist him/her in the task of conducting the Union’s CFSP in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty while respecting, in accordance with Article 40 TEU, the other competences of the Union.
(b) The central administration of the EEAS shall also include:—a strategic policy planning department,—a legal department under the administrative authority of the Executive Secretary-General which shall work closely with the Legal Services of the Council and of the Commission,—departments for interinstitutional relations, information and public diplomacy, internal audit and inspections, and personal data protection. — a strategic policy planning department, — a legal department under the administrative authority of the Executive Secretary-General which shall work closely with the Legal Services of the Council and of the Commission, — departments for interinstitutional relations, information and public diplomacy, internal audit and inspections, and personal data protection.
— a strategic policy planning department,
— a legal department under the administrative authority of the Executive Secretary-General which shall work closely with the Legal Services of the Council and of the Commission,
— departments for interinstitutional relations, information and public diplomacy, internal audit and inspections, and personal data protection.
— a strategic policy planning department,
— a legal department under the administrative authority of the Executive Secretary-General which shall work closely with the Legal Services of the Council and of the Commission,
— departments for interinstitutional relations, information and public diplomacy, internal audit and inspections, and personal data protection.
— the Development Cooperation Instrument(13),
— the European Development Fund(14),
— the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights(15),
— the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument(16),
— the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries(17),
— the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation(18),
— the Instrument for Stability, regarding the assistance provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006(19).
(i) country allocations to determine the global financial envelope for each region, subject to the indicative breakdown of the multiannual financial framework. Within each region, a proportion of funding will be reserved for regional programmes;
(ii) country and regional strategic papers;
(iii) national and regional indicative programmes.
— with regard to the protection of classified information, the EEAS shall apply the security measures set out in the Annex to Decision 2001/264/EC,
— with regard to other aspects of security, the EEAS shall apply the Commission’s Provisions on Security, as set out in the relevant Annex to the Rules of Procedure of the Commission(21).
— Crisis Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD)
— Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC)
— European Union Military Staff (EUMS)—Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS—Concepts and Capability Directorate—Intelligence Directorate—Operations Directorate—Logistics Directorate—Communications and Information Systems Directorate — Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS — Concepts and Capability Directorate — Intelligence Directorate — Operations Directorate — Logistics Directorate — Communications and Information Systems Directorate
— Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS
— Concepts and Capability Directorate
— Intelligence Directorate
— Operations Directorate
— Logistics Directorate
— Communications and Information Systems Directorate
— Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS
— Concepts and Capability Directorate
— Intelligence Directorate
— Operations Directorate
— Logistics Directorate
— Communications and Information Systems Directorate
— EU Situation Centre (SITCEN)
— Staff in the SITCEN supporting the Security Accreditation Authority
— Entities placed under the direct authority of the Director-General
— Directorate for the Americas and the United Nations
— Directorate for the Western Balkans, Eastern Europe and Central Asia
— Directorate for Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
— Directorate for Parliamentary Affairs in the area of CFSP
— New York Liaison Office
— Geneva Liaison Office
— All hierarchy posts and support staff directly attached to them
— Directorate A (Crisis Platform and Policy Coordination in CFSP)
— Directorate B (Multilateral Relations and Human Rights)
— Directorate C (North America, East Asia, Australia, New Zealand, EEA, EFTA, San Marino, Andorra, Monaco)
— Directorate D (European Neighbourhood Policy Coordination)
— Directorate E (Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus, Central Asia Republics)
— Directorate F (Middle East, South Mediterranean)
— Directorate G (Latin America)
— Directorate H (Asia, except Japan and Korea)
— Directorate I (Headquarters resources, information, interinstitutional relations)
— Directorate K (External Service)
— Directorate L (Strategy, Coordination and Analysis)
— Task Force on the Eastern Partnership
— Unit Relex-01 (Audit)
— Staff responsible for the management of financial instruments
— Staff responsible for the payment of salaries and allowances to staff in delegations
— All Heads of Delegation and Deputy Heads of Delegation and support staff directly attached to them
— All political sections or cells and staff
— All information and public diplomacy sections and staff
— All administration sections
— Staff responsible for the implementation of financial instruments
— Directorate D (ACP II – West and Central Africa, Caribbean and OCT) except OCT task force
— Directorate E (Horn of Africa, East and Southern Africa, Indian Ocean and Pacific)
— Unit CI (ACP I: Aid programming and management): Staff responsible for programming
— Unit C2 (Pan-African issues and institutions, governance and migration): Staff responsible for Pan-African relations
— Applicable hierarchy posts and support staff directly attached to them.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 27(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’),
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament,
Having regard to the consent of the European Commission,
(1) The purpose of this Decision is to establish the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’), a functionally autonomous body of the Union under the authority of the High Representative, set up by Article 27(3) of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’), as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. This Decision and, in particular, the reference to the term ‘High Representative’ will be interpreted in accordance with his/her different functions under Article 18 TEU.
(2) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 21(3) TEU, the Union will ensure consistency between the different areas of its external action and between those areas and its other policies. The Council and the Commission, assisted by the High Representative, will ensure that consistency and will cooperate to that effect.
(3) The EEAS will support the High Representative, who is also a Vice-President of the Commission and the President of the Foreign Affairs Council, in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy (‘CFSP’) of the Union and to ensure the consistency of the Union’s external action as outlined, notably, in Articles 18 and 27 TEU. The EEAS will support the High Representative in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council. The EEAS will also support the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission, in respect of his/her responsibilities within the Commission for responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations, and in coordinating other aspects of the Union’s external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the Commission services.
(4) In its contribution to the Union’s external cooperation programmes, the EEAS should seek to ensure that the programmes fulfil the objectives for external action as set out in Article 21 TUE, in particular in paragraph (2)(d) thereof, and that they respect the objectives of the Union’s development policy in line with Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’). In this context, the EEAS should also promote the fulfilment of the objectives of the European Consensus on Development(1)and the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid(2).
(5) It results from the Treaty of Lisbon that, in order to implement its provisions, the EEAS must be operational as soon as possible after the entry into force of that Treaty.
(6) The European Parliament will fully play its role in the external action of the Union, including its functions of political control as provided for in Article 14(1) TEU, as well as in legislative and budgetary matters as laid down in the Treaties. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 36 TEU, the High Representative will regularly consult the European Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the CFSP and will ensure that the views of the European Parliament are duly taken into consideration. The EEAS will assist the High Representative in this regard. Specific arrangements should be made with regard to access for Members of the European Parliament to classified documents and information in the area of CFSP. Until the adoption of such arrangements, existing provisions under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy(3)will apply.
(7) The High Representative, or his/her representative, should exercise the responsibilities provided for by the respective acts founding the European Defence Agency(4), the European Union Satellite Centre(5), the European Union Institute for Security Studies(6), and the European Security and Defence College(7). The EEAS should provide those entities with the support currently provided by the General Secretariat of the Council.
(8) Provisions should be adopted relating to the staff of the EEAS and their recruitment where such provisions are necessary to establish the organisation and functioning of the EEAS. In parallel, necessary amendments should be made, in accordance with Article 336 TFEU, to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities(8)(‘CEOS’) without prejudice to Article 298 TFEU. For matters relating to its staff, the EEAS should be treated as an institution within the meaning of the Staff Regulations and the CEOS. The High Representative will be the Appointing Authority, in relation both to officials subject to the Staff Regulations and agents subject to the CEOS. The number of officials and servants of the EEAS will be decided each year as part of the budgetary procedure and will be reflected in the establishment plan.
(9) The staff of the EEAS should carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interest of the Union in mind.
(10) Recruitment should be based on merit whilst ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance. The staff of the EEAS should comprise a meaningful presence of nationals from all the Member States. The review foreseen for 2013 should also cover this issue, including, as appropriate, suggestions for additional specific measures to correct possible imbalances.
(11) In accordance with Article 27(3) TEU, the EEAS will comprise officials from the General Secretariat of the Council and from the Commission, as well as personnel coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. For that purpose, the relevant departments and functions in the General Secretariat of the Council and in the Commission will be transferred to the EEAS, together with officials and temporary agents occupying a post in such departments or functions. Before 1 July 2013, the EEAS will recruit exclusively officials originating from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission, as well as staff coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. After that date, all officials and other servants of the European Union should be able to apply for vacant posts in the EEAS.
(12) The EEAS may, in specific cases, have recourse to specialised seconded national experts (‘SNEs’), over whom the High Representative will have authority. SNEs in posts in the EEAS will not be counted in the one third of all EEAS staff at Administrator (‘AD’) level which staff from Member States should represent when the EEAS will have reached its full capacity. Their transfer in the phase of setting up of the EEAS will not be automatic and will be made with the consent of the authorities of the originating Member States. By the date of expiry of the contract of an SNE transferred to the EEAS under Article 7, the relevant function will be converted into a temporary agent post in cases where the function performed by the SNE corresponds to a function normally carried out by staff at AD level, provided that the necessary post is available under the establishment plan.
(13) The Commission and the EEAS will agree on detailed arrangements relating to the issuing of instructions from the Commission to delegations. These should provide in particular that when the Commission will issue instructions to delegations, it will simultaneously provide a copy thereof to the Head of Delegation and to the EEAS central administration.
(14) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(9)(the ‘Financial Regulation’) should be amended in order to include the EEAS in Article 1 thereof, with a specific section in the Union budget. In accordance with the applicable rules, and as is the case for other institutions, a part of the annual report of the Court of Auditors will also be dedicated to the EEAS, and the EEAS will respond to such reports. The EEAS will be subject to the procedures regarding the discharge as provided for in Article 319 TFEU and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The High Representative will provide the European Parliament with all necessary support for the exercise of the European Parliament’s right as discharge authority. The implementation of the operational budget will be the Commission’s responsibility in accordance with Article 317 TFEU. Decisions having a financial impact will, in particular, comply with the responsibilities laid down in Title IV of the Financial Regulation, especially Articles 64 to 68 thereof regarding liability of financial actors, and Article 75 thereof regarding expenditure operations.
(15) The establishment of the EEAS should be guided by the principle of cost-efficiency aiming towards budget neutrality. To this end, transitional arrangements and a gradual build-up of capacity will have to be used. Unnecessary duplication of tasks, functions and resources with other structures should be avoided. All opportunities for rationalisation should be availed of.In addition, a number of additional posts for Member States’ temporary agents will be necessary, which will have to be financed within the framework of the current multiannual financial framework.
(16) Rules should be laid down covering the activities of the EEAS and its staff as regards security, the protection of classified information, and transparency.
(17) It is recalled that the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union will apply to the EEAS, its officials and other agents, who will be subject either to the Staff Regulations or the CEOS.
(18) The European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community continue to be served by a single institutional framework. It is therefore essential to ensure consistency between the external relations of both, and to allow the Union Delegations to undertake the representation of the European Atomic Energy Community in third countries and at international organisations.
(19) The High Representative should, by mid-2013, provide a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, accompanied, if necessary, by proposals for a revision of this Decision. Such a revision should be adopted no later than the beginning of 2014,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Nature and scope
Article 1
1. This Decision establishes the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’).
2. The EEAS, which has its headquarters in Brussels, shall be a functionally autonomous body of the European Union, separate from the General Secretariat of the Council and from the Commission with the legal capacity necessary to perform its tasks and attain its objectives.
3. The EEAS shall be placed under the authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘High Representative’).
4. The EEAS shall be made up of a central administration and of the Union Delegations to third countries and to international organisations.

Tasks
Article 2
1. The EEAS shall support the High Representative in fulfilling his/her mandates as outlined, notably, in Articles 18 and 27 TEU:
—
in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy (‘CFSP’) of the European Union, including the Common Security and Defence Policy (‘CSDP’), to contribute by his/her proposals to the development of that policy, which he/she shall carry out as mandated by the Council and to ensure the consistency of the Union’s external action,
—
in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council,
—
in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission for fulfilling within the Commission the responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations, and in coordinating other aspects of the Union’s external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the services of the Commission.
2. The EEAS shall assist the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission, and the Commission in the exercise of their respective functions in the area of external relations.

Cooperation
Article 3
1. The EEAS shall support, and work in cooperation with, the diplomatic services of the Member States, as well as with the General Secretariat of the Council and the services of the Commission, in order to ensure consistency between the different areas of the Union’s external action and between those areas and its other policies.
2. The EEAS and the services of the Commission shall consult each other on all matters relating to the external action of the Union in the exercise of their respective functions, except on matters covered by the CSDP. The EEAS shall take part in the preparatory work and procedures relating to acts to be prepared by the Commission in this area.
This paragraph shall be implemented in accordance with Chapter 1 of Title V of the TEU, and with Article 205 TFEU.
3. The EEAS may enter into service-level arrangements with relevant services of the General Secretariat of the Council, the Commission, or other offices or interinstitutional bodies of the Union.
4. The EEAS shall extend appropriate support and cooperation to the other institutions and bodies of the Union, in particular to the European Parliament. The EEAS may also benefit from the support and cooperation of those institutions and bodies, including agencies, as appropriate. The EEAS internal auditor will cooperate with the internal auditor of the Commission to ensure a consistent audit policy, with particular reference to the Commission’s responsibility for operational expenditure. In addition, the EEAS shall cooperate with the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘OLAF’) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999(10). It shall, in particular, adopt without delay the decision required by that Regulation on the terms and conditions for internal investigations. As provided in that Regulation, both Member States, in accordance with national provisions, and the institutions shall give the necessary support to enable OLAF’s agents to fulfil their tasks.

Central administration of the EEAS
Article 4
1. The EEAS shall be managed by an Executive Secretary-General who will operate under the authority of the High Representative. The Executive Secretary-General shall take all measures necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the EEAS, including its administrative and budgetary management. The Executive Secretary-General shall ensure effective coordination between all departments in the central administration as well as with the Union Delegations.
2. The Executive Secretary-General shall be assisted by two Deputy Secretaries-General.
3. The central administration of the EEAS shall be organised in directorates-general.
(a)
It shall, in particular, include:
—
a number of directorates-general comprising geographic desks covering all countries and regions of the world, as well as multilateral and thematic desks. These departments shall coordinate as necessary with the General Secretariat of the Council and with the relevant services of the Commission,
—
a directorate-general for administrative, staffing, budgetary, security and communication and information system matters, working in the EEAS framework managed by the Executive Secretary-General. The High Representative shall appoint, in accordance with the normal rules of recruitment, a Director-General for budget and administration who shall work under the authority of the High Representative. He/she shall be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He/she shall follow the same budget lines and administrative rules as are applicable in the part of Section III of the Union’s budget which falls under Heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework,
—
the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative, and which shall assist him/her in the task of conducting the Union’s CFSP in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty while respecting, in accordance with Article 40 TEU, the other competences of the Union.
The specificities of these structures, as well as the particularities of their functions, recruitment and the status of the staff shall be respected.
Full coordination between all the structures of the EEAS shall be ensured.
(b)
The central administration of the EEAS shall also include:
—
a strategic policy planning department,
—
a legal department under the administrative authority of the Executive Secretary-General which shall work closely with the Legal Services of the Council and of the Commission,
—
departments for interinstitutional relations, information and public diplomacy, internal audit and inspections, and personal data protection.
4. The High Representative shall designate the chairpersons of Council preparatory bodies that are chaired by a representative of the High Representative, including the chair of the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with the detailed arrangements set out in Annex II to Council Decision 2009/908/EU of 1 December 2009 laying down measures for the implementation of the European Council Decision on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council, and on the chairmanship of preparatory bodies of the Council(11).
5. The High Representative and the EEAS shall be assisted where necessary by the General Secretariat of the Council and the relevant departments of the Commission. Service-level arrangements may be drawn up to that effect by the EEAS, the General Secretariat of the Council and the relevant Commission departments.

Union delegations
Article 5
1. The decision to open or close a delegation shall be adopted by the High Representative, in agreement with the Council and the Commission.
2. Each Union Delegation shall be placed under the authority of a Head of Delegation.
The Head of Delegation shall have authority over all staff in the delegation, whatever their status, and for all its activities. He/she shall be accountable to the High Representative for the overall management of the work of the delegation and for ensuring the coordination of all actions of the Union.
Staff in delegations shall comprise EEAS staff and, where appropriate for the implementation of the Union budget and Union policies other than those under the remit of the EEAS, Commission staff.
3. The Head of Delegation shall receive instructions from the High Representative and the EEAS, and shall be responsible for their execution.
In areas where the Commission exercises the powers conferred upon it by the Treaties, the Commission may, in accordance with Article 221(2) TFEU, also issue instructions to delegations, which shall be executed under the overall responsibility of the Head of Delegation.
4. The Head of Delegation shall implement operational credits in relation to the Union’s projects in the corresponding third country, where sub-delegated by the Commission, in accordance with the Financial Regulation.
5. The operation of each delegation shall be periodically evaluated by the Executive Secretary-General of the EEAS; evaluation shall include financial and administrative audits. For this purpose, the Executive Secretary-General of the EEAS may request assistance from the relevant Commission departments. In addition to internal measures by the EEAS, OLAF shall exercise its powers, notably by conducting anti-fraud measures, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999.
6. The High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with the host country, the international organisation, or the third country concerned. In particular, the High Representative shall take the necessary measures to ensure that host States grant the Union delegations, their staff and their property, privileges and immunities equivalent to those referred to in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961.
7. Union delegations shall have the capacity to respond to the needs of other institutions of the Union, in particular the European Parliament, in their contacts with the international organisations or third countries to which the delegations are accredited.
8. The Head of Delegation shall have the power to represent the Union in the country where the delegation is accredited, in particular for the conclusion of contracts, and as a party to legal proceedings.
9. The Union delegations shall work in close cooperation and share information with the diplomatic services of the Member States.
10. The Union delegations shall, acting in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 35 TEU, and upon request by Member States, support the Member States in their diplomatic relations and in their role of providing consular protection to citizens of the Union in third countries on a resource-neutral basis.

Staff
Article 6
1. This Article, except paragraph 3, shall apply without prejudice to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities (‘CEOS’), including the amendments made to those rules, in accordance with Article 336 TFEU, in order to adapt them to the needs of the EEAS.
2. The EEAS shall comprise officials and other servants of the European Union, including personnel from the diplomatic services of the Member States appointed as temporary agents.
The Staff Regulations and the CEOS shall apply to this staff.
3. If necessary, the EEAS may, in specific cases, have recourse to a limited number of specialised seconded national experts (SNEs).
The High Representative shall adopt rules, equivalent to those laid down in Council Decision 2003/479/EC of 16 June 2003 concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council(12), under which SNEs are put at the disposal of the EEAS in order to provide specialised expertise.
4. The staff of the EEAS shall carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interests of the Union in mind. Without prejudice to the third indent of Article 2(1) and Articles 2(2) and 5(3), they shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government, authority, organisation or person outside the EEAS or from any body or person other than the High Representative. In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 11 of the Staff Regulations, EEAS staff shall not accept any payments of any kind whatever from any other source outside the EEAS.
5. The powers conferred on the appointing authority by the Staff Regulations and on the authority authorised to conclude contracts by the CEOS shall be vested in the High Representative, who may delegate those powers inside the EEAS.
6. Recruitment to the EEAS shall be based on merit whilst ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance. The staff of the EEAS shall comprise a meaningful presence of nationals from all the Member States. The review provided for in Article 13(3) shall also cover this issue, including, as appropriate, suggestions for additional specific measures to correct possible imbalances.
7. Officials of the Union and temporary agents coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States shall have the same rights and obligations and be treated equally, in particular as concerns their eligibility to assume all positions under equivalent conditions. No distinction shall be made between temporary agents coming from national diplomatic services and officials of the Union as regards the assignment of duties to perform in all areas of activities and policies implemented by the EEAS. In accordance with the provisions of the Financial Regulation, the Member States shall support the Union in the enforcement of financial liabilities of EEAS temporary agents coming from the Member States’ diplomatic services which result from a liability under Article 66 of the Financial Regulation.
8. The High Representative shall establish the selection procedures for EEAS staff, which shall be undertaken through a transparent procedure based on merit with the objective of securing the services of staff of the highest standard of ability, efficiency and integrity, while ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance, and a meaningful presence of nationals from all Member States in the EEAS. Representatives of the Member States, the General Secretariat of the Council and of the Commission shall be involved in the recruitment procedure for vacant posts in the EEAS.
9. When the EEAS has reached its full capacity, staff from Member States, as referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, should represent at least one third of all EEAS staff at AD level. Likewise, permanent officials of the Union should represent at least 60 % of all EEAS staff at AD level, including staff coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States who have become permanent officials of the Union in accordance with the provisions of the Staff Regulations. Each year, the High Representative shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the occupation of posts in the EEAS.
10. The High Representative shall lay down the rules on mobility so as to ensure that the members of the staff of the EEAS are subject to a high degree of mobility. Specific and detailed arrangements shall apply to the personnel referred to in the third indent of Article 4(3)(a). In principle, all EEAS staff shall periodically serve in Union delegations. The High Representative shall establish rules to that effect.
11. In accordance with the applicable provisions of its national law, each Member State shall provide its officials who have become temporary agents in the EEAS with a guarantee of immediate reinstatement at the end of their period of service to the EEAS. This period of service, in accordance with the provisions of Article 50b of the CEOS, shall not exceed eight years, unless, it is extended for a maximum period of two years in exceptional circumstances and in the interest of the service.
Officials of the Union serving in the EEAS shall have the right to apply for posts in their institution of origin on the same terms as internal applicants.
12. Steps shall be taken in order to provide EEAS staff with adequate common training, building in particular on existing practices and structures at national and Union level. The High Representative shall take appropriate measures to that effect within the year following the entry into force of this Decision.

Transitional provisions regarding staff
Article 7
1. The relevant departments and functions in the General Secretariat of the Council and in the Commission listed in the Annex shall be transferred to the EEAS. Officials and temporary agents occupying a post in departments or functions listed in the Annex shall be transferred to the EEAS. This shall applymutatis mutandisto contract and local staff assigned to such departments and functions. SNEs working in those departments or functions shall also be transferred to the EEAS with the consent of the authorities of the originating Member State.
These transfers shall take effect on 1 January 2011.
In accordance with the Staff Regulations, upon their transfer to the EEAS, the High Representative shall assign each official to a post in his/her function group which corresponds to that official’s grade.
2. The procedures for recruiting staff for posts transferred to the EEAS which are ongoing at the date of entry into force of this Decision shall remain valid: they shall be carried on and completed under the authority of the High Representative in accordance with the relevant vacancy notices and the applicable rules of the Staff Regulations and the CEOS.

Budget
Article 8
1. The duties of authorising officer for the EEAS section of the general budget of the European Union shall be delegated in accordance with Article 59 of the Financial Regulation. The High Representative shall adopt the internal rules for the management of the administrative budget lines. Operational expenditure shall remain within the Commission section of the budget.
2. The EEAS shall exercise its powers in accordance with the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union within the limits of the appropriations allocated to it.
3. When drawing up estimates of administrative expenditure for the EEAS, the High Representative will hold consultations with, respectively, the Commissioner responsible for Development Policy and the Commissioner responsible for Neighbourhood Policy regarding their respective responsibilities.
4. In accordance with Article 314(1) TFEU, the EEAS shall draw up estimates of its expenditure for the following financial year. The Commission shall consolidate those estimates in a draft budget, which may contain different estimates. The Commission may amend the draft budget as provided for in Article 314(2) TFEU.
5. In order to ensure budgetary transparency in the area of external action of the Union, the Commission will transmit to the budgetary authority, together with the draft general budget of the European Union, a working document presenting, in a comprehensive way, all expenditure related to the external action of the Union.
6. The EEAS shall be subject to the procedures regarding the discharge provided for in Article 319 TFEU and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The EEAS will, in this context, fully cooperate with the institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, the additional necessary information, including through attendance at meetings of the relevant bodies.

External action instruments and programming
Article 9
1. The management of the Union’s external cooperation programmes is under the responsibility of the Commission without prejudice to the respective roles of the Commission and of the EEAS in programming as set out in the following paragraphs.
2. The High Representative shall ensure overall political coordination of the Union’s external action, ensuring the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s external action, in particular through the following external assistance instruments:
—
the Development Cooperation Instrument(13),
—
the European Development Fund(14),
—
the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights(15),
—
the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument(16),
—
the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries(17),
—
the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation(18),
—
the Instrument for Stability, regarding the assistance provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006(19).
3. In particular, the EEAS shall contribute to the programming and management cycle for the instruments referred to in paragraph 2, on the basis of the policy objectives set out in those instruments. It shall have responsibility for preparing the following decisions of the Commission regarding the strategic, multiannual steps within the programming cycle:
(i)
country allocations to determine the global financial envelope for each region, subject to the indicative breakdown of the multiannual financial framework. Within each region, a proportion of funding will be reserved for regional programmes;
(ii)
country and regional strategic papers;
(iii)
national and regional indicative programmes.
In accordance with Article 3, throughout the whole cycle of programming, planning and implementation of the instruments referred to in paragraph 2, the High Representative and the EEAS shall work with the relevant members and services of the Commission without prejudice to Article 1(3). All proposals for decisions will be prepared by following the Commission’s procedures and will be submitted to the Commission for adoption.
4. With regard to the European Development Fund and the Development Cooperation Instrument, any proposals, including those for changes in the basic regulations and the programming documents referred to in paragraph 3, shall be prepared jointly by the relevant services in the EEAS and in the Commission under the responsibility of the Commissioner responsible for Development Policy and shall be submitted jointly with the High Representative for adoption by the Commission.
Thematic programmes, other than the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation and that part of the Instrument for Stability referred to in the seventh indent of paragraph 2, shall be prepared by the appropriate Commission service under the guidance of the Commissioner responsible for Development Policy and presented to the College of Commissioners in agreement with the High Representative and the other relevant Commissioners.
5. With regard to the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument, any proposals, including those for changes in the basic regulations and the programming documents referred to in paragraph 3, shall be prepared jointly by the relevant services in the EEAS and in the Commission under the responsibility of the Commissioner responsible for Neighbourhood Policy and shall be submitted jointly with the High Representative for adoption by the Commission.
6. Actions undertaken under: the CFSP budget; the Instrument for Stability other than the part referred to in the seventh indent of paragraph 2; the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries; communication and public Diplomacy actions, and election observation missions, shall be under the responsibility of the High Representative/the EEAS. The Commission shall be responsible for their financial implementation under the authority of the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission. The Commission department responsible for this implementation shall be co-located with the EEAS.

Security
Article 10
1. The High Representative shall, after consulting the Committee referred to in point 3 of Section I of Part II of the Annex to Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations(20), decide on the security rules for the EEAS and take all appropriate measures in order to ensure that the EEAS manages effectively the risks to its staff, physical assets and information, and that it fulfils its duty of care and responsibilities in this regard. Such rules shall apply to all EEAS staff, and all staff in Union Delegations, regardless of their administrative status or origin.
2. Pending the Decision referred to in paragraph 1:
—
with regard to the protection of classified information, the EEAS shall apply the security measures set out in the Annex to Decision 2001/264/EC,
—
with regard to other aspects of security, the EEAS shall apply the Commission’s Provisions on Security, as set out in the relevant Annex to the Rules of Procedure of the Commission(21).
3. The EEAS shall have a department responsible for security matters, which shall be assisted by the relevant services of the Member States.
4. The High Representative shall take any measure necessary in order to implement security rules in the EEAS, in particular as regards the protection of classified information and the measures to be taken in the event of a failure by EEAS staff to comply with the security rules. For that purpose, the EEAS shall seek advice from the Security Office of the General Secretariat of the Council, from the relevant services of the Commission and from the relevant services of the Member States.

Access to documents, archives and data protection
Article 11
1. The EEAS shall apply the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents(22). The High Representative shall decide on the implementing rules for the EEAS.
2. The Executive Secretary-General of the EEAS shall organise the archives of the service. The relevant archives of the departments transferred from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission shall be transferred to the EEAS.
3. The EEAS shall protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data(23). The High Representative shall decide on the implementing rules for the EEAS.

Immovable property
Article 12
1. The General Secretariat of the Council and the relevant Commission services shall take all necessary measures so that the transfers referred to in Article 7 can be accompanied by the transfers of the Council and Commission buildings necessary for the functioning of the EEAS.
2. The terms on which immovable property is made available to the EEAS central administration and to the Union Delegations shall be decided on jointly by the High Representative and the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission, as appropriate.

Final and general provisions
Article 13
1. The High Representative, the Council, the Commission and the Member States shall be responsible for implementing this Decision and shall take all measures necessary in furtherance thereof.
2. The High Representative shall submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the functioning of the EEAS by the end of 2011. That report shall, in particular, cover the implementation of Article 5(3) and (10) and Article 9.
3. By mid-2013, the High Representative shall provide a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, which will cover inter alia the implementation of Article 6(6), (8) and (11). The review shall, if necessary, be accompanied by appropriate proposals for the revision of this Decision. In that case, the Council shall, in accordance with Article 27(3) TEU, revise this Decision in the light of the review by the beginning of 2014.
4. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. The provisions on financial management and recruitment shall take effect once the necessary amendments to the Staff Regulations, the CEOS and the Financial Regulation, as well as the amending budget, have been adopted. To ensure a smooth transition, the High Representative, the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission shall enter into the necessary arrangements, and they shall undertake consultations with the Member States.
5. Within one month after the entry into force of this Decision, the High Representative shall submit to the Commission an estimate of the revenue and expenditure of the EEAS, including an establishment plan, in order for the Commission to present a draft amending budget.
6. This Decision shall be published in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 27(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’),
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament,
Having regard to the consent of the European Commission,
(1) The purpose of this Decision is to establish the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’), a functionally autonomous body of the Union under the authority of the High Representative, set up by Article 27(3) of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’), as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. This Decision and, in particular, the reference to the term ‘High Representative’ will be interpreted in accordance with his/her different functions under Article 18 TEU.
(2) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 21(3) TEU, the Union will ensure consistency between the different areas of its external action and between those areas and its other policies. The Council and the Commission, assisted by the High Representative, will ensure that consistency and will cooperate to that effect.
(3) The EEAS will support the High Representative, who is also a Vice-President of the Commission and the President of the Foreign Affairs Council, in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy (‘CFSP’) of the Union and to ensure the consistency of the Union’s external action as outlined, notably, in Articles 18 and 27 TEU. The EEAS will support the High Representative in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council. The EEAS will also support the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission, in respect of his/her responsibilities within the Commission for responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations, and in coordinating other aspects of the Union’s external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the Commission services.
(4) In its contribution to the Union’s external cooperation programmes, the EEAS should seek to ensure that the programmes fulfil the objectives for external action as set out in Article 21 TUE, in particular in paragraph (2)(d) thereof, and that they respect the objectives of the Union’s development policy in line with Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’). In this context, the EEAS should also promote the fulfilment of the objectives of the European Consensus on Development(1)and the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid(2).
(5) It results from the Treaty of Lisbon that, in order to implement its provisions, the EEAS must be operational as soon as possible after the entry into force of that Treaty.
(6) The European Parliament will fully play its role in the external action of the Union, including its functions of political control as provided for in Article 14(1) TEU, as well as in legislative and budgetary matters as laid down in the Treaties. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 36 TEU, the High Representative will regularly consult the European Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the CFSP and will ensure that the views of the European Parliament are duly taken into consideration. The EEAS will assist the High Representative in this regard. Specific arrangements should be made with regard to access for Members of the European Parliament to classified documents and information in the area of CFSP. Until the adoption of such arrangements, existing provisions under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy(3)will apply.
(7) The High Representative, or his/her representative, should exercise the responsibilities provided for by the respective acts founding the European Defence Agency(4), the European Union Satellite Centre(5), the European Union Institute for Security Studies(6), and the European Security and Defence College(7). The EEAS should provide those entities with the support currently provided by the General Secretariat of the Council.
(8) Provisions should be adopted relating to the staff of the EEAS and their recruitment where such provisions are necessary to establish the organisation and functioning of the EEAS. In parallel, necessary amendments should be made, in accordance with Article 336 TFEU, to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities(8)(‘CEOS’) without prejudice to Article 298 TFEU. For matters relating to its staff, the EEAS should be treated as an institution within the meaning of the Staff Regulations and the CEOS. The High Representative will be the Appointing Authority, in relation both to officials subject to the Staff Regulations and agents subject to the CEOS. The number of officials and servants of the EEAS will be decided each year as part of the budgetary procedure and will be reflected in the establishment plan.
(9) The staff of the EEAS should carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interest of the Union in mind.
(10) Recruitment should be based on merit whilst ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance. The staff of the EEAS should comprise a meaningful presence of nationals from all the Member States. The review foreseen for 2013 should also cover this issue, including, as appropriate, suggestions for additional specific measures to correct possible imbalances.
(11) In accordance with Article 27(3) TEU, the EEAS will comprise officials from the General Secretariat of the Council and from the Commission, as well as personnel coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. For that purpose, the relevant departments and functions in the General Secretariat of the Council and in the Commission will be transferred to the EEAS, together with officials and temporary agents occupying a post in such departments or functions. Before 1 July 2013, the EEAS will recruit exclusively officials originating from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission, as well as staff coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. After that date, all officials and other servants of the European Union should be able to apply for vacant posts in the EEAS.
(12) The EEAS may, in specific cases, have recourse to specialised seconded national experts (‘SNEs’), over whom the High Representative will have authority. SNEs in posts in the EEAS will not be counted in the one third of all EEAS staff at Administrator (‘AD’) level which staff from Member States should represent when the EEAS will have reached its full capacity. Their transfer in the phase of setting up of the EEAS will not be automatic and will be made with the consent of the authorities of the originating Member States. By the date of expiry of the contract of an SNE transferred to the EEAS under Article 7, the relevant function will be converted into a temporary agent post in cases where the function performed by the SNE corresponds to a function normally carried out by staff at AD level, provided that the necessary post is available under the establishment plan.
(13) The Commission and the EEAS will agree on detailed arrangements relating to the issuing of instructions from the Commission to delegations. These should provide in particular that when the Commission will issue instructions to delegations, it will simultaneously provide a copy thereof to the Head of Delegation and to the EEAS central administration.
(14) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(9)(the ‘Financial Regulation’) should be amended in order to include the EEAS in Article 1 thereof, with a specific section in the Union budget. In accordance with the applicable rules, and as is the case for other institutions, a part of the annual report of the Court of Auditors will also be dedicated to the EEAS, and the EEAS will respond to such reports. The EEAS will be subject to the procedures regarding the discharge as provided for in Article 319 TFEU and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The High Representative will provide the European Parliament with all necessary support for the exercise of the European Parliament’s right as discharge authority. The implementation of the operational budget will be the Commission’s responsibility in accordance with Article 317 TFEU. Decisions having a financial impact will, in particular, comply with the responsibilities laid down in Title IV of the Financial Regulation, especially Articles 64 to 68 thereof regarding liability of financial actors, and Article 75 thereof regarding expenditure operations.
(15) The establishment of the EEAS should be guided by the principle of cost-efficiency aiming towards budget neutrality. To this end, transitional arrangements and a gradual build-up of capacity will have to be used. Unnecessary duplication of tasks, functions and resources with other structures should be avoided. All opportunities for rationalisation should be availed of.In addition, a number of additional posts for Member States’ temporary agents will be necessary, which will have to be financed within the framework of the current multiannual financial framework.
(16) Rules should be laid down covering the activities of the EEAS and its staff as regards security, the protection of classified information, and transparency.
(17) It is recalled that the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union will apply to the EEAS, its officials and other agents, who will be subject either to the Staff Regulations or the CEOS.
(18) The European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community continue to be served by a single institutional framework. It is therefore essential to ensure consistency between the external relations of both, and to allow the Union Delegations to undertake the representation of the European Atomic Energy Community in third countries and at international organisations.
(19) The High Representative should, by mid-2013, provide a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, accompanied, if necessary, by proposals for a revision of this Decision. Such a revision should be adopted no later than the beginning of 2014,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Nature and scope

1. This Decision establishes the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’).
2. The EEAS, which has its headquarters in Brussels, shall be a functionally autonomous body of the European Union, separate from the General Secretariat of the Council and from the Commission with the legal capacity necessary to perform its tasks and attain its objectives.
3. The EEAS shall be placed under the authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘High Representative’).
4. The EEAS shall be made up of a central administration and of the Union Delegations to third countries and to international organisations.

Tasks

1. The EEAS shall support the High Representative in fulfilling his/her mandates as outlined, notably, in Articles 18 and 27 TEU:
—
in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy (‘CFSP’) of the European Union, including the Common Security and Defence Policy (‘CSDP’), to contribute by his/her proposals to the development of that policy, which he/she shall carry out as mandated by the Council and to ensure the consistency of the Union’s external action,
—
in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council,
—
in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission for fulfilling within the Commission the responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations, and in coordinating other aspects of the Union’s external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the services of the Commission.
2. The EEAS shall assist the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission, and the Commission in the exercise of their respective functions in the area of external relations.

Cooperation

1. The EEAS shall support, and work in cooperation with, the diplomatic services of the Member States, as well as with the General Secretariat of the Council and the services of the Commission, in order to ensure consistency between the different areas of the Union’s external action and between those areas and its other policies.
2. The EEAS and the services of the Commission shall consult each other on all matters relating to the external action of the Union in the exercise of their respective functions, except on matters covered by the CSDP. The EEAS shall take part in the preparatory work and procedures relating to acts to be prepared by the Commission in this area.
This paragraph shall be implemented in accordance with Chapter 1 of Title V of the TEU, and with Article 205 TFEU.
3. The EEAS may enter into service-level arrangements with relevant services of the General Secretariat of the Council, the Commission, or other offices or interinstitutional bodies of the Union.
4. The EEAS shall extend appropriate support and cooperation to the other institutions and bodies of the Union, in particular to the European Parliament. The EEAS may also benefit from the support and cooperation of those institutions and bodies, including agencies, as appropriate. The EEAS internal auditor will cooperate with the internal auditor of the Commission to ensure a consistent audit policy, with particular reference to the Commission’s responsibility for operational expenditure. In addition, the EEAS shall cooperate with the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘OLAF’) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999(10). It shall, in particular, adopt without delay the decision required by that Regulation on the terms and conditions for internal investigations. As provided in that Regulation, both Member States, in accordance with national provisions, and the institutions shall give the necessary support to enable OLAF’s agents to fulfil their tasks.

Central administration of the EEAS

1. The EEAS shall be managed by an Executive Secretary-General who will operate under the authority of the High Representative. The Executive Secretary-General shall take all measures necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the EEAS, including its administrative and budgetary management. The Executive Secretary-General shall ensure effective coordination between all departments in the central administration as well as with the Union Delegations.
2. The Executive Secretary-General shall be assisted by two Deputy Secretaries-General.
3. The central administration of the EEAS shall be organised in directorates-general.
(a)
It shall, in particular, include:
—
a number of directorates-general comprising geographic desks covering all countries and regions of the world, as well as multilateral and thematic desks. These departments shall coordinate as necessary with the General Secretariat of the Council and with the relevant services of the Commission,
—
a directorate-general for administrative, staffing, budgetary, security and communication and information system matters, working in the EEAS framework managed by the Executive Secretary-General. The High Representative shall appoint, in accordance with the normal rules of recruitment, a Director-General for budget and administration who shall work under the authority of the High Representative. He/she shall be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He/she shall follow the same budget lines and administrative rules as are applicable in the part of Section III of the Union’s budget which falls under Heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework,
—
the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative, and which shall assist him/her in the task of conducting the Union’s CFSP in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty while respecting, in accordance with Article 40 TEU, the other competences of the Union.
The specificities of these structures, as well as the particularities of their functions, recruitment and the status of the staff shall be respected.
Full coordination between all the structures of the EEAS shall be ensured.
(b)
The central administration of the EEAS shall also include:
—
a strategic policy planning department,
—
a legal department under the administrative authority of the Executive Secretary-General which shall work closely with the Legal Services of the Council and of the Commission,
—
departments for interinstitutional relations, information and public diplomacy, internal audit and inspections, and personal data protection.
4. The High Representative shall designate the chairpersons of Council preparatory bodies that are chaired by a representative of the High Representative, including the chair of the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with the detailed arrangements set out in Annex II to Council Decision 2009/908/EU of 1 December 2009 laying down measures for the implementation of the European Council Decision on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council, and on the chairmanship of preparatory bodies of the Council(11).
5. The High Representative and the EEAS shall be assisted where necessary by the General Secretariat of the Council and the relevant departments of the Commission. Service-level arrangements may be drawn up to that effect by the EEAS, the General Secretariat of the Council and the relevant Commission departments.

Union delegations

1. The decision to open or close a delegation shall be adopted by the High Representative, in agreement with the Council and the Commission.
2. Each Union Delegation shall be placed under the authority of a Head of Delegation.
The Head of Delegation shall have authority over all staff in the delegation, whatever their status, and for all its activities. He/she shall be accountable to the High Representative for the overall management of the work of the delegation and for ensuring the coordination of all actions of the Union.
Staff in delegations shall comprise EEAS staff and, where appropriate for the implementation of the Union budget and Union policies other than those under the remit of the EEAS, Commission staff.
3. The Head of Delegation shall receive instructions from the High Representative and the EEAS, and shall be responsible for their execution.
In areas where the Commission exercises the powers conferred upon it by the Treaties, the Commission may, in accordance with Article 221(2) TFEU, also issue instructions to delegations, which shall be executed under the overall responsibility of the Head of Delegation.
4. The Head of Delegation shall implement operational credits in relation to the Union’s projects in the corresponding third country, where sub-delegated by the Commission, in accordance with the Financial Regulation.
5. The operation of each delegation shall be periodically evaluated by the Executive Secretary-General of the EEAS; evaluation shall include financial and administrative audits. For this purpose, the Executive Secretary-General of the EEAS may request assistance from the relevant Commission departments. In addition to internal measures by the EEAS, OLAF shall exercise its powers, notably by conducting anti-fraud measures, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999.
6. The High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with the host country, the international organisation, or the third country concerned. In particular, the High Representative shall take the necessary measures to ensure that host States grant the Union delegations, their staff and their property, privileges and immunities equivalent to those referred to in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961.
7. Union delegations shall have the capacity to respond to the needs of other institutions of the Union, in particular the European Parliament, in their contacts with the international organisations or third countries to which the delegations are accredited.
8. The Head of Delegation shall have the power to represent the Union in the country where the delegation is accredited, in particular for the conclusion of contracts, and as a party to legal proceedings.
9. The Union delegations shall work in close cooperation and share information with the diplomatic services of the Member States.
10. The Union delegations shall, acting in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 35 TEU, and upon request by Member States, support the Member States in their diplomatic relations and in their role of providing consular protection to citizens of the Union in third countries on a resource-neutral basis.

Staff

1. This Article, except paragraph 3, shall apply without prejudice to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities (‘CEOS’), including the amendments made to those rules, in accordance with Article 336 TFEU, in order to adapt them to the needs of the EEAS.
2. The EEAS shall comprise officials and other servants of the European Union, including personnel from the diplomatic services of the Member States appointed as temporary agents.
The Staff Regulations and the CEOS shall apply to this staff.
3. If necessary, the EEAS may, in specific cases, have recourse to a limited number of specialised seconded national experts (SNEs).
The High Representative shall adopt rules, equivalent to those laid down in Council Decision 2003/479/EC of 16 June 2003 concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council(12), under which SNEs are put at the disposal of the EEAS in order to provide specialised expertise.
4. The staff of the EEAS shall carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interests of the Union in mind. Without prejudice to the third indent of Article 2(1) and Articles 2(2) and 5(3), they shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government, authority, organisation or person outside the EEAS or from any body or person other than the High Representative. In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 11 of the Staff Regulations, EEAS staff shall not accept any payments of any kind whatever from any other source outside the EEAS.
5. The powers conferred on the appointing authority by the Staff Regulations and on the authority authorised to conclude contracts by the CEOS shall be vested in the High Representative, who may delegate those powers inside the EEAS.
6. Recruitment to the EEAS shall be based on merit whilst ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance. The staff of the EEAS shall comprise a meaningful presence of nationals from all the Member States. The review provided for in Article 13(3) shall also cover this issue, including, as appropriate, suggestions for additional specific measures to correct possible imbalances.
7. Officials of the Union and temporary agents coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States shall have the same rights and obligations and be treated equally, in particular as concerns their eligibility to assume all positions under equivalent conditions. No distinction shall be made between temporary agents coming from national diplomatic services and officials of the Union as regards the assignment of duties to perform in all areas of activities and policies implemented by the EEAS. In accordance with the provisions of the Financial Regulation, the Member States shall support the Union in the enforcement of financial liabilities of EEAS temporary agents coming from the Member States’ diplomatic services which result from a liability under Article 66 of the Financial Regulation.
8. The High Representative shall establish the selection procedures for EEAS staff, which shall be undertaken through a transparent procedure based on merit with the objective of securing the services of staff of the highest standard of ability, efficiency and integrity, while ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance, and a meaningful presence of nationals from all Member States in the EEAS. Representatives of the Member States, the General Secretariat of the Council and of the Commission shall be involved in the recruitment procedure for vacant posts in the EEAS.
9. When the EEAS has reached its full capacity, staff from Member States, as referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, should represent at least one third of all EEAS staff at AD level. Likewise, permanent officials of the Union should represent at least 60 % of all EEAS staff at AD level, including staff coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States who have become permanent officials of the Union in accordance with the provisions of the Staff Regulations. Each year, the High Representative shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the occupation of posts in the EEAS.
10. The High Representative shall lay down the rules on mobility so as to ensure that the members of the staff of the EEAS are subject to a high degree of mobility. Specific and detailed arrangements shall apply to the personnel referred to in the third indent of Article 4(3)(a). In principle, all EEAS staff shall periodically serve in Union delegations. The High Representative shall establish rules to that effect.
11. In accordance with the applicable provisions of its national law, each Member State shall provide its officials who have become temporary agents in the EEAS with a guarantee of immediate reinstatement at the end of their period of service to the EEAS. This period of service, in accordance with the provisions of Article 50b of the CEOS, shall not exceed eight years, unless, it is extended for a maximum period of two years in exceptional circumstances and in the interest of the service.
Officials of the Union serving in the EEAS shall have the right to apply for posts in their institution of origin on the same terms as internal applicants.
12. Steps shall be taken in order to provide EEAS staff with adequate common training, building in particular on existing practices and structures at national and Union level. The High Representative shall take appropriate measures to that effect within the year following the entry into force of this Decision.

Transitional provisions regarding staff

1. The relevant departments and functions in the General Secretariat of the Council and in the Commission listed in the Annex shall be transferred to the EEAS. Officials and temporary agents occupying a post in departments or functions listed in the Annex shall be transferred to the EEAS. This shall applymutatis mutandisto contract and local staff assigned to such departments and functions. SNEs working in those departments or functions shall also be transferred to the EEAS with the consent of the authorities of the originating Member State.
These transfers shall take effect on 1 January 2011.
In accordance with the Staff Regulations, upon their transfer to the EEAS, the High Representative shall assign each official to a post in his/her function group which corresponds to that official’s grade.
2. The procedures for recruiting staff for posts transferred to the EEAS which are ongoing at the date of entry into force of this Decision shall remain valid: they shall be carried on and completed under the authority of the High Representative in accordance with the relevant vacancy notices and the applicable rules of the Staff Regulations and the CEOS.

Budget

1. The duties of authorising officer for the EEAS section of the general budget of the European Union shall be delegated in accordance with Article 59 of the Financial Regulation. The High Representative shall adopt the internal rules for the management of the administrative budget lines. Operational expenditure shall remain within the Commission section of the budget.
2. The EEAS shall exercise its powers in accordance with the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union within the limits of the appropriations allocated to it.
3. When drawing up estimates of administrative expenditure for the EEAS, the High Representative will hold consultations with, respectively, the Commissioner responsible for Development Policy and the Commissioner responsible for Neighbourhood Policy regarding their respective responsibilities.
4. In accordance with Article 314(1) TFEU, the EEAS shall draw up estimates of its expenditure for the following financial year. The Commission shall consolidate those estimates in a draft budget, which may contain different estimates. The Commission may amend the draft budget as provided for in Article 314(2) TFEU.
5. In order to ensure budgetary transparency in the area of external action of the Union, the Commission will transmit to the budgetary authority, together with the draft general budget of the European Union, a working document presenting, in a comprehensive way, all expenditure related to the external action of the Union.
6. The EEAS shall be subject to the procedures regarding the discharge provided for in Article 319 TFEU and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The EEAS will, in this context, fully cooperate with the institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, the additional necessary information, including through attendance at meetings of the relevant bodies.

External action instruments and programming

1. The management of the Union’s external cooperation programmes is under the responsibility of the Commission without prejudice to the respective roles of the Commission and of the EEAS in programming as set out in the following paragraphs.
2. The High Representative shall ensure overall political coordination of the Union’s external action, ensuring the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the Union’s external action, in particular through the following external assistance instruments:
—
the Development Cooperation Instrument(13),
—
the European Development Fund(14),
—
the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights(15),
—
the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument(16),
—
the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries(17),
—
the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation(18),
—
the Instrument for Stability, regarding the assistance provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006(19).
3. In particular, the EEAS shall contribute to the programming and management cycle for the instruments referred to in paragraph 2, on the basis of the policy objectives set out in those instruments. It shall have responsibility for preparing the following decisions of the Commission regarding the strategic, multiannual steps within the programming cycle:
(i)
country allocations to determine the global financial envelope for each region, subject to the indicative breakdown of the multiannual financial framework. Within each region, a proportion of funding will be reserved for regional programmes;
(ii)
country and regional strategic papers;
(iii)
national and regional indicative programmes.
In accordance with Article 3, throughout the whole cycle of programming, planning and implementation of the instruments referred to in paragraph 2, the High Representative and the EEAS shall work with the relevant members and services of the Commission without prejudice to Article 1(3). All proposals for decisions will be prepared by following the Commission’s procedures and will be submitted to the Commission for adoption.
4. With regard to the European Development Fund and the Development Cooperation Instrument, any proposals, including those for changes in the basic regulations and the programming documents referred to in paragraph 3, shall be prepared jointly by the relevant services in the EEAS and in the Commission under the responsibility of the Commissioner responsible for Development Policy and shall be submitted jointly with the High Representative for adoption by the Commission.
Thematic programmes, other than the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation and that part of the Instrument for Stability referred to in the seventh indent of paragraph 2, shall be prepared by the appropriate Commission service under the guidance of the Commissioner responsible for Development Policy and presented to the College of Commissioners in agreement with the High Representative and the other relevant Commissioners.
5. With regard to the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument, any proposals, including those for changes in the basic regulations and the programming documents referred to in paragraph 3, shall be prepared jointly by the relevant services in the EEAS and in the Commission under the responsibility of the Commissioner responsible for Neighbourhood Policy and shall be submitted jointly with the High Representative for adoption by the Commission.
6. Actions undertaken under: the CFSP budget; the Instrument for Stability other than the part referred to in the seventh indent of paragraph 2; the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries; communication and public Diplomacy actions, and election observation missions, shall be under the responsibility of the High Representative/the EEAS. The Commission shall be responsible for their financial implementation under the authority of the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission. The Commission department responsible for this implementation shall be co-located with the EEAS.

Security

1. The High Representative shall, after consulting the Committee referred to in point 3 of Section I of Part II of the Annex to Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations(20), decide on the security rules for the EEAS and take all appropriate measures in order to ensure that the EEAS manages effectively the risks to its staff, physical assets and information, and that it fulfils its duty of care and responsibilities in this regard. Such rules shall apply to all EEAS staff, and all staff in Union Delegations, regardless of their administrative status or origin.
2. Pending the Decision referred to in paragraph 1:
—
with regard to the protection of classified information, the EEAS shall apply the security measures set out in the Annex to Decision 2001/264/EC,
—
with regard to other aspects of security, the EEAS shall apply the Commission’s Provisions on Security, as set out in the relevant Annex to the Rules of Procedure of the Commission(21).
3. The EEAS shall have a department responsible for security matters, which shall be assisted by the relevant services of the Member States.
4. The High Representative shall take any measure necessary in order to implement security rules in the EEAS, in particular as regards the protection of classified information and the measures to be taken in the event of a failure by EEAS staff to comply with the security rules. For that purpose, the EEAS shall seek advice from the Security Office of the General Secretariat of the Council, from the relevant services of the Commission and from the relevant services of the Member States.

Access to documents, archives and data protection

1. The EEAS shall apply the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents(22). The High Representative shall decide on the implementing rules for the EEAS.
2. The Executive Secretary-General of the EEAS shall organise the archives of the service. The relevant archives of the departments transferred from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission shall be transferred to the EEAS.
3. The EEAS shall protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data(23). The High Representative shall decide on the implementing rules for the EEAS.

Immovable property

1. The General Secretariat of the Council and the relevant Commission services shall take all necessary measures so that the transfers referred to in Article 7 can be accompanied by the transfers of the Council and Commission buildings necessary for the functioning of the EEAS.
2. The terms on which immovable property is made available to the EEAS central administration and to the Union Delegations shall be decided on jointly by the High Representative and the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission, as appropriate.

Final and general provisions

1. The High Representative, the Council, the Commission and the Member States shall be responsible for implementing this Decision and shall take all measures necessary in furtherance thereof.
2. The High Representative shall submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the functioning of the EEAS by the end of 2011. That report shall, in particular, cover the implementation of Article 5(3) and (10) and Article 9.
3. By mid-2013, the High Representative shall provide a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, which will cover inter alia the implementation of Article 6(6), (8) and (11). The review shall, if necessary, be accompanied by appropriate proposals for the revision of this Decision. In that case, the Council shall, in accordance with Article 27(3) TEU, revise this Decision in the light of the review by the beginning of 2014.
4. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. The provisions on financial management and recruitment shall take effect once the necessary amendments to the Staff Regulations, the CEOS and the Financial Regulation, as well as the amending budget, have been adopted. To ensure a smooth transition, the High Representative, the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission shall enter into the necessary arrangements, and they shall undertake consultations with the Member States.
5. Within one month after the entry into force of this Decision, the High Representative shall submit to the Commission an estimate of the revenue and expenditure of the EEAS, including an establishment plan, in order for the Commission to present a draft amending budget.
6. This Decision shall be published in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.

DEPARTMENTS AND FUNCTIONS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE EEAS
 (1)

ANNEXThe following is a list of all the administrative entities to be transferred en bloc to the EEAS. This prejudges neither the additional needs and the allocation of resources to be determined in the overall budget negotiations establishing the EEAS, nor decisions on the provision of adequate staff responsible for support functions, nor the linked need for service-level arrangements between the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission and the EEAS.
1. GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COUNCILAll staff in the departments and functions listed below shall be transferred en bloc to the EEAS, except for a very limited number of staff to perform the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council in line with the second indent of Article 2(1), and except for certain specific functions which are indicated below:

Policy Unit

CSDP and crisis management structures

— | Crisis Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD)
— | Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC)
— | European Union Military Staff (EUMS)—Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS—Concepts and Capability Directorate—Intelligence Directorate—Operations Directorate—Logistics Directorate—Communications and Information Systems Directorate | — | Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS | — | Concepts and Capability Directorate | — | Intelligence Directorate | — | Operations Directorate | — | Logistics Directorate | — | Communications and Information Systems Directorate
— | Departments under the direct authority of DGEUMS
— | Concepts and Capability Directorate
— | Intelligence Directorate
— | Operations Directorate
— | Logistics Directorate
— | Communications and Information Systems Directorate
— | EU Situation Centre (SITCEN)Exception:

— | Staff in the SITCEN supporting the Security Accreditation Authority
Directorate-General E

— | Entities placed under the direct authority of the Director-General
— | Directorate for the Americas and the United Nations
— | Directorate for the Western Balkans, Eastern Europe and Central Asia
— | Directorate for Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
— | Directorate for Parliamentary Affairs in the area of CFSP
— | New York Liaison Office
— | Geneva Liaison Office
Officials of the General Secretariat of the Council on secondment to European Union Special Representatives and CSDP missions
2. COMMISSION (INCLUDING DELEGATIONS)All staff in the departments and functions listed below shall be transferred en bloc to the EEAS, except for a limited number of staff mentioned below as exceptions.

Directorate-General for External Relations

— | All hierarchy posts and support staff directly attached to them
— | Directorate A (Crisis Platform and Policy Coordination in CFSP)
— | Directorate B (Multilateral Relations and Human Rights)
— | Directorate C (North America, East Asia, Australia, New Zealand, EEA, EFTA, San Marino, Andorra, Monaco)
— | Directorate D (European Neighbourhood Policy Coordination)
— | Directorate E (Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus, Central Asia Republics)
— | Directorate F (Middle East, South Mediterranean)
— | Directorate G (Latin America)
— | Directorate H (Asia, except Japan and Korea)
— | Directorate I (Headquarters resources, information, interinstitutional relations)
— | Directorate K (External Service)
— | Directorate L (Strategy, Coordination and Analysis)
— | Task Force on the Eastern Partnership
— | Unit Relex-01 (Audit)Exceptions:

— | Staff responsible for the management of financial instruments
— | Staff responsible for the payment of salaries and allowances to staff in delegations
External Service

— | All Heads of Delegation and Deputy Heads of Delegation and support staff directly attached to them
— | All political sections or cells and staff
— | All information and public diplomacy sections and staff
— | All administration sectionsExceptions

— | Staff responsible for the implementation of financial instruments
Directorate-General for Development

— | Directorate D (ACP II – West and Central Africa, Caribbean and OCT) except OCT task force
— | Directorate E (Horn of Africa, East and Southern Africa, Indian Ocean and Pacific)
— | Unit CI (ACP I: Aid programming and management): Staff responsible for programming
— | Unit C2 (Pan-African issues and institutions, governance and migration): Staff responsible for Pan-African relations
— | Applicable hierarchy posts and support staff directly attached to them.
(1) The human resources to be transferred are all financed from the expenditure heading 5 (Administration) of the multiannual financial framework.

Pending: 32010D0390

Pending: 32010D0371

3.7.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 169/13
(1) The essential elements referred to in Article 9 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement have been violated.
(2) On 6 July 2009, under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, consultations were opened with Madagascar in the presence of representatives of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States, during which representatives of the High Transitional Authority failed to present satisfactory proposals or undertakings.
(3) The European Union proposed that consultations remain open in order to encourage Madagascar’s High Transitional Authority to continue negotiations with the country’s political factions under the aegis of the joint mediation team in order to arrive at a consensual agreement.
(4) Under the aegis of the joint mediation team headed by Mr Chissano, on 9 August 2009, Madagascar’s four political factions signed, in Maputo, agreements including provisions for the establishment of transition institutions to manage the transition process and organise presidential and legislative elections within fifteen months. These agreements were supplemented by the ‘Additional Act to the Malagasy Charter of the Transition’, which was signed in Addis Ababa on 6 November 2009.
(5) Since then, no compromise has been reached between the four political factions on the practical implementation of these agreements. The High Transitional Authority, which currently holds the reins of power, has, however, committed itself to a unilateral transition process, including the appointment of a Prime Minister and a government and the organisation of elections for 2010, which runs counter to the spirit and the letter of the Maputo agreements and the Addis Ababa Charter.
(6) Consequently, the consultations opened under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement should be closed and appropriate measures adopted,
— Humanitarian and emergency aid is not affected.
— Budgetary aid provided for in the National Indicative Programmes (‘NIP’) of the 9th European Development Fund (‘EDF’) and 10th EDF shall be suspended.
— Projects and programmes already under way under the 9th EDF shall continue to be implemented except for activities and payments directly involving the government and its agencies. Modifications and addenda to current contracts shall be examined on a case-by-case basis. New contracts shall be suspended.
— The implementation of the NIP – 10th EDF shall be suspended.
— The European Commission may implement certain projects and programmes that directly benefit the population,
— Regional projects shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
— The European Commission reserves the right to assume immediately, wholly or partially, the functions of National Authorising Officer for the EDF.
— The political dialogue provided for in Article 8 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement shall be maintained and conducted, as far as possible, in coordination with the International Contact Group on Madagascar. It may be stepped up if a consensus-based solution for a return to constitutional order is reached, which includes 1) a consensual arrangement for a transitional government; 2) the setting-up of a clear roadmap towards election, which is acceptable to the involved parties and which allows for a free and fair election campaign; 3) fair elections, recognised as such by the international community and which can provide democratic legitimacy to a new Government. The EU will continue to monitor closely developments in Madagascar and may give its support to, if applicable, the implementation of a consensual political solution to the crisis.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 217 thereof,
Having regard to the Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000(1), as revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005(2)(hereinafter referred to as the ‘ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’), and in particular Article 96 thereof,
Having regard to the Internal Agreement between representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on measures to be taken and procedures to be followed for the implementation of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement(3), and in particular Article 3 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
(1) The essential elements referred to in Article 9 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement have been violated.
(2) On 6 July 2009, under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, consultations were opened with Madagascar in the presence of representatives of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States, during which representatives of the High Transitional Authority failed to present satisfactory proposals or undertakings.
(3) The European Union proposed that consultations remain open in order to encourage Madagascar’s High Transitional Authority to continue negotiations with the country’s political factions under the aegis of the joint mediation team in order to arrive at a consensual agreement.
(4) Under the aegis of the joint mediation team headed by Mr Chissano, on 9 August 2009, Madagascar’s four political factions signed, in Maputo, agreements including provisions for the establishment of transition institutions to manage the transition process and organise presidential and legislative elections within fifteen months. These agreements were supplemented by the ‘Additional Act to the Malagasy Charter of the Transition’, which was signed in Addis Ababa on 6 November 2009.
(5) Since then, no compromise has been reached between the four political factions on the practical implementation of these agreements. The High Transitional Authority, which currently holds the reins of power, has, however, committed itself to a unilateral transition process, including the appointment of a Prime Minister and a government and the organisation of elections for 2010, which runs counter to the spirit and the letter of the Maputo agreements and the Addis Ababa Charter.
(6) Consequently, the consultations opened under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement should be closed and appropriate measures adopted,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Consultations with the Republic of Madagascar under Article 96 of the Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, as revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’) are hereby concluded.

Article 2
The measures set out in the annexed letter are hereby adopted as appropriate measures under Article 96(2)(c) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement.

Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
It shall remain in force for a period of 12 months and shall be re-examined regularly.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 217 thereof,
Having regard to the Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000(1), as revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005(2)(hereinafter referred to as the ‘ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’), and in particular Article 96 thereof,
Having regard to the Internal Agreement between representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on measures to be taken and procedures to be followed for the implementation of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement(3), and in particular Article 3 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
(1) The essential elements referred to in Article 9 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement have been violated.
(2) On 6 July 2009, under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, consultations were opened with Madagascar in the presence of representatives of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States, during which representatives of the High Transitional Authority failed to present satisfactory proposals or undertakings.
(3) The European Union proposed that consultations remain open in order to encourage Madagascar’s High Transitional Authority to continue negotiations with the country’s political factions under the aegis of the joint mediation team in order to arrive at a consensual agreement.
(4) Under the aegis of the joint mediation team headed by Mr Chissano, on 9 August 2009, Madagascar’s four political factions signed, in Maputo, agreements including provisions for the establishment of transition institutions to manage the transition process and organise presidential and legislative elections within fifteen months. These agreements were supplemented by the ‘Additional Act to the Malagasy Charter of the Transition’, which was signed in Addis Ababa on 6 November 2009.
(5) Since then, no compromise has been reached between the four political factions on the practical implementation of these agreements. The High Transitional Authority, which currently holds the reins of power, has, however, committed itself to a unilateral transition process, including the appointment of a Prime Minister and a government and the organisation of elections for 2010, which runs counter to the spirit and the letter of the Maputo agreements and the Addis Ababa Charter.
(6) Consequently, the consultations opened under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement should be closed and appropriate measures adopted,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Consultations with the Republic of Madagascar under Article 96 of the Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, as revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’) are hereby concluded.
The measures set out in the annexed letter are hereby adopted as appropriate measures under Article 96(2)(c) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
It shall remain in force for a period of 12 months and shall be re-examined regularly.

Draft letter

ANNEXH. E. Mr Andry Nirina RAJOELINA
President of the High Transitional Authority
of the Republic of Madagascar
Antananarivo
Madagascar
Sir,
The European Union (‘EU’) attaches great importance to the essential elements set out in Article 9 of the Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 and revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005, hereinafter ‘the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’, concerning respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law, which underpin the ACP-EU Partnership.
The EU therefore reacted immediately to the forcible transfer of power that occurred in Madagascar on 17 March 2009 and took the view that it constituted a flagrant violation of the essential elements set out in Article 9 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement.
Acting under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, the EU entered into a political dialogue with the ruling regime, which led to the opening of consultations with a view to assessing the situation and possible solutions for a rapid return to constitutional order. At the opening meeting of these consultations, which were held in Brussels on 6 July 2009, the EU did not consider that any satisfactory proposals had been made by the Malagasy side.
In a spirit of openness to dialogue and taking full account of the complexity of the political situation in Madagascar, the EU proposed that the consultations remain open in order to encourage Madagascar’s High Transitional Authority to continue negotiations with Madagascar’s political factions under the aegis of the joint mediation team made up of the African Union (‘AU’), the Southern African Development Community (‘SADC’), theOrganisation Internationale de la Francophonieand the United Nations, in order to arrive at a consensus that would permit a return to constitutional order.
Under the aegis of this joint mediation team for Madagascar, and particularly after the appointment of Mr Chissano at the SADC Summit in June 2009, on 9 August 2009, the leaders of the four political factions signed, in Maputo, the Maputo Political Agreement and the Charter of the Transition, plus other agreements providing, in particular, for the creation of the institutions to manage the transition process and organise presidential and legislative elections over the next fifteen months. These agreements, which were to be implemented over the ensuing thirty days with appointments to key posts in the transition institutions made by consensus, have been supplemented by the Additional Act to the Malagasy Charter of the Transition, which was signed by the leaders of the four political factions on 6 November 2009 in Addis Ababa.
Despite the many efforts of the joint mediation team with the support of the international community over the last few months, and despite the most recent ad hoc initiative of the President of the AU Commission, the political factions have not been able to reach agreement on the implementation of the transition process to which they agreed in Maputo and in Addis Ababa. Rather, Mr Rajoelina has embarked upon a unilateral transition process, including the appointment of a Prime Minister and a government and the organisation of elections for 2010, which runs counter to both the spirit and the letter of the Maputo Agreements and the Addis Ababa Charter.
In light of the foregoing, the EU has decided to close the consultation period and has decided under Article 96(2)(c) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement to adopt the appropriate measures described below:

— | Humanitarian and emergency aid is not affected.
— | Budgetary aid provided for in the National Indicative Programmes (‘NIP’) of the 9th European Development Fund (‘EDF’) and 10th EDF shall be suspended.
— | Projects and programmes already under way under the 9th EDF shall continue to be implemented except for activities and payments directly involving the government and its agencies. Modifications and addenda to current contracts shall be examined on a case-by-case basis. New contracts shall be suspended.
— | The implementation of the NIP – 10th EDF shall be suspended.
— | The European Commission may implement certain projects and programmes that directly benefit the population,
— | Regional projects shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
— | The European Commission reserves the right to assume immediately, wholly or partially, the functions of National Authorising Officer for the EDF.
— | The political dialogue provided for in Article 8 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement shall be maintained and conducted, as far as possible, in coordination with the International Contact Group on Madagascar. It may be stepped up if a consensus-based solution for a return to constitutional order is reached, which includes 1) a consensual arrangement for a transitional government; 2) the setting-up of a clear roadmap towards election, which is acceptable to the involved parties and which allows for a free and fair election campaign; 3) fair elections, recognised as such by the international community and which can provide democratic legitimacy to a new Government. The EU will continue to monitor closely developments in Madagascar and may give its support to, if applicable, the implementation of a consensual political solution to the crisis.These appropriate measures shall be adopted for an initial period of twelve months.
The EU reserves the right to examine and revise the measures mentioned above in order to take into consideration any developments, positive or negative, in the situation in Madagascar.
We wish to assure you, Mr President, of our highest consideration.

For the European Union
The Commission
The Council

Pending: 32010D0330

15.6.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 149/12
(1) On 7 March 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission in Iraq, EUJUST LEX(1). That Joint Action, as subsequently amended and extended, expired on 30 June 2009.
(2) On 24 March 2009, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) agreed that EUJUST LEX should be extended for another 12 months until 30 June 2010. During this period, EUJUST LEX was to conduct, in addition to continuing its core business, a pilot phase including activities in Iraq.
(3) On 21 May 2010, the PSC agreed that EUJUST LEX-IRAQ should be extended for another 24 months until 30 June 2012. During this period, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ should progressively shift its activities and relevant structures to Iraq, focusing on specialised training, while maintaining out-of-country activities.
(4) The mandate of the Mission is being carried out in a security context that is liable to deteriorate and to undermine the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as defined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
(5) The command and control structure of the Mission should be without prejudice to the contractual responsibility of the Head of Mission towards the Commission for implementing the budget of the Mission,
(a) the Head of Mission;
(b) a coordinating office in Brussels;
(c) an office in Baghdad with an antenna in Basra;
(d) an office in Erbil (Kurdistan Region);
(e) training facilities, trainers and experts provided by the Member States and coordinated by EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28 and 43(2) thereof,
(1) On 7 March 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission in Iraq, EUJUST LEX(1). That Joint Action, as subsequently amended and extended, expired on 30 June 2009.
(2) On 24 March 2009, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) agreed that EUJUST LEX should be extended for another 12 months until 30 June 2010. During this period, EUJUST LEX was to conduct, in addition to continuing its core business, a pilot phase including activities in Iraq.
(3) On 21 May 2010, the PSC agreed that EUJUST LEX-IRAQ should be extended for another 24 months until 30 June 2012. During this period, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ should progressively shift its activities and relevant structures to Iraq, focusing on specialised training, while maintaining out-of-country activities.
(4) The mandate of the Mission is being carried out in a security context that is liable to deteriorate and to undermine the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as defined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
(5) The command and control structure of the Mission should be without prejudice to the contractual responsibility of the Head of Mission towards the Commission for implementing the budget of the Mission,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Mission
Article 1
1. The European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, established by Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP (‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’ or the ‘Mission’), shall be continued from 1 July 2010.
2. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall operate in accordance with the objectives and other provisions as contained in the Mission statement set out in Article 2.

Mission statement
Article 2
1. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall continue to address the needs in the Iraqi criminal justice system through the provision of training for high- and mid-level officials in senior management and criminal investigation. This training shall aim to improve the capacity, coordination and collaboration of the different components of the Iraqi criminal justice system.
2. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall promote closer collaboration between the different actors across the Iraqi criminal justice system and strengthen the management capacity of senior and high-potential officials primarily from the police, judiciary and penitentiary and improve skills and procedures in criminal investigation in full respect for the rule of law and human rights.
3. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall, where security conditions and resources allow, continue to provide strategic mentoring and advising activities based on verified Iraqi needs and taking into account other international presence and the Union’s added value in this area.
4. The training activities shall take place in Iraq and in the region as well as in the Union. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have offices in Brussels and Baghdad, including an antenna in Basra, in preparation for a possible office opening, subject to an appropriate decision to that effect. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall also have an office in Erbil (Kurdistan Region). Taking into account the evolution of the situation in Iraq during the implementation of this new mandate, the Head of Mission and the bulk of its staff shall move from Brussels to Iraq and be posted to Baghdad as soon as the situation so permits.
5. Taking into account further developments in the security conditions in Iraq and the outcome of the Mission activities in Iraq, the Council shall examine the results of this new mandate and shall decide on the future of the Mission after 30 June 2012.
6. An effective strategic and technical partnership with the Iraqi counterparts shall be developed throughout the Mission, particularly in relation to the design of the curricula during the planning phase. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ activities should maintain a balanced representation of the Iraqi population, based on a human rights and gender equality approach. Participants shall continue to be able to attend relevant in-country activities, regardless of where they are held. Coordination shall also be needed for the selection, vetting, evaluation, follow-up and coordination of personnel attending the training with the aim of continued appropriation by the Iraqis. There shall also be a need for close coordination during the planning and implementation phases between EUJUST LEX-IRAQ and the Member States providing training. This shall include the involvement of the relevant Member States’ diplomatic missions in Iraq and liaison with those Member States with current experience in providing training relevant for the Mission.
7. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall be independent and distinct but shall be complementary and bring added value to the efforts of the Government of Iraq and the international community, in particular those of the United Nations (UN) and the United States of America. It shall also develop synergies with relevant activities of the Union and Member States. In this context, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall liaise with the relevant Iraqi authorities, and shall deepen collaboration and avoid duplication with international actors already operating in the country as well as with Member States presently conducting training projects in Iraq.

Structure
Article 3
EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have its offices in Brussels and Iraq and shall, in principle, be structured as follows:
(a)
the Head of Mission;
(b)
a coordinating office in Brussels;
(c)
an office in Baghdad with an antenna in Basra;
(d)
an office in Erbil (Kurdistan Region);
(e)
training facilities, trainers and experts provided by the Member States and coordinated by EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
These elements shall be developed in the Concept of Operations (CONOPS) and the Operation Plan (OPLAN).

Civilian Operation Commander
Article 4
1. The Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability Director shall be the Civilian Operation Commander for EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
2. The Civilian Operation Commander, under the political control and strategic direction of the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and the overall authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR), shall exercise command and control of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ at the strategic level.
3. The Civilian Operation Commander shall ensure proper and effective implementation of the Council’s decisions as well as the PSC’s decisions, including by issuing instructions at strategic level as required to the Head of Mission.
4. All seconded staff shall remain under the full command of the national authorities of the sending State or Union institution. National authorities shall transfer Operational Control of their personnel, teams and units to the Civilian Operation Commander.
5. The Civilian Operation Commander shall have overall responsibility for ensuring that the Union’s duty of care is properly discharged.

Head of Mission
Article 5
1. The Head of Mission shall assume responsibility and exercise command and control of the Mission at theatre level.
2. The Head of Mission shall exercise command and control over personnel, teams and units from sending States as assigned by the Civilian Operation Commander together with administrative and logistic responsibility including over assets, resources and information put at the disposal of the Mission.
3. The Head of Mission shall issue instructions to all Mission staff, including the Brussels coordinating office, the Erbil and Baghdad offices, and the Basra antenna, for the effective conduct of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, assuming its coordination and day-to-day management, following the instructions at strategic level of the Civilian Operation Commander.
4. The Head of Mission shall be responsible for the implementation of the Mission’s budget. For this purpose, the Head of Mission shall sign a contract with the Commission.
5. The Head of Mission shall be responsible for disciplinary control over the staff. For seconded staff, disciplinary action shall be exercised by the national authority or Union institution concerned.
6. The Head of Mission shall represent EUJUST LEX-IRAQ and shall ensure appropriate visibility of the Mission.

Staff
Article 6
1. The numbers and competence of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ staff shall be consistent with the Mission statement set out in Article 2 and the structure set out in Article 3.
2. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall consist primarily of staff seconded by Member States or Union institutions.
3. Each Member State or Union institution shall bear the costs related to any of the staff seconded by it, including travel expenses to and from the place of deployment, salaries, medical coverage, and allowances other than applicableper diemallowances as well as hardship and risk allowances.
4. International and local staff may also be recruited by EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, as required, on a contractual basis, if the functions required are not provided by personnel seconded by the Member States.
5. All staff shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the Mission. All staff shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations(2).

Status of staff
Article 7
1. Where required, the status of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ staff, including where appropriate the privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall be agreed in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union.
2. The State or Union institution having seconded a staff member shall be responsible for answering any claims linked to the secondment, from or concerning the staff member. The State or Union institution in question shall be responsible for bringing any action against the person seconded.

Chain of Command
Article 8
1. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have a unified chain of command, as a crisis management operation.
2. Under the responsibility of the Council and of the HR, the PSC shall exercise political control and strategic direction of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
3. The Civilian Operation Commander, under the political control and strategic direction of the PSC and the overall authority of the HR, is the commander of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ at strategic level and, as such, shall issue instructions to the Head of Mission and provide him with advice and technical support.
4. The Civilian Operation Commander shall report to the Council through the HR.
5. The Head of Mission shall exercise command and control of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ at theatre level and shall be directly responsible to the Civilian Operation Commander.

Political control and strategic direction
Article 9
1. The PSC shall exercise, under the responsibility of the Council and of the HR, political control and strategic direction of the Mission. The Council hereby authorises the PSC to take the relevant decisions for this purpose in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty on European Union.
2. This authorisation shall include the powers to amend the CONOPS and the OPLAN. It shall also include powers to take decisions regarding the appointment of the Head of Mission. The powers of decision with respect to the objectives and termination of the Mission shall remain vested in the Council.
3. The PSC shall report to the Council at regular intervals.
4. The PSC shall receive on a regular basis and, as required, reports by the Civilian Operation Commander and the Head of Mission on issues within their areas of responsibility.

Security
Article 10
1. The Civilian Operation Commander shall direct the Head of Mission’s planning of security measures and ensure their proper and effective implementation for EUJUST LEX-IRAQ in accordance with Articles 4 and 8 and in coordination with the Council Security Office.
2. The Head of Mission shall be responsible for the security of the Mission and for ensuring compliance with minimum security requirements applicable to the Mission, in line with the policy of the European Union on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty on European Union and its supporting documents.
3. For the elements of the Mission which are carried out in Member States, the host Member State shall take all necessary and appropriate measures to ensure the security of the participants and the trainers on its territory.
4. For the coordinating office in Brussels the necessary and appropriate measures shall be organised by the Security Office of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC) in collaboration with the host Member State’s authorities.
5. Should the training take place in a third State, the Union, with the involvement of the Member States concerned, shall ask the third State’s authorities to make the appropriate arrangements regarding the security of the participants and the trainers or experts on its territory.
6. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have a dedicated Security Officer for the Mission reporting to the Head of Mission.
7. The Head of Mission shall consult with the PSC on security issues affecting the deployment of the Mission as directed by the HR.
8. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ staff members, trainers and experts shall undergo mandatory security training organised by the GSC Security Office and, when appropriate, medical checks prior to any deployment or travel to Iraq.
9. Member States shall endeavour to provide EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, in particular the offices in Iraq, staff, trainers and experts travelling to and in Iraq, with secure accommodation, body armour and close protection and other security requirements, as appropriate, within Iraq. For such purpose, the Head of Mission may conclude appropriate arrangements with Member States or local authorities as necessary.

Financial arrangements
Article 11
1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the Mission between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2011 shall be EUR 17 500 000.
2. The financial reference amount for the subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.
3. All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union.
4. Given the particular security situation in Iraq, services in Baghdad and Basra shall be provided through the contracts entered into by the United Kingdom, other Member States where appropriate or through arrangements concluded between the Iraqi authorities and the companies providing and invoicing for these services. The budget of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall cover these expenses. The United Kingdom or other Member States concerned shall, in consultation with the Head of Mission, report with adequate information to the Council on these expenses.
5. The Head of Mission shall report fully to, and be supervised by, the Commission on the activities undertaken in the framework of his contract.
6. The financial arrangements shall respect the operational requirements of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, including compatibility of equipment.
7. Expenditure shall be eligible as of the date of entry into force of this Decision.
8. The equipment and supplies for the coordination office in Brussels shall be purchased or rented on behalf of the Union.

Participation of third States
Article 12
1. Without prejudice to the Union’s decision-making autonomy and its single institutional framework, candidate and other third States may be invited to contribute to EUJUST LEX-IRAQ on the basis that they bear the cost of sending the police experts and/or the civilian staff seconded by them, including salaries, allowances, medical coverage, high risk insurance and travel expenses to and from Iraq, and contribute to the running costs of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ as appropriate.
2. The Council hereby authorises the PSC to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions.
3. Third States making contributions to EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have the same rights and obligations in terms of day-to-day management of the Mission as Member States taking part in the Mission.
4. The PSC shall take appropriate action with regard to participation arrangements and shall, if required, submit a proposal to the Council, including on possible financial participation or contributions in kind from third States.
5. Detailed arrangements regarding the participation of third States shall be the subject of agreements pursuant to Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union and additional technical arrangements as necessary. Where the Union and a third State have concluded an agreement establishing a framework for the participation of that third State in EU crisis management operations, the provisions of such agreement shall apply in the context of the Mission.

Coordination
Article 13
1. Without prejudice to the chain of command, the Head of Mission shall act in close coordination with the EU delegation to Iraq to ensure the consistency of Union action in support of Iraq.
2. The Head of Mission shall coordinate closely with the Heads of the diplomatic missions of the relevant Member States.
3. The Head of Mission shall cooperate with other international actors present in the country, in particular the UN.

Release of classified information
Article 14
The HR is authorised to release to the host State and the UN, as appropriate and in accordance with the operational needs of the Mission, EU classified information and documents up to the level ‘RESTREINT UE’ generated for the purposes of the Mission, in accordance with the Council’s security regulations. Local arrangements shall be drawn up for this purpose.
The HR shall be authorised to release to third states associated with this Decision, Union non-classified documents related to the deliberations of the Council with regard to the Mission covered by the obligation of professional secrecy pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Council Rules of Procedure(3).

Watch-keeping
Article 15
The Watch-keeping Capability shall be activated for EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.

Entry into force
Article 16
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 1 July 2010 until 30 June 2012.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28 and 43(2) thereof,
(1) On 7 March 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission in Iraq, EUJUST LEX(1). That Joint Action, as subsequently amended and extended, expired on 30 June 2009.
(2) On 24 March 2009, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) agreed that EUJUST LEX should be extended for another 12 months until 30 June 2010. During this period, EUJUST LEX was to conduct, in addition to continuing its core business, a pilot phase including activities in Iraq.
(3) On 21 May 2010, the PSC agreed that EUJUST LEX-IRAQ should be extended for another 24 months until 30 June 2012. During this period, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ should progressively shift its activities and relevant structures to Iraq, focusing on specialised training, while maintaining out-of-country activities.
(4) The mandate of the Mission is being carried out in a security context that is liable to deteriorate and to undermine the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as defined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
(5) The command and control structure of the Mission should be without prejudice to the contractual responsibility of the Head of Mission towards the Commission for implementing the budget of the Mission,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Mission

1. The European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, established by Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP (‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’ or the ‘Mission’), shall be continued from 1 July 2010.
2. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall operate in accordance with the objectives and other provisions as contained in the Mission statement set out in Article 2.

Mission statement

1. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall continue to address the needs in the Iraqi criminal justice system through the provision of training for high- and mid-level officials in senior management and criminal investigation. This training shall aim to improve the capacity, coordination and collaboration of the different components of the Iraqi criminal justice system.
2. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall promote closer collaboration between the different actors across the Iraqi criminal justice system and strengthen the management capacity of senior and high-potential officials primarily from the police, judiciary and penitentiary and improve skills and procedures in criminal investigation in full respect for the rule of law and human rights.
3. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall, where security conditions and resources allow, continue to provide strategic mentoring and advising activities based on verified Iraqi needs and taking into account other international presence and the Union’s added value in this area.
4. The training activities shall take place in Iraq and in the region as well as in the Union. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have offices in Brussels and Baghdad, including an antenna in Basra, in preparation for a possible office opening, subject to an appropriate decision to that effect. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall also have an office in Erbil (Kurdistan Region). Taking into account the evolution of the situation in Iraq during the implementation of this new mandate, the Head of Mission and the bulk of its staff shall move from Brussels to Iraq and be posted to Baghdad as soon as the situation so permits.
5. Taking into account further developments in the security conditions in Iraq and the outcome of the Mission activities in Iraq, the Council shall examine the results of this new mandate and shall decide on the future of the Mission after 30 June 2012.
6. An effective strategic and technical partnership with the Iraqi counterparts shall be developed throughout the Mission, particularly in relation to the design of the curricula during the planning phase. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ activities should maintain a balanced representation of the Iraqi population, based on a human rights and gender equality approach. Participants shall continue to be able to attend relevant in-country activities, regardless of where they are held. Coordination shall also be needed for the selection, vetting, evaluation, follow-up and coordination of personnel attending the training with the aim of continued appropriation by the Iraqis. There shall also be a need for close coordination during the planning and implementation phases between EUJUST LEX-IRAQ and the Member States providing training. This shall include the involvement of the relevant Member States’ diplomatic missions in Iraq and liaison with those Member States with current experience in providing training relevant for the Mission.
7. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall be independent and distinct but shall be complementary and bring added value to the efforts of the Government of Iraq and the international community, in particular those of the United Nations (UN) and the United States of America. It shall also develop synergies with relevant activities of the Union and Member States. In this context, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall liaise with the relevant Iraqi authorities, and shall deepen collaboration and avoid duplication with international actors already operating in the country as well as with Member States presently conducting training projects in Iraq.

Structure

EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have its offices in Brussels and Iraq and shall, in principle, be structured as follows:
(a)
the Head of Mission;
(b)
a coordinating office in Brussels;
(c)
an office in Baghdad with an antenna in Basra;
(d)
an office in Erbil (Kurdistan Region);
(e)
training facilities, trainers and experts provided by the Member States and coordinated by EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
These elements shall be developed in the Concept of Operations (CONOPS) and the Operation Plan (OPLAN).

Civilian Operation Commander

1. The Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability Director shall be the Civilian Operation Commander for EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
2. The Civilian Operation Commander, under the political control and strategic direction of the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and the overall authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR), shall exercise command and control of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ at the strategic level.
3. The Civilian Operation Commander shall ensure proper and effective implementation of the Council’s decisions as well as the PSC’s decisions, including by issuing instructions at strategic level as required to the Head of Mission.
4. All seconded staff shall remain under the full command of the national authorities of the sending State or Union institution. National authorities shall transfer Operational Control of their personnel, teams and units to the Civilian Operation Commander.
5. The Civilian Operation Commander shall have overall responsibility for ensuring that the Union’s duty of care is properly discharged.

Head of Mission

1. The Head of Mission shall assume responsibility and exercise command and control of the Mission at theatre level.
2. The Head of Mission shall exercise command and control over personnel, teams and units from sending States as assigned by the Civilian Operation Commander together with administrative and logistic responsibility including over assets, resources and information put at the disposal of the Mission.
3. The Head of Mission shall issue instructions to all Mission staff, including the Brussels coordinating office, the Erbil and Baghdad offices, and the Basra antenna, for the effective conduct of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, assuming its coordination and day-to-day management, following the instructions at strategic level of the Civilian Operation Commander.
4. The Head of Mission shall be responsible for the implementation of the Mission’s budget. For this purpose, the Head of Mission shall sign a contract with the Commission.
5. The Head of Mission shall be responsible for disciplinary control over the staff. For seconded staff, disciplinary action shall be exercised by the national authority or Union institution concerned.
6. The Head of Mission shall represent EUJUST LEX-IRAQ and shall ensure appropriate visibility of the Mission.

Staff

1. The numbers and competence of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ staff shall be consistent with the Mission statement set out in Article 2 and the structure set out in Article 3.
2. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall consist primarily of staff seconded by Member States or Union institutions.
3. Each Member State or Union institution shall bear the costs related to any of the staff seconded by it, including travel expenses to and from the place of deployment, salaries, medical coverage, and allowances other than applicableper diemallowances as well as hardship and risk allowances.
4. International and local staff may also be recruited by EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, as required, on a contractual basis, if the functions required are not provided by personnel seconded by the Member States.
5. All staff shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the Mission. All staff shall respect the security principles and minimum standards established by Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations(2).

Status of staff

1. Where required, the status of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ staff, including where appropriate the privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall be agreed in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union.
2. The State or Union institution having seconded a staff member shall be responsible for answering any claims linked to the secondment, from or concerning the staff member. The State or Union institution in question shall be responsible for bringing any action against the person seconded.

Chain of Command

1. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have a unified chain of command, as a crisis management operation.
2. Under the responsibility of the Council and of the HR, the PSC shall exercise political control and strategic direction of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.
3. The Civilian Operation Commander, under the political control and strategic direction of the PSC and the overall authority of the HR, is the commander of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ at strategic level and, as such, shall issue instructions to the Head of Mission and provide him with advice and technical support.
4. The Civilian Operation Commander shall report to the Council through the HR.
5. The Head of Mission shall exercise command and control of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ at theatre level and shall be directly responsible to the Civilian Operation Commander.

Political control and strategic direction

1. The PSC shall exercise, under the responsibility of the Council and of the HR, political control and strategic direction of the Mission. The Council hereby authorises the PSC to take the relevant decisions for this purpose in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty on European Union.
2. This authorisation shall include the powers to amend the CONOPS and the OPLAN. It shall also include powers to take decisions regarding the appointment of the Head of Mission. The powers of decision with respect to the objectives and termination of the Mission shall remain vested in the Council.
3. The PSC shall report to the Council at regular intervals.
4. The PSC shall receive on a regular basis and, as required, reports by the Civilian Operation Commander and the Head of Mission on issues within their areas of responsibility.

Security

1. The Civilian Operation Commander shall direct the Head of Mission’s planning of security measures and ensure their proper and effective implementation for EUJUST LEX-IRAQ in accordance with Articles 4 and 8 and in coordination with the Council Security Office.
2. The Head of Mission shall be responsible for the security of the Mission and for ensuring compliance with minimum security requirements applicable to the Mission, in line with the policy of the European Union on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty on European Union and its supporting documents.
3. For the elements of the Mission which are carried out in Member States, the host Member State shall take all necessary and appropriate measures to ensure the security of the participants and the trainers on its territory.
4. For the coordinating office in Brussels the necessary and appropriate measures shall be organised by the Security Office of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC) in collaboration with the host Member State’s authorities.
5. Should the training take place in a third State, the Union, with the involvement of the Member States concerned, shall ask the third State’s authorities to make the appropriate arrangements regarding the security of the participants and the trainers or experts on its territory.
6. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have a dedicated Security Officer for the Mission reporting to the Head of Mission.
7. The Head of Mission shall consult with the PSC on security issues affecting the deployment of the Mission as directed by the HR.
8. EUJUST LEX-IRAQ staff members, trainers and experts shall undergo mandatory security training organised by the GSC Security Office and, when appropriate, medical checks prior to any deployment or travel to Iraq.
9. Member States shall endeavour to provide EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, in particular the offices in Iraq, staff, trainers and experts travelling to and in Iraq, with secure accommodation, body armour and close protection and other security requirements, as appropriate, within Iraq. For such purpose, the Head of Mission may conclude appropriate arrangements with Member States or local authorities as necessary.

Financial arrangements

1. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the Mission between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2011 shall be EUR 17 500 000.
2. The financial reference amount for the subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.
3. All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union.
4. Given the particular security situation in Iraq, services in Baghdad and Basra shall be provided through the contracts entered into by the United Kingdom, other Member States where appropriate or through arrangements concluded between the Iraqi authorities and the companies providing and invoicing for these services. The budget of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall cover these expenses. The United Kingdom or other Member States concerned shall, in consultation with the Head of Mission, report with adequate information to the Council on these expenses.
5. The Head of Mission shall report fully to, and be supervised by, the Commission on the activities undertaken in the framework of his contract.
6. The financial arrangements shall respect the operational requirements of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, including compatibility of equipment.
7. Expenditure shall be eligible as of the date of entry into force of this Decision.
8. The equipment and supplies for the coordination office in Brussels shall be purchased or rented on behalf of the Union.

Participation of third States

1. Without prejudice to the Union’s decision-making autonomy and its single institutional framework, candidate and other third States may be invited to contribute to EUJUST LEX-IRAQ on the basis that they bear the cost of sending the police experts and/or the civilian staff seconded by them, including salaries, allowances, medical coverage, high risk insurance and travel expenses to and from Iraq, and contribute to the running costs of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ as appropriate.
2. The Council hereby authorises the PSC to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions.
3. Third States making contributions to EUJUST LEX-IRAQ shall have the same rights and obligations in terms of day-to-day management of the Mission as Member States taking part in the Mission.
4. The PSC shall take appropriate action with regard to participation arrangements and shall, if required, submit a proposal to the Council, including on possible financial participation or contributions in kind from third States.
5. Detailed arrangements regarding the participation of third States shall be the subject of agreements pursuant to Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union and additional technical arrangements as necessary. Where the Union and a third State have concluded an agreement establishing a framework for the participation of that third State in EU crisis management operations, the provisions of such agreement shall apply in the context of the Mission.

Coordination

1. Without prejudice to the chain of command, the Head of Mission shall act in close coordination with the EU delegation to Iraq to ensure the consistency of Union action in support of Iraq.
2. The Head of Mission shall coordinate closely with the Heads of the diplomatic missions of the relevant Member States.
3. The Head of Mission shall cooperate with other international actors present in the country, in particular the UN.

Release of classified information

The HR is authorised to release to the host State and the UN, as appropriate and in accordance with the operational needs of the Mission, EU classified information and documents up to the level ‘RESTREINT UE’ generated for the purposes of the Mission, in accordance with the Council’s security regulations. Local arrangements shall be drawn up for this purpose.
The HR shall be authorised to release to third states associated with this Decision, Union non-classified documents related to the deliberations of the Council with regard to the Mission covered by the obligation of professional secrecy pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Council Rules of Procedure(3).

Watch-keeping

The Watch-keeping Capability shall be activated for EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 1 July 2010 until 30 June 2012.

Pending: 32010D0277

18.5.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 121/16
(1) Commission Decision 2009/821/EC of 28 September 2009 drawing up a list of approved border inspection posts, laying down certain rules on the inspections carried out by Commission veterinary experts and laying down the veterinary units in Traces(4)lays down a list of border inspection posts approved in accordance with Directives 91/496/EEC and 97/78/EC. That list is set out in Annex I to that Decision.
(2) The Commission inspection service, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out an inspection at the border inspection post at the port of Antwerp in Belgium. The results of the inspection were satisfactory. An additional inspection centre should therefore be added for that border inspection post in the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, the categories of the existing inspection centres at this border inspection post should be amended.
(3) The Commission inspection service, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out an inspection at the border inspection post at the port of Gdańsk in Poland. The results of the inspection were satisfactory. An additional inspection centre should therefore be added for that border inspection post in the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(4) Following communications from Denmark and Poland, certain inspection centres at border inspection posts for those Member States should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(5) Following communication from France, the border inspection post at Brest airport should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, certain categories at the border inspection posts at the airports at Lyon-Saint Exupéry, Marseille aéroport and Nice should be modified in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(6) Following communication from Italy, certain categories at the border inspection posts at the airports at Milano-Linate, Milano-Malpensa, Palermo, Reggio Calabria and Rimini should be suspended in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, certain categories at the border inspection post at the port at Napoli should be modified in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(7) Following communication from Latvia, the border inspection post at the port of Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, the listing of the categories for the two inspection centres at the approved border inspection post at Riga port should be corrected in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(8) Following communication from Spain, the list of border inspection posts for that Member State should be amended to take account of the suspension of two of its border inspection posts, of lifting the suspension for certain categories of products of animal origin that can be checked at one of its border inspection posts and of limiting the approval categories for products of animal origin at another one of its border inspection posts already approved in accordance with Decision 2009/821/EC.
(9) Following communication from the Netherlands, the name of one Inspection Centre at the port of Rotterdam should be amended in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(10) The list of central units, regional units and local units in Traces is laid down in Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(11) Following communications from Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Latvia and Finland, certain changes to the central, regional and local units in Traces should be reflected in the Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC for those Member States.
(12) Decision 2009/821/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
1. In the part concerning Belgium, the entry for the port at Antwerp is replaced by the following:‘AntwerpenAnversBE ANR 1PGIP LOHC(2), NHCKaai 650HC(2)AfrulogHC(2), NHC’ ‘AntwerpenAnvers BE ANR 1 P GIP LO HC(2), NHC Kaai 650 HC(2) Afrulog HC(2), NHC’
‘AntwerpenAnvers BE ANR 1 P GIP LO HC(2), NHC
Kaai 650 HC(2)
Afrulog HC(2), NHC’
‘AntwerpenAnvers BE ANR 1 P GIP LO HC(2), NHC
Kaai 650 HC(2)
Afrulog HC(2), NHC’
2. In the part concerning Denmark, the entry of the inspection centre Centre 1, SAS 1 (North) for the airport at København is deleted.
3. The part concerning Spain is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’(b)the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’(c)the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’(d)the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ (a) the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’ ‘Almeria (*) ES LEI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) O (*)’ (b) the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’ ‘Asturias (*) ES AST 4 A HC(2) (*)’ (c) the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’ ‘Palma de Mallorca ES PMI 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O’ (d) the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ ‘Vitoria ES VIT 4 A Productos HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2) Animales U, E, O’
(a) the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’ ‘Almeria (*) ES LEI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) O (*)’
‘Almeria (*) ES LEI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) O (*)’
(b) the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’ ‘Asturias (*) ES AST 4 A HC(2) (*)’
‘Asturias (*) ES AST 4 A HC(2) (*)’
(c) the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’ ‘Palma de Mallorca ES PMI 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O’
‘Palma de Mallorca ES PMI 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O’
(d) the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ ‘Vitoria ES VIT 4 A Productos HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2) Animales U, E, O’
‘Vitoria ES VIT 4 A Productos HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)
Animales U, E, O’
(a) the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’ ‘Almeria (*) ES LEI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) O (*)’
‘Almeria (*) ES LEI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) O (*)’
‘Almeria (*) ES LEI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) O (*)’
(b) the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’ ‘Asturias (*) ES AST 4 A HC(2) (*)’
‘Asturias (*) ES AST 4 A HC(2) (*)’
‘Asturias (*) ES AST 4 A HC(2) (*)’
(c) the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’ ‘Palma de Mallorca ES PMI 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O’
‘Palma de Mallorca ES PMI 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O’
‘Palma de Mallorca ES PMI 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O’
(d) the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ ‘Vitoria ES VIT 4 A Productos HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2) Animales U, E, O’
‘Vitoria ES VIT 4 A Productos HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)
Animales U, E, O’
‘Vitoria ES VIT 4 A Productos HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)
Animales U, E, O’
4. The part concerning France is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted;(b)the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’(c)the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’(d)the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ (a) the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted; (b) the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ ‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry FR LIO 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ (c) the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’ ‘Marseille Aéroport FR MRS 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT’ (d) the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ ‘Nice FR NCE 4 A HC-T(CH) (1) (2) O (14)’
(a) the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted;
(b) the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ ‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry FR LIO 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’
‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry FR LIO 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’
(c) the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’ ‘Marseille Aéroport FR MRS 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT’
‘Marseille Aéroport FR MRS 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT’
(d) the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ ‘Nice FR NCE 4 A HC-T(CH) (1) (2) O (14)’
‘Nice FR NCE 4 A HC-T(CH) (1) (2) O (14)’
(a) the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted;
(b) the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ ‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry FR LIO 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’
‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry FR LIO 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’
‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry FR LIO 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’
(c) the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’ ‘Marseille Aéroport FR MRS 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT’
‘Marseille Aéroport FR MRS 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT’
‘Marseille Aéroport FR MRS 4 A HC-T(1), HC-NT’
(d) the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ ‘Nice FR NCE 4 A HC-T(CH) (1) (2) O (14)’
‘Nice FR NCE 4 A HC-T(CH) (1) (2) O (14)’
‘Nice FR NCE 4 A HC-T(CH) (1) (2) O (14)’
5. The part concerning Italy is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’(b)the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’(c)the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’(d)the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’(e)the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’(f)the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ (a) the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’ ‘Milano-Linate IT LIN 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O (*)’ (b) the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’ ‘Milano-Malpensa IT MXP 4 A Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA HC(2), NHC(2) SEA U, E Cargo City MLE HC, NHC (*) O’ (c) the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’ ‘Napoli IT NAP 1 P Molo Bausan HC, NHC-NT’ (d) the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’ ‘Palermo (*) IT PMO 4 A HC-T (*)’ (e) the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’ ‘Reggio Calabria (*) IT REG 4 A HC (*), NHC (*)’ (f) the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ ‘Rimini (*) IT RMI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’
(a) the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’ ‘Milano-Linate IT LIN 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O (*)’
‘Milano-Linate IT LIN 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O (*)’
(b) the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’ ‘Milano-Malpensa IT MXP 4 A Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA HC(2), NHC(2) SEA U, E Cargo City MLE HC, NHC (*) O’
‘Milano-Malpensa IT MXP 4 A Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA HC(2), NHC(2)
SEA U, E
Cargo City MLE HC, NHC (*) O’
(c) the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’ ‘Napoli IT NAP 1 P Molo Bausan HC, NHC-NT’
‘Napoli IT NAP 1 P Molo Bausan HC, NHC-NT’
(d) the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’ ‘Palermo (*) IT PMO 4 A HC-T (*)’
‘Palermo (*) IT PMO 4 A HC-T (*)’
(e) the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’ ‘Reggio Calabria (*) IT REG 4 A HC (*), NHC (*)’
‘Reggio Calabria (*) IT REG 4 A HC (*), NHC (*)’
(f) the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ ‘Rimini (*) IT RMI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’
‘Rimini (*) IT RMI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’
(a) the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’ ‘Milano-Linate IT LIN 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O (*)’
‘Milano-Linate IT LIN 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O (*)’
‘Milano-Linate IT LIN 4 A HC(2), NHC(2) O (*)’
(b) the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’ ‘Milano-Malpensa IT MXP 4 A Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA HC(2), NHC(2) SEA U, E Cargo City MLE HC, NHC (*) O’
‘Milano-Malpensa IT MXP 4 A Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA HC(2), NHC(2)
SEA U, E
Cargo City MLE HC, NHC (*) O’
‘Milano-Malpensa IT MXP 4 A Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA HC(2), NHC(2)
SEA U, E
Cargo City MLE HC, NHC (*) O’
(c) the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’ ‘Napoli IT NAP 1 P Molo Bausan HC, NHC-NT’
‘Napoli IT NAP 1 P Molo Bausan HC, NHC-NT’
‘Napoli IT NAP 1 P Molo Bausan HC, NHC-NT’
(d) the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’ ‘Palermo (*) IT PMO 4 A HC-T (*)’
‘Palermo (*) IT PMO 4 A HC-T (*)’
‘Palermo (*) IT PMO 4 A HC-T (*)’
(e) the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’ ‘Reggio Calabria (*) IT REG 4 A HC (*), NHC (*)’
‘Reggio Calabria (*) IT REG 4 A HC (*), NHC (*)’
‘Reggio Calabria (*) IT REG 4 A HC (*), NHC (*)’
(f) the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ ‘Rimini (*) IT RMI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’
‘Rimini (*) IT RMI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’
‘Rimini (*) IT RMI 4 A HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’
6. The part concerning Latvia is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’(b)the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted. (a) the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ ‘Riga (Riga port) LV RIX 1a P HC(2), NHC(2) Kravu termināls HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ (b) the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted.
(a) the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ ‘Riga (Riga port) LV RIX 1a P HC(2), NHC(2) Kravu termināls HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
‘Riga (Riga port) LV RIX 1a P HC(2), NHC(2)
Kravu termināls HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
(b) the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted.
(a) the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ ‘Riga (Riga port) LV RIX 1a P HC(2), NHC(2) Kravu termināls HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
‘Riga (Riga port) LV RIX 1a P HC(2), NHC(2)
Kravu termināls HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
‘Riga (Riga port) LV RIX 1a P HC(2), NHC(2)
Kravu termināls HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
(b) the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted.
7. In the part concerning Netherlands, the entry for the port at Rotterdam is replaced by the following:‘RotterdamNL RTM 1PEurofrigo KarimatastraatHC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NTEurofrigo, Abel TasmanstraatHCFrigocare Rotterdam B.V.HC-T(FR)(2)WibacoHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ ‘Rotterdam NL RTM 1 P Eurofrigo Karimatastraat HC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NT Eurofrigo, Abel Tasmanstraat HC Frigocare Rotterdam B.V. HC-T(FR)(2) Wibaco HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
‘Rotterdam NL RTM 1 P Eurofrigo Karimatastraat HC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NT
Eurofrigo, Abel Tasmanstraat HC
Frigocare Rotterdam B.V. HC-T(FR)(2)
Wibaco HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
‘Rotterdam NL RTM 1 P Eurofrigo Karimatastraat HC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NT
Eurofrigo, Abel Tasmanstraat HC
Frigocare Rotterdam B.V. HC-T(FR)(2)
Wibaco HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’
8. The part concerning Poland is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’(b)the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ (a) the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’ ‘Gdańsk PL GDN 1 P IC 1 HC(2), NHC IC 2 HC(2), NHC(2)’ (b) the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ ‘Gdynia PL GDY 1 P IC 1 HC, NHC U, E, O’
(a) the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’ ‘Gdańsk PL GDN 1 P IC 1 HC(2), NHC IC 2 HC(2), NHC(2)’
‘Gdańsk PL GDN 1 P IC 1 HC(2), NHC
IC 2 HC(2), NHC(2)’
(b) the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ ‘Gdynia PL GDY 1 P IC 1 HC, NHC U, E, O’
‘Gdynia PL GDY 1 P IC 1 HC, NHC U, E, O’
(a) the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’ ‘Gdańsk PL GDN 1 P IC 1 HC(2), NHC IC 2 HC(2), NHC(2)’
‘Gdańsk PL GDN 1 P IC 1 HC(2), NHC
IC 2 HC(2), NHC(2)’
‘Gdańsk PL GDN 1 P IC 1 HC(2), NHC
IC 2 HC(2), NHC(2)’
(b) the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ ‘Gdynia PL GDY 1 P IC 1 HC, NHC U, E, O’
‘Gdynia PL GDY 1 P IC 1 HC, NHC U, E, O’
‘Gdynia PL GDY 1 P IC 1 HC, NHC U, E, O’
1. In the part concerning Denmark, the entries for the current three regional units NORD, SYD, ØST and the local units are replaced by the following:‘DK00001REGION VESTDK00800HADERSLEVDK00900ESBJERGDK01000VEJLEDK01100HERNINGDK01200ÅRHUSDK01300VIBORGDK01400AALBORGDK00002REGION ØSTDK00100RØDOVREDK00400RINGSTEDDK00700ODENSE’ DK00800 HADERSLEV DK00900 ESBJERG DK01000 VEJLE DK01100 HERNING DK01200 ÅRHUS DK01300 VIBORG DK01400 AALBORG DK00100 RØDOVRE DK00400 RINGSTED DK00700 ODENSE’
DK00800 HADERSLEV
DK00900 ESBJERG
DK01000 VEJLE
DK01100 HERNING
DK01200 ÅRHUS
DK01300 VIBORG
DK01400 AALBORG
DK00100 RØDOVRE
DK00400 RINGSTED
DK00700 ODENSE’
DK00800 HADERSLEV
DK00900 ESBJERG
DK01000 VEJLE
DK01100 HERNING
DK01200 ÅRHUS
DK01300 VIBORG
DK01400 AALBORG
DK00100 RØDOVRE
DK00400 RINGSTED
DK00700 ODENSE’
2. In the part concerning Germany, the entry for ‘NIEDERSACHSEN’ is amended as follows:(a)ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’(b)BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’(c)WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ (a) ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ ‘DE14103 ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ (b) BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ ‘DE46103 BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ (c) WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ ‘DE46903 WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
(a) ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ ‘DE14103 ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
‘DE14103 ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
(b) BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ ‘DE46103 BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
‘DE46103 BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
(c) WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ ‘DE46903 WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
‘DE46903 WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
(a) ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ ‘DE14103 ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
‘DE14103 ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
‘DE14103 ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
(b) BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ ‘DE46103 BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
‘DE46103 BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
‘DE46103 BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
(c) WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ ‘DE46903 WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
‘DE46903 WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
‘DE46903 WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
3. In the part concerning Ireland, the following entries for the local units are deleted:‘IE00100CARLOWIE00300CLAREIE01000KILKENNYIE01400LONGFORDIE01500LOUTHIE02100TIPPERARY NORTHIE01200SLIGO’ ‘IE00100 CARLOW IE00300 CLARE IE01000 KILKENNY IE01400 LONGFORD IE01500 LOUTH IE02100 TIPPERARY NORTH IE01200 SLIGO’
‘IE00100 CARLOW
IE00300 CLARE
IE01000 KILKENNY
IE01400 LONGFORD
IE01500 LOUTH
IE02100 TIPPERARY NORTH
IE01200 SLIGO’
‘IE00100 CARLOW
IE00300 CLARE
IE01000 KILKENNY
IE01400 LONGFORD
IE01500 LOUTH
IE02100 TIPPERARY NORTH
IE01200 SLIGO’
4. In the part concerning Italy in the region of ‘LOMBARDIA’, the entry for the local unit MILANO 3 is replaced by the following:‘IT02903MONZA e BRIANZA’ ‘IT02903 MONZA e BRIANZA’
‘IT02903 MONZA e BRIANZA’
‘IT02903 MONZA e BRIANZA’
5. The part concerning Latvia is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’(b)the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ (a) the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’ ‘LV00028 RIGA-MN’ (b) the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ ‘LV00030 BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
(a) the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’ ‘LV00028 RIGA-MN’
‘LV00028 RIGA-MN’
(b) the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ ‘LV00030 BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
‘LV00030 BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
(a) the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’ ‘LV00028 RIGA-MN’
‘LV00028 RIGA-MN’
‘LV00028 RIGA-MN’
(b) the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ ‘LV00030 BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
‘LV00030 BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
‘LV00030 BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
6. The part concerning Finland is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’(b)the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ (a) the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ ‘FI00000 ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ (b) the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ ‘FI00100 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI FI00200 LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO FI00300 AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO FI00400 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA FI00402 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE FI00500 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA FI00600 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI FI00700 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU FI00800 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO FI00900 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ FI01000 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA FI01100 POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO FI01200 LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
(a) the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ ‘FI00000 ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
‘FI00000 ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
(b) the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ ‘FI00100 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI FI00200 LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO FI00300 AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO FI00400 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA FI00402 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE FI00500 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA FI00600 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI FI00700 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU FI00800 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO FI00900 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ FI01000 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA FI01100 POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO FI01200 LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
‘FI00100 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI
FI00200 LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI00300 AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO
FI00400 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA
FI00402 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE
FI00500 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA
FI00600 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI
FI00700 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU
FI00800 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO
FI00900 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ
FI01000 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA
FI01100 POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI01200 LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
(a) the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ ‘FI00000 ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
‘FI00000 ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
‘FI00000 ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
(b) the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ ‘FI00100 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI FI00200 LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO FI00300 AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO FI00400 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA FI00402 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE FI00500 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA FI00600 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI FI00700 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU FI00800 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO FI00900 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ FI01000 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA FI01100 POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO FI01200 LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
‘FI00100 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI
FI00200 LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI00300 AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO
FI00400 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA
FI00402 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE
FI00500 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA
FI00600 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI
FI00700 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU
FI00800 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO
FI00900 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ
FI01000 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA
FI01100 POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI01200 LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
‘FI00100 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI
FI00200 LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI00300 AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO
FI00400 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA
FI00402 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE
FI00500 ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA
FI00600 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI
FI00700 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU
FI00800 ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO
FI00900 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ
FI01000 LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA
FI01100 POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI01200 LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 20(1) and (3) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(2), and in particular the last sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 6(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
(1) Commission Decision 2009/821/EC of 28 September 2009 drawing up a list of approved border inspection posts, laying down certain rules on the inspections carried out by Commission veterinary experts and laying down the veterinary units in Traces(4)lays down a list of border inspection posts approved in accordance with Directives 91/496/EEC and 97/78/EC. That list is set out in Annex I to that Decision.
(2) The Commission inspection service, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out an inspection at the border inspection post at the port of Antwerp in Belgium. The results of the inspection were satisfactory. An additional inspection centre should therefore be added for that border inspection post in the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, the categories of the existing inspection centres at this border inspection post should be amended.
(3) The Commission inspection service, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out an inspection at the border inspection post at the port of Gdańsk in Poland. The results of the inspection were satisfactory. An additional inspection centre should therefore be added for that border inspection post in the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(4) Following communications from Denmark and Poland, certain inspection centres at border inspection posts for those Member States should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(5) Following communication from France, the border inspection post at Brest airport should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, certain categories at the border inspection posts at the airports at Lyon-Saint Exupéry, Marseille aéroport and Nice should be modified in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(6) Following communication from Italy, certain categories at the border inspection posts at the airports at Milano-Linate, Milano-Malpensa, Palermo, Reggio Calabria and Rimini should be suspended in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, certain categories at the border inspection post at the port at Napoli should be modified in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(7) Following communication from Latvia, the border inspection post at the port of Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, the listing of the categories for the two inspection centres at the approved border inspection post at Riga port should be corrected in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(8) Following communication from Spain, the list of border inspection posts for that Member State should be amended to take account of the suspension of two of its border inspection posts, of lifting the suspension for certain categories of products of animal origin that can be checked at one of its border inspection posts and of limiting the approval categories for products of animal origin at another one of its border inspection posts already approved in accordance with Decision 2009/821/EC.
(9) Following communication from the Netherlands, the name of one Inspection Centre at the port of Rotterdam should be amended in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(10) The list of central units, regional units and local units in Traces is laid down in Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(11) Following communications from Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Latvia and Finland, certain changes to the central, regional and local units in Traces should be reflected in the Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC for those Member States.
(12) Decision 2009/821/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC is amended in accordance with Annex I to this Decision.
2. Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Decision.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), and in particular Article 20(1) and (3) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(2), and in particular the last sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 6(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
(1) Commission Decision 2009/821/EC of 28 September 2009 drawing up a list of approved border inspection posts, laying down certain rules on the inspections carried out by Commission veterinary experts and laying down the veterinary units in Traces(4)lays down a list of border inspection posts approved in accordance with Directives 91/496/EEC and 97/78/EC. That list is set out in Annex I to that Decision.
(2) The Commission inspection service, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out an inspection at the border inspection post at the port of Antwerp in Belgium. The results of the inspection were satisfactory. An additional inspection centre should therefore be added for that border inspection post in the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, the categories of the existing inspection centres at this border inspection post should be amended.
(3) The Commission inspection service, the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out an inspection at the border inspection post at the port of Gdańsk in Poland. The results of the inspection were satisfactory. An additional inspection centre should therefore be added for that border inspection post in the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(4) Following communications from Denmark and Poland, certain inspection centres at border inspection posts for those Member States should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(5) Following communication from France, the border inspection post at Brest airport should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, certain categories at the border inspection posts at the airports at Lyon-Saint Exupéry, Marseille aéroport and Nice should be modified in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(6) Following communication from Italy, certain categories at the border inspection posts at the airports at Milano-Linate, Milano-Malpensa, Palermo, Reggio Calabria and Rimini should be suspended in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, certain categories at the border inspection post at the port at Napoli should be modified in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(7) Following communication from Latvia, the border inspection post at the port of Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) should be deleted from the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC. In addition, the listing of the categories for the two inspection centres at the approved border inspection post at Riga port should be corrected in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(8) Following communication from Spain, the list of border inspection posts for that Member State should be amended to take account of the suspension of two of its border inspection posts, of lifting the suspension for certain categories of products of animal origin that can be checked at one of its border inspection posts and of limiting the approval categories for products of animal origin at another one of its border inspection posts already approved in accordance with Decision 2009/821/EC.
(9) Following communication from the Netherlands, the name of one Inspection Centre at the port of Rotterdam should be amended in the list of border inspection posts set out in Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(10) The list of central units, regional units and local units in Traces is laid down in Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC.
(11) Following communications from Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Latvia and Finland, certain changes to the central, regional and local units in Traces should be reflected in the Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC for those Member States.
(12) Decision 2009/821/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(13) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. Annex I to Decision 2009/821/EC is amended in accordance with Annex I to this Decision.
2. Annex II to Decision 2009/821/EC is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEX IAnnex I is amended as follows:

1. | In the part concerning Belgium, the entry for the port at Antwerp is replaced by the following:‘AntwerpenAnversBE ANR 1PGIP LOHC(2), NHCKaai 650HC(2)AfrulogHC(2), NHC’ | ‘AntwerpenAnvers | BE ANR 1 | P | GIP LO | HC(2), NHC | | Kaai 650 | HC(2) | | Afrulog | HC(2), NHC’ |
‘AntwerpenAnvers | BE ANR 1 | P | GIP LO | HC(2), NHC |
Kaai 650 | HC(2) |
Afrulog | HC(2), NHC’ |
2. | In the part concerning Denmark, the entry of the inspection centre Centre 1, SAS 1 (North) for the airport at København is deleted.
3. | The part concerning Spain is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’(b)the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’(c)the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’(d)the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ | (a) | the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’ | ‘Almeria (*) | ES LEI 4 | A | | HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) | O (*)’ | (b) | the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’ | ‘Asturias (*) | ES AST 4 | A | | HC(2) (*)’ | | (c) | the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’ | ‘Palma de Mallorca | ES PMI 4 | A | | HC(2), NHC(2) | O’ | (d) | the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ | ‘Vitoria | ES VIT 4 | A | Productos | HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2) | | Animales | | U, E, O’
(a) | the entry for the airport at Almeria is replaced by the following:‘Almeria (*)ES LEI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)O (*)’ | ‘Almeria (*) | ES LEI 4 | A | | HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) | O (*)’
‘Almeria (*) | ES LEI 4 | A | | HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*) | O (*)’
(b) | the entry for the airport at Asturias is replaced by the following:‘Asturias (*)ES AST 4AHC(2) (*)’ | ‘Asturias (*) | ES AST 4 | A | | HC(2) (*)’ |
‘Asturias (*) | ES AST 4 | A | | HC(2) (*)’ |
(c) | the entry for the airport at Palma de Mallorca is replaced by the following:‘Palma de MallorcaES PMI 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O’ | ‘Palma de Mallorca | ES PMI 4 | A | | HC(2), NHC(2) | O’
‘Palma de Mallorca | ES PMI 4 | A | | HC(2), NHC(2) | O’
(d) | the entry for the airport at Vitoria is replaced by the following:‘VitoriaES VIT 4AProductosHC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2)AnimalesU, E, O’ | ‘Vitoria | ES VIT 4 | A | Productos | HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2) | | Animales | | U, E, O’
‘Vitoria | ES VIT 4 | A | Productos | HC(2), NHC-NT(2), NHC-T(CH)(2) |
Animales | | U, E, O’
4. | The part concerning France is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted;(b)the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’(c)the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’(d)the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ | (a) | the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted; | (b) | the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ | ‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry | FR LIO 4 | A | | HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ | | (c) | the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’ | ‘Marseille Aéroport | FR MRS 4 | A | | HC-T(1), HC-NT’ | | (d) | the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ | ‘Nice | FR NCE 4 | A | | HC-T(CH) (1) (2) | O (14)’
(a) | the entry for the border inspection post at Brest airport is deleted;
(b) | the entry for the airport at Lyon-Saint Exupéry is replaced by the following:‘Lyon-Saint ExupéryFR LIO 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ | ‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry | FR LIO 4 | A | | HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ |
‘Lyon-Saint Exupéry | FR LIO 4 | A | | HC-T(1), HC-NT, NHC’ |
(c) | the entry for the airport at Marseille is replaced by the following:‘Marseille AéroportFR MRS 4AHC-T(1), HC-NT’ | ‘Marseille Aéroport | FR MRS 4 | A | | HC-T(1), HC-NT’ |
‘Marseille Aéroport | FR MRS 4 | A | | HC-T(1), HC-NT’ |
(d) | the entry for the airport at Nice is replaced by the following:‘NiceFR NCE 4AHC-T(CH) (1) (2)O (14)’ | ‘Nice | FR NCE 4 | A | | HC-T(CH) (1) (2) | O (14)’
‘Nice | FR NCE 4 | A | | HC-T(CH) (1) (2) | O (14)’
5. | The part concerning Italy is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’(b)the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’(c)the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’(d)the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’(e)the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’(f)the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ | (a) | the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’ | ‘Milano-Linate | IT LIN 4 | A | | HC(2), NHC(2) | O (*)’ | (b) | the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’ | ‘Milano-Malpensa | IT MXP 4 | A | Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA | HC(2), NHC(2) | | SEA | | U, E | Cargo City MLE | HC, NHC (*) | O’ | (c) | the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’ | ‘Napoli | IT NAP 1 | P | Molo Bausan | HC, NHC-NT’ | | (d) | the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’ | ‘Palermo (*) | IT PMO 4 | A | | HC-T (*)’ | | (e) | the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’ | ‘Reggio Calabria (*) | IT REG 4 | A | | HC (*), NHC (*)’ | | (f) | the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ | ‘Rimini (*) | IT RMI 4 | A | | HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ |
(a) | the entry for the airport at Milano-Linate is replaced by the following:‘Milano-LinateIT LIN 4AHC(2), NHC(2)O (*)’ | ‘Milano-Linate | IT LIN 4 | A | | HC(2), NHC(2) | O (*)’
‘Milano-Linate | IT LIN 4 | A | | HC(2), NHC(2) | O (*)’
(b) | the entry for the airport at Milano-Malpensa is replaced by the following:‘Milano-MalpensaIT MXP 4AMagazzini aeroportuali ALHAHC(2), NHC(2)SEAU, ECargo City MLEHC, NHC (*)O’ | ‘Milano-Malpensa | IT MXP 4 | A | Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA | HC(2), NHC(2) | | SEA | | U, E | Cargo City MLE | HC, NHC (*) | O’
‘Milano-Malpensa | IT MXP 4 | A | Magazzini aeroportuali ALHA | HC(2), NHC(2) |
SEA | | U, E
Cargo City MLE | HC, NHC (*) | O’
(c) | the entry for the port at Napoli is replaced by the following:‘NapoliIT NAP 1PMolo BausanHC, NHC-NT’ | ‘Napoli | IT NAP 1 | P | Molo Bausan | HC, NHC-NT’ |
‘Napoli | IT NAP 1 | P | Molo Bausan | HC, NHC-NT’ |
(d) | the entry for the airport at Palermo is replaced by the following:‘Palermo (*)IT PMO 4AHC-T (*)’ | ‘Palermo (*) | IT PMO 4 | A | | HC-T (*)’ |
‘Palermo (*) | IT PMO 4 | A | | HC-T (*)’ |
(e) | the entry for the airport at Reggio Calabria is replaced by the following:‘Reggio Calabria (*)IT REG 4AHC (*), NHC (*)’ | ‘Reggio Calabria (*) | IT REG 4 | A | | HC (*), NHC (*)’ |
‘Reggio Calabria (*) | IT REG 4 | A | | HC (*), NHC (*)’ |
(f) | the entry for the airport at Rimini is replaced by the following:‘Rimini (*)IT RMI 4AHC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ | ‘Rimini (*) | IT RMI 4 | A | | HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ |
‘Rimini (*) | IT RMI 4 | A | | HC(2) (*), NHC(2) (*)’ |
6. | The part concerning Latvia is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’(b)the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted. | (a) | the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ | ‘Riga (Riga port) | LV RIX 1a | P | | HC(2), NHC(2) | | Kravu termināls | HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ | | (b) | the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted.
(a) | the entry for the port at Riga is replaced by the following:‘Riga (Riga port)LV RIX 1aPHC(2), NHC(2)Kravu terminālsHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ | ‘Riga (Riga port) | LV RIX 1a | P | | HC(2), NHC(2) | | Kravu termināls | HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ |
‘Riga (Riga port) | LV RIX 1a | P | | HC(2), NHC(2) |
Kravu termināls | HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ |
(b) | the entry for the border inspection post at Riga (Baltmarine Terminal) port is deleted.
7. | In the part concerning Netherlands, the entry for the port at Rotterdam is replaced by the following:‘RotterdamNL RTM 1PEurofrigo KarimatastraatHC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NTEurofrigo, Abel TasmanstraatHCFrigocare Rotterdam B.V.HC-T(FR)(2)WibacoHC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ | ‘Rotterdam | NL RTM 1 | P | Eurofrigo Karimatastraat | HC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NT | | Eurofrigo, Abel Tasmanstraat | HC | | Frigocare Rotterdam B.V. | HC-T(FR)(2) | | Wibaco | HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ |
‘Rotterdam | NL RTM 1 | P | Eurofrigo Karimatastraat | HC, NHC-T(FR), NHC-NT |
Eurofrigo, Abel Tasmanstraat | HC |
Frigocare Rotterdam B.V. | HC-T(FR)(2) |
Wibaco | HC-T(FR)(2), HC-NT(2)’ |
8. | The part concerning Poland is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’(b)the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ | (a) | the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’ | ‘Gdańsk | PL GDN 1 | P | IC 1 | HC(2), NHC | | IC 2 | HC(2), NHC(2)’ | | (b) | the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ | ‘Gdynia | PL GDY 1 | P | IC 1 | HC, NHC | U, E, O’
(a) | the entry for the port at Gdańsk is replaced by the following:‘GdańskPL GDN 1PIC 1HC(2), NHCIC 2HC(2), NHC(2)’ | ‘Gdańsk | PL GDN 1 | P | IC 1 | HC(2), NHC | | IC 2 | HC(2), NHC(2)’ |
‘Gdańsk | PL GDN 1 | P | IC 1 | HC(2), NHC |
IC 2 | HC(2), NHC(2)’ |
(b) | the entry for the port at Gdynia is replaced by the following:‘GdyniaPL GDY 1PIC 1HC, NHCU, E, O’ | ‘Gdynia | PL GDY 1 | P | IC 1 | HC, NHC | U, E, O’
‘Gdynia | PL GDY 1 | P | IC 1 | HC, NHC | U, E, O’

ANNEX IIAnnex II is amended as follows:

1. | In the part concerning Denmark, the entries for the current three regional units NORD, SYD, ØST and the local units are replaced by the following:‘DK00001REGION VESTDK00800HADERSLEVDK00900ESBJERGDK01000VEJLEDK01100HERNINGDK01200ÅRHUSDK01300VIBORGDK01400AALBORGDK00002REGION ØSTDK00100RØDOVREDK00400RINGSTEDDK00700ODENSE’ | DK00800 | HADERSLEV | DK00900 | ESBJERG | DK01000 | VEJLE | DK01100 | HERNING | DK01200 | ÅRHUS | DK01300 | VIBORG | DK01400 | AALBORG | DK00100 | RØDOVRE | DK00400 | RINGSTED | DK00700 | ODENSE’
DK00800 | HADERSLEV
DK00900 | ESBJERG
DK01000 | VEJLE
DK01100 | HERNING
DK01200 | ÅRHUS
DK01300 | VIBORG
DK01400 | AALBORG
DK00100 | RØDOVRE
DK00400 | RINGSTED
DK00700 | ODENSE’
2. | In the part concerning Germany, the entry for ‘NIEDERSACHSEN’ is amended as follows:(a)ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’(b)BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’(c)WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ | (a) | ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ | ‘DE14103 | ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ | (b) | BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ | ‘DE46103 | BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ | (c) | WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ | ‘DE46903 | WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
(a) | ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE14103ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’ | ‘DE14103 | ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
‘DE14103 | ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMT JADEWESER’
(b) | BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46103BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’ | ‘DE46103 | BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
‘DE46103 | BRAKE, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMP JADEWESER’
(c) | WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND JADE-WESER is replaced by the following:‘DE46903WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’ | ‘DE46903 | WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
‘DE46903 | WITTMUND, ZWECKVERBAND VETERINÄRAMPT JADEWESER’
3. | In the part concerning Ireland, the following entries for the local units are deleted:‘IE00100CARLOWIE00300CLAREIE01000KILKENNYIE01400LONGFORDIE01500LOUTHIE02100TIPPERARY NORTHIE01200SLIGO’ | ‘IE00100 | CARLOW | IE00300 | CLARE | IE01000 | KILKENNY | IE01400 | LONGFORD | IE01500 | LOUTH | IE02100 | TIPPERARY NORTH | IE01200 | SLIGO’
‘IE00100 | CARLOW
IE00300 | CLARE
IE01000 | KILKENNY
IE01400 | LONGFORD
IE01500 | LOUTH
IE02100 | TIPPERARY NORTH
IE01200 | SLIGO’
4. | In the part concerning Italy in the region of ‘LOMBARDIA’, the entry for the local unit MILANO 3 is replaced by the following:‘IT02903MONZA e BRIANZA’ | ‘IT02903 | MONZA e BRIANZA’
‘IT02903 | MONZA e BRIANZA’
5. | The part concerning Latvia is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’(b)the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ | (a) | the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’ | ‘LV00028 | RIGA-MN’ | (b) | the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ | ‘LV00030 | BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
(a) | the entry for the local unit RIGA (BFT) is replaced by the following:‘LV00028RIGA-MN’ | ‘LV00028 | RIGA-MN’
‘LV00028 | RIGA-MN’
(b) | the entry for the following local unit is deleted:‘LV00030BALTMARINE TERMINAL’ | ‘LV00030 | BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
‘LV00030 | BALTMARINE TERMINAL’
6. | The part concerning Finland is amended as follows:(a)the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’(b)the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ | (a) | the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ | ‘FI00000 | ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ | (b) | the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ | ‘FI00100 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI | FI00200 | LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO | FI00300 | AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO | FI00400 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA | FI00402 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE | FI00500 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA | FI00600 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI | FI00700 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU | FI00800 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO | FI00900 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ | FI01000 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA | FI01100 | POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO | FI01200 | LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
(a) | the entry for the central unit is replaced by the following:‘FI00000ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’ | ‘FI00000 | ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
‘FI00000 | ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRASTO EVIRA’
(b) | the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:‘FI00100ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKIFI00200LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI00300AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTOFI00400ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNAFI00402LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPEREFI00500ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLAFI00600ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELIFI00700ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUUFI00800ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIOFI00900LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄFI01000LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASAFI01100POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTOFI01200LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’ | ‘FI00100 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI | FI00200 | LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO | FI00300 | AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO | FI00400 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA | FI00402 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE | FI00500 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA | FI00600 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI | FI00700 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU | FI00800 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO | FI00900 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ | FI01000 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA | FI01100 | POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO | FI01200 | LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’
‘FI00100 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HELSINKI
FI00200 | LOUNAIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI00300 | AHVENANMAAN VALTIONVIRASTO
FI00400 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, HÄMEENLINNA
FI00402 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, TAMPERE
FI00500 | ETELÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KOUVOLA
FI00600 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, MIKKELI
FI00700 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JOENSUU
FI00800 | ITÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, KUOPIO
FI00900 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, JYVÄSKYLÄ
FI01000 | LÄNSI- JA SISÄ-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO, VAASA
FI01100 | POHJOIS-SUOMEN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO
FI01200 | LAPIN ALUEHALLINTOVIRASTO’

Pending: 32010D0270

12.5.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 118/56
(1) Article 10 of Directive 92/65/EEC lays down the animal health requirements governing trade in dogs, cats and ferrets.
(2) Part 1 of Annex E to that Directive sets out the model health certificate for trade in animals from holdings, including dogs, cats and ferrets.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)lays down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and the rules applying to checks on such movements. It applies to movements between Member States or from third countries of pet animals of the species listed in Annex I thereto. Dogs, cats and ferrets are listed in Parts A and B of that Annex.
(4) The requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 differ, depending on the Member State of destination and the Member State or third country of origin.
(5) Third countries that apply to non-commercial movement of pet animals rules at least equivalent to the rules provided for in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation.
(6) In order to avoid that commercial movements are fraudulently disguised as non-commercial movements of pet animals within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003, point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of that Regulation provides that the requirements and checks laid down in Directive 92/65/EEC are to apply to the movement of more than five pet animals where the animals are brought into the Union from a third country other than those listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation.
(7) In addition, Commission Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 of 6 May 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the maximum number of pet animals of certain species that may be the subject of non-commercial movement(3)provides that the requirements and checks referred to in point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are to apply also to the movement of pet dogs, cats and ferrets where the total number of animals moved into a Member State from another Member State or a third country listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation, exceeds five.
(8) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 also provides that for a transitional period the non-commercial movement of dogs, cats and ferrets into the territory of Ireland, Malta, Sweden or the United Kingdom is to be subject to certain additional requirements.
(9) Directive 92/65/EEC refers to those additional requirements only as regards trade in dogs, cats and ferrets destined for Ireland, Sweden or the United Kingdom.
(10) The models for the certificates for intra-Union trade should be compatible with the integrated computerised veterinary system ‘TRACES’ developed in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/623/EC(4).
(11) To ensure that the requirements and checks for non-commercial movements of more than five pet dogs, cats and ferrets into all Member States, including Malta, are applied in a uniform manner, it is necessary to adapt the model health certificate set out in Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
(12) In addition, the model health certificate for intra-Union trade in live bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombusspp.) is laid down in Part 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
(13) That certificate establishes animal health requirements as regards American foulbrood for both bees and bumble bees. These requirements allow only movements of bees and bumble bees from areas that are free of that disease. A 30-day standstill is provided in case of an outbreak and it is applied to an area of three kilometres around the outbreak.
(14) In most cases, however, bumble bees are bred in environmentally isolated structures that are regularly controlled by the competent authority and checked for the presence of diseases. Such establishments that are recognised by and under the supervision of the competent authority of the Member State concerned are not likely to be affected by the presence of American foulbrood in the three kilometres radius set out in Part 2 of Annex E in contrast with open air colonies.
(15) It is therefore necessary to amend the model health certificate for intra-Union trade in live bees and bumble bees in order to introduce specific animal health requirements concerning the bumble bees bred in an environmentally isolated structure.
(16) Parts 1 and 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(17) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
1. Part 1 is replaced by the following:‘Part 1 —   Health Certificate for trade in animals from holdings (ungulates, birds, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)92/65 EIText of imagePart I: Details of consignment presentedEUROPEAN UNIONIntra trade certificateI.1. ConsignorNameAddressPostal codeI.2. Certificate reference numberI.2.a. Local reference number:I.3. Central Competent AuthorityI.4. Local Competent AuthorityI.5. ConsigneeNameAddressPostal codeI.6. No(s) of related original certificatesNo(s) of accompanying documentsI.7.I.8. Country of originISO codeI.9. Region of originCodeI.10. Country of destinationISO codeI.11. Region of destinationCodeI.12. Place of origin/Place of harvestHoldingNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.13. Place of destinationHoldingEstablishmentApproved bodySemen centreEmbryo teamOtherNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.14. Place of loadingPostal codeI.15. Date and time of departureI.16. Means of transportAeroplaneShipRailway wagonRoad vehicleOtherIdentification:I.17. TransporterNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeMember StateI.18. Animal species/productI.19. Commodity code (CN code)I.20. Number/quantityI.21.I.22. Number of packagesI.23. Identification of container/seal numberI.24.I.25. Animals certified as/products certified for:BreedingFatteningArtificial reproductionSlaughterPetsApproved bodyI.26. Transit through third countryThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeEntry pointBIP unit no.:I.27. Transit through Member StatesMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeI.28. ExportThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeI.29. Estimated journey timeI.30. Route planYesNoI.31. Identification of the animalsSpecies(Scientific name)Identification systemIdentification numberSexAgeQuantityText of imagePart II: CertificationCOUNTRY92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)II. Health informationII.a. Certificate reference numberII.b.I, the undersigned official veterinarian (1)/veterinarian responsible for the establishment of origin and approved by the competent authority certify that:either (1)[II.1 at the time of inspection the above animals were fit to be transported on the intended journey in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005.]or (1)[II.1 at the time of inspection the pet dogs (1)/cats (1)/ferrets (1) were fit to travel;]II.2 the conditions of Article 4 of Council Directive 92/65/EEC are fulfilled.either (1)[II.3.1 ruminant(s) (1)/Suidae (1) other than that/those covered by Directive 64/432/EEC:(a) belong(s) to the species … ;(b) at the time of examination, do(does) not show any clinical sign of any disease to which it/they is/are susceptible;(c) come(s) from an officially tuberculosis-free (1)/officially brucellosis-free (1) or brucellosis-free (1) herd (1)/holding (1) not subject to swine fever restrictions or from a holding where it/they was/were subjected with negative results to the test(s) laid down in Article 6(2)(b) of Directive 92/65/EEC.]or (1)[II.3.1 birds other than those referred to in Directive 90/539/EEC:(a) satisfy the requirements of Article 7 of Directive 92/65/EEC; and(b) at the time of examination do not show clinical signs of any disease to which the animals are susceptible.]or (1)[II.3.1 lagomorphs:(a) satisfy the requirements of Article 9 of Directive 92/65/EEC; and(b) at the time of examination do not show clinical signs of disease.]or (1)[II.3.1 dogs (1)/cats (1)/ferrets (1):either (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Article 10(2) of Directive 92/65/EEC, the requirements laid down in Articles 5 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;]or (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Article 10(3) of Directive 92/65/EEC, the requirements laid down in Articles 6 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;]or (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 388 /2010, the requirements laid down in Article 10(2) of Directive 92/65/EEC where the total number of pet animals moved for non-commercial purposes exceeds five;]or (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 388 /2010, the requirements laid down in Article 10(3) of Directive 92/65/EEC where the total number of pet animals moved for non-commercial purposes into Ireland, Malta, Sweden or the United Kingdom exceeds five;]and(b) underwent a clinical examination, within 24 hours of dispatch, by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority, and this examination showed the animals to be in good health.]II.4 The additional guarantees regarding diseases listed in Annex B(2)to Directive 92/65/EEC are as follows: (1)DiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionNotesPart I:Box reference I.5:Not applicable to movements for non-commercial purposes of pet animals (dogs, cats and ferrets) exceeding the number of five.Box reference I.6:No(s) of accompanying documents: CITES, if applicable.Box reference I.19:Use the appropriate HS code: 01.06.19, 01.06.31, 01.06.32, 01.06.39.Box reference I.31:Identification: individual identification must be used wherever possible but in the case of small animals, batch identification may be used.Text of imageCOUNTRY92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)II. Health informationII.a. Certificate reference numberII.b.Part II:(1) Delete as necessary.(2) As requested by a Member State benefiting from additional guarantees under Union legislation.The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.Official/approved veterinarianName (in capital letters):Qualification and title:Date:Signature:Stamp:’
2. Part 2 is replaced by the following:‘Part 2 —   Health certificate for trade in bees and bumble bees92/65 EIIText of imagePart I: Details ofconsinment presentedEUROPEAN UNIONIntra trade certificateI.1. ConsignorNameAddressPostal codeI.2. Certificate reference numberI.2.a. Local reference number:I.3. Central Competent AuthorityI.4. Local Competent AuthorityI.5. ConsigneeNameAddressPostal codeI.6.I.7.I.8. Country of originISO codeI.9.I.10. Country of destinationISO codeI.11.I.12. Place of origin/Place of harvestHoldingOtherNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.13. Place of origin/Place of harvestHoldingOtherNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.14. Place of loadingPostal codeI.15. Date and time of departureI.16. Means of transportAeroplaneShipRailway wagonRoad vehicleOtherIdentification:I.17.I.18. Animal species/productI.19. Commodity code (CN code)01.06.90I.20. Number/quantityI.21.I.22. Number of packagesI.23. Identification of container/seal numberI.24.I.25. Animals certified as/products certified for:BreedingTranshumanceI.26. Transit through third countryThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeEntry pointBIP unit no.:I.27. Transit through Member StatesMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeI.28. ExportThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeI.29.I.30.I.31. Identification of the animalsSpecies(Scientific name)QuantityBatch numberText of imagePart II: CertificationCOUNTRY92/65 EII Bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombus spp.)II. Health informationII.a. Certificate reference numberII.b.I, the undersigned certify that:II.1either (2)[(a) the bees/bumble bees (2) come from an area which is not subject of the prohibition order associated with an occurrence of American foulbrood (the period of prohibition has been continued for at least 30 days following the last recorded case and the date of which all hives within a radius of three kilometres have been checked by the competent authority and all infected hives burned or treated and inspected to the satisfaction of the said competent authority);]or (2)[(a) the bumble bees come from an environmentally isolated structure recognised by and under the supervision of the competent authority of the Member State which is free of American foulbrood and was inspected immediately prior to dispatch and all bumble bees and breeding stock show no clinical signs or suspicion of the disease;]and(b) the bees/bumble bees (2) come from an area of at least 100 km radius which is not the subject of any restrictions associated with the suspicion or confirmed occurrence of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) or the Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilaelaps spp.), and where these infestations are absent;and(c) the bees/bumble bees (2) as well as their packaging have undergone a visual examination to detect the occurrence of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) or their eggs and larvae, or other infestations, in particular the Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilaelaps spp.), affecting bees.II.2the additional guarantees regarding diseases listed in Annex B (1) to Directive 92/65/EEC are as follows (2):DiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionNotesPart I:Box reference I.31:Species: introduce Apis mellifera or Bombus spp.Quantity: provide the number of colonies.Batch number: provide the number of seals where applicable.Part II:(1) As requested by a Member State benefiting from additional guarantees under Union legislation.(2) Delete as necessary.The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.Approved veterinarian or approved officialName (in capital letters):Qualification and title:Date:Signature:Stamp:’
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(1), and in particular the first paragraph of Article 22 thereof,
(1) Article 10 of Directive 92/65/EEC lays down the animal health requirements governing trade in dogs, cats and ferrets.
(2) Part 1 of Annex E to that Directive sets out the model health certificate for trade in animals from holdings, including dogs, cats and ferrets.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)lays down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and the rules applying to checks on such movements. It applies to movements between Member States or from third countries of pet animals of the species listed in Annex I thereto. Dogs, cats and ferrets are listed in Parts A and B of that Annex.
(4) The requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 differ, depending on the Member State of destination and the Member State or third country of origin.
(5) Third countries that apply to non-commercial movement of pet animals rules at least equivalent to the rules provided for in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation.
(6) In order to avoid that commercial movements are fraudulently disguised as non-commercial movements of pet animals within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003, point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of that Regulation provides that the requirements and checks laid down in Directive 92/65/EEC are to apply to the movement of more than five pet animals where the animals are brought into the Union from a third country other than those listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation.
(7) In addition, Commission Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 of 6 May 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the maximum number of pet animals of certain species that may be the subject of non-commercial movement(3)provides that the requirements and checks referred to in point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are to apply also to the movement of pet dogs, cats and ferrets where the total number of animals moved into a Member State from another Member State or a third country listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation, exceeds five.
(8) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 also provides that for a transitional period the non-commercial movement of dogs, cats and ferrets into the territory of Ireland, Malta, Sweden or the United Kingdom is to be subject to certain additional requirements.
(9) Directive 92/65/EEC refers to those additional requirements only as regards trade in dogs, cats and ferrets destined for Ireland, Sweden or the United Kingdom.
(10) The models for the certificates for intra-Union trade should be compatible with the integrated computerised veterinary system ‘TRACES’ developed in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/623/EC(4).
(11) To ensure that the requirements and checks for non-commercial movements of more than five pet dogs, cats and ferrets into all Member States, including Malta, are applied in a uniform manner, it is necessary to adapt the model health certificate set out in Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
(12) In addition, the model health certificate for intra-Union trade in live bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombusspp.) is laid down in Part 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
(13) That certificate establishes animal health requirements as regards American foulbrood for both bees and bumble bees. These requirements allow only movements of bees and bumble bees from areas that are free of that disease. A 30-day standstill is provided in case of an outbreak and it is applied to an area of three kilometres around the outbreak.
(14) In most cases, however, bumble bees are bred in environmentally isolated structures that are regularly controlled by the competent authority and checked for the presence of diseases. Such establishments that are recognised by and under the supervision of the competent authority of the Member State concerned are not likely to be affected by the presence of American foulbrood in the three kilometres radius set out in Part 2 of Annex E in contrast with open air colonies.
(15) It is therefore necessary to amend the model health certificate for intra-Union trade in live bees and bumble bees in order to introduce specific animal health requirements concerning the bumble bees bred in an environmentally isolated structure.
(16) Parts 1 and 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(17) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(1), and in particular the first paragraph of Article 22 thereof,
(1) Article 10 of Directive 92/65/EEC lays down the animal health requirements governing trade in dogs, cats and ferrets.
(2) Part 1 of Annex E to that Directive sets out the model health certificate for trade in animals from holdings, including dogs, cats and ferrets.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)lays down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and the rules applying to checks on such movements. It applies to movements between Member States or from third countries of pet animals of the species listed in Annex I thereto. Dogs, cats and ferrets are listed in Parts A and B of that Annex.
(4) The requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 differ, depending on the Member State of destination and the Member State or third country of origin.
(5) Third countries that apply to non-commercial movement of pet animals rules at least equivalent to the rules provided for in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation.
(6) In order to avoid that commercial movements are fraudulently disguised as non-commercial movements of pet animals within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003, point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of that Regulation provides that the requirements and checks laid down in Directive 92/65/EEC are to apply to the movement of more than five pet animals where the animals are brought into the Union from a third country other than those listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation.
(7) In addition, Commission Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 of 6 May 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the maximum number of pet animals of certain species that may be the subject of non-commercial movement(3)provides that the requirements and checks referred to in point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are to apply also to the movement of pet dogs, cats and ferrets where the total number of animals moved into a Member State from another Member State or a third country listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to that Regulation, exceeds five.
(8) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 also provides that for a transitional period the non-commercial movement of dogs, cats and ferrets into the territory of Ireland, Malta, Sweden or the United Kingdom is to be subject to certain additional requirements.
(9) Directive 92/65/EEC refers to those additional requirements only as regards trade in dogs, cats and ferrets destined for Ireland, Sweden or the United Kingdom.
(10) The models for the certificates for intra-Union trade should be compatible with the integrated computerised veterinary system ‘TRACES’ developed in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/623/EC(4).
(11) To ensure that the requirements and checks for non-commercial movements of more than five pet dogs, cats and ferrets into all Member States, including Malta, are applied in a uniform manner, it is necessary to adapt the model health certificate set out in Part 1 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
(12) In addition, the model health certificate for intra-Union trade in live bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombusspp.) is laid down in Part 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
(13) That certificate establishes animal health requirements as regards American foulbrood for both bees and bumble bees. These requirements allow only movements of bees and bumble bees from areas that are free of that disease. A 30-day standstill is provided in case of an outbreak and it is applied to an area of three kilometres around the outbreak.
(14) In most cases, however, bumble bees are bred in environmentally isolated structures that are regularly controlled by the competent authority and checked for the presence of diseases. Such establishments that are recognised by and under the supervision of the competent authority of the Member State concerned are not likely to be affected by the presence of American foulbrood in the three kilometres radius set out in Part 2 of Annex E in contrast with open air colonies.
(15) It is therefore necessary to amend the model health certificate for intra-Union trade in live bees and bumble bees in order to introduce specific animal health requirements concerning the bumble bees bred in an environmentally isolated structure.
(16) Parts 1 and 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(17) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEXAnnex E to Directive 92/65/EEC is amended as follows:

1. | Part 1 is replaced by the following:‘Part 1 — Health Certificate for trade in animals from holdings (ungulates, birds, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)92/65 EIText of imagePart I: Details of consignment presentedEUROPEAN UNIONIntra trade certificateI.1. ConsignorNameAddressPostal codeI.2. Certificate reference numberI.2.a. Local reference number:I.3. Central Competent AuthorityI.4. Local Competent AuthorityI.5. ConsigneeNameAddressPostal codeI.6. No(s) of related original certificatesNo(s) of accompanying documentsI.7.I.8. Country of originISO codeI.9. Region of originCodeI.10. Country of destinationISO codeI.11. Region of destinationCodeI.12. Place of origin/Place of harvestHoldingNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.13. Place of destinationHoldingEstablishmentApproved bodySemen centreEmbryo teamOtherNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.14. Place of loadingPostal codeI.15. Date and time of departureI.16. Means of transportAeroplaneShipRailway wagonRoad vehicleOtherIdentification:I.17. TransporterNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeMember StateI.18. Animal species/productI.19. Commodity code (CN code)I.20. Number/quantityI.21.I.22. Number of packagesI.23. Identification of container/seal numberI.24.I.25. Animals certified as/products certified for:BreedingFatteningArtificial reproductionSlaughterPetsApproved bodyI.26. Transit through third countryThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeEntry pointBIP unit no.:I.27. Transit through Member StatesMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeI.28. ExportThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeI.29. Estimated journey timeI.30. Route planYesNoI.31. Identification of the animalsSpecies(Scientific name)Identification systemIdentification numberSexAgeQuantityText of imagePart II: CertificationCOUNTRY92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)II. Health informationII.a. Certificate reference numberII.b.I, the undersigned official veterinarian (1)/veterinarian responsible for the establishment of origin and approved by the competent authority certify that:either (1)[II.1 at the time of inspection the above animals were fit to be transported on the intended journey in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005.]or (1)[II.1 at the time of inspection the pet dogs (1)/cats (1)/ferrets (1) were fit to travel;]II.2 the conditions of Article 4 of Council Directive 92/65/EEC are fulfilled.either (1)[II.3.1 ruminant(s) (1)/Suidae (1) other than that/those covered by Directive 64/432/EEC:(a) belong(s) to the species … ;(b) at the time of examination, do(does) not show any clinical sign of any disease to which it/they is/are susceptible;(c) come(s) from an officially tuberculosis-free (1)/officially brucellosis-free (1) or brucellosis-free (1) herd (1)/holding (1) not subject to swine fever restrictions or from a holding where it/they was/were subjected with negative results to the test(s) laid down in Article 6(2)(b) of Directive 92/65/EEC.]or (1)[II.3.1 birds other than those referred to in Directive 90/539/EEC:(a) satisfy the requirements of Article 7 of Directive 92/65/EEC; and(b) at the time of examination do not show clinical signs of any disease to which the animals are susceptible.]or (1)[II.3.1 lagomorphs:(a) satisfy the requirements of Article 9 of Directive 92/65/EEC; and(b) at the time of examination do not show clinical signs of disease.]or (1)[II.3.1 dogs (1)/cats (1)/ferrets (1):either (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Article 10(2) of Directive 92/65/EEC, the requirements laid down in Articles 5 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;]or (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Article 10(3) of Directive 92/65/EEC, the requirements laid down in Articles 6 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003;]or (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 388 /2010, the requirements laid down in Article 10(2) of Directive 92/65/EEC where the total number of pet animals moved for non-commercial purposes exceeds five;]or (1)[(a) satisfy, in accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 388 /2010, the requirements laid down in Article 10(3) of Directive 92/65/EEC where the total number of pet animals moved for non-commercial purposes into Ireland, Malta, Sweden or the United Kingdom exceeds five;]and(b) underwent a clinical examination, within 24 hours of dispatch, by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority, and this examination showed the animals to be in good health.]II.4 The additional guarantees regarding diseases listed in Annex B(2)to Directive 92/65/EEC are as follows: (1)DiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionNotesPart I:Box reference I.5:Not applicable to movements for non-commercial purposes of pet animals (dogs, cats and ferrets) exceeding the number of five.Box reference I.6:No(s) of accompanying documents: CITES, if applicable.Box reference I.19:Use the appropriate HS code: 01.06.19, 01.06.31, 01.06.32, 01.06.39.Box reference I.31:Identification: individual identification must be used wherever possible but in the case of small animals, batch identification may be used.Text of imageCOUNTRY92/65 EI Animals from holdings (ungulates, birds, lagomorphs, dogs, cats and ferrets)II. Health informationII.a. Certificate reference numberII.b.Part II:(1) Delete as necessary.(2) As requested by a Member State benefiting from additional guarantees under Union legislation.The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.Official/approved veterinarianName (in capital letters):Qualification and title:Date:Signature:Stamp:’
2. | Part 2 is replaced by the following:‘Part 2 — Health certificate for trade in bees and bumble bees92/65 EIIText of imagePart I: Details ofconsinment presentedEUROPEAN UNIONIntra trade certificateI.1. ConsignorNameAddressPostal codeI.2. Certificate reference numberI.2.a. Local reference number:I.3. Central Competent AuthorityI.4. Local Competent AuthorityI.5. ConsigneeNameAddressPostal codeI.6.I.7.I.8. Country of originISO codeI.9.I.10. Country of destinationISO codeI.11.I.12. Place of origin/Place of harvestHoldingOtherNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.13. Place of origin/Place of harvestHoldingOtherNameApproval numberAddressPostal codeI.14. Place of loadingPostal codeI.15. Date and time of departureI.16. Means of transportAeroplaneShipRailway wagonRoad vehicleOtherIdentification:I.17.I.18. Animal species/productI.19. Commodity code (CN code)01.06.90I.20. Number/quantityI.21.I.22. Number of packagesI.23. Identification of container/seal numberI.24.I.25. Animals certified as/products certified for:BreedingTranshumanceI.26. Transit through third countryThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeEntry pointBIP unit no.:I.27. Transit through Member StatesMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeMember StateISO codeI.28. ExportThird countryISO codeExit pointCodeI.29.I.30.I.31. Identification of the animalsSpecies(Scientific name)QuantityBatch numberText of imagePart II: CertificationCOUNTRY92/65 EII Bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombus spp.)II. Health informationII.a. Certificate reference numberII.b.I, the undersigned certify that:II.1either (2)[(a) the bees/bumble bees (2) come from an area which is not subject of the prohibition order associated with an occurrence of American foulbrood (the period of prohibition has been continued for at least 30 days following the last recorded case and the date of which all hives within a radius of three kilometres have been checked by the competent authority and all infected hives burned or treated and inspected to the satisfaction of the said competent authority);]or (2)[(a) the bumble bees come from an environmentally isolated structure recognised by and under the supervision of the competent authority of the Member State which is free of American foulbrood and was inspected immediately prior to dispatch and all bumble bees and breeding stock show no clinical signs or suspicion of the disease;]and(b) the bees/bumble bees (2) come from an area of at least 100 km radius which is not the subject of any restrictions associated with the suspicion or confirmed occurrence of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) or the Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilaelaps spp.), and where these infestations are absent;and(c) the bees/bumble bees (2) as well as their packaging have undergone a visual examination to detect the occurrence of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) or their eggs and larvae, or other infestations, in particular the Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilaelaps spp.), affecting bees.II.2the additional guarantees regarding diseases listed in Annex B (1) to Directive 92/65/EEC are as follows (2):DiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionDiseaseDecisionNotesPart I:Box reference I.31:Species: introduce Apis mellifera or Bombus spp.Quantity: provide the number of colonies.Batch number: provide the number of seals where applicable.Part II:(1) As requested by a Member State benefiting from additional guarantees under Union legislation.(2) Delete as necessary.The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.Approved veterinarian or approved officialName (in capital letters):Qualification and title:Date:Signature:Stamp:’