Pending: 32005D0344

4.5.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 115/42
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in goodtime before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/523/EC of 27 June 2001 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that detergent products for the routine cleaning of windows are to be regarded as all-purpose cleaners, rather than as products for more specific cleaning uses, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/523/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than twelve months for applicants whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
(a) all-purpose cleaners comprising detergent products intended for the routine cleaning of floors, walls, ceilings, windows and other fixed surfaces, and which are dissolved or diluted in water prior to use. All purpose cleaners must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(b) window cleaners comprising specific all-purpose cleaners intended for the routing cleaning of windows, and which are either diluted in water prior to use or used without dilution. All window cleaners must have water content ≤ 95 % (w/w).
(c) cleaners for sanitary facilities comprising detergent products intended for the routine removal, including by scouring, of dirt and/or deposits in sanitary facilities, such as laundry rooms, bathrooms, showers, toilets and kitchens. All cleaners for sanitary facilities must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(a) products which are automatically used when a toilet is flushed, such as ‘self-dosing-products’, including toilet blocks;
(b) products for use in a toilet cistern;
(c) products, which have no cleaning effects other than the removal of calcium carbonate (scale);
(d) disinfectants.
— the reduction of environmental impact by limiting the quantity of harmful ingredients, by reducing the quantity of detergent used and by reducing packaging waste,
— the reduction or prevention of risks for the environment and for human health related to the use of hazardous substances,
— information that will enable the consumer to use the product in the way that is efficient and minimises environmental impact.
— Alkyl phenol ethoxylates (APEOs) and derivatives thereof,
— EDTA (ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetate) and its salts,
— NTA (nitrilo-tri-acetate),
— Nitromusks and polycyclic musks, including for example:—Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,—Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,—Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,—Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,—Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,—HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),—AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin). — Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene, — Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene, — Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan, — Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene, — Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone, — HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran), — AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
— Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,
— Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,
— Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,
— Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,
— Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,
— HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),
— AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
— Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,
— Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,
— Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,
— Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,
— Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,
— HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),
— AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
R31 (contact with acid liberates toxic gas),
R40 (limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect),
R45 (may cause cancer),
R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage),
R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation),
R68 (possible risks of irreversible effects)
R50-53 (very toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
R51-53 (toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
R59 (dangerous to the ozone layer),
R60 (may impair fertility),
R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child),
R62 (possible risk of impaired fertility),
R63 (possible risk of harm to the unborn child),
R64 (may cause harm to breastfed babies).
(a) The product may only include biocides in order to preserve the product, and in the appropriate dosage for this purpose alone. This does not refer to surfactants, which may also have biocidal properties.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets of any preservatives added shall be provided, together with information on their exact concentration in the product. The manufacturer or supplier of the preservatives shall provide information on the dosage necessary to preserve the product.
(b) It is prohibited to claim or suggest on the packaging or by any other communication that the product has an antimicrobial action.Assessment and verification: the texts and layouts used on each type of packaging and/or an example of each different type of packaging shall be provided to the competent body.Biocides, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation, that are used to preserve the product and that are classified with R50-53 or R51-53 risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC, are permitted but only if they are not potentially bioaccumulative. In this context, a biocide is considered to be potentially bioaccumulative if the log Pow(log octanol/water partition coefficient) ≥3,0 (unless the experimentally determined BCF ≤100).The concentration of biocides in the final product shall not exceed the maximum authorised concentration in Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products and its subsequent amendments.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all biocides, together with a documentation of the concentrations of the biocides in the final product.
(a) The product shall not contain perfumes containing nitro-musks or polycyclic musks (as specified in the criterion 3(a).
(b) Any ingredients added to the product as a fragrance must have been manufactured and/or handled in accordance with the code of practice of the International Fragrance Association.Assessment and verification:a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion shall be provided to the competent body.
(a) Sprays containing propellants must not be used.
(b) Plastic materials that are used for the main container shall be marked according to European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste(6), or DIN 6120 Parts 1 and 2 in connection with DIN 7728 part 1.
(c) If the primary packaging is made of recycled material, any indication of this on the packaging shall be in conformity with the ISO 14021 standard ‘Environmental labels and declarations — Self declared claims (type II environmental labelling)’.
(d) The primary packaging parts shall be easily separable into mono-material parts.Assessment and verification:data on the packaging, and/or a sample thereof if appropriate, shall be provided to the competent body, together with a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.
— an adequate and justifiable laboratory test, or
— an adequate and justifiable consumer test.
— reduced impact on aquatic life,
— reduced use of hazardous substances,
— clear user instructions.
Acute toxicity Chronic toxicity Degradation
DID-no Ingredient name LC50/EC50 SF(acute) TF(acute) NOEC(*1) SF(chronic)(*1) TF(chronic) DF Aerobic Anaerobic
Anionic surfactants
1 Linear alkyl benzene sulphonates 11,5-11,8 (LAS) 4,1 1 000 0,0041 0,69 10 0,069 0,05 R N
2 LAS-(C10/13-alkyl)triethanolamine salt 4,2 1 000 0,0042 3,4 100 0,034 0,05 R O
3 C14/17-Alkyl sulphonate 6,7 5 000 0,00134 0,44 10 0,044 0,05 R N
4 C8/10-Alkyl sulphate 132 5 000 0,0264 0,0264 0,05 R Y
5 C12/14-Alkylsulfaat (AS) 2,8 1 000 0,0028 2 100 0,02 0,05 R Y
6 C12/18-Alkyl sulphate (AS)(1) 0,0149 0,027 0,05 R Y
7 C16/18Fatty alcohol sulphate (FAS) 27 1 000 0,027 1,7 50 0,034 0,05 R Y
8 C12/15A 1-3 EO sulphate 4,6 1 000 0,0046 0,1 10 0,01 0,05 R Y
9 C 16/18 A 3-4 EO sulphate 0,57 10 000 0,000057 0,000057 0,05 R Y
10 Dialkyl sulpho succinate 15,7 1 000 0,0157 0,0157 0,5 I N
11 C 12/14 Sulpho- fatty acid methylester 9 10 000 0,0009 0,23 50 0,0046 0,05 R N
12 C 16/18 Sulpho- fatty acid methylester 0,51 5 000 0,000102 0,2 50 0,004 0,05 R N
13 C 14/16 alfa Olefin sulphonate 3,3 10 000 0,00033 0,00033 0,05 R N
14 C 14/18 alfa olefin sulphonate 0,5 5 000 0,0001 0,0001 0,05 R N
15 Soap C> 12-22 22 1 000 0,022 10 100 0,1 0,05 R Y
16 Lauroyl sarcosinate 56 10 000 0,0056 0,0056 0,05 R Y
17 C 9/11 2-10 EO Carboxymethylated, sodium salt or acid 100 10 000 0,01 0,01 0,05 R O
18 C 12/18 2-10 EO Carboxymethylated, sodium salt or acid 8,8 1 000 0,0088 5 100 0,05 0,05 R O
19 C 12/18 Alkyl phosphate esters 38 1 000 0,038 0,038 0,05 R N
Non-ionic surfactants
20 C8A 1-5 EO 7,8 1 000 0,0078 0,0078 0,05 R Y
21 C9/11A, > 3-6 EO predominantly linear 5,6 1 000 0,0056 0,0056 0,05 R Y
22 C9/11A, > 6-10 EO predominantly linear 5 1 000 0,005 0,005 0,05 R Y
23 C9/11A, 5-11 EO multibranched 1 1 000 0,001 0,001 0,05 R O
24 C10A, 5-11 EO multibranched (Trimer-propen-oxo-alcohol) 1 1 000 0,001 0,001 0,05 R Y
25 C12/15A, >2-6 EO predominantly linear 0,43 1 000 0,00043 0,18 50 0,0036 0,05 R Y
26 C12/145-8 EO 1 t-BuO (endcapped) 0,23 1 000 0,00023 0,18 100 0,0018 0,05 R O
27 C12/15A, 3-12 EO multibranched 1 1 000 0,001 3,2 100 0,032 0,05 R O
28 C12/15(mean value C<14) A, >6-9 EO 0,63 1 000 0,00063 0,24 10 0,024 0,05 R Y
29 C12/15(mean value C > 14) A, >6-9 EO 0,4 1 000 0,0004 0,17 10 0,017 0,05 R Y
30 C12/15A, > 9-12 EO 1,1 1 000 0,0011 0,017 0,05 R Y
31 C12/15A > 12-20 EO 0,7 1 000 0,0007 0,0007 0,05 R O
32 C 12/15 A > 20-30 EO 13 1 000 0,013 10 100 0,1 0,05 R O
33 C 12/15 A, > 30 EO 130 1 000 0,13 0,13 0,5 I O
34 C 12/18 A, 0-3 EO 0,3 1 000 0,0003 0,0003 0,05 R Y
35 C 12/18 A, 5-10 EO 1 1 000 0,001 0,35 100 0,0035 0,05 R O
36 C 12/18 A, > 10-20 EO 1 1 000 0,001 0,0035 0,05 R O
37 C 16/18 A, 2-8 EO 3,2 1 000 0,0032 0,4 100 0,004 0,05 R Y
38 C 16/18 A, > 9-18 EO 0,72 1 000 0,00072 0,32 10 0,032 0,05 R Y
39 C 16/18 A, 20-30 EO 4,1 1 000 0,0041 0,0041 0,05 R Y
40 C 16/18 A, > 30 EO 30 1 000 0,03 0,03 0,5 I Y
41 C 12-15 A 2-6 EO 2-6 PO 0,78 1 000 0,00078 0,36 100 0,0036 0,05 R O
42 C 10-16 A 0-3 PO 6-7 EO 3,2 5 000 0,00064 1 100 0,01 0,05 R O
43 Glycerine (1-5 EO) cocoate 16 1 000 0,016 6,3 100 0,063 0,05 R Y
44 Glycerin (6-17 EO) cocoate 100 1 000 0,1 0,1 0,05 R Y
45 C 12/14 Glucose amide 13 1 000 0,013 4,3 50 0,086 0,05 R Y
46 C 16/18 Glucose amide 1 1 000 0,001 0,33 50 0,0066 0,05 R Y
47 C 8/10 Alkyl polyglycoside 28 1 000 0,028 5,7 100 0,057 0,05 R Y
48 C 8/12 Alkyl polyglycoside, branched 480 1 000 0,48 100 100 1 0,05 R N
49 C 8/16 or C 12-14 Alkyl polyglycoside 5,3 1 000 0,0053 1 10 0,1 0,05 R Y
50 Coconut fatty acid monoethanolamide 9,5 1 000 0,0095 1 100 0,01 0,05 R Y
51 Coconut fatty acid monoethanolamide 4-5 EO 17 10 000 0,0017 0,0017 0,05 R Y
52 Coconut fatty acid diethanolamide 2 1 000 0,002 0,3 100 0,003 0,05 R O
53 PEG-4 Rapeseed amide 7 5 000 0,0014 0,0014 0,05 R Y
Amphoteric surfactants
60 C 12/15 Alkyl dimethylbetaine 1,7 1 000 0,0017 0,1 100 0,001 0,05 R O
61 Alkyl C 12/18 amidopropylbetaine 1,8 1 000 0,0018 0,09 100 0,0009 0,05 R Y
62 C 12/18 Alkyl amine oxide 0,3 1 000 0,0003 0,0003 0,05 R Y
Cationic surfactants
70 Alkyl trimethyl ammonium salts 0,1 1 000 0,0001 0,046 100 0,00046 0,5 I O
71 Alkyl ester ammonium salts 2,9 1 000 0,0029 1 10 0,1 0,05 R Y
Preservatives
80 1,2-Benzisothiazol-3-one 0,15 1 000 0,00015 0,00015 0,5 I N
81 Benzyl alcohol 360 1 000 0,36 0,36 0,05 R Y
82 5-bromo-5-nitro-1,3-dioxane 0,4 5 000 0,00008 0,00008 1 P O
83 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 0,78 1 000 0,00078 0,2 100 0,002 0,5 I O
84 Chloroacetamide 55,6 10 000 0,00556 0,00556 1 O O
85 Diazolinidylurea 35 5 000 0,007 0,007 1 P O
86 Formaldehyde 2 1 000 0,002 0,002 0,05 R O
87 Glutaraldehyde 0,31 1 000 0,00031 0,00031 0,05 R O
88 Guanidine, hexamethylene-, homopolymer 0,18 1 000 0,00018 0,024 100 0,00024 1 P O
89 CMI + MIT in mixture 3:1(2) 0,0067 1 000 0,0000067 0,0057 50 0,000114 0,5 I O
90 2-Methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one (MIT) 0,06 1 000 0,00006 0,00006 0,5 I O
91 Methyldibromoglutaronitrile 0,15 1 000 0,00015 0,00015 0,05 R O
92 e-phtaloimidoperoxyhexanoic acid 0,59 5 000 0,000118 0,000118 1 P O
93 Methyl-, Ethyl- and Propylparaben 15,4 5 000 0,00308 0,00308 0,05 R N
94 o-Phenylphenol 0,92 1 000 0,00092 0,00092 0,05 R O
95 Sodium benzoate 128 1 000 0,128 0,128 0,05 R Y
96 Sodium hydroxy methyl glycinate 36,5 5 000 0,0073 0,0073 1 O O
97 Sodium nitrite 87 10 000 0,0087 0,0087 1 NA NA
98 Triclosan 0,0014 1 000 0,0000014 0,0000014 0,5 I O
Other ingredients
110 Silicon 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 1 P N
111 Paraffin 1 000 10 000 0,1 0,1 1 P O
112 Glycerol 4 400 5 000 0,88 0,88 0,05 R Y
113 Phosphate, as STPP 1 000 1 000 1 1 0,15 NA NA
114 Zeolite (insoluble inorganic) 1 000 1 000 1 175 50 3,5 1 NA NA
115 Citrate and citric acid 825 1 000 0,825 80 50 1,6 0,05 R Y
116 Polycarboxylates 200 1 000 0,2 106 10 10,6 1 P N
117 Nitrilotriacetat (NTA) 494 1 000 0,494 64 50 1,28 0,5 I O
118 EDTA 121 1 000 0,121 22 50 0,44 0,5 I N
119 Phosphonates 650 1 000 0,65 25 50 0,5 1 P N
120 EDDS 320 1 000 0,32 32 50 0,64 0,05 R N
121 Clay (insoluble inorganic) 1 000 1 000 1 1 1 NA NA
122 Carbonates 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 0,15 NA NA
123 Fatty acids C≥ 14 3,7 5 000 0,00074 0,00074 0,05 R Y
124 Silicates 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 1 NA NA
125 Polyasparaginic acid, Na-salt 410 1 000 0,41 0,41 0,05 R N
126 Perborates (as boron) 14 1 000 0,014 0,014 1 NA NA
127 Percarbonate (see carbonate) 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 0,15 NA NA
128 Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) 250 1 000 0,25 500 100 5 0,05 R O
129 C 1-C 4 alcohols 1 000 1 000 1 1 0,05 R Y
130 Mono-, di- and triethanol amine 90 1 000 0,09 0,78 100 0,0078 0,05 R Y
131 Polyvinylpyrrolidon (PVP) 1 000 1 000 1 1 0,5 I N
132 Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) 250 5 000 0,05 0,05 0,5 I N
133 Sodium and magnesium sulphate 1 000 1 000 1 100 100 1 1 NA NA
134 Calcium- and sodiumchloride 1 000 1 000 1 100 100 1 1 NA NA
135 Urea 1 000 5 000 0,2 0,2 1 NA NA
136 Silicon dioxide, quartz (insoluble inorganic) 1 000 1 000 1 1 1 NA NA
137 Polyethylene glycol, MW > 4000 1 000 10 000 0,1 0,1 1 P N
138 Polyethylene glycol, MW < 4000 1 000 10 000 0,1 0,1 1 P O
139 Cumene-, xylene- and toluene sulphonates 66 10 000 0,0066 0,0066 0,5 I N
140 Na-/Mg-/KOH 30 1 000 0,03 0,03 0,05 NA NA
141 Enzymes/proteins 25 5 000 0,005 0,005 0,05 R Y
142 Perfume, if not other specified(*2) 2 1 000 0,002 0,002 0,5 I N
143 Dyes, if not other specified(*2) 10 1 000 0,01 0,01 1 P N
144 Starch 100 1 000 0,1 0,1 0,05 R Y
145 Anionic polyester 655 1 000 0,655 0,655 1 P N
146 PVNO/PVPI 530 1 000 0,53 0,53 1 P N
147 Zn ftalocyanin sulphonate 0,2 1 000 0,0002 0,16 100 0,0016 1 P N
148 Iminodisuccinat 81 1 000 0,081 17 100 0,17 0,05 R N
149 FWA 1 11 1 000 0,011 10 100 0,1 1 P N
150 FWA 5 10 1 000 0,01 1 10 0,1 1 P N
151 1-decanol 2,3 5 000 0,00046 0,00046 0,05 R O
152 Methyl laurate 1 360 10 000 0,136 0,136 0,05 R O
153 Formic acid (Ca salt) 100 1 000 0,1 0,1 0,05 R Y
154 Adipic acid 31 1 000 0,031 0,031 0,05 R O
155 Maleic acid 106 1 000 0,106 0,106 0,05 R Y
156 Malic acid 106 1 000 0,106 0,106 0,05 R O
157 Tartaric acid 200 10 000 0,02 0,02 0,05 R O
158 Phosphoric acid 138 1 000 0,138 0,138 0,15 NA NA
159 Oxalic acid 128 5 000 0,0256 0,0256 0,05 R O
160 Acetic acid 30 1 000 0,03 0,03 0,05 R Y
161 Lactic acid 130 1 000 0,13 0,13 0,05 R Y
162 Sulphamic acid 75 1 000 0,075 0,075 1 NA NA
163 Salicylic acid 46 1 000 0,046 0,046 0,15 R O
164 Glycollic acid 141 5 000 0,0282 0,0282 0,05 R O
165 Glutaric acid 208 5 000 0,0416 0,0416 0,05 R O
166 Malonic acid 95 5 000 0,019 0,019 0,05 R O
167 Ethylene glycol 6500 1 000 6,5 6,5 0,05 R Y
168 Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 747 5 000 0,1494 0,1494 0,05 R O
169 Diethylene glycol 4 400 10 000 0,44 0,44 0,15 I Y
170 Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether 500 1 000 0,5 0,5 0,5 I O
171 Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether 3 940 5 000 0,788 0,788 0,05 R O
172 Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether 1 254 1 000 1,254 1,254 0,05 R O
173 Diethylene glycol dimethylether 2 000 10 000 0,2 0,2 0,5 I O
174 Propylene glycol 32 000 1 000 32 32 0,15 R Y
175 Propylene glycol monomethyl ether 12 700 5 000 2,54 2,54 0,05 R O
176 Propylene glycol monobutylether 748 5 000 0,1496 0,1496 0,05 R O
177 Dipropylene glycol 1 625 10 000 0,1625 0,1625 0,05 R O
178 Dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether 1 919 5 000 0,3838 0,3838 0,05 R O
179 Dipropylene glycol monobutylether 841 5 000 0,1682 0,1682 0,05 R O
180 Dipropylene glycol dimethylether 1 000 5 000 0,2 0,2 0,5 I O
181 Triethylene glycol 4 400 1 000 4,4 4,4 0,5 I O
182 Tall oil 1,8 1 000 0,0018 0,0018 0,5 I O
183 Ethylenebisstearamides 140 5 000 0,028 0,028 0,5 I O
184 Sodium gluconate 10 000 10 000 1 1 0,05 R O
185 Glycol distearate 100 5 000 0,02 0,02 0,5 I O
186 Hydroxyl ethyl cellulose 209 5 000 0,0418 0,0418 1 P O
187 Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose 188 5 000 0,0376 0,0376 1 P O
188 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone 500 1 000 0,5 0,5 0,05 R O
189 Xanthan gum 490 1 000 0,49 0,49 0,05 R O
190 Trimethyl pentanediol mono-isobutyrate 18 1 000 0,018 3,3 100 0,033 0,05 R O
191 Benzotriazole 29 1 000 0,029 0,029 1 P O
192 Piperidinol-propanetricarboxylate salt 100 1 000 0,1 120 100 1,2 0,5 I O
193 Diethylaminopropyl-DAS 120 1 000 0,12 120 100 1,2 1 P O
194 Methylbenzamide-DAS 120 1 000 0,12 120 100 1,2 0,5 I O
195 Pentaerythritol-tetrakis-phenol-propionate 38 1 000 0,038 0,038 1 P O
196 Block polymers 100 5 000 0,02 0,02 1 P N
197 Denatonium benzoate 13 5 000 0,0026 0,0026 1 O O
198 Succinate 374 10 000 0,0374 0,0374 0,05 R O
199 Polyaspartic acid 528 1 000 0,528 0,528 0,05 R N
Insoluble inorganic Inorganic ingredient with very low, or no ability to dissolve in water.
List of abbreviations:SF(acute)=Safety factor for acute toxicityTF(acute)=Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms.SF(chronic)=Safety factor for chronic toxicity.TF(chronic)=Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms.DF=Degradation factor.Aerobic degradation:R=Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelinesI=Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines.P=Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability.O=The ingredient has not been tested.NA=Not applicable.Anaerobic degradation:Y=Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.N=Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.O=The ingredient has not been tested.NA=Not applicable. SF(acute) = Safety factor for acute toxicity TF(acute) = Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms. SF(chronic) = Safety factor for chronic toxicity. TF(chronic) = Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms. DF = Degradation factor. R = Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelines I = Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines. P = Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability. O = The ingredient has not been tested. NA = Not applicable. Y = Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions. N = Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions. O = The ingredient has not been tested. NA = Not applicable.
SF(acute) = Safety factor for acute toxicity
TF(acute) = Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms.
SF(chronic) = Safety factor for chronic toxicity.
TF(chronic) = Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms.
DF = Degradation factor.
R = Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelines
I = Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines.
P = Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
Y = Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
N = Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
SF(acute) = Safety factor for acute toxicity
TF(acute) = Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms.
SF(chronic) = Safety factor for chronic toxicity.
TF(chronic) = Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms.
DF = Degradation factor.
R = Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelines
I = Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines.
P = Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
Y = Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
N = Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
— Calculate the median value within each trophic level (fish, crustaceans or algae) using validated test results for chronic toxicity. If several test results are available for one species within a trophic level, a median for the species shall be calculated first, and these median values shall be used when calculating the median value for the trophic level .
— The chronic toxicity factor (TFchronic) is the lowest median of the trophic levels calculated.
— The TFchronicshall be used when calculating the critical dilution volume criterion.
— Calculate the median value within each trophic level (fish, crustaceans or algae) using validated test results for acute toxicity. If several test results are available for one species within a trophic level, a median for the species shall be calculated first, and these median values shall be used when calculating the median value for the trophic level .
— The acute toxicity factor (TFacute) is the lowest median of the trophic levels.
— The TFacuteshall be used when calculating the critical dilution volume criterion.
Data Safety factor (SF) Toxicity factor (TF)
1 short-term L(E)C50 10 000 Toxicity/10 000
2 short-term L(E)C50 from species representing two trophic levels (fish and/or crustaceans and/or algae) 5 000 Toxicity/5 000
At least 1 short-term L(E)C50 from each of three trophic levels of the base-set1 1 000 Toxicity/1 000
One long-term NOEC (fish or crustaceans) 100 Toxicity/100
Two long-term NOEC from species representing two trophic levels (fish and/or crustaceans and/or algae) 50 Toxicity/50
Long-term NOEC from at least three species (normally fish, crustaceans and algae) representing three trophic levels 10 Toxicity/10
DF
Readily biodegradable(*3) 0,05
Readily biodegradable(*4) 0,15
Inherently biodegradable 0,5
Persistent 1
Category Label
Anaerobically not biodegradable, i.e. tested and found not biodegradable. N
Anaerobically biodegradable i.e. tested and found biodegradable or not tested but demonstrated through analogy considerations etc. Y
Not tested for anaerobic biodegradability 0
Category Label
Readily biodegradable R
Inherently biodegradable, but not readily biodegradable I
Persistent P
Not tested for aerobic biodegradability O
(#) Due to a lack of toxicity results the TF has been calculated as an average of the values of C12/14Alkyl sulphate (AS) and C16/18Alkyl sulphate (AS).
(§) 5-Chloro-2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one in mixture 3:1
— The test product and the reference product shall be of the same product category.
— The reference product may be either a market-leading product or a generic formulation.
— If a market-leading reference product is used, it shall be one of the three or four products with the highest sales volume on the market in a region, where the eco-labelled product is to be marketed. Furthermore, the market-leading reference product must be approved by the competent body, and the trade name must be available to the public.
— If a generic reference product is used, it must have a composition which is representative for the products on the market. Furthermore, the generic reference product must be approved by the Competent body and the exact formulation must be publicly available free of charge.
— The dosages used shall be the recommended dosage for normal soil or normal use. If no recommended dosage is stated for the reference product, the same dosage must be used for both the test product and the reference product.
— If a dosage interval is given, the lowest recommended dosage must be used in the test.
— The soil mixture must be relevant for the use of the product, homogeneous and, if prepared artificially, based on well-described substances. Enough soil for the whole test must be prepared in a single batch.
— For all-purpose cleaners and cleaning products for kitchens, only fat-removing effects shall be documented. For sanitary cleaners and window cleaners, both calcium and fat removing effects shall be documented.
— The washing procedure must reflect realistic use conditions and can be manual or by machinery.
— The assessment of cleanness must include testing and comparison of test product, reference product.
— Each product must be tested in at least five parallels (see documentation requirements). Additionally, one test must be performed with water only, i.e. without any cleaning agent.
— The quantity of soil applied to plates or another substrate must be the same for each plate or substrate-part, weighed in grams to one decimal point.
— The order of testing of the two products shall be randomised.
— The test must be capable of generating results that provide a measure of the cleanness (fat and calcium removing effects) according to the product tested. Cleanness can be measured visually, photometrically (e.g. measuring reflectance), gravimetrically or by means of another relevant method. The method of measurement, including a possible scoring system, must be decided in advance.
— Testing of fat and calcium removing effects may be done either separately or jointly.
— The dosages used for the test product and the reference product.
— Common application area(s) for the test and the reference product.
— Justification of the choice of the reference product with respect to its position on the market and its function.
— Type(s) of surface used in the test, their relevance and whether the products are gentle on the chosen surface(s).
— Description of the soil mixture used in the test, together with an argumentation for its relevance in relation to the testing of fitness for use.
— Description of the procedures for soiling, washing and measurement of cleaning performance.
— Calculation and statistical comparison procedures.
— All raw data used in the testing and calculations.
— For the test product to be considered to have fulfilled the performance requirements its results must be positive in 100 % of the test rounds. If the result is less than 100 % positive, five new parallel tests must be performed. Of these 10 parallel tests, 80 % must be positive.As an alternative the applicant may use statistical methods and demonstrate with a one-sided 95 % confidence range that the test product is as good as or better than the reference product in at least 80 % of the test rounds, if more than 10 parallel tests are made.
— How it is shown that the product tested has a better performance than that of pure water.
— For testing of consumer products, responses must be received from a minimum of 20 persons, randomly selected in the sales region and normally using the reference product
— For testing of professional products, responses must be received from at least five professional users, randomly selected in the sales region and normally using the reference product
— The test product and the reference product should be of the same product category. The reference products shall be the products normally used by the test persons.
— The dosages used must be the dose recommended by the manufacturer
— The test must be performed on the type(s) of surface relevant in relation to the recommendations on the label
— The test period must allow for at least five uses of the test product
— Effectiveness of all-purpose cleaners must be assessed by the following properties:—The ability of the products to remove soil—The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used — The ability of the products to remove soil — The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability of the products to remove soil
— The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability of the products to remove soil
— The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
— Effectiveness of sanitary cleaners must be assessed by the following properties:—The ability to remove fat-based soil—The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)—The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used — The ability to remove fat-based soil — The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens) — The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability to remove fat-based soil
— The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)
— The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability to remove fat-based soil
— The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)
— The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The test persons must reply to the question ‘How effective do you consider the test product to be compared to the product you normally use?’ — or equivalent. At least three possibilities for a response must be available, e.g. ‘poorer’, ‘as good as’ and ‘better’
— At least 80 % of the test persons must assess the product to be ‘as good as’ or ‘better’ than the reference product
— The selection of the test persons
— The information provided by the test persons and a summary describing how the testing was performed
— The type of surface(s) the product was tested on.
— For each test person, the following information must be available, e.g. in the form of answers to a questionnaire:—The dosage used by the test person—The name of the reference product—A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times—The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product — The dosage used by the test person — The name of the reference product — A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times — The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
— The dosage used by the test person
— The name of the reference product
— A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times
— The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
— The dosage used by the test person
— The name of the reference product
— A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times
— The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
— Calculation and documentation showing that at least 80 % of the test persons assess the product to be as good as or better than the reference product.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in goodtime before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/523/EC of 27 June 2001 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that detergent products for the routine cleaning of windows are to be regarded as all-purpose cleaners, rather than as products for more specific cleaning uses, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/523/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than twelve months for applicants whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be composed of the following three subgroups:
(a)
all-purpose cleaners comprising detergent products intended for the routine cleaning of floors, walls, ceilings, windows and other fixed surfaces, and which are dissolved or diluted in water prior to use. All purpose cleaners must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(b)
window cleaners comprising specific all-purpose cleaners intended for the routing cleaning of windows, and which are either diluted in water prior to use or used without dilution. All window cleaners must have water content ≤ 95 % (w/w).
(c)
cleaners for sanitary facilities comprising detergent products intended for the routine removal, including by scouring, of dirt and/or deposits in sanitary facilities, such as laundry rooms, bathrooms, showers, toilets and kitchens. All cleaners for sanitary facilities must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
The subgroup specified in point (c) of the first paragraph shall not include the following:
(a)
products which are automatically used when a toilet is flushed, such as ‘self-dosing-products’, including toilet blocks;
(b)
products for use in a toilet cistern;
(c)
products, which have no cleaning effects other than the removal of calcium carbonate (scale);
(d)
disinfectants.
The product group shall not cover products for more specific cleaning uses, such as oven cleaners, floor-strippers, polishes, drain cleaners, and so on.
The product group shall cover products for both private and professional use.

Article 2
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label, for all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a cleaner must fall within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 December 2008.

Article 4
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be 020.

Article 5
Decision 2001/523/EC is repealed.

Article 6
Eco-labels awarded before the notification date of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the notification date of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/523/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in goodtime before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/523/EC of 27 June 2001 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that detergent products for the routine cleaning of windows are to be regarded as all-purpose cleaners, rather than as products for more specific cleaning uses, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/523/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than twelve months for applicants whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be composed of the following three subgroups:
(a)
all-purpose cleaners comprising detergent products intended for the routine cleaning of floors, walls, ceilings, windows and other fixed surfaces, and which are dissolved or diluted in water prior to use. All purpose cleaners must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(b)
window cleaners comprising specific all-purpose cleaners intended for the routing cleaning of windows, and which are either diluted in water prior to use or used without dilution. All window cleaners must have water content ≤ 95 % (w/w).
(c)
cleaners for sanitary facilities comprising detergent products intended for the routine removal, including by scouring, of dirt and/or deposits in sanitary facilities, such as laundry rooms, bathrooms, showers, toilets and kitchens. All cleaners for sanitary facilities must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
The subgroup specified in point (c) of the first paragraph shall not include the following:
(a)
products which are automatically used when a toilet is flushed, such as ‘self-dosing-products’, including toilet blocks;
(b)
products for use in a toilet cistern;
(c)
products, which have no cleaning effects other than the removal of calcium carbonate (scale);
(d)
disinfectants.
The product group shall not cover products for more specific cleaning uses, such as oven cleaners, floor-strippers, polishes, drain cleaners, and so on.
The product group shall cover products for both private and professional use.
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label, for all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a cleaner must fall within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 December 2008.
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be 020.
Decision 2001/523/EC is repealed.
Eco-labels awarded before the notification date of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the notification date of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/523/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

The aims of the criteria

ANNEXFRAMEWORKIn order to qualify for the eco-label, an all purpose cleaner or a cleaner for sanitary facilities (hereinafter referred to as the product) must fall within the product group as defined in Article 1, and must comply with the criteria of this Annex.
These criteria aim at promoting:

— | the reduction of environmental impact by limiting the quantity of harmful ingredients, by reducing the quantity of detergent used and by reducing packaging waste,
— | the reduction or prevention of risks for the environment and for human health related to the use of hazardous substances,
— | information that will enable the consumer to use the product in the way that is efficient and minimises environmental impact.The criteria are set at levels that promote the labelling of all-purpose cleaners and sanitary cleaners that have a low environmental impact.
Assessment and verification requirementsThe specific assessment and verification requirements are indicated within each criterion.
Where appropriate, test methods other than those indicated for each criterion may be used if the competent body assessing the application accepts their equivalence.
Where possible, the testing should be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements of EN ISO 17025 or equivalent
Where no tests are mentioned, or are mentioned as being for use in verification or monitoring, competent bodies should rely as appropriate on declarations and documentation provided by the applicant and/or independent verifications.
Where appropriate, competent bodies may require supporting documentation and may carry out independent verifications.
Where the applicant is required to provide declarations, documentation, analyses test reports, or other evidence to show compliance with the criteria, it is understood that these may originate from the applicant and/or his supplier(s) and/or their supplier(s), et cetera, as appropriate.
Where ingredients are referred to, this includes substances and preparations.
Appendix I presents the new revised detergent ingredient database (DID list), version 30 June 2004, which contains the most widely used ingredients in detergent formulations. Part-A of the DID list shall be used for deriving the data for the calculations of CDVtoxand for the assessment of the biodegradability of surfactants.
Where appropriate, the applicant may use subsequent revisions of the Detergent Ingredient Database as they become available.
For ingredients which are not included in part-A of the DID list, the applicant shall, under his own responsibility, apply the procedure as described in part-B of the Appendix I.
For ingredients, which are not listed in the DID-list, the applicant may use an approach to provide the necessary documentation of anaerobic degradability described in Appendix II
The competent bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental management schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria in this Annex (Note: It is not required to implement such management schemes.)
FUNCTIONAL UNITFor all-purpose cleaners the functional unit (used in the criteria below) is the dosage in grams of the product recommended by the manufacturer for 1 litre of suds (washing water).
For window cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities, no functional unit is defined (the relevant criteria below being calculated in relation to 100 g of the product).
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA1. Toxicity to aquatic organismsThe critical dilution volume toxicity (CDVtox) is calculated for each ingredient (i) using the following equation:

CDV tox (ingredient i) = weight (i) x DF (i)/TF chronic (i) x 1000
where weight (i) is the weight of the ingredient (in grams) per functional unit (for all-purpose cleaners) or per 100 g of product (cleaners for sanitary facilities). DF (i) is the degradation factor and TF chronic (i) is the toxicity factor of the ingredient (in milligram/litre).
The values of DF and TF chronic shall be as given in the detergent ingredient database list-part A (DID list-part A) (Appendix I). If the ingredient in question is not included in the DID list-part A, the applicant shall estimate the values following the approach described in the DID list-part B (Appendix 1). The CDVtoxis summed for each ingredient, making the CDVtoxfor the product.
For all-purpose cleaners, the CDVtoxfor the product shall not exceed 20 000 l/functional unit.
For cleaners for sanitary facilities, the CDVtoxfor the product shall not exceed 100 000 l per 100 g product.
For window cleaners, the CDVtoxfor the product shall not exceed 5 000 l per 100 g product.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the competent body, together with the details of the CDVtoxcalculations showing compliance with this criterion.
2. Biodegradability of surfactants
(a) Ready biodegradability (aerobic)Each surfactant used in the product shall be readily biodegradable.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product as well as a description of the function of each ingredient shall be provided to the competent body. The DID list-part A (Appendix I) indicates whether a specific surfactant is aerobically biodegradable or not (the surfactants with an entry of ‘R’ in the column on aerobic biodegradability are readily biodegradable). For surfactants which are not included in the DID list-part A, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are aerobically biodegradable shall be provided. The tests for ready biodegradability shall be as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents(1). Surfactants shall be considered as readily biodegradable if the level of biodegradability (mineralisation) measured according to one of the five following tests is at least 60 % within 28 days: CO2headspace test (OECD 310), carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution modified Sturm test (OECD 301B; Council Directive 67/548/EEC(2)Annex V.C.4-C), closed bottle test (OECD 301D; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-E), manometric respirometry (OECD 301F; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-D), or MITI (I) test (OECD 301C; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-F), or their equivalent ISO tests. Depending on the physical characteristics of the surfactant, one of the following tests might be used to confirm ready biodegradability, if the level of biodegradability is at least 70 % within 28 days: dissolved organic carbon DOC die-away (OECD 301A; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-A) or modified OECD screening DOC die-away (OECD 301E; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-B), or their equivalent ISO tests. The applicability of test methods based on measurement of dissolved organic carbon needs to be appropriately justified as these methods could give results on the removal and not on the biodegradability. Pre-adaptation is not to be used in tests for aerobic ready biodegradability. The 10 days window principle shall not apply.
(b) Anaerobic biodegradabilityEach surfactant used in the product shall be biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product as well as a description of the function of each ingredient shall be provided to the competent body. The DID list-part A (Appendix I) indicates whether a specific surfactant is anaerobically biodegradable or not (the surfactants with an entry of ‘Y’ in the column on anaerobic biodegradability are biodegradable under anaerobic conditions). For surfactants which are not included in the DID list-part A, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are anaerobically biodegradable shall be provided. The reference test for anaerobic degradability shall be OECD 311, ISO 11734, ECETOC No 28 (June 1988) or an equivalent test method, with the requirement of a minimum of 60 % ultimate degradability under anaerobic conditions. Test methods simulating the conditions in a relevant anaerobic environment may also be used to document that 60 % ultimate degradability has been attained under anaerobic conditions (see Appendix II).
3. Dangerous, hazardous or toxic substances or preparations(a) The following ingredients shall not be included in the product, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation:
— | Alkyl phenol ethoxylates (APEOs) and derivatives thereof,
— | EDTA (ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetate) and its salts,
— | NTA (nitrilo-tri-acetate),
— | Nitromusks and polycyclic musks, including for example:—Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,—Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,—Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,—Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,—Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,—HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),—AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin). | — | Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene, | — | Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene, | — | Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan, | — | Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene, | — | Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone, | — | HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran), | — | AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
— | Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,
— | Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,
— | Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,
— | Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,
— | Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,
— | HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),
— | AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).Assessment and verification:the applicant shall provide a declaration supported by declarations from manufacturers of ingredients, as appropriate, confirming that the listed substances have not been included in the product.
(b) Quaternary ammonium salts that are not readily biodegradable shall not be used, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation.Assessment and verification:the applicant shall provide documentation showing the biodegradability of any quaternary ammonium salt used.
(c) No ingredient (substance or preparation) shall be included in the product that is classified, with any of the following risk phrases, or any combination thereof, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(3) and its amendments:
| R31 (contact with acid liberates toxic gas),
| R40 (limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect),
| R45 (may cause cancer),
| R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage),
| R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation),
| R68 (possible risks of irreversible effects)
| R50-53 (very toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
| R51-53 (toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
| R59 (dangerous to the ozone layer),
| R60 (may impair fertility),
| R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child),
| R62 (possible risk of impaired fertility),
| R63 (possible risk of harm to the unborn child),
| R64 (may cause harm to breastfed babies).Specific requirements are prescribed for biocides, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation (see criterion on biocides below).
The above requirements shall apply to each ingredient (substance or preparation) that exceeds 0,01 % by weight of the final product. This includes also each ingredient of any preparation used in the formulation that exceeds 0,01 % by weight of the final product.
Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all ingredients (whether substances or preparations). A declaration prepared by the manufacturer of ingredients and showing compliance with this criterion shall be provided by the applicant.
4. Biocides
(a) | The product may only include biocides in order to preserve the product, and in the appropriate dosage for this purpose alone. This does not refer to surfactants, which may also have biocidal properties.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets of any preservatives added shall be provided, together with information on their exact concentration in the product. The manufacturer or supplier of the preservatives shall provide information on the dosage necessary to preserve the product.
(b) | It is prohibited to claim or suggest on the packaging or by any other communication that the product has an antimicrobial action.Assessment and verification: the texts and layouts used on each type of packaging and/or an example of each different type of packaging shall be provided to the competent body.Biocides, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation, that are used to preserve the product and that are classified with R50-53 or R51-53 risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC, are permitted but only if they are not potentially bioaccumulative. In this context, a biocide is considered to be potentially bioaccumulative if the log Pow(log octanol/water partition coefficient) ≥3,0 (unless the experimentally determined BCF ≤100).The concentration of biocides in the final product shall not exceed the maximum authorised concentration in Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products and its subsequent amendments.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all biocides, together with a documentation of the concentrations of the biocides in the final product.5. Dyes or colouring agentsAny dyes or colouring agents used in the product must be permitted by Council Directive 76/768/EEC relating to cosmetic products(4)and its subsequent amendments, or must be permitted by European Parliament and Council Directive 94/36/EC of 30 June 1994 on colours for use in foodstuffs(5)and its subsequent amendments, or must be characterised by environmental properties that do not imply classification with R50-53 or R51-53 risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments.
Assessment and verification:a declaration of compliance with this criterion shall be provided to the competent body, together with a full list of all dyes or colouring agents used.
6. Fragrances
(a) | The product shall not contain perfumes containing nitro-musks or polycyclic musks (as specified in the criterion 3(a).
(b) | Any ingredients added to the product as a fragrance must have been manufactured and/or handled in accordance with the code of practice of the International Fragrance Association.Assessment and verification:a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion shall be provided to the competent body.7. Sensitising substancesThe product shall not be classified with R42 (may cause sensitisation by inhalation) and/or R43 (may cause sensitisation by skin contact) risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 1999/45/EC and its amendments.
The concentration of any substance or ingredient classified with R42 (may cause sensitisation by inhalation) and/or R43 (may cause sensitisation by skin contact) risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC and its amendments, shall not exceed 0,1 % by weight of the final product.
Assessment and verification:the exact concentrations of all ingredients that are classified as R42 and/or R43 shall be provided to the competent body, together with copies of the material safety data sheets.
8. Volatile organic compoundsThe product shall not contain more than 10 % (by weight) of volatile organic compounds with a boiling point lower than 150oC.
Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets of each organic solvent together with details of the calculations of the total volatile organic compounds with a boiling point lower than 150oC shall be provided by the applicant.
9. PhosphorusThe total quantity of elemental phosphorous in the product shall be calculated per functional unit (for all-purpose cleaners) or per 100 g of product (cleaners for sanitary facilities) taking into account all ingredients containing phosphorus (e.g. phosphates and phosphonates).
For all-purpose cleaners, the total phosphorus content (P) shall not exceed 0,02 g/functional unit.
For cleaners for sanitary facilities, the total phosphorus content (P) shall not exceed 1,0 g/100 g of product.
Ingredients used in window cleaning products must not contain phosphorus.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the competent body, together with the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.
10. Packaging requirements
(a) | Sprays containing propellants must not be used.
(b) | Plastic materials that are used for the main container shall be marked according to European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste(6), or DIN 6120 Parts 1 and 2 in connection with DIN 7728 part 1.
(c) | If the primary packaging is made of recycled material, any indication of this on the packaging shall be in conformity with the ISO 14021 standard ‘Environmental labels and declarations — Self declared claims (type II environmental labelling)’.
(d) | The primary packaging parts shall be easily separable into mono-material parts.Assessment and verification:data on the packaging, and/or a sample thereof if appropriate, shall be provided to the competent body, together with a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.FITNESS FOR USE11. Fitness for useThe product shall be fit for use, meeting the needs of the consumers.
The cleaning ability must be equivalent to or better than a market-leading or generic reference product (see Appendix III), approved by a competent body, as well as better than pure water.
For all-purpose cleaners and cleaning products for kitchens, only fat-removing effects must be documented. For sanitary cleaning products and window cleaners, both calcium and fat-removing effects must be documented.
Assessment and verification:the performance of the product must either be tested by:

— | an adequate and justifiable laboratory test, or
— | an adequate and justifiable consumer test.Both tests must be carried out and reported within specified parameters as stated in the framework described in Appendix III.
CONSUMER INFORMATION12. User instructions(a) Dosage instructionsFor all-purpose cleaners, an exact dosage recommendation shall appear on the packaging in a reasonably sufficient size and against a visible background. The use of a pictogram (such as a 5 1 tub and number of caps with ml) is recommended but voluntary.
In the case of a concentrated cleaner for sanitary facilities, it shall be clearly indicated on the packaging that only a small quantity of the product is needed compared to normal (i.e. diluted) products.
The following text (or equivalent text) shall appear on the packaging:
‘Proper dosage saves costs and minimises environmental impacts’.
(b) Safety adviceThe following safety advice (or equivalent text) shall appear on the product (in both text form and with an equivalent pictogram):
‘Keep away from children’
‘Do not mix different cleaners’
‘Avoid inhaling sprayed product’ (only for products that are packaged as sprays).
(c) Information and labelling of ingredientsRegulation (EC) No 648/2004 shall be applied.
(d) Information about the eco-labelThe following text (or equivalent text) shall appear on the packaging:
‘For more information visit the EU eco-label web-site: http://europa.eu.int/ecolabel’.
Assessment and verification:a sample of the product packaging, including the label, shall be provided to the competent body, together with a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.
13. Information appearing on the eco-labelBox 2 of the eco-label shall contain the following text:

— | reduced impact on aquatic life,
— | reduced use of hazardous substances,
— | clear user instructions.14. Professional trainingFor detergents, which are used by professional users, the producer, its distributor or a third party shall offer training or training materials for cleaning staff. These shall include step-by-step instructions for proper dilution, use, disposal and the use of equipment.
Assessment and verification:a sample of training material containing step-by-step instructions for proper dilution, use, disposal and the use of equipment and a description of training courses shall be provided to the competent body.

(1)
OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 13.
(2) Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ L 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1).
(3) Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations (OJ L 200, 30.7.1999, p. 1).
(4)
OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169.
(5)
OJ L 237, 10.9.1994, p. 13.
(6)
OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10.

Pending: 32005D0344

4.5.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 115/42
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in goodtime before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/523/EC of 27 June 2001 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that detergent products for the routine cleaning of windows are to be regarded as all-purpose cleaners, rather than as products for more specific cleaning uses, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/523/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than twelve months for applicants whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
(a) all-purpose cleaners comprising detergent products intended for the routine cleaning of floors, walls, ceilings, windows and other fixed surfaces, and which are dissolved or diluted in water prior to use. All purpose cleaners must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(b) window cleaners comprising specific all-purpose cleaners intended for the routing cleaning of windows, and which are either diluted in water prior to use or used without dilution. All window cleaners must have water content ≤ 95 % (w/w).
(c) cleaners for sanitary facilities comprising detergent products intended for the routine removal, including by scouring, of dirt and/or deposits in sanitary facilities, such as laundry rooms, bathrooms, showers, toilets and kitchens. All cleaners for sanitary facilities must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(a) products which are automatically used when a toilet is flushed, such as ‘self-dosing-products’, including toilet blocks;
(b) products for use in a toilet cistern;
(c) products, which have no cleaning effects other than the removal of calcium carbonate (scale);
(d) disinfectants.
— the reduction of environmental impact by limiting the quantity of harmful ingredients, by reducing the quantity of detergent used and by reducing packaging waste,
— the reduction or prevention of risks for the environment and for human health related to the use of hazardous substances,
— information that will enable the consumer to use the product in the way that is efficient and minimises environmental impact.
— Alkyl phenol ethoxylates (APEOs) and derivatives thereof,
— EDTA (ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetate) and its salts,
— NTA (nitrilo-tri-acetate),
— Nitromusks and polycyclic musks, including for example:—Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,—Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,—Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,—Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,—Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,—HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),—AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin). — Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene, — Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene, — Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan, — Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene, — Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone, — HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran), — AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
— Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,
— Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,
— Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,
— Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,
— Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,
— HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),
— AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
— Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,
— Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,
— Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,
— Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,
— Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,
— HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),
— AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
R31 (contact with acid liberates toxic gas),
R40 (limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect),
R45 (may cause cancer),
R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage),
R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation),
R68 (possible risks of irreversible effects)
R50-53 (very toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
R51-53 (toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
R59 (dangerous to the ozone layer),
R60 (may impair fertility),
R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child),
R62 (possible risk of impaired fertility),
R63 (possible risk of harm to the unborn child),
R64 (may cause harm to breastfed babies).
(a) The product may only include biocides in order to preserve the product, and in the appropriate dosage for this purpose alone. This does not refer to surfactants, which may also have biocidal properties.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets of any preservatives added shall be provided, together with information on their exact concentration in the product. The manufacturer or supplier of the preservatives shall provide information on the dosage necessary to preserve the product.
(b) It is prohibited to claim or suggest on the packaging or by any other communication that the product has an antimicrobial action.Assessment and verification: the texts and layouts used on each type of packaging and/or an example of each different type of packaging shall be provided to the competent body.Biocides, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation, that are used to preserve the product and that are classified with R50-53 or R51-53 risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC, are permitted but only if they are not potentially bioaccumulative. In this context, a biocide is considered to be potentially bioaccumulative if the log Pow(log octanol/water partition coefficient) ≥3,0 (unless the experimentally determined BCF ≤100).The concentration of biocides in the final product shall not exceed the maximum authorised concentration in Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products and its subsequent amendments.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all biocides, together with a documentation of the concentrations of the biocides in the final product.
(a) The product shall not contain perfumes containing nitro-musks or polycyclic musks (as specified in the criterion 3(a).
(b) Any ingredients added to the product as a fragrance must have been manufactured and/or handled in accordance with the code of practice of the International Fragrance Association.Assessment and verification:a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion shall be provided to the competent body.
(a) Sprays containing propellants must not be used.
(b) Plastic materials that are used for the main container shall be marked according to European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste(6), or DIN 6120 Parts 1 and 2 in connection with DIN 7728 part 1.
(c) If the primary packaging is made of recycled material, any indication of this on the packaging shall be in conformity with the ISO 14021 standard ‘Environmental labels and declarations — Self declared claims (type II environmental labelling)’.
(d) The primary packaging parts shall be easily separable into mono-material parts.Assessment and verification:data on the packaging, and/or a sample thereof if appropriate, shall be provided to the competent body, together with a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.
— an adequate and justifiable laboratory test, or
— an adequate and justifiable consumer test.
— reduced impact on aquatic life,
— reduced use of hazardous substances,
— clear user instructions.
Acute toxicity Chronic toxicity Degradation
DID-no Ingredient name LC50/EC50 SF(acute) TF(acute) NOEC(*1) SF(chronic)(*1) TF(chronic) DF Aerobic Anaerobic
Anionic surfactants
1 Linear alkyl benzene sulphonates 11,5-11,8 (LAS) 4,1 1 000 0,0041 0,69 10 0,069 0,05 R N
2 LAS-(C10/13-alkyl)triethanolamine salt 4,2 1 000 0,0042 3,4 100 0,034 0,05 R O
3 C14/17-Alkyl sulphonate 6,7 5 000 0,00134 0,44 10 0,044 0,05 R N
4 C8/10-Alkyl sulphate 132 5 000 0,0264 0,0264 0,05 R Y
5 C12/14-Alkylsulfaat (AS) 2,8 1 000 0,0028 2 100 0,02 0,05 R Y
6 C12/18-Alkyl sulphate (AS)(1) 0,0149 0,027 0,05 R Y
7 C16/18Fatty alcohol sulphate (FAS) 27 1 000 0,027 1,7 50 0,034 0,05 R Y
8 C12/15A 1-3 EO sulphate 4,6 1 000 0,0046 0,1 10 0,01 0,05 R Y
9 C 16/18 A 3-4 EO sulphate 0,57 10 000 0,000057 0,000057 0,05 R Y
10 Dialkyl sulpho succinate 15,7 1 000 0,0157 0,0157 0,5 I N
11 C 12/14 Sulpho- fatty acid methylester 9 10 000 0,0009 0,23 50 0,0046 0,05 R N
12 C 16/18 Sulpho- fatty acid methylester 0,51 5 000 0,000102 0,2 50 0,004 0,05 R N
13 C 14/16 alfa Olefin sulphonate 3,3 10 000 0,00033 0,00033 0,05 R N
14 C 14/18 alfa olefin sulphonate 0,5 5 000 0,0001 0,0001 0,05 R N
15 Soap C> 12-22 22 1 000 0,022 10 100 0,1 0,05 R Y
16 Lauroyl sarcosinate 56 10 000 0,0056 0,0056 0,05 R Y
17 C 9/11 2-10 EO Carboxymethylated, sodium salt or acid 100 10 000 0,01 0,01 0,05 R O
18 C 12/18 2-10 EO Carboxymethylated, sodium salt or acid 8,8 1 000 0,0088 5 100 0,05 0,05 R O
19 C 12/18 Alkyl phosphate esters 38 1 000 0,038 0,038 0,05 R N
Non-ionic surfactants
20 C8A 1-5 EO 7,8 1 000 0,0078 0,0078 0,05 R Y
21 C9/11A, > 3-6 EO predominantly linear 5,6 1 000 0,0056 0,0056 0,05 R Y
22 C9/11A, > 6-10 EO predominantly linear 5 1 000 0,005 0,005 0,05 R Y
23 C9/11A, 5-11 EO multibranched 1 1 000 0,001 0,001 0,05 R O
24 C10A, 5-11 EO multibranched (Trimer-propen-oxo-alcohol) 1 1 000 0,001 0,001 0,05 R Y
25 C12/15A, >2-6 EO predominantly linear 0,43 1 000 0,00043 0,18 50 0,0036 0,05 R Y
26 C12/145-8 EO 1 t-BuO (endcapped) 0,23 1 000 0,00023 0,18 100 0,0018 0,05 R O
27 C12/15A, 3-12 EO multibranched 1 1 000 0,001 3,2 100 0,032 0,05 R O
28 C12/15(mean value C<14) A, >6-9 EO 0,63 1 000 0,00063 0,24 10 0,024 0,05 R Y
29 C12/15(mean value C > 14) A, >6-9 EO 0,4 1 000 0,0004 0,17 10 0,017 0,05 R Y
30 C12/15A, > 9-12 EO 1,1 1 000 0,0011 0,017 0,05 R Y
31 C12/15A > 12-20 EO 0,7 1 000 0,0007 0,0007 0,05 R O
32 C 12/15 A > 20-30 EO 13 1 000 0,013 10 100 0,1 0,05 R O
33 C 12/15 A, > 30 EO 130 1 000 0,13 0,13 0,5 I O
34 C 12/18 A, 0-3 EO 0,3 1 000 0,0003 0,0003 0,05 R Y
35 C 12/18 A, 5-10 EO 1 1 000 0,001 0,35 100 0,0035 0,05 R O
36 C 12/18 A, > 10-20 EO 1 1 000 0,001 0,0035 0,05 R O
37 C 16/18 A, 2-8 EO 3,2 1 000 0,0032 0,4 100 0,004 0,05 R Y
38 C 16/18 A, > 9-18 EO 0,72 1 000 0,00072 0,32 10 0,032 0,05 R Y
39 C 16/18 A, 20-30 EO 4,1 1 000 0,0041 0,0041 0,05 R Y
40 C 16/18 A, > 30 EO 30 1 000 0,03 0,03 0,5 I Y
41 C 12-15 A 2-6 EO 2-6 PO 0,78 1 000 0,00078 0,36 100 0,0036 0,05 R O
42 C 10-16 A 0-3 PO 6-7 EO 3,2 5 000 0,00064 1 100 0,01 0,05 R O
43 Glycerine (1-5 EO) cocoate 16 1 000 0,016 6,3 100 0,063 0,05 R Y
44 Glycerin (6-17 EO) cocoate 100 1 000 0,1 0,1 0,05 R Y
45 C 12/14 Glucose amide 13 1 000 0,013 4,3 50 0,086 0,05 R Y
46 C 16/18 Glucose amide 1 1 000 0,001 0,33 50 0,0066 0,05 R Y
47 C 8/10 Alkyl polyglycoside 28 1 000 0,028 5,7 100 0,057 0,05 R Y
48 C 8/12 Alkyl polyglycoside, branched 480 1 000 0,48 100 100 1 0,05 R N
49 C 8/16 or C 12-14 Alkyl polyglycoside 5,3 1 000 0,0053 1 10 0,1 0,05 R Y
50 Coconut fatty acid monoethanolamide 9,5 1 000 0,0095 1 100 0,01 0,05 R Y
51 Coconut fatty acid monoethanolamide 4-5 EO 17 10 000 0,0017 0,0017 0,05 R Y
52 Coconut fatty acid diethanolamide 2 1 000 0,002 0,3 100 0,003 0,05 R O
53 PEG-4 Rapeseed amide 7 5 000 0,0014 0,0014 0,05 R Y
Amphoteric surfactants
60 C 12/15 Alkyl dimethylbetaine 1,7 1 000 0,0017 0,1 100 0,001 0,05 R O
61 Alkyl C 12/18 amidopropylbetaine 1,8 1 000 0,0018 0,09 100 0,0009 0,05 R Y
62 C 12/18 Alkyl amine oxide 0,3 1 000 0,0003 0,0003 0,05 R Y
Cationic surfactants
70 Alkyl trimethyl ammonium salts 0,1 1 000 0,0001 0,046 100 0,00046 0,5 I O
71 Alkyl ester ammonium salts 2,9 1 000 0,0029 1 10 0,1 0,05 R Y
Preservatives
80 1,2-Benzisothiazol-3-one 0,15 1 000 0,00015 0,00015 0,5 I N
81 Benzyl alcohol 360 1 000 0,36 0,36 0,05 R Y
82 5-bromo-5-nitro-1,3-dioxane 0,4 5 000 0,00008 0,00008 1 P O
83 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 0,78 1 000 0,00078 0,2 100 0,002 0,5 I O
84 Chloroacetamide 55,6 10 000 0,00556 0,00556 1 O O
85 Diazolinidylurea 35 5 000 0,007 0,007 1 P O
86 Formaldehyde 2 1 000 0,002 0,002 0,05 R O
87 Glutaraldehyde 0,31 1 000 0,00031 0,00031 0,05 R O
88 Guanidine, hexamethylene-, homopolymer 0,18 1 000 0,00018 0,024 100 0,00024 1 P O
89 CMI + MIT in mixture 3:1(2) 0,0067 1 000 0,0000067 0,0057 50 0,000114 0,5 I O
90 2-Methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one (MIT) 0,06 1 000 0,00006 0,00006 0,5 I O
91 Methyldibromoglutaronitrile 0,15 1 000 0,00015 0,00015 0,05 R O
92 e-phtaloimidoperoxyhexanoic acid 0,59 5 000 0,000118 0,000118 1 P O
93 Methyl-, Ethyl- and Propylparaben 15,4 5 000 0,00308 0,00308 0,05 R N
94 o-Phenylphenol 0,92 1 000 0,00092 0,00092 0,05 R O
95 Sodium benzoate 128 1 000 0,128 0,128 0,05 R Y
96 Sodium hydroxy methyl glycinate 36,5 5 000 0,0073 0,0073 1 O O
97 Sodium nitrite 87 10 000 0,0087 0,0087 1 NA NA
98 Triclosan 0,0014 1 000 0,0000014 0,0000014 0,5 I O
Other ingredients
110 Silicon 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 1 P N
111 Paraffin 1 000 10 000 0,1 0,1 1 P O
112 Glycerol 4 400 5 000 0,88 0,88 0,05 R Y
113 Phosphate, as STPP 1 000 1 000 1 1 0,15 NA NA
114 Zeolite (insoluble inorganic) 1 000 1 000 1 175 50 3,5 1 NA NA
115 Citrate and citric acid 825 1 000 0,825 80 50 1,6 0,05 R Y
116 Polycarboxylates 200 1 000 0,2 106 10 10,6 1 P N
117 Nitrilotriacetat (NTA) 494 1 000 0,494 64 50 1,28 0,5 I O
118 EDTA 121 1 000 0,121 22 50 0,44 0,5 I N
119 Phosphonates 650 1 000 0,65 25 50 0,5 1 P N
120 EDDS 320 1 000 0,32 32 50 0,64 0,05 R N
121 Clay (insoluble inorganic) 1 000 1 000 1 1 1 NA NA
122 Carbonates 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 0,15 NA NA
123 Fatty acids C≥ 14 3,7 5 000 0,00074 0,00074 0,05 R Y
124 Silicates 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 1 NA NA
125 Polyasparaginic acid, Na-salt 410 1 000 0,41 0,41 0,05 R N
126 Perborates (as boron) 14 1 000 0,014 0,014 1 NA NA
127 Percarbonate (see carbonate) 250 1 000 0,25 0,25 0,15 NA NA
128 Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) 250 1 000 0,25 500 100 5 0,05 R O
129 C 1-C 4 alcohols 1 000 1 000 1 1 0,05 R Y
130 Mono-, di- and triethanol amine 90 1 000 0,09 0,78 100 0,0078 0,05 R Y
131 Polyvinylpyrrolidon (PVP) 1 000 1 000 1 1 0,5 I N
132 Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) 250 5 000 0,05 0,05 0,5 I N
133 Sodium and magnesium sulphate 1 000 1 000 1 100 100 1 1 NA NA
134 Calcium- and sodiumchloride 1 000 1 000 1 100 100 1 1 NA NA
135 Urea 1 000 5 000 0,2 0,2 1 NA NA
136 Silicon dioxide, quartz (insoluble inorganic) 1 000 1 000 1 1 1 NA NA
137 Polyethylene glycol, MW > 4000 1 000 10 000 0,1 0,1 1 P N
138 Polyethylene glycol, MW < 4000 1 000 10 000 0,1 0,1 1 P O
139 Cumene-, xylene- and toluene sulphonates 66 10 000 0,0066 0,0066 0,5 I N
140 Na-/Mg-/KOH 30 1 000 0,03 0,03 0,05 NA NA
141 Enzymes/proteins 25 5 000 0,005 0,005 0,05 R Y
142 Perfume, if not other specified(*2) 2 1 000 0,002 0,002 0,5 I N
143 Dyes, if not other specified(*2) 10 1 000 0,01 0,01 1 P N
144 Starch 100 1 000 0,1 0,1 0,05 R Y
145 Anionic polyester 655 1 000 0,655 0,655 1 P N
146 PVNO/PVPI 530 1 000 0,53 0,53 1 P N
147 Zn ftalocyanin sulphonate 0,2 1 000 0,0002 0,16 100 0,0016 1 P N
148 Iminodisuccinat 81 1 000 0,081 17 100 0,17 0,05 R N
149 FWA 1 11 1 000 0,011 10 100 0,1 1 P N
150 FWA 5 10 1 000 0,01 1 10 0,1 1 P N
151 1-decanol 2,3 5 000 0,00046 0,00046 0,05 R O
152 Methyl laurate 1 360 10 000 0,136 0,136 0,05 R O
153 Formic acid (Ca salt) 100 1 000 0,1 0,1 0,05 R Y
154 Adipic acid 31 1 000 0,031 0,031 0,05 R O
155 Maleic acid 106 1 000 0,106 0,106 0,05 R Y
156 Malic acid 106 1 000 0,106 0,106 0,05 R O
157 Tartaric acid 200 10 000 0,02 0,02 0,05 R O
158 Phosphoric acid 138 1 000 0,138 0,138 0,15 NA NA
159 Oxalic acid 128 5 000 0,0256 0,0256 0,05 R O
160 Acetic acid 30 1 000 0,03 0,03 0,05 R Y
161 Lactic acid 130 1 000 0,13 0,13 0,05 R Y
162 Sulphamic acid 75 1 000 0,075 0,075 1 NA NA
163 Salicylic acid 46 1 000 0,046 0,046 0,15 R O
164 Glycollic acid 141 5 000 0,0282 0,0282 0,05 R O
165 Glutaric acid 208 5 000 0,0416 0,0416 0,05 R O
166 Malonic acid 95 5 000 0,019 0,019 0,05 R O
167 Ethylene glycol 6500 1 000 6,5 6,5 0,05 R Y
168 Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 747 5 000 0,1494 0,1494 0,05 R O
169 Diethylene glycol 4 400 10 000 0,44 0,44 0,15 I Y
170 Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether 500 1 000 0,5 0,5 0,5 I O
171 Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether 3 940 5 000 0,788 0,788 0,05 R O
172 Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether 1 254 1 000 1,254 1,254 0,05 R O
173 Diethylene glycol dimethylether 2 000 10 000 0,2 0,2 0,5 I O
174 Propylene glycol 32 000 1 000 32 32 0,15 R Y
175 Propylene glycol monomethyl ether 12 700 5 000 2,54 2,54 0,05 R O
176 Propylene glycol monobutylether 748 5 000 0,1496 0,1496 0,05 R O
177 Dipropylene glycol 1 625 10 000 0,1625 0,1625 0,05 R O
178 Dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether 1 919 5 000 0,3838 0,3838 0,05 R O
179 Dipropylene glycol monobutylether 841 5 000 0,1682 0,1682 0,05 R O
180 Dipropylene glycol dimethylether 1 000 5 000 0,2 0,2 0,5 I O
181 Triethylene glycol 4 400 1 000 4,4 4,4 0,5 I O
182 Tall oil 1,8 1 000 0,0018 0,0018 0,5 I O
183 Ethylenebisstearamides 140 5 000 0,028 0,028 0,5 I O
184 Sodium gluconate 10 000 10 000 1 1 0,05 R O
185 Glycol distearate 100 5 000 0,02 0,02 0,5 I O
186 Hydroxyl ethyl cellulose 209 5 000 0,0418 0,0418 1 P O
187 Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose 188 5 000 0,0376 0,0376 1 P O
188 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone 500 1 000 0,5 0,5 0,05 R O
189 Xanthan gum 490 1 000 0,49 0,49 0,05 R O
190 Trimethyl pentanediol mono-isobutyrate 18 1 000 0,018 3,3 100 0,033 0,05 R O
191 Benzotriazole 29 1 000 0,029 0,029 1 P O
192 Piperidinol-propanetricarboxylate salt 100 1 000 0,1 120 100 1,2 0,5 I O
193 Diethylaminopropyl-DAS 120 1 000 0,12 120 100 1,2 1 P O
194 Methylbenzamide-DAS 120 1 000 0,12 120 100 1,2 0,5 I O
195 Pentaerythritol-tetrakis-phenol-propionate 38 1 000 0,038 0,038 1 P O
196 Block polymers 100 5 000 0,02 0,02 1 P N
197 Denatonium benzoate 13 5 000 0,0026 0,0026 1 O O
198 Succinate 374 10 000 0,0374 0,0374 0,05 R O
199 Polyaspartic acid 528 1 000 0,528 0,528 0,05 R N
Insoluble inorganic Inorganic ingredient with very low, or no ability to dissolve in water.
List of abbreviations:SF(acute)=Safety factor for acute toxicityTF(acute)=Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms.SF(chronic)=Safety factor for chronic toxicity.TF(chronic)=Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms.DF=Degradation factor.Aerobic degradation:R=Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelinesI=Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines.P=Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability.O=The ingredient has not been tested.NA=Not applicable.Anaerobic degradation:Y=Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.N=Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.O=The ingredient has not been tested.NA=Not applicable. SF(acute) = Safety factor for acute toxicity TF(acute) = Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms. SF(chronic) = Safety factor for chronic toxicity. TF(chronic) = Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms. DF = Degradation factor. R = Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelines I = Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines. P = Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability. O = The ingredient has not been tested. NA = Not applicable. Y = Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions. N = Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions. O = The ingredient has not been tested. NA = Not applicable.
SF(acute) = Safety factor for acute toxicity
TF(acute) = Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms.
SF(chronic) = Safety factor for chronic toxicity.
TF(chronic) = Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms.
DF = Degradation factor.
R = Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelines
I = Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines.
P = Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
Y = Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
N = Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
SF(acute) = Safety factor for acute toxicity
TF(acute) = Toxicity factor based on acute toxicity on aquatic organisms.
SF(chronic) = Safety factor for chronic toxicity.
TF(chronic) = Toxicity factor based on chronic toxicity on aquatic organisms.
DF = Degradation factor.
R = Readily biodegradable according to OECD guidelines
I = Inherently biodegradable according to OECD guidelines.
P = Persistent. The ingredient has failed the test for inherent biodegradability.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
Y = Biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
N = Not biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
O = The ingredient has not been tested.
NA = Not applicable.
— Calculate the median value within each trophic level (fish, crustaceans or algae) using validated test results for chronic toxicity. If several test results are available for one species within a trophic level, a median for the species shall be calculated first, and these median values shall be used when calculating the median value for the trophic level .
— The chronic toxicity factor (TFchronic) is the lowest median of the trophic levels calculated.
— The TFchronicshall be used when calculating the critical dilution volume criterion.
— Calculate the median value within each trophic level (fish, crustaceans or algae) using validated test results for acute toxicity. If several test results are available for one species within a trophic level, a median for the species shall be calculated first, and these median values shall be used when calculating the median value for the trophic level .
— The acute toxicity factor (TFacute) is the lowest median of the trophic levels.
— The TFacuteshall be used when calculating the critical dilution volume criterion.
Data Safety factor (SF) Toxicity factor (TF)
1 short-term L(E)C50 10 000 Toxicity/10 000
2 short-term L(E)C50 from species representing two trophic levels (fish and/or crustaceans and/or algae) 5 000 Toxicity/5 000
At least 1 short-term L(E)C50 from each of three trophic levels of the base-set1 1 000 Toxicity/1 000
One long-term NOEC (fish or crustaceans) 100 Toxicity/100
Two long-term NOEC from species representing two trophic levels (fish and/or crustaceans and/or algae) 50 Toxicity/50
Long-term NOEC from at least three species (normally fish, crustaceans and algae) representing three trophic levels 10 Toxicity/10
DF
Readily biodegradable(*3) 0,05
Readily biodegradable(*4) 0,15
Inherently biodegradable 0,5
Persistent 1
Category Label
Anaerobically not biodegradable, i.e. tested and found not biodegradable. N
Anaerobically biodegradable i.e. tested and found biodegradable or not tested but demonstrated through analogy considerations etc. Y
Not tested for anaerobic biodegradability 0
Category Label
Readily biodegradable R
Inherently biodegradable, but not readily biodegradable I
Persistent P
Not tested for aerobic biodegradability O
(#) Due to a lack of toxicity results the TF has been calculated as an average of the values of C12/14Alkyl sulphate (AS) and C16/18Alkyl sulphate (AS).
(§) 5-Chloro-2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one in mixture 3:1
— The test product and the reference product shall be of the same product category.
— The reference product may be either a market-leading product or a generic formulation.
— If a market-leading reference product is used, it shall be one of the three or four products with the highest sales volume on the market in a region, where the eco-labelled product is to be marketed. Furthermore, the market-leading reference product must be approved by the competent body, and the trade name must be available to the public.
— If a generic reference product is used, it must have a composition which is representative for the products on the market. Furthermore, the generic reference product must be approved by the Competent body and the exact formulation must be publicly available free of charge.
— The dosages used shall be the recommended dosage for normal soil or normal use. If no recommended dosage is stated for the reference product, the same dosage must be used for both the test product and the reference product.
— If a dosage interval is given, the lowest recommended dosage must be used in the test.
— The soil mixture must be relevant for the use of the product, homogeneous and, if prepared artificially, based on well-described substances. Enough soil for the whole test must be prepared in a single batch.
— For all-purpose cleaners and cleaning products for kitchens, only fat-removing effects shall be documented. For sanitary cleaners and window cleaners, both calcium and fat removing effects shall be documented.
— The washing procedure must reflect realistic use conditions and can be manual or by machinery.
— The assessment of cleanness must include testing and comparison of test product, reference product.
— Each product must be tested in at least five parallels (see documentation requirements). Additionally, one test must be performed with water only, i.e. without any cleaning agent.
— The quantity of soil applied to plates or another substrate must be the same for each plate or substrate-part, weighed in grams to one decimal point.
— The order of testing of the two products shall be randomised.
— The test must be capable of generating results that provide a measure of the cleanness (fat and calcium removing effects) according to the product tested. Cleanness can be measured visually, photometrically (e.g. measuring reflectance), gravimetrically or by means of another relevant method. The method of measurement, including a possible scoring system, must be decided in advance.
— Testing of fat and calcium removing effects may be done either separately or jointly.
— The dosages used for the test product and the reference product.
— Common application area(s) for the test and the reference product.
— Justification of the choice of the reference product with respect to its position on the market and its function.
— Type(s) of surface used in the test, their relevance and whether the products are gentle on the chosen surface(s).
— Description of the soil mixture used in the test, together with an argumentation for its relevance in relation to the testing of fitness for use.
— Description of the procedures for soiling, washing and measurement of cleaning performance.
— Calculation and statistical comparison procedures.
— All raw data used in the testing and calculations.
— For the test product to be considered to have fulfilled the performance requirements its results must be positive in 100 % of the test rounds. If the result is less than 100 % positive, five new parallel tests must be performed. Of these 10 parallel tests, 80 % must be positive.As an alternative the applicant may use statistical methods and demonstrate with a one-sided 95 % confidence range that the test product is as good as or better than the reference product in at least 80 % of the test rounds, if more than 10 parallel tests are made.
— How it is shown that the product tested has a better performance than that of pure water.
— For testing of consumer products, responses must be received from a minimum of 20 persons, randomly selected in the sales region and normally using the reference product
— For testing of professional products, responses must be received from at least five professional users, randomly selected in the sales region and normally using the reference product
— The test product and the reference product should be of the same product category. The reference products shall be the products normally used by the test persons.
— The dosages used must be the dose recommended by the manufacturer
— The test must be performed on the type(s) of surface relevant in relation to the recommendations on the label
— The test period must allow for at least five uses of the test product
— Effectiveness of all-purpose cleaners must be assessed by the following properties:—The ability of the products to remove soil—The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used — The ability of the products to remove soil — The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability of the products to remove soil
— The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability of the products to remove soil
— The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
— Effectiveness of sanitary cleaners must be assessed by the following properties:—The ability to remove fat-based soil—The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)—The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used — The ability to remove fat-based soil — The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens) — The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability to remove fat-based soil
— The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)
— The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The ability to remove fat-based soil
— The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)
— The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
— The test persons must reply to the question ‘How effective do you consider the test product to be compared to the product you normally use?’ — or equivalent. At least three possibilities for a response must be available, e.g. ‘poorer’, ‘as good as’ and ‘better’
— At least 80 % of the test persons must assess the product to be ‘as good as’ or ‘better’ than the reference product
— The selection of the test persons
— The information provided by the test persons and a summary describing how the testing was performed
— The type of surface(s) the product was tested on.
— For each test person, the following information must be available, e.g. in the form of answers to a questionnaire:—The dosage used by the test person—The name of the reference product—A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times—The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product — The dosage used by the test person — The name of the reference product — A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times — The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
— The dosage used by the test person
— The name of the reference product
— A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times
— The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
— The dosage used by the test person
— The name of the reference product
— A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times
— The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
— Calculation and documentation showing that at least 80 % of the test persons assess the product to be as good as or better than the reference product.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in goodtime before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/523/EC of 27 June 2001 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that detergent products for the routine cleaning of windows are to be regarded as all-purpose cleaners, rather than as products for more specific cleaning uses, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/523/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than twelve months for applicants whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be composed of the following three subgroups:
(a)
all-purpose cleaners comprising detergent products intended for the routine cleaning of floors, walls, ceilings, windows and other fixed surfaces, and which are dissolved or diluted in water prior to use. All purpose cleaners must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(b)
window cleaners comprising specific all-purpose cleaners intended for the routing cleaning of windows, and which are either diluted in water prior to use or used without dilution. All window cleaners must have water content ≤ 95 % (w/w).
(c)
cleaners for sanitary facilities comprising detergent products intended for the routine removal, including by scouring, of dirt and/or deposits in sanitary facilities, such as laundry rooms, bathrooms, showers, toilets and kitchens. All cleaners for sanitary facilities must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
The subgroup specified in point (c) of the first paragraph shall not include the following:
(a)
products which are automatically used when a toilet is flushed, such as ‘self-dosing-products’, including toilet blocks;
(b)
products for use in a toilet cistern;
(c)
products, which have no cleaning effects other than the removal of calcium carbonate (scale);
(d)
disinfectants.
The product group shall not cover products for more specific cleaning uses, such as oven cleaners, floor-strippers, polishes, drain cleaners, and so on.
The product group shall cover products for both private and professional use.

Article 2
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label, for all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a cleaner must fall within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 December 2008.

Article 4
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be 020.

Article 5
Decision 2001/523/EC is repealed.

Article 6
Eco-labels awarded before the notification date of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the notification date of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/523/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to the criteria, is to take place in goodtime before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/523/EC of 27 June 2001 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that detergent products for the routine cleaning of windows are to be regarded as all-purpose cleaners, rather than as products for more specific cleaning uses, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/523/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than twelve months for applicants whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be composed of the following three subgroups:
(a)
all-purpose cleaners comprising detergent products intended for the routine cleaning of floors, walls, ceilings, windows and other fixed surfaces, and which are dissolved or diluted in water prior to use. All purpose cleaners must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
(b)
window cleaners comprising specific all-purpose cleaners intended for the routing cleaning of windows, and which are either diluted in water prior to use or used without dilution. All window cleaners must have water content ≤ 95 % (w/w).
(c)
cleaners for sanitary facilities comprising detergent products intended for the routine removal, including by scouring, of dirt and/or deposits in sanitary facilities, such as laundry rooms, bathrooms, showers, toilets and kitchens. All cleaners for sanitary facilities must have water content ≤ 90 % (w/w).
The subgroup specified in point (c) of the first paragraph shall not include the following:
(a)
products which are automatically used when a toilet is flushed, such as ‘self-dosing-products’, including toilet blocks;
(b)
products for use in a toilet cistern;
(c)
products, which have no cleaning effects other than the removal of calcium carbonate (scale);
(d)
disinfectants.
The product group shall not cover products for more specific cleaning uses, such as oven cleaners, floor-strippers, polishes, drain cleaners, and so on.
The product group shall cover products for both private and professional use.
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label, for all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a cleaner must fall within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 December 2008.
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group ‘all purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ shall be 020.
Decision 2001/523/EC is repealed.
Eco-labels awarded before the notification date of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the notification date of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘all-purpose cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/523/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

The aims of the criteria

ANNEXFRAMEWORKIn order to qualify for the eco-label, an all purpose cleaner or a cleaner for sanitary facilities (hereinafter referred to as the product) must fall within the product group as defined in Article 1, and must comply with the criteria of this Annex.
These criteria aim at promoting:

— | the reduction of environmental impact by limiting the quantity of harmful ingredients, by reducing the quantity of detergent used and by reducing packaging waste,
— | the reduction or prevention of risks for the environment and for human health related to the use of hazardous substances,
— | information that will enable the consumer to use the product in the way that is efficient and minimises environmental impact.The criteria are set at levels that promote the labelling of all-purpose cleaners and sanitary cleaners that have a low environmental impact.
Assessment and verification requirementsThe specific assessment and verification requirements are indicated within each criterion.
Where appropriate, test methods other than those indicated for each criterion may be used if the competent body assessing the application accepts their equivalence.
Where possible, the testing should be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements of EN ISO 17025 or equivalent
Where no tests are mentioned, or are mentioned as being for use in verification or monitoring, competent bodies should rely as appropriate on declarations and documentation provided by the applicant and/or independent verifications.
Where appropriate, competent bodies may require supporting documentation and may carry out independent verifications.
Where the applicant is required to provide declarations, documentation, analyses test reports, or other evidence to show compliance with the criteria, it is understood that these may originate from the applicant and/or his supplier(s) and/or their supplier(s), et cetera, as appropriate.
Where ingredients are referred to, this includes substances and preparations.
Appendix I presents the new revised detergent ingredient database (DID list), version 30 June 2004, which contains the most widely used ingredients in detergent formulations. Part-A of the DID list shall be used for deriving the data for the calculations of CDVtoxand for the assessment of the biodegradability of surfactants.
Where appropriate, the applicant may use subsequent revisions of the Detergent Ingredient Database as they become available.
For ingredients which are not included in part-A of the DID list, the applicant shall, under his own responsibility, apply the procedure as described in part-B of the Appendix I.
For ingredients, which are not listed in the DID-list, the applicant may use an approach to provide the necessary documentation of anaerobic degradability described in Appendix II
The competent bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental management schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria in this Annex (Note: It is not required to implement such management schemes.)
FUNCTIONAL UNITFor all-purpose cleaners the functional unit (used in the criteria below) is the dosage in grams of the product recommended by the manufacturer for 1 litre of suds (washing water).
For window cleaners and cleaners for sanitary facilities, no functional unit is defined (the relevant criteria below being calculated in relation to 100 g of the product).
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA1. Toxicity to aquatic organismsThe critical dilution volume toxicity (CDVtox) is calculated for each ingredient (i) using the following equation:

CDV tox (ingredient i) = weight (i) x DF (i)/TF chronic (i) x 1000
where weight (i) is the weight of the ingredient (in grams) per functional unit (for all-purpose cleaners) or per 100 g of product (cleaners for sanitary facilities). DF (i) is the degradation factor and TF chronic (i) is the toxicity factor of the ingredient (in milligram/litre).
The values of DF and TF chronic shall be as given in the detergent ingredient database list-part A (DID list-part A) (Appendix I). If the ingredient in question is not included in the DID list-part A, the applicant shall estimate the values following the approach described in the DID list-part B (Appendix 1). The CDVtoxis summed for each ingredient, making the CDVtoxfor the product.
For all-purpose cleaners, the CDVtoxfor the product shall not exceed 20 000 l/functional unit.
For cleaners for sanitary facilities, the CDVtoxfor the product shall not exceed 100 000 l per 100 g product.
For window cleaners, the CDVtoxfor the product shall not exceed 5 000 l per 100 g product.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the competent body, together with the details of the CDVtoxcalculations showing compliance with this criterion.
2. Biodegradability of surfactants
(a) Ready biodegradability (aerobic)Each surfactant used in the product shall be readily biodegradable.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product as well as a description of the function of each ingredient shall be provided to the competent body. The DID list-part A (Appendix I) indicates whether a specific surfactant is aerobically biodegradable or not (the surfactants with an entry of ‘R’ in the column on aerobic biodegradability are readily biodegradable). For surfactants which are not included in the DID list-part A, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are aerobically biodegradable shall be provided. The tests for ready biodegradability shall be as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents(1). Surfactants shall be considered as readily biodegradable if the level of biodegradability (mineralisation) measured according to one of the five following tests is at least 60 % within 28 days: CO2headspace test (OECD 310), carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution modified Sturm test (OECD 301B; Council Directive 67/548/EEC(2)Annex V.C.4-C), closed bottle test (OECD 301D; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-E), manometric respirometry (OECD 301F; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-D), or MITI (I) test (OECD 301C; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-F), or their equivalent ISO tests. Depending on the physical characteristics of the surfactant, one of the following tests might be used to confirm ready biodegradability, if the level of biodegradability is at least 70 % within 28 days: dissolved organic carbon DOC die-away (OECD 301A; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-A) or modified OECD screening DOC die-away (OECD 301E; Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V.C.4-B), or their equivalent ISO tests. The applicability of test methods based on measurement of dissolved organic carbon needs to be appropriately justified as these methods could give results on the removal and not on the biodegradability. Pre-adaptation is not to be used in tests for aerobic ready biodegradability. The 10 days window principle shall not apply.
(b) Anaerobic biodegradabilityEach surfactant used in the product shall be biodegradable under anaerobic conditions.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product as well as a description of the function of each ingredient shall be provided to the competent body. The DID list-part A (Appendix I) indicates whether a specific surfactant is anaerobically biodegradable or not (the surfactants with an entry of ‘Y’ in the column on anaerobic biodegradability are biodegradable under anaerobic conditions). For surfactants which are not included in the DID list-part A, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are anaerobically biodegradable shall be provided. The reference test for anaerobic degradability shall be OECD 311, ISO 11734, ECETOC No 28 (June 1988) or an equivalent test method, with the requirement of a minimum of 60 % ultimate degradability under anaerobic conditions. Test methods simulating the conditions in a relevant anaerobic environment may also be used to document that 60 % ultimate degradability has been attained under anaerobic conditions (see Appendix II).
3. Dangerous, hazardous or toxic substances or preparations(a) The following ingredients shall not be included in the product, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation:
— | Alkyl phenol ethoxylates (APEOs) and derivatives thereof,
— | EDTA (ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetate) and its salts,
— | NTA (nitrilo-tri-acetate),
— | Nitromusks and polycyclic musks, including for example:—Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,—Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,—Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,—Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,—Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,—HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),—AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin). | — | Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene, | — | Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene, | — | Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan, | — | Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene, | — | Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone, | — | HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran), | — | AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
— | Musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,
— | Musk ambrette: 4-tert-butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,
— | Moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,
— | Musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,
— | Musk ketone: 4’-tert-butyl-2’,6’-dimethyl-3’,5’-dinitroacetaphenone,
— | HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran),
— | AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).Assessment and verification:the applicant shall provide a declaration supported by declarations from manufacturers of ingredients, as appropriate, confirming that the listed substances have not been included in the product.
(b) Quaternary ammonium salts that are not readily biodegradable shall not be used, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation.Assessment and verification:the applicant shall provide documentation showing the biodegradability of any quaternary ammonium salt used.
(c) No ingredient (substance or preparation) shall be included in the product that is classified, with any of the following risk phrases, or any combination thereof, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(3) and its amendments:
| R31 (contact with acid liberates toxic gas),
| R40 (limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect),
| R45 (may cause cancer),
| R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage),
| R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation),
| R68 (possible risks of irreversible effects)
| R50-53 (very toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
| R51-53 (toxic to aquatic organism and may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),
| R59 (dangerous to the ozone layer),
| R60 (may impair fertility),
| R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child),
| R62 (possible risk of impaired fertility),
| R63 (possible risk of harm to the unborn child),
| R64 (may cause harm to breastfed babies).Specific requirements are prescribed for biocides, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation (see criterion on biocides below).
The above requirements shall apply to each ingredient (substance or preparation) that exceeds 0,01 % by weight of the final product. This includes also each ingredient of any preparation used in the formulation that exceeds 0,01 % by weight of the final product.
Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all ingredients (whether substances or preparations). A declaration prepared by the manufacturer of ingredients and showing compliance with this criterion shall be provided by the applicant.
4. Biocides
(a) | The product may only include biocides in order to preserve the product, and in the appropriate dosage for this purpose alone. This does not refer to surfactants, which may also have biocidal properties.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets of any preservatives added shall be provided, together with information on their exact concentration in the product. The manufacturer or supplier of the preservatives shall provide information on the dosage necessary to preserve the product.
(b) | It is prohibited to claim or suggest on the packaging or by any other communication that the product has an antimicrobial action.Assessment and verification: the texts and layouts used on each type of packaging and/or an example of each different type of packaging shall be provided to the competent body.Biocides, either as part of the formulation or as part of any preparation included in the formulation, that are used to preserve the product and that are classified with R50-53 or R51-53 risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC, are permitted but only if they are not potentially bioaccumulative. In this context, a biocide is considered to be potentially bioaccumulative if the log Pow(log octanol/water partition coefficient) ≥3,0 (unless the experimentally determined BCF ≤100).The concentration of biocides in the final product shall not exceed the maximum authorised concentration in Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products and its subsequent amendments.Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all biocides, together with a documentation of the concentrations of the biocides in the final product.5. Dyes or colouring agentsAny dyes or colouring agents used in the product must be permitted by Council Directive 76/768/EEC relating to cosmetic products(4)and its subsequent amendments, or must be permitted by European Parliament and Council Directive 94/36/EC of 30 June 1994 on colours for use in foodstuffs(5)and its subsequent amendments, or must be characterised by environmental properties that do not imply classification with R50-53 or R51-53 risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments.
Assessment and verification:a declaration of compliance with this criterion shall be provided to the competent body, together with a full list of all dyes or colouring agents used.
6. Fragrances
(a) | The product shall not contain perfumes containing nitro-musks or polycyclic musks (as specified in the criterion 3(a).
(b) | Any ingredients added to the product as a fragrance must have been manufactured and/or handled in accordance with the code of practice of the International Fragrance Association.Assessment and verification:a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion shall be provided to the competent body.7. Sensitising substancesThe product shall not be classified with R42 (may cause sensitisation by inhalation) and/or R43 (may cause sensitisation by skin contact) risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 1999/45/EC and its amendments.
The concentration of any substance or ingredient classified with R42 (may cause sensitisation by inhalation) and/or R43 (may cause sensitisation by skin contact) risk phrases, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and its amendments or Directive 1999/45/EC and its amendments, shall not exceed 0,1 % by weight of the final product.
Assessment and verification:the exact concentrations of all ingredients that are classified as R42 and/or R43 shall be provided to the competent body, together with copies of the material safety data sheets.
8. Volatile organic compoundsThe product shall not contain more than 10 % (by weight) of volatile organic compounds with a boiling point lower than 150oC.
Assessment and verification:copies of the material safety data sheets of each organic solvent together with details of the calculations of the total volatile organic compounds with a boiling point lower than 150oC shall be provided by the applicant.
9. PhosphorusThe total quantity of elemental phosphorous in the product shall be calculated per functional unit (for all-purpose cleaners) or per 100 g of product (cleaners for sanitary facilities) taking into account all ingredients containing phosphorus (e.g. phosphates and phosphonates).
For all-purpose cleaners, the total phosphorus content (P) shall not exceed 0,02 g/functional unit.
For cleaners for sanitary facilities, the total phosphorus content (P) shall not exceed 1,0 g/100 g of product.
Ingredients used in window cleaning products must not contain phosphorus.
Assessment and verification:the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the competent body, together with the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.
10. Packaging requirements
(a) | Sprays containing propellants must not be used.
(b) | Plastic materials that are used for the main container shall be marked according to European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste(6), or DIN 6120 Parts 1 and 2 in connection with DIN 7728 part 1.
(c) | If the primary packaging is made of recycled material, any indication of this on the packaging shall be in conformity with the ISO 14021 standard ‘Environmental labels and declarations — Self declared claims (type II environmental labelling)’.
(d) | The primary packaging parts shall be easily separable into mono-material parts.Assessment and verification:data on the packaging, and/or a sample thereof if appropriate, shall be provided to the competent body, together with a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.FITNESS FOR USE11. Fitness for useThe product shall be fit for use, meeting the needs of the consumers.
The cleaning ability must be equivalent to or better than a market-leading or generic reference product (see Appendix III), approved by a competent body, as well as better than pure water.
For all-purpose cleaners and cleaning products for kitchens, only fat-removing effects must be documented. For sanitary cleaning products and window cleaners, both calcium and fat-removing effects must be documented.
Assessment and verification:the performance of the product must either be tested by:

— | an adequate and justifiable laboratory test, or
— | an adequate and justifiable consumer test.Both tests must be carried out and reported within specified parameters as stated in the framework described in Appendix III.
CONSUMER INFORMATION12. User instructions(a) Dosage instructionsFor all-purpose cleaners, an exact dosage recommendation shall appear on the packaging in a reasonably sufficient size and against a visible background. The use of a pictogram (such as a 5 1 tub and number of caps with ml) is recommended but voluntary.
In the case of a concentrated cleaner for sanitary facilities, it shall be clearly indicated on the packaging that only a small quantity of the product is needed compared to normal (i.e. diluted) products.
The following text (or equivalent text) shall appear on the packaging:
‘Proper dosage saves costs and minimises environmental impacts’.
(b) Safety adviceThe following safety advice (or equivalent text) shall appear on the product (in both text form and with an equivalent pictogram):
‘Keep away from children’
‘Do not mix different cleaners’
‘Avoid inhaling sprayed product’ (only for products that are packaged as sprays).
(c) Information and labelling of ingredientsRegulation (EC) No 648/2004 shall be applied.
(d) Information about the eco-labelThe following text (or equivalent text) shall appear on the packaging:
‘For more information visit the EU eco-label web-site: http://europa.eu.int/ecolabel’.
Assessment and verification:a sample of the product packaging, including the label, shall be provided to the competent body, together with a declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.
13. Information appearing on the eco-labelBox 2 of the eco-label shall contain the following text:

— | reduced impact on aquatic life,
— | reduced use of hazardous substances,
— | clear user instructions.14. Professional trainingFor detergents, which are used by professional users, the producer, its distributor or a third party shall offer training or training materials for cleaning staff. These shall include step-by-step instructions for proper dilution, use, disposal and the use of equipment.
Assessment and verification:a sample of training material containing step-by-step instructions for proper dilution, use, disposal and the use of equipment and a description of training courses shall be provided to the competent body.

(1)
OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 13.
(2) Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ L 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1).
(3) Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations (OJ L 200, 30.7.1999, p. 1).
(4)
OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169.
(5)
OJ L 237, 10.9.1994, p. 13.
(6)
OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10.

Pending: 32005D0341

4.5.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 115/1
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to those criteria, is to take place in good time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to reflect developments on the market, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/686/EC of 22 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco‐label to personal computers(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that servers are excluded, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/686/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 12 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
System Unit Display Keyboard Personal computer
Energy savings: system unit X X
Energy savings: monitor X X
Life-time extension: system unit X X
Life-time extension: monitor X X
Mercury content of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor X(where applicable) X(where applicable)
Noise X X
Electromagnetic emissions X X
Take-back and recycling X X(as applicable) X(as applicable) X(as applicable)
User instructions X X X(as applicable) X(as applicable)
(a) The computer system unit shall have an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) The computer system unit shall meet the Energy Star(1)configuration requirements that enable energy efficiency modes.The applicant shall provide a declaration to the competent body certifying that the personal computer system unit satisfies the configuration requirements (Guidelines) outlined in Energy Star.
(c) The computer shall support the ACPI(2)S3 sleep state (suspend to RAM) to allow minimum energy consumptions of no more than 4 watts. The computer shall be able to wake up from this mode in response to a command from any of the following:—modem,—network connection,—keyboard or mouse action.The default mode-change time from operation to the ACPI S3 sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the ACPI S3 mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode. — modem, — network connection, — keyboard or mouse action.
— modem,
— network connection,
— keyboard or mouse action.
— modem,
— network connection,
— keyboard or mouse action.
(d) The off-mode power consumption shall be no more than 2 watts. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the computer.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the off mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode.
(a) The monitor shall an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) The monitor shall have a sleep mode(3)power consumption of no more than 2 watts. The default mode-change time from operation to the sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.
(c) The monitor shall have an off-mode(4)power consumption of no more than 1 watt. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the monitor.
(d) Monitors shall not exceed the Energy Star Version 4 requirements for Tier 2, maximum active power consumption. Monitors must comply with the appropriate formula given below:i)if X < 1 then Y = 23ii)if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X(where X is the number of mega-pixels and Y the energy consumption in watts) i) if X < 1 then Y = 23 ii) if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
i) if X < 1 then Y = 23
ii) if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
i) if X < 1 then Y = 23
ii) if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
(a) The computer shall be designed so that the memory is readily accessible and can be changed.
(b) The computer shall be designed so that the hard disk, and if available the CD drive and/or DVD drive, can be changed.
(c) The computer shall be designed so that graphic cards are easily accessible and can be changed.
— 4,0 B(A) in the idle operating mode (equivalent to 40 dB(A))
— 4,5 B(A) when accessing a hard-disk drive (equivalent to 45 dB(A)).
(a) one qualified person alone shall be able to dismantle it;
(b) the manufacturer shall check the disassembly of the product and provide a disassembly report that shall be made available to third parties on request. Amongst other items, the report shall confirm that:—connections are easy to find and accessible,—connections are as standardised as possible,—connections are accessible with commonly available tools,—the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable; — connections are easy to find and accessible, — connections are as standardised as possible, — connections are accessible with commonly available tools, — the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
— connections are easy to find and accessible,
— connections are as standardised as possible,
— connections are accessible with commonly available tools,
— the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
— connections are easy to find and accessible,
— connections are as standardised as possible,
— connections are accessible with commonly available tools,
— the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
(c) hazardous materials shall be separable;
(d) 90 % (by weight) of the plastic and metal materials in the housing and chassis shall be technically recyclable;
(e) if labels are required, they shall be easily separable or inherent;
(f) plastic parts shall:—have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,—be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,—contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools; — have no lead or cadmium intentionally added, — be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint, — contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
— have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,
— be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,
— contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
— have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,
— be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,
— contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
(g) plastic parts shall not contain poly-brominated biphenyl (PBB) or poly-brominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants as listed in Article 4 to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5). This requirement shall take account of subsequent adaptations and amendments made to that Directive regarding the use of Deca-BDE.Plastic parts shall not contain chloroparaffin flame retardants with chain length 10‐17 carbon atoms and chlorine content greater than 50% by weight (CAS No 85535-84-8 and CAS No 85535-85-9).The applicant shall declare compliance with this requirement to the competent body;
(h) plastic parts heavier than 25 grams shall not contain flame retardant substances or preparations that are assigned at the time of applying for the ecolabel any of the risk phrases:Dangerous for health:R45 (may cause cancer)R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)R60 (may impair fertility)R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)Dangerous for the environment:R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)as defined in Council Directive 67/548/EEC(6); R45 (may cause cancer) R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage) R60 (may impair fertility) R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child) R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms) R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment) R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R45 (may cause cancer)
R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)
R60 (may impair fertility)
R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)
R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)
R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R45 (may cause cancer)
R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)
R60 (may impair fertility)
R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)
R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)
R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
(i) plastic parts shall have a permanent marking identifying the material, in conformity with ISO 11469: 2000. Excluded from this criterion are extruded plastic materials and the light-guide of flat panel displays;
(j) batteries shall not contain more than 0,0001 % of mercury, 0,001 % of cadmium or 0,01 % of lead by weight of the battery.
(a) recommendations for the use of the power management features, including information that disabling these features can lead to higher consumption of energy and thus can increase the running costs;
(b) information that the energy drawn from the mains can be reduced to zero if the computer is unplugged or if the wall socket is switched off;
(c) information on the availability of spare parts. When it is appropriate for the consumer to upgrade or exchange components, information on the proper procedures shall be given;
(d) information about the fact that the product has been designed to enable proper reuse of parts and recycling and should not be thrown away;
(e) advice on how the consumer can make use of the manufacturer's take-back offer;
(f) information as to how to make appropriate use of WLAN cards thus minimizing security risks;
(g) information that the product has been awarded the Community eco-label with a brief explanation as to what this means together with an indication that more information on the eco-label can be found at the website address(http://europa.eu.int/ecolabel).
(a) all packaging components shall be easily separable by hand into individual materials to facilitate recycling.
(b) where used, cardboard packaging shall consist of at least 80 % recycled material.
— reduced energy consumption,
— designed to facilitate recycling,
— reduced noise level.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to those criteria, is to take place in good time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to reflect developments on the market, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/686/EC of 22 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco‐label to personal computers(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that servers are excluded, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/686/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 12 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘personal computers’ shall comprise computers designed for use in a fixed location, such as on a desk, and consisting of a system unit and display, whether or not combined in a single case, as well as a keyboard.
That product group shall also cover system units, keyboards and displays designed for use with personal computers.
The product group shall not cover servers.

Article 2
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label for personal computers, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, an appliance must fall within the product group ‘personal computers’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘personal computers’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 30 April 2009.

Article 4
For administrative purposes, the code number assigned to the product group ‘personal computers’ shall be ‘013’.

Article 5
Decision 2001/686/EC is repealed.

Article 6
Eco-labels awarded before the date of notification of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the date of notification of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/686/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to those criteria, is to take place in good time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to reflect developments on the market, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/686/EC of 22 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco‐label to personal computers(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that servers are excluded, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/686/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 12 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘personal computers’ shall comprise computers designed for use in a fixed location, such as on a desk, and consisting of a system unit and display, whether or not combined in a single case, as well as a keyboard.
That product group shall also cover system units, keyboards and displays designed for use with personal computers.
The product group shall not cover servers.
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label for personal computers, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, an appliance must fall within the product group ‘personal computers’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘personal computers’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 30 April 2009.
For administrative purposes, the code number assigned to the product group ‘personal computers’ shall be ‘013’.
Decision 2001/686/EC is repealed.
Eco-labels awarded before the date of notification of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the date of notification of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/686/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

FRAMEWORK

ANNEX
| System Unit | Display | Keyboard | Personal computer
Energy savings: system unit | X | | | X
Energy savings: monitor | | X | | X
Life-time extension: system unit | X | | | X
Life-time extension: monitor | | X | | X
Mercury content of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor | | X(where applicable) | | X(where applicable)
Noise | X | | | X
Electromagnetic emissions | | X | | X
Take-back and recycling | X | X(as applicable) | X(as applicable) | X(as applicable)
User instructions | X | X | X(as applicable) | X(as applicable)Tests shall be carried out on application as indicated in the criteria, and shall be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements expressed in standard EN ISO 17025. Where appropriate, other test methods may be used if their equivalence is accepted by the competent body assessing the application. Where no tests are mentioned, or are mentioned as being for use in verification or monitoring, competent bodies should rely as appropriate on declarations and documentation provided by the applicant and/or independent verifications.
The competent bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental management schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria in this Annex. (Note: it is not required to implement such management schemes.)
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA1. Energy savingsSystem unit
(a) | The computer system unit shall have an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) | The computer system unit shall meet the Energy Star(1)configuration requirements that enable energy efficiency modes.The applicant shall provide a declaration to the competent body certifying that the personal computer system unit satisfies the configuration requirements (Guidelines) outlined in Energy Star.
(c) | The computer shall support the ACPI(2)S3 sleep state (suspend to RAM) to allow minimum energy consumptions of no more than 4 watts. The computer shall be able to wake up from this mode in response to a command from any of the following:—modem,—network connection,—keyboard or mouse action.The default mode-change time from operation to the ACPI S3 sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the ACPI S3 mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode. | — | modem, | — | network connection, | — | keyboard or mouse action.
— | modem,
— | network connection,
— | keyboard or mouse action.
(d) | The off-mode power consumption shall be no more than 2 watts. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the computer.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the off mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode.Monitor
(a) | The monitor shall an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) | The monitor shall have a sleep mode(3)power consumption of no more than 2 watts. The default mode-change time from operation to the sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.
(c) | The monitor shall have an off-mode(4)power consumption of no more than 1 watt. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the monitor.
(d) | Monitors shall not exceed the Energy Star Version 4 requirements for Tier 2, maximum active power consumption. Monitors must comply with the appropriate formula given below:i)if X < 1 then Y = 23ii)if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X(where X is the number of mega-pixels and Y the energy consumption in watts) | i) | if X < 1 then Y = 23 | ii) | if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
i) | if X < 1 then Y = 23
ii) | if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28XThe applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the levels of power consumption in off-, sleep-, and on-modes have been measured using the procedure in the Energy Star Programme Requirements for Computer Monitors (Version 4.0). The report shall state the measured power consumptions in all three modes.
2. Lifetime extension
(a) | The computer shall be designed so that the memory is readily accessible and can be changed.
(b) | The computer shall be designed so that the hard disk, and if available the CD drive and/or DVD drive, can be changed.
(c) | The computer shall be designed so that graphic cards are easily accessible and can be changed.The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements to the competent body.
3. Mercury content of a liquid crystal display (LCD) monitorThe background lighting of the LCD monitor shall not contain more than 3 mg of mercury on average per lamp.
The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements to the competent body.
4. NoiseThe ‘Declared A-weighted Sound Power Level’ (re l pW) of the personal computer system unit, according to paragraph 3.2.5 of ISO 9296, shall not exceed:

— | 4,0 B(A) in the idle operating mode (equivalent to 40 dB(A))
— | 4,5 B(A) when accessing a hard-disk drive (equivalent to 45 dB(A)).The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report, prepared by an independent test laboratory accredited to ISO 17025, certifying that the levels of noise emissions have been measured in accordance with ISO 7779 and declared in accordance with ISO 9296. The report shall state the measured levels of noise emissions in both the idle operating mode and when accessing a disk drive, which shall be declared in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5 of ISO 9296.
5. Electromagnetic emissionsThe personal computer monitor shall meet the requirements set out in EN50279, Category A.
The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report showing that the monitor’s emissions are compliant with the requirement.
6. Take-back, recycling and hazardous substancesThe manufacturer shall offer free of charge the take-back for refurbishment or recycling of the product, and for any component being replaced, except for items contaminated by users (e.g. in medical or nuclear applications). In addition, the product shall meet the following criteria:

(a) | one qualified person alone shall be able to dismantle it;
(b) | the manufacturer shall check the disassembly of the product and provide a disassembly report that shall be made available to third parties on request. Amongst other items, the report shall confirm that:—connections are easy to find and accessible,—connections are as standardised as possible,—connections are accessible with commonly available tools,—the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable; | — | connections are easy to find and accessible, | — | connections are as standardised as possible, | — | connections are accessible with commonly available tools, | — | the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
— | connections are easy to find and accessible,
— | connections are as standardised as possible,
— | connections are accessible with commonly available tools,
— | the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
(c) | hazardous materials shall be separable;
(d) | 90 % (by weight) of the plastic and metal materials in the housing and chassis shall be technically recyclable;
(e) | if labels are required, they shall be easily separable or inherent;
(f) | plastic parts shall:—have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,—be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,—contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools; | — | have no lead or cadmium intentionally added, | — | be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint, | — | contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
— | have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,
— | be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,
— | contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
(g) | plastic parts shall not contain poly-brominated biphenyl (PBB) or poly-brominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants as listed in Article 4 to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5). This requirement shall take account of subsequent adaptations and amendments made to that Directive regarding the use of Deca-BDE.Plastic parts shall not contain chloroparaffin flame retardants with chain length 10‐17 carbon atoms and chlorine content greater than 50% by weight (CAS No 85535-84-8 and CAS No 85535-85-9).The applicant shall declare compliance with this requirement to the competent body;
(h) | plastic parts heavier than 25 grams shall not contain flame retardant substances or preparations that are assigned at the time of applying for the ecolabel any of the risk phrases:Dangerous for health:R45 (may cause cancer)R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)R60 (may impair fertility)R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)Dangerous for the environment:R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)as defined in Council Directive 67/548/EEC(6); | | R45 (may cause cancer) | | R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage) | | R60 (may impair fertility) | | R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child) | | R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms) | | R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment) | | R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
| R45 (may cause cancer)
| R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)
| R60 (may impair fertility)
| R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)
| R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)
| R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
| R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
(i) | plastic parts shall have a permanent marking identifying the material, in conformity with ISO 11469: 2000. Excluded from this criterion are extruded plastic materials and the light-guide of flat panel displays;
(j) | batteries shall not contain more than 0,0001 % of mercury, 0,001 % of cadmium or 0,01 % of lead by weight of the battery.The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements and shall provide to the competent body assessing the application a copy of the disassembly report.
With reference to criterion 6(h), the flame retardants that are used, if any, shall not have been assigned any of the above risk phrases nor shall they be named in Annex 1 to Directive 67/548/EEC or its subsequent amendments regarding the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. This requirement does not apply to flame retardants that on application change their chemical nature to no longer warrant classification under any of the R-phrases listed above, and where less than 0,1 % of the flame retardant in the treated part remains in the form as before application. Any flame retardants that are used in plastic parts >25g must be specified in the application documentation by giving their name and CAS number.
7. User instructionsThe product shall be sold with relevant user information, which provides advice on its proper environmental use and, in particular:

(a) | recommendations for the use of the power management features, including information that disabling these features can lead to higher consumption of energy and thus can increase the running costs;
(b) | information that the energy drawn from the mains can be reduced to zero if the computer is unplugged or if the wall socket is switched off;
(c) | information on the availability of spare parts. When it is appropriate for the consumer to upgrade or exchange components, information on the proper procedures shall be given;
(d) | information about the fact that the product has been designed to enable proper reuse of parts and recycling and should not be thrown away;
(e) | advice on how the consumer can make use of the manufacturer’s take-back offer;
(f) | information as to how to make appropriate use of WLAN cards thus minimizing security risks;
(g) | information that the product has been awarded the Community eco-label with a brief explanation as to what this means together with an indication that more information on the eco-label can be found at the website address(http://europa.eu.int/ecolabel).The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements, and shall provide a copy of the instruction manual to the competent body assessing the application.
8. PackagingPackaging shall meet the following requirements:

(a) | all packaging components shall be easily separable by hand into individual materials to facilitate recycling.
(b) | where used, cardboard packaging shall consist of at least 80 % recycled material.Assessment and verification: The applicant shall declare compliance with the requirement and provide a sample(s) of the packaging to the awarding competent body as part of the application.
9. Information appearing on the eco-labelBox 2 of the eco-label shall include the following text:

— | reduced energy consumption,
— | designed to facilitate recycling,
— | reduced noise level.The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with this requirement, and shall provide a copy of the eco-label as it will appear on the packaging and/or product and/or accompanying documentation to the competent body.

(1) As defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and are in operation as at September 2004. See web site: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=computers.pr_crit_computers.
(2) Advanced configuration and power interface.
(3) As defined for monitors in Energy Star Version 4. See web site:http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=computers.pr_crit_computers
(4)
Ibidem.

(5)
OJ L 37, 13.2.2003, p. 19.
(6)
OJ L 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1.

Pending: 32005D0341

4.5.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 115/1
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to those criteria, is to take place in good time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to reflect developments on the market, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/686/EC of 22 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco‐label to personal computers(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that servers are excluded, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/686/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 12 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
System Unit Display Keyboard Personal computer
Energy savings: system unit X X
Energy savings: monitor X X
Life-time extension: system unit X X
Life-time extension: monitor X X
Mercury content of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor X(where applicable) X(where applicable)
Noise X X
Electromagnetic emissions X X
Take-back and recycling X X(as applicable) X(as applicable) X(as applicable)
User instructions X X X(as applicable) X(as applicable)
(a) The computer system unit shall have an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) The computer system unit shall meet the Energy Star(1)configuration requirements that enable energy efficiency modes.The applicant shall provide a declaration to the competent body certifying that the personal computer system unit satisfies the configuration requirements (Guidelines) outlined in Energy Star.
(c) The computer shall support the ACPI(2)S3 sleep state (suspend to RAM) to allow minimum energy consumptions of no more than 4 watts. The computer shall be able to wake up from this mode in response to a command from any of the following:—modem,—network connection,—keyboard or mouse action.The default mode-change time from operation to the ACPI S3 sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the ACPI S3 mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode. — modem, — network connection, — keyboard or mouse action.
— modem,
— network connection,
— keyboard or mouse action.
— modem,
— network connection,
— keyboard or mouse action.
(d) The off-mode power consumption shall be no more than 2 watts. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the computer.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the off mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode.
(a) The monitor shall an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) The monitor shall have a sleep mode(3)power consumption of no more than 2 watts. The default mode-change time from operation to the sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.
(c) The monitor shall have an off-mode(4)power consumption of no more than 1 watt. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the monitor.
(d) Monitors shall not exceed the Energy Star Version 4 requirements for Tier 2, maximum active power consumption. Monitors must comply with the appropriate formula given below:i)if X < 1 then Y = 23ii)if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X(where X is the number of mega-pixels and Y the energy consumption in watts) i) if X < 1 then Y = 23 ii) if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
i) if X < 1 then Y = 23
ii) if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
i) if X < 1 then Y = 23
ii) if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
(a) The computer shall be designed so that the memory is readily accessible and can be changed.
(b) The computer shall be designed so that the hard disk, and if available the CD drive and/or DVD drive, can be changed.
(c) The computer shall be designed so that graphic cards are easily accessible and can be changed.
— 4,0 B(A) in the idle operating mode (equivalent to 40 dB(A))
— 4,5 B(A) when accessing a hard-disk drive (equivalent to 45 dB(A)).
(a) one qualified person alone shall be able to dismantle it;
(b) the manufacturer shall check the disassembly of the product and provide a disassembly report that shall be made available to third parties on request. Amongst other items, the report shall confirm that:—connections are easy to find and accessible,—connections are as standardised as possible,—connections are accessible with commonly available tools,—the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable; — connections are easy to find and accessible, — connections are as standardised as possible, — connections are accessible with commonly available tools, — the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
— connections are easy to find and accessible,
— connections are as standardised as possible,
— connections are accessible with commonly available tools,
— the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
— connections are easy to find and accessible,
— connections are as standardised as possible,
— connections are accessible with commonly available tools,
— the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
(c) hazardous materials shall be separable;
(d) 90 % (by weight) of the plastic and metal materials in the housing and chassis shall be technically recyclable;
(e) if labels are required, they shall be easily separable or inherent;
(f) plastic parts shall:—have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,—be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,—contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools; — have no lead or cadmium intentionally added, — be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint, — contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
— have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,
— be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,
— contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
— have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,
— be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,
— contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
(g) plastic parts shall not contain poly-brominated biphenyl (PBB) or poly-brominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants as listed in Article 4 to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5). This requirement shall take account of subsequent adaptations and amendments made to that Directive regarding the use of Deca-BDE.Plastic parts shall not contain chloroparaffin flame retardants with chain length 10‐17 carbon atoms and chlorine content greater than 50% by weight (CAS No 85535-84-8 and CAS No 85535-85-9).The applicant shall declare compliance with this requirement to the competent body;
(h) plastic parts heavier than 25 grams shall not contain flame retardant substances or preparations that are assigned at the time of applying for the ecolabel any of the risk phrases:Dangerous for health:R45 (may cause cancer)R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)R60 (may impair fertility)R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)Dangerous for the environment:R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)as defined in Council Directive 67/548/EEC(6); R45 (may cause cancer) R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage) R60 (may impair fertility) R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child) R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms) R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment) R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R45 (may cause cancer)
R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)
R60 (may impair fertility)
R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)
R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)
R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R45 (may cause cancer)
R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)
R60 (may impair fertility)
R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)
R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)
R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
(i) plastic parts shall have a permanent marking identifying the material, in conformity with ISO 11469: 2000. Excluded from this criterion are extruded plastic materials and the light-guide of flat panel displays;
(j) batteries shall not contain more than 0,0001 % of mercury, 0,001 % of cadmium or 0,01 % of lead by weight of the battery.
(a) recommendations for the use of the power management features, including information that disabling these features can lead to higher consumption of energy and thus can increase the running costs;
(b) information that the energy drawn from the mains can be reduced to zero if the computer is unplugged or if the wall socket is switched off;
(c) information on the availability of spare parts. When it is appropriate for the consumer to upgrade or exchange components, information on the proper procedures shall be given;
(d) information about the fact that the product has been designed to enable proper reuse of parts and recycling and should not be thrown away;
(e) advice on how the consumer can make use of the manufacturer's take-back offer;
(f) information as to how to make appropriate use of WLAN cards thus minimizing security risks;
(g) information that the product has been awarded the Community eco-label with a brief explanation as to what this means together with an indication that more information on the eco-label can be found at the website address(http://europa.eu.int/ecolabel).
(a) all packaging components shall be easily separable by hand into individual materials to facilitate recycling.
(b) where used, cardboard packaging shall consist of at least 80 % recycled material.
— reduced energy consumption,
— designed to facilitate recycling,
— reduced noise level.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to those criteria, is to take place in good time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to reflect developments on the market, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/686/EC of 22 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco‐label to personal computers(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that servers are excluded, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/686/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 12 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The product group ‘personal computers’ shall comprise computers designed for use in a fixed location, such as on a desk, and consisting of a system unit and display, whether or not combined in a single case, as well as a keyboard.
That product group shall also cover system units, keyboards and displays designed for use with personal computers.
The product group shall not cover servers.

Article 2
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label for personal computers, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, an appliance must fall within the product group ‘personal computers’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘personal computers’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 30 April 2009.

Article 4
For administrative purposes, the code number assigned to the product group ‘personal computers’ shall be ‘013’.

Article 5
Decision 2001/686/EC is repealed.

Article 6
Eco-labels awarded before the date of notification of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the date of notification of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/686/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,
After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,
(1) Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, the Community eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing characteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific eco-label criteria, drawn up on the basis of the criteria drafted by the European Union Eco-Labelling Board, are to be established according to product groups.
(3) It also provides that the review of eco-label criteria, as well as of the assessment and verification requirements related to those criteria, is to take place in good time before the end of the period of validity of the criteria specified for the product group concerned.
(4) It is appropriate, in order to reflect developments on the market, to revise the ecological criteria established by Commission Decision 2001/686/EC of 22 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco‐label to personal computers(2).
(5) Furthermore, in order to specify that servers are excluded, it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group laid down in that Decision.
(6) In the interests of clarity, Decision 2001/686/EC should therefore be replaced.
(7) The revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
(8) It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 12 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before the date of notification of this Decision or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The product group ‘personal computers’ shall comprise computers designed for use in a fixed location, such as on a desk, and consisting of a system unit and display, whether or not combined in a single case, as well as a keyboard.
That product group shall also cover system units, keyboards and displays designed for use with personal computers.
The product group shall not cover servers.
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label for personal computers, under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, an appliance must fall within the product group ‘personal computers’ and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.
The ecological criteria for the product group ‘personal computers’, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 30 April 2009.
For administrative purposes, the code number assigned to the product group ‘personal computers’ shall be ‘013’.
Decision 2001/686/EC is repealed.
Eco-labels awarded before the date of notification of this Decision in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’ may continue to be used until 31 March 2006.
Where applications have been submitted before the date of notification of this Decision for award of the eco-label in respect of products falling within the product group ‘personal computers’, those products may be awarded the eco-label under the conditions laid down in Decision 2001/686/EC. In such cases the eco-label may be used until 31 March 2006.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

FRAMEWORK

ANNEX
| System Unit | Display | Keyboard | Personal computer
Energy savings: system unit | X | | | X
Energy savings: monitor | | X | | X
Life-time extension: system unit | X | | | X
Life-time extension: monitor | | X | | X
Mercury content of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor | | X(where applicable) | | X(where applicable)
Noise | X | | | X
Electromagnetic emissions | | X | | X
Take-back and recycling | X | X(as applicable) | X(as applicable) | X(as applicable)
User instructions | X | X | X(as applicable) | X(as applicable)Tests shall be carried out on application as indicated in the criteria, and shall be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements expressed in standard EN ISO 17025. Where appropriate, other test methods may be used if their equivalence is accepted by the competent body assessing the application. Where no tests are mentioned, or are mentioned as being for use in verification or monitoring, competent bodies should rely as appropriate on declarations and documentation provided by the applicant and/or independent verifications.
The competent bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental management schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria in this Annex. (Note: it is not required to implement such management schemes.)
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA1. Energy savingsSystem unit
(a) | The computer system unit shall have an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) | The computer system unit shall meet the Energy Star(1)configuration requirements that enable energy efficiency modes.The applicant shall provide a declaration to the competent body certifying that the personal computer system unit satisfies the configuration requirements (Guidelines) outlined in Energy Star.
(c) | The computer shall support the ACPI(2)S3 sleep state (suspend to RAM) to allow minimum energy consumptions of no more than 4 watts. The computer shall be able to wake up from this mode in response to a command from any of the following:—modem,—network connection,—keyboard or mouse action.The default mode-change time from operation to the ACPI S3 sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the ACPI S3 mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode. | — | modem, | — | network connection, | — | keyboard or mouse action.
— | modem,
— | network connection,
— | keyboard or mouse action.
(d) | The off-mode power consumption shall be no more than 2 watts. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the computer.The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the level of power consumption in the off mode has been measured using the procedure in the current Energy Star computer memorandum of understanding. The report shall state the measured power consumption in this mode.Monitor
(a) | The monitor shall an easily accessible on-off switch.
(b) | The monitor shall have a sleep mode(3)power consumption of no more than 2 watts. The default mode-change time from operation to the sleep state shall be no more than 30 minutes of inactivity. The manufacturer must enable this feature, but the user may disable it.
(c) | The monitor shall have an off-mode(4)power consumption of no more than 1 watt. In this context, the off-mode is the state initiated through the command to shut down the monitor.
(d) | Monitors shall not exceed the Energy Star Version 4 requirements for Tier 2, maximum active power consumption. Monitors must comply with the appropriate formula given below:i)if X < 1 then Y = 23ii)if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X(where X is the number of mega-pixels and Y the energy consumption in watts) | i) | if X < 1 then Y = 23 | ii) | if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28X
i) | if X < 1 then Y = 23
ii) | if X ≥ 1 then Y = 28XThe applicant shall provide the competent body with a report certifying that the levels of power consumption in off-, sleep-, and on-modes have been measured using the procedure in the Energy Star Programme Requirements for Computer Monitors (Version 4.0). The report shall state the measured power consumptions in all three modes.
2. Lifetime extension
(a) | The computer shall be designed so that the memory is readily accessible and can be changed.
(b) | The computer shall be designed so that the hard disk, and if available the CD drive and/or DVD drive, can be changed.
(c) | The computer shall be designed so that graphic cards are easily accessible and can be changed.The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements to the competent body.
3. Mercury content of a liquid crystal display (LCD) monitorThe background lighting of the LCD monitor shall not contain more than 3 mg of mercury on average per lamp.
The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements to the competent body.
4. NoiseThe ‘Declared A-weighted Sound Power Level’ (re l pW) of the personal computer system unit, according to paragraph 3.2.5 of ISO 9296, shall not exceed:

— | 4,0 B(A) in the idle operating mode (equivalent to 40 dB(A))
— | 4,5 B(A) when accessing a hard-disk drive (equivalent to 45 dB(A)).The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report, prepared by an independent test laboratory accredited to ISO 17025, certifying that the levels of noise emissions have been measured in accordance with ISO 7779 and declared in accordance with ISO 9296. The report shall state the measured levels of noise emissions in both the idle operating mode and when accessing a disk drive, which shall be declared in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5 of ISO 9296.
5. Electromagnetic emissionsThe personal computer monitor shall meet the requirements set out in EN50279, Category A.
The applicant shall provide the competent body with a report showing that the monitor’s emissions are compliant with the requirement.
6. Take-back, recycling and hazardous substancesThe manufacturer shall offer free of charge the take-back for refurbishment or recycling of the product, and for any component being replaced, except for items contaminated by users (e.g. in medical or nuclear applications). In addition, the product shall meet the following criteria:

(a) | one qualified person alone shall be able to dismantle it;
(b) | the manufacturer shall check the disassembly of the product and provide a disassembly report that shall be made available to third parties on request. Amongst other items, the report shall confirm that:—connections are easy to find and accessible,—connections are as standardised as possible,—connections are accessible with commonly available tools,—the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable; | — | connections are easy to find and accessible, | — | connections are as standardised as possible, | — | connections are accessible with commonly available tools, | — | the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
— | connections are easy to find and accessible,
— | connections are as standardised as possible,
— | connections are accessible with commonly available tools,
— | the background lighting lamps of LCD monitors are easily separable;
(c) | hazardous materials shall be separable;
(d) | 90 % (by weight) of the plastic and metal materials in the housing and chassis shall be technically recyclable;
(e) | if labels are required, they shall be easily separable or inherent;
(f) | plastic parts shall:—have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,—be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,—contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools; | — | have no lead or cadmium intentionally added, | — | be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint, | — | contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
— | have no lead or cadmium intentionally added,
— | be of one polymer or compatible polymers, except for the cover, which shall consist of no more than two types of polymers which are separable and uncoated with, for example, paint,
— | contain no metal inlays that cannot be separated by a single person using simple tools;
(g) | plastic parts shall not contain poly-brominated biphenyl (PBB) or poly-brominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants as listed in Article 4 to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5). This requirement shall take account of subsequent adaptations and amendments made to that Directive regarding the use of Deca-BDE.Plastic parts shall not contain chloroparaffin flame retardants with chain length 10‐17 carbon atoms and chlorine content greater than 50% by weight (CAS No 85535-84-8 and CAS No 85535-85-9).The applicant shall declare compliance with this requirement to the competent body;
(h) | plastic parts heavier than 25 grams shall not contain flame retardant substances or preparations that are assigned at the time of applying for the ecolabel any of the risk phrases:Dangerous for health:R45 (may cause cancer)R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)R60 (may impair fertility)R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)Dangerous for the environment:R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)as defined in Council Directive 67/548/EEC(6); | | R45 (may cause cancer) | | R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage) | | R60 (may impair fertility) | | R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child) | | R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms) | | R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment) | | R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
| R45 (may cause cancer)
| R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)
| R60 (may impair fertility)
| R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)
| R50 (very toxic to aquatic organisms)
| R50/R53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
| R51/R53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment)
(i) | plastic parts shall have a permanent marking identifying the material, in conformity with ISO 11469: 2000. Excluded from this criterion are extruded plastic materials and the light-guide of flat panel displays;
(j) | batteries shall not contain more than 0,0001 % of mercury, 0,001 % of cadmium or 0,01 % of lead by weight of the battery.The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements and shall provide to the competent body assessing the application a copy of the disassembly report.
With reference to criterion 6(h), the flame retardants that are used, if any, shall not have been assigned any of the above risk phrases nor shall they be named in Annex 1 to Directive 67/548/EEC or its subsequent amendments regarding the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. This requirement does not apply to flame retardants that on application change their chemical nature to no longer warrant classification under any of the R-phrases listed above, and where less than 0,1 % of the flame retardant in the treated part remains in the form as before application. Any flame retardants that are used in plastic parts >25g must be specified in the application documentation by giving their name and CAS number.
7. User instructionsThe product shall be sold with relevant user information, which provides advice on its proper environmental use and, in particular:

(a) | recommendations for the use of the power management features, including information that disabling these features can lead to higher consumption of energy and thus can increase the running costs;
(b) | information that the energy drawn from the mains can be reduced to zero if the computer is unplugged or if the wall socket is switched off;
(c) | information on the availability of spare parts. When it is appropriate for the consumer to upgrade or exchange components, information on the proper procedures shall be given;
(d) | information about the fact that the product has been designed to enable proper reuse of parts and recycling and should not be thrown away;
(e) | advice on how the consumer can make use of the manufacturer’s take-back offer;
(f) | information as to how to make appropriate use of WLAN cards thus minimizing security risks;
(g) | information that the product has been awarded the Community eco-label with a brief explanation as to what this means together with an indication that more information on the eco-label can be found at the website address(http://europa.eu.int/ecolabel).The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements, and shall provide a copy of the instruction manual to the competent body assessing the application.
8. PackagingPackaging shall meet the following requirements:

(a) | all packaging components shall be easily separable by hand into individual materials to facilitate recycling.
(b) | where used, cardboard packaging shall consist of at least 80 % recycled material.Assessment and verification: The applicant shall declare compliance with the requirement and provide a sample(s) of the packaging to the awarding competent body as part of the application.
9. Information appearing on the eco-labelBox 2 of the eco-label shall include the following text:

— | reduced energy consumption,
— | designed to facilitate recycling,
— | reduced noise level.The applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with this requirement, and shall provide a copy of the eco-label as it will appear on the packaging and/or product and/or accompanying documentation to the competent body.

(1) As defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and are in operation as at September 2004. See web site: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=computers.pr_crit_computers.
(2) Advanced configuration and power interface.
(3) As defined for monitors in Energy Star Version 4. See web site:http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=computers.pr_crit_computers
(4)
Ibidem.

(5)
OJ L 37, 13.2.2003, p. 19.
(6)
OJ L 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1.

Pending: 32005D0056

27.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 24/35
(1) Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to set up executive agencies in accordance with the general statute laid down by that Regulation and to entrust them with certain management tasks relating to one or more Community programmes; this decision does not affect the scope of that Regulation.
(2) The purpose of empowering the Commission to set up executive agencies is to allow it to focus on core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, or ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by the said executive agencies.
(3) Management of certain centralised strands of a number of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture involves implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and requires a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
(4) The delegation, to an executive agency, of tasks related to programme implementation is possible with a clear separation between, on the one hand, the project programming stages and the adoption of funding decisions, which should be carried out by the Commission, and, on the other hand, project implementation, which should be entrusted to the executive agency.
(5) The setting up of the executive agency affects neither the delegation by the Council to the Commission of the management of certain phases of action under the different programmes nor the delegation of management tasks to national agencies regarding certain programmes.
(6) A cost-benefit analysis carried out for that purpose has shown that using an executive agency to manage certain centralised strands of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture is the most advantageous of the options available, both in financial and in non-financial terms.
(7) The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies.
(8) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 of 21 September 2004 establishes a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(2),
(a) the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education ‘Socrates’ approved by Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3);
(b) the second phase of the Community vocational training action programme ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ approved by Council Decision 1999/382/EC(4);
(c) the ‘Youth’ Community action programme approved by Decision No 1031/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5);
(d) the ‘Culture 2000’ programme approved by Decision No 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6);
(e) the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus — Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001 to 2005) approved by Council Decision 2000/821/EC(7);
(f) the training programme for professionals of the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001 to 2005) approved by Decision No 163/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8);
(g) the programme for the enhancement of quality in higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries (Erasmus Mundus) approved by Decision No 2317/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(9);
(h) the multiannual programme (2004 to 2006) for the effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (e-Learning) approved by Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(i) the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), approved by Council Decision 2004/100/EC(11);
(j) the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of youth, approved by Decision No 790/2004/EC of the European Parliament and the Council(12);
(k) the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and support specific activities in the field of education and training, approved by Decision No 791/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13);
(l) the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture, approved by Decision No 792/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(14);
(m) projects in the field of higher education which could be funded under the provisions on aid for economic cooperation with the developing countries in Asia, approved under Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92(15).
(a) managing, throughout their duration, the projects entrusted to it in the context of implementation of Community programmes, on the basis of the annual work programme which serves as a funding decision with regard to grants and contracts in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture and is adopted by the Commission, or on the basis of specific funding decisions adopted by the Commission, and the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
(b) adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, some or all of the operations necessary for the management of the Community programmes and, in particular, those linked to the award of grants and contracts;
(c) gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide the implementation of the Community programmes.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,
(1) Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to set up executive agencies in accordance with the general statute laid down by that Regulation and to entrust them with certain management tasks relating to one or more Community programmes; this decision does not affect the scope of that Regulation.
(2) The purpose of empowering the Commission to set up executive agencies is to allow it to focus on core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, or ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by the said executive agencies.
(3) Management of certain centralised strands of a number of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture involves implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and requires a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
(4) The delegation, to an executive agency, of tasks related to programme implementation is possible with a clear separation between, on the one hand, the project programming stages and the adoption of funding decisions, which should be carried out by the Commission, and, on the other hand, project implementation, which should be entrusted to the executive agency.
(5) The setting up of the executive agency affects neither the delegation by the Council to the Commission of the management of certain phases of action under the different programmes nor the delegation of management tasks to national agencies regarding certain programmes.
(6) A cost-benefit analysis carried out for that purpose has shown that using an executive agency to manage certain centralised strands of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture is the most advantageous of the options available, both in financial and in non-financial terms.
(7) The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies.
(8) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 of 21 September 2004 establishes a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(2),
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Establishment of the Agency
Article 1
1. An executive agency (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) for the management of Community action in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, the statute and main operating rules of which are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, is hereby established.
2. The name of the Agency shall be the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.

Location
Article 2
The Agency shall be located in Brussels.

Term
Article 3
1. The Agency is established for a period beginning on 1 January 2005 and ending on 31 December 2008.
2. An evaluation of the operation of the Agency, including a cost-benefit analysis as referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, shall be drawn up by the Commission in 2006, with a view to the possible revision or extension of the tasks of the Agency in the framework of the new generation of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture.

Objectives and tasks
Article 4
1. The Agency shall be responsible for the management of certain strands of the following Community programmes:
(a)
the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education ‘Socrates’ approved by Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3);
(b)
the second phase of the Community vocational training action programme ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ approved by Council Decision 1999/382/EC(4);
(c)
the ‘Youth’ Community action programme approved by Decision No 1031/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5);
(d)
the ‘Culture 2000’ programme approved by Decision No 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6);
(e)
the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus — Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001 to 2005) approved by Council Decision 2000/821/EC(7);
(f)
the training programme for professionals of the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001 to 2005) approved by Decision No 163/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8);
(g)
the programme for the enhancement of quality in higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries (Erasmus Mundus) approved by Decision No 2317/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(9);
(h)
the multiannual programme (2004 to 2006) for the effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (e-Learning) approved by Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(i)
the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), approved by Council Decision 2004/100/EC(11);
(j)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of youth, approved by Decision No 790/2004/EC of the European Parliament and the Council(12);
(k)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and support specific activities in the field of education and training, approved by Decision No 791/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13);
(l)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture, approved by Decision No 792/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(14);
(m)
projects in the field of higher education which could be funded under the provisions on aid for economic cooperation with the developing countries in Asia, approved under Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92(15).
2. The Agency shall be responsible for the following tasks for the management of the Community programme strands referred to in paragraph 1:
(a)
managing, throughout their duration, the projects entrusted to it in the context of implementation of Community programmes, on the basis of the annual work programme which serves as a funding decision with regard to grants and contracts in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture and is adopted by the Commission, or on the basis of specific funding decisions adopted by the Commission, and the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
(b)
adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, some or all of the operations necessary for the management of the Community programmes and, in particular, those linked to the award of grants and contracts;
(c)
gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide the implementation of the Community programmes.
3. The Agency may be empowered by the Commission, after receiving the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies established under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, to carry out tasks of the same type under Community programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, other than those referred to in paragraph 1.
4. The Commission decision delegating authority to the Agency shall set out in detail all the tasks entrusted to it and shall be amended should any additional tasks be entrusted to the Agency. It shall be forwarded, for information purposes, to the Committee for Executive Agencies.

Organisational structure
Article 5
1. The Agency shall be managed by a Steering Committee and a Director appointed by the Commission.
2. The members of the Steering Committee shall be appointed for two years.
3. The Director of the Agency shall be appointed for four years.

Grants
Article 6
The Agency shall receive a grant entered in the general budget of the European Union and taken from the funds allocated to the programmes referred to in Article 4(1) and, where appropriate, from the funds allocated to other Community programmes the implementation of which has been entrusted to the Agency by virtue of Article 4(3).

Supervision and reporting requirement
Article 7
The Agency shall be subject to supervision by the Commission and shall report regularly on progress in implementing the programmes for which it is responsible in accordance with the arrangements and at the intervals stipulated in the instrument of delegation.

Implementation of the operating budget
Article 8
The Agency shall implement its operating budget in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,
(1) Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to set up executive agencies in accordance with the general statute laid down by that Regulation and to entrust them with certain management tasks relating to one or more Community programmes; this decision does not affect the scope of that Regulation.
(2) The purpose of empowering the Commission to set up executive agencies is to allow it to focus on core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, or ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by the said executive agencies.
(3) Management of certain centralised strands of a number of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture involves implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and requires a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
(4) The delegation, to an executive agency, of tasks related to programme implementation is possible with a clear separation between, on the one hand, the project programming stages and the adoption of funding decisions, which should be carried out by the Commission, and, on the other hand, project implementation, which should be entrusted to the executive agency.
(5) The setting up of the executive agency affects neither the delegation by the Council to the Commission of the management of certain phases of action under the different programmes nor the delegation of management tasks to national agencies regarding certain programmes.
(6) A cost-benefit analysis carried out for that purpose has shown that using an executive agency to manage certain centralised strands of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture is the most advantageous of the options available, both in financial and in non-financial terms.
(7) The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies.
(8) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 of 21 September 2004 establishes a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(2),
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Establishment of the Agency

1. An executive agency (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) for the management of Community action in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, the statute and main operating rules of which are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, is hereby established.
2. The name of the Agency shall be the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.

Location

The Agency shall be located in Brussels.

Term

1. The Agency is established for a period beginning on 1 January 2005 and ending on 31 December 2008.
2. An evaluation of the operation of the Agency, including a cost-benefit analysis as referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, shall be drawn up by the Commission in 2006, with a view to the possible revision or extension of the tasks of the Agency in the framework of the new generation of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture.

Objectives and tasks

1. The Agency shall be responsible for the management of certain strands of the following Community programmes:
(a)
the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education ‘Socrates’ approved by Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3);
(b)
the second phase of the Community vocational training action programme ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ approved by Council Decision 1999/382/EC(4);
(c)
the ‘Youth’ Community action programme approved by Decision No 1031/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5);
(d)
the ‘Culture 2000’ programme approved by Decision No 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6);
(e)
the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus — Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001 to 2005) approved by Council Decision 2000/821/EC(7);
(f)
the training programme for professionals of the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001 to 2005) approved by Decision No 163/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8);
(g)
the programme for the enhancement of quality in higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries (Erasmus Mundus) approved by Decision No 2317/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(9);
(h)
the multiannual programme (2004 to 2006) for the effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (e-Learning) approved by Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(i)
the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), approved by Council Decision 2004/100/EC(11);
(j)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of youth, approved by Decision No 790/2004/EC of the European Parliament and the Council(12);
(k)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and support specific activities in the field of education and training, approved by Decision No 791/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13);
(l)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture, approved by Decision No 792/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(14);
(m)
projects in the field of higher education which could be funded under the provisions on aid for economic cooperation with the developing countries in Asia, approved under Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92(15).
2. The Agency shall be responsible for the following tasks for the management of the Community programme strands referred to in paragraph 1:
(a)
managing, throughout their duration, the projects entrusted to it in the context of implementation of Community programmes, on the basis of the annual work programme which serves as a funding decision with regard to grants and contracts in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture and is adopted by the Commission, or on the basis of specific funding decisions adopted by the Commission, and the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
(b)
adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, some or all of the operations necessary for the management of the Community programmes and, in particular, those linked to the award of grants and contracts;
(c)
gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide the implementation of the Community programmes.
3. The Agency may be empowered by the Commission, after receiving the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies established under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, to carry out tasks of the same type under Community programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, other than those referred to in paragraph 1.
4. The Commission decision delegating authority to the Agency shall set out in detail all the tasks entrusted to it and shall be amended should any additional tasks be entrusted to the Agency. It shall be forwarded, for information purposes, to the Committee for Executive Agencies.

Organisational structure

1. The Agency shall be managed by a Steering Committee and a Director appointed by the Commission.
2. The members of the Steering Committee shall be appointed for two years.
3. The Director of the Agency shall be appointed for four years.

Grants

The Agency shall receive a grant entered in the general budget of the European Union and taken from the funds allocated to the programmes referred to in Article 4(1) and, where appropriate, from the funds allocated to other Community programmes the implementation of which has been entrusted to the Agency by virtue of Article 4(3).

Supervision and reporting requirement

The Agency shall be subject to supervision by the Commission and shall report regularly on progress in implementing the programmes for which it is responsible in accordance with the arrangements and at the intervals stipulated in the instrument of delegation.

Implementation of the operating budget

The Agency shall implement its operating budget in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004.

Pending: 32005D0056

27.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 24/35
(1) Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to set up executive agencies in accordance with the general statute laid down by that Regulation and to entrust them with certain management tasks relating to one or more Community programmes; this decision does not affect the scope of that Regulation.
(2) The purpose of empowering the Commission to set up executive agencies is to allow it to focus on core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, or ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by the said executive agencies.
(3) Management of certain centralised strands of a number of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture involves implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and requires a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
(4) The delegation, to an executive agency, of tasks related to programme implementation is possible with a clear separation between, on the one hand, the project programming stages and the adoption of funding decisions, which should be carried out by the Commission, and, on the other hand, project implementation, which should be entrusted to the executive agency.
(5) The setting up of the executive agency affects neither the delegation by the Council to the Commission of the management of certain phases of action under the different programmes nor the delegation of management tasks to national agencies regarding certain programmes.
(6) A cost-benefit analysis carried out for that purpose has shown that using an executive agency to manage certain centralised strands of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture is the most advantageous of the options available, both in financial and in non-financial terms.
(7) The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies.
(8) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 of 21 September 2004 establishes a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(2),
(a) the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education ‘Socrates’ approved by Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3);
(b) the second phase of the Community vocational training action programme ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ approved by Council Decision 1999/382/EC(4);
(c) the ‘Youth’ Community action programme approved by Decision No 1031/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5);
(d) the ‘Culture 2000’ programme approved by Decision No 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6);
(e) the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus — Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001 to 2005) approved by Council Decision 2000/821/EC(7);
(f) the training programme for professionals of the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001 to 2005) approved by Decision No 163/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8);
(g) the programme for the enhancement of quality in higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries (Erasmus Mundus) approved by Decision No 2317/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(9);
(h) the multiannual programme (2004 to 2006) for the effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (e-Learning) approved by Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(i) the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), approved by Council Decision 2004/100/EC(11);
(j) the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of youth, approved by Decision No 790/2004/EC of the European Parliament and the Council(12);
(k) the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and support specific activities in the field of education and training, approved by Decision No 791/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13);
(l) the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture, approved by Decision No 792/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(14);
(m) projects in the field of higher education which could be funded under the provisions on aid for economic cooperation with the developing countries in Asia, approved under Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92(15).
(a) managing, throughout their duration, the projects entrusted to it in the context of implementation of Community programmes, on the basis of the annual work programme which serves as a funding decision with regard to grants and contracts in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture and is adopted by the Commission, or on the basis of specific funding decisions adopted by the Commission, and the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
(b) adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, some or all of the operations necessary for the management of the Community programmes and, in particular, those linked to the award of grants and contracts;
(c) gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide the implementation of the Community programmes.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,
(1) Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to set up executive agencies in accordance with the general statute laid down by that Regulation and to entrust them with certain management tasks relating to one or more Community programmes; this decision does not affect the scope of that Regulation.
(2) The purpose of empowering the Commission to set up executive agencies is to allow it to focus on core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, or ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by the said executive agencies.
(3) Management of certain centralised strands of a number of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture involves implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and requires a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
(4) The delegation, to an executive agency, of tasks related to programme implementation is possible with a clear separation between, on the one hand, the project programming stages and the adoption of funding decisions, which should be carried out by the Commission, and, on the other hand, project implementation, which should be entrusted to the executive agency.
(5) The setting up of the executive agency affects neither the delegation by the Council to the Commission of the management of certain phases of action under the different programmes nor the delegation of management tasks to national agencies regarding certain programmes.
(6) A cost-benefit analysis carried out for that purpose has shown that using an executive agency to manage certain centralised strands of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture is the most advantageous of the options available, both in financial and in non-financial terms.
(7) The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies.
(8) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 of 21 September 2004 establishes a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(2),
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Establishment of the Agency
Article 1
1. An executive agency (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) for the management of Community action in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, the statute and main operating rules of which are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, is hereby established.
2. The name of the Agency shall be the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.

Location
Article 2
The Agency shall be located in Brussels.

Term
Article 3
1. The Agency is established for a period beginning on 1 January 2005 and ending on 31 December 2008.
2. An evaluation of the operation of the Agency, including a cost-benefit analysis as referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, shall be drawn up by the Commission in 2006, with a view to the possible revision or extension of the tasks of the Agency in the framework of the new generation of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture.

Objectives and tasks
Article 4
1. The Agency shall be responsible for the management of certain strands of the following Community programmes:
(a)
the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education ‘Socrates’ approved by Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3);
(b)
the second phase of the Community vocational training action programme ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ approved by Council Decision 1999/382/EC(4);
(c)
the ‘Youth’ Community action programme approved by Decision No 1031/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5);
(d)
the ‘Culture 2000’ programme approved by Decision No 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6);
(e)
the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus — Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001 to 2005) approved by Council Decision 2000/821/EC(7);
(f)
the training programme for professionals of the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001 to 2005) approved by Decision No 163/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8);
(g)
the programme for the enhancement of quality in higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries (Erasmus Mundus) approved by Decision No 2317/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(9);
(h)
the multiannual programme (2004 to 2006) for the effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (e-Learning) approved by Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(i)
the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), approved by Council Decision 2004/100/EC(11);
(j)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of youth, approved by Decision No 790/2004/EC of the European Parliament and the Council(12);
(k)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and support specific activities in the field of education and training, approved by Decision No 791/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13);
(l)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture, approved by Decision No 792/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(14);
(m)
projects in the field of higher education which could be funded under the provisions on aid for economic cooperation with the developing countries in Asia, approved under Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92(15).
2. The Agency shall be responsible for the following tasks for the management of the Community programme strands referred to in paragraph 1:
(a)
managing, throughout their duration, the projects entrusted to it in the context of implementation of Community programmes, on the basis of the annual work programme which serves as a funding decision with regard to grants and contracts in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture and is adopted by the Commission, or on the basis of specific funding decisions adopted by the Commission, and the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
(b)
adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, some or all of the operations necessary for the management of the Community programmes and, in particular, those linked to the award of grants and contracts;
(c)
gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide the implementation of the Community programmes.
3. The Agency may be empowered by the Commission, after receiving the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies established under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, to carry out tasks of the same type under Community programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, other than those referred to in paragraph 1.
4. The Commission decision delegating authority to the Agency shall set out in detail all the tasks entrusted to it and shall be amended should any additional tasks be entrusted to the Agency. It shall be forwarded, for information purposes, to the Committee for Executive Agencies.

Organisational structure
Article 5
1. The Agency shall be managed by a Steering Committee and a Director appointed by the Commission.
2. The members of the Steering Committee shall be appointed for two years.
3. The Director of the Agency shall be appointed for four years.

Grants
Article 6
The Agency shall receive a grant entered in the general budget of the European Union and taken from the funds allocated to the programmes referred to in Article 4(1) and, where appropriate, from the funds allocated to other Community programmes the implementation of which has been entrusted to the Agency by virtue of Article 4(3).

Supervision and reporting requirement
Article 7
The Agency shall be subject to supervision by the Commission and shall report regularly on progress in implementing the programmes for which it is responsible in accordance with the arrangements and at the intervals stipulated in the instrument of delegation.

Implementation of the operating budget
Article 8
The Agency shall implement its operating budget in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,
(1) Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to set up executive agencies in accordance with the general statute laid down by that Regulation and to entrust them with certain management tasks relating to one or more Community programmes; this decision does not affect the scope of that Regulation.
(2) The purpose of empowering the Commission to set up executive agencies is to allow it to focus on core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, or ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by the said executive agencies.
(3) Management of certain centralised strands of a number of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture involves implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and requires a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
(4) The delegation, to an executive agency, of tasks related to programme implementation is possible with a clear separation between, on the one hand, the project programming stages and the adoption of funding decisions, which should be carried out by the Commission, and, on the other hand, project implementation, which should be entrusted to the executive agency.
(5) The setting up of the executive agency affects neither the delegation by the Council to the Commission of the management of certain phases of action under the different programmes nor the delegation of management tasks to national agencies regarding certain programmes.
(6) A cost-benefit analysis carried out for that purpose has shown that using an executive agency to manage certain centralised strands of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture is the most advantageous of the options available, both in financial and in non-financial terms.
(7) The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies.
(8) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 of 21 September 2004 establishes a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes(2),
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Establishment of the Agency

1. An executive agency (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) for the management of Community action in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, the statute and main operating rules of which are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, is hereby established.
2. The name of the Agency shall be the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.

Location

The Agency shall be located in Brussels.

Term

1. The Agency is established for a period beginning on 1 January 2005 and ending on 31 December 2008.
2. An evaluation of the operation of the Agency, including a cost-benefit analysis as referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, shall be drawn up by the Commission in 2006, with a view to the possible revision or extension of the tasks of the Agency in the framework of the new generation of programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture.

Objectives and tasks

1. The Agency shall be responsible for the management of certain strands of the following Community programmes:
(a)
the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education ‘Socrates’ approved by Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(3);
(b)
the second phase of the Community vocational training action programme ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ approved by Council Decision 1999/382/EC(4);
(c)
the ‘Youth’ Community action programme approved by Decision No 1031/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(5);
(d)
the ‘Culture 2000’ programme approved by Decision No 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(6);
(e)
the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus — Development, Distribution and Promotion) (2001 to 2005) approved by Council Decision 2000/821/EC(7);
(f)
the training programme for professionals of the European audiovisual programme industry (MEDIA-Training) (2001 to 2005) approved by Decision No 163/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(8);
(g)
the programme for the enhancement of quality in higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries (Erasmus Mundus) approved by Decision No 2317/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(9);
(h)
the multiannual programme (2004 to 2006) for the effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (e-Learning) approved by Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(10);
(i)
the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), approved by Council Decision 2004/100/EC(11);
(j)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of youth, approved by Decision No 790/2004/EC of the European Parliament and the Council(12);
(k)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level and support specific activities in the field of education and training, approved by Decision No 791/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(13);
(l)
the Community action programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture, approved by Decision No 792/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(14);
(m)
projects in the field of higher education which could be funded under the provisions on aid for economic cooperation with the developing countries in Asia, approved under Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92(15).
2. The Agency shall be responsible for the following tasks for the management of the Community programme strands referred to in paragraph 1:
(a)
managing, throughout their duration, the projects entrusted to it in the context of implementation of Community programmes, on the basis of the annual work programme which serves as a funding decision with regard to grants and contracts in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture and is adopted by the Commission, or on the basis of specific funding decisions adopted by the Commission, and the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
(b)
adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, some or all of the operations necessary for the management of the Community programmes and, in particular, those linked to the award of grants and contracts;
(c)
gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide the implementation of the Community programmes.
3. The Agency may be empowered by the Commission, after receiving the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies established under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, to carry out tasks of the same type under Community programmes in the fields of education, audiovisual and culture, within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, other than those referred to in paragraph 1.
4. The Commission decision delegating authority to the Agency shall set out in detail all the tasks entrusted to it and shall be amended should any additional tasks be entrusted to the Agency. It shall be forwarded, for information purposes, to the Committee for Executive Agencies.

Organisational structure

1. The Agency shall be managed by a Steering Committee and a Director appointed by the Commission.
2. The members of the Steering Committee shall be appointed for two years.
3. The Director of the Agency shall be appointed for four years.

Grants

The Agency shall receive a grant entered in the general budget of the European Union and taken from the funds allocated to the programmes referred to in Article 4(1) and, where appropriate, from the funds allocated to other Community programmes the implementation of which has been entrusted to the Agency by virtue of Article 4(3).

Supervision and reporting requirement

The Agency shall be subject to supervision by the Commission and shall report regularly on progress in implementing the programmes for which it is responsible in accordance with the arrangements and at the intervals stipulated in the instrument of delegation.

Implementation of the operating budget

The Agency shall implement its operating budget in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004.

Pending: 32004D0450

Avis juridique important|32004D0450Décision 2004/450/CE de la Commission du 29 avril 2004 établissant les prescriptions communes applicables au contenu des demandes de financement communautaire pour l

Pending: 32004D0450

Avis juridique important|32004D0450Décision 2004/450/CE de la Commission du 29 avril 2004 établissant les prescriptions communes applicables au contenu des demandes de financement communautaire pour l

Pending: 32003D0071

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC(2), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,Whereas:(1) The occurrence of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in the Faroe Islands, led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2000/574/EC of 14 September 2000 on certain protective measures in respect of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in salmonids in the Faroe Islands(4), as last amended by Decision 2002/110/EC(5). The measures include a ban on imports into the Community of live salmon and stringent conditions for the importation of certain products for human consumption. Those measures apply until 1 February 2003.(2) Despite the measures undertaken by the Faroe Islands, further outbreaks of ISA were notified by that state in 2002, and a rapid eradication of that disease cannot therefore be envisaged.(3) The International Office of Epizootic Diseases (IOE), has given an opinion stating that there is no evidence of vertical transmission of ISA virus.(4) On the basis of the opinion of the IOE, and the experience and practice of Member States and third countries affected by ISA, it has not been demonstrated that it is necessary to retain the protective measures provided for in Decision 2000/574/EC relating to eggs and gametes of the family Salmonidae coming from a farm in the Faroe Islands that is not under animal health restrictions due to a suspicion or an outbreak of infectious salmon anaemia, and it is thus appropriate to replace the measures by those contained in this Decision and Decision 2000/574/EC should accordingly be repealed.(5) In light of the disease situation in the Faroe Islands, the protective measures contained in this Decision should remain applicable until February 2004.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

Article 1
Live fish, eggs and gametes belonging to the family Salmonidae
1. Member States shall prohibit imports of live fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.
2. Member States shall prohibit imports of live eggs of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands, unless they have been disinfected twice, both at the green egg stage and the eyed egg stage, and subject to the consignments being accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex I of this Decision.
3. Member States shall authorise the import of live gametes of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.

Article 2
Conditions for the import of non-processed slaughtered fish belonging to the family Salmonidae for human consumption
Member States shall authorise import of slaughtered Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), sea trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) originating in the Faroe Islands provided that they are eviscerated, or when they are non-eviscerated, provided that the consignments are accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex II of this Decision.

Article 3
Derogation for scientific purposes
By way of derogation, Member States may allow the importation into their territory of samples of the animals and products covered by the present Decision for scientific purposes.

Article 4
Decision 2000/574/EC is repealed.

Article 5
The Member States shall amend the measures they apply in trade in order to bring them into conformity with this Decision. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

Article 6
This Decision shall apply from 3 February 2003 until 1 February 2004.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 January 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.
(4) OJ L 240, 23.9.2000, p. 26.
(5) OJ L 40, 12.2.2002, p. 13.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC(2), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,Whereas:(1) The occurrence of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in the Faroe Islands, led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2000/574/EC of 14 September 2000 on certain protective measures in respect of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in salmonids in the Faroe Islands(4), as last amended by Decision 2002/110/EC(5). The measures include a ban on imports into the Community of live salmon and stringent conditions for the importation of certain products for human consumption. Those measures apply until 1 February 2003.(2) Despite the measures undertaken by the Faroe Islands, further outbreaks of ISA were notified by that state in 2002, and a rapid eradication of that disease cannot therefore be envisaged.(3) The International Office of Epizootic Diseases (IOE), has given an opinion stating that there is no evidence of vertical transmission of ISA virus.(4) On the basis of the opinion of the IOE, and the experience and practice of Member States and third countries affected by ISA, it has not been demonstrated that it is necessary to retain the protective measures provided for in Decision 2000/574/EC relating to eggs and gametes of the family Salmonidae coming from a farm in the Faroe Islands that is not under animal health restrictions due to a suspicion or an outbreak of infectious salmon anaemia, and it is thus appropriate to replace the measures by those contained in this Decision and Decision 2000/574/EC should accordingly be repealed.(5) In light of the disease situation in the Faroe Islands, the protective measures contained in this Decision should remain applicable until February 2004.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Live fish, eggs and gametes belonging to the family Salmonidae
1. Member States shall prohibit imports of live fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.
2. Member States shall prohibit imports of live eggs of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands, unless they have been disinfected twice, both at the green egg stage and the eyed egg stage, and subject to the consignments being accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex I of this Decision.
3. Member States shall authorise the import of live gametes of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.
Conditions for the import of non-processed slaughtered fish belonging to the family Salmonidae for human consumption
Member States shall authorise import of slaughtered Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), sea trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) originating in the Faroe Islands provided that they are eviscerated, or when they are non-eviscerated, provided that the consignments are accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex II of this Decision.
Derogation for scientific purposes
By way of derogation, Member States may allow the importation into their territory of samples of the animals and products covered by the present Decision for scientific purposes.
Decision 2000/574/EC is repealed.
The Member States shall amend the measures they apply in trade in order to bring them into conformity with this Decision. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision shall apply from 3 February 2003 until 1 February 2004.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 January 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.
(4) OJ L 240, 23.9.2000, p. 26.
(5) OJ L 40, 12.2.2002, p. 13.
>PIC FILE= “L_2003026EN.008202.TIF”>
>PIC FILE= “L_2003026EN.008302.TIF”>

Pending: 32003D0071

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC(2), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,Whereas:(1) The occurrence of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in the Faroe Islands, led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2000/574/EC of 14 September 2000 on certain protective measures in respect of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in salmonids in the Faroe Islands(4), as last amended by Decision 2002/110/EC(5). The measures include a ban on imports into the Community of live salmon and stringent conditions for the importation of certain products for human consumption. Those measures apply until 1 February 2003.(2) Despite the measures undertaken by the Faroe Islands, further outbreaks of ISA were notified by that state in 2002, and a rapid eradication of that disease cannot therefore be envisaged.(3) The International Office of Epizootic Diseases (IOE), has given an opinion stating that there is no evidence of vertical transmission of ISA virus.(4) On the basis of the opinion of the IOE, and the experience and practice of Member States and third countries affected by ISA, it has not been demonstrated that it is necessary to retain the protective measures provided for in Decision 2000/574/EC relating to eggs and gametes of the family Salmonidae coming from a farm in the Faroe Islands that is not under animal health restrictions due to a suspicion or an outbreak of infectious salmon anaemia, and it is thus appropriate to replace the measures by those contained in this Decision and Decision 2000/574/EC should accordingly be repealed.(5) In light of the disease situation in the Faroe Islands, the protective measures contained in this Decision should remain applicable until February 2004.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

Article 1
Live fish, eggs and gametes belonging to the family Salmonidae
1. Member States shall prohibit imports of live fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.
2. Member States shall prohibit imports of live eggs of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands, unless they have been disinfected twice, both at the green egg stage and the eyed egg stage, and subject to the consignments being accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex I of this Decision.
3. Member States shall authorise the import of live gametes of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.

Article 2
Conditions for the import of non-processed slaughtered fish belonging to the family Salmonidae for human consumption
Member States shall authorise import of slaughtered Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), sea trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) originating in the Faroe Islands provided that they are eviscerated, or when they are non-eviscerated, provided that the consignments are accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex II of this Decision.

Article 3
Derogation for scientific purposes
By way of derogation, Member States may allow the importation into their territory of samples of the animals and products covered by the present Decision for scientific purposes.

Article 4
Decision 2000/574/EC is repealed.

Article 5
The Member States shall amend the measures they apply in trade in order to bring them into conformity with this Decision. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

Article 6
This Decision shall apply from 3 February 2003 until 1 February 2004.

Article 7
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 January 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.
(4) OJ L 240, 23.9.2000, p. 26.
(5) OJ L 40, 12.2.2002, p. 13.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC(2), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,Whereas:(1) The occurrence of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in the Faroe Islands, led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2000/574/EC of 14 September 2000 on certain protective measures in respect of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in salmonids in the Faroe Islands(4), as last amended by Decision 2002/110/EC(5). The measures include a ban on imports into the Community of live salmon and stringent conditions for the importation of certain products for human consumption. Those measures apply until 1 February 2003.(2) Despite the measures undertaken by the Faroe Islands, further outbreaks of ISA were notified by that state in 2002, and a rapid eradication of that disease cannot therefore be envisaged.(3) The International Office of Epizootic Diseases (IOE), has given an opinion stating that there is no evidence of vertical transmission of ISA virus.(4) On the basis of the opinion of the IOE, and the experience and practice of Member States and third countries affected by ISA, it has not been demonstrated that it is necessary to retain the protective measures provided for in Decision 2000/574/EC relating to eggs and gametes of the family Salmonidae coming from a farm in the Faroe Islands that is not under animal health restrictions due to a suspicion or an outbreak of infectious salmon anaemia, and it is thus appropriate to replace the measures by those contained in this Decision and Decision 2000/574/EC should accordingly be repealed.(5) In light of the disease situation in the Faroe Islands, the protective measures contained in this Decision should remain applicable until February 2004.(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Live fish, eggs and gametes belonging to the family Salmonidae
1. Member States shall prohibit imports of live fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.
2. Member States shall prohibit imports of live eggs of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands, unless they have been disinfected twice, both at the green egg stage and the eyed egg stage, and subject to the consignments being accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex I of this Decision.
3. Member States shall authorise the import of live gametes of fish belonging to the family Salmonidae originating in the Faroe Islands.
Conditions for the import of non-processed slaughtered fish belonging to the family Salmonidae for human consumption
Member States shall authorise import of slaughtered Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), sea trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) originating in the Faroe Islands provided that they are eviscerated, or when they are non-eviscerated, provided that the consignments are accompanied by a certificate in accordance with the model laid down in Annex II of this Decision.
Derogation for scientific purposes
By way of derogation, Member States may allow the importation into their territory of samples of the animals and products covered by the present Decision for scientific purposes.
Decision 2000/574/EC is repealed.
The Member States shall amend the measures they apply in trade in order to bring them into conformity with this Decision. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision shall apply from 3 February 2003 until 1 February 2004.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 January 2003.
For the Commission
David Byrne
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.
(4) OJ L 240, 23.9.2000, p. 26.
(5) OJ L 40, 12.2.2002, p. 13.
>PIC FILE= “L_2003026EN.008202.TIF”>
>PIC FILE= “L_2003026EN.008302.TIF”>