Council Decision (EU) 2025/378 of 18 February 2025 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 18 February 2025 to 25 January 2030 and amending Decision (EU) 2025/71

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/378 6.3.2025
(1) Article 300(3) of the Treaty provides that the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.
(2) Article 305 of the Treaty provides for the members of the Committee of the Regions and an equal number of alternate members to be appointed by the Council for a term of five years in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State.
(3) As the term of office of the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions expired on 25 January 2025, new members and alternate members should be appointed.
(4) On 10 December 2024, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2025/71(2). By that Decision, it appointed, for the period from 26 January 2025 to 25 January 2030, the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions proposed by the Estonian, Irish, Croatian, Cyprus, Latvian, Luxembourgish, Maltese, Dutch, Austrian, Portuguese, Slovenian, Slovak, Finnish and Swedish Governments. By Decision (EU) 2025/71, the Council also appointed for the same period 12 members and nine alternate members proposed by the Czech Government, seven members and nine alternate members proposed by the Danish Government, 23 members and 19 alternate members proposed by the German Government, 11 members and 12 alternate members proposed by the Greek Government, 20 members and 20 alternate members proposed by the Spanish Government, 22 members and 24 alternate members proposed by the Italian Government, 21 members and 20 alternate members proposed by the Polish Government and nine members and nine alternate members proposed by the Romanian Government. Members and alternate members in relation to whom the proposals for appointment had not been communicated to the Council before 22 November 2024 could not be included in Decision (EU) 2025/71.
(5) On 21 January 2025, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2025/201(3). By that Decision, it appointed, for the period from 26 January 2025 to 25 January 2030, the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions proposed by the Bulgarian, Lithuanian and Hungarian Governments, as well as 10 members and 10 alternate members proposed by the Belgian Government and 24 members and 23 alternate members proposed by the French Government. Furthermore, by Decision (EU) 2025/201, the Council appointed two members and one alternate member proposed by the Danish Government, one of the members having initially been appointed as an alternate member by Decision (EU) 2025/71. It also appointed one alternate member proposed by the Italian Government following the resignation of an alternate member appointed by Decision (EU) 2025/71. Members and alternate members in relation to whom the proposals for appointment had not been communicated to the Council before 31 December 2024 could not be included in Decision (EU) 2025/201.
(6) From 31 December 2024 to 31 January 2025, further lists were submitted to the Council, namely a list containing two members and two alternate members of the Committee of the Regions proposed by the Belgian Government, a list containing two alternate members proposed by the German Government, a list containing one member proposed by the Greek Government, a list containing one member and one alternate member proposed by the Spanish Government, a list containing two members proposed by the Italian Government, a list containing six members and six alternate members proposed by the Romanian Government, and a list containing one alternate member proposed by the Polish Government. Those members and alternate members should be appointed for the period from 18 February 2025 to 25 January 2030.
(7) Ms Katja MEIER was appointed by Decision (EU) 2025/71 as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2025 to 25 January 2030. However, the mandate on the basis of which she was proposed for appointment to the Committee of the Regions came to an end on 18 December 2024. Following the end of that mandate, the German Government proposed that Mr Martin DULIG be appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions. Therefore, Mr Martin DULIG should be appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions and the list of members for Germany in Decision (EU) 2025/71 should be adapted accordingly.
(8) The appointment of the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions by this Decision will be followed at a later date by the appointment of other members and alternate members, in relation to whom the proposals for appointment were not communicated to the Council by 31 January 2025,
— as members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex I,
— as alternate members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex II.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 300(3) and Article 305 thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),
Having regard to the proposals made by each Member State,
Whereas:
(1) Article 300(3) of the Treaty provides that the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.
(2) Article 305 of the Treaty provides for the members of the Committee of the Regions and an equal number of alternate members to be appointed by the Council for a term of five years in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State.
(3) As the term of office of the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions expired on 25 January 2025, new members and alternate members should be appointed.
(4) On 10 December 2024, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2025/71 (2). By that Decision, it appointed, for the period from 26 January 2025 to 25 January 2030, the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions proposed by the Estonian, Irish, Croatian, Cyprus, Latvian, Luxembourgish, Maltese, Dutch, Austrian, Portuguese, Slovenian, Slovak, Finnish and Swedish Governments. By Decision (EU) 2025/71, the Council also appointed for the same period 12 members and nine alternate members proposed by the Czech Government, seven members and nine alternate members proposed by the Danish Government, 23 members and 19 alternate members proposed by the German Government, 11 members and 12 alternate members proposed by the Greek Government, 20 members and 20 alternate members proposed by the Spanish Government, 22 members and 24 alternate members proposed by the Italian Government, 21 members and 20 alternate members proposed by the Polish Government and nine members and nine alternate members proposed by the Romanian Government. Members and alternate members in relation to whom the proposals for appointment had not been communicated to the Council before 22 November 2024 could not be included in Decision (EU) 2025/71.
(5) On 21 January 2025, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2025/201 (3). By that Decision, it appointed, for the period from 26 January 2025 to 25 January 2030, the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions proposed by the Bulgarian, Lithuanian and Hungarian Governments, as well as 10 members and 10 alternate members proposed by the Belgian Government and 24 members and 23 alternate members proposed by the French Government. Furthermore, by Decision (EU) 2025/201, the Council appointed two members and one alternate member proposed by the Danish Government, one of the members having initially been appointed as an alternate member by Decision (EU) 2025/71. It also appointed one alternate member proposed by the Italian Government following the resignation of an alternate member appointed by Decision (EU) 2025/71. Members and alternate members in relation to whom the proposals for appointment had not been communicated to the Council before 31 December 2024 could not be included in Decision (EU) 2025/201.
(6) From 31 December 2024 to 31 January 2025, further lists were submitted to the Council, namely a list containing two members and two alternate members of the Committee of the Regions proposed by the Belgian Government, a list containing two alternate members proposed by the German Government, a list containing one member proposed by the Greek Government, a list containing one member and one alternate member proposed by the Spanish Government, a list containing two members proposed by the Italian Government, a list containing six members and six alternate members proposed by the Romanian Government, and a list containing one alternate member proposed by the Polish Government. Those members and alternate members should be appointed for the period from 18 February 2025 to 25 January 2030.
(7) Ms Katja MEIER was appointed by Decision (EU) 2025/71 as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2025 to 25 January 2030. However, the mandate on the basis of which she was proposed for appointment to the Committee of the Regions came to an end on 18 December 2024. Following the end of that mandate, the German Government proposed that Mr Martin DULIG be appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions. Therefore, Mr Martin DULIG should be appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions and the list of members for Germany in Decision (EU) 2025/71 should be adapted accordingly.
(8) The appointment of the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions by this Decision will be followed at a later date by the appointment of other members and alternate members, in relation to whom the proposals for appointment were not communicated to the Council by 31 January 2025,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the period from 18 February 2025 to 25 January 2030:

—
as members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex I,
—
as alternate members, the persons listed by Member State in Annex II.

In the list for Germany set out in Annex I to Decision (EU) 2025/71, the following entry is deleted:

‘Ms Katja MEIER
Staatsministerin der Justiz und für Demokratie, Gleichstellung und Europa, Sächsischen Staatsregierung, politische Verantwortung gegenüber dem Sächsischen Landtag (Minister of State for Justice, Democracy, Equality and Europe, Member of the Saxon State Government, political accountability to the Saxon State Parliament)’.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Членове / Miembros / Členové / Medlemmer / Mitglieder / Liikmed / Μέλη / Members / Membres / Comhaltaí / Članovi / Membri / Locekļi / Nariai / Tagok / Membri / Leden / Członkowie / Membros / Membri / Členovia / Člani / Jäsenet / Ledamöter

BELGIË / BELGIQUE / BELGIEN
Mr Pascal SMET

Lid van het Parlement van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest (Member of the Parliament of the Brussels Capital Region)
Mr Rudi VERVOORT

Membre du Parlement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Member of the Parliament of the Brussels Capital Region)
DEUTSCHLAND
Mr Martin DULIG

Mitglied des Sächsischen Landtags (Member of the Saxon State Parliament)
ΕΛΛΑΣ
Ms Athina ATHANASIADOU – AIDONA

Περιφερειάρχης Κεντρικής Μακεδονίας (Regional Governor of Central Macedonia)
ESPAÑA
Mr Imanol PRADALES GIL

Presidente del Gobierno Vasco (President of the Basque Government)
ITALIA
Mr Alessio MAMMI

Assessore della Regione Emilia-Romagna (Regional Minister of the Emilia-Romagna Region)
Ms Stefania PROIETTI

Presidente della Regione Umbria (President of the Umbria Region)
ROMÂNIA
Mr Costel ALEXE

Președinte Consiliul Județean Iași (President of the Iași County Council)
Mr Csaba BORBOLY

Vicepreședinte Consiliul Județean Harghita (Vice President of the Harghita County Council)
Ms Daniela CÎMPEAN

Președinte Consiliul Județean Sibiu (President of the Sibiu County Council)
Mr Corneliu ȘTEFAN

Președinte Consiliul Județean Dâmbovița (President of the Dâmbovița County Council)
Mr Constantin RĂDULESCU

Președinte Consiliul Județean Vâlcea (President of the Vâlcea County Council)
Mr Daniel-Claudiu TĂMAȘ

Vicepreședinte Consiliul Județean Bistrița Năsăud (Vice President of the Bistrița-Năsăud County Council)

Заместник-членове / Suplentes / Náhradníci / Suppleanter / Stellvertreter / Asendusliikmed / Αναπληρωτές / Alternate members / Suppléants / Comhaltaí malartacha / Zamjenici članova / Supplenti / Aizstājēji / Pakaitiniai nariai / Póttagok / Membri Supplenti / Plaatsvervangers / Zastępcy członków / Suplentes / Supleanți / Náhradníci / Nadomestni člani / Varajäsenet / Suppleanter

BELGIË / BELGIQUE / BELGIEN
Mr Yonnec POLET

Conseiller communal de Berchem Sainte Agathe (Member of the Municipal Council of Berchem Sainte Agathe)
Mr Jean-Luc VANRAES

Schepen van Ukkel (Deputy Mayor of Uccle)
DEUTSCHLAND
Mr Peter JAHR

Mitglied des Kreistages des Landkreises Mittelsachsen, Freistaat Sachsen (Member of the District Council of the District of Central Saxony, Free State of Saxony)
Mr Torsten RUBAN-ZEH

Oberbürgermeister der Großen Kreisstadt Hoyerswerda (Lord Mayor of the large district town of Hoyerswerda)
ESPAÑA
Mr Ander CABALLERO BARTUREN

Secretario General de Acción Exterior y Euskadi Global, Gobierno Vasco (Secretary-General of Foreign Affairs and Basque Country Global, Basque Government)
POLSKA
Mr Mirosław LECH

Wójt Gminy Korycin (Mayor of Korycin Commune)
ROMÂNIA
Mr Ionică NEGRU

Vicepreședinte Consiliul Județean Mehedinți (Vice President of the Mehedinți County Council)
Mr Alin-Adrian NICA

Consilier județean Consiliul Județean Timiș (County Councillor at the Timiș County Council)
Mr Mihai Adrian PISICĂ

Vicepreședinte Consiliul Județean Teleorman (Vice President of the Teleorman County Council)
Mr Dinu IANCU-SĂLĂJANU

Președinte Consiliul Județean Sălaj (President of the Sălaj County Council)
Mr István VÁKÁR

Vicepreședinte Consiliul Județean Cluj (Vice President of the Cluj County Council)
Mr Adrian-Ioan VEȘTEA

Președinte Consiliul Județean Brașov (President of the Brașov County Council)

Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/377 of 24 February 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135 concerning restrictive measures in view of activities undermining the stability and political transition of Sudan

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/377 25.2.2025
(1) On 9 October 2023, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135(1).
(2) On 8 November 2024, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1591(2005) added two persons to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.
(3) The entries for the two persons listed by the UNSC Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1591 (2005) in November 2024 should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies set out in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135.
(4) Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135 should therefore be amended accordingly,
4. Abdulrahman JUMA BARAKALLAH;
10. Osman Mohamed HAMID.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 9 October 2023, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135 (1).
(2) On 8 November 2024, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1591(2005) added two persons to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.
(3) The entries for the two persons listed by the UNSC Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1591 (2005) in November 2024 should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies set out in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135.
(4) Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

In the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2023/2135, under the heading ‘A List of natural persons referred to in Article 1(1) and in Article 2(1)’, the following two entries are deleted:
4. Abdulrahman JUMA BARAKALLAH;

10. Osman Mohamed HAMID.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/375 of 26 February 2025 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 as regards harmonised standards for gas meters and gas volume conversion devices drafted in support of Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/375 27.2.2025
(1) In accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(2), measuring instruments which are in conformity with harmonised standards, or parts thereof, the references of which have been published in theOfficial Journal of the European Unionare to be presumed to be in conformity with the essential requirements set out in Annex I to that Directive, and in the relevant instrument-specific Annexes to that Directive covered by those standards or parts thereof.
(2) By Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 8558(3), the Commission made a request to the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (Cenelec), and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) for the drafting, the revision and the completion of the work on harmonised standards in support of Directive 2014/32/EU for certain measuring instruments (‘the request’).
(3) On the basis of the request, CEN revised harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2018 on gas volume conversion devices and EN 12261:2018 on turbine gas meters, the references of which are published in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402(4). This resulted in the adoption of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024.
(4) The Commission, together with CEN, has assessed whether the harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024 comply with the request.
(5) Harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024 satisfy the essential requirements which they aim to cover, and which are set out in Directive 2014/32/EU. It is therefore appropriate to publish the references of those standards in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.
(6) Annex I to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 provides the references of harmonised standards conferring a presumption of conformity with Directive 2014/32/EU. In order to ensure that the references of harmonised standards drafted in support of Directive 2014/32/EU are listed in one act, the references of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024 should be included in that Annex.
(7) It is necessary to withdraw from theOfficial Journal of the European Unionthe references of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2018 and EN 12261:2018, given that those standards have been revised. It is therefore appropriate to delete those references from Annex I to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402.
(8) Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(9) In order to allow manufacturers sufficient time to prepare for the application of the revised standards, it is necessary to defer the withdrawal of the reference of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2018 and EN 12261:2018.
(10) Compliance with a harmonised standard confers a presumption of conformity with the corresponding essential requirements set out in Union harmonisation legislation from the date of publication of the reference of such standard in theOfficial Journal of the European Union. This Decision should therefore enter into force on the day of its publication,
(1) rows 2 and 3 are deleted;
(2) the following rows are inserted in sequential order:‘2a.EN 12261:2024Gas meters – Turbine gas meters’ ‘2a. EN 12261:2024Gas meters – Turbine gas meters’
‘2a. EN 12261:2024Gas meters – Turbine gas meters’
‘2a. EN 12261:2024Gas meters – Turbine gas meters’
(3) ‘3a.EN 12405-1:2021Gas meters – Conversion devices – Part 1: Volume conversion’ ‘3a. EN 12405-1:2021Gas meters – Conversion devices – Part 1: Volume conversion’
‘3a. EN 12405-1:2021Gas meters – Conversion devices – Part 1: Volume conversion’
‘3a. EN 12405-1:2021Gas meters – Conversion devices – Part 1: Volume conversion’
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European Standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), and in particular Article 10(6) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) In accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), measuring instruments which are in conformity with harmonised standards, or parts thereof, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union are to be presumed to be in conformity with the essential requirements set out in Annex I to that Directive, and in the relevant instrument-specific Annexes to that Directive covered by those standards or parts thereof.
(2) By Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 8558 (3), the Commission made a request to the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (Cenelec), and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) for the drafting, the revision and the completion of the work on harmonised standards in support of Directive 2014/32/EU for certain measuring instruments (‘the request’).
(3) On the basis of the request, CEN revised harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2018 on gas volume conversion devices and EN 12261:2018 on turbine gas meters, the references of which are published in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 (4). This resulted in the adoption of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024.
(4) The Commission, together with CEN, has assessed whether the harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024 comply with the request.
(5) Harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024 satisfy the essential requirements which they aim to cover, and which are set out in Directive 2014/32/EU. It is therefore appropriate to publish the references of those standards in the Official Journal of the European Union.
(6) Annex I to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 provides the references of harmonised standards conferring a presumption of conformity with Directive 2014/32/EU. In order to ensure that the references of harmonised standards drafted in support of Directive 2014/32/EU are listed in one act, the references of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2021 and EN 12261:2024 should be included in that Annex.
(7) It is necessary to withdraw from the Official Journal of the European Union the references of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2018 and EN 12261:2018, given that those standards have been revised. It is therefore appropriate to delete those references from Annex I to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402.
(8) Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(9) In order to allow manufacturers sufficient time to prepare for the application of the revised standards, it is necessary to defer the withdrawal of the reference of harmonised standards EN 12405-1:2018 and EN 12261:2018.
(10) Compliance with a harmonised standard confers a presumption of conformity with the corresponding essential requirements set out in Union harmonisation legislation from the date of publication of the reference of such standard in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Decision should therefore enter into force on the day of its publication,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Annex I to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Point (1) of the Annex shall apply from 27 August 2026.

Annex I to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1402 is amended as follows:

(1) rows 2 and 3 are deleted;

(2) the following rows are inserted in sequential order:
‘2a.
EN 12261:2024
Gas meters – Turbine gas meters’

(3)
‘3a.
EN 12405-1:2021
Gas meters – Conversion devices – Part 1: Volume conversion’

Council Decision (EU) 2025/374 of 18 February 2025 appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, of the European Economic and Social Committee

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/374 4.3.2025
(1) Pursuant to Article 300(2) of the Treaty, the Economic and Social Committee is to consist of representatives of organisations of employers, of the employed, and of other parties representative of civil society, notably in socioeconomic, civic, professional and cultural areas.
(2) On 2 October 2020, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2020/1392(2)appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025, and repealing and replacing the Council Decision appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025 adopted on 18 September 2020.
(3) A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Lottie VAN KELLE.
(4) The Dutch Government has proposed Ms Margo MOLKENBOER,Beleidsadviseur Europa en Internationaal bij CNV (Christelijk Nationaal Vakverbond)(Policy Advisor European and International Affairs at the CNV (National Federation of Christian Trade Union)), as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2025,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/853 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,
After consulting the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) Pursuant to Article 300(2) of the Treaty, the Economic and Social Committee is to consist of representatives of organisations of employers, of the employed, and of other parties representative of civil society, notably in socioeconomic, civic, professional and cultural areas.
(2) On 2 October 2020, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2020/1392 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025, and repealing and replacing the Council Decision appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025 adopted on 18 September 2020.
(3) A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Lottie VAN KELLE.
(4) The Dutch Government has proposed Ms Margo MOLKENBOER, Beleidsadviseur Europa en Internationaal bij CNV (Christelijk Nationaal Vakverbond) (Policy Advisor European and International Affairs at the CNV (National Federation of Christian Trade Union)), as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2025,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Ms Margo MOLKENBOER, Beleidsadviseur Europa en Internationaal bij CNV (Christelijk Nationaal Vakverbond) (Policy Advisor European and International Affairs at the CNV (National Federation of Christian Trade Union)), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2025.
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/373 of 18 February 2025 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 as regards the authorisation granted to Poland to continue to apply the special measure derogating from Article 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/373 28.2.2025
(1) Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310(2)authorised Poland to introduce a special measure, derogating from Article 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC, that requires suppliers to apply a mandatory split payment mechanism (the ‘special measure’). The mandatory split payment mechanism obliges suppliers (taxable persons) to pay value added tax (VAT) on invoices issued in relation to the supplies of goods and services susceptible to fraud and which are generally covered by a reverse charge mechanism and by joint and several liability in Poland, to a separate and blocked bank account opened in Poland. Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/559(3)extended the application of the special measure until 28 February 2025.
(2) By letters registered with the Commission on 27 March 2024 and on 1 October 2024, Poland requested an authorisation, in accordance with Article 395(2), first subparagraph, of Directive 2006/112/EC, to continue to apply the special measure until 29 February 2028 (the ‘request’).
(3) Pursuant to Article 395(2), second subparagraph, of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission transmitted the request to the other Member States by letter dated 9 October 2024. By letter dated 10 October 2024, the Commission notified Poland that it had all the information necessary for the appraisal of the request.
(4) The special measure applies to the goods and services listed in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 in accordance with the Polish Classification of Goods and Services. Poland is currently replacing that classification system with the system of the Combined Nomenclature laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87(4). The list in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 should therefore be replaced by a simplified list of categories of goods and services laid down in the Annex to this Decision. Poland has confirmed that the replacement of the list does not extend the scope of the special measure.
(5) On 13 November 2023, Poland submitted a report pursuant to Article 2, second paragraph, of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310, on the overall impact of the extension of the special measure on the level of VAT fraud and on the taxable persons concerned. Poland reported that, since the special measure was extended, its continued application has resulted in the reduction of, in particular, carousel fraud in the sectors that are subject to it, such as steel, scrap, precious metals and fuels. Poland further reported that, in cases where a taxable person is entitled to a VAT refund, Polish authorities have managed to reduce the refund time to below 20 days, in order to enhance the impact on the taxable person’s cash flow.
(6) Authorisations to apply a special measure are in general granted for a limited period of time to allow the Commission to evaluate whether the special measure is appropriate and effective. The authorisation to apply the special measure should therefore be extended until 29 February 2028. If Poland wishes to extend the special measure beyond 29 February 2028, it should submit a request to the Commission, together with a report on the special measure’s overall impact on the level of VAT fraud and on the taxable persons concerned.
(7) The special measure will not negatively affect the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the stage of final consumption and will have no adverse impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT.
(8) Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 should therefore be amended accordingly,
(1) in Article 3, second paragraph, the date ‘28 February 2025’ is replaced by that of ‘29 February 2028’.
(2) the Annex is replaced by the text appearing in the Annex to this Decision.
(1) transfer of allowances to emit greenhouse gases;
(2) construction and assembly works;
(3) steel and steel products;
(4) metals and products made of these metals;
(5) precious metals and products made of these precious metals, jewellery, pearls, precious stones;
(6) certain electric products and devices and certain electronic products and devices (in particular: tablets, laptops, notebooks, mobile phones, digital cameras, processors, video game consoles and machines, memory devices);
(7) fuels;
(8) coal and coal energy products;
(9) certain used materials, scrap, waste;
(10) animal and vegetable oils and fats;
(11) cartridges for devices, including toners, inks and similar;
(12) plastics and plastic articles, in particular stretch films;
(13) parts and accessories for motor vehicles.’.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1), and in particular Article 395(1), first subparagraph, thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 (2) authorised Poland to introduce a special measure, derogating from Article 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC, that requires suppliers to apply a mandatory split payment mechanism (the ‘special measure’). The mandatory split payment mechanism obliges suppliers (taxable persons) to pay value added tax (VAT) on invoices issued in relation to the supplies of goods and services susceptible to fraud and which are generally covered by a reverse charge mechanism and by joint and several liability in Poland, to a separate and blocked bank account opened in Poland. Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/559 (3) extended the application of the special measure until 28 February 2025.
(2) By letters registered with the Commission on 27 March 2024 and on 1 October 2024, Poland requested an authorisation, in accordance with Article 395(2), first subparagraph, of Directive 2006/112/EC, to continue to apply the special measure until 29 February 2028 (the ‘request’).
(3) Pursuant to Article 395(2), second subparagraph, of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission transmitted the request to the other Member States by letter dated 9 October 2024. By letter dated 10 October 2024, the Commission notified Poland that it had all the information necessary for the appraisal of the request.
(4) The special measure applies to the goods and services listed in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 in accordance with the Polish Classification of Goods and Services. Poland is currently replacing that classification system with the system of the Combined Nomenclature laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (4). The list in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 should therefore be replaced by a simplified list of categories of goods and services laid down in the Annex to this Decision. Poland has confirmed that the replacement of the list does not extend the scope of the special measure.
(5) On 13 November 2023, Poland submitted a report pursuant to Article 2, second paragraph, of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310, on the overall impact of the extension of the special measure on the level of VAT fraud and on the taxable persons concerned. Poland reported that, since the special measure was extended, its continued application has resulted in the reduction of, in particular, carousel fraud in the sectors that are subject to it, such as steel, scrap, precious metals and fuels. Poland further reported that, in cases where a taxable person is entitled to a VAT refund, Polish authorities have managed to reduce the refund time to below 20 days, in order to enhance the impact on the taxable person’s cash flow.
(6) Authorisations to apply a special measure are in general granted for a limited period of time to allow the Commission to evaluate whether the special measure is appropriate and effective. The authorisation to apply the special measure should therefore be extended until 29 February 2028. If Poland wishes to extend the special measure beyond 29 February 2028, it should submit a request to the Commission, together with a report on the special measure’s overall impact on the level of VAT fraud and on the taxable persons concerned.
(7) The special measure will not negatively affect the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the stage of final consumption and will have no adverse impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT.
(8) Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 3, second paragraph, the date ‘28 February 2025’ is replaced by that of ‘29 February 2028’.
(2) the Annex is replaced by the text appearing in the Annex to this Decision.

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its notification.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Poland.

‘ANNEX
List of supplies of goods and services covered by Article 1
Article 1 shall apply to the following categories of supplies of goods and services:
(1) transfer of allowances to emit greenhouse gases;
(2) construction and assembly works;
(3) steel and steel products;
(4) metals and products made of these metals;
(5) precious metals and products made of these precious metals, jewellery, pearls, precious stones;
(6) certain electric products and devices and certain electronic products and devices (in particular: tablets, laptops, notebooks, mobile phones, digital cameras, processors, video game consoles and machines, memory devices);
(7) fuels;
(8) coal and coal energy products;
(9) certain used materials, scrap, waste;
(10) animal and vegetable oils and fats;
(11) cartridges for devices, including toners, inks and similar;
(12) plastics and plastic articles, in particular stretch films;
(13) parts and accessories for motor vehicles.’.

Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 of 21 February 2025 establishing the role of the Chief Risk Officer overseeing the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/369 25.2.2025
(1) Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council (the ‘Financial Regulation’)(1)provides for the possibility that the Union provides loans backed by the budget and budgetary guarantees where these prove to be the most appropriate way to achieve policy objectives of the Union and in accordance with the definitions laid down in their respective basic act. The Union’s financial operations undertaken to implement these instruments might give rise to a range of financial risks (such as credit, market, liquidity, operational, reputational and compliance) with possible consequences for the Union budget.
(2) The Union’s financial operations have expanded significantly – in volume and scope – over the course of the present Multiannual Financial Framework. Loans, budgetary guarantees and financing of EU policies through issuance of debt securities have been used on a large scale to fund responses to emerging challenges and successive crises. In view of these developments, the Commission’s financial risk management and compliance framework developed and implemented in respect of the Union’s borrowing, lending and debt management operations should be enhanced and its coverage extended also to financial risks arising from asset management operations and budgetary guarantees.
(3) The role of the Chief Risk Officer under this Decision is a continuation of developments in financial risk management which started with the establishment of the role of Chief Risk Officer by Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 2502 of 14 April 2021 for borrowing, debt management and lending operations under NextGenerationEU. Following the introduction of the diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method, the Chief Risk Officer oversight was then extended to all borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations with Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2544,(2)which was subsequently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825(3).
(4) The financial risks arising from the implementation of the Union’s financial operations should be properly identified, mitigated, managed and communicated. The risk framework should be robust and provide a comprehensive, rigorous and independent capacity for supervising the financial risks arising across all the Union’s financial operations undertaken. The framework should ensure that the Union’s financial operations should be conducted in a manner consistent with the highest standards of integrity and sound financial and risk management.
(5) In enhancing its financial risk management and compliance framework for the Union’s financial operations, this Decision establishes a specific Commission governance solely regarding the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations. The rules of this Decision should complement the Rules of Procedure of the Commission(4)of the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations and have the intention to align with best practices and standards in financial risk management and compliance as implemented by peer institutions engaged in the conduct of similar financial operations, while respecting the legal and institutional framework established by the Treaties.
(6) The Decision should therefore be based on the ‘three lines of defence’ model. The ‘first line of defence’ should be the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations who should remain responsible for the design, implementation, management, planning and execution of operations under their responsibility in line with the Financial Regulation. The Chief Risk Officer should be an independent function, acting as the ‘second line of defence’ at a corporate level with primary responsibility to establish a sound financial risk management framework for the oversight of the Union’s financial operations and oversee its implementation. The ‘third line of defence’ should be the Internal Audit Service which should exercise its role in line with Article 118 of the Financial Regulation.
(7) In keeping with the model of three lines of defence, the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, acting in their capacity as first line of defence, should implement sound financial risk management processes and ensure compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies.
(8) The financial risk management and compliance framework is to be implemented together with other acts establishing Commission governance, in particular the Internal Rules(5), the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, the Communication from the President to the Commission P(2024)5 of 4 December 2024‘The Working Methods of the European Commission’ and the Commission Communication SEC(2000) 560(6)announcing the establishment of the Internal Audit Service. The close cooperation from the very early stages of preparation, pursuant to the Working Methods of the European Commission, should be ensured also in relation to the financial risk management laid down in this Decision and in particular should involve the Chief Risk Officer.
(9) The Chief Risk Officer and the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations should implement any steps under this Decision loyally, should establish and promote risk culture and apply the requirements of prudence and the principle of sound financial management in their approach to financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, ensuring close cooperation. This would entail developing policies through interservice working groups composed of participants of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations concerned, and working in a coordinated fashion from the outset. Furthermore, the work on financial risk management carried out pursuant to this Decision should take into account evaluations, lessons learned and experience gained by the services during the implementation of programmes and instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans, inclusive, as appropriate, existing risk frameworks, best market practices and international standards, as well as relevant legislation related to financial risk management and compliance.
(10) This Decision should accordingly extend the role, responsibilities and tasks of the Chief Risk Officer to all the Union’s financial operations concerned. The Chief Risk Officer should develop the financial risk management and compliance framework for all the Union’s financial operations including through the completion of specific tasks set out in this Decision, oversee the financial risks and report on them. In keeping with the function of second line of defence, the Chief Risk Officer should continue to act in full independence from the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations and should not be hierarchically subordinated to the Director-General for the Budget and should continue to have a direct reporting line to the Member of the College responsible for the Budget.
(11) In line with the independence of the Chief Risk Officer from the Commission services implementing the Union’s financial operations, the post of Chief Risk Officer should be occupied by a senior manager with adequate professional experience in financial risk management who is to be supported by a dedicated team having relevant expertise. The function of the Chief Risk Officer should not be compatible with the functions of authorising officer by delegation for the Union’s financial operations and of the Accounting Officer.
(12) Despite the Chief Risk Officer not being a service within the meaning of Article 45(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, it is of essence for the independence of the function to be considered equivalent to a service responsible and service having legitimate interests for the purposes of respectively Articles 55 and 58 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission. To this effect, the Chief Risk Officer should in particular be the service responsible for inter-service consultations on the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies. As service having legitimate interests, the Chief Risk Officer should be consulted in interservice consultations in particular on legislative proposals for programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans, as well as on acts implementing programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans and on acts concerning any Union’s financial operations.
(13) The Chief Risk Officer should have general and specific tasks. The Chief Risk Officer should develop the framework governing the financial risk management and compliance for the different categories of the Union’s financial operations, consisting of High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies in close cooperation with the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations. The Chief Risk Officer should oversee the implementation and the compliance with the risk and compliance framework pursuant to this Decision. The High Level Risk and Compliance Policy should contain risk and compliance guidelines for the implementation of the Union’s financial operations. This over-arching framework should define the risk objectives, the risk management governance, should identify the main risks and the principles for sound financial risk management to manage and mitigate those risks.
(14) In addition to these tasks of a general nature, the Chief Risk Officer should be assigned specific tasks relating to the main processes for planning important categories of the Union’s financial operations. This Decision should set out a non-exhaustive list of specific tasks which should be accomplished. This should include the issuance of opinions on the funding plan for borrowing and debt management operations, internal acts, and measures for the implementation of the Union’s borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and asset management operations. Furthermore, the Chief Risk Officer should develop, in close cooperation with the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, guidelines and common tools to underpin the methodologies and systems needed for effective risk management and reporting on the Union’s budgetary guarantees and loans whether provisioned or not. On the basis of the information provided by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, the Chief Risk Officer should also provide relevant input on financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations and contingent liabilities to reports encompassing these issues adopted by the Commission, in particular those referred to in Articles 41(5) and 256 of the Financial Regulation.
(15) The thematic risk and compliance policies should set out the details for the risk management and compliance related to the financial risks, such as credit, market, liquidity, operational, reputational and compliance risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, in accordance with their specificities at the programme or instrument level. These policies should set the risk appetite framework, and define the risk methodologies, which are used to assess, quantify, evaluate, and report on the relevant financial risks. For budgetary guarantees and loans, in view of the need to continuously assess the risks, it is appropriate that the thematic risk and compliance policies establish particular tools, define risk methodologies, including risk parameters, and ensure Commission-wide consistency as appropriate and to measure the level of financial risks to be provisioned.
(16) The internal rules and procedures, including internal guidelines, technical guidance and manuals put in place by Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations should permit the early and accurate identification of risks and the implementation of relevant risk mitigation and management measures and reliable and timely reporting to the Chief Risk Officer. With a view of ensuring coherent implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies, it should be possible for the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations to consult the Chief Risk Officer on the internal rules and procedures, including internal guidelines, technical guidance, and manuals on their compliance with those policies.
(17) The Chief Risk Officer should provide advice, where necessary to the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations on the implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, thematic risk and compliance policies, and the management of specific risks. The Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations should address such advice and provide explanations on the measures taken.
(18) To enable effective and efficient monitoring by the Chief Risk Officer, the respective Directorates-General working with third parties, notably implementing partners for budgetary guarantees, should obtain the necessary input about financial risks related to the Union’s financial operations from the implementing partners and share this upon request with the Chief Risk Officer.
(19) To ensure that all relevant actors are consistently informed on the financial risk management of the Union’s financial operations, appropriate reporting obligations for the Chief Risk Officer should be established. The Chief Risk Officer should in particular report regularly to the Member of the College for the Budget, the Members of the College responsible for the Union’s financial operations, and to the Director-General of the Directorate-General for the Budget and the Directors-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations. Reporting by the Chief Risk Officer should build on the programme-specific reporting by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations. The financial risk reporting and monitoring should enable the early identification of any emerging financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations.
(20) The Chief Risk Officer should be supported by a Compliance Officer. The latter should report directly to the Chief Risk Officer and act under their authority. Compliance functions should comprise matters regarding (i) compliance of the institution and conduct of the Union’s financial operations by Commission services and their counterparties with rules and procedures and (ii) prevention of money laundering, terrorist financing, tax avoidance, tax fraud or tax evasion. With respect to the Union’s financial operations implemented in indirect management, the compliance officer should not directly provide recommendations and guidelines, as these operations already benefit from a robust system of controls, and the rules of entrusted entities are pillar assessed under Title VI of the Financial Regulation.
(21) Currently, three different committees co-exist. Firstly, the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities was established by Commission Decision C(2020) 5154(7)to provide coordination and oversight of a common risk management framework for contingent liabilities. Secondly, for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations, the Chief Risk Officer, as currently in place, is supported by the Risk and Compliance Committee, as defined in Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825. Thirdly, within the Directorate-General for the Budget, an internal risk committee oversees the functioning of the asset management operations, with transmission of outputs to the Asset Management Board. With a view to creating an integrated risk and compliance management framework, a single Risk and Compliance Committee, replacing the above-mentioned committees, should be established to support the Chief Risk Officer with respect to all Union’s financial operations. Decision C(2020) 5154 establishing the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities should accordingly be repealed.
(22) The composition of the Risk and Compliance Committee should bring together expertise in matters of financial risk and budgetary management, as well as the policy and operational perspectives and the risk management expertise of Directorates-General involved in the implementation of the Union’s financial operations. The Members of the Risk and Compliance Committee should be representatives having senior management function of the Directorate-General for the Budget, of the Secretariat-General and from each Directorate-General responsible for managing the Union’s financial operations.
(23) The Risk and Compliance Committee should support the Chief Risk Officer in the conduct of their duties related to financial risk management and oversight and the development and implementation of the relevant risk framework applicable for the Union’s financial operations.
(24) The High-Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic and risk compliance policies should be adopted by the Commission. With a view to drawing on the expertise of the Risk and Compliance Committee and in view of the need to involve all the services concerned from early stages of preparation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic and risk compliance policies, the Chief Risk Officer should submit the draft of the policy to the Risk and Compliance Committee for discussion ahead of the interservice consultation.
(25) To ensure a smooth transition from the current governance setup which includes three committees, all existing risk management governance arrangements including the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities should remain in place until the first meeting of the Risk and Compliance Committee foreseen in this Decision. Several manuals and documents of the Directorate-General for the Budget as well as of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations set out the financial risk management rules for asset management operations and budgetary guarantees, including the risk management frameworks applicable to programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees already adopted at the date of entry into force of this Decision. In the field of borrowing and lending, a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and several supporting thematic policies have been adopted by the Commissioner for the Budget. These documents are the basis for the execution of ongoing financial operations and they should remain in force pending review by the Chief Risk Officer and until such time as replaced by the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, as well as thematic risk and compliance policies adopted in accordance with this Decision. To take account of the requirements of legal certainty and legitimate expectations of implementing partners and counterparts implementing already concluded guarantee agreements, it is appropriate to provide that the decisions approving the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies provide for transitory provisions. Those transitory provisions should ensure that the risks are managed within the risk appetite as defined for the programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees adopted before the entry into force of this Decision. When developing and implementing agreed risk measurement methodologies in respect of budgetary guarantees and loan programmes established before the entry into force of this Decision, the Chief Risk Officer and the Directorates-General in charge of the Union’s financial operations should respect the risk appetite as well as results from the programme or instrument authorising the budgetary guarantee or a loan and relevant implementing measures. This should also apply to any signed guarantee agreements, as well as to agreements that are yet to be signed based on programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantee already adopted at the date of entry into force of this Decision.
(a) ‘Union’s financial operation’ means loans provided directly by the Union, whether provisioned or not, the Union’s budgetary guarantees covering operations on the basis of guarantee agreements with the implementing partners, debt issuance and debt management including related liquidity management, asset management operations and tasks related to the function of asset management designated service for outsourced portfolio management;
(b) ‘programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans’ means the basic act within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Financial Regulation which authorises financial liability from budgetary guarantee or a loan in accordance with Article 213(1)(b) and (c) of the Financial Regulation;
(c) ‘financial risk’ means a risk of losses or other adverse events that arise or may arise in the design, execution and management of different categories of the Union’s financial operations due to materialisation of, in particular, credit, market, liquidity, funding, counterparty, operational, reputational and compliance risk;
(d) ‘contingent liability’ means contingent liability as defined in Article 2(16) of the Financial Regulation;
(e) ‘thematic risk and compliance policy’ means a policy, guideline, methodology or any other act referred to in Article 9, which sets out specific procedures and limits related to the Union’s financial operations that shall be followed by the Directorates-General responsible for the implementation of the Union’s financial operations;
(f) ‘risk methodologies’ means the quantitative approach and risk parameters for the assessment, measurement, monitoring and reporting of the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations which is implemented in risk management tools and risk management models;
(g) ‘risk appetite’ means the level of risk that the Commission is prepared to accept in order to achieve its policy objectives. The risk appetite per type of risk is to be defined, as appropriate, in the relevant legal acts, the risk management framework, internal policies and manuals and other documents that complement the relevant legal acts and the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy;
(h) ‘risk tolerance’ means the quantified acceptable deviation from the level of risk that shall not be exceeded. The tolerance levels for a specific type of risk and metrics shall allow measuring of and reporting on the risk exposure when implementing the relevant Union’s financial operations. The risk tolerance may be set from zero to full acceptance, depending on the legal framework, policy mandate and the availability and strength of the risk mitigation measures applied to the different identified risks, the framework governing the financial risk management and compliance for the different types or categories of the Union’s financial operations.
(a) lead the development of the risk framework governing the financial risk management and compliance for the Union’s financial operations, in particular drawing up a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, supplemented by thematic risk and compliance policies;
(b) set up and lead interservice working groups on the development of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies with participation of the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations and other Directorates General concerned;
(c) oversee the implementation of the risk framework, including systems and processes needed to give effect to the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic policies by Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations concerned;
(d) assess the financial risks arising from borrowing operations, liquidity management operations and programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans before proposals for these programmes or instruments are adopted by the Commission;
(e) independently assess, consolidate, and report on the risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, taking into account the data and input from the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, and on compliance with the risk management framework and specified limits, including any relevant provisions set out in the basic acts establishing the individual programmes and the Financial Regulation;
(f) identify potential breaches of and non-compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, thematic risk and compliance policies or other risk related guidelines, legal acts and policies and provide advice on mitigation measures where necessary, and/or review management and mitigating measures implemented or proposed by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations;
(g) promote best practices, risk culture, consistent and harmonised risk approaches across Commission services in the management of the risks arising from the Union’s financial operations.
(a) define within the relevant thematic risk policy, where feasible, the risk appetite, and risk tolerance applicable for the different types of financial operations;
(b) issue an opinion on the draft funding plan and its subsequent amendments;
(c) issue an opinion on the liquidity management strategy for liquidity management operations prior to their adoption or amendment;
(d) be consulted on the asset management guidelines, the strategic asset allocation, and the applicable benchmarks for asset management operations, before their adoption by the Directorate-General responsible for these operations;
(e) define eligibility criteria for authorised counterparties and potential issuers that may be considered for investment opportunities;
(f) define appropriate risk limits to ensure that the credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk undertaken through the asset management and liquidity management operations remain compliant with the risk objectives, risk capacity, risk appetite and risk tolerance set in the relevant investment guidelines, the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic policies. The risk limits may be set up at counterparty level or instrument level, or set up at the level of the aggregated exposures;
(g) assess, consolidate and report on risk exposures, executed by the Directorate-General for the Budget or, when relevant, outsourced to a third party.
(a) conduct regular and independent portfolio risk assessments based on the approved risk methodologies and based on data provided by Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations;
(b) provide relevant input on financial risks and contingent liabilities to reports adopted by the Commission on these issues, such as the risk assessment for reporting under Article 41(5) and Article 256 of the Financial Regulation based on information from the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations.
(a) set the strategic risk objectives guiding the management of the different categories of financial risk arising from the implementation of the Union’s financial operations;
(b) describe the risk governance framework which outlines the main roles and responsibilities related to the risk management and compliance framework of the Union’s financial operations;
(c) present the Commission’s high level risk appetite statement;
(d) identify the principal risks to the financial interests of the Union arising from the implementation of the Union’s financial operations and provide a high-level risk management and compliance framework for the assessment, measurement, mitigation and monitoring of those risks.
(a) establish the risk methodologies, including risk parameters and tools to evaluate potential losses resulting from budgetary guarantees and loans, which shall, inter alia, constitute guidance for the setting of the provisioning rate;
(b) define the risk methodologies as appropriate to ensure Commission-wide consistency and convergence relevant in the process of the designing, negotiating, implementing and monitoring of budgetary guarantees and loans;
(c) define the methodology to measure the level of financial risks to be provisioned as adequate safety buffer referred to in Article 214(2), second subparagraph of the Financial Regulation.
(a) take all necessary measures to implement controls and reporting systems needed to comply with the systems, methodologies and processes resulting from those policies;
(b) ensure in the implementation of the Union’s financial operations that financial risks remain within the risk appetite and risk limits defined, where relevant, for the programme or instruments establishing the budgetary guarantee and loans;
(c) provide regular reports to the Chief Risk Officer on compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance policy and thematic risk and compliance policies;
(d) document thoroughly the implementation of the Union’s financial operations which they oversee, report on situations where the risk of the portfolio of operations deviates or may deviate from the set risk levels;
(e) respond in a timely manner to requests for additional information from the Chief Risk Officer, including relevant information available on operations guaranteed by the Union budget and conducted by implementing partners and counterparts, where this is required to enable the Chief Risk Officer to establish an independent assessment of the risks;
(f) when working with third parties, notably implementing partners and counterparts, obtain the necessary information, available in particular in line with the respective guarantee agreements, about financial risks related to the Union’s financial operations.
(a) in respect of the Union’s financial operations:(i)compliance related support to relevant services responsible for the operational implementation and execution of the Union’s financial operations; and(ii)support for the observance of the Commission-wide rules on ethical behaviour and integrity applicable to relevant services involved in the Union’s financial operations; (i) compliance related support to relevant services responsible for the operational implementation and execution of the Union’s financial operations; and (ii) support for the observance of the Commission-wide rules on ethical behaviour and integrity applicable to relevant services involved in the Union’s financial operations;
(i) compliance related support to relevant services responsible for the operational implementation and execution of the Union’s financial operations; and
(ii) support for the observance of the Commission-wide rules on ethical behaviour and integrity applicable to relevant services involved in the Union’s financial operations;
(i) compliance related support to relevant services responsible for the operational implementation and execution of the Union’s financial operations; and
(ii) support for the observance of the Commission-wide rules on ethical behaviour and integrity applicable to relevant services involved in the Union’s financial operations;
(b) in respect of the Union’s financial operations other than operations implemented in indirect management, guidance addressing the prevention of money laundering and countering terrorism financing, tax avoidance, tax fraud or tax evasion for the execution of the Union’s financial operations other than budgetary guarantees in indirect management, by entities incorporated in or established in jurisdictions listed under the relevant policy on non-cooperative jurisdictions or that are identified as high-risk third countries pursuant to Article 9(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 or that do not effectively comply with the Union or internationally agreed tax standards on transparency and exchange of information, breach sanction regimes or perform other relevant financial irregularities.
(a) discuss the draft High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies prepared by the Chief Risk Officer, as well as their amendments;
(b) support the Chief Risk Officer in the tasks referred to in Article 5 of this Decision;
(c) support the Chief Risk Officer in evaluating, monitoring and approving practices regarding the implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and relating to the financial risk management and compliance of the Union’s financial operations;
(d) support the Chief Risk Officer in managing of the financial risks in connection with the Union’s financial operations and be consulted by the Chief Risk Officer about non-compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy or breaches of other related guidelines, thematic risk and compliance policies and limits.
(a) assisting the Chief Risk Officer in assessing and mitigating risks elaborated in thematic risk and compliance policies;
(b) preparing matters to be brought to the Risk and Compliance Committee;
(c) providing input on technical issues related to the assessment and mitigation of those risks.
(a) the Chief Risk Officer;
(b) the Accounting Officer of the Commission;
(c) a representative from the Directorate-General for the Budget overseeing the issuance of debt to finance Union programme;
(d) the Compliance Officer;
(e) a representative from the Secretariat-General designated by the Secretary-General;
(f) a representative from each Directorate-General responsible for budgetary guarantees or loans programmes.
(a) contacting and consulting with relevant Commission services when preparing input for the Risk and Compliance Committee;
(b) organising meetings of the Risk and Compliance Committee, including the preparation of the agenda, documents, and minutes of those meetings;
(c) performing other administrative and organisational tasks related to the organisation of the Risk and Compliance Committee.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 249 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council (the ‘Financial Regulation’) (1) provides for the possibility that the Union provides loans backed by the budget and budgetary guarantees where these prove to be the most appropriate way to achieve policy objectives of the Union and in accordance with the definitions laid down in their respective basic act. The Union’s financial operations undertaken to implement these instruments might give rise to a range of financial risks (such as credit, market, liquidity, operational, reputational and compliance) with possible consequences for the Union budget.
(2) The Union’s financial operations have expanded significantly – in volume and scope – over the course of the present Multiannual Financial Framework. Loans, budgetary guarantees and financing of EU policies through issuance of debt securities have been used on a large scale to fund responses to emerging challenges and successive crises. In view of these developments, the Commission’s financial risk management and compliance framework developed and implemented in respect of the Union’s borrowing, lending and debt management operations should be enhanced and its coverage extended also to financial risks arising from asset management operations and budgetary guarantees.
(3) The role of the Chief Risk Officer under this Decision is a continuation of developments in financial risk management which started with the establishment of the role of Chief Risk Officer by Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 2502 of 14 April 2021 for borrowing, debt management and lending operations under NextGenerationEU. Following the introduction of the diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method, the Chief Risk Officer oversight was then extended to all borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations with Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2022/2544, (2) which was subsequently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 (3).
(4) The financial risks arising from the implementation of the Union’s financial operations should be properly identified, mitigated, managed and communicated. The risk framework should be robust and provide a comprehensive, rigorous and independent capacity for supervising the financial risks arising across all the Union’s financial operations undertaken. The framework should ensure that the Union’s financial operations should be conducted in a manner consistent with the highest standards of integrity and sound financial and risk management.
(5) In enhancing its financial risk management and compliance framework for the Union’s financial operations, this Decision establishes a specific Commission governance solely regarding the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations. The rules of this Decision should complement the Rules of Procedure of the Commission (4) of the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations and have the intention to align with best practices and standards in financial risk management and compliance as implemented by peer institutions engaged in the conduct of similar financial operations, while respecting the legal and institutional framework established by the Treaties.
(6) The Decision should therefore be based on the ‘three lines of defence’ model. The ‘first line of defence’ should be the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations who should remain responsible for the design, implementation, management, planning and execution of operations under their responsibility in line with the Financial Regulation. The Chief Risk Officer should be an independent function, acting as the ‘second line of defence’ at a corporate level with primary responsibility to establish a sound financial risk management framework for the oversight of the Union’s financial operations and oversee its implementation. The ‘third line of defence’ should be the Internal Audit Service which should exercise its role in line with Article 118 of the Financial Regulation.
(7) In keeping with the model of three lines of defence, the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, acting in their capacity as first line of defence, should implement sound financial risk management processes and ensure compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies.
(8) The financial risk management and compliance framework is to be implemented together with other acts establishing Commission governance, in particular the Internal Rules (5), the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, the Communication from the President to the Commission P(2024)5 of 4 December 2024‘The Working Methods of the European Commission’ and the Commission Communication SEC(2000) 560 (6) announcing the establishment of the Internal Audit Service. The close cooperation from the very early stages of preparation, pursuant to the Working Methods of the European Commission, should be ensured also in relation to the financial risk management laid down in this Decision and in particular should involve the Chief Risk Officer.
(9) The Chief Risk Officer and the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations should implement any steps under this Decision loyally, should establish and promote risk culture and apply the requirements of prudence and the principle of sound financial management in their approach to financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, ensuring close cooperation. This would entail developing policies through interservice working groups composed of participants of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations concerned, and working in a coordinated fashion from the outset. Furthermore, the work on financial risk management carried out pursuant to this Decision should take into account evaluations, lessons learned and experience gained by the services during the implementation of programmes and instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans, inclusive, as appropriate, existing risk frameworks, best market practices and international standards, as well as relevant legislation related to financial risk management and compliance.
(10) This Decision should accordingly extend the role, responsibilities and tasks of the Chief Risk Officer to all the Union’s financial operations concerned. The Chief Risk Officer should develop the financial risk management and compliance framework for all the Union’s financial operations including through the completion of specific tasks set out in this Decision, oversee the financial risks and report on them. In keeping with the function of second line of defence, the Chief Risk Officer should continue to act in full independence from the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations and should not be hierarchically subordinated to the Director-General for the Budget and should continue to have a direct reporting line to the Member of the College responsible for the Budget.
(11) In line with the independence of the Chief Risk Officer from the Commission services implementing the Union’s financial operations, the post of Chief Risk Officer should be occupied by a senior manager with adequate professional experience in financial risk management who is to be supported by a dedicated team having relevant expertise. The function of the Chief Risk Officer should not be compatible with the functions of authorising officer by delegation for the Union’s financial operations and of the Accounting Officer.
(12) Despite the Chief Risk Officer not being a service within the meaning of Article 45(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, it is of essence for the independence of the function to be considered equivalent to a service responsible and service having legitimate interests for the purposes of respectively Articles 55 and 58 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission. To this effect, the Chief Risk Officer should in particular be the service responsible for inter-service consultations on the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies. As service having legitimate interests, the Chief Risk Officer should be consulted in interservice consultations in particular on legislative proposals for programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans, as well as on acts implementing programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans and on acts concerning any Union’s financial operations.
(13) The Chief Risk Officer should have general and specific tasks. The Chief Risk Officer should develop the framework governing the financial risk management and compliance for the different categories of the Union’s financial operations, consisting of High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies in close cooperation with the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations. The Chief Risk Officer should oversee the implementation and the compliance with the risk and compliance framework pursuant to this Decision. The High Level Risk and Compliance Policy should contain risk and compliance guidelines for the implementation of the Union’s financial operations. This over-arching framework should define the risk objectives, the risk management governance, should identify the main risks and the principles for sound financial risk management to manage and mitigate those risks.
(14) In addition to these tasks of a general nature, the Chief Risk Officer should be assigned specific tasks relating to the main processes for planning important categories of the Union’s financial operations. This Decision should set out a non-exhaustive list of specific tasks which should be accomplished. This should include the issuance of opinions on the funding plan for borrowing and debt management operations, internal acts, and measures for the implementation of the Union’s borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and asset management operations. Furthermore, the Chief Risk Officer should develop, in close cooperation with the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, guidelines and common tools to underpin the methodologies and systems needed for effective risk management and reporting on the Union’s budgetary guarantees and loans whether provisioned or not. On the basis of the information provided by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, the Chief Risk Officer should also provide relevant input on financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations and contingent liabilities to reports encompassing these issues adopted by the Commission, in particular those referred to in Articles 41(5) and 256 of the Financial Regulation.
(15) The thematic risk and compliance policies should set out the details for the risk management and compliance related to the financial risks, such as credit, market, liquidity, operational, reputational and compliance risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, in accordance with their specificities at the programme or instrument level. These policies should set the risk appetite framework, and define the risk methodologies, which are used to assess, quantify, evaluate, and report on the relevant financial risks. For budgetary guarantees and loans, in view of the need to continuously assess the risks, it is appropriate that the thematic risk and compliance policies establish particular tools, define risk methodologies, including risk parameters, and ensure Commission-wide consistency as appropriate and to measure the level of financial risks to be provisioned.
(16) The internal rules and procedures, including internal guidelines, technical guidance and manuals put in place by Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations should permit the early and accurate identification of risks and the implementation of relevant risk mitigation and management measures and reliable and timely reporting to the Chief Risk Officer. With a view of ensuring coherent implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies, it should be possible for the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations to consult the Chief Risk Officer on the internal rules and procedures, including internal guidelines, technical guidance, and manuals on their compliance with those policies.
(17) The Chief Risk Officer should provide advice, where necessary to the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations on the implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, thematic risk and compliance policies, and the management of specific risks. The Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations should address such advice and provide explanations on the measures taken.
(18) To enable effective and efficient monitoring by the Chief Risk Officer, the respective Directorates-General working with third parties, notably implementing partners for budgetary guarantees, should obtain the necessary input about financial risks related to the Union’s financial operations from the implementing partners and share this upon request with the Chief Risk Officer.
(19) To ensure that all relevant actors are consistently informed on the financial risk management of the Union’s financial operations, appropriate reporting obligations for the Chief Risk Officer should be established. The Chief Risk Officer should in particular report regularly to the Member of the College for the Budget, the Members of the College responsible for the Union’s financial operations, and to the Director-General of the Directorate-General for the Budget and the Directors-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations. Reporting by the Chief Risk Officer should build on the programme-specific reporting by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations. The financial risk reporting and monitoring should enable the early identification of any emerging financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations.
(20) The Chief Risk Officer should be supported by a Compliance Officer. The latter should report directly to the Chief Risk Officer and act under their authority. Compliance functions should comprise matters regarding (i) compliance of the institution and conduct of the Union’s financial operations by Commission services and their counterparties with rules and procedures and (ii) prevention of money laundering, terrorist financing, tax avoidance, tax fraud or tax evasion. With respect to the Union’s financial operations implemented in indirect management, the compliance officer should not directly provide recommendations and guidelines, as these operations already benefit from a robust system of controls, and the rules of entrusted entities are pillar assessed under Title VI of the Financial Regulation.
(21) Currently, three different committees co-exist. Firstly, the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities was established by Commission Decision C(2020) 5154 (7) to provide coordination and oversight of a common risk management framework for contingent liabilities. Secondly, for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations, the Chief Risk Officer, as currently in place, is supported by the Risk and Compliance Committee, as defined in Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825. Thirdly, within the Directorate-General for the Budget, an internal risk committee oversees the functioning of the asset management operations, with transmission of outputs to the Asset Management Board. With a view to creating an integrated risk and compliance management framework, a single Risk and Compliance Committee, replacing the above-mentioned committees, should be established to support the Chief Risk Officer with respect to all Union’s financial operations. Decision C(2020) 5154 establishing the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities should accordingly be repealed.
(22) The composition of the Risk and Compliance Committee should bring together expertise in matters of financial risk and budgetary management, as well as the policy and operational perspectives and the risk management expertise of Directorates-General involved in the implementation of the Union’s financial operations. The Members of the Risk and Compliance Committee should be representatives having senior management function of the Directorate-General for the Budget, of the Secretariat-General and from each Directorate-General responsible for managing the Union’s financial operations.
(23) The Risk and Compliance Committee should support the Chief Risk Officer in the conduct of their duties related to financial risk management and oversight and the development and implementation of the relevant risk framework applicable for the Union’s financial operations.
(24) The High-Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic and risk compliance policies should be adopted by the Commission. With a view to drawing on the expertise of the Risk and Compliance Committee and in view of the need to involve all the services concerned from early stages of preparation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic and risk compliance policies, the Chief Risk Officer should submit the draft of the policy to the Risk and Compliance Committee for discussion ahead of the interservice consultation.
(25) To ensure a smooth transition from the current governance setup which includes three committees, all existing risk management governance arrangements including the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities should remain in place until the first meeting of the Risk and Compliance Committee foreseen in this Decision. Several manuals and documents of the Directorate-General for the Budget as well as of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations set out the financial risk management rules for asset management operations and budgetary guarantees, including the risk management frameworks applicable to programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees already adopted at the date of entry into force of this Decision. In the field of borrowing and lending, a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and several supporting thematic policies have been adopted by the Commissioner for the Budget. These documents are the basis for the execution of ongoing financial operations and they should remain in force pending review by the Chief Risk Officer and until such time as replaced by the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, as well as thematic risk and compliance policies adopted in accordance with this Decision. To take account of the requirements of legal certainty and legitimate expectations of implementing partners and counterparts implementing already concluded guarantee agreements, it is appropriate to provide that the decisions approving the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies provide for transitory provisions. Those transitory provisions should ensure that the risks are managed within the risk appetite as defined for the programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees adopted before the entry into force of this Decision. When developing and implementing agreed risk measurement methodologies in respect of budgetary guarantees and loan programmes established before the entry into force of this Decision, the Chief Risk Officer and the Directorates-General in charge of the Union’s financial operations should respect the risk appetite as well as results from the programme or instrument authorising the budgetary guarantee or a loan and relevant implementing measures. This should also apply to any signed guarantee agreements, as well as to agreements that are yet to be signed based on programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantee already adopted at the date of entry into force of this Decision.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Subject matter

1. This Decision defines the role, responsibilities and tasks of the Chief Risk Officer for the Union’s financial operations (the ‘Chief Risk Officer’). The Chief Risk Officer, as a second line of defence at corporate level, shall have the mandate to develop, implement and monitor the Commission’s risk management and compliance framework for financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations. The Chief Risk Officer provides an independent assessment of the risks associated with the Union’s financial operations and performs an ongoing monitoring of the portfolio to monitor credit, market and liquidity risks and to identify appropriate risk management actions.

2. The Decision shall be based on the standard financial risk management practice of the ‘three lines of defence’ model, under which the first line of defence shall be the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, the corporate second line of defence shall be the Chief Risk Officer and the third line of defence shall be the Internal Audit Service.

Definitions

For the purposes of this Decision, the following definitions apply:

(a) ‘Union’s financial operation’ means loans provided directly by the Union, whether provisioned or not, the Union’s budgetary guarantees covering operations on the basis of guarantee agreements with the implementing partners, debt issuance and debt management including related liquidity management, asset management operations and tasks related to the function of asset management designated service for outsourced portfolio management;
(b) ‘programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans’ means the basic act within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Financial Regulation which authorises financial liability from budgetary guarantee or a loan in accordance with Article 213(1)(b) and (c) of the Financial Regulation;
(c) ‘financial risk’ means a risk of losses or other adverse events that arise or may arise in the design, execution and management of different categories of the Union’s financial operations due to materialisation of, in particular, credit, market, liquidity, funding, counterparty, operational, reputational and compliance risk;
(d) ‘contingent liability’ means contingent liability as defined in Article 2(16) of the Financial Regulation;
(e) ‘thematic risk and compliance policy’ means a policy, guideline, methodology or any other act referred to in Article 9, which sets out specific procedures and limits related to the Union’s financial operations that shall be followed by the Directorates-General responsible for the implementation of the Union’s financial operations;
(f) ‘risk methodologies’ means the quantitative approach and risk parameters for the assessment, measurement, monitoring and reporting of the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations which is implemented in risk management tools and risk management models;
(g) ‘risk appetite’ means the level of risk that the Commission is prepared to accept in order to achieve its policy objectives. The risk appetite per type of risk is to be defined, as appropriate, in the relevant legal acts, the risk management framework, internal policies and manuals and other documents that complement the relevant legal acts and the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy;
(h) ‘risk tolerance’ means the quantified acceptable deviation from the level of risk that shall not be exceeded. The tolerance levels for a specific type of risk and metrics shall allow measuring of and reporting on the risk exposure when implementing the relevant Union’s financial operations. The risk tolerance may be set from zero to full acceptance, depending on the legal framework, policy mandate and the availability and strength of the risk mitigation measures applied to the different identified risks, the framework governing the financial risk management and compliance for the different types or categories of the Union’s financial operations.

Close cooperation on financial risk management

1. The Chief Risk Officer and the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall implement any steps under this Decision, ensuring close cooperation, shall establish and promote risk culture and apply the requirements of prudence and the principle of sound financial management in their approach to financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations.

2. The development of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance polices shall take place through interservice working groups composed of participants of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations concerned.

3. The services of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations and of the Chief Risk Officer shall, from the outset, work in close cooperation and in a coordinated fashion within the Risk and Compliance Committee and its sub-committees on all tasks resulting from the implementation of this Decision, in particular in the preparation of the draft High Level Risk and Compliance Policy referred to in Article 8, of the thematic risk and compliance policies referred to in Article 9 and during the process on assessment of financial risks of programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans referred to in Article 10.
4. The work on financial risk management pursuant to this Decision shall in particular take into account evaluations, lessons learned and experience gained during the implementation of programmes and instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans, including, as appropriate, existing risk frameworks, feedback received from counterparts, implementing partners and other stakeholders, best market practices and international standards, as well as relevant legislation related to financial risk management and compliance.

Status and independence of the Chief Risk Officer

1. The Chief Risk Officer shall serve as the corporate second line of defence for the financial risk assessment of the Union’s financial operations. The Chief Risk Officer shall enjoy autonomy in carrying out the tasks and responsibilities set out in this Decision.

2. The post of the Chief Risk Officer shall constitute a specific function which shall be occupied by a senior manager with adequate professional experience in financial risk management and shall be supported by a dedicated team having relevant expertise. The Chief Risk Officer shall report directly to the Member of the College responsible for the Budget with respect to the responsibilities set out in this Decision.

3. The Chief Risk Officer shall exercise its role independently of functions and tasks related to the design, planning, implementation, management, execution of, and accounting for the Union’s financial operations. The function of the Chief Risk Officer shall not be compatible with the functions of an authorising officer by delegation for the Union’s financial operations and of the Accounting Officer.

4. The Chief Risk Officer shall be considered equivalent to the service responsible within the meaning of Article 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission in respect of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies. The Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall be services with a legitimate interest who shall be consulted in interservice consultations on the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and on those thematic risk and compliance policies which concern them.

5. The Chief Risk Officer shall be considered equivalent to the service with legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 58 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission and shall be consulted in interservice consultations in particular on legislative proposals for programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans, as well as on acts implementing programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans and on acts concerning any Union financial operation. This shall include interservice consultations on draft guarantee agreements and loan agreements as well as decisions approving the main elements of guarantee agreements. When being consulted, the Chief Risk Officer shall exclusively assess aspects of the financial risk management and compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies.

General tasks of the Chief Risk Officer

The Chief Risk Officer shall oversee the financial risks stemming from the Union’s financial operations and shall be responsible for the following general tasks:

(a) lead the development of the risk framework governing the financial risk management and compliance for the Union’s financial operations, in particular drawing up a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, supplemented by thematic risk and compliance policies;
(b) set up and lead interservice working groups on the development of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies with participation of the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations and other Directorates General concerned;
(c) oversee the implementation of the risk framework, including systems and processes needed to give effect to the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic policies by Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations concerned;
(d) assess the financial risks arising from borrowing operations, liquidity management operations and programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans before proposals for these programmes or instruments are adopted by the Commission;
(e) independently assess, consolidate, and report on the risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, taking into account the data and input from the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, and on compliance with the risk management framework and specified limits, including any relevant provisions set out in the basic acts establishing the individual programmes and the Financial Regulation;
(f) identify potential breaches of and non-compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy, thematic risk and compliance policies or other risk related guidelines, legal acts and policies and provide advice on mitigation measures where necessary, and/or review management and mitigating measures implemented or proposed by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations;
(g) promote best practices, risk culture, consistent and harmonised risk approaches across Commission services in the management of the risks arising from the Union’s financial operations.

Specific tasks in respect of EU borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and asset management operations

In addition to the general tasks, the Chief Risk Officer shall have the following tasks in respect of EU borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and asset management operations:

(a) define within the relevant thematic risk policy, where feasible, the risk appetite, and risk tolerance applicable for the different types of financial operations;
(b) issue an opinion on the draft funding plan and its subsequent amendments;
(c) issue an opinion on the liquidity management strategy for liquidity management operations prior to their adoption or amendment;
(d) be consulted on the asset management guidelines, the strategic asset allocation, and the applicable benchmarks for asset management operations, before their adoption by the Directorate-General responsible for these operations;
(e) define eligibility criteria for authorised counterparties and potential issuers that may be considered for investment opportunities;
(f) define appropriate risk limits to ensure that the credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk undertaken through the asset management and liquidity management operations remain compliant with the risk objectives, risk capacity, risk appetite and risk tolerance set in the relevant investment guidelines, the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic policies. The risk limits may be set up at counterparty level or instrument level, or set up at the level of the aggregated exposures;
(g) assess, consolidate and report on risk exposures, executed by the Directorate-General for the Budget or, when relevant, outsourced to a third party.

Specific tasks related to assessment of financial risks of programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans

The Chief Risk Officer shall in respect of programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans:

(a) conduct regular and independent portfolio risk assessments based on the approved risk methodologies and based on data provided by Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations;
(b) provide relevant input on financial risks and contingent liabilities to reports adopted by the Commission on these issues, such as the risk assessment for reporting under Article 41(5) and Article 256 of the Financial Regulation based on information from the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations.

The High Level Risk and Compliance Policy

1. In furtherance of the general task referred to in Article 5(1)(a), the Chief Risk Officer shall prepare a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy.

2. The High Level Risk and Compliance Policy shall:
(a) set the strategic risk objectives guiding the management of the different categories of financial risk arising from the implementation of the Union’s financial operations;
(b) describe the risk governance framework which outlines the main roles and responsibilities related to the risk management and compliance framework of the Union’s financial operations;
(c) present the Commission’s high level risk appetite statement;
(d) identify the principal risks to the financial interests of the Union arising from the implementation of the Union’s financial operations and provide a high-level risk management and compliance framework for the assessment, measurement, mitigation and monitoring of those risks.

Thematic risk and compliance policies

1. The thematic risk and compliance policies shall set out the systems, rules, risk methodologies, procedures and processes for the risk management, reporting and compliance related to the main categories of financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations and shall describe the roles and responsibilities of the different services involved in the management of the identified risks. Those policies shall take into account the specificities of different categories of the Union’s financial operations.

2. The thematic risk and compliance policies shall be in line with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy.

Specific elements of thematic risk and compliance policies establishing risk framework for the Union’s budgetary guarantees and loans

1. The relevant thematic risk and compliance policy in respect to budgetary guarantees and loans shall:
(a) establish the risk methodologies, including risk parameters and tools to evaluate potential losses resulting from budgetary guarantees and loans, which shall, inter alia, constitute guidance for the setting of the provisioning rate;
(b) define the risk methodologies as appropriate to ensure Commission-wide consistency and convergence relevant in the process of the designing, negotiating, implementing and monitoring of budgetary guarantees and loans;
(c) define the methodology to measure the level of financial risks to be provisioned as adequate safety buffer referred to in Article 214(2), second subparagraph of the Financial Regulation.

2. The risk methodologies and tools established in the thematic risk and compliance policies shall be used by both the first and second lines of defence when assessing envisaged programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans.

Implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies

1. The Chief Risk Officer shall oversee the implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations.

2. The Directorates-Generals responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall monitor the risks related to the respective Union’s financial operations and ensure compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies. To this effect, the Directorates-Generals responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall in particular:
(a) take all necessary measures to implement controls and reporting systems needed to comply with the systems, methodologies and processes resulting from those policies;
(b) ensure in the implementation of the Union’s financial operations that financial risks remain within the risk appetite and risk limits defined, where relevant, for the programme or instruments establishing the budgetary guarantee and loans;
(c) provide regular reports to the Chief Risk Officer on compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance policy and thematic risk and compliance policies;
(d) document thoroughly the implementation of the Union’s financial operations which they oversee, report on situations where the risk of the portfolio of operations deviates or may deviate from the set risk levels;
(e) respond in a timely manner to requests for additional information from the Chief Risk Officer, including relevant information available on operations guaranteed by the Union budget and conducted by implementing partners and counterparts, where this is required to enable the Chief Risk Officer to establish an independent assessment of the risks;
(f) when working with third parties, notably implementing partners and counterparts, obtain the necessary information, available in particular in line with the respective guarantee agreements, about financial risks related to the Union’s financial operations.

3. The Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall establish the rules and procedures to ensure effective compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the relevant thematic risk and compliance policies for the Union’s financial operations for which they are responsible. The Chief Risk Officer may be consulted on these rules and procedures with a view to review their compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the thematic risk and compliance policies.

Advice to mitigate financial risks

1. The Chief Risk Officer may advise the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations on the implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy or thematic risk and compliance policies or on the management of specific risks. Such advice may include appropriate remedial measures.

2. The Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall, without undue delay, address the advice or, as applicable, other non-compliance or breach of limits as referred to in the Article 5(f) and provide to the Chief Risk Officer explanations on the measures taken.

3. The Chief Risk Officer may, as appropriate, inform the Member of the College responsible for the Budget and the Member(s) of the College responsible for the Union’s financial operations concerned about the advice referred to in paragraph (1) and, where relevant, about the deliberations of the Risk and Compliance Committee. Such information may also include assessment of the rules and procedures referred to in Article 11(3).

4. The Chief Risk Officer shall regularly inform the Risk and Compliance Committee on the advice provided and on the follow up by the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations.

Reports and information on financial risks

1. The Chief Risk Officer shall submit regular reports to the Member of the College responsible for the Budget, the Members of the College responsible for the Union’s financial operations, to the Risk and Compliance Committee, to the Director-General of the Directorate-General for the Budget, to the Accounting Officer and to the Directors-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, respectively for their areas of competence, on financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations in accordance with this Decision.

2. The Chief Risk Officer shall promptly inform the Member of the College responsible for the Budget in the event of material developments which call for urgent consideration. In addition, the Directorates-General concerned shall be timely and duly informed.

3. The Chief Risk Officer shall regularly inform the Risk and Compliance Committee, the Director-General of the Directorate-General for the Budget, the Accounting Officer and the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations, on risks and non-compliance with rules and procedures or breaches of limits in respect of the Union’s financial operations, respectively for their areas of competence.

4. The Chief Risk Officer shall submit a report on the implementation and functioning of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy to the College once per year, which may be accompanied by a proposal to review the policy.

Compliance Officer

1. A staff member entrusted with the role of Compliance Officer shall report directly to the Chief Risk Officer on matters regarding conformity with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies, and rules for anti-money laundering and terrorist financing in respect of the Union’s financial operations and shall perform the compliance function.

2. The compliance function shall in particular include:
(a) in respect of the Union’s financial operations:
(i) compliance related support to relevant services responsible for the operational implementation and execution of the Union’s financial operations; and
(ii) support for the observance of the Commission-wide rules on ethical behaviour and integrity applicable to relevant services involved in the Union’s financial operations;
(b) in respect of the Union’s financial operations other than operations implemented in indirect management, guidance addressing the prevention of money laundering and countering terrorism financing, tax avoidance, tax fraud or tax evasion for the execution of the Union’s financial operations other than budgetary guarantees in indirect management, by entities incorporated in or established in jurisdictions listed under the relevant policy on non-cooperative jurisdictions or that are identified as high-risk third countries pursuant to Article 9(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 or that do not effectively comply with the Union or internationally agreed tax standards on transparency and exchange of information, breach sanction regimes or perform other relevant financial irregularities.

3. Guidelines on compliance shall be adopted in accordance with Article 18. These guidelines shall apply to financial operations other than those implemented in indirect management.
The Compliance Officer may also, under the authority of the Chief Risk Officer, where necessary and appropriate, provide advice in line with Article 12.

Risk and Compliance Committee

1. A Risk and Compliance Committee shall be established to support the Chief Risk Officer in the conduct of responsibilities of that officer.

2. The Risk and Compliance Committee shall:
(a) discuss the draft High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies prepared by the Chief Risk Officer, as well as their amendments;
(b) support the Chief Risk Officer in the tasks referred to in Article 5 of this Decision;
(c) support the Chief Risk Officer in evaluating, monitoring and approving practices regarding the implementation of the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and relating to the financial risk management and compliance of the Union’s financial operations;
(d) support the Chief Risk Officer in managing of the financial risks in connection with the Union’s financial operations and be consulted by the Chief Risk Officer about non-compliance with the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy or breaches of other related guidelines, thematic risk and compliance policies and limits.

3. The Chief Risk Officer may decide to establish sub-committees for specific topics, in particular for specific categories of the Union’s financial operations or for a specific category of risk.

4. The sub-committees shall facilitate the efficient functioning of the Risk and Compliance Committee through:
(a) assisting the Chief Risk Officer in assessing and mitigating risks elaborated in thematic risk and compliance policies;
(b) preparing matters to be brought to the Risk and Compliance Committee;
(c) providing input on technical issues related to the assessment and mitigation of those risks.

Members and organisation of the Risk and Compliance Committee and the sub-committees

1. The Chief Risk Officer chairs the Risk and Compliance Committee.

2. The Risk and Compliance Committee shall be composed of the following members:
(a) the Chief Risk Officer;
(b) the Accounting Officer of the Commission;
(c) a representative from the Directorate-General for the Budget overseeing the issuance of debt to finance Union programme;
(d) the Compliance Officer;
(e) a representative from the Secretariat-General designated by the Secretary-General;
(f) a representative from each Directorate-General responsible for budgetary guarantees or loans programmes.

3. The representative from the Directorate-General for the Budget in charge of the multiannual financial framework and a representative from the Directorate-General for the Budget in charge of the annual budget shall be permanent observers to the Risk and Compliance Committee.

4. The Chief Risk Officer may invite other observers to the Risk and Compliance Committee whose opinion and functions is deemed appropriate for the matters discussed at the Risk and Compliance Committee.

5. The level of the representatives under points (c), (e) and (f) of paragraph 2 of this Article shall be Director-General or Deputy Director-General, who may appoint an alternate at the level of senior manager to ensure compliance with the mandate and responsibilities laid down in this Decision.

6. The Compliance Officer referred to in point (d) of paragraph 2 of this Article shall be a non-voting member of the Risk and Compliance Committee.

7. The Chief Risk Officer shall appoint up to three external experts to participate in the meetings of the Risk and Compliance Committee. The external experts shall give opinions and participate in deliberations without voting rights on matters brought before the Committee.

8. The decision to establish a sub-committee pursuant to Article 15(3) shall determine the members which shall participate. A member of the Risk and Compliance Committee, if designated as a sub-committee member, may either be a member of the sub-committee themself or designate the members of the sub-committee from the staff of the respective Directorate-General. The designated members shall possess adequate knowledge and competencies in areas relevant for the work of the sub-committee. A sub-committee shall be chaired by the Chief Risk Officer or by a chair designated by the Chief Risk Officer.

9. The Risk and Compliance Committee shall adopt by a majority of two thirds of its members its rules of procedure and the rules of procedure of sub-committees established in accordance with Article 15(3). The majority vote shall include votes of the members referred to in points (a) and (e) of paragraph 2 of this Article.

Secretariat of the Risk and Compliance Committee

The staff of the Chief Risk Officer shall ensure the secretariat of the Risk and Compliance Committee covering at least the following tasks:

(a) contacting and consulting with relevant Commission services when preparing input for the Risk and Compliance Committee;
(b) organising meetings of the Risk and Compliance Committee, including the preparation of the agenda, documents, and minutes of those meetings;
(c) performing other administrative and organisational tasks related to the organisation of the Risk and Compliance Committee.

Pre-consultations on the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and of thematic risk and compliance policies

1. The draft High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and draft thematic risk and compliance policies shall be drawn up by the Chief Risk Officer and discussed in an interservice working group in which the Directorates General responsible for the Union’s financial operations shall participate. The Secretariat-General and the Legal Service shall be invited to such a working group.

2. Prior to initiating the interservice consultation, the Chief Risk Officer shall present the draft High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and draft thematic risk and compliance policies for discussion in the Risk and Compliance Committee in accordance with Article 15(2), point (a).

3. When submitting the draft policies to the interservice consultation and to the Commission for adoption, the Chief Risk Officer shall provide information regarding the outcome of the discussion in the Risk and Compliance Committee referred to in Article 15(2)(a) and its assessment.

4. The members’ comments shall be given due and fair consideration and the Chief Risk Officer shall provide information on how the comments have been reflected, or not, in the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy or the thematic risk and compliance policies.

Repeal

1. Decision C(2020) 5154 on establishing the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities arising from Budgetary Guarantees is repealed.

2. References to the repealed Decision shall be construed as references to this Decision.

3. Decision C(2024) 745 on the adoption of a Charter of tasks and responsibilities for the Commission’s Chief Risk Officer for borrowing, debt management and lending operations is repealed.

Transitional provisions

1. The High Level and Risk Compliance Policy adopted under Decision (EU) 2023/2825 shall remain valid in respect to categories of the Union’s financial operations covered therein until replaced by the High Level and Risk Compliance Policy referred to in Article 8.
2. Manuals and other relevant documents relating to the risk management of asset management operations adopted prior to the entry into force of this Decision shall be reviewed by the Chief Risk Officer. The manuals and other relevant documents approved by the Steering Committee on Contingent Liabilities as well as the manuals and documents of the Directorates-General responsible for the Union’s financial operations setting out the financial risk management rules for existing programmes shall remain valid until their replacement by thematic risk and compliance policies.

3. Appointments of the members of the Risk and Compliance Committee pursuant to points (c), (e) and (f) of Article 16(2) shall be notified to the Chief Risk Officer within one month from the entry into force of this Decision or from the date a Directorate-General receives authorising officer responsibilities for the Union’s financial operations.

4. The decision adopting the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and thematic risk and compliance policies shall provide for transitory provisions to ensure that the risks are managed within the risk appetite as defined for the programmes or instruments authorising budgetary guarantees adopted before the entry into force of this Decision.

5. Without prejudice to the risk appetite determined by the legislative acts establishing those programmes, the ex post assessment, monitoring and reporting on financial risks of programmes and instruments authorising budgetary guarantees and loans adopted before the entry into force of this Decision shall be carried out by using the methodologies set out in the thematic risk and compliance policies adopted on the basis of this decision.

Entry into force and application

1. This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

2. Article 18 and paragraph 1 of Article 19 shall apply as of the day of the first meeting of the Risk and Compliance Committee, which shall be duly convened by the Chief Risk Officer.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/362 of 21 February 2025 postponing the expiry date of the approval of cypermethrin for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/362 24.2.2025
(1) Cypermethrin was approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2013(2)subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(2) The approval of cypermethrin for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 (‘the approval’) is to expire on 31 May 2025. On 24 November 2023, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 for the renewal of the approval (‘the application’).
(3) On 22 May 2024, the evaluating competent authority of Belgium informed the Commission that it had decided, pursuant to Article 14(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, that a full evaluation of the application was necessary. Pursuant to Article 8(1) of that Regulation, the evaluating competent authority is to perform a full evaluation of the application within 365 days of its validation.
(4) The evaluating competent authority may, as appropriate, require the applicant to provide sufficient data to carry out the evaluation, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012. In that event, the 365-day period is suspended for a period that may not exceed 180 days in total unless a longer suspension is justified by the nature of the data requested or by exceptional circumstances.
(5) Within 270 days of receipt of a recommendation from the evaluating competent authority, the European Chemicals Agency is to prepare and submit to the Commission an opinion on renewal of the approval of the active substance in accordance with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
(6) Consequently, for reasons beyond the control of the applicant, the approval is likely to expire before a decision has been taken on its renewal. It is therefore appropriate to postpone the expiry date of the approval for a period of time sufficient to enable the examination of the application. Taking into account the time-limits for evaluation by the evaluating competent authority, for preparation and submission by the European Chemicals Agency of its opinion and the time needed for the Commission to decide whether to renew the approval, the expiry date should be postponed to 30 November 2027.
(7) After the postponement of the expiry date of the approval, cypermethrin remains approved for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2013,
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1), and in particular Article 14(5) thereof,
After consulting the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
Whereas:
(1) Cypermethrin was approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2013 (2) subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(2) The approval of cypermethrin for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 (‘the approval’) is to expire on 31 May 2025. On 24 November 2023, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 for the renewal of the approval (‘the application’).
(3) On 22 May 2024, the evaluating competent authority of Belgium informed the Commission that it had decided, pursuant to Article 14(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, that a full evaluation of the application was necessary. Pursuant to Article 8(1) of that Regulation, the evaluating competent authority is to perform a full evaluation of the application within 365 days of its validation.
(4) The evaluating competent authority may, as appropriate, require the applicant to provide sufficient data to carry out the evaluation, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012. In that event, the 365-day period is suspended for a period that may not exceed 180 days in total unless a longer suspension is justified by the nature of the data requested or by exceptional circumstances.
(5) Within 270 days of receipt of a recommendation from the evaluating competent authority, the European Chemicals Agency is to prepare and submit to the Commission an opinion on renewal of the approval of the active substance in accordance with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
(6) Consequently, for reasons beyond the control of the applicant, the approval is likely to expire before a decision has been taken on its renewal. It is therefore appropriate to postpone the expiry date of the approval for a period of time sufficient to enable the examination of the application. Taking into account the time-limits for evaluation by the evaluating competent authority, for preparation and submission by the European Chemicals Agency of its opinion and the time needed for the Commission to decide whether to renew the approval, the expiry date should be postponed to 30 November 2027.
(7) After the postponement of the expiry date of the approval, cypermethrin remains approved for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2013,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The expiry date of the approval of cypermethrin for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 set out in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2013 is postponed to 30 November 2027.
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/363 of 21 February 2025 amending Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 as regards the rules on risk management and compliance framework for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations and non-competitive auction allocation

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/363 25.2.2025
(1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825(2)sets out a risk management and compliance framework for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations. That framework includes the role of the Chief Risk Officer.
(2) By Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369(3), the Commission’s financial risk management and compliance framework for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations within the meaning of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 has been enhanced and its coverage extended also to financial risks arising from the asset management operations, budgetary guarantees and financial assistance. In that context, the scope of oversight by the Chief Risk Officer has been extended to cover financial risks arising from all those financial operations.
(3) Taking into account that Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 establishes the role of the Chief Risk Officer for overseeing the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, it is appropriate to clarify that the financial risk management of the borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations should be governed by the rules of that Decision. Therefore, the provisions in Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 on the role of the Chief Risk Officer and the establishment of a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy should be deleted. Moreover, the provisions on the Risk and Compliance Committee should be deleted as the remit of that Committee, its composition and working methods are now included in Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369. Finally, the references to the opinion of the Chief Risk Officer on the funding plan and the liquidity management strategy should be amended to reflect the provisions of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.
(4) Faced with the need to raise increasing volumes through auctions for debt securities, it is appropriate to introduce new incentives to boost participation in these transactions. It is proposed to follow the example of Member State auction programmes to allow the credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602(4)to purchase additional amounts of debt securities sold at an auction following the fixing of the auction-price. In case the market price of the auctioned security increases after the auction, it allows primary dealers to buy additional debt securities at a price below market price, thus constituting an incentive to bid in the auction. Accordingly, a new type of transaction of non-competitive auction allocation should be introduced to allow buying at a set price additional amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities within a set period following the auction. It should be possible to use the auction platform to carry out the allocation.
(5) Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(6) To ensure a smooth transition from the current governance framework set out in Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 to the new framework set out in Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369, the existing risk management arrangements related to the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the Risk and Compliance Committee should remain in place until the day of the first meeting of the Risk and Compliance Committee established in Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.
(1) in Article 2, the following point (17) is added:‘(17)‘non-competitive auction allocation’ means the issuance process whereby amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities additional to the auctioned amounts are allocated to members of the primary dealer network established under Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1602(*1)participating in the auction based on a set price, within a set period of time following an auction and by using, as appropriate, an auction platform to carry out the allocation.(*1)Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602 of 31 July 2023 on the primary dealer network and the definition of eligibility criteria for lead and co-lead mandates for syndicated transactions for the purposes of the borrowing activities by the Commission on behalf of the Union and of the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ L 196, 4.8.2023, p. 44, ELI:http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2023/1602/oj).’;" ‘(17) ‘non-competitive auction allocation’ means the issuance process whereby amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities additional to the auctioned amounts are allocated to members of the primary dealer network established under Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1602(*1)participating in the auction based on a set price, within a set period of time following an auction and by using, as appropriate, an auction platform to carry out the allocation.
‘(17) ‘non-competitive auction allocation’ means the issuance process whereby amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities additional to the auctioned amounts are allocated to members of the primary dealer network established under Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1602(*1)participating in the auction based on a set price, within a set period of time following an auction and by using, as appropriate, an auction platform to carry out the allocation.
‘(17) ‘non-competitive auction allocation’ means the issuance process whereby amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities additional to the auctioned amounts are allocated to members of the primary dealer network established under Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1602(*1)participating in the auction based on a set price, within a set period of time following an auction and by using, as appropriate, an auction platform to carry out the allocation.
(2) in Article 4(2), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:‘When establishing the funding plan, the opinion of the Chief Risk Officer referred to in Article 6, point (b), of Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369(*2)shall be duly taken into account.(*2)Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 of 21 February 2025 establishing the role of the Chief Risk Officer overseeing the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations (OJ L, 2025/369, 25.2.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/369/oj).’;"
(3) in Article 7(1), point (c) is replaced by the following:‘(c)borrowing operations may be organised through a mix of syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations and private placements, in all cases relying on the services of credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602’; ‘(c) borrowing operations may be organised through a mix of syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations and private placements, in all cases relying on the services of credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602’;
‘(c) borrowing operations may be organised through a mix of syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations and private placements, in all cases relying on the services of credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602’;
‘(c) borrowing operations may be organised through a mix of syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations and private placements, in all cases relying on the services of credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602’;
(4) in Article 8(4), the first sentence is replaced by the following:‘When establishing or amending the liquidity management strategy, the opinion of the Chief Risk Officer referred to in Article 6(c) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 shall be duly taken into account.’;
(5) in Article 12(2), points (c) and (d) are replaced by the following:‘(c)establishing arrangements and rules for the organisation of auctions and non-competitive auction allocations, including agreements with external providers of systems and constant oversight of the performance of auctions;(d)implementing individual borrowing transactions through syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations, and private placements;’; ‘(c) establishing arrangements and rules for the organisation of auctions and non-competitive auction allocations, including agreements with external providers of systems and constant oversight of the performance of auctions; (d) implementing individual borrowing transactions through syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations, and private placements;’;
‘(c) establishing arrangements and rules for the organisation of auctions and non-competitive auction allocations, including agreements with external providers of systems and constant oversight of the performance of auctions;
(d) implementing individual borrowing transactions through syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations, and private placements;’;
‘(c) establishing arrangements and rules for the organisation of auctions and non-competitive auction allocations, including agreements with external providers of systems and constant oversight of the performance of auctions;
(d) implementing individual borrowing transactions through syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations, and private placements;’;
(6) Article 18 is replaced by the following:‘The financial risk management of the borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations shall be governed by Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.’;
(7) Article 19 is deleted;
(8) Articles 20 and 21 are deleted;
(9) Articles 22 and 23 are deleted.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (1), and in particular Article 224(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 (2) sets out a risk management and compliance framework for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations. That framework includes the role of the Chief Risk Officer.
(2) By Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 (3), the Commission’s financial risk management and compliance framework for borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations within the meaning of Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 has been enhanced and its coverage extended also to financial risks arising from the asset management operations, budgetary guarantees and financial assistance. In that context, the scope of oversight by the Chief Risk Officer has been extended to cover financial risks arising from all those financial operations.
(3) Taking into account that Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 establishes the role of the Chief Risk Officer for overseeing the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations, it is appropriate to clarify that the financial risk management of the borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations should be governed by the rules of that Decision. Therefore, the provisions in Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 on the role of the Chief Risk Officer and the establishment of a High Level Risk and Compliance Policy should be deleted. Moreover, the provisions on the Risk and Compliance Committee should be deleted as the remit of that Committee, its composition and working methods are now included in Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369. Finally, the references to the opinion of the Chief Risk Officer on the funding plan and the liquidity management strategy should be amended to reflect the provisions of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.
(4) Faced with the need to raise increasing volumes through auctions for debt securities, it is appropriate to introduce new incentives to boost participation in these transactions. It is proposed to follow the example of Member State auction programmes to allow the credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602 (4) to purchase additional amounts of debt securities sold at an auction following the fixing of the auction-price. In case the market price of the auctioned security increases after the auction, it allows primary dealers to buy additional debt securities at a price below market price, thus constituting an incentive to bid in the auction. Accordingly, a new type of transaction of non-competitive auction allocation should be introduced to allow buying at a set price additional amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities within a set period following the auction. It should be possible to use the auction platform to carry out the allocation.
(5) Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(6) To ensure a smooth transition from the current governance framework set out in Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 to the new framework set out in Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369, the existing risk management arrangements related to the High Level Risk and Compliance Policy and the Risk and Compliance Committee should remain in place until the day of the first meeting of the Risk and Compliance Committee established in Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Implementing Decision (EU, Euratom) 2023/2825 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 2, the following point (17) is added:
‘(17) ‘non-competitive auction allocation’ means the issuance process whereby amounts of the Union and Euratom debt securities additional to the auctioned amounts are allocated to members of the primary dealer network established under Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1602 (*1) participating in the auction based on a set price, within a set period of time following an auction and by using, as appropriate, an auction platform to carry out the allocation.
(*1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602 of 31 July 2023 on the primary dealer network and the definition of eligibility criteria for lead and co-lead mandates for syndicated transactions for the purposes of the borrowing activities by the Commission on behalf of the Union and of the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ L 196, 4.8.2023, p. 44, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2023/1602/oj).’;”

(2) in Article 4(2), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
‘When establishing the funding plan, the opinion of the Chief Risk Officer referred to in Article 6, point (b), of Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 (*2) shall be duly taken into account.
(*2) Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 of 21 February 2025 establishing the role of the Chief Risk Officer overseeing the financial risks arising from the Union’s financial operations (OJ L, 2025/369, 25.2.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/369/oj).’;”

(3) in Article 7(1), point (c) is replaced by the following:
‘(c) borrowing operations may be organised through a mix of syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations and private placements, in all cases relying on the services of credit institutions and investment firms who are members of the primary dealer network established under Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1602’;
(4) in Article 8(4), the first sentence is replaced by the following:
‘When establishing or amending the liquidity management strategy, the opinion of the Chief Risk Officer referred to in Article 6(c) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369 shall be duly taken into account.’;
(5) in Article 12(2), points (c) and (d) are replaced by the following:
‘(c) establishing arrangements and rules for the organisation of auctions and non-competitive auction allocations, including agreements with external providers of systems and constant oversight of the performance of auctions;
(d) implementing individual borrowing transactions through syndicated transactions, auctions, non-competitive auction allocations, and private placements;’;
(6) Article 18 is replaced by the following:
‘The financial risk management of the borrowing, debt management, liquidity management and lending operations shall be governed by Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.’;
(7) Article 19 is deleted;
(8) Articles 20 and 21 are deleted;
(9) Articles 22 and 23 are deleted.

This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 1, points (7) and (9), shall apply as of the day of the first meeting of the Risk and Compliance Committee pursuant to Decision (EU, Euratom) 2025/369.

Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 16 June 2025 laying down the Rules on the reimbursement of expenses incurred by petitioners when participating in official fact-finding visits of the Committee on Petitions within the European Union

Official Journalof the European Union ENC series
C/2025/3603 1.7.2025
(1) When investigating petitions, establishing facts or seeking solutions, Parliament’s Committee on Petitions may organise official fact-finding visits to the Member State or region concerned by admissible petitions that have been already debated in that Committee.
(2) Petitioners are regularly invited to meet the members of the delegation of an official fact-finding visit of the Committee on Petitions when their petitions are discussed, since the presence of petitioners can reveal crucial facts and details on specific matters due to the information and experience they can share.
(3) In duly justified exceptional cases, there should be a possibility of reimbursement of the costs of participation of petitioners in official fact-finding visits of the Committee on Petitions when the official fact-finding visit takes place outside the place of residence of the petitioner,
— the official fact-finding visit takes place in the Union;
— the petitioner resides on the territory of the Union;
— the distance between the permanent place of residence of the petitioner and the place of the official fact-finding visit is more than 200 kilometres.
(a) Travel expenses:(i)If they travel by train or air, petitioners shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses actually incurred, up to a maximum of the first-class train fare or the flexible economy-class airfare, as appropriate; that reimbursement shall be made on the basis of the shortest route between the closest railway station or airport to the petitioner’s permanent residence and the venue for the meeting, and on presentation of the original train or airplane tickets, in paper or electronic format, including the boarding cards, if applicable; if the petitioner can demonstrate that a different route or class of air travel is more economical than that described in this point, that petitioner may be reimbursed accordingly; petitioners shall receive a flat-rate allowance to cover the cost of a return journey between their permanent residence and the nearest railway station or airport, including any parking fees paid at the station or airport; the amount of the flat-rate allowance shall be the one set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings;(ii)petitioners travelling by car shall be entitled, on presentation of a written declaration of honour, to a flat-rate reimbursement of their expenses corresponding to the second-class train fare calculated on the basis of the shortest route between their permanent residence and the venue of the official fact-finding visit; if there is no railway station in the direct vicinity of the permanent residence of the petitioner or of the venue of the official fact-finding visit to allow for such calculation, reimbursement shall be on the basis of a per-kilometre allowance paid at the rate set out in paragraph 78 of the Parliament’s Internal Rules governing missions and duty travel by officials and other servants of the European Parliament(1);(iii)travel from and to a place other than the permanent residence of the petitioner may be authorised in exceptional circumstances and shall have to be duly justified by the petitioner; (i) If they travel by train or air, petitioners shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses actually incurred, up to a maximum of the first-class train fare or the flexible economy-class airfare, as appropriate; that reimbursement shall be made on the basis of the shortest route between the closest railway station or airport to the petitioner’s permanent residence and the venue for the meeting, and on presentation of the original train or airplane tickets, in paper or electronic format, including the boarding cards, if applicable; if the petitioner can demonstrate that a different route or class of air travel is more economical than that described in this point, that petitioner may be reimbursed accordingly; petitioners shall receive a flat-rate allowance to cover the cost of a return journey between their permanent residence and the nearest railway station or airport, including any parking fees paid at the station or airport; the amount of the flat-rate allowance shall be the one set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings; (ii) petitioners travelling by car shall be entitled, on presentation of a written declaration of honour, to a flat-rate reimbursement of their expenses corresponding to the second-class train fare calculated on the basis of the shortest route between their permanent residence and the venue of the official fact-finding visit; if there is no railway station in the direct vicinity of the permanent residence of the petitioner or of the venue of the official fact-finding visit to allow for such calculation, reimbursement shall be on the basis of a per-kilometre allowance paid at the rate set out in paragraph 78 of the Parliament’s Internal Rules governing missions and duty travel by officials and other servants of the European Parliament(1); (iii) travel from and to a place other than the permanent residence of the petitioner may be authorised in exceptional circumstances and shall have to be duly justified by the petitioner;
(i) If they travel by train or air, petitioners shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses actually incurred, up to a maximum of the first-class train fare or the flexible economy-class airfare, as appropriate; that reimbursement shall be made on the basis of the shortest route between the closest railway station or airport to the petitioner’s permanent residence and the venue for the meeting, and on presentation of the original train or airplane tickets, in paper or electronic format, including the boarding cards, if applicable; if the petitioner can demonstrate that a different route or class of air travel is more economical than that described in this point, that petitioner may be reimbursed accordingly; petitioners shall receive a flat-rate allowance to cover the cost of a return journey between their permanent residence and the nearest railway station or airport, including any parking fees paid at the station or airport; the amount of the flat-rate allowance shall be the one set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings;
(ii) petitioners travelling by car shall be entitled, on presentation of a written declaration of honour, to a flat-rate reimbursement of their expenses corresponding to the second-class train fare calculated on the basis of the shortest route between their permanent residence and the venue of the official fact-finding visit; if there is no railway station in the direct vicinity of the permanent residence of the petitioner or of the venue of the official fact-finding visit to allow for such calculation, reimbursement shall be on the basis of a per-kilometre allowance paid at the rate set out in paragraph 78 of the Parliament’s Internal Rules governing missions and duty travel by officials and other servants of the European Parliament(1);
(iii) travel from and to a place other than the permanent residence of the petitioner may be authorised in exceptional circumstances and shall have to be duly justified by the petitioner;
(i) If they travel by train or air, petitioners shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses actually incurred, up to a maximum of the first-class train fare or the flexible economy-class airfare, as appropriate; that reimbursement shall be made on the basis of the shortest route between the closest railway station or airport to the petitioner’s permanent residence and the venue for the meeting, and on presentation of the original train or airplane tickets, in paper or electronic format, including the boarding cards, if applicable; if the petitioner can demonstrate that a different route or class of air travel is more economical than that described in this point, that petitioner may be reimbursed accordingly; petitioners shall receive a flat-rate allowance to cover the cost of a return journey between their permanent residence and the nearest railway station or airport, including any parking fees paid at the station or airport; the amount of the flat-rate allowance shall be the one set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings;
(ii) petitioners travelling by car shall be entitled, on presentation of a written declaration of honour, to a flat-rate reimbursement of their expenses corresponding to the second-class train fare calculated on the basis of the shortest route between their permanent residence and the venue of the official fact-finding visit; if there is no railway station in the direct vicinity of the permanent residence of the petitioner or of the venue of the official fact-finding visit to allow for such calculation, reimbursement shall be on the basis of a per-kilometre allowance paid at the rate set out in paragraph 78 of the Parliament’s Internal Rules governing missions and duty travel by officials and other servants of the European Parliament(1);
(iii) travel from and to a place other than the permanent residence of the petitioner may be authorised in exceptional circumstances and shall have to be duly justified by the petitioner;
(b) Daily subsistence and overnight allowances on the basis of flat rates:(i)petitioners shall be entitled to a daily allowance for each day of active participation in a meeting in order to cover the cost of meals, local transport at the place of the official fact-finding visit and other expenses; a 30 % reduction shall be applied to the daily allowance for each meal provided free of charge; in the event that breakfast is provided free of charge, that reduction of the daily allowance shall be of 10 %;(ii)if petitioners are required to spend the night at the place of the official fact-finding visit, they shall be entitled to an overnight flat-rate allowance subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; in exceptional cases, petitioners may be authorised to spend more than one night at the place of the official fact-finding visit; in such cases, petitioners shall be entitled to the same overnight flat-rate allowance for the additional night(s) subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer;(iii)the amounts of the daily subsistence and overnight flat-rate allowances shall be those set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings. (i) petitioners shall be entitled to a daily allowance for each day of active participation in a meeting in order to cover the cost of meals, local transport at the place of the official fact-finding visit and other expenses; a 30 % reduction shall be applied to the daily allowance for each meal provided free of charge; in the event that breakfast is provided free of charge, that reduction of the daily allowance shall be of 10 %; (ii) if petitioners are required to spend the night at the place of the official fact-finding visit, they shall be entitled to an overnight flat-rate allowance subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; in exceptional cases, petitioners may be authorised to spend more than one night at the place of the official fact-finding visit; in such cases, petitioners shall be entitled to the same overnight flat-rate allowance for the additional night(s) subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; (iii) the amounts of the daily subsistence and overnight flat-rate allowances shall be those set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings.
(i) petitioners shall be entitled to a daily allowance for each day of active participation in a meeting in order to cover the cost of meals, local transport at the place of the official fact-finding visit and other expenses; a 30 % reduction shall be applied to the daily allowance for each meal provided free of charge; in the event that breakfast is provided free of charge, that reduction of the daily allowance shall be of 10 %;
(ii) if petitioners are required to spend the night at the place of the official fact-finding visit, they shall be entitled to an overnight flat-rate allowance subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; in exceptional cases, petitioners may be authorised to spend more than one night at the place of the official fact-finding visit; in such cases, petitioners shall be entitled to the same overnight flat-rate allowance for the additional night(s) subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer;
(iii) the amounts of the daily subsistence and overnight flat-rate allowances shall be those set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings.
(i) petitioners shall be entitled to a daily allowance for each day of active participation in a meeting in order to cover the cost of meals, local transport at the place of the official fact-finding visit and other expenses; a 30 % reduction shall be applied to the daily allowance for each meal provided free of charge; in the event that breakfast is provided free of charge, that reduction of the daily allowance shall be of 10 %;
(ii) if petitioners are required to spend the night at the place of the official fact-finding visit, they shall be entitled to an overnight flat-rate allowance subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; in exceptional cases, petitioners may be authorised to spend more than one night at the place of the official fact-finding visit; in such cases, petitioners shall be entitled to the same overnight flat-rate allowance for the additional night(s) subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer;
(iii) the amounts of the daily subsistence and overnight flat-rate allowances shall be those set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings.
THE BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 227 thereof,
Having regard to Rule 25, paragraphs 2 and 9, and to Title IX of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament,
Having regard to the Bureau Decision of 24 June 2024 on Rules on Public Hearings,
Having regard to the Decision of the Conference of Presidents’ of 13 March 2025 on the Implementing provisions governing missions outside the three places of work of the European Parliament;
(1) When investigating petitions, establishing facts or seeking solutions, Parliament’s Committee on Petitions may organise official fact-finding visits to the Member State or region concerned by admissible petitions that have been already debated in that Committee.
(2) Petitioners are regularly invited to meet the members of the delegation of an official fact-finding visit of the Committee on Petitions when their petitions are discussed, since the presence of petitioners can reveal crucial facts and details on specific matters due to the information and experience they can share.
(3) In duly justified exceptional cases, there should be a possibility of reimbursement of the costs of participation of petitioners in official fact-finding visits of the Committee on Petitions when the official fact-finding visit takes place outside the place of residence of the petitioner,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Scope and annual limit
Article 1
A yearly maximum of 16 petitioners who participate in an official fact-finding visit of the Committee on Petitions within the Union may have their expenses reimbursed in accordance with this Decision and subject to the availability of funds.

Requests for reimbursement of expenses
Article 2
1. Within the scope and limit set out in Article 1, petitioners participating in official fact-finding visits of the Committee on Petitions may have their expenses reimbursed, on an exceptional and case-by-case basis, upon request by the petitioner, at the discretion of the Chair of the Committee on Petitions, provided that:
—
the official fact-finding visit takes place in the Union;
—
the petitioner resides on the territory of the Union;
—
the distance between the permanent place of residence of the petitioner and the place of the official fact-finding visit is more than 200 kilometres.
2. Requests that have been approved by the Chair of the Committee on Petitions shall be submitted by that committee’s secretariat, on behalf of the Chair, to the authorising officer by sub-delegation and shall indicate the names of the petitioners quoted in the reports (as well as the number of the relevant petition) to prove that the requestor is a petitioner.
3. When the petition is signed by more than one natural or legal person, only the expenses of the designated representative may be reimbursed.
4. The petitioners shall be informed by the secretariat of the Committee on Petitions of the decision taken on their reimbursement request.
5. The Chair of the Committee on Petitions shall be responsible for ensuring geographical balance among the petitioners whose expenses are reimbursed each year.

Financial arrangements
Article 3
Petitioners whose request for reimbursement of expenses has been approved shall be entitled to reimbursement of their travel expenses and to a daily allowance, in accordance with the following arrangements:
(a)
Travel expenses:
(i)
If they travel by train or air, petitioners shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses actually incurred, up to a maximum of the first-class train fare or the flexible economy-class airfare, as appropriate; that reimbursement shall be made on the basis of the shortest route between the closest railway station or airport to the petitioner’s permanent residence and the venue for the meeting, and on presentation of the original train or airplane tickets, in paper or electronic format, including the boarding cards, if applicable; if the petitioner can demonstrate that a different route or class of air travel is more economical than that described in this point, that petitioner may be reimbursed accordingly; petitioners shall receive a flat-rate allowance to cover the cost of a return journey between their permanent residence and the nearest railway station or airport, including any parking fees paid at the station or airport; the amount of the flat-rate allowance shall be the one set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings;
(ii)
petitioners travelling by car shall be entitled, on presentation of a written declaration of honour, to a flat-rate reimbursement of their expenses corresponding to the second-class train fare calculated on the basis of the shortest route between their permanent residence and the venue of the official fact-finding visit; if there is no railway station in the direct vicinity of the permanent residence of the petitioner or of the venue of the official fact-finding visit to allow for such calculation, reimbursement shall be on the basis of a per-kilometre allowance paid at the rate set out in paragraph 78 of the Parliament’s Internal Rules governing missions and duty travel by officials and other servants of the European Parliament(1);
(iii)
travel from and to a place other than the permanent residence of the petitioner may be authorised in exceptional circumstances and shall have to be duly justified by the petitioner;
(b)
Daily subsistence and overnight allowances on the basis of flat rates:
(i)
petitioners shall be entitled to a daily allowance for each day of active participation in a meeting in order to cover the cost of meals, local transport at the place of the official fact-finding visit and other expenses; a 30 % reduction shall be applied to the daily allowance for each meal provided free of charge; in the event that breakfast is provided free of charge, that reduction of the daily allowance shall be of 10 %;
(ii)
if petitioners are required to spend the night at the place of the official fact-finding visit, they shall be entitled to an overnight flat-rate allowance subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; in exceptional cases, petitioners may be authorised to spend more than one night at the place of the official fact-finding visit; in such cases, petitioners shall be entitled to the same overnight flat-rate allowance for the additional night(s) subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer;
(iii)
the amounts of the daily subsistence and overnight flat-rate allowances shall be those set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings.

Implementing measures
Article 4
The Secretary-General may adopt measures for the implementation of this Decision.

Entry into force and publication
Article 5
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.

THE BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 227 thereof,
Having regard to Rule 25, paragraphs 2 and 9, and to Title IX of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament,
Having regard to the Bureau Decision of 24 June 2024 on Rules on Public Hearings,
Having regard to the Decision of the Conference of Presidents’ of 13 March 2025 on the Implementing provisions governing missions outside the three places of work of the European Parliament;
(1) When investigating petitions, establishing facts or seeking solutions, Parliament’s Committee on Petitions may organise official fact-finding visits to the Member State or region concerned by admissible petitions that have been already debated in that Committee.
(2) Petitioners are regularly invited to meet the members of the delegation of an official fact-finding visit of the Committee on Petitions when their petitions are discussed, since the presence of petitioners can reveal crucial facts and details on specific matters due to the information and experience they can share.
(3) In duly justified exceptional cases, there should be a possibility of reimbursement of the costs of participation of petitioners in official fact-finding visits of the Committee on Petitions when the official fact-finding visit takes place outside the place of residence of the petitioner,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Scope and annual limit

A yearly maximum of 16 petitioners who participate in an official fact-finding visit of the Committee on Petitions within the Union may have their expenses reimbursed in accordance with this Decision and subject to the availability of funds.

Requests for reimbursement of expenses

1. Within the scope and limit set out in Article 1, petitioners participating in official fact-finding visits of the Committee on Petitions may have their expenses reimbursed, on an exceptional and case-by-case basis, upon request by the petitioner, at the discretion of the Chair of the Committee on Petitions, provided that:
—
the official fact-finding visit takes place in the Union;
—
the petitioner resides on the territory of the Union;
—
the distance between the permanent place of residence of the petitioner and the place of the official fact-finding visit is more than 200 kilometres.
2. Requests that have been approved by the Chair of the Committee on Petitions shall be submitted by that committee’s secretariat, on behalf of the Chair, to the authorising officer by sub-delegation and shall indicate the names of the petitioners quoted in the reports (as well as the number of the relevant petition) to prove that the requestor is a petitioner.
3. When the petition is signed by more than one natural or legal person, only the expenses of the designated representative may be reimbursed.
4. The petitioners shall be informed by the secretariat of the Committee on Petitions of the decision taken on their reimbursement request.
5. The Chair of the Committee on Petitions shall be responsible for ensuring geographical balance among the petitioners whose expenses are reimbursed each year.

Financial arrangements

Petitioners whose request for reimbursement of expenses has been approved shall be entitled to reimbursement of their travel expenses and to a daily allowance, in accordance with the following arrangements:
(a)
Travel expenses:
(i)
If they travel by train or air, petitioners shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses actually incurred, up to a maximum of the first-class train fare or the flexible economy-class airfare, as appropriate; that reimbursement shall be made on the basis of the shortest route between the closest railway station or airport to the petitioner’s permanent residence and the venue for the meeting, and on presentation of the original train or airplane tickets, in paper or electronic format, including the boarding cards, if applicable; if the petitioner can demonstrate that a different route or class of air travel is more economical than that described in this point, that petitioner may be reimbursed accordingly; petitioners shall receive a flat-rate allowance to cover the cost of a return journey between their permanent residence and the nearest railway station or airport, including any parking fees paid at the station or airport; the amount of the flat-rate allowance shall be the one set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings;
(ii)
petitioners travelling by car shall be entitled, on presentation of a written declaration of honour, to a flat-rate reimbursement of their expenses corresponding to the second-class train fare calculated on the basis of the shortest route between their permanent residence and the venue of the official fact-finding visit; if there is no railway station in the direct vicinity of the permanent residence of the petitioner or of the venue of the official fact-finding visit to allow for such calculation, reimbursement shall be on the basis of a per-kilometre allowance paid at the rate set out in paragraph 78 of the Parliament’s Internal Rules governing missions and duty travel by officials and other servants of the European Parliament(1);
(iii)
travel from and to a place other than the permanent residence of the petitioner may be authorised in exceptional circumstances and shall have to be duly justified by the petitioner;
(b)
Daily subsistence and overnight allowances on the basis of flat rates:
(i)
petitioners shall be entitled to a daily allowance for each day of active participation in a meeting in order to cover the cost of meals, local transport at the place of the official fact-finding visit and other expenses; a 30 % reduction shall be applied to the daily allowance for each meal provided free of charge; in the event that breakfast is provided free of charge, that reduction of the daily allowance shall be of 10 %;
(ii)
if petitioners are required to spend the night at the place of the official fact-finding visit, they shall be entitled to an overnight flat-rate allowance subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer; in exceptional cases, petitioners may be authorised to spend more than one night at the place of the official fact-finding visit; in such cases, petitioners shall be entitled to the same overnight flat-rate allowance for the additional night(s) subject to prior authorisation by the authorising officer;
(iii)
the amounts of the daily subsistence and overnight flat-rate allowances shall be those set out in the Bureau Decision on Rules on Public Hearings.

Implementing measures

The Secretary-General may adopt measures for the implementation of this Decision.

Entry into force and publication

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in theOfficial Journal of the European Union.

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/360 of 21 February 2025 postponing the expiry date of the approval of bromoacetic acid for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Official Journalof the European Union ENL series
2025/360 25.2.2025
(1) Bromoacetic acid was approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1032/2013(2)subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(2) The approval of bromoacetic acid for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 (‘the approval’) is to expire on 30 June 2025. On 22 December 2023, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 for the renewal of the approval (‘the application’).
(3) On 25 June 2024, the evaluating competent authority of Spain informed the Commission that it had decided, pursuant to Article 14(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, that a full evaluation of the application was necessary. Pursuant to Article 8(1) of that Regulation, the evaluating competent authority is to perform a full evaluation of the application within 365 days of its validation.
(4) The evaluating competent authority may, as appropriate, require the applicant to provide sufficient data to carry out the evaluation, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012. In that event, the 365-day period is suspended for a period that may not exceed 180 days in total unless a longer suspension is justified by the nature of the data requested or by exceptional circumstances.
(5) Within 270 days of receipt of a recommendation from the evaluating competent authority, the European Chemicals Agency is to prepare and submit to the Commission an opinion on renewal of the approval of the active substance in accordance with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
(6) Consequently, for reasons beyond the control of the applicant, the approval is likely to expire before a decision has been taken on its renewal. It is therefore appropriate to postpone the expiry date of the approval for a period of time sufficient to enable the examination of the application. Taking into account the time-limits for evaluation by the evaluating competent authority, for preparation and submission by the European Chemicals Agency of its opinion and the time needed for the Commission to decide whether to renew the approval, the expiry date should be postponed to 31 December 2027.
(7) After the postponement of the expiry date of the approval, bromoacetic acid remains approved for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1032/2013,
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1), and in particular Article 14(5) thereof,
After consulting the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
Whereas:
(1) Bromoacetic acid was approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1032/2013 (2) subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
(2) The approval of bromoacetic acid for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 (‘the approval’) is to expire on 30 June 2025. On 22 December 2023, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 for the renewal of the approval (‘the application’).
(3) On 25 June 2024, the evaluating competent authority of Spain informed the Commission that it had decided, pursuant to Article 14(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, that a full evaluation of the application was necessary. Pursuant to Article 8(1) of that Regulation, the evaluating competent authority is to perform a full evaluation of the application within 365 days of its validation.
(4) The evaluating competent authority may, as appropriate, require the applicant to provide sufficient data to carry out the evaluation, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012. In that event, the 365-day period is suspended for a period that may not exceed 180 days in total unless a longer suspension is justified by the nature of the data requested or by exceptional circumstances.
(5) Within 270 days of receipt of a recommendation from the evaluating competent authority, the European Chemicals Agency is to prepare and submit to the Commission an opinion on renewal of the approval of the active substance in accordance with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
(6) Consequently, for reasons beyond the control of the applicant, the approval is likely to expire before a decision has been taken on its renewal. It is therefore appropriate to postpone the expiry date of the approval for a period of time sufficient to enable the examination of the application. Taking into account the time-limits for evaluation by the evaluating competent authority, for preparation and submission by the European Chemicals Agency of its opinion and the time needed for the Commission to decide whether to renew the approval, the expiry date should be postponed to 31 December 2027.
(7) After the postponement of the expiry date of the approval, bromoacetic acid remains approved for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1032/2013,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The expiry date of the approval of bromoacetic acid for use in biocidal products of product-type 4 set out in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1032/2013 is postponed to 31 December 2027.
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.