Pending: 31994D0766

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Taiwan to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of Taiwan legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the Bureau of Commodity Inspection and Quarantine (BCIQ), the competent authority in Taiwan, is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products, giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the BCIQ to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the BCIQ to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the BCIQ has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Bureau of Commodity Inspection and Quarantine (BCIQ) is recognized as the competent authority in Taiwan for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Taiwan must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model set out in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Taiwan’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. The certificate referred to in point 1 of Article 2 must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the BCIQ and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the other indications on the certificate.

Article 4
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 1995.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 November 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Taiwan to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of Taiwan legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the Bureau of Commodity Inspection and Quarantine (BCIQ), the competent authority in Taiwan, is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products, giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the BCIQ to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the BCIQ to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the BCIQ has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Bureau of Commodity Inspection and Quarantine (BCIQ) is recognized as the competent authority in Taiwan for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Taiwan must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model set out in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Taiwan’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1. The certificate referred to in point 1 of Article 2 must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the BCIQ and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the other indications on the certificate.
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 1995.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 November 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery or aquaculture products originating in Taiwan and intended for export to the European Community with the exception of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in any form
Reference No:
Country of dispatch: Taiwan
Competent authority: Bureau of Commodity Inspection and Quarantine (BCIQ)
I. Details identifying the products
Description of fishery or aquaculture product (1):
– species (scientific name):
– presentation of product (2) and type of treatment:
Code number (where available):
Type of packaging:
Number of packages:
Net weight:
Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s) approved by the BCIQ for exports to the Community:
III. Destination of products
The fishery or aquaculture products (1) are dispatched:
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
IV. Health attestation
The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery and aquaculture products specified above:
1. where caught and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto.
Official seal
Signature of official inspector
(name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
(1) Delete where inapplicable.
(2) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, etc.
LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS “” ID=”1″>7F30003> ID=”2″>Fa Tai Frozen Food> ID=”3″>No 3, Shin-iu 4th Road,> ID=”4″>30. 6. 1995″> ID=”2″>Works Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Chien-chen Dist., Kaohsiung,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30058> ID=”2″>Union Development Frozen> ID=”3″>No 5, Tung Lin Road,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Foods Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Hsiao Kang Dist., Kaohsiung,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>2F00001> ID=”2″>Tong Ho Foods> ID=”3″>67-4 Chung Fu Road, Wu Chieh> ID=”4″>30. 6. 1995″> ID=”2″>Industrial Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Hsiang, E-Lan Hsien,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30048> ID=”2″>Luxe Enterprise> ID=”3″>No 88 Sec. 2 Pei Ning Road,> ID=”4″>30. 6. 1995″> ID=”2″>Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Nei Pu Hsiang, Ping-tung Hsien,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30062> ID=”2″>Shin Ho Sing Ocean> ID=”3″>No 31 Fishing Harbour South> ID=”4″>30. 6. 1995″> ID=”2″>Enterprise Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>1st Road, Chien Chen District,”> ID=”3″>Kaohsiung, Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30074> ID=”2″>Sanwa Frozen Food> ID=”3″>No 131, Yen Ping Road,> ID=”4″>30. 6. 1995″> ID=”2″>Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Neipu Hsiang, Pingtung Hsien,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30076> ID=”2″>Ho Kee Frozen Food> ID=”3″>No 26 Jong Heng Street,> ID=”4″>30. 6. 1995″> ID=”2″>Factory Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Hsiao Kang District, Kaohsiung,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>2F30040> ID=”2″>L’s Izumi Frozen Food> ID=”3″>No 7 Long Hsiang 1 Road,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Suao, E-Lan Hsien,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30001> ID=”2″>Song Cheng Enterprise> ID=”3″>No 469 Chung Cheng Road,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Fong-Tien, Neipoo, Ping-Tung,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30075> ID=”2″>Just Champion Enterprise> ID=”3″>No 99, Tatung Road,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Nanchow Hsiang, Pingtung Hsien,”> ID=”3″>Taiwan”> ID=”1″>2F30017> ID=”2″>I-Mei Frozen> ID=”3″>No 244 Fu-der Road, Su-ao,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Foods Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>I-Lan Hsien, Taiwan”> ID=”1″>2F30039> ID=”2″>Hochico Marine> ID=”3″>No 29 Der Shin 1st Road,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Processing Corp.> ID=”3″>Su-ao, I-Lan, Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30080> ID=”2″>Chreng Hwa Frozen> ID=”3″>1153, Chao Chou Road, Chao Chou> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Foods Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Chen, Pingtung Hsien, Taiwan”> ID=”1″>7F30035> ID=”2″>Tong Pao Frozen> ID=”3″>No 20, Tien Chang Road,> ID=”4″>31. 12. 1995″> ID=”2″>Food Co., Ltd> ID=”3″>Chiao Tou Shiang, Kaohsiung”> ID=”3″>Hsien, Taiwan”>

Pending: 31994D0467

January 15, 2026
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), as last amended by Decision 92/438/EEC (2), and in particular Article 9 (1) (c) thereof, Whereas, in accordance with Article 9 (1) (c) of Directive 91/496/EEC, health guarantees must be laid down for the transport of animals from one third country to another; whereas certain problems have been encountered as regards movements of equidae from one third country to another; Whereas the Commission laid down, in Decision 92/260/EEC (3), as amended by Decision 93/344/EEC (4), the health conditions and veterinary certification required for the temporary admission or registered horses; whereas these conditions provide all the necessary guarantees as regards the Community’s health status; whereas for the health guarantees applicable to movements of equidae from one third country to another reference should therefore be made to the health conditions laid down in Decision 92/260/EEC; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. Equidae on their way from one third country to another must come from a third country mentioned in Annex I to Decision 92/260/EEC.
2. Equidae as referred to in paragraph 1 must be accompanied by a certificate entitled ‘Transit certificate for the transport of equidae from one third country to another’. This certificate must comprise Sections I, II and III of the health certificate, corresponding to the third country of provenance listed in Annex II to Decision 92/260/EEC. It must in addition comprise the following sections.
‘IV. Equidae coming from:
and proceeding to:
V. Stamp and signature of official veterinarian: ‘

Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 July 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ No L 243, 25. 8. 1992, p. 27.
(3) OJ No L 130, 15. 5. 1992, p. 67.
(4) OJ No L 138, 9. 6. 1993, p. 11.

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), as last amended by Decision 92/438/EEC (2), and in particular Article 9 (1) (c) thereof, Whereas, in accordance with Article 9 (1) (c) of Directive 91/496/EEC, health guarantees must be laid down for the transport of animals from one third country to another; whereas certain problems have been encountered as regards movements of equidae from one third country to another; Whereas the Commission laid down, in Decision 92/260/EEC (3), as amended by Decision 93/344/EEC (4), the health conditions and veterinary certification required for the temporary admission or registered horses; whereas these conditions provide all the necessary guarantees as regards the Community’s health status; whereas for the health guarantees applicable to movements of equidae from one third country to another reference should therefore be made to the health conditions laid down in Decision 92/260/EEC; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. Equidae on their way from one third country to another must come from a third country mentioned in Annex I to Decision 92/260/EEC.
2. Equidae as referred to in paragraph 1 must be accompanied by a certificate entitled ‘Transit certificate for the transport of equidae from one third country to another’. This certificate must comprise Sections I, II and III of the health certificate, corresponding to the third country of provenance listed in Annex II to Decision 92/260/EEC. It must in addition comprise the following sections.
‘IV. Equidae coming from:
and proceeding to:
V. Stamp and signature of official veterinarian: ‘
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 July 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56.
(2) OJ No L 243, 25. 8. 1992, p. 27.
(3) OJ No L 130, 15. 5. 1992, p. 67.
(4) OJ No L 138, 9. 6. 1993, p. 11.

Pending: 31994D0448

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted on inspection visit to New Zealand to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of New Zealand legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas, in New Zealand, the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) is capable of verifying effectively the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in point (a) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to point (b) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to point (c) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the MAF to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the MAF to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the MAF has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) is recognized as the competent authority in New Zealand for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in New Zealand, must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and consisting of a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the words ‘New Zealand’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the MAF and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.

Article 4
This Decision shall apply from 1 September 1994.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted on inspection visit to New Zealand to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of New Zealand legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas, in New Zealand, the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) is capable of verifying effectively the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in point (a) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to point (b) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to point (c) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the MAF to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the MAF to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the MAF has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) is recognized as the competent authority in New Zealand for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in New Zealand, must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and consisting of a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the words ‘New Zealand’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the MAF and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision shall apply from 1 September 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery and aquaculture products originating in New Zealand and intended for export to the European Community
Reference No:
Country of dispatch: NEW ZEALAND
Competent authority: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF)
I. Details identifying the fishery products
Description of Fishery – Aquaculture products (1):
– Species (scientific name):
– Presentation of product and type of treatment (2):
Code Number (where available):
Type of packaging:
Number of packages:
Net weight:
Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s) approved by the MAF for export to the EC:
III. Destination of products
The products are dispatched
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
IV. Health attestation
The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery or aquaculture products specified above:
1. were caught and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decision thereto;
7. in addition, where the fishery products are frozen or processed bivalve molluscs; the molluscs were obtained from production areas subject to conditions which are at least equivalent to those laid down by Directive 91/492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of live bivalve molluscs.
Official stamp
Signature of official inspector (name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
(1) Delete where applicable.
(2) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, . . .
LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS AND FACTORY VESSELS I. Establishments
“” ID=”1″>PH 1> ID=”2″>Talleys Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>PORT MOTUEKA> ID=”4″>PO Box 5, PORT MOTUEKA”> ID=”1″>PH 3> ID=”2″>Alliance Group Limited Biosciences> ID=”3″>320 Port Hills Road, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 19727, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 5> ID=”2″>Healtheries of New Zealand Ltd> ID=”3″>130 Maura Road, Mount Wellington, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 11201, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 12> ID=”2″>Sealord Products Ltd> ID=”3″>Vickerman Street, NELSON> ID=”4″>PO Box 11, NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 16> ID=”2″>Prepared Foods Ltd> ID=”3″>117-119 Ruahine Street, PALMERSTON NORTH> ID=”4″>PO Box 942, PALMERSTON NORTH”> ID=”1″>PH 17> ID=”2″>Freshpack Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>31 Raycroft Street, CHRISTCHURCH 2> ID=”4″>31 Raycroft Street CHRISTCHURCH 2″> ID=”1″>PH 26> ID=”2″>McFarlane Laboratories New Zealand Limited> ID=”3″>117 Lansford Crescent, Avondale, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 19-028, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 35> ID=”2″>Aroma NZ Limited> ID=”3″>12 Senior Place, Bromley, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 2683, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 37> ID=”2″>Independent Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Staunton Street, Woolston, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 19554, Woolston CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 48> ID=”2″>Coromandel Fish Exporters 1976 Ltd> ID=”3″>Wharf Road, COROMANDEL> ID=”4″>Wharf Road, COROMANDEL”> ID=”1″>PH 51> ID=”2″>Globe Export Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Sawyers Bay, PORT CHALMERS> ID=”4″>PO Box 41, PORT CHALMERS”> ID=”1″>PH 57> ID=”2″>Harbour Inn Seafoods O Kahungunu Ltd> ID=”3″>Grey Street, Awatoto, NAPIER> ID=”4″>PO Box 393, NAPIER”> ID=”1″>PH 59> ID=”2″>Moana Pacific Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Subway Road, Pukekohe, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 273, Pukekohe, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 60> ID=”2″>O.P. Columbia> ID=”3″>South Highway, WHITIANGA> ID=”4″>PO Box 48, WHITIANGA”> ID=”1″>PH 62> ID=”2″>Harbour Inn Wholesale and Export Ltd> ID=”3″>79 The Esplanade, PETONE> ID=”4″>PO Box 38-435, PETONE”> ID=”1″>PH 63> ID=”2″>Mount Maunganui Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>Tyne Street, MOUNT MAUNGANUI> ID=”4″>PO Box 4397, MOUNT MAUNGANUI”> ID=”1″>PH 72> ID=”2″>NZ Eel Processing Co. Limited> ID=”3″>Rata Street, TE KAUWHATA> ID=”4″>PO Box 43, TE KAUWHATA”> ID=”1″>PH 73> ID=”2″>Talaford Sea Products> ID=”3″>21 McPherson Street, Richmond, NELSON> ID=”4″>PO Box 3169, Richmond NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 74> ID=”2″>Moana Pacific Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>110 Bentley Street, MASTERTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 611, MASTERTON”> ID=”1″>PH 75> ID=”2″>Port Nicholson Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>254 Taranaki Street, WELLINGTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 9765, WELLINGTON”> ID=”1″>PH 76> ID=”2″>Sanford Ltd> ID=”3″>Cross Road, TAURANGA> ID=”4″>PO Box 391, TAURANGA”> ID=”1″>PH 77> ID=”2″>Nelson Fisheries> ID=”3″>London Quay, PICTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 39, PICTON”> ID=”1″>PH 78> ID=”2″>Burkhart Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Main Road South, WARD> ID=”4″>PO Box 40, WARD”> ID=”1″>PH 81> ID=”2″>Mossburn Enterprises Limited> ID=”3″>Kennington, No 1 RD, INVERCARGILL> ID=”4″>PO Box 169, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>PH 85> ID=”2″>Coral Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>28 Herekino Street, WHANGAREI> ID=”4″>28 Herekino Street, WHANGAREI”> ID=”1″>PH 87> ID=”2″>Rainbow Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>4 Wharf Street, DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 483, DUNEDIN”> ID=”1″>PH 89> ID=”2″>Kornew Fisheries (New Zealand) Ltd> ID=”3″>Bristol Street, Riverlands, BLENHEIM> ID=”4″>PO Box 122, BLENHEIM”> ID=”1″>PH 91> ID=”2″>Otakou Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Corner Cresswell and Mason Streets, DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 5086, DUNEDIN”> ID=”1″>PH 94> ID=”2″>Bruce Wayne Sanderson> ID=”3″>Totara North, NORTHLAND> ID=”4″>c/o Post Office TOTARA NORTH”> ID=”1″>PH 98> ID=”2″>Gisborne Fisheries (1955) Limited> ID=”3″>131 Peel Street, GISBORNE> ID=”4″>PO Box 1340, GISBORNE”> ID=”1″>PH 102> ID=”2″>Talleys Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Greeson Street, GREYMOUTH> ID=”4″>PO Box 274, GREYMOUTH”> ID=”1″>PH 103> ID=”2″>Talleys Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Chamberlain Street, WESTPORT> ID=”4″>PO Box 230, WESTPORT”> ID=”1″>PH 105> ID=”2″>Global Fish Processing Co. Ltd> ID=”3″>81 Port Road, WHANGAREI> ID=”4″>PO Box 4353, Kamo, WHANGAREI”> ID=”1″>PH 107> ID=”2″>Talleys Fisheries> ID=”3″>Waitapu Wharf, TAKAKA> ID=”4″>Waitapu Wharf, TAKAKA”> ID=”1″>PH 111> ID=”2″>United Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>26 Sandyford Street, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 2131, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 112> ID=”2″>Southern Ocean Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>Kaingaroa, CHATHAM ISLANDS> ID=”4″>PO Box 14, Kaingaroa CHATHAM ISLANDS”> ID=”1″>PH 115> ID=”2″>United Fisheries (Tim) Ltd> ID=”3″>27 Grey Street, TIMARU> ID=”4″>PO Box 733, TIMARU”> ID=”1″>PH 116> ID=”2″>Moana Pacific Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>100 Waghorne Street, AHURIRI> ID=”4″>PO Box 2017, NAPIER”> ID=”1″>PH 118> ID=”2″>Bapobs Ltd> ID=”3″>Water Front Street, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 129, BLUFF”> ID=”1″>PH 119> ID=”2″>Westbay Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>Adairs Road, TAKUTAI> ID=”4″>PO Box 12, HOKITIKA”> ID=”1″>PH 120> ID=”2″>Deep Cove Fisheries> ID=”3″>7 Hall Street, North Mole, TIMARU> ID=”4″>PO Box 119, TIMARU”> ID=”1″>PH 123> ID=”2″>Pacifica Fishing Ltd> ID=”3″>North Wharf, KAIKOURA> ID=”4″>PO Box 30, KAIKOURA”> ID=”1″>PH 124> ID=”2″>United Fisheries (CHCH) Ltd> ID=”3″>7 Maldon Street, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 2131, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 126> ID=”2″>Leigh Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Cumberland Street, LEIGH> ID=”4″>RD 5, WARKWORTH”> ID=”1″>PH 129> ID=”2″>Anton’s Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>1-3 Bell Avenue, Westfield, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 632, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 130> ID=”2″>Regal Salmon Limited> ID=”3″>4 Queen Charlotte Drive, PICTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 24, PICTON”> ID=”1″>PH 138> ID=”2″>Sea Products (1982) Limited> ID=”3″>57 Firth Street, DRURY> ID=”4″>PO Box 22274, Otahuhu AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 139> ID=”2″>Riverton Fisherman’s Coop Limited> ID=”3″>RIVERTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 844, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>PH 141> ID=”2″>Pacific Marine Farms (1991) Limited> ID=”3″>Long Bay Road, COROMANDEL> ID=”4″>Long Bay Road, COROMANDEL”> ID=”1″>PH 142> ID=”2″>Urwin and Company Limited> ID=”3″>153 Foreshore Road, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 3, BLUFF”> ID=”1″>PH 143> ID=”2″>Westfleet Fisherman’s Cooperative Limited> ID=”3″>Gilbert Street, GREYMOUTH> ID=”4″>PO Box 180, GREYMOUTH”> ID=”1″>PH 145> ID=”2″>Bluff Fisherman’s Coop Ltd> ID=”3″>Foreshore Road, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 1764, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>PH 146> ID=”2″>Johnson & de Rijk> ID=”3″>Foreshore Road, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 124, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>PH 147> ID=”2″>Johnson Oysters Limited> ID=”3″>Foreshore Road, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 37, BLUFF”> ID=”1″>PH 148> ID=”2″>Sanford South Island Ltd> ID=”3″>Western Foreshore, Reclamation, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 120, BLUFF”> ID=”1″>PH 150> ID=”2″>Cook Strait Seafoods> ID=”3″>17 Lorne Street, WELLINGTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 9739, TEARO WELLINGTON”> ID=”1″>PH 151> ID=”2″>Wanganui Seafoods> ID=”3″>Gilbert Street, WANGANUI> ID=”4″>Private Bag, WANGANUI”> ID=”1″>PH 153> ID=”2″>Shallpac Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>15 Alach Street, Greerton, TAURANG> ID=”4″>15 Alach Street, Greerton, TAURANGA”> ID=”1″>PH 155> ID=”2″>Sealord Products Ltd> ID=”3″>Birch Street, DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 930, DUNEDIN”> ID=”1″>PH 157> ID=”2″>Southern Ocean Seafoods Limited> ID=”3″>11-18 Bullen Street, Tahunanui, NELSON> ID=”4″>PO Box 1180, NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 159> ID=”2″>Talleys Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Old Renwick Road, BLENHEIM> ID=”4″>PO Box 304, BLENHEIM”> ID=”1″>PH 162> ID=”2″>Far North Fisheries> ID=”3″>Main Road North, AWANUI> ID=”4″>PO Box 149, AWANUI”> ID=”1″>PH 163> ID=”2″>Regal Salmon Ltd> ID=”3″>219 Bond Street, INVERCARGILL> ID=”4″>PO Box 1559, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>PH 164> ID=”2″>Sanford South Island Limited> ID=”3″>137 Vickerman Street, NELSON> ID=”4″>PO Box 270, PORT NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 165> ID=”2″>Otakou Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Bombay and Creswell Streets, DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 5086, DUNEDIN”> ID=”1″>PH 166> ID=”2″>Mac Cure Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>18 Rotherham St, NELSON> ID=”4″>PO Box 5077, NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 168> ID=”2″>Stewart Island Fisherman’s Coop Ltd> ID=”3″>Half Moon Bay, STEWART ISLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 106 Half Moon Bay, STEWART ISLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 175> ID=”2″>Pacifica Fishing (Christchurch) Ltd> ID=”3″>2 Matipo Street, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 8696, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 176> ID=”2″>Westhaven Shellfish Co. Ltd> ID=”3″>Main Road, Pakawau, GOLDEN BAY> ID=”4″>Main Road, Pakawau, GOLDEN BAY”> ID=”1″>PH 177> ID=”2″>Sanford South Island Limited> ID=”3″>Havelock Wharf, HAVELOCK> ID=”4″>PO Box 13, HAVELOCK”> ID=”1″>PH 181> ID=”2″>Southern Processors Ltd> ID=”3″>83 Beatty Street, NELSON> ID=”4″>PO Box 32, Tahunanui, NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 182> ID=”2″>E N Vanderdrift 1987 Ltd> ID=”3″>121 Cordelia Street, STRATFORD> ID=”4″>PO Box 200, STRATFORD”> ID=”1″>PH 183> ID=”2″>Gould Aquafarms> ID=”3″>Timber Yard Road, Lakeside, LEESTON> ID=”4″>RD 3, LEESTON”> ID=”1″>PH 184> ID=”2″>Seafresh Fisheries NZ Limited> ID=”3″>61 Seaview Road, Gracefield, LOWER HUTT> ID=”4″>PO Box 30888, LOWER HUTT”> ID=”1″>PH 186> ID=”2″>Asta Merchants Ltd> ID=”3″>12 Crummer Road, Grey Lynn, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>Grey Lynn, PO Box 898, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 187> ID=”2″>Marlborough Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>Bristol Street, Riverlands Industrial Estate, BLENHEIM> ID=”4″>PO Box 762, BLENHEIM”> ID=”1″>PH 188> ID=”2″>Moana Pacific Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Kaiti Esplanade, GISBORNE> ID=”4″>PO Box 819, GISBORNE”> ID=”1″>PH 189> ID=”2″>Sea-First Processors Ltd> ID=”3″>29A Hewlett Street, WHANGAREI> ID=”4″>PO Box 9744, Newmarket, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 190> ID=”2″>Southern Seafoods> ID=”3″>Horseshoe Bay Wharf, STEWART ISLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 119, STEWART ISLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 192> ID=”2″>Wellington Trawling Company Limited> ID=”3″>218-220 Cuba Street, WELLINGTON> ID=”4″>PO Box 2200, WELLINGTON”> ID=”1″>PH 193> ID=”2″>Southern Ocean Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>Waitangi, CHATHAM ISLANDS> ID=”4″>PO Box 14, CHATHAM ISLANDS”> ID=”1″>PH 194> ID=”2″>Simunovich Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>1 Market Place, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 3331, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 195> ID=”2″>The Isaac Salmon Farm Ltd> ID=”3″>’Peacock Springs’ McLeans Road Harewood, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 20001 Bishopdale CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 197> ID=”2″>Hauraki Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>Wharf Road, Kopu RD 1, THAMES> ID=”4″>Wharf Road, Kopu RD 1, THAMES”> ID=”1″>PH 199> ID=”2″>Pacifica Seafoods (Nelson) Ltd> ID=”3″>Main Road, RAI VALLEY> ID=”4″>PO Box 55, RAI VALLEY”> ID=”1″>PH 201> ID=”2″>Pacifica Fishing Limited> ID=”3″>Awatea Street, DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 11, NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 204> ID=”2″>Constantia Foods Limited> ID=”3″>79 Maleme Street, TAURANGA> ID=”4″>PO Box 3161 TAURANGA”> ID=”1″>PH 219> ID=”2″>Deep Cove Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Hall Street, TIMARU> ID=”4″>PO Box 119, TIMARU”> ID=”1″>PH 222> ID=”2″>Sanford Limited> ID=”3″>Vessel ‘San Waitaki’> ID=”4″>PO Box 443, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 223> ID=”2″>Westpac Mussels Distributors Ltd> ID=”3″>19 Corban Avenue, Henderson, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>19 Corban Avenue, Henderson, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 227> ID=”2″>The New Zealand Fish Co. Limited> ID=”3″>136 Vanguard Street, NELSON> ID=”4″>136 Vanguard Street, NELSON”> ID=”1″>PH 245> ID=”2″>Tiffany Foods> ID=”3″>10 Print Place, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 8301, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 248> ID=”2″>Glenalbany Holdings> ID=”3″>Bradleys Road, Ohoka RD 2, KAIAPOI> ID=”4″>PO Box 16337, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 255> ID=”2″>Levin Eel Trading Co. Ltd> ID=”3″>11 Main Road South, LEVIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 1057, LEVIN”> ID=”1″>PH 263> ID=”2″>Fiordland Lobster Company Ltd> ID=”3″>Caswell Street, TE ANAU> ID=”4″>PO Box 92, TE ANAU”> ID=”1″>PH 273> ID=”2″>Mount Fishmarkets Ltd> ID=”3″>40 Hull Road, MT MANGANUI> ID=”4″>PO Box 4323, MT MANGANUI SOUTH”> ID=”1″>PH 287> ID=”2″>Coastal Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>1 Market Place, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 15-142, New Lynn, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 290> ID=”2″>Moana Pacific Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>12 Brigade Road, Mangere, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 445, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 295> ID=”2″>Fresco Seafoods 1990 Ltd> ID=”3″>25 Marylands Place CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO 9219, Addington CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 296> ID=”2″>Regal Salmon Limited> ID=”3″>Mahutangi West Road, WARKWORTH> ID=”4″>PO Box 216, WARKWORTH”> ID=”1″>PH 299> ID=”2″>Regent Fisheries> ID=”3″>13 Miami Parade, Onehunga, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>13 Miami Parade, Onehunga, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 313> ID=”2″>Paua Supplies Ltd> ID=”3″>35 Fox Street, South Dunedin DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 1469, DUNEDIN”> ID=”1″>PH 318> ID=”2″>Moana Pacific Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Kaiti Esplanade,> ID=”4″>PO Box 819, GISBORNE”> ID=”1″>PH 344> ID=”2″>Bluff Fisherman’s Coop Ltd> ID=”3″>Orchard Road, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 1764, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>PH 347> ID=”2″>New Zealand Seafoods Limited> ID=”3″>20b Portage Road, New Lynn, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 19-120, Avondale, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 348> ID=”2″>Vancouver Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>119 Wordsworth Street, CHRISTCHURCH 2> ID=”4″>119 Wordsworth Street, CHRISTCHURCH 2″> ID=”1″>PH 350> ID=”2″>No 1 Live Lobster Company Limited> ID=”3″>8 Doncaster Road, Mangere, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>8 Doncaster Road, Mangere, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>PH 362> ID=”2″>New Zealand Red Rock Lobster Company Limited> ID=”3″>29-31 Edmonton Road, Hornby, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 1477, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>PH 368> ID=”2″>Star Fish Supply Ltd> ID=”3″>27 Dunlop Road, NAPIER> ID=”4″>PO Box 2028, NAPIER”> ID=”1″>PH 371> ID=”2″>Te Aroha Seafoods Ltd> ID=”3″>9 Park Terrace, BLENHEIM> ID=”4″>PO Box 331, PICTON”> ID=”1″>PH 382> ID=”2″>Fresha Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>126A Brooklands Road, NEW PLYMOUTH> ID=”4″>PO Box 350, NEW PLYMOUTH”> ID=”1″>PH 389> ID=”2″>Lobster New Zealand Ltd> ID=”3″>Bolt Place, CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 14-067, CHRISTCHURCH AIRPORT”> ID=”1″>PH 393> ID=”2″>Mapua Seafoods Nelson New Zealand Ltd> ID=”3″>29 Tahi Street, Mapua, NELSON> ID=”4″>Mapua Wharf Aranui Road PORT MAPUA”> ID=”1″>PH 397> ID=”2″>Murikihu Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>Ocean Beach Road, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 113, BLUFF”> ID=”1″>PH 400> ID=”2″>The New Zealand Fish Company> ID=”3″>Main Road, STOKE> ID=”4″>c/o New Zealand Hays Meat Producers, Main Road, STOKE”> ID=”1″>PH 402> ID=”2″>Sealord Products Ltd> ID=”3″>Fryatt Street, DUNEDIN> ID=”4″>PO Box 930, DUNEDIN”> ID=”1″>PH 403> ID=”2″>Deep South Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>State Highway 1, Ocean Beach Site, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 7, BLUFF”> ID=”1″>PH 587> ID=”2″>United Fisheries Ltd> ID=”3″>58 Parkhouse Road Sockburn CHRISTCHURCH> ID=”4″>PO Box 2131 CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>FPH 3> ID=”2″>Sanford South Island Limited> ID=”3″>Hall Street, North Mole, TIMARU> ID=”4″>Private Bag, TIMARU”> ID=”1″>FPH 5> ID=”2″>Sanford (South Island) Limited> ID=”3″>Normanby Wharf, OAMARU> ID=”4″>PO Box 263, OAMARU”> ID=”1″>FPH 11> ID=”2″>Hikurangi Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>21 King Street, HIKURANGI> ID=”4″>21 King Street, HIKURANGI”> ID=”1″>FPH 36> ID=”2″>Thomas Richard & Co. Ltd> ID=”3″>Brigham Creek Road, Whenuapai, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 81009, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>FPH 52> ID=”2″>Sanford Limited> ID=”3″>22 Jellicoe Street, Freemans Bay, AUCKLAND> ID=”4″>PO Box 443, AUCKLAND”> ID=”1″>FPH 53> ID=”2″>Hikurangi Fisheries Limited> ID=”3″>Main Highway, KAEO> ID=”4″>Main Highway, KAEO”> ID=”1″>FPH 152> ID=”2″>Noma Oysters Limited> ID=”3″>42, Kaka Street, WHANGAREI> ID=”4″>PO Box 806, WHANGAREI”> ID=”1″>FPH 197> ID=”2″>Port Albert Fisheries> ID=”3″>11 Hood Street, WELLSFORD> ID=”4″>PO Box 220, WHANGAREI”> ID=”1″>W 4> ID=”2″>T J Gould> ID=”3″>Lakeside RD 3, CHRISTCHURCH”> ID=”1″>W 9> ID=”2″>Live Lobster Southland Limited> ID=”3″>Foreshore Road, BLUFF> ID=”4″>PO Box 884, INVERCARGILL”> ID=”1″>W 10> ID=”2″>Pacifica Fishing Ltd> ID=”3″>Careys Bay, PORT CHALMERS> ID=”4″>PO Box 1360, DUNEDIN”>
II. Factory vessels
“” ID=”1″>PH 46> ID=”2″>Amaltal Explorer”> ID=”1″>PH 160> ID=”2″>Ibuki Maru”> ID=”1″>PH 169> ID=”2″>Banshu Maru
8″> ID=”1″>PH 180> ID=”2″>Pakura”> ID=”1″>PH 203> ID=”2″>Azuchi Maru”> ID=”1″>PH 216> ID=”2″>Tomi Maru No 58″> ID=”1″>PH 222> ID=”2″>San Waitaki”> ID=”1″>PH 224> ID=”2″>Chiyo Maru No 2″> ID=”1″>PH 225> ID=”2″>San Rangitoto”> ID=”1″>PH 234> ID=”2″>Will Watch”> ID=”1″>PH 239> ID=”2″>Chiyo Maru”> ID=”1″>PH 250> ID=”2″>Tomi Maru No 86″> ID=”1″>PH 251> ID=”2″>Tomi Maru No 87″> ID=”1″>PH 269> ID=”2″>Echizen Maru”> ID=”1″>PH 292> ID=”2″>Koyo Maru No 2″> ID=”1″>PH 304> ID=”2″>M V Norom”> ID=”1″>PH 308> ID=”2″>M V Tampen”> ID=”1″>PH 309> ID=”2″>Ottar Birting”> ID=”1″>PH 315> ID=”2″>FV Labrador”> ID=”1″>PH 319> ID=”2″>F/V Mary Ann”> ID=”1″>PH 329> ID=”2″>Longva No 3″> ID=”1″>PH 337> ID=”2″>F V Lord Auckland”> ID=”1″>PH 340> ID=”2″>Kirkholmen”> ID=”1″>PH 345> ID=”2″>Longva 2″> ID=”1″>PH 355> ID=”2″>GRV Tangaroa”> ID=”1″>PH 370> ID=”2″>Eikyu Maru No 6″> ID=”1″>PH 373> ID=”2″>Dalmor II”> ID=”1″>PH 381> ID=”2″>FV James Cook”> ID=”1″>PH 384> ID=”2″>Amaltal Columbia”> ID=”1″>PH 390> ID=”2″>San Aotea”> ID=”1″>PH 392> ID=”2″>San Arawa”> ID=”1″>PH 407> ID=”2″>FV Aquila”> ID=”1″>PH 410> ID=”2″>Newfoundland Lynx”> ID=”1″>L 70806> ID=”2″>20 Syezd”> ID=”1″>L 70809> ID=”2″>26 Syezd”> ID=”1″>L 15618> ID=”2″>Advancer”> ID=”1″>L 15781> ID=”2″>Agatovyy”> ID=”1″>L 15874> ID=”2″>Albatross II”> ID=”1″>L 62713> ID=”2″>Aleksey Slobodchikov”> ID=”1″>L 16041> ID=”2″>Alexandrovsk”> ID=”1″>L 7847> ID=”2″>Amaltal Voyager”> ID=”1″>L 15886> ID=”2″>Amga”> ID=”1″>L 62748> ID=”2″>Arzamas”> ID=”1″>L 7996> ID=”2″>Atu”> ID=”1″>L 62224> ID=”2″>Barit”> ID=”1″>L 8103> ID=”2″>Bars”> ID=”1″>L 15894> ID=”2″>Belovo”> ID=”1″>L 15811> ID=”2″>Bilyarra”> ID=”1″>L 62756> ID=”2″>Bratya Stoyanovy”> ID=”1″>L 15738> ID=”2″>Christmas Creek”> ID=”1″>L 62286> ID=”2″>Cordella”> ID=”1″>L 62232> ID=”2″>Daniel Solander”> ID=”1″>L 8058> ID=”2″>Darvin”> ID=”1″>L 8090> ID=”2″>Donfico No 701″> ID=”1″>L 90038> ID=”2″>Dong Won 517″> ID=”1″>L 62289> ID=”2″>Dong Won No 513″> ID=”1″>L 8007> ID=”2″>Dong Wong No 522″> ID=”1″>L 7969> ID=”2″>Dong Won No 521″> ID=”1″>L 15950> ID=”2″>Drysdale”> ID=”1″>L 15671> ID=”2″>Eikyu Maru No 8″> ID=”1″>L 62867> ID=”2″>Eishin Maru No 82″> ID=”1″>L 15837> ID=”2″>Enemelay”> ID=”1″>L 15858> ID=”2″>Geliograf”> ID=”1″>L 8055> ID=”2″>Giljanes”> ID=”1″>L 90000> ID=”2″>Gissar”> ID=”1″>L 90004> ID=”2″>Gnevnyl”> ID=”1″>L 16121> ID=”2″>Grigoriy Terentyev”> ID=”1″>L 86136> ID=”2″>Gromovo”> ID=”1″>L 62511> ID=”2″>Hoshin Maru No 58″> ID=”1″>L 70619> ID=”2″>Hunter No 1″> ID=”1″>L 62751> ID=”2″>Ivan Korobkin”> ID=”1″>L 70828> ID=”2″>Ivan Golubets”> ID=”1″>L 15887> ID=”2″>Izumrudnyy”> ID=”1″>L 15975> ID=”2″>Karagach”> ID=”1″>L 7995> ID=”2″>Kariqa”> ID=”1″>L 15849> ID=”2″>Khrustalnyy”> ID=”1″>L 86189> ID=”2″>Komtek 2″> ID=”1″>L 16122> ID=”2″>Kontayka”> ID=”1″>L 62738> ID=”2″>Koryo Maru No 52″> ID=”1″>L 70709> ID=”2″>Krylova”> ID=”1″>L 62567> ID=”2″>Kyofuku Maru”> ID=”1″>L 15978> ID=”2″>Langoustine Explorer”> ID=”1″>L 62638> ID=”2″>Melilla”> ID=”1″>L 62858> ID=”2″>Meridian I”> ID=”1″>L 16030> ID=”2″>MFV Petersen”> ID=”1″>L 15871> ID=”2″>Mutual Enterprise”> ID=”1″>L 62857> ID=”2″>MYS Chaikovskogo”> ID=”1″>L 70709> ID=”2″>MYS Krylova”> ID=”1″>L 70851> ID=”2″>MYS Senyavina”> ID=”1″>L 15936> ID=”2″>MYS Yudina”> ID=”1″>L 32621> ID=”2″>NR Francis”> ID=”1″>L 70837> ID=”2″>Nikon Karpenko”> ID=”1″>L 70807> ID=”2″>Novoangarsk”> ID=”1″>L 70808> ID=”2″>Novoarkangelsk”> ID=”1″>L 62663> ID=”2″>Novoeniseysk”> ID=”1″>L 44596> ID=”2″>Novokazalinsk”> ID=”1″>L 8080> ID=”2″>Novokotovsk”> ID=”1″>L 62664> ID=”2″>Novonikolsk”> ID=”1″>L 16064> ID=”2″>Novoorsk”> ID=”1″>L 70875> ID=”2″>Novopskov”> ID=”1″>L 44597> ID=”2″>Novosokolniki”> ID=”1″>L 62373> ID=”2″>Ocean Ranger”> ID=”1″>L 8057> ID=”2″>Ochakov”> ID=”1″>L 62281> ID=”2″>Ohau”> ID=”1″>L 62749> ID=”2″>Oktant”> ID=”1″>L 62623> ID=”2″>Oyang No 77″> ID=”1″>L 56182> ID=”2″>Oyang No 86″> ID=”1″>L 56181> ID=”2″>Oyang No 85″> ID=”1″>L 70857> ID=”2″>Peredovik”> ID=”1″>L 8091> ID=”2″>Pioner Nikoaeva”> ID=”1″>L 7959> ID=”2″>Pirit”> ID=”1″>L 70874> ID=”2″>Planerist”> ID=”1″>L 62660> ID=”2″>Poct”> ID=”1″>L 90024> ID=”2″>Polevod”> ID=”1″>L 90025> ID=”2″>Prostor”> ID=”1″>L 62662> ID=”2″>Prosvititel”> ID=”1″>L 15737> ID=”2″>Red Bluff”> ID=”1″>L 44336> ID=”2″>Sagaml Maru No 1″> ID=”1″>L 7990> ID=”2″>San Te Maru No 18″> ID=”1″>L 15944> ID=”2″>San Tangaroa”> ID=”1″>L 7972> ID=”2″>San Te Maru No 17″> ID=”1″>L 70836> ID=”2″>Sapun Gora”> ID=”1″>L 70870> ID=”2″>Sarfaq”> ID=”1″>L 70849> ID=”2″>Sokolinoe”> ID=”1″>L 62272> ID=”2″>Solander II”> ID=”1″>L 44335> ID=”2″>Soshu Maru”> ID=”1″>L 70773> ID=”2″>Suan Korzunov”> ID=”1″>L 90011> ID=”2″>Sur Este 707″> ID=”1″>L 70863> ID=”2″>Sureste 709″> ID=”1″>L 70854> ID=”2″>Takaroa 1″> ID=”1″>L 70765> ID=”2″>Tavrida”> ID=”1″>L 70852> ID=”2″>Tigil”> ID=”1″>L 86042> ID=”2″>Tomi Maru No 83″> ID=”1″>L 62701> ID=”2″>Turkul”> ID=”1″>L 44453> ID=”2″>Venture K”> ID=”1″>L 15862> ID=”2″>Volnomer”> ID=”1″>L 15936> ID=”2″>Yudina”> ID=”1″>L 70745> ID=”2″>Yuzhnomorsk”> ID=”1″>L 15669> ID=”2″>Zhemchuzhny”> ID=”1″>W 44615> ID=”2″>Ibaraki Maru No 11″> ID=”1″>W 86002> ID=”2″>Paluma”> ID=”1″>W 44570> ID=”2″>Shioml Maru No 55″> ID=”1″>W 44566> ID=”2″>Young Heung No 55″>

Pending: 31994D0442

January 15, 2026
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of the Council of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2048/88 (2), and in particular Article 5 (3) thereof, Whereas it is intended to reform the clearance procedures for EAGGF Guarantee Section accounts and to submit to the Council a proposal for certain amendments to Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 whereby, in particular, before any decision is taken by the Commission to refuse financing by the Community of expenditure disbursed by the Member State, the two parties are to endeavour to conciliate their respective positions; Whereas the rules in force concerning the clearance of accounts do not preclude the Commission from setting up conciliation machinery; whereas a conciliation body should therefore be set up in order to permit a reconciliation of the positions of the Commission and a Member State when these differ, and the detailed rules governing its operation should be established; Whereas the Fund Committee has given a favourable opinion on the measures proposed in this Decision, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. For the purposes of the clearance of EAGGF Guarantee Section accounts, a Conciliation Body, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Body’, is hereby set up in the Commission. Its tasks shall be:
(a) to examine any matter referred to it by a Member State which, following inspections pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and bilateral discussion of the findings of such inspections, receives formal notification from the competent Commission departments, with reference to this Decision, of the conclusion that certain items of expenditure incurred by that Member State are not chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section,
(b) to try to reconcile the divergent positions of the Commission and the Member State concerned, and
(c) at he end of its investigations, to draw up a report on the outcome of its efforts at reconciliation, making any remarks it deems useful should all or some of the points of dispute remain unresolved.
2. For the purposes of the subsequent stages of the accounts clearance procedure:
(a) the position of the Body shall be without prejudice to the Commission’s final decision on the clearance of the accounts and shall not affect the Member State’s right to institute proceedings under Article 173 of the Treaty;
(b) the fact of not referring a matter to the Body shall not be prejudicial to a Member State which receives notification from the Commission within the meaning of paragraph 1 (a).

Article 2
1. A Member State must refer a matter to the Body within thirty working days of its receipt of notification as referred to in Article 1 (1) (a), by sending a reasoned request for conciliation to the Secretariat of the Conciliation Body, the address of which will be notified to the Member States through the EAGGF Committee.
2. A request for conciliation is admissible only where the financial adjustment recommended by the Commission in respect of a budget heading:
– exceeds ECU 0,5 million; or
– represents more than 25 % of the Member State’s total annual expenditure under the budget heading concerned.
In addition, if, during the bilateral discussions referred to in Article 1 (1) (a), the Member State claims, and demonstrates, that the matter is one of principle relating to the application of Community rules, the Chairman of the Body may declare a request for conciliation to be admissible.
3. The Secretariat of the Body shall acknowledge receipt of the request for conciliation.
4. The Body shall conduct its investigations as informally and promptly as possible, basing itself on the evidence in the dossier and on a fair hearing of the Commission staff and national authorities concerned. At the end of its investigations it shall send them the report referred to in Article 1 (1) (c).
5. Where, within four months of a case being referred to it, the Body has failed to reconcile the positions of the Commission and the Member State, the conciliation procedure is deemed to have failed. The report referred to in Article 1 (1) (c) shall state the reasons why the positions could not be reconciled.
6. The report drawn up within the stipulated limit shall be sent:
– to the Member State which referred the matter to the Body;
– to the other Member States in the framework of the EAGGF Committee; and
– to the Commission when the accounts clearance decision is proposed.

Article 3
1. The Body shall be composed of five members selected from among eminent persons offering every guarantee of independence and highly qualified in EAGGF Guarantee Section matters. They must be nationals of different Member States.
The Chairman and the members shall be appointed by the Commission after the matter has been referred to the EAGGF Committee under Article 14 (1) (a) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70.
By the same procedure, the Commission shall appoint substitute members who meet the criteria referred to in the first subparagraph, and who may be called upon in the order listed by the Commission.
The names of the Chairman, the members and the substitute members shall be published in the ‘C’ series of the Official Journal of the European Communities.
2. The members of the Body shall be remunerated having regard to the complexity of the questions likely to be raised and to the time which they will be required to dedicate to the task.
3. The term of office of the members of the Body shall be three years. It shall be renewable.
After expiry of the three-year period, the members of the Body shall remain in office until they are replaced or until their term is renewed.
4. Before the expiry of the three-year period, a term of office may be terminated as a result of voluntary or compulsory resignation, or death. In such cases a substitute shall be appointed for the remainder of the term by the first available substitute member.
A member who no longer meets the conditions required for the accomplishment of his duties with the Body or who commits a serious offence or who, for whatever reason, declares that he is unavailable for an indeterminate period may be retired by the Commission after consultation of the EAGGF Committee.
5. If a member declares himself unavailable for a stated period, the Chairman may decide that he be replaced for that period by a substitute member.

Article 4
1. The Body shall meet at the headquarters of the Commission. In his absence, and without prejudice to Article 3 (4), the oldest member shall take the Chair.
The secretariat of the Body shall be provided by Commission staff.
2. No member may take part in the work of the Body or sign a report if, in an earlier office, he has been personally involved in the matter at issue.
3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, reports must be adopted by an absolute majority of members present, the quorum being three.
The reports shall be signed by the Chairman and members wo have taken part in the deliberations. They shall be registered by the secretariat.

Article 5
1. The members of the Body shall carry out their duties quite independently, neither seeking nor accepting instructions from any government or body.
2. Without prejudice to Article 214 of the Treaty, the members of the Body may not disclose any information acquired by them in the course of their work for the Body. Such information is confidential and covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 July 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 13.
(2) OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 1.

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of the Council of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2048/88 (2), and in particular Article 5 (3) thereof, Whereas it is intended to reform the clearance procedures for EAGGF Guarantee Section accounts and to submit to the Council a proposal for certain amendments to Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 whereby, in particular, before any decision is taken by the Commission to refuse financing by the Community of expenditure disbursed by the Member State, the two parties are to endeavour to conciliate their respective positions; Whereas the rules in force concerning the clearance of accounts do not preclude the Commission from setting up conciliation machinery; whereas a conciliation body should therefore be set up in order to permit a reconciliation of the positions of the Commission and a Member State when these differ, and the detailed rules governing its operation should be established; Whereas the Fund Committee has given a favourable opinion on the measures proposed in this Decision, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. For the purposes of the clearance of EAGGF Guarantee Section accounts, a Conciliation Body, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Body’, is hereby set up in the Commission. Its tasks shall be:
(a) to examine any matter referred to it by a Member State which, following inspections pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and bilateral discussion of the findings of such inspections, receives formal notification from the competent Commission departments, with reference to this Decision, of the conclusion that certain items of expenditure incurred by that Member State are not chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section,
(b) to try to reconcile the divergent positions of the Commission and the Member State concerned, and
(c) at he end of its investigations, to draw up a report on the outcome of its efforts at reconciliation, making any remarks it deems useful should all or some of the points of dispute remain unresolved.
2. For the purposes of the subsequent stages of the accounts clearance procedure:
(a) the position of the Body shall be without prejudice to the Commission’s final decision on the clearance of the accounts and shall not affect the Member State’s right to institute proceedings under Article 173 of the Treaty;
(b) the fact of not referring a matter to the Body shall not be prejudicial to a Member State which receives notification from the Commission within the meaning of paragraph 1 (a).
1. A Member State must refer a matter to the Body within thirty working days of its receipt of notification as referred to in Article 1 (1) (a), by sending a reasoned request for conciliation to the Secretariat of the Conciliation Body, the address of which will be notified to the Member States through the EAGGF Committee.
2. A request for conciliation is admissible only where the financial adjustment recommended by the Commission in respect of a budget heading:
– exceeds ECU 0,5 million; or
– represents more than 25 % of the Member State’s total annual expenditure under the budget heading concerned.
In addition, if, during the bilateral discussions referred to in Article 1 (1) (a), the Member State claims, and demonstrates, that the matter is one of principle relating to the application of Community rules, the Chairman of the Body may declare a request for conciliation to be admissible.
3. The Secretariat of the Body shall acknowledge receipt of the request for conciliation.
4. The Body shall conduct its investigations as informally and promptly as possible, basing itself on the evidence in the dossier and on a fair hearing of the Commission staff and national authorities concerned. At the end of its investigations it shall send them the report referred to in Article 1 (1) (c).
5. Where, within four months of a case being referred to it, the Body has failed to reconcile the positions of the Commission and the Member State, the conciliation procedure is deemed to have failed. The report referred to in Article 1 (1) (c) shall state the reasons why the positions could not be reconciled.
6. The report drawn up within the stipulated limit shall be sent:
– to the Member State which referred the matter to the Body;
– to the other Member States in the framework of the EAGGF Committee; and
– to the Commission when the accounts clearance decision is proposed.
1. The Body shall be composed of five members selected from among eminent persons offering every guarantee of independence and highly qualified in EAGGF Guarantee Section matters. They must be nationals of different Member States.
The Chairman and the members shall be appointed by the Commission after the matter has been referred to the EAGGF Committee under Article 14 (1) (a) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70.
By the same procedure, the Commission shall appoint substitute members who meet the criteria referred to in the first subparagraph, and who may be called upon in the order listed by the Commission.
The names of the Chairman, the members and the substitute members shall be published in the ‘C’ series of the Official Journal of the European Communities.
2. The members of the Body shall be remunerated having regard to the complexity of the questions likely to be raised and to the time which they will be required to dedicate to the task.
3. The term of office of the members of the Body shall be three years. It shall be renewable.
After expiry of the three-year period, the members of the Body shall remain in office until they are replaced or until their term is renewed.
4. Before the expiry of the three-year period, a term of office may be terminated as a result of voluntary or compulsory resignation, or death. In such cases a substitute shall be appointed for the remainder of the term by the first available substitute member.
A member who no longer meets the conditions required for the accomplishment of his duties with the Body or who commits a serious offence or who, for whatever reason, declares that he is unavailable for an indeterminate period may be retired by the Commission after consultation of the EAGGF Committee.
5. If a member declares himself unavailable for a stated period, the Chairman may decide that he be replaced for that period by a substitute member.
1. The Body shall meet at the headquarters of the Commission. In his absence, and without prejudice to Article 3 (4), the oldest member shall take the Chair.
The secretariat of the Body shall be provided by Commission staff.
2. No member may take part in the work of the Body or sign a report if, in an earlier office, he has been personally involved in the matter at issue.
3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, reports must be adopted by an absolute majority of members present, the quorum being three.
The reports shall be signed by the Chairman and members wo have taken part in the deliberations. They shall be registered by the secretariat.
1. The members of the Body shall carry out their duties quite independently, neither seeking nor accepting instructions from any government or body.
2. Without prejudice to Article 214 of the Treaty, the members of the Body may not disclose any information acquired by them in the course of their work for the Body. Such information is confidential and covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 July 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 13.
(2) OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 1.

Pending: 31994D0435

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, in Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 (2) (a) and (c) and Article 13 thereof, Whereas Annex I Chapter 15 of the abovementioned Directive lays down requirements for the import of pig bristles; whereas different rules apply to pig bristles from third countries which are considered to present a risk as regards African swine fever and pig bristles from third countries which present no risk concerning this disease; Whereas Commission Decision 94/278/EC (2) has laid down a list of third countries from which Member States authorize the importation of pig bristles; Whereas the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the import of this product must be laid down; Whereas, since a new certification scheme is established, a period of time should be provided for its implementation; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Member States shall authorize the importation of pig bristles from third countries or, in the case of regionalization according to Community legislation, regions thereof, where no case of African swine fever has occurred during the previous 12 months, if the consignment is accompanied by an animal health certificate as laid down in Annex A.

Article 2
Member States shall authorize the importation of pig bristles from third countries or, in the case of regionalization according to Community legislation, regions thereof, where one or more cases of African swine fever has occurred during the previous 12 months, if the consignment is accompanied by an animal health certificate as laid down in Annex B.

Article 3
Animal health certificates mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 shall consist of one sheet and shall be drawn up in at least one of the official languages of the Member State where the controls are carried out.

Article 4
After importation the pig bristles must be consigned directly to the processing establishment of destination or to the warehouse for storage specified on the animal health certificate, where they shall be stored separately from other products of animal origin.

Article 5
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1994.

Article 6
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 June 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(2) OJ No L 120, 11. 5. 1994, p. 44.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, in Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 (2) (a) and (c) and Article 13 thereof, Whereas Annex I Chapter 15 of the abovementioned Directive lays down requirements for the import of pig bristles; whereas different rules apply to pig bristles from third countries which are considered to present a risk as regards African swine fever and pig bristles from third countries which present no risk concerning this disease; Whereas Commission Decision 94/278/EC (2) has laid down a list of third countries from which Member States authorize the importation of pig bristles; Whereas the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the import of this product must be laid down; Whereas, since a new certification scheme is established, a period of time should be provided for its implementation; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Member States shall authorize the importation of pig bristles from third countries or, in the case of regionalization according to Community legislation, regions thereof, where no case of African swine fever has occurred during the previous 12 months, if the consignment is accompanied by an animal health certificate as laid down in Annex A.
Member States shall authorize the importation of pig bristles from third countries or, in the case of regionalization according to Community legislation, regions thereof, where one or more cases of African swine fever has occurred during the previous 12 months, if the consignment is accompanied by an animal health certificate as laid down in Annex B.
Animal health certificates mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 shall consist of one sheet and shall be drawn up in at least one of the official languages of the Member State where the controls are carried out.
After importation the pig bristles must be consigned directly to the processing establishment of destination or to the warehouse for storage specified on the animal health certificate, where they shall be stored separately from other products of animal origin.
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 June 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(2) OJ No L 120, 11. 5. 1994, p. 44.
ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE for pig bristles from third countries or regions thereof which are free from African swine fever, intended for consignment to the European Community
Note to the importer:
This certificate is for veterinary purposes only and must accompany the consignment until it reaches the border inspection post.
(1) Optional.
(2) The signature and stamp must be in a colour different to that of the printing.
ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE for pig bristles from third countries or regions thereof which are not free from African swine fever, intended for consignment to the European Community
Note to the importer:
This certificate is for veterinary purposes only and must accompany the consignment until it reaches the border inspection post.
(1) Optional.
(2) Delete as appropriate.
(3) The signature and stamp must be in a colour different to that of the printing.

Pending: 31994D0432

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 93/23/EEC of 1 June 1993 on the statistical surveys to be carried out on pig production (1), and in particular Articles 1 (3), 2 (2), 3 (2), 6 (1) and (2), 8 (1) and (2) and 10 (3) thereof,Whereas precise definitions are required in order to carry out the surveys provided for in Directive 93/23/EEC; whereas this requires the definition of the agricultural holdings covered by the survey; whereas the herd size classes and regions according to which the Member States draw up the survey results at regular intervals must also be determined; whereas a single definition of carcass weight is necessary for the drawing-up of slaughtering statistics;Whereas, according to Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States may, at their request, be authorized to carry out the April and August surveys in selected regions, on the understanding that these surveys cover at least 70 % of the pig population; whereas Member States whose pig population makes up only a small percentage of the overall population of the Community may, at their request, also be authorized to dispense altogether with the April and August surveys, or to use the regional breakdown for the final results of the April or August survey; whereas, finally, the Member States may, at their request, be authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys to determine the pig population and the prescribed breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years and/or for those of a given month of the year;Whereas applications have been made by the Member States for the abovementioned types of authorization;Whereas Commission Decision 76/805/EEC (2), as last amended by Decision 91/268/EEC (3), should be replaced;Whereas, since Directive 93/23/EEC is applicable as from 1 January 1994, it is appropriate to apply the provisions of this Decision with effect from the same date;Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. For the purposes of Article 2 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, ‘agricultural holding` means any technical and economic unit under single management which produces agricultural products.
2. The survey referred to in Article 1 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC shall cover:
(a) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of 1 ha or more;
(b) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of less than 1 ha, if their production is to a certain extent intended for sale or if their production unit exceeds certain natural thresholds.
3. Member States wishing to apply a different survey threshold shall, however, undertake to determine that threshold in such a way that only the smallest holdings are excluded, and that together the holdings excluded account for 1 % or less of the total standard gross margin, within the meaning of Commission Decision 85/377/EEC (4), of the Member State concerned.

Article 2
The territorial subdivisions referred to in Article 6 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC are set out in Annex I.

Article 3
The breakdown provided for in Article 8 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC is set out in Annex II.

Article 4
The carcass weight referred to in Article 10 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC is defined in Annex III.

Article 5
1. Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (a) of Annex IV are authorized to carry out the April and August surveys in selected regions, on the understanding that these surveys cover at least 70 % of the pig population.
2. Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (b) of Annex IV are authorized to dispense altogether with the April and August surveys.
3. Pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (c) of Annex IV are authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys.
4. Pursuant to Article 6 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (d) of Annex IV are authorized to use the regional breakdown for the final results of the April or August survey.
5. Pursuant to Article 8 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (e) of Annex IV are authorized to use the breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years and/or for those of a given month of the year.

Article 6
Decision 76/805/EEC is repealed.

Article 7
This Decision shall apply with effect from 1 January 1994.

Article 8
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 May 1994.
For the Commission
Henning CHRISTOPHERSEN
Vice-President
(1) OJ No L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ No L 285, 16. 10. 1976, p. 31.
(3) OJ No L 134, 29. 5. 1991, p. 49.
(4) OJ No L 220, 17. 8. 1985, p. 1.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 93/23/EEC of 1 June 1993 on the statistical surveys to be carried out on pig production (1), and in particular Articles 1 (3), 2 (2), 3 (2), 6 (1) and (2), 8 (1) and (2) and 10 (3) thereof,Whereas precise definitions are required in order to carry out the surveys provided for in Directive 93/23/EEC; whereas this requires the definition of the agricultural holdings covered by the survey; whereas the herd size classes and regions according to which the Member States draw up the survey results at regular intervals must also be determined; whereas a single definition of carcass weight is necessary for the drawing-up of slaughtering statistics;Whereas, according to Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States may, at their request, be authorized to carry out the April and August surveys in selected regions, on the understanding that these surveys cover at least 70 % of the pig population; whereas Member States whose pig population makes up only a small percentage of the overall population of the Community may, at their request, also be authorized to dispense altogether with the April and August surveys, or to use the regional breakdown for the final results of the April or August survey; whereas, finally, the Member States may, at their request, be authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys to determine the pig population and the prescribed breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years and/or for those of a given month of the year;Whereas applications have been made by the Member States for the abovementioned types of authorization;Whereas Commission Decision 76/805/EEC (2), as last amended by Decision 91/268/EEC (3), should be replaced;Whereas, since Directive 93/23/EEC is applicable as from 1 January 1994, it is appropriate to apply the provisions of this Decision with effect from the same date;Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. For the purposes of Article 2 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, ‘agricultural holding` means any technical and economic unit under single management which produces agricultural products.
2. The survey referred to in Article 1 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC shall cover:
(a) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of 1 ha or more;
(b) agricultural holdings with a utilized agricultural area of less than 1 ha, if their production is to a certain extent intended for sale or if their production unit exceeds certain natural thresholds.
3. Member States wishing to apply a different survey threshold shall, however, undertake to determine that threshold in such a way that only the smallest holdings are excluded, and that together the holdings excluded account for 1 % or less of the total standard gross margin, within the meaning of Commission Decision 85/377/EEC (4), of the Member State concerned.
The territorial subdivisions referred to in Article 6 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC are set out in Annex I.
The breakdown provided for in Article 8 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC is set out in Annex II.
The carcass weight referred to in Article 10 (1) of Directive 93/23/EEC is defined in Annex III.
1. Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (a) of Annex IV are authorized to carry out the April and August surveys in selected regions, on the understanding that these surveys cover at least 70 % of the pig population.
2. Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (b) of Annex IV are authorized to dispense altogether with the April and August surveys.
3. Pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (c) of Annex IV are authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys.
4. Pursuant to Article 6 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (d) of Annex IV are authorized to use the regional breakdown for the final results of the April or August survey.
5. Pursuant to Article 8 (2) of Directive 93/23/EEC, the Member States listed in point (e) of Annex IV are authorized to use the breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years and/or for those of a given month of the year.
Decision 76/805/EEC is repealed.
This Decision shall apply with effect from 1 January 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 May 1994.
For the Commission
Henning CHRISTOPHERSEN
Vice-President
(1) OJ No L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ No L 285, 16. 10. 1976, p. 31.
(3) OJ No L 134, 29. 5. 1991, p. 49.
(4) OJ No L 220, 17. 8. 1985, p. 1.
Territorial subdivisions
Size classes of pig populations
Definition of carcass weight
Carcass weight is the weight of the slaughtered pig’s cold body, either whole or divided in half along the mid-line, after being bled and eviscerated and after removal of the tongue, bristles, hooves, genitalia, flare fat, kidneys and diaphragm.
(a) Member States authorized to carry out the April and August surveys in selected regions
(b) Member States authorized to dispense altogether with the April and August surveys
(c) Member States authorized to use administrative sources instead of statistical surveys
(d) Member States authorized to use the regional breakdown for the final results of the April or August survey
(e) Member States authorized to use the breakdown by herd size classes for the final results of even-numbered years and/or for those of a given month of the year

Pending: 31994D0323

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof, Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Singapore to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of legislation of Singapore on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department, the competent authority in Singapore, and the Veterinary Public Health Division, its inspection department, are capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the qualifications of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department (Veterinary Public Health Division) shall be the competent authority in Singapore for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery products originating in Singapore, with the exception of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in any form, must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Singapore’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. The certificate referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Minister of National Development, Primary Production Department and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.

Article 4
This Decision shall apply from 1 August 1994.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 May 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof, Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Singapore to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of legislation of Singapore on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department, the competent authority in Singapore, and the Veterinary Public Health Division, its inspection department, are capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11 (4) (a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the qualifications of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to Article 11 (4) (c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department (Veterinary Public Health Division) shall be the competent authority in Singapore for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery products originating in Singapore, with the exception of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in any form, must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Singapore’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1. The certificate referred to in Article 2 (1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Minister of National Development, Primary Production Department and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision shall apply from 1 August 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 May 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery products originating in Singapore and intended for export to the European Community with the exception of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in any form
Reference No:
Country of dispatch: SINGAPORE
Competent authority: Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department
Inspection department: Veterinary Public Health Division
I. Details identifying the fishery products
Description of product:
– Species (scientific name):
– Presentation of product and type of treatment (1):
Code number (where available):
Type of packaging:
Number of packages:
Net weight:
Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishments(s) approved by the Ministry of National Development, Primary Production Department for export to the EC:
III. Destination of products
The products are dispatched
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
IV. Health attestation
The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery products specified above:
1. were caught and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto.
Done at: ,
(place) on:
Official stamp
Signature of official inspector (name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
(1) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, etc.
List of approved establishments >(1)”> ID=”1″>VPH-CS-001> ID=”2″>Q.B. Food Trading Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-CS-002> ID=”2″>Tai Wee Company (Pte) Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 0512> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-CS-003> ID=”2″>NCS Cold Store> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-001> ID=”2″>Global Fisheries Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-002> ID=”2″>Wales Seafood (Singapore) Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2263> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-003> ID=”2″>Fong Hsiang Enterprises Co. Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-004> ID=”2″>Sigma Food Products Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2775> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-005> ID=”2″>Tri-Oceanic (Pte) Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-006> ID=”2″>Marissco (Pte) Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-007> ID=”2″>Thong Siek Trading Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2775> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-FE-008> ID=”2″>Tenneco Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 1953> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-ME-001> ID=”2″>Effort Holdings Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 0512> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-ME-002> ID=”2″>Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2158> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-ME-003> ID=”2″>Amoy Canning Corporation (Singapore) Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 2261> ID=”4″>unlimited”> ID=”1″>VPH-SE-001> ID=”2″>Woh Hup Food Industries Pte Ltd> ID=”3″>Singapore 0512> ID=”4″>unlimited””
(1) Date of expiry of approval, or unlimited.

Pending: 31994D0269

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Colombia to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of Colombian legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas, in Colombia, the Ministry of Health (Foodstuffs Division) is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in point (a) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to point (b) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery and aquaculture products, giving the name of the non-member country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to point (c) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the Colombian Ministry of Health to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the Colombian Ministry of Health to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4); Whereas the Colombian Ministry of Health has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Ministry of Health (Foodstuffs Division) shall be the competent authority in Colombia for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Colombia must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model set out in Annex A;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Colombia’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. The certificate referred to in point 1 of Article 2 must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Ministry of Health of Colombia and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the other indications on the certificate.

Article 4
This Decision shall apply from 1 June 1994.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 April 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Colombia to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community; Whereas the provisions of Colombian legislation on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC; Whereas, in Colombia, the Ministry of Health (Foodstuffs Division) is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force; Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in point (a) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it; Whereas, pursuant to point (b) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery and aquaculture products, giving the name of the non-member country and the approval number of the establishment of origin; Whereas, pursuant to point (c) of Article 11 (4) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments must be drawn up; whereas that list must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the Colombian Ministry of Health to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the Colombian Ministry of Health to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11 (4); Whereas the Colombian Ministry of Health has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval of establishments; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Ministry of Health (Foodstuffs Division) shall be the competent authority in Colombia for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Colombia must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model set out in Annex A;
2. the products must come from approved establishments listed in Annex B;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘Colombia’ and the approval number of the establishment of origin in indelible letters.
1. The certificate referred to in point 1 of Article 2 must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. The certificate must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the Ministry of Health of Colombia and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the other indications on the certificate.
This Decision shall apply from 1 June 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 April 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery and aquaculture products originating in Colombia and intended for export to the European Community with the exception of bilvalve molluscs, echinoderms tunicates and marine gastropods in any form
Reference No
Country of dispatch: Colombia
Competent authority: Ministry of Health
Inspection Service: Foodstuffs Division
I. Details identifying the fishery products
Description of fishery or aquaculture product (1):
– species (scientific name):
– presentation of product (2) and type of treatment:
Code number (where available):
Type of packaging:
Number of packages:
Net weight:
Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name (s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s) approved by the Ministry of Health for exports to the Community:
III. Destination of products
The products are dispatched
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
IV. Health attestation
The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery and aquaculture products specified above:
1. were caught and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto.
Signature of official inspector
(name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
(1) Delete where inapplicable.
(2) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, etc.
LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS
“” ID=”1″>0017-91> ID=”2″>Comercializadora Internacional Vikingos, SA (Vikingos SA), Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0019-91> ID=”2″>Frigorífico y Pesca de Cartagena, SA (CI Frigopesca SA), Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0023-91> ID=”2″>Comercializadora Internacional Océanos SA (CI Océanos), Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0040-91> ID=”2″>Comercializadora Antillana SA (Antillana SA), Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0024-91> ID=”2″>Comercializadora Internacional (Coapesca Ltda), Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0023-91> ID=”2″>Atunes de Colombia SA, Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0023-91> ID=”2″>Seatech International, Cartagena”> ID=”1″>0001-91> ID=”2″>Frigorífica Ganadero SA (Frigogan SA), Barranquilla”> ID=”1″>0042-91> ID=”2″>Industrial Pesquera Colombiana SA (Indupesca SA), Cartagena”> ID=”1″>00197-91 > ID=”2″>Frigomarina, Buenaventura”> ID=”1″>0013-91> ID=”2″>Industria de Pesca sobre el Pacífico SA (Inpesca SA), Buenaventura”> ID=”1″>0109-92> ID=”2″>Compañía Pesquera Colombiana (Copescol SA), Buenaventura”> ID=”1″>0198-92> ID=”2″>Armadores Pesqueros Colombianos (Arpecol), Buenaventura”> ID=”1″>0033-91> ID=”2″>Inversiones Marítimas del Pacífico, Ltda (Invermarp), Buenaventura”> ID=”1″>0028-91> ID=”2″>Comercializadora El Delfín Blanco, Ltda, Tumaco”>

Pending: 31994D0143

January 15, 2026
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 paragraph 2 (a) and (c) thereof, Whereas Annex I Chapter 8 of the abovementioned Directive allows the import of serum from equidae from third countries, from which the import of slaughter equidae is allowed; Whereas the animal health conditions and veterinary certification must be laid down in order to guarantee the disease status of the serum; Whereas considering that a new certification regime is established, a period of time should be provided for its implementation; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
1. Member States shall authorize the importation of serum from equidae from third countries or parts of third countries, from where the import of live equidae for slaughter is allowed, if it is accompanied by a health certificate as laid down in the Annex to this Decision.
2. The health certificate shall consist of one sheet and shall be completed in at least one official language of the Member State carrying out the import control.

Article 2
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1994.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 March 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 paragraph 2 (a) and (c) thereof, Whereas Annex I Chapter 8 of the abovementioned Directive allows the import of serum from equidae from third countries, from which the import of slaughter equidae is allowed; Whereas the animal health conditions and veterinary certification must be laid down in order to guarantee the disease status of the serum; Whereas considering that a new certification regime is established, a period of time should be provided for its implementation; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1. Member States shall authorize the importation of serum from equidae from third countries or parts of third countries, from where the import of live equidae for slaughter is allowed, if it is accompanied by a health certificate as laid down in the Annex to this Decision.
2. The health certificate shall consist of one sheet and shall be completed in at least one official language of the Member State carrying out the import control.
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1994.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 March 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for the import of serum from equidae from third countries or parts of third countries from which the import of live equidae for slaughter is allowed intended for dispatch to the European Community
Note to the importer
This certificate is for veterinary purposes only and must accompany the consignment until it reaches the border inspection post.
Country of destination:
Reference No of the health certificate:
Exporting country:
Responsible ministry:
Certifying department:
I. Identification of serum
Nature of packaging:
Number of packages:
Net weight:
II. Origin of serum
Address and veterinary control number of the registered establishment of collection
III. Destination of serum
The serum will be sent from
(place of loading)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport
No of the seal (1):
Name and address of consignor:
Name and address of consignee:
IV. Attestation
The undersigned official veterinarian certifies that:
the serum from equidae described above
(a) comes from a country where the following diseases are compulsorily notifiable; African horse sickness, dourine, glanders, equine encephalomyclitis (of all types including VEE), equine infectious anaemia, vesicular stomatitis, rabies, anthrax;
(b) was obtained, under the supervision of a veterinarian, from equidae which at the time of collection were free from clinical signs of infectious disease;
c) was obtained from equidae, which have remained since birth in the territory or, in cases of official regionalization according to Community legislation, in parts of the territory of a third country in which:
i) Venezuelan equine encephalomyclitis has not occurred during the last two years;
ii) dourine has not occurred during the last six months;
iii) glanders has not occurred during the last six months;
d) was obtained from equidae, which at the moment of collection did not come from a holding and have not been present on a holding which was subject to prohibition for animal health reasons:
i) within the previous six months in the case of equine encephalomyelitis, beginning on the date on which the equidae suffering from the disease are slaughtered;
ii) in the case of infectious anaemia, until the date on which, the infected animals having been slaughtered, the remaining animals have shown a negative reaction to two Coggins tests carried out three months apart;
iii) within the previous six months in the case of vesicular stomatitis;
iv) within the previous month of the last recorded case, in the case of rabies;
v) within the previous 15 days of the last recorded case, in the case of anthrax.
If all the animals of species susceptible to the disease located on the holding have been slaughtered and the premises disinfected, the period of prohibition shall be 30 days, beginning on the day on which the animals were destroyed and the premises disinfected, except in the case of anthrax, where the period of prohibition is 15 days;
e) has undergone all precautions to avoid contamination with pathogenic agents during production, handling and packaging;
f) was packed in sealed impermeable containers clearly labelled ‘serum from equidae’ and bearing the registration number of the establishment of collection.
(signature of the official veterinarian) (1)
(name in capital letters)
(1) Optional.
(2) The signature and the stamp must be in a colour different to that of the printing.

Pending: 31994D0086

January 15, 2026
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992 on public health and animal health problems relating to the killing of wild game and the placing on the market of wild game meat (1), as amended by Directive 92/116/EEC (2), and in particular Article 16 (2) and (3) thereof, Whereas imports of wild game meat must come from third countries or parts of third countries which are able to offer to Member States equivalent guarantees to the conditions laid down for the placing on the Community market; Whereas in view of facilitating the new system of controls, it is necessary to draw up a provisional list of third countries or parts of third countries concerned, from which imports of wild feathered game meat or other wild game meat are authorized; Whereas it is justified to separate imports of fresh meat of ungulates which are authorized from third countries appearing on the list of Part I of the Annex of Council Decision 79/542/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Decision 93/507/EEC (4); Whereas, considering the adaptation to the new system which will follow the adoption of these lists, it is justified to foresee a period of time for their application; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in conformity with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 16
(2) and (3) thereof,
Whereas imports of wild game meat must come from third countries or parts of third countries which are able to offer to Member States equivalent guarantees to the conditions laid down for the placing on the Community market;
Whereas in view of facilitating the new system of controls, it is necessary to draw up a provisional list of third countries or parts of third countries concerned, from which imports of wild feathered game meat or other wild game meat are authorized;
Whereas it is justified to separate imports of fresh meat of ungulates which are authorized from third countries appearing on the list of Part I of the Annex of Council Decision 79/542/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Decision 93/507/EEC (4);
Whereas, considering the adaptation to the new system which will follow the adoption of these lists, it is justified to foresee a period of time for their application;
Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in conformity with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
Member States shall authorize imports of wild feathered game meat from third countries appearing on the list in Part I of the Annex.
Member States shall authorize imports of wild game meat other than wild feathered game meat from third countries appearing on the list in Part II of the Annex.

Article 2
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1994.

Article 3
This Decision is addressed to Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 35.
(2) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 1.
(3) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.
(4) OJ No L 237, 22. 9. 1993, p. 36.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992 on public health and animal health problems relating to the killing of wild game and the placing on the market of wild game meat (1), as amended by Directive 92/116/EEC (2), and in particular Article 16 (2) and (3) thereof, Whereas imports of wild game meat must come from third countries or parts of third countries which are able to offer to Member States equivalent guarantees to the conditions laid down for the placing on the Community market; Whereas in view of facilitating the new system of controls, it is necessary to draw up a provisional list of third countries or parts of third countries concerned, from which imports of wild feathered game meat or other wild game meat are authorized; Whereas it is justified to separate imports of fresh meat of ungulates which are authorized from third countries appearing on the list of Part I of the Annex of Council Decision 79/542/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Decision 93/507/EEC (4); Whereas, considering the adaptation to the new system which will follow the adoption of these lists, it is justified to foresee a period of time for their application; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in conformity with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
(2) and (3) thereof,
Whereas imports of wild game meat must come from third countries or parts of third countries which are able to offer to Member States equivalent guarantees to the conditions laid down for the placing on the Community market;
Whereas in view of facilitating the new system of controls, it is necessary to draw up a provisional list of third countries or parts of third countries concerned, from which imports of wild feathered game meat or other wild game meat are authorized;
Whereas it is justified to separate imports of fresh meat of ungulates which are authorized from third countries appearing on the list of Part I of the Annex of Council Decision 79/542/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Decision 93/507/EEC (4);
Whereas, considering the adaptation to the new system which will follow the adoption of these lists, it is justified to foresee a period of time for their application;
Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in conformity with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Member States shall authorize imports of wild feathered game meat from third countries appearing on the list in Part I of the Annex.
Member States shall authorize imports of wild game meat other than wild feathered game meat from third countries appearing on the list in Part II of the Annex.
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1994.
This Decision is addressed to Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 1994.
For the Commission
René STEICHEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 35.
(2) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 1.
(3) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.
(4) OJ No L 237, 22. 9. 1993, p. 36.
The following lists are lists in principle and importations shall fulfil the relevant animal and public health requirements.
PART I List of third countries from which Member States shall authorize imports of wild feathered game meat: – The list of third countries from which Member States authorize imports of fresh poultry meat appearing in Commission Decision 94/85/EC (1), but excluding those third countries permietted to export fresh poultry meat to the Community by virtue of the exercise of the derogations in Article 4, paragraphs 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 93/342/EEC (2).
– Greenland
PART II List of third countries from which Member States authorize imports of wild game meat other than wild feathered game meat: A. For meat derived from wild clovenhoofed animals and solipeds:
third countries listed in the appropriate columns for fresh meat of wild clovenhoofed animals and wild solipeds in the first part of the Annex to Council Decision 79/542/EEC including any restrictions laid down in the column for special remarks for fresh meat.
B. For meat derived from wild game other than those referred to in Part I and Part II (A) above:
third countries listed in the first part of the Annex to Council Decision 79/542/EEC.
(1) See page 31 of this Official Journal.
(2) OJ No L 137, 8. 6. 1993, p. 24.