Pending: 31999D0319

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to Common Position 1999/318/CFSP(1), adopted by the Council on 10 May 1999 concerning additional restrictive measures against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY),Whereas in order to implement

Article 1
The persons to which the obligation of non-admission referred to in Article 1 of Common Position 1999/318/CFSP applies are the following:

Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the same date as Common Position 1999/318/CFSP.

Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal.
Done at Brussels, 10 May 1999.
For the Council
The President
(1) See page 1 of this Official Journal.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to Common Position 1999/318/CFSP(1), adopted by the Council on 10 May 1999 concerning additional restrictive measures against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY),Whereas in order to implement
The persons to which the obligation of non-admission referred to in Article 1 of Common Position 1999/318/CFSP applies are the following:
This Decision shall take effect on the same date as Common Position 1999/318/CFSP.
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal.
Done at Brussels, 10 May 1999.
For the Council
The President
(1) See page 1 of this Official Journal.

Pending: 31999D0311

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(4),(1) Whereas the European Council meeting in Strasbourg on 8 and 9 December 1989 called on the Council to adopt, on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, measures aimed at enabling the central and eastern European countries to take part in programmes in the areas of education and/or training similar to the existing Community programmes;(2) Whereas on 18 December 1989 the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 on economic aid to the Republic of Hungary and the Polish People’s Republic(5) (PHARE programme), which provides for aid to support the process of economic and social reform in central and eastern European countries in areas including training; whereas on 25 June 1996 the Council adopted Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 concerning the provision of assistance to economic reform and recovery in the new independent States and Mongolia(6) (TACIS programme);(3) Whereas on 29 April 1993 by Decision 93/246/EEC the Council adopted the second phase of the trans-European cooperation scheme for higher education (Tempus II) for a period of four years from 1 July 1994(7); whereas that Decision was amended on 21 November 1996 by Decision 96/663/EC(8) to extend to six years the duration of this programme (1994-2000);(4) Whereas the countries of central and eastern Europe, the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia, which are beneficiaries of the PHARE and TACIS programmes, consider higher education and training to be key areas for the process of economic and social reform;(5) Whereas cooperation on higher education strengthens and deepens the whole fabric of relations existing between the peoples of Europe, brings out common cultural values, allows fruitful exchanges of views to take place and facilitates multinational activities in the scientific, cultural, artistic, economic and social spheres;(6) Whereas the recent establishment of Tempus in the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and in Mongolia, whose needs are greater and whose areas are more extensive, fully warrants the continuation of the measures undertaken;(7) Whereas Tempus can make an effective contribution to the structural development of higher education including the improvement of human resources and occupational skills adapted to economic reform and whereas there is no other instrument for achieving this objective;(8) Whereas Tempus can also make an effective contribution, via universities and university staff, to the development of public administration and education structures in the eligible countries;(9) Whereas Tempus can contribute to the restoration of cooperation, interrupted by recent events, between neighbouring regions of the Community and whereas this cooperation is a factor of peace and stability in Europe;(10) Whereas the associated countries in the pre-accession phase which have taken part in Tempus I and Tempus II could now, thanks to the experience they have acquired, make a useful contribution alongside the Member States in assisting the partner countries who came into the programme at a much later stage to restructure their higher education systems;(11) Whereas Article 11 of Decision 93/246/EEC stipulates that the Commission must carry out an evaluation of the implementation of the Tempus programme and submit no later than 30 April 1998 a proposal for the extension or the adjustment of the programme for the period commencing on 1 July 2000;(12) Whereas the competent authorities in the countries of central and eastern Europe, the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia, the users of the programme, the structures responsible for organising it in the eligible countries and in the European Community, and the experts and qualified representatives reflecting the views of the university world in Europe, share the findings of the evaluation report attesting to the capacity of Tempus to make an effective contribution in the eligible countries to the diversification of educational opportunities and to cooperation between universities, thereby paving the way for the development of scientific, cultural and economic and social cooperation;(13) Whereas the possibility should be provided of creating effective coordination between the Tempus III programme and other Community programmes or activities with an educational and/or training-related dimension, thus stimulating synergies and increasing the added value of each of the Community activities;(14) Whereas the Treaty does not provide, for the adoption of this Decision, powers other than those of Article 235; whereas the conditions for invoking that Article have been satisfied,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Duration of Tempus IIIThe third phase of the trans-European cooperation scheme for higher education (hereinafter referred to as “Tempus III”) is hereby adopted for a period of six years as from 1 July 2000.Article 2Eligible countriesTempus III shall concern the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible for economic aid by virtue of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 (PHARE programme)(9), and the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia mentioned in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 (TACIS programme), subject to these assistance programmes being prolonged for the period referred to. These countries are hereinafter referred to as “eligible countries”.On the basis of an evaluation of the specific situation of each country the Commission, in accordance with the procedures set out in the said Regulations, shall agree with the eligible countries concerned whether they should participate in Tempus III, and the nature and conditions of their participation in the national planning of Community assistance for social and economic reform.Article 3Involvement of associated countriesActions under Tempus III are also open to the associated countries of central and eastern Europe so that what has been achieved through Tempus can be shared with the neighbouring countries and in order to develop regional and cross-border cooperation. Taking into account the respective financial rules and regulations, cooperation between Tempus and Erasmus projects should be encouraged.Article 4DefinitionsFor the purposes of Tempus III:(a) the term “university” shall be used to cover all types of post-secondary educational and vocational training establishments which offer, within the framework of advanced education and training, qualifications or diplomas of that level, whatever such establishments may be called;(b) the terms “industry” and “company” shall be used to cover all types of economic activity, irrespective of legal status, autonomous business organisations, chambers of commerce and industry and/or their equivalents, professional associations, and the training bodies of the institutions and organisations mentioned above;(c) the term “institution” shall be used to cover local and public authorities, and the social partners’ and their training bodies.Each Member State or eligible country may determine what types of establishment referred to in point (a) can participate in Tempus III.Article 5AimsThe aim of Tempus III is to promote, in line with the guidelines and general objectives of the PHARE and TACIS programmes for economic and social reform, the development of the higher education systems in the eligible countries through the most balanced cooperation possible with the partners from all the Member States of the Community.More specifically, Tempus III is intended to facilitate the adaptation of higher education to the new socio-economic and cultural needs of the eligible countries by addressing:(a) issues relating to the development and reshaping of curricula in the priority areas;(b) reform of higher education structures and establishments and their management;(c) the development of training leading to qualifications, with a view to making good the shortage of high-level skills needed in the context of economic reform, particularly by improving and increasing links with industry;(d) the contribution of higher education and training to citizenship and the strengthening of democracy.The Commission will, when pursuing the objectives of Tempus III, endeavour to adhere to the Community’s general policy on equal opportunities for men and women. The Commission will also endeavour to ensure that no group of citizens is excluded or disadvantaged.Article 6Dialogue with the eligible countriesIn agreement with the competent authorities in each country, the Commission will define the detailed priorities and objectives for the role of Tempus III in the national strategy for economic and social reform, on the basis of the programme’s objectives and the provisions set out in the Annex, and in conformity in particular with:(a) (i) the general objectives of the PHARE programme;(ii) the general objectives of the TACIS programme, with particular reference to its sectoral aspects;(b) the policy of each eligible country on economic, social and educational reforms;(c) the need to strike an appropriate balance between the priority areas selected and the resources allocated to Tempus III.Article 7Committee1. The Commission shall implement the Tempus III programme in accordance with the provisions of the Annex, on the basis of detailed guidelines to be adopted annually and following the detailed objectives and priorities agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country, as provided for in Article 6.2. In the performance of that task, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of two representatives appointed by each Member State and chaired by the Commission representative. The members of the committee may be assisted by experts and advisers.The committee shall, in particular, assist the Commission in the implementation of the scheme having regard to the objectives set out in Article 5 and shall coordinate its work with that of other programme committees established in the field of education (Socrates) and training (Leonardo).3. The Commission representative shall submit to the Committee drafts for measures concerning:(a) the general guidelines governing Tempus III;(b) the selection procedures and general guidelines for the Community’s financial assistance (amounts, duration and beneficiaries);(c) questions relating to the overall balance of Tempus III, including the breakdown between the various actions;(d) the detailed priorities and objectives to be agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country;(e) the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating Tempus III.4. The committee shall deliver its opinion on these draft measures within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith.In that event the Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided upon for a period of one month.The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the previous subparagraph.5. In addition, the Commission may consult the committee on any other matter concerning the implementation of Tempus III, including the annual report.The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on this draft, within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote.The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes.The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee on the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account.Article 8Cooperation with the competent bodies1. The Commission shall cooperate with the agencies of each of the eligible countries designated and set up to coordinate the relations and structures needed to implement Tempus III, including the allocation of funds earmarked by the eligible countries themselves.2. In addition, for the implementation of Tempus III, the Commission shall cooperate closely with the competent national structures designated by the Member States. It shall take due account whenever possible of bilateral measures taken in this context by the Member States.Article 9Links with other Community actionsIn line with the procedure set out in Article 7(3) of this Decision and, if applicable, the procedure defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 and in Article 8 of Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96, within the limits established by the annual budgetary decisions, the Commission shall ensure consistency and, where necessary, complementarity between Tempus III and other Community actions undertaken both in the Community and as part of assistance provided to eligible countries, particularly with regard to the activities of the European Training Foundation.Article 10Coordination with action taken in non-Community countries1. The Commission shall organise appropriate coordination with actions undertaken by countries not members of the Community(10) or by universities and the business sector in these countries in the same field as Tempus III, including, where applicable, participation in Tempus III projects.2. This participation may take a variety of forms, including one or more of the following:- participation in Tempus III projects on a co-financing basis,- using the opportunities available under Tempus III to channel exchange actions receiving bilateral funding,- coordination between Tempus III and national initiatives which have the same aims but which are funded and managed separately,- mutual exchange of information on all relevant initiatives in this field.Article 11Annual reportAn annual report on the operation of Tempus III shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. This report shall also be forwarded to the eligible countries for information.Article 12Monitoring and evaluation – reportsIn accordance with the procedure set out in Article 7(3), the Commission shall supervise the arrangements for regular monitoring and external evaluation of experience gained with Tempus III, taking due account of the specific objectives in Article 5 and the national objectives defined in accordance with Article 6.It shall submit by 30 April 2004 an interim report on the findings of the evaluation, together with any proposals for extending or adjusting Tempus for the period commencing on 1 July 2006.The Commission shall submit a final report no later than 30 June 2009.Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 1999.For the CouncilThe PresidentW. MÜLLER(1) OJ C 270, 29.8.1998, p. 9, and OJ C 87, 29.3.1999, p. 102.(2) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999.(3) OJ C 40, 15.2.1999, p. 23.(4) OJ C 51, 22.2.1999, p. 86.(5) OJ L 375, 23.12.1989, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 753/96 (OJ L 103, 26.4.1996, p. 5).(6) OJ L 165, 4.7.1996, p. 1.(7) OJ L 112, 6.5.1993, p. 34.(8) OJ L 306, 28.11.1996, p. 36.(9) At present Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.(10) These countries are the members of the Group of 24, other than the Member States of the Community, the Republic of Cyprus and Malta, and the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, and participation relates to projects with the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible under the PHARE programme.ANNEXJoint European projects1. The European Community will provide support for joint European projects (JEPs) of a maximum of three years’ duration.The JEPs will associate at least one university in an eligible country, one university from a Member State and a partner establishment (university, company or institution as defined in Article 4) in another Member State.2. Support for JEPs can be provided for activities according to the specific needs of the establishments concerned and in line with the priorities established, including:(i) joint education and training actions, particularly with a view to curriculum development and updating, boosting university capacity to provide continuing education and retraining, development of short intensive courses, and development of open and distance learning systems including information and communication technology;(ii) measures for the reform and development of higher education and its capacity, particularly by restructuring the management of higher education establishments and systems, by modernising existing infrastructures, by acquiring the equipment needed to implement a JEP and, where applicable, by providing technical and financial assistance to the authorities responsible;(iii) the promotion of cooperation between universities, industry and institutions as defined in Article 4 through JEPs;(iv) the development of mobility for teachers, administrative staff of universities and students under JEPs:(a) grants will be provided for teaching/administrative staff of universities or to trainers in companies in the Member States to carry out teaching/training assignments for periods lasting up to one year in eligible countries and vice versa;(b) grants will be awarded to teaching/administrative staff of universities in the eligible countries to undertake periods of retraining and updating in the European Community;(c) grants will be available for students up to and including postgraduate at doctoral level, targeting both students in the eligible countries undertaking a period of study in the European Community and European Community students undertaking a period of study in the eligible countries. These grants will normally be granted for a period of three months to one year;(d) grants will be available for students taking part in JEPs with the specific aim of promoting mobility, priority will go to students taking part in projects for which their university of origin will give full academic recognition to the period of study spent abroad;(e) support will be provided for practical or in-company training periods of one month to one year for teachers, trainers, students and graduates of the eligible countries between the end of their studies and their first job, so that they can undertake a period of practical training in companies in the Community and vice versa;(v) activities to ensure the success of a JEP involving two or more eligible countries.Structural and/or complementary measuresFinancial support will be provided for certain structural and/or complementary measures (particularly technical assistance, seminars, studies, publications, information activities) to support the objectives of the programme, particularly the development and restructuring of higher education systems in the eligible countries. Under the structural measures, financial aid will be granted to assist the eligible countries inter alia to:- develop and strengthen the capacity for strategic planning and institutional development of higher education establishments at university or faculty level,- establish a development plan for universities to help them build up international relations,- support the spread of durable cooperation actions targeting the Tempus objectives,- prepare a national strategy in a given eligible country to develop a specific aspect of higher education.Individual grantsIn addition to the JEPs and the structural and/or complementary measures, the European Community will also support the provision of individual grants to teachers, trainers, university administrators, senior ministerial officials, education planners and other experts in training from eligible countries or from the Community, for visits to promote the quality, development and restructuring of higher education and training in the eligible countries.These visits could inter alia cover the following areas:- the development of courses and teaching material,- the development of staff, particularly through periods of refresher training and in-company placements,- teaching and training assignments,- activities to support the development of higher education,- participation in the activities of European associations, in particular university associations.Support actions1. The Commission will receive the technical assistance needed to underpin the action taken pursuant to this Decision and to monitor programme implementation.2. Support will be provided for appropriate external evaluation of Tempus III. Support will also be provided for dissemination in relation to JEPs, structural and/or complementary measures and individual mobility and for dissemination of successful outcomes from specific projects in earlier stages of the Tempus programme.

Article 1
Duration of Tempus III
The third phase of the trans-European cooperation scheme for higher education (hereinafter referred to as “Tempus III”) is hereby adopted for a period of six years as from 1 July 2000.

Article 2
Eligible countries
Tempus III shall concern the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible for economic aid by virtue of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 (PHARE programme)(9), and the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia mentioned in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 (TACIS programme), subject to these assistance programmes being prolonged for the period referred to. These countries are hereinafter referred to as “eligible countries”.
On the basis of an evaluation of the specific situation of each country the Commission, in accordance with the procedures set out in the said Regulations, shall agree with the eligible countries concerned whether they should participate in Tempus III, and the nature and conditions of their participation in the national planning of Community assistance for social and economic reform.

Article 3
Involvement of associated countries
Actions under Tempus III are also open to the associated countries of central and eastern Europe so that what has been achieved through Tempus can be shared with the neighbouring countries and in order to develop regional and cross-border cooperation. Taking into account the respective financial rules and regulations, cooperation between Tempus and Erasmus projects should be encouraged.

Article 4
Definitions
For the purposes of Tempus III:
(a) the term “university” shall be used to cover all types of post-secondary educational and vocational training establishments which offer, within the framework of advanced education and training, qualifications or diplomas of that level, whatever such establishments may be called;
(b) the terms “industry” and “company” shall be used to cover all types of economic activity, irrespective of legal status, autonomous business organisations, chambers of commerce and industry and/or their equivalents, professional associations, and the training bodies of the institutions and organisations mentioned above;
(c) the term “institution” shall be used to cover local and public authorities, and the social partners’ and their training bodies.
Each Member State or eligible country may determine what types of establishment referred to in point (a) can participate in Tempus III.

Article 5
The aim of Tempus III is to promote, in line with the guidelines and general objectives of the PHARE and TACIS programmes for economic and social reform, the development of the higher education systems in the eligible countries through the most balanced cooperation possible with the partners from all the Member States of the Community.
More specifically, Tempus III is intended to facilitate the adaptation of higher education to the new socio-economic and cultural needs of the eligible countries by addressing:
(a) issues relating to the development and reshaping of curricula in the priority areas;
(b) reform of higher education structures and establishments and their management;
(c) the development of training leading to qualifications, with a view to making good the shortage of high-level skills needed in the context of economic reform, particularly by improving and increasing links with industry;
(d) the contribution of higher education and training to citizenship and the strengthening of democracy.
The Commission will, when pursuing the objectives of Tempus III, endeavour to adhere to the Community’s general policy on equal opportunities for men and women. The Commission will also endeavour to ensure that no group of citizens is excluded or disadvantaged.

Article 6
Dialogue with the eligible countries
In agreement with the competent authorities in each country, the Commission will define the detailed priorities and objectives for the role of Tempus III in the national strategy for economic and social reform, on the basis of the programme’s objectives and the provisions set out in the Annex, and in conformity in particular with:
(a) (i) the general objectives of the PHARE programme;
(ii) the general objectives of the TACIS programme, with particular reference to its sectoral aspects;
(b) the policy of each eligible country on economic, social and educational reforms;
(c) the need to strike an appropriate balance between the priority areas selected and the resources allocated to Tempus III.

Article 7
1. The Commission shall implement the Tempus III programme in accordance with the provisions of the Annex, on the basis of detailed guidelines to be adopted annually and following the detailed objectives and priorities agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country, as provided for in Article 6.
2. In the performance of that task, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of two representatives appointed by each Member State and chaired by the Commission representative. The members of the committee may be assisted by experts and advisers.
The committee shall, in particular, assist the Commission in the implementation of the scheme having regard to the objectives set out in Article 5 and shall coordinate its work with that of other programme committees established in the field of education (Socrates) and training (Leonardo).
3. The Commission representative shall submit to the Committee drafts for measures concerning:
(a) the general guidelines governing Tempus III;
(b) the selection procedures and general guidelines for the Community’s financial assistance (amounts, duration and beneficiaries);
(c) questions relating to the overall balance of Tempus III, including the breakdown between the various actions;
(d) the detailed priorities and objectives to be agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country;
(e) the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating Tempus III.
4. The committee shall deliver its opinion on these draft measures within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith.
In that event the Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided upon for a period of one month.
The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the previous subparagraph.
5. In addition, the Commission may consult the committee on any other matter concerning the implementation of Tempus III, including the annual report.
The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on this draft, within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote.
The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes.
The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee on the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account.

Article 8
Cooperation with the competent bodies
1. The Commission shall cooperate with the agencies of each of the eligible countries designated and set up to coordinate the relations and structures needed to implement Tempus III, including the allocation of funds earmarked by the eligible countries themselves.
2. In addition, for the implementation of Tempus III, the Commission shall cooperate closely with the competent national structures designated by the Member States. It shall take due account whenever possible of bilateral measures taken in this context by the Member States.

Article 9
Links with other Community actions
In line with the procedure set out in Article 7(3) of this Decision and, if applicable, the procedure defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 and in Article 8 of Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96, within the limits established by the annual budgetary decisions, the Commission shall ensure consistency and, where necessary, complementarity between Tempus III and other Community actions undertaken both in the Community and as part of assistance provided to eligible countries, particularly with regard to the activities of the European Training Foundation.

Article 10
Coordination with action taken in non-Community countries
1. The Commission shall organise appropriate coordination with actions undertaken by countries not members of the Community(10) or by universities and the business sector in these countries in the same field as Tempus III, including, where applicable, participation in Tempus III projects.
2. This participation may take a variety of forms, including one or more of the following:
– participation in Tempus III projects on a co-financing basis,
– using the opportunities available under Tempus III to channel exchange actions receiving bilateral funding,
– coordination between Tempus III and national initiatives which have the same aims but which are funded and managed separately,
– mutual exchange of information on all relevant initiatives in this field.

Article 11
Annual report
An annual report on the operation of Tempus III shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. This report shall also be forwarded to the eligible countries for information.

Article 12
Monitoring and evaluation – reports
In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 7(3), the Commission shall supervise the arrangements for regular monitoring and external evaluation of experience gained with Tempus III, taking due account of the specific objectives in Article 5 and the national objectives defined in accordance with Article 6.
It shall submit by 30 April 2004 an interim report on the findings of the evaluation, together with any proposals for extending or adjusting Tempus for the period commencing on 1 July 2006.
The Commission shall submit a final report no later than 30 June 2009.
Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 1999.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ C 270, 29.8.1998, p. 9, and OJ C 87, 29.3.1999, p. 102.
(2) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999.
(3) OJ C 40, 15.2.1999, p. 23.
(4) OJ C 51, 22.2.1999, p. 86.
(5) OJ L 375, 23.12.1989, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 753/96 (OJ L 103, 26.4.1996, p. 5).
(6) OJ L 165, 4.7.1996, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 112, 6.5.1993, p. 34.
(8) OJ L 306, 28.11.1996, p. 36.
(9) At present Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
(10) These countries are the members of the Group of 24, other than the Member States of the Community, the Republic of Cyprus and Malta, and the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, and participation relates to projects with the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible under the PHARE programme.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(4),(1) Whereas the European Council meeting in Strasbourg on 8 and 9 December 1989 called on the Council to adopt, on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, measures aimed at enabling the central and eastern European countries to take part in programmes in the areas of education and/or training similar to the existing Community programmes;(2) Whereas on 18 December 1989 the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 on economic aid to the Republic of Hungary and the Polish People’s Republic(5) (PHARE programme), which provides for aid to support the process of economic and social reform in central and eastern European countries in areas including training; whereas on 25 June 1996 the Council adopted Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 concerning the provision of assistance to economic reform and recovery in the new independent States and Mongolia(6) (TACIS programme);(3) Whereas on 29 April 1993 by Decision 93/246/EEC the Council adopted the second phase of the trans-European cooperation scheme for higher education (Tempus II) for a period of four years from 1 July 1994(7); whereas that Decision was amended on 21 November 1996 by Decision 96/663/EC(8) to extend to six years the duration of this programme (1994-2000);(4) Whereas the countries of central and eastern Europe, the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia, which are beneficiaries of the PHARE and TACIS programmes, consider higher education and training to be key areas for the process of economic and social reform;(5) Whereas cooperation on higher education strengthens and deepens the whole fabric of relations existing between the peoples of Europe, brings out common cultural values, allows fruitful exchanges of views to take place and facilitates multinational activities in the scientific, cultural, artistic, economic and social spheres;(6) Whereas the recent establishment of Tempus in the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe, in the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and in Mongolia, whose needs are greater and whose areas are more extensive, fully warrants the continuation of the measures undertaken;(7) Whereas Tempus can make an effective contribution to the structural development of higher education including the improvement of human resources and occupational skills adapted to economic reform and whereas there is no other instrument for achieving this objective;(8) Whereas Tempus can also make an effective contribution, via universities and university staff, to the development of public administration and education structures in the eligible countries;(9) Whereas Tempus can contribute to the restoration of cooperation, interrupted by recent events, between neighbouring regions of the Community and whereas this cooperation is a factor of peace and stability in Europe;(10) Whereas the associated countries in the pre-accession phase which have taken part in Tempus I and Tempus II could now, thanks to the experience they have acquired, make a useful contribution alongside the Member States in assisting the partner countries who came into the programme at a much later stage to restructure their higher education systems;(11) Whereas Article 11 of Decision 93/246/EEC stipulates that the Commission must carry out an evaluation of the implementation of the Tempus programme and submit no later than 30 April 1998 a proposal for the extension or the adjustment of the programme for the period commencing on 1 July 2000;(12) Whereas the competent authorities in the countries of central and eastern Europe, the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia, the users of the programme, the structures responsible for organising it in the eligible countries and in the European Community, and the experts and qualified representatives reflecting the views of the university world in Europe, share the findings of the evaluation report attesting to the capacity of Tempus to make an effective contribution in the eligible countries to the diversification of educational opportunities and to cooperation between universities, thereby paving the way for the development of scientific, cultural and economic and social cooperation;(13) Whereas the possibility should be provided of creating effective coordination between the Tempus III programme and other Community programmes or activities with an educational and/or training-related dimension, thus stimulating synergies and increasing the added value of each of the Community activities;(14) Whereas the Treaty does not provide, for the adoption of this Decision, powers other than those of Article 235; whereas the conditions for invoking that Article have been satisfied,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1Duration of Tempus IIIThe third phase of the trans-European cooperation scheme for higher education (hereinafter referred to as “Tempus III”) is hereby adopted for a period of six years as from 1 July 2000.Article 2Eligible countriesTempus III shall concern the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible for economic aid by virtue of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 (PHARE programme)(9), and the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia mentioned in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 (TACIS programme), subject to these assistance programmes being prolonged for the period referred to. These countries are hereinafter referred to as “eligible countries”.On the basis of an evaluation of the specific situation of each country the Commission, in accordance with the procedures set out in the said Regulations, shall agree with the eligible countries concerned whether they should participate in Tempus III, and the nature and conditions of their participation in the national planning of Community assistance for social and economic reform.Article 3Involvement of associated countriesActions under Tempus III are also open to the associated countries of central and eastern Europe so that what has been achieved through Tempus can be shared with the neighbouring countries and in order to develop regional and cross-border cooperation. Taking into account the respective financial rules and regulations, cooperation between Tempus and Erasmus projects should be encouraged.Article 4DefinitionsFor the purposes of Tempus III:(a) the term “university” shall be used to cover all types of post-secondary educational and vocational training establishments which offer, within the framework of advanced education and training, qualifications or diplomas of that level, whatever such establishments may be called;(b) the terms “industry” and “company” shall be used to cover all types of economic activity, irrespective of legal status, autonomous business organisations, chambers of commerce and industry and/or their equivalents, professional associations, and the training bodies of the institutions and organisations mentioned above;(c) the term “institution” shall be used to cover local and public authorities, and the social partners’ and their training bodies.Each Member State or eligible country may determine what types of establishment referred to in point (a) can participate in Tempus III.Article 5AimsThe aim of Tempus III is to promote, in line with the guidelines and general objectives of the PHARE and TACIS programmes for economic and social reform, the development of the higher education systems in the eligible countries through the most balanced cooperation possible with the partners from all the Member States of the Community.More specifically, Tempus III is intended to facilitate the adaptation of higher education to the new socio-economic and cultural needs of the eligible countries by addressing:(a) issues relating to the development and reshaping of curricula in the priority areas;(b) reform of higher education structures and establishments and their management;(c) the development of training leading to qualifications, with a view to making good the shortage of high-level skills needed in the context of economic reform, particularly by improving and increasing links with industry;(d) the contribution of higher education and training to citizenship and the strengthening of democracy.The Commission will, when pursuing the objectives of Tempus III, endeavour to adhere to the Community’s general policy on equal opportunities for men and women. The Commission will also endeavour to ensure that no group of citizens is excluded or disadvantaged.Article 6Dialogue with the eligible countriesIn agreement with the competent authorities in each country, the Commission will define the detailed priorities and objectives for the role of Tempus III in the national strategy for economic and social reform, on the basis of the programme’s objectives and the provisions set out in the Annex, and in conformity in particular with:(a) (i) the general objectives of the PHARE programme;(ii) the general objectives of the TACIS programme, with particular reference to its sectoral aspects;(b) the policy of each eligible country on economic, social and educational reforms;(c) the need to strike an appropriate balance between the priority areas selected and the resources allocated to Tempus III.Article 7Committee1. The Commission shall implement the Tempus III programme in accordance with the provisions of the Annex, on the basis of detailed guidelines to be adopted annually and following the detailed objectives and priorities agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country, as provided for in Article 6.2. In the performance of that task, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of two representatives appointed by each Member State and chaired by the Commission representative. The members of the committee may be assisted by experts and advisers.The committee shall, in particular, assist the Commission in the implementation of the scheme having regard to the objectives set out in Article 5 and shall coordinate its work with that of other programme committees established in the field of education (Socrates) and training (Leonardo).3. The Commission representative shall submit to the Committee drafts for measures concerning:(a) the general guidelines governing Tempus III;(b) the selection procedures and general guidelines for the Community’s financial assistance (amounts, duration and beneficiaries);(c) questions relating to the overall balance of Tempus III, including the breakdown between the various actions;(d) the detailed priorities and objectives to be agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country;(e) the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating Tempus III.4. The committee shall deliver its opinion on these draft measures within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith.In that event the Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided upon for a period of one month.The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the previous subparagraph.5. In addition, the Commission may consult the committee on any other matter concerning the implementation of Tempus III, including the annual report.The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on this draft, within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote.The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes.The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee on the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account.Article 8Cooperation with the competent bodies1. The Commission shall cooperate with the agencies of each of the eligible countries designated and set up to coordinate the relations and structures needed to implement Tempus III, including the allocation of funds earmarked by the eligible countries themselves.2. In addition, for the implementation of Tempus III, the Commission shall cooperate closely with the competent national structures designated by the Member States. It shall take due account whenever possible of bilateral measures taken in this context by the Member States.Article 9Links with other Community actionsIn line with the procedure set out in Article 7(3) of this Decision and, if applicable, the procedure defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 and in Article 8 of Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96, within the limits established by the annual budgetary decisions, the Commission shall ensure consistency and, where necessary, complementarity between Tempus III and other Community actions undertaken both in the Community and as part of assistance provided to eligible countries, particularly with regard to the activities of the European Training Foundation.Article 10Coordination with action taken in non-Community countries1. The Commission shall organise appropriate coordination with actions undertaken by countries not members of the Community(10) or by universities and the business sector in these countries in the same field as Tempus III, including, where applicable, participation in Tempus III projects.2. This participation may take a variety of forms, including one or more of the following:- participation in Tempus III projects on a co-financing basis,- using the opportunities available under Tempus III to channel exchange actions receiving bilateral funding,- coordination between Tempus III and national initiatives which have the same aims but which are funded and managed separately,- mutual exchange of information on all relevant initiatives in this field.Article 11Annual reportAn annual report on the operation of Tempus III shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. This report shall also be forwarded to the eligible countries for information.Article 12Monitoring and evaluation – reportsIn accordance with the procedure set out in Article 7(3), the Commission shall supervise the arrangements for regular monitoring and external evaluation of experience gained with Tempus III, taking due account of the specific objectives in Article 5 and the national objectives defined in accordance with Article 6.It shall submit by 30 April 2004 an interim report on the findings of the evaluation, together with any proposals for extending or adjusting Tempus for the period commencing on 1 July 2006.The Commission shall submit a final report no later than 30 June 2009.Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 1999.For the CouncilThe PresidentW. MÜLLER(1) OJ C 270, 29.8.1998, p. 9, and OJ C 87, 29.3.1999, p. 102.(2) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999.(3) OJ C 40, 15.2.1999, p. 23.(4) OJ C 51, 22.2.1999, p. 86.(5) OJ L 375, 23.12.1989, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 753/96 (OJ L 103, 26.4.1996, p. 5).(6) OJ L 165, 4.7.1996, p. 1.(7) OJ L 112, 6.5.1993, p. 34.(8) OJ L 306, 28.11.1996, p. 36.(9) At present Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.(10) These countries are the members of the Group of 24, other than the Member States of the Community, the Republic of Cyprus and Malta, and the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, and participation relates to projects with the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible under the PHARE programme.ANNEXJoint European projects1. The European Community will provide support for joint European projects (JEPs) of a maximum of three years’ duration.The JEPs will associate at least one university in an eligible country, one university from a Member State and a partner establishment (university, company or institution as defined in Article 4) in another Member State.2. Support for JEPs can be provided for activities according to the specific needs of the establishments concerned and in line with the priorities established, including:(i) joint education and training actions, particularly with a view to curriculum development and updating, boosting university capacity to provide continuing education and retraining, development of short intensive courses, and development of open and distance learning systems including information and communication technology;(ii) measures for the reform and development of higher education and its capacity, particularly by restructuring the management of higher education establishments and systems, by modernising existing infrastructures, by acquiring the equipment needed to implement a JEP and, where applicable, by providing technical and financial assistance to the authorities responsible;(iii) the promotion of cooperation between universities, industry and institutions as defined in Article 4 through JEPs;(iv) the development of mobility for teachers, administrative staff of universities and students under JEPs:(a) grants will be provided for teaching/administrative staff of universities or to trainers in companies in the Member States to carry out teaching/training assignments for periods lasting up to one year in eligible countries and vice versa;(b) grants will be awarded to teaching/administrative staff of universities in the eligible countries to undertake periods of retraining and updating in the European Community;(c) grants will be available for students up to and including postgraduate at doctoral level, targeting both students in the eligible countries undertaking a period of study in the European Community and European Community students undertaking a period of study in the eligible countries. These grants will normally be granted for a period of three months to one year;(d) grants will be available for students taking part in JEPs with the specific aim of promoting mobility, priority will go to students taking part in projects for which their university of origin will give full academic recognition to the period of study spent abroad;(e) support will be provided for practical or in-company training periods of one month to one year for teachers, trainers, students and graduates of the eligible countries between the end of their studies and their first job, so that they can undertake a period of practical training in companies in the Community and vice versa;(v) activities to ensure the success of a JEP involving two or more eligible countries.Structural and/or complementary measuresFinancial support will be provided for certain structural and/or complementary measures (particularly technical assistance, seminars, studies, publications, information activities) to support the objectives of the programme, particularly the development and restructuring of higher education systems in the eligible countries. Under the structural measures, financial aid will be granted to assist the eligible countries inter alia to:- develop and strengthen the capacity for strategic planning and institutional development of higher education establishments at university or faculty level,- establish a development plan for universities to help them build up international relations,- support the spread of durable cooperation actions targeting the Tempus objectives,- prepare a national strategy in a given eligible country to develop a specific aspect of higher education.Individual grantsIn addition to the JEPs and the structural and/or complementary measures, the European Community will also support the provision of individual grants to teachers, trainers, university administrators, senior ministerial officials, education planners and other experts in training from eligible countries or from the Community, for visits to promote the quality, development and restructuring of higher education and training in the eligible countries.These visits could inter alia cover the following areas:- the development of courses and teaching material,- the development of staff, particularly through periods of refresher training and in-company placements,- teaching and training assignments,- activities to support the development of higher education,- participation in the activities of European associations, in particular university associations.Support actions1. The Commission will receive the technical assistance needed to underpin the action taken pursuant to this Decision and to monitor programme implementation.2. Support will be provided for appropriate external evaluation of Tempus III. Support will also be provided for dissemination in relation to JEPs, structural and/or complementary measures and individual mobility and for dissemination of successful outcomes from specific projects in earlier stages of the Tempus programme.
Duration of Tempus III
The third phase of the trans-European cooperation scheme for higher education (hereinafter referred to as “Tempus III”) is hereby adopted for a period of six years as from 1 July 2000.
Eligible countries
Tempus III shall concern the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible for economic aid by virtue of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 (PHARE programme)(9), and the new independent States of the former Soviet Union and Mongolia mentioned in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 (TACIS programme), subject to these assistance programmes being prolonged for the period referred to. These countries are hereinafter referred to as “eligible countries”.
On the basis of an evaluation of the specific situation of each country the Commission, in accordance with the procedures set out in the said Regulations, shall agree with the eligible countries concerned whether they should participate in Tempus III, and the nature and conditions of their participation in the national planning of Community assistance for social and economic reform.
Involvement of associated countries
Actions under Tempus III are also open to the associated countries of central and eastern Europe so that what has been achieved through Tempus can be shared with the neighbouring countries and in order to develop regional and cross-border cooperation. Taking into account the respective financial rules and regulations, cooperation between Tempus and Erasmus projects should be encouraged.
Definitions
For the purposes of Tempus III:
(a) the term “university” shall be used to cover all types of post-secondary educational and vocational training establishments which offer, within the framework of advanced education and training, qualifications or diplomas of that level, whatever such establishments may be called;
(b) the terms “industry” and “company” shall be used to cover all types of economic activity, irrespective of legal status, autonomous business organisations, chambers of commerce and industry and/or their equivalents, professional associations, and the training bodies of the institutions and organisations mentioned above;
(c) the term “institution” shall be used to cover local and public authorities, and the social partners’ and their training bodies.
Each Member State or eligible country may determine what types of establishment referred to in point (a) can participate in Tempus III.
The aim of Tempus III is to promote, in line with the guidelines and general objectives of the PHARE and TACIS programmes for economic and social reform, the development of the higher education systems in the eligible countries through the most balanced cooperation possible with the partners from all the Member States of the Community.
More specifically, Tempus III is intended to facilitate the adaptation of higher education to the new socio-economic and cultural needs of the eligible countries by addressing:
(a) issues relating to the development and reshaping of curricula in the priority areas;
(b) reform of higher education structures and establishments and their management;
(c) the development of training leading to qualifications, with a view to making good the shortage of high-level skills needed in the context of economic reform, particularly by improving and increasing links with industry;
(d) the contribution of higher education and training to citizenship and the strengthening of democracy.
The Commission will, when pursuing the objectives of Tempus III, endeavour to adhere to the Community’s general policy on equal opportunities for men and women. The Commission will also endeavour to ensure that no group of citizens is excluded or disadvantaged.
Dialogue with the eligible countries
In agreement with the competent authorities in each country, the Commission will define the detailed priorities and objectives for the role of Tempus III in the national strategy for economic and social reform, on the basis of the programme’s objectives and the provisions set out in the Annex, and in conformity in particular with:
(a) (i) the general objectives of the PHARE programme;
(ii) the general objectives of the TACIS programme, with particular reference to its sectoral aspects;
(b) the policy of each eligible country on economic, social and educational reforms;
(c) the need to strike an appropriate balance between the priority areas selected and the resources allocated to Tempus III.
1. The Commission shall implement the Tempus III programme in accordance with the provisions of the Annex, on the basis of detailed guidelines to be adopted annually and following the detailed objectives and priorities agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country, as provided for in Article 6.
2. In the performance of that task, the Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of two representatives appointed by each Member State and chaired by the Commission representative. The members of the committee may be assisted by experts and advisers.
The committee shall, in particular, assist the Commission in the implementation of the scheme having regard to the objectives set out in Article 5 and shall coordinate its work with that of other programme committees established in the field of education (Socrates) and training (Leonardo).
3. The Commission representative shall submit to the Committee drafts for measures concerning:
(a) the general guidelines governing Tempus III;
(b) the selection procedures and general guidelines for the Community’s financial assistance (amounts, duration and beneficiaries);
(c) questions relating to the overall balance of Tempus III, including the breakdown between the various actions;
(d) the detailed priorities and objectives to be agreed with the competent authorities in each eligible country;
(e) the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating Tempus III.
4. The committee shall deliver its opinion on these draft measures within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote.
The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith.
In that event the Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided upon for a period of one month.
The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the previous subparagraph.
5. In addition, the Commission may consult the committee on any other matter concerning the implementation of Tempus III, including the annual report.
The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on this draft, within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote.
The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes.
The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee on the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account.
Cooperation with the competent bodies
1. The Commission shall cooperate with the agencies of each of the eligible countries designated and set up to coordinate the relations and structures needed to implement Tempus III, including the allocation of funds earmarked by the eligible countries themselves.
2. In addition, for the implementation of Tempus III, the Commission shall cooperate closely with the competent national structures designated by the Member States. It shall take due account whenever possible of bilateral measures taken in this context by the Member States.
Links with other Community actions
In line with the procedure set out in Article 7(3) of this Decision and, if applicable, the procedure defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 and in Article 8 of Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96, within the limits established by the annual budgetary decisions, the Commission shall ensure consistency and, where necessary, complementarity between Tempus III and other Community actions undertaken both in the Community and as part of assistance provided to eligible countries, particularly with regard to the activities of the European Training Foundation.
Coordination with action taken in non-Community countries
1. The Commission shall organise appropriate coordination with actions undertaken by countries not members of the Community(10) or by universities and the business sector in these countries in the same field as Tempus III, including, where applicable, participation in Tempus III projects.
2. This participation may take a variety of forms, including one or more of the following:
– participation in Tempus III projects on a co-financing basis,
– using the opportunities available under Tempus III to channel exchange actions receiving bilateral funding,
– coordination between Tempus III and national initiatives which have the same aims but which are funded and managed separately,
– mutual exchange of information on all relevant initiatives in this field.
Annual report
An annual report on the operation of Tempus III shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. This report shall also be forwarded to the eligible countries for information.
Monitoring and evaluation – reports
In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 7(3), the Commission shall supervise the arrangements for regular monitoring and external evaluation of experience gained with Tempus III, taking due account of the specific objectives in Article 5 and the national objectives defined in accordance with Article 6.
It shall submit by 30 April 2004 an interim report on the findings of the evaluation, together with any proposals for extending or adjusting Tempus for the period commencing on 1 July 2006.
The Commission shall submit a final report no later than 30 June 2009.
Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 1999.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ C 270, 29.8.1998, p. 9, and OJ C 87, 29.3.1999, p. 102.
(2) OJ C 98, 9.4.1999.
(3) OJ C 40, 15.2.1999, p. 23.
(4) OJ C 51, 22.2.1999, p. 86.
(5) OJ L 375, 23.12.1989, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 753/96 (OJ L 103, 26.4.1996, p. 5).
(6) OJ L 165, 4.7.1996, p. 1.
(7) OJ L 112, 6.5.1993, p. 34.
(8) OJ L 306, 28.11.1996, p. 36.
(9) At present Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
(10) These countries are the members of the Group of 24, other than the Member States of the Community, the Republic of Cyprus and Malta, and the associated countries of central and eastern Europe, and participation relates to projects with the non-associated countries of central and eastern Europe eligible under the PHARE programme.
Joint European projects
1. The European Community will provide support for joint European projects (JEPs) of a maximum of three years’ duration.
The JEPs will associate at least one university in an eligible country, one university from a Member State and a partner establishment (university, company or institution as defined in Article 4) in another Member State.
2. Support for JEPs can be provided for activities according to the specific needs of the establishments concerned and in line with the priorities established, including:
(i) joint education and training actions, particularly with a view to curriculum development and updating, boosting university capacity to provide continuing education and retraining, development of short intensive courses, and development of open and distance learning systems including information and communication technology;
(ii) measures for the reform and development of higher education and its capacity, particularly by restructuring the management of higher education establishments and systems, by modernising existing infrastructures, by acquiring the equipment needed to implement a JEP and, where applicable, by providing technical and financial assistance to the authorities responsible;
(iii) the promotion of cooperation between universities, industry and institutions as defined in Article 4 through JEPs;
(iv) the development of mobility for teachers, administrative staff of universities and students under JEPs:
(a) grants will be provided for teaching/administrative staff of universities or to trainers in companies in the Member States to carry out teaching/training assignments for periods lasting up to one year in eligible countries and vice versa;
(b) grants will be awarded to teaching/administrative staff of universities in the eligible countries to undertake periods of retraining and updating in the European Community;
(c) grants will be available for students up to and including postgraduate at doctoral level, targeting both students in the eligible countries undertaking a period of study in the European Community and European Community students undertaking a period of study in the eligible countries. These grants will normally be granted for a period of three months to one year;
(d) grants will be available for students taking part in JEPs with the specific aim of promoting mobility, priority will go to students taking part in projects for which their university of origin will give full academic recognition to the period of study spent abroad;
(e) support will be provided for practical or in-company training periods of one month to one year for teachers, trainers, students and graduates of the eligible countries between the end of their studies and their first job, so that they can undertake a period of practical training in companies in the Community and vice versa;
(v) activities to ensure the success of a JEP involving two or more eligible countries.
Structural and/or complementary measures
Financial support will be provided for certain structural and/or complementary measures (particularly technical assistance, seminars, studies, publications, information activities) to support the objectives of the programme, particularly the development and restructuring of higher education systems in the eligible countries. Under the structural measures, financial aid will be granted to assist the eligible countries inter alia to:
– develop and strengthen the capacity for strategic planning and institutional development of higher education establishments at university or faculty level,
– establish a development plan for universities to help them build up international relations,
– support the spread of durable cooperation actions targeting the Tempus objectives,
– prepare a national strategy in a given eligible country to develop a specific aspect of higher education.
Individual grants
In addition to the JEPs and the structural and/or complementary measures, the European Community will also support the provision of individual grants to teachers, trainers, university administrators, senior ministerial officials, education planners and other experts in training from eligible countries or from the Community, for visits to promote the quality, development and restructuring of higher education and training in the eligible countries.
These visits could inter alia cover the following areas:
– the development of courses and teaching material,
– the development of staff, particularly through periods of refresher training and in-company placements,
– teaching and training assignments,
– activities to support the development of higher education,
– participation in the activities of European associations, in particular university associations.
Support actions
1. The Commission will receive the technical assistance needed to underpin the action taken pursuant to this Decision and to monitor programme implementation.
2. Support will be provided for appropriate external evaluation of Tempus III. Support will also be provided for dissemination in relation to JEPs, structural and/or complementary measures and individual mobility and for dissemination of successful outcomes from specific projects in earlier stages of the Tempus programme.

Pending: 31998D0695

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Council Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Mexico to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of legislation of Mexico on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Mexico the ‘Dirección General de Calidad Sanitaria de Bienes y Servicios (DGCSBS) de la Secretaría de Salud` is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11(4)(a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments, factory vessels, or cold stores must be drawn up; whereas a list of freezer vessels registered in the sense of Directive 92/48/EEC (3) must be drawn up; whereas these lists must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the DGCSBS to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the DGCSBS to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11(4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the DGCSBS has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval or registration of establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or freezer vessels of origin;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The ‘Dirección General de Calidad Sanitaria de Bienes y Servicios (DGCSBS) de la Secretaría de Salud` shall be the competent authority in Mexico for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Mexico must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘MEXICO` and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2(1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the DGCSBS and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 November 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Council Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Mexico to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of legislation of Mexico on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Mexico the ‘Dirección General de Calidad Sanitaria de Bienes y Servicios (DGCSBS) de la Secretaría de Salud` is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11(4)(a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments, factory vessels, or cold stores must be drawn up; whereas a list of freezer vessels registered in the sense of Directive 92/48/EEC (3) must be drawn up; whereas these lists must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the DGCSBS to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the DGCSBS to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11(4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the DGCSBS has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval or registration of establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or freezer vessels of origin;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The ‘Dirección General de Calidad Sanitaria de Bienes y Servicios (DGCSBS) de la Secretaría de Salud` shall be the competent authority in Mexico for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Mexico must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘MEXICO` and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2(1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the DGCSBS and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 November 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery and aquaculture products originating in Mexico and intended for export to the European Community, excluding bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in whatever form
>START OF GRAPHIC>
Reference No
Country of dispatch:
Competent authority:
Dirección General de Calidad Sanitaria de Bienes y Servicios (DGCSBS) de la Secretaria de Salud
I. Details identifying the fishery products
– Description of fishery/aquaculture products (1):
– species (scientific name):
– presentation of product and type of treatment (2):
– Code number (where available):
– Type of packaging:
– Number of packages:
– Net weight:
– Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s), factory vessel(s) or cold store(s) approved or freezer vessel(s) registered by the DGCSBS for export to the European Community:
III. Destination of products
The products are dispatched
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
(1) Delete where applicable.
(2) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, etc.
IV. Health attestation
– The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery or aquaculture products specified above:
1. were caught, and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto.
– The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directive 91/493/EEC, Directive 92/48/EEC and Decision 98/695/EC.
Signature of official inspector (1)
(Name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
(1) The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.
>END OF GRAPHIC>

Pending: 31998D0653

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC, and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,(1) Whereas several distinct transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) have been recognised for many years as occurring separately in humans and animals; whereas bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was first recognised in cattle in 1986 and in following years was recognised as occurring in other species of animals; whereas a new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (nv-CJD) was described in 1996; whereas evidence is accumulating that the agent causing BSE is identical to that causing nv-CJD;(2) Whereas 66 cases of BSE have been notified in Portugal between 1 January 1998 and 14 October 1998; whereas this leads to a BSE incidence rate calculated over the past 12 months of 105,6 cases per million animals over two years of age; whereas two cases have been identified in animals born after implementation of the prohibition on feeding mammalian derived protein to ruminants; whereas the development of the incidence of the disease indicates potential recycling and accumulation of the BSE agent in the Portuguese cattle population;(3) Whereas missions on BSE-related issues have been carried out in Portugal by the Commission Office for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Inspection and Control from 7 to 12 July 1996 and by the Food and Veterinary Office of the Commission from 15 to 21 June 1997 and from 11 to 15 May 1998; whereas those missions contributed to the assessment of the application and effectiveness of measures to protect against BSE; whereas those missions concluded that, despite important improvements, not all risk factors were adequately managed; whereas a follow-up mission was conducted by the food and Veterinary Office from 28 September to 2 October 1998; whereas that mission confirmed most of the findings of the previous missions and observed, despite an overall improvement, certain continued shortcomings in the enforcement of the measures to control the risk factors; whereas the sharp increase in the incidence of BSE, in particular since June 1998, raises serious concerns with regard to the development of the disease in the near future; whereas on the basis of that mission it is concluded that due to deficiencies existing until very recently in the implementation of Community legislation on identification and registration of animals, and of measures on TSE surveillance and BSE eradication, no adequate guarantees can be provided regarding the BSE history of the herds of origin and herds through which bovine animals pass and regarding the dams of bovine animals;(4) Whereas the Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) adopted an opinion on BSE risk on 27 March 1998; whereas in that opinion the SSC recognised three major issues in considering the risk of BSE: first, the risk of human exposure arising from the direct consumption of potentially infective material, secondly, the risk to man from ingesting or being exposed to processed, potentially infective material, and, thirdly, the risk of propagating the infection by recycling the infective material through animal feed; whereas the Code Commission of the International Office of Epizootics (OIE) also proposes that the assessment of the risk to human and animal health in countries, or regions within countries, be based on a combination of the spread of BSE and the application of measures to control the risk;(5) Whereas, in those circumstances and as an emergency measure, it is appropriate to prohibit temporarily the dispatch from Portugal to the other Member States of all bovine animals and of all products obtained from, or incorporating materials derived from, bovine animals which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains or are destined for use in cosmetic or medicinal products or medical devices; whereas in order to prevent deflections of trade, the same prohibitions should also apply to exports to third countries; whereas it is necessary to prohibit temporarily the dispatch from Portugal of mammalian meat-and-bone meal and animal feed and fertilisers containing mammalian meat-and-bone meal, which by their nature could enter the animal feed chain;(6) Whereas the level of risk of propagating or introducing the disease from live cattle to unaffected animal populations is considered to be considerable; whereas additional measures proposed by Portugal to address the risk of exposing humans and animals to infected material are considered to be adequate; whereas account should be taken of the effective implementation and assessment of effective enforcement of those measures; whereas, therefore, the prohibition on the dispatch of bovine products can be limited in time, provided that a risk assessment conducted on the basis of the findings of a mission of the Food and Veterinary Office, taking into account the evolution of the disease, demonstrates that appropriate measures have been taken to manage any risk, and that the relevant Community and national measures are complied with and effectively enforced; whereas the period foreseen for the prohibition on the export of meat and certain other products could be reduced in the event of a favourable outcome of such risk assessment;(7) Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (4) provides for a system enabling animals to be traced back to the dam and herd of origin; whereas such a system is a prerequisite for effective eradication of BSE and it is necessary for Portugal to ensure that those Community provisions are effectively complied with;(8) Whereas Commission Decision 98/272/EC of 23 April 1998 on epidemio-surveillance for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and amending Decision 94/474/EC (5) provides for an on-going education programme to encourage reporting of TSEs, the compulsory notification, movement restriction, possible killing, examination and destruction of suspect animals, the conducting of a sampling and monitoring programme and the annual reporting to the Commission and the Member States of the results of this programme and in particular of the information concerning the number and outcome of clinical and epidemiological investigations of suspect animals; whereas it is justified, in view of the seriousness of the situation, to require Portugal to increase the frequency of reporting to the Commission and the Member States to once every four weeks;(9) Whereas Commission Decision 96/381/EC of 20 June 1996 approving the measures to be implemented as regards bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Portugal (6) refers to the principle, laid down in point 6 of the conclusions of the Council meeting of 1 to 3 April 1996, that a programme to control BSE and reduce the number of future cases should concentrate on removal of animals, or as appropriate herds, most likely to have been exposed to infected meat-and-bone meal; whereas the main principles of the plan are:(a) compulsory slaughter of animals identified as imported from the United Kingdom, all animals in herds where cases of BSE have occurred and all animals in other herds identified as belonging to the same birth cohort as affected animals;(b) and improved system of health monitoring of holdings with bovine animals and intensified surveillance of the feed manufacturing industry to prevent the possible use of meat-and-bone meal;whereas the Commission accepted under circumstances particular to Portugal and to restore consumer confidence that a whole herd slaughter policy be adopted in Portugal; whereas the plan approved by Decision 96/381/EC provides for the slaughter of all animals belonging to the same birth cohort as affected animals; whereas, therefore, Portugal must identify all animals belonging to the same birth cohort regardless of whether the affected animals were born or reared in the same herd as that to which they belonged at the moment of confirmation of BSE or in another herd;(10) Whereas the provisions of Council Directive 82/894/EEC of 21 December 1982 on the notification of animal diseases within the Community (7), as last amended by Commission Decision 98/12/EC (8), require each Member State to notify directly to the Commission, at least on the first working day of each week, the secondary outbreaks of BSE confirmed in its territory;(11) Whereas, in order to protect animal and human health in the Community, the Commission adopted Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 concerning certain protection measures with regard to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and the feeding of mammalian derived protein (9), as amended by Decision 95/60/EC (10), which prohibited the feeding of mammalian protein to ruminants throughout the Community, Decision 96/449/EC of 18 July 1996 on the approval of alternative heat treatment systems for processing animal waste with a view to the inactivation of spongiform encephalopathy agents (11), which lays down the best available method for processing animal waste as regards spongiform encephalopathy agents, and Decision 97/735/EC of 21 October 1997 concerning certain protection measures with regard to trade in certain types of mammalian animal waste (12);(12) Whereas Portugal has taken measures as notified to the Commission on 12 October 1998, including measures to prohibit the incorporation of meat-and-bone meal in any animal feed and to require the destruction of meat-and-bone meal; whereas subsequently commitments were given to recall and destroy any stocks of meat-and-bone meal, and of animal feed that contains meat-and-bone meal, present in animal waste processing establishments, feedingstuff producing plants, agricultural establishments or any other place; whereas those measures are considered to reduce the risk of propagating the disease through animal feed;(13) Whereas Portugal has taken measures to destroy certain risk materials as notified to the Commission on 12 October 1998, including the bovine, ovine, and caprine tissues defined as specified risk materials in Commission Decision 97/534/EC of 30 July 1997 on the prohibition of the use of material presenting risks as regards transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (13), as last amended by Council Decision 98/248/EC (14); whereas those measures are considered to reduce the risk of exposing humans or animals directly or indirectly to the BSE agent present in risk materials;(14) Whereas, in those circumstances and as an emergency measure, it is appropriate to require Portugal to implement programmes to demonstrate effective compliance with all relevant Community legislation, this Decision and relevant national legislation, and to report in detail to the Commission every four weeks on the outcome of those programmes;(15) Whereas strict conditions should apply to derogations from the prohibition for certain products and for products derived from bovine animals slaughtered outside Portugal;(16) Whereas, in view of the epidemiological situation and the movements of live cattle to the autonomous region of the Azores, this Decision should not apply to that region;(17) Whereas, with a view to giving financial support to the efforts made by Portugal, the Commission will, as soon as possible, propose appropriate measures;(18) Whereas the Commission should continue to carry out Community inspections in Portugal to verify the application of the measures provided for in this Decision;(19) Whereas, pending an overall examination of the situation, this Decision should be reviewed in the light of new scientific information;(20) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:CHAPTER I SCOPE

Article 1
1. Notwithstanding Community provisions adopted to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), this Decision lays down emergency measures made necessary by the occurrence of BSE in Portugal.
2. The provisions of this Decision shall not apply to the autonomous region of the Azores.
However, Portugal shall ensure that the provisions of Articles 2 to 12 are applied to the dispatch of consignments from the other parts of Portugal to the Azores.

Article 2
Portugal shall ensure that the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) live bovine animals and bovine embryos;
(b) meat meal, bone meal, and meat-and-bone meal of mammalian origin;
(c) animal feed and fertilisers containing material referred to in (b).

Article 3
By way of derogation from Article 2, food destined for domestic carnivores containing material referred to in Article 2(b) may be dispatched to other Member States or to third countries provided that those materials did not originate from Portugal and that the conditions laid down in Articles 8 and 9 are complied with.

Article 4
Portugal shall ensure that until 1 August 1999 the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries, when derived from bovine animals slaughtered in Portugal:
(b) products which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains;
(c) materials which are destined for use in cosmetic or medicinal products or medical devices.

Article 5
1. By way of derogation from Article 4, Portugal may authorise the production and the dispatch from its territory to other Member States or to third countries of:
(a) amino acids, peptides and tallow, which have been produced in establishments under official veterinary supervision which have been shown to be operating in accordance with the conditions set out in the Annex;
(b) tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, where these are manufactured from tallow produced in accordance with this Article;
(c) samples, dispatched from the national veterinary laboratories in Lisbon and Porto to officially approved institutes, obtained from bovine animals slaughtered in Portugal and which are destined for use for the purpose of laboratory examination or research into BSE and BSE diagnostic tests.
2. Portugal shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph 1(a) and (b) are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and to indicate that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics, medicinal products or medical devices.
3. Portugal shall ensure that products referred to in paragraph 1(a) which are dispatched to other Member States in accordance with this Article are accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that they conform to the conditions laid down in this Decision and attesting to the frequency of official controls carried out.
4. Before an establishment may commence or recommence the dispatch of products pursuant to this Article, Portugal shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of the establishments referred to in paragraph 1(a), identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the other Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.

Article 6
Portugal shall ensure that gelatin, di-calcium phosphate, collagen, tallow, tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis which are produced for technical use from raw materials derived from bovine animals slaughtered in Portugal are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and their unsuitability for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics, medicinal products or medical devices.

Article 7
Portugal shall ensure that the provisions of Articles 8 to 12 are complied with when the following products derived from bovine animals not slaughtered in Portugal are dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) ‘fresh meat` as defined by Council Directive 64/433/EEC (15);
(b) ‘minced meat` and ‘meat preparations` as defined by Council Directive 94/65/EC (16);
(c) ‘meat products` and ‘other products of animal origin` as defined by Council Directive 77/99/EEC (17);
(d) food which is destined for domestic carnivores;
(e) gelatin and di-calcium phosphate, tallow, tallow products, and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, amino acids, peptides and collagen which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains, or are destined for use in cosmetic or medicinal products or medical devices.

Article 8
1. The products referred to in Article 7 shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through, establishments in Portugal:
(a) which have been approved by the competent authority;
(b) which are under official veterinary supervision or, in the case of products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, under the supervision of the competent authority;
(c) which have put in place a system of tracing of the raw material which will guarantee the origin of the material throughout the whole production chain;
(d) which have put in place a registration system of amounts of incoming and outgoing materials to allow for cross-checking consignments entering or leaving;
(e) in which the products are unloaded, processed, stored, handled, loaded and transported separately from, or at different times from, products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article and Articles 9, 10 and 11.
2. Portugal shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of establishments which meet the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.

Article 9
1. Products referred to in Article 7(a) to (d) shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in Portugal:
(a) in which all unloading, processing, storage or other handling and loading of products takes place under official supervision;
(b) in which the products are stored in cold stores in chambers which are not used at the same time for storing any bovine products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article and in Articles 8, 10, 11 and 12 and are kept locked under the seal of the competent authority when the latter is not present;
(c) in which the products are marked or labelled with an additional distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark;
(d) in which the products eligible for dispatch from Portugal under this Article and Articles 8, 10, 11 and 12, but destined for placing on the market in Portugal do not bear the additional mark referred to in point (c). Where such a mark is present, it shall be cancelled or removed from the meat or cancelled from the label at the time that meat or those products leave the establishment.
Portugal shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the model of the additional mark.
2. For the purposes of the health marking and application of additional marks provided for in Community legislation, the competent authority shall keep and maintain under its responsibility:
(a) the instruments intended for meat health marking and application of additional marks, which may be handed over to auxiliaries only at the time of marking and for the length of time required for that purpose;
(b) any labels bearing a health mark or an additional mark. Those labels shall be serially numbered and the requisite quantity may be given to auxiliaries at the time when they are to be used.
3. The products referred to in paragraph 1 shall be transported in means of transport that are sealed by the competent authority.
When those products are dispatched to other Member States, they shall be accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that the conditions referred to in this Article and Articles 8, 10, 11 and 12 are met, identifying all establishments where they were obtained, processed, handled or stored and identifying all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
Meat shall be accompanied by the health certificate referred to in Annex IV to Directive 64/433/EEC identifying in the ‘Identification of meat` section of the certificate all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
The following words shall be added to all certificates:
‘produced in accordance with Commission Decision 98/653/EC`.
4. Portugal shall inform the competent authority of the place of destination of each consignment by means of the ANIMO system as referred to in Commission Decision 91/398/EEC (18), or by fax.

Article 10
Without prejudice to Article 9(1)(d), where products referred to in Article 7(a) come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in Portugal, the health marks shall not be removed except where that is unavoidable in the cutting process.

Article 11
The products referred to in Article 7(e) which are dispatched to other Member States shall be labelled in order to identify the establishment of production and to indicate that they have been produced in accordance with this Decision and, as appropriate, that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics, medicinal products or medical devices.

Article 12
1. A Member State which dispatches meat as referred to in Article 7(a) from an establishment or Community approved border inspection post in its territory through the territory of Portugal or to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 8 shall ensure that the meat is accompanied by a veterinary certificate issued by an official veterinarian or the certificate issued by the competent authority of the border inspection post.
The originals of all certificates shall accompany the consignment to the establishment of its destination.
2. The meat as referred to in Article 7(a) shall be transported in an officially sealed vehicle.
The seal may be broken only for official inspection purposes.
3. A Member State which dispatches products referred to in Article 7(e) or any raw materials for use in the production of those products to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 8 shall ensure that they are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment and Member State in which they were produced.

Article 13
1. Portugal shall complete the efforts undertaken, and implement a programme to demonstrate effective compliance with all relevant Community legislation on identification and registration of animals, the notification of animal diseases, epidemio-surveillance for transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) and with all other Community legislation to protect against BSE.
2. Portugal shall adopt a programme to demonstrate effective compliance with:
(a) the provisions of this Decision;
(b) the relevant national measures to protect against BSE, in particular those on the eradication of BSE.
3. The programmes referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall include a permanent monitoring of the application of the provisions and where appropriate physical examination by an approved method of the products concerned.

Article 14
Portugal shall send the Commission every four weeks a report on the application of the protective measures taken against TSEs in accordance with Community and national provisions and on the results of the programmes referred to in Article 13.

Article 15
The Commission shall carry out Community inspections on-the-spot in Portugal to:
(a) verify the application of the provisions of this Decision, in particular in relation to the implementation of official controls;
(b) to examine the development of the incidence of the disease, the effective enforcement of the relevant national measures and to conduct a risk assessment demonstrating whether appropriate measures to manage any risk have been taken.

Article 16
1. This Decision shall be reviewed within 18 months after its adoption at the latest, pending an overall examination of the situation, in particular in view of the development of the incidence of the disease and the effective enforcement of the relevant measures, and in the light of new scientific information.
2. At the request of Portugal, this Decision shall be amended to take account of different control systems that provide equivalent guarantees to the measures provided for in Articles 5 to 12.
3. This Decision shall be amended, where appropriate, after consultation of the appropriate scientific committee, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Directive 89/662/EEC.

Article 17
Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 18
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 18 November 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29.
(2) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(3) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13.
(4) OJ L 117, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 122, 24. 4. 1998, p. 59.
(6) OJ L 149, 22. 6. 1996, p. 25.
(7) OJ L 378, 31. 12. 1982, p. 58.
(8) OJ L 4, 8. 1. 1998, p. 63.
(9) OJ L 172, 7. 7. 1994, p. 23.
(10) OJ L 55, 11. 3. 1995, p. 43.
(11) OJ L 184, 24. 7. 1996, p. 43.
(12) OJ L 294, 28. 10. 1997, p. 7.
(13) OJ L 216, 8. 8. 1997, p. 95.
(14) OJ L 102, 2. 4. 1998, p. 26.
(15) OJ 121, 29. 7. 1964, p. 2012/64.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC, and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,(1) Whereas several distinct transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) have been recognised for many years as occurring separately in humans and animals; whereas bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was first recognised in cattle in 1986 and in following years was recognised as occurring in other species of animals; whereas a new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (nv-CJD) was described in 1996; whereas evidence is accumulating that the agent causing BSE is identical to that causing nv-CJD;(2) Whereas 66 cases of BSE have been notified in Portugal between 1 January 1998 and 14 October 1998; whereas this leads to a BSE incidence rate calculated over the past 12 months of 105,6 cases per million animals over two years of age; whereas two cases have been identified in animals born after implementation of the prohibition on feeding mammalian derived protein to ruminants; whereas the development of the incidence of the disease indicates potential recycling and accumulation of the BSE agent in the Portuguese cattle population;(3) Whereas missions on BSE-related issues have been carried out in Portugal by the Commission Office for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Inspection and Control from 7 to 12 July 1996 and by the Food and Veterinary Office of the Commission from 15 to 21 June 1997 and from 11 to 15 May 1998; whereas those missions contributed to the assessment of the application and effectiveness of measures to protect against BSE; whereas those missions concluded that, despite important improvements, not all risk factors were adequately managed; whereas a follow-up mission was conducted by the food and Veterinary Office from 28 September to 2 October 1998; whereas that mission confirmed most of the findings of the previous missions and observed, despite an overall improvement, certain continued shortcomings in the enforcement of the measures to control the risk factors; whereas the sharp increase in the incidence of BSE, in particular since June 1998, raises serious concerns with regard to the development of the disease in the near future; whereas on the basis of that mission it is concluded that due to deficiencies existing until very recently in the implementation of Community legislation on identification and registration of animals, and of measures on TSE surveillance and BSE eradication, no adequate guarantees can be provided regarding the BSE history of the herds of origin and herds through which bovine animals pass and regarding the dams of bovine animals;(4) Whereas the Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) adopted an opinion on BSE risk on 27 March 1998; whereas in that opinion the SSC recognised three major issues in considering the risk of BSE: first, the risk of human exposure arising from the direct consumption of potentially infective material, secondly, the risk to man from ingesting or being exposed to processed, potentially infective material, and, thirdly, the risk of propagating the infection by recycling the infective material through animal feed; whereas the Code Commission of the International Office of Epizootics (OIE) also proposes that the assessment of the risk to human and animal health in countries, or regions within countries, be based on a combination of the spread of BSE and the application of measures to control the risk;(5) Whereas, in those circumstances and as an emergency measure, it is appropriate to prohibit temporarily the dispatch from Portugal to the other Member States of all bovine animals and of all products obtained from, or incorporating materials derived from, bovine animals which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains or are destined for use in cosmetic or medicinal products or medical devices; whereas in order to prevent deflections of trade, the same prohibitions should also apply to exports to third countries; whereas it is necessary to prohibit temporarily the dispatch from Portugal of mammalian meat-and-bone meal and animal feed and fertilisers containing mammalian meat-and-bone meal, which by their nature could enter the animal feed chain;(6) Whereas the level of risk of propagating or introducing the disease from live cattle to unaffected animal populations is considered to be considerable; whereas additional measures proposed by Portugal to address the risk of exposing humans and animals to infected material are considered to be adequate; whereas account should be taken of the effective implementation and assessment of effective enforcement of those measures; whereas, therefore, the prohibition on the dispatch of bovine products can be limited in time, provided that a risk assessment conducted on the basis of the findings of a mission of the Food and Veterinary Office, taking into account the evolution of the disease, demonstrates that appropriate measures have been taken to manage any risk, and that the relevant Community and national measures are complied with and effectively enforced; whereas the period foreseen for the prohibition on the export of meat and certain other products could be reduced in the event of a favourable outcome of such risk assessment;(7) Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (4) provides for a system enabling animals to be traced back to the dam and herd of origin; whereas such a system is a prerequisite for effective eradication of BSE and it is necessary for Portugal to ensure that those Community provisions are effectively complied with;(8) Whereas Commission Decision 98/272/EC of 23 April 1998 on epidemio-surveillance for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and amending Decision 94/474/EC (5) provides for an on-going education programme to encourage reporting of TSEs, the compulsory notification, movement restriction, possible killing, examination and destruction of suspect animals, the conducting of a sampling and monitoring programme and the annual reporting to the Commission and the Member States of the results of this programme and in particular of the information concerning the number and outcome of clinical and epidemiological investigations of suspect animals; whereas it is justified, in view of the seriousness of the situation, to require Portugal to increase the frequency of reporting to the Commission and the Member States to once every four weeks;(9) Whereas Commission Decision 96/381/EC of 20 June 1996 approving the measures to be implemented as regards bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Portugal (6) refers to the principle, laid down in point 6 of the conclusions of the Council meeting of 1 to 3 April 1996, that a programme to control BSE and reduce the number of future cases should concentrate on removal of animals, or as appropriate herds, most likely to have been exposed to infected meat-and-bone meal; whereas the main principles of the plan are:(a) compulsory slaughter of animals identified as imported from the United Kingdom, all animals in herds where cases of BSE have occurred and all animals in other herds identified as belonging to the same birth cohort as affected animals;(b) and improved system of health monitoring of holdings with bovine animals and intensified surveillance of the feed manufacturing industry to prevent the possible use of meat-and-bone meal;whereas the Commission accepted under circumstances particular to Portugal and to restore consumer confidence that a whole herd slaughter policy be adopted in Portugal; whereas the plan approved by Decision 96/381/EC provides for the slaughter of all animals belonging to the same birth cohort as affected animals; whereas, therefore, Portugal must identify all animals belonging to the same birth cohort regardless of whether the affected animals were born or reared in the same herd as that to which they belonged at the moment of confirmation of BSE or in another herd;(10) Whereas the provisions of Council Directive 82/894/EEC of 21 December 1982 on the notification of animal diseases within the Community (7), as last amended by Commission Decision 98/12/EC (8), require each Member State to notify directly to the Commission, at least on the first working day of each week, the secondary outbreaks of BSE confirmed in its territory;(11) Whereas, in order to protect animal and human health in the Community, the Commission adopted Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 concerning certain protection measures with regard to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and the feeding of mammalian derived protein (9), as amended by Decision 95/60/EC (10), which prohibited the feeding of mammalian protein to ruminants throughout the Community, Decision 96/449/EC of 18 July 1996 on the approval of alternative heat treatment systems for processing animal waste with a view to the inactivation of spongiform encephalopathy agents (11), which lays down the best available method for processing animal waste as regards spongiform encephalopathy agents, and Decision 97/735/EC of 21 October 1997 concerning certain protection measures with regard to trade in certain types of mammalian animal waste (12);(12) Whereas Portugal has taken measures as notified to the Commission on 12 October 1998, including measures to prohibit the incorporation of meat-and-bone meal in any animal feed and to require the destruction of meat-and-bone meal; whereas subsequently commitments were given to recall and destroy any stocks of meat-and-bone meal, and of animal feed that contains meat-and-bone meal, present in animal waste processing establishments, feedingstuff producing plants, agricultural establishments or any other place; whereas those measures are considered to reduce the risk of propagating the disease through animal feed;(13) Whereas Portugal has taken measures to destroy certain risk materials as notified to the Commission on 12 October 1998, including the bovine, ovine, and caprine tissues defined as specified risk materials in Commission Decision 97/534/EC of 30 July 1997 on the prohibition of the use of material presenting risks as regards transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (13), as last amended by Council Decision 98/248/EC (14); whereas those measures are considered to reduce the risk of exposing humans or animals directly or indirectly to the BSE agent present in risk materials;(14) Whereas, in those circumstances and as an emergency measure, it is appropriate to require Portugal to implement programmes to demonstrate effective compliance with all relevant Community legislation, this Decision and relevant national legislation, and to report in detail to the Commission every four weeks on the outcome of those programmes;(15) Whereas strict conditions should apply to derogations from the prohibition for certain products and for products derived from bovine animals slaughtered outside Portugal;(16) Whereas, in view of the epidemiological situation and the movements of live cattle to the autonomous region of the Azores, this Decision should not apply to that region;(17) Whereas, with a view to giving financial support to the efforts made by Portugal, the Commission will, as soon as possible, propose appropriate measures;(18) Whereas the Commission should continue to carry out Community inspections in Portugal to verify the application of the measures provided for in this Decision;(19) Whereas, pending an overall examination of the situation, this Decision should be reviewed in the light of new scientific information;(20) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:CHAPTER I SCOPE
1. Notwithstanding Community provisions adopted to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), this Decision lays down emergency measures made necessary by the occurrence of BSE in Portugal.
2. The provisions of this Decision shall not apply to the autonomous region of the Azores.
However, Portugal shall ensure that the provisions of Articles 2 to 12 are applied to the dispatch of consignments from the other parts of Portugal to the Azores.
Portugal shall ensure that the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) live bovine animals and bovine embryos;
(b) meat meal, bone meal, and meat-and-bone meal of mammalian origin;
(c) animal feed and fertilisers containing material referred to in (b).
By way of derogation from Article 2, food destined for domestic carnivores containing material referred to in Article 2(b) may be dispatched to other Member States or to third countries provided that those materials did not originate from Portugal and that the conditions laid down in Articles 8 and 9 are complied with.
Portugal shall ensure that until 1 August 1999 the following are not dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries, when derived from bovine animals slaughtered in Portugal:
(b) products which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains;
(c) materials which are destined for use in cosmetic or medicinal products or medical devices.
1. By way of derogation from Article 4, Portugal may authorise the production and the dispatch from its territory to other Member States or to third countries of:
(a) amino acids, peptides and tallow, which have been produced in establishments under official veterinary supervision which have been shown to be operating in accordance with the conditions set out in the Annex;
(b) tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, where these are manufactured from tallow produced in accordance with this Article;
(c) samples, dispatched from the national veterinary laboratories in Lisbon and Porto to officially approved institutes, obtained from bovine animals slaughtered in Portugal and which are destined for use for the purpose of laboratory examination or research into BSE and BSE diagnostic tests.
2. Portugal shall ensure that the products referred to in paragraph 1(a) and (b) are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and to indicate that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics, medicinal products or medical devices.
3. Portugal shall ensure that products referred to in paragraph 1(a) which are dispatched to other Member States in accordance with this Article are accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that they conform to the conditions laid down in this Decision and attesting to the frequency of official controls carried out.
4. Before an establishment may commence or recommence the dispatch of products pursuant to this Article, Portugal shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of the establishments referred to in paragraph 1(a), identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the other Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.
Portugal shall ensure that gelatin, di-calcium phosphate, collagen, tallow, tallow products and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis which are produced for technical use from raw materials derived from bovine animals slaughtered in Portugal are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment of production and their unsuitability for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics, medicinal products or medical devices.
Portugal shall ensure that the provisions of Articles 8 to 12 are complied with when the following products derived from bovine animals not slaughtered in Portugal are dispatched from its territory to other Member States or to third countries:
(a) ‘fresh meat` as defined by Council Directive 64/433/EEC (15);
(b) ‘minced meat` and ‘meat preparations` as defined by Council Directive 94/65/EC (16);
(c) ‘meat products` and ‘other products of animal origin` as defined by Council Directive 77/99/EEC (17);
(d) food which is destined for domestic carnivores;
(e) gelatin and di-calcium phosphate, tallow, tallow products, and products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, amino acids, peptides and collagen which are liable to enter the human food or animal feed chains, or are destined for use in cosmetic or medicinal products or medical devices.
1. The products referred to in Article 7 shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through, establishments in Portugal:
(a) which have been approved by the competent authority;
(b) which are under official veterinary supervision or, in the case of products derived from tallow by saponification, transesterification or hydrolysis, under the supervision of the competent authority;
(c) which have put in place a system of tracing of the raw material which will guarantee the origin of the material throughout the whole production chain;
(d) which have put in place a registration system of amounts of incoming and outgoing materials to allow for cross-checking consignments entering or leaving;
(e) in which the products are unloaded, processed, stored, handled, loaded and transported separately from, or at different times from, products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article and Articles 9, 10 and 11.
2. Portugal shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the list of establishments which meet the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, identifying for each establishment the purpose for which it has been approved. It shall notify the Commission and the Member States immediately of any amendments to that list.
1. Products referred to in Article 7(a) to (d) shall come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in Portugal:
(a) in which all unloading, processing, storage or other handling and loading of products takes place under official supervision;
(b) in which the products are stored in cold stores in chambers which are not used at the same time for storing any bovine products which do not comply with the conditions laid down in this Article and in Articles 8, 10, 11 and 12 and are kept locked under the seal of the competent authority when the latter is not present;
(c) in which the products are marked or labelled with an additional distinct mark which cannot be confused with the Community health mark;
(d) in which the products eligible for dispatch from Portugal under this Article and Articles 8, 10, 11 and 12, but destined for placing on the market in Portugal do not bear the additional mark referred to in point (c). Where such a mark is present, it shall be cancelled or removed from the meat or cancelled from the label at the time that meat or those products leave the establishment.
Portugal shall forward to the Commission and the other Member States the model of the additional mark.
2. For the purposes of the health marking and application of additional marks provided for in Community legislation, the competent authority shall keep and maintain under its responsibility:
(a) the instruments intended for meat health marking and application of additional marks, which may be handed over to auxiliaries only at the time of marking and for the length of time required for that purpose;
(b) any labels bearing a health mark or an additional mark. Those labels shall be serially numbered and the requisite quantity may be given to auxiliaries at the time when they are to be used.
3. The products referred to in paragraph 1 shall be transported in means of transport that are sealed by the competent authority.
When those products are dispatched to other Member States, they shall be accompanied by a health certificate issued by an official veterinarian stating that the conditions referred to in this Article and Articles 8, 10, 11 and 12 are met, identifying all establishments where they were obtained, processed, handled or stored and identifying all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
Meat shall be accompanied by the health certificate referred to in Annex IV to Directive 64/433/EEC identifying in the ‘Identification of meat` section of the certificate all labels and their serial numbers in the consignment.
The following words shall be added to all certificates:
‘produced in accordance with Commission Decision 98/653/EC`.
4. Portugal shall inform the competent authority of the place of destination of each consignment by means of the ANIMO system as referred to in Commission Decision 91/398/EEC (18), or by fax.
Without prejudice to Article 9(1)(d), where products referred to in Article 7(a) come from and, as appropriate, have passed through establishments in Portugal, the health marks shall not be removed except where that is unavoidable in the cutting process.
The products referred to in Article 7(e) which are dispatched to other Member States shall be labelled in order to identify the establishment of production and to indicate that they have been produced in accordance with this Decision and, as appropriate, that they are suitable for use in human food, animal feed, cosmetics, medicinal products or medical devices.
1. A Member State which dispatches meat as referred to in Article 7(a) from an establishment or Community approved border inspection post in its territory through the territory of Portugal or to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 8 shall ensure that the meat is accompanied by a veterinary certificate issued by an official veterinarian or the certificate issued by the competent authority of the border inspection post.
The originals of all certificates shall accompany the consignment to the establishment of its destination.
2. The meat as referred to in Article 7(a) shall be transported in an officially sealed vehicle.
The seal may be broken only for official inspection purposes.
3. A Member State which dispatches products referred to in Article 7(e) or any raw materials for use in the production of those products to an establishment approved in accordance with Article 8 shall ensure that they are labelled or otherwise identified to show the establishment and Member State in which they were produced.
1. Portugal shall complete the efforts undertaken, and implement a programme to demonstrate effective compliance with all relevant Community legislation on identification and registration of animals, the notification of animal diseases, epidemio-surveillance for transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) and with all other Community legislation to protect against BSE.
2. Portugal shall adopt a programme to demonstrate effective compliance with:
(a) the provisions of this Decision;
(b) the relevant national measures to protect against BSE, in particular those on the eradication of BSE.
3. The programmes referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall include a permanent monitoring of the application of the provisions and where appropriate physical examination by an approved method of the products concerned.
Portugal shall send the Commission every four weeks a report on the application of the protective measures taken against TSEs in accordance with Community and national provisions and on the results of the programmes referred to in Article 13.
The Commission shall carry out Community inspections on-the-spot in Portugal to:
(a) verify the application of the provisions of this Decision, in particular in relation to the implementation of official controls;
(b) to examine the development of the incidence of the disease, the effective enforcement of the relevant national measures and to conduct a risk assessment demonstrating whether appropriate measures to manage any risk have been taken.
1. This Decision shall be reviewed within 18 months after its adoption at the latest, pending an overall examination of the situation, in particular in view of the development of the incidence of the disease and the effective enforcement of the relevant measures, and in the light of new scientific information.
2. At the request of Portugal, this Decision shall be amended to take account of different control systems that provide equivalent guarantees to the measures provided for in Articles 5 to 12.
3. This Decision shall be amended, where appropriate, after consultation of the appropriate scientific committee, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Directive 89/662/EEC.
Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to comply with this Decision. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 18 November 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29.
(2) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.
(3) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13.
(4) OJ L 117, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.
(5) OJ L 122, 24. 4. 1998, p. 59.
(6) OJ L 149, 22. 6. 1996, p. 25.
(7) OJ L 378, 31. 12. 1982, p. 58.
(8) OJ L 4, 8. 1. 1998, p. 63.
(9) OJ L 172, 7. 7. 1994, p. 23.
(10) OJ L 55, 11. 3. 1995, p. 43.
(11) OJ L 184, 24. 7. 1996, p. 43.
(12) OJ L 294, 28. 10. 1997, p. 7.
(13) OJ L 216, 8. 8. 1997, p. 95.
(14) OJ L 102, 2. 4. 1998, p. 26.
(15) OJ 121, 29. 7. 1964, p. 2012/64.

Pending: 31998D0570

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Council Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Tunisia to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of legislation of Tunisia on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Tunisia the ‘Direction générale de la santé animale (DGSA) du ministère de l’agriculture` is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11(4)(a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved/registration establishments, factory vessels, or cold stores must be drawn up; whereas a list of freezer vessels registered in the sense of Directive 92/48/EEC (3) must be drawn up; whereas these lists must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the DGSA to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the DGSA to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11(4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the DGSA has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval or registration of establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or freezer vessels of origin;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The ‘Direction générale de la santé animale (DGSA) du ministère de l’agriculture` shall be the competent authority in Tunisia for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Tunisia must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘TUNISIA` and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2(1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the DGSA and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 October 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Council Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Tunisia to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of legislation of Tunisia on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Tunisia the ‘Direction générale de la santé animale (DGSA) du ministère de l’agriculture` is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11(4)(a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved/registration establishments, factory vessels, or cold stores must be drawn up; whereas a list of freezer vessels registered in the sense of Directive 92/48/EEC (3) must be drawn up; whereas these lists must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the DGSA to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the DGSA to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11(4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the DGSA has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval or registration of establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or freezer vessels of origin;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The ‘Direction générale de la santé animale (DGSA) du ministère de l’agriculture` shall be the competent authority in Tunisia for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Tunisia must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘TUNISIA` and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2(1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the DGSA and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 October 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery and aquaculture products originating in Tunisia and intended for export to the European Community, excluding bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in whatever form
>START OF GRAPHIC>
Reference No:
Country of dispatch:
Competent authority:
Direction générale de la santé animale (DGSA) du ministère de l’agriculture
I. Details identifying the fishery products
– Description of fishery/aquaculture products (1):
– species (scientific name):
– presentation of product and type of treatment (2):
– Code number (where available):
– Type of packaging:
– Number of packages:
– Net weight:
– Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s), factory vessel(s) or cold store(s) approved or freezer vessel(s) registered by the DGSA for export to the European Community:
III. Destination of products
The products are dispatched
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
(1) Delete where applicable.
(2) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, etc.
IV. Health attestation
– The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery or aquaculture products specified above:
1. were caught, and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto.
– The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directive 91/493/EEC, Directive 92/48/EEC and Decision 98/570/EC.
Signature of official inspector (1)
(Name in capital letters, capactiy and qualifications of person signing)
(1) The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.
>END OF GRAPHIC>

Pending: 31998D0568

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Council Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Guatemala to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of legislation of Guatemala on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Guatemala the ‘Dirección General de Servicios Pecuarios (DIGESEPE) del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación` is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11(4)(a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments, factory vessels, or cold stores must be drawn up; whereas a list of freezer vessels registered in the sense of Directive 92/48/EEC (3) must be drawn up; whereas these lists must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the DIGESEPE to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the DIGESEPE to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11(4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the DIGESEPE has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval or registration of establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or freezer vessels of origin;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The ‘Dirección General de Servicios Pecuarios (DIGESEPE) del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación` shall be the competent authority in Guatemala for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

Article 2
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Guatemala must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘GUATEMALA` and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.

Article 3
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2(1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the DIGESEPE and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 October 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by the Council Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,Whereas a Commission expert has conducted an inspection visit to Guatemala to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community;Whereas the provisions of legislation of Guatemala on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas, in Guatemala the ‘Dirección General de Servicios Pecuarios (DIGESEPE) del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación` is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force;Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate referred to in Article 11(4)(a) of Directive 91/493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the language(s) in which it must be drafted and the grade of the person empowered to sign it;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(b) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a mark should be affixed to packages of fishery products giving the name of the third country and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin;Whereas, pursuant to Article 11(4)(c) of Directive 91/493/EEC, a list of approved establishments, factory vessels, or cold stores must be drawn up; whereas a list of freezer vessels registered in the sense of Directive 92/48/EEC (3) must be drawn up; whereas these lists must be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the DIGESEPE to the Commission; whereas it is therefore for the DIGESEPE to ensure compliance with the provisions laid down to that end in Article 11(4) of Directive 91/493/EEC;Whereas the DIGESEPE has provided official assurances regarding compliance with the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and regarding the fulfilment of requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the approval or registration of establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or freezer vessels of origin;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The ‘Dirección General de Servicios Pecuarios (DIGESEPE) del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación` shall be the competent authority in Guatemala for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fishery and aquaculture products originating in Guatemala must meet the following conditions:
1. each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed, dated and comprising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
2. the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold stores or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
3. except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods, all packages must bear the word ‘GUATEMALA` and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.
1. Certificates as referred to in Article 2(1) must be drawn up in at least one official language of the Member State where the checks are carried out.
2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the DIGESEPE and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 October 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41.
HEALTH CERTIFICATE for fishery and aquaculture products originating in Guatemala and intended for export to the European Community, excluding bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in whatever form
>START OF GRAPHIC>
Reference No
Country of dispatch:
Competent authority:
Dirección General de Servicios Pecuarios (DIGESEPE) del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación
I. Details identifying the fishery products
– Description of fishery/aquaculture products (1):
– species (scientific name):
– presentation of product and type of treatment (2):
– Code number (where available):
– Type of packaging:
– Number of packages:
– Net weight:
– Requisite storage and transport temperature:
II. Origin of products
Name(s) and official approval number(s) of establishment(s), factory vessel(s) or cold store(s) approved or freezer vessel(s) registered by the DIGESEPE for export to the European Community:
III. Destination of products
The products are dispatched
(place of dispatch)
(country and place of destination)
by the following means of transport:
Name and address of dispatcher:
Name of consignee and address at place of destination:
(1) Delete where applicable.
(2) Live, refrigerated, frozen, salted, smoked, preserved, etc.
IV. Health attestation
– The official inspector hereby certifies that the fishery or aquaculture products specified above:
1. were caught, and handled on board vessels in accordance with the health rules laid down by Directive 92/48/EEC;
2. were landed, handled and where appropriate packaged, prepared, processed, frozen, thawed and stored hygienically in compliance with the requirements laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
3. have undergone health controls in accordance with Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
4. are packaged, marked, stored and transported in accordance with Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC;
5. do not come from toxic species or species containing biotoxins;
6. have satisfactorily undergone the organoleptic, parasitological, chemical and microbiological checks laid down for certain categories of fishery products by Directive 91/493/EEC and in the implementing decisions thereto.
– The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directive 91/493/EEC, Directive 92/48/EEC and Decision 98/568/EC.
Signature of official inspector (1)
(Name in capital letters, capactiy and qualifications of person signing)
(1) The colour of the stamp and signature must be different from that of the other particulars in the certificate.
>END OF GRAPHIC>

Pending: 31998D0536

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC (1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,Whereas Article 14(1) of Directive 96/23/EC stipulates that at least one national reference laboratory is to be designated in each Member State for the detection of certain substances and residues so that each residue or group of residues is not assigned to more than one national reference laboratory; whereas in this connection, until 31 December 2000 the Member States may continue to entrust testing for the same residue or residue group to several national laboratories which they designated prior to the date of adoption of that Directive;Whereas Article 14(1) of Directive 96/23/EC lays down the tasks of such national reference laboratories for the detection of residues and provides that the Commission is to draw up the list of such national reference laboratories;Whereas the Annex to this Decision must be reviewed by 31 December 2000 at the latest;Whereas, for reasons of legal clarity, certain provisions of Commission Decision 93/257/EEC of 15 April 1993 laying down the reference methods and the list of national reference laboratories for detecting residues (2) should be repealed;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The national reference laboratories for the detection of residues designated pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 96/23/EC shall be as listed in the Annex hereto.

Article 4
of Decision 93/257/EEC and the Annex thereto are hereby repealed.

Article 3
This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 December 2000 at the latest.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC (1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,Whereas Article 14(1) of Directive 96/23/EC stipulates that at least one national reference laboratory is to be designated in each Member State for the detection of certain substances and residues so that each residue or group of residues is not assigned to more than one national reference laboratory; whereas in this connection, until 31 December 2000 the Member States may continue to entrust testing for the same residue or residue group to several national laboratories which they designated prior to the date of adoption of that Directive;Whereas Article 14(1) of Directive 96/23/EC lays down the tasks of such national reference laboratories for the detection of residues and provides that the Commission is to draw up the list of such national reference laboratories;Whereas the Annex to this Decision must be reviewed by 31 December 2000 at the latest;Whereas, for reasons of legal clarity, certain provisions of Commission Decision 93/257/EEC of 15 April 1993 laying down the reference methods and the list of national reference laboratories for detecting residues (2) should be repealed;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The national reference laboratories for the detection of residues designated pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 96/23/EC shall be as listed in the Annex hereto.
of Decision 93/257/EEC and the Annex thereto are hereby repealed.
This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 December 2000 at the latest.

Pending: 31998D0161

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes: common system of value added tax, uniform basis for assessment (1), and in particular Article 27 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion and avoidance;Whereas, by letter registered at the Commission on 9 June 1997, the Kingdom of the Netherlands requested authorisation to introduce a measure derogating from Articles 2 and 28a(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas, in accordance with Article 27(3) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the other Member States were informed on 10 September 1997 of the request submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands;Whereas that special measure provides, firstly, for exemption of the supply and intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials, with the exception of non-ferrous metals, in the case of taxable entities with an annual turnover of less than NLG 2,5 million and, secondly, for exemption of the supply and intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals;Whereas the taxable persons whose transactions are covered by the above exemptions may, subject to the conditions laid down by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, be authorised not to apply that measure to their transactions;Whereas the measure both simplifies matters and helps to combat fraud since a category of taxable persons where checks and efforts at collection would be disproportionate to the revenue generated can be excluded from the VAT system;Whereas, consequently, the special measure satisfies the conditions laid down in Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme, together with a timetable, for the phased introduction of a common system of VAT for the internal market;Whereas authorisation is being granted until 31 December 1999 so that an assessment can then be made of the compatibility of the derogation measure with the overall approach adopted for the new common system of VAT;Whereas this derogation will not have an adverse impact on the Community’s own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The Kingdom of the Netherlands is hereby authorised until 31 December 1999 to apply a special measure for the taxation of used and waste materials that contains provisions derogating from Directive 77/388/EEC.
The provisions in question are laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of this Decision.

Article 2
By way of derogation from Article 2 of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the supply of used and waste materials by firms with an annual turnover of less than NGL 2,5 million. For the purposes of that threshold, turnover in non-ferrous metals may be disregarded,
– the supply of non-ferrous metals.

Article 3
By way of derogation from Article 28a(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials by firms with an annual turnover of less than NGL 2,5 million. For the purposes of that threshold, turnover in non-ferrous metals may be disregarded,
– the intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals.

Article 4
Taxable entities carrying out transactions which are exempt pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 above may be authorised not to make supplies and intra-Community acquisitions of used and waste materials effected by them subject to the special measure provided for by this Decision.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes: common system of value added tax, uniform basis for assessment (1), and in particular Article 27 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, pursuant to Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion and avoidance;Whereas, by letter registered at the Commission on 9 June 1997, the Kingdom of the Netherlands requested authorisation to introduce a measure derogating from Articles 2 and 28a(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas, in accordance with Article 27(3) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the other Member States were informed on 10 September 1997 of the request submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands;Whereas that special measure provides, firstly, for exemption of the supply and intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials, with the exception of non-ferrous metals, in the case of taxable entities with an annual turnover of less than NLG 2,5 million and, secondly, for exemption of the supply and intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals;Whereas the taxable persons whose transactions are covered by the above exemptions may, subject to the conditions laid down by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, be authorised not to apply that measure to their transactions;Whereas the measure both simplifies matters and helps to combat fraud since a category of taxable persons where checks and efforts at collection would be disproportionate to the revenue generated can be excluded from the VAT system;Whereas, consequently, the special measure satisfies the conditions laid down in Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC;Whereas the Commission adopted on 10 July 1996 a work programme, together with a timetable, for the phased introduction of a common system of VAT for the internal market;Whereas authorisation is being granted until 31 December 1999 so that an assessment can then be made of the compatibility of the derogation measure with the overall approach adopted for the new common system of VAT;Whereas this derogation will not have an adverse impact on the Community’s own resources accruing from VAT,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The Kingdom of the Netherlands is hereby authorised until 31 December 1999 to apply a special measure for the taxation of used and waste materials that contains provisions derogating from Directive 77/388/EEC.
The provisions in question are laid down in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of this Decision.
By way of derogation from Article 2 of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the supply of used and waste materials by firms with an annual turnover of less than NGL 2,5 million. For the purposes of that threshold, turnover in non-ferrous metals may be disregarded,
– the supply of non-ferrous metals.
By way of derogation from Article 28a(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the following shall be exempt from VAT:
– the intra-Community acquisition of used and waste materials by firms with an annual turnover of less than NGL 2,5 million. For the purposes of that threshold, turnover in non-ferrous metals may be disregarded,
– the intra-Community acquisition of non-ferrous metals.
Taxable entities carrying out transactions which are exempt pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 above may be authorised not to make supplies and intra-Community acquisitions of used and waste materials effected by them subject to the special measure provided for by this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 1998.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/95/EC (OJ L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 89).

Pending: 31997D0830

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 93/43/EEC of 14 June 1993 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (1) and in particular Article 10 (1) thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 97/613/EC of 8 September 1997 on the temporary suspension of imports of pistachios and certain products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran (2) is applicable until 15 December 1997 and should be repealed;Whereas pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran have been found to be, in many cases, contaminated with excessive levels of Aflatoxin B1;Whereas the Scientific Committee for Food has noted that Aflatoxin B1, even at extremely low doses, causes cancer of the liver and in addition is genotoxic;Whereas this constitutes a serious threat to public health within the Community and it is imperative to adopt protective measures at Community level;Whereas an examination of conditions of hygiene in Iran has been undertaken and revealed that improvements in hygiene practices and the traceability of pistachios are required; whereas the mission team was unable to check all stages of the handling of pistachios prior to exportation; whereas commitments have been received from the Iranian Authorities in particular in relation to improvements in production, handling, sorting, processing, packaging and transport practices; whereas it is therefore appropriate to subject pistachios or products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran to special conditions to provide a high level of protection to public health;Whereas pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, may be imported, provided that these special conditions are applied;Whereas it is necessary that pistachios and products derived from pistachios have been produced, sorted, handled, processed, packaged and transported following good hygienic practices; whereas it is necessary to establish the levels of Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin in samples taken from the consignment immediately prior to leaving Iran;Whereas it is necessary for documentary evidence to be provided by the Iranian Authorities to accompany each consignment of pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, relating to the conditions of production, sorting, handling, processing, packaging and transport and the results of laboratory analysis of the consignment for levels of Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin;Whereas, it is necessary to submit for analyses lots of pistachios originating in, or consigned from all third countries, in order to determine the levels of contamination of pistachios from all sources with Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin, whereas co-ordinated official control programmes for foodstuffs shall be completed to this end;Whereas Member States have been consulted on 29 October 1997 and on 10 November 1997,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
This Decision repeals Decision 97/613/EC of 8 September 1997 on the temporary suspension of imports of pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran.

Article 2
1. Member States may import:
– pistachios falling within CN code 0802 50 00,
– roasted pistachios falling within CN codes 2008 19 13 and 2008 19 93;
originating in, or consigned from Iran, only where the consignment is accompanied by the results of official sampling and analysis, and the health certificate in Annex I, completed, signed and verified by a representative of the Iranian Ministry of Health.
2. Pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, may only be imported into the Community through one of the points of entry listed in Annex II.
3. Each consignment shall be identified with a code which corresponds to the code on the sampling results of the official sampling and analysis and health certificate referred to in paragraph 1.
4. The competent authorities in each Member State shall ensure that imported pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, are subject to documentary checks to ensure that the requirement for the health certificate and sampling results referred to in paragraph 1, are complied with.
5. The competent authority shall ensure that before release onto the market from the point of entry into the Community, each consignment is subject to systematic sampling and analysis for Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin. The Commission shall be informed by the competent authority of the results of these analyses.

Article 3
The present Decision shall be reviewed before the 31 October, 1998, in order to assess whether the special conditions referred to in Article 2 provide a sufficient level of protection to public health within the Community. The review shall also assess whether there is a continuing need for the special conditions.

Article 4
Member States shall take the measures necessary to comply with this Decision. They shall inform the Commission thereof.

Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 December 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 175, 19. 7. 1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 248, 11. 9. 1997, p. 33.

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 93/43/EEC of 14 June 1993 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (1) and in particular Article 10 (1) thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 97/613/EC of 8 September 1997 on the temporary suspension of imports of pistachios and certain products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran (2) is applicable until 15 December 1997 and should be repealed;Whereas pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran have been found to be, in many cases, contaminated with excessive levels of Aflatoxin B1;Whereas the Scientific Committee for Food has noted that Aflatoxin B1, even at extremely low doses, causes cancer of the liver and in addition is genotoxic;Whereas this constitutes a serious threat to public health within the Community and it is imperative to adopt protective measures at Community level;Whereas an examination of conditions of hygiene in Iran has been undertaken and revealed that improvements in hygiene practices and the traceability of pistachios are required; whereas the mission team was unable to check all stages of the handling of pistachios prior to exportation; whereas commitments have been received from the Iranian Authorities in particular in relation to improvements in production, handling, sorting, processing, packaging and transport practices; whereas it is therefore appropriate to subject pistachios or products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran to special conditions to provide a high level of protection to public health;Whereas pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, may be imported, provided that these special conditions are applied;Whereas it is necessary that pistachios and products derived from pistachios have been produced, sorted, handled, processed, packaged and transported following good hygienic practices; whereas it is necessary to establish the levels of Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin in samples taken from the consignment immediately prior to leaving Iran;Whereas it is necessary for documentary evidence to be provided by the Iranian Authorities to accompany each consignment of pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, relating to the conditions of production, sorting, handling, processing, packaging and transport and the results of laboratory analysis of the consignment for levels of Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin;Whereas, it is necessary to submit for analyses lots of pistachios originating in, or consigned from all third countries, in order to determine the levels of contamination of pistachios from all sources with Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin, whereas co-ordinated official control programmes for foodstuffs shall be completed to this end;Whereas Member States have been consulted on 29 October 1997 and on 10 November 1997,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
This Decision repeals Decision 97/613/EC of 8 September 1997 on the temporary suspension of imports of pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran.
1. Member States may import:
– pistachios falling within CN code 0802 50 00,
– roasted pistachios falling within CN codes 2008 19 13 and 2008 19 93;
originating in, or consigned from Iran, only where the consignment is accompanied by the results of official sampling and analysis, and the health certificate in Annex I, completed, signed and verified by a representative of the Iranian Ministry of Health.
2. Pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, may only be imported into the Community through one of the points of entry listed in Annex II.
3. Each consignment shall be identified with a code which corresponds to the code on the sampling results of the official sampling and analysis and health certificate referred to in paragraph 1.
4. The competent authorities in each Member State shall ensure that imported pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran, are subject to documentary checks to ensure that the requirement for the health certificate and sampling results referred to in paragraph 1, are complied with.
5. The competent authority shall ensure that before release onto the market from the point of entry into the Community, each consignment is subject to systematic sampling and analysis for Aflatoxin B1 and total Aflatoxin. The Commission shall be informed by the competent authority of the results of these analyses.
The present Decision shall be reviewed before the 31 October, 1998, in order to assess whether the special conditions referred to in Article 2 provide a sufficient level of protection to public health within the Community. The review shall also assess whether there is a continuing need for the special conditions.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to comply with this Decision. They shall inform the Commission thereof.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 December 1997.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 175, 19. 7. 1993, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 248, 11. 9. 1997, p. 33.
>START OF GRAPHIC>
>END OF GRAPHIC>
List of Points of Entry through which pistachios and products derived from Pistachios Originating in, or Consigned from Iran may be imported into the European Community

Pending: 31997D0788

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 70/457/EEC of 29 September 1970 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species (1), and in particular Article 21 (1) (b) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 70/458/EEC of 29 September 1970 on the marketing of vegetable seed (2), and in particular Article 32 (1) (b) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, by Decision 92/420/EEC (3), the Council noted that the official checks on practices for the maintenance of varieties carried out in certain third countries afforded the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States; whereas the said Decision expired on 30 June 1997;Whereas it appears that the abovementioned checks carried out in the third countries referred to in Decision 92/420/EEC, without prejudice to the fact that the former ‘Czech and Slovak Federal Republic` was replaced by the ‘Czech Republic` and the ‘Slovak Republic`, continue to afford the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States;Whereas, in the case of the Republic of Korea, covered by the abovementioned Decision, additional information has been requested; whereas additional information has also been requested from the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia;Whereas it is therefore appropriate, in the case of these countries, to grant a shorter period of equivalence to allow time for this information to be supplied and assessed;Whereas, in the case of certain countries, an examination of the conditions under which official checks on practices for the maintenance of varieties of additional species has shown that these checks afford the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States;Whereas the equivalence granted to such countries should be extended to these additional species;Whereas it appears pointless to continue the equivalence granted in respect of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina as no varieties of Communty interest are maintained there;Whereas this Decision in no way prevents Community findings on equivalence from being revoked or the extension of their period of validity being refused when the conditions on which they are based are not, or cease to be, satisfied; whereas, to this end, further practical information on seed of the varieties being maintained in the third country concerned should also be obtained when carrying out Community comparative tests;Whereas certain of the technical and administrative provisions in the Annex may be subject to frequent adjustment; whereas, in order to simplify the procedure which at present governs amendments to the Annex, recourse should be had to the procedure of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The official checks on practices for the maintenance of varieties carried out in the countries by the authorities listed in the Annex for the species covered by the Directives listed therein and concerning the said countries shall afford the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States.

Article 2
The technical and administrative adjustments to be made to the Annex, with the exception of those concerning the first column of the table, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23 of Directive 70/457/EEC and in Article 40 of Directive 70/458/EEC.

Article 3
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1997 to 30 June 1999 in the case of the Republic of Korea and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and from 1 July 1997 to 30 June 2002 in the case of the other third countries listed in the Annex.

Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 1997.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 225, 12. 10. 1970, p. 1. Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(2) OJ L 225, 12. 10. 1970, p. 7. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC (OJ L 304, 27. 11. 1996, p. 10).
(3) OJ L 231, 13. 8. 1992, p. 22.

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 70/457/EEC of 29 September 1970 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species (1), and in particular Article 21 (1) (b) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 70/458/EEC of 29 September 1970 on the marketing of vegetable seed (2), and in particular Article 32 (1) (b) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, by Decision 92/420/EEC (3), the Council noted that the official checks on practices for the maintenance of varieties carried out in certain third countries afforded the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States; whereas the said Decision expired on 30 June 1997;Whereas it appears that the abovementioned checks carried out in the third countries referred to in Decision 92/420/EEC, without prejudice to the fact that the former ‘Czech and Slovak Federal Republic` was replaced by the ‘Czech Republic` and the ‘Slovak Republic`, continue to afford the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States;Whereas, in the case of the Republic of Korea, covered by the abovementioned Decision, additional information has been requested; whereas additional information has also been requested from the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia;Whereas it is therefore appropriate, in the case of these countries, to grant a shorter period of equivalence to allow time for this information to be supplied and assessed;Whereas, in the case of certain countries, an examination of the conditions under which official checks on practices for the maintenance of varieties of additional species has shown that these checks afford the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States;Whereas the equivalence granted to such countries should be extended to these additional species;Whereas it appears pointless to continue the equivalence granted in respect of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina as no varieties of Communty interest are maintained there;Whereas this Decision in no way prevents Community findings on equivalence from being revoked or the extension of their period of validity being refused when the conditions on which they are based are not, or cease to be, satisfied; whereas, to this end, further practical information on seed of the varieties being maintained in the third country concerned should also be obtained when carrying out Community comparative tests;Whereas certain of the technical and administrative provisions in the Annex may be subject to frequent adjustment; whereas, in order to simplify the procedure which at present governs amendments to the Annex, recourse should be had to the procedure of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The official checks on practices for the maintenance of varieties carried out in the countries by the authorities listed in the Annex for the species covered by the Directives listed therein and concerning the said countries shall afford the same guarantees as those carried out by the Member States.
The technical and administrative adjustments to be made to the Annex, with the exception of those concerning the first column of the table, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23 of Directive 70/457/EEC and in Article 40 of Directive 70/458/EEC.
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 1997 to 30 June 1999 in the case of the Republic of Korea and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and from 1 July 1997 to 30 June 2002 in the case of the other third countries listed in the Annex.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 1997.
For the Council
The President
(1) OJ L 225, 12. 10. 1970, p. 1. Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.
(2) OJ L 225, 12. 10. 1970, p. 7. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC (OJ L 304, 27. 11. 1996, p. 10).
(3) OJ L 231, 13. 8. 1992, p. 22.