Pending: 31998D0385

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 95/64/EC of 8 December 1995 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (1), and in particular Articles 4, 10 and 12 thereof,Whereas derogations should be granted to the Member States to enable them to adapt their national statistical systems to the requirements of Directive 95/64/EC;Whereas a list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, must be drawn up by the Commission;Whereas the content of the Annexes to the said Directive needs to be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Statistical Programme Committee set up by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom (2),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. The derogations granted by the Commission to the Member States are defined in Annex I.
2. The derogations apply for 1997, 1998 and 1999, except for certain derogations defined in Annex I, which shall apply for 1997 only.

Article 2
The list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, is given in Annex II.

Article 3
1. Annexes II, III, IV, V, VII and VIII of Directive 95/64/EC shall be amended as follows:
1) Annex II:
Figure 3 referring to footnote 3 is entered in the ‘Tonnage` column against code Nos 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34.
2) Annex III:
The sentence below the heading ‘Goods nomenclature` is replaced by the following text:
‘The goods nomenclature used is that consisting of the 24 groups of goods (first column below) based on the uniform nomenclature of goods for transport statistics (NST/R) until the Commission, having consulted the Member States decides to replace it.`
3) Annex IV:
The first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Maritime coastal areas` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer.
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.`
4) Annex V:
(a) the first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Nationality of registration of vessels` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer, with the following exception: codes 017 and 018 are to be used for Belgium and Luxembourg respectively;
(b) in the list of codes: codes ‘0011 France` and ‘0012 Kerguelen Islands` are deleted; codes ‘0281 Norway` and ‘0282 Norway (NIS)` are inserted after code ‘0112 Spain (Rebeca)`; code ‘8902 French Antarctic Territory` is replaced by ‘French Antarctic Territory (including the Kerguelen Islands)`.
5) Annex VII:
The figures in the ‘DWT` columns of the table are repeated in the ‘GT` columns; the lower limit for class ’01` under ‘GT` is ‘100`.
6) Annex VIII:
(a) below the heading ‘summary and detailed statistics`, at the end of each of the first three sentences ‘F1` is replaced by ‘F1 or F2 or F1 and F2`;
(b) in the table ‘Data set F1`, in the ‘Coding detail` column the reference ‘One-letter alphanumeric` against the variable ‘Type of vessel` is replaced by ‘Two-letter alphanumeric`; in the ‘Nomenclature` column and in the last line of the table, the words ‘or gross tonnage` are deleted;

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 May 1998.
For the Commission
Yves-Thibault de SILGUY
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 320, 30.12.1995, p. 25.
(2) OJ L 181, 28.6.1989, p. 47.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 95/64/EC of 8 December 1995 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (1), and in particular Articles 4, 10 and 12 thereof,Whereas derogations should be granted to the Member States to enable them to adapt their national statistical systems to the requirements of Directive 95/64/EC;Whereas a list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, must be drawn up by the Commission;Whereas the content of the Annexes to the said Directive needs to be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Statistical Programme Committee set up by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom (2),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The derogations granted by the Commission to the Member States are defined in Annex I.
2. The derogations apply for 1997, 1998 and 1999, except for certain derogations defined in Annex I, which shall apply for 1997 only.
The list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, is given in Annex II.
1. Annexes II, III, IV, V, VII and VIII of Directive 95/64/EC shall be amended as follows:
1) Annex II:
Figure 3 referring to footnote 3 is entered in the ‘Tonnage` column against code Nos 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34.
2) Annex III:
The sentence below the heading ‘Goods nomenclature` is replaced by the following text:
‘The goods nomenclature used is that consisting of the 24 groups of goods (first column below) based on the uniform nomenclature of goods for transport statistics (NST/R) until the Commission, having consulted the Member States decides to replace it.`
3) Annex IV:
The first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Maritime coastal areas` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer.
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.`
4) Annex V:
(a) the first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Nationality of registration of vessels` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer, with the following exception: codes 017 and 018 are to be used for Belgium and Luxembourg respectively;
(b) in the list of codes: codes ‘0011 France` and ‘0012 Kerguelen Islands` are deleted; codes ‘0281 Norway` and ‘0282 Norway (NIS)` are inserted after code ‘0112 Spain (Rebeca)`; code ‘8902 French Antarctic Territory` is replaced by ‘French Antarctic Territory (including the Kerguelen Islands)`.
5) Annex VII:
The figures in the ‘DWT` columns of the table are repeated in the ‘GT` columns; the lower limit for class ’01` under ‘GT` is ‘100`.
6) Annex VIII:
(a) below the heading ‘summary and detailed statistics`, at the end of each of the first three sentences ‘F1` is replaced by ‘F1 or F2 or F1 and F2`;
(b) in the table ‘Data set F1`, in the ‘Coding detail` column the reference ‘One-letter alphanumeric` against the variable ‘Type of vessel` is replaced by ‘Two-letter alphanumeric`; in the ‘Nomenclature` column and in the last line of the table, the words ‘or gross tonnage` are deleted;
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 May 1998.
For the Commission
Yves-Thibault de SILGUY
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 320, 30.12.1995, p. 25.
(2) OJ L 181, 28.6.1989, p. 47.
EUROSTAT LIST OF EUROPEAN PORTS
Description of the list of ports
The statistical ports and sub-ports are classified in alphabetical order for each Member State.
TYPE OF CARGO CLASSIFICATION
GOODS NOMENCLATURE
The goods nomenclature used is that consisting of 24 groups of goods (first column below) based on the uniform nomenclature of goods for transport statistics (NST/R (¹) until the Commission, having consulted the Member States, decides to replace it.
GROUPS OF GOODS
(¹) Published by the Statistical Office of the European Communities, 1968 edition. OJ L 151, 15.6.1990, p. 1.
MARITIME COASTAL AREAS
The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹)) in force in the year to which the data refer.
The code consists of four digits: the three-digit code from the abovementioned nomenclature, followed by a zero (e.g. code 0030 for Netherlands), except for countries which are divided into two or more maritime coastal areas, which are identified by a fourth digit other than zero (from 1 to 7), as below:
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.
NATIONALITY OF REGISTRATION OF VESSELS
The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹)) in force in the year to which the data refer, with the following exception: codes 017 and 018 are to be used for Belgium and Luxembourg respectively.
The code consists of four digits: the three-digit code from the abovementioned nomenclature, followed by a zero (e.g. code 0010 for France), except for countries with more than one register.
Where more than one register exists, the countries are to be coded as follows:
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.
VESSEL SIZE CLASSES
in deadweight (DWT) or in gross tonnage (GT)
This classification applies only to vessels with a gross tonnage of 100 or more.
STRUCTURE FOR STATISTICAL DATA SETS
The data sets specified in this Annex define the periodicity for the maritime transport statistics required by the Community. Each data set defines a cross classification of a limited set of dimensions at different levels of the nomenclatures, aggregated across all other dimensions, for which statistics of good quality are required.
The conditions for collecting data set B1 will be decided by the Council on a proposal from the Commission in the light of the results of the pilot study during a three-year transitional period as defined in Article 10 of this Directive.
SUMMARY AND DETAILED STATISTICS
– The data sets to be provided for selected ports for goods and passengers are A1, A2, B1, C1, D1, E1 and F1 or F2 or F1 and F2.
– The data sets to be provided for selected ports for goods but not for passengers are A1, A2, A3, B1, C1, E1 and F1 or F2 or F1 and F2.
– The data sets to be provided for selected ports for passengers but not for goods are A3, D1 and F1 or F2 or F1 and F2.
– The data set to be provided for ports which are not selected (for neither goods nor passengers) is A3.
Data set A1: Seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo and relation
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set A2: Non-unit seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo and relation
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set A3: Data required for ports for which detailed statistics are not required (see Article 4(3))
Periodicity: Annual
Data set B1: Seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo, goods and relation
Periodicity: Annual
Data set C1: Unit-load seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo, relation and loaded status
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set D1: Passenger transport in the main European ports, by relation
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set E1: Seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo, relation and nationality of registration of vessels
Periodicity: Annual
Data set F1: Port traffic in the main European ports, by port, type and size of vessels loading or unloading cargo
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set F2: Port traffic in the main European ports, by port, type and size of vessels loading or unloding cargo
Periodicity: Quarterly

Pending: 31998D0385

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 95/64/EC of 8 December 1995 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (1), and in particular Articles 4, 10 and 12 thereof,Whereas derogations should be granted to the Member States to enable them to adapt their national statistical systems to the requirements of Directive 95/64/EC;Whereas a list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, must be drawn up by the Commission;Whereas the content of the Annexes to the said Directive needs to be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Statistical Programme Committee set up by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom (2),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. The derogations granted by the Commission to the Member States are defined in Annex I.
2. The derogations apply for 1997, 1998 and 1999, except for certain derogations defined in Annex I, which shall apply for 1997 only.

Article 2
The list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, is given in Annex II.

Article 3
1. Annexes II, III, IV, V, VII and VIII of Directive 95/64/EC shall be amended as follows:
1) Annex II:
Figure 3 referring to footnote 3 is entered in the ‘Tonnage` column against code Nos 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34.
2) Annex III:
The sentence below the heading ‘Goods nomenclature` is replaced by the following text:
‘The goods nomenclature used is that consisting of the 24 groups of goods (first column below) based on the uniform nomenclature of goods for transport statistics (NST/R) until the Commission, having consulted the Member States decides to replace it.`
3) Annex IV:
The first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Maritime coastal areas` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer.
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.`
4) Annex V:
(a) the first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Nationality of registration of vessels` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer, with the following exception: codes 017 and 018 are to be used for Belgium and Luxembourg respectively;
(b) in the list of codes: codes ‘0011 France` and ‘0012 Kerguelen Islands` are deleted; codes ‘0281 Norway` and ‘0282 Norway (NIS)` are inserted after code ‘0112 Spain (Rebeca)`; code ‘8902 French Antarctic Territory` is replaced by ‘French Antarctic Territory (including the Kerguelen Islands)`.
5) Annex VII:
The figures in the ‘DWT` columns of the table are repeated in the ‘GT` columns; the lower limit for class ’01` under ‘GT` is ‘100`.
6) Annex VIII:
(a) below the heading ‘summary and detailed statistics`, at the end of each of the first three sentences ‘F1` is replaced by ‘F1 or F2 or F1 and F2`;
(b) in the table ‘Data set F1`, in the ‘Coding detail` column the reference ‘One-letter alphanumeric` against the variable ‘Type of vessel` is replaced by ‘Two-letter alphanumeric`; in the ‘Nomenclature` column and in the last line of the table, the words ‘or gross tonnage` are deleted;

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 May 1998.
For the Commission
Yves-Thibault de SILGUY
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 320, 30.12.1995, p. 25.
(2) OJ L 181, 28.6.1989, p. 47.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 95/64/EC of 8 December 1995 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (1), and in particular Articles 4, 10 and 12 thereof,Whereas derogations should be granted to the Member States to enable them to adapt their national statistical systems to the requirements of Directive 95/64/EC;Whereas a list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, must be drawn up by the Commission;Whereas the content of the Annexes to the said Directive needs to be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Statistical Programme Committee set up by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom (2),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The derogations granted by the Commission to the Member States are defined in Annex I.
2. The derogations apply for 1997, 1998 and 1999, except for certain derogations defined in Annex I, which shall apply for 1997 only.
The list of ports, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area, is given in Annex II.
1. Annexes II, III, IV, V, VII and VIII of Directive 95/64/EC shall be amended as follows:
1) Annex II:
Figure 3 referring to footnote 3 is entered in the ‘Tonnage` column against code Nos 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34.
2) Annex III:
The sentence below the heading ‘Goods nomenclature` is replaced by the following text:
‘The goods nomenclature used is that consisting of the 24 groups of goods (first column below) based on the uniform nomenclature of goods for transport statistics (NST/R) until the Commission, having consulted the Member States decides to replace it.`
3) Annex IV:
The first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Maritime coastal areas` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer.
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.`
4) Annex V:
(a) the first paragraph of the text below the heading ‘Nationality of registration of vessels` is replaced by the following text:
‘The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹) in force in the year to which the data refer, with the following exception: codes 017 and 018 are to be used for Belgium and Luxembourg respectively;
(b) in the list of codes: codes ‘0011 France` and ‘0012 Kerguelen Islands` are deleted; codes ‘0281 Norway` and ‘0282 Norway (NIS)` are inserted after code ‘0112 Spain (Rebeca)`; code ‘8902 French Antarctic Territory` is replaced by ‘French Antarctic Territory (including the Kerguelen Islands)`.
5) Annex VII:
The figures in the ‘DWT` columns of the table are repeated in the ‘GT` columns; the lower limit for class ’01` under ‘GT` is ‘100`.
6) Annex VIII:
(a) below the heading ‘summary and detailed statistics`, at the end of each of the first three sentences ‘F1` is replaced by ‘F1 or F2 or F1 and F2`;
(b) in the table ‘Data set F1`, in the ‘Coding detail` column the reference ‘One-letter alphanumeric` against the variable ‘Type of vessel` is replaced by ‘Two-letter alphanumeric`; in the ‘Nomenclature` column and in the last line of the table, the words ‘or gross tonnage` are deleted;
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 May 1998.
For the Commission
Yves-Thibault de SILGUY
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 320, 30.12.1995, p. 25.
(2) OJ L 181, 28.6.1989, p. 47.
EUROSTAT LIST OF EUROPEAN PORTS
Description of the list of ports
The statistical ports and sub-ports are classified in alphabetical order for each Member State.
TYPE OF CARGO CLASSIFICATION
GOODS NOMENCLATURE
The goods nomenclature used is that consisting of 24 groups of goods (first column below) based on the uniform nomenclature of goods for transport statistics (NST/R (¹) until the Commission, having consulted the Member States, decides to replace it.
GROUPS OF GOODS
(¹) Published by the Statistical Office of the European Communities, 1968 edition. OJ L 151, 15.6.1990, p. 1.
MARITIME COASTAL AREAS
The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States, originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹)) in force in the year to which the data refer.
The code consists of four digits: the three-digit code from the abovementioned nomenclature, followed by a zero (e.g. code 0030 for Netherlands), except for countries which are divided into two or more maritime coastal areas, which are identified by a fourth digit other than zero (from 1 to 7), as below:
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.
NATIONALITY OF REGISTRATION OF VESSELS
The nomenclature to be used is the Geonomenclature (the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States originally drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/75 (¹)) in force in the year to which the data refer, with the following exception: codes 017 and 018 are to be used for Belgium and Luxembourg respectively.
The code consists of four digits: the three-digit code from the abovementioned nomenclature, followed by a zero (e.g. code 0010 for France), except for countries with more than one register.
Where more than one register exists, the countries are to be coded as follows:
(¹) OJ L 183, 14.7.1975, p. 3.
VESSEL SIZE CLASSES
in deadweight (DWT) or in gross tonnage (GT)
This classification applies only to vessels with a gross tonnage of 100 or more.
STRUCTURE FOR STATISTICAL DATA SETS
The data sets specified in this Annex define the periodicity for the maritime transport statistics required by the Community. Each data set defines a cross classification of a limited set of dimensions at different levels of the nomenclatures, aggregated across all other dimensions, for which statistics of good quality are required.
The conditions for collecting data set B1 will be decided by the Council on a proposal from the Commission in the light of the results of the pilot study during a three-year transitional period as defined in Article 10 of this Directive.
SUMMARY AND DETAILED STATISTICS
– The data sets to be provided for selected ports for goods and passengers are A1, A2, B1, C1, D1, E1 and F1 or F2 or F1 and F2.
– The data sets to be provided for selected ports for goods but not for passengers are A1, A2, A3, B1, C1, E1 and F1 or F2 or F1 and F2.
– The data sets to be provided for selected ports for passengers but not for goods are A3, D1 and F1 or F2 or F1 and F2.
– The data set to be provided for ports which are not selected (for neither goods nor passengers) is A3.
Data set A1: Seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo and relation
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set A2: Non-unit seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo and relation
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set A3: Data required for ports for which detailed statistics are not required (see Article 4(3))
Periodicity: Annual
Data set B1: Seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo, goods and relation
Periodicity: Annual
Data set C1: Unit-load seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo, relation and loaded status
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set D1: Passenger transport in the main European ports, by relation
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set E1: Seaborne transport in the main European ports, by port, type of cargo, relation and nationality of registration of vessels
Periodicity: Annual
Data set F1: Port traffic in the main European ports, by port, type and size of vessels loading or unloading cargo
Periodicity: Quarterly
Data set F2: Port traffic in the main European ports, by port, type and size of vessels loading or unloding cargo
Periodicity: Quarterly

Pending: 31998D0372

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Council Directive 72/462/EEC, of 12 December 1972, on health and veterinary inspection problems on importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Articles 6, 8 and 11,Whereas the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for import of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Estonia, Croatia, Slovak Republic and Czech Republic, were established by Commission Decisions 92/322/EEC (3), 92/323/EEC (4), 92/325/EEC (5), 92/402/EEC (6), 93/181/EEC (7), 93/182/EEC (8), 93/183/EEC (9), 93/184/EEC (10), 94/321/EC (11), 96/185/EC (12), 96/186/EC (13) respectively;Whereas, with a view to the internal market, numerous health measures have been established in the framework of trade inside the Community; whereas the realisation of this objective necessitates, in parallel, an adaptation of the health conditions required for importation of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from certain European countries;Whereas this adaptation must take into account the different epidemiological situations in the European countries concerned, and indeed in the different parts of their territories; whereas, given the existence of similar health situations between the various parts of those countries, it is necessary to take account of this fact in establishing a new system of health guarantees;Whereas, as a result, it is appropriate to establish different health certificates in accordance with the conditions required for the importation of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from those different categories of countries or parts of countries;Whereas, in order to clarify and simplify the Community legislation it is necessary to group together the health conditions required for imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from certain European countries and to repeal the decisions in force for those countries;Whereas the animal health situation of Albania, Belarus, Bosnia Herzegovina, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Russia does not allow the conditions for the imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species to be established;Whereas each responsible veterinary authority of the concerned countries must confirm that their country or parts of their country have during the last 24 months been free from foot-and-mouth disease and during the last 12 months been free from rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia encephalomyelitis (Teschen disease), swine vesicular disease and vesicular exanthema; whereas no vaccinations have been carried out against any of those diseases during the past 12 months;Whereas, in addition, the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries must undertake to notify the European Commission and the Member States, by telex or fax, within 24 hours of the confirmation of the occurrence of any of the abovementioned diseases or of the adoption of vaccination against any of them or, within an appropriate period, of any proposed changes in their import rules concerning bovine animals or swine or the semen or embryos thereof; whereas certain authorities have also undertaken to notify the Commission periodically with updated information on monitoring and disease control plans for the abovementioned diseases in particular classical swine fever;Whereas the imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species are not allowed in so far as a programme of control of residues in the exporting non-member country has not been approved by the European Commission;Whereas the guarantees provided by the exporting country as regards bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis must be equivalent to that of herds in the European Community having the status of ‘Officially Free`;Whereas animal health conditions and veterinary certification must be adapted according to the animal health situation of the third country concerned;Whereas certain conditions for certificates drawn up by the official veterinarian of the non-member country are laid down in Directive 72/462/EEC;Whereas Directive 96/93/EC (14) lays down standards of certification which are necessary for valid certification and to prevent fraud; whereas it is appropriate to ensure that the rules and principles applied by non-member country certifying officers provide guarantees which are at least equivalent to those laid down in this Directive;Whereas the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries have undertaken to supervise officially the issue of certificates arising from this Decision and to ensure that all relevant certificates, declarations and statements on which export certification may have been based remain on official file for at least 12 months following the dispatch of the animals to which they refer;Whereas the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries have undertaken not to permit the issue of the certificates described in the Annexes to this Decision in respect of animals which have been imported unless such animals were imported in accordance with veterinary conditions at least as strict as the relevant requirements of Directive 72/462/EEC, including any subsidiary decisions;Whereas the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries have undertaken to fulfil the requirements of Commission Decision 91/189/EEC (15) in order to authorise assembly centres for the animals covered by the present Decision;Whereas considering that a new certification regime is hereby established, a period of time should be provided for its implementation;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
For the purposes of this Decision to definitions contained in Directive 72/462/EEC shall be applied as necessary.

Article 2
1. Member States shall authorise the importation of the categories of live animals set out in Annex II and coming from the territories laid down in Annex I, only if they comply with the guarantees laid down in the health certificate, drawn up in conformity with Annex III.
2. Member States shall make the introduction onto their territory of bovine or porcine animals from the country of origin only if they comply with the supplementary guarantees required in Annex II and described in Annex IV. These supplementary guarantees must be provided by the exporting country in section VI of each model of the certificate laid down in Annex III.
3. Member States shall authorise the importation from the concerned exporting countries of the domestic animals of the bovine or porcine species indicated in paragraph 1 which have been imported into the concerned exporting country only if such animals were imported from the Community or from a non-member country included in the list annexed to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (16), in so far as it covers domestic animals of these species and only if the importation was made in accordance with veterinary conditions at least as strict as the requirements of Chapter II of Directive 72/462/EEC, including any subsidiary Decisions.
4. Member States shall require that animals which are submitted to tests in application of this Decision are kept continuously isolated, under conditions approved by an official veterinarian of the country of origin, from all cloven-hooved animals not intended for export to the Community or not of equivalent health status to such animals from the time of the first of such tests to the time of loading.
5. Member States shall permit the entry onto their territory from the non-member country of origin of bovine animals only if such animals:
(a) come from herds declared by the veterinary authorities of the non-member country of origin to be enzootic bovine leukosis free as defined in Annex V to this Decision and have been subjected, within 30 days before export and with negative result, to an individual test for enzootic leukosis carried out according to the protocol in Annex I to Decision 91/189/EEC;
(b) are intended for meat production, are not more than 30 months of age, come from herds which are included in a national programme for the eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis and in which there has been no evidence whatever of that disease for at least two years and are permanently marked as described in Annex VI to this Decision,
(c) come from herds which are included in a national programme for the eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis, are consigned directly to a slaughterhouse and are slaughtered within five working days of their arrival there.
In the case of the animals referred to in (b) and (c) above, Member States shall ensure, by inspection, that such animals are clearly identified, shall supervise them until slaughter and shall take all measures to prevent contamination of indigenous herds.
6. Member States shall make the introduction onto their territory of pigs from the country of origin subject to a guarantee that they have not been vaccinated against classical swine fever and, in the case of pigs intended for breeding or production, a guarantee that they have shown a negative result to a test for the antibody produced by the virus of classical swinefever.
7. Member States shall not authorise the imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species other than those as indicated in this Article.

Article 3
Pending the entry into force of any measures adopted by the Community for the eradication, prevention or control of a contagious or infectious bovine or porcine disease other than rabies, tubercuosis, brucellosis, foot-and-mouth disease, anthrax, rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, enzootic bovine leukosis, porcine enteroviral encephalomyelitis (Teschen disease), classical swine fever, African swine fever or swine vesicular disease, Member States may apply in respect of animals imported from the country of origin such additional health conditions as they apply to other animals within the framework of a national programme, submitted to and approved by the Commission, for the eradication, prevention or control of such disease.

Article 4
Member States shall authorise the importation of live animals of the bovine, porcine species subject to the following conditions:
(a) the certificate shall consist of a single sheet or, where more than one page is required, shall be in such a form that any two or more pages are part of an integrated whole and indivisible; each certificate shall bear a code number on each page. This number shall be issued by the central competent authority. The health certificate shall be signed by an official veterinarian designated by the central competent authority and countersigned and numbered by a senior veterinary official specially appointed by the chief veterinary officer to sign export certificates. The signature and the stamp of the certificate must be in a different colour to that of the printing;
(b) the original completed veterinary shall be drawn up in the official language of the Member State of destination and the Member State in which the import inspection at the border inspection post is carried out;
(c) the original completed veterinary certificate shall be presented with the animals at the border inspection post.

Article 5
This Decision will be reassessed as required by the changing animal health situation in the Community and in the European countries concerned from which the imports are permitted.

Article 6
This Decision shall come into effect on 15 June 1998.

Article 7
Decisions 92/322/EEC, 92/323/EEC, 92/325/EEC, 92/402/EEC, 93/181/EEC, 93/182/EEC, 93/183/EEC, 93/184/EEC, 94/321/EC, 96/185/EC and 96/186/EC are repealed on the date referred to in Article 6.

Article 8
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 May 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 177, 30. 6. 1992, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 177, 30. 6. 1992, p. 18.
(5) OJ L 177, 30. 6. 1992, p. 52.
(6) OJ L 224, 8. 8. 1992, p. 18.
(7) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 1.
(8) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 11.
(9) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 21.
(10) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 31.
(11) OJ L 143, 8. 6. 1994, p. 11.
(12) OJ L 59, 8. 3. 1996, p. 23.
(13) OJ L 59, 8. 3. 1996, p. 41.
(14) OJ L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 28.
(15) OJ L 96, 17. 4. 1991, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Council Directive 72/462/EEC, of 12 December 1972, on health and veterinary inspection problems on importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Articles 6, 8 and 11,Whereas the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for import of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Estonia, Croatia, Slovak Republic and Czech Republic, were established by Commission Decisions 92/322/EEC (3), 92/323/EEC (4), 92/325/EEC (5), 92/402/EEC (6), 93/181/EEC (7), 93/182/EEC (8), 93/183/EEC (9), 93/184/EEC (10), 94/321/EC (11), 96/185/EC (12), 96/186/EC (13) respectively;Whereas, with a view to the internal market, numerous health measures have been established in the framework of trade inside the Community; whereas the realisation of this objective necessitates, in parallel, an adaptation of the health conditions required for importation of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from certain European countries;Whereas this adaptation must take into account the different epidemiological situations in the European countries concerned, and indeed in the different parts of their territories; whereas, given the existence of similar health situations between the various parts of those countries, it is necessary to take account of this fact in establishing a new system of health guarantees;Whereas, as a result, it is appropriate to establish different health certificates in accordance with the conditions required for the importation of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from those different categories of countries or parts of countries;Whereas, in order to clarify and simplify the Community legislation it is necessary to group together the health conditions required for imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from certain European countries and to repeal the decisions in force for those countries;Whereas the animal health situation of Albania, Belarus, Bosnia Herzegovina, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Russia does not allow the conditions for the imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species to be established;Whereas each responsible veterinary authority of the concerned countries must confirm that their country or parts of their country have during the last 24 months been free from foot-and-mouth disease and during the last 12 months been free from rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia encephalomyelitis (Teschen disease), swine vesicular disease and vesicular exanthema; whereas no vaccinations have been carried out against any of those diseases during the past 12 months;Whereas, in addition, the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries must undertake to notify the European Commission and the Member States, by telex or fax, within 24 hours of the confirmation of the occurrence of any of the abovementioned diseases or of the adoption of vaccination against any of them or, within an appropriate period, of any proposed changes in their import rules concerning bovine animals or swine or the semen or embryos thereof; whereas certain authorities have also undertaken to notify the Commission periodically with updated information on monitoring and disease control plans for the abovementioned diseases in particular classical swine fever;Whereas the imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species are not allowed in so far as a programme of control of residues in the exporting non-member country has not been approved by the European Commission;Whereas the guarantees provided by the exporting country as regards bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis must be equivalent to that of herds in the European Community having the status of ‘Officially Free`;Whereas animal health conditions and veterinary certification must be adapted according to the animal health situation of the third country concerned;Whereas certain conditions for certificates drawn up by the official veterinarian of the non-member country are laid down in Directive 72/462/EEC;Whereas Directive 96/93/EC (14) lays down standards of certification which are necessary for valid certification and to prevent fraud; whereas it is appropriate to ensure that the rules and principles applied by non-member country certifying officers provide guarantees which are at least equivalent to those laid down in this Directive;Whereas the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries have undertaken to supervise officially the issue of certificates arising from this Decision and to ensure that all relevant certificates, declarations and statements on which export certification may have been based remain on official file for at least 12 months following the dispatch of the animals to which they refer;Whereas the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries have undertaken not to permit the issue of the certificates described in the Annexes to this Decision in respect of animals which have been imported unless such animals were imported in accordance with veterinary conditions at least as strict as the relevant requirements of Directive 72/462/EEC, including any subsidiary decisions;Whereas the responsible veterinary authorities of the concerned countries have undertaken to fulfil the requirements of Commission Decision 91/189/EEC (15) in order to authorise assembly centres for the animals covered by the present Decision;Whereas considering that a new certification regime is hereby established, a period of time should be provided for its implementation;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
For the purposes of this Decision to definitions contained in Directive 72/462/EEC shall be applied as necessary.
1. Member States shall authorise the importation of the categories of live animals set out in Annex II and coming from the territories laid down in Annex I, only if they comply with the guarantees laid down in the health certificate, drawn up in conformity with Annex III.
2. Member States shall make the introduction onto their territory of bovine or porcine animals from the country of origin only if they comply with the supplementary guarantees required in Annex II and described in Annex IV. These supplementary guarantees must be provided by the exporting country in section VI of each model of the certificate laid down in Annex III.
3. Member States shall authorise the importation from the concerned exporting countries of the domestic animals of the bovine or porcine species indicated in paragraph 1 which have been imported into the concerned exporting country only if such animals were imported from the Community or from a non-member country included in the list annexed to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (16), in so far as it covers domestic animals of these species and only if the importation was made in accordance with veterinary conditions at least as strict as the requirements of Chapter II of Directive 72/462/EEC, including any subsidiary Decisions.
4. Member States shall require that animals which are submitted to tests in application of this Decision are kept continuously isolated, under conditions approved by an official veterinarian of the country of origin, from all cloven-hooved animals not intended for export to the Community or not of equivalent health status to such animals from the time of the first of such tests to the time of loading.
5. Member States shall permit the entry onto their territory from the non-member country of origin of bovine animals only if such animals:
(a) come from herds declared by the veterinary authorities of the non-member country of origin to be enzootic bovine leukosis free as defined in Annex V to this Decision and have been subjected, within 30 days before export and with negative result, to an individual test for enzootic leukosis carried out according to the protocol in Annex I to Decision 91/189/EEC;
(b) are intended for meat production, are not more than 30 months of age, come from herds which are included in a national programme for the eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis and in which there has been no evidence whatever of that disease for at least two years and are permanently marked as described in Annex VI to this Decision,
(c) come from herds which are included in a national programme for the eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis, are consigned directly to a slaughterhouse and are slaughtered within five working days of their arrival there.
In the case of the animals referred to in (b) and (c) above, Member States shall ensure, by inspection, that such animals are clearly identified, shall supervise them until slaughter and shall take all measures to prevent contamination of indigenous herds.
6. Member States shall make the introduction onto their territory of pigs from the country of origin subject to a guarantee that they have not been vaccinated against classical swine fever and, in the case of pigs intended for breeding or production, a guarantee that they have shown a negative result to a test for the antibody produced by the virus of classical swinefever.
7. Member States shall not authorise the imports of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species other than those as indicated in this Article.
Pending the entry into force of any measures adopted by the Community for the eradication, prevention or control of a contagious or infectious bovine or porcine disease other than rabies, tubercuosis, brucellosis, foot-and-mouth disease, anthrax, rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, enzootic bovine leukosis, porcine enteroviral encephalomyelitis (Teschen disease), classical swine fever, African swine fever or swine vesicular disease, Member States may apply in respect of animals imported from the country of origin such additional health conditions as they apply to other animals within the framework of a national programme, submitted to and approved by the Commission, for the eradication, prevention or control of such disease.
Member States shall authorise the importation of live animals of the bovine, porcine species subject to the following conditions:
(a) the certificate shall consist of a single sheet or, where more than one page is required, shall be in such a form that any two or more pages are part of an integrated whole and indivisible; each certificate shall bear a code number on each page. This number shall be issued by the central competent authority. The health certificate shall be signed by an official veterinarian designated by the central competent authority and countersigned and numbered by a senior veterinary official specially appointed by the chief veterinary officer to sign export certificates. The signature and the stamp of the certificate must be in a different colour to that of the printing;
(b) the original completed veterinary shall be drawn up in the official language of the Member State of destination and the Member State in which the import inspection at the border inspection post is carried out;
(c) the original completed veterinary certificate shall be presented with the animals at the border inspection post.
This Decision will be reassessed as required by the changing animal health situation in the Community and in the European countries concerned from which the imports are permitted.
This Decision shall come into effect on 15 June 1998.
Decisions 92/322/EEC, 92/323/EEC, 92/325/EEC, 92/402/EEC, 93/181/EEC, 93/182/EEC, 93/183/EEC, 93/184/EEC, 94/321/EC, 96/185/EC and 96/186/EC are repealed on the date referred to in Article 6.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 May 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 177, 30. 6. 1992, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 177, 30. 6. 1992, p. 18.
(5) OJ L 177, 30. 6. 1992, p. 52.
(6) OJ L 224, 8. 8. 1992, p. 18.
(7) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 1.
(8) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 11.
(9) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 21.
(10) OJ L 78, 31. 3. 1993, p. 31.
(11) OJ L 143, 8. 6. 1994, p. 11.
(12) OJ L 59, 8. 3. 1996, p. 23.
(13) OJ L 59, 8. 3. 1996, p. 41.
(14) OJ L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 28.
(15) OJ L 96, 17. 4. 1991, p. 1.
ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE For domestic animals of the bovine species for breeding and production intended for consignment to the European Community
>START OF GRAPHIC>
Code No (1)
(This certificate is only for veterinary purposes and the orginal must accompnay the consignment until it reaches the border inspection post. It covers only animals in the same category, breeding or production, transported in the same railway wagon, lorry, aircraft or ship and consigned to the same destination. It must be completed within 24 hours before loading and all time limits referred to expire on that date.)
Exporting country: Code of territory:
Competent issuing authority:
Country of destination:
Reference to accompanying animal welfare certificate:
I. Number of animals:
II. Origin of animals:
Name(s) and address(es) of holding(s) of origin:
The animals will be sent from (full address of place of loading):
Name and address of consignor:
III. Destination of animals
Name and address of consignee:
The animals will be sent to (country and place of destination):
by: Means of transport Railway wagon Lorry Aircraft Ship
Identification (1) (1) Indicate registration marks, flight number or registered name, as appropriate.
(1) Issued by the central competent authority.
IV. Identification of animals (1) Identification Tests Official and other marks or brands (Give number and position) (2) Sex (3) Breed Date of birth (day/ month/ year) Mastitis (4) Tuber- culosis (5) Brucel- losis (5) EBL (5) Others specify (6)
(1) When more animals need to be added, then a schedule must be used containing the above information and on each page the code No and must be signed and stamped by the certifying official veterinarian.
(2) An ear tag must include the ISO code of the country of origin.
(3) M = male, F = female, C = castrated male.
(4) See section V.2 g(i).
(5) EBL = enzootic bovine leukosis.
Mark ‘+` when the test is completed with negative results an ‘O` when the test is not required.
(6) Indicate the coded letter(s) as laid down in Annex IV to the Decision 98/372/EC when a supplementary guarantee is required. If an additional test for infectious bovine rhinotracheitits is required by the Member State of destination then use the code ‘IBR`.
V. Health information
I, the undersigned official veterinarian, hereby certify:
(1) that the territory described in Annex I to Commission Decision 98/372/EC with code . . . version . . . has for the past 24 months been free of foot-and-mouth disease and for the past 12 months has been free of rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, vesicular stomatitis and bluetongue and that no vaccinations have been carried out against any of these diseases for the past 12 months and that the importation of animals vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease is prohibited
(2) that the animals described in this certificate meet the following requirements:
(i) they were born on the territory as described under V.1 and have remained there since birth (1)
(ii) they were imported, not less than six months ago, from a Member State of the European Community or from a non-member Country included in the list annexed to Council Decision 79/542/EEC, in so far as it covers domestic animals of this species, in accordance with veterinary conditions at least as strict as the relevant requirements of Directive 72/462/EEC, including any subsidiary decision (1)
(b) they have been examined to day and show no clinical signs of disease
(c) they have not been vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease
(d) they come from herds which are not restricted under the national tuberculosis eradication legislation, and as recorded at section IV
(i) they have been subjected to an intradermal tuberculin test within the past 30 days with negative result (1)
(ii) they are less than six weeks old (1);
(e) they come from herds which are not restricted under the national brucellosis eradication legislation and as recorded at section IV
(i) they have been subjected to a serum agglutination test which showed a brucella count of less than 30 IU of agglutination per ml, within the past 30 days and they have not been vaccinated against brucellosis (1)
(ii) they are than 12 months old (1)
(iii) they are castrated males of any age (1)
(f) they come from herds declared by the veterinary authorities of
(exporting country)
to be enzootic bovine leukosis free as defined in Annex V to Commission Decision 98/372/EC and as recorded at section IV,
(i) they have been subjected, within the past 30 days to an individual test for enzootic bovine leukosis with negative result (1)
(ii) they are intended for meat production, are not more than 30 months old, come from herds which are included in a national programme for the eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis and in which there has been no evidence whatever of that disease for the past two years and are marked in the manner defined in Annex VI to Commission Decision 98/372/EC (1)
(1) Delete as appropriate.
(g) as recorded at section IV,
(i) they show no clinical sign of mastitis and the analysis (and second analysis, where relevant) of the milk, carried out according to Annex D to Council Directive 64/432/EEC within the past 30 days showed no characteristic inflammatory condition, no specific pathogenic micro-organism or, in the case of a second analysis, the presence of an antibiotic (1)
Supplementary guarantees to be provided by the exporting territory when required in Annex II in application of Article 2(2).
(a) The animals described in this certificate have reacted negatively to a foot-and-mounth virus test carried out by the laryngo-pharyngeal scrape method (probang test).
(b) The animals described in this certificate have reacted negatively to a serological test carried out to detect the presence of foot-and-mouth antibodies.
(c) The animals described in this certificate have been isolated for at least 14 days immediately prior to loading for export at a quarantine station in the territory of origin under the surveillance of an official veterinarian, no animal on the premises of isolation having been vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease during the 21 days preceding exportation and no animal other than those forming part of the consignment having been introduced to the premises of isolation during the same period.
Enzootic bovine leukosis-free herds and regions
1. A herd becomes established as enzootic bovine leukosis-free when:
(a) (i) there has been no evidence whatever of enzootic bovine leukosis in the herd for a period of at least two years
(ii) it has been subjected with negative result to two herd-tests for enzootic bovine leukosis at an interval of not less than four and not more than 12 months, each herd-test consisting of one of the serological tests described in Annex I to Decision 91/189/EEC applied to all bovine animals in the herd over 24 months old on the date of the test
(b) the region in which it is situated becomes established as an enzootic bovine leukosis-free region, provided the status of the herd is not at the time suspended under the terms of paragraph 5.
2. A region becomes established as enzootic bovine leukosis-free when:
(a) at least 99,8 % of bovine herds have the status of enzootic bovine leukosis-free
(b) (i) there has been no evidence whatever of enzootic bovine leukosis in the region for a period of at least three years
(ii) all bovine herds in the region have been subjected to at least one herd-test as described in paragraph 1
(iii) at least 10 % of bovine herds in the region, selected on a random basis, have been subjected with negative result to at least two herd-tests as described in paragraph 1.
3. A herd maintains its status as enzootic bovine leukosis-free as long as:
(a) there is no evidence whatever of enzootic bovine leukosis in the herd
(b) all the bovine animals in the herd were born there or were introduced from herds of enzootic bovine leukosis-free status
(c) within three years of the date of its establishment as enzootic bovine leukosis-free, and at intervals of not more than three years thereafter, it is subjected with negative result to a herd-test as described in paragraph 1.
4. A region maintains its status as enzootic bovine leukosis-free as long as:
(a) each year, a proportion of the herds in the region, selected on a random basis and sufficient in number to demonstrate, with a 99 % confidence rating, that not more than 0,2 % of herds are infected with enzootic bovine leukosis, have been subjected to a herd test as described in paragraph 1, or
(b) each year, a proportion of the herds in the region, sufficient to contain at least 20 % of the bovine animals in the region over 24 months of age, have been subjected with negative result to a herd test as described in paragraph 1.
5. The enzootic bovine leukosis free status of a herd is suspended when:
(a) the conditions described in paragraph 3 cease to apply, or
(b) one or more animals give a positive result to one of the serological tests described in Annex I to Decision 91/189/EEC.
6. The enzootic bovine leukosis-free status of a region is suspended when:
(a) the conditions described in paragraph 4 cease to apply, or
(b) enzootic bovine leukosis is detected and confirmed in more than 0,2 % of bovine herds in the region.
7. The enzootic bovine leukosis-free status of a herd is reestablished when:
(a) any reactor animal and, if the reactor is a cow, its progeny in the herd have been removed under the supervision of the veterinary authorities for slaughter, except that the competent authority may grant a derogation from the requirement for the removal of the progeny of a reactor cow if it is satisfied that the animal(s) was/were separated from its/their dam immediately after birth, and
(b) (i) if the suspension results from a positive test on a single animal, the herd has been subjected with negative result and not less than three months after the withdrawal referred to in paragraph 7(a) to a herd-test as described in paragraph 1, or
(ii) if the suspension results from a positive test on more than one animal, the herd has been subjected to two herd-tests as described in paragraph 1, the first being applied not less than three months after the withdrawal referred to in paragraph 7(a) and the second not less than four or more than 12 months later, the tests to include any progeny of a rector cow retained in the herd under the derogation referred to in paragraph 7(a), regardless of their age at the time of test, and
(c) an epizootological enquiry has been conducted on all herds epizootologically linked to the infected herd.
8. The enzootic bovine leukosis-free status of a region is reestablished when:
(a) at least 99,8 % of bovine herds in the region have the status of enzootic bovine leukosis-free, and
(b) at least 20 % of bovine herds in the region have been subjected with negative result to two herd-tests as described in paragraph 1, at an interval of not less than four and not more than 12 months.
Mark to be applied to bovine animals in application of Article 2(5)(b)
A permanent mark, having the dimensions indicated below, applied to and visible on at least two places on the hindquarters of each animal using the technique known as ‘freeze-branding`.
>REFERENCE TO A FILM>

Pending: 31998D0361

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,Whereas Member States may obtain for their territory or parts thereof the status of approved zone free of certain fish diseases;Whereas Spain has submitted to the Commission a programme designed to obtain, with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) the status of approved zone for the region of Asturias;Whereas this programme was adopted by Commission Decision 94/862/EC (3);Whereas, after examination of the evidence submitted by Spain, it appears that this programme has been successfully completed and that no case of IHN or VHS has been detected in Asturias;Whereas therefore the conditions are fulfilled to grant to the region of Asturias the status of approved zone with regard to IHN and VHS;Whereas the provisions of this Decision are in compliance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. The catchment areas referred to in Part I of the Annex are recognised as approved continental zones in respect of IHN and VHS.
2. The coastal zones listed in part II of the Annex are recognised as approved coastal zones in respect of IHN and VHS.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 18 May 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 352, 31. 12. 1994, p. 72.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,Whereas Member States may obtain for their territory or parts thereof the status of approved zone free of certain fish diseases;Whereas Spain has submitted to the Commission a programme designed to obtain, with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) the status of approved zone for the region of Asturias;Whereas this programme was adopted by Commission Decision 94/862/EC (3);Whereas, after examination of the evidence submitted by Spain, it appears that this programme has been successfully completed and that no case of IHN or VHS has been detected in Asturias;Whereas therefore the conditions are fulfilled to grant to the region of Asturias the status of approved zone with regard to IHN and VHS;Whereas the provisions of this Decision are in compliance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. The catchment areas referred to in Part I of the Annex are recognised as approved continental zones in respect of IHN and VHS.
2. The coastal zones listed in part II of the Annex are recognised as approved coastal zones in respect of IHN and VHS.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 18 May 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 352, 31. 12. 1994, p. 72.
LIST OF APPROVED ZONES WITH REGARD TO IHN AND VHS IN SPAIN
I. Continental zones
All the water catchment areas in the region of Asturias, excluding the water catchment area of the Río Eo.
II. Coastal zones
The entire coast of Asturias.

Pending: 31998D0256

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,(1) Whereas new information has been published in the United Kingdom further supporting the hypothesis that exposure to the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agent is linked to the new variant of Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease (CJD) in humans; whereas on 16 September 1997 the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) of the United Kingdom concluded that recent research provided compelling new evidence that the agent which causes BSE is identical to the agent which causes the new variant of CJD in humans; whereas on 18 September 1997 the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) concluded that the BSE agent should now be classified as a human pathogen;(2) Whereas, in those circumstances and as an emergency measure, it is appropriate to prohibit temporarily the dispatch to the other Member States of all bovine animals from the United Kingdom and of all products consisting entirely or in part of, or incorporating materials derived from, bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains or are destined for use in cosmetic, pharmaceutical or medical products; whereas in order to prevent deflections of trade, the same prohibitions should also apply to exports to third countries;(3) Whereas, in order to protect animal and human health in the Community, the Commission adopted Decision 94/474/EC of 27 July 1994 concerning certain protection measures relating to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and repealing Decisions 89/469/EEC and 90/200/EEC (3), Decision 92/290/EEC of 14 May 1992 concerning certain protection measures relating to bovine embryos in respect of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the United Kingdom (4), Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 concerning certain protection measures with regard to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and the feeding of mammalian derived protein (5) and Decision 96/449/EC of 18 July 1996 on the approval of alternative heat-treatment systems for processing animal waste with a view to the inactivation of spongiform encephalopathy agents (6);(4) Whereas the United Kingdom has taken measures as a result of the publication of information on certain cases of CJD in that Member State;(5) Whereas the United Kingdom has banned the use of mammalian meat-and-bone meal, regardless of its origin, for feeding farm animals; whereas it is necessary to provide that mammalian meat-and-bone meal and farm animal feed and fertilisers containing mammalian meat-and-bone meal, which by their nature could enter the farm animal feed chain, may not be dispatched from the United Kingdom;(6) Whereas the risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) entering the human food or animal feed chains through the consumption of protein derived from domestic carnivores is considered low; whereas that risk can be further reduced by requiring that domestic carnivores are not fed mammalian meat-and-bone meal originating in the United Kingdom; whereas it is therefore appropriate to provide that food for domestic carnivores which is produced in the United Kingdom but contains no mammalian meat-and-bone meal originating in that country may be dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries;(7) Whereas the United Kingdom has taken measures to destroy certain bovine tissues;(8) Whereas Commission Decision 96/239/EC of 27 March 1996 on emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy (7), before its amendment by Decision 96/362/EC (8), prohibited the dispatch from the United Kingdom to other Member States and to third countries, in particular, of bovine semen, and certain other products from the United Kingdom obtained from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom which are liable to enter the animal feed or human food chains and materials destined for use in medicinal products, cosmetics or pharmaceutical products;(9) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary was consulted on 18 and 26 April 1996; whereas, in the opinion of that Committee, bovine semen is considered to be safe for animal health with respect to BSE;(10) Whereas the Scientific Committee on Cosmetology was consulted on the safety of certain bovine products on 11 April 1996; whereas the Liaison Committee of European Associations of the Perfume, Cosmetic Products and Toiletries Industries (Colipa) has recommended its members not to use source materials from United Kingdom bovine animals; whereas that Committee has declared that its members follow that recommendation; whereas Commission Directive 97/1/EC of 10 January 1997 adapting to technical progress Annexes II, III, VI, and VII to Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (9), has provisionally prohibited the placing on the market of cosmetic products containing certain tissues and fluids;(11) Whereas the Scientific Committee for food was consulted on the safety of certain bovine products on 15 April 1996;(12) Whereas the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products was consulted on 16 April 1996; whereas the pharmaceutical sector had already introduced measures relating to the sourcing of materials and their treatment; whereas every medicinal product undergoes a pre-marketing approval before it is placed on the market by virtue of which the treatment process of any raw material is evaluated; whereas at the request of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, all Community marketing authorisation holders, or applicants with a positive opinion from the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products or the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products, have confirmed that the products concerned do not contain bovine tissue of United Kingdom origin;(13) Whereas subsequently, additional information was made available in order to facilitate a more complete risk assessment; whereas, on that basis, the Scientific Veterinary Committee on 26 April 1996 concluded that a combination of appropriate sourcing of bovine materials used and the application of minimum processing standards which have been shown effectively to inactivate the BSE agent together give good reassurances about the safety of those materials for food or cosmetic use; whereas, consequently, the Scientific Veterinary Committee has recommended safety parameters for the production of those materials which are therefore considered to be safe;(14) Whereas the Commission accordingly considered that certain products, such as gelatin and tallow, were safe;(15) Whereas in 1988 the United Kingdom introduced a requirement for animals affected with BSE to be completely destroyed; whereas the Council, at its meeting on 1, 2 and 3 April 1996, concluded that bovine animals over the age of 30 months should not enter the human food or animal feed chains or be used for cosmetic or pharmaceutical products; whereas such animals should not be used as source materials for certain bovine products;(16) Whereas furthermore, certain bovine tissues should not be used as source materials for those products;(17) Whereas Decision 96/362/EC amended Decision 96/239/EC to exempt certain products, such as gelatin, tallow and bovine semen, from the prohibition;(18) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee at its meeting on 17 July 1996 endorsed the report of the sub-group for BSE of 26 June 1996, where it recommended that the risk assessment for gelatin established by the Scientific Veterinary Committee on 26 April 1996 be reappraised in the light of the uncertainties as to the inactivation of the BSE agent, due note being taken of the requirements of Decision 96/362/EC;(19) Whereas Decision 96/362/EC laid down certain preconditions which had to be met before the United Kingdom could dispatch from its territory gelatin made from raw materials from bovine animals; whereas those preconditions have not been fulfilled and such dispatch has not been authorised; whereas, however, in order to regularise the situation, pending further scientific knowledge and advice, it is appropriate to withdraw the possibility of dispatch of gelatin made from raw materials from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom for human food, animal feed, cosmetics pharmaceutical and medical purposes; whereas that is in conformity with the advice from the Multidisciplinary Scientific Committee of 3 April 1997, according to which no production can be considered safe if the base material used for gelatin production is potentially infectious;(20) Whereas the United Kingdom should be permitted to dispatch rom its territory gelatin and di-calcium phosphate for technical purposes made from raw material from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom, provided that it is suitably labelled;(21) Whereas the United Kingdom should also be permitted to dispatch from its territory gelatin produced from raw material from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom; whereas the United Kingdom has introduced a system of traceability for such gelatine to ensure that the origin of the raw material is identifiable; whereas the Community rules should be supplemented by formally introducing a system of traceability; whereas such a system should be introduced for other products which are exempted from the overall ban; whereas a system of labelling should also be introduced;(22) Whereas it is necessary to provide that products from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom should come from approved establishments under official veterinary control which have a system in place to ensure traceability to the origin of the raw materials; whereas, however, dispatch of those products from the United Kingdom may take place immediately, without prior inspection by the Commission;(23) Whereas it is necessary to lay down appropriate guarantees for the dispatch from the United Kingdom of certain products obtained from bovine animals which were not slaughtered in the United Kingdom;(24) Whereas a reliable system of controls throughout the Community is a precondition for the smooth functioning of the beef market; whereas it is clear from the investigations by the Unit on Coordination of Fraud Prevention (UCLAF) and the Food and Veterinary Office of the Commission that there are deficiencies in official controls on production of beef in the United Kingdom for dispatch to other Member States and third countries; whereas it is, therefore, necessary to reinforce the system of veterinary checks in order to prevent fraud;(25) Whereas reinforced checks should apply to all commercial consignments of fresh meat of bovine animals moving into, through or from the territory of the United Kingdom; whereas it is appropriate to require that all such consignments be sealed and unsealed by the competent authority and accompanied by veterinary certificates and, in the case of intra-Community trade, to require an official notification of the dispatch of a consignment by means of the ANIMO system as referred to in Commission Decision 91/398/EEC of 19 July 1991 on a computerised network linking veterinary authorities (ANIMO) (10), or by fax;(26) Whereas the veterinary supervision of the processing of meat derived from bovine animals slaughtered elsewhere than in the United Kingdom should also be reinforced;(27) Whereas the United Kingdom put forward a first proposal for an export certified herds scheme to the Commission on 25 February 1997; whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee concluded at its meeting of 11 June 1997 that that proposal was not adequate; whereas the United Kingdom put forward a modified proposal dated 1 July 1997; whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee issued an opinion on that revised proposal on 17 September 1997 stating that the major obstacle to approving the scheme for the entire territory of the United Kingdom was the lack of a comprehensive computerised movement and tracing system and associated database for live cattle in Great Britain but that an adequate system did appear to exist in Northern Ireland; whereas the Committee concluded furthermore that small modifications could be made to minor aspects of the scheme at the request of the competent Commission departments in order to comply with certification or control requirements; whereas the Food and Veterinary Office conducted a feasibility inspection in Northern Ireland from 3 to 7 November 1997; whereas the United Kingdom has agreed to further improvements in line with the recommendations made following that inspection; whereas, therefore, a partial lifting of the prohibition on the dispatch of products from bovine animals slaughtered in Northern Ireland is appropriate;(28) Whereas inspections carried out by the Commission services have shown that the system of veterinary checks in Northern Ireland is more effective; whereas, therefore, a step-by-step approach is appropriate, starting with the lifting of the prohibitions on the dispatch of products from bovine animals slaughtered, cut, processed and stored in establishments exclusively used for products destined for dispatch to other Member States and third countries, located in Northern Ireland; whereas subsequent steps will include the lifting of the prohibition on the processing of eligible meat from Northern Ireland in Great Britain, under conditions which will be laid down at a later stage: whereas the Commission will immediately start investigating, with the authorities of the United Kingdom, by what means and under what conditions those restrictions may be further relaxed;(29) Whereas in order to prevent fraud, meat derived from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom should bear, in addition to the health mark provided for in Article 3(1)(A)(e) of Council Directive 64/433/EEC of 26 June 1964 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in fresh meat (11), a distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark;(30) Whereas most of the provisions of Decision 94/474/EC are no longer in conformity with the opinion of the Scientific Veterinary Committee of 17 September 1997 and should therefore be deleted;(31) Whereas Decision 96/239/EC required the United Kingdom to provide reports on the BSE situation every two weeks; whereas that period has been found to be too short; whereas it should be extended to one month;(32) Whereas the Commission should continue to carry out Community inspections in the United Kingdom to verify the application of the measures provided for in this Decision;(33) Whereas the foregoing entails a fundamental reworking of Decision 96/239/EC; whereas, in the interests of clarity, that Decision should be repealed;(34) Whereas this Decision will be reviewed in the light of new scientific information;(35) Whereas the Standing Veterinary Committee has not given a favourable opinion,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:CHAPTER I Live bovine animals, bovine embryos, meat-and-bone meal and related products

Article 1
Pending an overall examination of the situation, and notwithstanding Community provisions adopted to protect against BSE, the United Kingdom shall ensure that the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) live bovine animals and bovine embryos;
(b) meat meal, bone meal, and meat-and-bone meal of mammalian origin;
(c) animal feed and fertilisers containing material referred to in (b).

Article 2
By way of derogation from Article 1, food destined for domestic carnivores containing material referred to in Article 1(b) may be dispatched to other Member States or to third countries provided that those materials did not originate from the United Kingdom and that the conditions laid down in Articles 9 and 10 are complied with.

Article 3
Pending an overall examination of the situation, and notwithstanding Community provisions adopted to protect against BSE, the United Kingdom shall ensure that the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries, when derived from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom:
(b) products which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains;
(c) materials which are destined for use in cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.

Article 4
1. By way of derogation from Article 3, the United Kingdom may authorise the production and the dispatch from its territory to other Member States or to third countries of:
(a) amino acids, peptides and tallow, which have been produced in establishments under official veterinary supervision which have been shown to be operating in accordance with the conditions set out in Annex I;
(b) tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, where these are manufactured from tallow produced in accordance with this Article.
2. The United Kingdom shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph 1 are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and to indicate that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.
3. The United Kingdom shall ensure that products referred to in paragraph 1(a) which are dispatched to other Member States in accordance with this Article are accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that they conform to the conditions laid down in this Decision and attesting to the frequency of official controls carried out.
4. Before an establishment may commence or recommence the dispatch of products pursuant to this Article, the United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of the establishments referred to in paragraph 1(a), identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the other Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.
5. Community inspections shall be carried out on the implementation of official controls in respect of each of the products referred to in paragraph 1 before the dispatch of those products may commence or recommence.
6. The Commission, after having consulted the Member States in the framework of the Standing Veterinary Committee, shall set the date on which establishments may commence or recommence dispatch of the products referred to in paragraph 1(a).

Article 5
The United Kingdom shall ensure that gelatin, di-calcium phosphate, collagen, tallow, tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis which are produced for technical use from raw materials derived from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and their unsuitability for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.

Article 6
1. By way of derogation from Article 3, the United Kingdom may authorise the dispatch to other Member States or to third countries of the following products derived from bovine animals born and reared in Northern Ireland which have been slaughtered in Northern Ireland in slaughterhouses exclusively used for that purpose, in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, Article 7, Articles 9 to 12 and Annex II:
(a) ‘fresh meat` as defined by Directive 64/433/EEC;
(b) ‘minced meat` and ‘meat preparations` as defined by Directive 94/65/EC (12);
(c) ‘meat products` as defined by Directive 77/99/EEC (13).
2. The fresh meat referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be deboned and all adherent tissues, including obvious nervous and lyphatic tissues shall be removed in cutting plants in Northern Ireland, exclusively used for eligible products. Cold storage shall take place in Northern Ireland in chambers exclusively used for eligible products. Cutting, storage and transport shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, Article 7, Articles 9 to 12 and Annex II.
3. The fresh meat referred to in paragraph 1(a) may be used for the production of products referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c) in establishments in Northern Ireland exclusively used for eligible products, in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, in Article 7, Articles 9 to 12 and Annex II.
4. For the purposes of this Article, eligible products means products referred to in paragraph 1 and products derived from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom which comply with the conditions laid down in Articles 9 to 13.
5. The Commission, after having carried out Community inspections and after having informed the Member States, shall set the date on which dispatch of the products referred to in paragraph 1 may commence.
6. The Commission shall review the provisions of this Article at least every three months and shall take appropriate measures in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Directive 89/662/EEC.

Article 7
1. The meat and products referred to in Article 6(1) shall be marked or labelled with an additional distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark.
2. Meat and products as referred to in Article 6(1) which are destined for placing on the market in the United Kingdom shall not bear the additional mark referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Where such a mark is present, it shall be cancelled or removed from the meat or cancelled from the label at the time that meat or those products leave the establishment. The Community health mark shall not be removed except where that is unavoidable in the cutting process.
3. The United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the model of the additional mark referred to in paragraph 1 before dispatch commences.

Article 8
The United Kingdom shall ensure that the provisions of Articles 9 to 13 are complied with when the following products derived from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom are dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) ‘fresh meat` as defined by Directive 64/433/EEC;
(b) ‘minced meat` and ‘meat preparations` as defined by Directive 94/65/EC;
(c) ‘meat products` and ‘other products of animal origin` as defined by Directive 77/99/EEC;
(d) food which is destined for domestic carnivores;
(e) gelatin and di-calcium phosphate, tallow, tallow products, and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, amino acids, peptides and collagen which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains, or are destined for use in cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.

Article 9
1. The products referred to in Article 8 shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through, establishments in the United Kingdom:
(a) which have been approved by the competent authority;
(b) which are under official veterinary supervision or, in the case of products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, under the supervision of the competent authority;
(c) which have put in place a system of tracing the raw material which will guarantee the origin of the material throughout the whole production chain;
(d) which have put in place a registration system of amounts of incoming and outgoing materials to allow for cross-checking consignments entering or leaving;
(e) in which the products are unloaded, processed, stored, handled, loaded and transported separately from, or at different times from, products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article and Articles 10, 11 and 12.
2. The United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of establishments which meet the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.

Article 10
1. Products referred to in Article 8(a) to (d) shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in the United Kingdom in which:
(a) all unloading, processing, storage or other handling and loading of products takes place under official supervision;
(b) the products are stored in cold stores in chambers which are not used at the same time for storing any bovine products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article, in Articles 9, 11, 12 and 13 and are kept locked under the seal of the competent authority when the latter is not present;
(c) the products, with the exception of the products referred to in Article 8(d), are marked or labelled with an additional distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark;
(d) the products eligible for dispatch from the United Kingdom within the meaning of this Article and Articles 9, 11, 12 and 13, but destined for placing on the market in the United Kingdom do not bear the additional mark referred to in point (c). Where such a mark is present, it shall be cancelled or removed from the meat or cancelled from the label at the time that meat or those products leave the establishment.
The United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the model of the additional mark.
2. For the purposes of the health marking and application of additional marks provided for in Community legislation, the competent authority shall keep and maintain under its responsibility:
(a) the instruments intended for meat health marking and application of additional marks, which may be handed over to auxiliaries only at time of marking and for the length of time required for that purpose;
(b) any labels bearing a health mark or an additional mark. Those labels shall be serially numbered and the requisite quantity may be given to auxiliaries at the time when they are to be used.
3. The products referred to in paragraph 1 shall be transported by means of transport that are sealed by the competent authority.
When those products are dispatched to other Member States, they shall be accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that the conditions referred to in this Article and Articles 9, 11, 12 and 13 are met, identifying all establishments where they were obtained, processed, handled or stored and identifying all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
Meat shall be accompanied by the health certificate referred to in Annex IV to Directive 64/433/EEC identifying in the ‘Identification of Meat` section of the certificate all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
The following words shall be added to all certificates:
‘produced in accordance with Decision 98/256/EC`.
4. The United Kingdom shall inform the competent authority of the place of destination of each consignment by means of the Animo system or by fax.

Article 11
Without prejudice to Article 7(2) and Article 10(1)(d), where products referred to in Article 8(a) come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in the United Kingdom, the Community health marks shall not be removed except where that is unavoidable in the cutting process.

Article 12
The products referred to in Article 8(e) which are dispatched to other Member States shall be labelled in order to identify the establishment of production and to indicate that they have been produced in accordance with this Decision and, as appropriate, that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.

Article 13
1. A Member State which dispatches meat as referred to in Article 8(a) from an establishment or Community approved border inspection post in its territory through the territory of the United Kingdom or to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 9 shall ensure that the meat is accompanied by a veterinary certificate issued by an official veterinarian or the certificate issued by the competent authority of the border inspection post.
The originals of all certificates shall accompany the consignment to the establishment of its destination.
2. The meat as referred to in Article 8(a) shall be transported in an officially sealed vehicle.
The seal may be broken only for official inspection purposes.
3. A Member State which dispatches products referred to in Article 8(e) or any raw materials for use in the production of those products to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 9 shall ensure that they are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment and Member State in which they were produced.

Article 14
The Commission shall carry out Community inspections on-the-spot in the United Kingdom to verify the application of the provisions of this Decision, in particular in relation to the implementation of official controls.

Article 15
The United Kingdom shall send the Commission every month a report on the application of the protective measures taken against BSE, in accordance with national and Community provisions.

Article 16
This Decision shall be reviewed regularly in the light of new scientific information. This Decision shall be amended, where appropriate, after consultation of the appropriate Scientific Committee, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Directive 89/662/EEC.

Article 17
Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 18
Decision 94/474/EC is hereby amended as follows:
1. Article 1 shall be deleted;
2. in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be deleted;
3. Article 4 shall be deleted.

Article 19
Decision 96/239/EC is hereby repealed.

Article 20
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 1998.
For the Council
The President
J. CUNNINGHAM
(1) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49).
(2) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13. Directive as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC.
(3) OJ L 194, 29. 7. 1994, p. 96. Decision as last amended by Decision 95/287/EC (OJ L 181, 1. 8. 1995, p.40).
(4) OJ L 152, 4. 6. 1992, p. 37. Decision as amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(5) OJ L 172, 7. 7. 1994, p. 23. Decision as amended by Decision 95/60/EC (OJ L 55, 11. 3. 1995, p. 43).
(6) OJ L 184, 24. 7. 1996, p. 43.
(7) OJ L 78, 28. 3. 1996, p. 47.
(8) OJ L 139, 12. 6. 1996, p. 17.
(9) OJ L 16, 18. 1. 1997, p. 85.
(10) OJ L 221, 9. 8. 1991, p. 30.
(11) OJ 121, 29. 7. 1964, p. 2012/64. Directive as last amended by Directive 95/23/EC (OJ L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 7).
(12) OJ L 368, 31. 12. 1994, p. 10.
(13) OJ L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 85.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,(1) Whereas new information has been published in the United Kingdom further supporting the hypothesis that exposure to the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agent is linked to the new variant of Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease (CJD) in humans; whereas on 16 September 1997 the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) of the United Kingdom concluded that recent research provided compelling new evidence that the agent which causes BSE is identical to the agent which causes the new variant of CJD in humans; whereas on 18 September 1997 the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) concluded that the BSE agent should now be classified as a human pathogen;(2) Whereas, in those circumstances and as an emergency measure, it is appropriate to prohibit temporarily the dispatch to the other Member States of all bovine animals from the United Kingdom and of all products consisting entirely or in part of, or incorporating materials derived from, bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains or are destined for use in cosmetic, pharmaceutical or medical products; whereas in order to prevent deflections of trade, the same prohibitions should also apply to exports to third countries;(3) Whereas, in order to protect animal and human health in the Community, the Commission adopted Decision 94/474/EC of 27 July 1994 concerning certain protection measures relating to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and repealing Decisions 89/469/EEC and 90/200/EEC (3), Decision 92/290/EEC of 14 May 1992 concerning certain protection measures relating to bovine embryos in respect of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the United Kingdom (4), Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 concerning certain protection measures with regard to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and the feeding of mammalian derived protein (5) and Decision 96/449/EC of 18 July 1996 on the approval of alternative heat-treatment systems for processing animal waste with a view to the inactivation of spongiform encephalopathy agents (6);(4) Whereas the United Kingdom has taken measures as a result of the publication of information on certain cases of CJD in that Member State;(5) Whereas the United Kingdom has banned the use of mammalian meat-and-bone meal, regardless of its origin, for feeding farm animals; whereas it is necessary to provide that mammalian meat-and-bone meal and farm animal feed and fertilisers containing mammalian meat-and-bone meal, which by their nature could enter the farm animal feed chain, may not be dispatched from the United Kingdom;(6) Whereas the risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) entering the human food or animal feed chains through the consumption of protein derived from domestic carnivores is considered low; whereas that risk can be further reduced by requiring that domestic carnivores are not fed mammalian meat-and-bone meal originating in the United Kingdom; whereas it is therefore appropriate to provide that food for domestic carnivores which is produced in the United Kingdom but contains no mammalian meat-and-bone meal originating in that country may be dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries;(7) Whereas the United Kingdom has taken measures to destroy certain bovine tissues;(8) Whereas Commission Decision 96/239/EC of 27 March 1996 on emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy (7), before its amendment by Decision 96/362/EC (8), prohibited the dispatch from the United Kingdom to other Member States and to third countries, in particular, of bovine semen, and certain other products from the United Kingdom obtained from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom which are liable to enter the animal feed or human food chains and materials destined for use in medicinal products, cosmetics or pharmaceutical products;(9) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary was consulted on 18 and 26 April 1996; whereas, in the opinion of that Committee, bovine semen is considered to be safe for animal health with respect to BSE;(10) Whereas the Scientific Committee on Cosmetology was consulted on the safety of certain bovine products on 11 April 1996; whereas the Liaison Committee of European Associations of the Perfume, Cosmetic Products and Toiletries Industries (Colipa) has recommended its members not to use source materials from United Kingdom bovine animals; whereas that Committee has declared that its members follow that recommendation; whereas Commission Directive 97/1/EC of 10 January 1997 adapting to technical progress Annexes II, III, VI, and VII to Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (9), has provisionally prohibited the placing on the market of cosmetic products containing certain tissues and fluids;(11) Whereas the Scientific Committee for food was consulted on the safety of certain bovine products on 15 April 1996;(12) Whereas the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products was consulted on 16 April 1996; whereas the pharmaceutical sector had already introduced measures relating to the sourcing of materials and their treatment; whereas every medicinal product undergoes a pre-marketing approval before it is placed on the market by virtue of which the treatment process of any raw material is evaluated; whereas at the request of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, all Community marketing authorisation holders, or applicants with a positive opinion from the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products or the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products, have confirmed that the products concerned do not contain bovine tissue of United Kingdom origin;(13) Whereas subsequently, additional information was made available in order to facilitate a more complete risk assessment; whereas, on that basis, the Scientific Veterinary Committee on 26 April 1996 concluded that a combination of appropriate sourcing of bovine materials used and the application of minimum processing standards which have been shown effectively to inactivate the BSE agent together give good reassurances about the safety of those materials for food or cosmetic use; whereas, consequently, the Scientific Veterinary Committee has recommended safety parameters for the production of those materials which are therefore considered to be safe;(14) Whereas the Commission accordingly considered that certain products, such as gelatin and tallow, were safe;(15) Whereas in 1988 the United Kingdom introduced a requirement for animals affected with BSE to be completely destroyed; whereas the Council, at its meeting on 1, 2 and 3 April 1996, concluded that bovine animals over the age of 30 months should not enter the human food or animal feed chains or be used for cosmetic or pharmaceutical products; whereas such animals should not be used as source materials for certain bovine products;(16) Whereas furthermore, certain bovine tissues should not be used as source materials for those products;(17) Whereas Decision 96/362/EC amended Decision 96/239/EC to exempt certain products, such as gelatin, tallow and bovine semen, from the prohibition;(18) Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee at its meeting on 17 July 1996 endorsed the report of the sub-group for BSE of 26 June 1996, where it recommended that the risk assessment for gelatin established by the Scientific Veterinary Committee on 26 April 1996 be reappraised in the light of the uncertainties as to the inactivation of the BSE agent, due note being taken of the requirements of Decision 96/362/EC;(19) Whereas Decision 96/362/EC laid down certain preconditions which had to be met before the United Kingdom could dispatch from its territory gelatin made from raw materials from bovine animals; whereas those preconditions have not been fulfilled and such dispatch has not been authorised; whereas, however, in order to regularise the situation, pending further scientific knowledge and advice, it is appropriate to withdraw the possibility of dispatch of gelatin made from raw materials from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom for human food, animal feed, cosmetics pharmaceutical and medical purposes; whereas that is in conformity with the advice from the Multidisciplinary Scientific Committee of 3 April 1997, according to which no production can be considered safe if the base material used for gelatin production is potentially infectious;(20) Whereas the United Kingdom should be permitted to dispatch rom its territory gelatin and di-calcium phosphate for technical purposes made from raw material from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom, provided that it is suitably labelled;(21) Whereas the United Kingdom should also be permitted to dispatch from its territory gelatin produced from raw material from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom; whereas the United Kingdom has introduced a system of traceability for such gelatine to ensure that the origin of the raw material is identifiable; whereas the Community rules should be supplemented by formally introducing a system of traceability; whereas such a system should be introduced for other products which are exempted from the overall ban; whereas a system of labelling should also be introduced;(22) Whereas it is necessary to provide that products from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom should come from approved establishments under official veterinary control which have a system in place to ensure traceability to the origin of the raw materials; whereas, however, dispatch of those products from the United Kingdom may take place immediately, without prior inspection by the Commission;(23) Whereas it is necessary to lay down appropriate guarantees for the dispatch from the United Kingdom of certain products obtained from bovine animals which were not slaughtered in the United Kingdom;(24) Whereas a reliable system of controls throughout the Community is a precondition for the smooth functioning of the beef market; whereas it is clear from the investigations by the Unit on Coordination of Fraud Prevention (UCLAF) and the Food and Veterinary Office of the Commission that there are deficiencies in official controls on production of beef in the United Kingdom for dispatch to other Member States and third countries; whereas it is, therefore, necessary to reinforce the system of veterinary checks in order to prevent fraud;(25) Whereas reinforced checks should apply to all commercial consignments of fresh meat of bovine animals moving into, through or from the territory of the United Kingdom; whereas it is appropriate to require that all such consignments be sealed and unsealed by the competent authority and accompanied by veterinary certificates and, in the case of intra-Community trade, to require an official notification of the dispatch of a consignment by means of the ANIMO system as referred to in Commission Decision 91/398/EEC of 19 July 1991 on a computerised network linking veterinary authorities (ANIMO) (10), or by fax;(26) Whereas the veterinary supervision of the processing of meat derived from bovine animals slaughtered elsewhere than in the United Kingdom should also be reinforced;(27) Whereas the United Kingdom put forward a first proposal for an export certified herds scheme to the Commission on 25 February 1997; whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee concluded at its meeting of 11 June 1997 that that proposal was not adequate; whereas the United Kingdom put forward a modified proposal dated 1 July 1997; whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee issued an opinion on that revised proposal on 17 September 1997 stating that the major obstacle to approving the scheme for the entire territory of the United Kingdom was the lack of a comprehensive computerised movement and tracing system and associated database for live cattle in Great Britain but that an adequate system did appear to exist in Northern Ireland; whereas the Committee concluded furthermore that small modifications could be made to minor aspects of the scheme at the request of the competent Commission departments in order to comply with certification or control requirements; whereas the Food and Veterinary Office conducted a feasibility inspection in Northern Ireland from 3 to 7 November 1997; whereas the United Kingdom has agreed to further improvements in line with the recommendations made following that inspection; whereas, therefore, a partial lifting of the prohibition on the dispatch of products from bovine animals slaughtered in Northern Ireland is appropriate;(28) Whereas inspections carried out by the Commission services have shown that the system of veterinary checks in Northern Ireland is more effective; whereas, therefore, a step-by-step approach is appropriate, starting with the lifting of the prohibitions on the dispatch of products from bovine animals slaughtered, cut, processed and stored in establishments exclusively used for products destined for dispatch to other Member States and third countries, located in Northern Ireland; whereas subsequent steps will include the lifting of the prohibition on the processing of eligible meat from Northern Ireland in Great Britain, under conditions which will be laid down at a later stage: whereas the Commission will immediately start investigating, with the authorities of the United Kingdom, by what means and under what conditions those restrictions may be further relaxed;(29) Whereas in order to prevent fraud, meat derived from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom should bear, in addition to the health mark provided for in Article 3(1)(A)(e) of Council Directive 64/433/EEC of 26 June 1964 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in fresh meat (11), a distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark;(30) Whereas most of the provisions of Decision 94/474/EC are no longer in conformity with the opinion of the Scientific Veterinary Committee of 17 September 1997 and should therefore be deleted;(31) Whereas Decision 96/239/EC required the United Kingdom to provide reports on the BSE situation every two weeks; whereas that period has been found to be too short; whereas it should be extended to one month;(32) Whereas the Commission should continue to carry out Community inspections in the United Kingdom to verify the application of the measures provided for in this Decision;(33) Whereas the foregoing entails a fundamental reworking of Decision 96/239/EC; whereas, in the interests of clarity, that Decision should be repealed;(34) Whereas this Decision will be reviewed in the light of new scientific information;(35) Whereas the Standing Veterinary Committee has not given a favourable opinion,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:CHAPTER I Live bovine animals, bovine embryos, meat-and-bone meal and related products
Pending an overall examination of the situation, and notwithstanding Community provisions adopted to protect against BSE, the United Kingdom shall ensure that the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) live bovine animals and bovine embryos;
(b) meat meal, bone meal, and meat-and-bone meal of mammalian origin;
(c) animal feed and fertilisers containing material referred to in (b).
By way of derogation from Article 1, food destined for domestic carnivores containing material referred to in Article 1(b) may be dispatched to other Member States or to third countries provided that those materials did not originate from the United Kingdom and that the conditions laid down in Articles 9 and 10 are complied with.
Pending an overall examination of the situation, and notwithstanding Community provisions adopted to protect against BSE, the United Kingdom shall ensure that the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries, when derived from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom:
(b) products which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains;
(c) materials which are destined for use in cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.
1. By way of derogation from Article 3, the United Kingdom may authorise the production and the dispatch from its territory to other Member States or to third countries of:
(a) amino acids, peptides and tallow, which have been produced in establishments under official veterinary supervision which have been shown to be operating in accordance with the conditions set out in Annex I;
(b) tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, where these are manufactured from tallow produced in accordance with this Article.
2. The United Kingdom shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph 1 are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and to indicate that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.
3. The United Kingdom shall ensure that products referred to in paragraph 1(a) which are dispatched to other Member States in accordance with this Article are accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that they conform to the conditions laid down in this Decision and attesting to the frequency of official controls carried out.
4. Before an establishment may commence or recommence the dispatch of products pursuant to this Article, the United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of the establishments referred to in paragraph 1(a), identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the other Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.
5. Community inspections shall be carried out on the implementation of official controls in respect of each of the products referred to in paragraph 1 before the dispatch of those products may commence or recommence.
6. The Commission, after having consulted the Member States in the framework of the Standing Veterinary Committee, shall set the date on which establishments may commence or recommence dispatch of the products referred to in paragraph 1(a).
The United Kingdom shall ensure that gelatin, di-calcium phosphate, collagen, tallow, tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis which are produced for technical use from raw materials derived from bovine animals slaughtered in the United Kingdom are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and their unsuitability for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.
1. By way of derogation from Article 3, the United Kingdom may authorise the dispatch to other Member States or to third countries of the following products derived from bovine animals born and reared in Northern Ireland which have been slaughtered in Northern Ireland in slaughterhouses exclusively used for that purpose, in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, Article 7, Articles 9 to 12 and Annex II:
(a) ‘fresh meat` as defined by Directive 64/433/EEC;
(b) ‘minced meat` and ‘meat preparations` as defined by Directive 94/65/EC (12);
(c) ‘meat products` as defined by Directive 77/99/EEC (13).
2. The fresh meat referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be deboned and all adherent tissues, including obvious nervous and lyphatic tissues shall be removed in cutting plants in Northern Ireland, exclusively used for eligible products. Cold storage shall take place in Northern Ireland in chambers exclusively used for eligible products. Cutting, storage and transport shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, Article 7, Articles 9 to 12 and Annex II.
3. The fresh meat referred to in paragraph 1(a) may be used for the production of products referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c) in establishments in Northern Ireland exclusively used for eligible products, in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Article, in Article 7, Articles 9 to 12 and Annex II.
4. For the purposes of this Article, eligible products means products referred to in paragraph 1 and products derived from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom which comply with the conditions laid down in Articles 9 to 13.
5. The Commission, after having carried out Community inspections and after having informed the Member States, shall set the date on which dispatch of the products referred to in paragraph 1 may commence.
6. The Commission shall review the provisions of this Article at least every three months and shall take appropriate measures in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Directive 89/662/EEC.
1. The meat and products referred to in Article 6(1) shall be marked or labelled with an additional distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark.
2. Meat and products as referred to in Article 6(1) which are destined for placing on the market in the United Kingdom shall not bear the additional mark referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Where such a mark is present, it shall be cancelled or removed from the meat or cancelled from the label at the time that meat or those products leave the establishment. The Community health mark shall not be removed except where that is unavoidable in the cutting process.
3. The United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the model of the additional mark referred to in paragraph 1 before dispatch commences.
The United Kingdom shall ensure that the provisions of Articles 9 to 13 are complied with when the following products derived from bovine animals not slaughtered in the United Kingdom are dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) ‘fresh meat` as defined by Directive 64/433/EEC;
(b) ‘minced meat` and ‘meat preparations` as defined by Directive 94/65/EC;
(c) ‘meat products` and ‘other products of animal origin` as defined by Directive 77/99/EEC;
(d) food which is destined for domestic carnivores;
(e) gelatin and di-calcium phosphate, tallow, tallow products, and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, amino acids, peptides and collagen which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains, or are destined for use in cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.
1. The products referred to in Article 8 shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through, establishments in the United Kingdom:
(a) which have been approved by the competent authority;
(b) which are under official veterinary supervision or, in the case of products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, under the supervision of the competent authority;
(c) which have put in place a system of tracing the raw material which will guarantee the origin of the material throughout the whole production chain;
(d) which have put in place a registration system of amounts of incoming and outgoing materials to allow for cross-checking consignments entering or leaving;
(e) in which the products are unloaded, processed, stored, handled, loaded and transported separately from, or at different times from, products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article and Articles 10, 11 and 12.
2. The United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of establishments which meet the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.
1. Products referred to in Article 8(a) to (d) shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in the United Kingdom in which:
(a) all unloading, processing, storage or other handling and loading of products takes place under official supervision;
(b) the products are stored in cold stores in chambers which are not used at the same time for storing any bovine products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article, in Articles 9, 11, 12 and 13 and are kept locked under the seal of the competent authority when the latter is not present;
(c) the products, with the exception of the products referred to in Article 8(d), are marked or labelled with an additional distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark;
(d) the products eligible for dispatch from the United Kingdom within the meaning of this Article and Articles 9, 11, 12 and 13, but destined for placing on the market in the United Kingdom do not bear the additional mark referred to in point (c). Where such a mark is present, it shall be cancelled or removed from the meat or cancelled from the label at the time that meat or those products leave the establishment.
The United Kingdom shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the model of the additional mark.
2. For the purposes of the health marking and application of additional marks provided for in Community legislation, the competent authority shall keep and maintain under its responsibility:
(a) the instruments intended for meat health marking and application of additional marks, which may be handed over to auxiliaries only at time of marking and for the length of time required for that purpose;
(b) any labels bearing a health mark or an additional mark. Those labels shall be serially numbered and the requisite quantity may be given to auxiliaries at the time when they are to be used.
3. The products referred to in paragraph 1 shall be transported by means of transport that are sealed by the competent authority.
When those products are dispatched to other Member States, they shall be accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that the conditions referred to in this Article and Articles 9, 11, 12 and 13 are met, identifying all establishments where they were obtained, processed, handled or stored and identifying all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
Meat shall be accompanied by the health certificate referred to in Annex IV to Directive 64/433/EEC identifying in the ‘Identification of Meat` section of the certificate all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
The following words shall be added to all certificates:
‘produced in accordance with Decision 98/256/EC`.
4. The United Kingdom shall inform the competent authority of the place of destination of each consignment by means of the Animo system or by fax.
Without prejudice to Article 7(2) and Article 10(1)(d), where products referred to in Article 8(a) come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in the United Kingdom, the Community health marks shall not be removed except where that is unavoidable in the cutting process.
The products referred to in Article 8(e) which are dispatched to other Member States shall be labelled in order to identify the establishment of production and to indicate that they have been produced in accordance with this Decision and, as appropriate, that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics or medical or pharmaceutical products.
1. A Member State which dispatches meat as referred to in Article 8(a) from an establishment or Community approved border inspection post in its territory through the territory of the United Kingdom or to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 9 shall ensure that the meat is accompanied by a veterinary certificate issued by an official veterinarian or the certificate issued by the competent authority of the border inspection post.
The originals of all certificates shall accompany the consignment to the establishment of its destination.
2. The meat as referred to in Article 8(a) shall be transported in an officially sealed vehicle.
The seal may be broken only for official inspection purposes.
3. A Member State which dispatches products referred to in Article 8(e) or any raw materials for use in the production of those products to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 9 shall ensure that they are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment and Member State in which they were produced.
The Commission shall carry out Community inspections on-the-spot in the United Kingdom to verify the application of the provisions of this Decision, in particular in relation to the implementation of official controls.
The United Kingdom shall send the Commission every month a report on the application of the protective measures taken against BSE, in accordance with national and Community provisions.
This Decision shall be reviewed regularly in the light of new scientific information. This Decision shall be amended, where appropriate, after consultation of the appropriate Scientific Committee, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18 of Directive 89/662/EEC.
Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
Decision 94/474/EC is hereby amended as follows:
1. Article 1 shall be deleted;
2. in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be deleted;
3. Article 4 shall be deleted.
Decision 96/239/EC is hereby repealed.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 1998.
For the Council
The President
J. CUNNINGHAM
(1) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49).
(2) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13. Directive as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC.
(3) OJ L 194, 29. 7. 1994, p. 96. Decision as last amended by Decision 95/287/EC (OJ L 181, 1. 8. 1995, p.40).
(4) OJ L 152, 4. 6. 1992, p. 37. Decision as amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(5) OJ L 172, 7. 7. 1994, p. 23. Decision as amended by Decision 95/60/EC (OJ L 55, 11. 3. 1995, p. 43).
(6) OJ L 184, 24. 7. 1996, p. 43.
(7) OJ L 78, 28. 3. 1996, p. 47.
(8) OJ L 139, 12. 6. 1996, p. 17.
(9) OJ L 16, 18. 1. 1997, p. 85.
(10) OJ L 221, 9. 8. 1991, p. 30.
(11) OJ 121, 29. 7. 1964, p. 2012/64. Directive as last amended by Directive 95/23/EC (OJ L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 7).
(12) OJ L 368, 31. 12. 1994, p. 10.
(13) OJ L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 85.
1. Deboned fresh meat and products referred to in Article 6(1)(b) and (c) from that meat derived from bovine animals slaughtered in Northern Ireland may be dispatched from Northern Ireland in application of the provisions of Article 6 when obtained from eligible animals which originate from eligible herds.
Eligible herds
2. A herd is a group of animals forming a separate and distinct unit, that is a group of animals which were managed, housed and kept separately from any other group of animals and which were identified with unique herd and animal identification numbers.
3. A herd is eligible when for at least 8 years, there has been no confirmed case of BSE, nor a suspect case for which the diagnosis of BSE has not been ruled out, in any animal which was still in or had moved through or from the herd.
4. As an exception to the provisions in point 2, a herd that has been in existence for less than eight years may be considered eligible, after a thorough epidemiological investigation by the competent veterinary authority, on condition that:
(a) all animals born or moved into the newly established herd complied with the conditions set out in point 6(a), (c), (d) and (e); and,
(b) the herd has complied with the conditions set out in point 3 during its entire existence.
5. If a herd is newly established on a holding which experienced a confirmed case of BSE in any animal which was still in or had moved through or from a herd on that holding, the newly established herd can only be eligible after a thorough epidemiological investigation by the competent veterinary authority, taking into account compliance with each of the following conditions to the satisfaction of the competent veterinary authority:
(a) all animals of the affected herd have been removed or killed;
(b) all feed has been removed and destroyed and all feed containers thoroughly cleansed;
(c) all buildings have been emptied and thoroughly cleansed before the new animals were admitted;
(d) all conditions set out in point 4 have been complied with.
Eligible animals
6. A bovine animal is eligible if it has been born and reared in Northern Ireland and at the time of slaughter:
(a) all records of its birth, identity and movements are recorded on an official computerised tracing system;
(b) it is more than six months but less than 30 months of age, determined by reference to an official computer record of its date of birth;
(c) its dam has lived for at least six months after its birth;
(d) its dam has not developed BSE and is not suspected of having contracted BSE;
(e) the herd of birth of the animal and all herds through which it has ever moved are eligible.
7. The official computerised tracing system referred to in point 6(a) will be accepted only where it has been in operation for sufficient time to contain all the information relating to the lifetime and movements of the animals needed to check compliance with the requirements of this Decision, and only in respect of animals born after the system came into operation. Historical data loaded into a computer for any period before the system was operational will not be accepted for this purpose.
8. If animal presented for slaughter or any circumstance surrounding its slaughter does not meet all of the requirements of this Decision, the animal must be automatically rejected. If that information becomes available after slaughter, the competent authority must immediately cease issuing certificates, and cancel issued certificates. If dispatch has already taken place, the competent authority must notify the competent authority of the place of destination. The competent authority of the place of destination must take the appropriate measures.
9. Slaughter of eligible animals must take place in slaughterhouses exclusively used for that purpose. Cutting, deboning and processing must place in establishments exclusively used for products which are eligible for dispatch to other Member States or third countries. Cold storage must take place in chambers, exclusively used for products which are eligible for dispatch to other Member States or third countries. All establishments through which the products pass before such dispatch must be situated in Northern Ireland.
10. The competent authority must ensure that procedures used in the cutting plants ensure that the following lymph nodes have been removed:
– popliteal, ischiatic, superficial inguinal, deep inguinal, medial and lateral iliac, renal prefemoral, lumbar, costocervical, sternal, prescapular, axilliary and caudal deep cervical.
11. Meat must be traceable back to the herd of the eligible animal by means of the computerised tracing system until the time of slaughter. After slaughter, labels must be capable of tracing fresh meat and products referred to in Article 6(1)(b) and (c) back to the herd to enable the consignment concerned to be recalled.
12. All approved eligible carcases must have individual numbers correlated with the ear tag number.
13. The United Kingdom must have detailed protocols in place covering:
(a) tracing and controls prior to slaughter;
(b) controls during slaughter;
(c) all labelling and certification requirements after slaughter to the point of sale.
14. The competent authority must set up a system for recording checks on compliance so that control can be demonstrated.
The establishment
15. To obtain approval, the establishment must, in addition to all other requirements of this Decision, devise and implement a system whereby the eligible meat and/or eligible product is identifiable and all meat or products can be traced back to its herds of origin. The system must facilitate full traceability of the meat of products at all stages and records must be retained for at least two years. Details of the system to be employed must be given, in writing, by the management of the establishment to the competent authority.
16. The competent authority must assess, approve and monitor the system provided by the establishment in order to ensure that it provides full segregation and traceability both backwards and forwards.

Pending: 31998D0198

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (1), and in particular Article 27 thereof,Having regard to the previous Decision 95/252/EC (2),Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce or extend special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance;Whereas, by letter registered at the Commission on 6 October 1997, the United Kingdom requested authorisation to extend application of the derogation previously granted to it by Decision 95/252/EC;Whereas the other Member States were informed on 23 October 1997 of the United Kingdom’s request;Whereas the United Kingdom was authorised by Decision 95/252/EC to apply until 31 December 1997 a measure derogating from Articles 6 and 17 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the derogation in question is designed, firstly, to restrict to 50 % the right of the hirer or lessee of a car to deduct the VAT on the hire or leasing transaction where the car is used for private purposes and, secondly, to waive the VAT payable on the private use of the car in question;Whereas the objective of this restriction of the right to deduct is to tax the private use of cars hired or leased by taxable persons at a flat rate;Whereas the measure, by reducing the administrative burden on traders, who are not required to keep records of private mileage, constitutes a simplification of the procedure for charging tax within the meaning of Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme, accompanied by a schedule of proposals, providing for gradual, stage-by-stage progress towards a common VAT system for the internal market;Whereas the authorisation is being granted until 31 December 1998 so as to enable an assessment to be made at that time as to whether the derogation measure is consistent with the Community approach to limitations of the right to deduct VAT on certain expenditure, which will be adopted under that programme;Whereas the derogation will not have an adverse impact on the Community’s own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
By way of derogation from Article 17(2) and (3) of Directive 77/388/EEC the United Kingdom is hereby authorised to restrict to 50 % the right of the hirer or lessee of a car to deduct the VAT on the cost of hiring or leasing that car where it is used for private purposes.

Article 2
By way of derogation from Article 6(2)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC the United Kingdom is hereby authorised not to treat as supplies of services for consideration the private use of a business car hired or leased by a taxable person.

Article 3
This authorisation shall expire on 31 December 1998.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom.
Done at Brussels, 9 March 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).
(2) OJ L 159, 11. 7. 1995, p. 19.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (1), and in particular Article 27 thereof,Having regard to the previous Decision 95/252/EC (2),Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce or extend special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance;Whereas, by letter registered at the Commission on 6 October 1997, the United Kingdom requested authorisation to extend application of the derogation previously granted to it by Decision 95/252/EC;Whereas the other Member States were informed on 23 October 1997 of the United Kingdom’s request;Whereas the United Kingdom was authorised by Decision 95/252/EC to apply until 31 December 1997 a measure derogating from Articles 6 and 17 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the derogation in question is designed, firstly, to restrict to 50 % the right of the hirer or lessee of a car to deduct the VAT on the hire or leasing transaction where the car is used for private purposes and, secondly, to waive the VAT payable on the private use of the car in question;Whereas the objective of this restriction of the right to deduct is to tax the private use of cars hired or leased by taxable persons at a flat rate;Whereas the measure, by reducing the administrative burden on traders, who are not required to keep records of private mileage, constitutes a simplification of the procedure for charging tax within the meaning of Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme, accompanied by a schedule of proposals, providing for gradual, stage-by-stage progress towards a common VAT system for the internal market;Whereas the authorisation is being granted until 31 December 1998 so as to enable an assessment to be made at that time as to whether the derogation measure is consistent with the Community approach to limitations of the right to deduct VAT on certain expenditure, which will be adopted under that programme;Whereas the derogation will not have an adverse impact on the Community’s own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
By way of derogation from Article 17(2) and (3) of Directive 77/388/EEC the United Kingdom is hereby authorised to restrict to 50 % the right of the hirer or lessee of a car to deduct the VAT on the cost of hiring or leasing that car where it is used for private purposes.
By way of derogation from Article 6(2)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC the United Kingdom is hereby authorised not to treat as supplies of services for consideration the private use of a business car hired or leased by a taxable person.
This authorisation shall expire on 31 December 1998.
This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom.
Done at Brussels, 9 March 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).
(2) OJ L 159, 11. 7. 1995, p. 19.

Pending: 31997D0217

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/494/EEC of 26 June 1991 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of fresh poultrymeat (1) as amended by Directive 93/121/EEC (2), and in particular Articles 9, 11 and 14 thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A Chapter I to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (3), as last amended by Directive 96/90/EC (4), and in particular Article 10 (2) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992 on public health and animal health problems relating to the killing of wild game and the placing on the market of wild game meat (5), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 16 (3) thereof,Whereas following Annex I Chapter 11 of Directive 92/118/EEC, furred farmed game meat and feathered farmed game meat can be imported only if they come from third countries included on the lists of countries from which fresh meat of the corresponding species may be imported pursuant to Council Directive 72/462/EEC (6) and Council Directive 91/494/EEC respectively;Whereas Commission Decision 94/86/EC (7) as amended by Decision 96/137/EC (8) lays down the third countries list from which Member States are authorized to import wild game meat;Whereas Commission Decision 94/278/EC (9) as last amended by Decision 96/344/EC (10) lays down the list of third countries from which Member States authorize the import of rabbit meat;Whereas Commission Decision 97/219/EC (11) lays down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of farmed game meat and rabbit meat from third countries;Whereas Commission Decision 97/218/EC (12) lays down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of wild game meat (excluding meat of wild swine) from third countries;Whereas Commission Decision 97/220/EC (13) lays down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification of meat of wild swine from third countries;Whereas information was received from the third countries concerned and inspections have been carried out by the Commission services in the third countries; whereas it is now possible to lay down groups of third countries, or parts thereof, which can comply with the Community criteria as laid down in the different categories of certification;Whereas the group for wild soliped meat includes only those third countries which have zebras on their territory;Whereas according to their disease situation some third countries concerned cannot comply with the certification requirements for farmed game meat and game meat of ungulates and meat of farmed game birds and game birds; whereas these countries have not been included in the relevant groupings and imports cannot be authorized for the time being;Whereas it is necessary to foresee the same date of application of this decision as for Decision 97/218/EC, Decision 97/219/EC, and Decision 97/220/EC;Whereas it is necessary to review this Decision in the light of the results of checks on consignments of products referred to above, imported into the Community and of the results of Commission inspection missions;Whereas the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
For the purposes of this decision ‘farmed game birds` means quail, pigeons, pheasants, partridges and any other game birds. It excludes fowl, turkeys, guinea fowl, ducks, geese and ratites.

Article 2
Member States shall authorize imports of:
(a) meat of farmed ‘cloven-hoofed game`, excluding farmed ‘wild swine`, conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in:
– Annex A to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column A of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex B to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column B of the Annex to this Decision;
(b) meat of farmed ‘wild swine` conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex C to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column C or D of the Annex to this Decision;
(c) meat of farmed rabbits conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex D to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column E of the Annex to this Decision;
(d) meat of farmed ‘game birds` conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in:
– Annex E to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column F of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex F to Decision 97/219/EC provided that if the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column G of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3
Member States shall authorize imports of:
(a) meat, excluding offals, of wild cloven-hoofed animals conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in:
– Annex A to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column A of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex B to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes form third countries or parts of third countries listed in column B of the Annex to this Decision;
(b) wild soliped meat, excluding offal, conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex C to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column H of the Annex to this Decision;
(c) wild leporidae (rabbit and hare) meat conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex D to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column E of the Annex to this Decision;
(d) the meat of wild game birds conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex E to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column F of the Annex to this Decision;
(e) the meat, excluding offal, of wild land-mammals (excluding wild ungulates and leporidae) conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex F to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column I of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 4
Member States shall authorize imports of meat, excluding offals, of wild swine conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in
– Annex A to Decision 97/220/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries listed in column C of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex B to Decision 97/220/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries listed in column D of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 5
This Decision will be reviewed before 1 January 1998.

Article 6
This Decision shall apply from 1 March 1997.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 February 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 35.
(2) OJ No L 340, 31. 12. 1993, p. 39.
(3) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(4) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 24.
(5) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 35.
(6) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.
(7) OJ No L 44, 17. 2. 1994, p. 33.
(8) OJ No L 31, 9. 2. 1996, p. 31.
(9) OJ No L 120, 11. 5. 1994, p. 44.
(10) OJ No L 133, 4. 6. 1996, p. 28.
(11) See page 45 of this Official Journal.
(12) See page 25 of this Official Journal.
(13) See page 70 of this Official Journal.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/494/EEC of 26 June 1991 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of fresh poultrymeat (1) as amended by Directive 93/121/EEC (2), and in particular Articles 9, 11 and 14 thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A Chapter I to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (3), as last amended by Directive 96/90/EC (4), and in particular Article 10 (2) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992 on public health and animal health problems relating to the killing of wild game and the placing on the market of wild game meat (5), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 16 (3) thereof,Whereas following Annex I Chapter 11 of Directive 92/118/EEC, furred farmed game meat and feathered farmed game meat can be imported only if they come from third countries included on the lists of countries from which fresh meat of the corresponding species may be imported pursuant to Council Directive 72/462/EEC (6) and Council Directive 91/494/EEC respectively;Whereas Commission Decision 94/86/EC (7) as amended by Decision 96/137/EC (8) lays down the third countries list from which Member States are authorized to import wild game meat;Whereas Commission Decision 94/278/EC (9) as last amended by Decision 96/344/EC (10) lays down the list of third countries from which Member States authorize the import of rabbit meat;Whereas Commission Decision 97/219/EC (11) lays down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of farmed game meat and rabbit meat from third countries;Whereas Commission Decision 97/218/EC (12) lays down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of wild game meat (excluding meat of wild swine) from third countries;Whereas Commission Decision 97/220/EC (13) lays down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification of meat of wild swine from third countries;Whereas information was received from the third countries concerned and inspections have been carried out by the Commission services in the third countries; whereas it is now possible to lay down groups of third countries, or parts thereof, which can comply with the Community criteria as laid down in the different categories of certification;Whereas the group for wild soliped meat includes only those third countries which have zebras on their territory;Whereas according to their disease situation some third countries concerned cannot comply with the certification requirements for farmed game meat and game meat of ungulates and meat of farmed game birds and game birds; whereas these countries have not been included in the relevant groupings and imports cannot be authorized for the time being;Whereas it is necessary to foresee the same date of application of this decision as for Decision 97/218/EC, Decision 97/219/EC, and Decision 97/220/EC;Whereas it is necessary to review this Decision in the light of the results of checks on consignments of products referred to above, imported into the Community and of the results of Commission inspection missions;Whereas the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
For the purposes of this decision ‘farmed game birds` means quail, pigeons, pheasants, partridges and any other game birds. It excludes fowl, turkeys, guinea fowl, ducks, geese and ratites.
Member States shall authorize imports of:
(a) meat of farmed ‘cloven-hoofed game`, excluding farmed ‘wild swine`, conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in:
– Annex A to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column A of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex B to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column B of the Annex to this Decision;
(b) meat of farmed ‘wild swine` conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex C to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column C or D of the Annex to this Decision;
(c) meat of farmed rabbits conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex D to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column E of the Annex to this Decision;
(d) meat of farmed ‘game birds` conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in:
– Annex E to Decision 97/219/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column F of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex F to Decision 97/219/EC provided that if the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column G of the Annex to this Decision.
Member States shall authorize imports of:
(a) meat, excluding offals, of wild cloven-hoofed animals conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in:
– Annex A to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column A of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex B to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes form third countries or parts of third countries listed in column B of the Annex to this Decision;
(b) wild soliped meat, excluding offal, conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex C to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column H of the Annex to this Decision;
(c) wild leporidae (rabbit and hare) meat conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex D to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column E of the Annex to this Decision;
(d) the meat of wild game birds conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex E to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column F of the Annex to this Decision;
(e) the meat, excluding offal, of wild land-mammals (excluding wild ungulates and leporidae) conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in Annex F to Decision 97/218/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries or parts of third countries listed in column I of the Annex to this Decision.
Member States shall authorize imports of meat, excluding offals, of wild swine conforming to the requirements laid down in the model certificate in
– Annex A to Decision 97/220/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries listed in column C of the Annex to this Decision,
– Annex B to Decision 97/220/EC provided that the meat comes from third countries listed in column D of the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision will be reviewed before 1 January 1998.
This Decision shall apply from 1 March 1997.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 February 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 35.
(2) OJ No L 340, 31. 12. 1993, p. 39.
(3) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(4) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 24.
(5) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 35.
(6) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.
(7) OJ No L 44, 17. 2. 1994, p. 33.
(8) OJ No L 31, 9. 2. 1996, p. 31.
(9) OJ No L 120, 11. 5. 1994, p. 44.
(10) OJ No L 133, 4. 6. 1996, p. 28.
(11) See page 45 of this Official Journal.
(12) See page 25 of this Official Journal.
(13) See page 70 of this Official Journal.
Groups of third countries which are able to utilize the veterinary certification as laid down in Decisions 97/218/EC, 97/219/EC and 97/220/EC

Pending: 31997D0010

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and imports from third countries of equidae (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Articles 12 (2), 13 (2), 14, 15, 16 and 19 (i) thereof,Whereas South Africa is included in Part 1 of the Annex to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (2) establishing the list of third countries from which Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products, as last amended by Commission Decision 95/624/EC (3); whereas, however, the importation of equidae from South Africa is currently suspended;Whereas Commission Decision 92/160/EEC (4), as last amended by Decision 95/536/EC (5), established the regionalization of certain third countries for imports of equidae;Whereas Commission Decision 92/260/EEC (6), as last amended by Decision 92/279/EEC (7), established the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for temporary admission of registered horses;Whereas Commission Decision 93/197/EEC (8), as last amended by Decision 96/279/EC, established the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production;Whereas following a Commission veterinary inspection mission to South Africa the animal health situation appears to be under the satisfactory control of well structured and organized veterinary services;Whereas African horse sickness is endemic in certain parts of South Africa; whereas, however, the Cape Peninsula has been free of African horse sickness for more than five years, and systematic vaccination against African horse sickness has not been carried out during the last 12 months;Whereas an initial sero-epidemiological monitoring for African horse sickness was carried out with satisfactory results on all horses and on a representative sample of other equidae in the proposed African horse sickness free area and on random samples of horses in the proposed surveillance and protection zone in the Western Cape Province to establish the serological status of the resident equidae population in relation to antibodies against African horse sickness and equine encephalosis virus;Whereas dourine is endemic in certain parts of South Africa; whereas, however, the Western Cape Province has been free of dourine for more than six months; whereas South Africa is officially free of glanders, equine encephalomyelitis of all types, equine infectious anaemia and vesicular stomatitis for more than six months;Whereas the veterinary authorities of South Africa have guaranteed to notify within 24 hours by telefax, telegram or telex to the Commission and the Member States the confirmation of any infectious or contagious disease in equidae mentioned in Annex A to Council Directive 90/426/EEC and any change in the vaccination policy, and within an appropriate time, in the import policy in respect of equidae;Whereas the veterinary authorities of South Africa have provided certain guarantees in respect of registered horses intended for temporary admission or permanent imports into the Community;Whereas the animal health conditions must be adopted in accordance with the animal health situation of the third country concerned; whereas due to necessary requirements in relation to movement control and quarantine within South Africa the present case relates only to the temporary admission and imports of registered horses;Whereas Decisions 79/542/EEC, 92/160/EEC, 92/260/EEC and 93/197/EEC must be amended accordingly;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The regionalization of South Africa in respect of the temporary admission and imports into the Community of registered horses shall apply under the condition that the additional guarantees in Annex I are fulfilled.

Article 2
In Part 1 of the Annex to Decision 79/542/EEC in the column ‘live animals` under ‘Special Remarks` the footnote ‘(6)` relating to South Africa is replaced by ‘(5)`.

Article 3
The Annex to Decision 92/160/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the following words are added:
‘South Africa (3)
the metropolitan area of Cape Town delineated as follows:
`2. the corresponding footnote is added:
‘(3) Only temporary admission and permanent imports into the Community of registered horses are authorized.`

Article 4
Decision 92/260/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the following words are added to Annex I:
South Africa (1)`;
2. in Annex II the following is added:
(a) ‘F. Health certificate for temporary admission of registered horses from third countries assigned to group F.`;
(b) Annex II to this Decision.

Article 5
Decision 93/197/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the following words are added to Annex I:
South Africa (1)`;
2. in Annex II the following is added:
(a) ‘F. Health certificate for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production form third countries assigned to Group F.`;
(b) Annex III to this Decision.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 December 1996.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 42.
(2) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.
(3) OJ No L 279, 31. 10. 1996, p. 33.
(4) OJ No L 71, 18. 3. 1992, p. 27.
(5) OJ No L 304, 16. 12. 1995, p. 49.
(6) OJ No L 130, 15. 5. 1992, p. 67.
(7) OJ No L 107, 30. 4. 1996, p. 1.
(8) OJ No L 86, 6. 4. 1993, p. 16.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and imports from third countries of equidae (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Articles 12 (2), 13 (2), 14, 15, 16 and 19 (i) thereof,Whereas South Africa is included in Part 1 of the Annex to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (2) establishing the list of third countries from which Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products, as last amended by Commission Decision 95/624/EC (3); whereas, however, the importation of equidae from South Africa is currently suspended;Whereas Commission Decision 92/160/EEC (4), as last amended by Decision 95/536/EC (5), established the regionalization of certain third countries for imports of equidae;Whereas Commission Decision 92/260/EEC (6), as last amended by Decision 92/279/EEC (7), established the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for temporary admission of registered horses;Whereas Commission Decision 93/197/EEC (8), as last amended by Decision 96/279/EC, established the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production;Whereas following a Commission veterinary inspection mission to South Africa the animal health situation appears to be under the satisfactory control of well structured and organized veterinary services;Whereas African horse sickness is endemic in certain parts of South Africa; whereas, however, the Cape Peninsula has been free of African horse sickness for more than five years, and systematic vaccination against African horse sickness has not been carried out during the last 12 months;Whereas an initial sero-epidemiological monitoring for African horse sickness was carried out with satisfactory results on all horses and on a representative sample of other equidae in the proposed African horse sickness free area and on random samples of horses in the proposed surveillance and protection zone in the Western Cape Province to establish the serological status of the resident equidae population in relation to antibodies against African horse sickness and equine encephalosis virus;Whereas dourine is endemic in certain parts of South Africa; whereas, however, the Western Cape Province has been free of dourine for more than six months; whereas South Africa is officially free of glanders, equine encephalomyelitis of all types, equine infectious anaemia and vesicular stomatitis for more than six months;Whereas the veterinary authorities of South Africa have guaranteed to notify within 24 hours by telefax, telegram or telex to the Commission and the Member States the confirmation of any infectious or contagious disease in equidae mentioned in Annex A to Council Directive 90/426/EEC and any change in the vaccination policy, and within an appropriate time, in the import policy in respect of equidae;Whereas the veterinary authorities of South Africa have provided certain guarantees in respect of registered horses intended for temporary admission or permanent imports into the Community;Whereas the animal health conditions must be adopted in accordance with the animal health situation of the third country concerned; whereas due to necessary requirements in relation to movement control and quarantine within South Africa the present case relates only to the temporary admission and imports of registered horses;Whereas Decisions 79/542/EEC, 92/160/EEC, 92/260/EEC and 93/197/EEC must be amended accordingly;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The regionalization of South Africa in respect of the temporary admission and imports into the Community of registered horses shall apply under the condition that the additional guarantees in Annex I are fulfilled.
In Part 1 of the Annex to Decision 79/542/EEC in the column ‘live animals` under ‘Special Remarks` the footnote ‘(6)` relating to South Africa is replaced by ‘(5)`.
The Annex to Decision 92/160/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the following words are added:
‘South Africa (3)
the metropolitan area of Cape Town delineated as follows:
`2. the corresponding footnote is added:
‘(3) Only temporary admission and permanent imports into the Community of registered horses are authorized.`
Decision 92/260/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the following words are added to Annex I:
South Africa (1)`;
2. in Annex II the following is added:
(a) ‘F. Health certificate for temporary admission of registered horses from third countries assigned to group F.`;
(b) Annex II to this Decision.
Decision 93/197/EEC is amended as follows:
1. the following words are added to Annex I:
South Africa (1)`;
2. in Annex II the following is added:
(a) ‘F. Health certificate for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production form third countries assigned to Group F.`;
(b) Annex III to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 December 1996.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 42.
(2) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.
(3) OJ No L 279, 31. 10. 1996, p. 33.
(4) OJ No L 71, 18. 3. 1992, p. 27.
(5) OJ No L 304, 16. 12. 1995, p. 49.
(6) OJ No L 130, 15. 5. 1992, p. 67.
(7) OJ No L 107, 30. 4. 1996, p. 1.
(8) OJ No L 86, 6. 4. 1993, p. 16.
Additional guarantees which apply to the regionalization of South Africa in respect of the temporary admission and imports into the European Community of registered horses
1. The following diseases are compulsorily notifiable in South Africa:
African horse sickness (AHS), glanders, dourine, equine encephalomyelitis of all types including Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis, equine infectious anaemia, vesicular stomatitis, anthrax and rabies.
The whole of the Western Cape Province is declared an ‘African horse sickness control area` in accordance with the provisions of the Animal Disease Act. In respect of the regionalization for African horse sickness the territory of the Western Cape Province is divided into the African horse sickness free area, the surveillance zone and the protection zone.
Within the Western Cape Province, African horse sickness is a ‘controlled disease` in accordance with the provisions of the Animal Disease Act.
2. Regionalization:
2.1. African horse sickness free area.
The metropolitan area of Cape Town is the free area for African horse sickness and delineated as follows:
2.2. African horse sickness surveillance zone:
The African horse sickness free area is surrounded by a surveillance zone of at least 50 km width which includes the magisterial districts of Cape Town, Vredenburg, Hopefield, Moorreesburg, Malmesbury, Wellington, Paarl, Stellenbosch, Kuilsrivier, Goodwood, Wynberg, Simonstown, Somerset West, Mitchell’s Plain and Strand and is defined by the Berg Rivier to the north, the Hottentots Holland Mountains to the east and the coast to the south and west.
2.3. African horse sickness protection zone:
The surveillance zone is surrounded by a protection zone of at least 100 km width which includes the magisterial districts of Vanrynsdorp, Vredendal, Clanwilliam, Piketberg, Ceres, Tulbagh, Worcester, Caledon, Hermanus, Bredasdorp, Robertson, Montagu, Swellendam, Laingsburg, Ladismith, Heidelberg, Riversdale, Mossel Bay, Calitzdorp, Oudtshoorn, George, Knysna, Uniondale, Prince Albert, Beaufort west and Murraysburg.
2.4. African horse sickness infected zone:
The part of the territory of the Republic of South Africa outside the Western Cape Province.
3. Vaccination:
3.1. No systematic vaccination against African horse sickness is allowed within the free area and the surveillance zone.
However, by way of derogation the Director of Animal Health of the Ministry of Agriculture of South Africa may grant permission for vaccination using a registered polyvalent AHS vaccine as prescribed by the vaccine manufacturer and carried out exclusively by a veterinarian, of those horses scheduled to leave the free area or the surveillance zone beyond the perimeters of the surveillance zone under the provision that these horses may not leave the holding until departure for a destination outside the free area and the surveillance zone.
3.2. Where vaccination of registered horses against AHS is carried out in areas outside the free area and surveillance zone it must be carried out by a veterinarian using a registered polyvalent AHS vaccine as prescribed by the vaccine manufacturer and the vaccination must be entered in the passport.
4. Registration of holdings and identification of equidae:
4.1. Within the free area all holdings (holdings in the meaning of Article 2 (a) of Directive 90/426/EEC) are identified, registered and supervised by the State veterinarian of the area.
4.2. All equidae resident in the free area are identified and records are kept which include information on movement and the health and vaccination history of the animal.
5. Movement control
5.1. Any movement of equidae from the infected zone into the protection zone, into the surveillance zone and into the free area and any movement of equidae from the protection zone into the surveillance zone and into the free area and any movement of equidae from the surveillance zone into the free area is prohibited.
5.2. However, in derogation to the prohibitions laid down in paragraph 5.1, equidae other than registered horses can be admitted from the infected zone into the protection zone, the surveillance zone and the free area, and from the protection zone into the surveillance zone and the free area, and from the surveillance zone into the free area exclusively under the conditions of Article 5 (3) of Directive 90/426/EC.
5.2.1. The months June, July and August are the vector insect safe period as required in Article 5 (3) (a) of Directive 90/426/EEC.
5.2.2. The equidae are released from quarantine suitably identified.
5.2.3. In addition to the provisions in paragraph 5.2, equidae for slaughter shall not enter the free area and shall enter the surveillance zone under official veterinary supervision only for immediate slaughter at designated slaughterhouses.
5.3. However, in derogation to the provisions in paragraph 5.1, movement of registered horses from the infected zone into the protection zone can be allowed under the following conditions:
5.3.1. The horse must be identified by a passport and particulars on vaccination must be entered in the passport.
5.3.2. The movement of the horse must be pre-notified by the issuing official veterinarian to the responsible official veterinarian in the district of destination.
5.3.3. The horse must be accompanied by a certificate which is part of the passport and issued by an official veterinarian (official veterinarian in the meaning of Article 2 (h) of Directive 90/426/EEC) at the premises of origin.
5.3.4. The certificate must state that the horse:
– was clinically examined within 48 hours of dispatch and showed no clinical signs of disease,
– has not been in contact during the past 15 days (as far as can be ascertained) with other equidae suffering from an infectious or contagious disease,
– does not originate from an area where veterinary restrictions pertaining to diseases communicable to equidae are in force and does not come from a holding under veterinary restrictions,
– does not come from a holding where there has been a case of African horse sickness during the past 60 days,
– was vaccinated against African horse sickness by a veterinarian using a registered polyvalent African horse sickness vaccine as prescribed by the vaccine manufacturer at least 60 days, and not more than 24 months, prior to entering the protection zone.
5.4. However, in derogation to the provisions in paragraph 5.1, movement of registered horses from the infected zone or the protection zone into the surveillance zone can be allowed under the following conditions:
5.4.1. The horse must be identified by a passport and particulars on vaccination must be entered in the passport.
5.4.2. The movement of the horse must be pre-notified by the issuing official veterinarian to the responsible official veterinarian in the district of destination.
5.4.3. The horse must be accompanied by a certificate which is part of the passport and issued by an official veterinarian (official veterinarian in the meaning of Article 2 (h) of Directive 90/426/EEC) at the premises of origin.
5.4.4. The certificate must state that the horse:
– was clinically examined within 48 hours of dispatch and showed no clinical signs of disease,
– has not been in contact during the past 15 days (as far as can be ascertained) with other equidae suffering from an infectious or contagious disease,
– does not originate from an area where veterinary restrictions pertaining to diseases communicable to equidae are in force and does not come from a holding under veterinary restrictions,
– does not come from a holding where there has been a case of African horse sickness during the past 60 days,
– was vaccinated against African horse sickness by a veterinarian using a registered polyvalent African horse sickness vaccine as prescribed by the vaccine manufacturer at least 60 days, and not more than 24 months, prior to entering the surveillance zone.
5.5. However, in derogation to the provisions in paragraph 5.1, movement of registered horses into the free area can be allowed under the following conditions:
5.5.1. Registered horses can be moved from the infected zone or the protection zone or the surveillance zone into the free area under the following conditions:
5.5.1.1. The horse must be identified by a passport and particulars on vaccination must be entered in the passport.
>START OF GRAPHIC>
HEALTH CERTIFICATE
for the temporary admission of registered horses into Community territory from South Africa for a period of less than 90 days
Certificate No:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third country of dispatch (1):. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ministry responsible:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I. Identification of the horse
(a) Identification document No (passport):. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Validated by:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(name of competent authority)
II. Origin and destination of the horse
The horse is to be sent from:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(place of export)
directly to:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Member State and place of destination)
by aircraft:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(indicate flight number)
Name and address of consignor:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Name and address of consignee:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
III. Health information
I, the undersigned official veterinarian of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (insert name of country) certify that the horse described above:
(a) comes from a country where the following diseases are compulsorily notifiable: African horse sickness, dourine, glanders, equine encephalomyelitis of all types including Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis, equine infectious anaemia, vesicular stomatitis, rabies, anthrax;
(b) has been examined today and shows no clinical signs of disease (2);
(c) is not intended for slaughter under a national programme of infectious or contagious disease eradication;
(d) has been resident during the 60 days immediately preceding the exportation on holdings under veterinary supervison:
– on the territory of the country (1) of dispatch,
– in a Member State of the European Community, if it was imported into the country (1) of dispatch directly from a Member State of the European Community (3),
– on the territory of a third country (1) approved for temporary admission or permanent imports into the European Community of registered horses, if it was imported directly into the country (1) of dispatch under conditions at least as strict as laid down for the temporary admission or permanent imports of registered horses from the third country concerned directly into the European Community (3),
has undergone the pre-export isolation during the last 40 days immediately preceding the exportation from . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) in the approved quarantine station at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . under the following conditions:
(i) the horse was accomodated permanently under vector-protected conditions (3);
(ii) the horse has been confined to the vector-protected stables at least from two hours prior to sunset until two hours after sunrise the next day and exercise was provided under official veterinary supervision, following the application of effective insect repellents prior to the removal from the stables, and in strict isolation from equidae not being prepared for export under conditions at least as strict as required for temporary admission or imports into the European Community (3);
(e) comes from the territory of a country (1) in which:
(i) Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis has not occurred during the last two years;
(ii) dourine has not occurred during the last six months;
(iii) glanders has not occurred during the last six months;
(iv) vesicular stomatitis has not occurred during the last six months (3);
was tested on a sample of blood taken, within 21 days of export, on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5), by virus neutralization test for vesicular stomatitis, with negative result at a dilution of 1 in 12 (3) (4);
(v) in the case of an uncastrated male animal older than 180 days:
– either equine viral arteritis has not been officially recorded during the last six months (3),
– the animal was tested on a blood sample taken within 21 days of export on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) by virus neutralization test for equine viral arteritis with negative result at a dilution of 1 in 4 (3) (4)
– an aliquot of the entire semen of the horse taken, within 21 days of export, on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) was tested with negative result by virus isolation test for equine viral arteritis (3) (4),
– the animal was vaccinated on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) aginst equine viral arteritis under official veterinary supervision with a vaccine approved by the competent authority, according to the following programmes for initial vaccination and has been re-vaccinated at regular intervals (3) (4).
Programmes for initial vaccination against equine viral arteritis:
Instruction: Cross out vaccination programmes that do not apply to the animal described above.
(a) Vaccination was carried out on the day a blood sample was taken that subsequently proved negative in a virus isolation test for equine viral arteritis at a dilution of 1 in 4.
(b) Vaccination was carried out during a period of isolation of not more than 15 days under official veterinary supervision commencing on the day a blood sample was taken that was tested during that time with negative result in a virus neutralization test for equine viral arteritis at a dilution of 1 in 4.
(c) Vaccination was carried out when the animal was at an age of 180 to 270 days, during a period of isolation under official veterinary supervision. During the isolation period two blood samples taken at least 10 days apart proved a stable or declining antibody titre in a virus neutralization test for equine viral arteritis;
(f) does not come from the territory of a country (1) considered, in accordance with EC legislation, as infected with African horse sickness and was either:
– not vaccinated against African horse sickness (3),
– was vaccinated against African horse sickness on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5), not more than 24 months and at least 80 days prior to pre-export isolation, by administration of a registered vaccine as prescribed by the vaccine manufacturer (3) (4);
>START OF GRAPHIC>
HEALTH CERTIFICATE
for imports into Community territory of registered horses from South Africa (1)
Certificate No:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third country of dispatch (1):. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ministry responsible:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I. Identification of the horse
(a) Identification document No (passport):. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Validated by:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(name of competent authority)
II. Origin and destination of the horse
The horse is to be sent from:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(place of export)
directly to:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Member State and place of destination)
by aircraft:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(indicate flight number)
Name and address of consignor:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Name and address of consignee:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
III. Health information
I, the undersigned official veterinarian of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (insert name of country) certify that the horse described above:
(a) comes from a country where the following diseases are compulsorily notifiable: African horse sickness, dourine, glanders, equine encephalomyelitis of all types including Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis, equine infectious anaemia, vesicular stomatitis, rabies, anthrax;
(b) has been examined today and shows no clinical signs of disease (2);
(c) is not intended for slaughter under a national programme of infectious or contagious disease eradication;
(d) has been resident on the territory of the country (1) of dispatch during three months immediately preceding the exportation (or since birth if less than three months old or since entry if it was imported directly from a Member State of the European Community during the previous three months)
has undergone the pre-export isolation during the last 40 days immediately preceding the exportation from . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) in the approved quarantine station at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . under the following conditions:
(i) the horse was accomodated permanently under vector-protected conditions (3);
(ii) the horse has been confined to the vector-protected stables at least from two hours prior to sunset until two hours after sunrise the next day and exercise was provided under official veterinary supervision, following the application of effective insect repellents prior to the removal from the stables, and in strict isolation from equidae not being prepared for export under conditions at least as strict as required for temporary admission or imports into the European Community (3);
(e) comes from the territory of a country (1) in which:
(i) Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis has not occurred during the last two years;
(ii) dourine has not occurred during the last six months;
(iii) glanders has not occurred during the last six months;
(iv) vesicular stomatitis has not occurred during the last six months (3)
was tested on a sample of blood taken within 21 days of export on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5), by virus neutralization test for vesicular stomatitis, with negative result at a dilution of 1 in 12 (3) (4);
(v) in the case of an uncastrated male animal older than 180 days:
– either equine viral arteritis has not been officially recorded during the last six months (3),
– the animal was tested on a blood sample taken, within 21 days of export, on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) by virus neutralization test for equine viral arteritis with negative result at a dilution of 1 in 4 (3) (4)
– an aliquot of the entire semen of the horse taken, within 21 days of export, on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) was tested with negative result by virus isolation test for equine viral arteritis (3) (4),
– the animal was vaccinated on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) against equine viral arteritis under official veterinary supervision with a vaccine approved by the competent authority, according to the following programmes for initial vaccination and has been re-vaccinated at regular intervals (3) (4).
Programmes for initial vaccination against equine viral arteritis:
Instruction: Cross out vaccination programmes that do not apply to the animal described above.
(a) Vaccination was carried out on the day a blood sample was taken that subsequently proved negative in a virus isolation test for equine viral arteritis at a dilution of 1 in 4.
(b) Vaccination was carried out during a period of isolation of not more than 15 days under official veterinary supervision commencing on the day a blood sample was taken that was tested during that time with negative result in a virus neutralization test for equine viral arteritis at a dilution of 1 in 4.
(c) Vaccination was carried out when the animal was at an age of 180 to 270 days, during a period of isolation under official veterinary supervision. During the isolation period two blood samples taken at least 10 days apart proved a stable or declining antibody titre in a virus neutralization test for equine viral arteritis.
(f) does not come from the territory of a country (1) considered, in accordance with EC legislation, as infected with African horse sickness and was either:
– not vaccinated against African horse sickness (3),
– was vaccinated against African horse sickness on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5), not more than 24 months and at least 110 days prior to pre-export isolation by administration of a registered polyvalent vaccine as prescribed by the vaccine manufacturer (3) (4);
(g) does not come from a holding which was subject to a prohibition order for animal health reasons which laid down the following conditions:
(i) If not all the animals of species susceptible to the disease located on the holding were slaughtered, the prohibition lasted for:
– six months in the case of equine encephalomyelitis, beginning on the date on which the equidae suffering from the disease are slaughtered,

Pending: 31995D0473

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Directive 95/22/EC (2), and in particular Article 6 thereof, Whereas Member States may obtain the status of approved farm free of infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) for fish farms situated in a zone which is not approved as regards those diseases; Whereas France has, by letter dated 1 August 1995, submitted to the Commission evidence in support of the grant to certain farms, with respect to IHN and VHS, of the status of approved farm situated in a non-approved zone and also the national provisions ensuring compliance with the rules on maintenance of approval; Whereas the Commission and the Member States have examined the evidence sent by France in respect of those farms; Whereas, as a result of the examination, further information has been requested, notably as regards the geographical situation of some of the farms and their water supply; Whereas scrutiny of this information indicates that some farms meet all the requirements of Article 6 of Directive 91/67/EEC; Whereas these farms may therefore enjoy the status of approved farm situated in a non-approved zone; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The fish farms listed in the Annex are recognized as approved farms situated in a non-approved zone with regard to IHN and VHS.

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 October 1995.
For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Directive 95/22/EC (2), and in particular Article 6 thereof, Whereas Member States may obtain the status of approved farm free of infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) for fish farms situated in a zone which is not approved as regards those diseases; Whereas France has, by letter dated 1 August 1995, submitted to the Commission evidence in support of the grant to certain farms, with respect to IHN and VHS, of the status of approved farm situated in a non-approved zone and also the national provisions ensuring compliance with the rules on maintenance of approval; Whereas the Commission and the Member States have examined the evidence sent by France in respect of those farms; Whereas, as a result of the examination, further information has been requested, notably as regards the geographical situation of some of the farms and their water supply; Whereas scrutiny of this information indicates that some farms meet all the requirements of Article 6 of Directive 91/67/EEC; Whereas these farms may therefore enjoy the status of approved farm situated in a non-approved zone; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The fish farms listed in the Annex are recognized as approved farms situated in a non-approved zone with regard to IHN and VHS.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 October 1995.
For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
APPROVED FISH FARMS IN FRANCE WITH RESPECT TO IHN AND VHS
1. Pisciculture de Sarrance Pyrénées-Atlantiques F-40260 Castets 2. Pisciculture des Sources Aveyron F-12540 Cornus

Pending: 31995D0454

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 thereof, Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to the Republic of Korea to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of legislation of the Republic of Korea on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas, in the Republic of Korea the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – National Fisheries Administrations – National Fisheries Products Inspection Station (NFPIS) is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the NFPIS to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the NFPIS to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the NFPIS has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – National Fisheries Administration – National Fishery Products Inspection Station (NFPIS) shall be the competent authority in the Republic of Korea for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in the Republic of Korea must meet the following conditions:
1. Each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto.
2. The products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto.
3. Except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the words ‘REPUBLIC OF KOREA` and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the NFPIS and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.

Article 4
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 1996.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 October 1995.
For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 thereof, Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to the Republic of Korea to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of legislation of the Republic of Korea on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas, in the Republic of Korea the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – National Fisheries Administrations – National Fisheries Products Inspection Station (NFPIS) is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the NFPIS to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the NFPIS to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the NFPIS has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – National Fisheries Administration – National Fishery Products Inspection Station (NFPIS) shall be the competent authority in the Republic of Korea for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in the Republic of Korea must meet the following conditions:
1. Each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto.
2. The products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto.
3. Except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the words ‘REPUBLIC OF KOREA` and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the NFPIS and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 1996.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 October 1995.
For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
>START OF GRAPHIC>
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery and aquaculture products originating in the Republic of Korea and intended for export to the European Community Reference No:
Country of dispatch: REPUBLIC OF KOREA Competent authority: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – National Fisheries Administration – National Fishery Products Inspection Station (NFPIS) I. Details identifying the fishery products Description of fishery – aquaculture products (1):
– species (scientific name):
– presentation of product and type of treatment (2):
Code No (where available):
Type of packaging:
Number of packages:
Net weight:
Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s) approved by the NFPIS for export to the EC:
III. Destination of products The products are dispatched from: (place of dispatch) to: (country and place of destination) by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
IV. Health attestation The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery of aquaculture products specified above:
1. were caught and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto;
7. in addition, where the fishery products are frozen or processed bivalve molluscs: the molluscs were obtained from approved production areas laid down by the Annex to Commission Decision 95/453/EC of 23 October 1995 laying down special conditions for the import of live bivalve molluscs echinoderms, tunicates, and marine gastropods originating in the Republic of Korea.
The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directive 91/493/EEC, Directive 92/48/EEC and Decision 95/453/EC.
Done at , (Place) on (Date) Official stamp (1) Signature of official inspector (1) (Name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing) (1) >END OF GRAPHIC>
LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS AND FACTORY VESSELS